Indian Wells '26: Will Mboko stop Sabalenka? Fonseca shines vs Sinner, Empty crowd issue

After dominating Naomi Osaka, Aryna Sabalenka has another tough test in Victoria Mboko. The 19-year-old reached the Indian Wells quarterfinals of her debut in the desert and seeks revenge vs the World No.1 after losing their Australian Open match in January. Joao Fonseca gave a valiant effort in his highly competitive loss to Jannik Sinner. The tournament continues to struggle with poor crowd attendance for Stadium 2 matches. 

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:00

I was expecting two potential match of the year contenders today or yesterday with Sablenka Osaka and Anisimova Mboko, but Arena and Vicky both had other plans, dominating their oppositions to set a tasty quarterfinal clash in the desert. I'll preview that match, discuss Jo Alphonseca's impressive loss to Yannick Center and Indying Walls' empty crowd catastrophe. What's up, dudes? My name's Christian Bass Knight. Welcome to Christian's Court where I cover tennis from all angles. If you haven't yet already, make sure you subscribe and click that notification bell, dude, so you're notified whenever I post more vids, bro. Mm-mm. Seven and a half years after their first meeting at the 2018 US Open, Arena Sabalenka defeated Naomi Osaka in the battle of the four-time major champions with a score line of 6'2, 6'4 to reach the Indian Wells quarterfinal. This marks Arena's 15th straight quarterfinal at a tournament, which is incredible by the way. But Sablanka's team control really in all aspects of the match. And I wasn't expecting this, to be honest, because I thought Naomi would serve better and have a bit more firepower from the ground. Naomi, she had a subpar serving day today, for her standards at least. I feel like her toss was all over the place, and she hit three double faults in the one all game alone in the opening set to concede the opening break of the match. Naomi had decent success whenever she got it to Arena's forehand, but she wasn't able to do it as consistently. And she paid the price oftentimes whenever she did serve to Sablanka's backhand, which was the stronger uh side on her return, at least. And Sablanka, meanwhile, she was phenomenal behind her serve. She hit eight aces, zero double faults, and only allowed Osaka two total break opportunities, both of which Sablenka saved. And the zero double faults is impressive because it's not like Sablenka just spun it in. She really went after her second serves a lot of times. In addition to using, you know, the big power from the serve and from the ground, Arena incorporated a lot of variety, which was a huge X factor here. And she used her now trusty drop shots. She won nearly every point behind the drop shot. And she also came to the net quite a few times and served and volleyed even to change the rhythm. And she had good success behind that move. Arena herself said after the match, I was trying to change the rhythm and make sure that the ball comes back on her side at different heights and speeds. So I think that was the key of the match. And that high bouncing play from Arena was so intelligently executed because the ball already bounces higher, especially during the day time at Indian Wells. And it was also a smart way to prevent Osaka from hitting the ball that she likes to hit. I said this really a couple years ago, but Naomi needs to take notes from Arena and use more variety with her shots. And I feel like hopefully she'll learn from this word to Tower Banks. But like here in this point in particular, I think she should have sliced and came forward instead of hitting a top spin backhand and retreating back only to get beaten by Soblink up the line with her with her backhand. I honestly was a little bit disappointed. I was expecting a more competitive match from these two. Because Naomi also loves to produce her best tennis for the big marquee matchups. Maybe it being first on kind of took away from the you know the spectacle of it all. I'm surprised the tournament made that move. I think this could have been a prime time match, but alas. But still, overall, too, it was just tough, I think, for anyone to beat Arena with how well she played today. 31 winners, 16 unforced errors. I think Naomi would have beaten most players remaining in the draw with her form. She finished with 17 winners and also 17 unforced errors. Hopefully, though, like I said earlier, that this would be a wake-up call for Osaka and she can make adjustments in her game to be more well-rounded because she has the potential to do so, to come forward in the net, to use more slices, but I still feel like her game is a little bit too one-dimensional. Now, there's also an interesting dynamic to this Salabanka Osaka matchup because it was the first time that Naomi played someone representing Evolve, her former agency, which she and longtime agent Stuart Dugood co-founded. Osaka left Evolve late last year, and according to an interview with Ben Rothenberg's bounces, Naomi never owned any shares or equity in the company. And during this fourth-round match, Stuart Dugood was in Arena's player box. And that's interesting because from what I've noticed, you don't really see Stuart in the player box of matches of players he represents all that often. So I feel like it must have been an odd feeling for both of them, but especially Naomi, because he was really with Osaka from the beginning, from the very beginning. And Arena was asked in her post-match press conference if it makes a difference playing against someone like Naomi who used to be in her agency. And Sablenka said, not at all. I just feel sorry for her that she moved from Evolve back to IMG. I don't think that's a smart decision to do. By the way, Sabalenka was formerly with IMG, but she left