The Risk Wheelhouse

S6E5: 2026 Convergence - Risk Management Must Be Integrated

• Wheelhouse Advisors LLC • Season 6 • Episode 5

Share episode

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 26:44

The ground rules of risk have changed, and waiting for the next headline won’t save the balance sheet. We take you inside “The 2026 Convergence: Integrated Risk Management in a New Era” and map how cyber, AI, third parties, geopolitics, and reputation have fused into one risk surface. Instead of chasing alerts, we focus on disruption economics: what a breach costs per minute, which processes bleed first, and how quickly you can recover without compounding fines. Cyber stops being an IT story and becomes a CFO story.

We then unpack why AI is a systemic enterprise risk. The issue isn’t sci‑fi; it’s embedded algorithms making daily decisions with drifting models and murky provenance. Policies alone cannot govern dynamic systems, so we lay out how continuous testing, auditability, and a horizontal control layer protect legal, HR, security, and operations together. From there, we move into the ecosystem era, where vendors run your core functions and static questionnaires leave you blind. The fix is unifying taxonomies and evidence so a critical security finding halts a contract before renewal, not after the breach.

Zooming out, geopolitics is now the climate, not the storm. Sanctions, regulatory divergence, and state-backed cyber campaigns require decision-grade scenarios wired to live data: suppliers, SKUs, revenue, cash. Finally, we connect trust to operations. Reputation is no longer a slogan; it’s the measurable outcome of how you run, respond, and disclose. We share the four pillars of modern IRM—dependency-led visibility, continuous testable controls, scenario-driven decision support, and unified evidence—that turn fragmented signals into real resilience and a brand that survives.

If this resonates, follow the research at wheelhouseadvisors.com and read the full analysis free at risktechjournal.com. Like what you hear? Subscribe, share with your team, and leave a review with the pillar you’ll tackle first.



Visit www.therisktechjournal.com and www.rtj-bridge.com to learn more about the topics discussed in today's episode.

Subscribe at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or Amazon Music. Contact us directly at info@wheelhouseadvisors.com or visit us at LinkedIn or X.com.

Our YouTube channel also delivers fast, executive-ready insights on Integrated Risk Management. Explore short explainers, IRM Navigator research highlights, RiskTech Journal analysis, and conversations from The Risk Wheelhouse Podcast. We cover the issues that matter most to modern risk leaders. Every video is designed to sharpen decision making and strengthen resilience in a digital-first world. Subscribe at youtube.com/@WheelhouseAdv.


Ori Wellington:

Hello and welcome back to the Deep End. You are listening to another edition of the Deep Dive, broadcasting from the Risk Wheelhouse.

Sam Jones:

You're in the right place.

Ori Wellington:

I'm your host, Ori Wellington, and today we are doing something a little um a little different. Usually we look at a specific event, a breach, a new regulation, something that's already happened.

Sam Jones:

We're usually reactive.

Ori Wellington:

Exactly.

Sam Jones:

Yeah.

Ori Wellington:

But today we are looking at the map itself. We are looking at the blueprint of the building we're all standing in, and we're asking a very uncomfortable question. Is the foundation cracking?

Sam Jones:

Oh, it's it's not just cracking. I think it's shifting. And it turns out the Mac we've all been using is, well, it's about 10 years out of date.

Ori Wellington:

That is the cheerful, reassuring voice of my co-host and fellow analyst here at Wheelhouse Advisors, Samantha Jones. Welcome back.

Sam Jones:

It is great to be here. And you are right, the energy is different. We aren't reacting to a fire today. We're looking at the seismograph and realizing the big one isn't a single event anymore.

Ori Wellington:

What is it then?

Sam Jones:

It's the new normal.

Ori Wellington:

Right. And to do that, we're digging into a piece of research that honestly it feels like a landmark. It's titled The 2026 Convergence: Integrated Risk Management in a New Era. And before we get into the heavy lifting, we should probably address the author. This isn't just an observation from the sidelines. This is coming from, you know, inside the house.

