The Maxwell Case, COVID Numbers, and Chinese Surveillance: A Peasant's Perspective

Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed. The little guys always take the brunt of everything while the elites walk free. This raw, unfiltered look at current events peels back layers of deception surrounding some of today's most controversial topics.

The Ghislaine Maxwell arrest should be front-page news, yet media attention is already fading. Why? Perhaps because the judge overseeing her case is an Obama appointee who served as his special assistant, while one of the prosecutors is James Comey's daughter. These connections matter in a justice system increasingly split between political insiders and everyone else. From selective prosecution to judicial overreach, the Maxwell case represents another test of whether accountability exists for the powerful.

COVID-19 reporting has become a statistical shell game. Minnesota Senator Scott Jensen reveals how health departments instructed doctors to list COVID-19 as cause of death without testing or confirmation – contradicting standard medical practice. His reward for speaking out? A medical board investigation threatening his license. Meanwhile, a Texas county judge exposed new guidelines classifying anyone with common symptoms like headache and fever as "probable cases," artificially inflating numbers. No wonder different states show wildly different statistics – they're literally counting cases differently.

Most disturbing are the connections between government contractors, intelligence agencies, and potential bioweapon development. The Moderna vaccine – literally standing for "modification RNA" – represents a fundamental shift from traditional vaccines by instructing human DNA to create antibodies rather than introducing inactivated viruses. Is this current pandemic merely a test run to gauge population compliance before something more sinister?

The surveillance state extends beyond our borders. Chinese apps like TikTok collect extensive personal data from users' phones, transmitting it directly to Chinese authorities. Secretary Pompeo's warning was clear: only download TikTok "if you want your private information in the hands of the Chinese Communist Party."

Want to protect yourself? Start questioning official narratives, guard your digital privacy, and remember – peasants have always needed to look out for each other when kings claim divine right to rule.

Chapters

• 0:00 Opening: Peasants Taking the Brunt
• 1:46 Ghislaine Maxwell Case and Obama Judges
• 11:42 COVID Death Count Manipulation
• 31:22 Senator Scott Jensen's Medical License Threat
• 42:01 Greg Gutfeld on COVID Media Bias
• 46:12 DynCorp, Bioweapons, and Moderna Vaccine
• 53:02 TikTok Ban and Chinese Surveillance

Transcript

Speaker 1: 0:02

And when they went to the queen To tell her Her subjects had no bread, do you know what she said? Let them eat cake here. You take the bomb.

Speaker 2: 0:15

We're getting screwed, man. Every time we turn around we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's gonna be through podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys, the little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's gotta stop. Peasants, man, we're just peasants, every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background with the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Alright, welcome to another episode of Peasants Perspective. Welcome, peasants. As always, you can find me at on Twitter, at PeasantsPod, on Parler, at PeasantsPod, on Facebook, at the Peasants Perspective. And email. You can email me at peasantspod at gmailcom.

Speaker 2: 1:07

We have so much stuff happening in the news right now, but yet it's a slow news cycle. It's actually extremely painful, I don't know. I mean it gets like this every now and then, where there's just these big bombshells, but they're kind of like on due day two or three of their news cycle and so they're kind of starting to fade away and there's just nothing quite exciting replacing it. But the things that are there are huge. The Ghislaine Maxwell arrest is huge. We should still be talking about it. We should be trying to get to more of the bottom around the circumstances. There's a lot of things in question. So I'm just going to go through a couple of the highlight news stories, a couple of things that are affecting me, and we're going to talk about COVID again. I really don't like talking about COVID. I'm kind of done with it. I'm going to show you a video from Greg Gutfeld today that describes things very well. Let's just put it that way.

Speaker 2: 1:56

Let's jump into the Ghislaine Maxwell story here. I think the way I'm going to approach this story on this show is I'm mainly going to do it from a perspective of updates, because the story is pretty difficult to tell and I don't know if it's a story that I really want to tell on this show. All the details and graphic details but justice in the case of Ghislaine Maxwell is kind of like critical. I mean, if we don't get justice in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, then we're not likely going to get justice on a lot of other things. I think the Ghislaine Maxwell case, the Epstein case, ties into a lot of the nightmares that we go through as a country and a lot of the things that we seem to just not be able to get right.

Speaker 2: 2:37

So let me just look at one thing here. Another set of news or another change of events. That's kind of unique. This is the judge in charge of Ghislaine Maxwell case is an Obama appointee who used to be his Barack Obama's special assistant, and one of the prosecutors is James Comey's daughter. And then the question that's posed here is how does this keep happening? That's a really good question.

Speaker 2: 3:02

So, all right, what's my perspective on this? My perspective has been that Obama did not appoint judges that seem to care about our Constitution. Everything I have experienced thus far, every single case that has gone through an Obama judge that has been even remotely controversial, almost without exception. They have sided on the side of activism, on the side of judicial review, on the side of judicial overreach. They really haven't been constitutional judges by any stretch of the imagination. Now they're all individuals and who knows right? I mean, obama did nominate a lot of judges, so there's a lot of judges that could be good, but this is another one of those things that's kind of concerning. Now, I'm pretty sure they don't get. I think you have some ability to choose judges, but not a lot. I think that you kind of put it into the court that you want to go and it shows up on the docket. So I'm not sure if this was a randomly subjected judge or not, but I will say this in the Mueller investigation every single judge that was used so Amy Berman, jackson, judge Sullivan. Amy Berman had a couple of the cases. They were horrible judges, horrible judges. They made extrajudicial decisions. They did things out of normal procedure. I mean, in one case, the Judge Sullivan case, it's so egregious. It went to an appellate court and they granted a writ of mandamus and have ordered Judge Sullivan to dismiss the case against General Flynn because the judge refuses to dismiss the case. So when we're talking about judicial judges and who they're appointed by, it apparently is pretty important. I mean, the Mueller team sought out or got only Obama judges and frankly, those judges had a lot of malpractice in their courts.

