Peace Was NEVER The Plan... Here's What's Really Happening | Trending Ep304

This morning Jaymie discusses Trump's claims of negotiations with Iran, Israel says it will take control of large buffer zone in southern Lebanon as part of their campaign against Hezbollah, a Labour energy minister gives fuel update insisting UK drivers should continue as normal, despite suggestions from the International Energy Agency that people should work from home and drive slower. And the UK government will see 300 teens take part in a trial involving social media bans, digital curfews and time limits on apps.

You can watch the full episode FOR FREE over on https://ickonic.com/Watch/3761

You can also subscribe to Ickonic to receive…

-  New Content Daily
-  Feature-Length Documentaries
-  Exclusive Original Series

Start your journey today for just £1.99 for the first month

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:04

Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Wednesday's episode of Trending. I hope you're having a good week wherever you are. Well, we're going to carry on talking about what's going on in the Middle East. We're going to come and cover a couple of stories here in Britain, and we're going to talk about an inevitable story that we covered weeks and weeks ago and said that this was coming. So let's dive into all of that this morning on the show. Trump says that negotiations to end the Iran war, the war that he and Israel started, are happening right now, and apparently Iran is talking sense. Now, Gareth covered a story last week to do with a British diplomat that was involved in the talks between the US, UK, and Iran negotiating prior to this conflict starting, and he said that Iran was basically prepared to give up everything. Iran had given up everything Trump wanted. And that Whitcroft and Kushner still went back to the US and advised him to invade. Now, the reason they did that is because peace was never on the cards. Peace was never the plan. We said this months and months ago. I remember back in June last year when the strikes were exchanged between Israel, the US, and Iran. Then all of a sudden, from nowhere, the peace came quite quickly. I remember we covered then that this was short-term because the long-term goal was always war with Iran. So peace was always going to be a short-term solution, and something was always going to happen to justify in the minds of the public, or not in this case actually, but for the establishment to use as a justification to go again. They just weren't quite ready then. But now they are. So Whitcroft, Kushner went to these negotiations, knowing full well that the outcome was going to be the US invasion and Israeli invasion of Iran. There was never any doubt of that. Iran could have literally done anything, but this invasion was still going to happen. So I don't believe for a second that Iran is trying to build a nuclear weapon. Iran's been two weeks away from a nuclear weapon for about 50 years. I don't have any skin in the game for the Iranian regime. I think they're a despicable regime, and the way they treat their people is absolutely disgraceful. And like all conflict, civilians are the ones that suffer. But equally, they're not trying to destroy Israel and they're not trying to bomb Britain, the US, Europe with nuclear weapons. They're not trying to do that. We saw exactly the same thing in 2003 with Saddam Hussein weapons of mass destruction. That was not true either. We've seen the chemical weapons debacle, which was again not true in Syria. All of these things were designed to create this bogeyman which allows them to go and do what they want to do. So peace was never on the cards, unfortunately. And the saddest part of it is the people of Iran. I know people in Iran, and having spoken to them in recent weeks, they feel very, very in the middle because they don't like the regime. They don't like the regime, the Ayatollahs and the way they're treated. But equally, they know that any regime change that's backed by the US and Israel is not going to be any better either. So they feel in a real catch-22, like a double-edged sword, they're staring down. And that's the saddest part of it, because in conflict of any kind, civilians, innocent civilians, are always the ones that suffer. They're always the collateral damage in the giant chess game of this cult. While they're playing video games, essentially, pressing buttons, dropping bombs, real people are suffering. Real people are losing their homes, real people are losing their lives, real people are not able to feed their families. But who cares, eh? We've got an agenda to fulfill. The sad thing is that's the reality of it. That's the mindset of these people. So essentially, if there is talks, and the talks appear to have been heavily instigated by the US rather than the other side, then I wonder why they're happening. I think a potential reason they are happening is because this is not going to plan. Iran have not capitulated in the way that it was expected they may have. And Trump and his ego need to save face in some way, shape, or form. Because this conflict that was meant to be an easy one, and the greatest military in the world, as he likes to tell everyone, he's responsible for rebuilding, are not doing what they said they were going to do, are they? They're not walked in and taken over. The Iranians are showing quite a big resistance. And equally, in the court of public opinion, which as much as they they spout rhetoric that suggests they don't care what we think, they do. That's why the propaganda is so strong. You don't use propaganda and gaslighting on a population that you don't care about what they think. They don't care as much as they should, but they can't be as belligerent as we think they can because they wouldn't do all these things to try and get us on board if they genuinely didn't care at all. So they are trying to circumvent that public opinion which is on the floor. On the floor at the moment. The opinion of the US, the opinion of Israel. So they've got to do something. Because after all, this is the peace president, right? This is the man that was going to end wars in 30, in 24 hours. This is the man that had started no new wars in his first regime. Madness. But it does appear that there is some cracks in the relationship between Israel and the US. Now, whether this is just for public opinion or whether this is something that's real, time will tell. Vice President J.D. Vance is on his way to Pakistan to be part of these peace talks with Iran. And where did he stop off on the way? Tel Aviv. For a meeting with Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu. Because that's what you do, obviously, isn't it? If you're the most powerful nation in the world, you obviously go and land in a tiny one to chat to their president on the way to a peace deal. Of course you don't. He's gone there to get his orders because Trump may well be owned by Israel, but he's also got a huge ego. Whereas JD Vance is absolutely owned by Israel down to his core. He's had his entire political career funded by Peter Till, who's as in the club as anybody. So that man, without a shadow of a doubt, I would say is higher up the food chain and more connected than Trump himself. So he's also trying to position himself, isn't he, to run for president in the next election in 2028. Now, whether he does and whether he wins, I think is highly unlikely given the popularity of all of them on the back of