004 - Psychosexual Approaches to Development - Anna Freud, Klein, and Mahler

Following Freud, there were many researchers trying to make sense of child development using his psychosexual approach as a framework.  Among those that adopted the psychoanalytic approach was his daughter, Anna Freud, who has been called “the mother of child psychoanalysis.”  Other mothers include the developers of Object Relations including Melanie Klein and Margaret Mahler.

Referenced resources can be found within the show transcripts at https://psydactic_caps.buzzsprout.com

Feedback can be emailed to feedback@psydactic.com OR submitted via a form at https://psydactic.com.

This is not medical advice.  Please see a licensed physician for any personal questions regarding your own or your child's health.

Transcript

Copy

Below is an outline of this episode:

Welcome to PsyDactic - CAPs board study edition.  I am your host, Dr. O'Leary, a child and adolescent psychiatry fellow in the national capital region.  This is a podcast I designed to help myself and other CAPs fellows study for their boards.  Anyone interested in human development and mental health will likely also get something out of it.  For a run-down on how it is produced, please see Episode 001.  I am using AI to assist me with the content creation.  However, all the content in the podcast should be considered my opinion and no one else's. 

This is episode 4.  The last episode explored Sigmund Freud's foray into explaining child development.  His ideas left much to be desired, especially given that he spent very little time studying children.  He also spent no time systematically testing any of his ideas, which remains the most damning criticism of his approach.  Following Freud, there were many researchers trying to make sense of child development using his primary ideas as a framework.  Among those that adopted the psychoanalytic approach was his daughter, Anna Freud, who has been called “the mother of child psychoanalysis.”  Other mothers include the developers of Object Relations including Melanie Klein and Maragret Mahler.

I am going to discuss and contrast them together in this episode.

Anna Freud and Ego Psychology

Anna was more pragmatic than her father. While her father was primarily concerned with unconscious processes that arose in the Id or superego, Anna shifted attention to the ego, and she was one of the primary thinkers to develop what is called Ego Psychiatry.  Anna and other early explorers of child psychology helped to identify that the external and social environment, instead of merely internal conflicts, were critically important factors.

Here are some of her key contributions to psychodynamic theories of infancy:

• Child Analysis: Anna Freud pioneered the technique of child analysis, adapting psychoanalytic methods to suit the developmental needs and communication styles of children. She was one of the early developers of play therapy as a means to uncover unconscious conflicts and anxieties in young children.  Play, for Anna Freud, is the way that children deal with their fears and anxieties, and the ego can be the master of these anxieties.  Unlike Melanie Klein, who I’ll mention later, she did not believe that the normal analytic technique of passive listening to free association and then making interpretations was appropriate for children.  Instead, she would get down and play with them.
• Normal and Abnormal Development: Anna Freud and others' observational work with children helped to differentiate between normal and abnormal development.  Anna emphasized how environmental factors like parenting, trauma, or neglect contribute to ego strength or weakness.
• Ego Psychology: Anna Freud emphasized the importance of the ego, the conscious part of the personality, in mediating between the id (primitive impulses) and the superego (moral conscience). She believed that a nurturing and supportive environment could empower the ego to maintain balance between the demands of the Id and Superego.  Others, like Melanie Klein speculated more about the id’s role in generating unconscious fantasies that were realized in a child’s play.
• Defense Mechanisms: She elaborated on her father's defense mechanisms including how they are used by children.  For infants, there is not much to be observed, but as children become more social, they begin to develop important defenses include splitting (dividing things into all-good or all-bad categories) or acting out (expressing emotions through behavior rather than words) or repression (when we unconsciously push distressing content away from our conscious awareness) or projection (where we assume others have the same emotions or motivations that we have) introjection (where we unconsciously take on aspects of others, adopt their values and behaviors in order to reduce conflict) and regression (where someone reverts to a more primitive stage of development).

At the same time Anna Freud was developing her Ego Psychology, others were developing what became known as Object Relations, which continued Sigmunds emphasis on the supposed unconscious processes that define us.

Object Relations Theories and Infant Development

Object relations theories, rooted in the work of Sigmund Freud and Melanie Klein, emphasize the importance of early relationships in shaping personality development. These theories focus on how infants internalize and represent significant others, particularly caregivers, and how these internalized representations influence their interactions with others later in life.

Key concepts in object relations theories:

• Internal Objects: These are mental representations of significant others, such as caregivers. Infants gradually develop internal objects through their interactions with these individuals.
• Object Relations: The relationships between the infant and their internalized objects. These relationships can be positive, negative, or a combination of both.

Melanie Klein: A Technical Summary

Melanie Klein, a prominent figure in psychoanalysis, made significant contributions to our understanding of early childhood development and unconscious processes. Her work, particularly her analysis of children's play, revolutionized psychoanalytic theory.

