Peasants Perspective
Peasants Perspective: A Voice from the Edge of Freedom
Join Taylor Johnatakis, a self-proclaimed “peasant” turned podcaster, on an unfiltered journey through family, faith, and the fight for American ideals. From the depths of DC Jail—where he recorded during a 14-month sentence tied to January 6—to his triumphant return home after a Trump clemency in 2025, Taylor delivers raw, heartfelt commentary for the common man. Expect a mix of gritty storytelling, reflections on liberty lost and reclaimed, and timeless lessons drawn from his life as a septic designer, father, and reluctant rebel. Whether he’s reading Dr. Seuss to his kids or dissecting the state of the republic, Peasants Perspective is a bold, unpolished call to stay grounded amidst chaos. Subscribe for a front-row seat to a story that’s as real as it gets—no filter, no apologies.
Peasants Perspective
From Liberal to MAGA: Why One Podcaster Switched Sides
Deception runs deep in American politics, and it's coming from both sides of the aisle. This eye-opening episode cuts through the noise to examine how our leaders consistently mislead us while claiming to act in our best interests.
Starting with a bombshell revelation, we dissect the CDC's own published study on face masks that plainly states: "Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza." Despite this scientific finding from May 2020, politicians nationwide continue pushing mask mandates. This blatant contradiction raises an urgent question: are our leaders following science, or something else entirely?
The conversation shifts to a jaw-dropping interview between Tucker Carlson and Senator Mike Braun of Indiana. When pressed about his endorsement of Black Lives Matter, Braun couldn't articulate what the organization actually stands for or explain why he's pushing legislation to eliminate qualified immunity for police officers. This exchange perfectly illustrates how establishment Republicans often abandon their principles to appease the media, writing legislation that actively harms their constituents.
Perhaps most fascinating is the unexpected conversion story of a liberal podcaster who, after six months of researching current events, decided to support Trump. "I'm voting for Trump," he states plainly, explaining how immersing himself in unfiltered information rather than mainstream narratives completely changed his perspective. His journey demonstrates the power of independent thinking in an age of media manipulation.
The marketplace of ideas requires both good and bad viewpoints to function properly. When we censor opposing perspectives, we lose the ability to distinguish beneficial policies from harmful ones. Whether you're conservative, liberal, or somewhere in between, this episode challenges you to question everything you're told and think critically about who truly represents your interests.
Subscribe now and join the revolution of independent thinkers who refuse to be peasants in the political game. Your perspective matters – but only if you're willing to defend it.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her subjects had no bread, do you know what she said? Let them eat cake here. You take the bomb.
Speaker 2:We're getting screwed, man. Every time we turn around we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's gonna be through podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys, the little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's gotta stop. Peasants, man, we're just peasants, every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background with the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. We're those people. All right, welcome to another episode.
Speaker 2:Peasants, I really appreciate you coming out and joining me. Okay, today we're going to well. No, we're not going to jump right in. I'm supposed to read all my socials and stuff. So you can find me on Twitter at PeasantsPod. You can find me on Parler at PeasantsPod. You can find me on Facebook at the Peasants Perspective, and you can email me at PeasantsPod at gmailcom, and I do appreciate the feedback I've gotten and you know some of you guys send me different links and different videos and things like that, and I really appreciate it.
Speaker 2:You know it helps out a lot. Every now and then there's something that I haven't seen or maybe a video that I haven't kept track of, and I really appreciate it. One of the listeners sent in a video from Jordan Peterson and it was a great video. It was a little bit longer, longer videos I can't share on the podcast because then the videos become the podcast, but it's really great about postmodernism and I think Jordan Peterson just nails it. So thank you for sending me that.
Speaker 2:A couple other things People are so mean the Sarah Brady interview, which I think is a great interview. I've gotten a lot of comments on the Facebook post. I've actually deleted quite a few just because some of them are just kind of atrocious. It's amazing to me and it kind of goes along with the postmodernism. For anybody who doesn't know what postmodernism but basically it means that everything's bad and you have no personal individual identity and it's kind of the underpinnings of Marxism, so to speak. And so, anyways, it's quite interesting to see people just not understand the constitutional issues that are involved. Oh, she's arrested because of the way she reacted. No consideration to the fact that maybe she shouldn't have even been asked to leave, no consideration to any of the surrounding situation. And it's interesting to me. This is a boomer quality. So I'm talking to my boomer audience.
Speaker 2:You are a generation of a generation that had to go to war. You're a generation of a generation that had to go to war. You're a generation of a generation that had to be, that was hardened and the only thing that worked to survive as a nation was conformity. The nation had to get homogenous. This is critical for you to understand. You're the product of your parents, who are not necessarily the best. Remember, your parents are the ones who put Japanese in internment camps. Your parents are the ones who went into a war that they didn't know was justified. People have to understand World War II. When people went into World War II, they didn't know about Hitler in the concentration camps, they didn't know what the Imperial Japanese were doing and, quite frankly, we did the same thing to Asians on our own shores. So we've kind of justified it in the rear view mirror and I think that rightly so. Rightly so we have. But nonetheless, keep in mind we were going to a war for Imperial interests. Uh, we pushed Japan into bombing us. Essentially.
Speaker 2:Now, the reason I'm saying that is because you have to recognize your parents became homogenous. They taught you to. You know, children should not be seen it. Children should be seen but not heard. Don't become too individual, don't make a stink.
Speaker 2:Boomers hate to dye their hair, they hate to be individuals, right, but boomers boomers' children. In a lot of cases. The beginning of them were the ones that became the children of the 60s and 70s. Okay, but anyways, my point in saying this is the boomers have a certain mentality and it's acceptable and it's fine. It's part of what helps you survive, right? There's a huge amount of herd mentality with the boomers. That's why young kids look at boomers and they go okay, boomer, because what you say is what every single person in your generation would say. And I get called boomer too. Sometimes I'm kind of on the edge of the bottom side of the boomer generation, but nonetheless that's important. It's funny to me how many boomers get on and say well, she shouldn't have talked back to the cop?
Speaker 2:Oh, I'm sorry. Is six months in jail the consequence for talking back to a cop when you think the cop is doing something wrong? Do you see where this is? Everybody has a right to take a stand. Everybody has a right to say from here, I go no further.
