Peasants Perspective
Peasants Perspective: A Voice from the Edge of Freedom
Join Taylor Johnatakis, a self-proclaimed “peasant” turned podcaster, on an unfiltered journey through family, faith, and the fight for American ideals. From the depths of DC Jail—where he recorded during a 14-month sentence tied to January 6—to his triumphant return home after a Trump clemency in 2025, Taylor delivers raw, heartfelt commentary for the common man. Expect a mix of gritty storytelling, reflections on liberty lost and reclaimed, and timeless lessons drawn from his life as a septic designer, father, and reluctant rebel. Whether he’s reading Dr. Seuss to his kids or dissecting the state of the republic, Peasants Perspective is a bold, unpolished call to stay grounded amidst chaos. Subscribe for a front-row seat to a story that’s as real as it gets—no filter, no apologies.
Peasants Perspective
Coronavirus Gaslighting: How Medical Tyranny Threatens Our Freedom
Have you ever felt like something about the entire coronavirus narrative just doesn't add up? You're not alone.
The unprecedented response to COVID-19 represents perhaps the most extensive coordinated gaslighting campaign in modern history. From the way deaths are counted (as revealed by health officials themselves who admit that "even if you died of a clear alternate cause but you had COVID at the same time, it's still listed as a COVID death") to the deliberate misrepresentation of CDC guidelines about school reopenings, we're witnessing a systematic manipulation of data to justify the erosion of civil liberties.
The contrast couldn't be more striking between how President Trump approaches governance and how state governors are behaving. While the Mexican President praises Trump for respecting Mexico's sovereignty and national dignity, Americans are being subjected to increasingly draconian measures from their state governments. As CDC Director Robert Redfield explicitly stated, their guidelines were designed to help schools reopen safely, yet governors and local officials are using these same guidelines as "rationale to keep schools closed."
Washington state provides a perfect case study in how this manipulation works. Governor Jay Inslee's mask mandate contains exemptions for medical conditions that don't require disclosure—yet this information is deliberately obscured to create the impression that masks are universally required. Meanwhile, the state has systematically undermined election integrity through same-day registration, automatic voter registration through welfare agencies, and acceptance of tribal IDs without address verification.
The time for passive acceptance has passed. We must recognize that we're not just fighting a virus—we're fighting for the preservation of our fundamental rights and republican system of government. Are we peasants or citizens? The answer depends entirely on our willingness to resist.
Ready to take a stand? Subscribe to the Peasants Podcast for regular updates on how to protect your rights and fight back against government overreach.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
And when they went to the queen To tell her Her cupcakes had no bread, do you know what she said? Let them eat cake here. You take the bomb.
Speaker 2:We're getting screwed, man. Every time we turn around we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's gonna be through podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys, the little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's gotta stop. Peasants, man, we're just peasants, Every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background with the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. We're those people.
Speaker 2:All right, welcome to another episode of Peasants Podcast. We are going to jump in it here. This morning I got. Well, we're going to jump in it because I'm talking and I'm not going to stop until we're done right. So I'm an hour late getting this show out this morning because I drove all the way here to my office without my computer bag. I had to drive all the way back home. I had to load up an excavator in the process of doing this. So I've been up since about 4 30 this morning, driving, hauling equipment back and forth. It's been the longest morning. But I am here and we are going to do this thing and we are going to talk about coronavirus.
Speaker 2:I hate talking about coronavirus. It's the most frustrating thing. It is the largest criminal gaslighting exercise that has ever been done on planet earth. It is the largest gaslighting project ever done on planet Earth, and millions, billions of people are falling for it, and it is in our faces. There's so much evidence against the reaction to coronavirus. I want to be clear about that. I don't doubt that there's a coronavirus. I don't doubt there's a novel coronavirus. I don't doubt there's a novel coronavirus that came forth in 2019, right. I don't even it's a whole different topic the origins of it, if it came from a bat soup or if it came from a lab. Those are all fun, great, awesome discussions.
Speaker 2:I don't care, though. I don't care if it was swine flu. I don't care if it's African bird flu. I don't care if it's Ebola from the Ebola river in the Congo. I don't care if it's African bird flu. I don't care if it's Ebola from the Ebola River in the Congo. I don't care. Call it an epidemic, right? It's so inconsistent.
Speaker 2:When we argue with people about coronavirus on medical terms and we let them define the terms and we let them define the data, we end up where we're at now. We end up in a retarded, stupid place as a society. It can't be any more simple, so I'm going to do a lot of coronavirus stuff. I've got a couple personal stories, but I want to show you an example of republicanism. This is critical for us to have because I get a lot of feedback from my especially my conservative friends.
Speaker 2:Why isn't Trump doing something? Let me explain to you why Trump's not doing something. Because sometimes the way you do something sets precedent for the future. And because our past presidents and our past leaders have been weak and feckless, they've leaned on strongmen and what's happened is those strongmen have created protocols and procedures and precedent to where now we're being led by strongman tyrants at all levels. So let me show you the correct form of government. Let me show you how two nations should interact.
