Won't You Be My Neighbor: What Mr. Rogers Understood That the Church Forgot

Neighborhood justice may not be what you think. Every day for over thirty years, Fred Rogers changed his shoes, hung up his jacket, and asked the same question: won't you be my neighbor? He understood something the church has largely forgotten, that the neighborhood is not a backdrop. That the people next door are not a project or a mission field for someone else. They are neighbors. And neighboring is a practice we have largely abandoned.

Most of us will send money across an ocean before we will knock on the door across the street. This episode asks why, and what it would cost us to tell a different story.

Neighborhood Justice, Proximity, and the Church: What We Cover
• Why distance makes justice feel safer, and what that reveals about how we have been formed

• Place-based justice as a Christological commitment, not a social movement catchphrase

• What John 1:14 actually says about where Jesus showed up, and why it matters

• Why Jeremiah 29:7 is not a comfort verse, and who God was actually talking to

• The difference between charity and repair, and why repair requires a zip code

• The Good Samaritan reframe: from 'who is my neighbor?' to 'who acted like one?'

• The Social Gospel movement, what it got right, what it got wrong, and the women who modeled it better than the institutions

• What MLK's theology of the Beloved Community has to do with your street

• Why mutual aid, rooted in Black, Indigenous, and immigrant communities, looks more like Jesus than most church outreach

• Proximity as a spiritual discipline: what it looks like to practice it, fail at it, and start again

Referenced in This Episode
• Toward De-centering the New Testament | Mitzi J. Smith and Yung Suk Kim

• Christianity and the Social Crisis | Walter Rauschenbusch (1907)

• Episode 8:  Reconciliation that holds

• Episode 50 Season 3 Bonus: What King Said About People Like Me | Letter from Birmingham Jail 

• Episode 1, Season 3 | Ready or Not: The Year Courage Stopped Being Optional

Reflection Questions
• When you think about 'doing justice,' does your mind go near or far first? What does that tell you about how you have been formed?

• What is the difference between charity and mutual aid, and which one does your community primarily practice?

• What is already growing in your neighborhood, and how could you show up in support of it rather than replacing it?

• Who near you has been harmed by systems you have benefited from? What would repair look like in that relationship?

• Is your global engagement expanding your vision, or has it become a way of avoiding what is right in front of you?

• What would it look like to treat proximity as a spiritual discipline this week, not perfectly, but practically?

This Week's Challenge

Sit with one question this week. Not 'how can I help?', that question is still about you. Ask instead: What is already growing here, and how can I show up alongside that?

Next Week, Episode 10

Mercy in Motion: Small Acts, Big Healing. A reflection on everyday repair, the kind of healing that happens not in grand gestures but in ordinary moments of showing up.

For women who stayed small and called it faithfulness : a reading list to start finding your way back. Get it here!

If this episode was meaningful for you, the best way to help others find the show is to:

• Text this episode to a friend who might need it
• Leave a 5-star rating and review
• Subscribe so you don’t miss future episodes
• Wrestling with faith and justice and not sure where to start?
• Grab my free theological reading list, Beyond Faith as Usual, HERE!

Here’s to a faith that tells the truth, refuses silence in the face of harm, and follows Jesus all the way into healing and justice.

RESOURCES:

www.kristenannette.com

Holy Disruption: Reclaiming a Justice-Rooted Faith course info and interest list

Justice Coaching options!

"Find your justice mindset" quiz!

Transcript

Episode 9: Won't You Be My Neighbor: What Mr. Rogers Understood That the Church Forgot

Welcome back to Jesus, Justice + Mercy. I've been sitting with this episode for a minute. Because if I'm honest, this one can be a little personal for me. It's easy to talk about justice in the abstract, systems, structures, history. But this episode is about something closer. Something as close as the street we live on.

With that, if you read the title, you might guess that I want to start with a man in a cardigan.

Because every day, for over thirty years, that man in a cardigan would change his shoes, hang up his jacket, and ask the same question: won't you be my neighbor?

