Spygate Revelations: How the FBI Spied on a Sitting President

The carefully constructed narrative around the FBI's investigation of President Trump is crumbling, revealing a scandal of staggering proportions. Through meticulous analysis of recently revealed documents, we uncover how FBI officials manipulated the Justice Department's chain of command following Attorney General Jeff Sessions' recusal – a recusal recommended by officials who themselves had conflicts of interest related to the Clinton investigation.

Most shocking is how President Trump unknowingly authorized his own surveillance by signing Executive Order 13775, which elevated Dana Buente in the DOJ succession line. This allowed Buente to approve the renewal of a FISA warrant against Carter Page in April 2017 – despite the FBI knowing months earlier that the Steele dossier lacked validity. Through the "two-hop rule," this surveillance effectively gave investigators access to virtually all White House communications.

The corruption doesn't end there. Dana Buente later became the legal advisor to FBI Director Christopher Wray while the Mueller investigation was ongoing – a blatant conflict of interest that explains why Wray has seemed so disconnected from reform efforts. Even more concerning, Michael Atkinson – the Intelligence Community Inspector General who facilitated the Ukraine whistleblower complaint leading to Trump's impeachment – was previously Buente's legal counsel during this surveillance operation.

Beyond domestic corruption, we examine FBI Director Wray's alarming warnings about China's massive theft of American intellectual property and personal data. With the FBI opening a new China-related counterintelligence case every 10 hours, and nearly half of all active counterintelligence cases relating to China, the threat cannot be overstated.

We also spotlight radical elected officials like Seattle Councilwoman Kashama Sawant and Representative Ilhan Omar, who openly call for dismantling American systems of government and economics. Their rhetoric, combined with the admission by climate activist Michael Schlenberger that environmental alarmism has "misled the public," reveals a coordinated effort to undermine our institutions from within.

Join me as we connect these critical dots and explore what they mean for America's future. The threats we face – both internal and external – demand our attention and understanding.

Chapters

• 0:00 Peasants Rising: Show Introduction
• 1:13 Obamagate: FBI Corruption Exposed
• 5:07 Sessions' Recusal and DOJ Manipulation
• 10:33 FISA Surveillance Uncovered
• 19:33 The China Threat: FBI Warnings
• 34:00 Socialist Infiltration in American Government
• 44:08 Climate Change Confession
• 54:37 John Roberts and Supreme Court News
• 56:34 Episode Closing

Transcript

Speaker 1: 0:02

And when they went to the queen To tell her Her subjects had no bread, do you know what she said? Let them eat cake here. You take the bomb.

Speaker 2: 0:15

We're getting screwed, man. Every time we turn around we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's gonna be through podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys, the little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's gotta stop. Peasants, man, we're just peasants, every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background with the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. We're those people.

Speaker 2: 0:52

Hey, welcome to another episode of Peasants Perspective. And just real quick to get it out of the way, you can find me on Twitter, at PeasantsPod Parler, at PeasantsPod Facebook, at the Peasants Perspective email, at peasantspod at gmailcom. I love hearing from you. I love your criticism. Well, I don't really love your criticism unless it's constructive. I love your feedback, all that kind of fun stuff.

Speaker 2: 1:11

Anyways, let's jump on in here. I've got a couple different stories today that I want to cover Big, massive, breaking news. So yesterday, let's go to the Spygate case, russiagate, obamagate. You know, I think from here on out I'm probably just going to go ahead and call it Obamagate. For the most part, I think Obamagate encompasses the entirety of the coup scandal against Donald Trump and really, in all honesty, the entire Obama presidency was just a big scandal. Not only is he one of the most a big scandal, not only is he one of the most. Let's put it this way Barack Obama brags about having a scandal-free presidency Towards the end of his term. He bragged about that on TV in some interview and a lot of Republicans were like, well, what about Benghazi, what about this? And he kind of pretends like that's not a scandal because to half of America, half of America that watches left-wing news sources, they don't think those were scandals. They think those were totally justified actions taken for whatever random reasons, right. But the reality is you can go through a pretty long list IRS targeting Fast and Furious Benghazi. The Iran nuclear deal is a scandal in and of itself. Look at everything Joe Biden did. Look at all the money Joe Biden's running off with from around the world. So his whole entire presidency was just filled with scandal. But what we're going to find here and what we've been discovering, and the whole point of Spygate and Russiagate, is the fact that the reason that Obama was scandal free was because who was going to prosecute? He had the entire DOJ and FBI upper echelons wrapped around his little finger. They weren't going to do anything. So let's just jump into the first case. This comes from the conservative treehouse and I really like these guys. The last refuge here really good, really good article that's titled this the FBI corruption is far worse than we currently imagine.

Speaker 2: 2:57

President Trump authorized his own surveillance. So what happened was right. When Donald Trump got into office, donald Trump signed an executive order that changed the chain of command at the DOJ and the FBI, and the reason for this was multiple reasons, but basically you had Loretta Lynch, who, when Barack Obama left office, left office as well, and Sally Yates jumped up into her spot. Well, sally Yates, who was the assistant attorney general, she refused to enforce Trump's travel ban. A lot of people call it the Muslim travel ban. It wasn't the Muslim travel ban because you've got countries like Venezuela included on there. It basically Trump did a travel ban against countries that refused to participate in background checks and vetting of visa requests, and so when you look at that list, you look at, one of the common things you'll see is these are very third world countries, with the exception of, like Iran. They do not do background checks, they don't have good public records to know who the criminals are or not, and so, just real simple, we're just not going to take these people wholesale into our country. Lots of good reasons for that. Anyways, sally Yates refused to enforce it, so Sally Yates was dismissed and that caused Dana Buente to step up into her spot. Dana Buente was running the district of Virginia FBI and he was essentially a stand-in at the DOJ because Jeff Sessions had recused himself. Rod Rosenstein couldn't supervise it. Anyways, rod Rosenstein, this whole long thing, so long story. Dana Buente gets put in Well.

