Another ‘Attempt’ On Trump… Or Something Else? | Trending Ep325

 This morning Jaymie discusses the shooting at the Whitehouse Correspondents' Dinner in Washington. Was this another assassination attempt on Trump, or something else? After dramatically canceling peace talks and rejecting last-minute offer Trump is facing three tough choices on Iran War, as he claims oil pipelines will 'explode from within' in just days. Green Party MP, Hannah Spencer Calls Out Alcohol Smell Before Commons Votes, and car bomb explodes next to police station in Dunmurry, as police said their initial thinking is the New IRA could be responsible.

You can watch the full episode FOR FREE over on https://ickonic.com/Watch/3822

You can also subscribe to Ickonic to receive…

-  New Content Daily
-  Feature-Length Documentaries
-  Exclusive Original Series

Start your journey today for just £1.99 for the first month 

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:05

Well, the obvious place to start this morning is what's gone on in Washington. The attempted assassination, according to the mainstream media, third attempted assassination of Donald Trump, shots fired at a press conference, sorry, at a White House correspondence dinner at the Hilton in Washington, DC. Let's have a look at the videos. Now the story suggests a thirty-one-year-old Californian man entered the premises, fired several shots, didn't really break the perimeter or get particularly close to anyone to cause any real damage or any real harm. Doesn't appear to be any casualties, and that man has been arrested alive for once, and it will obviously face prosecution. And he supposedly had a manifesto with him of what he wanted to achieve. That's not been released or made public yet. But essentially, this is the third attempted assassination, if you believe the official narratives on Trump since the last couple of years. The one obviously on the golf course, which they apprehended somebody, and then the most famous one, which involved the shooting of him in Florida when he was stood on stage. Now, I think certainly that one is very easy to debunk. The uh the plaster on the ear that disappeared very quickly, the grazing of the ear that then left no damage, the golf course one, nobody even got close to him, even on the official story. So whether that was true, whether that was whatever, is uh is to be known. They were both blamed on Iran. And then this one, there's not really been anybody blamed yet, but I guess Iran would be probably quite a good blame again, wouldn't it? This is a very interesting one because I don't know why now. Maybe they're trying, as Trump is losing, certainly losing the narrative within his base. Maybe this creates that idea that once again he's an outsider and that he's a target and that he's somebody that the system fears, and therefore it it, as I say, it targets. Or you could look at it from it from a different perspective and look at it from the point that this is him trying to get some credibility back, or a warning. There's another way to look at it, that this could be a warning. As we saw with President Reagan when he was in charge, there was an attempted assassination where shots were fired at him in the street. There was a lot of discussion that that was a warning that the policies that he was doing at the time weren't what was going to be acceptable, and that was a bit of a wake-up call for him to get back in line. Whether this is something similar with Trump and he's not going far enough, he's not doing things the cult want him to do, and this is a bit of a look, look how easily we can get to you, we won't miss next time type thing, or whether it's something else. There is lunatics out there, there is people out there that do think, you know, I want to go and shoot somebody. So maybe this is organic, maybe this is just a lone guy. Time will tell. And usually with things like this, the best way to tell what the motives are and who's behind it is what happens afterwards. What decisions are made, what bills are passed, what laws are decided, and the different reactions of different people. But the thing that I think is very, very interesting, if we watch this video here, if you look at the Secret Service, who do they get out of there a lot quicker than Trump? Now, for a few weeks now, myself and Gareth have talked about, David's talked about how J.D. Vance seems to be the chosen one. He seems to be the next cab off the rank. He's not been associated with this war or tarnished by this war in Iran in the same way Trump has been. He's been the guy that's been seen as the one trying to bring about peace by going to these talks. And also he's not been the one on the front page talking about how great this war is, like Hegseth and Trump have been. He's also the man they prioritised to get out of that place before they got Trump out. If you look, there's a good a good few seconds between Vance being removed and then Trump being removed. Might be nothing to it. I'm sure they'll they'll have different security, but it just to me, I saw that as a a very visual representation of that dynamic and who is the most important one in that dynamic. And we also saw Erica Kirk leaving, uh crying, saying she just wanted to go home. Now, some will look at that and