Episode 6: The Handless Maiden, Part 2 | The Silver Hands: How Relationships Mirror Our Wounds

In Part 2 of The Handless Maiden, we follow the maiden into the king’s pear orchard, where the story begins to reveal what our relationships often mirror back to us: our wounds, our patterns, and the places where rescue can be mistaken for love.

The king gives the maiden silver hands, but silver hands are not living hands. They may cover the wound, but they cannot restore her agency, her inner knowing, or her direct connection to God. In this episode, Jennifer explores deficiency-love, the honeymoon stage, wounded masculine and feminine patterns, and the painful loneliness of trying to make love work with someone who has emotionally left the castle.

This is an episode for anyone who has ever confused being chosen with being truly met, or who has had to learn that healing cannot come from someone else covering the wound.

This is not the end of the maiden’s journey.

Next week, we’ll follow her deeper into the forest, where her real hands grow back, the king begins his own healing, and we begin to see what love looks like when it comes from wholeness.

About Know Thy Soul

Know Thy Soul explores myth, fairy tales, scripture, symbolism, psychology, and spiritual traditions as maps of the soul, revealing the timeless patterns that illuminate the journey home to ourselves. 

 🎙️ New episodes every Tuesday.

Visit knowthysoul.com for episode transcripts, reflections, and more.

 📬 Join the Know Thy Soul newsletter 

Transcript

Copy

SPEAKER_00 0:06

Hi friends, welcome to Know Thy Soul, where we explore the stories, symbols, and truths that help us understand the journey home through the relationships that mirror our deepest wounds. Today we're returning to the Handless Maiden and following her in part two of her journey. But before we step back into the story, I want to say this for anyone who is new here. Each episode of Know Thy Soul is meant to stand on its own. You can begin right here and still receive what this part of the story has to offer. But these episodes are also weaving a larger tapestry together. So if you want the deeper map, you may eventually want to go back and listen to the previous episode where we began The Handless Maiden. That is where we watched the father make a deal with the devil, gain worldly wealth, and unknowingly sacrifice the maiden's hands in the process. And even though he later offered to provide for her, she knew she could not remain in the house where the wound had happened. So when we meet her again, she has left the only life she has ever known. She has no plan, no hands, and no resources. But she still has the one thing the wound could not take from her: her direct connection to God. That connection will not spare her from every painful thing she encounters, but it will remain as a living thread within her, guiding her through everything that comes next. And I want to name something else before we go further. While in today's episode, I will primarily look at this part of the story through relationships. This is not only about the relationships we have with other people. It is also about what happens inside us. The maiden is the wounded soul, and the king can represent the ego, the part of us that's oriented toward the outer physical world, that part that wants to rescue, fix, cover, or make things look whole before they have actually healed. Remember the 70 faces of Torah? This is only one level of understanding the story, and throughout this podcast, we will explore many others. But this level is also one of the most obvious and relatable, because most of us have lived it in some form. So, yes, we are going to talk about men and women, and a man or a woman could be either character in this story, and at different times, we may even carry both. But in my experience, men often act more like the king and women often act more like the handless maiden. This is not a hard and fast rule, but it's simply a pattern the story helps us to see. And if this were a modern movie, we might expect the maiden to meet a wise old sage who gives her all the answers, but instead, she meets a man. And this is where the story begins to ask one of the great questions of love and relationships. Why do we choose the people we choose? And what might our relationships be trying to show us about the wounds we still carry? Because few things reveal our patterns, our fears, and our unfinished healing quite like love. So let's get back into the story. After a full day of wandering through the forest without eating, the maiden sees by the light of the moon a beautiful pear orchard on the other side of a moat. She's starving, and the fruit she needs is close enough to see, but still completely beyond her reach. She thinks to herself that if only she were inside the garden, she could eat from those trees. Otherwise, she'll perish. And then she kneels down and prays for help. The maiden has been in relationship with God throughout this story, but God does not simply swoop in and override her will. She asks for help, and in asking, she actively participates in the relationship that has been guiding her all along. Jesus even says it when he says, Ask and it will be given to you, seek and you will find, knock and the door will be open to you. And once she asks for help, an angel appears and parts the waters of the moat, allowing her to cross safely into the orchard. Unable to pluck the pear with her hands, the maiden reaches up with her mouth and takes a single pear with her teeth. And I think that image is so tender because even without her hands, something in her still knows how to reach for life. This is the nature of the soul. No matter how deeply our feelings, intuition, or inner knowing have been buried, they don't disappear. They keep pressing toward our awareness in whatever way they can, quietly reminding us that something within us is still alive, still hungry, and still trying to be fed. The next morning, the