Politics Protecting Paedophiles | Trending Ep327

 Labour MP's block investigation into the truth and Starmer survives the latest scandal, Nigel Farage is a no-show for the vote. Tommy Robinson takes £100K from the same man who pulled $2 Million funding from Charlie Kirk just 2 days before he was shot. Europe is danger of overheating according to the latest climate lies.

You can watch the full episode FOR FREE over on https://ickonic.com/Watch/3827

Link to our sponsor: https://tzla.club/

You can also subscribe to Ickonic to receive…

-  New Content Daily
-  Feature-Length Documentaries
-  Exclusive Original Series

Start your journey today for just £1.99 for the first month 

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:00

Hundred years ago, Nicola Tesla discovered a healing technology that according to the entire pharmaceutical industry. The day he died, the government seized everything. For 100 years, this technology was hidden. Until now, plasma is back. Tesla club. Tzla.club.

SPEAKER_03 0:27

Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Wednesday's episode of Trending. Right, let's dive straight into this story this morning. So, the US ambassador from Great Britain, Peter Mandelson, was appointed despite failing security checks. This has been known for a few weeks now. Mandelson had close ties to Epstein. He's basically been the mentor, if you like, of Keir Starmer, the now Prime Minister. Starmer has desperately, desperately tried every opportunity to deny the fact that he knew of these connections to Epstein. He's blamed everybody but himself. He's blamed the civil service. He's blamed everyone doing the vetting and all of that. And many people have come out and actually gone, well, no, he was told. He was told all about the fact that he'd failed security, told about the concerns, but he was asked to ignore them because he obviously owed Mandelson something. And more evidence came out this week that he'd actually appointed or talked about appointing Mandelson before he'd even won the election. So this guy was clearly not just appointed because he was appointed, he was clearly always going to be for, you know, as a payback for services rendered. So Starmer's desperately trying to cling on to power and trying to cling on to the fact that he didn't know when everybody knows. Last week you had MPs chucked out of the chamber for calling him a liar, which is kind of sums up British politics, really. You can lie and that's fine, but you call somebody a liar for doing exactly that, that gets you in trouble. I mean, it's it's mad when you when you put it like that. But yesterday there was a vote between MPs as to whether to launch a formal investigation into whether he lied, whether information was covered up, and whether Starmer misled Parliament when he announced the appointment of Mandelson and when he denied any prior knowledge of these connections to Epstein. Now, the vote went against trying to get the truth out. It went in favour of Starmer. However, quite a lot of his own MPs backed the vote. So what's an interesting thing to discuss this morning is how this voting system works and how it literally is designed to cover up whatever they want to cover up. So Starmer has a majority. There's 650 MPs, he has a majority. Okay. So essentially, if every Labour MP votes with what he wants them to, they will never lose a vote. What you need in order to create a situation where they lose a vote is to have Labour MPs either abstain, which means they don't vote, they say I'm not going to vote, so you don't get a for or an against, which I think is just a cowardly thing to do anyway. If you're abstaining, you're saying no. So just say no. Um, also, what they what they need is they need Labour MPs to go, actually, morally, I can't vote in favour of this. I'm going to rebel and I'm going to vote against it. That obviously has has repercussions for them. And I'm going to introduce something which many of you, I'm sure, will be aware of, but uh in different parts of the world potentially not, called the WIP system. So what the WIP system essentially means is if you have the party whip, that means you're part of that party. So if you have a Labour Party whip, you're part of the Labour Party. If you have the whip removed, you're essentially having your Labour status removed, and then you would then become an independent MP. We've seen this happen with a number of MPs over the years. We saw it happen with Andrew Bridgeham when he was a member of the Conservative Party and started speaking out against vaccine injuries. He's had the he had the Conservative Party whip removed. But what does that actually mean? And the reason this is important to mention is because throughout this story, it states that the Labour Party MPs were given a three-line whip. And those who rebelled ignored that three-line whip. Now I'm going to explain what a three-line whip, one-line whip, two-line whip actually means. So what the whip means is it's an M it's a document sent round to MPs essentially asking them how to vote or advising them how the party, the leadership of the party, would like them to vote at any given opportunity. So whether it's to vote in favour of a policy, to vote against a policy, in favor of a war or against it, whatever it is. Well, a one-line whip is, which is that the least significant, is a non-binding request attendance. So if there's a vote coming up, it will say, we'd like you to attend this and vote in this direction. But quite informal. A two-line whip is a mandatory attendance and permission needed to miss it. So it's this is really important. You need to be there, there's no excuses, and you need to vote in this favour. And then there's the three-line whip, which is obviously relevant to this story here this morning. Strict instructions to attend and vote. Rebellion usually results in serious consequences, such as removal of the whip. An MP who consistently disobeys is expelled from the party and will become a sitting MP as an independent. So we have this illusion that every MP goes in there and votes with their own conscience, votes with their own intentions, votes on behalf of the people that put them there, which will come from different parts of the country, which will have very different philosophies, very different ideologies, very different problems, and therefore very different requests and needs than other parts of the country. You've got Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, who is the MP for St Pancras and Holburn in London. They're going to have very different requests and very different desires than an MP who's sitting there up in Sunderland in the Northeast. They both might be Labour MPs, they both might be Labour Party members, but they'll have very different interests and they'll have very different things that they care about. I don't think somebody up in Sunderland who's struggling to make ends meet cares about Keystarmer remaining in his job. They're probably more likely to be caring about putting food on the table and surviving another day. So why is their MP now compelled and in fact essentially bullied and manipulated and blackmailed really, it's blackmailed, is what it is essentially, into voting in a certain way that does not benefit the people that put that MP there. If ever you want evidence or a v such a clear black and white representation of how broken politics is, it's this whip system. The fact that you have a Prime Minister that if you asked any random person in the street in any part of this country, do you think he lied? I would suggest the overwhelming majority would say yes. Yet he's forced his MPs, and I think there's been about 15 who have rebelled, from what I can read. He's forced them to vote to protect him, to protect his job, not to protect anybody else, not to protect the country, not doing what's best for them. No, he's forced them to save his own skin. And we're meant to sit here and believe that we live in some kind of open, fair, democratic society. We live in a dictatorship. We live in an absolute dictatorship, which right now is being dictated to on the surface by one man. Really, it's being dictated to by the people behind him that are obviously propping him up, and in time will absolutely throw him under the bus. And the fact that he's survived all of these scandals, he survived all of these different opportunities for him to be ousted, just goes to show how much he must be the chosen one. Certainly the chosen one for the time now, but it's not like they haven't got plenty of materials to get rid of him when they want to. Ooh, believe me, they have. And uh we're gonna come on to that in the next part of the show. So if you head over to iconic.com, you can watch the rest of this morning's episode. We're gonna talk about a trial of three certain young men that Gareth covered a little bit yesterday. We're gonna talk about Tommy Robinson and the upcoming May the 16th of March that just happened to get a massive new donation from a very interesting individual with a very interesting history of donating to uh alternative figures. We're gonna talk about climate change and we're gonna talk again just a little bit more about this vote and who wasn't there, and who didn't decide to attend and vote in favour of exposing this Prime Minister, despite supposedly being the one to benefit from this Labour government leaving. I wonder who you I might be talking about. I'll see you on over over on iconic.com if you click the link in the description.

SPEAKER_02 9:25

Two latte, please, one decap thank you.

SPEAKER_01 9:32

I've just seen the most horrendous moves on the upstream findings.

SPEAKER_02 9:52

Um a conspiracy relevant. Well, this thing's a little bit subscribed from all your main three platforms ITV, PPC Rim. Then you want to subscribe to the only platform.