Speaker 2:And she just decided to make a stand that day. She said no, there's no reason for you to kick me off the park. And she challenged the cop to arrest her. And he did. Somebody had commented something about. Oh well, you know she could have done something different, she could have protested in a different way. What other way? What other way would there be? Like you know, when you see these protests going on right now and these people are yelling in their faces and we say, well, they could do it another way. What other way? Okay, what other way? Sarah is doing it the right way. She protested, she said if you're going to stand your ground, arrest me. And she turned around and made it easy for him to arrest her. And that was that. I mean, what better way to protest? It's just amazing to me. Some people don't see past the, they don't see the signal through the. You know, they can't hear the signal through the noise. It's just interesting to me.
Speaker 2:Another thing too. I need to issue a correction. I misstated yesterday the deaths of COVID in Idaho being at 1,000. They are much lower than that. They are closer to 1,000 cases. So I misstated that and I apologize for that. It happens I do this show pretty much in one take, and sometimes I do. I do I just make simple mistakes, lips to the tongue and sometimes I understand things incorrectly too. That's always a a rare, a very rare possibility that I understand something incorrectly. But you know, you know how that goes. Okay, a couple of things I want to. I want to um point out here.
Speaker 2:I want to kind of set the stage a little bit for what. I'm continually kind of harping on this, this idea that we're kind of getting lied to, and I get messages, pretty often actually from people who say, oh, remember years ago when we were talking and you were super liberal. Remember years ago when we were talking and you were super liberal? I'm glad you've come around to our side. And I always chuckle a little bit because yeah, I've come around. I've come around quite a bit in certain aspects as far as conservative values go, but I actually don't really think I've changed all that much. I don't really think that I would talk about things differently. I mean, I would love to talk about social welfare programs and things like that Not socialist programs, but social welfare programs I think are important.
Speaker 2:There's a lot of things that I think are beneficial, but I think we've just reached a point in time where the postmodernists have taken over, the communists have taken over, the Marxists have taken over and we're no longer having a discussion about American values. We're having a discussion about the underlying opinions of Western culture, and that's a line that we have to draw, and I find it a little bit ironic that the people who say that to me are the people who didn't couldn't articulate exactly. How do I say this? I'm thinking of one specific person who made a comment recently and I just kind of thought to myself well, my opinions as far as the discussions we used to have, have not changed one inch. The difference is, you know, you have a party that's just gone so far left that they're no longer even in the American camp, and so it makes people think, hey, you're super conservative Republican, I am, I'm Republican, I'm going to vote all red because that's just the right thing to do and that's where the American values are right now. And there might be a correction in the Democrat party after this election. I mean, there very well could be a correction, but they might not. I mean, I think we've got quite a bit. This battle's not done. This cultural war is not over.
Speaker 2:I want to play this video here. This is from Ted Gunderson, and Ted Gunderson was the FBI director, the FBI chief, and he died on July 31st 2011. And he was thought to be by poisoning, but this was a little conference he did after he was the director of the FBI, and I want you to hear what he's talking about because I'm going to tie this into kind of the bigger picture here. This is the former FBI director.
Speaker 3:He investigated the Oklahoma City bombing case. Huge cover up. Jack Kennedy's assassination. Huge cover up. World Trade Center huge cover-up. Okay, terrorism they're using it as an excuse to take away our constitutional rights and our civil liberties. Cosmic flame the Bilderberg's, the Illuminati, Bilderberg, New World Order, globalists are the element behind this. It dovetails into the satanic movement and this movement has infiltrated into our intelligence community, the once great FBI and the CIA.
Speaker 2:Okay, the reason I play that, okay, we're not going to go talking about all those scandals and all those different things today, but the reason I play that is because we're in upside down world. Okay, that's the former FBI director telling you that the Oklahoma City bombing, cover-up, 9-11, cover-up Kennedy assassination huge up Kennedy assassination, huge cover up. Robert Kennedy cover up right, why, why? Well, you got this. The Bilderberg group who's the Bilderberg group? Sometimes they're looped in with the Illuminati. But the Bilderberg group has been around for a long time and the way I understand it basically is it's essentially a lot of bankers, compromised of bankers. But they also invite other world leaders. They meet every year.
Speaker 2:Alex Jones has done a lot of undercover work with them. In fact, he followed the Bilderberg group all the way to the Bohemian Grove and actually infiltrated the Bohemian Grove and has, as far as I know, the only footage of the Bohemian Grove. So there's kind of these little jokes out there about oh, you guys are the Illuminati, just a bunch of guys standing out in the woods naked, ha, ha, that can't be real. That's not real. No, it's real. We have footage of it. Now we actually have Alex Jones who was with Joe Rogan, by the way, like 20 years ago, they infiltrated the Bohemian Grove and got footage of their crazy wood rituals. These are world leaders going out in the woods dancing around an owl named Moloch right, and Ted Gunderson here is talking about the same type of stuff, you know, and it dovetails in with the satanic.
Speaker 2:The reason I'm saying this is I don't want to go into all the details there today, although I'd love to explore these topics more thoroughly, but the things that we're going to talk about when you say, hey, why is the government lying to me? Why do things don't make sense? That's your government folks. That's who's sitting in some of those chief seats is people who are involved in those cover ups, who've got a lot to hide, who've got everything from personal financial interests. If there's one thing this show does, is that we as the peasants have to dissect what our leaders and elites are doing. We've got to understand it so that we can prevent it from happening in the future, so that we can hire and vote for new politicians who understand these issues and can change them, do something about them, figure out where we're going off the rails. Okay, so now that I've just introduced that, I kind of just wanted to get it out there on the record so I could talk about it. But also, I want you to understand, there are scams going on left and right folks. So let's talk about masks. Okay, I am reading from the cdcgov Okay, and this is a study that was done.
Speaker 2:Let's see, this was published uh, mate, may 2020. Okay, so let's see, it doesn't have the day that it was published, it's just May 2020. It's when the CDC released this, so May 2020, and this is non-pharmaceutical measures for pandemic influenza in non-healthcare settings, personal protective and environmental measures. So what's going on across the country right now is you've got different governors, republican and Democrat, that are trying to appease the mob, appease the people that Ted Gunderson just talked about running the show, right, whatever the swamp or the medical establishment, we don't even know who these people are appeasing at this point. Right, because they keep saying the scientists, the scientists. But I'm about to read you what the scientists have written. Okay, so what are they asking us to do? They're asking us to wear a mask. Why are they asking us to wear a mask? Because it's just a good idea to protect people for other people's health. I've heard everything. I've heard it all.