gardener immediately notices that one pear is missing, because every pear in this orchard has been carefully counted and numbered. And already the story is showing us something important. The maiden has left the patriarchal world of her father's house, but is entering right into another version of the same world. In her father's house, the feminine could be bargained away, sacrificed, and handed over. And here, in the king's garden, even the fruit has been counted, numbered, guarded, and brought under control. Throughout mythology, fairy tales, and sacred text, the garden is one of the great symbols of the feminine. It represents life, creation, fertility, growth, and mystery. It's the place where something hidden beneath the surface becomes visible and begins to bear fruit. And often at the center of the garden there's a tree. We'll expand more on the trees in a future story, but for now, notice that the tree is already showing up for the second time in this story. And yet, here, just as the father failed to recognize the value of the apple tree, we find another garden that has been measured and contained. Every pear has been counted, every piece of fruit has been claimed, as if the masculine is trying to impose order on the very source of life itself. Think about the world in which this story was first told. For much of history, women had very little authority over their own lives. Men controlled women through marriage, property, money, law, education, work, religion, sexuality, motherhood, movement, clothing, and speech. A woman might have no say in whom she married, no legal claim to the money or property she helped create, no freedom to leave an unhappy or dangerous marriage, and no guarantee that she would keep her own children if she tried. Fathers and husbands often decided where she lived, whether she could work or study, what happened to her body, and when or whether her voice would be heard. Women who resisted could be punished, shamed, discredited, declared immoral or unstable, subjected to physical violence, institutionalized, or even killed. So the numbered pear garden is not merely an abstract symbol, it reflects a world in which men were given authority over the land, the household, and nearly every living thing within their borders, including women. Today domination does not always announce itself as domination, but sometimes it's still quite direct. Some men continue to control all the money, decide whether their wives can work, determine where they go and who they spend time with, monitor their phones or location, dictate what they wear, and make major decisions without consulting them. They may use money, intimidation, anger, threats, or physical violence to keep that control in place. In these relationships, the garden is still visibly numbered. But domination can also be much quieter. A man may never explicitly forbid a woman from doing anything, yet his criticism, anger, withdrawal, ridicule, or disapproval teaches her which choices will come at a cost. His career determines where they live and how the family's time is organized, while hers is expected to fit in around it. His ambitions are treated as necessary, while hers are supported only as long as they do not inconvenience him, compete with him, or threaten his sense of importance. He may control the pace and intensity of the relationship, when they move closer, when he withdraws, when commitment happens, and how much emotional intimacy he is willing to tolerate while she waits, accommodates, and tries to understand what it is that he needs. It happens when a woman's ideas are dismissed before they are even considered, when her instincts are treated as emotional, irrational, unrealistic, or inconvenient, when the direction of the relationship quietly forms around his comfort, his timing, his fears, his desires, and his way of seeing. Eventually, she begins monitoring his mood, softening her opinions, minimizing her needs, and asking, how will he react before she asks, What do I actually want? In one version, he openly restricts her life. In the other, she gradually learns to restrict herself in anticipation of his response. Both are versions of the numbered garden. Our world has changed greatly since this story was first told, and women now possess rights and freedoms the maiden could not have imagined. But the underlying desire of the masculine to rule the feminine has not disappeared completely. Order itself is not the wound. A garden needs boundaries, care, and protection. But when care becomes possession, when every fruit is numbered and nothing living is allowed to grow beyond the ruler's control, order hardens into domination. So before the king ever appears, the story has already told us something about the world he rules. This is a world where life is managed more than trusted, where the feminine is protected perhaps, but also possessed, and where mystery is not yet allowed to remain mystery. When the king hears what the gardener has seen, he returns to the orchard with a gardener and a priest. That night, the three men see the maiden, and when they see her, they do not know what to make of her. Is she a spirit? Is she human? Is she something holy? Something dangerous? Something strange? And maybe that's because the wounded masculine does not yet know how to recognize the feminine when she appears before him in suffering. He can see that something strange has happened. He can see that something sacred may be standing in front of him, but he does not yet know how to see the woman herself. So they ask her whether she is spirit or human being, and the maiden replies, I am not a spirit, but a poor human who has been abandoned by everyone except God. The story tells us that the king fell in love with her and made her his wife, but it says nothing about how she felt toward him. Why is that? For starters, this story was first told in a time when women had little to no say in who they married. And while times have changed, the