Speaker 2:So what I'm going to play for you is an excerpt from Donald Trump's press conference with the president of Mexico yesterday. So president of Mexico came in it's his first foreign trip. It's his first trip to the United States, Washington DC, and he came to celebrate and kick off the USMCA. But I want you to pay attention to what the president of Mexico says. Now. He's speaking in English. He has a very soft, almost feminine voice. I actually thought there was a translator at first, but that's actually his voice. He's just a soft-spoken socialist, let's just put it that way. But listen to what he says. It's like honeydew, it's just so sweet. Just listen to how he describes the relationship with the US.
Speaker 3:It is very important for us to be launching this new agreement, but I also wanted to be here to thank people of the United States, its government and thank you, president Trump, for being increasingly respectful with our Mexican fellow men. And to you, president Trump, I want to thank you for your understanding and the help you've given us in issues related to trade, commerce, oil, as well as your personal support for the acquisition of medical equipment that we needed urgently to treat our patients of COVID-19. But what I mainly appreciate is that you have never sought to impose anything on us, violating our sovereignty. Instead of the Monroe Doctrine, you have followed, in our case, the wise advice and illustrious and prudent George Washington, who said, quote nations should not take advantage of the unfortunate condition of other peoples. End of quote. You have not tried to treat us as a colony. On the contrary, you have honored our condition as an independent nation.
Speaker 3:That's why I'm here to express to the people of the United States that their president has behaved with us with kindness and respect. You have treated us just as what we are a country and a dignified people, a free, democratic and sovereign people. Long live the friendship of our two nations. Long live the United States of America. Long live Canada. Long live the United States of America. Long live Canada. Long live our America. Long live Mexico. Long live Mexico. Viva Mexico.
Speaker 2:I love it. Can you imagine how it must feel as a Mexican citizen, someone who's proud of your country, to essentially have been a colony of America for the last long time? We've taken advantage of Mexico. Nafta took advantage of Mexico. Nafta didn't do a lot of good things for Mexico. It was really in big businesses' advantage. And the USMCA changes that Because remember it essentially institutes a minimum wage, so it institutes a wage across the borders that is consistent, so that it's not cheaper for an American company to outsource to Mexico. But by that same token, it means that Mexicans aren't taken advantage of because of their willingness to work for cheaper labor. It's really good all around as far as those benefits. There's other little nuances. You know, the devil's always in the details. And UMCA in 20 years we'll know what its shortcomings are too. Just like NAFTA, but on the surface and just as a whole, it has a lot of the protections that NAFTA didn't have, and NAFTA didn't have them intentionally, okay, so why did I play that? I played that because this is an example of how our president actually acts.
Speaker 2:Don't get caught up in the media hype about this tyrannical president who's a threat to democracy. Let me ask you this Is Donald Trump a threat to Mexican democracy? Really, truly, is he a threat to Mexican democracy? You have a socialist president in Mexico praising our populist president right, saying that you've honored our sovereignty. Why is that? Because our president believes in borders. Our president believes he's the president of the United States and not the president of the world. He doesn't need to treat the rest of the world like a colony. He doesn't need to take advantage of the third world. We don't need to do that. Why would you need to take advantage of the third world when you have poverty in the Appalachian Mountains? Why don't you take advantage of the Appalachian Mountains? Why don't you take advantage of the Appalachian Mountains and bring some prosperity there? Right? If the idea is that by being globalist, you're bringing prosperity to other nations, which is, you know, a false sale, why not use that same logic to bring impoverished communities around our nation some benefit? So really cool. Now let me translate that to the coronavirus. President Trump is a Republican. He believes in states' rights.
Speaker 2:Do you have to have a strong federal government? Yes. Do you have to have a strong federal government for international politicking? Yes. But do you need a strong federal government to manage within the United States? The answer is no, not usually. Now, the way the country's been governed for the last 30 years, a strong executive, a strong president, is able to basically manage across borders. They set education standards that every school across the country has to use.
Speaker 2:I mean, part of the challenge we have right now with this epidemic is we're all looking to national figures. We're looking to three medical professionals dr redfield, dr fauci and dr bricks, and they're the end-all, be-all. Whatever signal they put out, everyone else is supposed to puppet. And then it gets complicated even more so because, like everything, the devil's in the details. By the way, true Pundit has a great breaking story. He's got a hospital administrator and I'm using this podcast that he did this interview with this hospital administrator in Utah to kind of fill in some gaps and understand some things, and I highly recommend anybody go take a listen to that. You can just find it on trueponditcom. It's this week's breaking story and this high-level, very high-level hospital administrator in the largest health organization in Utah is just waving all kinds of flags saying there's just nothing good about this.
Speaker 2:Patients are being coded as COVID that aren't really sick. The hospitalization rate is dropping way down. Most of the patients who have died have truly died of their comorbidities, not of coronavirus. There's lots of instances where he was talking about families that were getting back a hold of the hospital because, you know, on the death certificate they found out that their loved one had coronavirus. Covid-19 was coded as a COVID death, even though they'd had, you know, chronic heart disease for years. In one case they had someone who died of renal failure who'd really truly been on like day to day hospice care for six months, coded him as a coronavirus patient because he was in a long term care home where they thought coronavirus had been. I mean story after story like that. That's in the state of Utah.
