Peasants Perspective
Peasants Perspective: A Voice from the Edge of Freedom
Join Taylor Johnatakis, a self-proclaimed “peasant” turned podcaster, on an unfiltered journey through family, faith, and the fight for American ideals. From the depths of DC Jail—where he recorded during a 14-month sentence tied to January 6—to his triumphant return home after a Trump clemency in 2025, Taylor delivers raw, heartfelt commentary for the common man. Expect a mix of gritty storytelling, reflections on liberty lost and reclaimed, and timeless lessons drawn from his life as a septic designer, father, and reluctant rebel. Whether he’s reading Dr. Seuss to his kids or dissecting the state of the republic, Peasants Perspective is a bold, unpolished call to stay grounded amidst chaos. Subscribe for a front-row seat to a story that’s as real as it gets—no filter, no apologies.
Peasants Perspective
Beyond the Matrix: Reclaiming Your Power in a Fabricated World
What if everything you're witnessing in the world is merely an elaborate stage production? That's the unsettling proposition we explore in this eye-opening episode about the manufactured realities shaping our lives.
A bombshell confession from a Mossad agent on 60 Minutes reveals the chilling truth behind global operations: "We create a pretend world. We are a global production company. We write the screenplay, we're the directors... The world is our stage." This isn't conspiracy theory—it's straight from the source.
We examine shocking congressional testimony about COVID vaccines causing an 82% miscarriage rate in first-trimester pregnancies—data deliberately concealed while experts insisted on safety. The systematic suppression of dissent exposes how authority is weaponized when financial interests are at stake. When RFK Jr. confronted media about their "trust the experts" messaging, the immediate denial despite overwhelming evidence demonstrates the gaslighting techniques keeping us disoriented.
Donald Trump's effectiveness as a communicator is analyzed through Scott Adams' "master wizard" framework. His persuasive techniques—linguistic kill shots, powerful visual anchors, and strategic vagueness—allow him to cut through manufactured realities and connect authentically. Beyond political theater, we share a touching story of Trump stopping to help a suicidal woman on New York streets, revealing character rarely captured in media narratives.
The most liberating realization? Government isn't paternal—it doesn't love you, it didn't create you. Once we stop projecting our goodness onto institutions and recognize we're living in a projection, we can focus on what's real: family, community, and personal sovereignty. The peasant's perspective—practical wisdom and healthy skepticism toward authority—offers our path forward.
Ready to see behind the curtain? Join our community at PeasantsPerspective.com where we're building a movement of clear-eyed truth-seekers who refuse to be players in someone else's production.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her subject had no bread, do you know what she said? Let them eat cake here. You take the bomb we're getting screwed man.
Speaker 3:Every time we turn around we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's gonna be through podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys. The little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's gotta stop. Peasants, man, we're just peasants, every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background With the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning peasants. Welcome to another episode of the peasants perspective. We're back. We're just peasants, every one of us, everywhere. Whoops, just checking, checking the socials. Make sure we went live. See, everywhere we went live. It's friday, it's friday, yeah, we are good on everywhere. I've checked so far. Ron, good job, nailed it. Okay.
Speaker 3:Let's last place to check oh, please, please I hope everybody uh has enjoyed their week and I appreciate you hanging with us while we were traveling.
Speaker 7:That was fun all right, it was fun for me to sleep in I got some feedback yesterday.
Speaker 3:People were were laughing at the show starting me jumping problems. Oh, what a party. All right here, we go.
Speaker 7:Turns out, having a producer is pretty important, even if he's not that smart, and kind of lazy.
Speaker 3:You know one of the things I listened to, this podcast, uh, between tucker carlson and katherine austin fitz. Katherine austin fitz was the department of secretary of housing, I think during the bush administration so very high level investment banker.
Speaker 3:Um, she was around obviously during, like the mortgage meltdown and did prevent it anyway, saw some things, saw some things, did some things, had some things happen. So, anyways, go listen to that podcast. It's, it's very much in line with the theme of our show and it just once again reinforces the fact we're on the right side of this. How long is it?
Speaker 7:like an hour.
Speaker 3:Oh, it's a tucker carlson podcast or two or whatever. It is okay cool it's, you know, not overwhelming, but go take a listen to it everybody. I'm getting a feedback in my ears at a delay. What is it? Does it sound? Sounds good? Yeah, five by five out there, everybody five by five. Apparently that's military speak, for sounds coming good five by five.
Speaker 3:I'm not military oh my dad told me that okay, all right, I'm gonna close out of all these. Oh, hey, debbie, okay, okay. So a couple things happened. A big beautiful bill passed yesterday yeah sounds like it's big which one?
Speaker 7:I mean, I watched a couple bills get signed in washington and they were pretty big.
Speaker 3:They were pretty big now the big, huge reconciliation bill. This is the big. They're not calling it an omnibus, they've. They've relabeled it to big, beautiful bill. But basically what this does is it avoids the filibuster in the senate. So rather than do actual bills, we do these reconciliations which apparently the Senate agreed to a long time ago that they didn't have to do. That Couldn't do the filibuster, so the Senate's picking it up, this thing. Here's the bottom line, and I was talking to my wife about this yesterday. I was like I'm very disconnected from this. Right, I absolutely understand the system. Right, I'm not. I absolutely understand the system. I understand the smoke monster I'm looking at when you're talking about trillions and trillions of dollars and debts and you know your mortgages are underwritten and they're putting these trenches with all these big, huge international bankers and Saudi sheiks buying it and Japanese and Chinese, and the idea is like someday, if all those debts came due, they would come foreclose on your house and you would just willingly walk away and it would be like, ah right.
Speaker 3:Well to me it's like no, because if they start foreclosing on everything, like if they make the system so bad that nobody can pay their debts and make money, and then all of a sudden you start having foreclosures by the time you're you know a couple of houses in on my street you're not foreclosing on any more houses. Yeah, you know, there's this is the possession becomes nine tenths of the law, like come and get it over my dead body attitude. And so that's where they use. It's a slow burn. You know BlackRock buying up houses paying full price. Well, then, nobody owns them. Then they just are evicting them.
Speaker 3:And you know again, but does black rock really believe they could evict everybody? Do you know what I mean? Like again, if you start evicting everybody, like that you're only going to evict a few in my neighborhood and pretty soon evict no more. Yeah, right, so there's kind of like that that's their hubris, but that's what they're doing. So when we're trillions and trillions and we have to pay this off on our grandkids, I'm like, yeah, yeah, I should teach people not to be dependent on you guys. Right, like I'm calling you the matrix, the smoke monster. You've created this financial house of cards that money's based in nothing. I'm going to focus on things that are real. I'm going to try to own real estate free and clear. I'm going to try to own some gold. I'm going to try to have a bitcoin wallet that's separate from some online thing that they can turn off assets that are not a fiat currency, like get back to basics you know, what I mean, and it's like, if you're chasing money, what are you chasing right now?