underlying pattern has not disappeared. A wounded woman may not yet know that partnership is not only about being chosen, she may believe love begins when someone finally sees her, wants her, claims her, and says, You belong with me. But she may not yet know that she also gets to choose. She may not yet know how to ask. Can this man meet me? Can he see my wound without trying to cover it? Can he stand beside me as I heal? So she waits to be chosen. She waits to be claimed. She waits for him to come closer, to become clear, to decide what they are. But a wounded woman may not yet realize that she is not only waited in to be chosen, but that she is allowed to choose. She's allowed to ask, is this love actually meeting me? Or am I simply being carried along by the speed and intensity of someone else's desire? Remember that the king finds her in his garden where every pair is counted and numbered. This is already red flag number one. This shows us how he views the feminine as something to be contained and controlled. We can already see that this is not yet mature love because being chosen is not the same thing as being met. The king then tells her the very thing she has probably longed to hear for most of her life. He tells her he will never abandon her. He tells her that she will never have to work, that he will provide everything for her, and he has a pair of silver hands made for her. But this is where we begin to see the rescuer inside him, because one version of the wounded masculine believes love means saving the fair maiden in distress. It sees suffering and wants to fix it. It wants to provide, protect, and become the answer. And in many ways, that sounds beautiful, but rescue is not the same thing as healing, and being chosen by a king is not the same thing as becoming whole. Many women will recognize this moment in some form, the moment a man's gaze turns toward us with intensity, the moment we feel as if we've awakened something in him, the moment he wants to protect us, provide for us, rescue us, and make us feel, even briefly, as if we have become his whole world. This is what I sometimes call the guy at the beginning. And I don't mean he's fake, I don't even mean he's lying. I mean there is often a version of a man who appears at the beginning of a relationship full of attraction, certainty, promise, and desire to become the answer to what has hurt us. And when you've been abandoned, unseen, or unprotected, that kind of promise can feel like salvation. But the story is wise enough to show us that a promise made in a moment of inspiration is not the same thing as a promise a person has become capable of keeping. Because as we'll see, the promise will not be kept, because the king has not yet become the kind of man who can stay when love requires more than provision, attraction, or rescue. And this is what we might call the honeymoon stage of the story, because on the surface, it looks as if everything has finally changed. The maiden has gone from the forest to the castle, from hunger to provision, from abandonment to a man promising that he will never leave, from handlessness to silver hands. But if we look a little more closely, the king is offering a solution remarkably similar to the one her father offered. You don't need your own hands, you don't need your own agency, and you do not need to learn how to provide for yourself, because I will take care of you. And after everything she has endured, it makes perfect sense that she would accept what he offers. She left home searching for compassion, for sympathy, and for someone who would finally see her suffering and care. And at first, the silver hands probably feel like exactly that. They're a visible sign that someone has noticed her pain, that someone wants to help, and that someone has made her wound beautiful enough to be seen. But wisdom often arrives much later than rescue. It takes time to discover that silver hands, no matter how beautiful they are, are not a substitute for living hands, because they're cold, lifeless, and unable to truly feel. But the silver hands are not only a symbol of the king's inability to give mature love, they're also a symbol of the wounded women's inability to receive love without abandoning herself to keep it. Silver hands show us that she is not able to be fully authentic. She may shape shift into what she thinks he needs her to be. She may chase, she may obsess, she may overgive, over-explain, over-function, and call it devotion. She may confuse the anxiety of trying to be chosen with the feeling of love itself. And sometimes, yes, she may even manipulate, not always because she's cruel, but because she does not feel safe enough to be just direct. So instead of asking clearly, she she tests. Instead of naming the wound, she performs, instead of leaving what does not honor her, she tries harder to become indispensable. At the root of it, the wounded woman is subconsciously not trying to love, she is trying not to be abandoned. This dynamic is what Maslow called deficiency love or delove. It is a love that comes from lack, hunger, fear, and from the ache of something inside us that has not yet been healed. And this is the kind of love they are both caught in. Her wound says, please choose me so I know that I'm enough. His wound says, let me rescue you so that I know I am man enough. She needs to be chosen, he needs to be needed. And for a time, their wounds fit together so perfectly that it feels like love. Neither one is giving or receiving love from wholeness yet. Because deficiency love may look like devotion, it may look like rescue, it may even look like romance, but underneath it is still trying to get something from the other person that only healing can restore. And that is why the silver hands are so important. They're beautiful, they're generous, they're probably given with sincerity, but if he decides what she needs, gives her silver hands instead of helping her heal, and expects her to remain dependent upon