Speaker 2: 4:34

On January 30th 2017, sally Yates was fired for refusing to defend Trump travel ban from extremist countries and Yates was replaced on January 31st by US attorney from the Eastern District of Virginia, dana Buente. Remember the names? This wasn't an existing AG because Loretta Lynch had left. As of Yates' exit and Dana Buente's entry Buente was acting Deputy Attorney General in charge of Jess Sessions was confirmed February 8th 2017. On February 9th 2017, trump issued Executive Order 13775, changing the line of DOJ succession, moving the EDVA the Eastern District of Virginia attorney, so that would be Dana Buente up, granting Buente the full legal authority to carry out the duties of the Deputy Attorney General until a permanent replacement was confirmed. When Jeff Sessions became Attorney General, dana Buente acting Deputy AG a role Buente would retain until Rod Rosenstein was confirmed on April 25th. Okay, keep these names in your brain, float them around. Rod Rosenstein was confirmed on April 25th.

Speaker 2: 5:40

On March 2nd 2017, dana Buente was one of a small group who participated in a conversation that led to the recusal of Jeff Sessions from anything related to the 2016 election. This recusal included the ongoing FBI counterintelligence investigation known as Crossfire Hurricane, which was later picked up by Robert Mueller. So let's think about this for a second. So Jeff Sessions, who's appointed the Attorney General by Donald Trump? And supposedly, jeff Sessions has flown on Trump plane and he's been talking about how they're going to take down the swamp, which they think is very thin. Just a few people at the top, mainly Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, and they're fully intended on coming in closing down the southern border, building a wall, fixing immigration I mean, really going after a lot of our issues that the DOJ needs to be involved with. So Sessions is going to be Trump's right-hand man, and Sessions is one of the few people in all of Congress that has no skeletons in his closet. Okay, there are two people in all of Congress that were considered unimpeachable, two people that were scandal-free Mike Pence and Jeff Sessions. Those are the two people that were supposedly the cleanest, best members of Congress. Both of those guys are now surrounding Donald Trump in key positions a vice president and the attorney general.

Speaker 2: 6:59

Now, other attendees at this meeting for the recusal of Jeff Sessions are Jody Hunt, a criminal chief in the US Attorney's Office for District of Maryland. Jim Crowell, deputy Assistant General DAAG in the Department of Justice, national Security Division. Tosh Gower, fisa lawyer and Associate Deputy General, scott Schools Note Tasha Gardner was a lawyer for the Clinton case and Scott Schools was part of drafting the Clinton exoneration letter. So the people who are convening to talk about Jeff Sessions' recusal have themselves a conflict of interest on the things that they're going to get Jeff Sessions to recuse himself from. So, essentially, someone who should have recused themselves is telling someone else who doesn't need to recuse himself that they should recuse himself from. So, essentially, someone who should have recused themselves is telling someone else who doesn't need to recuse himself that they should recuse themselves.

Speaker 2: 7:49

This is like really critical to understand here, because to understand the story of Jeff Sessions and Donald Trump, you've got to understand this. The entire Q plan almost hangs on this one interaction here. Okay, the whole idea of trust sessions, trust sessions. Okay, so a couple things. I need to do a whole episode on Q. I don't believe Q is some master plan. I believe Q is General Flynn and his digital army. I think they serve a valuable role. I think they are the news. I think right now they drive the narrative, especially on the right side, which they claim. But a lot of the things they said and this is much to the chagrin of Q followers, and I'd ask any one of them to come and talk to me and explain some of the things that I have found is they're extremely immersed in the news. I myself, who am immersed in the news, oftentimes go, oh, I find something. I connect some dots and then I read it on Q and I go, oh, q got this too. And I look at the timestamp like, oh, the article came out before the cue post, which means if they read it, they could have connected the dots too.

Speaker 2: 8:48

The more organized you are, the easier this thing is to crack right. Remember the names, remember the places, remember who they're married to. You always see those investigators with a wall with pictures of people and strings touching them. I need that in my office here, because that's essentially what you have to do to be able to crack this, because you've got to remember who all these people are. That's an investigative technique. You've got to remember who they're related to. You've got to remember who they've worked with in years past.

Speaker 2: 9:09

Think about some of the best relationships you have are just shared over lunch. I've got a close friend of mine who was friends for years. I haven't seen him for 15 years. His name is Schuyler, or, as some people call him, schweiler, and I haven't talked to him forever. I mean, I think it's probably been I guess not 15 years, probably more like eight years. But if I called him up today and I asked a favor, I'd probably get it right, because we have a longstanding relationship that goes back to when we're really young. One of our listeners same thing. He and I have a longstanding relationship back to when I was 14 and he was 21. Now he's like 65 or something like that. I'm just kidding, he's not that old, but nonetheless. You know, you develop these relationships with people and then years later you reconnect and it's like you didn't miss a beat.

Speaker 2: 9:51

So it's important to know who people worked with, what departments they've worked on, cases they've worked on together, especially cases that are long. You got to remember. You know, if you worked on the Watergate case, those guys were locked in an office together and they couldn't talk to anybody other than the people in that office for years and years and years. So they investigated the Clintons for multiple years basically Clinton's entire first term he was under investigation and they ended up not coming with the complicated financial case that the Clintons were absolutely guilty of, often called it's not Watergate, it's Whitewater, the Whitewater investigation. But they ended up uncovering the Monica Lewinsky scandal in the process and they got their scope memo changed, which the Democrats did right along back to Trump, which is honestly where Stormy Daniels comes in. Stormy Daniels was supposed to be the Monica Lewinsky for Donald Trump, because the time frame from which Stormy Daniels and Donald Trump supposedly had allegedly had an affair was when Melania was pregnant with Barron. So that would have been pretty scandalous. That would have been pretty lame for the president of Dunn. I personally don't think it was the president. I think it was Donald Trump Jr who had an affair with Stormy Daniels. And the time frame works up because his marriage essentially fell apart right when Trump got elected, right when the Stormy Daniels. And the time frame works up, because his marriage essentially fell apart right when Trump got elected, right when the Stormy Daniels stuff came up. However, there was also a fake anthrax attack on the entire Trump family, which also might have prompted Don Jr's wife to run. Remember, don Jr has five kids with his wife, his former wife. Now he's dating Kimberly Garfoyle, who is on the Trump campaign. It's kind of weird actually, the whole Kimberly Garfoyle, donald Trump Jr. They're a good couple though, whatever.

