Peasants Perspective
Peasants Perspective: A Voice from the Edge of Freedom
Join Taylor Johnatakis, a self-proclaimed “peasant” turned podcaster, on an unfiltered journey through family, faith, and the fight for American ideals. From the depths of DC Jail—where he recorded during a 14-month sentence tied to January 6—to his triumphant return home after a Trump clemency in 2025, Taylor delivers raw, heartfelt commentary for the common man. Expect a mix of gritty storytelling, reflections on liberty lost and reclaimed, and timeless lessons drawn from his life as a septic designer, father, and reluctant rebel. Whether he’s reading Dr. Seuss to his kids or dissecting the state of the republic, Peasants Perspective is a bold, unpolished call to stay grounded amidst chaos. Subscribe for a front-row seat to a story that’s as real as it gets—no filter, no apologies.
Peasants Perspective
Internet of Bodies: The Dark Side of Technology and Human Control
What if the world's most powerful institutions aren't what they seem? In this eye-opening episode of The Peasant's Perspective, we pull back the curtain on the hidden power structures that govern our daily lives and shape our future without our consent.
We begin by examining Harvard University not as a mere educational institution, but as a deliberate counterpart to the Vatican—a Protestant power center designed to create a secular priestcraft that shapes American ideology across generations. This revelation helps explain why certain political figures target Harvard's endowments and tax-exempt status; they're confronting an unelected power structure that operates beyond democratic oversight while training government leaders.
The conversation takes a fascinating turn when we feature insights from Katherine Austin Fitts, whose background in high finance and government gives weight to her warnings about technological control systems. She details the disturbing concept of an "internet of bodies," where nanoparticles in food, injections, and environmental factors create what amounts to "organic barcodes" in human beings. Even more alarming, she explains how this technology is already being deployed by corporations for marketing purposes—raising the question of what government agencies might do with such capabilities.
We also venture into the realm of climate challenges, artificial intelligence, and government surveillance. Former NASA advisor Dr. John Casey warns that contrary to mainstream messaging about global warming, we should prepare for a period of devastating cold. Meanwhile, Microsoft's recent layoff of 3,000 employees whose jobs were entirely replaced by AI illustrates the rapid economic transformation underway. All this occurs against a backdrop of increasing government tendency to label dissenting citizens as "domestic violent extremists."
Perhaps most troubling is our examination of the Biden "autopen scandal," where evidence suggests unelected staffers may have illegally executed presidential powers including pardons, effectively bypassing constitutional authority structures.
Throughout this journey, we emphasize one crucial message: self-reliance and critical thinking remain our best defense in a world where powerful forces seek to manage humanity like livestock. Join us as we navigate these challenging waters and reclaim our sovereignty as free individuals. The revolution begins with awareness—are you ready to see beyond the illusion?
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
And when they went to the queen to tell her Ruth Buncheck had no bread. Do you know what she said?
Speaker 2:Let them eat cake.
Speaker 1:Here you take the bomb.
Speaker 4:We're getting screwed man.
Speaker 5:Every time we turn around we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's gonna be through podcasting, for sure. That's the only way we talk. Screwed man. Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's going to be through podcasting, for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys. The little guys that take the brunt of everything.
Speaker 4:It's got to stop.
Speaker 5:Peasants. Man, we're just peasants, every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning peasants. Welcome to another episode of the peasants perspective. We have sound. Yes, now. Apparently yesterday they couldn't hear the opener or the closer.
Speaker 6:Oh well, that might have happened again.
Speaker 5:Well, we sat and listened to the entire opener and we'll listen to the closer as well. So I guess yesterday you guys got to hear some heavy breathing. You're squeaking by Ron.
Speaker 4:Oh, throw me under the bus. I hauled off to the bathroom, man it's a joke like this.
Speaker 5:It was me all right. Well, we've got a rainy, drizzly day up here in washington and uh man back when I was in other parts of the country.
Speaker 6:Right now it was crazy, not when you're in prison.
Speaker 4:I was in prison okay.
Speaker 5:So we were just um, getting the show all put together here. We've got a good one today. We're going to pick up where we left off yesterday. There were a couple things that I wanted to get to and I didn't get a chance. So are we streaming everywhere? Do I need to go check everything? I think we're everywhere. All right, let me get the chat popped out. That I have not done yet. I like to see the chat in case somebody wants to correct something I say I don't know.
Speaker 4:Okay, let's see here.
Speaker 5:Perfect, okay, folks. Nope, no one's even said hi. Awesome. Okay, here we go. First things first. Yesterday I did not get a chance to play this and I wanted to. This is Catherine Austin Fitz, and this is a longer part. And for those, for, uh, those people that don't know, katherine austin fitz used to be I think it was like, uh, the deputy secretary for housing and urban development, or uh something like that yeah, uh, some kind of secretary, yeah.
Speaker 5:And then she, she went on to sit. She currently sits on the board of sally may. So she's not a crackpot, is? What I'm saying okay, and she was a finance. She did um big trades like mergers or finance, I mean uh, huge stuff, but I can't remember what it was like. Anyways, big, big money stuff, high finance, and at one point she was even asked to join the.
Speaker 6:Uh um, council on foreign relations wasn't she asked to join the imf?
Speaker 5:uh, I don't know if she was asked to join the imf, but anyways. Point is, she's like one of those people that has the highest amount of credibility. Well, when she refused to join the council on foreign relations, um, they attacked her and and by attacker I mean irs auditing lawsuits from whatever her family farm was.
Speaker 5:I mean, it's just all an attack and I've highlighted on this show different people who have kind of been targeted and once you're on that targeted list, it's like you get the full pressure. Anywhere that they can put pressure on you, they will.
Speaker 6:Yeah, we don't know anything about targeting.
Speaker 5:Yeah, exactly, there is a way to survive it. But you've got to. She talks a lot. She talks about she did a podcast with Tucker Carlson. I highly recommend everybody go listen to it. But in the process of kind of all of this, obviously she knows things right. She kind of knows how government works from the inside out. She knows how money works from the inside out. She she talks openly about how money's just not backed by anything. I mean very interesting person and one of the things she's realized is there's, there's is an agenda. You know they're like we talk about it quite a bit. But I believe that most of the people even that listened to this show don't necessarily believe it. Like you don't understand how much these secret societies and these clubs and these ideology affiliation groups work right. They don't understand that Harvard and its endowment and everything that it does is not a university that is not just like your local state Boise state university or Utah university. Like Harvard is a competitor to the Vatican.
Speaker 6:They're just sitting around singing Kumbaya it has tax-free diplomatic immunity.
Speaker 5:It's tied in with high finance. It competes with Harvard. It was created as a counterbalance to the influence that Harvard had Vatican had. Remember the Vatican at the time that Harvard's created right Is has got schools, it's got civil like groups that raise up bureaucrats and it has a whole priest group. Like the way that the Vatican and the Catholic church is structured throughout the middle ages was, as a governing force, right, whether it was the direct government or whether it was an overarching imperial government, it was a government right. And so the Harvard, when the United States kind of became its own quality, harvard was to compete with that. It was to create the schools, the education, the ideology, to create a secular priestcraft, which is why going to these schools it's about going there and being indoctrinated in.
Speaker 5:Whatever the zeitgeist is of. This is our sphere of influence and power, the American way right Versus the Vatican way. It's a competitor the billions and billions of dollars. Look at the research things they do and the tentacles they have. That's why Donald Trump is attacking Harvard. He's taking away their funding. He's taking away their tax exempt status. He he's looking at it not like, oh hey, oh look, he's attacking our university systems. That's not what's happening here. That's not what's happening here. He's attacking their endowment, he's attacking their tax-free status because they are a competitor to Harvard and they sit atop of our government. It trains our government leaders right and it's independent of any kind of representative government or democracy. It's become its own thing with its own inertia you know how the vatican has its own city.
Speaker 6:Does harvard have a similar, like uh jurisdiction?
Speaker 5:yeah, basically all well, this is what christy gnome said. She goes look, you operate within our walls, as in. You don't run a police force, we do that for you. Right, vatican at least has its own police force and walls. You know what I mean. But because harvard was created to be everything vatican does, but for america, right, and for the non-catholic sect of, because harvard's not catholic, harvard is clearly christian based, right, when you look at all of its logos and everything. Right, like it attributes truth and God is one thing, and so that's its origin it was. It was the Protestant, non-catholic competition to what the Vatican had set up. Universities, right, harvard trains the professors at the universities you attend. You know what I mean. Harvard's the, the college of colleges and, within its network, the ivy league and all this stuff, like that's what that is so it's the origination of all the policy and direction that the idea it's the cathedral.
Speaker 5:This is how you get an ideology to span space and time. Is you enshrine it in your education? You enshrine it in Sunday school, right? It is not inappropriate to because we're talking about the same thing to compare religion to education. You know, you look back in time. Oh, let's make America great again. Are you trying to bring back religious education? Well, is it different now? When you have secular education, you're having a Harvard education. When you have a religious education, you're having a canonical, ecclesiastical, Vatican education. You know what I mean. Like this is the competition that you have here in the world of things. Harvard was created to compete with the structure on the education side. In politics, we call this the cathedral right To compete with the cathedral, the priest craft of of power, and so that's why trump's attacking?
Speaker 6:hold on, hold on, hold on. We have somebody saying we got no sound this was like the best part I don't even know where to look okay, okay, let's see what the heck?
Speaker 5:we're not a nice now I got that double feedback thing going.
Speaker 6:How about that?
Speaker 5:can you hear it now? What about now? We're not here oh now I got that double feedback thing going. How about that?
Speaker 4:can you hear it now? I can hear it here. No sound, what?
Speaker 6:about now okay, takes about 20 minutes for them to hear it.
Speaker 4:Oh no, I got that okay how about now?
Speaker 5:okay, have you not had sound the whole time, guys?
Speaker 6:I think so sound what about now, oh geez, we can't have that. It's for them to hear it well, I've got, I'm playing it here on my end. Uh, yeah, turn that off okay so you guys have sound.