Fred Rogers understood something the church has largely forgotten. That our neighborhood is not a backdrop. That the people next door are not an inconvenience or a project or a mission field for someone else. They are our neighbors. And true neighboring is a practice we’ve largely abandoned.

In fact, most of us will send money across an ocean before we knock on the door across the street. We will treat our passport stamps more seriously than our zip codes.

So, what would it look like if the church changed that?

Somewhere, right now, a church is raising money to send a team to build a school in another country. It is celebrated. There are slideshows. There are fundraisers. There are testimonies. There is genuine love. For kids in the youth group, it is a real opportunity, a chance to step outside their world of plenty and feel the weight of something real.

That same church is three miles from an underfunded school district that has been asking for tutors for two years. Two years of kids who are falling farther behind because there just aren’t enough resources for the teachers and the classrooms let alone anything extra to help these kids succeed. Two years, and nobody from the church has signed up.

So, I have to ask us, “Why does distance make justice feel safer? Why does the cross feel lightest when it is carried far from home?

I'm not here to shame that church. I have been that church, and my kids have been a part of those trips. In fact, I did those trips both in high school and college and they were life changing.  What I am here to ask is why that's the story we love to keep telling, and what it might it cost for us to tell a different one.

Today I’m going to talk about what it means when faith enters the neighborhood. Not as a program. Not as an outreach initiative. But as a way of being formed.

And it starts with this: Jesus didn't come as a concept. He came as a neighbor.

The Incarnation Was an Address
One of the things I love about the gospels is that each writer found a unique way to introduce the story. Matthew starts with genealogy, Mark starts with the prophets, Luke starts with John the Baptist, but John does something different in his gospel. John reaches all the way back. Before Jesus came to earth, he acknowledges that God is the beginning of all things. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” John uses the word Logos, or translated, the Word. And John 1:14 leads us to the incarnation. In their book Toward De-centering the New Testament, authors Mitzi J. Smith and Yung Suk Kim say this: "In John 1:14 the Logos is connected to the work of Jesus. The invisible, preexistent Logos became flesh and was embodied through Jesus."

The Word, this Logos, this preexistent divine being, became flesh in a specific place. That place was Nazareth, a region people doubted anything good could come from. He came to a specific people, the Jewish people who had been waiting for their Messiah for centuries, and under a specific empire, the oppressive and hostile Roman empire. John 1:14 is not just a spiritual metaphor. It is a location statement.

And that matters more than we have let it.

When I talk about place-based justice, I am not using a catch phrase or borrowing the language of a social movement. I mean something theologically specific: Jesus himself modeled a faith that was rooted, geographically, relationally, historically. He didn't do justice from a distance. He did it somewhere specific, with real people, in moments that actually mattered. That is what the Incarnation shows us. Not a strategy for community engagement. A Christological commitment to showing up. To follow Jesus is to show up somewhere in particular. 

In fact, if we read the first part of John 1:14 “The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us" we learn that the Greek word for 'dwelt,' eskēnōsen, literally means "to pitch a tent," "to tabernacle," or "to encamp." This word emphasizes the Incarnation as God tabernacling among humanity, which mirrors the Old Testament Tabernacle where God's presence, the Shekinah, dwelt with the Israelites. This was not a stopover. This was not a mission trip. This was God choosing to take up residence and stay.

Jesus was not visiting. He moved in. 

So I have to ask: if this is the God we follow, a God who pitches a tent, who moves in, who stays, what does it mean that we have often confused distance with devotion? Where have we spiritualized our way out of proximity?

Jeremiah 29 Was Written to People Who Wanted Out
Probably no surprise to you, my faithful listeners, it turns out, this is not a new problem. God has been calling his people back to this for a very long time.