Sam Jones:

Right. This article is written by John A. Wheeler. He's the founder and CEO here at Wheelhouse Advisors. And for those listening who track the history of our industry, that name carries a very specific weight.

Ori Wellington:

He's the architect, isn't he?

Sam Jones:

In many ways, yes. I mean, back in 2016, John was leading research into the industry, and he was the one who actually coined the term integrated risk management. IRM. IRM. He looked at the whole landscape of governance, risk, and compliance, GRC, and basically said, this is becoming a dusty compliance exercise. He defined IRM as the next evolution.

Ori Wellington:

Aaron Powell So 2016 was the birth of the concept. We're now looking at 2026, 10 years later. And the premise of this new article is that we have hit an inflection point. I have to say, inflection point is one of those corporate buzzwords I usually try to ban from the show. Why is it justified here?

Sam Jones:

Aaron Ross Powell It's justified because the data is finally, finally on the same page. If you look at the major global risk surveys that drop every January, we're talking the heavy hitters here. Like who? Aon, Alliance, the World Economic Forum, Pertivity, PWC, Marsh, Zurich, the Eurasia Group. I mean, usually they are all over the place.

Ori Wellington:

Trevor Burrus, Jr.: Everyone has their own favorite flavor of anxiety.

Sam Jones:

Trevor Burrus, Jr.: Exactly. One says climate is the doom scenario, another says it's the economy, another says it's talent retention. It's just noise.

Ori Wellington:

Aaron Powell But not this time.

Sam Jones:

Aaron Powell Not in the 2026 survey cycle. There's a consensus emerging. And it's not just that they're agreeing on what the risks are: cyber, AI, geopolitics. They are agreeing on why our current way of managing them is failing.

Ori Wellington:

Aaron Powell And that why is really the core mission of this deep dive, isn't it? Trevor Burrus, it is. The argument here is that risk has stopped being a set of separate problems like the IT problem over there or the legal problem down the hall, and has become a single tangled web.

Sam Jones:

Aaron Powell A convergence to use the title of the piece. And the scary part, or maybe the clarifying part, is that this web is exposing the fact that most companies are still operating in silos.

Ori Wellington:

Still. After all this time.

Sam Jones:

Oh, absolutely. The IT team secures the server, the lawyer reads the contract, the PR team drafts the press release, and none of them really know what the others are doing in context.

Ori Wellington:

Aaron Powell Which leads us to the thesis. The idea that integrated risk management is shifting from being an uh architectural aspiration.

Sam Jones:

Aaron Powell A nice drawing on a whiteboard.

Ori Wellington:

Yeah, a drawing that makes the board feel good to an execution requirement.

Sam Jones:

Aaron Powell Meaning if you don't integrate, you just don't survive. It's no longer about efficiency, it's about existential resilience.

Ori Wellington:

Aaron Powell Okay. That definitely sets the stakes. So the article outlines five specific trends in this convergence. I want to walk through them, but I really want to push past the headlines. Let's get into the mechanics.

Sam Jones:

Let's do it.

Ori Wellington:

Trend number one it's the heavyweight champion still cyber risk.

Sam Jones:

Still number one. You see it across Olions, Aeon, Potivity, and PWC. But, and this is where it gets really interesting, the conversation in 2026 has fundamentally changed.

Ori Wellington:

How so? Because for the last, what, decade, cyber risk meant keep the hackers out.

Sam Jones:

It was a fortress mentality.

Ori Wellington:

Lock the doors, patch the servers, train the staff not to click the phishing link. It was a security problem.

Sam Jones:

That is the security mindset. John argues that we are now moving into a disruption economics mindset.

Ori Wellington:

Disruption economics? That sounds expensive.

Sam Jones:

It is extremely expensive. Think about it like this. In the old model, success was binary. Did we get breached? Yes or no? If the answer was no, the COSO gets a bonus. Simple enough. But in 2026, the assumption based on the sheer volume and sophistication of attacks is that incidents will happen. It's an inevitability.