Speaker 5:Now everybody's got sound reboot.
Speaker 4:We just had 20 minutes. We just solved everything. We just 20 minutes. We gave all the secrets. It was the best part we were talking about harvard competing with the vatican and the whole cathedral, and it was like that was that was gonna be the end of the show. That was it. Yeah, oh, my gosh. 20 minutes without sound.
Speaker 5:No sound till now. Oh, dude, we're gonna have to trim. I can't post 20 minutes of blank audio on stuff.
Speaker 6:Oh my gosh, oh jeez, you got a moron for a producer.
Speaker 4:Oh man, well, good morning Peasant. It was only 10 minutes, let's roll. Oh, good morning Peasant. Okay, we were talking about it's only 10 minutes. I got 20 minutes on the stream.
Speaker 6:No 10. Sorry, why does it say 20?
Speaker 4:I don't know All right.
Speaker 5:I guess we're double timing it there. Okay, no sound, but you looked good. Oh my gosh, I just can't even. What am I doing here? Okay? Well, good morning peasants. Welcome to another. Oh, we're not ai, because ai couldn't pull that off. Oh here, that's the problem. We weren't lit up. That was okay. Okay, zero by five. Does that mean bad quality sound? Is that what that means?
Speaker 4:oh my goodness okay what that means. Oh my goodness. Okay, that's right. I want to recapture all of that. I don't okay. I don't even know where to start. Katherine austin fits okay katherine austin fits.
Speaker 5:So I'm going to play a little video from katherine austin fit. She recently did a podcast with tucker carlson. I recommend everybody go and listen to it. Katherine austin fits is is is very credible. So she was the, I think, the assistant secretary to the Department of Housing. Yeah, we just got done talking about all her bona fides.
Speaker 5:Yeah, she's big finance, hedge funds, all that kind of stuff Very talented at it. At one point. She currently sits on the board of Sally Mae. So she's by no means like some crackpot Didn't fall off the turnip truck, didn't fall off the turnip truck but she, you know, she does a lot of like. You know, she's basically like in the world that George Soros is in as far as trading, currency and money and like the big stuff, right, the big stuff.
Speaker 5:And and she was in the room when they were, you know, deciding to no longer have the United States be the center of the economic universe back after, uh, when they passed in 2008, when they had the budget issues and or no, it was in the nineties, excuse me. She was there when they were like, uh, money's leaving America, like it's going to take. And she talks about if you're doing risk management for the planet, right, if you're one of these people, that's central banking for the planet. She's like you've got to steer the ship, for the ship crashes. It might take you 20 years to do that. So, to dismantle the United States as the economic center of the world because of because it was no longer going to be able to guarantee the debts. It might take them 20 years or 30 years to dismantle that operation and they're doing it Right. So she's like that's why we're seeing so many issues.
Speaker 5:And she goes into great detail about how you know they have diplomatic immunity for finance and you know they answer to higher moral authorities and they say these things. And so there's this disconnect between us, the peasants, and we just think everybody, oh, we're all equal under the law. We're completely fooled. I mean we're just completely in left field If we think that your bank is following the laws that they force you to follow. I mean you're just. You're just in a complete nut house. To believe that, to to think that money is real, you're crazy, because to them it's about power and control and resources. It's not about dollar bills. They'll just print more of it, and they know that Right. So there's this whole. You know scam there more of it, and they know that right. So there's this whole. You know scam they're. They're holding in place an illusion through contracts and slavery and things like that. The vatican was a government, so for some reason we brought in the topic of harvard.
Speaker 6:I don't even remember how we got there, but the point is, is because harvard was the american version or the counterpart, the counterpart to the vatican, the Vatican, right Like, created a priest craft.
Speaker 5:They call it the cathedral. In in, in, when you look at government, you have your like bureaucrats, you have your priests. That's part of the cathedral. They're the ones who carry the message of your ideology and your through time and space, right by teaching little children in Sunday school and creating this, this premise, this perspective, this paradigm that everybody walks around the Christian worldview, the biblical worldview you know, we're Catholic the universal general.
Speaker 6:You were saying before we had sound that Harvard was the American version.
Speaker 5:Yeah, Harvard is. It was established as essentially the Protestant. I don't Puritan whatever, I don't care. Non-catholic version of that in the United States, and it was created specifically to compete with that. I don't puritan whatever, I don't care. Non-catholic version of that in the united states, and it was created specifically to compete with that. They don't pay taxes, they have diplomatic immunities. You know now. They don't have a police force. I mean, it's not like the exact same, but it was created to basically be america's network of priestcraft. How do you spread jeffersonian deism and secularism across time and space? You do it through the university system. Harvard is the center of that universe and you talked about Trump's attack on.
Speaker 5:Trump's attack on Harvard. This isn't just going after Harvard, oh, just because of DEI or everything. It's a direct attack on the power center that upholds this corrupt structure. I mean, there's no other way to look at this.
Speaker 10:Right.
Speaker 5:Right. And so Mike Benz breaks that down how Harvard and its endowment does, has the same function as the Vatican, and Catherine Austin Fitz talks about the same thing, as Harvard was created to compete with the Vatican and when you look at their network of money and research, she's like it's not a university, like it's not there, like their enrollment is like three percent of their total reported revenue and that's just what's reported because, remember, they're tax exempt and they've got all this ties with world bank and IMF and they're holding the superstructure in place through time and space, through the liberal idea of which they preach Right and and and and that's so. That's what they're doing. So I'm bringing this up with Castanoth and Fisk, because in her journey right, she was in the room when they couldn't pass a budget in the 90s and big money decided to turn the ship and shift the center of the economic universe from the United States to other places, and that's why we've had this drain on our country and we've had one financial attack after another.
Speaker 5:Scott Besson, in one of his speeches a couple of weeks ago, was saying that America, on shocking to the world of finance, has survived nine 11 and the Patriot act, which Catherine Austin Fitch proposes was basically created just to transfer money right To move money with, with no accountability right. We've survived nine, 11 and the war on terror and 20 years of drain for that, trying to, you know, basically move the economic center of the universe somewhere else by moving all that money. Um, they, they have, we. We survived that. We survived the 08 housing crisis and the stock market crash, which I mean mean we've suffered I mean this is serious consolidation in the housing market and stuff like that. So we survived that. We survived the COVID attack and shutting down basically every business and the private equity sweep up of small businesses in America. And here we are still kicking and breathing and expanding and growing because you can't beat the American entrepreneurial free man.
Speaker 6:It's not going to happen. It's crazy how resilient we are.
Speaker 5:And Scott Bessett was like so now we're shifting the power back because we've made you know, no one else could survive this. But America has come back basically on its own Every time. They're that resilient there. We are the only country and Ayn Rand points this out in the book Atlas Shrugs, or a character, francisco D'Anconio. We're the only country and Ayn Rand points this out in the book Atlas Shrugs, or a character, francisco Duncanio we're the only country where we have the phrase to make money. We make money out of nothing because we are the unleashed creative force, the divine within. We have tapped into the creator's essence by being free. We're not subjugated, we have blue sky ahead, and that is a huge difference. That's unquantifiable. Ai can never calculate that human capital unless they can get you to be a subject. If they can get you into their box like a rat in a maze, you'll just follow the path until you get to the cheese. But the moment you realize that you're in a box, you just start climbing over those walls, and that's what America does. Okay, but the moment you realize that you're in a box, you just start climbing over those walls, and that's what America does. And so Catherine Austin Fitz understands that she preaches the exact same message. I preach self-reliance, be free and anything you can do to not have dependency on others. Right, she teaches that same message and how to do it.
Speaker 5:Now she's doing this little interview and she's talking about COVID-19 because, remember, covid-19 isn't just about a virus. It's a virus. But what did they do? You know, k Bono? Look at the consolidation of the tech market. Look at how we know Uber, eats and all that kind of the automation like it drove COVID had extended out for three or four or five years, had they not launched that vaccine.
Speaker 5:You know, operation warp speed was the idea. If you're going to go through hell, go through quickly. That was. That was whole Trump Like. If we got to, if we got to bottom the market, then rather than drag this thing out, I'm just going to rip the bandaid off, tell everybody to go home for two weeks. Look at the critics who said told me that the most extreme measure should be more than sufficient and when it doesn't work, I'll say, well, I'm never going to do that again and never going to buy into it again. You know what I mean. And then we can crawl back from nothing. But let's just do it fast. That's what they did, and at the same time, we declared another national bankruptcy we don't call it that, but the treasury took over uh, something that the Federal Reserve used to do. We covered it, like right before I, we canceled the podcast. So it was like I can't.
Speaker 5:But you know, there was something to do with the Treasury taking over. I can't remember what it was Some element of what we used to delegate to the Federal Reserve, and that was again another one of these kind of monetary policy, kind of monetary policy. I can't remember what it was, but there was a thing that was important. So um.
Speaker 6:We've teased this austin catherine yes, video quite a bit yes, I hope it plays.
Speaker 5:She's talking about this, except yesterday she's talking about how covid, what one of the things she sees, because everything's an op with layered purposes. I mean, she's coming from the world where that's if you're going to come in with IMF money, there's layered purposes because you got to pass a social agenda, you have a political agenda, you have a finance agenda, so there's layered purposes in everything that they're doing. And then there's the commercial interest. Remember yesterday, bombs before happy meals. Like, why do you come in and do something? Well, what comes behind it? Right, think about all these medical advances. Oh, my gosh, we're on the verge of curing cancer. Well, that's not good for business. Okay, maybe we should get more people having cancer. Yeah, let's make cancer something that you just get and can go get fixed. Do you see how?
Speaker 5:the carrots and sticks of a pharmacy company at a drug company, the medical industry do you see that you know what I mean. The carrots and sticks would say to do that because they don't have the humanity in there.
Speaker 15:Okay, For several years with a group of doctors and scientists trying to understand what was happening with the injections, and I absolutely believe that they were trying to install operating systems in people's bodies. Operating systems, yeah.
