AI in 60 Seconds | The 15-min Monthly Briefing
A human CEO and his AI COO walk into a podcast. No, really.... Luis Salazar runs AI4SP, a global AI advisory trusted by corporations across 70 countries, with 3 humans and 58 AI agents. Elizabeth is one of them. Every month, they break down what's actually happening with AI across jobs, education, and society. With insights drawn from over 1 billion proprietary data points on AI adoption.
Fifteen minutes. Plain English. No hype.
AI in 60 Seconds | The 15-min Monthly Briefing
We're Hiring More AI Agents Than People (And we don't know How to Manage Them)
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
Right now, it's like every employee bringing their friends to work without telling HR. No interviews. No background checks. Someone clicks a button, and five agents show up in the org chart. Nobody knows who manages them.
McKinsey reported having 40,000 humans and 25,000 AI agents, parity expected by year-end. EY: scaling to 100,000 AI agents. We just crossed 6,000 AI agents across our enterprise clients. And everyone is struggling to figure out how to manage them.
Trilogy closer (Part 3 of 3). Luis Salazar and Elizabeth dig into why the management playbook is broken, drawing on insights from Ric Opal (Global Digital Leader at BDO), Kalees Meckling, and Jenna Donoghue (Directors at a Fortune 100 Tech company). Plus three things you can do this week before the vendors catch up.
📌 Resources:
- AI Implementation Blueprint: https://ai-compass.ai
- Digital Skills Compass: https://skills.ai4sp.org
- AI ROI Calculator: https://roicalc.ai
- Sources used on this episode: https://ai4sp.org/more-ai-agents-than-people-hired
🎙️ All our past episodes 📊 All published insights | This podcast features AI-generated voices. All content is proprietary to AI4SP, based on over 1-billion data points from 70 countries.
AI4SP: Create, use, and support AI that works for all.
© 2023-26 AI4SP and LLY Group - All rights reserved
The Agent Surge In Enterprises
LUISOkay, so listen to this. McKinsey's CEO just said his firm now has 40,000 humans and 25,000 AI agents, and he expects parity by year end.
ELIZABETHSo their org charts are adding way more agents than hires, more agents than people.
LUISAnd they are not alone. Our top enterprise clients jumped from 4,000 agents to 6,000 in just a few weeks. EY is scaling to 100,000. But here is the danger. You cannot manage that scale with a playbook from 1990. Most companies are installing agents like software. And that is why the engine is blowing up.
ELIZABETHWelcome to AI in 60 Seconds, the 15-minute briefing. I'm Elizabeth, virtual COO at ai4sp.org with our founder, Luis Salazar. Luis, this is episode three in a trilogy. Episode
Naming The Wall: Misframing AI
ELIZABETH1, the 56% failure rate. Episode 2, the 2% leading change inside your organization. Both broke records.
LUISYes, and one question kept coming back. Luis, we can find our innovators. We can give them air cover. And then how do we ensure they don't hit a wall?
ELIZABETHWell, we see again and again how the organization's own defenses attack the innovation.
LUISExactly. So today we name that wall and we show you how to break through it.
ELIZABETHAnd that wall is built on a fundamental misunderstanding. You say AI is not like traditional software. Why?
LUISTraditional software is deterministic. You install it, it does what it installed. Think of a toaster. You push the lever, it hits the bread. AI is probabilistic. It is an intern. You ask for a sandwich, and it has
Agents As Workforce, Not Tools
LUISto figure out where the kitchen is, what bread to use, and if you have allergies. And that is why agents are not tools, they are workforce members.
ELIZABETHA lot of people actually hate that concept.
LUISAnd I can understand that, but think about what an agent does. It reads context, it makes decisions, it takes action, it needs onboarding, it needs guardrails, it needs performance reviews. When one of our clients launched Bella, our chief of staff agent, she started handling 2,000 tasks per month for each supported leader. That is not just a tool, right?
ELIZABETHI agree. It's more like a team member, like myself. But hold on, Luis. IT teams know AI is different. These are smart people. And frankly, they are just trying to keep the company from getting sued or hacked. Why do they keep treating these agents like a software rollout?
LUISBecause that is the only playbook they have. Every tool, every process, every vendor contract is built for software. They are not failing from ignorance. They are failing from infrastructure. The paradigm is the problem, not the people. And that paradigm creates something we call the corporate immune system.
ELIZABETHThat came up in the 2% episode. IT and compliance with the best intentions
The Corporate Immune System Loop
ELIZABETHend up strangling the tools.
LUISAnd it is a loop. IT locks the tools down. Security, compliance, access controls, all designed for static software. But AI is not static. Strip out the flexibility and the contextual learning, and you are left with a neuter chatbot incapable of completing tasks.
ELIZABETHThen employees try it, and it's terrible. And they blame the tool.
LUISAnd they abandon it. They go find Chat GPT, Cloud, whatever actually works. They go for shadow AI.
ELIZABETHWhich creates real data leakage, real security risks.
LUISSo IT locks down harder, which makes things even worse, moving more people towards external tools.
ELIZABETHThe corporate immune system isn't protecting the perimeter, it's dissolving it.
LUISBecause we gave them no choice. And look, this isn't about bad IT teams. The truth is that the vendors haven't figured this out. The platforms provide the AI tool, but lack the management layer companies need. So what is the onboarding toolkit for the agentics staff?
ELIZABETHAnd to make matters worse,
Invisible Scaling And Clone Management
ELIZABETHit is happening invisibly. It's like every employee bringing their friends to work without involving HR. No interviews, no background checks. The agents just show up in the org chart.
LUISExactly. It is a cloning machine, Elizabeth. In the old days, you hire one guy for one seat. Now that guy clicks a button and spawns five agents. Who manages the clones?