Jeremiah is one of my favorite prophets and not just because he emphasizes justice as a significant aspect of God’s character.  Jeremiah is full of grief and mourning as he walks through the crisis of the destruction of Jerusalem. But it is also a voice of hope. By the time we get to Jeremiah 29, the temple has been destroyed, the Israelites have been forcibly removed from their homes, and they were living in a hostile and foreign culture. They were in despair. And in the middle of all this Jeremiah tells them in v. 7,” Seek the shalom of the city where I have sent you.' We quote this verse at prayer breakfasts. We put it on coffee mugs. But we can forget who God was talking to.

You've probably heard the phrase, bloom where you are planted. We've also turned it into a bumper sticker or some pretty wall art. But Jeremiah 29 is where that idea actually comes from, and in context it is not a comfort. It is a command to a people who wanted out.

The Israelites were exiles. People who had been ripped from all they knew, dragged into a hostile empire, and told to build lives in a place they despised. They didn’t want to invest in Babylon. They wanted to leave and they were waiting to be rescued.

But God said: your flourishing is bound up with theirs. Don’t isolate yourselves. Do not wait for to be rescued. Take root here.

An instead of this being a pretty verse about a missions trip this becomes a word about making good in the place that you live. That is a hard word. Especially when looking away feels so much easier. For us today, especially those in communities experiencing economic abandonment, racial harm, generational poverty, the call is the same. You don't need to wait for a better mission field. You are already standing in one. The question is whether you are willing to see it.

Repair Requires Proximity

Last episode we wrestled with repair, what it actually costs, and why reconciliation without it is just an agreement to keep the peace while the harm stays buried. Here's what I didn't say: repair requires a zip code. You cannot repair what you will not touch.

Reconciliation at a distance is performance, not repair. Real repair demands a neighborhood. A relationship. A specific place. 

Today, some of you are listening from a "good" zip code. The kind with well-funded schools, maintained sidewalks, and coffee shops that stay open past eight. I want you to sit with something for a moment: that zip code did not happen by accident.

Many of the boundaries we treat as natural, the freeway that cuts through one community but not another, the redlining maps that determined where Black families could and couldn't buy homes, the highway that got routed through a thriving community and called urban renewal, those were decisions. Made by people. Upheld by systems.

Before the freeways, there were the railroad tracks. We still use that phrase, the wrong side of the tracks, knowing what it meant but not stopping to ask what it came from. It meant the side where Black families were pushed. Where immigrant communities were contained. Where the smell and environmental outputs of industry were someone else's problem. The infrastructure changed and separation was the point.

We created the "good" zip codes and the "bad" ones. We created the distance we now call normal.

So when repair asks: who has been harmed here? What has been taken from this community? What has been broken by systems that I have benefited from? These are not abstract questions. Remember from last week, repair is not just personal as we tend to believe. It is communal. It is not just about what I did or didn't do as an individual. It is about what we have allowed, what we have inherited, what we have benefited from collectively. These questions, have addresses. And some of those addresses are very close to your comfortable one.

For most of us, when we think about helping our community, we think about assistance or charity. We think about giving money. Donating clothes and backpacks. Serving at the food pantry once a year during Thanksgiving. And those things are not nothing. But they are not repair. And that is exactly why the difference between charity and repair matters so much. Because charity lets us help from a distance. It lets us write a check, drop off a donation, feel good about what we gave, and never once cross the freeway. Charity never asks us to think about how the freeway got there in the first place.

Repair is something different. Charity flows downward. It maintains distance. It keeps the helper comfortable and often unintentionally, the helped dependent. Repair is a reckoning with what has been taken, and a commitment to be present in the rebuilding. It asks us to cross the street. To take a different exit from the freeway. To show up in the neighborhood we have been formed to drive past or drive around.

Here's the tension I want to name. This kind of repair, the kind that is reciprocal, that crosses to the other side of the tracks, that shows up, assumes neighbors.  I’ve just spent the last few minutes acknowledging that we have built entire systems, tracks, freeways, redlining maps, specifically so that we would not have to be neighbors with certain people. So when I say neighbor-to-neighbor, I need to address that directly.

Because a lawyer once asked Jesus the same question you might be asking right now. Who is my neighbor? It sounds like a sincere question. But Jesus knew it was really asking: how small can I draw the circle? How close does someone have to be, geographically, culturally, racially, before I am obligated to them?