Ori Wellington:

So the metric isn't did they get in anymore?

Sam Jones:

No. The metric is what did it cost us per minute?

Ori Wellington:

So we're moving from the IT closet straight to the CFO's office.

Sam Jones:

Precisely. It's all about business interruption. Let's say you're a manufacturer. If your email server gets hacked, that's annoying, but it's manageable. But if your operational technology, the software that's actually running the assembly line, gets hit with ransomware, you are bleeding millions of dollars an hour.

Ori Wellington:

Aaron Powell And the legacy approach, the old GRC model, it just treats those two servers as assets to be patched. It doesn't differentiate the economic value at all.

Sam Jones:

Not at all. IRM in 2026 requires what John calls integrated dependency mapping. You have to know that this specific server runs this specific revenue line. If you don't have that context, you're just playing whack-a-mole with the vulnerability scans.

Ori Wellington:

The article also mentions latency here. It's not just about the breach itself, it's about the recovery time.

Sam Jones:

Correct. Does a breach halt operations immediately or is there a lag? And this is the crucial part, does it trigger a regulatory fine?

Ori Wellington:

You mean like GDPR?

Sam Jones:

Exactly. If you lose data in Europe, that clock on GDPR notification starts ticking instantly. If you don't know which server holds European data because your risk data is in a silo, you've just compounded a cyber problem with a legal disaster.

Ori Wellington:

So an analogy popped into my head reading this. Tell me if this works. The old way was checking if the retail store's front door was locked at night.

Sam Jones:

Okay.

Ori Wellington:

The new way, this disruption economics, is knowing exactly how much sales revenue you lose for every 60 seconds that door is stuck shut during the Christmas rush.

Sam Jones:

That is a perfect visualization. It completely shifts the power dynamic. The board doesn't understand SQL injection. No. They don't care about buffer overflows, but they absolutely understand we lost four million dollars in revenue because the checkout system was down for 90 minutes.

Ori Wellington:

That is the language of this 2026 convergence.

Sam Jones:

It has to be.

Ori Wellington:

So if you're a risk manager listening to this, your job isn't just to report the hack, it's to report the price tag of the hack in real time.

Sam Jones:

Exactly. And to do that, you need access to financial data, not just security logs. You have to know the value of the process being disrupted.

Ori Wellington:

Which is a perfect segue, actually. Because if we're talking about processes and we're talking about the year 2026, we have to talk about the technology that is increasingly running all of those processes.

Sam Jones:

Oh, yes.

Ori Wellington:

We can't avoid it.

Sam Jones:

You are talking about the elephant in the server room.

Ori Wellington:

I am. Trend number two, artificial intelligence.

Sam Jones:

The fastest rising risk across every single one of those surveys in 2026. Alliance calls it the biggest mover year over year. The World Economic Forum puts adverse AI outcomes right in their top tier of global risks.

Ori Wellington:

But again, let's get specific here. The media loves to talk about the terminator scenario. You know, robots becoming sentient, taking over the nuclear codes. Is that what we're actually worried about here?

Sam Jones:

No, and honestly, the sci-fi distraction is a huge part of the problem. We are not worried about AI becoming sentient. We are worried about AI becoming embedded.

Ori Wellington:

Embedded in the boring stuff.

Sam Jones:

Exactly. The really critical, boring stuff. We are moving from viewing AI as an innovation upside, you know, look at this cool chatbot, look at this code generator. Right the fun toys to viewing it as a systemic enterprise risk. Companies are rushing to put AI into their core business processes, lending decisions, supply chain logistics, customer service routing.

Ori Wellington:

So it's like we're building skyscrapers on a foundation of wet cement, and we aren't even sure what's mixed into the cement.

Sam Jones:

That is the provenance problem that John highlights. Do you know where the AI learned its facts? If you're using a generative model to summarize legal contracts, and that model was strained on bad data or worse, copyrighted data you don't have the rights to, you have just created a massive silent liability.

Ori Wellington:

And then there's model drift. This is a new term for me, but it sounds absolutely terrifying.

