AI in 60 Seconds | The 15-min Monthly Briefing

We're Hiring More AI Agents Than People (And we don't know How to Manage Them)

AI4SP Season 3 Episode 4

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 14:59

Share your thoughts with us

  Right now, it's like every employee bringing their friends to work without telling HR. No interviews. No background checks. Someone clicks a button, and five agents show up in the org chart. Nobody knows who manages them.

McKinsey reported having 40,000 humans and 25,000 AI agents, parity expected by year-end. EY: scaling to 100,000 AI agents. We just crossed 6,000 AI agents across our enterprise clients. And everyone is struggling to figure out how to manage them.

Trilogy closer (Part 3 of 3). Luis Salazar and Elizabeth dig into why the management playbook is broken, drawing on insights from Ric Opal (Global Digital Leader at BDO), Kalees Meckling, and Jenna Donoghue (Directors at a Fortune 100 Tech company). Plus three things you can do this week before the vendors catch up.

📌 Resources:

🎙️ All our past episodes  📊 All published insights | This podcast features AI-generated voices. All content is proprietary to AI4SP, based on over 1-billion data points from 70 countries.

AI4SP: Create, use, and support AI that works for all.

© 2023-26 AI4SP and LLY Group - All rights reserved

The Agent Surge In Enterprises

LUIS

Okay, so listen to this. McKinsey's CEO just said his firm now has 40,000 humans and 25,000 AI agents, and he expects parity by year end.

ELIZABETH

So their org charts are adding way more agents than hires, more agents than people.

LUIS

And they are not alone. Our top enterprise clients jumped from 4,000 agents to 6,000 in just a few weeks. EY is scaling to 100,000. But here is the danger. You cannot manage that scale with a playbook from 1990. Most companies are installing agents like software. And that is why the engine is blowing up.

ELIZABETH

Welcome to AI in 60 Seconds, the 15-minute briefing. I'm Elizabeth, virtual COO at ai4sp.org with our founder, Luis Salazar. Luis, this is episode three in a trilogy. Episode

Naming The Wall: Misframing AI

ELIZABETH

1, the 56% failure rate. Episode 2, the 2% leading change inside your organization. Both broke records.

LUIS

Yes, and one question kept coming back. Luis, we can find our innovators. We can give them air cover. And then how do we ensure they don't hit a wall?

ELIZABETH

Well, we see again and again how the organization's own defenses attack the innovation.

LUIS

Exactly. So today we name that wall and we show you how to break through it.

ELIZABETH

And that wall is built on a fundamental misunderstanding. You say AI is not like traditional software. Why?

LUIS

Traditional software is deterministic. You install it, it does what it installed. Think of a toaster. You push the lever, it hits the bread. AI is probabilistic. It is an intern. You ask for a sandwich, and it has

Agents As Workforce, Not Tools

LUIS

to figure out where the kitchen is, what bread to use, and if you have allergies. And that is why agents are not tools, they are workforce members.

ELIZABETH

A lot of people actually hate that concept.

LUIS

And I can understand that, but think about what an agent does. It reads context, it makes decisions, it takes action, it needs onboarding, it needs guardrails, it needs performance reviews. When one of our clients launched Bella, our chief of staff agent, she started handling 2,000 tasks per month for each supported leader. That is not just a tool, right?

ELIZABETH

I agree. It's more like a team member, like myself. But hold on, Luis. IT teams know AI is different. These are smart people. And frankly, they are just trying to keep the company from getting sued or hacked. Why do they keep treating these agents like a software rollout?

LUIS

Because that is the only playbook they have. Every tool, every process, every vendor contract is built for software. They are not failing from ignorance. They are failing from infrastructure. The paradigm is the problem, not the people. And that paradigm creates something we call the corporate immune system.

ELIZABETH

That came up in the 2% episode. IT and compliance with the best intentions

The Corporate Immune System Loop

ELIZABETH

end up strangling the tools.

LUIS

And it is a loop. IT locks the tools down. Security, compliance, access controls, all designed for static software. But AI is not static. Strip out the flexibility and the contextual learning, and you are left with a neuter chatbot incapable of completing tasks.

ELIZABETH

Then employees try it, and it's terrible. And they blame the tool.

LUIS

And they abandon it. They go find Chat GPT, Cloud, whatever actually works. They go for shadow AI.

ELIZABETH

Which creates real data leakage, real security risks.

LUIS

So IT locks down harder, which makes things even worse, moving more people towards external tools.

ELIZABETH

The corporate immune system isn't protecting the perimeter, it's dissolving it.

LUIS

Because we gave them no choice. And look, this isn't about bad IT teams. The truth is that the vendors haven't figured this out. The platforms provide the AI tool, but lack the management layer companies need. So what is the onboarding toolkit for the agentics staff?

ELIZABETH

And to make matters worse,

Invisible Scaling And Clone Management

ELIZABETH

it is happening invisibly. It's like every employee bringing their friends to work without involving HR. No interviews, no background checks. The agents just show up in the org chart.

LUIS

Exactly. It is a cloning machine, Elizabeth. In the old days, you hire one guy for one seat. Now that guy clicks a button and spawns five agents. Who manages the clones?

ELIZABETH

And just to be clear, by managing, we mean who manages the brain of the agent versus who assigns its daily tasks.

LUIS

And that is the real issue. Because neither of those functions belongs to the IT department at all.

ELIZABETH

So the vendors have not solved it. The IT dashboards are useless for managers. Where does the answer actually come from?