what he provides, then his love does not truly make room for her sovereignty or wholeness. The silver hands still belong to deficiency love because they compensate for what she lacks without restoring what was lost. They allow him to remain the rescuer and her to remain the one who needs rescuing. They preserve the very arrangement their wounds created. They do not come from the healed king and queen yet. They come from two wounded people trying to love each other from the places where they are still wounded and afraid. And this brings us back to something we saw in the tapestry episode. The maiden is other focused. She's watching him, accommodating him, waiting for him to choose her, and looking to him to tell her who she is. In loving him, she once again abandons herself. The king, as we saw in Percival, is self-focused. Even when he turns toward her, he is preoccupied with whether he can rescue her, provide for her, and prove that he's a good and powerful man. He may be doing something for her, but his attention is still on what doing it says about him. In loving her this way, he fails to fully see her. She abandons herself for the sake of the other. He abandons the other for the sake of himself. And this is also how deficiency love can become domination without ever calling itself that. He is focused on himself and she is focused on him. His needs, his wounds, his timing, and his interpretation of the relationship become central while she slowly becomes a supporting character in his life. But if the relationship requires her to remain dependent so that he can remain necessary, then it still cannot make room for her sovereignty. For their love to mature, she must learn to remain connected to herself while loving another, and he must learn to remain connected to another even when he cannot fix, rescue, or control what's happening. This is the movement toward wholeness, not self instead of other or other instead of self, but the ability to hold both. According to Maslow, the goal is called being love, a love that arises from fullness and allows us to meet another with presence and reverence, without abandoning either ourselves or them. This kind of love says, I see you. I delight in who you are, not only in what you give me or how you make me feel about myself. I do not need to possess you, fix you, rescue you, or make you responsible for the emptiness within me. I am no longer asking you to prove that I am worthy, powerful, safe, or enough. I can bring my whole self into this relationship and meet your whole self there, not as the missing piece that will complete me, but as someone I freely choose and who is free to choose me. Being love does not mean that we stop needing one another. It means our need is no longer confused with love. We can receive comfort, support, affection, and companionship without asking the other person to carry the burden of our worth. And from that place, I can finally love you for who you are, not merely for the role you play in soothing my wounds. But the silver hands show us another way we try to fill that inner sense of not being enough. We make our lives or our relationship look beautiful from the outside, hoping that what we can create, achieve, possess, or display will quiet whatever inside still feels unfinished, unhealed, or unseen. The silver may make the wound more beautiful, perhaps even less visible, but it does not heal it. It simply allows everyone to pretend that what was lost has been restored. And how many of us know what it feels like to live a silver-handed life, a life that appears beautiful from the outside, Pinterest worthy even, while inside we feel disconnected from our own needs, our own desires, our own agency, and our own ability to reach for what is real. We might call it keeping up with the Joneses, but I think it goes deeper than simply wanting what someone else has. We try to arrange our lives so that they look the way a good life is supposed to look, hoping that the right home, relationship, family, career, or body will finally quiet the fear that we're not enough. We polish the silver hands, we learn how to display them, we may even receive praise for how beautiful they are, but no matter how convincing the life appears from the outside, silver cannot restore the living hands underneath. It's the same mistake Percival makes when he first sees the knights. He believes that if he can get the armor, then he'll be a knight. But armor cannot give him wisdom, discernment, compassion, or the inner maturity of knighthood. It can only make him look like one. And silver hands cannot restore the maiden's agency, inner knowing, or ability to direct her own life. They can only make her look whole. Percival has to become the knight from within, and the maiden has to grow living hands. But the story does not let this silver handed life become the ending, because even this seemingly beautiful life, even this life where she has been chosen. Married, crowned, and given pans of silver, cannot protect her from the next wound that has to be revealed. Only about a year after their marriage, the king is called away to war. And what do we know comes with war? Armor. The story doesn't say this directly, but I imagine this as the moment the king puts his armor back on, not just outwardly, but inwardly. He moves back into fight or flight, back into the part of him that knows how to battle, protect, perform, and survive, but does not yet know how to stay emotionally present. Many women will recognize this part of a story because so many women know what it feels like when the honeymoon ends and the man in front of them disappears into his own armor. He may still be there physically, he may still be doing the things he thinks a good man does, but something tender has gone missing. In the beginning, he's attentive, loving, and present. You feel like his world. You feel like something in him has awakened because of you, and maybe for a little while, it really does feel as if everything