Speaker 2:Let me tell you exactly what this study goes through. So in this, in this study it goes, there were three influenza pandemics, and so this is the abstract. There were three influenza pandemics in the 20th century and there has been one so far in the 21st century. Local, national and international health authorities regularly update their plans for mitigating the next influenza pandemic in light of the latest available evidence on the effectiveness of various control measures in reducing transmission. Here we review the evidence based on effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical personal protective measures and environmental hygiene measures in non-health care settings and discuss their potential inclusion in pandemic plans.
Speaker 2:Although mechanistic studies support the potential effect of hand hygiene or face masks, evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza. We similarly found limited evidence on the effectiveness of improved hygiene and environmental cleaning. We identified several major knowledge gaps requiring further research, most fundamentally an improved characterization of the modes of person-to-person transmission. So let me break that down for you 14 studies, randomized controlled studies. That means these are as good as they get right. These are as good as they get as far as determining if you know the personal protection issues here. So they've done it based off influenza.
Speaker 2:Now I can project out there an argument that people would have. Well, that's influenza, that's not coronavirus, that's not the Wuhan flu, the Kung flu as the president calls it. Well, so what? Everything we've learned so far about this virus is guess what it's like every other influenza and every other coronavirus which we're very familiar with. It doesn't seem to be, you know, exempt from the traditional rules that viruses go by. So let me, if anything it might be, you know, it just doesn't make any sense, okay, so, so we go down here.
Speaker 2:They talk about hand washing. So, when it comes to hand washing, they say it seems to be effective, although we're not a hundred percent sure. Hand hygiene is also effective in preventing other infectious diseases, including diarrhea diseases and some respiratory disease. So basically, the hand hygiene, what they found here. This is what it says. For instance, the control group would not typically have zero knowledge or use of hand hygiene in the intervention. Sorry, I'm missing the punchline there In support of hand. Sorry, this is, I might not even be looking at the right paragraph. Hold on, okay. So on the hand washing here. So I found it here. So it basically it's saying this with hand washing it's effective. We don't know why it's effective, but it's effective. So hand washing is good. You should definitely wash your hands because in their controlled studies, when people shook hands and things like that, the virus did potentially spread, and so that was something that they wanted to. Uh, wanted to do now Respiratory etiquette.
Speaker 2:They went through here and they said you know some basic, obvious things like coughing into your elbow, um, and stuff like that. However, uh, the rationale for not coughing into hands is to prevent subsequent contamination of other surfaces or objects. We conducted a search on November 6, 2018 and identified literature that was available in a database similar incidents of self-reported respiratory illness, and they also did a study of US pilgrims with or without practicing respiratory etiquette during the Hajj, which is a religious event that they go to. They also did not specify the type of respiratory ailment. The etiquette is often listed as preventative measure for respiratory infections, so this is like coughing into your shoulder, coughing into your you know, just basically not coughing into your hand. So they've done these studies and they said the respiratory etiquette is often listed as a preventative measure for respiratory infections.
Speaker 2:However, there is lack of scientific evidence to support this measure, whether respiratory etiquette is an effective non-pharmaceutical intervention in preventing influenza virus transmission remains questionable of worthy of other research. So what they're saying here, okay, the good old advice, right, when, when, when, when you're a little kid and you sneeze, you either sneeze just out in the open or you might put your hand up and then eventually your parents go don't put your hand up, cause then your hands dirty. So you go cough into your elbow or cough into your sleeve or something else. Here's the bottom line. We don't know that it works. We find no scientific backing that that works. Cough into your hand, cough into people's faces, don't be rude. But there's no scientific backing. So essentially what they're saying is they've scientifically confirmed now that it's an old wives' tale that that prevents the spread of disease or spread of infection.
Speaker 2:Now here's the kicker face masks. We're going to read this about face masks. Now there's some numbers and mumbo jumbo in here, scientific stuff. I'm going to kind of skip over it because it's just not worth reading. But let me just read this. It's a couple paragraphs but it's worth reading Because this is important. Our leaders are lying to us. Our leaders are asking us to do something for nothing. It cannot be more clear. And they'll cite the CDC. They claim the CDC is telling them to do this. They're lying to you.
Speaker 2:Face masks In our systematic review we identified 10 RCTs that reported estimates of the effectiveness of FaceMax in reducing laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the community from literature published during 1946 to 2018. In pooled analysis we found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks. Face masks One study evaluated the use of face masks among pilgrims from Australia during the pilgrimage and reported no major difference in the risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection in the control or mask group. Two studies in university settings assessed the effectiveness of face masks for primary protection by monitoring the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza among student hall residents for five months. The overall reduction in ILI or laboratory-confirmed influenza case in the face mask group was not significant In either studies.
Speaker 2:Study designs in the seven household studies were slightly different. One study provided face masks and P2 respirators for household contacts only. Another study evaluated face mask use as a source control for infected persons only, and remaining studies provided masks for the infected persons as well as their close contacts. None of the household studies reported a significant reduction in secondary laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the face mask group. Most studies were underpowered because of limited sample size. Some studies also reported suboptimal adherence to the face mask group, which, guess what guys? Is the norm, right? Not everyone's wearing an M95 face mask, which, by the way, isn't designed to keep the virus in. It's designed to keep the virus out, so it's not protecting you. Okay, it's not protecting other people. It might possibly be protecting you anecdotally. So basically, they're saying it wasn't a huge study, that's they're out, but at the same time they're like yeah, but also people don't, you know, people are going to mess with their face masks. That's one of the inherent problems of the whole thing.
Speaker 2:Disposable medical masks, also known as surgical masks, are loose-fitting devices that were to be worn by medical personnel to protect accidental contamination of patient wounds and to protect aware against splashes or sprays of bodily fluids. There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission and coronavirus, either when worn by the infected person or the source control, or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure. Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza. We did not consider the use of respirators in the community. Respirators are tight-fitting masks that can protect the wearer from fine particles and should provide better protection against influenza virus exposures when properly worn because of higher filtration efficiency. However, respirators such as N95 and P2 masks work best when they are fit tested and these masks will be limited supply during the next pandemic which we saw. These specialist devices should be reserved for the healthcare settings or the special subpopulations, such as immunocompromised persons in the community. First responders are those performing other critical community functions and supplies as permit In low-income settings.
