Why Isn’t Anyone Talking About This Trial? | Trending Ep326

 Join Gareth this morning as he discusses this week's arson trial involving Starmer that no one is talking about. There's a policy push that emerged in 2024 to extend certain legal protections to Americans who serve in the Israel Defense Forces. The Guardian newspaper reports that the UK Foreign Office unit logging possible war crimes has shut amid funding cuts. And an AI-powered robot has beaten elite table tennis players in Tokyo.

You can watch the full episode FOR FREE over on https://ickonic.com/Watch/3825

You can also subscribe to Ickonic to receive…

-  New Content Daily
-  Feature-Length Documentaries
-  Exclusive Original Series

Start your journey today for just £1.99 for the first month 

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:05

Silence at the Old Bailey. Why is the Starmer Arson trial being buried? Good question. Can I have a guess? Because it would ruin the Prime Minister. There we go. That was easy. Um, the loudest silence in Britain. I like that. It's clever. Well done, whoever came up with that. Three men are in the dock at the old Bailey. The trial opened this morning. That was yesterday, Monday. Most of Britain's press cannot find the space to tell you. Well, of course they can't. They're too busy talking about how a former footballer and a TV actor had an argument on I'm a celebrity. Get me out of here. Because you've got to cover all the important stuff. When three men are accused of a coordinated campaign to torch properties linked to the sitting prime minister and the nation's editors collectively determine that there are more pressing matters. You're not living in a free press, you're living in a managed one. 100%. 100%. From the beginning of this, from the whole debacle, from when when the arson attacks happened, we said that the media's reaction to it was an um it was an enormous red flag. Because you've got three. Well, there's three in the dock, but there was actually four as I understand it. So we'll go with we'll go with three and a half. You've got three and a half Ukrainian nationals. Bearing in mind this is at a time when the UK taxpayer is basically funding Zelensky and the war in Ukraine while we're all skint here. And all of these guys are working in some capacity as either male models, escorts, or or worse. Setting fire, as mentioned, in a coordinated fashion to a bunch of the Prime Minister's properties and stuff, including a bunch of stuff that wasn't even public knowledge. There was a car he used to own but had sold. There was a property he just sold as well, I think. Stuff that you would be aware of if you knew him previously, but wasn't in the public sphere. So it's not like they tried to, you know, blow up or set a fire to Downing Street or Chequers or or anything like that. These are these are things that I wouldn't know. I'd walk past it, I wouldn't go, oh, that's Keir Starmer's old house. But they knew. You have to ask the question why they didn't know. And the media don't ask a single question. And they don't report on it. And they're in court now at the old Bailey in London, and there's nothing. So there's clearly a you know a gagging order in place. There's clearly something, a denotice from British intelligence or whatever, to tell the media that they're not allowed to report on it. And the question's why? Because if you think about this, and I've already guessed the answer, but if you think about this, just going back to I'm a celebrity, get me out of here, say that footballer on there, Jimmy Bullard, or say the TV actor, Adam something, I don't watch um soaps, but whatever. Say one of those guys had a bunch of their stuff torched by three and a half Ukrainian nationals who were working as male escorts, male models, they'd be front page, mate. Yet when it's the Prime Minister, the sitting Prime Minister who's sending our money every five minutes out to Ukraine, nothing.

SPEAKER_01 3:29

Hmm.