Sam Jones:

It's critical. Think about standard software. If I install a word processor from TGL Cent and it works the same way today as it did back then, the code is static. Right. AI is different. It evolves, it learns, it can degrade.

Ori Wellington:

It changes its mind.

Sam Jones:

It changes its patterns based on the new data it ingests. So an AI model that effectively screens job applicants in January might start developing a subtle bias against certain demographics by June just because of the data it's processing. It drifts away from the original baseline.

Ori Wellington:

Wow. So if you just set it and forget it, you could be breaking discrimination laws six months from now without even knowing it.

Sam Jones:

Exactly. And this brings us right to the IRM implication. I hear this from clients all the time. Can't we just write a policy for this? Let's just have an acceptable use of AI PDF, have everyone sign it and call it a day.

Ori Wellington:

The classic cover your assets move.

Sam Jones:

The CYA move. I told them not to do the bad thing, so it's not my fault if they do.

Ori Wellington:

And what does the resource say about that?

Sam Jones:

It says that is dead on arrival. Policy artifacts are not enough. You cannot govern a dynamic algorithm with a static document. You need continuous automated testing. You need to be able to audit the AI's decision making in real time.

Ori Wellington:

Aaron Powell So you basically need a machine to watch the machine.

Sam Jones:

In essence, yes. AI risk has to be a horizontal control layer. It can't just sit in the IT department. It touches legal because of copyright, HR because of bias, operations because of reliability, security because of data leakage.

Ori Wellington:

It's everywhere.

Sam Jones:

Right. If you treat AI risk as some standalone program in a corner office, you are completely missing the convergence.

Ori Wellington:

It's the single risk surface. The AI isn't just a separate tool, it's becoming the glue that holds the business together. And if the glue fails, the whole building falls down.

Sam Jones:

And that glue is made of data that you often don't even own. Which flows perfectly into trend number three.

Ori Wellington:

Go on.

Sam Jones:

Because AI is hungry, it needs data, and businesses are hungry for speed. So where do they get the data and the speed?

Ori Wellington:

From other people.

Sam Jones:

They get it from other people. They rent it. They buy it.

Ori Wellington:

Which brings us to trend three: the ecosystem era. Third-party risk is no longer just a procurement headache, it's a top-tier enterprise threat.

Sam Jones:

I really resonated with the language John used here. The idea that organizations are no longer enterprises surrounded by castle walls. They are ecosystems.

Ori Wellington:

It's a biological metaphor and it really fits. Protivity and Alliance are both emphasizing this. You're an organism living in an environment. If your cloud provider gets sick, you get sick.

Sam Jones:

If your payroll processor gets hacked, your employees don't get paid.

Ori Wellington:

Exactly. But we've known about vendors for decades. Why is this a 2026 convergence issue? What has actually changed?

Sam Jones:

Is it the depth of the dependency?

Ori Wellington:

That's a huge part of it. It's the depth and the criticality. In the past, a vendor might supply you with paperclips or cleaning services, annoying if they fail, but not catastrophic.

Sam Jones:

Right.

Ori Wellington:

Today your vendors are holding your customer database, running your website, and processing your payments. You have outsourced your brain and your nervous system.

Sam Jones:

And yet the way we assess them hasn't really changed much, has it? We are still treating them like the paperclip guy.

Ori Wellington:

That is the failure mode.

Sam Jones:

Yeah.

Ori Wellington:

We are still relying on the 400 question spreadsheet. You know the drill.

Sam Jones:

Oh, I know it well.

Ori Wellington:

You send a vendor a questionnaire in January asking, Are you secure? They check yes. You file it away, done for the year.

Sam Jones:

And then in March, they change their server configuration, open a massive vulnerability, and you have absolutely no idea.

Ori Wellington:

You're flying blind for 10 months. That snapshot in time assessment is completely archaic. It just doesn't work for real-time dependencies.

Sam Jones:

But the bigger issue John identifies is the Tower of Babel problem inside the company itself.