Speaker 2:It is more likely that reusable cloth masks which is all we're seeing running around, is reusable cloth masks. I know some of you, my listeners you got one on your face right now will be used rather than disposable medical masks because of the cost and availability. Use rather than disposable medical masks because of the cost and availability. There are still few uncertainties in the practice of face mask use, such as who should wear the mask and how long it should be used for. In theory, transmission should be reduced most if both infected members and other contacts wear masks, but compliance in uninfected close contacts could be a problem. Proper use of face masks is essential because improper use might increase the risk for transmission. Thus, education on proper use and disposal of face masks include hand hygiene is also needed.
Speaker 2:Did you guys catch that? Did you guys catch that what they did there in this little study? Now, keep in mind, this study was just published, right before all of the face mask rules came out. So on one hand, they've just gone through hand washing works, we don't know why. They've just gone through, uh, coughing into your elbow, and things like that don't seem to work. Okay, so it's just a matter of not being rude and coughing and sneezing in people's faces, uh.
Speaker 2:And then we get to face masks and they basically say they don't work. Uh, but you might, in a low income setting, wear a cloth one. Did you catch it? I mean, did you catch how silly this is? So I just find it hilarious that here we are being told to wear masks because the CDC told us to, and they're telling us masks don't work even though you wear them. I mean, literally that's just what they did here. They just went through and say masks don't work unless they're N95 and P2, and even then they have to be fitted and should only be used by healthcare providers. And in low-income settings you're likely to wear a cloth mask, so clean it, but it's not effective. So why the mandate? Why the mandate? So why the mandate? Why the mandate? Folks, folks, there's a big agenda here. I could go on and on. I can go on and on about all the lies.
Speaker 2:You know this virus has been here way longer. I've got here from Uncovered DC. They've broken a story. An Alabama man nearly died from COVID-19 in the first week of January and they've got pictures. They've got his lung scans. They've got his whole story here and it was pretty brutal. I mean he obviously got this nasty, nasty virus. I mean he ended up being intubated for a while. They ended up doing a plasma treatment, taking his plasma and cycling it. They didn't know what it was. Anyways, he finally got better, finally came home and then he went home. So I'm looking here at some chest x-rays and, oh my goodness, I mean his chest is just completely filled in these ones. But anyways, it sounds like it was brutal. But here's the thing. So he's put his story out there and said, hey, I had COVID. He's got the COVID antibodies. That's when he was antibodies, that's when he was sick, that's when he was hospitalized.
Speaker 2:This was well before China had acknowledged that this was a human-to-human transmission. This was before we closed the borders. This is in the first week of January and there's a lot to this. Right, this virus has been here. It was in Alabama, that's the other thing. It was in Alabama, that's the other thing. It was in Alabama. So all these like one of the things that we're seeing right in front of our eyes. I covered it yesterday.
Speaker 2:The CDC said my bad on these testing. They've been counting the antibodies with the infection rate. So if you go get an antibody test and come back positive but you were sick a month ago, you're not a new infection. But the CDC, up until literally just a few days ago, was counting it as a new infection. So, keep in mind, I keep hearing people say, well, we've got to shut, we've got to go back into a lockdown mode because we've had all these new infections. Have we really, have we really? Or is it the nine to one antibody to virus test that we're counting all the people who had it? I mean, are we literally getting to the? What's going to happen? The way we're, the way the CDC was counting it was, we're going to test through the country and we're going to find out everybody that had it and everybody that has it, and everybody who had it or has it is going to end up going on a quarantine, which is what they have to do, and then and then eventually this thing will run out and then one day we'll test and then it will be like the last person that has had it and then it'll just drop off to zero because now everybody's been tested, everybody who got it has got it, we've got some kind of herd immunity and we're just going to go. Oh, I guess the virus isn't spreading anymore. No, ding bad. It hasn't been spreading for a while. It hasn't been spreading for a while. It's just that you were counting your antibody tests, antibody tests as if they were current patients.
Speaker 2:You have to realize one of the things about this coronavirus we know is there's asymptomatic people. People get it, they don't get sick. They're carriers for it, right, lots of people get viruses and sicknesses, but then they themselves don't get sick. The vast majority of people who get coronavirus will not show any symptoms. Right, it is definitely something that goes after the elderly and it goes after people who do not have the Neanderthal gene. Okay, that's, that's kind of the general gist. So obviously it's a real virus, it's out there, but it's not what they're saying. Also, where are the flu deaths? I read before. 6,000 flu deaths this year so far. That's pretty incredible. Weren't we supposed to have like 40 or 50,000? We all know what's happening is if you go into the hospital with a sniffle, they code you as COVID. They don't even necessarily have to test you to count those numbers.
Speaker 2:Okay, the next thing I wanna cover is I wanna cover a little bit of a longer piece, and this is by Tucker Carlson and this piece features Mike Braun. Now, tucker Carlson and this piece features Mike Braun. Now, it's a little bit of a longer piece, quite a bit longer. So I'm going to have to break it up as we go and I want to inject some analysis into this, because when we, you know we talk about systemic racism, let me talk about systemic idiocy here. Let me talk about what is happening with our leaders that are selling us up the road, and I'm going after Republicans right now.
Speaker 2:The Democrats are a lost cause. Okay, the Democrats are a lost cause. So just recognize that If you're in a Democrat state, just vote red. Red is better. Okay, I will take Mike Braun over some other Democrats, although I don't know, I mean at least the other Democrats. I know their colors. We don't know these guys. Like Mike Braun. They're wolf in sheep's clothing and we're going to see that more than anything right now. So listen to Tucker Carlson, pick apart Mike Braun. For those of you who don't know, mike Braun is the senator for I believe it's Ohio. So here he is, and what Tucker's talking about is the defund, the police movements, and he's saying few have stepped up to help, and then he's going to introduce Senator Mike Braun.
Speaker 4:To defend the police from totally bogus accusations of quote systemic racism. Some are repeating that slur. One Republican, though, has gone farther than that. As we told you last week, senator Mike Braun of Indiana has introduced legislation to make it easier for left-wing activists to sue police officers. We must do this, senator Braun explained, in part because Rayshard Brooks' death was egregious.
