The Conversation You're NOT Allowed To Have | Trending Ep352

On this morning's Trending, Jaymie connects four seemingly unrelated stories and explore the argument that when legitimate concerns are ignored rather than debated, frustration and division inevitably follow. From immigration and crime to NHS pressures and rising community tensions, he asks whether shutting down difficult conversations is making problems worse rather than solving them. Jaymie also looks at renewed conflict in the Middle East as Iran and Israel exchange strikes, examine Donald Trump's shifting position on military involvement, and discusses whether the latest escalation was inevitable despite recent hopes for peace. Plus, he covers the growing controversy surrounding Iran's World Cup participation, after restrictions were reportedly placed on the team's travel and support staff, raising questions about politics, fairness, and the role of FIFA ahead of the tournament.

Ottilie’s Neuroblastoma Journey: https://gofund.me/e4ee99f74

You can watch the full episode FOR FREE over on https://ickonic.com/Watch/3899

You can also subscribe to Ickonic to receive…

-  New Content Daily
-  Feature-Length Documentaries
-  Exclusive Original Series

Start your journey today for just £1.99 for the first month

Transcript

SPEAKER_01 0:04

Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Monday's episode of Trending. I hope you're well. I hope you had a nice weekend wherever you are in the world. Well, we're gonna start this morning with four stories that appear completely unconnected. But bear with me. We're gonna connect them and we're gonna explain how one, two, three, and four, although seemingly completely random and completely unconnected in many ways, all tie into the same thing and all create the same outcome. So this is a headline here from the Daily Express here in Britain this morning. Migrant heading to the UK makes extraordinary admission that he will fight, shoot, and stab when he arrives. Okay. The next headline. Man, 34, stopped at the port of Dover for attempting to re-enter Britain, is charged for the rape of two teenage girls in Great Yarmouth in May. 16,000 NHS patients in England have died after long waits in AE. A service admits to lots of surgery blunders and dropping what they call non-essential surgeries and things like that, which has led to a number of people dying completely unnecessarily if they'd received treatment in time. And the final one of the four Sikhs are being attacked every single day in Britain since Henry Noak's killer was jailed. Okay. So all four of those stories might appear connected in certain areas but will appear very disconnected in others. And the reason that they're all very much connected, in my opinion, because but is because they all tie into the same thing, which is that you're unable to have a sensible conversation about the issue of immigration and the issue of basic mathematics without being called racist, without being called Islamophobic, without being called all the phobics you can think of. Alongside that, the NHS is considered the kind of golden goose in this country that again you criticize or you question anything to do with it, and people are up in arms. Both of those situations are leading to nothing but chaos. When you can't talk about an issue, when you can't have a sensible conversation about something, that always leads inevitably to violence. Because when you try and engage with somebody about a particular problem, whether that's a concern you have or whatever it might be, and you're met with a brick wall, eventually you feel you have to do something, and that usually leads to violence. So in the case of immigration, let's forget social cohesion, let's forget demographics, let's forget religious cultures, forget any of that for a second, and let's focus on this AE story and talk about the basics of maths. If you've got a three-bedroom house and you've got a family of two adults and two kids, you've all got a bedroom, you've probably got enough space. Okay. You might want a bit more, but you're probably comfortable. You all of a sudden put a family of two adults and eight children into a three-bedroom house, all of a sudden, then not everyone has their own room. What appeared to be more than adequate once isn't adequate anymore. That's really immigration in a heartbeat when it comes to mathematics. If you've got a country or a city or a town or a village, whatever it might be, that has the infrastructure and capability of handling a certain amount of people, whether that be doctor surgeries, school places, buses, whatever it might be, roads. And all of a sudden you add a huge influx of people without upgrading that infrastructure, without improving it to cope with the additional demand, then what was once adequate, just like your three-bedroom house, is now not adequate. People don't have as much space, and resources are spread across a thinner, you know, they're spread thinner. They're spread the same resources are spread across more people. So therefore the quality of those resources goes down. That has nothing to do with skin colour. That has nothing to do with culture. That has nothing to do with anything other than basic maths. And it's ironic, really, that when you you see videos from these anti-hate and anti-racist refugees welcome marches, none of them would take anyone coming across in any of these boats or coming across on planes, legally or illegally. None of them would take any of them in their own home. And you've seen of people going around asking, saying, you know, do you want to adopt a refugee if you're if you've this is an issue you care about so much? And every single one of them responds with either, oh, I'm renting, I can't. But the vast majority respond with, I don't have the space. Okay, so if you don't have the space, you understand the concept then that you need a certain amount of space in order to cope with a certain number of people. But that on a on a wider scale seems to be completely forgotten. So that's one key aspect here. One key aspect of this debate that gets completely ignored because people like to simplify it down. So if you care about this, you must be a far right racist. Or maybe you just understand that two plus two equals four. And then you come on to the cultural aspect of it. So this first story from The Express: migrant heading to the UK makes extraordinary admission. I will fight, shoot, and stab. Now, am I saying that every single person that comes into the UK on a small boat or comes into the UK via a plane and wants to stay has the same mindset as this guy? 100% no, because the vast majority absolutely will not. But if your job is to protect the nation that you represent, the nation that you were elected to protect and represent on the world stage and represent the interests of, then one or two or three out of a large number of people coming in is one or two or three too many. Pure and simple. One person coming into their lives that wants to do them harm is one too many. And your job as a parent is to protect and identify those risks. So you're letting in swathes of people into the country, particularly those coming across those small boats, with no documentation whatsoever. You have no idea who these people are, no idea how old they are, no idea what they may be running from, what they may have done back in their home nations or on the way across Europe to the border. And you're willing to risk the lives of the people