Speaker 3:or what are you chasing you know? I think jesus explained it well. No, you're not the salt of the earth when he said that it was solarium. Solarium was salary like roman soldiers got paid in salt coins.
Speaker 3:You guys are just chasing a bunch of salt, don't you know? You, you're the money, you're the salt, you're the thing of value, right? It's never really a good time to go make another big hedge fund, blah, blah, blah, unless it's actually taking care of your family, you know. If it's just for money's sake, that's then holding real value. Yeah, holding real value. So we have to remember that we're living in a world that's highly constructed.
Speaker 7:Shakespeare said it first. He said all the world's the stage and we're just the actors. Yeah, we're the permanent value.
Speaker 3:The money is just a temporary, you know very, uh slippery value yes, so we're going to start to show today, opening our eyes a little bit, realizing that we're in a projection, right, and hollywood tries to tell this to us. And you know what's the accusation? Kanye west, hollywood's run by jews. Okay, just keep this in the back of your mind for a moment. Here, all the world's a stage, there's a projection of what is history, what's normal, and you know, for those people that go digging and they go, well, actually, a little bit of this in history, and we consider adding color, but as long as it's with the mainstream narrative.
Speaker 3:But for those of us that are a little bit more contrarian by nature, right, and ask a few questions and go. I don't think what you're telling me is right. We see this, I'm helping you. I want you to see this. We're peasants, no matter who's in charge, no matter what dominant religions there. We're the ones that are asked to farm the fields. We're the ones that are asked to fix the fields. We're the ones that are asked to fix the cars.
Speaker 3:We're the ones that are asked to build the roads, regardless of what's in the history regardless of what's in the history books food, water, shelter, family tribe right like I gotta take care of it now. And when we lose touch with that, if they lose touch with our responsibility and things we start to buy into a created world and that created world becomes pretty dangerous. So this right here was six months ago. 60 Minutes, did a deal. Do you remember when Israel got the pagers and then the radios to explode in the hands of Hezbollah?
Speaker 7:Yeah.
Speaker 3:How did that happen? So they had. They had a what appears here to be a Mossad agent on 60 Minutes talking about this operation and how it goes, and there's something he says in here that when you hear it it should send chills through your spine, because this is confirming exactly the kind of thing I'm saying about Hegelian dialectic smoke screens, who use a topic to create something else. They get you to buy into delusion and a reality that's actually not real.
Speaker 7:How did you convince Hezbollah to buy this?
Speaker 6:Well, obviously they didn't know that they were buying it from Israel.
Speaker 10:Who did they buy it from, or think they were buying it from?
Speaker 6:We have an incredible array of possibilities of creating foreign companies that have no way being traced back to Israel Shell companies over shell companies, who affect the supply chain to our favor. We create a pretend world. We are a global production company. We write the screenplay, we're the directors, we're the producers, we're the main actors. The world is our stage.
Speaker 7:How did you convince Hezbollah?
Speaker 3:to buy this. That's an intelligence agency. Hold on.
Speaker 7:It sounds like we're talking to AI. I mean, who is this guy?
Speaker 3:I don't know. 60 Minutes Reddit. They're fake news. But this is fake news. Telling you you're fake news. Yeah, exactly, everything's fake. We create a fake world Shell companies, we produce it. We're funneling. Think about you know, to build a business you have to have a profit incentive right there's got to be like it. If it doesn't, it's got to make sense. Got to make sense, that's great yeah well, when you can just print money, you can have a business.
Speaker 6:That doesn't make sense yeah, anything, this is what the mob would do.
Speaker 3:You got a laundromat that nobody seems to ever do laundry in, but yet it makes money In a bad location. You know they're buying swampland and building hotels and casinos out in the middle of nowhere. Why Not? Because they make money, because that's where they launder. They've got to launder a lot of cash. So in this case, when your cash isn't your incentive, it's control.
Speaker 3:It's bombs and things it's, you know, destruction of life or whatever your agenda is. When you're not doing the normal carrots and sticks of what's real and you're living in delusion, that's where you end up and that's what the whole thing is. In this book Sapiens, he has a chapter in here about corporations and it's like we treat it like like it's real, right. So I got a ticket and as I'm looking through the ticket, it says on there, uh, um, something, county, and then it says slash or other, uh other public body, like who's the jurist, who's the jurisdiction that this would go to? This is public body. Why do they use the word body? Um, I don't know.
Speaker 7:Well, they could use corpse, but why wouldn't they use the word potty? I don't know.
Speaker 3:Well, they could use corpse. But why wouldn't they use corpse? It's kind of an antiquated gross word, right yeah. So why don't they use corporation?
Speaker 7:I don't know.
Speaker 3:It's the same thing, corporation. Yeah, it is the same thing they use public body, because if they openly said public corporation, referring to the city. Do you see what I'm saying?
Speaker 7:Might be too much on the nose. It might be too much.
Speaker 3:It's a construct, it's not real. It's contracts, right. So they trick us a lot of times. And the other thing too, is you got to realize and we've talked about this we don't, we shouldn't project our goodness onto these people. Our profit incentive is just to pay the bills, right. Everybody's dream is just like well, if I could just have money and spend time with my family, how great would that be. Yeah, right, yeah, of course. So keep in mind, our motivation is real. Our motivation is the motivation God gave us. It's, you know, everybody just wants to get paid and occasionally, get right and have a family and have that true wealth, to have people around you when you die, to have you know what I'm saying the joys of life.
Speaker 7:Just be left alone so you can enjoy the time that you have on this.
Speaker 3:None of us are in it for the money, it just turns out it's incredibly important. Yeah, so like we have that perspective, we're just peasants, we'll do the difficult things just to put food on the table. That's OK, right. We're just peasants, we'll do the difficult things just to put food on the table. That's okay, right. And we understand sunrises in the east, plant your fields in the spring, harvest in the fall, basic stuff. But when we're imposed upon, we don't often ask ourselves why are we being imposed upon? I don't do this. Yeah, you're right. Do you see what I'm?
Speaker 7:saying yeah.