Speaker 5:I wanted to put a template out there that protects law enforcement from frivolous lawsuits but holds the egregious departments and individuals accountable in these egregious, you know, instances of a George Floyd or Rayshard Brooks or Breonna Taylor.
Speaker 4:In case you suspect, we somehow selectively edited that clip. Here's Republican Senator Braun going all the way in endorsing Black Lives Matter.
Speaker 5:Do you support the Black Lives Matter movement. I support that movement because it's addressing an inequity that has not been solved. You know, from a grassroots level.
Speaker 4:After our segment on Thursday, senator Braun asked to come on this show to detail his position. Of course we're happy to have him. Senator Braun, thanks so much for coming on. Before I ask you about qualified immunity and your attempts to water it down, I was very surprised by that endorsement that you gave on camera of Black Lives Matter. Black Lives Matter has, of course, called for the murder of police officers. Why do you support it, and are there any other race-specific revolutionary movements that you support?
Speaker 5:So, tucker, thanks for having me on in the first place. I know when you came out and I like it when somebody does challenge, especially something like this, when you're talking about changing something that's been around for a while. And, tucker, I come from Main Street, your viewers are my supporters and I've got one of the most conservative voting records.
Speaker 5:No, that's true. You'd have to check with them, just like I checked with the Indiana State Police. Indiana Sheriff's Association Return of Order Police spent over an hour with them last week to make sure I wasn't off base. And here's where I come from.
Speaker 4:I'm sorry, I'm confused. Really quick, hold on, you're off base in your support of Black Lives Matter, your endorsement that you just gave. Have support of Black Lives Matter, your endorsement that you just gave. Have you read their website? Or are you in favor of abolishing the nuclear family?
Speaker 2:Okay, so I'm going to jump in here. We're going to jump over to the Black Lives Matter website and we're going to take a look at this. He endorsed Black Lives Matter. Oh, they have an inequity to address. This is an elected senator, this is one of a hundred men who breathes the rarefied air of the Senate and he's endorsing Black Lives Matter. So you would think, like he knows what Black Lives Matter is all about. Right, or is he a panderer? Okay, so listen to this. I'm just going to read them. Black Lives Matter. You go to their about section. You go down to what we stand for. I'm just going to read. I'm just going to randomly read some of the paragraphs that they have here.
Speaker 2:We disrupt the Western prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and villages that collectively care for another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents and children are comfortable. Okay. Now, if you don't like raising your kids, that sounds great. Okay, well, I'm going to get help from my neighbors. But we all know that this is what this means they get to be the parent of your kid. So whoever's in charge of the future government disrupts the Western prescribed nuclear family in order to let the village raise the kids. So your children are now property of the state.
Speaker 2:Do you understand the transition there? We foster queer affirming network when we gather, we do so with the intention of freeing ourselves from the tight grip of heteronormative thinking, or rather the belief that all in the world are heterosexuals unless she, he or they disclose otherwise. All right, so, like 2% of the population is gay. But okay, we are guided by the fact that black lives matter, regardless of actual or perceived sexual identity, gender identity, gender expression, economic status, ability, disability, religious beliefs or disbeliefs, immigration, status or location. Okay, I believe your lives matter, but it's kind of. You know, a lot of this is about sexual orientation. You'd almost wonder if this was a trans group.
Speaker 2:Let's see, here we are unapologetic, black in our positioning. We affirm black lives matter. Uh, we see ourselves as part of the global black family anyway. So as you go through here, you realize okay, you know, couple this with everything they've been telling us about their marxist, marxist bent and what it is they're trying to accomplish. You see, really quickly, you shouldn't be endorsing black lives matter if you're a elected republican. I, let's just be honest here. So just keep that in mind. Mike Braun, an elected Republican, has endorsed Black Lives Matter because they've got a grievance, but he has no idea what Black Lives Matter is. Same thing with Mitt Romney and a bunch of these rhino Republicans.
Speaker 2:One of the problems with the Senate is because they've got the longest terms and they've and they're the most elite politician other than the president. They kind of have this impression that they just don't they're above the day-to-day things that are going on. They just think this is something that will come and go and blow away and and they'll just kind of get in there. They're practicing Hegelian dialect, which is basically where you go one direction with the conversation, but because you have two opposing sides, you're able to go exactly where you want. But the people who are watching, or pay or or a part of it, think that they're like picking a side and there's like this battle back and forth, when really there's no battle. They're just agreeing and they're just creating basically a public spectacle of debate. That's what we see here. So let's continue.
Speaker 4:What do you support exactly?
Speaker 5:Not at continue. What do you support exactly? No, I'm not at all. What does that mean? I support anybody that does have a grievance to be able to air it, and that's it. That doesn't mean all lives don't matter. It just means that if you think a certain sector of society has a grievance, it ought to be through transparency and the willingness to debate it and get it out there. I'm going to always go on the merits of the particular case and going back to what I learned last.
Speaker 2:Okay. So before he moves on to the next part of what he's about to say here, we can't do this. He's going to get pressed a little bit more, but we can't give an inch. So in this case, he endorses black lives matter because they have a grievance and we should support the protesters. Folks, don't get sucked into that thinking. Pay attention to what it is they're saying, what it is they're protesting and what it is they want to accomplish. He's just trying to pay a little bit of lip service. He has no idea the damage he's doing. People are listening that aren't up on these topics, that don't everything. Black lives matters, all the people who just put blackout Tuesday, all the people who you know what I mean. Like he is speaking to this ignorant crowd because he himself is ignorant. Okay, now he's going to get into the details of of of it.
Speaker 5:So let's week first of all, uh, law enforcement in Indiana thought was talking about eliminating it or drastically modifying it. This was to find that sweet spot to where they said they are being unduly stigmatized because of these events, because in some cases their own aren't held accountable. And when they knew that, they basically said we need to be in the discussion. Look how we got rolled with Obamacare when we refused to discuss it 10 years ago.
Speaker 4:Wait, wait, hold on, hold on, I'm sorry. I'm sorry. We just showed tape of you Senator saying that we need to pull back. We need to make it easier to sue the police because of quote egregious incidents like the death of Rayshard Brooks. You said you wanted to speak about specifics. Do you believe that he was killed unjustly? Do you believe Officer Rolfe deserves the death penalty which he now faces? What did you mean by that, please?