is going to be different. But it takes time, and sometimes a painful amount of awakening, to know the difference between a man offering being love and a man offering silver hands. Because even after the rescue, even after the wedding, even after giving her something beautiful, this king still cannot remain present with what a relationship requires of him. So he leaves the castle and goes to war. And she is left carrying the life of the relationship alone. The man who was once loving and attentive seems to become someone else entirely. Instead of feeling like he's in love with you, it can begin to feel as if he is at war with you, and maybe underneath it, he is. Not because she's the enemy, but because intimacy has touched the places in him that are still armored. And this is exactly what's happening here. The king goes to war, but I don't think this is only about neighboring kingdoms. Symbolically, he's at war with the feminine, at war with his parents, at war with life, at war with truth, and perhaps most of all, at war with himself. Because whenever we become disconnected from the feminine within us, from our feelings, our intuition, our receptivity, our vulnerability, and our capacity for compassion, life often becomes something we try to control instead of something we know how to be in relationship with. Everything begins to feel like a battle. And really, everything in this story has been pointing us toward this pattern. The severing of the hands, the numbered pear garden, and the silver hands, and now the war all show us a world where the feminine has not been honored, trusted, or allowed to live freely. He is at war with his own impulses, his desire, his anger, his shame, his fear of being needed, his fear of not being enough, his fear of being seen. And that war can show up in so many ways. Sometimes it looks respectable, it looks like work, like providing or being busy, like always having one more thing outside the home that needs him. Sometimes it looks like escape. Maybe it's golf every weekend, video games, drinking, pornography, scrolling, fantasy, another woman, another place where he can feel free, powerful, distracted, or in control. And sometimes it looks like silence. Modern psychology might call this avoidant attachment, but I think the older symbolic language gives us an even clearer image. It's armor. Armor is what comes up when closeness feels dangerous, when need feels threatening, and when vulnerability feels like too much. Sometimes armor flees, sometimes armor fights, sometimes it shuts down, withdraws, defends, blames, or disappears. But underneath all of it is the same wound. The person does not yet know how to stay open in the presence of love. One man with an avoidant pattern described it to me this way. He said, I take the first exit ramp when things get hard. And that is such a clear image of what armor can look like in relationship. When closeness becomes too vulnerable, the armored part of the person starts looking for a way out. And in this story, this is exactly what the king does. He fights and he flees. And the maiden, of course, has her own wound. She abandons herself for the sake of him and for the sake of the relationship, accepting whatever scraps of love he's able to offer, even when those scraps are not enough to nourish her. And perhaps she accepts them because she has never really known the kind of love that stays. After all, her father is the one who cut off her hands, and her mother was unable to protect her. So somewhere deep inside, she has learned that her needs matter less than everyone else's, and that she's not worth fighting for, at least, not yet. Together, they create a dance that reinforces both of their wounds. The maiden has brought the king into relationship with parts of himself he has spent a lifetime avoiding. She awakens his vulnerability, his dependence, and his need for connection. And when those parts begin to rise, he does what many of us do when we do not know how to stay present with what is happening inside of us. He leaves the castle. And I suspect many women know what this feels like, to be physically present with a man who is emotionally absent. He may still be in the room, in the house, in the relationship, but some essential part of him has gone somewhere else. He can number the trees in the garden, measure the walls of a castle, learn the rules of knighthood, and master the outer world, but he cannot approach the human heart in the same way. The closer she gets, the more clearly he can see the parts of himself he has spent his life trying to avoid. And so he retreats toward what he knows how to handle. In moments of uncertainty, the nervous system often defaults to fight or flight, and the king, in a way, does both. He flees the unfamiliar territory of intimacy by turning toward a battle he knows how to fight. The war gives him a visible enemy, a clear objective, and a role he understands, so the outer battle becomes a refuge from the inner one. And that is often the nature of our deepest defenses. We run from what we cannot control by throwing ourselves into what we can. But this story has not yet shown us the healing. The king is still in armor and the maiden is still handless, carrying the consequences of both their wounds. The maiden is his wife now, and she's the woman with whom he is meant to build a new life. But when he leaves, he places her back under the care of his mother. And this is where the mother wound enters the story. Not because his mother is necessarily evil, or because every mother-in-law is the problem, and not even because his mother is always physically present. Sometimes she can be any of those things, but often the mother is present as an inner pattern within him. She's present in the part of him that still wants a woman to soothe him, approve of him, love him unconditionally, regulate him, tell him what to do, and carry the emotional life he has not yet learned to carry within himself. So the mother wound is