Speaker 2: 4:46

In the case of the Roger Stone case with Amy Berman-Jaxman, she put a gag order on Roger Stone, which I think was an egregious abuse of power. She really just didn't want him talking politically. I mean there was really nothing he could say. What his case was about was lying to Congress about immaterial statements made to the Mueller team as opposed to made to Congress. There was no. There was nothing. I mean the whole premise of why he was being talked to. The entire premise on what he was being asked about the Trump campaign's connection to WikiLeaks had no factual basis. It was all false. But yet he lied or misled or misstated something in between Congress and his to the FBI, and what he misstated was not material to the fact that Trump campaign had or had not colluded and worked with WikiLeaks. So you've got another situation here where, with this judge, she's put a gag order on him for something that you should be able to talk about. I mean, these are not high crimes, these are not state secrets. There was no confidential or classified information involved.

Speaker 2: 5:56

This was a pretty simple case of lying to Congress, something that seems like everybody just does, seems like it's really no big deal. Just for the record, roger Stone is now the first person to be held accountable for lying to Congress in 15 years, 20 years. I mean the problem is so bad and there's been so little lack of enforcement on the statutes of lying to Congress. I mean people talk about it all the time. I think it's just a political punishment. You know, the Congress makes a referral to the Department of Justice and then the Department of Justice proceeds and, just for the record, congress does make a lot of referrals. I mean, they held Eric Holder in contempt of Congress for lying to Congress and failure to disclose documents, and then, of of course, that led to Barr being held in contempt, and then you've got a whole handful of other people who have been held in contempt. But it seems like anytime lying to Congress comes up, only if you're a Republican is there any consequence for that. So you know, I don't know. I don't know what's going on.

Speaker 2: 6:58

Another thing about this case too, just to keep everybody up on the same page, this case is being tried by the office. Just to keep everybody up on the same page, this case is being tried by the office, handled by the office's public corruption unit. Assistant US Attorney Alex Rosemiller, allison Moe and Maureen Comey are in charge of the prosecution. So we're going to remember those names Alex Rosemiller, allison Moe and Maureen Comey. Those three attorneys right there hold the fate of whether there's a two-tier justice system or not in their hands. I mean this case right here.

Speaker 2: 7:33

Epstein killed himself. Epstein got away. He got the cowards out with all the horror that he had caused on people, including murder. By the way, I mean, those charges of murder have not been brought up. You need a body with a birth certificate usually to be convicted of murder. But what we're going to find and I've already played on this podcast multiple times about the bodies, the children that are trafficked without birth certificates, that are used in satanic cults or satanic rituals which Epstein Island is a temple is a satanic temple. When you look at the floor plan, the blueprints, when you look at the side view and how they went into the mountain and under the mountain with the submarine landing, I mean it looks eerily like the layout of a pyramid in island form. If you subsurface the island, it's really quite disturbing, quite disturbing.

Speaker 2: 8:25

So Alex Rosemiller, alison Moe and Maureen Comey are in charge of the prosecution. It bothers me, it really bothers me, that Maureen Comey is on that, on that, on that list. And you know, I think her dad needs to be tried for treason and I think he deserves to be executed as a prisoner of the state and for crimes against the citizens of the United States. And I say that very seriously, like I think James Comey is a traitor to our nation and we don't hold children accountable for the sins of their father. But I think that Maureen Comey has a. She's going to have a spotlight on her and I'm definitely going to put a spotlight on her as far as I can and keeping an eye on her, because that is that is atrocious. That is, she should just recuse herself if for no other reason than the fact that her name is Comey and her dad had let the Clintons off the hook over and over and over again, and her dad, on his watch, had these cases in his uh possession. He had the Wiener laptop. He had uh Epstein's uh was Epstein's first arrest Mayor may not have been on his watch it probably wasn't on his watch, but either way, um, it's quite astonishing.

Speaker 2: 9:37

I don't, again, don't have a lot of words on how to quite get where we're at here. Here's another thing too. This is Prince Andrew. I just want to play this here. This is an actual admission of guilt and I want you to pay attention to the way he does.

Speaker 2: 9:52

Now, prince Andrew is the son of the queen. He's not really in line for the crown. For the crown to come to him, it'd have to leave the normal line of succession. Basically, what it'd have to mean is some people who should get the crown would have to die, and so it would have to pass over to him, but nonetheless he's a royal figure. He has been dismissed from his royal duties because of this specific scandal, because of the Epstein involvement with Epstein, pictures have surfaced where, obviously, prince Andrew took Kevin Spacey and Ghislaine Maxwell on a tour of Buckingham Palace and they actually sat on the throne.

Speaker 2: 10:28

Yeah, that picture's floating around there and that's a pretty devastating picture as far as the crown is concerned, because no one should be sitting on those thrones except for the king and queen, and you've got Ghislaine Maxwell, a child predator, and Kevin Spacey, also a predator, sitting on the palace thrones. I mean, that is in the monarchy way. That is a mockery to God, if you were to put it that way. So, anyways, this is Prince Andrew in a BBC interview, and notice the way that he confirms his involvement with Jeffrey Epstein.

Speaker 3: 11:04

The problem was the fact that once he had been convicted, you stayed with him, I stayed with him, and that's the bit that, as it were, I kick myself for on a daily basis, because it was not something that was becoming of a member of the royal family, and we try and uphold the highest standards and practices and I let the side down. Simple as that.