Evolve apparently because she wanted more opportunities for herself. Sablenka went on to say, I'm happy, super happy now, because all the time they're kind of like balancing between me and Naomi. Now I get most of the attention, and I'm happy with that. Very interesting comments there from Sabalenka. Again, she left IMG last year to sign on with Evolve. And a reporter essentially relayed Sablenka's quotes to Naomi for her press conference, who had the following to say, was she laughing when she said it? Look, we're two different people, like for sure. I think her experiences aren't the same as mine, and I wouldn't have it any other way. For me, I've always loved IMG. I've been treated really well there, and the people there are really kind to me. I would recommend IMG to people. I guess she wouldn't. I think we have just two very different experiences at two different places. For now, it looks like Team Evolve won the battle, but I'm definitely looking forward to hopefully more Salabanka Osaka showdown soon because we definitely need more matches than just the two that we've seen thus far between them. And we'll also be getting a second installment of another edgy budding rivalry as Arena takes on now, next, 19-year-old Canadian Phenom, Victoria Mboko, in the Indian Wells quarterfinals. Mboko took care of Amanda Anisemova 6'4, 6'1 in just 73 minutes. Anisimova was dominant coming into this match. She had only dropped three games in her last four sets coming into it, and she had just dished Emirata Kano a double breaststick beatdown. But Vicky just has more firepower than Emma, and she was better able to exploit Anisimova's sometimes shaky forehand, which can be definitely hit or miss. And last night it was more miss than hit. I said that in Boco's forehand in my one of my previous videos that her forehand was more steady, and that factor proved to be really the most important factor of that of this match. And I think definitely a majority of Anis Mova's 16 unforced heirs were from that forehand wing. That said, Vicky played just another great match. 14 winners, seven unforced heirs. She won 72% of her total service points, so she's got to be happy with her performance. And this marks Mboko's third straight win against a top 10 player, and it's her fifth top 10 scalp overall. Vicky, she looked very different in this match. I mean, aside from the different hairstyle, which I love by the way, she seemed much more positive and happy out there competing. She's definitely more even killed, but sometimes she can be a little bit more negative, even when she wins points. But throughout the match, she was more positive, which I love to see. Now, like with Sal Blanca Osaka, I'm disappointed that Anisimova Mboko was not as competitive. I think Mboko would have won this match regardless, but I feel like the atmosphere could have been a lot better here, especially for Anis Mova with her being an American if it weren't played at the same time as Center Fonseca. I think Anis Mova Mboko for sure deserve the Stadium 1 slot. And Anisomova Mboko was played on Stadium 2. And unfortunately, Stadium 2 matches have lacked a lot of aura this year in Wells. And a major reason for this is the tournament's move from no longer granting ground pass holders access to Stadium 2 and their non-reserve seating in the upper levels. And we've seen a lot of empty seats for some very good quality matchups like NSM Oval and Boco, which is truly a shame. Ground pass holders formerly had access to courts two through nine, and stadium one ticket holders they also cannot access Stadium 2 upper reserve seats. Even the US Open grants Authorash ticket holders first come, first served access to Louis Armstrong, Grand Stand, and all the other outside courts. The Stadium 2 ticket is actually a decent deal itself because it offers all day access to the matches played on that court. Plus, ticket holders can still get access to all the other courts aside from Stadium 1. But most people who buy seats for Stadium 2 are not going to stay on Stadium 2 or watch Stadium 2 matches for the entire day. They might go and watch other matchups going on. And in a statement sent to the Athletic, the tournament said, in advance of this year's tournament, we have decided to evolve ticket offerings in Stadium 2 to charge the upper both seat sales from general admission to reserve ticketing. Like every decision we make, we carefully evaluate it after each tournament's conclusion, and that analysis informs future policies. So a very nothing burger of a statement from the tournament. Hopefully, the tournament does evaluate and goes back to how it was before because this is just a terrible look for the sport, and the top players don't deserve this. But focusing on Salablanka and Boco, Arena won their lone previous meeting, which was at the Australian Open fourth round uh two months ago by a score of 6176. Arena was dominant for most of the match. She led by a set and a double break, and she played great, but Vicky struggled to make inroads with her own serve. Mboko won just 50% of her first serve points, which is not great at all. Salanka did tell off a little bit, and Imboco rose her level, and she came within two points of winning the second set. Arena shut her out though in the tie break, winning it 7-1, and she was simply unplayable. And when talking about the Salanka matchup, Mboko had this to say in her post-match press conference. She generates a really good ball. I feel like she was able to push me off the court a lot more and was able to really stay aggressive against me. So hopefully I can hold my ground a little bit more against her and try to kind of even it out a little bit more. It was my first time playing on a Grand Slam center court too. So I feel like there was a lot going on in my head. It's a