not always about the actual mother being in the room. It's about the man who is not yet fully separated from the childhood place in himself that still looks to the feminine as mother instead of meeting the feminine as partner. The story also gives us no father for the king. We only hear of his mother, and symbolically, I think that absence matters. And this is where the father wound enters. Not only with a father who is literally absent, but with the absence of a mature masculine guide, the absence of someone who can teach a boy how to become a man without cutting himself off from his heart. A boy needs to be mirrored by mature masculinity. He needs to know: I see you. You're capable. Your feelings are not shameful, and your tenderness does not make you weak. Without that, masculinity can become something he has to prove. And underneath all of that proving, there is often a quieter question, am I man enough? Am I capable of becoming the man I was never shown how to be? A boy may learn how to achieve, protect, provide, or perform strength, but he may not learn how to stay present with pain. He may not learn how to listen without defending, how to love without controlling, or how to remain open when intimacy asks more of him than he knows how to give. We'll explore this much more deeply when we get to Percival, because Percival is one of the great stories of the father wound and the wounded masculine. But for now, I just want you to notice that the king does not seem to have been formed by a mature masculine present. And the mother wound can shape how he tries to answer that question. If his mother compensates by doing everything for him, protecting him from struggle, or expecting very little of him, the unconscious message may become, you're loved, but I don't trust you to handle life. And this is not necessarily one person's fault. A mother may overfunction because a father is absent, unavailable, or unwilling to help carry the responsibility of raising a son. But the boy may grow into a man who performs masculinity through rescue, provision, control, or strength because no one helped him develop real inner steadiness. His father's absence may leave him fearing that he's not enough. His mother's overfunctioning may leave him wondering whether he can actually trust himself. And now he is asking the woman beside him to soothe both fears. And that is when she stops feeling like his wife and she starts feeling like his mother. Because underneath the conflict, he is not only asking her to love him, he is asking her to soothe the fears his mother could not heal and his father could not initiate him through. He is asking her to make him feel enough, to tell him what to do, to reassure him that he can handle life, love, responsibility, and the emotional weight of the relationship. But that is not the role of a wife. A wife can love him, she can stand beside him, she can invite him into deeper intimacy, but she cannot become the mother who raises the boy inside of him into a man. Even Genesis recognizes this pattern when it says, a man must leave his mother and father and cling to his wife. And I don't think this is only about moving out of the house. It's about becoming inwardly mature enough to build a new union, to stop relating to the feminine as mother and begin meeting the feminine as partner. And this is where the maiden's father wound comes into play. She has already been wounded by the first masculine figure who was supposed to love and protect her. The one who was meant to protect her became the one through whom the wound arrived. And then, after causing it, offered no sympathy for what he had done. So when the king chooses her, marries her, and promises he will never abandon her, that promise reaches the deepest place in her wound. It feels like redemption, but then he abandons her too, emotionally, physically, and spiritually, and her body recognizes it. So she may do anything to bring back the man he seemed to be in the beginning. Because some part of her may believe that if she just loves him enough, gives enough, explains enough, forgives enough, then maybe he'll finally see. Maybe this time the masculine will look at the wound he helped create and say, I see what happened to you. I see what I have done, and I will not leave you alone with it. Maybe he'll wake up. Maybe he'll become the man she senses is somewhere inside him. And this is not exactly fixing, though it can look that way from the outside. What she is really trying to do is love him into consciousness. And instead of two people meeting each other in truth, both of them are now speaking through the armor. But no woman can awaken a man who is still committed, consciously or unconsciously, to staying asleep. And the same is true in reverse. No awakened man can force consciousness into a woman who is not yet willing to face herself. There's a saying that when an egg is cracked from the outside, life ends, but when it cracks from the inside, life begins. And this is true of the soul too. You can love someone, you can see the sleeping part of them, you can sense what is hidden inside the castle, but you cannot force their awakening. You cannot break through another person's armor without being wounded yourself. Because the armor is not only keeping you out, it's protecting the place in them that has not yet learned it's safe to wake up. And maybe this is part of what the maiden has to learn. She can keep reaching toward him in love, she can tell the truth as clearly and gently as she knows. She can invite him to look at what he has not wanted to see. She can pray for his healing and pray for her own, but she cannot enter his inner world and do the work for him. She cannot wake up the parts of him that he is not yet willing to face. And eventually she has to stop confusing devotion with self-abandonment. In time, the maiden gives birth to a beautiful son. And children and stories often symbolize something new being born within us, a new consciousness, a