Speaker 2: 11:24

So that's a good little admission that he hung around with Epstein. He's admitting the fact that he was with him. Now the fact that you know basically what that means is there's no more deniability, there's no possibility of oh, those pictures aren't me, they're photoshopped. All those things have been floated around and it's not going to happen anymore. Okay, let's move on to the coronavirus. So there's this video floating around with it's not really just floating around with Dr Scott Jensen. Who is Dr Scott Jensen? Well, you might know him as Senator Scott Jensen. So Senator Scott Jensen is one of the senators from the state of Minnesota and he put out a video yesterday that is really fascinating. Now, it's a little too long to play, it's actually 11 or 12 minutes in total, but here's what has happened Dr Johnson is being investigated by the Minnesota Board of Health and this is quite shocking and frustrating to Scott Johnson, and they've listed two reasons why they're investigating him.

Speaker 2: 12:21

One, for making inappropriate connections between coronavirus and the flu. So basically comparing them, just simply. You know, this is how many flu deaths, this is how many coronavirus deaths is similar, or this is similar symptoms. Basically just making the comparison to from coronavirus to the flu. And then the second thing was making reference to. Let's see, there was Making Reference to Coronavirus and Misleading the Public on gosh. What was it, hi Senator Scott Jensen?

Speaker 5: 12:55

I represent Carver County. This is one of the most important videos of the Family Doc for 40 years.

Speaker 2: 13:00

I'm skipping through it until I find it.

Speaker 5: 13:02

For the flu, for COVID-19. We've had some 35, 40,000 cases of COVID-19 in Minnesota thus far, According to the Department of Health people. That might translate into 10 times that many, and if it does translate into 10 times, I mean that's 350,000 cases. But in 2018, we had more than a half a million Minnesotans with the flu.

Speaker 2: 13:26

Did you catch that? So this is a long video and I just jumped to that specific part, so I wasn't looking for it specifically. But basically he's saying we've had 350,000 cases on a max. Like if you take the 35,000 that have tested, times it by 10, 350,000. But yet. We had a half a million flu cases, but yet we have no flu cases this year in Minnesota. We had a half a million flu cases, but yet we have no flu cases this year in Minnesota.

Speaker 5: 13:45

That's basically what he's saying. Say that Am I recklessly giving you advice? Regarding COVID-19 and the flu, dr Anthony Fauci has come out and compared them all the time Dr Mike Osterholm has. In terms of the death certificates.

Speaker 2: 14:21

On April 3rd I got an email from the Department of Health that said very clearly that we should report COVID-19 on death certificates if it is assumed to have caused or contributed. Well, that's not how we do. Death certificates, the official ICD-10 coding, okay. So I want to put some significance in here. So Dr Scott Scottson at the beginning of this video goes through his credentials 40 years in practice he's run hospitals, he's done house calls. Basically he's done it all. You know he's a competent doctor and he is a sitting US senator okay, someone who's now in charge of legislation around medical. He sits on the committees that deal with medical regulation and things like that, and so he's very, very up to date on everything. So when he's saying this, this is a. In a certain sense, this is a nuclear bomb going off in the medical community. In a certain sense, this is a nuclear bomb going off in the medical community.

Speaker 5: 15:14

Because here's the senator who essentially has power to take power from the actual health department in Minnesota. That's investigating him and he's calling foul. If the provider documents suspected possible, probable or inconclusive COVID-19, do not assign U07.1, which is COVID-19 disease. It says. Assign a code explaining the reason for the encounter, such as fever or a cough or shortness of breath. That's what the official instructions say. So I get this on April 3rd. I end up inadvertently, sort of accidentally, running it up the flagpole with Chris Berg on April 7th. And what happens? The Department of Health a few days later comes out with a clarification and then a few weeks later they come out with another clarification. And I appreciate it. The fact of the matter is I'm proud of the Department of Health in Minnesota for saying we are not going to list non-confirmed cases as deaths in Minnesota. We are going to put an asterisk by them and we'll follow up on those later.

Speaker 5: 16:18

But that's not what Pennsylvania was doing. That's why they had to subtract 200 patients from their COVID-19 death count. Colorado did the same thing. New York went the other direction. New York said we're having more deaths in a certain period than we normally have, so those deaths must be COVID-19. We just didn't pick them up. So, nevermind the testing, we're adding 3,700 to our total, and well, that does increase our total by 50%.

Speaker 2: 16:44

So one of the things that happened in New York is. So what he's talking about is, basically, he is making the connection and a direct connection between the policies that the state health departments are putting out and how we're counting COVID deaths, covid cases, et cetera, et cetera. So this is why this is a nuclear bomb. This is a sitting Senator. Okay, this is a sitting senator who sits on the committee and he's going to examine and investigate this stuff. He's getting directives as a sitting medical doctor, a medical doctor who has a license in the state of Minnesota. He's getting guidance and guidelines from his local health department, his state health department, telling him how to count the deaths. He runs it up the flagpole, gets it corrected in the state of Minnesota and, as you can see, he's saying, hey, at least Minnesota is doing this right, they're not just going to count anybody as COVID death.

Speaker 2: 17:30

But that's not what Pennsylvania has done, that's not what New York did. In fact, new York went so far the opposite direction and the story behind that is in New York, when they did the lockdown, a lot of people died in their homes Because, remember, you can't go to the hospital, you can't go to the ER, you're only supposed to go out for certain things. So there's a lot of heart attack victims, there were a lot of stroke victims, there were a lot of people that let small or minor medical things essentially build up and so they started having people dying in homes, and they normally do. In a huge city like the size of New York. They'll retrieve like 50 bodies a day out of homes in New York, which, when you do it by the percentage, isn't super crazy.

Speaker 2: 18:08

People die in their homes all the time. But that number shot up, it quadrupled, and what they were doing was they were counting every single home death, every single home death, as a COVID death, because you know it was caused by COVID, because COVID caused the lockdowns. I mean it was. It was ridiculous. It was caused by COVID, because COVID caused the lockdowns. I mean it was ridiculous.