Speaker 3:So we live through 2020. And in many ways, this is like a continuation of the show we used to have here we go, Same topics, but we live through 2020, where they forced vaccination and a lot of us were like, hey, this isn't right. And those of you who took the vaccine you know I've got loved ones, it doesn't matter for whatever reason for whatever reason, it doesn't matter what you did.
Speaker 3:It matters what you, what you know and do now, because going forward it's like are you going to? You know, is the fisherman going to sink the line? Are you going to spit the bait?
Speaker 3:right this is your chance, fish, because they're coming for you. So this, now that trump's in office and they're really dedicated to transparency and keep in mind, trump was a part of this whole covid narrative and the lockdowns and all that kind of stuff. So I don't I've got opinions on what it was, what it was and all that kind of stuff. So I don't I've got opinions on what it was, what it wasn't, all that kind of stuff. But at the end of the day, let's look at reality, what actually happened. And this was where, remember, the media was trying to constantly spin people and constantly get people to not believe themselves, to not do their own research, to trust experts. Right, we have the solution. Don't worry, we've got your best interest in mind. All the things they said, this is for you, to keep you safe. Yeah, don't Google it, don't.
Speaker 7:Google it. This is what has actually happened.
Speaker 3:Go read my writings on PeasantsPerspectivecom where I talk about that population reduction is one of the goals. The Republican Party is pro-war, but, oh yeah, they're pro-choice. And then the Democrat Party is pro-life. The Democrat Party is pro excuse me, pro life. The Democrat Party is poor choice, but they're antiwar. But both of them are ultimately making you kill somebody somewhere, right, and I'm opposed to killing at all. So Trump is unique because he's like how about we just be pro life? No war because you're killing 5000 killed kids a day, russia and Ukraine and pro pro life Because why would we kill? The unborn? Life is precious, right, it's like the same principle applies, but the party system splits the issue, thereby splitting your ability to be the good guy in the situation. Are we the baddies?
Speaker 7:Yes.
Speaker 3:Right. So keep in mind, for people that push the jab, for people that advocated, this was the net result.
Speaker 12:It was institutionalized in the now infamous Shima Bakuro study published on April 21st 2020.
Speaker 3:And, by the way, it's all black. What do you mean? It's all black.
Speaker 7:It's got a black screen.
Speaker 3:But now.
Speaker 7:Yeah, what Shouldn't?
Speaker 3:be, black.
Speaker 7:There you go. Ok, it's working.
Speaker 12:OK, so this was in a congressional hearing yesterday 21 in the digital version of the New England Journal of Medicine. 21 authors claim the miscarriage rate was 12.6%, but the raw data revealed an 82% miscarriage rate in women vaccinated during the first trimester, whoa. This figure mirrors the effects of chemical abortion drugs such as RU486. Also in the same journal edition on the same day, an op-ed appeared by CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and Journal Editor-in-Chief Eric Rubin. These publications were riddled with conflicts of interest and deliberate misrepresentations intended to coerce pregnant women into taking vaccines. Subsequent studies have also claimed that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective during pregnancy and have been rebuked by respected researchers. These publications are fundamentally compromised by serious conflicts of interest, ranging from biased funding sources and mandates and even threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. Between 2020 and 2022, pharmaceutical companies paid $1.06 billion to reviewers at leading medical journals the New England Journal of Medicine, jama, lancet and BMJ thus corrupting the peer review process. At least six existing studies three from CDC, fda and two from Pfizer revealed major breaches in safety signals for COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy. These findings were ignored. Conversely, countless independent researchers with no conflicts of interest published findings that contradicted the false narratives and the pharmaceutical industry narratives, only to be rewarded by persecution, censorship and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. This is not hypothetical. It happened to me.
Speaker 12:On February 8th 2025, our team of researchers published a peer-reviewed study in science, public health policy and the law. We identified 37 adverse pregnancy outcomes significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccine, including miscarriage, stillbirth, birth defects, cervical insufficiency, premature rupture of membranes, preterm birth and death of the newborn. Lynn and colleagues, in a major journal publication, documented that the COVID-19 vaccine traverses the placenta, enters the fetal blood and bioactively produces spike protein in the placenta and the lining of the uterus. Recently, animal studies revealed the mRNA COVID vaccine causes the destruction of 60% of the ovarian reserve in rats. This catastrophic public health failure was financed with taxpayer dollars and channeled through federal agencies to medical gatekeepers such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, acog, the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, abog, and the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine, smfm. These organizations have abandoned their ethics and responsibilities to physicians and patients and must be held accountable. I urge the government to immediately halt all funding to these entities and to end every promotional campaign that coerces or recommends experimental mRNA therapies to pregnant women. This must stop now.
Speaker 3:Thank you, the COVID vaccine that they openly encouraged pregnant women to get had the same effect as an abortion drug. Yeah, encouraged is a really nice term there, and on one hand, you know oh, we've got demographic failure. Hello, that's what these people want. They're building underground bunkers. They're advancing AI and robotics Right, they knowingly make you sick to profit off of you. Like the whole thing is yeah, look at this, the whole world's a stage and we're just in a Truman show.
Speaker 7:Yeah, no, it's like more like Escape from LA world's a stage and we're just in a truman show.
Speaker 3:yeah, no, it's like more like escape from la. Okay, and again, the media's in on this. Clearly, the tell-all vision right, they're programming you. Hello, okay, the program, what are you being programmed? So here's, uh, caitlin collins talking up to rfk. And again, the gaslighting and the hubris of these people. And it's not just cnn, it's fox news, it's, it's all of them, anybody that's broadcasting on a channel that requires a license to broadcast. Yes, okay, they're, they're in bed with the government. And then the government, they're, they're the. You know what I mean. You hear the? This is a cover-up that joe biden was targeting joe scarborough. To get joe Scarborough because he's an influencer on this. You know what I mean? That's hello.
Speaker 7:That's a really important point. I was just thinking about that. You mentioned that if they get a license and it's like, yes, if they get a license, that's exactly where the impingement is, and right now, podcasts don't have license.
Speaker 3:The podcast the revolution will be podcast.
Speaker 7:Yes, this is the pamphlet. Yes, and we can't, and it's only a matter of time before they come for it. Yes, and that's why I'm, that's why I'm bringing it up, so that in the future, when there are politicians that start talking about licenses are needed for podcasts.