Speaker 6:So in fact, no, if you.
Speaker 15:If you listen, there's a great clip from right at the beginning of the pandemic when the chief scientist officer at Moderna says we're installing an operating system in people's bodies and he, you know he's describing something that can be used plug and play for future vaccines. But if you look at all the material on the internet of bodies, you know you're talking about putting materials in people's bodies that make them basically easier to interact with with telecommunications and and digital technology. Are you?
Speaker 16:talking about like the 5g stuff and like how 5G can connect to this stuff, these nanobots. There's a whole. I've done a podcast on this before. It's so bizarre and out there and like hard to grasp but like it's not hard to grasp at all, because. It just seems like sci-fi.
Speaker 15:No, it's not sci-fi at all. It's not just like they're tagging livestock. I mean one of the things that really helps you to understand what this looks like. I live in a farming community in the United States and if you know about livestock, if you've ever studied livestock management, a lot of this makes a lot more sense and they are tagging all the livestock. But this is simply a way of you know if you, if you get a lot of these nanoparticles into the human body, you're creating the equivalent of an organic barcode so people don't realize this.
Speaker 5:But, for example, starbucks did it did and and multiple many companies have done this. They put graphene in the coffee. It's a flavorless additive, it's not a big deal, but it's acts as an rfi d chip. And then they put sensors out in the community and they figure out where their customers are coming to and commuting from and what. Yes, so you know, when you see two starbucks on like opposite corners, the only reason they do that is because they've done the studies and they've realized people coming from this side of town will not cross the street to the Starbucks here. They would go to the Dunkin' over there. So they want to compete with that Dunkin' oh my gosh.
Speaker 5:You know what I mean, because, for whatever reason, the way the traffic flow is, they do that.
Speaker 6:Dude, you're triggering a lot of people, right?
Speaker 5:now, I know, this stuff is this is the thing, oh yeah, this stuff is this is the thing, oh yeah. And marketing, that makes sense. You know well, if they can do that for just marketing, to figure out where they're going to put their Starbucks coffee, imagine what the department of defense is thinking about. Yeah, for real, that's what she's saying.
Speaker 15:Right.
Speaker 5:So that's what she's saying is there's all these things going on? It's not just about microplastics that's pollution, right, it's microplastics that's pollution, right. It's not just about, like heavy metal, mercury, coming from tuna fish that's pollution, right. This is this is talking about the idea that if you understand how you treat livestock, hey, how great would it be for a farmer to be able to just look at his app and have a starlink working internet of bodies I know where all your cows are yeah, that'd be incredible oh, and what's really cool is because it's passed down mother to dot, you know parent to kid, when your calves are birthing, you're getting text messages all through the day.
Speaker 5:I got a new body because they already have the barcode. It's in the code, it's passed through the to the baby. Wow, livestock management. What have I talked about?
Speaker 6:they're building a fence this is like a huge. This is a huge breakthrough too.
Speaker 5:This would be cool cool yeah you know, it was so offensive in prison but somebody would always do it when they'd have us in the. You know the line like going down the hallway all changing up and someone go, so bad. But again, if you understand livestock management, this kind of stuff makes sense when you know what they already are doing at places like starbucks just for marketing purposes you know, when we first talked about nanoparticles, I really didn't understand what, how they were going to be used and what they were going to be used for.
Speaker 6:But this makes so much sense to just just have a tracker, you're just radioactive, basically yeah you know, and like they can create a heat map of your movement.
Speaker 5:So it's one thing. When you're like, hey, I have my phone, and they're like oh, you know what? You know what really smart people do?
Speaker 4:they leave their phone off, go have their private conversations and you know, yeah, but with these nanoparticles you are the phone you're the glowy, all right, okay but I don't but was that?
Speaker 16:I don't think there was actually any hard evidence that there was any nanoparticles?
Speaker 15:So I strongly recommend you. We just published Patrick Wood at Technocracy News. I was the moderator. We just published the second symposium called OmniWar, and this one is called the Battle for the Brain and it gets into the internet of bodies and what. Here's what I believe and I'm not a scientist, so don't ask me to explain this at all. But if you look at all the patents and research and other work done on the internet of bodies, you know it is clear that that there are mysterious ingredients in the food, there are mysterious ingredients in the spray, there are mysterious ingredients in the injections and the question is what? You know, what are those for? And I don't think I think it's very intentional, I don't think it's an accident, and I think one of the goals is, as the chief scientist officer at Moderna said, is to is to install an operating system in your body that's pretty dark.
Speaker 15:Yes, it's very dark. So go to the purdue, go to the purdue engineering website, to the internet of bodies and look at the whole internet of bodies.
Speaker 16:I'm sure you're familiar with the story of that guy, charles lieber, who I think was a harvard nano biologist. He there's actually a story I just saw on Twitter this morning. He just got sent to hired by China to go work in a university in China. He got busted basically for like taking millions of dollars from China.
Speaker 15:He got busted to keep him quiet. That's what I believe.
Speaker 16:He got busted to keep him quiet. Explain what do you mean by that?
Speaker 15:So when you have a guy charles lieber is one of the world's leading experts on brain machine interface okay, and he was working with the guys in china, you know, in a very significant way and he was one of the I think he was the top expert at harvard on brain machine interface, right, right and um, and you know, once they went after him.
Speaker 5:So just so you guys know charles lieber for old-time listeners. Charles lieber, it was the harvard professor that got caught in the airport with vials on him, fleeing to wuhan and they accused him of being a double agent and basically doing that and he's, like you know, silence, like I don't know where he's at now. He's probably in prison, um, but that's who.
Speaker 15:That's who they're referring to they went after him hard and they put him in a process where they he had to be entirely shut up. And then so they authorized operation warp speed, which remembers a military program. And who did they put in charge of it? But they put the former head of research at GSK. Who is what? A brain machine interface expert. The guy who ran Operation Warp Speed that Trump appointed was a brain machine interface expert. What was his name?
Speaker 16:Oh, it's long. Head of GSK Glaxo. Head of research. Head of research.
Speaker 15:He had been head of research at GlaxoSmithKline, wow and and his expertise was brain machine interface. And, what's interesting, for many, many years I've worked with Clifford Carnicum on global spraying. What's in the spray, what does it do to you? And Clifford insists we just did a huge interview with him at the solar report that the materials, the biosynthetic engineered materials, in the spray are exactly what's in the injections. She's talking about chemtrails.
Speaker 5:don't ask me about it because I can't okay. So chemtrails, by the way, you know long copy chemtrails or contrails, yeah, it's chemtrails, right, they're. They're weather modifying, like absolutely no doubt about it, because florida went to go pass a law to eliminate it. And out of the woodwork here comes the actual company owners that are putting the injectables into commercial flights and things like that. Like no, we have to keep doing this, it's for, it's for oranges and crops, and da, da, da, da. And they had all. And then Israel's doing it and everybody's doing it, and you hand it, but don't do the Bill Gates thing. And they're like don't do the thing where you go and block the sun. They were like that's a different tech, that's not our tech, our tech, we've been using our tech since the 70s.
Speaker 5:That's what they were saying I guess, just I know it's, and they were like, yes, it's toxic, but you know, you put and he has, like you know, it's just this little baggie, and you do it, and it feels it's just particles, particles, man, but it helps. The clouds, and like you had the, and then you've got pictures of that guy going and meeting with bill clinton. Right, you know this, of course, not so the chem trails thing that you know. No, it's not. It's not a conspiracy at all. There's these people that finance it.
Speaker 5:Oh, I believe so she's on the perspective like no, they're financing it, like there's whole companies on the stock market that are doing that. So when you're like talking to someone like me, he's like, oh, chemtrails. And I've been real skeptical of the chemtrails really like.
Speaker 6:That's the one where I'm like. I used to be skeptical about them until I saw some stuff that changed my mind yeah, so I used to be really skeptical.
Speaker 5:Oh, that's just steam and you know, mist or whatever right vapor. No, those are contrails yeah, those are contrails. Chemtrails are where they put additive into the fuel and they're doing it intentionally and they're doing it over specific zones, right.
Speaker 6:And when you see a video of a big jetliner and all of a sudden their contrails turn off, you're like, hmm, not a contrail, something yeah.
Speaker 5:So, anyways, they're on the side of finance, where they're like no, I mean, we've been investing in this for a long time. It Anyways, they're on the side of finance where they're like no, I mean, we've been investing in this for a long time, it's a great moneymaker, like you know. I mean, all the orange producers down in Florida have like put money into this and are paying for it, like in their farmers associations, like. So on their end, they're like it's not a conspiracy, and that's why it's so hard because what they're doing is so hard for you, not only from the technology, to wrap your mind around, but from then it goes to the older engineering hurricanes.
Speaker 5:No one said that. No one said that. That's the conspiracy theorist. To take it to a point that now it's totally unbelievable and doesn't match the technology, because the private equity companies that are investing in it are like we're not doing hurricanes, right? No, you're just doing rain in florida, okay, great, right, right, you see what I'm saying. We're just trying to help the crops, yeah, we're just bringing, we just bringing life to the desert. Like, okay, we're not doing the hurricane, okay, that's something. If that tech exists, that's DOD for sure.
Speaker 16:Yeah, that's bizarre.
Speaker 15:No, here's the thing If you are running the planet and you are a risk manager and you're worried about all sorts of risks and you can't tell people what's really going on, the question is you've got to turn the the aircraft carrier before it hits the iceberg, and that may be 20 years before it hits the iceberg, and you can't get people to follow you, and so it's very attractive to have complete control and to be able. I mean, if you look at the amount of money that's spent to influence people to adopt this opinion or that opinion or keep them busy or keep them away from the power line, I mean the biggest investment almost in this society is persuading people you know to believe a fake reality welcome to the peasant's perspective.
