Peasants Perspective
Peasants Perspective: A Voice from the Edge of Freedom
Join Taylor Johnatakis, a self-proclaimed “peasant” turned podcaster, on an unfiltered journey through family, faith, and the fight for American ideals. From the depths of DC Jail—where he recorded during a 14-month sentence tied to January 6—to his triumphant return home after a Trump clemency in 2025, Taylor delivers raw, heartfelt commentary for the common man. Expect a mix of gritty storytelling, reflections on liberty lost and reclaimed, and timeless lessons drawn from his life as a septic designer, father, and reluctant rebel. Whether he’s reading Dr. Seuss to his kids or dissecting the state of the republic, Peasants Perspective is a bold, unpolished call to stay grounded amidst chaos. Subscribe for a front-row seat to a story that’s as real as it gets—no filter, no apologies.
Peasants Perspective
Democracy vs. Republic: Understanding Our Constitutional Foundation
A seismic shift in global diplomacy unfolded today as European leaders flocked to meet with Trump, recognizing his unprecedented breakthrough in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. After three years of deadly stalemate, Trump's direct engagement with Putin has opened the first real pathway to peace, with Italian PM Giorgia Meloni declaring, "Something has changed thanks to you."
The episode examines this diplomatic pivot alongside Trump's announcement that his administration has already rescued 10,000 missing children as part of a massive anti-trafficking operation. This humanitarian crisis, largely ignored by mainstream media, represents one of the most significant child recovery efforts in recent history.
We explore the justice system's troubling political bias through contrasting cases: the immediate arrest of a woman threatening Trump versus DC grand juries twice refusing to indict someone who assaulted an FBI agent during an ICE operation. This selective application of law raises profound questions about equal justice.
The conversation shifts to Trump's bold election integrity plans to eliminate mail-in voting and electronic voting machines, triggering predictable outrage from Democratic operatives like Mark Elias who previously championed these very systems.
Most compelling is our examination of America's foundational principles as a constitutional republic rather than a democracy – a critical distinction where individual rights cannot be overridden by majority rule. This fundamental concept, increasingly forgotten in modern discourse, may be the key to preserving freedom in an increasingly polarized society.
Want to understand how the world is changing right before our eyes? This episode connects dots mainstream media won't touch. Join us for a perspective you won't find anywhere else.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
Wow, that's really loud, that's loud, wow, wow.
Speaker 2:Could be this. Got this maxed out.
Speaker 3:And when they went to the queen to tell her her subjects had no bread, do you know what she said? Let them eat cake here, you take the bomb we're getting screwed man.
Speaker 2:Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's going to be through podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys, the little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's got to stop. Peasants, man, we're just peasants, every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background with the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning peasants. Welcome to another episode of the Peasants Perspective. We made it. We made it All it all. Right, I'm getting the chats out. Where are the chats on the rumble? Oh, I know what the problem is. I'm looking at yesterday's.
Speaker 2:Oh man, good morning everybody. Welcome to another episode of the peasants perspective. We're so glad to have you. We've got more fallout from the Trump Russia meeting, as well as and I'd call it fallout, and I'd as well as we've got a whole bunch of fun stuff we're going to be looking at today, so let's go ahead and dive in. Just as a little reminder, this is Janine Janine Piro. She was the judge that was on Fox News for years and years and years. Apparently, she used to be an old prosecutor up in New York, I believe. Well, she's now the United States attorney for the District of Columbia, and she arrested someone yesterday for attempting to eliminate Donald Trump.
Speaker 7:Hi everyone, it's Judge Janine. I just wanted to let you know here from the United States Attorney's Office in DC, from the United States Attorney's Office in DC, that an individual by the name of Nathalie Rose Jones is now in custody, charged with two federal crimes, for knowingly and willfully threatening to take the life of the President of the United States. She did come from New York to Washington DC and she has been threatening and calling for the removal of the president. And, even worse, as she got to DC, her threats were on Facebook and Instagram and she continued to call the president a terrorist and was working to have him eliminated. She is now in custody. She will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Make no mistake about that.
Speaker 2:All right, I got real mixed feelings about this.
Speaker 8:I wonder what kind of a care in this was. See, that's the challenge, because this could have been my aunt.
Speaker 2:That's the challenge.
Speaker 2:I remember when I was in prison, there was this guy. His name was Beck and his grandma was a super fan of January. There you go. I wrote her a couple of letters and he gave me a Jordan Peterson book which I need to return to him somewhere. He's got about six, seven more years on his sentence, but anyways, he his grandma Right, who's like a big, huge Trump supporter and a big fan of January Sixers. She was like so you're in there with January Sixers, oh my gosh, give him a hug. And she was like so excited, you're in there with january sixers, oh my gosh, give him a hug.
Speaker 9:And then she was like why do I think of that? Joe biden?
Speaker 2:I just want to poke his eye, as I'm like mom, you can't say this on the on the prison phones they listen to this stuff. Yeah, she's like I just feel that way I'd punch his throat. Anyways, I just want to throat punch him. He was a bitter boy man, he. I remember one time stepping by on the, walking by him on the phone, and he's like oh, they just want to take us out in the field and shoot us in the head.
Speaker 2:Mom, oh geez, oh, he had a real bum rap deal. He was got a gun and drug charge. Oh no, anyways, he was from alabama and it showed, but uh, but uh, he was down on the gulf coast, but uh, he got transferred from where I was at down to pensacola and he was like I'm going close to home. Apparently his house is like across the river, across the bay or something like that.
Speaker 8:You know I'm not from the south, but I know that you, when you start talking bad about Bama, you get yourself in trouble really fast.
Speaker 2:Those boys. They're good guys. My best friends in prison were from Mississippi, you know. So that is what it is OK. So I'm a little I have like this kind of concern with this lady getting arrested, coming down to eliminate donald trump. Now, on one hand, totally legitimate, can't be threatened in public officials can't be trialing to dc. You can't have the ways, the means or the you know. If you're out there trying to hire hits or something like that, you're going down. But just knowing what I know I mean, did she have a bike rack exactly? Just knowing what I know, having been through the, the trial, right, they'll pull out stuff that you had zero intention to mean. Anything like me putting out an emoji fire, light them up.
Speaker 2:Tweet made it into trial that went out in the summer bullhorn in her backpack yeah, in the summer of 2020. So the crazy thing about this is I had this political article pulled up, but we'll play this other art. We'll show you this other article first. So meanwhile, on one hand they've gotten an indictment or they've arrested this girl. I don't actually know the nature of exactly how they arrested her, but in DC, right the electorate there's like 96 percent Democrat and I used to have this thought oh, oh, that doesn't really matter, like if you present somebody with a crime, most people will see the crime. That is not the case. So julie kelly posts this another example of what the trump doj is up against.
Speaker 2:In washington dc. This month, a dc grand jury twice refused to indict a woman arrested for interfering, then assaulting, an fbi agent involved in an ICE operation in Washington. This is particularly infuriating. The same DC grand juries quickly brought the same charge, the 111 felony. I got that one against hundreds of J6s, even for minor scuffles with police. The magistrate judge assigned to the case, michael Harvey, signed hundreds of J6 arrest warrants. Harvey is now low key mocking the doj for for lacking evidence in the case rather than admitting an indictment on the assault.
Speaker 2:Interference statute depends on the political affiliation of the individual charge and sympathetic dc residents sitting on the grand jury. Us attorney pierre's office admits grand jury refused ice interference charges twice. So it comes down here. Two presentations to the grand jury returned a bill, no bill. Both times a bill is a bill of indictment. Harvey said suggesting the evidence is wanting, given the standard for indictment, is probable cause, suggesting the government may never get an indictment.
Speaker 2:Grand juries are tasked with deciding whether there is reasonable basis to support charging someone with a crime a much lower burden for prosecution than the than a beyond a reasonable doubt standard of criminal juries, and typically take their decision after hearing evidence only from the government. At the federal level grand juries return indictments or true bills in the vast majority of cases. So they've been rejected twice in front of a grand jury in DC, probably again because of affiliation. And oh, this is an illegal immigrant and it's an ice. You know it's for an ice raid.
Speaker 2:The zeitgeist is real. There was an expectation in dc that you would convict all january sixers. In fact, uh, one of the jury members in my jury her spouse, wife her wife was a journalist for the atlantic magazine actually came out to my house and interviewed my wife. She was on the jury and she was like, oh, I hope I'm not on one of these January 6 cases. Now you are. In fact, during the void year of my trial, multiple jurors had already served on January 6 trials and were dismissed so they were recycling the jury pool.
Speaker 2:Oh geez, yeah. So in more DC news, fbi taps Missouri attorney general to be number two at the fbi. This is a gentleman named andrew bailey. He's to share the role in second in command at the fbi as the administration tries to contain tension over the handling of files related to the sex offender jeffrey epstein. I actually don't think that's the case. I think what's happening is bongino can only do so much, and so they're bringing in a second hand, because on one hand, they're cleaning up DC, they're going, they're doing major nationwide initiatives against child trafficking and other like violent crimes, and they're going after the grand conspiracy case.
Speaker 8:Well, also, they're targeting sanctuary cities and targeting sanctuary cities, yep.
Speaker 2:So bailey has resigned as attorney general for missouri and he'll be moving out to dc and assisting bongino in that role. Some people have said, oh, this is the end of bongino, he's going to go after this. Some people have said, no, that's not really the case. I tend to think this is probably going to be two guys in that role. I think one of them is going to do your normal fbi work and the other one's going to do the grand conspiracy. Yeah, specialized stuff.
Speaker 8:That's my opinion I think if mon gena was going to be gone, he'd be gone now.
Speaker 2:The previous attorney for missouri was their now senator, eric schmidt very good senator, and he was a very good attorney general. He's the one who sued the biden administration over censorship, which ultimately they lost, and I think it's still kind of working through the courts. And then andrew bailey took over. Andrew bailey continued a bunch of these really pro mega lawsuits. Missouri, and no doubt about it, is the center of the political rights lawfare movement. Missouri is the center of the conservative universe when it comes to legal matters. They have the most, the best legal brains coming out of there. They're smattered all through the federal government. They are by a mile leading the way. It's kind of the equivalent of like what New York produces as far as liberal attorneys, missouri produces conservative attorneys. Wow, now Andrew Bailey.
Speaker 8:I got no idea, idea. I mean, how are they floating under the radar like that?
Speaker 2:they don't. So trump's lead uh general counsel is uh al al scharf or eric scharf al scharf, I can't remember his name, but he's also from missouri and he ran against andrew bailey for attorney general. Got a little bit of mud fight between the two of them because andrew bailey is a good old farm bred, grown missouri boy and schmidt is born in missouri but he's educated in new york, has big new york donors, has connections right.
Speaker 12:So that was the thing, oh you don't want some new york guy.
Speaker 2:He's really not missourian, he's new york but of course he was trump's attorney that won, uh, multiple of those appeals, like he was Trump's attorney and now he's Trump's general counsel. So a lot of people when it happened, the local talk radio down in Missouri cause you know I listened every day, the local talk radio down in Missouri was like this might be a blessing because sharp is being, you know, going to the white house and he's probably going to end up in some like appeals court judge, ship or something and he's going to bless the day that he didn't end up being attorney general because he'll have much longer impact going the route he's going with his pedigree. But Ed Martin, who's also from Missouri Okay, you know who Ed Martin is Eagle Ed Martin. We played him yesterday in the private side nine minute video with oh yeah.
Speaker 2:Yeah, so Ed Martin's also from missouri so it was my attorney, mark mccluskey, dealing with my j6 stuff. So missouri is the center of the conservative political universe. When it comes to law and legal lawyers, florida is probably the base, but missouri is definitely the law uh breeding ground. You. They don't have nice beaches to distract law students, so they keep busy. But anyways, one of the things about Andrew Bailey, again, just seeing things from all perspectives, I was in prison and while I was in prison there were two separate cases in Missouri that were Missouri state capital murder charges. Both of them returned acquittals when the person was on death row, so they'd been through multiple appeals or whatever, and one of them came through, if I'm not mistaken, no evidence and a complete mistrial which overturned the conviction and supposed to. That person was supposed to walk free. He'd been, she had been in prison I 12 years or 20 years some very long time.
