Peasants Perspective
Peasants Perspective: A Voice from the Edge of Freedom
Join Taylor Johnatakis, a self-proclaimed “peasant” turned podcaster, on an unfiltered journey through family, faith, and the fight for American ideals. From the depths of DC Jail—where he recorded during a 14-month sentence tied to January 6—to his triumphant return home after a Trump clemency in 2025, Taylor delivers raw, heartfelt commentary for the common man. Expect a mix of gritty storytelling, reflections on liberty lost and reclaimed, and timeless lessons drawn from his life as a septic designer, father, and reluctant rebel. Whether he’s reading Dr. Seuss to his kids or dissecting the state of the republic, Peasants Perspective is a bold, unpolished call to stay grounded amidst chaos. Subscribe for a front-row seat to a story that’s as real as it gets—no filter, no apologies.
Peasants Perspective
Narrative Control: How Yesterday's Conspiracy Becomes Today's Accepted Truth
Welcome to a riveting examination of how the Trump administration is fundamentally reshaping American governance through strategic monetization and structural reform. This episode reveals the fascinating pattern emerging as Trump applies his business acumen to government operations - treating America like a corporation that deserves its fair share of profits.
We dive deep into the remarkable shifts happening at the IRS, where six leadership changes in a single year point toward Trump's stated goal of potentially abolishing the agency altogether. His suggestion that tariffs could replace income tax entirely isn't just rhetoric - it's becoming a blueprint for action. Meanwhile, unprecedented deals with tech giants like NVIDIA and AMD now require them to pay 15% of their China chip sales revenue directly to the U.S. government, transforming export licenses into significant revenue streams.
The conversation explores how narratives previously dismissed as "conspiracy theories" are suddenly acceptable in mainstream discourse - from government involvement in historical events to election integrity concerns. This calculated release of information appears to be building toward larger revelations about governmental overreach and accountability.
Perhaps most consequential is Trump's order for a new census, addressing statistical errors that undercounted Republican states while overcounting Democratic ones. According to officials, this correction could shift 10 House seats to Republicans and fundamentally alter congressional power dynamics for years to come.
Join us as we connect these seemingly disparate actions into a coherent strategy that's delivering exactly what Trump voters expected - border security, tax cuts, spending reductions, and strong international posturing. Whether you view these changes as necessary disruptions or concerning overreach, understanding the underlying pattern is essential for navigating America's rapidly evolving political landscape.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
good morning peasants. Welcome to another episode of the peasants perspective they're gonna get you right now wait what's happening. We're not ai, just so you know. This is not an ai broadcast went wrong.
Speaker 3:Try again later. Studio is already streaming. Oh well, it doesn't say that it is.
Speaker 1:See my hair for the first time this morning.
Speaker 3:Let me refresh maybe oh, are we streaming? Yeah, we've been restreaming for 20 some seconds, okay.
Speaker 1:I love this business so much.
Speaker 3:We're back in, and we're the only ones there.
Speaker 1:Okay great. Good, no one saw the beginning. Oh my goodness, somebody did, rejoined yet are we streaming?
Speaker 3:yeah, we've been restreaming for 20 some seconds.
Speaker 1:That's here, okay I love this business so much all right, and we're the only ones there okay, great. Good, no one's on YouTube. You know it's become like a joke every morning.
Speaker 3:Okay, people are filtering back in. Okay, great.
Speaker 1:We're live. We're doing it live, bill O'Reilly style. Good morning. We got a chat before we had to stop the stream and start the stream again, so sorry. Some people got the intro on Rumble, some Before. We had to stop the stream and start the stream again, so sorry. Some people got the intro on rumble, some people did not. Uh, yep, yep Is what it is. Good morning everybody. Yes, good morning. Yeah, all right. I'm just seeing my hair in the feedback thing here. All right, all right.
Speaker 1:Okay, you came in this morning seven minutes ago I didn't watch the news much, but there's a lot of stuff happening. What did you see this week? What were some of the things that just popped out to you?
Speaker 3:okay, this is uh, there's not going to be anything that makes any sense. But I saw donald trump popping up in feeds. I saw dan bongino. For some reason I was like what is he saying? Oh, another kind of cryptic statement about trust me, it's coming out. It's coming out, trust me, trust me. It's like, oh okay, yeah, as soon as I see it I'll trust you. But it's he sounded uh, he sounded positive, you know, like he was coming up with some information. It wasn't just blown smoke. Um, no real information to share, just lots of little drips that I saw just kind of on the periphery as I was super busy this weekend. We got the roof is 90 done yeah, yeah, is that like?
Speaker 3:flashing is all that's left yeah, so we're short two pieces because I can't measure, so I'm not sure how we're gonna solve that. So run to the store three times. Well, the metal is fabricated in spokane. Measure once, cut twice. Run the store three times.
Speaker 1:Measure twice, cut thrice you're always gonna be cutting one extra. Yeah, well, a couple couple things happened this weekend. One of the big things that happened this weekend is billy long, who was just confirmed as commissioner for the IRS, simply two months ago got fired. No Slash got nominated to be the ambassador to Iceland. What that feels like going to Siberia, I don't know, man, yeah, I don't know. I mean Iceland's important, I think, but Billy Long was a representative that submitted multiple bills to abolish the IRS and he was a big, big proponent of doing that. So he goes over to the IRS and what the rumor is, politico reported I think it was Politico. If it wasn't, it was someone else. That is rumor mill paper at this point and they said that he was outed because he wouldn't give Department of Homeland Security, irs information on potential illegal aliens and there was some type of blow up where he told Trump you know, I'm not going to provide that information.
Speaker 1:And then hours later he was out.
Speaker 3:Bye, bye.
Speaker 1:Director of the IRS. I don't really buy that story. First of all, I think if Trump wanted it and he could give it, he would give it. It's possible. He said hey, you know, the attorneys have looked at this. We're not actually supposed to be able to give that data, so there needs to be an executive order or a fix in law. I could understand that happening. I don't see Trump being like well, you're out then if you won't break the law. I feel like that's an old narrative where Trump is asking officials to break the law all the time. You know what I mean.
Speaker 1:Yeah, and I don't think that that's ever really borne any fruit.
Speaker 3:I think that that's the story that the news media wants, because of the angle they want to shoot at.
Speaker 1:That's what I mean. Like they want to run this narrative that Billy Long refused to break the law. Now he's out of the IRS, you know that kind of thing, and now he's banished to be an ambassador. I think if Trump was going to fire him because of some hostile blow up, he wouldn't be immediately nominated to be an ambassador to Iraq. Now something else happened that was pretty interesting along with that. So Billy Long's out IRS has had six directors this year. Whoa, really A lot. Dang yes, doge got in there. That's like what a month Did some stuff Right. They're bringing in more revenue. Like revenues are up right, like it's bringing like the first time, and for a long time they're shaking the bushes, for sure.
Speaker 1:Yeah, they're shaking the bushes. They're collecting more revenue. Well now IRS, which is under treasury. Scott Bessa is now the acting director. I'd say the director, commissioner, I don't know, it doesn't matter, it doesn't matter, but he's now in that position. Now there's a pattern that's happening here State department would take over one of its subsidiaries as they eliminated it, and Trump has been talking about eliminating the IRS.
Speaker 1:I've gotten this question quite a few times from people I've been talking to the last little bit about what happens if Trump loses the IRS. I've been doubtful that it's going to happen.
Speaker 3:But me as well, just because there are so many levers, you know.
Speaker 1:Yeah, but a couple of things have been going on. So this is Howard Legnick talking about Trump's campaign promises.
Speaker 9:Donald Trump- announces the external revenue service and his goal is very simple oh dang. His goal is to abolish the internal revenue service and let all the outsiders pay. Do you believe?
Speaker 11:at some point in time we could find a way. Once the country's back on its feet and getting enough revenue and paid off our debt, do you think it's possible to find a way to eliminate federal taxes? There is a way. There is a way.
Speaker 10:There is a way, I mean, if what I'm planning comes out. It's a great question. By the way, Everyone could agree.
Speaker 12:You're pretty sophisticated and yeah, I have a real shot we're taking in tremendous amounts of money. The answer is yeah, I think there's a real shot. I actually say there's a shot. You know, we have the Internal Revenue Service. We could use the External Revenue Service and we wouldn't even need the Internal Revenue Service.
Speaker 10:Can we reform taxes to eliminate the need to file? Well, it's possible. You know, if the tariffs work out really well, you wouldn't need income tax. You know that If tariffs work out well, our country at its richest was during from 1870 to 1913. That was the richest and that was.
Speaker 12:We were an all-tariff nation and it's possible, we'll do a complete tax cut, because I think the tariffs will be enough to cut all of the income tax so we are staged up right now.
Speaker 1:With billy long out and with scott besant taking it over under the treasury, I could possibly see the stage being set on this one. I think it could happen.
Speaker 3:But you know, especially if they're creating this external residency service where they could retain some of the levers that were maybe useful from the irs and here's the thing trump is doing all kinds of things to get the corporation of the united states of america paid.
Speaker 1:He views it as a business. He views it as a business partner. Okay, all these public corporations that are using the united states government as the check exchange and, uh, the bullied protection money? Okay, he's like, okay, we're partners in this. So Financial Times this morning ran NVIDIA and AMD to pay 15% of China chip sale revenue to US government. Chip makers agreed on an unusual agreement to secure export licenses from Trump administration. Nvidia and AMD have agreed to give the United States government 15% of the revenues from chip sales in China as part of an unusual arrangement with the Trump administration to obtain export licenses for the semiconductors. So Trump is monetizing so many little things, so many things. Right, he's monetizing the import game. If people are importing things, the seller has to pay to get it across the border. Now does the price get passed on? Of course, but so does everything else. So export licenses new.
Speaker 1:No, they have export licenses for sure but instead of it just being, like you know, an application fee and a review process, he's saying the cut. We're getting a cut. Yeah, we're getting a cut. Okay, yeah, we're getting a cut. Okay, you're selling to our enemy. We're getting a cut. Yes, it's pretty unique. The US official said NVIDIA agreed to pay 15% share in the revenues from H2O chip sales to China, and AMD will provide the same percentage from MI308 chip revenues Two people familiar with their region.
Speaker 3:I wonder if they're doing this because it puts pressure on the importer somehow that they couldn't get the pressure on before.
Speaker 1:Well, these are American companies that make the chips still overseas for the most part. So it's not just an export license, it's an intellectual property. I'm sure there's probably a lot of that. Actually, maybe they are made domestically, I don't know Right there's probably a lot of that.
