Trending

Not Another Conspiracy Theory... | Trending Ep296

Ickonic Season 16 Episode 18

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 18:31

 Is Egypt the next one in the gunsights? Atomic Energy board in bed with Israel. Didn't take long for Russia to be blamed for attacks on UK bases. Lab-Grown meet in the UK within 5 years.

You can watch the full episode FOR FREE over on https://ickonic.com/Watch/3736

Link to our sponsor: https://tzla.club/

You can also subscribe to Ickonic to receive…

-  New Content Daily
-  Feature-Length Documentaries
-  Exclusive Original Series

Start your journey today for just £1.99 for the first month 

Support the show

Watch the Full Episode Now!
Catch the latest episode in full at Ickonic.com or on Ickonic's YouTube and X channels.

Why Join Ickonic?
Your gateway to alternative media, ground-breaking stories, and unique insights.

🔸 New Content Daily
🔸 Feature-Length Documentaries
🔸 Exclusive Original Series

Start your journey today for just £1.99 for the first month at www.ickonic.com

Today's Sponsors

Red Life Devices

Discover the power of Red Light Therapy:
Join the webinar here.

APE Nutrition
Fuel your body with premium nutrition!
Shop at apenutrition.co.uk/IckonicMedia and use code 'ickonicmedia' for 10% off.

Ickonic Coffee
New Ickonic Coffee - Wake Up World - Use the code 'trending' for 10% off - https://shop.ickonic.com/product/ickonic-coffee-wake-up-world-grounded-or-beans

