Peasants Perspective
Peasants Perspective: A Voice from the Edge of Freedom
Join Taylor Johnatakis, a self-proclaimed “peasant” turned podcaster, on an unfiltered journey through family, faith, and the fight for American ideals. From the depths of DC Jail—where he recorded during a 14-month sentence tied to January 6—to his triumphant return home after a Trump clemency in 2025, Taylor delivers raw, heartfelt commentary for the common man. Expect a mix of gritty storytelling, reflections on liberty lost and reclaimed, and timeless lessons drawn from his life as a septic designer, father, and reluctant rebel. Whether he’s reading Dr. Seuss to his kids or dissecting the state of the republic, Peasants Perspective is a bold, unpolished call to stay grounded amidst chaos. Subscribe for a front-row seat to a story that’s as real as it gets—no filter, no apologies.
Peasants Perspective
From Russia Hoax to J6: Exposing Government Weaponization
The administrative state's reckoning has begun. In this revealing episode, we dive into the systematic dismantling of what many call "the deep state" as the Trump administration takes decisive action against those who weaponized government power for political purposes.
Tulsi Gabbard's bombshell revelations about the origins of Russiagate expose how intelligence was manufactured under Obama's direction to undermine Trump's presidency. The subsequent revocation of security clearances for 37 intelligence officials signals a serious commitment to accountability that has sent shockwaves through Washington's power corridors.
We explore the growing list of high-profile figures facing criminal referrals for mortgage fraud – including Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, NY Attorney General Letitia James, and former Congressman Adam Schiff – revealing how the political elite operated with impunity while wielding the law against ordinary citizens.
Perhaps most chilling is our firsthand account of government weaponization against January 6th participants. Beyond legal prosecution, we hear how individuals were systematically targeted through terrorism watch lists, banking restrictions, no-fly designations, and IRS scrutiny – creating an unprecedented assault on American citizens for their political beliefs.
On the international front, Trump's peace strategy for Ukraine takes shape with a clear stance: no American boots on the ground. Instead, the administration is coordinating with European allies on security guarantees while working to end a conflict that claims thousands of lives weekly.
The power dynamics in Washington are shifting dramatically. As Scott Besant and Peter Navarro outline plans to use tariff revenue to begin paying down the national debt, we're witnessing the implementation of economic policies that put American interests first without burdening taxpayers with endless foreign conflicts.
Join us as we unpack these seismic shifts and what they mean for everyday Americans fighting to reclaim their voice against entrenched power structures determined to silence them.
https://1776live.us/peasants_perspective
www.PeasantsPerspective.com
www.LeftBehindandWithout.org
www.givesendgo.com/GEJWJ
www.DollarsVoteLouder.com
buymeacoffee.com/peasant
And when they went to the queen to tell her her subjects had no bread, do you know what she said? Let them eat cake here. You take the bomb. We're getting screwed man.
Speaker 3:Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's going to be through podcasting for sure. That's the only way we talk. It's the little guys. The little guys that take the brunt of everything. It's got gotta stop. Peasants, man, we're just peasants, every one of us. You watch those old movies. You see the peasants in the background with the kings and queens walking around. We're those people. We're those people.
Speaker 5:Good morning. Looks like we're starting without the host, shoot Taylor. Where are you? Oh no, where are you, shoot? I guess we'll pause for a second you good morning is it time?
Speaker 3:yeah, we're on live. I went ahead and opened it good morning peasants. Welcome to another episode of the peasants perspective. We are rocking and rolling. Is there a little bit of?
Speaker 5:feedback or is that? No, I had my mic turned off. Okay, I can. It was feeding through your mic. Okay, I can hear something. Oh, I don't know what it? Is. I have electronic feedback, something going on your end I don't know. Your fancy microphone.
Speaker 3:I can't use my fancy microphone, that wouldn't be nice. No, could just be it might just be turned up. It's our way to turn my volume down? Probably not all right, well, welcome to another episode. Not ai, this show is not ai still still, although we're working on it. We've got some projects in the making. Oh wow, we got a good good showing this morning. Wow, you think I'd be a little more prepped. Look, we've got people in the chats.