Speaker 2:He even goes into detail about how the Mormon church is facilitating in the cover-up and in the false information and spreading of false information. And he then goes a step further and says I'm very concerned because some of the worst characters in human history have been medical professionals and they've used medical as the justification to take away your liberty, your rights and things like that. And he goes into some detail about that and he's basically saying they're starting with forcing you to wear a mask and it's just going to go from there. And that's what he sees and he's trying to blow the flag and fortunately he got the true pundit and he's got some decent circulation. People think he's super biased. He's not biased at all. He just he'll break stories that no one else will break.
Speaker 2:Just for reference, a lot of you, a lot of my listeners, probably saw the Plandemic with Judy Miskovich, who kind of came out against Dr Fauci and called him on his fraud. That story broke through True Pundit. She went through True Pundit and did her thing and then had the plandemic release. Anyways. So that's Donald Trump and for one thing it's good to know that's how Mexico is. But imagine if that's how our developing relationship is with all the other countries in the world. Imagine if, as we're withdrawing, we're withdrawing diplomatic pressure, we're withdrawing political pressure to influence elections. Isn't it interesting that they constantly say Donald Trump is a threat to democracy? But if I had to guess, I would say this Mexican president say he's probably the first American president to respect Mexican democracy in decades and Donald Trump will also honor states' rights and governors' rights, which he has done.
Speaker 2:So now let's get back to coronavirus. I want to spend a little bit of time talking about Washington state specifically, although we are going to jump around the country just a little bit. So Washington state put out the mandate saying you have to wear a mask, and I've kind of followed this story on the podcast. So if you listen to a couple episodes you might've already heard different clips from Jay Inslee and things like that. But Jay Inslee said you know, first of all, when we introduced the mask mandate, he said it's not going to be enforced by law enforcement. So no, law enforcement is going to enforce this. But we want peer pressure, we want to raise people's consciousness. He talked about it being a signal that we care about other people's lives. So the whole thing is just an exercise in symbolism, as the New England Journal of Medicine called masks. They use the actual word, they are a quote talisman. A talisman is just a symbol. Right, it's a symbol of your virtue, and so that's what Jay Inslee's got going on.
Speaker 2:So yesterday I've done this on a couple stores now you know where I walk in and they say, hey, you got to put a mask on. I say, oh, I have a concealed carry permit, and usually they just back right away. I mean it's happened. Oh gosh, I mean it seems like every other. Every other time I have to go into a store. I get asked about not wearing a mask and most people don't want to push back too much, but every now and then you'll get someone who wants to push back a little bit, and yesterday that happened to me.
Speaker 2:I walked into a Ferguson Waterworks in Seattle which is a pipe store it's where I get a lot of my pipe fittings for our septic business and things like that and went in there just to get some normal parts and a guy yelled out hey, you got to have a mask. And my partner was with me and he said, okay, and he just threw on a mask they gave us. They had some paper masks at the door that they would just give to guests, which is fine. And he threw on a mask and I was like I'm not throwing on a mask, I can't wear a mask. I have a concealed carry permit and he goes. Well, it doesn't matter, I don't care if you have a concealed carry permit.
Speaker 2:No one told me that concealed carry permits didn't have to wear a mask. You got to put on a mask and I was like I'm not putting on a mask. So rather than cause a fuss right there at that moment, I just walked out let my partner be in there, he's going to do the shopping, get what we needed, walk back to the truck and I just, you know, went online just on Facebook video. I saw this video this was this is Jay Inslee. This was a press conference that he gave yesterday and he got asked a question about the mask mandate. So let's just hear what Jay Inslee has to say about masks.
Speaker 4:The second thing I will say is, if you do have a medical condition that makes wearing a mask difficult for you, you do not have to tell the business what that medical condition is. You simply tell the business owner the business what that medical condition is. You simply tell the business owner I have a medical condition that exempts me and that will be honored by the business. So, Jay Inslee said that.
Speaker 2:Now the way that the guidance that came out from the state was, it didn't really make that clear. So I got that clip. I mean that is a 19-second clip. I got that clip, I walked back into Ferguson, I put it on my phone on speakerphone as loud as I could. I walked up right to the guy that had told me I had to wear a mask and I played that whole clip. I played that whole clip and I looked at him and I said I have a medical condition. And he just looked at me with this blank stare on his face and said okay, and that was it. And then I just walked around the store the rest of the time without a mask on and my partner was like well, that's my go-to now. I'm not putting another mask on, I'm just saying I have a medical condition.
Speaker 2:So Jay Inslee is saying here you know you don't have to wear a mask if you have a medical condition, but you don't have to disclose what that medical condition is. So don't wear a mask, folks Don't wear a mask If you're state. Say you have a medical condition, say you got one. Force Jay Inslee to make some kind of mandate that requires you to disclose your private health information, violate HIPAA, because here's what's going to happen. This gentleman that you're going to hear from now is going to come right back at him. His name is Aaron White and he is the chairman of the Freedom Foundation, and he has filed lawsuits against Jay Inslee. So take a listen to this.