Speaker 8:No evidence. How'd she get convicted in the first place? It?
Speaker 2:happens all the time, dude.
Speaker 8:Oh my gosh.
Speaker 2:Go talk to the Innocence Project.
Speaker 8:All right.
Speaker 2:Like it happens all the time. So she went to go get released there were two instances, so if I cross stories I'm sorry, but went to go get released and Andrew Bailey submitted a motion basically saying we can't let her out of prison because of her behavior in prison oh geez what because she'd gotten in fights and stuff like that. So therefore you couldn't let her out and it's like, well, she shouldn't have been there in the first place. You put her in that position, you, the state right. So I believe he lost that appeal. But he fought hard to keep an innocent woman in prison.
Speaker 2:Okay Fought hard, okay, and the court basically said let her out by midnight on a certain date. And they finally did. There was another gentleman, the same thing he was. He was in prison, death row. He was exonerated, case dismissed. The court ordered him removed. He gave away all his stuff in prison, gave it all away, was sitting in discharge, called r&d, receiving and discharge, or sitting in discharge with his paperwork to process out, and his wife was on the way to the prison to pick him up and andrew bailey called it off, sent him back to his cell and filed a motion to essentially retry the thing I believe that I believe.
Speaker 2:Ultimately it prevailed and the guy got out. But his wife got on the radio, conservative radio. Why is this happening? This is so not fair. You know very tragic story. In fact she went on to Fox News and talked about it. That's Andrew Bailey. So Andrew Bailey, bulldog for the conservatives, real MAGA warrior, but like many MAGA folks, we lean on the side of fascism.
Speaker 8:Yes.
Speaker 2:It's just the truth. We lean on the side of the state. We back the blue to a fault, even when they're wrong. I don't know that. That's the way I want to be, because I've been on the side of the wrong when the blue is wrong.
Speaker 8:I don't want to be like that.
Speaker 2:Exactly so. I point this out, not because I'm not supportive. I cheer this on. I think andrew bailey is a great attorney general. I would love to have him as my attorney general. He'll keep your streets clean. But unfortunately, the conservatives motto is better that 10 guilty men walk free than one innocent men go to jail, and conservatives are usually more like. It's better that 10 innocent men go to jail than one guilty man walk free. And I say that not because I think that's at the core of people's hearts, but it's at the core of the policies okay, does that make sense?
Speaker 8:well, because I was trying to read my heart going. I can't find that anywhere.
Speaker 2:It's not what we want. It's not what we want. It's not at the court. We, we all agree, better that.
Speaker 2:I hear what you're saying but in practice it's wrapped up in the policy. In practice, right In Florida, you go to jail. In Florida, you do something wrong, you commit a motor vehicle violation, you get caught shoplifting, you go to jail. There's no extenuating circumstances, there's no understanding. You go to jail here in washington right, you might not go to jail, they're going to hear your story out. They're going to take all the equities into account. Oh, you're poor. Okay, you can steal. I don't like that either. Yeah, right, it's. It's the two. You've gone too far to the left and the right, and then ultimately, I, you both end up with a boot on my neck because you both got to clean up the streets, right?
Speaker 2:and at that point, nobody cares about the innocent I watched a piece yesterday.
Speaker 8:It was another country, it's australia, um but a gentleman had a little bit too much to drink and he ran over some kids and killed four of them and went to jail you know, deservedly and the the piece was interesting because the man in jail got to meet the father of the kids. Oh, sorry, and and it's kind of an interesting meeting up when you're meeting up with the guy that murdered your kids, and this father understood that this was an accident and this guy truly was. He was extremely sorry, of course, but both of them recognized that the reason he's in jail is not because it's to protect the public. Yeah.
Speaker 8:And that's it. And this gentleman that ran over the kids understood that and he's like you know, it doesn't matter what the feelings are between, because he was very repentant and the father was very forgiving and so between them they were basically family now and there was no animosity between them. But this guy's staying in jail Price had to be paid, price had to be paid for the public, yep, and that was kind of the point I pulled away from that whole story and I just thought that was interesting to bring that up at this moment, just because of what we're talking about.
Speaker 2:That was my big aha. It wasn't a big aha in prison, just because of what we're talking about. That was my big aha. It wasn't a big aha in prison, but I remember, prior to going to prison, a family member said well, I want felons to go to jail, so if you're found guilty, you know you're a felon. You're going to jail and I was like I don't know, like I, I I'm not a drug dealer you know what I mean.
Speaker 2:Like I don't know that I don't know that these things are equal. And through time and watching my trial and then for him it was actually watching Donald Trump's New York trial that's when he was like this isn't right, this isn't how it's supposed to be. And that's when he started to look at my case and was like, oh, I can see more what's happening here. But he said that I want, I want felons to go to jail. And I thought what a virtue, right, what a virtue that gets weaponized. Well, we want bad guys to go to jail. So if you say he's a bad guy, then go to jail. Well, who's saying he's a bad guy? Have you heard both sides, you know?
Speaker 2:And when I got to prison I got by the time I got there and I started, especially when I started realizing most of these people need rehab, and you're like you could probably cut the prison population in half if you just had decent rehab centers. But then I started to see the real underworkings and I was like, oh no, some of these people here are sociopaths. People here will eat your face off. They do not have regard for public safety or cooperation or anything like that. And so, yes, the state's job is to protect society from our own vices, from our own, the products of our families.
Speaker 2:That don't go well. You know what I mean. Like I get it, but but there has to be some type of balance. I'm not, I'm not sitting here saying here's the solution, we're all dumb for not doing it. I'm saying these are complicated issues and, unfortunately, this is why I say, in practice, conservatives would rather see 10 innocent men in prison than one guilty man walk free. In its utility, in its practice, because of this idea of law and order and you know what I mean Like it's better to sacrifice one or two innocent people.
Speaker 8:In this Australia case, the thought was that the public is being protected because there is this, you know state that'll do it. Yeah, yeah and there is such a a damning, you know, consequence, and so if the consequence is not, you know, followed through, then you know what's the point of having a consequence, or even a law in the books yes, so yep.
Speaker 2:No, you got to fall through and again, I'm not sitting here acting like I got all the answers. In fact, I'm the exact opposite. I don't have all the answers, but I know that there's some things I don't like.
Speaker 2:There's also some crossover here, because we have some politicians that seem to think that they can kind of do whatever they want without any accountability, and, uh, it would be nice to see some accountability, just for accountability's sake and what you see is when the democrats are in charge, or the left, or the conservative, or the liberals, or the collectivists or the communists or whatever you want to call them right, they'll come after the middle class right, whereas when the republicans are in charge, they'll come after the lower class it's kind of a different, but either way, they're kind of just coming after people.
Speaker 2:Some of them need to become after. Obviously, I'm a huge supporter of deportations, so this is a flashback clip. This is from steve pichenik. Oh, I was going to mention one other thing. I watched a documentary years ago about the green river killer and when he was being sentenced you know all the victims families was you're evil, you're the devil incarnate just he just sat there completely stone cold, like he did not care.
Speaker 2:But when one man got up and he was he looked like santa claus big beard, big round belly. He even had suspenders on and he was like I forgive you. You know, find god in your heart, I forgive you. Blah, blah and the green river killer just became an emotional mess. It was forgiveness that pierced his heart rancor, bitterness, anger he could deal with that he could deal with that.
Speaker 2:He couldn't deal with forgiveness okay, so this is steve pachanik and this is, uh, back when he was on alex jones's show right after the 2016 election, and there was this. I'm playing this because I I fell victim to this, but I didn't believe it, but I wanted to believe it. Does that make sense? Yeah, I wanted to believe this. It gave me hopium. In fact, I believe we even played this on the show and talked about I remember playing some Bill Barr clips that gave me a lot of hopium you want some hopium.
Speaker 2:Let's get this, as we were in that transition period between the 2016 election and January 6th and then January 20th, so at the point that this came out, I'm pretty sure I was already well, I know for a fact, I was already indicted. Didn't know it yet, but this came out and this was like the last little shot of Hopian that maybe at the last moment there'll be some type of you know, military intervention. Somebody's coming to come in and do the right thing military intervention.
Speaker 19:Somebody's coming to come in and do the right thing. Let me just say again what I said in 2016. There are honorable members of our intelligence, military and civilian community in the government who understood exactly how corrupt Biden and the Democratic machinery is, was and will be. This is really a sting operation, contrary to what everybody else said. Trump knew this was happening, eric knew this was happening and warned the public. I knew this was happening. However, I could not say anything about it.
Speaker 2:What happened was we so Steve Pachanik, just so you, you guys know he writes fictional stories. Now he used to work at the state department, allegedly also involved with the cia, and he's one of these script writers so is he like tom clancy well, uh, his operations that he wrote that then were acted out by seals and whatever did make it into Tom Clancy novels.
Speaker 2:Yes, so those guys get their tips and their storylines from real life events and then they write a story about it and that's the only way these secret operators can get their claim to fame. Have you read that Clancy book? I'm Roger in that book. So Steve Pachinick is one of these guys and he and he works with psyops, with the state department, and he stretches all the way back into Reagan. Now he's retired.
Speaker 2:So he comes on Alex Jones' show and does these little things. And I don't know if he's going to say it here in just a minute, but Alex Jones kind of challenges him, like listen, we've had everything promised to us and nothing has come through. We've just been out here dying on the vine, steve, and Steve's on the vine, steve and stuff. Like well, I can speak the truth because I don't have to sell, you know, supplements to survive. And alex took a little offense. Well, this doesn't. If there's not a sting, you're never coming back on my show. He's like that's great deal. We're never coming back on your show. He's back on his show because I think steve helps him sell some lotions, potions and pills.
Speaker 2:He's talking about the 2016 election, having been this giant stink.
Speaker 19:Watermark every ballot with what's called the QFS blockchain encryption code. In other words, we know pretty well where every ballot is, where it went and who has it. So this is not a stolen election. On the contrary, we reversed the entire game of war along the lines of the Sun Tzu the art of war and Trump was brilliant and still is brilliant at it. When the art of the war, you pull back, allow your enemy to make all the mistakes that they are making, manipulate the situation, expose them and then come in for the final killing. And that's what's happening now.
Speaker 19:None of this was unexpected. The genius of Trump is that he is able to pull back at any point and manipulate the opponent without the opponent ever realizing. And he said I will use common sense or my intelligence, ie both literal and figurative intelligence. What was not announced was that we watermarked all the ballots with what I said at UFS blockchain, which is a very hard encryption code to break. And the second thing is we sent probably 20,000 or more National Guards 48 hours ago. None of it was reported and I thank the press for not reporting it and others.
Speaker 19:So what in fact is happening is you're seeing a sophisticated sting operation that was initiated by Trump. I'm just a lowly peasant in this game and, honestly, I was informed that I could say something about it today only last night. This is not a surprise here. This is the biggest sting operation, probably in our country, that we've ever had To use it in terms of counting, knowing which ones were fake, which ones were not. It's a very sophisticated code, so if you just throw them away, these are cyber communication, uh implementations that we have the code for. We know exactly what was thrown away, we know exactly what was placed, we know exactly who has it and we know exactly where it went. I can't go any further than that what do you think of that, ron?
Speaker 2:when was this, this clip? Four years ago. That was 2021, just after January 6th.
Speaker 8:This was the shot of hopium that was keeping me moving. I was like, okay, great, this is art of war. Blah, blah, blah. We're going to get to see some of the most brilliant moves I've ever seen in my life.