SPEAKER_00

Well, the Greater Israel Project is just a conspiracy theory, and if you say otherwise, you are a racist, anti-Semitic Nazi, okay? Regardless of how much evidence comes out that the exact lands that the RDF are attacking and occupying just happen to fit with the exact maps of the Greater Israel Project, you are a conspiracy theorist and you should be silenced. Okay? Let's just get that out. Right. From the current report, Israeli media are reporting that Egypt is quietly increasing its military build-up in the Sinai Desert, which is the desert between the edge of the Gaza Strip and obviously mainland Egypt, if you like. It's the bit that borders the Red Sea. And it's transforming what they'll call the demilitarized buffer zone into a major military stronghold. Now, that Sinai Desert is obviously part of the Greater Israel project. What we're also seeing is the fact that the Israeli media are now talking about that being a genuine battle zone. So that would do exactly what they want, which is it would create a war zone where they can then occupy, because they have a vastly superior military technologically, and they have obviously the backing of the United States. It gives them an opportunity to take that land, which would then never be given back, just like the Golan Heights, just like areas of southern Lebanon, just like more areas of Syria that have been taken, just like the West Bank, areas of Jordan. When there's conflict and conflict over a certain period of lap a piece of land, it never gets given back. It just becomes either a buffer zone. So therefore you extend your land more, or it actually gets incorporated into your land, like the Golon Heights, for example. It's quite difficult, isn't it, to still call people conspiracy theorists, still hide behind anti-Semitism. But it's very clear to see, and we've said this many times, it's very clear to see why they do that. Because whether you're speaking about anything, and we've spoke about this many a time in different contexts, when the facts aren't on your side, they have to lie. Whether that be about statistics, like we've seen with like we saw with COVID, like we saw with vaccines, like we saw with other things, if the statistics don't support your narrative, then lie. Climate change is not a good example. And in certain cases here, if admitting the truth about a situation or admitting the truth about your aspirations in a certain scenario would not get you public support, lie. And it's backfiring because even with the lies, two things are happening. One, people aren't believing the lies in such bigger numbers, and secondly, people still are calling them out for what they're doing and what they're claiming they're doing. Whether you believe that Israel wants to walk in and take over Gaza or not, or whether you believe in the Greater Israel project or not, in terms of whether they are trying to achieve it, they're not winning this battle of in the court of public opinion. What they've done in Gaza, what they're doing currently in Iran, what they're doing currently in Lebanon. People are calling it out like never before. And it's very, very good and refreshing to see for a number of reasons. One, people are talking about it for the first time ever. And secondly, the big one, and I'm sure many of you will appreciate this as well, is people aren't afraid to talk about it anymore. You know, not too long ago, people were terrified to mention Israel. Terrified to mention what was going on between them and the Palestinians, or what was going on between them and the Lebanese, and obviously now what's going on between them and the Iranians. They were terrified because you were labelled a racist, you were labelled anti-Semitic, you were labelled a Nazi, you were labeled a Jew hater or whatever. And you'd get pylons to try and get you cancelled from whatever it is you were doing, whether it was your job, whether it was your social circle, your TV job if you had one, journalists were attacked, your social media presence, all of those things were attacked. And it was very coordinated. But it's gone too far now because so many people are calling this out that they can't sack, delete, fire, and abuse everybody. They try and they focus on some of the more uh prominent, high-profile names that are talking about this. But you go on to X on any given day, and you will see the number of people questioning the narrative coming out of Tel Aviv is higher than it's ever been, and that is fantastic. And particularly the fact that that's happening in America more than ever before, where America have obviously been sold this concept that Israel is their greatest ally and it's you know it's their baby brother they've got to look after. But with more evidence coming out that people are seeing about things like USS Liberty, 9-11, and other situations where Israel have directly attacked America, it's very clear that that support is waning. And it's fantastic to see because more and more is being exposed. But this Greater Israel project is not a conspiracy theory, the maps exist, the maps that show the Nile to the Euphrates is what they want, from the river to the sea and all of that. And it's very obvious when you just look at the land that's being invaded and occupied, that that alongside the map, as you can see here, go hand in hand. So I don't know at what point denying it becomes unsustainable because in order to achieve the Greater Israel project, at some point they've got to do it. And if you spend all this time denying it to then go and do it anyway, people are just gonna go like, excuse me, what you've spent all this time denying it, and now so there'll there'll be something that will happen to allow them to shift their narrative from this being a conspiracy theory and quiet and it being obvious to someone who's researched it what they're doing, and obvious to somebody to be fair, anyone who's looked at it, but they will they will struggle to do that right now, they'll have to bait and switch in a in a particular fashion in order to in order to be able to um to sell this to the public. Right, the next um story that we are going to talk about is leaked documents that have been released by the Iran an Iranian media agency that reveal that the International Atomic Energy Agency chief Raphael Grossi has been fully coordinating with Israel to carry out its directives. Okay. So you've got a situation where you know that a war in this region where around 30%, I think it is, or no, so it's higher than that, of the of the world's oil comes from that region through countries like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE, Iran itself. And you know that the Strait of Hamous is obviously one of the biggest shipping um lanes in the world, I think around 50 ships a day on average, and it's run and controlled in parts by Iran. It comes under their territorial waters at its narrowest point. So you know that a conflict in that region is going to have massive knock-on effects to the rest of the world. Of course it is. It can't not, it can't not so by creating a conflict there, you know that this is simply an inevitability. And the fact that the world has been dragged into war without so much as a conversation around the impact that this would have shows the I would say incompetence, but it's not incompetence because it's carefully designed. It shows the contempt that these so-called leaders have for the people that they represent. Because your job as a leader in any context is to protect and take care of the people that you represent. That's the job of a leader. If you don't want to do that, then don't become a leader. Very simple. Especially the leader of a country. Your job is to make decisions in the best interests of the people that you are representing who have put you in the position you are in. Now, obviously, we know that system doesn't work because we know that that's not the dynamic that there is. They work for the people in the shadows that have paid for them to be there rather than put them there. But the point is that on the surface, if they are supposedly representing us, they've taken countries into a war or embroiled countries into a war that has had a knock-on effect at the petrol pumps, knock on effect on your