And Jesus answered with a story about a Samaritan. A person that the lawyer would have considered outside the circle entirely. Across every track and freeway of his day. And at the end of the story Jesus doesn't answer the question that was asked. He changes it. He doesn't say that man was your neighbor. He asks: which one acted like a neighbor?

Proximity is not just about where we live. It is about where we are willing to go. Who we are willing to see. Whose suffering we are willing to let matter. Mutual aid is not about waiting for the neighborhood to come to us. It is about crossing toward it, with humility, with reciprocity, with the recognition that we need the people on the other side of that freeway just as much as they need us.

Jesus doesn't let the lawyer, or us, stay in the abstract. He doesn't give a definition. He tells a story. And at the end of that story the question is no longer theoretical. It is personal. It is directional. It is: now go and do likewise.

Not go and feel likewise. Not go and donate likewise. Go. Do. The Incarnation was active. Jeremiah 29 was active. And the Good Samaritan is active. Proximity has always been a verb.

This is why the concept of mutual aid, neighbors showing up for neighbors, no hierarchy, no white savior complex, looks more like Jesus than most of what we call church outreach. It does not position people as a project. It does not let anyone stay comfortable behind a wall of generosity. It says: we need each other. We are in this together.

The Prophetice Disruption

The hard word in all of this is that the church has often used distant mission as an escape hatch from local accountability. Not always. Rarely with malice. But functionally, the pattern is real:

The congregation that sends teams to rebuild homes overseas but has never asked why housing in their own city is unaffordable. The Christian who sponsors a child abroad but votes against SNAP benefits at home. The faith community that prays for persecuted Christians in other nations while ignoring the harm being done to vulnerable people three blocks away.

This is not just inconsistency. It is a discipleship failure. We have been specifically formed to feel the weight of distant suffering more than nearby suffering, because nearby suffering is complicated. It implicates us. It asks something of our daily lives, not just our vacation weeks. It is political. And we have been taught that political is the opposite of spiritual, but, the prophets would tell us otherwise.

The good news is that we can hold both/and. Global work matters. I run a small nonprofit supporting an NGO in Uganda, their people, their strategy, their community. The point being I am not preaching from abstraction. The goal is not to choose between local and global; it is to refuse to use global as a reason to avoid local. Both are expressions of the same incarnational call.

The Uganda work? I believe in that work and the people with everything I have. But I can tell you, the hardest justice can be the kind I have to practice before breakfast. In my own neighborhood. With the people I will actually see again.

Historical Interlude, The Social Gospel and Its Shadow

Here is what I want you to understand, this is not a personal failure. This is not a character flaw in the individual Christian who would rather board a plane than cross a freeway. We have been specifically formed away from proximity. And that formation has a history. A theological history. One that was deliberately constructed, and that we are still living inside of whether we know it or not.

And if we don't understand why we keep getting this wrong, we will keep getting it wrong.

Walter Rauschenbusch and the Birth of the Social Gospel
In 1907, a Baptist pastor named Walter Rauschenbusch published Christianity and the Social Crisis. He had spent years in Hell's Kitchen in New York City, watching immigrants crammed into tenements, working 16-hour days, dying young, and he watched people offer them personal salvation and almost nothing else.

He named the same formation problem I am naming today: a faith so focused on saving individual souls that it had no theological category for systemic suffering. Proximity to the poor changed everything for him. He could not unsee what he had seen. The Social Gospel movement was born out of what he witnessed.

Rauschenbusch argued that sin was not only personal but systemic, embedded in institutions, economies, and the ordering of society. That was a prophetic claim in 1907. It remains a disruptive one today.

The Overcorrection, and Why We Are Still Paying for It
The pushback to this was swift and lasting. Conservative theologians accused the movement of trading the gospel for politics, of prioritizing social reform over personal salvation. That critique landed hard. And the evangelical church spent most of the 20th century running from anything that sounded structural, systemic, or, God forbid, political.