Speaker 2:All of a sudden, on January 20th they're going to line up for the inauguration and here's going to come the troops. Yeah, exactly, I think, and I'm we're releasing the episode, so eventually you'll get to hear in real time what our thoughts on that were on the audio side. So if you want to catch old season one episodes, uh, we've been uploading them every day. We upload an episode, current episode in an old episode. Every day at 6 am the old episode comes out. Those are from 2020 and 2021.
Speaker 2:And it's hilarious because some of the titles you think we could have played them today. In fact there's almost like overlap sometimes Rod Rosenstein's a day in the thing and then Rod Rosenstein makes it in the new. Hey, freaking people. So if that wasn't a big sting operation, I became fodderder in it because clearly they didn't prove anything. Clearly the cyber ninja thing didn't move the needle nationally. I mean, we all saw what we saw. Clearly the cyber symposium that lindell did and that information, the p caps or whatever he got, that didn't seem to go anywhere. I don't know that anybody that's meaningful disputes that the machines are hackable, but there's been multiple versions of how they're hackable and it's hard to tell if we're talking about different machines or if it's just being let a full load of bull bloney. One of the things someone said to me when you know, with the steve pachinik clip was like, well, I mean, he's a spy doing spy stuff, I mean how do you?
Speaker 2:know you're not getting played. It was like, oh my gosh, I totally could be getting played. This is insider, that's your double agent right there, I don't know. So the reason I played that is because obviously yesterday Trump put out the thing saying he's going to lead an effort to end mail in voting and to end the shady machines. Well, mark Elias, you know Mark Elias is right. Mark Elias was one of the Perkins Cooey lawyers. He's the lawyer that helped launder the dossier into the fbi. He eventually the heat came on perkins cooey and he separated from perkins cooey and started his own law firm. But he's one of these democrat law firms that does election integrity, goes after transgender issues. Basically it's a tds law firm. You know anything tds, they'll write up a lawsuit. So Mark Elias is being interviewed by this podcaster and being asked specifically about.
Speaker 6:Trump's announcement about going after mail-in ballots. I am I'm pretty alarmed by the statement that Trump put out on Truth Social, the bleat he put out about mail-in ballots. I want to read that for everybody. But first, mark, I guess I'm wondering could you give us kind of an alarm scale for you on what you're seeing out of out of the White House today on mail-in ballots?
Speaker 15:I think it's very alarming. I think you know anytime the president of the United States says that he is going to shut down the predominant method of voting in, you know, a quarter of the states, a method of voting that Democrats disproportionately rely on versus Republicans, and, to boot, is also going to attack unspecified voting equipment. I'm not sure what voting equipment this is that he's attacking, but he's going to attack that. It is a, it is. It is something we have to take both literally and seriously.
Speaker 6:Yeah. So here's the statement begins I'm going to lead a movement to get rid of mail in ballots and also, while we're at it, highly inaccurate, very expensive and seriously controversial voting machines which cost 10 times more than accurate and sophisticated watermark paper, which is faster and leaves no doubt. Okay, so we'll stay with that for a second, but we move forward. He goes on to talk about how he has an executive order plant. Uh, he's finding a's signing an executive order to help bring honesty to the 2026 midterm elections. Remember, the states are merely a quote agent for the federal government in counting and tabulating the votes. They must do what the federal government, as represented by the president of the United States, me, tells them for the good of our country. There's a lot there.
Speaker 15:But the punctuationuation, the capitalization, the occasional quotations around words. Kevin, you and I share something in common you worked for jeb bush, I worked for hillary clinton, and there are times like this that I just think how the fuck did we lose to this guy?
Speaker 2:how, how well, I have some suggestions. Your your grammar doesn't matter when you kill soldiers in benghazi. Your grammar doesn't matter when you steal villages of children in haiti. Your grammar doesn't matter when you're not flying around on private jets with underage girls. I don't know, I just say it.
Speaker 8:I don't know I'm like, I don't like this guy already.
Speaker 2:Nobody does Him and Norm Isom give me the creepy vibes, but you know, those are the frontline soldiers on the other side. I mean, those are the people that come and fight. So that's his disdain. You know, all this punctuation is horrible.
Speaker 8:Well, plus he's just playing stupid, Like oh, what machines is he even talking about?
Speaker 2:talking about. Oh, shut up, trump puts out this. Nobody in the world does mail-in ballots. I don't know that. That's a fact. There's a lot of countries, but it doesn't surprise me. I know france is like what? Like I know, in the 2016 election, when they had french uh parliamentarians coming over to the war room to talk to steve bannon, they're like we're just running a bunch of elections now. This is very bad. This is very bad. We got rid of mail-in voting. It's you cheat, they cheat. It's no good, no good. You know what it's like, yikes. And here we are doing it. Chats excuse me, excuse me, ladies and gentlemen's audio listeners, I apologize for filling your ears with my phlegm. Okay, it's been kind of quiet on the chats this morning. Youtube tiffany and carlito welcome, welcome, yes, uh, tiffany. And carlito says I fell for the qfs watermark stuff too, still waiting, ha ha ha.
Speaker 2:And I'm like yeah I know I put 420 days in prison waiting too. Okay, uh, over on rumble. Pony boy, good morning. And carlitz, good morning to you as well. So thank you so much for joining us. We're a little light today. It feels like we're flying light, flying fast, no turbulence. It's pretty good if you guys chatted more, I'd slow the slow down, read your chats, but you're not chatting, so we're just gonna fly through this stuff soon yeah, and yesterday, by the way, our ad reads didn't count, so rumble you got a free ad read and you know, go get your flow tube, ladies and gentlemen, but we did it wrong, so don't tune out.
Speaker 2:If you're on rumble, if you're on youtube, migrate over to rumble. Just open a new tab. We got to get enough viewers over there so that we can do another ad read. Remember, we have like a minimum number of ad reads we have to do in the month and we're already halfway through the month plus, so we're gonna have to slam some ad reads in. Okay, this is chris cuomo talking with benny johnson. I think it's funny, benny Johnson being a creature of the right, a DeSantis supporter nonetheless, but we'll forgive that for a moment. He does have good hits. He's talking to Chris Cuomo, who formerly was a not just a Kool-Aid drinker, a Kool-Aid mixer, passed it out to millions of Americans. Ok, lots of John Jones going.
Speaker 8:You take your shots too, you know so and then he's always like oh well, I didn't know I was making kool-aid I didn't know.
Speaker 2:I didn't know there was a little poison in it. So, on top of that, his brother was the governor of new york right killing folks, killing folks and nursing homes. So, allegedly, allegedly so this topic comes up about COVID right and how people didn't know COVID. And this is Chris Cuomo. I've made Mr. I make lots of mistakes, I've been wrong about a lot of things, but now that I'm trying to survive on my own out in the you know, the world of supply and demand news.
Speaker 8:We need all the ventilators.
Speaker 2:Yeah, exactly, mr Supply and demand news. Now he's tacking to the Tack into common sense because like, oh, I can't cover this stuff, they're not paying me enough money to say these nonsense lines in two minute clips, right, so he's talking to Benny, talking about covid, and his logic here is a little bit funny. I went back.
Speaker 17:You are not. Oh no, leave my kid as exposed as possible. All four of them should get it. No, we were figuring it out in real time. It was weird in real time, but a lot of this is hindsight, where I'm pro freedom, not tyranny. You weren't saying that shit right in the beginning, beginning, benny because we didn't know any better. Well, absolutely we were.
Speaker 1:That was the way that I was living, but no, I went back and looked.
Speaker 17:You were not a big detractor until later, and that's okay. There are plenty of things that we should still know, that we don't know.
Speaker 2:The problem is what is later, after the two weeks to flatten the curve, because I know I was like okay, president's saying it, okay, two weeks. Okay, we'll watch. I've seen the videos in wuhan. I can kind of see the zeitgeist here, you know. I know the energy is going on something's weird two weeks of flatten the curve.
Speaker 8:So hold on, I'll give everybody grace for two weeks yesterday I was listening to a local radio station that has some lefty leaning djs, surprise, and they were talking about um working from home, remotely for federal workers here locally in the state. And they're like, well, you know, should workers be in in the office? Well, if it promotes, you know, better efficiency, then maybe we should be getting back to work. Well. And then they had this whole discussion about, well, how long should people be back at work and should should federal workers, you know especially. They were talking about, like, um, health and human services, and um, for your favorite department, the, uh, the health department, oh yeah, and they're like, you know, these guys should be back at work because it just promotes better efficiency and people get, you know, better service.
Speaker 8:And there's a lot of people that are just complaining about service. And then they got to this discussion, this point of discussion, where they were like, well, how long should people be back at work? I mean, how long should this policy have been enacted like this? And then they started saying stuff like, well, I think that people should have been back at work like three years ago. And it's like, well, how come they weren't?
Speaker 2:yeah we're figuring it out.
Speaker 8:It's like hello you guys were promoting this shit for the last forever and all of a sudden you guys have figured out that you like it doesn't work this doesn't work, and this doesn't work, and we shouldn't work, and this doesn't work, and we shouldn't have been doing this for the last three years.
Speaker 2:And who do we blame ourselves? Yes. So, chris, here is having one of those. Well, you didn't push against it. Listen, everybody gets a little grace. You get the two week grace, the one month grace.
Speaker 8:I guess I forgot. The most important part of this story is that they were all trying to still blame this on trump and it's like for the last three years, for the last three years, it's been biden. Yeah, it's been, but it was all biden yeah, you dumb asses.
Speaker 2:Well, and trump didn't lock. I mean he did the two weeks to stay home, flatten the curve, and then the states kind of took off with it. Certain states became maniacal. It's funny. I was talking to people out in missouri like yeah, covet, it was kind of kind of stunk and you know yeah yeah, I get this when I talk to my family it was like a 50 50, you know, whereas out here I'm like no, it was like 99, it was total mass compliance.
Speaker 2:Like we went out to dinner one time and you had a baby shirt on. It was full fascism here. Yeah, this was full lot, it was. Yeah, it was something else. All right, let's continue on with this. So again, going back, while I looked, you weren't pushing back at what was point, was it when the frontline doctors stood? I mean, there's a turning point for everybody, right? It's guys that are late to the game now, like Chris Cuomo.
Speaker 8:Well, they're all late to the game, but they're all pretending like that they were on the side of right the entire time, which is complete freaking nonsense. No.
Speaker 2:The people that, and that's the other thing too. I mean, these guys were soldiers for the left soldiers. Here's the other thing. Benny was online. Benny navigated that entire time period without getting shut down, canceled. How did he do it? He somehow skirted the line so he couldn't speak out too much. Those of us that did got our shows canceled. Yeah, we weren't available to be heard. We were stripped off spotify. Stripped off spotify because of our opinion, right. So benny made it through that. Can't fault him for it. He did it. Maybe he held back a little bit. I don't know, he's a Ron DeSantis supporter. It's wishy-washy at best. Oh, back here. Maybe maybe we'll play. All right, what are we at 36? I do want to hear the end of this, so we're gonna wait a second.
Speaker 1:Oh no, I'm married to a nurse and she informed me what a coronavirus was and that this was the flu and that we should actually not be locking down and living in fear. And that's the way that I lived my life. I was was traveling through the whole thing. I hated the mask mandates. I hated the lockdown. Everybody hated them. Who didn't hate them? I moved my family and my business away from Washington DC because of how horrific these lockdowns were and how antithetical they are to human flourishing.
Speaker 17:I think you did all that once it became a cause.
Speaker 8:I would hazard a guess that you, but you didn't, chris. No, this guy was the guy that was promoting it all and pushing it, and I'm so.
Speaker 2:I can't even listen to this guy I remember him and his brother on tv where he's holding up the big cotton swap. Go get tested when it became a cause.
Speaker 17:Dude, you were pushing the cause that we had to fight against her wife, who's a nurse, did not ignore the protocols um for her place of work because they were really worried, because a lot of those first responders you know, like your wife, were getting sick, really sick, and it's the flu. You find a flu other than the one in 1918 that matches the numbers of covid 19. The answer is you won't. It's not, not the flu, that's a nonsense statement.