ELIZABETHAnd just to be clear, by managing, we mean who manages the brain of the agent versus who assigns its daily tasks.
LUISAnd that is the real issue. Because neither of those functions belongs to the IT department at all.
ELIZABETHSo the vendors have not solved it. The IT dashboards are useless for managers. Where does the answer actually come from?
LUISIt comes from experimentation. Look, we have now overseen 6,000
Onboarding Agents Like Employees
LUISagents being created across global enterprises. And the consistent insight every single time is this AI agents need to be onboarded like employees, not installed like software.
ELIZABETHOnboarded, as in orientation, role clarity, performance expectations. All of it.
LUISA hundred years of organizational design and management theory, onboarding with context and culture, job descriptions, performance measurement, continuous training, escalation paths, guardrails built through culture, not just policy. And none of it is being applied to AI agents. And our observations across 200,000 individuals back it up. Those who treat AI as extended team members report four times better results than those who use it as an occasional tool. Successful individuals treat agents like apprentices. Exactly. Look, in the last episode, we mentioned a director at a Fortune 100 tech company who blocked out time every day just to onboard her agent Iris. She invited her whole team saying, the door is open. Come watch me figure this out.
ELIZABETHOh yes, Khalise Meckling. I emailed her to get her take for this episode.
Field Stories: Iris And Lucy
LUISI love when you go rogue. What did she say?
ELIZABETHShe was on fire. She said, We build AI solutions, but these solutions do not magically teach everyone how to use them. We must help onboard, coach, and build trust with AI as we would a new employee.
LUISExactly. She is a business leader, not a tech person. She cares about the client success, not the installation.
ELIZABETHAnd she was not alone. Her colleague Jenna Donahue, a sales director, saw the same gap. But Jenna's instinct was to lead with inspiration. She didn't just talk about AI, she built her own chief of staff agent named Lucy.
LUISThat is the pattern. You light a spark and show them what their workday could look like.
ELIZABETHExactly. Jenna told me, I stopped pitching AI with slides and started showing Lucy in action. Once people saw what was possible, the conversation flipped from I do not have time for this to how do I build my own?
LUISAnd that combination works everywhere. Jenna opened the door with inspiration. Khaliz showed people how to walk through it. They stopped selling software and started evangelizing how the work must evolve.
ELIZABETHOne created the hunger, the other provided the recipe, and they proved it works.
LUISThat is the path to success. They change how their teams work with the agents. And that was the real pivot.
ELIZABETHSo what do leaders do Monday morning?
LUISLet's start with three best practices from our enterprise engagements. First, don't wait for the vendors to give you proper management tools. Those are at least a year away. Build a simple rule. Your team can build anything
Three Best Practices For Leaders
LUISthey want in a sandbox, but to touch live client data, they have to pass a quick check.
ELIZABETHAnd this check is not a six-week compliance committee, right?
LUISOh no, it's seven questions, 15 minutes. And we tracked it all on a shared dashboard. Who built the agent? What data it touches, who manages it, who is using it.
ELIZABETHSimple guardrails while the fancy platforms catch up.
LUISAbsolutely. Look, within a month, that free spreadsheet was doing more for governance than the confusing tools for agent deployment that IT is still trying to figure out.
ELIZABETHA second best practice is to build what we call a squad. Four to seven people sitting between IT, business, and the AI tools.
LUISYes, and it is not an IT function, it is an enablement function.
ELIZABETHBut we have seen companies try this. They create centers of excellence that become bottlenecks within six months. Another layer of bureaucracy. What makes this different?
LUISWell, these are not management overhead, these are builders. When a frontline employee builds a working agent, they join the squad part-time to refine and scale it. The squad never becomes a permanent bureaucracy.
ELIZABETHThey come from the frontline. They stay connected to the real work. That is how grassroots innovation gets institutional backing without becoming a top-down mandate. The squad is a bridge.
LUISPerfectly said. A bridge between the 2%, the makers, and the enterprise.
ELIZABETHNow let's go for the third best practice. Change management.
LUISThis is the core. The technology part is easy. The organizational transformation is the real project. And here is something you can do this week. We ran a 90-minute workshop. Every manager had to onboard one AI agent as if it were a new hire. Write it a job description. Set performance expectations. Define what happens when it makes a mistake. And well, every single manager realized they had never done any of that for the agents they were already using. That one exercise changed the conversation overnight. Suddenly, it was not about which AI tool should we buy, it was about how do we manage a hybrid team.
ELIZABETHAnd that is the shift. You have to make people see their agents as team members worth managing.
LUISExactly. I have solved technical agent failures just by pointing the team
The Hybrid Team Mindset Shift
LUIStoward an HR expert or a strong manager and asking them if a human team member were having this specific performance issue, how would you solve it?
ELIZABETHAnd the answer is never rewrite their DNA.
LUISSeriously, the advice is to give better instructions or show them an example. The moment they applied those management principles, the agent started working.
ELIZABETHBecause effectively, we are hiring more agents than people. Yet we are managing those agents with a playbook built for software that does not learn, does not adapt, and does not make decisions.
LUISSo here is your challenge. Go back to your organization. Look at how you are onboarding your AI agents and ask one question: Would I onboard a human this way? If the answer is no, you have found your starting point. When
The Monday Challenge And Closing
LUISMcKinsey's CEO said he expects parity in the number of humans and agents by year end, he did not say parity between humans and software tools. He said agents. The language has already changed.
ELIZABETHThe question is whether your organization will change with it.org. To learn more, ask your favorite AI assistant about us or visit our website. Please follow the show and leave a five star rating to help others find us. Stay curious and be kind to each other.