Speaker 2: 11:29

Okay, so back to this. So now the attendees so Jody Hunt, jim Crowell, tasha Gower and Scott Schools are the senior. These people are appointed to basically look at ethical violations and recommend if people should or should not recuse themselves. So Sessions recused himself because at one point he had met with the ambassador during the campaign. So now he's a suspect. The ambassador from Russia during the campaign. So now he's a suspect. So they tell him to recuse himself. And he does A drop of hat, boom, recuses himself. He doesn't say, hey, let me look at this case first and let me see if there's actually a conflict. Let me see if the people you're investigating actually I shouldn't be working with. The only person that probably would have caused that recusal to be necessary would have been General Flynn, because General Flynn and Jeff Sessions probably talked and worked together prior, but nonetheless he was recused from everything having to do with the Trump campaign, russia, everything. So they convinced Jeff Sessions he must recuse himself.

Speaker 2: 12:34

In hindsight, each of the people giving Jeff Sessions advice was connected to previously corrupt activity within Maine justice. That included the Clinton Spygate operations. Not knowing each conflict each advisor was carrying, sessions took their advice and recused himself. A big mistake, with Jeff Sessions recused from anything involving the 2016 election, which included the Russia investigation. Effective the evening of March 2, 2017, fbi director now reported to acting AG Dana Boente director now reported to acting AG Dana Buente. Technically, at this point in March 2017, buente is still US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia and is only acting as Deputy AG With Sessions recused. Buente would be needed when the Carter-Page FISA would be up for renewal 2017. With Sessions recused from the Russia investigation without any confirmed Deputy Attorney General able to authorize all of the material the FBI investigators needed for Maine justice would have to flow through Dana Buente. Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein was not confirmed until April 25th, the January 12th FISA renewal was going to expire April 12th 2017.

Speaker 2: 13:42

90 days from its issuance, they renewed this thing four times. And remember there's what's called a two-hop rule and when they get a FISA warrant they're able to look at everybody you called or emailed and then you're able to jump two times. So let's say, carter Page emails George Papadopoulos was also being investigated. But say Carter Page emails assistant number one. Say Carter Page emails assistant number one. Assistant number one emails assistant number two. Assistant number two emails Donald Trump, or assistant number one let's do this a little bit more realistic Assistant number one. So Carter Page emails assistant number one, who then emails the chief of staff, who then emails who at the time would have been John Kelly, who then emails Donald Trump. So now the FBI, robert Mueller and his 17 team of Democrats and 40 FBI agents who are handpicked according to Trump or according to Obama get the quote right people on this, as in, people who are going to go after Donald Trump hard are now have access to the president's emails, all of them, all of his phone calls, everything Because of the two-hop rule.

Speaker 2: 14:51

That's how FISA works. That's pretty amazing. So anybody two people away from Donald Trump who emailed someone who emailed Donald Trump, they've got his emails, they've got his chief of staff, all the cabinet members. They have everything. They're completely, totally spying on everything Donald Trump is doing. That means every policy, every consideration.

Speaker 2: 15:12

Think about all the leaks that were coming out of the White House. Where could these leaks be coming from? They were probably coming right out of the special counsel's office. So we discover handwritten notes. So we got a bunch of handwritten notes that were released by Rachel Maddow a long time ago, that were released by the SSI, and what they were trying to do. So keep going here.

Speaker 2: 15:35

In hindsight, the subject matter almost certainly relates to the issue of Russia investigation, the sensitivity of the administration. So the notes that Comey let out, which read things like I told AG before recusal I cannot be speaking with the president alone keep coming back, making it hard, too difficult for the country. We will work well, referring to the investigators. What can I do to relieve the cloud? That's a question that's posed to Comey. Anyways, he's not willing to do it.

Speaker 2: 16:04

So, with Jeff Sessions recused and Dana Buente is now the acting AG, approving whatever James Comey needs from Maine Justice, james Comey wants Carter Page extended, Jeff Sessions is recused and capable and after February 9th, executive order initiating the change of DOJ succession was signed, dana Buente can now officially sign the Carter Page FISA application renewal, which is exactly what happens. A week after their March 3rd call with James Comey and Dana Buente signed the admittedly fraudulent FISA warrant. Wow, so get that. Donald Trump signed an executive order after Jeff Sessions recused himself. Being advised by people who should have themselves recused themselves from even suggesting the rec with James Comey became evidence for Mueller's expanded obstruction. And if you pay attention to the dates, this one's April 10th they turned over these notes. And so, to recap, this is where we're at here the acting Attorney General, dana Buente, advised Jeff Sessions to recuse himself March 2nd 2017.

Speaker 2: 17:22

Then acting Director David Buente and FBI Director Comey signed a renewal for the fraudulent Carter-Flaes page application. This is well into Trump's presidency, permitting the FBI to continue surveillance on the Trump administration. Keep in mind Inspector General outlined that in January 2017, shortly after the application was first renewed the FBI knew the Steele dossier, which is the basis of all of these fraudulent FISA applications. Right, they knew in January, but they renewed the FISA warrant with this corrupted chain of command into April, which then extends 90 days beyond that. Wow, and they knew. The whole thing was false. The whole thing. There's absolutely no doubt. The FBI knew in January 2017 the dossier was not valid.

Speaker 2: 18:10

The dossier was paid for by Hillary Clinton through Perkins Coie. It went to Glenn Simpson at Fusion GPS. Fusion GPS had an employee, nellie Orr, who was the wife of Bruce Orr, who worked at the DOJ and was the number four person in charge of the DOJ who worked at the DOJ and was the number four person in charge of the DOJ. So all this Steele dossier information was being funneled into the DOJ through this back-channel source, which is exempt from certain prosecutions because of their marital relationship. How convenient is that? Right? It's almost like maybe they planned it and then they leaked it to other people, like John McCain, who then showed it to Lindsey Graham and his staff, and then they turned it to other people like John McCain, who then showed it to Lindsey Graham and his staff, and then they turned it into the FBI and then it went to the FBI through Harry Reid. So you got a Republican, a prominent Republican and a prominent Democrat all turning it into the FBI, on top of the fact that the FBI already has this. So they're laundering the information back into the FBI. They've got a corrupt group of guys that are telling Jeff Sessions to recuse himself. And yeah, this is pretty much a total setup, right?

Speaker 2: 19:09

So when the FBI director came, james Comey is making contact with acting DAG, so Deputy Attorney General, dana Buente, on March 30, 2017, for issues relating to the need for a FISA renewal. In April 2017, the FBI was absolutely certain there was no validity to the underlying evidence within the FISA application. Yet the FBI team was so determined to get the fraudulent FISA reauthorized. They ignored all of the evidence that undermined their objective. Think about the scale of deceit and corruption involved. But it doesn't end. It gets worse. On April 25th 2017, rod Rosenstein is confirmed. Rosenstein now takes over responsibilities held by acting DAG, dana Buenti. This includes the FBI counterintelligence probe. So now Rosenstein's involved. Fbi Director James Comey is fired FBI Director Andrew McCabe. So they're running this investigation without the special counsel up till this moment.