Ori Wellington:

It's a taxonomy issue.

Sam Jones:

Exactly. Procurement cares about price and speed. Security cares about firewalls and encryption. Legal cares about liability and indemnity. Audit cares about compliance.

Ori Wellington:

They're all looking at the same vendor.

Sam Jones:

But they are speaking different languages and using completely different data sets.

Ori Wellington:

So the nightmare scenario is procurement renews the contract because the price is good, completely unaware that security just flagged a critical vulnerability in that exact vendor's software.

Sam Jones:

It happens all the time. The left hand is shaking the vendor's hand while the right hand is holding a warning sign that nobody sees.

Ori Wellington:

So what's the IRM solution here?

Sam Jones:

It's about unifying taxonomies. You need a shared dictionary, so everyone is on the same page, and you need unified evidence.

Ori Wellington:

Meaning if security finds a flaw, that has to trigger a red light on the procurement dashboard immediately.

Sam Jones:

Before the check is signed, not after.

Ori Wellington:

It seems so obvious when you say it out loud.

Sam Jones:

It does, but it requires a level of integration that most companies just don't have. It requires breaking down the political walls between departments.

Ori Wellington:

Yeah.

Sam Jones:

That's why it's so hard. It's culture as much as it is code.

Ori Wellington:

Okay, let's recap the stack we've built so far. We have cyber disrupting our economics, we have AI embedding itself in our core processes and occasionally drifting off course, and we have a sprawling ecosystem of vendors we barely control.

Sam Jones:

A precarious stack.

Ori Wellington:

Very. Now let's zoom out. Way, way out. To the map of the world itself.

Sam Jones:

Trend number four geopolitics as the baseline.

Ori Wellington:

This is the heavy one. The World Economic Forum, the Eurasia Group, PWCC, they all cite geopolitical volatility as a dominant force. But again, let's look for the shift. Wars and trade disputes are not new.

Sam Jones:

No, humans have been doing that forever.

Ori Wellington:

So what is the 2026 angle on this?

Sam Jones:

The shift is from periodic shock to structural condition.

Ori Wellington:

Unpack that for me. What is the real difference between a shock and a condition?

Sam Jones:

Well, traditionally, businesses treated a war or a trade sanction like a hurricane. It's a storm, it hits, you batten down the hatches, it passes, and then you rebuild.

Ori Wellington:

It's an event, something you survive.

Sam Jones:

Exactly. And now it's the climate. It's not a storm. It's the fact that it just rains every single day. Trade restrictions, regulatory divergence between the US, EU, and China, state-sponsored cyber campaigns. These are permanent features of the operating environment.

Ori Wellington:

Aaron Powell So you can't just wait it out anymore. You can't say, oh, we'll just wait for things to calm down.

Sam Jones:

Aaron Powell Because they won't calm down. Volatility is the baseline. That means the old tool, the annual scenario exercise is basically useless.

Ori Wellington:

Oh, I know this one. The executive retreat, where everyone goes to a nice hotel, drinks good wine, pretends China invaded Taiwan for four hours.

Sam Jones:

Looks at some scary charts.

Ori Wellington:

And then goes to dinner feeling very strategic.

Sam Jones:

Precisely. It's academic, it's role-playing, it's a fun intellectual exercise, but it rarely changes what happens in operations on Monday morning. John argues we need decision grade scenarios.

Ori Wellington:

Decision grade. That implies money is on the table.

Sam Jones:

It means your scenario planning has to be wired directly into your live business data. Let's create a scenario. Imagine the U.S. government announces a new sanction on semiconductor exports to a specific region on a Tuesday morning.

Ori Wellington:

Okay, Tuesday morning, the news breaks.

Sam Jones:

The old way, you might discuss it in a meeting on Friday. The new way, you need to know by Tuesday afternoon which of our vendors are in that region? Which of our products rely on those specific chips? What is the immediate revenue impact? And do we need to trigger a capital reserve right now?