this war. But obviously he stopped there on his way to Pakistan to be part of these peace talks. But on the surface, there is cracks between Israel and the US. Israel are apparently, according to Trump, out of control. They're bombing energy sites, they're bombing civilian infrastructure. And also, they're dropping large numbers of bombs in southern Lebanon as well, because that's what you do, isn't it? You've got a conflict that you're saying is threatening your very existence coming from another country in Iran. You then go and bomb another country, don't you? A country that has no military, a country that is where people live in incredible poverty, a country that you occasionally go and bomb whenever you feel like it anyway, that are not going to fire things back. It's not a conflict, there's no repercussions really for Israel of bombing there. It's a land grab. And we'll dive into that more in the second story. But in terms of in terms of the end of this conflict, it's I I don't really know where this ends. I've sat sat sat and said this a couple of times that this could go many different ways because chaos, order out of chaos, obviously is a freemasonic motto, and conflict creates chaos, and it doesn't just create chaos in the Middle East, it creates a knock-out effect of chaos. So many of the stories we're going to talk about this morning and that we've covered over the last few weeks involve collateral damage of conflict, of this conflict, on the rest of the world, whether it be energy prices, whether it be mortgages, whether it be food supplies, whether it be potential violence on the streets of any given country. You know, there's so many potential ways that this can be used, manipulated, and the more it's prolonged, the more it creates more devastation. So a swift end and everything going back to normal. What objectives have been completed then in terms of the occult, in terms of the agenda? Because they've talked about regime change in Iran. They want regime change. Well, they've not done that yet. They've talked about a complete destruction of its military infrastructure. Well, they're still firing ballistic missiles and drones in response to these attacks, so they've not done that yet. So, in terms of these objectives that the cult have to completely obliterate Iran, they've not achieved them. So let's say they sign a peace deal today, where they say, okay, Iran have agreed to not have a nuclear weapon. Well, we've been here before, because they signed that deal with Obama, didn't they? They've also repeatedly said that they have no interest in creating a nuclear weapon. Their nuclear program is peaceful for power. So what happens if that deal is then signed? Are we going to see a conflict again in two years because oh Iran have broken the terms of their agreement and we need to go and stop it? Does that leave the door ajar for further bombardment, further conflict? Probably. Or do they go whole hog until they they feel they've achieved what they are set out to achieve, or what the target of this conflict was, which was complete destruction of the Iranian regime. And the appointment of the Shah, which is clearly their man that they want back. That's why he's been you know wheeled out, that's why he's been seen kissing the Western Wall. I I don't really know which way this could go. Because keeping the door ajar, because this isn't going as well as they thought it was, and Israel was taking a pound in, particularly in recent days from Iranian missiles, so buying themselves some time, which is essentially all they did last June. They bought themselves some time. They knew full well, as I said at the top, they were going to come back and do all of this. So they bought some time because interceptor missiles were running short in Israel, and the Iranian regime were retaliating. And all of a sudden, out of nowhere, Trump came out and went, No, it's over, it's over, we've signed a deal. And that ended it basically overnight, knowing full well they were going to come again once they'd restockpiled. And if you look at the military plane movements between the US and Israel between June and obviously this war starting this time, you'll see the amount of weaponry, the amount of infrastructure, air defences, and resources that were taken to Israel. They just re-rearmed essentially. So they knew that that was going to come again. So are we going to see something similar? Are we going to see an end to this conflict signed on paper? Everyone celebrates, but the doors ajar, knowing one more excuse further down the line that Iran have broken the terms or something like that, allows us to go again. So we leave our options open, essentially. We keep them on the hook. Or do we just go in and try and achieve what the aspirations of this cult and this agenda are right now? Or you could argue, just to finally point out a third option, you could argue that they've achieved the cult the cult's objectives already, because they've created global chaos. They're going to create fuel shortages, they've driven the price of things so high, whether that be food, oil, and so on. So they've created that chaos already. They've created a situation where people are scared, where people are worried about the future, whether that be actual safety or whether that be the ability to put food on the table. So it's very possible that they may well have achieved their objectives as well. Um so we will see. Time will tell. And unfortunately, during this time, more civilians are being targeted, more innocent people are losing their lives and losing their homes, and more people are sat in posh buildings in Washington or Tel Aviv, sipping tea and coffee, essentially playing a video game with the lives of innocent people. How anybody still has or ever had, to be fair, an ounce of respect or belief that the people in those positions do anything but whatever they're told to do by people a lot more powerful to them than me and you I'll never understand. Still seeing people online saying that Trump's brilliant, Trump's brilliant, he's done this, he's done that, what a genius. There's cognitive dissidence and there's cognitive dissidence, and there's outright stupidity and ignorance, and the aggression and vitriol you get from people when you call that out, because they don't want their hero questioned, do they? They don't want their hero questioned, they don't want to believe they've been duped, and I understand that it's not a nice feeling. It's also not a nice feeling when somebody takes away your hero. But that doesn't mean that you keep backing somebody who you can clearly see is not doing what they said they were going to do. Well, as I say, time will tell. Right, that's that for the free version on YouTube and Twitter. If you head over to iconic.com, click the link in the description below. We're going to talk about Lebanon, we're going to talk about Rachel Reeves, talk about fuel, and we're going to talk about a social media ban here in the UK, which don't worry, it's just a trial. See you there.

SPEAKER_01 14:11

Don't mention the reps, Dave. Even less is said about the Grey Pope, which some believe to be the true ruling power in the Vatican. Humans are missing a macadress. All of them had political signals. I've never seen it before. This is the ultimate suicide. What if the symbols around us every day are just ornamental? We must have these at least. What is their instruction?

SPEAKER_00 14:38

State of awareness is not manipulatable.