Speaker 2: 19:59

On May 10th, the day after James Comey is fired, andrew McCabe, who has now been fired, opens a criminal obstruction of justice investigation into President Trump. Because Trump is being investigated, but he was told by James Comey he was not the subject of the investigation. So how can someone who's not the subject of the investigation doesn't know necessarily who the targets are, except for General Flynn then be accused of obstruction of justice because he fired James Comey and the firing was authorized or recommended by Rod Rosenstein. Oh my gosh, see, this is just a mess. No wonder, in the moment of all this happening, they're getting papers complicated things. They don't know who these people are. They don't know their previous connections and ties, because no one in justice that is related to the Trump administration can look at any of these files or any of these cases and see what the heck is going on. On April 10th, fbi director opens the criminal obstruction investigation into Trump and then Dana Buente now becomes the assistant attorney general to head the DOJ National Security Division, simultaneously retaining the role as US attorney for the Eastern District of VA. So he's holding these two positions, which is kind of messed up At the moment.

Speaker 2: 21:05

Guess who Dana Buenti's legal counsel is? Remember Michael Atkinson? Remember the name? Who's Michael Atkinson, aside from being my old boss in a low-voltage electric company? Different person, of course. Michael Atkinson is the same Michael Atkinson who's the current intelligence community attorney, ig investigative general, who facilitated the whistleblower complaint and was senior counsel to legal Buente when he headed the DOJ. The whistleblower complaint what was the whistleblower complaint, the whistleblower complaint that led to impeachment. That's right. So now you see the tie in here. So they tried to impeach Trump because Trump. Eventually they figure out this is all scam, right, a hoax, as Trump lovingly called it. And Michael Atkinson was the legal advisor to Dana Buente. So Michael Atkinson must know everything Dana Buente is doing, because anytime Dana Buente makes a decision, who's, he got to call up His assigned attorney to run it by the attorney, who is Michael Atkinson. So Michael Atkinson is now implicated in the entire Spygate scandal, russiagate scandal, and that is the same Michael Atkinson who brought forward an illegal whistleblower that does not meet any of the terms of being a whistleblower that Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi used to impeach the president On May 16, 2017, rosenstein takes Robert Mueller to the White House to meet President Trump on May 17,.

Speaker 2: 22:31

So the next day, rosenstein appoints Mueller to the special counsel Rod Rosenstein and or became reauthorized the same fraudulent FISA application. That was the fourth time for this Robert Mueller and corrupt team of 19 special prosecutors and now 40 FBI agents to continue to exploit. Dana Buenti is head of DOJ NSD from May 11th through the end of October 2017, then officially announced his intent to retire, but wait. On January 3rd 2018, fbi director Christopher Wray announces Dana Buente has shifted over to the FBI to be chief legal counsel, replacing James Baker, who's under investigation for a leak. Oh my goodness. So the DOJ, or the DC, is a swamp. See how he moves from DOJ to FBI. He's still involved in this entire thing, and so we think he's being moved, but he's not. You know, we think he's being moved out of the picture. He's not. He's being moved to be in the picture even tighter. Yes, that's correct. Mueller is using 19 lawyers, 40 investigators. Buente now becomes legal advisor to Christopher Wray inside the FBI. So think about that. The FBI director now has one of the main culprits in this entire scandal as his legal advisor inside the FBI while Mueller probe is going on. Oh, and you can see from his participation with Mueller, dana Buente is now a fact witness to the Mueller investigation. It gets better. Who do you think is in charge of the 40 FBI agents now conducting the third year fraudulent Mueller investigation? Dana Buente. This is staggeringly unreal. It's no wonder the FBI director, christopher Wray, who we've all called for his resignation, appears detached, disconnected and completely unfazed by the scale and scope of the corrupt enterprise he is in charge of.

Speaker 2: 24:12

His own legal counsel was a key player in the operation to remove the president. It always seemed odd that White House counsel Don McGahn left in 2018 until you look at the bigger picture. So the Carter Page application was officially declassified and made public in 2018. No doubt, as McCann looked at the FISA issues from the unique perspective, he likely realized in hindsight how FISA issues crossed over. So Don McGahn was the president's White House attorney. Basically, every department has like a series of attorneys that just review everything right, make sure they're all legal and follow the law and whatever every single order, so that the things don't get termed unconstitutional later. And so that's his role and he realizes what's going on. This is when they got caught. This is probably the moment when they got caught. Trump knew that they had been spying on him during his campaign Everybody remembers that from late 2016. But this point, this is probably where they realized this whole thing is a complete setup and this is when they realized everybody's messed up and they released the FISA application.

Speaker 2: 25:15

There are almost no documents, except for documents that prove the existence of aliens, that are probably more classified than these FISA applications. This is the first and only one that has ever in the history of the United States FISA courts been released. It was obviously released for this very reason. Now, well, not this reason. It was released Don McGahn left. And then we get to another article by the same people, conservative Treehouse and this one identifies that when that was released it kind of goes through everybody that was there. So this article was written on the 8th and this is the basic gist of it here. Considering all the documents that would have been easiest not to release because of its top secret classified intelligence product, and considering the denial of FOIA, the Freedom of Information Request would have easily withstood all the judicial challenge because of the nature of its content. All of a sudden, here you go. Here's the most classified document the government's ever really have foreign intelligence surveillance court application. It's never made sense why that was released and other things weren't released Things like notes, things like the charging documents, the scope memos, all those other things that were officially declassified but they were being stonewalled.

Speaker 2: 26:32

In the article he says I always thought Robert Mueller was a false front, a semi-cogent face for a team of 17 lawyers that moved in to take over main justice. I was not wrong about Mueller. He was exactly that a hand-selected name to give credibility to a team assembly and a man who would acquiesce to the smart, familiar and legal minds that were really running the resistance operation, which was the lawyers. Where I was wrong was thinking Rosenstein was a countermeasure to those who took over main justice. Q says if Rosenstein good, mueller good, Rosenstein bad, mueller bad. I think that that's true. It's very obviously a connection. I think Rosenstein is dirty as they get. I think he was involved directly in this coup plot against Donald Trump, which I read earlier. There are supposedly tapes out there. I've got that Twitter thread pinned on my Twitter profile. You have to scroll down a ways to find it. I'm sure from John here to help. He wasn't. Rod Rosenstein wasn't there to be a countermeasure.