Speaker 5:There's a lot of effort and energy into getting you to believe a fake reality. It's called the cathedral. This is why churches get tax-exempt status. Just keep everybody christian and that's not a bad thing. I'm not opposed to that. You got to pick one of these world views. Okay, you can't. You can't come out of the gate and tell your kid santa claus doesn't exist. It ostracizes them from society. Okay, so their society. Because in their little world, in their truman show at the elementary school, everybody believes in santa. And because, why? Because we've figured out with little kids. You can motivate them with presents and you can teach delayed gratification. And it's annual instead of your entire life. Be good all of your life and then when you go back to the blackness, you may or may not be judged.
Speaker 6:Nowadays, it's just Santa Claus as an NGO that delivers you millions of dollars.
Speaker 4:Millions of dollars. Yeah, Santa Claus comes with a suit with a little pocket square.
Speaker 5:Okay so millions of dollars. Yeah, santa, clubs comes with a suit with a little pocket square. Okay, so, set the stage here. Everything is kind of this truman show, right, and in the truman show, if you remember what happens? His first peek into reality is when an? L he goes into a building he's never been in, right, and and an elevator opens and it's a break room inside for the actors and he's like and then what happens is everybody around him is there to pull him back in. No, you didn't see what you saw. Oh, that was just something else. Oh, come over here, do that. You know what I mean? Yeah, it's because it's like gatekeepers, the gatekeepers, the people like the shields, as soon as, and anybody, who's ever.
Speaker 5:I'm a little bit of an antagonist by nature, right, so I'm always going to be like the one that's calling out something. I'm just that's who I am poking the bear. Poking the bears is who I am right. So, um, when you have someone like me that comes along and it's like this is fake, you know, then what happens is everybody around you is like, ah. So if you've ever been the one that steps out of the fence or jumps over and is like hey guys, the grass actually is green on the other side. You know, if you're ever that guy that they turn around and they're like, oh, it's maybe green right there, but if you keep going it dies. You know, like, okay, like every effort to drag you back into the, the, to the, the safe fence pasture that's full of muck.
Speaker 5:As long as we're all standing in the muck together and there's green, you know, we're happy, even though there's green grass on the other side of the fence, why can't we go over there? You see what I'm saying Just be happy, just be happy. So they, the world has always viewed that, has always viewed. That reminds me of class Schwab. Oh, nothing can be happy. Yeah, yeah, the world, the world, has been structured through a series of dominion of people taking advantage of other people, and I'm just using that taking advantage of other people.
Speaker 5:Ayn Rand describes them as the second handers. They didn't invent fire, but they sure know how to regulate it. Hey, they don't invent the will, but they sure know how do you regulate it. Okay, they don't invent the will, but they sure knew how to regulate it. Like. You know what I mean. They'll profit off. They're the grifters, the second handers, the looters. Okay, when you, and so they've all like, there's a class of people that have that, they want to be the manager, you know. So the whole system is set up to enforce their rule and they view the people as property collateral and you just go.
Speaker 5:You know, study history. This is the relationship of the king. He's the patriarchal leader, the czar, was literally the father of his nation. You know, they establish this right to rule through some divine authority, but then when they do undivine things, we all start to question it. So you know, in our world we believe in individual, that we're all individually divine, we're all individually sovereign. And then we create political coalitions, political structures. Knowing that makes it very pliable because it means it can change. Right, we as a species have realized that you can change these things. You might not be, you know, we're testing the waters if we can change our gender, but we can definitely change our government. Okay, so, um, just keep in mind that you're expendable in all of this.
Speaker 5:And with the onset of technology, right, you're. They even view you as replaceable because, remember the people that are the second handers, they are not creative, they're not creative. So they think that this is the end of technology. As far as they can see is all they can see. They never can calculate in that creative mind, right, when they, when, when, um, I mean this, you can. Just a great vignette of this is just Galileo, right, they can't foresee how, what a new creation will do, because they're so comfortable with the power they have now, right, so anything new represents a potential new power center.
Speaker 5:So right now, the powers that be kind of have control of AI. They funded it, they control it. They didn't create it, but they funded it control. And now they want to implement it and use it. And to them, that's the end of you. Okay, but they funded it, control, and now they want to implement it and use it. And to them, that's the end of you. Okay, that's the end of you.
Speaker 5:So everything they're doing using your labor, your skills, your resources of our earth, and everything is essentially trying to replace you. That's where the money goes, where the creation goes is into the frontier, because the captive refuses to be in that box, and that's where the entrepreneur comes in, and we're the. We're constantly pushing the envelope. What's the reason we've had this massive leap since the creation of America and why America has been the center of innovation is just that is because you're free to take the leap. No other nation in recorded history has allowed their people to be free to take the leap right.
Speaker 5:Maybe if the Pharaoh hired you and had you on his science council council, he might tightly regulate you and make sure whatever you you know what I'm saying, but they want to capture that spirit. America's different. Now, at the same time, we're not always wise with our inventions. I can get make your teeth clean and white. You might lose your enamel, though. That's the. That's the other side. That's why good people then support things like regulation. Now, this guy right here, he's an attorney and he's a guy who has done a handful of lawsuits over people who get sick around cell towers.
Speaker 5:So this is another one of those things where one of these people that are financing this stuff, the people that are in the internet, the internet of things that have figured out. Right, the internet's not free. I mean, every element of internet that you access goes through a handful of gatekeepers cisco, intel, a uh, at&t. These guys physically, essentially, own the internet infrastructure. When you think about where you go on the web, it's typically what? A handful of common websites, right. So so, more and more, the internet has become a perfect place to create digital fences.
Speaker 6:Well, and all of those websites that people think are independent? They're all hosted on the same servers.
Speaker 5:Yeah, yeah. So, if you think of it, it go back to that farming management. Right, they're able to silo you into different groups. Oh, here we have some extremists. Here we have some, you know, uh, traditional whatever. Here we have a bunch of sex fiends. Here we have, and they're able to silo you. And it's farming into paddocks right, they're farming you in these little paddocks and developing you. Oh, we, we've got some Antifa guys. They'll come in handy later. You see what I'm saying. They're able to get right into your, your face, right? You know from how many of you guys have kids that are sitting there on social media. They've already been siloed, they've already been assigned a staring.
Speaker 6:We're going to see a bit of S3 buckets.
Speaker 5:Yeah, we're. They're steering them into a certain bucket. You know your, your dad's a a conservative bucket. We're going to break that family up. We're going to send the kid on a far left progressive trip and maybe even be transgender. We're going to destroy that family, assuming the root of their value systems. Because, why? Because that device is able to move you apart and in a world where kids go to school all day, then they have nonstop entertainment on demand, and now they even have entertainment that's curated for them. How much time do you really spend parenting, as opposed to say how they did it 200 years ago? Totally different. So all of this tech? At one point it frees you up. Hey, I don't even have to babysit my kids. The screen will. It's very convenient, but do you know what it's actually doing?
Speaker 6:And then whoops, I didn't parent my kid.
Speaker 5:Not only is it moving you psychologically, but what if it was also making you dependent on the grid for things that you can't leave, like medical care?
Speaker 9:One of these towers goes up, people start getting sick. We've got some folks in Pittsfield, massachusetts a tower went up. Within a day a cluster of 19 people started getting deathly ill, including many children. We've got clients who a cell tower goes on and they start having strokes. One of our clients, 51 strokes within day. Another client, huge heart issues. And these are affecting individual people. Congress seems to think that, you know, these folks just must be sacrificed, apparently in the name of modern age, and people be able to watch cat videos on the beach in new jersey. But we think that, you know, actually that's not the way it's supposed to be.
Speaker 5:People have individual rights okay, so I go back to this list. So when you think about this, right, oops, okay, let me think about this list here. How many people cancer, dna damage, fertility issues, impacts of sleep and brain function and learning disorders?
Speaker 6:yeah, the increase, the increase in those instances over the last few decades are known adverse health effects of rf radiation known, right?
Speaker 5:you? I don't know if I played it here, but I had it, but there's's a video of RFK talking about cell phones. He's like do not put the cell phone to your ear as I do it, do not let your children do it, do not let them sleep with it, even in the room. He's like they've got to take a break from that. He's like there's a couple of things, there's blue light, but the radiation is horrible. Right, you've got people that are men especially, are infertile and the biggest thing is because you sit and carry your cell phone in your pocket and you're radiating your little boys.
Speaker 5:I mean all of these things impacts on sleep and brain function, learning disorders. How many people are running around at 60 percent because they're in a fog? And this recently became an issue in my family because I've got a family member that this happened Telephone tower went up and they live in this little neighborhood and we were just walking around and he's been feeling a lot of health issues and he's been trying to deal with them and he kind of figured this out. But it's like cancer, cancer, some advanced form of something or another. You know. I mean it's like this whole neighborhood is chronically ill, the whole neighborhood. There's a wi-fi tower and he's got all the little sensors, you know the, the radiation, not our like that does all the he can do like a detector, yeah, like he can do volts and radiation and a series of it's like a volt meter, but for the air, so you can walk around your house and see where you like an rf detector yes
Speaker 5:so you know, we're walking on a street and he's like watch, and we walk and it's like we get in front of his house and it goes down and we get there's one little spot on his front porch where it's like small but it's still unhealthy, but it's small and you come around the house, it's like literally, as you, you know, in his, the whole back of his house, his master bedroom's, like right there, serotonin, it's just straight line of sight, 200 yards, if that right. Just big old tower with all these little things on it, like they keep adding to these 5g things because they're not, you know, crazy. I'm just saying they're communicating with your body. The nanotech, the internet of bodies, like money is investing in this stuff. You think that?
Speaker 6:you think they just throw their money away no, I'd expect that they would want to return you know why.
Speaker 5:You know climate change was a scam because they would never give a 30-year loan on a beach in florida if finance thought that it was going to be rising tides. Yeah, they would not invest in ports or anything like that. Right, that's one of the biggest things is like no, it's a scam.
Speaker 6:It's a scam to get you to pay yeah, and the insurance companies in florida are not even blinking, so you know it's a scam there yeah, okay.