energy prices. Even this week I was reading has a knock-on effect on mortgage prices here in Britain. Mortgage offers are being pulled because of interest rates being very up and down as a result of this conflict. You've created tension on the streets, you've created tensions within families and workplaces. It's it's extremely bizarre that people don't seem to be calling this out in such a way. But the connections is what's is one thing that I want to talk about here. The connections between this uh Raphael Grossi is quite an interesting read, to say the least. I'm gonna put up some documents now that you will see. Some of these are in are in various different languages. The International Atomic Energy Agency Um has always been compromised. It's always been compromised. It's always allowed Israel to do whatever it wants in terms of nuclear weapons. They they have a nuclear program which they don't ask about, which they don't tell anyone about, which they don't allow inspectors to come and see, and all of that, while they, you know, spout narratives so that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon. Iran are doing this, Iran are doing that. When let's not forget, now I have no skin in the game for the Iranian regime at all, but on this subject, I don't believe for a second they're trying to create nuclear weapons. I don't believe that they have been, and they have allowed inspectors in to see their nuclear facilities, which they say is entirely peaceful for nuclear power. Now, there's nuclear power in multiple countries, including the one I'm sat in now, and nobody is accusing this country of about to go start nuclear war when Britain actually does have nuclear weapons. If nuclear weapons exist, that's another rabbit hole to go down. But work on the assumption that they do for the for the basis of this story. You go around telling everybody that they can't have them, while as far as I can remember, there is one nation in the world that has ever fired a nuclear weapon, in fact, fired two, and that's the home of the free, land of the brave, isn't it? It's not Israel, it's not Iran, it's not North Korea, it's the United States of America in 1945 when they dropped bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima in Japan. That killed tens of thousands of civilians. And if you believe the official narrative around nuclear weapons, the weapons that exist today blow those ones into the water in terms of the impact that they would have. And you go around spouting to everybody else about morality. It's not even it's not even funny, but it but it almost is. It's like being a gangster and then going and telling everybody else to be peaceful, to l to love, man, to let it go, don't be violent. You're a gangster, mate. Well, that's essentially the US military. It's gangsters. They do what they want. They're the world's police while doing and well, basically doing whatever they want. They'll bomb a school with hundreds of Iranian girls in there and get and kill them. No, it's fine, it's America. Someone else did that, you'll be in The Hague, mate. That's a war crime, that. Let's put an ICC arrest warrant out. No, no, it's it's it's the US. No, fine, don't worry about it. Don't worry about it. And I've I've I feel so sorry for for people in America who who see through this who what's been done in their name, essentially, because there is obviously a stigma attached to that, and people across the world will look at America and Americans in a certain light because of what their military and their regimes do across the world, and that's not right. I don't want to be judged based on what Keir Starmer does. I don't think he's done anything that I agree with yet. So, same principle lies to the Americans, but this story just sums up how controlling all sides, how bought and paid for people in these key positions are. These key positions that dictate policy, these key positions that dictate the information that is given, is incredibly important. So this lady has got connections into Israel, she's the head of the atomic agency that was judging whether Iran was creating nuclear weapons or not. What do you think the chances are that she's objective about the information she received from Iran when she is owned by Israel, and you know that Israel wants a war with Iran? So if she goes back empty-handed and says, ah, they're not creating nuclear weapons, that's not great for the narrative, is it? It reminds me very much of uh Dr. David Kelly. I don't know if many of you around the world will remember that story. So Dr. David Kelly was a UK government um guy who was tasked to basically figure out whether Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction back in 2002, 2003. And he concluded that they didn't. And that man mysteriously committed suicide in a forest after going for a walk. After emailing a friend saying, I'll speak to you later, I'm going for a walk. They had to get rid of him because a weapons inspector saying this isn't true would have been damning to the support for an invasion in 2003 when Blair and Bush led the US and UK in. So they took him out. So, one, this lady I'm sure will be fully aware that that happened and fully aware of the consequences for not doing her job as far as the cult's concerned, which is giving them a justification to go and invade Iran, as they have. And secondly, she'll be she's been there from day one to do exactly this. Who's her allegiance to? And that's the point with all these people who have allegies to different people. If you're elected to a certain body, if you're elect whether it's the atomic agency, whether it's the UN, whether it's the ICC, whatever it is, your allegiance should be to that organization doing its job, which should be objective impartiality. And if you're the leader of a country or if you're an MP in a particular country, a particular place, your allegiance should be to that country or the people of that constituency that elected you. You shouldn't be on the board of a foreign government's agency. You shouldn't be on the board of a lobby group for a foreign power. Speak to your Lindsey Grahams, you know, I'm Israel first. You're a United States senator. You're not an Israeli senator. All these Labour MPs that are Labour friends of Israel, all these conservative MPs that are conservative friends of Israel, all the US lot that are members of APAC and others. You're on the board of an agency that supports a foreign government. Imagine if there was a North Korean friends, Labour Party group. Do you think people would be like, oh yes, fine, yes, fine. Of course it is, yeah. Like Kim, nice bloke. Of course they wouldn't. So why is it different? And that is to go back to the point I raised at the top of this story, that is why the censorship around this subject has been so prolific for years, because they need to hide what they're doing. They need to censor people, they need to belittle people, they need to abuse people into submission because the real truth comes out about the scale of control and manipulation that Israel has infesting not just Britain, not just America, but entire Western governments, corporations, media outlets, and so on. If that really was exposed, unredacted, and people saw it, even conspiracy researchers like myself and like you would be shocked at the scale and depth of manipulation that comes from that regime. Not that population of people, not that religious ideology, that regime. And that's why there's been so much aggressive censorship and abuse over the last few years to prevent that from happening. Right, if you're watching with us on YouTube or X, thank you for joining me. We're gonna head over to iconic.com, we're gonna talk a little bit about Iraq, we're gonna talk a bit about Ben Shapiro, Yawn, and we're gonna talk about lab grown meat. I'll see you over there.

SPEAKER_01

Don't mention the reps in those days. Even less is said about the grey pipe, which some believe to be the true ruling power in the Vatican.

SPEAKER_00

Humans are missing lack of dress.

SPEAKER_01

All of them have little sickness. I've never seen it before. It's a transition that this is the ultimate suicide. The symbols around us every day are each elemental. We must have these. What is their instruction?