Speaker 3:Actually, maybe they are made domestically, I don't know Right. But regardless of where the chips are made, if the chips cost more than the products they go into, we're going to be affected somehow on price. Yeah, and I wonder if there's a lever there.
Speaker 1:Well, here's the criticism. In April, the Trump administration said it would also ban H2O exports to China. However, trump reversed the course in Juneune after meeting huang at the white house. Over the following weeks, nvidia became concerned because the bureau of industry and security, bis, the arm of the commerce department that runs export controls, had not issued any licenses. Huang raised the issue with trump on wednesday. According to people familiar with the exchange h2o revenue deal comes as nvidia and the trump administration face criticism over the decision to sell the chip to china. Us security exports say the H2O helped the Chinese military to undermine US strength in artificial intelligence. Beijing must be gloating to see Washington turn export licenses into revenue streams. Liz Tobin, a China expert who served on the National Security Council in the first Trump administration, now at the Jamestown Foundation what's next? Letting Lockheed Martin sell F 35 to China for 15% commission? The BIS officials have also expressed concerns about the reversal. So these are like China Hawks that wants just to cut them off completely. I don't know. I don't know either.
Speaker 1:I think there are situations where you're like you can't not export because that's like an act of war, and so well, let's monetize it, let's make it expensive. You know, oh, they're just going to get ahead in the ai race. Well, it's going to pay us to do it so maybe that's the lever I don't know, I don't know yeah, trump uses tariffs as a tool.
Speaker 1:Right, we know this. Scott besant talks about this quite a bit. It's not just a tool for revenue, but it's also a tool for uh, compliance yeah, that's why I call it a lever.
Speaker 3:I just don't really understand, maybe, what the levers are doing.
Speaker 1:He's using it in conjunction with sanctions. Sanctions have kind of run their course now, and the other thing too is there's escape valves for sanctions. You can buy up gold, you can buy up Bitcoin, you can buy up resources, and people are doing it. So Russia figured out how to just basically detach themselves and they exchange directly with other countries. So the sanctions only go so far. Probably work really great against ghana, but they don't work any more against russia right.
Speaker 7:Alexander hamilton, who was the original tariff man. Uh used terrorists for two reasons one, to form, to fund the government, two, to protect us industry. And now president trump is using tariffs as an instrument of foreign policy and he is putting secondary tariffs on india for buying russian oil.
Speaker 1:Alexander hamilton, who is the original tariff man and they've kind of just skirted around the rules. And then india will get some oil from iran and they've kind of been a middle man for some of this. Well, india's a big country and you don't have a lot of leverage there. So what trump did was he basically said, hey, I'm going to apply the secondary sanctions which he has threatened. But it's like sending a huge shock, because countries can't decouple and it has down, it has a domino effect. So secondary tariffs affect another country and another country you know what I mean and so it starts to like kind of have a cascade, and trump has proven to stand strong on this tariff thing and he's collecting the money well, that's precisely why I call these things levers.
Speaker 3:But we don't really know exactly what they're doing. Because I'm not smart enough to know what the secondary and tertiary impacts are to these things, it's hard to know.
Speaker 1:Well, for example, when he goes, hey, we're going to, we're going to up tariffs on exports from India, or imports from India, ok, great. So now we're at 40, 50 percent. Well, ok, the guys that profit from illegally collecting the oil, or whatever, I mean that's measured in billions, I'm sure.
Speaker 1:well, all of a sudden you start looking at all the other exports, like, I don't know, silk and uh, cocoa, whatever, whatever, yeah, like all of a sudden, every other industry is affected and they're like hey, our goods are no longer, they're no longer competitive on the market because of the markups. And that's happening because you guys are offloading dirty oil and we can't have that anymore you know, what I mean.
Speaker 1:So that's what I mean. Like it creates a cascade effect because all of a sudden, some stockbroker in new york is like whoa, you know, a huge part of my mutual fund portfolio is some company that's got manufacturing in india and, oh my goodness, all of a sudden my algorithm is going bonkers. My algorithm is going crazy. I've gotten in the, I've gotten in the red, you know, and it's like sell, sell, sell. And so it creates these real cascade effects every time. That's why you know they don't like donald trump to be flippant about these things, because it does create. You know. You've got all the analysis that are why are we buying all?
Speaker 3:these tranches of housing securities. What's going on?
Speaker 1:yeah, changes things anyways. So that's that's pretty interesting it's and I guess india ran silent like they didn't respond for a couple days and trump pointed that out. He's like, hey, you better get on this or it's gonna get worse. So india's like kind of probably in the background doing the math and the calculations. Over in the youtube chat we got a couple people talking. John attack is having a disagreement with the irs. It would not hurt my feelings if it was fixed gone. Yes, that'd be nice. We don't, boys. Good morning, it's getting getting ready for your doctor's appointment. Good luck with that. Hopefully you don't have cancer. Just kidding, I have no idea what it's for. Hopefully it's not a cancer checkup. Howdy from.
Speaker 1:Texas, tiffany and Carlito and we don't boys Howdy from West Texas. Oh, and then over on rumble, john attack is checked in there as well. Thank you very much. If you have a choice and it's possible for you, please watch this on rumble. We get more credit for it. Over there we stream to youtube because we know sometimes it's a better stream or whatever. Whatever, people have different and we're trying to grow the channel and we're trying to grow the channel, but we do get more credit if you're over on rumble and, of course, at the end of the show today we're going to be talking about. By credit we mean cash. Yeah, we're at the end of the show in private and I'm teasing this out early, so you have time to go sign up for rumble premium if you want to do that again you know it's a shameless plug, but I got asked this week why we stream on rumble.
Speaker 1:No, do you remember why?
Speaker 3:well, I remember getting kicked off of spotify. I remember getting kicked off.
Speaker 1:Yeah, we stream on Rumble because we realized pretty quick we were, you know, well, we're a hot potato, a hot potato and we really needed to like, stay streaming somewhere.
Speaker 4:Yeah.
Speaker 1:And so Rumble was pretty new and YouTube was just, I mean, you couldn't say we're promising some freedom, you couldn't say hardly anything. So we just went straight to Rumbleble. So rumble's always been our home, like since the very beginning. Yeah and uh, youtube, we, we just stream there, like we upload there now because they seem to let it happen. But I just honestly, I've already dealt with a couple strikes or whatever. I just expect one day the whole thing will disappear yeah, youtube could disappear someday, yeah okay.
Speaker 1:So I took some notes as I was driving in this morning because I wanted to keep this in in mind, because this show right now is we're in the mainstream and we're talking about stuff that's not even scary. There are two. There is the story as it happens right right.
Speaker 1:As things break, chunks of information leak out and people can piece it together. There's the story as it happens, this is dangerous. The truth is dangerous, especially when you're dealing with corruption, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. The truth is very dangerous. Then there's the story as it's released. This is the narrative, right? This is where okay, now, it's okay to talk about this, and it can go one direction or another the necessary cover-up things have been covered up and, for the most part, you know, you kind of flood the zone with information and the law.
Speaker 1:This is when the media is posting the official narrative the media is posting the fashion narrative and what happens is the law of primacy takes over the, whatever way it's released and its new rendition right, not as it's breaking, but as its new rendition. That tends to be what sticks right. It's the law of primacy, law of first impression. So as the story's released, it's with a purpose, the story is safe and one of the sides of the Hegelian dialectic supports it. So some of the stories that you can talk about now because I noticed this, because some of the people that I pay attention to that are like we're in the intelligence world and you hear these little tidbits, like the other day we heard Devin Nunes talk about a fusion. Gps was one of these companies that stirs up a media story, it leaks it out over time and it creates this narrative.
Speaker 1:So then when you come in with the okay, this is now the official line, you have all the pieces to put together. It's been seeded right and that's what the Fusion GPS does. They create the seed material to go out and spread the fertile ground. When Devin Nunes says he's like one of many of these companies that's doing it, it's like, okay, so this is a thing. So these deep intelligence people that are like yeah, we create the narrative. And they do?
Speaker 1:they plant the seeds and they hire the consultants to create the buzz or the the little posts that are dated now. It's the fertile ground. You know you? You leak something now on some obscure twitter site just to retweet it later and make it famous. You know what I'm saying?
Speaker 3:so they kind of seed the ground and that adds legitimacy because it's got all this, all these roots exactly.
Speaker 1:so I paid attention to this because those people, right as stuff is happening with trump and epstein and you know, like four or five things are happening, all of a sudden you've got tucker carlson doing a big interview with a lady talking about the oklahoma city bombing, and then now she's on john solomon, and now she's making the rounds in kind of what you would consider to con ink or the conservative ecosystem, and it's like, oh, so now it's OK to talk about.
Speaker 3:Yeah, 30 years later.
Speaker 1:Oh, it's like the Russian Whitmer kidnapping hoax, where there's a whole lot of agents and people who have been now blacked out and redacted Right. We're involved, but no, it was a lone wolf operation, I mean. So it's like like, oh, so now this is okay to talk about. Like I personally know someone who was the investigator hired by the families of the children to investigate it and he gave up his bar card and now lives completely on gold on a farm somewhere in texas, off grid off grid like he's out.
Speaker 1:I got out, okay, I talked to him and he basically was telling about the j6. He's well, good luck when you're done, bounce buddy. So I was like, wow. So all of a sudden, now it's okay to talk about some other stories that are now okay to talk about COVID and everything dealing with that. We can be really critical about it now and not worry about literally losing our entire channel or getting a strike on YouTube. Uh, jfk assassination. We can openly talk about it, possibly having the government involved. We now have documents. It's, it's in the mainstream, it's back right, it's no longer relegated to just dark channels. Cnn's running whole series, series on it. You've got russiagate right. We can say charmella, charmella, eric, charmella, and did our stream drop? Nope, no, we're good, couldn't do that before. We would have dropped the stream. We can talk about the rigged election openly. Trump has made sure that we can still say that.
Speaker 1:I mean we're gonna show a minute we're gonna show a clip later today that now they targeted people who talked about the rig election. For sure they, the, they, the smoke monster. You talk about Biden's health. That was couldn't really talk about that for the last four years. No, ok, you can talk about arresting public officials. That's become now a thing, right, I mean that kind of the seal got broken by actually doing it with arresting Donald Trump. But that's what those are. Things are now part of the narrative as it's released. There's a reason why now we're talking about the Oklahoma City bombing. Now we're talking about weaponization of government and how it's weaponized against the citizens to get them to do things they wouldn't otherwise normally do.
Speaker 2:You see what I'm saying. This goes to it goes in.