Speaker 3:You need to oppose that shit like hard yes, yes, because, well, that's essentially what you have by regulation, free speech hate speech is there. They can't license it because it would look too weird. Oh, if you're, if you're what you have by regulation, free speech, hate speech is there. They can't license it because it would look too weird. Oh, if you're, if you're talking, you have to have a license, right, you know, and we all know, you can't have what about a company Zoom meeting, or you know? It's like OK, so instead we'll just have these hate speech laws, right? You see what I'm saying? Yes, same same concept. It's it control of what you're saying, it's gatekeeping Exactly the real people that are that. You know someone like Donald Trump who accepts the challenge. He'll criticize you openly, right, but that's not censorship. Biden wouldn't criticize you openly, but on the back door, they were censoring you. Trump will take all comers and then make you look stupid if you, because he's a wizard.
Speaker 7:We'll talk about that.
Speaker 3:Well, yeah, kind uh what he did with the african president, like oh yeah, you want to watch a video. Instead of in the dark room, he does it in the front room that's the thing we have to bring all this stuff to the light, open and notorious.
Speaker 3:You're talking about the government. You need wild transparency, you know, and I don't. I don't know. I'm of an. I had a discussion with another j6er who worked for the nsa, worked alongside snowden, actually left the nsa when snowden did release because he was like I can't work for this guy, okay, but he was a intelligence officer in the navy, speaks multiple languages, all right, high-end dude, okay, high-end dude, one of the smartest guys I've ever met, and that says a lot. So he, I don't know where I was going with this.
Speaker 7:You're gonna say something about what he was into oh, he was.
Speaker 3:He was like, it'll come back. Let me listen, let's listen to this clip and I'll think about all right, a second you know the message.
Speaker 13:message was to trust the science and what studies were finding During COVID, that was a bad message.
Speaker 4:No, it was trust the experts. That's what you kept telling us Trust the experts. I don't know that.
Speaker 13:I ever said that. I mean we talked to the officials. Your network was saying it every day. We took the briefings live every day with all the experts.
Speaker 4:Those are President Trump's doctors. It every day.
Speaker 13:We we took the briefings live every day with all the experts that president but those are present the people president trump brought out to the briefings.
Speaker 4:Oh, president trump brought, and I can, I can, I can tell you what president trump did right and what president biden did wrong.
Speaker 13:But what I'm saying to you, I want to get back to what your comment was about, that you said that people should not take your medical advice. Is that that's your position? Yeah, absolutely.
Speaker 4:People should not be taking medical advice. I'm somebody who is not a physician, but they should, and they should also be skeptical about any medical advice. They need to do their own research. You know you're a mom. If you're a mom, you do your own research on your baby carriage, on your baby bottles, on your baby formula.
Speaker 13:But they don't have medical degrees. Obviously, If you're a mom and you're looking at what science has been tested, they trust their doctors and their pediatricians, you know one of the responsibilities of living in a democracy where physicians and every sort of expert are subject to all kinds of biases.
Speaker 4:One of the responsibilities of living in a democracy is to do your own research and to make up your own mind.
Speaker 13:So that's your message to moms or to anyone, is to do your own research.
Speaker 4:I would say be skeptical of authority. My father told me that when I was a young kid People in authority lie and we've seen a lot of that in our country and people in the media lie and uh, and people need to make their own judgments and be skeptical and maintain their capacity for critical thinking, and that was shut down during covet and the media was complicit in that disagree on that last part.
Speaker 13:Secretary kennedy, thank you for your time come on disagree on that last part.
Speaker 3:Yeah, of course I didn't tell people. Oh my gosh, super clip incoming the gas lighting is unreal. I don't agree with that last part. What are you doing? What are you doing? Just say you're propagating. We'd love just be the spokesperson for the party. Like why can't we? Just I wouldn't, I wouldn't mind going to msnbc if I knew it was just you know dnc tv. Like call it dnc tv and democrats will tune in what's the?
Speaker 7:yeah, they sure would right.
Speaker 3:Sell it that way. What's the spend of the day? You know how popular opinion shows are night at night are because they wear their opinion on their right here, right. The point of a new show is either the pass on facts that are undisputable or you're catering public and you know public awareness by what information you provide. This is the discussion I had with matt. He is got top secret clearances, confidential, and he has in his mind he's like some things need to be classified, can't be shared with the public, they're too dangerous. And'm like the only thought for me that is, if they're too dangerous, if they destabilize the governing body itself, that's the only reason it would be too much, because if it helped them have power, help them do whatever their agenda was, if it was in the common good and our needs were aligned, they would disclose it.
Speaker 3:Oh they would the only reason you don't disclose it is because it's not in line with your needs. I understand a very temporary matter of confidentiality, like an attack plan If you're actually in war, but the reasons why we're at war should not be classified. Does that make sense? I understand micro classification, but when we're talking about anything that's not in the moment operation and as soon as the operation's over, by the way, you got to unclassify it, yeah, in the story, right, but then they're. Oh well, we don't want you to know our methods. No, I actually do, because I don't always believe the ends justify the means. That's not my belief, because I don't believe this is it, but we don't want the enemy to you know, if all the world's on stage and we're just the actors, then someone's watching.
Speaker 3:So I I don't really believe this is it. I believe there's something else to it. So I don't always believe the ends justify the means. It's pretty logical. It's pretty logical. Do people in power lie? Yeah, that mantle of authority does not strip them of of their humanity. Okay, I mean anybody who's. I mean until when you're a child and you have good parents, that's authority and you trust them and and they love you and they have your best interest in mind. So even when they punish you as you mature, you see the, the benefit in it. Don't project that on to government. It is not paternal, it does not love you, it did not sire you, it did not. It does that make sense? You created it, it did not create you. Yes, do not project the divine love onto something like the government.
Speaker 7:That's cold, that's cold callous visible and a smoke monster and his policy and it does not love anybody.
Speaker 3:It does not love anybody okay, no, that's why it's so important that you find someone who has the genuine characteristics. If you for the necessary evil of government like donald trump, right to do it, because otherwise, if you have a cold, callous, glossy behind the eyes mannequin as president b Biden, you get what we got the last four years. How'd you like that inflation? How'd you like it? You know, I didn't really appreciate it. How did you like? I'm still not like the migration. I mean, you know, go talk to your kids. If you live in a school district where now you know, 50% of the kids are don't speak english as a primary language, how do you like it? How do you like it? If you miscarried, you took a shot, how do you like it?
Speaker 3:Right, don't trust these people. Don't trust the experts, especially people who say trust me, the people who say here, here's the information I have. You judge, you're only as good as the information you have. I'm not here to gatekeep, I'm here to be a conduit, that's it, right. I just want to show you guys hey, this is what I'm looking at, this is my opinion. Develop your own, come talk. Right, I love debate.
Speaker 7:Look, I love debate well, yeah, that was the problem during covid is nobody was allowed to debate. It was it was like no question, just trust the experts, no matter what they weren't saying, just trust us, yeah so here's elon musk.