that you were elected to protect and represent and put them on the streets. One in a hundred people coming across that gets up to no good is one too many. And I would rather have a system that is too protective in terms of who comes into the country and knowing who they are than one that is too the other way, which is what we have now. Anyone with this mindset, and also this man is clean, he's not even hiding the fact that this is what he believes, is he? What will happen when he turns up at Dover? If he does? Will this video surface? Will he be sent straight back or will he be put into a hotel on the taxpayer's expense? Will he even be identified as the same guy in the video? If he's got no documentation, you're relying on somebody recognising a face, aren't you? Another part of the conversation that gets ignored. And then the man 34 stopped at the Port of Dover from re-entering Britain and is charged with the rape of two teenage girls on the beach in Great Yarmouth in May this year. Again, is everyone that's coming across or everyone that's trying to enter Britain got the same mindset and attitude and actions as this man? Absolutely not. But this is one too many. Could this have been prevented? What did this man do back in his homeland? If that knowledge was had, could this been have prevented? Could those young girls have been saved? That's the questions that should be asking. And the fact that you can't talk about this is what is fueling the anger? And that is not being done by accident. When injustice happens, if that injustice is then silenced, and you're not allowed to talk about the injustice that's so blatant, people just get angrier and angrier and angrier and bitter and more aggressive. And as I said at the top, when talking stops, violence starts invariably. But that's the outcome they want. And then the final story: Sikhs are being attacked every day in Britain since Henry Noak's killer was arrested. And that's where then you go to the other extreme, which is that because the acknowledgement of the injustice is not being given to people, whether that be mathematics of immigration, whether that be the fact that some people coming across are committing these crimes, or whether it be the fact that there clearly is a two-tier justice system, when all three of those things are ignored, people's anger needs to go somewhere. And I'm not condoning it in any way, shape, or form, but it's an inevitability. That anger is going to go somewhere. And right now, because of what happened a couple of weeks ago to Henry Nowak, people have this perception of an enemy which is now Sikhs because the guy that stabbed him and tried to cover it up, and the family that tried to protect him were Sikhs. So now people have clumped that entire demographic together and are attacking them at random, of which I would suggest the vast majority completely condemn the actions of the man who killed Henry Nowak. So we come back to that simple adage. It's about behavior, it's about mindset, it's about actions and beliefs. It's not about which social group you are a member of. I support Derby County. I don't clump me together with every Derby County fan because I bet there'll be a ton that I have absolutely nothing in common with in terms of what I believe. Same with, you could argue, I suppose, a religion is slightly different. Of course, it's quite different, to be fair, actually, because there's a belief system, a shared ideology there. However, the extremes that you're willing to go for it are completely different from person to person. Some people who identify as Christian haven't been to church for decades. Some people go every Sunday. They don't necessarily mean the same thing. So by ignoring people's concerns, you create then another target for that anger, which at the moment appears to be seeks. So all four of these stories very much connect because the common theme is that you are ignoring people's genuine, reasonable concerns. And you're stopping and silencing a sensible grown-up conversation about the implications of certain decisions that are being made by people who are elected to represent the interests of the people of Great Britain. Instead, they're representing the interests of corporations, of lobby groups, of foreign governments in many cases, rather than representing the interests of those who put them there. And if you really think that's going to change with a Farage and Tys government, then I'm afraid I feel sorry for you because you're still falling for the concept that politics in its current form will change anything. What's going to change this is mass non-compliance. It's not burning cars and throwing things at riot police like we saw in Southampton, like we saw following Southport. It's standing up and just going, you know what? I'm not taking part. Yes, that needs to happen in large enough numbers to create an impact. Yes, that needs to happen in a well-organised fashion so that they have to sit up and take notice. But I believe it can. That's why the fault lines of division, they are working so hard to amplify more and more at the moment because they need us separated. They need us looking at each other as a potential enemy, as a potential threat. We know what the threat is. We know who the enemy is. We've known for decades, centuries probably. And whether you're black, whether you're white, whether you're an immigrant, whether you're indigenous, whether you're a Sikh, whether you're a Christian, they want every single one of you. The migrants coming across are pawns in this game as much as anyone. They are there to create an outcome, which is to create division, which is to create an enemy in the minds of people, rather than looking going, well, hang on, how did this migrant crisis, how did this caravan to Europe from the Middle East begin? Where did it start? And how did it start? And who encouraged it? Who funded it? Who was behind it? Who's still funding it today? You don't have to look very far to answer some of those questions. Why would a billionaire like George Soros and his open society foundations have any interest in flooding Britain with migrants from North Africa and the Middle East? Why would Israel have any interest or any skin in the game in being involved in flooding Europe and Britain with migrants from the Middle East and North Asia? Ask yourself those questions and you'll find some answers as to who's behind it and to what end. But the final point on this first part of the show is that sensible conversations between sensible people generally lead to sensible outcomes. They generally lead to give and take, compromise, solutions that work for all. People leaving the sit leaving the conversation content. When you silence people, when you shut people down, eventually either violence starts or people will just walk away from the table. Which is what we're seeing. More and more. And that's not by accident, that's completely by design. So the more they try and split us apart, the more they try and create more and more division. It's more important than ever to not give it to them.com with the link in the description to watch the rest of this morning's episode. I'll see you over there.

SPEAKER_00 16:05

Don't mention the reps of those days. Even less is said about the Grey Pope, which some believe to be the true ruling power in the Vatican. All of them had political signals. I've never seen it before. This is the ultimate suicide. The symbols around us every day are just ornamental.