Climate Economics with Arvid Viaene

#22 Dr. Richard Tol - The Social Cost of Carbon, EPA Rulemaking, and How Models Get Misunderstood

Arvid Viaene

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 42:01

In Part 2 of my conversation with Richard Tol, we move from model structure to policy use.

We discuss the social cost of carbon, how the Obama-era EPA worked with FUND, DICE, and PAGE, and why Tol thinks the process of understanding a model matters as much as running it. We also talk about why integrated assessment models are often misunderstood, why debates around damage functions get so heated, and what this reveals about the boundary between economics and politics.

The second half of the episode turns to Europe: why cap-and-trade won out over a carbon tax, why cost-benefit analysis is often awkward in real policy settings, and what Tol is working on now at the frontier of climate economics.

This is Part 2 of a two-part conversation.

In this episode:

  • why a single social cost of carbon estimate can be misleading
  • how the EPA used FUND in practice
  • why misunderstood models are dangerous
  • damage-function debates and the politics around IAMs
  • EU climate policy, cap-and-trade, and cost-benefit analysis
  • Tol’s current work on transfers, population, and welfare

These descriptions fit the show’s “paper to policy” framing and your economist/policy audience.

For questions, comments or suggestions, you can contact me at arvid.viaene.ce@gmail.com