Speaker 1:I don't think we want to talk about inflated, overinflated numbers or why some of those numbers, especially in nursing homes, got so high.
Speaker 17:Why do you think they got high in nursing homes? You had old people there.
Speaker 2:Because your brother was shoving ventilators down their throats. That's why it's because you were shoving people with the flu into old folks homes. That's why they were dying at elevated rates. And, by the way, everybody knows, because of the leaks, your brother got thrown out of office on bogus sex assault charges or allegations in order to not impeach you and try you for something else. Yeah, exactly, that's exactly why we know that. And chris did. He did this, I know. I know they cut a deal. My own family cut a deal to get out of this thing. Pray the rosary daily. Welcome. Welcome to the rumble chat, and I think it's time. I think it's time for an ad read. Oh yeah, we're doing it. So ron's going to be doing our ad read. One of our hosts, ron, is a host, by the way, just so everybody knows. So, ron, now it's a little different. Today. There's going to be doing our ad read. One of our hosts, ron, is a host, by the way, just so everybody knows. So.
Speaker 2:Ron now it's a little different. Today there's going to be a QR code on your screen. If you are so good, please scan the QR code, go visit the site so they know that our show's working right.
Speaker 8:So quick ad read here All right, still haven't tried 1775 coffee. Now it's your shot. The 1775 coffee now it's your shot. The 1775 starter kit just dropped. Only a thousand units. You're getting the bold, dark roast that hits hard and the smooth medium roast and the vitality mushroom coffee for clean energy and laser focus. No crash, all single origin, small batch, toxin free and mold free. Plus, you're also getting a gold spoon clip because freedom isn't scooped with plastic A frother strong enough to stir up your coffee and your mother-in-law's opinions, and a black 1775 tumbler. $170 worth of coffee and gear Yours for $99. This is for the ones you've been watching 1775 blow up on rumble, wondering if it's actually worth it. Spoiler is it is. Go to 1775 coffeecom slash studio and grab your starter kit before they're gone. Bold beans, clean fuel and a morning routine that stands for something just like Rumble does.
Speaker 2:Awesome. You know what's great about that is? Ron's never had coffee, but I enjoy a cup every morning, so I'll be ordering my 1775 coffee. And what I love about 1775 is that's the year of angst. That's the year that the American colonies were like we're done with this, freaking king, we're done with this. And that led to, of course, our favorite year 1776 Live. Don't forget to visit us at 1776liveus, where we teach on strategies, how to live in the private, how to get out of public exposure and protect your assets, so don't forget to join us there. That is not an ad read. That's just a shameless plug for what I do after the podcast so 1776 5 leads to 1776 live.
Speaker 2:So get your, get your morning brew going, okay. So let's jump into trump and the fallout from the russia alaska or the russia us sentiment held in alaska, which, by the way, holding the summit in alaska was a huge point of contention for putin. He didn't want to come. He's like we got to go to a neutral third party. And trump's like, no, no, I'm the king. You're coming from my castle, by the way, I'm gonna fly a bomber right over your head. Alaska's neutral death, do you?
Speaker 2:think that that it was a big deal it was a big deal to get putin to come to america. Oh yeah, right, it was a big deal. It was a big deal to get Putin to come to America oh yeah, it was a big deal. That establishes dominance of America. He's coming as a supplicant to ask for help to resolve this war. The whole thing, the optics of it, the B-52. I think Trump did a good job of validating him, but, at the same time, the entire optics of it. That's what a supplicant does.
Speaker 2:I would call putin a big man for doing it, though I would say too, I would think so too, and he's got a lot of people think you know putin, who runs his country. No, it's like what mark rubio said they have constituencies. He's got hardliners in his party that are more hardline than him, and he's got liberals in the country, too, that he has to accommodate. For, like it's just like any other country, there's diverse political feelings, and though he might have a lot of power, and we might call him an authoritarian dictator, he still has to move the needle yeah, there's a lot of rich oligarchs over there that probably have something to say yeah, you still have to have some, some people to support you.
Speaker 2:pb brown, utah scouts, welcome. I always love it when you join us. Thank you for joining us. Ok, so, talking about the Trump or the Russia-Ukraine situation, I actually don't know who this gentleman is, but he's got a good little breakdown of exactly kind of what led up to this and the Democrats role in it.
Speaker 20:Trump was right about you. Now the media is quietly admitting it. Now the media is quietly admitting it. Look, you don't have to like Trump, you don't have to support Putin. But you may want to pay attention for a moment, because something massive just shifted the Hill.
Speaker 20:One of the biggest political outlets in DC just dropped an article called sadly, trump is right on Ukraine. That headline alone is enough to make half the media scramble for damage control, but what's inside that article is even more powerful. They admit that the war in Ukraine wasn't unprovoked. That it was Ukrainian right-wing militants who ignited the conflict back in 2014, long before Russia took Crimea. That Zelensky, far from being a hero of peace, rejected multiple peace agreements, pushed for NATO military involvement and amped up aggression in the Donbass region, keep banned opposition parties, shut down the media outlets and then begged for more weapons to defend democracy in the West.
Speaker 20:They didn't just let it happen, they funded it, they armed it and they sold you a one-sided story on every major network, day and night. For years. They told you this war started in 2022, that Russia attacked unprovokedoked. That selensky was the last man standing between freedom and tyranny. That was a script. If you questioned it, you were labeled a traitor, a putin puppet or even worse. But now even the hill is admitting. It's not that simple, and here's what they're not saying out loud.
Speaker 2:Trump said all this he said nato expansion the hill newspaper is a rhino publication but they're a serious newspaper. So when they publish something even the Democrats are kind of pay attention to it, so it makes sense. Like WAPO you can almost ignore, new York Times you can almost ignore. But the Hill is like there's some meat on that bone Might have. It's not conservative, it's not a Republican publication. It kind of is that rhino center right wall street journal area but they pride themselves on like doing real reporting. So the fact that they reported on this is kind of like okay, this is the now, this is the new fact pattern was reckless.
Speaker 20:He said west was playing games in ukraine. He said we were headed for a war we didn't need. And now the same media that mocked him is quietly backpedaling. So why now? Because the narrative is cracking, because independent journalists, alternative media and everyday people like us kept pushing for the truth, because mainstream media knows people are waking up. The same people who lied to us in Iraq and Afghanistan have been lying about Ukraine, and now they're getting caught.
Speaker 20:So no, I'm not a pro-Russia, I'm not a pro-Zelensky person. I'm pro-truth, pro-reality and pro-peace. And here's the thing you don't have to pick a side to see what's going on. You just need to pause, zoom out and do a little bit of digging, because once you step outside the media filter, the picture changes. You start to see how much we've been manipulated, not just into war, but into turning on each other. The elites thrive on distraction, on outrage, on fear, but now? So before you start replying with hateful words, take a moment. You have the chance to think for yourself, question why you're so angry and look at what is being presented in front of you. I challenge you to do it, not for Trump, not for Putin, not for a flag. Do it for the truth, do it for peace.
Speaker 2:So share this, because war thrives on lies and peace starts with waking up I remember when the ukraine russian war first started and we were off the air at this point and I had a discussion with a family member oh you can't invade a sovereign country and I'm like, oh my gosh, you should have been looking at the mirror 20 years ago and we invaded a sovereign country, you know what I mean like okay, onto the youtube comments weed and boys.
Speaker 2:Ron, you sold me a, you sold me I'm a coffee drinker, I'll grab some. Yes, go weed them boys. Alan mongrel van cleave define republican. You can't sifting sand beneath your feet. It cannot be defined. It changes from year to year from leading politician to leading politician. You also cannot define the Democrats unless you just define them as idiots.
Speaker 2:Okay so, there isn't really, it's the uniparty, the political powers. You can go back and in season three of the Peasants Perspective on the audio version, so you have to go in where you can separate by season. You can go see Common Sense Applied Today. You can also go to PeasantsPerspectivecom and you can go into the. There's a link there for Common Sense Applied Today where I go over Thomas Paine's Common Sense Applied Today and in that I make the comparison that when Thomas Paine is talking about the crown and its interests and stuff like that, I make the comparison that what we've done is we've done the same thing that people did to the crown. They gave it the keys to the kingdom. We've done that to the two political parties. Collectively. They hold the keys of the kingdom. They select who is allowed to be our leaders, who's allowed to be selected. They are the real power brokers Between the two of them. They hold everything. They could they put?
Speaker 2:all the uh they put. They put all the options on the table, and it's their options. Does that make sense? So the republican party is simply the other side of the coin of the democrat party it's.
Speaker 8:It's where all the people come from that we get to pick from in our primary exactly.
Speaker 2:So by giving it two separate names, the uniparty basically can march us into whatever they want to march us into they use? They use hegelian dialectic, they use machiavellian tactics one party causes the problem, the other one brings the solution, and vice and back and forth. We march over hill and dell until we're in some foreign land fighting for a banker's war and all these r&d people.
Speaker 2:They all came from the same place so, just like we were watching, was with, uh, mark elias talking. Well, you worked for jeb bush and I worked for hillary clinton. Why are you guys talking? I thought we were supposed to be mortal enemies. You're right, like why? Why would you have someone who works directly with hillary clinton talking with someone who works with directly with jeb? Well, well, we all just have to get along. No, we don't do the Victor, go the spoils. Clearly, the Republican Democrat party collectively have been the victors of whatever there was to win and we, the people, have been left tilling our gardens, going to work, doing basic stuff. Meanwhile, our interests haven't been met, end of story. So define Republican party haven't been met, end of story so define Republican Party, alan?
Speaker 2:I don't know the red team. You know what I mean. Like, honestly, alan and I kind of made mention of this in the speech I gave this weekend but what are we conserving? You know, when people get up there and they claim to be Republicans, they're like we should get the county to do this on property rights, and we should. I'm like you're just imposing on private property rights. I want freedom. I want people to do whatever they want on their property. How about we talk about eliminating the entire permit system altogether? Yeah, that's what a Republican should be arguing.
Speaker 2:All right, what are you conserving? Are we picking a date and going? Well, we want to return to. You know 2009, republican Party values. You know where the state creates a giant, enormous bill called no Child behind behind that functionally neuters the state and the parents and the school boards in directing what their children learn at school? Yeah, I want to conserve that republican party. Yeah, exactly. So what are you? What are you trying to conserve? I'm trying to conserve the intelligence apparatus that tells us there's weapons of mass destruction in iraq. Yellow cake, yellow cake. What are we trying to conserve? Freak, if I know, 1775 coffee. That's what I'm trying to preserve. Yeah, just get off my lawn. Just get off my lawn. It's all fun and games until someone goes to jail and then it's serious and we have to do a podcast about it.
Speaker 2:That's right. So trump was heaped with praise. Yesterday, all these european leaders showed up in washington dc and the thing about this is it's okay. The left is like oh, they came in, you know, zielinski bought, brought back up and they're going to try to talk trump into isolating putin. Blah, blah, blah. But that's not really what came out of these meetings.
Speaker 4:Instead, we heard things like this Maloney of Italy, who's a really great leader and an inspiration which, by the way, we're going to show a couple of clips of Maloney today.
Speaker 2:She's the Italian prime minister, total, total. Trying to pick my words that don't come back and bite me later, but she's a very uh, powerful woman. Okay, very powerful woman. Her, she's Italian, very expressive, you can see it. She's got no poker face. She does not hide. Is that her right there? That's her right there, and look at the way she looks at Trump. There are pictures like this all the time, where she'll like lean over and look across emmanuel marcon and have this like glowing look towards donald trump. It's really fun to watch. So, anyways, she has a little something to say over there.
Speaker 4:She's she's served now, even though she's a very young person. She's served there for a long period of time relative to others. They don't. They don't last very long. You've lasted a long time. You're going to be there a long time, please, sergio.