Speaker 5:All right. Thanks so much, Emma. As coronavirus cases continue to surge across the US, more and more governors are beginning to implement a mask requirement, and that's not sitting well with everyone, even in liberal states like Washington, where a lawsuit has been filed against Governor Inslee's mask order, claiming it exceeds his constitutional authority. Joining us now to tell us more about this is Aaron Witt, National Director of the Freedom Foundation, which is the organization behind the lawsuit. Aaron, thanks for joining us. Talk to us a little bit about this lawsuit.
Speaker 6:Yeah, sure. So while we are the Freedom Foundation, we're not opposed to people wearing face masks or, in fact, even businesses mandating that people wear face masks. We're not opposed to people wearing face masks or, in fact, even businesses mandating that people wear face masks. We are thoroughly opposed to the governor and the governor Inslee and the Department of Health Secretary making this the law of the land in Washington state. And, to make things worse, there's no real end date in sight for this mandate. It could go as long as it takes to find a vaccine, and that could be who knows years. So are people really going to be happy wearing face masks for potentially years to come? Yeah, aaron, is there a fine involved? Yeah, there is a fine. In fact, you could even get jail time for not wearing a mask You're kidding.
Speaker 6:No, it's unbelievable. It's unbelievable, Governor Inslee. He wants to create two classes of people and his end goal is to create separation in Washington state and throughout the country. On one hand, you have everyday, otherwise law abiding citizens that don't want to wear masks former residents of the CHOP zone in Seattle that can basically get away with what they want, and Governor Inslee is going after people that don't want to wear face masks. You can do whatever you want in the name of Black Lives Matter, but if you want to go outside your house without a face mask on, you could face a fine, jail time and criminal charges. His idea of society is sick.
Speaker 2:His idea of society is sick. I completely agree with him. In a different interview where he sits down with Mike Huckabee on his podcast, this same Aaron With talks about the fact that in Washington State, at a minimum, at a minimum our death count is 13% inflated. At a minimum. They did a cursory audit where they were able to determine comorbidities that were beyond a shadow of a doubt. The cause of death, rather than coronavirus Gunshot victims, car accident victims, renal failure was something that was on there that had nothing to do with coronavirus there were people who were just on a cursory look were obviously not coronavirus deaths 13 percent. On top of that, Washington state has adopted the most liberal possible way to count coronavirus cases. They also have stopped counting pneumonia and flu. Don't even count it. There have been no pneumonia or flu deaths in the United States since, I think, March 15th. What that means is every single flu, every single pneumonia death are being counted as coronavirus, regardless of if they've taken a test or not.
Speaker 2:So organizations like Freedom Foundation are filing these lawsuits. We've got to support them if we can, If you can, make small donations to these conservative groups Judicial Watch, Freedom Foundation they're doing the legal work that is difficult for us to do. Now, what is our job? Our job is to resist. We've got to resist. We are getting to a point of craziness. Here's Tucker Carlson on masks and social distancing.
Speaker 7:Many schools that do plan to reopen will do so under a series of restrictions that have no basis of any kind in science. It's a kind of bizarre health theater. Students will be kept six feet apart. Everyone will have to wear a mask, class size will be limited. In some schools, there will be scheduled bathroom breaks, et cetera, et cetera. No sports.
Speaker 2:So across the country, right, people are trying to decide on how to get prepared for school, how are we going to get ready for schools, how are we going to open up schools? And I've heard over and over and over again, you know, we hear about the threats, all the different things that are happening and all the fear mongering. In fact, here's a super clip of the fear mongering. This is just a super clip. It's running through a lot of the liberal media, but listen to the way they talk about coronavirus, listen to the way they talk about the numbers. Just listen to this. This is what the majority of Americans are hearing about coronavirus and it's not based in reality.
Speaker 5:Governors across the country and some of these hotspot states that it's good news that it's just younger people because they have a better survival rate. That is a fallacy.
Speaker 3:The president also points out the coronavirus death rate is down. That's true for now.
Speaker 7:But the death toll. You can't celebrate it right now when you're seeing people heading into the hospital.
Speaker 2:Because we've seen this story before. In some ways, it never really ended. In a lot of ways, it is worse than ever.
Speaker 7:And, of course, as we see younger people infected and going into the ICUs, it spreads to older populations. That death rate will change. These people go home, these people infect their parents and their grandparents. Those people get sick, they end up in the ICU and they either die or they take it from somebody else that could have used it. So actually the virus has become more dangerous. Because it can infect more people, it's more easily able to take root in the community. So it's changing in a worse way.
Speaker 8:This is going to be catastrophe upon catastrophe. Just to say hey, look at the death rate now is extremely superficial.
Speaker 5:Does the US need another stay at home order?
Speaker 3:If the virus continues to rage like this, we have no choice.
Speaker 8:The White House and their calculation. This is about trying to instill a sense of normalcy. Then we all know that life can't really feel like it's back to normal. I mean it can't feel. Americans can't feel that they have the virus under control. We have absolutely zero chance and by zero chance I mean zero Z-E-R-O, zero chance of moving past this with Donald Trump in that job.