Ori Wellington:

You can't wait for the annual retreat to figure that out. You might not even have until Wednesday.

Sam Jones:

Speed is the only real defense against volatility. You have to connect the geopolitical headline to the supply chain node instantly. That is what a true IRM platform does. It connects the macro threat to the micro dependency.

Ori Wellington:

It connects the CNN headline to the server rack.

Sam Jones:

Yeah, to the bank account.

Ori Wellington:

Which brings us to the final trend. Trend number five. And honestly, after talking about cyber warfare and global conflict, this one might feel a bit soft.

Sam Jones:

It might seem that way at first.

Ori Wellington:

But the source material argues it might be the deadliest of them all.

Sam Jones:

We are talking about trust and reputation.

Ori Wellington:

The erosion of trust. The WEF lists misinformation and disinformation as a top-tier risk. Marsh and Zurich are talking about it constantly.

Sam Jones:

And it's so easy to dismiss this as just a PR problem. You know, oh, people are saying mean things about us on social media. Right. But John takes a very specific, very hard-nosed angle here. He says reputation is no longer an abstract brand concern, it is a managed outcome.

Ori Wellington:

Explain that. How do you manage trust? Like you manage a server or a budget.

Sam Jones:

By realizing that trust is the direct result of your operational signals.

Ori Wellington:

Operational signals. What does that mean?

Sam Jones:

Think about the sedu gap. If your CEO goes on CNBC and says, we value customer privacy above all else, but your operational data shows you haven't patched a critical vulnerability in your customer database in six months. That gap is where reputation goes to die.

Ori Wellington:

And in 2026, the truth always comes out, leaks happen, whistleblowers happen, regulators dig deep.

Sam Jones:

Exactly. In this era of pervasive misinformation where anyone can say anything about you, your only real defense is radical evidence-based transparency. If you have a cyber incident, do you hide it? Or do you have the integrated data to explain exactly what happened, what was lost, and how you fixed it within hours.

Ori Wellington:

So trust isn't about the logo or the Super Bowl commercial anymore. Trust is do your systems actually work and do you tell the truth when they don't?

Sam Jones:

Precisely. The insight here is trust is an outcome of integrated risk execution. You cannot have a good reputation with bad risk management. They are now the exact same thing.

Ori Wellington:

That is a profound shift. It means the risk manager isn't just protecting the downside anymore, they are actively protecting the brand promise.

Sam Jones:

That's it.

Ori Wellington:

If you cannot link your incident response data to your executive communication strategy, you are flying into a storm without a radar.

Sam Jones:

And that brings us to the synthesis. We've looked at the five threads, now we have to see the web.

Ori Wellington:

And John's article sums it up with a pretty bold statement, I thought. He says, risk fragmentation is now the primary failure mode.

Sam Jones:

If you are fragmented, you fail. It's that simple. Let's trace the chain reaction we just built. It's a domino effect, but the dominoes are falling in every direction at once.

Ori Wellington:

Okay, let's walk through the nightmare scenario. Paint the picture of fragmentation in action.

Sam Jones:

Okay. A geopolitical event, say, a new trade war triggers a sudden supply chain disruption. That disruption forces you to onboard a new unvetted vendor very quickly because you just need the parts to keep the factory running.

Ori Wellington:

Okay, so now I have a third-party risk because I skipped all the checks.

Sam Jones:

Right. And that new vendor uses a custom AI tool in their logistics that you haven't audited. That AI tool has a subtle security flaw or a data bias.

Ori Wellington:

Now we've got a cyber risk and an AI risk, all from one vendor.

Sam Jones:

Exactly. Hackers exploit that flaw to breach your customer data. Now you have a disruption economics problem, your revenue halts, your website is down. And then because your teams are siloed, your PR team goes out and denies the breach while your IT team is desperately trying to fix it. The public finds out you lied, and now you have a Massive reputation crisis.

Ori Wellington:

And the stock price tanks. And the CEO gets fired.

Sam Jones:

All because the initial geopolitical signal from that trade war wasn't connected to the vendor onboarding process.

