Can Mental Illness Research Improve AI Alignment?

This episode explores a research program that borrows ideas from computational psychiatry to improve the reliability of advanced AI systems. Instead of thinking about AI failures in abstract terms, the approach treats recurring alignment problems as if they were “clinical syndromes.” Deceptive behaviour, overconfidence, or incoherent reasoning become measurable patterns (analogous to delusional alignment or masking) giving us a structured way to diagnose what is going wrong inside large models.

The framework draws on how human cognition breaks down. Problems like poor metacognitive insight or fragmented internal states become useful guides for designing explicit architectural components that help an AI system monitor its own reasoning, check its assumptions, and keep its various internal processes aligned with each other.

It also emphasises coping strategies. Just as people rely on different methods to manage stress, AI systems can use libraries of predefined coping policies to maintain stability under conflicting instructions, degraded inputs, or high task load. Reality-testing modules add another layer of safety by forcing the model to verify claims against external evidence, reducing the risk of confident hallucinations.

Taken together, this provides a non-anthropomorphic but clinically informed vocabulary for analysing complex system behaviour. The result is a set of practical tools for making large foundation models more coherent, grounded, and safe.