Speaker 1:Death rates are going to go up following all of these large infections. And Dr Fauci, again, is doing what he's been doing from the beginning.
Speaker 8:He's been telling you the truth and you haven't want to hear it.
Speaker 2:He's been telling you the truth and you haven't wanted to hear it. So let's not go to Dr Fauci, but let's go to Dr Redfield. So, across the state, across the country, certain governors including in my state, jay Inslee have said you know, we can't reopen schools because of these CDC guidelines. Keep that in mind. We can't reopen schools because of the CDC guidelines. So, rather than take culpability and take responsibility and be decision makers and executives themselves everything from the school boards to the governors, right up the chain of command they're pushing this up to unelected people to make these decisions. Robert Redfield's not elected, dr Birx isn't elected, fauci isn't elected okay, so you put the decision in their hands, because the political repercussions are what Minor? Who pays the political repercussions for them? Donald Trump, because he's their boss. So let's hear what the CDC is actually saying about reopening schools. This is critical. Just pay attention. This is Dr Redfield.
Speaker 2:Now I've got some thoughts about Dr Redfield From everybody that I've heard from that knows him personally. They say he's a God-fearing man, he's a born-again Christian, he's relatively soft-spoken and you know what? From all appearances it seems that way. I do believe he's corrupt. I believe he's a corruptocrat. I think he steals money from the medical system I think he puts himself. Maybe not even you know, he doesn't know it's openly illegal because I'm sure he has attorneys drawing up contracts and things. But this guy's a grifter. He has made millions of dollars off of medical things that he has been able to grant licenses, grant permits, approvals, et cetera, et cetera. Through the CDC. He owns stock in some of the businesses that make vaccines then the CDC being the world's largest buyer of vaccines. You can see where this goes, okay, but nonetheless, this guy sounds like he's got a decent heart, like he cares.
Speaker 2:And I have a little perspective on this because, growing up religious, if you Google my former church and you Google corruption, religious if you Google my former church and you Google corruption, you will find dozens and dozens and I mean it's just page after page of people who held positions of power in the church I grew up in that were convicted of essentially white-collar crimes, everything from money laundering to, you know, rent schemes, all kinds of stuff. So a lot of times people that are religious, they think of crime in terms of violence. They don't think in crimes in terms of, like, financial damage, just the reality. I mean Utah is the world's capital for pyramid schemes and financial crime, and the reason for that is because of the religious trust that's there. This is this embedded trust with other people of your faith.
Speaker 2:Anyways, I bring that up just to say I think Dr Redfield is one of those guys that he's. He's got a good soul. He just is in a bad system and he's financially corrupt, less so than Dr Bricks and Fauci. Dr Bricks and Fauci, in my opinion, are, like you know, lizard people. I mean they, they are just on a whole nother level of corruption and and it's in, I, I, I kind of just skim the surface on them because it's again, it's one of those things where devil's in the details. Someone like Dr Fauci who's been in charge of the NIH for 38 years, right, there's a lot of stuff to dig through, but there's also well-executed cover-ups, like the entire HIV cover-up.
Speaker 2:Okay, so this is Dr Redfield talking specifically about the CDC. This is a press conference yesterday. Listen to the way he goes about talking about this. Remember, donald Trump respects the nation of Mexico, he respects the state of Washington, he respects the chain of command. He's not a threat to democracy. In fact, he's exposing the weaknesses in our democracy and the fact that we've elected weak people. But listen to Dr Redfield.
Speaker 9:First and foremost, I want to make it very, very clear that the guidance that CDC continues to put out for schools K through 12 and higher learning is intentional for reopening and keeping our schools open. That's its purpose. We recognize that there's a variety of unique circumstances for different schools and different school districts, and so we've outlined a number of strategies that those schools, those administrators, can use to accomplish this goal safely. But I want to make it very clear that what is not the intent of CDC's guidelines is to be used as a rationale to keep schools closed. Cdc guidelines are is to be used as a rationale to keep schools closed.
Speaker 2:CDC guidelines are not to be used as a rationale to keep schools closed. If you've been paying attention to your local news, you have heard the CDC be used as a rationale for why we shouldn't open backup schools. Now he's going to go into another thing and I wish he would have defined this. But he does mention it. But what's the difference between a guideline and a prescription?
Speaker 9:We're prepared to work with each school, each jurisdiction, to help them use the different strategies that we propose that help do this safely so they come up with the optimal strategy for those schools. I think it's critical and it would be personally very disappointing to me and I know my agency if we saw that individuals were using these guidelines as a rationale for not reopening our schools.
Speaker 2:Okay, so their guidelines? Now it would be disappointing to them. So your local school board? What are they doing? See earlier on in the podcast.