That overcorrection is part of why we are here. The formation problem I am naming in this episode did not emerge from nowhere. It was carefully, theologically constructed, a faith retreat inward that left whole neighborhoods, whole communities, whole systems unexamined and unchallenged.

When someone calls justice work 'political' in your church, this is the history behind that reaction. We were formed that way on purpose.

MLK and the Thread That Connects
And then, 55 years later, there was King. Who refused to accept that silence was faithfulness. Who refused to accept the personal salvation was the whole story. The only story.

We love to quote him. Selectively. Safely.

We put him on murals and t-shirts and February bulletin boards. We quote the dream. We quote the arc of the moral universe. We quote the parts that make us feel hopeful without requiring anything of us.

But King was not a comfortable prophet. He was deeply shaped by the Social Gospel tradition, and he took it further than Rauschenbusch ever did. His theology of the Beloved Community was not a feel-good vision of people holding hands across difference. It was a radical claim about how human beings are actually connected, that what destroys one person diminishes all of us. That you cannot be whole while your neighbor is broken. That we were never meant to be okay while the people around us are not and that we had a specific obligation not just to preach salvation but to dismantle the systems that were destroying people made in the image of God.

King took it further than anyone before him. He was not watching from the tenement windows. He was in the neighborhood. He was in the march. He was in the jail. He was not helping from a distance. He was practicing proximity as a spiritual discipline with his whole life, and it cost him everything.

And the white church, by and large, told him to slow down. To be patient. To stop making things political. Eight white Alabama clergymen published a statement calling his demonstrations "unwise and untimely." Not wrong. Just not now. Work within the system. Use the proper channels. And then, and this is the part that should stop us cold, they praised the police for their restraint. The same police with the fire hoses and the dogs.

Sound familiar?

We have done to King exactly what we did to Jeremiah 29. We took a hard word, softened it into something decorative, and lost the entire point. I did a whole episode on King's Letter from Birmingham Jail, what he actually said about white moderates, about people like me, about our devotion to order over justice. If you haven't heard it go back and listen. Its episode x of this season. And it is important because what he wrote in that jail cell in 1963 is one of the most accurate descriptions of the church's failure on proximity that has ever been put to paper. And it was written to clergy. To people whose job was to follow Jesus.

He was writing to us.

The Shadow Worth Naming
That Social Gospel movement, while well-intentioned, had a complicated legacy. Its institutional leadership was largely white and often paternalistic. That means they decided what poor communities needed without asking them and frequently reproduced the same power dynamics they claimed to disrupt. But it also produced women like Jane Addams, who didn't help from a distance. She moved in. Into Hull House in the middle of a Chicago immigrant neighborhood and lived alongside her neighbors for decades. Her life is closer to what we are describing today than most of the theologians who got the credit.

This is not a reason to dismiss the movement; it is a reason to learn from the whole of it. To follow the women who got it right, not just the institutions that got it wrong.

And if we look even further outside those institutions, we find something older and more rooted. Mutual aid, the practice of neighbors caring for neighbors without hierarchy or white savior complex, has ancient and deep roots in Black, Indigenous, and immigrant communities who could not wait for white institutions to show up. They took care of each other because no one else was coming. That tradition is more theologically faithful to what Jesus was actually doing, and it largely did not come from the Social Gospel establishment.

So, here is what the history tells us...

We have been here before. We have seen the neighborhood. We have sometimes crossed toward it with courage, and we have chosen sometimes to turn away. Chosen comfort. Chosen distance. Chosen silence. We are not starting from scratch. We are picking up a thread that keeps getting dropped. The question is whether we are willing to hold it this time.

Formation Reframe

Let's bring this home.

All of this, the Incarnation, Jeremiah in Babylon, King in the jail cell, Rauschenbusch in Hell's Kitchen, Jane Addams in Hull House, it is all asking the same question. What are you being shaped to see? What are you being shaped to do? And by what? Because something is always forming us. The question is whether it is pulling us toward the people around us, or away from them.