Speaker 1:Do you see what I'm saying? This goes to, it goes in. There's this larger narrative that's being curated so that when they come and this is my opinion this is going to culminate with coming down on the hammer on the Russiagate thing, and you're going to say look, these people are the weaponizers. That's my, that's my opinion, that's why that stuff's coming out. And for people who follow these stories early on, as they broke, look what happened to them.
Speaker 1:A couple of them got othered a couple of them are now running the fbi. You know what I mean. So I mean you stick with the truth and eventually it wins. Here's a little story, too, talking about government corruption, and this is why I mean we have such a big problem. It goes all the way down to the, to the bottom ranks.
Speaker 1:So, uh, steve tompkins was a sheriff who was recently elected in suffolk county, uh, suffolk county, uh, massachusetts, and he was arrested this last, or basically, I think, friday.
Speaker 1:From the very first day of suffolk county, sheriff stephen tompkins sought to portray himself as a man of the people, a principal public servant, a reformer devoted to the cause of justice. That's why it's beyond disappointing that he's now accused of gaming a system instituted in the interest of public safety. The FBI took Sheriff Tompkins into custody for allegedly extorting $50,000 from the owner of a national cannabis retailer seeking to do business in Boston. We believe the sheriff saw. What the sheriff saw was an easy way to make a quick buck. On the end on the sly is clear cut corruption under federal law. The citizens of Suffolk County deserve better, not a man who is accused of trading his position to bankroll his own political and financial future. Public servants must be held to the highest ethical standards, and those falling shall be rooted out. So days after he was sworn in as sheriff, he was already shaken down a cannabis dealership in exchange for a license.
Speaker 3:He's 50 grand wild where did he learn to do that?
Speaker 1:gee, I don't know that's bad. I was in prison with a guy who they made a a hbo documentary about him. He was he's a corrupt police chief in uh, maryland, baltimore, and uh, you know, he and his gang of cops would basically vie for territory against drug gangs and rob the drug gangs, you know under a raid and take the money and the drugs and arrest the guys for petty stuff and run them through the system.
Speaker 1:Oh man, it was bad one day. So, yeah, so one day I'm walking around, I'm walking around the track with this guy and he and I were having a pretty deep conversation and it was about I asked him he'd gone to the hole for like four or five months for drug use in prison and I was like, dude, was it worth it? And he was like, well, yeah, it was worth it.
Speaker 1:And he had to think about it for a whole day he got back to me with the questions. That was what he came. He came up to me on the track he goes hey, I've been thinking about that question you asked me and he's like it is, it was worth it and here's why. And he explained to me why he's like it's because I was hooked in the hole. Get sober, think about it. And I haven't touched it since and I think better of myself. And he's like so if that's what it took for me to finally like decide not to use it cause it's everywhere, and he's like but now I can say no, but I had to go through that.
Speaker 1:So, that's how he justified it. Was it worth it? Yes, because he learned his lesson. So he's you, you know, he's being reflective, so this was a good conversation. It's like, okay, you're learning from you know, and you're recognizing that sometimes, you know, people discipline you so that you can learn, and that's I thought he was gonna say it was worth it and it was like, oh my gosh no, it was worth it. Like my, my thing is like you go to the hole for six months. Was the high really worth it exactly?
Speaker 3:that's what. And then, if he says yes, I'd be like really right the quick answer should be no, but his thing was.
Speaker 1:I was so addicted like I needed to go to the hole so he thought through the question which was all right, really good, so we've had we were having this deep discussion he also has 13 kids, 11 moms. He's got 13 kids. It's idiocracy on big time for sure. Now, when I watched the beginning of that movie with the he's with all the strings and connections oh, my goodness, the great guy, one of the good guys.
Speaker 1:You know one of the good guys in prison. You know the burglars, the arsons, the assaulters, the drug dealers, the good guys, the non-child molester, yeah, the non-pedos. So he had some great tattoo ink too that he'd all gotten in prison, even at color work. So we're walking around the track and there's the former sheriff or a former police officer, police um captain or whatever it was, and he's sitting up against the bench and he waves us over and so we go over to him and he's up, he's in there. He's got like stomach cancer or something like that, so he's not doing great. But uh, we go in there and we walk over and the guy's like, hey, he works in, commissary, and you can pay him a bribe to get your food first and ty would pay the bribe. So he's like hey, ty, I haven't been feeling great. I'm probably not gonna be working there much longer, so I'm gonna stop taking tickets. That's what he called.
Speaker 1:I'm gonna stop taking tickets and he's like ty's like okay, I get it, that's cool, and like there's kind of like this detente like like the sex offenders work in laundry. So if you want your laundry done and folded and returned, you have to do business with the sex offenders work in laundry. So if you want your laundry done and folded and returned, you have to do business with the sex offender. So there's a couple of spots where you're just kind of stuck doing business with whoever works there.
Speaker 1:So, normally this guy would be persona non grata, but because he's got the job in commissary, people want to be in front of the line, so they're going to, they're going to do the business with them, so anyways, so so anyways. So ty is like okay, that's cool. So guys like, all right, cool puts us right hand out to dab him now dabbing in prison's a big deal.
Speaker 1:It's like the fist bump. And in fact ty I know I'm going a couple places with the story it all ties together. Ty taught me the dab because coming down the hallway he'd, he'd, and you know he'd put his, he'd put his hand out. Well, you know we're coming at each other right and left lane and he puts his right hand out and I pop him with my left hand, like that, and he like spins around and watches me walk away, like what was that Walking on? So he comes up to me at the chow hall the next day, throws his tape up. What the was that man Left-handed? I was like what, what? He's like you dab me with your left hand. He's like yeah, I'm left-handed. He's like dude, right hand, only left hand dirty. You reach across the body but it's always the right hand.
Speaker 1:So he like got me schooled up without a fight, so that was nice so he, the cop, puts out his right hand to to get a dab. You know conversations over dab, walk away. And so ty reaches out and dabs him and then we walk away and ty is just ticked. Had we not just had like this deep, reflective conversation, it might have turned into something. I was looking at his right. He's like I just dabbed that dirty cop he's a cop.
Speaker 1:He's still a dirty cop to boot you. You know he's like the least. Oh, he was so bad he couldn't let it go. We had to walk like a whole lap before he finally let it go. He's like.
Speaker 2:I feel like I should go defend my honor or something I can't believe he took me in a dab at him.
Speaker 1:Anyways, all right, so dabbing. So those are the things that are now safe to talk about that are now safe to talk about, okay. All right. So this is Michael Cohen talking about specifically arresting public officials. So a couple of things. Ed Martin has been on the weaponization working group has been officially tasked with looking into the mortgage fraud for both Letitia James and for Adam shift. Oh, big deal. So this is Michael Cohen's take on that.
Speaker 8:Look at what he's doing right now, for example, with Tish James. Look at what he's doing with Adam Schiff, and I'm going to make another bold prediction here on the show. A lot of predictions at 8 o'clock in the morning.
Speaker 18:There's a lot of predictions.
Speaker 8:Take these notes because mark my words politically, they're both doomed. All right, I'm telling you right off the bat this is a political suicide for both Tish James and Adam Schiff, more of a political homicide.
Speaker 1:Well, yeah, but how are they going to?
Speaker 16:be? How are they politically doomed if Senator Schiff comes from a blue state, attorney General Pitch James is here in a blue state. They are elected by the people.
Speaker 8:How are they doomed politically? It'll be gerrymander.
Speaker 5:It will end up being somehow they will end up being held. Yes, but they will also be held accountable.
Speaker 8:Mark my words they will be held accountable for the crimes that, for the crimes that they are now looking at. That's Ed Martin who's looking at him, and I know so many people are going to say, oh my God, Michael Cohen is like bending the knee to Trump. No, what I'm doing is I'm actually telling you the reality. We can talk to each other all day long and we can say, oh, we have, I have a million followers, you have a million followers. It's the same million followers. Seventy seven million Americans ended up voting for Trump.
Speaker 8:Mark my words, Ed Martin, the Department of Justice, Pam Bondi they will figure out exactly how to go after Adam Schiff, how to go after Tish James for these mortgage violations and they will be alleged correct and they will be held accountable. That's my next prediction here on your show, and I know that I'm right because if there is a signing of a box which is wrong wrong and, trust me, I know I went to prison. One of my charges was on my HELOC. I had a low mortgage onto it, 80% equity. They held me accountable for a HELOC violation. Theirs is much worse and rest assured.
Speaker 8:Allegedly Right. So let's go one step even further here. When you have the courts on your side as well, what chance do you have of success? It's why I turn around and I say doomed. Yeah, I love it, they're doomed.
Speaker 1:He has the right perspective. Man, when you're in their crosshairs, I mean you're fighting for your life. Yeah, and it's the little things, yes, the checked you're fighting for your life.
Speaker 3:Yeah, and it's the little things. Yes, the checked box. I don't know who those two dudes were that?
Speaker 1:one guy looked like a baller, the big hair, yeah, yeah, no kidding. So this was jd vance. He was on with maria bartolomo on sunday morning and he gave a great interview. In fact, I have a couple clips from the show, but he talked about accountability for the whole russiagate thing. So there's michael cohen, former attorney for the president. That you know, I don't know. Man like lost his mind.
Speaker 3:I know something about this. There's a couple of things that went on.
Speaker 1:The first thing was, as soon as Trump got elected, companies like AT&T paid Michael Cohen two hundred and fifty thousand dollars for access, basically Like can we call you to call the president? And Michael Cohen wanted a position somewhere in the White House and didn't get one. All this kind of scandal was breaking simultaneously. By the way, boris um, boris epstein kind of had the same problem. There was a little bit of self-dealing going on, allegedly who knows right, but he didn't. I don't think he has an official position in the white house and he was kind of at trump's side this whole time.
Speaker 1:So michael co kind of played that part right, kind of turned on the president when he didn't get what he wanted and, I don't know, maybe saw he would be successful at the left. But they came after him pretty hard too. They pinched him for information and they got him and he spent some time in prison. Um, it wasn't that bad and I mean he was like in for a a couple months and then he got out with an ankle monitor and then they tried to revoke his bail because he went to coffee with somebody. Anyways. Point is he paid the price for checking a box on a mortgage application with leticia james and shift, or accused of, is a little bit more and he's like they're coming yeah, he knows something about it.
Speaker 3:They're coming. They're coming for you. I like how he calls her tish tish.
Speaker 1:Yeah, they're coming for you. I like how he calls her Tish Tish. Yeah, they're coming for him. Now you've got the Russiagate situation, so this is what JD Vance talks about that.
Speaker 8:Do you want to see indictments?
Speaker 16:I absolutely want to see indictments, maria. Look, of course you've got to have the law, follow the facts here. You don't just indict people to indict people. You indict people because they broke the law. You indict people because they broke the law.