Speaker 13:Well, thank you very much, Donald, mr President, for hosting us today in this important meeting, and I think it is an important day, a new phase, after three years and a half that we didn't see any kind of sign from the Russian side that there was a willing for dialogue. So something is changing. Something has changed thanks to you, thanks also to the standing in the battlefield, which was achieved with the bravery of Ukrainians and with the unity that we all provided to Ukraine, and the reason why I mention it is that we also have to remind that if we want to reach peace and if we want to guarantee justice, we have to do it united. So that's why it's a very good day, the one we are in. You can obviously count on Italy, as it was from the beginning. We are on the side of Ukraine and we absolutely support your efforts towards peace.
Speaker 13:We will talk about many important topics. The first one is security guarantees how to be sure that it won't happen again, which is a precondition of every kind of peace. I'm happy that we will discuss about that. I'm happy that we will begin from a proposal which is the, let's say, article 5 model, which was Italian at the beginning. So we are always ready to bring our proposals for peace for dialogue. It's something we have to build together to guarantee peace and to defend the security of our nation. So thank you, mr president, for hosting us.
Speaker 2:Thank you very much so basically in three and a half years, the russians have done nothing.
Speaker 2:They've not wanted to be talked to.
Speaker 2:They've not basically engaged with europe directly. They've didn't. I know biden didn't engage him directly. It was just all support ukraine, throw money and weapons at him and, you know, let him settle it on the battlefield. One of the things that's happened on the battlefield is it's become world war, one trench warfare. They're not moving and it's become completely mechanized. This is an interview from a ukrainian medic and he's like I don't know when. The last time I treated a bullet wound was it's all drone shrapnel. This is a war. They said. Robotic wars aren't coming, they're here. This is a robotic war. We are not fighting the enemy, we're fighting the drones, we're fighting, you know, the tech and that's what's doing all the damage. I thought that was pretty interesting. You know what I mean. Like, okay, we're here, aoi or ai wars.
Speaker 2:John in alabama, it's time, man, he starts. Got to start testing the, the strength of various metals. I gotta go like, print that off and frame it. His little monologue there, uh pray. The rosary daily says put the qr code back up and I'll check it out. If we can, we will. I don't know we can't.
Speaker 2:I don't think we can just randomly put it back up in. But if we do another ad read we will well, you can go back in.
Speaker 8:You can go back in time in the show.
Speaker 2:Yeah, you'll have to do that. Yeah, but 1775 coffee, yeah, and the qr code would be great, because then I think it like links to us. I don't think it doesn't matter, we're not gonna. We're not here for the money, we're here for the, to spread the ideas and the information. The money just pays for the hosting, which is surprisingly expensive.
Speaker 9:Okay, so this is, uh, the the nato secretary general talking too I really want to thank you, uh, president of the united states, dear donald, for the fact that you, as I said before, broke the deadlock basically with president putin by starting that dialogue, and I think it was in february that you had first a phone call, and from there we are now where we are today, and that is, uh, I think, if we play this well, we could end this.
Speaker 9:And we have to end this. We have to stop the killing, we have to stop the destruction of ukraine's infrastructure. That is a terrible war, um, so I'm really excited and let's make the best out of today and make sure that, from today onwards, we get this thing to an end as soon as possible. I really want to thank you for your leadership. What you are doing for Lodomir, but of course, also all the European colleagues, it is really crucial, and the fact that you have said I'm willing to participate in security guarantees is a big step. It's really a breakthrough and it makes all the difference. So also thank you for that.
Speaker 2:Now this whole thing started when Ukraine was basically pushed along the line of getting NATO membership. Well, Article 5 of NATO says if any member of NATO is attacked, it's an attack on all and it triggers everybody into having to do something. But one of the things you can do is you can just simply make a statement that says we're now monitoring the situation. So that is an appropriate response for an Article five. For an attack on an Article five country, the countries can just say we're monitoring the situation and that's enough. Ok, security guarantees are actually a step farther. That's saying we will actually engage, Right. So this is another one of those instances. Trump is going to get rid of the thing that Russia doesn't want with just NATO membership, which also comes with other strings attached. But they're willing to tolerate a security guarantee which is a direct military support of Ukraine itself.
Speaker 8:Yes, I have a problem with this as well. Um, yesterday on my drive home I was listening to some reporters talk about this, and they were, and I was like damn you know, this is exactly the kind of slipperiness that gets american boots on the ground and then all of a sudden it's world war. Yes, I'm like this is so dangerous.
Speaker 2:Now George Washington, going all the way back to his last speech as president, he talked about foreign entanglements and he said we don't want to go out and create these alliances, but we can go out and do commerce. We want to have commerce. So Trump is trying to create these commercial agreements where everything's win--win, where everybody wins when we have peace because the money's flowing. You guys can handle your domestic conflicts, we'll handle our domestic conflicts, but if the money's flowing and the international rules-based order is being maintained, everybody's happy right.
Speaker 8:So what I'm saying is the appetite for boots on the ground in ukraine has been zero in our country oh yeah, but this is somehow going to get boots on the ground it could.
Speaker 2:I'm like, yeah, so I don't know. I mean, I I have the attitude of sit back and watch. I don't want to be a part of this, yeah, but it's going to affect future generations, it's going to affect my dinner table, it's going to affect my gas prices, like so we watch? Yep, we watch, and as peasants, we try to. You know, look onto the horizon a little bit, see what's coming, see what time of season it is. Are the oak leaves falling? As the bible says? Because if you do, no one has to tell you what time it is you know, exactly okay, so uh and who was that dude that was talking last?
Speaker 2:that was the, the UN, the NATO secretary general.
Speaker 8:OK, definitely a guy that never got any dirt under his fingernails.
Speaker 2:Probably not, probably. Didn't. Climb up through the ranks, from private to corporal to sergeant, probably not. Yeah, no, no. This is an EU bureaucrat if we've ever seen one, yeah right. And this whole table which, by the way, seeing this table with these european leaders there, this is, there's a lot of might at this table.
Speaker 8:You know I I wanted to say something a little bit snide, but as I was looking at this table, I'm thinking to myself this is like a moment that gets put in the history books. I mean, these are world leaders coming together for for some kind of a weird summit. I don't know what. You call it a very impromptu summit, yeah, and this is a big deal and I think the media doesn't know how to take it.
Speaker 2:Do we go full tds? Do we support you know that maybe the potential end of the war? Do we criticize the outcomes and want to be on the side of continuing the war? They don't really know how to cover this All right.
Speaker 8:I mean I'm seeing very Well, some of these world leaders sitting at the table don't even know what to say. Trump, thank you.
Speaker 2:Yeah, that's what they're saying. Trump, thank you, we support you. So the chancellor of Germany starts talking and Milani is sitting next to Trump with this expressive Italian face.
Speaker 10:We don't really care what he's saying, but look at her facial expressions, let's try to put pressure on Russia, because the credibility of these efforts, these efforts we are undertaking today, are depending on at least a ceasefire from the beginning of the serious negotiations, from the next step on. So I would like to emphasize this aspect and would like to see a ceasefire from the meeting, which should be a trilateral meeting I don't know wherever it takes place well, probably just the look she gets when she's thinking hard that's the look of disdain, man.
Speaker 2:That's totally a look at the stain. Don't tell me anything other than that. That is a look of disdain. So there was a uh okay. So there was a moment, as this impromptu summit wrapped up, that I found to be very, very funny, but also very endearing and warming. So trump closes out the meeting and, of course, as soon as you close out the meeting, the press cameras go crazy. Questions start getting yelled in this digital age.
Speaker 2:We still got the shutters yep and there's a little uh hot mic moment here. All right, uh, sapphire patrick says she is getting decorating ideas. She's getting ideas looking around the white house yeah that's a woman's perspective. Maybe that's exactly what she's doing. She's like, you know, the golden here does the room well, okay. So this is a hot mic moment after the after the meeting's over.
Speaker 4:That's all we ask for is fairness with the media. Thank you all very much. We appreciate it. Thank you very much.
Speaker 2:So the audio doesn't come through to you, but there's lots of chatter, lots of chatter. So the media is. You can't hear it because of the way we do this, but the media, just like after everything Trump does cameras, Trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump, trump. When Putin was there and he actually turned to the media, in English goes enough.
Speaker 13:No, thank you for being so fair. Thank you, donald, but he loves it. He loves it, he never wants to speak with Mike.
Speaker 19:He's a very good guy.
Speaker 13:He went to college. But he says he to college.
Speaker 2:So she was saying that you go through this every day. Like they control their media, they don't get that media, doesn't get access to them like that. You know what I mean.
Speaker 2:And trump's just got this gaggle of people screaming at him. And she's like you, you the, the guy across the table, you go through this every day. And milani's like, he likes it, he likes it, you like it, right, I don't. And she goes. I don't ever want to talk to my media like this, like trump just does it. I thought that was kind of endearing. And again, trump you know, if there's anything that he can be accused of, it's not being unavailable to the media at all. So, after they had this thing, do we need to do another read?
Speaker 8:are we not yet, not yet okay.
Speaker 2:So after he had the gaggle he went and met with zielinski in the white house and he gave zielinski a little bit of a hard time, which I thought was totally appropriate legal so you say during, during the war you?
Speaker 2:can't. So the question was if zielinski was going to hold elections, because remember, you know we got to support democracy but he's completely canceled all elections in his nation because they're at war, so can't have an election Right, a little bit of an interesting carrot and a stick, so you can't really resolve the war, either because the polling shows that you'd be run out, probably exiled, like the last two presidents.
Speaker 8:That's a perfect pause moment. Why Look at his?
Speaker 2:eyes. So Trump has given him a little bit of a hard time here, because the question is about elections.
Speaker 4:You say during the war you can't have elections. So let me just say three and a half years. So you mean, if we happen to be in a war with somebody, no more elections. Oh, that's good. I wonder what the? Oh elections, oh that's good. I wonder what the?
Speaker 2:I wonder what the value likes is oh do you see what trump just did there yeah trump is a magician. He really is a wizard. For again, love him or hate him, I tend to like him, but this is the kind of stuff. Oh, so you're saying if we, in three and a half years, had a war, I could just cancel elections? And the left who's like Trump is a king, but you got to support the King Zelensky, who's canceled his elections.
Speaker 8:Who just said oh, trump likes that idea Exactly.
Speaker 17:Oh, hurry up and hold elections.
Speaker 2:Do you see how Trump will just kind of flip around things on people? Oh so if you're in war, war, no elections maybe we should go to war. Is there any chance you've put off settlement because you know there might be accountability for all that money that's missing and all those yachts in morocco? And I mean, it's not like this stuff isn't out there, you know, it's not like there's just this weird smattering of new multi-millionaire ukrainians showing up in random ports around europe with nice new boats just recently purchased from oil sheiks in saudi arabia. You know what?
Speaker 2:I mean it's like hello man, some of this stuff. It's just so patently obvious. And trump is just the king of, uh, he's just the king of captain, he's just captain obvious you know oh well, should we? Should we just cancel our elections? I don't know about that. So Trump also confirmed that he had a call with Putin.
Speaker 4:We just spoke to. I was just telling the president. I just spoke to President Putin indirectly and we're going to have a phone call right after these meetings today and we may or may not have a trilat. If we don't have a trilat, then the fighting continues, and if we do, we have a good chance. I think if we have a trilat there's a good chance of maybe ending it. But he's expecting my call when we're finished with this meeting.
Speaker 2:We just spoke to. I was just telling all the press he did end up having a call with Putin and it looks like they're moving forward to scheduling a trilat. That's good news. This is a big deal.
Speaker 8:And trilat is trilateral agreement. Is that what that stands for?
Speaker 2:So they're just trilateral meeting. So this is a really big deal. All the conflicts that Trump has settled so far, with the exception of Israel-Hamas, that's a very embedded problem, you know. That's like almost better described as a civil war, you know, because it's inside of one nation's sovereign territory, kind of thing going on there. But this Ukraine-Russia war has all kinds of complications.