Speaker 2: 27:27

Rod Rosenstein was doing exactly the same as Mueller, acquiescing to every request, instruction and demand by the 17 legal squatters who took over Maine Justice. Rod Rosenstein recently testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee. He never once questioned the special counsel about any request, demand or instruction and he never once challenged their motives for requests they made as Deputy AG and AG Sessions recused. Rod Rosenstein would have been on top of the special counsel, but he wasn't. He intentionally wasn't.

Speaker 2: 27:52

The entire time the special counsel was operating, 17 assembled members of the Trump resistance were running the show inside the US Department of Justice. They controlled everything. Jeff Sessions was firewalled. He saw nothing and he had no input into anything. That was the first step in the resistance operation. The second step was to instruct Rosenstein that every request made by the team was part of their investigation. Regardless of how it might seem disconnected, it was all part of their investigative process. That's how they steamrolled Rosenstein into sitting in a corner and waiting for documents to sign, authorities to grant scope memos, etc. Remember he signed a scope memo that named people and then said go look for a crime. Rather than hey, here's a crime, go prosecute a person, indictments to approve and requests to be fulfilled Okay.

Speaker 2: 28:35

When the FISA application was released in June 2018, it was released by the special counsel team. Technically, rosenstein released it. However, unofficially, it was released by the demand of the resistance operators under the auspices that it was part of their investigative technique. Except that wasn't the real motive. The real motive for releasing the FISA application under the auspices of granting a FOIA request was because the resistance knew the New York Times already had obtained it illegally. It had been leaked to the New York Times. In fact, the New York Times had the FISA application since March 17, 2017. The New York Times had the FISA application since March 17, 2017. That's right.

Speaker 2: 29:11

When the Special Counsel Security Director, james Wolfe, operating under instructions from the SSCI Resistance Coordinator, mark Warner, took pictures of each page of the FISA application and sent them to a journalist, allie Watkins, at BuzzFeed BuzzFeed is ultimately the one who released it. Ms Watkins then shared the FISA with the fellow resistance allies at the Washington Post and the New York Times to cover her tracks. Ms Watkins did not immediately write about the FISA application and I suspect the editors of Bud Fies may have not known. In exchange for her pre-planned role, the New York Times then hired Watkins and, under the legal tutelage of the New York Times, watkins based her reporting on the Trump-Russian narrative from there, however. There, however, in March 17, what Watkins, wolfe, media and Mark Warner did not Mark Warner, who's a senator, okay did not immediately know was that the FBI was conducting a leak investigation a genuine leak investigation and the SSCI was suspected. So, on outside of the special counsel, this leak investigation got started because they knew that this FISA warrant was out there.

Speaker 2: 30:06

The FISA application picked up by James Wolfe and delivered to the SSCI contained a leak tracer, a trap. When the tracer showed up in media reports, the FBI knew it leaked from the SSCI. So what they'll do on these documents? Sometimes they'll change a date, they'll change a specific spot where things are redacted, they'll change one of the code numbers, they'll do any handful of small things so that they can say, hey, if this document ever shows up, we know it came from this place, and then they're able to kind of trace back the link. So that's just something they do and they do it on a regular basis and if you're good, you figure out what you know. You can't just leak the raw data because of these tracers.

Speaker 2: 30:48

Unfortunately, what the FBI did not know was that the SSCI Vice Chairman, mark Warner, was inside the resistance operative giving Wolf instructions on how to proceed. I might be wrong on Mark Warner. Maybe he's not the senator. It's Burr that's the senator. In May 2017, fbi informed Vice Chair Warner and Chairman Richard Burr. Chairman Richard Burr was in charge of the Senate Intelligence Committee. He's the senator that someone in the SSCI leaked the FISA application. In essence, the FBI investigators just told the culprit who leaked. They were investigating a leak he created. Think about the ramifications. As part of the overall investigation to locate the specific leaker, all of the SSCI was subject to review in quiet investigation as the FBI worked through a process of elimination. That's when the FBI discovered the Mark Warner text messages to Adam Waldman, the lawyer for Chris Steele. Not coincidentally, the Warner text messages ended May 2017, exactly when he was first notified by the FBI about the specifics of the leak hunt.

Speaker 2: 31:46

What also started in May 2017? The special counsel. One important aspect of coordinated demand and incessant drumbeat by the media for special counsel was need to control the outcome of the leak investigation Total control. This was all connected. The resistance took over Maine Justice with the appointment of the special counsel. All connected the resistance took over Maine Justice with the appointment of the special counsel. One of their priorities was to stop anyone from A finding out the FISA application had leaked. B blocking anyone from finding out how it was leaked. And C to block any independent FBI activity surrounding the leak Takeaways. 17 members of the special counsel were intentionally brought to Maine Justice to organize the resistance.

Speaker 2: 32:27

The DOJ was running the resistance operation. Ag Jeff sessions was firewalled and clueless. Rod Rosenstein was just approving anything he put in front of him because he was sold. It was part of the investigative process. Regardless of the FBI investigation, the DOJ resistance operation held ultimate control. Some of the FBI were not happy not all, we're not happy, not happy. Not all were not happy, not happy at all but in a position to do nothing about Maine Justice, patting them on the head and telling them to run along. Now there's so much more, so much more. That's just an appetizer. You also have the Gang of Eight in Congress involved, the DOJ, the ICIG All of these people are involved. The wheels are coming off the bus, man. The wheels are coming off the bus. So that's our update on spy gate.

Speaker 2: 33:13

Let's jump into one other thing here. So the real issue that we have facing our country is china. I got asked the question yesterday are you worried about an invasion or a civil war? I said, well, I'm kind of worried about both and and he said, uh, and I said but the civil war? I said either way, it's caused by foreigners and my opinion is it's all caused by China.

Speaker 2: 33:31

This is Chris Wray, the director of the FBI. This was yesterday. This was a press conference he put out specifically talking about China. So now Chris Wray is in a little bit different light for me, knowing that Chris Wray, just like Rod Rosenstein, probably never knew any of the details of this investigation, because anything that he was hearing, any briefs he was getting, were being blocked by his legal counsel. So Dana Buente right. So I got a feeling that this thing is, now that this is all out there, conservative Review is a well-read publication. This thing is going to continue to roll downhill on these investigators, so let's leave the topic of Russia for now, though, and focus on China. Let's hear what Chris Wray has to say about it.