Speaker 3:Holy cow, how long is this going? Good morning, john, attack us. Really nice to see you, carlitz. Good morning from houston for asia. You can do it, ron, we have full faith in you. Good morning, that's the best. You guys are awesome, all right. Well, let's go ahead and jump into it today.
Speaker 3:Steve Bannon had this to say yesterday you get a couple of things rearranged, ok. So when you think about what's going on out there, you've got the sanctuary city crackdown. I still am getting some type of like metallic electronic feedback. All right, well, if you guys are having issues in the sound, just mention it in the chats and then we'll figure it out, okay. So Steve Bannon yesterday on war room was talking about just all the things that are going on. You've got ice agents in the streets. Fbi, DOJ, atf, marshall's, every other law enforcement has basically, you know, made a presence on the streets. Dc is literally being overrun by cops and federal agents. It's quite the show.
Speaker 3:As you go down like the little rabbit holes and watch all the little videos, I mean these guys are marching in the streets, these guys are deploying cops from all over the place is. I was seeing a video yesterday of federal officers in their cop cars. So these are white marked cop cars, you know, just with federal jurisdiction. Okay, driving into dc, like crossing the bridge, and someone was filming from an apartment, just a hundred, I mean it was like no, really, this is a 10 square mile city. I'm pretty sure this place is going to be something else. Okay, when I was in DC the first time on January 6th, as I was leaving the Capitol and making my way through the streets trying to figure out where I could catch an Uber, because they'd created like a no-go zone, and I'm walking around and I walk by this fire extinguisher and it's a brass fire extinguisher. Right, like you mean like a hydrant, it's a fire hydrant. Yes, I said fire extinguisher, fire hydrant.
Speaker 3:It's a fire hydrant, but it's brass, brass, brass, brass, Like polished, bright, chromey looking. You know, brass is brass. Never seen that before, I know. And this, never seen that before I know. And this guy walking next to me, or you know, kind of coming up from my behind, he says to his wife look at that, but look at that fire extinguisher. Yeah, we got fire extinguishers like that out where we live. No, we don't. We have cast iron suckers painted yellow or red right, yeah and I was like that brass fire hydrant it's's not cheap.
Speaker 3:No, not cheap at all, and those kind of things are like it was something. You talk about a gilded city. When you're in DC, you can hear the sucking noise of tax dollars coming in and nothing but rules and regulations coming out. There are no factories in the District of Columbia. They don't make things in DC, they make policy. They make policy Exactly so. The idea that they would have all this extra money and that they could have a brass fire hydrant. But you know those of us out in the hinterlands, us peasants, we don't get a brass fire hydrant. If you get one at all, if you get one at all, yeah, exactly. Anyways.
Speaker 3:So the Democrats are starting to really see the writing on the wall. You deporting people. People are self-deporting. You've got this executive order coming dealing with ballots and mail-in ballots. You've got lawsuits going against ice. Media matters is under attack. There's no more censorship coming out of the, the government. They're not getting talking orders, marching orders. All the mainstream medias are settling with trump. Cbs, mbc is sold. Now it's going to be ms space d and they're going to keep the same name, but it's going to be uh something, some stupid name right the whole zeitgeist of what they have people like stacy abrams are losing their piggy banks yes, the whole zeitgeist that they have is kind of like crumbling and they're looking at what's upcoming.
Speaker 3:They don't have any leadership and Bannon just points out the super obvious. This is legitimate.
Speaker 10:Okay, here's some point. That guy who's a writer put up a tweet that said oh my gosh, and cutting away mail-in ballots, they're going to force people actually go to polling places and vote and then they're going to have ICE agents there. And they're going to have ice agents there and they're going to put the word out ice agents so that people be intimidated. Well, hey, if you're a citizen, what you're not intimidated by an ice agent? Uh, an ice agent is looked at as protector to get an illegal alien out of the country. You damn right, we're gonna have ice agents out. If you're not, if you're illegal alien, you're going home and you're certainly not going to vote. Look at those people right there. If they, I keep telling you, if they can't cheat, they can't win. And now they're just freaking out because we've had enough of this nonsense, we've had enough of crap from guys like abbott.