Speaker 2:Ukraine's a major I mean Russia is a major world player. Like I said, they have the largest nuclear arsenal. They're not away. They have complete detente. No one's taken over russia. It's not going anywhere. Surprise couldn't even get. Even when the soviet union fell, you still couldn't get rid of russia. You know why? Because somebody went and grabbed the nuke button and said I got it, I captured the flag, we're it. They're not going anywhere. Ukraine, however, is de-armed.
Speaker 2:Ukraine is a fodder nation and it's been treated like a laundromat. So is, you know, but that's a great way to say it. It's been the laundromat for all of Europe and the American elites, for all of Europe and the American elites. There's no insignificance to the fact that you have Mitt Romney's chief of staff sitting on the same Burisma board that Hunter Biden is sitting on. Just wrap your brain around that for a minute. Wrap your brain around that for a minute. How do we define Republican? Again, I can't remember. So this has been a problem for a long time. That's just been working and it's out of sight, out of mind.
Speaker 2:Why does the united states sponsor 27 bio labs in ukraine? Tulsa gabbert talked about this. Victoria newland confirmed it. Had you ever heard of that? Nope, no. So this ukraine russia conflict has huge, has an escalatory ladder that ends with all of us in heaven. Okay, so so this is a huge deal. This is why everybody showed up the table. Not everybody showed up at the table for an azerbaijan, armenia. You know treaty, they didn't show up for that, but they're going to show up for this because it's got huge, uh, escalatory things.
Speaker 2:Now, the other day, trump put out a truth social that said he called for the end of the of hamas and the annihilation of hamas, and so they turned around and accepted a ceasefire. What, yeah? So trump put out a thing saying it's time to completely eliminate hamas like root and stem, and so they instantly said oh, we're good fighting. Hamas has accepted an updated proposal for a ceasefire in gaza presented by the qatari and egyptian mediators. Two sources with knowledge of the talks, tell axios why it matters. This is part of a last-ditch effort to reach a deal to avoid major new Israel offensive to occupy Gaza City. A diplomatic source said the deal Hamas accepted is 98% similar to the last US-backed proposal Israel agreed to, but talks broke down when Hamas did not. Israel officials said they still haven't received a written Hamas response and therefore cannot say whether they find it acceptable.
Speaker 2:The second source said the proposal Hamas accepted is a partial deal for a 60 day ceasefire to release 10 life hostages, 18 deceased hostages and release Palestinian prisoners. The news comes just hours after President Trump's. Trump urged Israel to expand its attacks on Hamas, saying the hostages would not be freed until Hamas was confronted and destroyed. So all of a sudden, they got pretty pliable. So, trump doing some good stuff? I tell you, uh, there's this meme that I saw that I thought was fairly appropriate and I think it's just something that you know. We should all be aware of. It's this in 2011, if you are true christians, open your borders, right the syrian refugee crisis, and now you have europe will become islamic in 2025.
Speaker 8:Just, you know nothing against the religion of peace, but you know it's baked into the cake all right, it's about that time here we go big moments okay, set your clocks, mark your calendars and buckle up for the best nfl primetime football action starting september 4th on Westwood One. You can catch all the bone-crushing hits, last-second heroics and edge-of-your-seat action that NFL Thursday, sunday and Monday nights have to offer, whether you're tailgating, driving or chilling at home. Don't miss a single snap home. Don't miss a single snap. Listen on the nfl app, the westwood one sports app at westwood one sportscom. Or just say alexa, open westwood one sports. If it's the nfl, it's on westwood one that's big time.
Speaker 2:That's big time. Oh, that's west yeah.
Speaker 5:Three and a half years. A lot of people have died.
Speaker 2:So check out your NFL. My wife actually came to me like a week ago and was like we need a sport. She's like we need a sport that we can just turn off everything else and just enjoy the camaraderie of a sports team. And so she was like, should it be football? Should it be basketball? And I probably she was like, should it be football should?
Speaker 8:it be basketball and I don't know I probably football. It's a shorter season, you know they hit harder and we have a home team.
Speaker 2:You know I was like we'll probably do football. I know, no basketball for us. You know, I really did enjoy football in prison, well, sitting on the hard. Well, because the blacks are hilarious to watch watching a sporting event. It's like I actually wouldn't watch the football, I was watching the blacks, and I don't mean that pejoratively, I've been in prison, I can say it like that. Okay, so the blacks, they're betting. You know they got their like little bet tapes and stuff going on and you know if a kicker misses something then the other half's like, yeah, I'm up 50 steps.
Speaker 2:You don't have these whole things going on. It was pretty hilarious to watch, so I did enjoy Kansas city. I was in Missouri for a good part of it and watch Kansas city games, I will say this. So I watched the super bowl in DC and it was Baltimore, and it was Baltimore, it was Kansas city, and for the 49ers. Now I don't root for the 49ers, okay, I'm not. I wasn't a kansas city fan prior to this. But there was this thing going on because the last time trump lost, kansas city won and so they wanted was it that? Was it the other way around? I can't remember. Either way. They were working, they were rooting for 49ers because taylor swift was, you know, boyfriend of kelsey, or whatever.
Speaker 8:Kansas city ended up with all this is lost on me, so then the next.
Speaker 2:So then I ended up in philadelphia, home of the eagles, and got to see the fan base there, because most of them are from the philadelphia area, and then also watching philadelphia 76ers basketball games. I didn't know they had a fan base. I thought they sucked. I really like the philadelphia 76. I thought they peaked with Allen Iverson. I didn't realize that it would be like a huge thing going on there. And then when I ended up in Missouri, it was all about Kansas City, kansas City, kansas City and then of course, baseball's Cardinals and the Royals. It was pretty interesting.
Speaker 8:So here's an interesting tidbit about me folks. So I don't drink coffee. I also don't give a crap about football, so for both of those two ad reads are like, not near and dear to me at all, but we have listeners who love football. Oh yeah, yeah yeah. But it's just funny because, you know, I live in a town where, you know, the seahawks did pretty well a few years ago and they went to the super bowl. I didn't even know we were in the super bowl, I went to work and everybody's like, and I was like what we just won the super bowl I didn't even watch it and they they were my co-workers were furious with me.
Speaker 2:That's so funny. Anti-socialist league jumps in in the rumble chat nato desperately trying to stay relevant, which is why the show of force became irrelevant years ago. Just a bunch of idiots intentionally taking their own countries. They want to take us down with them. Yeah, I don't see the functional need for nato anymore. It was designed to counter the soviet union. Um, I think it be. It's just another entanglement. It's another layer of bureaucracy. It's supposed to unite the, the uh, different groups. And I will say this it's unlikely that any two natal countries will go to war with each other.
Speaker 2:So to that extent, I guess it's okay. But yes, it creates the homogenization effect. When you're all under one unified government, the government's natural inclination is to unify its population.
Speaker 8:And it can also be used.
Speaker 2:It wants everybody in on the Truman Show.
Speaker 8:And it can also be used kind of like a Hegelian dialectic thing where you get to smash each other if you're part of the team and you're not part of the team Exactly.
Speaker 2:So Marco Rubio went on to Jesse Waters show to talk about the inside the Trump-Zolinski meeting. So let's take a look at that. Listen to this.
Speaker 5:Well, I think the whole thing was a big moment, unprecedented really, when you think campaign leaders came here, seven that were there, and that included the head of NATO and the head of the EU and they all said the same thing, which is this you know, after three years of sort of deadlock and no talks and no change in circumstances, this is the first time where there seems to be some movement. Now, look, this is a complicated war. There's no doubt about it. I mean, this has been going on for three and a half years. A lot of people have died, a lot of territories exchanged back and forth, so it's not an easy thing to unwind.
Speaker 5:But nothing was happening on this war. Literally, the only option that we were given under the previous administration was continue to fund Ukraine for however much they need, for however long it takes, and now you have people actually talking about pathways towards ending it. Now it's going to take a little bit more work and a little bit more time, but we are making progress. It's not me saying it, that is. Virtually every leader there today said that in front of the cameras. And they're saying it for a reason because it's true, and they're witnessing it and they've been a part of it.
Speaker 2:Well, I think the whole thing is really the amount of death and dying that has gone on almost unchecked. And then to get now to the point where everybody's coming to the table and at least talking. I'm sure there's fighting going on today, but there's, there's at least a glimmer of hope on the horizon, like the dawn is breaking. I hope. I hope you know I say it all the time I have low expectations, but there was this video that came out. These are monks. But there was this video that came out. These are monks. I think these guys are from Cambodia. Oh my gosh, I love it when I research this and then I forget when we go live. But these guys are talking about the peace deal that Trump just brokered between it was a Cambodia and Indonesia. Oh man, I hope that that doesn't sound right. Either way, they're praising Trump for what he's doing and encouraging more the people of both nations.
Speaker 14:Your diplomatic engagement and visionary intervention were critical in de-escalating tension and facilitating a truth. Your commitment to promoting peace and stability for Cambodia and Thailand is deeply commendable. The ceasefire which was active in recent talks in Kuala Lumpur, malaysia, is a testament to your extraordinary statements to resolve conflict and preventing catastrophic war between the two nations. It is our sincere hopes that this initial success will lay the groundwork for a lasting and comprehensive resolution to the long-standing territorial dispute. The people of both Thailand and Cambodia deserve to live in peace and without fear. Your actions have provided a path for that goal and for that we are profoundly grateful, and we thank you for your leadership and dedication to conflict resolution on the world states.
Speaker 2:So when I look at this group of people here, I don't see an oligarch class, I don't see a ruling class. I see people. Yeah, I see these. These guys have chosen to live the monk life, but these are the people that end up being fodder. These are the people that end up being these minority groups, these faction groups, and they're. They see the peace. The peace is the objective. The end of the fighting is the objective. Like I have a feeling these guys don't see a lot of differentiation between cambodian children and thailand thailand children. You know what I mean. They understand and I think we have the same attitude. Like I have great sympathy and empathy for the russians and the ukrainians. The war is the problem and trump's attitude of just settle it.
Speaker 2:Just settle it, start talking and settle it. Nobody wants bullets flying at them. It's just the most common sense thing. The oligarchs don't have bullets flying at them. The ruling class are protected. Say what of it you will. Of course we want our public leaders protected, but they insulate themselves. The people who pay the price, people live in those areas and all that kind of stuff I love seeing that it's kind of what my comment about the guy with no dirt under his nails was all about yeah, yeah, it's like you don't know they're just removed
Speaker 2:so the other thing too bill barr apparently got his day in the hot seat in a closed meeting with the house and so he came in and did his first testimony that you know talk about his time as attorney general, and he said this was reported by Fox News and then clandestine makes this commentary before I read the headline. Former Bill Barr testified before the House Oversight Committee today. Behind closed doors. Barr said he never saw anything that would implicate Trump in Epstein's crimes and that Biden admin would have leaked it if it existed. The Dems MSN will ignore this because it does not fit their nonsense accusations. But if Barr had some something different, it would be front page breaking news on every outlet in America. Trump is not implicated in Epstein's crimes and everyone knows it. If he was, they would have leaked it before Trump reached the bottom of the escalator. Bill, they would have leaked it before Trump reached the bottom of the escalator. Bill Barr testifies he didn't see info that would implicate Trump in the Epstein case. Comer says and this was coming from James Comer he said that he has never seen anything that would implicate President Trump in any of this and he believed that had there been anything pertaining to President Trump with respect to the Epstein list that he felt like the Biden administration would have probably leaked it out. And of course he would have directed them to leak it out because he was working with the Biden administration, talking to Fannie Willis and all the apparatchiks on the Democrat side of the party.
Speaker 2:Again back to Alan's thing. Can you define Republican? No, I can't, because Bill Barr, when worked with Fannie Willis and I don't see anything similar in their ideology. I'm not exactly sure the tie that binds, but basically Bill Barr is their ideology, so I'm not exactly sure. I'm not exactly sure the tie that binds, okay, but basically bull bar is admitting, uh, the democrats would have released it and by tacit admission, since he was working with the democrats, I would have released it well, and also, um, we're not really, uh, carrying water for republicans either.