go, I can I understand completely. She, you know, her husband was shot in front of uh a crowd of people, so this must be a massive flashback situation. And that would be working on the the proviso that Erica Kirk is a genuine grieving widow when you've only got to watch quite a lot of the content from her, quite a lot of her actions, quite a lot of her interviews, her stage appearances within days of her husband being killed, and you'll see that there's a lot of questions about her. Now, a lot of people believe Charlie Kirk isn't dead. I can believe that's possible. A lot of people believe that Erica Kirk and others in his immediate circle at Turning Point USA were either in some way involved or knew certainly what was going to happen to him. Um again, I can believe that. But the outcome, I think you know, we don't know the truth on that yet. But what we do know is that her actions following were very bizarre, they were very unexplainable, they were very strange. Even to the most ardent defender of her, you can't justify some of the actions, whether it be the tear gel before going on stage, whether it be the immediate laughing and joking within days saying about how excited she is about the future. Very, very strange. So her walking away and crying and saying she just wants to go home and all of that didn't feel particularly genuine. It felt quite act like an act, it felt quite fake. But that's just my opinion. What happens from here? Who knows? As I say, it depends who this is blamed on. It depends who who they conclude is behind this, whether they conclude it's one lone guy from California, whether they conclude it's somebody working on behalf of another person, on behalf of a foreign government. Anything's on the table at this stage. We're in 26, and we said at the start of the year this was going to be a very fast-paced year, it was going to move very quickly, and we're sat here now in the last week of April, and look at how many things have happened. We've had the trade war with China, we've had now the war in Iran, we've had escalations of the war in Ukraine, we've had an increase to the cost of living crisis, we're now having energy shortages and a potential disruption to jet fuel and travel and so on. So much has happened. We've had the Venezuelan president overthrown. There's been so much happened in just a just four months. So we've got to remain light on our feet and we've got to remain open to everything. Not to blindly believe things, but to be open to everything. And with events like this that usually act as catalysts for some kind of outcome, when we see the outcome, it becomes very, very clear who was behind whatever event it was. Okay? So we'll see in the next few days what is announced, what comes of it. But one thing I will say, just to finish on this subject, is that compared to the other two assassination attempts, particularly the first one, yes, this has been in the news, of course, but it's not been anything like as publicised, in my opinion, as those. It was it's not been every single news bulletin top story. It's not dominated X in quite the same way. So whether that's happening because people are starting to put two and two together and go, this just doesn't feel right for me. I'm not going to give it as much credibility or as much airtime. Or whether it's deliberately being kept slightly quieter. I don't know. I'd say if it's the second one, that would increase the likelihood that this is actually a genuine, you know, just a guy who's trying to create um sorry, just a guy who's who's working alone. Because if it was a mainstream cult agenda attempted assassination to create an outcome, I'd have thought it would have been a much bigger story because they'll want to garner a bigger outrage and a bigger reaction from people. So that's a possibility. And hopefully, I sincerely hope that it's actually the first idea I put forward, which is people are seeing through this more and more and going, I can't, I've not got the time, I've not got the energy to put into this because this can't be real. Because realistically, it's probably not, it's probably a false flag, it's probably an attempt to create a certain outcome. Like I say, I could be completely wrong, and time and actions following this will show that to be right or to be wrong. And always happy to be wrong. Because if I'm wrong, it means the world's in a better place than I think it is. So as I say, this week, the next coming next coming few days, we will probably see more that tells us who was really behind this and what was really behind this. So let's hold judgment until we see more of that. Right, if you're watching with us on YouTube or Twitter, head over to icolic.com to watch the remainder of today's episode. Have a great start to your week.

SPEAKER_01 9:49

Don't mention the reptiles, Dave. Even less is said about the Grey Pope, which some believe to be the true ruling power in the Vatican.

SPEAKER_00 9:56

Humans emiting a MAC address.

SPEAKER_01 9:58

All of them had little signals. I've never seen it before. This is the ultimate suicide cult. What if the symbols around us every day aren't just ornamental? We lost a thousand years of history. What if they're instruction?

SPEAKER_00 10:15

That state of awareness is not manipulatable.