Speaker 5: 18:30

So our count is off. So I'm in the position where I have to explain that I wasn't spreading misinformation and I'm not being reckless when I talk about COVID-19 and the influence of both, being single-stranded RNA viruses that are respiratory in nature, with similar symptoms and can be spread through particulate matter and aerosol transmission. I've got an eight-page document that I put together for the Board of Medical Practice and let me be clear, they do important work and I'm going to fully cooperate with them. I also have some 70 pages of attachments and in the attachments I've got the Pennsylvania Department of Health slashing their numbers by 201. I've got the Department of Health in Illinois where one of the directors says that just because we put COVID-19 down on the death certificate as cause of death, that doesn't mean the patient died of COVID-19. She said that.

Speaker 5: 19:33

Dr Fauci, when he talks about influenza, he was the lead article in this New England Journal article and he said this If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases for COVID-19 is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza. That was Dr Fauci. And oh, by the way, one of the contributing authors was those of a severe seasonal influenza. That was Dr Fauci. And oh, by the way, one of the contributing authors was Dr Robert Redfield, the head of the CDC.

Speaker 5: 20:14

Dr Osterholm is a well-regarded epidemiologist and he was saying this in the middle of March. He said the flu has become a pandemic more than once and has killed millions of people. It still exists today, unfortunately. We now have on our hands something else, but it's caused by coronavirus, which is acting very much like influenza. Folks, do I feel targeted? Yeah, I do. Do I know who my accusers are? No, I don't get to know. Could I be disciplined by the Board of Medical Practice? Well, sure I could. There's two allegations there.

Speaker 2: 20:58

So someone made an anonymous complaint against him to the Minnesota Board of Health, and so he did a little research. In the beginning of the video that I clipped off, he talked about how it's a one-page complaint. It goes in it's a one-page complaint. You don't put your name on it, the health department doesn't know who you are. But this entire investigation is being launched because somebody put a one-page complaint in which with pretty much unfounded complaints, and so the government is now being used as a political tool to come against a sitting senator and create this investigation. It's going to cost money, it's going to cost time, it's going to cost resources to go after this and it potentially could end up in the loss of this senator's medical license. In a normal world this would be loss of income, loss of revenue, loss of livelihood. He's not able to face his accuser, he's not able to go through an appeals court. I mean, this is like tyranny. This is objective tyranny and this is how you can use the government as a police state.

Speaker 2: 21:58

I have a neighbor who does this. By the way, every time I start a fire he calls the fire department to find out if I have a burning permit. Every time I clear the front of my property that's full of blackberries. He says I'm clearing in a wetland and I have to deal with the building department and get a stop work order and go through a rigmarole. He's cost me money, time, but every time he makes these anonymous tips right, thinking that it won't come back to him. Obviously it always comes back to time to figure it out. He'd probably made four or five complaints before I finally figured it out. It was all coming from him but you know, county couldn't tell me that I had to finally deduce it and confront him about it. So here's Scott Johnson, senator Scott Johnson. He's got to confront his health department. Can't face his actual accuser, can't just on its surface say, hey, these claims are nonsense. He's got to go through this whole process.

Speaker 5: 22:56

If I have been spreading misinformation, then what about Governor Walz and the Department of Health memo that talked about the purpose of, if you will, some of the measures that we'd be taking to dampen, delay and decrease the peak to allow the accumulation of PPE and make sure that our hospital capacities weren't being overwhelmed? In that memo they say what effective measures are cover your mouth. Don't go out if you have cough or fever. Avoid touching your face, your eyes or mouth. Cover your mouth if you cough. Wash your hands frequently. Minimize outings socially distance. But what did they say were not effective measures? They said wearing masks is not effective, taking antibiotics is not effective.

Speaker 5: 23:49

A month later Governor Walz comes out, talks about 74,000 Minnesotans dying. Later on he went back to 29,000. And right around then I put a different video saying just the facts and I said I'm not buying 74,000 Minnesotans dying, I'm not buying 29,000. And then this one came out a month later, right around May 1st. This is a model that they're using and it says on here Minnesotans model projects nearly 1,000 deaths a day in mid-July. Well, folks, that's next week. So far we have less than right around 1,500, of which all but 300 of them have occurred in people in long-term care facilities, in large part because the department of health participated in decisions that put people with active covid19 disease in the nursing homes you hear that he's laying the feet of two-thirds of their deaths directly at the health department.

Speaker 2: 24:37

You put sick people back in nursing homes, and that's minnesota. We haven't even talked about new york, right? What governor cuomo did is a tangent amount to genocide, right or elder side I mean. What he did was atrocious. 6,900 people died because Andrew Cuomo put sick coronavirus patients back into nursing homes with non-sick patients sick patients. So here's the senator laying two-thirds of their deaths in Minnesota at their feet, calling their lies on projected deaths. Because here we are in mid-July and they haven't even had 1,500 total deaths, let alone 1,000 deaths a day. This is pretty stark. This is pretty serious.

Speaker 5: 25:19

And I'm spreading misinformation? Of course I am. I don't know what to tell you. I just know this is wrong. We're in a bad place. My wife asked me the other day, scott, why did 9-1-1 pull us together as Americans so much, and why is COVID-19 breaking us apart? I think physicians are part to blame. Scientists are. We've become so darn political. Physicians and scientists in the past are supposed to be above the fray. They're not.