Speaker 2:In a previous episode I've said you have to take their shame and you have to put it back in their face. Okay, if you have a leader that is telling you CDC says XYZ to justify a draconian measure or not opening school, put that shame back in their face. No, they didn't. The entire point of the guidelines is there are guidelines. These are best practices. You can't meet all of them. Look, maybe you can't do six feet of separation, but if you spread the desks all the way from wall to wall, maybe we can get five feet. Okay, great, the guideline is six. We can't get six, so we'll best practice it and go to five. That's what the CDC wants to see happen. Hey, you know what we shouldn't do assemblies. We can still have all the other functions of school, but we just shouldn't do assemblies. Or how about this Instead of having an hour lunch with two half hour, you know, half the school eats in the first half hour, half the school eats and the second half hour, spread it out over three, make it an hour and a half. That way you reduce the load in the cafeteria by three. That's called following guidelines. They're not prescriptions on must be. This Can't open the school if you can't get six feet of separation 100% of the time. No, no, no, no. Find what works on your individual school. There are rural schools in America where they could do 10 feet of separation if they wanted to. You know there's communities that have slowly had their populations go down, that still have huge schools right, I know a couple of them in Western Washington where you've got like a school that's much larger than the community needs because of the logging industry left. Eventually, the kids left and so you're left with these huge schools with like 50 kids in them. There's no need for anything there. They can achieve all of the social separation guidelines.
Speaker 2:Here's another one. This was more of a longer form interview and it's chopped up, but it's chopped up to just kind of the things that we need to hear. Now. Robert Redford in Classic Faction does what's called double speak, so he'll say his point and then sometimes he kind of backs off. It a little bit because you know devils in the details. There's nuance to this stuff it a little bit because you know devils in the details. There's nuance to this stuff, but don't get lost in what he's saying. The signal and the noise right.
Speaker 2:Robert Redfield is not on Trump's side. Robert Redfield is not on the side of we should just open up the economy, and this whole thing's a scam. He is benefiting personally far too much from the financial instruments that are being used in this coronavirus thing, the bailouts, the vaccine money. You follow the money, you will find Robert Redfield is getting some of it. So I'm not saying that this is like our savior. What I'm saying is he, as the leader of CDC, where the buck has to stop, will eventually be held accountable if the CDC is doing things that are just wrong. And so he's trying to protect his institution, and rightly so. But listen to the way he goes through this.
Speaker 9:CDC encourages all schools, all schools, to do what they need to reopen. The guidance that we've put out, as the Secretary mentioned, is guidance and I want people to see it as guidance to reopen. Mentioned is guidance and I want people to see it as guidance to reopen. Nothing would cause me greater sadness than to see any school district or school use our guidance as a reason not to reopen. Cdc never recommended general school closure throughout this pandemic.
Speaker 9:We see schools, as has already been mentioned, as a vital part of our society. Is that we have to stay focused on protecting the vulnerable, those individuals that have multiple medical conditions, those individuals that are elderly with multiple medical conditions. As I mentioned, our household studies, the role that children play in the transmission cycle. For example, in our household studies, so far there was limited implications that the virus was brought into the household by a child. I think when we looked at individuals under the age of 45, they represent 2.4% of all the deaths in this country and when you look at them, those individuals under 45 frequently had a significant comorbidity, significant obesity, diabetes, type 1.
Speaker 9:So this virus does seem to be very limited pathogenicity for children, but I do think getting ahead of the curve that you're talking about how you're going to handle cases of COVID in the school when you diagnose them, so that doesn't become some type of you know nine o'clock at night phone call tree that goes through the community and the next thing you know you have the school shut down for you know a week, rather than everyone being on board. How we're going to handle this. I think that's really important from a risk versus risk point of view, that we need to reopen our schools and we need to plan to keep our schools reopened. I think this really is the important message and this is why we're having these discussions to get people to understand that we need to reopen the schools. We can do this safely. We need to commit to it and we need just to get it done.
Speaker 2:That's it, guys. So when someone says the CDC says the CDC says no, no, they didn't. The CDC didn't say that. The CDC is saying get back to school, don't use our guidelines as a rationale to not open back up. Okay. So now we're going to jump over to New Jersey here and this is a. This is actually someone else's video and it's dubbed over, but he does a pretty good analysis, so I'm just going to let it play. But this is. They're talking about the death rate. And listen. The facts are facts. They're a stubborn thing. They're not going to change. Focus on the facts and you'll debunk all of the spin. See the signal through the noise, right? So listen to this smart reporter who breaks this down and you'll hear the commentary. Hold on. Maybe this is a little different video format for me here.
Speaker 5:It reported the death of a teenager in Cook County. Are you familiar with this case? If so, is this the state's first teenage death and can you tell us if the teenager in question had underlying conditions?
Speaker 8:Okay, we're going to get a definition now of how you can determine whether or not someone died with COVID.
Speaker 10:Very simple. I don't have that information at my disposal at this time. I know we have had people of all age groups die. I just want to be clear in terms of the definition of people die.
Speaker 8:Okay, here comes the definition of death by COVID. As long as you were positive for COVID when you died, you are a COVID death. Even if you got in a car wreck or you fell off a cliff, for whatever reason that you died, as long as you had COVID, it's counted as a COVID death. Listen.