new relationship to life, a new self is beginning to emerge. And in many spiritual traditions, the birth of a child represents the birth of the spiritual self, the authentic self, the divine self, the part I call the soul. And notice something important. The child is born before the journey is complete, before the wounds are healed, before the kingdom is restored. Something new has begun to live in her, but it's still fragile, still in infancy, still developing, and still in need of protection and care. The child does not mean her healing is complete. The child marks the beginning of her awakening. Something new has entered the story. It's a new life and a new awareness, a part of her that can no longer keep repeating the old pattern unconsciously. She's beginning to see what has been happening between them, the wounds they are both carrying, the roles they have both been playing, the way love can become distorted when two people are trying to soothe old pain through each other. And she's beginning to look for another way, because the soul has a way of demanding truth. And that often terrifies the parts of us, and sometimes the people around us who benefited from our silence, the parts that preferred us unconscious, the parts that needed us to stay small, dependent, manageable, and afraid, which is precisely why the devil appears again. Because whenever something authentic is born within us, the forces that benefited from our unconsciousness begin fighting for control. After the birth of the son, the king's mother immediately sends a messenger to tell the king the news, but the devil intercepts the message and changes it. So when the message reaches the king, it does not say that the queen has given birth to a beautiful son. It says she has given birth to a monster. And think about that symbolism for a moment. If the child represents the soul, the authentic self, that new consciousness being born within us, and what is the first thing the devil does? He convinces the king that this new life is something monstrous, something dangerous, something to fear. And isn't that exactly what happens when we begin to awaken? The very part of us that's trying to become whole is often labeled selfish, foolish, irrational, difficult, or wrong. When we begin setting boundaries, we're told we're being cruel. When we stop abandoning ourselves, we're told you've changed. When we begin listening to our own inner knowing, we're told you can't trust that. The old conditioning rarely surrenders quietly. Instead, it convinces us that the thing threatening its survival is the problem, that the healing is the danger, that the new life is the monster. And this pattern does not only happen inside one person, it happens inside families, in religions, in cultures, and it happens anytime a new consciousness begins to emerge. The person who asks difficult questions is often labeled dangerous. The one who challenges an inherited story is often called rebellious, heretical, ungrateful, woke, or deceived before they are understood, because awakening threatens the structures that were built around sleep. And so the king sends word back that his wife and child should be protected until he returns home. But once again, the devil intercepts the message and changes it entirely. And I think this happens in real life too. Because on the surface, the king may be saying all the right things. Of course I love you. Of course I support you. Of course I care. But somewhere beneath these words, there's often another message being sent. A quieter message, a more frightened message, one he may not even be conscious enough to hear himself. Please stop talking about the things that make me uncomfortable. Please stop pointing out the wounds I'm trying not to see. Please stop asking me to grow. Please become the old version of yourself that is easy for me to love. And this is the tragedy of unconsciousness. This is what unconscious love can look like. Someone may believe he loves the woman before him while only knowing how to love the version of her that does not challenge him. When the king's mother receives the altered reply, it commands her to kill the queen and cut out her eyes and tongue as proof. And notice how specific that command is. Not only must the queen die, her eyes and tongue must also be removed, the symbols of sight and speech, the ability to see, the ability to speak, the ability to bear witness to truth. And perhaps this reveals something important about the wound being exposed here. Because throughout this story, the feminine keeps revealing truths the masculine does not yet want to see. She exposes what's out of balance, what's wounded, and what requires healing. And each time she does, the resistance grows stronger. First, her hands are taken, then they're replaced with silver ones, and now she's condemned to death. But symbolically, even death is not enough. Her eyes and tongue must be removed too. Because if she can no longer see the truth, she can no longer speak it. And if she can no longer speak it, then nothing has to change. And isn't this what happens in so many relationships, families, systems, and even cultures? Instead of becoming curious, we do what frightened parts of us do. We cover our eyes, we plug our ears, we convince ourselves that the thing in front of us is the monster, and then we try to silence it. Because the old pattern would rather destroy the truth teller than face the truth. Upon receiving the letter, the queen's mother-in-law is horrified. She can't bring herself to carry out such a terrible act. So instead, she secretly sends the queen and her child away to safety and uses the eyes and tongue of a deer as evidence. And notice again, we see a woman recognizing the truth of what's happening. She sees the horror of the command. She sees the innocence of the queen. And even though she cannot stop the whole pattern from unfolding, she refuses to participate in the destruction of the feminine. But notice what happens. For