Speaker 16:But if you look at what Tulsi and Kash Patel have revealed in the last couple of weeks, I don't know how anybody can look at that and say that there wasn't aggressive violations of the law. What they basically did is they defrauded the American people in order to take Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign talking points and turn them into intelligence. By defrauding the American people, defrauding the intelligence agencies, lying about what the intel said, they would take something that supported a Hillary Clinton campaign talking point and they would overemphasize it and exaggerate it. They took anything that actually contradicted that narrative and they buried it deep and through that they actually laundered Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign talking points through the American intelligence services. That's a violation of the people's trust. That's a violation of what our intelligence services should be doing, and I absolutely think they broke the law.
Speaker 16:You're going to see a lot of people get indicted for that. Here's the thing that should really bother the American people. What do you want our intelligence community to be doing. I want them to be catching bad guys. I want them to be making sure that terrorists aren't going to kill innocent American civilians. I don't want them laundering Hillary Clinton's campaign talking points into the American media and giving them this air of legitimacy. It is sick and it's disgusting. It hurt the intelligence community, it hurt the American people and it hurt the first Trump administration. We've got to have consequences for it or we're just going to see the same play repeated again. Yeah.
Speaker 1:JD Vance is so good at his communication. Yes, if you, when I read his book, he'll be the elegy Very impressed, and I look at someone like that. Someone who knew him when he was a teenager is probably blown away at how far he's made it in life but, he just kept learning from every experience.
Speaker 1:I mean really impressive. Pony boy says uh, uh, carlit says this. He says good morning. Rumble made the switch. Yes, he made the switch. Thank you for coming over.
Speaker 1:Cohen admitted that they all have the same 1 million chatbot farm followers. Yeah, that's right. I like that. I've got a million followers. He's got a million followers. They're all the same followers. He's got 77 million. Yeah, no kidding. Good morning. Pray the rosary daily, welcome, welcome, okay. So that's all good news. Check out this. This got I can't remember this was newly okay. This is newly revealed.
Speaker 1:Uh, communications obtained by senator grassley proved biden's doj dc, us matthew graves and washington fbi brass coordinated to fast track the indictment and arrest of peter navarro in 2022. So what this email is this is from tibo tibo timothy tibo, I believe, is how he says his name. It's like the football player kind of reply. Contempt of Congress case update. So this is everybody involved in this and it goes.
Speaker 1:I just spoke with DC United States Attorney's Office. So that would be Merrick Garland. After consultation with Maine Justice, they are not intending to prosecute Meadows or Scavino. That's Mark Meadows, who is the chief of staff, and dan, because cavino, who's like trump's personal caddy. This decision is based on their white house positions prior and prior doj opinion. So those executive branch intercourse circle people have the executive branch immunity molly asked for you to call if you have any questions or concerns. We have been told to cease work on those cases. They would like to charge. So this is coming from top to bottom. They would like to charge Navarro in the next two weeks.
Speaker 1:However, here is what we need to accomplish Locate him, sam, can you assist with this? Get subpoena returned from Verizon for his phone Subpoena served about 10 days ago. Issue preservance letter to Apple. Prepare phone subpoena served about 10 days ago. Issue preserver preservance letter to apple. Prepare search warrant for his phone and icloud account. Conduct a knock and talk interview and serve phone search warrant at conclusion of interview. Best regards, walter. So they were targeting. It wasn't based on observation or information. It was a top-down target uh-huh that's what it was.
Speaker 1:All those guys didn't want to testify, but they had to target the two. They kind of let off on the others. They had their little legal reasoning for that, but, dude, totally targeted. Now that doesn't even surprise me, because if you look at Andrew McCabe, who was basically in Dan Bongino's spot as the deputy director of the FBI, he said this and just you know, flashback, Remember when he like openly said this, the deputy attorney general offered to wear a wire into the White House.
Speaker 1:He said I never get searched, the deputy attorney general is was Rod Rosenstein.
Speaker 11:When I go into the White House. I could easily wear a recording device. They wouldn't know it was there. Now, he was not joking, he was absolutely serious and in fact he brought it up in the next meeting we had. I did discuss it with my general counsel and my leadership team. Constitution allows the vice president and a majority of the cabinet to remove the president.
Speaker 11:The discussion of the 25th Amendment was simply. Rod raised the issue and discussed it with me in the context of thinking about how many other cabinet officials might support such an effort.
Speaker 6:Rosenstein was actually openly talking about whether there was a majority of the cabinet who would vote to remove the president. That's correct Counting votes. What seemed to be coursing through the mind of the deputy attorney general was getting rid of the president of the United States. Well, one way or another, the deputy attorney general was getting rid of the president of the united states.
Speaker 1:Well, one way or another, the deputy attorney general.
Speaker 3:So, and that came out in 2019 I mean, that's what it sounds like again.
Speaker 1:So you know, I was one of those people 2019. I was just watching this from the seat of my excavator. What are you guys talking about people? People hear what they're saying, like you hear what they're saying. Here's another one where he's being interviewed.
Speaker 13:Uh, on msn or on nbc on our intelligence investigation into the president I did. Is that tantamount to saying you felt there was reason to suspect that he was a national security threat? Is that what?
Speaker 11:that means it is saying that we had information that led us to believe.
Speaker 1:And now we know that information was fake and we know that they knew that that information was fake. We know that that is beyond dispute. At this point there's no more narrative. You know hustling or anything.
Speaker 11:It's beyond dispute that there might be a threat to national security in this case, that the president himself might in fact be a threat to the United States national security and, in particular, was it your suspicion and the reason that you opened this investigation that you thought the president might actually be working on behalf of Russia we had a number of very concerning things that we were considering at the time.
Speaker 11:One of them was the fact that the president, in our view, had gone to extreme measures to potentially impact negatively impact, possibly turn off our investigation of Russian meddling into the election and Russian coordination.
Speaker 1:The one that was used to target him himself, that was opened by them for the specific purpose to ruin his president, to tank him, to ruin his president.
Speaker 1:And it wasn't quite, and we were afraid he would not let it happen because he's too cozy with russia, which is how we premised this whole thing in the first place. Wow, nation. By the way, they paid him a million dollars, or I think it was one or two million dollars, because, uh, you know, they fired him over this and he lost his pension. So he sued him and got his pension back and a couple million bucks. This guy yeah.
Speaker 11:With his campaign.
Speaker 13:So that goes to his potential motive. But when you're opening this particular kind of investigation counterintelligence Did you suspect the president might actually be working for Russia?
Speaker 11:We thought that might be possible. Yes, we thought it might be possible. Now, remember Savannah, we're at the beginning of an investigation. We don't draw conclusions. We simply look at the facts and the information we have and begin investigations.
Speaker 13:But, as you point out in your book, the FBI does not start any investigation willy-nilly. In your book, the FBI does not start any investigation willy-nilly. What were the predicate facts? Lay them out here. What were the facts that suggested the president may be a national security threat and may in fact be working on behalf of a foreign adversary, russia?
Speaker 11:Okay, so, sabini, we have to go back to the investigation of potential collusion between the campaign and Russia. I said through the fall fall. These are topics we've been looking at. During that time, the president has been publicly undermining the investigative efforts.
Speaker 16:He's talking about it as a witch now that we know about it as a hoax he's not happy with what we're doing also taylor.
Speaker 3:How many of these stories are you covering?
Speaker 1:willy-nilly dude they did this to us, like these people ruined so much good. Like, yeah, the government's been corrupt, but it's a good, it's our corrupt government are you saying there was something there?
Speaker 3:well, we were concerned.
Speaker 1:We were concerned that he might actually be working with russia, because he might shut down the investigation into Russian meddling in the election, which is targeted.
Speaker 3:I mean, he did say might quite a few times.
Speaker 1:Oh my.
Speaker 11:Let's finish it. During that time, the president approaches the director of the FBI and asks him to stop investigating Michael Flynn, a part of our investigation into Russian interference. Asks him to turn off that investigation.
Speaker 13:investigation into Russian interference, asks him to turn off that investigation. Why isn't that just the normal obstruction of justice? Criminal inquiry, which is substantial enough on its own, but what takes it to this next level, where there's a suspicion that he's working for a foreign government?
Speaker 11:I mean, this is extraordinary Because you have to ask yourself, Savannah, if you believe that the president might have obstructed justice for the purpose of ending our investigation into Russiaussia. You have to ask yourself why. Why would any president of the united states not want the fbi to get to the bottom of russian interference in our election?
Speaker 1:I know that's joe so here's what happened, going back with my little notes I made this morning. So there's the story. As it happens, we found out why is andrew mccabe giving this interview where he's kind of fessing up to some pretty serious things, but then he's got all the justifications and the interviewer is perfectly asking it. Well, but I mean for you, you don't just open it Web investigation Nilly. So what was your predicate? Right, you see? How she's setting it up.
Speaker 1:So, as the story broke, we out, mccabe actually started the investigation into trump. He did it right after the meeting at the white house. We knew that the information came from hillary clinton and that they knew the information had come from hillary clinton, right? So all those things had broke a couple weeks, week or two before that, right, you've got the peter struck lisa page text messages that are constantly referencing meeting with McCabe and Comey, and the White House is running this and we have a plan, blah, blah, blah. So that's the story as it breaks. That's coming out in these jumbled parts Text messages here. A warrant application, that's. That's Freedom of Information Act over here. A little leak into John Solomon over here, and we can kind of put it together. Here's the events as they unfolded. Well, then here's andrew mccabe, who has to acknowledge the legitimate opening of the investigation. So he's the guy somehow so now you've got to.
Speaker 1:You've got to craft the narrative again as it's being released. It's the narrative, it's the story as it's released. He's now releasing this news, so the vast majority of Americans are hearing about this as Savannah this hard hitting, so you started the investigation into Trump. Yes, I did start the investigation of Trump, but the vast majority of Americans that's the first time they're hearing it and connecting McCabe to the warrant. You know, maybe on social media they saw the paper, but they didn't connect it to the person and the story. So that's where Savannah Guthrie comes in and tells the story through the question. It's brilliant, this is Operation Mockingbird, perfect. And so he acknowledges the stuff that the conspiracy theorists were just a minute ago. Like what are you crazy? Yeah, right, he acknowledges it. But then he puts his well, it's all predicated and process and serious concerns.
Speaker 3:And we can't be ignoring and keep in mind the 25th.
Speaker 1:Amendment. These companies that create the news story buzzer out there. Trump's crazy. Trump's going off the hinge inside the White House. Trump's yelling look, he fired Rex Tillerson over a tweet.