Ori Wellington:

That is absolutely terrifying. But we aren't here just to scare people. We're here to offer the solution. The article defines the new era of IRM with four distinct pillars. This is the solution kit.

Sam Jones:

Let's run through them. It's the roadmap out of the mess.

Ori Wellington:

Pillar one.

Sam Jones:

Dependency-led risk visibility. You have to see the whole ecosystem, no more blind spots. You have to know how the legal department connects to the server room, connects to the vendor in Asia.

Ori Wellington:

Pillar two.

Sam Jones:

Continuous testable controls. No more of this once-a-year assessment nonsense. You need to know if the control is working right now. If the lock is broken, you need to know before the burglar tries the handle. Scenario-driven decision support. Tying those big geopolitical shifts directly to business outcomes and money. Making risk data speak the language of the CFO.

Ori Wellington:

And finally, pillar four.

Sam Jones:

Unified evidence and assurance. This is critical. Everyone audit, risk, compliance, security. They all need to be looking at the same single source of truth. One set of books. No more arguing over whose spreadsheet is correct during a crisis.

Ori Wellington:

It's a tall order. It sounds like a massive cultural shift as much as it is a technological one.

Sam Jones:

It is. But as John puts it, organizations that treat IRM as a platform for management execution rather than just a reporting framework are the ones that will convert risk insight into real resilience.

Ori Wellington:

And resilience is the only competitive advantage that really matters in a world this volatile. If you can take a punch and keep moving while your competitor crumbles, you win.

Sam Jones:

Exactly. You stop being the department of no and you start being the department of how.

Ori Wellington:

How to survive, how to grow. That is a powerful place to be.

Sam Jones:

It is the only place to be in 2026.

Ori Wellington:

We've covered a massive amount of ground today. We've gone from disruption economics to the ethics of AI to the geopolitics of trade. Now, for the listener who is sitting there thinking, I need to show this to my boss, or I need to understand the specific metrics behind this, where should they go?

Sam Jones:

Well, first, everything we've talked about today comes from the research done right here at Wheelhouse Advisors. We are based in Atlanta, but our research is global. You can find more about our broader work at wheelhouseadvisors.com.

Ori Wellington:

And the specific article that we've been breaking down.

Sam Jones:

The 2026 Convergence is available to read right now at risktechjournal.com. That's our free standard publication. And it's a fantastic resource for keeping up with these trends without a paywall.

Ori Wellington:

However, and I know our audience, some of you are practitioners. You're the ones in the trenches. You need the deep metrics. You need a specific vendor analysis. You need the stuff you can take to the board to justify a million-dollar budget.

Sam Jones:

For those people, you absolutely need the RTJ Bridge. That is our premium version of the Risk Tech Journal. We publish in-depth research notes every week. It provides the type of insights you would usually find in a high-priced research subscription from one of the massive analyst firms, but at a fraction of the cost.

Ori Wellington:

It's the smart play. You can subscribe at rtj-bridge.com. That's rtj-bridge-bridge.com.

Sam Jones:

I'd say it's highly recommended. If you want to survive the convergence, you're going to need the bridge.

Ori Wellington:

I love that. Okay, before we sign off, I want to leave our listeners with one final, perhaps slightly provocative thought to chew on.

Sam Jones:

Go for it.

Ori Wellington:

We talked about how trust is an outcome. We talk about how integrated risk is the nervous system of the company. If all that's true, if risk management is what actually keeps the promises the company makes, does that mean the risk manager is now the most important guardian of the brand, more important than the chief marketing officer?

Sam Jones:

That is a very dangerous question to ask in a room full of marketers. But looking at the 2026 landscape, looking at how fragile reputation has become, I think you might be right. The brand isn't what you say anymore. The brand is how you survive.

Ori Wellington:

Something to mull over on your commute.

Sam Jones:

Yeah.

Ori Wellington:

Thank you for diving deep with us today.

Sam Jones:

See you at the deep end.

Ori Wellington:

Bye for now.