Speaker 5:So the other thing too is uh, you've also got the, the potential event for, uh, large cosmic events like a solar, a solar minimum or a comet impact. We had this happen in uh 2000. There was a comet impact, and there I don't.
Speaker 5:I probably briefly touched on this, but there's a very real possibility that the lockdowns had very less to do with covid and more to do with a cluster of asteroids flying by the planet, because one hit in nigeria and it blew the roof off a thousand homes and it was like a huge deal and it came out of nowhere. It caught the whole world by surprise. We did not cover that. We did not cover that. In fact they did. They had a media blackout on and and partly because there was a window where there's about a month window where these asteroids were. You know, oh, we're what.
Speaker 4:So just saying, there's always like other things.
Speaker 5:And that's why you have the Space Force and like there are an element of reason we pay, these big governments is partly to be concerned about this stuff.
Speaker 6:This is Dr John L Casey. Right, they're not just Star Wars cosplaying. So this is.
Speaker 5:Dr John L Casey, former NASA and vice presidential advisor, and he's giving a a private briefing on basically things to be prepared for from his experience working in the government. And some of this stuff is just good advice, but again it's like my. My message, catherine Austin Fitch, is like we have to be self-reliant, self-dependent, so we want to be aware of what they're doing. I want to know when they're building the empire, right, I want to know because I don't want to get sucked into that nonsense. Right? Same thing here. If there's, if they're planning on some cosmic event, I'm probably not going to crawl in a bunker with those people, so maybe I should have my own.
Speaker 3:Okay, now we're back to the questions about okay, what do we do now? How do we prepare for this new cold era? Thank you for asking all those questions oh, excuse me.
Speaker 5:uh, the premise of his talk here is there will be a cold era. I don't know if you guys remember, but when Donald Trump was meeting with Gavin Newsom, he told Gavin Newsom it's going to get a lot colder. And they're like oh, because global warming. He's like it'll get colder. Just watch, it'll get colder.
Speaker 5:So this is something that I've seen that we're still in an ice age and when you hear things like the ice wall is getting bigger or the ice pack in the poles is getting bigger for the first time, like there is and Catherine Austin Fitz talked about this in a period of cooling can come from a pole shift. There's a whole series of things that could cause this, but this is what this is what he's talking about here that the climate change, the idea that it's going to get hotter, is the greatest fraud, because they know it's going to get colder and that's what they're preparing for prepare for record cold, food shortages, rationing, silver, civil unrest, international conflict.
Speaker 3:All we have to do, ladies and gentlemen, let's go back and look at history. That's all we have to do to understand what's going to happen in the future. This, this cold era has begun. All we have to do is go back and look at what happened before. What did happen before? We lost crops on a global scale, people starved and froze to death on a global scale, and that was when they were more resilient, more reliable. We now have almost 50 million people on food stamps, totally dependent on the government for food.
Speaker 3:What's going to happen with those 50 million people on food stamps, totally dependent on the government for food? What's going to happen with those 50 million people when we run out of food? What's going to happen with everyone in this room when you go to the Publix and there's no bread on the shelf Because it was either looted the night before or bought out the night before? What happens in these events? One of the first things that happens when everyone recognizes the crops just got wiped out by a cold front in the spring or before harvest. What happens? It's panic, panic. Their panic will come because the President of the United States is telling us we only have global warming, we don't need to be worried or prepared for global movement. Therefore, everyone will be totally unprepared. Unless you hear and believe and convey this message to your friends with panic which I recommend you do strongly Panic will be the first step.
Speaker 5:So they're preparing and this is Katherine Austin Fitz in her podcast with Tucker Carlson what's this? So Katherine Austin Fitz talks about how they've put 21 trillion, they suspect, into these underground cities, underground tunnels and these underground systems. Why, well, they're preparing to go underground either nuclear holocaust or potentially a little cold snap. So um patrne, on his podcast with Roseanne Barr, talked about how the elite that he sees and communicates with the common belief is that they're kind of done with the population, the world, that between robotics and AI they figure they no longer need 95 percent of the population to maintain their high quality of life, their high quality of life. Okay, so this is something that is very, very concerning and I think I think even we as Americans, I believe we'll survive this because I think Liberty still thrives here. But you have to be considerate of short-term stuff. I've talked about AI, especially in our 1776 classes. I've talked about kind of how AI is going to impact, especially like real estate and stuff like that.
Speaker 5:So Joe Allen is a reporter who's been tasked by war room for going on six years now, five years now, just looking at AI and its impact and things like that. He's written a book on it and he's talking about. We're getting to the point now where you're actually seeing like Microsoft just laid off 3000 workers. They were all laid off directly because their job was utterly replaced by AI. Right, got the new york times. Now who's saying that? They're and, and, uh, axios, yeah, axios is talking about using ai to replace copywriters and editors and things like that. Like, okay, you might still have the journalists out there doing the reporting, but all the back end stuff is now being done by ai.
Speaker 6:3 000 employees at microsoft. That's incredible. So that I mean just think of the, the economic value there. I mean how, how much does the average microsoft employee make? Oh, hundred grand plus, yeah, so what's three thousand times that?
Speaker 5:big. Yeah, I mean, and that's not the only company. There's multiple other companies that have already done their first round of layoffs replacing those employees right. So ai is having a real economic impact and on the money side of things, they're having their little symposiums and stuff and they're telling their investors and shareholders, like, get ready, our profits are going to be huge because, guess what, our bottom line is about to drop through the floor. Why is that?
Speaker 2:very difficult to master. Uh, let's just assume that these technologies remain as flawed as they are right now.
Speaker 5:We know that the people creating them, and we know you hear so, just fyi I. Ai has a lot of flaws. One of them is a there's no creativity, but b, so it can only do what's already been done. So, even if it's gathering information that we can't found, it's information that we produced the other thing is it hallucinates, it lies.
Speaker 5:This is a huge problem. They don't know why it does it, they don't know how it's doing it, but somehow, in the way of building it, they've given it the ability to manipulate and lie to us, and so it hallucinates. We don't know why that's weird yes. So that's why you always got It'll cite a source that might not actually be real. And you know, I don't know, I don't know why it does that Nobody does. But it doesn't matter, because the money is saying, well, they'll figure it out. What if they don't?
Speaker 2:There on Morning Joe with the Axios editor, that corporations across America and across the world are intent on incorporating AI and the blue-collar level robotics at every level, anywhere possible to make it more efficient. They will replace human beings. This is being incorporated in education, with AI teachers. This is being incorporated in medicine. You have Dr Oz talking about that. Physicians who do not consult AI in the near future will be considered negligent. This is being incorporated in the government.
Speaker 2:You see it, with Doge clearing the way for AI to be used to employ or to basically replace government employees, or force government employees to use it to become quote unquote more productive. Force government employees to use it to become quote unquote more productive. And then, of course, in the military, ai is being heralded as the key to geopolitical power in the future. But let's imagine they remain this flawed Then that means, basically, we are intentionally, willfully, crippling ourselves with flawed technologies that do have some aspects of superiority as far as data gathering and analysis, but ultimately are rife with hallucinations and other sorts of glitches. Or let's imagine that these technologies are refined to the point that Elon Musk believes they will be, that Sam Altman believes they will be, that Dario Armaday at Anthropic believes they will be. Well then, that means these hyper-effective, hyper-efficient machines will first forcefully augment human workers, who are basically cornered and have to adopt them, and then replace first coders and then most white-collar jobs and then most blue-collar jobs with robotics. If it goes the way they, it is total replacement.
Speaker 6:Poor Steve, hang on, hang on, hang on Come on man.
Speaker 5:Yeah, so basically, you know right. A lot of people thought that it would come for low level jobs, but it's not. It's going to come for white level jobs Editors, copywriters, marketers, analysts, analyze you know all it's not. It's going to come for white level jobs editors, copywriters, marketers, analysis, analyze you know all it's coming for you. First, big coders, it people. I mean it's a lot more efficient just to ask rock your it question in the call up, a call center or call up a help guy, you know what?
Speaker 5:I mean Like, this is a big deal. The internet obviously reshaped things, but it was something that was you could easily get into. I mean ultimately ended up being that oh yeah, you want to be online? Yes, throw a bit a little website up and there you know, there's a lot of people who predicted that, you know, by such and such year, if you're not on the internet, you won't be in business. That's not necessarily true for every small business, but for the most part, every business pretty much has a website or some kind of presence. Some kind of presence not every, but you know, huge majority and game changing.
Speaker 5:Well, ai is the same thing, but the problem is, is AI actually where the internet created a job for someone to put you on the internet, right? But then it also created oh well, now we need a marketing and we need this, we need you know what I mean? It creates its own little thing. Well, ai, right now, it's like you could job for someone just to tell AI what you do and they'll create the website and it'll create the marketing plan and it'll put. You know what I mean? You just eliminated 10 downstream opportunities.
Speaker 6:Yeah.
Speaker 5:At least it'll take time for us to for free thinking people to figure out how to now make that subservient. That's, that's what I think. But money right now is going to start dumping employees, and that's you know. So when trump says, hey, I want to take money from harvard, give it to trade schools, it's because the thing that the ai isn't going to be able to do is like what I do for a little bit, it'll come. It'll come, but yeah, it'll be. It'll be a minute, all right, mike ben's talking about the election integrity group and he's talking about a war play scenario, and I'm just trying to paint this picture that, remember to us, we're just the, we're just the, the, uh, the cattle behind the transition, the herd everybody projects which explicitly plotted groups.
Speaker 5:Think about the mindset they have to be in on wanting to co-opt a democracy to take it away from the people. Think about their mentality and what, how far they'll go to accomplish what they're going to accomplish. So he's talking about the election integrity group that did a war game prior to the 2020 election, basically figuring out how to oust Donald Trump. So, no matter what, they were going to knock Donald Trump off.