Speaker 3:And his claims are legitimate, because otherwise the president wouldn't want to shut down the investigation, exactly, and he's a desperate man. The walls are closing in he's like a cornered wall.
Speaker 1:They're closing in 25th amendment. He's completely incompetent. Look, he misspelled a word, you know, and so. So then he's like well, rod rosenstein said what about the 25th amendment? Well, where are these stories percolating from? Are they representing reality or are they being generated to give an air of legitimacy for the operation that these guys are like? Hey, step one, impeachment. Step two 25th Amendment. Step three a bullet. They've got the plan worked out.
Speaker 3:The insurance policy, step five. We're full commie Step five.
Speaker 1:We're full commie. Oh my gosh, it's perfect. Looking back back, you can see it well. Now you know, like I mentioned, we're hearing all kinds of other stuff. Here's this again in this idea of this, all the sins of this last couple years. This was the whistleblower from brazil and this is the end of that interview she did, where she's talking about, uh, the meetings and the targeting. So this was bill barr meeting with fannie willis along with this other williams guy that was a conservative influencer, apparently hates trump. If you go look at his twitter, it's pretty wild. He's mr tariffs are going to cause that. He's like plays the rhino line to a t. So this is her notes, taken, contemporaneously, validated and verified. She worked with months with project veritas for this and this information has been given to the doj at this point like one of the first meetings that I had about this plan.
Speaker 19:They had to go after everyone who works or support. That was back in September 13 of 2021. So in this meeting was me, armstrong Shermichael and Bill Barr by phone and they spoke about January 6th committee. They authorized the committee to investigate the events about January 6th. We started like with some names. They also gave a lot of names. Here we have Michael Flynn, steve Bannon, roddy Giuliani, jeffrey Clark, oath Keepers, proud Boy People. Proud Boy Group.
Speaker 1:Scott Perry, jim Jordan a group called stop they steal.
Speaker 1:That's me, right there. Stop the steal. I hashtag stop the steal on everything leading up to january 6th for a month. Right, that's the whole. Stop the steal hashtag. Hashtag hash tons of tweets stop the steal hashtag. Hashtag. Hashtag tons of tweets stop the steal, stop the steal. Those came up. He's part of the stop the steal movement to stop the steal. They came intentionally to stop what they perceived as a stolen election. They didn't even go that far. They were trying to steal the election, Right, but that's what it was. Right there. Look, it was a targeted group. That was a permitted protest protest name. That was a group that was started for the purpose of organizing that event. They got a ticket or they got a permit from DC for that event. It was run by Ali Alexander, who somehow testified the January 6th committee and escaped prosecution. Total again, deep dive on him Brings up scary results, but that was that right there stop the spiel um brad again.
Speaker 19:Um half half is buried shamos, ruby freeman, patrice c poloni, alex johns, nick fuents and we have some target people which is like the people they want to target more and that was like Stuart Rhodes and Henrique Tarrio and Roger Stone, and here I have a quote it was like Bart and Cheney once folks at Roger Stone, rhodes, ontario and Bannon and also in Kimberly Guilford who is close to Trump. Armstrong goes on TV or he goes on social media or he goes over his Twitter account or X account and he claims he's Republican.
Speaker 1:He owns the Baltimore Sun. He's a broadcast owner and philanthropist.
Speaker 19:America first. He's this person who is like, extremely patriotic, he loved his country and everything, but at the same time he was lunch meetings with Bill Barr to plan against Trump and against people involved in january 6th huh, huh, that's all I got to say about that.
Speaker 1:Huh that's pretty huh so I'm like glad not to see my name, but I mean, I'm I absolutely believe they targeted the stop the steal and they could just simply go on x and or twitter and hashtag stop the steal and see everybody who tweeted it yeah, it would not surprise me if your name is in there somewhere, just on some notebook somewhere or the podcast I was I was sedition hunters first turn in.
Speaker 1:I would be super curious if. Did they pull up a stream? Were they following me already? Did they get sent? Hey, look up this guy, or this is who it is, I'm sure they got a list of names and you were probably at the top.
Speaker 1:I would be really curious to see how they found me, like not just we built our facial recognition software OK well, but how did you get the first video, like? Who sent it to you? Did you get a batch? You know anonymous email? Who sent it to you? Did you get a batch? You know anonymous email? Look at these people first.
Speaker 3:They got it off your phone.
Speaker 1:Yeah, so the other thing that's now we can talk about, because both sides have released their narrative Epstein. So here's JD Vance, kind of correcting the record on the they're going to meet about Epstein and how to deal with it. And again, we're dealing with media narratives and we'll just take JD Vance at his word here.
Speaker 13:Can you give us some clarity on this meeting that is reportedly happening or happened last night at the White House, about the Epstein files and how you're communicating the Epstein story?
Speaker 16:So I've seen so many different fake reports about this. Let me set the record straight there was no meeting at my house last night. There just wasn't. Was there a meeting at the White House?
Speaker 16:We did meet at the White House yesterday, but not at the time that they said that we were going to meet and not about the subject that they said that we were going to meet about. We have a great FBI director and a great Department of Justice lead Attorney General, Pam Bondi, and we met to talk about how to ensure we have justice for the American people. We actually didn't talk about the Epstein issue at all. That was never meant to be the subject of the meeting and it's one of those things where I guess somebody leaked a calendar entry maybe, and then people assumed that it must have been about Epstein, even though it had nothing to do with Epstein.
Speaker 16:On the Epstein issue, what the president has said very clearly because we've had other meetings about that is that he wants us to be fully transparent and he wants the credible information out there. So we're working to compile the thousands and thousands of documents that are out there for full transparency. But I have to say, Maria, I laugh at the Democrats who are now all of a sudden so interested in the Epstein files. For four years, Joe Biden and the Democrats did absolutely nothing about this story. We know that Jeffrey Epstein had a lot of connections with left wing politicians and left wing billionaires. And now President Trump has demanded full transparency from this, and yet somehow the Democrats are attacking him and not the Biden administration, which did nothing for four years.
Speaker 16:Was it the right move for Comer to send subpoenas to the Clintons? It absolutely was. It drives home how, while the Democrats have tried to make this Epstein thing about anything but the fact that Democrat billionaires and Democrat political leaders went to Epstein Island all the time, who knows what they did? But it's totally reasonable to ask these questions. What you saw in the House subpoena is they are trying to investigate all of the things related to this particular case. I know a lot of Americans want answers. I certainly want answers and I think James Comer and the team of the House they're doing the right thing. And of course, we know that Clinton or allegedly he, went to the island 26 times, 28 times. Totally appropriate for Comer to be asking what was going on at that island.
Speaker 13:Let me get your quick take on growth and this moment in time that we're at All right.
Speaker 3:All right. The only problem I have with that clip is there. They have a really big carve out for republicans. What do you mean by that? Well, they've talked about how democrats went to the island and democrats this and democrat that. Well, there's a lot of republicans with dirt on their hands too, and they just kind of ignored all that yeah, potentially yes, that's what I'm talking about.
Speaker 1:So james comer was carving out safe space for republicans james comer was talking to john solomon about what to expect from these hearings and he's like, oh yeah, well, they're going to be asking a lot of questions about epstein, but I'm going to be asking about the russia this and I was like, oh wow, they've, they've conflated the two things. They are related, because some of these people are related the Clintons, russiagate, and Clintons and Epstein. That's one conversation. When you're talking about the Clintons, right, I don't know Obama's relationship with the Clintons. I don't know Eric or, excuse me, I don't know Eric Holder's relationship with Epstein, but Eric Holder is going to have more to do with weaponization of government in general.
Speaker 1:So these hearings, I think, are going to be they're going to be a lot of drama. There's going to be a lot of padding on the back and I can't believe the Republicans are making you come in here, mr Clinton, blah, blah, blah, and then there's going to be so what'd you do at the island? Did you get a massage from an underage woman? And then you know, do you know?
Speaker 1:edition of is is after all these years. Mr clinton, right, there's going to be a light. There's a pattern here. You have a tendency to lie under oath, so I don't know what's going to come of it, but what kind of cigars they got down there yeah, it's going to be pretty interesting to watch six attorney generals all kinds of people coming on that one.
Speaker 1:Wow. So john bolton gets on cnn because trump has a peace meeting, a peace summit, coming up in alaska in the next couple days. Oh, I can't remember exactly which day, but that all got set up this weekend and, of course, john bolton's just first term who knows?
Speaker 11:both of these to be tied very well and, ambassador bolton, it's great to have to have you here. I mean, you were in the room in 2018 in helsinki when, when this happened, uh, what do you make of the fact that Putin has now been invited to Alaska?
Speaker 17:Well, it's very gracious of Putin to come to former Russian America for this summit. This is not quite as bad as Trump inviting the Taliban to Camp David to talk about the peace negotiations in Afghanistan, but it certainly reminds one of that. The only better place for Putin than Alaska would be if the summit were being held in Moscow. So the initial setup, I think, is a great victory for Putin. He's a rogue leader of a pariah state and he's going to be welcomed into the United States. Second, I have a feeling this is sliding very quickly in russia's direction. Uh, we're not quite back. Uh, at february the 28th, in the oval office, when trump told zelensky uh, you don't have any cards that's all we need to listen to the whole thing is like it's too much conciliatory action to russia.
Speaker 1:Anything shy of hitting the nuclear button just isn't enough. Former coming to alaska, former russia man, that decision was made a long time ago, I think you know. I mean we're not talking like russian speaking population of ukraine that's only been detached for 20 years. You know what I mean. We're talking like no, nobody in alaska speaks russian. They're not russian. We're done with that.
Speaker 3:Like this taliban reference that you came up with. You're the only one that remembers that, bro.
Speaker 1:Nobody else remembers that meanwhile, trump, everywhere he has a summit, seems to be brokering peace. He brokered peace between ar and Azerbaijan. The President of the Republic of.
Speaker 5:Azerbaijan and the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia will now sign a joint declaration on the outcomes of the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity Summit. They will sign three copies in English the President of the united states signs as a witness to the president of the republic of azerbaijan just let them do the signing in the background.
Speaker 1:They, they all sign it. So these guys. What's really impressive about this is because russia's been focused on ukraine, there's been these tensions that have been breaking out more and more in azerbaijan and armenia, and so for trump to broker this peace deal and not putin, right in their backyard, in their sphere of influence yeah, this was one of the stories that I saw and it was.
Speaker 3:It was curious to me because I also get uh, what is that the white house update thing that gets sent to my email? Uh-huh, and when I got that email, it had a list of like boom, boom, boom, peace talks, peace, brokered peace, and it was like, oh okay, the message is going to be this is the present of peace, yeah, and I think it's been that way the whole time. But now he's, he's racking up these, you know bullet points that he can put together for you know his six months, his year long, and you know when he gets to the end of his term he's going to be look at this peace, peace, peace, peace, peace peace.