Speaker 3:Hey, again being asked by experts. This is some journalist doing one of elon musk's big thing, where they put his face in 30 feet by 20 feet wide right and he's being interviewed and asked about legislation and the budget. And he's being asked about an ev bill. Right, that's going to have a bill. And keep in mind the premise of which the question's being asked the assumptive idea that this is a good idea. It's just a matter of by degree. Okay, we have to be very cautious of the argument that, oh, this is inertia and it has to be this way. It's just a matter of to what degree. Be cautious of that argument. Right, christ preached a utopia by living it, not not by forcing others to do it. He invited others to follow. Okay, be wary of the premise that you have to do something. Sometimes we have to resist the urge to do something, okay. So here is, and let the natural marketplace do its thing.
Speaker 11:Here's elon musk honestly, I would just can this whole bill. Don't pass it. That's my recommendation.
Speaker 13:What about the support, though, for the charging?
Speaker 10:network. I mean, there are parts of this bill no no.
Speaker 11:Do we need support for gas stations? We don't. There's no need for support for charging network. I would delete it. Delete, okay, all right. I'm literally saying get rid of all subsidies, also for oil and gas.
Speaker 10:Think about also how this affects your competitors.
Speaker 11:I mean, maybe they need it, I don't know. I'm in favor of deleting subsidies. I mean, when we started Tesla, there were no EV subsidies at all and gasoline was super cheap. The $7,500 tax credit came as a result not of Tesla activity, but of General Motors lobbying for it. I would just say delete them all.
Speaker 13:There's some other good things in this bill. Some would argue I mean a lot of money earmarked for R&D. Would you want to put that towards something? No, okay, all right, we're going to move on from the bill because I think we get what you're saying on it In general, if we don't cut government spending, something really bad is going to happen.
Speaker 11:This is crazy.
Speaker 3:Our spending is so far in excessive revenue. It's insane. Yeah, what's bad gonna happen? It's the government's gonna disappear.
Speaker 3:And then now you're gonna find out if that second amendment and you're adequately armed enough yeah it seems extreme unless you lived in you know 1860 in the civil war showed up on your door. You know what I mean. Like it seems extreme until you're something crazy happens and the political leadership says we hate donald trump, we're succeeding from the union and I live in washington, and we live in washington state, where you can't buy a semi-automatic rifle anymore yeah.
Speaker 3:So again, it's stay and fight, or are they taking away your ability to fight and making it so you have to pick your battle so early? You have no support right. Are you the first one being foreclosed on? Hey, I just got through in prison for political charges, straight up.
Speaker 3:Yeah right, scott adams just said oh you, you know if you and somebody's gonna be in the next wave, yeah so you know we don't get a handle this is real, like I, I'm glad that I stood strong and the people came to my aid. I'm definitely grateful for that, I will. I I understand this very clearly who my allies were, who the people came to my aid. I'm definitely grateful for that, I will. I understand this very clearly who my allies were, who the people's bank was, who helped my family get through. Right, I understand I know who stood up and stepped up and you know what?
Speaker 3:It wasn't always the people that you would think so. It was the people who believed what we believe. It wasn't the people sometimes you would think would should be there based on other obligation. You know, and you realize oh, I was the one contributing, I wasn't. There's no exchange there. Does that make sense? But then, in another area that's why we do this podcast I'm trying to pay people back. You know, in a big, in a big way, I'm trying to pay people back, provide something of value for all the people. That gave me five bucks and twenty five bucks at a time. You know, let's do this, but still go to buy a coffee and you can continue to.
Speaker 3:Yeah, support the show there's lots of ways there's a couple links in there to go support the show. Figure out that five bucks was yesterday. Yeah, five bucks was yesterday. No, but seriously, you know we're not in this for the money turns out. It's incredibly important these subscriptions don't pay for themselves Broadcast things, okay. So there's a.
Speaker 3:I want to make sure I get a chance to play this and talk about it adequately. And so this is Scott Adams, and I'd never saw this, but if you go read some of my political writings, scott, I've been listening to Scott Adams for a long time, and the reason I listened to him is because I think a lot like him. I can see the parallels and there's things that he and I would disagree on because we have different bits of information. I'm not offering the whole solution, I'm just offering a way to think about it and look at it, and I see in him a parallel figure where he could look at a thing from different angles, think first before seeking to be understood. He's got all the different things that make make his opinion to me matter, simply because he's, you know, applies his lived experience, uses logic and reason, but also understands that people are very fungible Right. It's very interesting to watch, and when he talks about Donald Trump, I see in him much the same.
Speaker 3:Some of the things he says in here. I'm like, oh my gosh, I loved it when I got in prison to do a lot of essays and writing, because you really get to use the economy of words to say what you want to say, and that's what this is. This is one of my essays that he read. You know that's how I feel about it If I were to be assessing Donald Trump. I love his language here and the way he says it, and this is what I. Well, there's a yeah, let's watch this. It's well worth it, and it's Scott Adams describing why Donald Trump is a wizard and why why it is that Donald Trump is able to do what he's going to do. And when you recognize this, you want to also understand that we have the power to do this too. Collectively, we can reshape the world we live in.
Speaker 9:Donald Trump is a set of skills that are so deep and so exquisite. It would be hard for me to imagine anybody beating him, and so I've predicted he'll go all the way and win the presidency. Donald Trump has a way with words and people.
Speaker 14:I will be phenomenal to the limit. I have many Hispanics working for me, many, many Hispanics. We're rounding them up in a very humane way, in a very nice way, and they're going to be happy Vote for me because we're going to make America great again. But the media don't get him and he doesn't appreciate it. Some of the media is among the worst people I've ever met, and I mean a pretty good percentage is really a terrible group of people.
Speaker 2:Scott Adams, prolific author, blogger and creator of Dilbert, thinks they're all getting trolled.
Speaker 9:I'm saying I see a flamethrower, I think the flamethrower guy wins in the stick fight.
Speaker 2:Though he doesn't support Trump or any other candidate, he believes that Trump is in fact, a master wizard. Trump or any other candidate, he believes that Trump is in fact, a master wizard.
Speaker 9:The idea of the master wizard hypothesis says that there are some people in the world living people who are masters of persuasion. They've got a linguistic gift for influencing people and they're using actual technique. What I saw in Trump was someone who was highly trained and that a lot of the things that the media were reporting as sort of random insults and bluster and just Trump being Trump, looked to me like a lot of deep technique that I recognize from the fields of hypnosis and persuasion. So let me give you a few examples of the technique that Trump uses. There's something that I call the linguistic kill shot, and what that is is a engineered set of words that essentially changes an argument or ends it so decisively. I call it a kill shot. So one of the ones that Donald Trump used was when he referred to Jeb Bush being a low energy guy.