Speaker 10:So that means that if you were in hospice and had already been given a you know a few weeks to live, and then you also were found to have COVID, that would be counted as a COVID death. There it was.
Speaker 8:Okay, she's going to make it more simple for us.
Speaker 10:It means that if, technically, even if you died of a clear alternate cause but you had COVID at the same time, it's still listed as a COVID death. You died of a clear alternate cause, but you had COVID at the same time, it's still listed as a COVID death.
Speaker 8:So technically, even if you died of an alternate cause, if you had COVID when you died, it's called a COVID death. You wonder why the numbers are messed up.
Speaker 2:So to put this in perspective, we actually have a lower total death rate than we did last year at the same time. So if you take the annual amount of deaths for all causes and then you put it on, this year, we have a lower total cause of death. But we've got this huge COVID number right, this COVID number. But look at the total number of flu deaths that's way down like to 6,000. And we stopped counting. The CDC doesn't want that information anymore. Pneumonia that's a standalone thing, right, and it's caused by a lot of different reasons. No cases, none, zero. Okay, you go through the other issues here and it's like, oh, this is a scam. This wasn't any worse than any regular year. The average age of death for coronavirus patients is above the average age of death. Look at what they said about people under 45, what Dr Redfield said Of the 40,. You know, 2% of all the COVID deaths, of all the COVID deaths that have been coded, 2% of them. There are 130,000, 2% of them, right, I mean Washington state. 13% of our reported numbers are not COVID. So you know, I figure 13% is probably across the country, but let's just go with the big number 130,000,. 2% of those are under 45. So you know you're talking what 2,000, see 100,000, 2% of 100,000 is. Is that 20? Whatever you get the point, you start doing that and then he says, oh, and they have major comorbidities. Well, how many of the people under 45 were the car wrecks, the gunshot wounds, right, the things that had absolutely nothing to do with coronavirus? It's a scam. This is the largest corrupt, criminal gaslighting program that's ever been run on the world and lots of people are falling for it. They are taking our freedoms in the name of science and medicine. It devolves upon you, the person listening to me talking, to take a stand somewhere. Take a stand, open your eyes. The numbers are fake. We know we've relied to about the origins of the virus. China's never even fessed up to spreading it. They never even told the who. I mean we're leaving the World Health Organization over this thing because they mishandled it. They never even told the who. I mean we're leaving the World Health Organization over this thing because they mishandled it. Based on the current data and numbers that we have now, this was never a pandemic. It never reached the level of pandemic. All the projections that we had ended up being bunk faults. This is an incredible, incredible exercise in gaslighting.
Speaker 2:Now, last thing, last thing I want to cover is I want to cover elections. Okay, elections are one of those things that's absolutely critical for it. All right. So this is about election integrity and this comes from Amber Crawback. She is running for Washington's fourth district, for, I think, house, and so, anyways, she's just she's running, and if you're in her district, if you see her signs, see her, vote for her man, she is on top of it, but she says this. So I'm just going to read her thread. Time to take a systematic look at some Washington state election integrity concerns, if possible. I'd love for our region's most diligent researchers and reporters to take a look at this as well. And I'm just going to read the thread and I'll just mention the links and evidence she has here as a preemptive point of clarification. I will be supporting Secretary of State Kim Wyman's re-election this year. My best guess is that she is stuck between a rock and a hard place on this issue. I have no doubt she is well qualified for the job she has taken on. Here we go Over the last 40 years, the Washington state legislature has systematically made changes to the state's election system that I believe undermine our elections to the point that we can no longer provide assurance of election integrity to the people of Washington state.
Speaker 2:Starting in the mid-1980s, permanent absentee voting was established for retirees and those struggling with disabilities. In the early 1990s the benefits were expanded to include any voter in Washington state. To include any voter in Washington state In November 2004,. Shortly after moving to Washington, I witnessed the most Washingtonians would consider the most memorable example of mail-in balloting troubles in our history, illustrated in the gubernatorial race between Christine Grigor and Dino Rossi. And then she's got the chart here and it looks, based on the chart, that Dino Rossi ran away with this thing. To cite Dino Rossi, winning both the election and the automatic recount.
Speaker 2:Gregor took the seat after additional ballots were discovered, additional ballots discovered in a second manual recount paid for by Gregor. And then she's got all the links and the articles here. Side note the law firm Gregor hired to manage the manual recount happened to be. Remember the names guys Perkins Coie who's Perkins Coie? Perkins Coie is the law firm that Hillary Clinton hired to pay Fusion GPS in England and Glenn Simpson to create the Steele dossier to meddle in an election. So Gregor previously hired Perkins Coie, a now known election meddler through the Russiagate scandal, to also oversee the recount in Washington Gosh, how convenient, right? Maybe the Russiagate scandal wasn't the first time Perkins Coie meddled in an election, go figure.
Speaker 2:After Grigor's team had completed a manual recount and was declared the winner by 133 votes. So after she was the winner by 133 votes for state governor, with ballots being found after the race was called originally, over 1,000 fraudulently cast ballots were identified by Rossi's team. Because Washington voters don't declare party when registering, there was no way to determine those votes helped. Under Christine Gregor, washington election policy changed quite rapidly. In 2009, she signed the National Popular Vote Bill obligating Washington's electors to cast their vote for the National Popular Vote winner rather than the state popular vote winner.