Speaker 1:Yeah uh, I saw the same chart too. I was just looking to see if I could find it. It's like it's like all the countries that he's brokered these deals with, and it's it's an impressive little list, I know especially when you contrast it with the uh prior. You know presidencies I don't remember peace deals breaking out no it was always war breaking out yeah, I'm trying to see if I can find it here real quick.
Speaker 1:I can't even count them all, I mean, and some of them they're. Yeah, like did I know there was a huge conflict in armenia and azure? Yeah, actually I did, but but not, you know, I'm not. I don't know any details about it, but me is a typical american, not so much it's one of those long-running ones, you know, that's what I know about it?
Speaker 3:well, it's it's. That's why we don't know about it, because it's so long-running. It's just background noise that nobody cares about anymore yeah, so it's a pretty big deal.
Speaker 1:Peace deals broken under trump. Us, north korea, kosovo, serbia, us taliban, afghanistan, israel, uae, israel, bahrain, israel, sudan, israel, morocco, rwanda and democratic republic of congo. India, pakistan ceasefire israel, iran currently facilitating into the gaza war and expanding the abraham accords wow, yeah, I mean that's a lot going on in the first eight months or whatever yeah, no, it's really impressive. Oh my gosh, look at this picture. This is lindsey graham. I just ran across this. That is perfect, that is perfect, that is perfect.
Speaker 3:It looks like a Liberace outfit.
Speaker 1:If Lindsey Graham could, he would wear that Absolutely. I could, absolutely my South.
Speaker 3:Carolina. Hey man, it's America, you do you.
Speaker 1:The Rosary Daily, multitasking While I listened to this morning. One comment relative to Cohen Clinton's McCabe they never thought she would lose. Yes, that McCabe. They never thought she would lose. Yes, that is true, they never thought she would lose.
Speaker 1:This all went to crap when she lost. Okay. So JD Bantz is talking about the Ukrainian war. This is again Trump. Scott Adams points this out. Trump is monetizing all the problems. If he can't fix it, he monetizes it Right. So then the problems? If he can't fix it, he monetizes it right. So then, as long as it's a problem, at least it's generating revenue. I mean it's it's like he reverses the bleeding, like this trump. Ukraine war has bled us. If you can't resolve it and it's bleeding us, well then let's monetize it. We're going to monetize our blood. If you're going to need bombs, bullets, planes, you have to pay for them now, in cash, up front, and that's what he's got europe paying for it. He's got nato up to five percent, because why, oh you guys are free to sell stuff.
Speaker 1:Well, it's brilliant because it puts the onus on everybody else to make to take some action his attitude is you guys are free to give these weapons to ukraine, but you're going to buy them from us, yes, and we are not going to be giving them to ukraine anymore.
Speaker 16:So this is jd vance, articulating this point to your point about weapons, what we said to the europeans is simply first of all, this is in your neck of the woods, this is in your back door. You guys have got to step up and take a big see if I get this, the video to catch up.
Speaker 1:Oh, sometimes you get a little late in. The show needs a little refresh. Things have been sitting stagnant for a minute a little stale a little stale, a little digital stale.
Speaker 16:You guys have got to step up weapons. What we said to the Europeans is simply first of all, this is in your neck of the woods, this is in your back door. You guys have got to step up and take a bigger role in this thing. And if you care so much about this conflict, you should be willing to play a more direct and a more substantial way in funding this war yourself. I think the president and I certainly think that America we're done with the funding of the Ukraine war business. We want to bring about a peaceful settlement to this thing. We want to stop the killing, but Americans, I think, are sick of continuing to send their money, their tax dollars, to this particular conflict. But if the Europeans want to step up and actually buy the weapons from American producers, we're okay with that, but we're not going to fund it ourselves anymore. To your point about weapons, what we said to the Europeans is-.
Speaker 1:They got it, they nailed it. They more to your point about weapons. What we said to the europeans is they got it, they nailed it, they got it figured out. That's exactly what needs to happen. Look, you guys want to keep fighting, whatever. I mean what you're going to do. Another thing that happened, too is last week trump ordered the census to be redone a new census. So it's a little early because we usually do them on the decade, but he's like nope, it's got to be redone. Well, cnn, of course, had a couple people on that had a fit, and then they had their little expert on and he had this to say and turns out, the census, the Bureau of Labor Statistics or whatever, came out and basically condemned their own census. Already One of the big things is.
Speaker 11:It helps decide congressional maps.
Speaker 14:Does this have everything to do with redistricting? Well, it does, in fact, we know the 2020 census. The errors were almost always to the detriment of red states, blue states like Rhode Island. We do know that the Census Bureau's own audit of its work has proven that blue states like Rhode Island were overcounted. Rhode Island, then doesn't, didn't lose a seat. Red states like Alabama were undercounted. Listen, that's. This is just a fact. It wasn't all red blue, but it was disproportionately red.
Speaker 11:One of the big things is it helps so.
Speaker 1:I don't get hung up so much. I mean, we do get hung up on a little side stories here and there, but I'm always kind of looking for the stuff that's gonna have some impact, like it's gonna come back around on us. Free speech stories, um, you know, obviously everything doing with the covid, the russia gate thing, like the weaponization of government, it's a little personal.
Speaker 3:Well, this is impactful because it deals with representation it deals with representation, exactly.
Speaker 1:So, while it's this kind of you know it's kind of nitty-gritty and gerrymandering and what's that and we'll look at this district, look how it stretches across the whole state, does this even make sense? You know it's, it becomes kind of an in the weeds topic, but it's like the whole ball game. Yeah, it's everything. You want to win, you want to change the agenda. You know how hard it was to get girls out of boy sports. I mean, you had to basically win the presidency. Part of the part of the reason is that is because everything's so gerrymandered. You just don't have the right representation, you. It's my contention that we have a true republican majority in this country. Oh yeah, we have a true conservative majority in this country. In washington state, I think there's way more conservatives and Republican voters than shows in the election. I agree, I think we're lulled into pacification, thinking our vote doesn't matter. I think that the zeitgeist leans left and there's a few there's enough weirdos that express themselves.
Speaker 3:That we, we, you know well, the zeitgeist only leans left because the media has been playing it that way for the last 30 to 40, 50 years.
Speaker 1:And here are the left. It feels safe acting violent. Yes, like you can I see bumper stickers that are openly. I just saw one that their whole car was painted up with kill trump and it was like unreal. I'm like. Dude is calling for public assassination is in chalk on their car.
Speaker 3:Yeah, you know, car paint, car chalk and they're the kind of people that are proud of it yeah, so they.
Speaker 1:They get this ability to just kind of walk amongst us as if they have a social validation. Meanwhile, we're all sidelining them, knowing that they'll hit us in the head with a sock and a in a, with a lock in a sock.
Speaker 1:You know what I mean, like the andy, no treatment and so but it'll probably be gaslit about it, but they're not the majority right, but they're kind of like living on this lower tier of society, probably getting funding through some usa id out, you know, some kind of act, blue money that's laundered to them.
Speaker 1:And so it does. It's just this weird, but we're the majority. Why don't we win elections? We don't have control over our voting apparatus in this state and a lot of states probably feel that way and we don't even know how we're being cheated. We just know we're being cheated. Yeah, absolutely. The danger. The danger is for Republicans is to let the narrative that the election is stolen not align with the facts. It's got to align with the facts, like come with the evidence, and I think that's where more and more of that evidence is coming, where you can almost make a blanket statement using dominion machines, they're compromised. Well, this election compromise doesn't matter. Right, doesn't matter. I don't even know. It doesn't matter. You can't prove it. I can't prove it. They got dual sim chips in the things. Do you know what you're looking at when you look at that little green board with a bunch of things no, dodes and niodes and flat things do you know how to code? Do you know if, then statements ad nauseum? You know what I mean like no no, I can't verify.
Speaker 1:Not the earth flat around, I don't freaking know.
Speaker 3:Yeah, it looks this was my hot topic. The entire time on the podcast here was like I want fair and free elections and I want somebody to demonstrate to me that they are fair. Somehow is there a way to do that?
Speaker 1:that's the thing it's like when, when chat gpt can tell you that there's a forty thousand dollar problem in your forty thousand vote problem in your local county, you should probably figure that out and everybody acknowledges there's a problem. But then I go to the Republican meetings and they're like our assessor here is so transparent, they'll let you like, just totally come in and watch other counties this is where it goes Other counties they won't let the Republicans in the watch the ballots. I'm like do you hear yourself, do you? You, this county should be suing those counties for robbing your votes here because they can't run their elections clean. I guess that I guess the board of commissioners here or the election board in this county just had to pay it like a sixty thousand dollar recount fee because they chose to not follow the law. And when the judgment came back from the judge, they're like you chose to not follow the law. And when the judgment came back from the judge, they're like you chose to not follow the law. And one of the council member that voted against it was like you, we have to pay this now because you guys chose to not follow the law. And it said I told you that and you guys voted that. You chose to ignore the plain black and white law and now we have to pay for a recount out of our pocket because it's our fault. You know what I mean. This is happening and yet what's like.
Speaker 1:Why can't we win elections? Well, we're just not aggressive enough. There's a lot of reasons and that's one of them, but part of it is you know how you got to shake up the system. You got to get the peasants involved. The system will change based on what they know you won't tolerate. They know the math.
Speaker 1:So redistricting and things like that, fixing the illusion it's a big deal Democrats have created, not only through the media but through the way they gerrymander elections, this illusion that a state like New Hampshire is solid blue. It's not. There's a lot of Republicans in New Hampshire. They're completely gerrymandered out of representation. But if you had it right, they would have at least one or two or three or four congressional seats, because the country is full of republicans. It's like here, like there's really doesn't make sense why this is a republican district. It's geographically mostly rural. It's that whole left-hand side of that map, right there. You know it makes no sense why it's, why it's republican, but there's a zeitgeist about it and there's not a lot of political activity and so people, it's a low turnout vote, a lot of concentrated voted in a little neighborhood around bremerton where there happens to be a college yeah, you know, it feels to me like this county's been rolling over for decades it's jerry-rigged because it pulls in bremerton.
Speaker 1:Bremerton and bainbridge should be like their own thing yeah you know what I mean. But instead we tie in all this rural landscape and they can counterbalance it with a little neighborhood in one city that is on the fringe of it that could be, absorbed into seattle, even if they wanted to.