Speaker 14:Very, very low energy. So low energy that every time you watch him you fall asleep. You cannot take more energy tonight. I like that.
Speaker 9:Or when he referred to Carly Fiorina as a robot.
Speaker 14:Like a robot. Like a robot.
Speaker 9:Or Carson as nice.
Speaker 14:Ben is a nice man. He's actually a really nice guy.
Speaker 9:All of these have the same quality they're words you haven't heard in the political realm before, so they're sort of virginal words that he can use the way he wants. They don't have a lot of baggage with them. But they also perfectly fit what you are already thinking about these people. They weren't random insults and once you hear it you can never get it out of your mind. That's how powerful it is. You notice that he insults people that come at him.
Speaker 14:I'm telling you, anybody that would view it that way has to be a little bit of a deviant.
Speaker 9:And he also compliments people quite effusively when they're nice, or at least they're not bothering him.
Speaker 14:I think they like me in a certain way, which is nice.
Speaker 9:It's always nice to be liked, so what he's done is he's created a fairly large gap between insulting Trump, where he'll take you down, or being nice to him, where he'll take you up.
Speaker 10:It sounds like you're saying I have leverage over the Republican Party so they better be nice to me.
Speaker 9:Well, essentially, I want to be treated fairly. That's true. I do want to be nice. You go against him. You know there's a little bit more to lose. An anchor is something big and visual and emotional that takes you off of whatever you were thinking before, just because it's a bigger thought. So, for example, when Trump was in his first debate.
Speaker 13:You've called women. You don't like fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals.
Speaker 9:That was a terrible thing for him to answer with a direct answer, but he didn't do that. Your Twitter account Only Rosie O'Donnell the direct answer, but he didn't do that. Your Twitter account Only Rosie O'Donnell. Immediately you go to this big visual. Everybody knows her. His base probably has a negative feeling about her and all the headlines became about Rosie O'Donnell instead of. Is Trump a sexist?
Speaker 14:I blurted out the name Rosie O'Donnell and the place went crazy and it really had a big impact on her questioning.
Speaker 9:Kind of brilliant. He does the same thing with his idea for immigration and for the wall. The wall is this big, visual, magnificent thing in your head.
Speaker 14:It will be a real wall. It'll be a wall that works. It'll actually be a wall that will look good, a big, beautiful, powerful wall. It can have a gate, it can have a door, it can have a tremendous, beautiful, wide-open door, nice, big door, even if you hate it.
Speaker 9:It's still big and visual and it takes all the attention in that direction, and that's what he wants. One of the things that Trump does really well is he uses a type of linguistic judo. For example, there was one interviewer who said you're kind of a whiner.
Speaker 10:Rich Lowry says that you are the most fabulous whiner in the world.
Speaker 9:And instead of saying no, I'm not a whiner, trump embraced it like judo.
Speaker 14:He took the force of the label and said I am a whiner and I'm a whiner and I keep whining and whining until I win.
Speaker 9:And I'm going to win for the country and I'm going to make our country great again. So he changed whiner into the biggest voice for change, and he did it with just a few words. It's amazing. Likewise, if Trump says anything about capitalism in the context of the pope, it's just not going to come out right. So instead, trump doesn't take the bait.
Speaker 14:What do you say in response to the pope? I'd say ISIS wants to get you.
Speaker 9:It's such a big, bold, thought you talk to him about capitalism.
Speaker 15:You scare the pope, no, no.
Speaker 9:I'm going to have to scare the pope. All your attention just goes to that. He uses vagueness as a tool. This is a trick I learned in hypnosis class. Sometimes you want to tell a story in a way that lets people fill in the blanks with whatever would make them the happiest. So if Trump has a vague idea about foreign policy, just like I have the Chinese banks in my buildings.
Speaker 14:they listen to me, they respect me. You're a vague idea about the economy. My economy will expand so rapidly we're going to take jobs back from other countries.
Speaker 9:You're a vague idea about how to handle ISIS. I would end ISIS forcefully. People fill in the blanks with brilliant plans that are their own plans. It's more of a strategy than you imagine it is. But he has another thing going for him. He's developed the Trump persona over many years. He can do what nobody can do as a politician. He can change his mind, raising the Social Security retirement age to 70.
Speaker 7:Is that? Still your plan.
Speaker 9:Not anymore. He can say I'm not going to tell you what I'll do, I'll just hire good people to do it.
Speaker 14:I have the smartest people on Wall Street lined up already.
Speaker 9:And he also can tell a joke. He can be outrageous.
Speaker 14:I'm worried if you're president.
Speaker 9:I'll get deported, all right. That's what I'm worried about. We're going to try like hell to keep you here, bill. You see apple pie and flags and eagles coming out of his ass when he talks. A lot of people ask me what could bring down Donald Trump. Probably there's no defense, and that's why I predicted he probably will win the presidency, based just on skill. I've said that if Trump wins, it might change how we see the world, not just how we see politics, but how we see humans and how humans are influenced. And how little reason has anything to do with what we do. In my book, how to Fail at Almost Everything and Still Win Big, I write about the moist robot idea. It's the idea that humans are essentially robots that are made of meat. In that world, emotion and influence and all the techniques that Trump uses are really the only things that explain what's happening in the world. Reason will never be a satisfying explanation of what you see.
Speaker 14:We're going to build a wall and we're going to create a border. It's going to be a great wall and it's not going to be very expensive.
Speaker 9:I find it terribly interesting that you can defend an entirely different view of the world with the same data that's used to defend the standard model. So whenever I can do that, I'm so there, because as soon as you realize that the model you've been looking at maybe isn't so firm as you thought, then you're free.
Speaker 3:When you can look at a model and see it one way and then see it another. You're free because you realize it's just a matter of perspective. That is this show that we are the counter to the mainstream. We're simply looking at it from the perspective of the ground. How does this affect me? Because this whole system is on my back. These people are fighting over you. You're the money, yes, you're the thing of value.
Speaker 7:Quit listening to the experts and as soon as you become indispensable.
Speaker 3:You lose your as soon as you don't recognize the whole thing is on you. You lose your buy-in. The moment can see it. You become free because you don't become someone else's sheep. You become your own. You become your own sheep, you become your own shepherd, whatever it is.
Speaker 7:Well, you've got to become your own expert.