Speaker 2:I believe you ought to. So Rayshard Brooks is the man who was shot in Atlanta. So if you remember, he's the one who was the child beater who was sleeping in the Wendy's parking lot. The cops came up to his window, said, hey, man, can you pull over, sleep over there, get out of the drive through. He immediately fell back asleep after the cop had talked to him. The cop went back over, said, hey, now that you've like fallen back asleep, I'm going to have to go.
Speaker 2:He went through the whole DUI thing. They spent 45 minutes talking to him and then when they went to arrest him, the guy started fighting. He fought with the two police officers that were there. He took the taser, shot one of them with a taser and then he still had the taser and while he was fleeing, turned around, pointed the taser and shot the taser. Click, you know, shot the taser, pulled the trigger on the taser at the pursuing officer who then shot Rayshard Brooks twice, who was kind of in the back as he was fleeing away, and then and then proceeded to do CPR on him until the paramedics arrived. So that's the Rayshard Brooks killing. Okay, so that's the. That's what they're referencing here. This is the incident where it looks like what the cop was doing was justified, but he's being charged with murder.
Speaker 5:Have the ability to just like, when anyone's civil rights would be violated, that you've got access to due process to have your case heard.
Speaker 4:But they do. But they do have that right. Qualified immunity Hold on. Qualified immunity has nothing to do with that case. He's been charged. They have the right to sue him under qualified immunity, as you know, since you're writing the change to the law, so that's irrelevant.
Speaker 2:OK, so I love that Tucker points this out, but this is critical. This is a senator. I can't keep saying this. Stop looking at your leaders like they know what they're talking about. Stop it. This guy's a moron. Ok, mike Braun shouldn't be writing a bill taking away qualified immunity from cops when he doesn't even understand some of the basics of the case.
Speaker 4:Ok, we'll just let Tucker Tucker's going to fillet him, but unfortunately Tucker doesn't have enough time, so but we'll hear it and I'm asking about the case you cited it Do you believe that the officer now facing the death penalty deserves to face the death penalty and if you don't tell us what he should have done?
Speaker 5:I think that that's going to be determined by the court. And when it comes to that civil you cited it, so what do you wait?
Speaker 4:hold on. You cited it. What do you think of it? You're the one who called it egregious. So why don't you tell us what Officer Roth should have done when this man fired a taser at him? What do you think?
Speaker 5:I think that you probably should have had the judgment that in a traffic stop like that you don't shoot somebody in the back.
Speaker 2:So if we In a traffic stop like that. He has no idea that Rayshard Lewis was drunk, that he was sleeping in a Wendy's parking lot, that he was released on covid probation. Mike Braun has no idea those issues, he just thinks it was a traffic stop. Oh, this is just. This is just another one of those shootings, right, I mean this guy just keep doing that, so what should he do?
Speaker 5:No, hold on.
Speaker 4:No, no, no. I want you to explain. I think it's fair. You're an office holder. I don't normally press people like this, but it's not fair for you to filibuster without answering my question, which is very simple. The officer facing the death penalty had a guy fire a weapon at him. What should he have done then?
Speaker 5:Probably not have killed the guy.
Speaker 4:And that'll come out in court. So what should?
Speaker 5:he have done.
Speaker 4:He should have probably not, you're the one saying it's egregious Let him go.
Speaker 5:Do you think he was going to get away?
Speaker 4:They were going to fine him? You tell me. You tell me You're the one judging the officer, so maybe you could explain why you're judging him.
Speaker 5:Tucker, that'll all come out in the court process and all I'm saying. Let me finish this. If we don't get better at it for all of us on Main Street, Democrats are going to spin it. Chuck Schumer's already decided he can make hay of this in the election, and we'll end up on the short side of it again.
Speaker 4:If you're wanting to say absolutely— who controls the Senate? Does Chuck Schumer control it? I thought Republicans controlled the Senate.
Speaker 2:One of the biggest accusations with the Senate is that the Republicans have no spine. So this is Mike Braun Tucker's pointing out appropriately the Republicans control the Senate. Who gives a crap what Chuck Schumer cares? Right now Mike Braun is taking his marching orders from the minority leader. Because Mike Braun, along with his cohorts, are rhino Republicans. What that means is they run on a slightly Republican platform A few key issues like being pro-choice or yeah, no, not pro-choice, pro-life. They'll be pro-life and so they'll just automatically get the Republican nomination or the Republican ticket. But in every other aspect they are flaming liberals. I mean, this is just. This is a great example of it, and I'm so glad Tucker actually pressed him. This is a rare moment of good interviewing against a Senator. This is great.
Speaker 4:So you're taking your cues from Chuck Schumer?
Speaker 3:You're saying Chuck.
Speaker 4:Schumer might criticize me. Therefore, I have to pass a law that makes it easier to sue police Tucker.
Speaker 5:You know you have to have 60 votes in the Senate to get anything done. You can check my record. They're about to change that when? They take over, and even law enforcement in Indiana thinks that in some of these cases it's giving them a bad name and bad apples. There ought to be due process there for the victim.
Speaker 4:So what law enforcement groups are endorsing your bill?
Speaker 5:They're not endorsing it, but they said it was a good template to work from, but why aren't they endorsing it?
Speaker 4:then You've cited them twice as supporters of this idea, but they're not endorsing your bill, so they don't actually support it. So why are you bringing them up as?
Speaker 5:evidence that it's a good idea. They think it's a better idea to be in the discussion than be outside of it.
Speaker 4:But if you care what they think, why don't you write something they'll endorse?
Speaker 5:And that doesn't necessarily mean we won't get there. That's not going to be done today. The Democrats now think they can win with it in the election, and that's why we needed to be engaged now in a way that would have kept it on the table.
Speaker 4:So you need to write a bill that law enforcement won't endorse. The country is burning not because cops are burning it down, but because the mob is. But you think the morally culpable party is the police, so you're making it easier for left-wing groups to sue them. Am I missing something?
Speaker 5:You are missing it. You're trying to put words in my mouth. I don't think you can justify any of the looting.
Speaker 2:So do you see what Tucker just did? He just reduced his argument down to the actual steps that he's taking. And don't put words in my mouth. Well, what words did I put in your mouth? Feel free to fill me in, because that's exactly what he just said the rioting.