Speaker 1:You know what I mean, yeah. So again it's jerry-rigged against the republicans instead of for the republicans. So the republicans are fighting back. So jd vance is openly acknowledging part of the agenda is a the census, which will shift the the map to florida, away from new york, away from california. Idaho probably get another seat. I think utah gets another one, you know. Basically, a bunch of red seats are going to get more seats, bunch of blue seats are going to lose. So redoing the census correctly could even be more dramatic from that. If they actually get no citizens counted in it or no non-citizens, illegals, counted in it, it could be even more significant. Yeah, california.
Speaker 3:So the errors?
Speaker 1:they saw were already big enough, and that was without taking into effect that they counted illegal aliens in the last census. So this could be absolutely devastating to the, the raw electoral possibility for the Democrats. So JD Vance is addressing this because basically he's like look, we're done rolling over and letting the Democrats do all the gerrymandering while we don't.
Speaker 16:Yeah.
Speaker 16:So another crazy thing that I had no idea about but everybody, even Democrats, actually admit this that the census in 2020 had a major statistical error, and what that meant is that you actually undercounted a few states that are Republican, like Florida and Ohio.
Speaker 16:You overcounted some blue states, and so what I understand, if you actually did the census anew right now, you would have 10 additional Republican seats and nine fewer Democrat seats 10 additional Republican seats and nine fewer Democrat seats and really what we're living with, maria, is the consequence of 40 years of institutional control in the Democratic Party.
Speaker 16:These guys have fought very dirty for a very long time, and they haven't just won elections and enacted laws that we may not agree with. They have tried to rig the game for Democrats and against Republicans, and thankfully, under President Trump's leadership, you finally see some spine. You finally see some backbone in the Republican Party to fight back against these very aggressive Democratic dirty tricks. But the only way for us to do it is to actually go and do the hard work to reset the scales a little bit. What we want to do is redo the census, but importantly, we want to redistrict some of these red states and we want to make the congressional apportionment fair in this country. Again, you cannot do it unless Republicans actually take some very decisive action in the months to come. We think they will and we're obviously supporting them every step of the way.
Speaker 13:But do you worry that, as Republicans do, that the Democrat blue states are going to do the same thing, and then you'll have redistricting in California, new Jersey and so on?
Speaker 16:You know. There's just not a whole lot of juice left out of that limit. The Democrats have already gone as far as they possibly can. Let me give you a crazy statistic. So I believe that it's in New Jersey, illinois, new York, california and there's one other Democrat state. Where you take those five states, you have a large number of Democrat representatives. But here's the crazy statistic President Trump won 43 percent of those five states and Democrats have something like 85 percent of the representatives out of those states. You cannot gerrymander these far left states anymore, and that's the whole point.
Speaker 16:We have unilaterally disarmed in the Republican Party. We have said to the Democrats if you want to rig the game in your favor in blue states, go ahead. We're going to do nothing to fight back against it. That's crazy. It makes it harder for us to pass our agenda, it makes it harder for us to win elections and, most importantly, it gives Democrats this ability to run roughshod over the country without any pushback from the American people. To run roughshod over the country without any pushback from the American people. The democratic system in this country is broken, because who you vote for doesn't necessarily get reflected in who your representatives are. We're just trying to rebalance the scales and frankly push back against a very unfair system created by the Democrats. I know yes, so brilliant.
Speaker 3:Yeah.
Speaker 1:Like these guys are reshaping the whole board about time. Whoa, it's so much stuff. Here's another one. Again. It's stuff that you can't talk about. Right, can't, gotta be politically correct, can't, can't, can't point out someone's immigration status or the fact that can't speak English. Well, the Trump administration, a couple of months ago, implemented the rule where no-transcript. How important is it for truck drivers to speak?
Speaker 11:English in this country. Listen, it's wild.
Speaker 1:Ok, that's too hard. That's like is a I For those audio listeners it was a very garbage digital. English in this country.
Speaker 2:Listen, it's wildly important because this has been on the American books for decades, because if you're pulled over, if you have a crash and you can't communicate with law enforcement or with first responders, it's a truly safety issue. Barack Obama, what he did is he took the teeth out of this rule of English. Only we brought those teeth back to the pre-Obama era to go, we're going to put you out of service. We've taken 1,500 trucks out of service off the roads because the drivers couldn't speak English, and I think that's what the American people expect from us. English is the language of the United States of America and if you're going to get in, that is pretty impressive.
Speaker 1:Fifteen hundred trucks off the road because they can't speak English.
Speaker 3:Thanks, Max Headroom.
Speaker 1:Thanks, Max Headroom. What do you mean, oh?
Speaker 3:oh, that's an old reference, sorry, is it 80s?
Speaker 1:OK, anyways that's an old reference, sorry, from the 80s. Okay, anyways, that's pretty impressive. I like to see that kind of enforcement. Here's another one Things that we used to not be able to talk about that we can talk about is RFK is really again going after this vaccine stuff, and sometimes we talk about the internal logic of something or the carrots and sticks, and he addresses the vaccine industry, with pediatricians and doctors getting paid to do it hi, I'm robert f kennedy jr.
Speaker 4:You're hh as a secretary. Let me ask you something do doctors make decisions based upon what's best for their patients or based upon what makes them the most money? It's not a tough question, but we've inherited a healthcare system that constantly pushes doctors toward the latter. It rewards certain treatments not because they're better for the patient, but because someone profits. Take what happened during COVID. Hospitals were paid to report staff vaccination rates. Those numbers were fed into the National Healthcare Safety Network, then published on the CDC website to shame any hospital that refused to become an enforcer of federal vaccine mandates. Today, I'm proud to announce we've eliminated that policy by repealing a dangerous Biden-era provision in the CMS inpatient payment rule.
Speaker 4:And we're not stopping there. We're scanning every corner of the health care system for hidden incentives at corrupt medical judgment. What we're finding is alarming. Doctors are being paid to vaccine, not to evaluate. They're pressured to follow the money, not the science. We've recently uncovered that more than 36,000 doctors had their Medicare reimbursements altered based upon childhood vaccination rates. That's not medicine, that's coercion. It's immoral. It has no place in a constitutional democracy or in a system that claims to protect children. Medical decisions should be made based upon one thing and one thing only the well-being of the patient, never on a financial bonus or a government mandate. Patients deserve honest, uncorrupted advice from their doctors. Doctors deserve the freedom to use their training and to follow the science and speak the truth without fear of punishment. Doctors should be guided by medical judgment and their Hippocratic oath, not by financial incentives or government mandates. That's what this policy change is about, and it's just the beginning. Thank you very much.
Speaker 1:Dude, we're only seven months into this.
Speaker 3:Those are all the right words but they haven't been said.
Speaker 1:I know it's all the right words, but okay, the way the government works right, feels so good. President says one little thing and it sets off like we should really be looking at these social media companies to see if, uh, you know, there's a problem.
Speaker 3:Boom mark zuckerberg's getting hit with a bunch of subpoenas it's all the right words, and it's all the right alignment too, so it feels good so now that he said it, we can say it yes right when this, when the surgeon general came out and said that something about transgender, whatever, okay, now everybody can say this.
Speaker 1:right. Well, now this is we can say this now, look, the doctors were getting paid to vaccinate your kids, regardless if your kids have it or not. There's another talk he gave where he gave an example of mom has three kids that had preexisting conditions that when they got that shot they literally had massive reactions, epileptic seizures, and are on the spectrum now and we know 100 percent it came from the shot and the doctor's like you should definitely give your fourth kid the shot.
Speaker 3:Yeah. A year ago and then you got a strike and kicked off Spotify and thrown in jail.
Speaker 1:Yeah, so it's like the incentives are pretty incredible. This is awesome, like awesome. In fact it's so awesome Everything that's been happening. Even Frank once, who is no fan of Donald Trump by any stretch of the imagination, but he's one of these conservative you know, right wing lincoln project slash rhino uh, pollster analyzer guys he's got a real life mock-up of the white house in his of the oval office in his house. Did you know this? Yeah, and he was also sharing a room. He and um mccarthy from california when he was speaker of the house. He was, they were roommates in dc together. So this guy's pretty well connected. Kind of has the inside buzz on the we hate Trump crowd from the right and he was on CNN and he was just breaking it to him straight up. Like they cannot figure out why Trump just cannot go down in the polls. And they can say all they want, he's down in the poll numbers but he's really not. Over and over and over again and over and over and over again, and Frank Lynch just explains it to him.
Speaker 9:If you voted for Donald Trump, this is exactly, almost to the letter, what you wanted. He didn't mind about the anger, he didn't mind the conflict between the Republicans and the Democrats. What you wanted was to make a border safe and secure, which they've done. What you wanted were tax cuts, which he's done. What you wanted was cuts to spending, which he's done, which you want to wear. Cuts to spending, which he's done. Element after element, he delivered exactly what he said he was going to do, and that's why his own voters believe that this has been an incredibly successful presidency.
Speaker 1:If you voted for Donald Trump, I would say it's going pretty well myself. I don't even know what I would say you could improve, because I understand the landscape is tough. So it's like, oh, he could have done this on day three or not.
Speaker 1:You can do it the right way or the wrong way, and it's interesting. I'm kind of in my heart. I'm thinking I got low expectations, but I'm feeling like springtime we might see some indictments on this grand conspiracy case. I feel like all this stuff's going to play out in the house and then we're going to have some new revelations and then they're going to build some more narrative and then they're going to arrest McCabe or something like that.
Speaker 3:I hope it doesn't take that long?
Speaker 1:I hope not either, but it is Okay.
Speaker 1:It is I just got a gut feeling. My expectations are low, so I'm putting it out there a little bit, okay. So I'm putting it out there a little bit, okay. Now we are going to head over into private, so we'll do the outro, since we kind of cut you short on the intro. We listened to it and then only streamed for like a minute because YouTube wasn't streaming. So we're going to listen to the outro and then we're going to jump over to private rumble and we are going to be talking about how the physicist in Los Alamos survived when they were being hunted and we're going to talk about how that is going to be the way of the future. What? Yeah, it's going to be fun. So if you can join us over on the rumble premium, that'd be awesome. If not, we'll talk to you again tomorrow.
Speaker 18:Old woman, man, man, sorry, what night. Lived in that castle over there. I'm 37. What? I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind you looked. What I object to is that you automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king, oh king. Eh, very nice. And how do you get that? Eh, by exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society, if there's ever going to be any progress. There's some lovely filth down here, oh how do you do?
Speaker 21:How do you do, good lady, I'm Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the? Who the Britons? Who are the Britons?
Speaker 18:Well, we all are. We are all Britons, and I am your king. Didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy, in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about.
Speaker 21:If only people would Please, please good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your?