SPEAKER_00 3:30

There is a question that every journalist in Britain should be asking today, and almost none of them are. It's not a complicated question. It does not require a security clearance or a well-placed source in Whitehall. It requires only a pair of eyes and a functioning conscience. Well, good luck with that, but go on. The question is this why on the morning that Britain's most politically charged criminal trial of the year opens at the Old Bailey, are the digital front pages of the BBC, the Daily Mail, and even the supposedly insurgent GB News so conspicuously devoid of the names of these three and a half Ukrainian men? Well, it's very true. It's a very good question. But there's another question as well, and it's a real simple one, and no one's asked it. And that is dear Prime Minister Starmer, Keir Starmer, Chairman Starmer, Zippy from Rainbow, did you know these men? In any capacity? Do you have any connection to them? Because they know about a load of your stuff that most people don't. So did you know them? And if you did, in what capacity? Very simple question. It's not it's not like it's a charged, intrusive question. Did you know them, mate? Because if someone sets fire to your stuff and you phone the police and the police come around, that's one of the first things they'll say. Say you had a ring doorbell or CCTV at your house, and there's the footage of the person. The copper is gonna say to you, Do you know that guy? And if you do, oh yeah, I do know him. That's that's Dave. Alright, where'd you know Dave from then? No one's asked that question. And also, it's not just a case of the media not asking the question. None of the opposing politicians have asked the question. You know, they go at each other all the time in prime minister's questions, and they they create this illusion of the fact that we live in a democracy, and these are opposing parties, and they're genuinely fighting to try and bring each other down, to try and seize power. Yet, here they've got a hand grenade they can throw at him. Metaphorical, of course. They've got a hand grenade, a Ukrainian one, we probably paid for it. That they can go, Bosch, did you know these guys? If so, how? Why? Why are they torching your stuff? How did they know that it was your stuff when it's not public knowledge? There must be some connection, what is it? Not a word, and that in itself is a red flag as well. Because you could bring him down over this. So why not? Why, why, why literally, if we live in a democracy and these are genuinely opposing parties and not just players on the stage, why is no one going for him over it? He's clearly being protected by the establishment, and that's I mean, that's obvious. The fact that there's a gag in order on the media, that's enough to tell you that he's being protected, but you have to ask yourself why. Because on the face of it, he's doing a horrendous job for Great Britain, for the country. He's a horrendous prime minister, he's the most unpopular, despised, even I would say, Prime Minister in my lifetime. And geez Louise, there's been some ropey ones, but then I'm looking at it there naively as a British citizen, as a member of the public. See, for me and for us, he's doing a horrendous job. For the establishment, for the cult, he's mate, he's a Champions League winner. He's he's having a worldie. Because their goal, as we are kind of aware of now, is to destroy the United Kingdom, to destroy Europe, to destroy the West in general. So actually, as much as on the face of it for us, he's he's having a mayor, mate, he's having a worldie in their eyes. For now, because that's the thing about useful idiots, people like Zelensky, Lamy, Starmer, Trump, all of them. They're all puppets. None of them are in charge, not really. They're useful idiots. And the thing about useful idiots is when they cease to be useful, well then they're just idiots. And you just discard an idiot. So, yes, of course, we can look at this and we can see the fact that he's being protected and untouchable as the stories buried. But that's the thing about buried things, you can dig them up again whenever you want. As long as you've got a little mark, a little cross on the ground, a little cross on the map, you can go back and dig that treasure up anytime you want. And as soon as he has served his role, or begins, maybe, maybe I'm giving him too much credit here, but begins to waver a little bit from his lane. Maybe his ego gets in the way and he sees how unpopular he's become and thinks, well, maybe I won't do that then just for my own. Oh, you will, son, because I've got a shovel ready to go to dig that up, mate. And they can bring him down. And you know, you can apply that as well to the Epstein Files. All the all those redacted names within the Epstein Files, they seem powerful, right? Oh, it must be powerful. His name's redacted, identities protected. Must be a big player. Must be a real big player, real powerful. Well, not really. Because the real power, the real cards, are in the hands of those that have the ability to unredact that name.

SPEAKER_01 9:16

Don't mention the reptiles, Dave. Even less is said about the Grey Pope, which some believe to be the true ruling power in the Vatican.

SPEAKER_00 9:24

Humans are missing a macadress.

SPEAKER_01 9:26

All of them had plotted signals. I've never seen it before. This is the ultimate suicide cult. What if the symbols around us every day aren't just ornamental? We lost a thousand years of history. What if their instruction?

SPEAKER_00 9:42

That state of awareness is not manipulatable.