the second time, the maiden is forced out of the safety of a home and into the wilderness. The first time it was her father's wound that sent her into the forest. This time, it's the king's. The king's wounds have not yet been healed, and eventually the people we love are forced to live with the consequences of the wounds we refuse to face. The story is revealing something many of us learn the hard way. No relationship, no matter how loving, can do our inner work for us. Sooner or later, life, or more specifically, our unhealed wounds, will lead us back into the forest. But perhaps this time, the forest has something different to teach her. The first journey was about survival. This one is about discernment. She's beginning to see that she cannot heal the king's wounds for him, just as he cannot heal hers. Each of them must make their own journey through the forest. Each must face what has been avoided. Each must discover what can only be discovered there. Not because she's failed, but because there are some lessons that can only be learned by experience. What we are seeing here is not simply a bad king and a good queen. The story is showing us two wounds needing each other. A wounded masculine that is still trying to make everything look right from the outside while avoiding the deeper work within. And a wounded feminine that has learned to survive by giving herself away, by staying silent, by caring the needs of other while slowly disappearing from herself. And this is why I don't see the maiden's story and Percival's story as two competing stories. I see them as two sides of the same tapestry. The maiden shows us what happens when the feminine loses her hands, her agency, and her ability to act on what she knows. And Percival will eventually show us the journey the masculine must take when he has been living in armor, mistaking appearance for maturity and action for wisdom. So for the second time, the maiden is sent back into the forest. Only this time, she's not going empty-handed. Even without hands, she still carries the child. She carries the new life. She carries the soul that has begun to awaken within her, the part of her that can no longer pretend. And maybe this is where we leave her for now. But before we do, I want you to think about the woman in your own life, your friend, your sister, your daughter, your coworker, your mother, or maybe the woman you used to be. The woman who is not being loved as much as she's being controlled, managed, emotionally or physically abused, silenced, corrected, dismissed, or slowly taught to make herself smaller. The woman who keeps trying to make a relationship work and cannot understand why love feels so empty. While sleeping in a bed beside someone who has left the castle can feel like one of the loneliest places on earth. The woman who keeps explaining, softening, forgiving, waiting, hoping, and wondering why she still feels so unseen. If someone came to mind while you were listening to this episode, send it to her. Tell her about the handless maiden, because this is why these stories survived. They were carried orally for centuries because they were more than just entertainment. They helped people heal. They gave hope, and they offered a kind of lighthouse when someone felt trapped in their dark night of the soul and couldn't see where to go next. Sometimes a story can say what we have not yet found the words to say. Sometimes a story can help us see that the problem is not that we're not loving enough, patient enough, forgiving enough, or good enough. Sometimes the story helps us see the wound. And once we can see the wound, we can begin to stop calling it love. And I can tell this story not only because I've studied The Handless Maiden, but because I've lived it. I know this pattern from the inside. I know what it feels like to be in a relationship where you keep trying to explain your pain more gently, more clearly, more carefully, hoping that this is the time you'll finally be heard. And I know how exhausting it is when your own need starts to feel like something you have to apologize for. So if this woman is you, I see you, I hear you, and I understand you. I know it may feel like there is no way out, but there is. God is helping you the same way God is helping the maiden in this story. You may just need more healing, enough space, and enough quiet to begin hearing that guidance again. So keep showing up with me here week after week as we follow these old stories back to the connection with God that still exists within you too. Because it's not only the maiden who must walk into the forest, it's each of us. And maybe the healing of the world begins here, inside the healing of women who are no longer willing to call control love. Women who are no longer willing to abandon themselves for a relationship that offers nothing in return. Women who are no longer willing to carry another person's unhealed wounds and call it sacrifice. Women who are learning to trust what they know. Women who are growing their real hands back. Women who are remembering their direct connection to God. Because when a woman heals, she does not only heal herself, something begins to heal around her too, as we'll see in the conclusion of the story next week. So once again, we end with the maiden leaving everything she knows in search of something deeper, something truer, something that can only be found by returning to the forest. Not because the story is over, but because sometimes the next part of the journey begins in the place we least want to return to. The forest, the place where everything familiar falls away. But as we have already seen, the forest is not only a place of loss, it's also a place where help appears. And next week, we'll follow the maiden deeper into that forest to a house with a sign that says, Here all dwell free, and to the quiet, long healing that allows her real hands to grow back. Until next time, my friends, may you know thy soul. It already knows the way.