Speaker 5: 26:02

I have this odd set of hats I'm wearing because I'm the vice chair of the Health and Human Services Committee in the Senate and I'm involved in policy discussions and involved in bills that deal with providing relief for COVID-19. And, on the other hand, I've been a physician in the trenches for 35 years. So I try to connect the dots. I don't try to present myself to be something I'm not. I'm not an epidemiologist, but yes, I've taken epidemiology classes. I'm not an infectious disease doctor, but I take care of infectious disease every day. I just want to leave you with a couple of questions you could maybe ask yourself. Do we think it's okay for physicians to certify on death certificates that someone died of COVID-19, even if there was never a COVID-19 positive test obtained, even if there was never a COVID-19 test done, even if a COVID-19 test hadn't even been considered and maybe the worst, even if, even if the family had no clue that the death certificate they received for their loved one was going to say COVID-19. What do we want to be doing there In Minnesota? I think the Department of Health is taking care of business. Those are important questions.

Speaker 5: 27:25

I'm sure there are naysayers out there that think that I'm getting exactly what I deserve. Fine, if it can happen to me. I think, frankly, that it could happen to anybody. It feels ugly. It feels like some of the people that disagree with me don't want to have a conversation. I've asked many of you to have conversations and you've not been interested.

Speaker 5: 27:51

So reckless advice regarding comparisons between COVID-19 and the flu, spreading misinformation. Because I cried foul when I received a memorandum from the Department of Health on April 3rd which directed me to a CDC link which says clearly that you could have a patient suffering from other medical problems wheelchair-bound severe stroke within the preceding year or two, no COVID-19 test ever done or ordered, and when that patient dies of pneumonia, it's a COVID-19 death. I cried foul and I'm grateful that the Department of Health a week later tried to clarify things and and a month later clarified it further. But I'll say it again the official people who write the coding Bible in this country said if the provider documents suspected possible, probable or inconclusive, do not assign COVID-19. Thanks for listening.

Speaker 2: 29:04

We better all stay engaged we better all stay engaged, because they are trying to take your freedoms. Take your freedoms. So this is a uh. This, this one right here is a uh judge. So this is chris hill uh, from a collin county judge in in tex. And take a listen to this one here.

Speaker 7: 29:31

This has informed public health departments that they have adopted a revised definition for COVID-19 probable cases.

Speaker 2: 29:35

This was May 18th 2020. So this is we're coming up on two months ago. So keep in mind, as this time passes and cases happen, they're counting cases based on the guidelines they have at that moment. So you could see a spike in cases just based off the way they do these guidelines.

Speaker 8: 29:55

So for confirmed case it stays the same. You still just need PCR. But now they've added a probable case definition so that still gets counted towards the case count. It's different, it's not confirmed, it's probable but it's still a case. So at the end of this definition there are 50 probable, as in.

Speaker 2: 30:15

I was on a cruise boat and one person got sick, so we have 5,000 probable cases.

Speaker 8: 30:20

So that's how you end up from one case to 5,000 cases 15 different options on how you could be classified as a probable case Based on this diagram and what they report. There's a total of 17 cases now. One is still only confirmed because that was that original index case. Who then had all these contacts underneath in orange? And all the rest of them became probable. But they are still considered a case.

Speaker 7: 30:49

It has the potential to be a very significant event for us here in Texas and here in Collin County, as the state now has elected to adopt this new probable definition. If you have a subjective fever and you have a headache and you live in Collin County, you now meet the qualifications to be a probable COVID patient.

Speaker 2: 31:09

If you have a fever and a headache in Collin County, you're a COVID patient. A fever and a headache. A fever and a headache the two most common symptoms. You get a headache from not drinking enough caffeine in the day. My mom taught me that when I was 10 because she drank so much Dr Pepper. Right, if she didn't get enough Dr Pepper she got a headache. So if we lived in Collin County, my mom would be a coronavirus patient because she didn't have enough caffeine in the day. That's how ridiculous this gets. Oh, you have a low-grade fever. Why do you have a fever? Oh, I don't know, maybe I just got done working out? Oh, I don't know, maybe I just am sick. I had some bad food, had some bacteria on it. My body's kicked up the temperature. The burn off the bacteria coronavirus. That's not how this works, guys. This is a joke.

Speaker 7: 31:56

It is remarkable how low the standard is now. If you have one of the major symptoms you have a cough or you have shortness of breath and you live in Collin County then you can satisfy the definition for a probable COVID case. But I'm very concerned that we absolutely could see the numbers jump very rapidly in a way that actually is not indicative of what we're seeing here in the community in the public health department is not indicative of what we're seeing here in the community, in the public health department.

Speaker 2: 32:28

So that is a Collins County judge talking in a commissioner's court and with the health department and going over the guidelines and he's calling it. He says we're going to have a huge spike in cases because now everybody has a case. In fact, let me check my forehead right now I might have a case of coronavirus right now I'm a little hot. So this right here is a. This is another one of these meetings here. Let me I got to get the thing out of the way.

Speaker 9: 32:51

The CDC a couple of weeks ago did a study where they looked at every single.

Speaker 2: 32:55

Okay, so this is another one of those county meetings and this is this is a health personnel who is speaking and she's just got like a couple minutes, so she's kind of running through this as good.

Speaker 9: 33:06

Other study in the entire world on face mask wearing and this is what they found. The CDC found quote no reduction in viral transmission with the use of face masks. There is absolutely zero point in putting face masks on healthy or asymptomatic carriers. They do not work to stop the virus and what they do do is cut the oxygen hypoxically low. Let me explain to you what happens when people go down due to loss of oxygen. They don't break their fall by putting a hand out like an average person does when they're headed south. What they do is they drop like a ton of bricks. Their skull hits first.

Speaker 2: 33:41

It's interesting listening to that because that's what we were seeing in Iran and in China was the skulls hitting first popping down? I want to play. This is Greg Gutfeld. This is a little clip from the Five and he was responding to something Juan Williams had and Greg's just had it and I think a lot of people in media have kind of just had it, especially if you're on the conservative side, because you feel like you're talking into this empty ecosystem, right, Like facts don't matter, Nothing matters, it's just opinion smearing. It's a really interesting world on the left side of politics. I mean, there's no consistency. It's hypocritical to the umpteenth degree. Nobody stands on any principle. They're flailing in the wind all the time. It's obvious. I mean it's just obvious, and so this is Greg Gutfeld's kind of take. I love it.