Ask yourself, what practices are shaping you right now? What rhythms are influencing how you see the people next door? And are you moving toward them, or away?

Proximity is a spiritual discipline. Not a program. Not an event. A discipline, something we practice, cultivate, return to when we fail at it. Like prayer. Like fasting. Like sabbath.

It means learning someone's name before you know their need. It means showing up at a city council meeting for families whose kids don't go to school with your kids or supporting the families when you have never had kids in the district. It means asking what a community needs instead of deciding from the outside. It means staying when it gets hard, not departing for a cleaner and more photographic mission field.

I want to speak directly to those of you who are sitting with this and feeling something between convicted and overwhelmed. Maybe you've never thought about your zip code as a theological statement before today. Maybe you're wondering if you've already gotten it wrong, if the mission trip you went on, the donation you dropped off, the food pantry shift you did once counted for anything at all. Trust me, it did. 

But it's okay to wrestle with that, and to not know where to start. We all get it wrong. I get it wrong. But that is not a reason to stay comfortable, it is part of what it means to grow. Remember back at the beginning of this season I said courage had stopped being optional? This is what that looks like in practice. It looks like showing up before we feel ready. It looks like crossing the freeway before we know what we'll say when we get there. Proximity is a discipline, Disciplines are practiced. We don't start sabbath already knowing how to rest. we don't start a prayer practice already knowing how to pray. we start. we fail. we start again.

So do it anyway. Show up anyway. Learn the name anyway. Cross the freeway anyway, even if you feel awkward and out of place and like you have no idea what you're doing. Because here's what I know: the neighborhood doesn't need us to arrive with all the answers. It needs us to arrive.

And know that looks different for each of us depending on where we are. I want to stay with that for a moment, because some of you aren't just navigating this personally. You're navigating it institutionally. Some of you lead organizations, nonprofits, churches, community groups, and the question of proximity is not just personal, it is structural. Do we ask: Are the people most affected by our work in the room when decisions get made? Are our programs building toward the day they are no longer needed, or are they building toward sustainability for the people we serve? That same posture, as an organizational commitment, looks like asking those questions out loud even when the answers are uncomfortable.

And for those of you doing global work, your work abroad does not exempt you from local accountability, myself included. If anything, it should sharpen it. If you can see injustice in another country, you can see it in your zip code. The question worth sitting with is this: is my global engagement expanding my vision, or has it become a way of avoiding my own street?

Nobody gets a pass. Not even those of us with passport stamps.

So if proximity is a spiritual discipline, and I believe it is, then the invitation is not complicated. It is just close. Closer than a plane ticket. Closer than a missions trip application. It is the street you live on, the school down the road, the neighbor whose name you do not yet know.

Right now, in this moment, families are losing food assistance. Immigrant neighbors are living in fear of what each morning might bring. People are one diagnosis away from financial ruin because healthcare is a privilege and not a right. Medicaid is on the chopping block. Affordable housing feels further away than ever. And the poor are being told the safety net is gone, so they just need to figure it out.

This is not background noise. This is the neighborhood. This is who is waiting.

Because these are not statistics. These are people. They have names. They live on streets and in homes, some of those near yours.

And we, the body of Christ, the people who claim to follow a God who pitched a tent and moved in, have an opportunity right now that we have always had but have rarely taken seriously. Not to send teams somewhere far. But to show up somewhere real. To cross the tracks. To learn the name. To show up before we have all the answers.

The neighborhood is not waiting for a mission trip.

It is waiting for a neighbor.

This week I want you to sit with one question. Not how can I help, that question is still about you. Ask instead: What is already growing here, and how can I tend it rather than replace it?

That question changes everything

Next week we are going to get even more practical about what that actually looks like in the everyday, because proximity without action is just an idea. We are going to talk about mercy in motion. Small acts. Everyday repair. The kind of healing that happens not in grand gestures but in ordinary moments of showing up.

Until then, go find your neighborhood. It has been waiting.

Jesus. Justice. No apologies.