Speaker 5:And if you don't address the underlying issue, you think it's going to fix itself on its own. You think it's going to get better. You think the underlying issue is Rayshard Brooks being shot?
Speaker 4:So you're telling me that what's happening now is the result of police behavior? It's the police, it's the fault of the police. That's what you're saying police behavior.
Speaker 5:It's the police, it's the fault of the police. That's what you're saying, because you know I'm saying what they're getting by with on the other side is trying to generalize on the specific and they'll get away with it if we decide to do nothing. That's just a general disagreement and approach.
Speaker 4:What about? Are you making it easier for business owners to sue the mob for burning their businesses down? I haven't noticed that bill coming out of the Senate business owners to sue the mob for burning their businesses down.
Speaker 5:I haven't noticed that bill coming out of the Senate. Hey, if we're not in the discussion, Tucker, we're going to be on the sidelines like we are on so many issues as conservatives because we fail to engage and they run circles around us in the end run.
Speaker 2:What issues that we fail to engage in? What he's talking about is they run circles around us. He's talking about the media. Who's running circles? Not the Democrats, they're not running roughshod, it's the media. He's kowtowing to the media. He's not standing on any principle. He wants to be in the conversation. He wants to not be run away with because traditionally, in the pre-Trump era, yeah, the media becomes so left-leaning. You had to lean left to get any airtime. Well, guess what? That's not the case anymore. In fact, courage is contagious. Stand up for what you believe in. You know why Donald Trump has a 96% approval rating in the Republican Party Because he stands on his principles, regardless of the cost and the consequence.
Speaker 2:Guys like Mike Braun, he's a jellyfish. He doesn't have a spine. He's literally caving in to the Marxist BLM group, endorsing them, not knowing what they stand for. Writing a bill that takes away qualified immunity from police officers to punish the police officers for the rioting and looting. That's literally directly caving in to the mob's demands. You're giving ground to them. Rather than overfunding the police, rather than giving them more training or more tools, no, no, no. We're going to take money from them. We're going to defund them. We're going to make it easier for people to sue cops. He's saying well, I want to be in the conversation. Guys, it's a non-starter. The Democrats can't push a bill, they can't put one out. So why does Mike Braun feel like he has to?
Speaker 5:You think you're going to keep the Senate in the fall on this platform. I think we're going to keep the Senate if we at least are willing to engage in issues that are important to the American public and that we don't always stand on the sidelines until it's too late.
Speaker 4:It's more about when you get involved in the issue. I don't think the public supports you at all on this. With respect, I just don't.
Speaker 5:I think law enforcement knows they need to have a better system than what they got now, because it's stigmatizing them unduly.
Speaker 4:Okay, senator Brown, thanks for joining us tonight. I appreciate it, you bet.
Speaker 2:All right, what a fool, what a fool. And there's so many other politicians just like him. They've got to be weeded out, guys. They've got to be weeded out, like it's just egregious. Okay, last video, last video.
Speaker 2:This is going to leave you on a little bit of a slightly better note. So we've talked about the CDC's guidelines for masks that essentially, they know for scientific facts masks talked about the CDC's guidelines for masks that essentially they know for scientific facts, masks do not prevent the spread of viruses, influenza, coronaviruses and things like that, but yet we're being told to wear them. Who are we being told to wear them by? By spineless jellyfishes like Mike Braun, who are getting bullied around by the mob Not just the protest mob, the media mob, right, the medical mob. There's mobs out there and there's people who've learned they're the tantrum babies of the world. These are the people who learn that just by screaming louder and louder and kicking their feet louder and louder, they could get what they wanted. They're the people who'd like to rule from the minority, ruling with fear, ruling with intimidation, right, all that. Guys like Mike Braun are jellyfishes. All they see is those people. That's the people that are in their sight all the time. The longer and longer they stay in politics, the less and less they care about the people out in the field in Indiana farming corn, and the more and more he cares about the select activist interest groups that are constantly banging on his door. In his office he has lost sight of the American people. He has lost sight of his constituents. He's in an echo chamber of politics. He's in an echo chamber where he's writing a bill that will cost police officers life and limb because of Black Lives Matter, because of Rayshard Brooks, because he was killed unjustly. Do you see how he's passed that judgment? He says it was egregious. What is he talking about? He's going to write a bill and push it through over that. Come on, folks, it's not just the Democrats that are screwing us, it's the Republicans too. In fact, it's the Republicans that we oftentimes overlook. We think that they're doing a good job passing these bills, but these bills are horrible. Okay, just because we passed a bill on one side of the aisle doesn't make it a win if it's bad for the American people. Mike Braun is bad for the people of Indiana. Mike Braun is bad for the people of America. Other politicians same thing. If you're got a Republican governor that's putting you on a lockdown right now or asking you to wear masks. They're bought and paid for. They are just like Mike Braun.
Speaker 2:I want you to understand and internalize that Some of the areas that are like more conservative and I just I can use Idaho as an example. I'm from Idaho. I understand how Idaho thinks. I actually interned in the Idaho state Capitol. I know how the Capitol works. I've been in the underground tunnel tunnels. I've, I've, I've sat in committee meetings at the state Capitol. I love the Idaho state Capitol, I think it's awesome. But I also know that when you go to the Idaho state Capitol, all of the commercial leases all around that Capitol are filled by lobby organizations. Okay, that's where everybody else interned was at one of those NGOs or one of those PACs.
Speaker 2:So they're out there and guys, guys like Mike Braun, guys like Brad Little, they get in these little echo chambers and they think that because they're in a conservative state with conservative values, that they don't have to fight for them. But what they they? But because they're constantly dealing with the Democrats and negotiating, they just give and give and give. Make the Democrats give. Make the Democrats give up ground. The Democrats are the take an inch, they take a mile. And you, as a Republican, are over there giving them the rope Take an inch, give them an inch, they take a mile. And guys like Mike Rahn aren't holding on to the rope, they're just letting it go. They're just letting it go. We want to be in the conversation. I just want to be in the conversation. I want to get on CNN from time to time, all right.
Speaker 2:So this next one is a little video. This is from a podcast. It's from the Tim pool group and, uh, this is. These guys started a podcast about six months ago and I need you to close your eyes, unless you're driving. If you're driving, don't close your eyes. I need you to close your eyes. I need you to imagine one of those, uh, one of those like Snapchat emojis, or I guess they have them on Facebook now or different things, but it's just an emoji.