Speaker 16:The exact group behind the Transition Integrity Project, which explicitly plotted in the height of the George Floyd riots, ran a war game about how the Biden campaign encased Trump won in a clear win scenario. Clear Trump win was the name of their scenario. Scenario three is in June 2020. How the Biden campaign could get racial justice activists from these riots to be quote receptive to a Biden call to take to the streets and plotted what needed to be done to resource them and to cultivate relationships with Black Lives Matter's senior leadership and community leaders so that they would owe the Biden administration favors in case they need to be called on. And lo and behold the $50 billion. The Chamber of Commerce then flooded them with $50 billion in contributions. You remember that All the different Chamber of Commerce companies just flooded billions of dollars of donations to BLM to destroy our country.
Speaker 5:So yeah, the Chamber of Commerce, you know you got to, you got to like those guys because they do a hot dog party in the spring for the kids at the local park in conjunction with the Rotary Club. You know what?
Speaker 5:I mean Right before they burn your town, this little group that is absolutely pro open borders does not care about law and order on the streets. It's all about cheap labor, helping the bottom line of the corporation. And don't fool you know, the dirty joke is they're like business is good for america, yeah, when we work at them, right, but you're constantly asking me to go into further and further debt to consume because I just love these iphones. And did you see this recent ad on instagram? I gotta have those leggings. You know what I mean? Like, the whole thing is just crazy when you step back for a moment and think about it. You're the product, you're the cattle.
Speaker 5:And with this whole thing now that was 2020, they were planning on using racial justice. Well, the BLM movement has very much died down. They were really exposed as being frauds, but that doesn't change anything. They'll just change the movement. So, instead of BLM and racial justice, now it's don't be, don't be a xenophobic, don't deport these people. So this is going on. Here was. This was in New York city. So we've had our own little riots here in Seattle as of recent or I don't know riots, protests that got a little hot. So this is one in New York and these are federal officers, these are ice agents, okay, and this is protesters pushing on this gate usc 118 11111A1.
Speaker 5:This is an assault on federal officers impeding, impairing, resisting and preventing them from doing their job, which they're clearly doing. They're pushing the bike rack. That's a deadly weapon. Department of Justice in DC will call that a firearm, and you know clearly this is more than just a protest. This is actually taking action. Does that make sense? This is doing a protest. This is actually taking action. Does that make sense? This is doing a thing. So, just so you know, this is not a protest, this is a crime. Everything you're seeing here is a crime. Everything that's not a protest.
Speaker 5:Yeah, they need to put some bracelets on that pink I spent 14 months in prison on a seven year and three months sentence for doing less than that, than that, less than what that woman is doing right there. Okay, less than what that or woman, man, I have no idea what look got, resist, almost got, oh, but feel sympathetic because they got pepper sprayed so, oh okay, oh man.
Speaker 5:So again, these people in my opinion, have been siloed into this. This is not a normal reaction from under anybody who understands basic job markets, and you know what I mean. What are they fighting for the almond pickers? Are they fighting for someone to come scrub your toilet?
Speaker 4:they don't even know how do they phrase this.
Speaker 5:They don't even know, you know don't send them back to their country, where everything grows just fresh. But you know, I don't know, this is wild, wild everything you just saw there. But you know, I don't know, this is wild, wild Everything you just saw. There's a crime. Are they going to do anything about it? Who knows? Meanwhile, those who try to expose the real crimes, people like Tina Peters. She's sitting in prison over exposing the election fraud. Do you know who Tina Peters is?
Speaker 6:Yeah, we covered her just a few days ago.
Speaker 5:Yeah, so she's in Colorado. She was got state charges, so president Trump can't directly pardon her, but she was given a nine year sentence for basically seeing that there was election fraud in her County. She was a County election official and she uh, they wanted to come in and, you know, out of policy, wipe the machines. So she got a copy of that machine and that copy of the machine is what allowed us to see that they have like a, a shadow hard drive which allows them to access it and then rewrite files without leave no trace. And we got to see all that because when they came in and rewrote it, it didn't match the copy that they've got and that's what they were like.
Speaker 5:How did this happen? And that's when they realized that there was the second drive on there that you couldn't tell, you would never know, because you couldn't access it from the one portal. Anyways, it got explained. Pretty amazing stuff. She exposed that, but then in her trial they wouldn't let the wet experts in. I mean, it was just a big, huge railroad and they don't want her talking. So here's her message to Trump.
Speaker 6:Hold on. That's me Go ahead.
Speaker 14:You know Mike Frontera, Dominion's lawyer, but they found a way to not let us have our witnesses. Those bios passwords 670 of them from 63 counties out of the 64 counties in colorado have been on the public website for the secretary of state, which means they were out there for anybody to grab so the passwords into the dominion machines, the secretary of state in colorado.
Speaker 5:While this was all going on, had the passwords just on the secretary of state in colorado. While this was all going on, had the passwords just on the secretary of state website. Just public, just public. Anybody could grab them and use them like amateur hackers could grab. And it was like didn't even have to hack, it was just you just logged in what the hell? Yeah, oh, our machines aren't connected to the internet, then why do you have passwords for them for remote access on the Secretary of State website?
Speaker 4:And how come I'm logged in. And why am I in prison?
Speaker 14:You should be locked up and they should throw away the key and let me loose.
Speaker 7:Yeah, we need a prisoner swap. Yeah for sure. So you think that this election in Colorado is definitely compromised because of the leaked passwords?
Speaker 14:Oh, always. I mean in Mesa County they were finding fraudulent ballots. They were finding the same person was signing the ballot envelopes and they brushed it off like it was nothing, as a matter of fact, what Jenna Grinswold did with the password. She knew while I was going through the trial that that was out there and did nothing.
Speaker 7:So those passwords were leaked out there during your trial, before your sentencing.
Speaker 14:They were out there since June. But she knew about it and didn't tell the clerks about it. And now she's apologizing to the clerks. She should apologize to the American people, or at least the people in Colorado. But there are other passwords besides, just for Colorado. I've heard for the United States that they're for Dominion machines.
Speaker 7:So you think some of our other elections in other states can be compromised because of leaked passwords for the Dominion machines?
Speaker 14:Absolutely, absolutely. That's what's going on with the cartel in Arizona and Michigan and you know I was so happy when I saw Florida for Trump and all these other places. But just remember, dominion's headquarters is in Colorado Denver, colorado and also most people don't know that Dominion is out of Serbia as well, and if you can play that video by Gary Brunson, the 30-year CIA whistleblower, or look at the transcripts, you'll see exactly how this all started with Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, and that's why this stuff with Patrick Byrne and all this coming out, it leads all the way back to Venezuela and then the corruption worldwide.
Speaker 5:And she's sitting in prison. Yeah, why do you think she's sitting in prison? What's a bigger threat to the system? Some people pushing on gates in New York or her exposing that the elections are fraudulent, dubious, dubious at best. Right Again, we're just painting the picture. Who is it that we're looking at? Who are these people in power? Rfk said it people in authority lie, people in authority. I here's a here's a different us cia contractor whistleblower that we played a video from the other day. He was the one that the japanese guy met with and was like, oh, take a bribe. And he's like, why'd you do this?
Speaker 5:and he turned him in five, you know, kept writing reports five times it turns out that was actually an agent yeah it was his cover that you didn't speak good english. I mean, that's how extreme they went. So they had a conversation in arabic. Okay, so he talks about again the cia and through usaid, and we know that their relationship. Usaid was just the funding arm of of, uh, the cia. It was the soft power side, so that's their non-bullet side.
Speaker 10:This is how we take you over with money, okay I never, ever, encountered a cia officer who was embedded in usaid. I don't think that that happens. It wouldn't make sense anyway. Because, really, yeah, because when you're, when you're embedded, you have to do that cover job for eight hours and then you go out and do your CIA job for eight hours. That's right. If you're going to be given some kind of official cover, you don't want it to be USA ID where you actually have to do the work you want to be.
Speaker 10:I got to be very careful here, but you want to be in a position where you can sort of blend the two. Why do you have to be careful here? Because, um, the details are classified, okay, yeah, yeah, let's not have another trial. No, no, no more trials for me, thank you. So you got to blend the two. Yeah, that there. No, the reason I said that this is a a problem usa id was was a beachhead for the cia in the state department. That's. That's not what usa id is supposed to do. Usa id is supposed to be digging water wells and training doctors and you know, building sewage treatment plants and electrical grids and helping people develop. It's the agency for international development. John f kennedy's, that was the plan of it.
Speaker 10:Yeah, usa id, the peace corps, vista were all created at the same time by John Kennedy. You know it was a great idea, yeah, but the CIA moved right in as soon as Kennedy was killed. By 1964, the CIA was running covert operations out of USAID. This has all been declassified. It's all available. Okay, this is declassified. This is declassified. It's available at the National Security Archives at George Washington University.
Speaker 2:Okay, so for this example, since it's declassified, can you explain what that one looked like? Yeah, because now I'm a bit confused because you're saying you wouldn't go undercover there, but there's a blend of the two.
Speaker 10:They did not have people undercover at USAID. What they did is they ran covert operations through USAID, english operations through USAID, english. Okay, in 1972, ted Kennedy wrote a letter to the CIA and he said I heard the CIA was paying Laotian mercenaries through USAID, just cutting payroll checks. Yeah, is that true? He got a letter back from Henry Kissinger, who was the secretary of state at the time Real straight shooter too. Oh, yeah, yeah, he's never going to obfuscate Phenomenal guy. He got an identical letter from the CIA, identical to the word, saying we're using USAID essentially to launder money and pay these low ocean mercenaries to fight communists. And yeah, we paid him in 69 and 70 and 71 and 72. Like what are you going to do about it, kendi? That was just one of many, many operations that was paid for through USAID.
Speaker 5:Remember the $40 million going to Afghanistan every week? Yeah To the Taliban, uh-huh, yeah. Some songs never change, do they? Yeah?
Speaker 6:Unfortunately, there were a lot of stations playing.