Speaker 3:You've got to become your own expert. Don't trust the experts. They're just you, with a little different life experience. Take the advice, take it into consideration. Make your own decisions. Basic principles Take the advice, take it into consideration. Make your own decisions. Basic principles right. Don't project your goodness onto other people. You should always live in a world of trust and verify always yeah, right, okay, so what other? The other thing too, and this is not meant to be just a you know rub up on Trump session, but he is really changing things and he's allowing, he's, he's, in my opinion, merging in a lot of different perspectives. This is who Trump is and this is the difference between him and many of the politicians that have come before is Trump, in the private, seems to act a different way than what the media projects.
Speaker 10:But that's OK because Trump knows how the media works. So New York is about the Tish James probe doing a little interview right there by Grand Central in Manhattan and we met a woman named Debbie who's's been living in new york for 50 years and this woman blasted tish james said she loves trump, says trump saved her life one night in new york long before he was president back in the apprentice days. Told us quite a story. Take a a listen.
Speaker 8:Trump saved my life literally. My dad and my mom passed at the same time. I was in a bad place. I was going towards the Brooklyn Bridge. Don't ask me why, but I was.
Speaker 8:Donald Trump was standing on 97th Street in Broadway. He was at a friend's birthday party and when he saw me coming past, I was hysterical and scared and he gently grabbed my arm. He was like whoa, wait a minute, are you okay? And he said well, I don't know what you're going to do right now, but, whatever it is, forget about it, take it out of your head. Your mom and dad wouldn't want that. And he talked to me until I forgot all about what I was going to do. So he said let me pray for you, for you. So when I went to get my keys out of my pocket and I opened my hand, he had placed a folded up real small folded up $100 bill in my hand. I framed it literally and this is a true story. He saved my life. Yeah, he did so. Anybody that has anything bad to say about Trump said it because he's a good man.
Speaker 10:That's something else. What a story. And you hear stories about him like that all the time too. You don't hear those stories about Obama, hillary, joe Biden.
Speaker 3:You know everybody's reporting the same stories, the same spin. You know, I feel the same way about Trump. That's a big game. They're playing that DC game, the Vatican game, the London game, the International Bank of Settlements game. He represents me.
Speaker 3:I'm not bogged down by the details of the big beautiful build or this, that or the other. I mean I think it's great that there looks like they're going to make suppressors legal. That's awesome, right. But at the same time it affects me. So I care, we talk about it. It's in my sphere of concern, but what I'm focused on is growing the sphere of influence, the sphere sphere of people, to understand what's real, that you got to plant your crops in the spring and harvest in the fall. You got to take care of those kids, you know. You got to keep your family together, your tribe together. You got to be there for people when they struggle. We wouldn't need a welfare program if everybody would just take care of their tribe, take care of their family, right. That's the perspective we have to have, the kind of perspective of a rich man who walks out on the street and sees a distraught black woman and then stops and says what's going on, dear?
Speaker 7:And prays with her.
Speaker 3:Offers a hand up. I'm so grateful that we have a man Leading the country In his private moments does things like that, because in the big moments, when it came to giving me my life back and putting me back in my family, he could have played politics. He could have said well, some but not others. He could have drawn funny lines, but he didn't.
Speaker 3:He just did dang near a blanket pardon and he let everybody that was incarcerated out because he knew that that was wrong. And that's a guy who stands on principle because he understands the simple element of life, but he understands there's consequences, choices. He's gonna lock a people, a lot of people, up. No doubt about it. All right, guys, that's it for the show today. We oh we didn't even hit.
Speaker 3:No, we got 13 minutes yeah which is good time in I wanted to make sure we we ended on time today. So a couple other things. You're in a projection. China has a shutoff switch for america and we aren't ready to deal with it. They've got three ways to shut us off that apparently the powers that be have determined that are functional and they could do it. One is tactical electromagnetic, electromagnetic pulse, emf weapons. This is the danger of things like spy balloons flying over your facilities. Deep sea fiber cups over 95 percent of global Internet traffic travels through undersea fiber cables. China recently unveiled deep sea cable cutters capable of severing cables at extreme depths. So literally there are is a transmission line, a fiber optic cable that spans the oceans.
Speaker 7:Lots of them, hundreds of them, you see that I know it's hard to believe.
Speaker 3:These things are thousands of miles long wires that they dropped off back of boats into the depths of the ocean yeah, it's hard to comprehend elon's like hello we have space, which again is decentralized yes it's harder to take out all the satellites than it is to clip clip one wire so um.
Speaker 7:The market provides solutions but apparently china has a monopoly on space too, because now they're operating a base on the back side of the moon.
Speaker 3:That's where the nazis are three anti-satellite weapons they've got an arsenal of that and cyber attacks. So all of those things is china has a delete america button, turn off, switch again. You know, when you're buying your Huawei phones and your chips just recognize a lot of that. Don't put yourself in a position in life where you're dependent on something that someone else can turn off. Right, seems like good advice.
Speaker 7:Yeah, 5g 5g Yep.
Speaker 3:Another thing too that's happening is uh Ed Martin told uh Mark Halperin that they had a whistleblower come forward in this auto pin scandal. If you don't think this auto pin scandal is a big deal, check yourself.
Speaker 3:The auto pin scandal means that a living person, the whole premise of this thing is when you put a signature on a piece of paper and it induces a commercial energy into it based on the living equity of that person, and they have to have the capacity, all that kind of stuff, that person and they have to have the capacity, all that kind of stuff. When you have the president, he's the only one that can essentially obligate the corporation of the united states and all of its property, which citizenship is considered property of the united states okay, unless you're an intern with access to the auto pin so this is like a huge deal.
Speaker 3:like you can't have a, you can't have uh orders signed by auto pin. You know they Autopen's things for like proclamations and funeral announcements and stuff like that, things that have no commercial energy to them. Right, it's not supposed to be for things where, like, you're invested with the sovereignty of the people.
Speaker 7:Right. Think about it this way Do you want the same person that clicked the Autopen to be the same guy that holds the nuclear football?
Speaker 15:Well, I'll make a little news for you, mark. Here I was in the office as US attorney for about five days when I wrote to a number of senior Biden officials in the White House saying what did you know about Joe Biden's competence and the pardons? And I got some responses, and so I've been looking at this for a while. Again. I think that the question is more about competence. If you have someone who's not competent, they can't enter into a contract, right, and if you do enter into a contract, you've committed fraud. The question is whether you use a tool to trick people into entering into a fraud. So I look, I the the Biden pardons are unprecedented, the ones right before Christmas that he did. People forget this. I think it's a couple thousand pardons that were done. Did he know about that? Did he really understand? Look, the pardon power is plenary but the guy has to be competent to do it.