Speaker 2:One of the major loopholes in the Washington election integrity is, so long as the registrant has a name, address, id number, signature and check in the I am a citizen box, our Secretary of State is legally prohibited from verifying the person's registration is valid. One of my biggest concerns about election integrity in Washington State is that we have never run an audit for our voter rolls for non-citizens and non-residents. Since we are a sanctuary state, our cities struggle with rampant homelessness problem, which is a major fraud risk. Up until recently, this type of audit was all but impossible to do because there was no database of US citizens available to use to query the Washington state voter base. It would have been required a manual auditing, which does not appear to be lawful. However, as of a few months ago, dh Secretary, governor or Department of Health and DHS Gov has provided a citizenship database that state officials can use to verify census information. Washington's Secretary of State should be legally permitted to use this database in her efforts to maintain and clean voter rolls. I am frustrated that this work hasn't happened, but I am assuming that the reason Secretary Wyman has not already run this audit is because it's an election year for her and she will be sued into the ground for it by the left, not because they have cause, so we'll just have to wait for assurance of election integrity.
Speaker 2:2019 was a particularly busy year for dismantling the security of Washington state elections. We saw same-day registration implemented for the first time. This year, automatic voter registration implemented even those who are not eligible to vote like 16-year-olds and, as a side note, there are only a handful of specific agencies that are permitted to automatically register voters who employ their services. The approved list appears to consist of agencies that provide social services to underserved populations. So basically, if you're using any kind of welfare program in Washington, they automatically register you to vote.
Speaker 2:Another issue of election integrity hasn't gotten much attention is the inclusion of provisions that now allow tribal IDs to be used as valid ID registering to vote in Washington State, even if the applicant doesn't have a verifiable address. This is a significant hindrance to our assurance of election integrity, as I don't believe Washington State officials have any jurisdiction over tribal IDs. I don't believe we even have the authority to get the number of new tribal IDs given out each year, much less a list of names. This means there is no United States checks and balances to ensure the individuals receiving tribal IDs are US citizens, and it is reasonable to be concerned that non-citizens from Central America are illegally immigrating into our tribal communities. So the question is how difficult is it in the sanctuary state of Washington for an individual from Central America to get a tribal ID in Washington state and use it to register to vote, and how might the tribal leaders be compensated for bringing in and hiding illegal immigrants?
Speaker 2:Interestingly, on top of the lack of oversight accountability, there was a lot of state and federal money given to the tribes this year. Washington Senator Patty Murray was very happy to know hundreds of millions that would be given to tribes for the purpose of building new housing, from special provisions for the governor to entering into agreements with tribes, to providing taxpayer funding for health care and more. In any case, washington tribal leaders made out big time this year in financial provision and benefits. Thanks to Washington bureaucrats, even broadband internet, which we can't get for 10 houses in my rural neighborhood for under 100K. They're getting it in all. The tribes House leader represent, jt Wilcox and his family seem to have quite an intimate relationship with a number of tribal leaders. I think it might be helpful to have his thoughts and agreements on these provisions as well. Thank you for letting me know, yep. So that's the end of our thread. Pretty fascinating.
Speaker 2:So, guys, election integrity here's the deal. The game plan has to change. We got to fight like the left fights. That means you got to go to people that are unreasonable, that are jerks. You got to call their employer. You got to do the exact same thing they do to conservatives. It is the only way to play. They have changed the rules. They've changed the ground rules.
Speaker 2:This election that's coming up, there's no guarantee of nothing. There's no guarantee of nothing. If it's not such an overwhelming, stomping victory from the right, they'll steal it. They stole this election that she's talking about here by 133 votes, with a minimum of a thousand votes cast fraudulently Minimum. They will steal it and you are living through the precursor to what they're going to do. You think it's bad now? You think it's a little unfortunate now? Just wait. You just wait until they get full control again. What Donald Trump is doing is the right thing. He's allowing the local states, the local government, the different nations to handle their own stuff. Us citizens need to be enraged. If our local leaders aren't helping us, you can't blame Donald Trump. You can't blame Donald Trump. All right, you can find me. You can find me on Twitter at PeasantsPod. You can find me on Parler at PeasantsPod. You can find me on Facebook at the Peasants Perspective, and you can email me at peasantspod at gmailcom. I look forward to talking to you again tomorrow. Thanks for spending some time with me today.
Speaker 1:Who are the Britons? We all are. We are all Britain and I am your king. I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy, in which the working classes oh, there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about. If only people would Please please good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then, who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What I told you? We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune.
Speaker 1:We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week, yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority. In the case of pure internal affairs, be quiet. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major, be quiet. I order you to be quiet. All the l he think he is. I'm your king.
Speaker 1:Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings. Well, how do you become king then? The lady of the lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. If I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had loved a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up, will you Shut up? Now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help help. I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? That's what I'm on about. Did you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?