Speaker 5:Mm-hmm, mm-hmm. Now, on a personal level, these guys interacted with my story a little bit. This is the Whitmer kidnapping plot. Oh, ok, so you got a lot of beds and mercenaries in Laotia and here you've got. President Trump is looking at a pardon for the. There's five of them that are currently still incarcerated, that didn't get acquitted Right, that took plea deals, basically because the pressure that was mounting on him, and president Trump is looking at those cases. And this is the one and only reporter who has followed this case, actually met with these men and heard their side of the story and thanks to her, we put together how big this plot was. It extended into Virginia. They had Michigan they were. They were trying to make this like a multi-state plot and instead they moved the guy. Guy as soon as the Michigan Whitmer thing happened, they moved the guy to DC and then J6 happened Same same, same same FBI officer, part of the people who are accused of conspiring to kidnap Michigan Governor Chris Whitmer.
Speaker 8:I'm going to look at it. I will take a look at it. It's been brought to my attention. I did watch the trial. It looked to me like somewhat of a railroad job. I'll be honest with you. It looked to me like some people said some stupid things. You know they were drinking and I think they said stupid things. But I'll take a look at that and a lot of people are asking me that question, from both sides. Actually, a lot of people think they got railroaded. A lot of people think they got railroaded. A lot of people think they got railroaded and probably some people don't.
Speaker 18:Well, I want to thank the president for drawing attention to this case. These men are innocent and, yes, they did say some stupid things while they were being followed around by a network of 12 FBI informants two undercover agents. Over a period of almost an entire year, they took these men out, they got them drunk, got them stoned and got them to basically say incendiary things, which is not illegal, by the way. But these men were completely railroaded at trial. They were denied their rights. Their families have suffered.
Speaker 18:As far as I know, I'm the only person who's traveled across the country to interview not only the men that were charged in this case, but also the many unindicted co-conspirators who never had their stories told. It was bigger than Michigan. They were trying to make this a multi-state plot. There is a disabled Vietnam veteran in Virginia. They were trying to target, to go after Ralph Northam. The entire thing was a setup and really it was designed to be an October surprise against the president in the 2020 election, to sway the election in a swing state. So I would be happy to brief the president on this case. I've actually gone and visited these men in prison. I'm the only person who's done that. I'm the only person who's in contact with all of these men, all the five that are still incarcerated, their families. So I'd like to thank the president for highlighting this case and hopefully pardoning these men.
Speaker 5:So, to be fair, when I see Antifa, I see the same thing that they were doing to these guys. To me it's all the same two sides of the same coin. It's just one big op. But they took what would just be normally law-abiding guys and turned them into domestic violent extremists trying to kidnap the governors. And how'd they do it? Getting them drunk, getting them high, planting ideas in their heads.
Speaker 5:I'm sure they had some online siloing where they're getting constant videos of, you know, the tyrant ritmer or what you know. What I'm saying like it's just I listen, we're only as good as the information we have. I'm constantly trying to be careful, too, right, I mean, think about how many videos I've showed just this morning. Trying to connect this theme here, here's an old video from newt gingrich, and this was back when, uh, donald trump. Uh, this is back when Donald Trump, when Mitt Romney excuse me, mitt Romney wrote a big old letter and I think he gave a speech with it about how he did not endorse Donald Trump and he wasn't a man of character. Blah, blah, blah. Well, mitt Romney gave a little news blurb with Bill O'Reilly back at the time. You remember that, back when Bill O'Reilly was still doing this and we'll do it live. I'll do it live, we'll do it live, yeah, so, anyways, back with Bill O'Reilly and he's talking about his thoughts on this Mitt Romney, and he drops a little something in there that we should all have our antenna pop up.
Speaker 13:Okay, so how do you assess Mitt Romney's speech today? Why did he give it today? What is he trying to accomplish? Well, let me say first of all, I was a little surprised just because I was with Mitt in Las Vegas when Donald Trump endorsed him and I remember how effusively Mitt thanked Donald and praised him and talked about him as a great job creator.
Speaker 13:So it's a little bit over the top today, but I think that represents personally the panic of the establishment wing of the party and I think they all hoped held their breath through Super Tuesday no that didn't work and now they're faced with the very real prospect of Donald Trump becoming the leader of the party, and it absolutely drives them crazy. They just cannot imagine sharing Well, because he's an outsider, he's not them, he's not part of the club, he's uncontrollable. You know, he hasn't been through the initiation rights, he didn't belong to the secret society and I think that they don't see him. They have no idea how to relate to him.
Speaker 5:He hasn't done the initiation rights. He doesn't belong to the secret society.
Speaker 6:What are the initiation rights?
Speaker 5:Maybe I shouldn't have asked that, that is a step too far for this podcast. This is not a conspiracy show I want to remind people where this all got started the very word.
Speaker 11:Secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society, and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in ensuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment that I do not intend to permit to the extent that it's in my control, and no official of my administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know. But I do ask every publisher, every editor and every newsman in the nation to re-examine his own standards and to recognize the nature of our country's peril In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort, based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy In times of clear and present danger. The courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security.
Speaker 11:Today, no war has been declared and, however fierce the struggle may be, it may never be declared in the traditional fashion. Our way of life is under attack. Those who make themselves our enemy are advancing around the globe. The survival of our friends is in danger, and yet no war has been declared, no borders have been crossed by marching troops, no missiles have been fired. If the press is awaiting a declaration of war before it imposes the self-discipline of combat conditions, then I can only say that no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of clear and present danger, then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent. More clear and its presence has never been more imminent.
Speaker 11:It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader and by every newspaper. But we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covet means for expanding its sphere of influence on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a wartime discipline, discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to man why do you think they killed that man?
Speaker 5:I don't know how far would they go? How far would they go in their cover up?
Speaker 6:Well, it is clear that by killing him, they were able to acquire some of the greatest powerful tentacles this world's ever known.
Speaker 5:Yeah, and look at what they did with it. Here you go. As director of national intelligence this is Tulsi Gabbard I promised to root out an exposed politicization of intelligence. I recently declassified two reports that show Biden administration labeled Americans who disagreed with their policies as potential domestic violent extremists, which was often followed by fbi investigations, surveillance and government-directed social media censorship. This is a classic ploy to politicize intelligence and the national security state against the american people, undermining our constitution, constitutionally guaranteed rights and freedoms.
Speaker 5:So the first one here is uh, foreign analogs may react violently to covid19 mitigation mandates. And then there's this one right here diverse socio-political factors amplifying persistent domestic violent extremism and you go through and read this. So dve is domestic violent extremism. An overlapping set of socio-political grievances spurred domestic violent extremists to plot attacks during 2021, fomenting this is January 6, fomenting a sustained threat of violence to the public and democratic institution. Events of 2022 will probably further exacerbate the DVE activity, so they're projecting into 2022.
Speaker 5:Adherence of several DVE ideologies continue to converge around anger at government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, immigration and perceived election fraud, along with evolving conspiracy theories, thus increasing the likelihood that violent extremist messaging or an attack would encourage other domestic violent extremists to take action. Dvs carried out at least four fatal attacks in 2021, the same number as in 2020, killing 13 people. According to preliminary analysis of FBI investigative information, the number pending domestic terrorism investigations more than doubled in 2021, from about 1400 to 2900, in part because of cases related to the siege on the us capital at 2021. There you go, folks 14 deaths, 14 deaths. How many died of fentanyl last?
Speaker 4:year. How many was it?
Speaker 5:deaths. How many died of fentanyl last year? How many was it? 14 deaths, how many? How many domestic abuse situations involving alcohol ended up in deaths? 14 deaths. And they're concerned and going to redirect all their resources to go after dves domestic violent extremists. They're talking about me, ron. I'm talking about me potentially. They're not talking about actual violence like actual threats here.
Speaker 6:My brother died from fentanyl.
Speaker 5:Yeah, and did the FBI come knocking?
Speaker 6:No.
Speaker 5:No no.
Speaker 6:They're not interested.
Speaker 5:DVA is adhering to different ideologies but motivated the perceptions of fraud in 2020. Ideologies but motivated the perceptions of fraud in 2020 general election. Were arrested in 2021 for plotting or threatening violence against federal, state local enforcement officials and political party representation, highlighting the elevated threat posed to elected officials countrywide. A new york threatening an assault and murder members of congress um since the us capital cities. A diverse set of dves have shared DVEs have shared in person and online their perceptions of government overreach on pandemic mitigation efforts and they have encouraged one another to act. In August-September 2021, nves called for violence against medical and pharmaceutical employees, mobile vaccine clinics, elected or public health officials, school board or faculty members, federal agencies and law enforcement in response to alleged overreach insinuating enforcing or otherwise supporting health measures to mitigate COVID-19 spread. This is all premised on lies man. The COVID-19 people that were against it ended up being right.
Speaker 4:Right, correct, true, accurate.
Speaker 5:The truth tellers, the guy standing in the light, and from the darkness comes these people who want to? What? Censor, silence, investigate, prosecute Hello Covet means Secret societies. You know Donald Trump isn't in because he hasn't been through the initiation rights. What are we talking about? What are we talking about? Our beloved country? God bless America. What are we talking about? You're talking about the nation. You're talking about a corrupt empire, a corrupt corporation that has no morality, is not being run by people that share our values.
Speaker 6:It's full of conspiring men. It doesn't matter if the nation continues, if we lose. All is not being run by people that share our values.
Speaker 5:It's full of conspiring men, it's. It doesn't matter if the nation continues, if we lose all of our traditions and values. John F Kennedy man, crazy, crazy stuff, you know, and I mean it's. It's wildly subversive. This, uh, auto pen scandal is huge. I kind of downplayed it and I've even said on this podcast I don't think they're going to do anything Like what are they going to do? It was all fraud. Yeah Well, I mean, he who consents to be injured is not injured. We just all kind of pretended we spent the money. It's done, it's over. You know what I mean. Maybe they can prosecute some people, but I don't want to go work outside. Here we go. Mitch Burrell, we might be here all day. We might be here all day. Yeah, this is just a live. Live for the.