Key Concepts:

1. Phantasy: Klein argued that infants and young children possess a rich fantasy life that manifests soon after birth.  She assumes that infants have a rather well-developed, pre-programed set of narratives for understanding the world.  These fantasies, most of which are unconscious, shape children’s conscious perceptions of the world and determine their relationships with others.  These “others” are called objects.
2. Object Relations: The first object is likely the mother's breast (or the bottle if the breast is not available). Klein posited that the infant's experiences with that breast, both good and bad, form the basis of their later object relations.  She described children as taking “positions” which I am going to poorly define as the mechanism by which a child relates to external objects.
3. Paranoid-Schizoid Position: Klein’s ideas have been described as “dark” because she thought a lot about the less desirable traits that children have.  Klein emphasizes aggression (aka the death instinct or Thanatos), whereas Sigmund Freud put more emphasis on pleasure (aka the life instinct or Eros). The paranoid-schizoid position is a developmental stage characterized by an infant's experience of anxiety and fear. The infant splits objects (such as the mother’s breast) into good and bad parts in order to manage the overwhelming anxieties associated with the stress of being a baby.  The baby either feels protected and nourished, or persecuted and angry toward the mother/breast.  The greatest fear is loss of the breast, which forms the basis of an infant's paranoia about the world.
4. Depressive Position: The next position to develop is the depressive position, and it describes how a child changes during the weaning process.  The characteristics of this change persist throughout life.  If successful, the infant develops a capacity for empathy and concern for others.  The depressive position occurs because a child increasingly becomes aware of the whole object (the mother) and experiences unconscious guilt and remorse for prior destructive fantasies against the “bad” part of the object.  No longer is the infant anxious only about their own survival, but they start to feel anxiety about the survival of their object.  After this, there is a kind of oscillation between the paranoid-schizoid and the depressive positions throughout like in a kind of balance.  
5. Projective Identification: The oscillations between positions is illustrated by a defense mechanism called Projective Identification, where the individual projects unwanted parts of the self onto others but then goes further.  After the projection, whatever undesirable or split of part of the self was projected becomes changed by its interaction with the object it was projected onto.  Next, a person then introjects (or unconsciously readopts) the same characteristic, but in a morphed form.  In this way, the line between the identities of objects can get blurred and they can oscillate between positions.  A child may even suppose that they can control these external objects as if they were merely parts of themselves, until they reinter the depressive position and regret what they have done.

Margaret Mahler's Separation-Individuation Theory

While I find Klein to be rather dense and difficult to understand, I find Mahler a bit more palatable.  Also, Mahler appears to take a bit more of an empirical approach by incorporating more observations about how infants actually act and less speculation about their unconscious conflicts.

Margaret Mahler was a psychiatrist, pediatrician and object-relations psychoanalyst, and she emphasizes a process called separation and individuation during the first two years of life. This approach suggests that infants initially experience a state of symbiosis with their mothers, and then gradually develop a sense of self and independence.

Mahler's theory outlines four phases of separation-individuation:

1. Autistic Phase (first few weeks): Infants are primarily focused on their own internal states and are relatively unaware of their external environment.  Mahler abandoned this phase later, instead starting with what was originally phase 2 or the symbiotic phase.
2. Symbiotic Phase (~0-5 months): Infants experience a state of fusion with their mothers, perceiving them basically as an extension of themselves.
3. Separation-Individuation Phase (~5-18 months): Infants begin to differentiate themselves from their mothers and explore their environment. This phase involves several subphases, including hatching, practicing, rapprochement, and consolidation.

1. Hatching (5-9 months):

• Shifting Focus: The infant begins to shift its focus from internal sensations to external objects, particularly the mother.
• Separation Anxiety: The infant starts to protest when separated from the mother, indicating the development of a sense of self and awareness of the mother's separateness.

2. Practicing (9-16 months):

• Increased Mobility: With newfound mobility, the infant explores the environment more independently, but they don’t go far, and if they suspect that their mother object is not close, they will immediately cry for help.
• Distance and Exploration: The child ventures further away from the mother, testing their limits and developing a sense of autonomy.
• Idealization of the Parent: The parent is seen as omnipotent and perfect.

3. Rapprochement (16-24 months):

• Ambivalence: The child experiences a desire for both independence and closeness to the parent, leading to feelings of ambivalence.  Ambitendency describes how a child might appear to angrily reject their primary caretaker in one moment, and then in the next, cling to them for comfort.
• Fear of Abandonment: The child may become clingy and anxious when the parent is not present.
• Testing Limits: The child may test the parent's limits and boundaries.

4. Consolidation (24-36 months):

• Object Constancy: The child develops a stable internal representation of the parent, allowing for separation without anxiety.
• Self-Identity: The child develops a stronger sense of self, including their own identity and individuality.
• Emotional Regulation: The child becomes better at regulating their emotions and coping with separation.

Conclusion

I want to reiterate here that all of these approaches to development attempt to describe what was considered normal or most common.  Anyone with a child with severe ADHD might have noticed that they were far less concerned about where mom was, wandered away without concern, and did not appear to have much stranger-danger at all.

Anna Freud and Klein both took Sigmund's primary framework and attempted to apply it to the normally developing child.  Anna emphasized environmental influences in development, the use of ego defenses, and postulated a more primary role for the ego in determining how well a child can balance the demands of life.  Because of this, she was concerned a lot about reinforcing ego strength.  Klein continued to emphasize unconscious processes as of primary importance, and developed ideas about object relations and the various ways that infants rely on, reject, identify with, fear the loss of, or are envious of these objects.  For Klein, there is an oscillation between paranoid-schizoid and depressive positions, where we tend to merge our own identities with others, then tear them apart.  Klein believed that children could be psychoanalyzed like adults, while Freud believed that children did not develop any useful transference to the analyst, so psychoanalysis was not possible.  Mahler, on the other hand, emphasized what she called separation-individuation, where a child slowly separates its identity from that of its primary object, generally the mother.

I am going to be done with the psychoanalytic, psychosexual approaches for now.  Later I am going to address some approaches that emphasize the quality of the attachment that an infant develops and how a child’s temperament affects this attachment.  Before I get there, I want to discuss some alternatives ways to conceptualize child development, starting with Piaget and onward to Erikson.

Until then, I am Dr. O’Leary and this has been an episode of PsyDactic Child and Adolescent Board Study Edition.