Speaker 15:Now you come forward to this question broadly of the auto pen. Auto pen is completely obviously legal if you're competent, and there must be a trail that shows who was in charge of the auto pen. I know this exists. Like I worked for a governor, we had a system for an auto pen to be able to use it. And so right now we have unprecedented conduct, the pardons, unprecedented admissions, the books as well as the staffers, the books as well as the staffers.
Speaker 15:I had a whistleblower in my office 10 days ago, senior, senior Democrat, saying look, it was these three people that controlled access and they were making money off of it. I don't know if I believe it yet, but the point is, I think we have to get to the bottom of it for the American people and to protect the process, and that's what we're doing and, by the way, make it all the way to the bottom. It may not be criminal, but it certainly should be a scandal of the first order, maybe in human history or maybe American history I sound like the president there but in American history, to have this kind of conduct.
Speaker 5:And I'm from Maryland, not North Carolina, so I'm not that bright. Did I miss what the news was? You said you'd make news. What was the news you made?
Speaker 15:The news was that nobody knows until that. I was writing to these folks at the US Attorney's Office and including the Biden family. I don't think anybody has seen that, so my point is I'm bragging about being there early.
Speaker 5:Everybody got to this 120 days later. Did they reply or you just?
Speaker 15:sent them letters. What did they say? A couple of them lawyered up and one of them wrote directly.
Speaker 5:I won't talk about what they said, and you probably won't tell us, but but can you characterize who the whistleblower was? The someone who worked in the Biden White House?
Speaker 15:Biden Biden campaign 2020 campaign at the highest levels 2020.
Speaker 5:And who are the three people they said were doing it for money?
Speaker 15:This is one is Well, let me say it carefully, the gatekeepers different characterization of who was using the access, but the gatekeepers were Klain and Anita Dunn and Bob Bauer, and those three were really dominant characters in the White House Rick Keddie a little bit and obviously Jill, but I think that was the three. I was with this person and I said what about Susan Rice? What about some of these others? And they said no, these were the ones.
Speaker 5:Okay, I will politely and gently tell you his name name. His name is france rachetti.
Speaker 15:Oh, okay well, just so you know just fine, okay, yeah, I'll make sure. If I meet him I'll tell I'll get it right okay, he's a very nice guy.
Speaker 3:I think you'd like him so those are the people that were basically running the white house do we know those people?
Speaker 7:I've never heard those names a chief of staff?
Speaker 3:yeah, exactly, exactly, I don't know those names. A chief of staff? Yeah, exactly, exactly, I don't know those names. Taxation without representation yeah, life, liberty, all the things.
Speaker 7:Think about Whatever, let's go to McDonald's.
Speaker 3:Spades and contracts stuff. My prediction is this will be unturnaroundable, that it's just going to be an expose and shame operation as far as what they did. But I don't think you're going to be able to reverse.
Speaker 7:I don't know how they're going to reverse the pardons, unless there's just something wild about it, right, I don't know how it's going to happen, but anyways, um representative, andy ogles, told benny johnson well, I think the argument there I mean let's, before we move on, I think the argument there was these pardons were contracts that were made and in order for the contracts to be made legally with, they have to be made by somebody who's uh, you know, has all their faculties.
Speaker 3:And if biden's provably not competent, then were those contracts made, um, illegally the answer is no, but you live in a world where nothing that matters okay, because he who consents to be injured is not injured. We consented, the money went out, the money got spent, people lived their lives and you consented if you didn't stand up right away, like right, I'm talking about like a, a pardon for fauci.
Speaker 3:Yeah, well, he could to be injured is not injured, okay, right. So I think, well, he to be injured is not injured, ok, right. So I think again, prove that he paid, charge him. You know the crime is now paying for the part you got. You got Al Capone on tax fraud, not on murder, you know what I mean. Like there's going to be something. I don't know the solution here, I just know it's a bunch of bull, right, and that's why you can't trust these people. They're projecting onto you what they want you to believe and they're weaponizing your virtue by getting you to to see in them your virtue.
Speaker 7:You know you when it's not real.
Speaker 3:You don't trust them. When you see a figure of authority and you think of your father, who loved you and had your best interests in mind and would say hard things to you that you didn't like, but in time and wisdom showed you that they were accurate, you know good, you know what I'm saying you project that authority, goodness, that father figure, that paternal love, onto your attorney general. Right? Do a judge? Do you know what these people do in their private lives? Do you know? No? A judge, do you know what these people do in their private lives? Do you know? No?
Speaker 3:So we follow a process, and that's why the law is supposed to protect us from them in some ways. But when facts are on the moon and when despotism and tyranny rise, all that is nothing. They're using the law against you. You're not able to use the laws of protection from them right, and that's that's why we, as peasants, have to recognize that, no matter who's in charge, no matter what predominant religion there is, if they've got a cross or a star or a crescent moon above the church, I gotta plant my crops, I gotta raise these kids. You know what I mean. That's the divine. That's where the truth is, that's the universal element. Everything else is a play, everything else is a stage, and we should project ourselves onto it. We should allow ourselves to go and be the players, rather than letting some other intelligence agency that shows up in a black mask on 60 minutes saying oh, we're the actors, we're the ones projecting, and this is where the big conspiracies of who's really running this place come in.
Speaker 3:I don't care, I just want to run my life. All right, guys. That's it for today. Thank you for joining us. Don't forget to visit Peasants Perspective dot com left behind and without dot org. And, of course, 1776 live dot US. We love our classes. They're getting bigger and bigger and we would like for you to join any of them, so check out the links in the show notes below and we look forward to talking to you again tomorrow. Old woman, man, man, sorry, what night lived in that castle over there.
Speaker 1:I'm 37. What I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis, I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind you looked.
Speaker 1:Well, I object to it. You automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king, oh king. Eh, very nice. And how do you get that? Eh, by exploiting the workers. Workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society, if there's ever going to be any progress.
Speaker 1:There's some lovely filth down here. Oh, how do you do? How do you do? Good, lady, I'm Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the who, the Britons? Who are the Britons? Well, we all are. We are all Britons and I am your king. I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about. If only people would, please, please, good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What I told you? We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, be quiet. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major.
Speaker 1:Be quiet. I order you to be quiet. Order. Who does he think he is? I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings? Well, I can become king. Then.
Speaker 1:The lady of the lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. I mean, if I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up, will you Shut up? Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help. I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Did you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?
