'Wrong Bullet, Wrong Gun'. What Next..? | Trending Ep309

 The gun and the bullet don't match in the latest anomaly in the Charlie Kirk shooting, the case against Tyler Robinson continues to look shaky at best. Trump says the US will leave Iran is 2-3 weeks. Derby attacker charged. Weight-loss jab set to be offered on the NHS to heart patients. COVID BACK, no, seriously....Another BBC star in hot water after Scott Mills is fired.

You can watch the full episode FOR FREE over on https://ickonic.com/Watch/3774

Link to our sponsor: https://tzla.club/

You can also subscribe to Ickonic to receive…

-  New Content Daily
-  Feature-Length Documentaries
-  Exclusive Original Series

Start your journey today for just £1.99 for the first month 

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:04

Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Wednesday's episode of Trending. I hope you're well. Well, here we go. No one saw this come in, did they? Only a conspiratorial mind would have ever questioned the assassination of Charlie Kirk, and we were called Tinfoil Hats. We were called Everything Under the Sun, and lo and behold, we were right. Now, this story is just utterly, utterly bizarre. And the fact that this has taken this long to come out is also even more bizarre. Charlie Kirk, lawyers for the man accused of killing Charlie Kirk claim the bullet used does not match the scene, as ballistic reports come back and say they are inconclusive in proving that the rifle caught in the forest that Tyler Robinson supposedly left was the bullets, sorry, fired the bullets that killed Charlie Kirk. Shock. No one saw that coming, did they? The amount of anomalies around this case are just utterly astonishing that there is this young man still in jail. Now, whether this young man is involved in some way, shape, or form in the plot, I don't know. He may well have a role. He may well be a Learvey Oswald who was involved in some capacity but had no idea what was meant to happen. You know, there's so many different possibilities. I would I would not sit and commit to any of them. But what I would commit to, definitely, is that that man did not kill Charlie Kirk. So there's so many, just for people that have not followed this case particularly closely, let's look at a few of them. So he's supposedly shot by Tyler Robinson from the roof. There was CCTV footage of Robinson running away with a backpack, which clearly showed if he was had the rifle in the backpack, then the rifle must have been taken apart. Yet you can see him running away across the roofs, which on mobile phone footage that was taken just after the shooting, like as in seconds after the shooting. So when's he had time to take that rifle apart? So that's question number one. Question number two is as he leaves the scene holding a backpack, as I say, clearly not holding a rifle. So the only way he's done that is he's taken the rifle apart, as I've said a second ago. But when's he done that? So that's one question. Question number two is in the forest at the drop-off point, the rifle is found. But the rifle is found completely built. So what we're expected to believe is that he shot Charlie Kirk, he took the rifle apart in insane speed while running across a roof and climbing down a fire escape, put it in his backpack, went to the woods, rebuilt the rifle, and then fled the scene. Why would you do that? Because to a naked eye, if you're walking through a forest and you see a few scattered things, you might not necessarily think that's a rifle. If a rifle's built, you can see it's a rifle. So the chance of him getting caught or the chance of that rifle being found quicker is obviously a lot higher if it's built because you people know what they're looking for. You know, literally, rifles can be taken apart to the point that it just looks like a bunch of metal, and only somebody with a trained eye would know that all those pieces go together to create a rifle. So there's that anomaly which has always been very strange and has never been explained. Another is how good a shot he was from such a distance away, despite having no gun experience. The other is to do with you know the security guards that were stood either side of Charlie Kirk. Another major anomaly is the camera that Turning Point USA have that shoots from behind Charlie Kirk looking out at the crowd. Well, that footage was disappeared and has never been seen, never been seen. Yet surely that would show exactly what happened because it would show looking out at the direction the bullet supposedly come from. That footage was run away. Uh sorry, well, it was hidden, literally run away with very, very quickly. Candace Owens exposed that months and months ago when she showed some footage of a cameraman taking out the SD card and battery from that particular camera. So there's so many anomalies. But what's bizarre is this has taken weeks, months, months, and months for a very basic ballistics report, which would have been run, you would expect, on the day that that rifle was found and then compared to the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk, and it would have been known pretty much within a day, possibly even less, whether that rifle fired that bullet. So why has this young man spent all these days and weeks and months in prison for this to only come out now? Again, that's a huge red flag, isn't it? If somebody is guilty beyond any reasonable doubt, and that's that absolutely should be the barometer, because you're you're you're literally talking about either sending somebody to a death penalty or putting somebody in prison for probably the rest of their lives, you've got to make sure it's a crime they actually committed, isn't it? Haven't you? The barometer of proof should be incredibly high, and the fact that a very, very basic thing, like the gun you found being the gun that was used to shoot this person, should be 0.1 surely for you to prove there's some start, there's some correlation here. It's like it's it literally is the equivalent of someone being arrested based on a car being used in a crime, and then you finding out that's that car is doesn't belong to that person. Well, there's a few questions there then, isn't it? Isn't there? Because you're saying this person used their car to get away with a to use it to get away with a crime, but that's not their car, and there's no evidence anyone stole that car. So can you explain that for me, please? Well, immediately that case would fall apart unless there was other evidence. So if you've got a gun that's been found, which you're saying