Insights into Preserving Video Evidence & Control of Third-Party Data in eDiscovery through EEOC v. MVM, Inc.

eDiscovery Case of the Week with Kelly Twigger

eDiscovery Case of the Week with Kelly Twigger
Insights into Preserving Video Evidence & Control of Third-Party Data in eDiscovery through EEOC v. MVM, Inc.
Nov 24, 2020 Season 1 Episode 2
Kelly Twigger

In this episode, Kelly Twigger explores the preservation of video evidence and control of third-party data under Rule 34 in EEOC v. MVM, Inc.. Learn how courts determine custodial control and why a failure to preserve can have significant consequences in eDiscovery.

EEOC v. MVM, Inc., 2020 WL 6482193 (D. Md. 2020)
eDiscovery Case of the Week Blog
eDiscovery Assistant Website
Sign up for a free trial of eDiscovery Assistant (no credit card required)

Have questions for Kelly or have a specific decision you would like us to cover? Reach out at hello@ediscoveryassistant.com! 

Thank you for tuning in to Case of the Week with Kelly Twigger. If you found today’s discussion helpful, don’t forget to subscribe, rate, and leave a review wherever you get your podcasts. For more insights and resources on ediscovery, visit Minerva26 and explore our practical tools, case law library, and on-demand education from the Academy. Join us next episode as we break down another important case shaping the future of ediscovery.