Speaker 18:lord. We don't have a lord. What I told you? We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, be quiet. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major, be quiet. I order you to be quiet. Order. Who does he think he is? I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings.
Speaker 15:Well, I can become king then the lady of the lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying, by divine providence, that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur, that is why I'm your king.
Speaker 18:Listen strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. If I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up, will you Shut up? Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help. I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about.
Speaker 1:Did you about? Do you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you? There you go. All right, welcome to private rumble. The party is rolling. We are on it. Now we can say anything we want. Whoa careful, all right, we're going to talk about owning real things here. So this little clip is talking is referencing back to when we used to own real things, as opposed to now where we just kind of borrow them.
Speaker 20:Remember when we used to own things. Your music lived in your CD case, your photos were printed, your car, your movies, your suffer, yours. Now you don't own, you access, you subscribe, rent. Even your creativity runs on borrowed platforms. They call it the convenience era, but let's be real, it's the control era, because when you don't own something, you don't make the rules, miss a payment, it's gone. Change the terms too bad. Your tools freeze your files, vanish your account resets. You think you're the user. No, you're the product and they're selling you back to yourself. That's what, in business, in brand, in life, ownership matters. Own your email list, own your systems, own your ideas, because if you don't, someone else will.
Speaker 1:That is something we're dealing with over at 1776 live is we're migrating everything into the private servers.
Speaker 3:I kind of experienced this a little bit of this yesterday. So yesterday our Internet went down at our house. It was like this was devastating for my daughter. It's like, oh, we can't watch TV, you know, yeah. And she's like well, we can't watch TV, you know, yeah. And she's like, well, let's just play a video game. It's like, well, we can't play video games either. And it's like well, I'm like well, let's play some solitaire, because you can play solitaire on your computer, right? Yeah, well, I turned on solitaire. Can't play it without line being online.
Speaker 1:What, yeah, I was like so it's just another way to be online being tracked.
Speaker 3:Wow, we can't even play solitaire anymore.
Speaker 1:They probably have some algorithm where they figure out your eye movements as you follow the cards. I don't know.
Speaker 3:Wow, but it couldn't play anything until we got our online back. Until we were back online.
Speaker 1:So I guess we're fully plugged in now. It's amazing with smart tvs, like yeah, you don't have a cable anymore, it's just internet and everything streamed and you know you buy a movie. We do a lot of amazon prime because we don't, you know, buy a movie on amazon prime and rent it or whatever it's like. But we do have a lot of like hard copy dvds and we still kind of keep that alive.
Speaker 3:We ended up watching a dvd movie and it was a movie I'd never heard of. It turned out being okay. It was something about, uh, my friend totoro or something like that.
Speaker 1:Yeah, it's interesting to me because you know I've got, um, you know, different music things that you download. You to buy the music back when apple music. You could buy the music things that you down. You to buy the music back when Apple music. You could buy the music and then you can download it. So it's like I've got these albums that are on my Apple music but I can't really do like, I can't put them on a CD because they're in their special little algorithm thing that it's not, you know, transportable, it's. I basically have to be an Apple music to listen to them.
Speaker 3:It's probably in a format that doesn't translate anywhere to exactly.
Speaker 1:You know what do you own. You've got to pay for subscriptions, you've got to have access. I'm more and more an advocate of just pay the price to have it on, have it do the hard work to own it yourself. Even with like the online, like Dropbox and Mega and all these different Well, kids these days don't don't understand the pain of owning music.
Speaker 3:I mean remember when a cd was 18 bucks oh yeah, you know, today the kids are like well, that's like a whole hours of work, I would never pay for that.
Speaker 1:And it's like bro, that's what's like five hours of work when we're kids that album was something, but just keeping stuff on it like a, an external hard drive instead of on cloud storage, right, like they said, don't pay your bill. Poof files are gone. Yeah, can't log in, can't two-step verify poof it's all gone, yeah. So, yeah, it's something we're talking about over at 1776 live a lot about owning owning your own stuff, you know, owning your email list, not not having everything in a cloud server somewhere. Uh. The other thing, too is elon musk posted this and this is this is uh. So this harkens back to, during world war ii, the los alamos labs down in california. Right, you've got spies from all over the place japanese spies, russian spies, german spies, who knows what? Spies from everywhere and so in order to protect the activity which I think at los alamos is where a lot of the manhattan project.
Speaker 3:there are several labs, and Los Alamos is one of them. It's definitely not in California. There is a lab in California, that's Livermore Lab. Yes, lawrence, livermore is in California. Los Alamos is in New Mexico.
Speaker 1:All right.
Speaker 3:I'm confusing them, okay.
Speaker 1:So, anyways, los Alamos is in New Mexico. Yes, yes, I was confusing them. Same crowd, well. Well, it can be back and forth, yes, anyways. Uh, elon musk posted this. He says this is the way and in the context of a totalitarian government of any stripe, left or right, boot come from the left or right, doesn't matter, still the boot of my neck. They're going to analyze information. That's the whole game. Intelligence the more thing intelligence they can gather, the more they know, the more they know they can cut you off influence, etc.
Speaker 3:Etc and I've talked to some of these dudes at los angeles and they are smart cookies.
Speaker 1:Yes, I had a scout leader that worked out there when I was a kid yes, very smart cookie, so my father-in-law worked there, yeah so anonymity prevailed.
Speaker 1:This is what it said. Famous names were disguised and occupations were not mentioned. Enrico Fermi became Henry Farmer. Nails Bohr became Nicholas Baker. The word physicist was forbidden. Everyone was an engineer. Driver's licenses, auto registration, bank accounts, income tax returns, food and gasoline rations and insurance policies were issued to numbers. Outgoing mail was censored and long distance calls were monitored. No one was permitted to mention names or occupations of fellow residents, to give distances or names of nearby places, or even to describe a beautiful view. To give distances or names of nearby places, or even to describe a beautiful view, lest the location be pinpointed, incoming mail was addressed simply to po box 1663, santa fe, new mexico, an obscurity that cloaked the existence of the los alamos during the entire war so they did things very.
Speaker 1:It was a secret city yeah, and anonymously in the world of ai. I think that that when he says this is the way you know, everyone's an engineer, nobody is special. It makes it makes it not. It's a target rich environment, but you know who's the physicist, who's the engineer. A little little difference in value. You see what I'm saying. Yeah, everybody becomes a peasant. Everybody just kind of goes to the lowest common denominator Everybody, when we're, you know you can distinguish a real human being from AI. Ai gives a specific answer. Human being gives a nice big description from ai. Ai gives a specific answer. Human being gives a nice big description. You know what I mean. That kind of alludes to things. This is kind of how christianity survived in the first centuries with the fish. Right, you know, just scratch a line in the sand and someone else that they came and completed it made a fish. You knew you were talking about the christian right.
Speaker 1:So we're going to be talking a lot more through symbolism and things like that. It's an interesting future. It's an interesting future. I think that's why a lot of history's wisdom is stored in parable myth and legend it's because it stores the information without ai being able to go.
Speaker 3:Oh well, it also stores it out in the open. So if you understand it, you see it. If you don't understand it, you miss it it's a parable.
Speaker 1:Yeah, exactly right, it's just a story. It's just a bedtime story. Oh, no, this is an idea, and ideas that which. That's what changes the world. Uh, carlitz trump is live announcing deployment of the national guard to dc. Yes, so that's been going on this week.
Speaker 1:Obviously, dc is a crime-ridden hellhole and having spent four months in their dungeon, I absolutely understand that. That place is a bleeping mess. It wasn't safe around dc. It wasn't safe around the capitol. You can see the crime out in the open. Everybody's affected by it. It's just this absolute major problem.
Speaker 1:Um, they keep, they keep the capitol mall clean, but even there you can see a lot of distraction going on. And uh, so I am. Every morning we'd wake up in the morning news. It was another drive by shooting, another shooting, you know, and people were being brought in all night long into the into the jail. You could see their entrance from our windows, so that jail was just packed with people and they were getting cycled in and out of there, a lot of them taking chintzy plea deals. That place is a mess. So I am not surprised Trump is going to do the clean up the town thing. He's going to arrest a billion people, a bunch of people, are going to get the heck out of Dodge. They're going to clean up the homeless encampments and send them somewhere else. I have no doubt that in like 30 days, dc is going to be a very nice tourist destination. But yeah, like he's going to be deploying the national guard, it's going to be crazy. And you know what they did it for January 6th. I mean, he's the seal has been broken, the Rubicon has been crossed on that and Trump deployed them into Los Angeles.
Speaker 1:Some people say they didn't do anything. Some people say their presence enough was enough to threaten the entire existence of the riots down there. I say the investigations into the money is probably what stopped that in my opinion. Into the money is probably what stopped that in my opinion. But either way, yeah, that'll be interesting. So we're not. We haven't covered it because it's happening right now, but that was something that was coming up this weekend.
Speaker 1:Okay, that's it. That's all I got for the private chat. We got a couple different news stories in there, but yeah, we got to think of some like peasant terms where we can talk about something that's just like an elusive term and see if we can't get it to stick in the book Atlas shrugged you know who is John Galt becomes like this simple phrase that's like well, I don't know who's in charge of this, you know, I don't know Like. It becomes this, this, this phrase that brings this whole idea that applies to the situation. And we got to find something like that, got to find some peasant perspective phrase that really puts it out there. All right, guys, don't forget to visit. Left behind, withoutorg Didn't mention that in the last time, so you guys get to hear it now. And, of course, business perspective. And 1776 livecom orus. Oh, my goodness, 1776 liveus. All right, we'll talk to you guys again tomorrow.
Speaker 18:Bye, old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in that castle over there? I'm 37. What? I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind you looked. Well, I object to it. You automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king, oh, king. Eh, very nice. And how do you get that? Eh, by exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. If there's ever going to be any progress, there's. There's some lovely filth down here, oh.
Speaker 21:How do you do? How do you do, good lady, I am Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the? Who the Britons? Who are the Britons? Well, we all are.
Speaker 18:We are all Britons and I am your king. I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy, in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about.
Speaker 21:If only people would Please, please good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No-one lives there, then who is your?
Speaker 18:lord. We don't have a lord. What I told you? We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority. In the case of purely internal affairs, be quiet. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major, be quiet. I order you to be quiet. Order. Who does he think he is? I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings. Well, I can become king. Then the lady of the lake.
Speaker 15:her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur, that is why I'm your king.
Speaker 18:Listen strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just cuz some watery tart through a sword at you. Shut up. I mean, if I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had loved a scimitar at me, they put me away. Shut up, will you shut up? Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help. I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Did you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you? You, you, you.
