Society and faith
This podcast invites listeners to reflect on their own beliefs and assumptions, urging a deeper examination of the building blocks of truth, reason, and faith that guide our lives.
In a world where information is abundant and perspectives are diverse, questions surrounding the nature of truth, reason, and faith remain as relevant as ever. A new exploration into these fundamental concepts challenges us to consider how truth is defined, tested, and understood in both individual and collective contexts.
This podcast dives into the relationship between objective truth and personal experience, suggesting that while truth may be universal, our interpretations are often shaped by personal encounters, biases, and cultural influences. Drawing on insights from philosophy, history, and human behavior, I draw the focus in the importance of transparency in methods of testing truth, advocating for approaches that are rigorous, reliable, and open to scrutiny.
At the heart of this series is the idea that while reason and logic are essential tools in our search for truth, faith also plays a crucial role. Faith should not be seen as blind or irrational but as a necessary complement to reason, providing the foundation for understanding what is yet to be fully revealed or understood.
Ultimately, the exploration suggests that truth, morality, and human understanding are interwoven in a complex tapestry shaped by both objective reality and subjective experience. It challenges us to navigate these concepts with humility, transparency, and a commitment to continual learning.
Thank you for trying out this podcast.
I want to give credit to my very good friend Jesse B. Glass, for creating the introduction-music to this podcast. He has also helped me edit the episodes. Thank you Jesse!
Society and faith
Transparency in methods
Click here to write us a note .
How have we come to know, and how we can affirm it with validation? A clear and visual approach to a claim will let you confide in your own understanding of things, but it is ourselves that are the testing instruments. It must be a trustworthy method that humanity can relate to, and the method must have the ability to be checked for flaws. Approach the steps with caution and be aware of the influence of self, culture and prejudice. To test a truth-statement the method of testing must be transparent and have the common acceptability as valid. It must rely on commonality, and the methods must receive the same results.
To be acceptant to different results is mandatory, because it cannot be a fixed experiment, which only works for selected groups. It is a prerequisite that the results be allowed to play out to know and understand cause and effect. A bias in expectance of results will skew the analysis. Therefore, past evidence and encounters must be recognized as a proclamation, or a hypothesis, until the individual can prove it.
To test an object for material content, we must find the elements it contains. We break it down and find the building blocks. Truth must be tested the same way. The test of causal effects, as Hume (Ayer, 2001) laid it out must eliminate any misinterpretation so that we know what comes before the other. Small microscopic details will change the results and create a different product.
Therefore, when thought or ideology is at it’s test, every aspect of the thought-line must be tested with thoroughness. Because it can have completely different results and might be at fault. To be cautious of the details is therefore quite important because it will not portray truth, if it doesn’t contain the elements of truth.
If you like this episode and the channel give it a rating and give a review and subscribe to the channel!
Also if you would like to get in contact with me you can click on "write us a note", write to my e-mail; robert.strommen@me.com or find me on instagram.com/societyandfaith/
Sources:
Ayer, A. J. (2001). Hume: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. OX2 6DP, UK: Oxford University Press.