new day, new tournament. I'm expecting a more competitive match from start to finish for this one. The first set in Melbourne was very one-sided, and I think Mboko, like she said herself, will probably be more adjusted for the occasion of facing Salanka. And Vicky gets up even more, I feel, for facing top opposition, as she's on a three-match winning streak against top 10 players. Her last loss was against Sal Blanca herself. Arena's best bet, I think, is to honestly win this in straight sets. Mboko has won her last six three-set matches, so she's a great three-set player whenever things are pushed to the distance. I also think the result might depend on the time of day in which the matches played. Arena will prefer to play during the day. She played all of her matches during that time. And Boko's last two matches have been at night. And the conditions are different. They're like night and day. I mean, no pun intended. I feel like during the day, Arena can use her variety a little bit more with varying spins and heights, like she did against Naomi. I do think Arena's playing better tennis right now, and she kind of looked unplayable low-key against Osaka. Meanwhile, Anisimova Counsky are good players, of course, but they were also just too error prone. And I think Arena will better challenge Vicky's consistency. This pick is subject to change low-key depending on the time of day in which the match is played, but right now I'm having Sabalenka take this in two tight sets. Now, arguably, the story of the tournament is 21-year-old Aussie Talia Gibson. Gibson has already won six matches this tournament. She had to qualify for the main draw, and she was 0-9 against top 50 players before this tournament. Not only did she beat four top 50 players thus far in Indian Wells, but she's knocked out three top 20 players in a row, Ikaterina Alexandrova, Clara Towson, and now Jasmine Paolini. She beat the seventh seed Paolini 7-5-2661. Gibson is the first Aussie woman to reach the Indian Wells quarterfinals since Casey DeLaca did it in 2014. And DeLacqua was also a qualifier during that tournament. And I've had my eye on Gibson for a little bit. She really impressed me at the Australian Open despite losing in the second round because she had three match points against Deanna Schneider, but just couldn't convert. But still, she has a really big power game. She hit 44 winners, 42 unforced errors against Paolini. And really, it's just an insane run because Talia had just three tour-level main draw wins to her name before ending wells. And she's 110 in the world right now. Now she's up to 67 in the live rankings, and she could rise to 55 if she wins her quarterfinal against Linda Noskova. Now, Noskova's gonna be a tough woman to beat because she put on an absolute clinic against Alex Ayala, dominating the Filipina 6'2, 6 love in just 55 minutes. It was a ruthless display from Noscova, who finished with 25 winners to 11 unforced airs. She was also dominant on serve, winning 77% of her first serve points and 81% of her second serve points. It was really the opposite for Alex, who struggled a lot behind her serve. Iala won just 36% of her first serve points, which just would not cut it, period, against anybody. It's long been an area for improvement, but matches like this really highlight that weakness. Noscova also overpowered her from the ground and was just simply phenomenal. And I feel like if she keeps this up, Linda could really take this entire tournament. Now on the men's side, the big blockbuster match, of course, of the day was between Yannick Center and Joel Fonseca. And this one actually did live up to the hype and expectation. The world number two beat the Brazilian Phenom in two tiebreak sets in just over two hours to progress to his third quarterfinal at Tennis Paradise. I felt like Fonseca could definitely test center and maybe even take a set off of him just because of how well he played against Tommy Paul the round prior. But I thought it'd be a pretty big challenge for him to do so and sustain that level with this being his first big marquee matchup against someone like Yannick's caliber. But Joao really proved that he is made for these big match occasions, and he showed us very early on that he came to play. Fonseca had the first break look of the match in Yannick's opening service game, but center sound defense got him out of trouble. Yannick had a couple break point opportunities himself at three all and four all, but Joao here showed big cojones. He saved the first break point with the big serve plus one, and he escaped the second with a gutsy 118 mile per hour second serve. It's very rare to see a guy not only consistently match center pound for pound from the ground with pace, but sometimes even out hit him. And Joao did that to grant himself three set points up 6-3 in the opening set tie break. I don't think Joao really did much wrong to let those set points go by. I think Yannick was pretty dominant on his serve whenever he faced the set points on his serve. The one point where Fonseca had set point on his racket, yeah, you can't really miss shots like that. The forehand that was sent long, but it's still tough, especially on a big point like that. I thought Fonseca might go away in the second set, but really Joao's level didn't really dip. Even when he got broken and went down 2-5, he kept his head up and kept plugging away to force a tie break, where center once again just raised his level just that notch higher to advance. And Fonseca said it best himself. He said those little details are just super important, like when he played the important points, how he deals with it. So, of course, I still need a lot of experience, but I think the level is still there. Of course, I can play against them. There are many more things to improve, but