Speaker 10: 34:31

About the political strategy here. How does the strategy of normalizing the coronavirus help the Trump campaign? I mean, obviously people are dying. This is no common cold and I think that's evident to everybody.

Speaker 2: 34:45

Okay. So this is no common cold. That's evidence to everybody. Think about what I just played you sitting Senator who's going through it, essentially saying this is the common flu, and we're jacking up our numbers, we're messing up our reporting. How could we possibly trust anything? You've got that judge down there going well, you got a headache and a cough. I guess Washington's got another coronavirus case. Apparently I got the coronavirus. You heard it there. Folks Live cough and you know I'm symptomatic. Now I got a cough. I must have coronavirus. Count me up. So anyways, it's all based on an incorrect premise. So Greg Gutfeld's got this strained. Look on his face and just I love it.

Speaker 11: 35:27

That's the craziest question you've ever done. Nobody's normalizing a virus okay. But, by the way, no one should take anybody in the media seriously in their questioning of process if they haven't actually made a correct piece of advice. Okay, let's face it. Number one they politicized hydroxy. Remember that they were so happy to find that one bad study that said it didn't work. Now they go strangely silent when you hear that it might work. And in fact we all kind of knew that it might work. In terms of a strategy, it was well-tolerated among people. We knew that there was promise, but the media didn't like that.

Speaker 11: 36:09

Two the rest home debts. The media bent over backward to cover up for the Cuomos right. They didn't want that to be a big story, but that was a big story, okay. So they covered up the rest home stuff. They bashed a drug that had potential. They refused to cite the most important data on earth, which is the reduction in death rates. That is the important thing, but you can't talk about the fact that that's plummeting. And then let's not forget the travel ban right, which many in the media won, said that was stupid and said that it was racist, but that probably did a large part in preventing a lot of death. So the media and those who politicize this need to be ignored, all right.

Speaker 2: 36:52

That's it. They need to be ignored. I think they so, and it goes, it goes, it goes. It got Russiagate. You've got now COVID. You've got scam after scam after scam after scam. He's exactly right They've got to be ignored.

Speaker 2: 37:04

Now, I have said for a long time that there is a uh oh. I've got the who video here where she says things can't be spread asymptomatically. I'll skip that. It's made the rounds. I think you guys get the point.

Speaker 2: 37:17

Now, what is it that we're really dealing with? What is coronavirus? Why would Donald Trump right? Isn't Donald Trump supposed to be like our hero? Isn't he supposed to be like keeping an eye out for us and helping us out? Well, he is, but he's got some things that he's up against. I want you to listen to this video.

Speaker 2: 37:48

So this is a contractor for DynCorp. Dyncorp was involved with the DNC and then they were hired by Congress by the Democrats in Congress, so the Democratic caucus to do their servers. They got arrested. This was kind of during the Mueller time. Debbie Wasserman Schultz was involved with this because she's the one who procured the contract when she was the head of the DNC. They were suspected of some WikiLeaks collaboration, which turned out to be nothing. Then we found out they were collaborating with CrowdStrike and anyways, these guys ended up getting tried, got a quick little sentence and they're basically put away short period of time. Not really tried for their crimes, tried for, you know, process crimes around the crime, just to get them locked up and out of the public eye. It was a huge cover-up. All One Brothers, a-w-a-n. All one brothers. They were IT professionals for the Democrat party, so this contractor was involved with them. Now he's going to put out a really dire warning and he's going to connect some dots, so we're just going to go through it here.

Speaker 12: 38:44

Uh, along came a spy team.

Speaker 2: 38:47

Okay, so he's, I'm I'm jumping into the story because, again, it's a longer video and uh, but he's kind of explains himself, so I'll stop it if I have to go back and explain something that he skipped over. But he's talking about how he got involved with the whole case on on capitol hill by the name of the awans.

Speaker 12: 39:03

I immediately put the two together. I put their blackberries, encrypted networks together. We said that dying core slowly cached weapons over a period of time to replace police forces, un police forces, with UN peacekeepers.

Speaker 2: 39:17

Okay, so remember when I reported that in 2015, loretta Lynch and Joe, there's no conspiracies, but there's no coincidences. Folk, this put on your thinking caps. Right now, a lot of dots are going to start connecting A lot of dots. Maybe I've undersold this video just a little bit. This is a critical video. This is going to start connecting A lot of dots. Maybe I've undersold this video just a little bit. This is a critical video. This is going to connect major dots. You want to know why, even on the right side of the aisle, some people get a little panicked. This is why, okay, we're going to connect some dots here. So sorry if I undersold this video. We're going to connect some dots here. Everything from weapons so UN peacekeeping troops being brought here. That was 2015 UN resolution. Biden and Loretta Lynch went and signed on it, minnesota being the key ground for that. There's been lots of groundwork laid in Minnesota for this, so here we go.

Speaker 12: 40:04

We said they slowly cached weapons. They use things like biological weapons and chemical weapons. We talk about DynCorp spraying in Central America, spraying in Kosovo, spraying in Bosnia, spraying in conflict areas all over Central America, stopping at nothing, spraying all kinds of weapons, using all kinds of machinations and leading no holds barred to overthrowing countries and overthrowing their police departments. That's what we said three and a half years ago. Back then it was conspiracy theory. Back then didn't seem to be taken too seriously. Until we found the Awan Blackberries, until we found the Pride hard drives, until we found the same Blacks that had planned all these coups the Libya, syria, sudan, yemen. The coup probably in.