Speaker 4:We're trying to get a 30 hour stream live for the rest of forever.
Speaker 5:Yeah, Back to the show.
Speaker 17:Welcome back. Tonight we confront a scandal so grave it threatens the very foundation of our republic the Biden-Autopen scandal. What began as whispers of bureaucratic overreach has exploded into a constitutional crisis, with the Heritage Foundation's oversight project uncovering evidence that could unravel the legitimacy of our government's actions. This isn't just about a machine signing documents. It's about who was really running the country and whether our democracy was hijacked by unelected operatives. The Oversight Project's bombshell findings reveal that 32 of President Joe Biden's 57 clemency warrants, affecting over 4,000 individuals, were signed using an auto pen, a device that replicates a signature without the president's direct involvement.
Speaker 17:These weren't routine proclamations. They included sweeping preemptive pardons for the Biden's family, political allies like Dr Anthony Fauci and General Mark Milley, and members of the January 6th committee like now, Senator Adam Schiff. The same auto pen signature appeared on nearly every executive order and major document except, curiously, Biden's 2024 election withdrawal letter. This raises a chilling question Was Biden even aware of these actions, or were unelected staffers wielding his authority like a blank check? Worse allegations have surfaced that Biden aides, including names like Ron Klain, Anita Dunn and Bob Bauer, were not just using the auto pen, but may have been selling access to it, peddling pardons like commodities in a DC flea market. Doj pardon attorney Ed Martin came on our show recently to explain the latest from a whistleblower who claims these gatekeepers profited from controlling Biden's signature while he was, as evidence suggests, in significant mental decline.
Speaker 12:What I was told was about who was really in control in the White House, and I've had concerns Matt, I've expressed them for almost three months about the competence of Joe Biden when it comes to whether we had valid pardons. What I've heard and I mentioned some of the names I think they're well-known names. Ron Klain is one. Also, bob Bauer and his wife, anita Dunn are key players in this. Obviously, jill Biden.
Speaker 17:The mental decline isn't speculation. Recordings from special counsel Robert Herr's 2023 interview with Joe Biden struggling to recall basic details, raising doubts about his capacity to authorize these actions where did you keep papers that related?
Speaker 3:to those things that you were actively working, I I I don't know what was happening. What's happened in the meantime is that as Trump gets elected in November of 2017. 2016. 16. 16. All right.
Speaker 17:So 2017. So why does this all matter? The Constitution vests the pardon power solely in the president, a non-delegable authority meant to reflect the will of the elected leader. If unelected staffers were forging Biden's signature to issue pardons, potentially for personal gain, they bypassed the democratic process, effectively staging a shadow presidency. This isn't just a scandal. It's a betrayal of the American people, undermining the rule of law and the checks and balances that define our republic. If pardons can be bought and sold, what's to stop the erosion of every other presidential power? House Oversight Chairman, james Comer, is now demanding answers, issuing subpoenas to Biden's physician and aides, like Neera Tanden and Annie Tomasini, to uncover who controlled the auto pen and why the stakes couldn't be higher. If these allegations are true, we face a precedent where unelected bureaucrats can usurp presidential authority, rendering our votes meaningless. This isn't about partisan point scoring. It's about ensuring no one, democrat or Republican, can exploit a president's incapacity to subvert our democracy, america. We must demand transparency before this shadow governance becomes the norm, threatening the republic we hold dear.
Speaker 5:Wow. So if the pardon power can be bought, what other power could be bought? Yeah, hey, you know that contract. Hey, the gold bars were dropping off the back of the ship, the Titanic, the EPA. What, what bars were dropping off the back of the ship? The titanic dpa. Uh, uh, what. This auto pin scandal isn't just about that. Now I gotta tell you. Back when I was in prison I had to. I was sitting in the bullpen one day, and where the bullpen was, where there was in the wood shop, we had what was called the cage. It was literally our cell that we could all go sit in, said about 12 people would go sit in above the wood shop and it was a cage like a cage. It was called the cage. Okay, so we go sit in this cage.
Speaker 5:They can lock us in, okay. And then when I, when I became orderly over the all the facilities that we had, what was called the bullpen it was just a different cage on ground floor and but I I had to go sit in the cage all the time. So I'm sitting in the bullpen Right, which the only is this nice, cause the door was open. I could come in and out when I had to go take the trash out or whatever, but either way I had to go sit in the bullpen. And coming in out of the plumbing department comes our shot. I know he's coming from maintenance, but it comes up my, my unit shot caller, that guy, relationship with interesting guy. So anyways, he comes in with this, this newspaper, this very one. So this is usa today. This is dated um, I don't even see november 14th 2024. So trump is nine days in after winning the presidency. Okay. So thun went is the new speaker authority leader. Nfl head coaches of color hit record high. What a great thing. Trump duo will target wasting government, musk and ranaswamy. Okay.
Speaker 5:And then january 6th, pardons, could revitalize far-right groups. So he walks in, throws this paper down and, uh, it's probably december at this point by the time I this paper made. The made his way to facilities and throws this paper down and goes, hey, hey, you guys mentioned in here, your boys in here, your boys in here. I'm like okay. So I looked at January 6th pardon. So I start reading it's horrible article. It's got a picture of Jacob Chansley here, the QAnon shaman. That's what he's talking about. Your boys in here, your boys in here. So quote basically, if Trump ends up giving pardons to the January 6th because at this point it's all speculative that signals something very dangerous, not just for America but for what could eventually turn into a civil war. Donovan said. I think that if Trump does pardon some of these more serious vigilantes from January 6th, that sends a clear message he is building a private army projection.
Speaker 5:Clearly clearly this paper is liberal. Snot okay, but what are they projecting here? The idea that these pardons equal a private army. Right that he's trying to raise a private army. That was in the usa today.
Speaker 4:I took it from prison because it was that like what the you think I going to join a private army?
Speaker 6:You're out of your mind. Okay, all 1500 of you.
Speaker 16:I wouldn't even join the real army.
Speaker 5:So projection, before Biden left office he clemencied and released thousands of prisoners. What he did was he took the crack cocaine laws and and the cocaine laws. There's a disparity in the sentencing. You got way more time for crack cocaine than cocaine way more time. So it horribly affected the minority community. What he did was he just simply made them the same. So he dropped the crack cocaine guidelines down to the cocaine guidelines. So on the news we're watching this on the news and they're saying it's nonviolent, nonviolent drug offenders. Then they're posting a list in the law library where you could go down and see if their name was on the commutation list, because it was automatically changing your sentencing. So there were people that were getting hauled out like immediately because they were over their time. Some people's release dates were changing by years and years and years.
Speaker 5:Like I'm getting out this summer instead of I'm getting out in 2030, you know that kind of thing Really exciting and they were. It was really cool, they were, they were super happy about it. But there's a nonviolent and when I saw one I'm like we handle him nearly, he's not violent. Here's the deal you get more time for crack cocaine than you do for violent assault. You get more time for crack cocaine than drive-by shooting. You get more time for crack cocaine than you do for, um, you know, using a gun in a crime. So what happens is you get, basically, your time is your top sentence. You know your your biggest crime, so the crack cocaine is your sentence.
Speaker 5:And when you start talking about plea deals, well, let's drop the gun and we'll drop the assault and we'll drop the drive-by just plead to the crack cocaine, because you're going to get 15 years see what I'm saying instead of 30 if we stacked it all together. So you have a lot of that going on. So I start asking him because one guy's like I'm going home next week, I'm going home next week and I'm like, great, what, what you know. So he explains crack, no, super violent, super, violent, super. And, by the way, the reason I'm so curious, no remorse either. He's committed to the life he's getting out. You want to talk about building a private army. That's how you build a private army, not with a bunch of homeschool dads and pastors like Scott who we interviewed this week. Oh the pastor.
Speaker 6:Not a bunch of self-reliant Domestic violent extremists.
Speaker 5:The pastor, self-reliance warriors, the self-reliant Domestic violent extremists. The pastor, self-reliance warriors, the self-reliance warriors. Yeah, exactly the projection that you see from stuff like that. Okay, that's what's like our government. Think about everything we just covered today. You don't think that they're willing to build a private army. I mean, they're horribly concerned about Donald Trump building a private army, goodness gracious.
Speaker 5:All right, guys, it's about time for us to wrap it up, and I got more stuff left, so we're going to hit the stuff tomorrow. We've got a JD Vance talking about Bitcoin, which, again, solutions to all your financial problems. We've got a Megan Kelly and Viva Frye talking about the Diddy uh, the Diddy scan, the Diddy uh trial. We're going to hear some more about Ed Martin and continue with this auto pin scandal and where things are going there. I mean, this is going to be a lot of fun, so make sure you join us tomorrow. Don't forget to share the show. This was an important show. We had a really low viewership yesterday. I don't know what's going on. I think it's because we've had a couple kind of a funny show scheduled for a minute. Anyways, don't forget to share the show. Don't forget to watch it all the way through. Thanks for joining us all the way to the end. We'll talk to you guys again tomorrow. Peasants perspectivecom left behind without 1776 liveus. See you tomorrow.
Speaker 1:Old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in that castle over there. I'm 37. What? I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind you looked.
Speaker 1:Well, I object to it. They automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king, oh king. Eh, very nice. And how do you get that? Eh, by exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society, if there's ever going to be any progress.
Speaker 1:There's some lovely filth down here. Oh, how do you do? How do you do? Good, lady, I am Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the who, the Britons? Who are the Britons? Well, we all are. We are all Britons and I am your king.
Speaker 1:I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy, in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about. If only people would Please, please, good people. I am in haste.
Speaker 1:Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What I told you? We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting.
Speaker 1:Yes, I see, by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, be quiet. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major, be quiet. I order you to be quiet. Order. Who does he think he is? I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings. Well, I can become king.
Speaker 1:Then the Lady of the Lake, her, the Lady of the Lake, her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence, that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet, you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you, shut up. If I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up, will you Shut up? Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up. Come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help. I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Did you see him, rep.