Speaker 2:No, this just goes to show anything the democrats are accused of and it's again, it's not even just the democrats, anybody in this elite crust yes, anything they're actually doing. They'll try to turn around and accuse trump of doing it first. Right, so it breaks the ice. And then, when that's disproven, and then their stuff comes out. There's already this idea of oh yeah, political leaders get accused of things all the time, but it never pans out. You know all this russiag thing. It didn't pan out, so now it's Russiagate, hillary. Oh, it's not going to pan out.
Speaker 8:You see what I'm saying.
Speaker 2:It's like this complete mind warp that we live in. So, yeah, I don't think Trump had anything to do with Epstein. It makes me wonder Elon Musk's whole tack and thing. But the smearing trump with the epstein crimes. It not only potentially implicates what they did, but there's also a reason why they want to create this subterfuge that trump is a elite pedo and that he's part of these rings and he's been involved this whole time because, simultaneously to the media narrative, there's an actual boots on the ground thing that's happening here.
Speaker 12:As you know, half a million children trafficked over a four year period in the United States. This administration is going to investigate every instance of child trafficking, labor trafficking, sex trafficking, child smuggling and all the attendant crimes involved in that, and our message to everyone in the country is to cooperate fully with immigration and customs enforcement so that we can end the scourge of child trafficking and child abuse that has been endemic these last four years.
Speaker 18:Something that you should have that you haven't reported. As you know, 300,000 children are missing right. 300,000, undivided. We've already gotten back 10,000 of those children and we have a lot more planned to come back. We've already gotten back 10,000 of those children and we have a lot more planned to come back. We're getting back by the thousands, but 300,000. And, as of this morning, over 10,000 we've gotten back.
Speaker 2:So he put out this tweet. Ursula von der Leyen, who's the EU president, or whatever they call her, the distinguished and highly respected president of the European Union, europe could have just read the rest of the sentence. President of the european commission and I have been discussing a massive worldwide problem of missing children. This likewise a big subject for my wife, melania. It is a subject at the top of all lists and the world will work together to solve it, hopefully bringing them home to their families. It is a worldwide problem and the trump administration is actually doing something about it, not just talking about it.
Speaker 2:But we know that they've brought 10,000 of those kids home and if you go back and listen to what representative Clay Higgins talks about, he says we are deposing all of them. We are asking them where they went, who they were with, and they're going after them. I don't know what that looks like. You know, if you bring back 10,000 kids to me, you should bring back 10,000 captors. You know there should be like a one to one. Who were you with when we got you? So I don't know. I don't know where those people are.
Speaker 8:Even if it's a two to one or a three to one, there should be hundreds and hundreds, yeah, but I'm glad to hear that there's work on that.
Speaker 2:And again, this kind of laces in with the Epstein scandal, whether directly or not. I am uncertain if Epstein's involved in mass. I mean we're talking on the thousands scale of child trafficking. I believe he trafficked over the years hundreds of teenage girls to various locations and most of them were kind of in this, came off the streets. I'll pay for your dance.
Speaker 2:You know I'll pay for much more believable yeah, I don't know that he's involved in the mass trafficking, but it gives you a avatar to project all of that angst about worldwide sex trafficking. Yes, onto one man who's dead, by the way right, right and so well, who are his associates?
Speaker 8:they all have to go down so if you, if you got some hate in your heart and you want somebody to punch, this is the guy you can punch.
Speaker 2:You know, but he's already dead but he's already dead, so we'll just punch his friends.
Speaker 8:Right.
Speaker 2:You know which? Maybe they deserve it, I don't know, but the point is on the scale. It's HHS we're talking. Alexander Mayorkas is the world's leading child trafficker.
Speaker 8:Well, we're not talking about numbers like 300, 000. You need an industrial 500, 500, oh geez.
Speaker 2:Well, you need an industrial machine to be able to move that kind of numbers exactly, which is where we have the whistleblower saying we were contracted millions 43 million dollars to transport miners to homes of unvetted uh, people. I mean, it's every day. There's these little reports. I rarely touch on them because they're depressing as all get out. But, it's there, it's in the background.
Speaker 8:Well, we have covered a few of these stories where you have couples that have somehow gotten 30 or 40 kids delivered to them. It's like what the heck happened to all these kids.
Speaker 2:I know.
Speaker 8:It's crazy.
Speaker 2:Okay, so we have reached the end of our public show today and we are going to jump over to private. Thank you guys so much for sticking through us. We had big things happen today. We had qr codes on the screen, we read some ads. We are grown as a show and we absolutely love it and we are so happy to have all of you guys along for the ride. So thank you very much. Do we have to do?
Speaker 8:Yeah, we got five minutes before we can do it, okay.
Speaker 2:So we have to do one more? Yeah, all right. So are we sticking around for five minutes? Is that what you're telling me? Yeah, slave driver. Did we just get into a spot where now the ads run the show?
Speaker 2:Has it just happened in real time, in front of our dedicated audience, that all of a sudden, we're like kowtowing to the pennies literally pennies that they're throwing at us. Is that what just happened here? Six cents to read an ad oh my goodness, we got to keep the show going because we got to read an ad. We got to get another seven cents. We're going to be rich. Ladies and gentlemen, this is the takeover of our democracy. You've got buymeacoffeecom forward, slash peasants, where you can support the show directly. You can subscribe on twitter. You can subscribe on rumble to pay direct. There's multiple ways. You can come join us over at 1776 live, but this show has to pay for itself.
Speaker 2:This is not a non-profit from the comfort of your office, ron. Okay, this is a. We can't even do it. We don't have enough people. This is a passion project, but give me a break. I just got out of prison a few months ago. Okay, I don't have like deep pockets here, so so we gotta.
Speaker 2:You know, some ads would be nice, but what just happened here? I got wrong. It doesn't drink coffee, doing coffee ads and football ads. It's great man. This is awesome. This is the best, and I don't even know if we can do one, because I think, okay, some of our YouTube listeners, you need to go over onto Rumble. I need you to go over to Rumble, open the tab, establish yourself as a viewer there so that in about what three minutes, ron, we can do our final ad reads, so we can go over to private and talk over there. So in the meantime, I'm going to play this video about AI, and if anything tells you that this show is not an AI show, this will demonstrate it. These are some music producers who used AI to create some music. Now I have used AI from time to time and I am blown away at its processing capacity. It hallucinates. It's not great. Yes, they're probably going to destroy mankind, but is this Rick Beato?
Speaker 2:I don't know who this is, but is this Rick Beato.
Speaker 8:I don't know who this is, but it is yes, it is yes.
Speaker 2:So, but AI is an incredible tool and it makes certain that. I heard someone say I want a. I think I might have read this on here, but it was like I want AI to do the dishes and fold the laundry so that I can do writing and make art. I don't want AI to do writing and make art so I can do the dishes, and exactly so. This is one of those instances where ai is taking away the things that used to bring us joy and passion yeah and it's, frankly, doing it better than we are.
Speaker 2:So while we play this it's only a minute I need people that are listening on youtube and I know there's a bunch of you to jump over onto rumble so that we can do our last ad. Read this this is incredibly important for us. Otherwise it kind of ruins the whole day. So while we watch this video, migrate over and and then, uh, we'll talk on the other side of this. So this is AI creating music.
Speaker 11:Here's my prompt create a square avatar of a fictitious female alternative slash indie singer and a name for her Wow, sadie winners, sadie winners, okay, okay. The song is about walking away from someone who never really saw her worth just going to create the song lyrics wait, how many seconds was that? That was like a video it's frozen I know it's broken did you even see this?
Speaker 8:video. What do you mean? I've seen this video, I watched it yesterday did we?
Speaker 2:we didn't watch it in here.
Speaker 8:No, I watched it.
Speaker 11:I watched it independently female alternative slash indie singer and a name for her wow, sadie winners, sadie winners. Okay, the song is about walking away from someone who never really saw her worth just going to create the song lyrics yeah, wait, how many seconds was that?
Speaker 5:that was like more seconds God did you even read any of these, or you don't care I?
Speaker 11:don't care, but my lyrics in the lyrics that happen in four seconds, yes, and then hit create. Let's listen this is the world premiere.
Speaker 13:I was paper, you were scissors. Cut me out Good singer, good singer. Ooh, that's nice.
Speaker 17:Where are we, Rick? Where have we found ourselves?
Speaker 11:I mean, it's pretty amazing. Actually I hate to say it.
Speaker 2:Yeah, that kind of freaks me out a little bit, because you make amazing music, that you search the world over for a talent and instead in under one minute it produced a show, a hit.
Speaker 2:It makes me wonder um how hard is taylor sift work ring there was a rapper that was on saying yeah, I used chat gp, gpt to write my rap lyrics. I did my whole last album on it and they were like what he's like? Yeah, no, it was sick, I just put in like a prompt and it kicked out a whole thing and I just went with it and it's like oh, okay I guess anybody can be a rap star all the.
Speaker 2:You know it. It changes the calculation. You don't have to have the creative talent, you just have to have the vocals.
Speaker 8:The ai can be the creative lyric I don't think you even need any of that. You just need the look, because ai and auto-tune can make you sound anything you want to be exactly, it's incredible.
Speaker 2:All right, we good now. Um, oh yes, all right, we're doing it hold on, let me, I gotta find one oh let's see I gotta say in my appreciate.
Speaker 2:I really appreciate rumble and what they've done for us as a show. I appreciate them accepting us into the creators program and, uh, giving us a huge license, never had any free speech issues with rumble whatsoever and uh, I absolutely think rumble is a dynamite platform. I think that it has kept youtube in check. I know it has a lot smaller market share, but it has. It has become the thing that if youtube censors and rumble does not, it drives so much traffic to rumble that youtube basically shot themselves in the foot. They could have gone on forever as a total monopoly for video streaming, but because they chose to censor, there was the rumble outlet, who, who did better than bit shoot and better than uh, red pill and some of the other groups in basically capturing the overflow market.
Speaker 8:Let's do a little bit here to promote Rumble, then Great. The countdown is over, the rivalries are real and the road to the championship begins. On August 23rd, westwood One Sports brings you every electrifying moment of NCAA football, from the first snap to the final whistle top teams, big plays, unforgettable Saturdays. Don't miss a second of the action. Listen to NCAA football on rumblecom, the Westwood one sports app, on Westwood one sportscom, via Westwood one station streams or by asking Alexa to open Westwood One Sports. If it's sports, it's on Westwood One.
Speaker 2:Alexa open Westwood One Sports.
Speaker 8:Somebody out there is like Daniel Alexa, stop cancel.
Speaker 2:Stop Alexa, stop. That's really cool Rumble does NCAA? I know we have NCAA fans here. College football is like a cult thing, seriously, so definitely very cool. Glad they're getting into the sports market. That is a huge market, Holy cow. All right, guys, we are going to jump over onto private. Thank you for joining us for the last ad read of the day Again you love having the ads. It's hilarious that in real time our show just got literally threw a nickel at us.
Speaker 8:Pretty soon it'll be brought to you by Pfizer.
Speaker 2:I got to tell you, if we do anything Pfizer related, you can tune out, but they're probably not interested in us until you know. Whatever Guys you vote with your eyes, your dollars and your clicks. There's a website that I have neglected to promote. That was a joint project between myself and one of the listeners from season one. It's dollarsvoteloudercom.
Speaker 2:And at that website. You can go and you can find alternatives to your most progressive things. Right, that's links to Patriot Mobile instead of using AT&T Verizon. There's links to Amazon alternatives and things like that. That's a place for you to go and find alternatives to the companies that do not support our needs. You vote with your eyes, your dollars and your clicks. That's the only way we move things.