Speaker 2: 40:58

You remember yesterday's episode that was a little bit rough and choppy. Well, remember the BlackBerry, the encrypted network. These are the guys who broke it.

Speaker 12: 41:07

The coups in Central America, again for DynCorp and other companies as well that came in and followed DynCorp like Blackwater. We talked about the chemical weapons and biological weapons partnerships, dyncorp.

Speaker 2: 41:19

Who is Blackwater? Blackwater is owned by Eric Prince, who's the sister of Betsy DeVos, the secretary of education. Blackwater is the one who told the world about the Wienergate laptop at the Southern District of New York. Remember, it's not the Southern District of New York that exposed what was on it. It was leaked to Blackwater, who then leaked it to the world. So Blackwater's involved in domestic law enforcement.

Speaker 12: 41:43

We had with a company called DynPort. It's happening right now in your US city. We said there was 45 Awan Blackberry carriers. These are 45 representatives. We said that they were the representatives in the areas that had the big cities, the large black populations, where they had safe congressional districts. We said the Awans were taking money that we were sending to stop Osama Bin Laden, to stop terrorism, and it only spending a couple of days on the docks where Imran was in Karachi and then being turned right back around because the soldiers they were going to, the soldiers they were going to in Afghanistan, were actually ghost soldiers. The technology that we were sending there to support were ghost. It was ghost technology. It was actually turned right back around and being cashed right back here for technology and weapons against the people in the United States.

Speaker 12: 42:37

We also looked at a link to a woman who was married to Imran Awan's invisible brother, abid, named Natalia Sovia.

Speaker 12: 42:54

Background and her connections with Nancy Pelosi, her connections with other people on Capitol Hill in terms of Ukrainian intelligence to purchase chemical weapons and biological weapons that could be used against the United States population. Isn't that exactly what COVID-19 is? We are seeing more and more evidence now every day that this was a NATO simulation in 2019 during the World NATO Games, completely synchronized with the Event 201 to simulate a world event with a weak virus. And we are now more convinced than ever that a stronger version of the virus the binding affinity, remember, of the S protein can be now controlled through using the CRISPR to create as lethal of a virus as possible. There's the four HIV inserts in there. If they want to go and crank it all the way up to the most lethal form, they can crank up how virile and contagious it is, and also the payload can be mixed with a whole sort of different pathogens, not just AIDS, but also Ebola and other very virulent pathogens.

Speaker 2: 44:04

This is so when you go in and you look at the virus and you look at the vaccine, specifically Moderna, which is mode RNA. Moderna, which stands for modification RNA, so change your RNA, which then your RNA is the duplicator of your DNA. So, by modifying your RNA, you therefore modify your DNA. So they're going to try to tell your body to print the antibody, to make the antibody to the virus. So they're not going to give you a dead virus and then let your body create an antibody. They're going to tell your DNA to print the antibody, to make the antibody to the virus. So they're not going to give you a dead virus and then let your body create antibody. They're going to tell your DNA to create the antibody. Moderna modify your RNA. Okay. So now he's talking about they can use CRISPR, which is James, the DNA code. They can crank up the virus so they could tell your body to create Ebola, and then now you're the carrier for Ebola. And they can do that through electronic signals, because the Moderna vaccine uses nanotechnology, which is activated by electronic pulses.

Speaker 2: 45:02

Folks, folks, this is why President Trump shut down the economy. This is why he closed the borders, because this is the intel he has, the virus that's floating around the United States is not a high-risk virus. It's a simulation. It's a test run to see how we respond. And how are we responding? We're giving away our liberties and our rights, the very thing we should be defending. We're not demanding truthfulness from our politicians and our leaders. We're letting them run politics with policy instead of smart decisions. We should not be doing what we're doing now until the real virus hits.

Speaker 12: 45:40

Exactly what we warned three and a half years ago. Back then we had all kinds of time. Now we have a wand minutes to midnight. Now we have very little time 120 days. But who knows when the second wave will happen. I say it's the October, the 19th, just because I'm going on. How the defense department works, how NATO works, how military, larger military organizations train and plan, but who's to say that it won't be moved forward to Jacksonville now in July? Uh, in Florida with the Republican convention, with the DynCorp attack? We just don't know. And the longer we wait to expose the network, the more we put ourselves at risk.

Speaker 2: 46:23

The go out today and so one of the things as peasants is, all we get to do is hear the information. We get the propaganda along with the info and we've got to sort it out. So we get to sort this out. You've got real bad people out there that want to do real bad things at a real big scale, it is true, and some of those people are people we see on TV every day, and some of those people we will never know their names on TV every day, and some of those people we will never know their names. And this is why it is so important that we have a society and a culture that values individual life. It is so important that we have a culture and a society that believes that there's karma, that there's just punishment for those who are bad actors, whether in quote this life or the next, because to hold society together, you have to be able to eliminate the people that want to commit genocide. Oh man, it's crazy. There are no conspiracies, but there's no coincidences, right? I mean, I've spent I don't know a lot of episodes. Now I feel like I've been doing this show for a long time and everything just ties in together all the time so nicely. Remember the names, remember the people remember where they work, remember what they do, remember who they're married to. I haven't confirmed this, but I heard that Ghislaine Epstein's sister is married to Dr Fauci. Now, the source I got that from was credible enough that it gave me pause. So I got to do a little digging and confirm it like definitively. But gosh, wouldn't that just be something right? Again, no conspiracies, but there's no coincidences.

Speaker 2: 48:05

The Awan brothers the way that their trial was just thrown through we didn't really know what it was all about. We knew it was bad. We knew it was bad. Well, now we know just how bad it was. They were obviously part of, you know, planning COVID through a NATO strike. They were using that BlackBerry encrypted network which, again yesterday the episode. They've been rolling up all these networks. Does this man who's talking know that? Does he know that they were using that information?