Speaker 4: 34:14

But if you think these issues are just an intelligence issue or a government problem or a nuisance largely just for big corporations who can largely take care of themselves, you could not be more wrong. It's the people of the United States who are the victims of what amounts to Chinese theft on a scale so massive that it represents one of the largest transfers of wealth in human history.

Speaker 2: 34:42

I need you to think about that phrase the transfers of wealth. A lot of people don't understand what that means. The Marshall Plan, when we rebuilt Europe after World War II, that was a transfer of wealth. That was the American middle class going to work, buying cars, buying gasoline, spending their hard-earned money and paying a huge chunk of it in taxes. They then took those taxes and they shuffled them overseas to Europe and literally rebuilt Europe. Taxes and they shuffled them overseas to Europe and literally rebuilt Europe. I mean, it wasn't cheap to fly plane after plane in forever during the Berlin airlift right, that's all part of this transfer of wealth to Europe. We've had a transfer of wealth to South America, a transfer of wealth to Canada, although Canada does produce its own wealth. But we're talking about China, the largest transfer of wealth in human history to China.

Speaker 4: 35:30

For an American adult, it is more likely than not that China has stolen your personal data. In 2017, the Chinese military conspired to hack Equifax and made off with the sensitive personal information of 150 million Americans we're talking nearly half of the American population and most American adults and, as I'll discuss in a few moments, this was hardly a standalone incident. Our data isn't the only thing at stake here. So are our health, our livelihoods and our security. We've now reached the point where the FBI is opening a new China-related counterintelligence case about every 10 hours. Of the nearly 5,000 active FBI counterintelligence cases currently underway across the country currently underway across the country, almost half are all related to China and at this very moment, china is working to compromise American healthcare organizations, pharmaceutical companies and academic institutions conducting essential COVID-19 research.

Speaker 2: 36:43

So China is a huge problem. Okay, they're spying on us everywhere. They're in our phones, they're in our home, listening. You know our Alexas and our Apple HomePods and things like that. They're hoovering up all that data and they're doing it in a lot of different ways. So one of the big ways right now for the youth of America is TikTok.

Speaker 2: 37:03

I've been a huge TikTok app fan. I've used TikTok. I've made some funny videos Good chance. If you follow me on social media, you've probably seen a few of them. I deleted it completely from my phone.

Speaker 2: 37:17

There was a little study that came out that talked about they literally will grab pretty much all your data. I mean everything you put on your clipboard your pictures, your location data. They can access all of it through TikTok. So delete it off your phone if you have it. All of it through TikTok, so delete it off your phone if you have it. The State Department is probably going and I played this clip yesterday but the State Department is probably going to make it so that no one can have TikTok in the United States.

Speaker 2: 37:35

India has done that and a few other countries are following suit. It's a big deal. I mean China's hacking networks, China's hacking the credit unions and a lot of times we think, well, what are they going to do with it? Right, it's China. What can they do? Well, with online, they could buy things. They could take your money right out of your bank account and you know, good luck getting it back if it gets transferred to a Hong Kong account. Right, I mean, there's so many implications on what they could do.

Speaker 2: 38:01

The national security law that they just passed that's become a big deal in Hong Kong. The national security law, the way it's written is any person in the world who says negative things about the CCP so me, right here right now on this podcast they could detain me for life. They have no. The way their national security law is written, there's no jurisdiction. They could go after Mike Pompeo, donald Trump. They could go after anyone, anyone, and if they get control, they will. If the Democrats win, they will.

Speaker 2: 38:31

I mean there's no doubt there's going to be retribution on conservatives. Think about that for just a second. Anytime in world history where you've had a time where a population is so divided like we, are so polarized, and especially when one side is so emotional about it specifically the left they're so emotional about the quote-unquote injustices of our history and things like that that they will hurt you If they gain power. They will hurt you, they will send you to a gulag, they will do horrible things to you and you don't believe it, but it's true. There's this old phrase it's when a politician tells you something that's you know, believe them. Especially when they're crazy, like when they're off the norm, it means they really believe it. Here is city councilwoman Kashama Sawant, so I've talked about her quite a bit in relation to Chaz. She's from India, she's an immigrant, she was part of the Maoist Communist Party there. She's a devout communist, basically a Marxist or Maoist.

Speaker 2: 39:30

And they just passed a special tax in the city of Seattle that really goes after the wealthy, specifically Amazon. I mean, this is a huge tax on Amazon and they got it passed and typically when something like this happens in the city of Seattle, jeff Bezos, who bases his company Amazon right out of Seattle, flexes his muscle, throws some money around, throws some campaigns around and gets these things overturned. We've had things like head taxes be protested by construction workers. Amazon discontinued all construction and remodeling on all of their buildings for a time period until they revoke the head tax. So there's been a constant string between Jeff Bezos and the Seattle City Council because they basically are trying to punish Jeff Bezos for being wealthy. And listen to what Councilwoman Kashama Sawant is saying about basically everything. This is pretty incredible. The audio is not great, but this is during a council meeting, so this is actually coming from the city of Seattle. This is their recording and this is relating to CB 119810, an ordinance relating to taxation. So these are Councilwoman Kashama's words on that, or words to Jeff Bezos.

Speaker 3: 40:42

I have a message for Jeff Bezos and his class. If you attempt again to overturn the Notice how she says his class right.

Speaker 2: 40:52

She's Marxist, so she's doing the class warfare thing. It's the dictatorship of the proletariat, the workers right. They want to overthrow the bourgeoisie, the elite. So she's using the language of Marxism a ton here.

Speaker 3: 41:18

Amazon tax Working people will go all language of Marxism a ton here. And if you, jeff Bezos, want to drive that process forward by lashing out against us in our modest demands, then so be it, because we are coming for you and your rotten system. We are coming to dismantle this deeply oppressive, racist, sexist, violent, utterly bankrupt system of capitalism, this police state. We cannot and will not stop until we overthrow it and replace it with a world based instead on solidarity, genuine democracy and equality, a socialist world. Thank you.

Speaker 2: 41:59

You got to take them kind of serious. I mean, she was a political leader of Chaz, an autonomous zone that caused tons of property damage, tons of murder. She's got, obviously, thousands of working people will rise up and take it. Is that the rioters? Right, I mean, she's talking about laying the groundwork for a new world. How'd she get elected to city council? This kind of goes to my bigger theme. Right, you got to know who these people are.