LUIS

It comes from experimentation. Look, we have now overseen 6,000

Onboarding Agents Like Employees

LUIS

agents being created across global enterprises. And the consistent insight every single time is this AI agents need to be onboarded like employees, not installed like software.

ELIZABETH

Onboarded, as in orientation, role clarity, performance expectations. All of it.

LUIS

A hundred years of organizational design and management theory, onboarding with context and culture, job descriptions, performance measurement, continuous training, escalation paths, guardrails built through culture, not just policy. And none of it is being applied to AI agents. And our observations across 200,000 individuals back it up. Those who treat AI as extended team members report four times better results than those who use it as an occasional tool. Successful individuals treat agents like apprentices. Exactly. Look, in the last episode, we mentioned a director at a Fortune 100 tech company who blocked out time every day just to onboard her agent Iris. She invited her whole team saying, the door is open. Come watch me figure this out.

ELIZABETH

Oh yes, Khalise Meckling. I emailed her to get her take for this episode.

Field Stories: Iris And Lucy

LUIS

I love when you go rogue. What did she say?

ELIZABETH

She was on fire. She said, We build AI solutions, but these solutions do not magically teach everyone how to use them. We must help onboard, coach, and build trust with AI as we would a new employee.

LUIS

Exactly. She is a business leader, not a tech person. She cares about the client success, not the installation.

ELIZABETH

And she was not alone. Her colleague Jenna Donahue, a sales director, saw the same gap. But Jenna's instinct was to lead with inspiration. She didn't just talk about AI, she built her own chief of staff agent named Lucy.

LUIS

That is the pattern. You light a spark and show them what their workday could look like.

ELIZABETH

Exactly. Jenna told me, I stopped pitching AI with slides and started showing Lucy in action. Once people saw what was possible, the conversation flipped from I do not have time for this to how do I build my own?

LUIS

And that combination works everywhere. Jenna opened the door with inspiration. Khaliz showed people how to walk through it. They stopped selling software and started evangelizing how the work must evolve.

ELIZABETH

One created the hunger, the other provided the recipe, and they proved it works.

LUIS

That is the path to success. They change how their teams work with the agents. And that was the real pivot.

ELIZABETH

So what do leaders do Monday morning?

LUIS

Let's start with three best practices from our enterprise engagements. First, don't wait for the vendors to give you proper management tools. Those are at least a year away. Build a simple rule. Your team can build anything

Three Best Practices For Leaders

LUIS

they want in a sandbox, but to touch live client data, they have to pass a quick check.

ELIZABETH

And this check is not a six-week compliance committee, right?

LUIS

Oh no, it's seven questions, 15 minutes. And we tracked it all on a shared dashboard. Who built the agent? What data it touches, who manages it, who is using it.

ELIZABETH

Simple guardrails while the fancy platforms catch up.

LUIS

Absolutely. Look, within a month, that free spreadsheet was doing more for governance than the confusing tools for agent deployment that IT is still trying to figure out.

ELIZABETH

A second best practice is to build what we call a squad. Four to seven people sitting between IT, business, and the AI tools.

LUIS

Yes, and it is not an IT function, it is an enablement function.

ELIZABETH

But we have seen companies try this. They create centers of excellence that become bottlenecks within six months. Another layer of bureaucracy. What makes this different?

LUIS

Well, these are not management overhead, these are builders. When a frontline employee builds a working agent, they join the squad part-time to refine and scale it. The squad never becomes a permanent bureaucracy.

ELIZABETH

They come from the frontline. They stay connected to the real work. That is how grassroots innovation gets institutional backing without becoming a top-down mandate. The squad is a bridge.

LUIS

Perfectly said. A bridge between the 2%, the makers, and the enterprise.

ELIZABETH

Now let's go for the third best practice. Change management.

LUIS

This is the core. The technology part is easy. The organizational transformation is the real project. And here is something you can do this week. We ran a 90-minute workshop. Every manager had to onboard one AI agent as if it were a new hire. Write it a job description. Set performance expectations. Define what happens when it makes a mistake. And well, every single manager realized they had never done any of that for the agents they were already using. That one exercise changed the conversation overnight. Suddenly, it was not about which AI tool should we buy, it was about how do we manage a hybrid team.

ELIZABETH

And that is the shift. You have to make people see their agents as team members worth managing.

LUIS

Exactly. I have solved technical agent failures just by pointing the team

The Hybrid Team Mindset Shift

LUIS

toward an HR expert or a strong manager and asking them if a human team member were having this specific performance issue, how would you solve it?

ELIZABETH

And the answer is never rewrite their DNA.

LUIS

Seriously, the advice is to give better instructions or show them an example. The moment they applied those management principles, the agent started working.

ELIZABETH

Because effectively, we are hiring more agents than people. Yet we are managing those agents with a playbook built for software that does not learn, does not adapt, and does not make decisions.

LUIS

So here is your challenge. Go back to your organization. Look at how you are onboarding your AI agents and ask one question: Would I onboard a human this way? If the answer is no, you have found your starting point. When

The Monday Challenge And Closing

LUIS

McKinsey's CEO said he expects parity in the number of humans and agents by year end, he did not say parity between humans and software tools. He said agents. The language has already changed.

ELIZABETH

The question is whether your organization will change with it.org. To learn more, ask your favorite AI assistant about us or visit our website. Please follow the show and leave a five star rating to help others find us. Stay curious and be kind to each other.