Speaker 2:It's a white guy with a beard. He's got a pretty skinny face. Okay, it's pretty skinny. It's got long hair down down past his shoulders. He's a man long hair down past shoulders, got a beard. He's wearing round glasses. He's wearing a gray hoodie that comes down to his eyebrows, right, so you know real class, and he's wearing gray shirt. So gray shirt, gray hoodie, long brown hair down down past his shoulders, little beard, round glasses and he's wearing headphones because he's on a podcast. Okay, so that's the image of this guy. These guys started a liberal podcast. They started a podcast just like mine, except it was liberally oriented, right? So they started it about six months ago. Listen to what he says. This is a liberal guy. These are guys who got on to rag on Republicans, rag on Donald Trump and basically do exactly what I'm doing, but from the other side of the aisle. Okay, listen to this.
Speaker 6:Learned from our history and gotten to here. So now you want to destroy all that history and all these people? I personally, just talking about myself, I'm pissed Me too. I don't, I don't like it. I I'm, I'm voting for Trump, I'm okay with it. I'm talking about it Like I'll openly say it, like yeah, I am. I think he is doing a lot of things that I didn't understand and I didn't like him before. But now, over the past four or five months, how long have we been doing this show? Month six I am immersing myself in what is going on in the world and I see it. I'm not an idiot, I'm a logical-based. I follow the logic, I follow you know what's actually happening and I think he's doing a lot of things that we need to have had happen. The Democrats work with China. It's like. That scares me. I am frightened of China. They clearly want to control the world and what a great blurb there, man.
Speaker 2:I mean. I mean, guys, if you pay attention to what's going on, you know that we have one guy who's not like mike braun, who's standing on principle, and that's donald trump. I'm super concerned about the people around him. I have a major concerns about mark meadows, his chief of staff. Love him and hate him right. On one hand I like him. He's a fire breather, you think he's got things going, but on the other hand, I know for a fact he gave the clinton. He had the chance to go after the clinton foundation. He had the uh, the doyles in there with their all their irs and all their tax fraud case and, and you know, mark meadows gave him a pass. Who knows mark meadows not going to tell donald trump to give hillary clinton a pass? I mean, these are serious issues and serious concerns, but there's one guy that stands apart and that's Donald Trump, and it's just kind of fun. Okay, I like that.
Speaker 2:A couple of things that I just want to briefly mention. You've got the news right now that you know Russia was paying the Taliban to kill our soldiers. First of all, they probably always do that covertly. They probably probably never do it, um, you know overtly uh, sounds like it was kind of some bad intelligence or wasn't really verified intelligence not worth passing up the chain. Anyways, democrats are trying to take a run at this specifically. Adam Schiff now is going to start. He's got a whistleblower somewhere in the DOD that's going to come forward. So they're going to try to make another run at impeachment or another run at some embarrassing hearings and see if this thing's got legs. It's got no legs. That dog don't hunt. It's been debunked four ways from Sunday, but I think they're going to run with it because it kind of plays bad in the media. And that's where we're at. We're at a spot where just it's about sound bites, right, it's just about a blurb that can play bad, like Mike Braun isn't wrong in his assessment where he's like if we don't have a bill, chuck Schumer, they've just determined they can win on this thing and they're going to pound it and pound it, and pound it. Here's the thing. If they think they can win on it, let them pound away. It's a bad idea.
Speaker 2:In the marketplace of ideas, bad ideas come to die. Okay, that's what this gentleman right here is saying. He's in the marketplace of ideas Now that he's immersing himself in the current events and then he's contrasting that with his ideas. Guess what he's realizing? I was wrong. Right, and Donald Trump is right. Guys, ideas, in the marketplace of ideas, good ideas will boil to the top, bad ideas will go down.
Speaker 2:When you suppress anything, when you censor free speech, book burning, all of those things, what that does is it takes out both the good and the bad ideas. When we bookburn, we think we're getting rid of bad ideas, ideas that we think are bad. But you don't realize that the reason your ideas are good is because you're able to contrast them with the bad. As soon as you take away the bad, all of a sudden your good idea doesn't seem so good anymore, because you don't know what the bad is. You know, one of the reasons why Marxism is rising in America is because nobody reads the Gulag Archipelago. Go read the Gulag Archipelago and then come back and tell me you want a Soviet state or you want a communist country. Go read the Red Scarf Girl. Go read the Red Scarf Girl and then come back and tell me you want to have a cultural revolution here in our country and tell me that it's worth it. But when you take those books out. When you remove those books, you remove uh, you remove you, you, you know you you remove the opposition to the good. So it's just a bad, bad idea.
Speaker 2:Marketplace of ideas. Let everything come out, let it boil up. Stop thinking in two minute blurbs, right, two Two-minute media hits although that's all I ever play on my show right. But start thinking about the real issues, the core fundamentals. What do you believe in and how does the things around you compare to that? Use your eyes. You're an independent, individual person. What makes sense to you? Recognize you've got your generational ideas, which are fine. You needed your generational ideas, which are fine. You needed your generational ideas to survive.
Speaker 2:But you know what, if you were, if you were, growing up in my generation taking the advice of the boomers? It didn't work. Go to school, get a good job. Those that advice didn't work. It worked for the boomers because in that society it worked. Things change, right, but one of the problems we haven't, we're having right now say it a million times is everybody's just not working off the same sheet of music. Everybody's not working off the same sheet of music. So let's get on the same sheet of music. All right, I'm out of time. I appreciate you joining with me today. You can find me at the Peasants Pod on Twitter and Parler the Peasants Perspective on Facebook and peasantspod at gmailcom.
Speaker 1:Look forward to talking to you tomorrow. Who are the Britons? We all are. We are all Britons and I am your king. I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy, in which the working class is oh, there you go bringing class into it again. That's what it's all about. If only people would hear Please, please, good people, I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What I told you. We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune.
Speaker 1:We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority. In the case of pure internal affairs, be quiet. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major, be quiet. I order you to be quiet. All the waves he think he is. I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings. Well, how do you become king then?
Speaker 1:The Lady of the Lake, her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying, by divine providence, that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. If I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up. Will you Shut up? Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up. Come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help, I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Do you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?