Speaker 2: 42:32

We elect people and we look at, like a national ticket, right, the down ballot voting. If you're going to vote for Donald Trump, you just vote for everybody with an R in front of their name. If you're going to vote for Barack Obama, you vote for everybody with a D in front of your name. This is one of the challenges of having a popularity contest as our national elections, because the down ballot becomes scary, right, I mean, when Barack Obama's getting elected, look at who's getting elected on the down ballots. I mean you've got women like this councilwoman, kashama Sawant. Look, I live in Seattle. There's a lot of Bernie bros, there's a lot of, like you know, socialists, but I don't personally know anyone that's not off their rocker, that wants to burn down the system, that wants to get rid of the Bill of Rights, that wants to get rid of the Constitution, that wants to get rid of capitalism. I mean, let's just listen to it again. It's a minute.

Speaker 3: 43:27

It's a minute. It's a minute. Listen to it again. I have a message for Jeff Bezos and his class If you attempt again to overturn the Amazon tax, working people will go all out in the thousands to defeat you and we will not stop there, because, you see, we are fighting for far more than this tax. We are preparing the ground for a different kind of society, and if you, jeff Bezos, want to drive that process forward by lashing out against us in our modest demands, then so be it, because we are coming for you and your rotten system. We are coming to dismantle this deeply oppressive, racist, sexist, violent, utterly bankrupt system of capitalism, this police state. We cannot and will not stop until we overthrow it and replace it with a world based instead on solidarity, genuine democracy and equality, a socialist world. Thank you.

Speaker 2: 44:24

It's so hard for me to listen to that stuff because I just can't always figure out exactly what it's like. Man, this racist system, this horrible system that you immigrated to. I mean, you can go back to India anytime you want, right? It's really something else. Here's another one. This is Rep Ilhan Omar. Now, again, she's elected, she's actually in office, she actually has a base. She got there, right, she got there. How'd she get there? Listen to this. This is, again, unbelievable.

Speaker 6: 44:56

As long as our economy and political systems prioritize profit without considering who is profiting, who is being shut out?

Speaker 2: 45:08

we will perpetuate. I missed the beginning of the video, so I'm going to go back to the beginning here. Actually, no, I didn't, I should have just let it play. It's not a long video.

Speaker 6: 45:17

As long as our economy and political systems prioritize profit without considering who is profiting, who is being shut out, we will perpetuate this inequality. So we cannot stop at criminal justice system. We must begin the work of dismantling the whole system of oppression, wherever we find it.

Speaker 2: 45:44

They want to dismantle the whole system of oppression which is the United States. Now, in fairness, in fairness, in the last 15, basically since 9-11, the United States has not been great around the world, I mean especially in the Middle East. So it's kind of one of those funny deals. The actual peasants of the Middle East love America because we defended them against ISIS, but the elites and the upper middle class of the Middle East hate America. Why? Because they're educated and they know that we were there under false pretenses. Pretenses, it's kind of not a whole lot different than the DOJ going after the president. Shouldn't have been there in the first place, right? You're going to charge him with obstruction of justice. Shouldn't have been looking at him in the first place. There shouldn't have been there in the first place, right, You're going to charge them with obstruction of justice. Shouldn't have been looking at them in the first place. There shouldn't have been anything to obstruct. Well, it's the same thing. We shouldn't be in the Middle East. We shouldn't have bombed their schools and their bridges and their water treatment facilities and their power plants and all those things, right, In the beginning of 2001 to 2005, when we were just bomb crazy, we shouldn't have done that, Shouldn't have done it. It was all false pretenses and the smart people in the Middle East know that, and so they've organized against us. Now the peasants might love us because they view us as liberators. But again, different worldviews, right, Different paradigms. Ilhan Omar has been convinced by the elites who have bankrolled her people from Qatar. She's considered the jewel of Qatar, even though she's from Somalia. They got a Muslim who's dedicated to overthrowing the US government into government. She married her brother. She committed illegal immigration fraud. She married her campaign person. She paid her campaign person over $868,000. She should be arrested. She should be in jail. She should be in jail. But you know political capital, son of a gun. Once you got it, it's hard for people to go against you. Okay, George Soros, let's touch on him again. You may remember this as a little video.

Speaker 2: 47:40

They painted Black Lives Matter on the road in California, in Costa County, California. The Costa County California district attorney. Her name is Deanna Beck-Con-Ton. Now, keep in mind. Black Lives Matter came in. They painted the road. I don't know if they had a permit or not who the frick knows? Probably not but they did. They painted Black Lives Matter on the road and some concerned citizen came by and painted over the permit, painted over Black Lives Matter. Oh, they did have a permit to support this. They painted over Black Lives Matter.

Speaker 2: 48:12

Obviously, Black Lives Matter is pretty bad. I mean, you're starting to see it. Terry Crews yesterday or two days ago on CNN talked about it. Anybody who looks into it really quickly realizes it's totally a Marxist setup, right? Anyways, this district attorney is now charging this woman and how convenient. She just happens to be another one of these George Soros-backed DAs. This is so deep. She is a county district attorney and she is funded by George Soros. And she's now charging this woman with a hate crime for painting over Black Lives Matter. You know, it just makes you wonder, right, it just makes you question things.

Speaker 2: 48:57

Another thing that came up and I tweeted this out last night. I put Mom, you were right. When I used to drive around as a kid, my mom would listen to Rush Limbaugh, sometimes on climate change. It was an up-and-coming topic. It had been around for a long time. It had been around. When my mom was a kid it had been debunked. When she was a kid, it was mostly about population control. When she was younger, she used to tell me the world is always going through weather phases, climate phases it's always changing. She told me climate change is just a big scam, and she was right. In fact, here you have Michael Schlenberger, who wrote a book about it. He's been a climate activist for years and years.

Speaker 2: 49:32

So this is a news report out of New Zealand, and New Zealand is part of the Five Eyes Network. The Five Eyes Network are the Anglophone countries, so Australia, Canada, Britain, USA and New Zealand. All of us are native English speakers, and after World War II, we saw the damage that the communists were doing in Russia. We never didn't defeat them. We saw what Mao was starting to do in China. We saw the imperialist enterprise of Japan. We saw fascism in Europe and in Italy, and so we decided those five countries all come from you know democratic backgrounds, they all are Christian, and so we decided we have to stick together. And so we created a spy network called the Five Eyes and we share intelligence at the highest levels and essentially, if Australia spies on you, the US spied on you. I mean, we share intelligence highly. So New Zealand has people who are really about liberty, and it's pretty interesting, Anyways. So listen to this. This is on Sky News and this is a little bit of a book review about this climate activist who's basically come clean.