I feel happy with the way that I played because I felt the level was pretty close today. This to me is a statement loss for Joao. I know that's a crazy thing to say, but I feel like at least he quieted quite a few critics who were just calling him overhyped and not as talented as people make him out to be, like a week ago. And I do think people were, you know, doing a little bit too much with the hype, I'll say that. But I think the critics were also doing a lot in and bashing him because less we forget he's still 19 years old. He has a long career career ahead of him, and he just also might naturally have more ebbs and flows with his form, especially with him still being so young. He was really peaking his last two matches against Paul and Center. I think just his normal base level needs to rise, and when it does, we'll see him make more deep runs. He also had that back injury to start the season, so now that he's healthy and confident, perhaps he can make a deep run in Miami where the crowd will be even more in his favor. And it's also a great sign that he produced this high level against one of the sports greats. He came for blood, literally, because that 120 mile per hour forehand almost took Yannick out. I know his life flashed before his eyes. Another young star, Lerner Tien, is up next for center. Lerner saved two match points before defeating Alejandro Davidovic Fokina 466176. According to Miles David, this is the 13th match where Alejandro has lost from match point up. So not great for him, of course. But in Davidovich Fokina's defense, there's not too much he did wrong on those two match points. The second one was just a good serve from Lerner. The first match point, he had a chance. It was a pretty long rally, but he ended it with a pretty tough backhand volley to execute there. I think maybe he could have waited and let that one bounced, but alas, nothing he can do about it now. This will be Yannick and Lerner's second ever career meeting. They met for the first time in the Beijing finals last year, where Yannick won 6-2-6-2. I feel like Lerner overcompensated in this match. He tried, I think, too much to match Yannick with pace. I wonder what strategy he'll employ in Indian Wells. 10 also didn't serve that great in that Beijing final. Zero aces, six double fault, won just 55% of his first serve points. I think that'll be the big thing. Can he protect his serve? I think a good thing for Lerner is that he has improved his serve considerably since then. So I think he has a good opportunity to show that improvement. Still, I do think Yannick will be too good for Lerner, and I'll have him winning this one by a score of like 6'4-6-4. Another young star, 21-year-old Archer Feast, is through to his second straight Indian Wells quarterfinals, as I correctly predicted, when he defeated his fellow French-speaking, light-skinned brother, Felix Auger Al-Yassim, 6'3, 7-6. These two played in Montpellier last month, where FAA won pretty routinely, only dropping six games. But that was indoors, where Felix obviously plays his best tennis, and Arthur was playing his first tournament since the injury layoff coming back from the back issue. And he played at a very high level for the first set and a half of this match. He led 4-2 in the second set, but then the error started coming, and FAA capitalized on them. And he really, Felix should have forced it to a third set at least. He was up 5-0 in the tie break and he had five total set points, but Arthur produced some really gutsy tennis to come through in the end. And up next for Feast is Alexander Zverev, who defeated Francis Tiafo for the seventh straight time by a score of 6-3-6-4. Zverev now improves to 9-1 against Tiafo. Feast has a better head-to-head record against Zverev. He's 2-4 against the German, and he also won their last meeting on hard court at the Miami round of 16 last year. A first 1000 semifinal will be on the line for Feast. Meanwhile, a first Indian Wells semifinal is on the line for Zverev, as this is the only 1000 event where Zverev has failed to reach the final four. I'm going to be having Arthur take this one in three sets as I predicted him to win this very match in my tournament preview. Ending the video away from Indian Wells, I want to talk about the Austin 125 challenger going on right now. And Bianca Andrescu, the 2019 US Open Champion, scored her first top 100 win of the season when she defeated the third seed Solana Sierra in three sets. This is Andrescu's best win by ranking since June 2025. So great for her. Now, not so great news for the top seed in Austin. Emma Navarro gotta have a moment of silence for her, like I had a moment of silence for Sloane Stevens because it's been a god-awful season for the American. She fell in the opening round to Lulussoon 6'4-6-4, and that marks Navarro's fourth straight match loss. And it's not like she's losing to players that are so good, that are better than her. Every woman she's lost to, she was ranked higher than. So this is just not a good look. She's now four and nine on the year. Hopefully, she can get her act together, maybe in Charleston, her home tournament. I don't know, but yeah, not great for M. Navarro. But that's all I have for this Indian Wells update video. Let me know your thoughts on all the matches that went down from Sal Blanca Osaka to Mboco and Samova and give your own picks and predictions for Sao Blanca Mboco. Also, let me know your thoughts on Fonseca's impressive loss to Yannick and if you think that Lerner has a solid shot at taking down the Italian. Again, make sure you subscribe and click that notification bell so you're notified whenever I post my next Indian Wells update video. Thank you all so much for watching and for your. support and I will see you all next time here on Christian's Court.