Speaker 2: 48:30

Maybe Trump is letting COVID happen so he can show us? Doesn't Q always say he has to show us how bad it is? It's crazy To me. The real good people, the real good people, don't let innocent people die. Now, how does that fit in things I read this thing the other day about in World War II, they cracked the German U-boat subcodes the decoder thing they had, but they wouldn't let the Germans know.

Speaker 2: 49:02

So they literally sacrificed convoys of boats so that they weren't so successful in stopping the U-boats all the time. I mean, eventually they were able to stop them all the time, but they had to make it look like they were just randomly finding these U-boats rather than reading their messages. I thought how interesting that they would make the decision to let those ships die in order not to tip their hand. I don't know, it's a tough decision, isn't it? It's a tough decision, you know.

Speaker 2: 49:27

Does Trump let this thing go? Let people's businesses suffer, let people, you know, get drug addictions because they're out of work, and the rioting and looting and all the things that are a result of these lockdowns? Does he let that happen in order just to show us how evil the Democrats are? Is that what it takes? I mean, maybe it is, maybe that's a form of warfare, maybe that's. You know, take the mask off and there's a lot of suffering, but there's going to be a lot of suffering anyways. I mean, if these people won, we would have an earth with half a million people on. I mean, really, that's truly what they want? The Georgia guys don't say it, and that's exactly what they are working for is a world population of about half a million. That's how many people they think they need to create a slave service economy. They figure a half a million people. And they can with AI, they can keep their rich and famous lifestyle and the earth will recover itself. They really do believe that. I mean, that's the agenda of the people pushing for depopulation, the Bill Gates, the nihilists of the world. That's what they want.

Speaker 2: 50:20

So just to leave you on a little higher note, let's go one more last spot, and this has to do with TikTok, which is an app that I have loved. By the way, I have used TikTok and thought it was really fun. You've probably followed me on my socials. You've seen a few of my funny media as well. I have deleted my TikTok app completely. So what happened with TikTok?

Speaker 2: 50:39

Tiktok is a Chinese developed app and it basically mimics Instagram little 15 second videos. Now they're up to a minute. Little music video. It's cute, tiktok's fun. However, it's a spy app, so I didn't know this, but obviously China's got all my info. Now, anything you got on your phone, china's pretty much getting, that's right, everything on TikTok, if you got TikTok on your phone. China has all your data your pictures, your clipboards, your messages, your location data, your health data, everything your phone's got. China's got Some tech guys. So that was suspected ever since TikTok came out. It used to be Musically, and they bought out TikTok bought them out to expand into the US, and so now it's just TikTok Anyways. So here's the point India, some engineers reverse engineered TikTok and they were able to determine all the information that was going back to China and they said no more. So India has banned TikTok, as well as a whole bunch of other Chinese apps, and the US is fast on its tail. So here's Mike Pompeo.

Speaker 6: 51:40

TikTok has about 30 million users in the United States, but it's been banned now by India, and Australia is considering the same action, saying that TikTok was full of mass surveillance and propaganda, and also that the app had the ability to feed information straight to Beijing. So kind of obvious question. If all that's the case, shouldn't we be considering right now, tonight, a ban on Chinese social media apps, especially TikTok?

Speaker 4: 52:07

Laurie, your viewers should know we're taking this very seriously. We're certainly looking at it. We've worked on this very issue for a long time, whether it was the problems of having Huawei technology in your infrastructure. We've gone all over the world and we're making real progress getting that out. We declared ZTE a danger to American national security. We've done all of these things with respect to Chinese apps on people's cell phones. I can assure you the United States will get this one right too. Laura, I don't want to get out in front of the president, but it's something we're looking at.

Speaker 6: 52:35

Would you recommend that people download that up on their phones tonight, tomorrow, anytime currently?

Speaker 4: 52:41

Only if you want your private information in the hands of the Chinese Communist Party.

Speaker 6: 52:46

Mr Secretary, it's great to see you, as always tonight. Thanks so much, thank you, laura?

Speaker 2: 52:50

Okay, so only if you want China to have your information. Do you want to download TikTok or have it on your phone? So, if you got it, download your videos onto your phone, save them if you want them and for posterity sake, but delete the app. Get rid of TikTok. Get rid of any other app that you know has a Chinese background, and don't think that they're not coming for you. Don't think they're not coming for you. They've that new national security law. We'll have to tie that in later, but they've got.

Speaker 2: 53:13

They claim to have jurisdiction over the whole world. So if they want to come in, take you in the middle of the night, put you on a helicopter, fly over to China and torture you. They think they have the right to do that, and then it would be upon our government to go retrieve you. And you know, do you think you're most valuable enough to start a war? So be careful. What say about China? Right? That's literally the direction we're headed. So again, lots of crazy stuff happening in the world. Have a good day, peasants. You can find me at PeasantsPod, on Twitter, on Parler at PeasantsPod, facebook, the Peasants Perspective and email at peasantspodcom. Thanks a lot, guys. I appreciate your time and I look forward to talking to you again tomorrow and I look forward to talking to you again tomorrow.

Speaker 1: 53:55

Who are the Britons? We all are. We are all Britons, and I am your king. I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working class is oh there you go bringing class into it again. That's what it's all about. If only people would Please, please, good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What I told you? We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune.

Speaker 1: 54:26

We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority. In the case of pure internal affairs, be quiet. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major, be quiet. I order you to be quiet. All the waves he think he is. I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings. Well, how do you become king then?

Speaker 1: 54:53

The lady of the lake, her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying, by divine providence, that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you.

Speaker 1: 55:27

Shut up. If I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had loved a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up, will I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up, will you? Shut up? Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help, I'm being repressed. Bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Did you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?