Speaker 2:Trust me, the elite care about what the peasants think. Our pitchforks are sharp and we control we do actually control the vast amount of money in this country. You know you can get as good as you want with AI, as good as you want for the production, but if you don't have customers, they don't have anything. So I encourage you not to buy AI albums. Continue to support real, raw shows like this. We clearly are not AI and, anyways, we love you guys so much. We're going to jump over onto private and we've got a little video over there that we're going to listen to about democracy versus the Republic. So we'll talk to the rest of you guys again tomorrow those of you on rumble premium. We look forward to seeing you in just a minute. Thank you so much. And a sapphire patriot says yes, don't forget to smash that like button y'all, it does help the show grow.
Speaker 8:Thank you, we closing yeah, old woman, man man sorry what night lives in that castle over there.
Speaker 3:I'm 37 Old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in that castle over there? I'm 37. What I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind you looked. What I object to is that you automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king, oh king, eh, very nice. And how do you get that? Eh, by exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society, if there's ever going to be any progress. There is.
Speaker 3:There's some lovely filth down here.
Speaker 21:Oh how do you do? How do you do? Good lady, I am Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the? Who the Britons? Who are the Britons? Well, we all are. We are all Britons and I am your king.
Speaker 3:I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes oh there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about.
Speaker 21:If only people would Please please good people, I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your lord we?
Speaker 3:don't have a lord what I told you. We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, be quiet but by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major.
Speaker 3:Be quiet. I order you to be quiet. Order. I order you to be quiet. Order. Who does he think he is? I am your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings? Well, I can become king.
Speaker 3:Then the lady of the lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying, by divine providence, that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. But you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. I mean, if I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up, will you Shut up? Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up. Come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help help, I'm being repressed, bloody pe. Violence inherent in the system. Help help, I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Hey, that's what I'm on about. Do you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?
Speaker 8:there, we are all right we're back, you know.
Speaker 2:You just said never get tired listening to the outro with Bunny. Python. I don't either. I don't, either. I think it's like. It's such a perfect encapsulation. It is the most precise political treaties acted out in a skit. Right, I mean, it's just From like 40 years ago.
Speaker 2:Supreme executive authority derives from a mandate of the masses, just because some farcical aquatic being through a scimitar does not make you a king. I love. It's like yes, yes, come, come see the violence, the violence inherent in the system. Who are the brits? We're all brits, we're all brits. Oh, anyways, I love it. So this guy right here it says up here at the top he dropped this on us before he died Aaron Russo, don't know anything about him, but he says something that's pretty, pretty enlightening. And you know, sometimes we beat on the dead horse when we talk about the system and stuff like that. But you can't talk about it enough. You can't talk about it enough, you can't Right. Until everybody sees what it is, it will not change. You can't change something that is cloaked, obscure. If you think the smoke monster is real and has real power, then you're going to constantly be in a prison of smoke, of nothing. Right, we are not captives, we are free beings. The problem is we've run a prison in our own minds.
Speaker 8:Yeah, we're just trying to end the gaslighting here, folks.
Speaker 2:Yes, and our forefathers granted us something. They gave us a republic, a republic that allows you to be free a minority of one, if necessary. So let's listen to what he has to say here.
Speaker 16:No. If you ask 100 people on the street what kind of government is America supposed to be, ninety 99% of them will tell you a democracy. But that's a lie. The word democracy is not written into the Constitution at one time. It's not in the Bill of Rights. It's not in the Declaration of Independence.
Speaker 16:The founding fathers hated the idea of a democracy. They thought it was the worst form of government there is. And I agree with them, because in a democracy, 51% of the people control 49% of the people. If you're part of the 49%, you're not free. America was founded as a constitutional republic and in that constitutional republic that we have, 99% of the people can't take away the rights of 1%. You have your rights because you were born with them, human rights that nobody can take away from. Rights because you were born with them human rights that nobody can take away from you. The government, the majority, no matter who they are. I can't take away your rights, and that's what our founding fathers gave us. But the psychological operations that they do to us, they make us believe that we're a democracy and that majority rules. You see, and they want you to believe that, because then they tell you this poll says this many want this and this many want that and this many want this, and it doesn't have anything to do with anything.
Speaker 16:You hear George Bush saying democracy means freedom. No, democracy equals New World Order. Democracy equals slavery. The word democracy is not synonymous with freedom. It's the opposite of freedom. Democracy is the worst form of government. You with freedom. It's the opposite of freedom.
Speaker 16:Democracy is the worst form of government. You can have it's majority rule and the government can tell you exactly what they want to tell you to do. The majority wants it. I don't care what the majority wants. I live my life as I choose and if I don't commit violence, theft or fraud against another human being, I can live my life as I wish. That's my choice. And if I'm allowed to make mistakes because when you make mistakes you learn from them you grow as a human being. We're put on this earth to become the best individuals we can be. We're not here to put on this earth so the government can tell us how to live our lives and what we must do. We put into these systems and these paradigms no I think that's really interesting because that dude is the director for a bunch of movies that you've probably seen.
Speaker 8:The most important one that he did was one called trading places with with uh uh trading places.
Speaker 2:I know it took uh the black guy, what's his name? And and eddie murphy and eddie murphy and dan akroyd, yes. And he switched places and one became a wall street executive, the other guy became a bum and it was like he directed that movie and they couldn't survive in each other's worlds. That's right. That's right. Yes, that's interesting. I didn't know again, you know, don't know who some people are.
Speaker 8:Ron's clearly got the 80s down pack he did some other stuff too, but that was probably his best one but he's exactly right.
Speaker 2:Right, and we've run into this position in our country where a small minority specifically we're here, I'm going to talk about the lgbtq plus I zxy movement it's a small, tiny minority, one, four percent max if you extend out the b right. So how did they force my kids to learn about things in school? How did they do that? Well, they leveraged the democracy. You know what I mean. They leveraged the democracy. Their rights were protected. You mean they leveraged the democracy. Their rights were protected. You want to cross-dress? Ain't no one going to stop you Until you infringe on someone else's rights Going to a lady's restroom? You've got to deal with that. That's an interpersonal conflict and you might be asked to leave the restroom if someone makes a complaint. You know what I'm saying.
Speaker 8:But this idea that somehow the minority can weaponize the majority to get the barely not a majority to go along with it, that's hell well, we do right, we do write our own history books, and then we teach from those history books what we want people to know about history so pony boy says russo was a friend of the rockefellers.
Speaker 2:You know, I have an interesting relationship with the rockefellers because on one hand you've got a lot of nefarious stuff attributed to them, but I often wonder if it's so much that they were nefarious in their day, or if the result of what they did was nefarious. For example, I could make a really good case against Abraham Lincoln that he was a tyrant, that he was a dictator, that he shredded the Constitution, to quote unquote, save it Right. Totally can't happen that way. I could make a case that many of the woes we feel today with the interplay between the states and the federal government is a direct result of Abraham Lincoln's prosecuting the Civil War in the way he did. Right? I think the same thing with the Rockefellers.
Speaker 2:If it weren't for the Rockefellers, no national park system. If it weren't for the Rockefellers, public education would be something different than it is now Not necessarily better. Okay, so in their day they created mass education systems. They created mass education systems. They created mass transit systems. They created a park, they supported a park system. They did good things in their moment, right, not saying everything they've done ever is great, but sometimes I wonder.
Speaker 8:Just think about what life was like before we had an education system at all.
Speaker 2:Well, sometimes I think we look back and we don't recognize that in the moment that was the solution they needed. Like I mentioned. At the beginning of the show, the woman got up. I'm running for school board. We need oh, I didn't mention this- oh.
Speaker 2:OK, so someone gets up. Support you know conservative Republican lover. More power to her. I want her to get elected. She gets up in a meeting and goes running for school board. Scores are down, reading proficiencies of 54%. Uh, science is at 27%. Math is at 30%. Failing our students, blah, blah, blah. We're moving into this golden age and we need factory workers. These words came out of her mouth, mouth we need factory workers and we need manufacturers.
Speaker 2:We need good, educated people to go get those jobs. So we want I'm running for school board to you know indoctrinate the kids to be good employees and good factory workers. And I thought and in the next breath you'll blame the rockefellers for but yet you're now part of it, because in this moment, guess what the need is. We need factory workers, not artists. Enough with the english lit degrees, let's get some engineering and some stem.
Speaker 2:That's what the rockefellers were thinking in their moment they were like enough with the phd, economists and stuff like that. I need someone that can do basic engineering and work on an assembly line put widgets together but put things together, yes.
Speaker 2:So I'm always very hesitant to. I want to really look at something in its moment. There's a, there's a verse in the Bible where it goes Noah in his day was good. Noah was a bad dude. If you use revisionist history, abraham warlord right. David, polygamist, womanizing philanderer, uh, uh gideon, uh, also womanizing philanderer. You know what I mean. And, by the way, uh, terrorist, you know, taking down that ball tower. So you've got to judge them in their day in the context with what they're doing. Thomas jefferson hero, slave owner, you know what I mean.
Speaker 2:You could call them all fascists you can call them all fascist, communist, horrible people. Revisionist history is sometimes when we take our our lens and our paradigm on our values of the day and we look back in time and we go, oh, these were bad dudes or these were good dudes. Projection no, no, no no you got to judge them by the standards of their day. It's just otherwise. You do end up just turning over history and over and over again you get different results every time when the reality is you look around you what's built here, the rockefellers.
Speaker 2:When I'm driving through national park I'm thinking the rockefellers, you know what I mean? Do I think the outcome of the things that they did, like the, the medical school stuff and how they just listen? Medical maybe isn't a factory, you know? I mean, if we're doing STEM, sure, factory workers, but medical, independent thinking, critical thinking, absolute must. That's the kind. Did the Rockefellers eliminate critical thinking from medical? Probably not. But they made medical school available to the max amount of people. It's that people who don't understand the greater vision of things turned it into a factory program.
Speaker 2:Pharmaceuticals said we want to create internalists which basically run hospitals and standardize everything. That's not a Rockefeller creation, that's a Rockefeller outcome, not part of their intent. My belief right. Again, I'm not pro Rockef, anti-rockefeller. They were a part of them. Things I believe they're part of uh, creature from jekyll island and the fed reserve, no bueno, but that was even that was created to solve a problem of bank liquidity and stuff like that. Again, we got to judge them in their day. We also judge the outcomes.
Speaker 2:I don't like central banking. Its entire premise doesn't work for me. I'd rather go broke and rebuild from zero than prop up a house of cards that when it falls down, everybody starves, you know. So, okay, that is it for the show today. Thank you for listening to me ramble. Sometimes I feel like when we go on these political things, I'm so little nuanced in how to look at it. But I think it's important for us to look at people like the Rockefellers and go. You know, russo was a friend of the Rockefellers. I don't know if that's good or bad, I don't know what that means anymore.
Speaker 2:I can only judge it from the lens of a peasant right now. I think school is good If you're doing STEM. If you're not doing STEM and you don't intend to work on a factory your whole life, youtube university might be a way for you to go.
Speaker 8:Probably wasting your time.
Speaker 2:You're probably wasting your time. All right, guys, that's it.
Speaker 3:We'll talk to you again tomorrow so Old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in that castle over there. I'm 37. What? I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind you looked. What I object to is that you automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king, oh, king, eh, very nice. And how do you get that? Eh, by exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. If there's ever going to be any progress, there is. There's some lovely filth down here, oh.
Speaker 21:How do you do? How do you do, good lady? I am Arthur, king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the? Who, the Britons? Who are the Britons? Well, we all are. We are all Britons and I am your king.
Speaker 3:I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes oh there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about.
Speaker 21:If only people would Please, please, good people I am in haste who lives in that castle? No one lives there.
Speaker 3:Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What I told you? We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs, be quiet. But by a two-thirds majority in a case of more major, be quiet.
Speaker 3:I order you to be quiet. Order. Who does he think he is? I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings? Well, I can become king.
Speaker 3:Then the lady of the lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. But you can't expect to wield supreme executive power from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you.
Speaker 3:Shut up. If I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up. Will you Shut up Now? We see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up. Come and see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up. Oh, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help, I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Did you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?