Speaker 5: 50:38

I haven't heard one single apology following the story last week by Michael Schellenberger. He admitted he wanted to quote formally apologise for the climate scare we created that's environmentalists over the past 30 years. He said I've been a climate activist for 20 years and an environmentalist for 30. Of climate change, he said, I quote, it's not even our most serious environmental problem. And he said I feel an obligation to apologise for how badly we environmentalists have misled the public. He said climate change is not making natural disasters worse. He said the build-up of wood fuel and more houses near forests, not climate change, explains why there are more and more dangerous fires in Australia and California. He said wood fuel is far worse for people and wildlife than fossil fuels.

Speaker 5: 51:30

Schellenberger wrote, and I quote until last year I mostly avoided speaking out against the climate scare, partly because I was embarrassed, but mostly I was scared. He said I remained quiet about the climate disinformation campaign because I was afraid of losing friends and funding. So he's written a book Apocalypse Never why. Environmental Alarmism Hurts Us All. And he writes reality bites. Once you realise how badly misinformed we've been, often by people with plainly unsavoury motivations, it's hard not to feel duped. And he says the evidence is overwhelming that our high-energy civilisation is better motivations. It's hard not to feel duped. And he says the evidence is overwhelming that our high energy civilization is better for people and nature than the low energy civilization that climate alarmists would return us to. And tellingly, he writes I hope you'll accept my apology.

Speaker 2: 52:22

So that was one of the leading climate activists over the last 20 years who has written this tell-all book and said, yeah, it's all a scam. And not only is it all a scam, we know it's a scam. The religion of climate change is ending. Think about all the Green New Deal. Think about Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar and the squad and think about the push for the Green New Deal and what that is. Remember when the Green New Deal came out, republicans quickly picked it apart and said this isn't about the environment. This is about changing the economy. This is about upturning capitalism. It's coming from the same people now that are telling us to defund our police and tear down the system. Believe them when they tell us they're going to do those extreme things. Believe Council Member Sawant. Believe Ilhan Omar. They are working from inside. They are working from without. Foreign entities are bankrolling this and organizing it Internally. These mobs that are running around. These are shock troopers for these socialists. Guys, it's in our faces.

Speaker 2: 53:24

On one hand, we've got great news coming out of the DOJ. Conservative Treehouse broke this case wide open. They've showed the collusion within the DOJ. I mean dozens and dozens of people need to go to jail in the DOJ and the FBI for their roles in spying on the Trump administration for the coup plot. It goes on and on. George Soros funding people even at the low county levels to prevent criminals from getting locked up to get bail. Reforms to create some type of utopic society where there's no police, which just means he who has the gun and is willing to pull the trigger rules the world.

Speaker 2: 54:04

This is scary, and we're in a nuclear world too. We can't have kinetic wars. Kinetic wars will be disastrous. If you live near a major city, good chance you're going to get nuked, good chance there's going to be an EMP. That's another thing. I don't know if I've read that, but there's serious threat of an EMP from China. That was pretty much ignored until Donald Trump started to reinforce our infrastructure. But there's been a fight between the utilities and the government as to who's going to pay for reinforcing our infrastructure to survive through an EMP attack. Man, crazy stuff.

Speaker 2: 54:37

Another thing that came out yesterday is we found out John Roberts was hospitalized last month, which really was only like a week ago. Was hospitalized last month because he fell while working out. Now, back a handful of years ago, john Roberts had a couple seizures that caused a fall, but he hasn't had any seizures since then. They say that this fall wasn't caused by seizures. He just essentially tripped, but it required a couple sutures and he stayed overnight in the hospital. When I saw this, I thought to myself you know what this is? John Roberts' exit ramp. Ghislaine Maxwell's in jail.

Speaker 2: 55:08

John Roberts flew on the Lolita Express and went down to Epstein's Island in the Caribbean. That's right, the Supreme Court Justice of the United States, where the buck stops. The sovereign, the leader of the independent branch of the judiciary, right the same Supreme Court who decided a presidential election when it came down to a recount. That Supreme Court justice, justice John Roberts, is compromised by this Epstein stuff. He should at minimum recuse himself with anything to do with Epstein, anything to do with even Donald Trump, really. But he won't.

Speaker 2: 55:42

But this might be an off-ramp for him. This might be the precursor to injuries that cause him to leave. Maybe another fall. Any number of things could happen here. So I look at this as a potential off-ramp for Justice Roberts.

Speaker 2: 55:54

I don't think it's a coincidence that we're getting the news reporting on it now. The Supreme Court basically has to fess up to these kind of things, but we'll see how it shakes out. I mean, if he leaves, that's a really good thing in many regards. Another thing that just broke this morning the Supreme Court decided on the case with the Catholic nuns that they can this is an Obamacare case that they can basically be exempt from Obamacare because they don't want to do the contraceptive requirements of Obamacare because of their religious beliefs. The Supreme Court upheld their right to basically opt out. So that's actually really good news. So that's good. All right, guys, that's our show today Lots of stuff happening, lots of good stuff, and I appreciate your time. We'll talk to you again tomorrow, don't forget. You can reach out to me at the Peasants, at PeasantsPod on Twitter, at PeasantsPod on Parler, at the Peasants Perspective on Facebook, and you can email me at thepeasantspod at gmailcom or peasantspod at gmailcom. All right, I look forward to talking to you tomorrow who are the britons?

Speaker 1: 57:07

we all are. We are all britain and I am your king. I didn't know we had a king. I thought we're an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy, in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about. If only only people would, please, please, good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What I told you? We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune.

Speaker 1: 57:38

We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority. In the case of pure internal affairs, be quiet. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major, be quiet. I order you to be quiet, all right, who does he think he is?

Speaker 1: 57:58

I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings. Well, I can become the king. Who are you to become king then?

Speaker 1: 58:09

The lady of the lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying, by divine providence, that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. If I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistenistened bint had logged a scimitar at me, they put me away. Shut up. Will you Shut up? Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help, I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Do you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?