is the smoking gun, no pun intended, in Charlie Rob um Tyler Robinson's involvement in this case, and then within pretty much a day, I would say, police officers that are watching will may dispute a day, but let's say a week then, you get a ballistics report back, you would know whether that rifle shot that bullet. Yet here we are, months and months and months on from this shooting on September the 10th. This man's been in jail this whole time, and really, apart from a few, most people have forgotten about this and moved on to other things, including the war with Iran that Charlie was very much opposed to. It's it's incredibly bizarre. It's incredibly bizarre to see to see what is happening. Absolutely bizarre. And the fact that this was it was on the mainstream media yesterday, yes, but it was it was very much hidden. It wasn't something that was front page bombshell news, which is what it should have been. Because this is the story that dominated the headlines around the world for a few days until this man was caught. But what if it's all a lie? Who really killed Charlie Kirk? I don't believe for a second Tyler Robinson pulled that trigger. I believe Charlie Kirk was taken out probably a lot closer to home. Now, I saw a post yesterday from somebody on Twitter who was showing an image of the the Charlie Kirk assassination and the attempted Trump assassination on the on the right, as in uh showing them in comparison and saying that both these events were staged. Now, I agree to an extent. I don't believe, I believe with the Trump one, it's different. I don't think Trump was ever in any danger. I think he was probably in on it. Certainly his team were in on it in terms of that that whole narrative of an attempted assassination being created to to allow him to become this godlike figure that he became. And it won in the election, it garnered him so much support afterwards, he became the face of the anti-violence, anti-we've got to stop the far radical left movement. He became the face of that very, very quickly. I don't think he was ever in any danger because I think his job is to do exactly what he's doing now, and he was worth a lot more to them alive. However, Charlie Kirk, I believe it was staged in the sense that Tyler Robinson didn't pull that trigger. I don't believe it was staged in the sense of the whole thing was a one big psyop. I I think Charlie Kirk, I would be very, very confident to say that he did die that day. He wasn't killed by the person it's claimed he was killed by, he was probably killed by somebody in his team, or certainly somebody much closer to him than that. Uh who was involved. I don't know. I have a lot of questions about the the actions of people like Erica Kirk and others close to him following his death. I think it was been quite bizarre, which to me is a bit a bit of a a bit of a strange one. And so I do think those two instances are different. I think I would say the Charlie Kirk one was more of a false flag in the sense of it's being blamed on somebody that didn't do it to create a certain outcome and hide who really did it. So I I I think those two major, major things are both psyops in the sense of they're trying to get an outcome in your mind, but I don't think they're both staged in the sense of they're both completely unreal. Now I might be completely wrong, and if I'm proved wrong, I will hold my hands up and say I'm wrong, but I'm yet to see any credible evidence that suggests that Charlie Kirk is either alive or that he didn't he didn't die that day. Whereas Trump, I mean, his ear recovered quite quickly, didn't it? So therefore that's a very different conversation. But what happens from from here with this case, I don't know, because I can't see a situation where they're gonna let this young man out. I just can't see it. Similar to Ali Arvey Oswald, where obviously Oswald got shot in the car park by Jack Ruby, didn't he? Because he didn't want him to talk. I I don't see how they they let this young man out because he if he was to get out and talk, it would be very, very damaging. So whether something happens to him in jail, whether they concoct other evidence to you know convict him, I don't know. Um prosecutors have said they intend to seek the death penalty. This is a possible angle. Um they intend to seek the death penalty, however, Robinson has not yet entered a plea. Now it's very plausible that they put a deal in front of him, which is we'll take the death penalty off the table if you accept a guilty plea. So if you say I did this, and in the eyes of the public it's an open and shut case, the guy's admitted he's done it, but we'll take the death penalty off the table. So Robinson then has a choice of I fight this, I'm against the rigg system, am I probably gonna lose and then I die? Or do I accept it and I just don't face the death penalty, I spend life in prison or a certain amount of time in prison. That's quite possible, quite possible, and I think if I remember rightly, not long after the uh the arrest of him, other people were talking about this as as a possibility that they might offer him a deal like that. Because as far as the courts go, they get an open and shut case. As far as public perception goes, someone killed Charlie Kirk, tick, we solved it. Well, covering up who really did it, and Tyler Robinson plays the full guy, and his only benefit to doing that is that he's not going to face the lethal injection or the chair. So we will see. We will see. But for me, this is a huge story. It's a huge story, it's not a surprising story because you only had to look at this case for for five minutes to see that there were so many anomalies within it. But what happens next, we will have to wait and see. Because if this is if this is the first bit of evidence that comes out that points the finger at somebody else other than Tyler Robinson, maybe there is more. Right, we're gonna head over to iconic.com, we're gonna talk about the Middle East, we're gonna talk about this derby story that we spoke about on Monday, just following up on that. Talk about weight loss jabs, we're gonna talk about a new COVID strain, how exciting! And we're gonna talk about the BBC in the second half of the show. I'll see you there.

SPEAKER_01 13:29

Don't mention the reptiles, David. Even less is said about the grey pipe, which some believe to be the true ruling power in the Vatican.

SPEAKER_00 13:37

Humans missing macadress.

SPEAKER_01 13:39

All of them have little sickness. I've never seen it before. This is the ultimate suicide. The symbols around us every day are just monumental.