Speaker 10:Down in texas, the grassroots is stepping up and saying no, we need to do these redistricting. President trump's coming and said we're going to do a new census and we're going to cut the illegal aliens and they're going to stop the mail in ballots. John Lott and the reason the Democrats and Rachel Maddow sitting there this is authoritarian is they cannot exist unless they have phony voters, unless they steal elections. Let's be blunt they can't win. They know that and that's why they're going. Oh, the guy tweets out this is terrible.
Speaker 10:Trump's going to take away mail-in ballots. It means people actually have to go to vote in person and they're going to put the word out. They're going to have ICE agents. So people are going to be intimidated. Hey yo, if you're a citizen, you ain't intimidated. Ice agents looked at as a someone that is protecting your rights as a citizen to get illegal aliens out of here. But Rachel and your writer friend, you damn right that they're going to be people there. And if illegal aliens are coming up there, boom, throw them in the back of the paddy wagon and shipping the hell out of the country.
Speaker 3:If you show up to vote, there's ice agents there. You're dumb enough to get thrown in the back of the country. If you show up to vote, there's ice agents there. You're dumb enough to get thrown in the back of the paddy wagon, pretty much. Oh my goodness for asia on rumble says, reported in new york post illegal immigrant caught working as police officer in maine agrees to voluntarily self-deport.
Speaker 5:What an illegal immigrant is working as a police officer. Officer of the law.
Speaker 3:Dude, not even surprised. When I was in D, half the guards were foreign born. Half the guards were there on some type of I just assumed like work visa there's not a checkbox on the application that says I'm not a resident, I'm not a citizen.
Speaker 5:Racist to ask. Oh, I'm sorry, racist to ask was this like a sanctuary city, maine?
Speaker 3:they're going full retard. Oh, my goodness, no gosh. So the democrat party is functionally dead, yeah, which begs the question why is it? At my local gop meeting they are talking about how they can't win elections and how there's just this overwhelming. You know the hate Republicans. What's going on? If the Democrat Party is dead, why is it not dead at the base? Here's what I would say the Democrat Party has been a top down party. It's missing right now an effective upper crust. It's missing the power players that say what to do. The power players that have existed the clintons, the bidens, the obamas, you know, and their apparatchiks, their little groups, are all under the microscope right now. They're all potentially facing criminal indictment. So the message they're pushing down to their base is tds, all the way trump does it. We hate it, right? Tds? It's that, like I explained in debate, it's that nuke card. If you give trump power, he's gonna end up going and, you know, causing nuclear war, but he's striking peace. That's bad for business everywhere he goes you see that trump is bad for business.
Speaker 3:So this is chris cuomo and he's talking to, uh, benny johnson. He's talking about the democrat party, okay not again again yeah we're gonna listen to it. Okay, again, these things are, this is.
Speaker 5:These are the people who literally persecuted us I know that's why I get tired of listening to I know, and now he's kind of doing this mia culpa thing.
Speaker 3:Now he doesn't have his big paycheck coming from CNN Right, but he's making some admissions about the Democrat Party and then at the end we see the disingenuity of it and we see how he still has TDS.
Speaker 12:My brother's a Democrat. I don't know why, but he is. My father was a Democrat. I know exactly why he was, but his party doesn't exist anymore.
Speaker 3:And while I had disagreements with my father brothers like screw you, chris, all right, we got to refresh this because it was plenty.
Speaker 5:That was enough of a clip. I don't know why he is my brother's a Democrat. I have no idea why.
Speaker 12:I don't know why, but he is. My father was a Democrat. I know exactly why he was, but his party doesn't exist anymore, and while I had disagreements with my father about different issues, I knew what principles were guiding him.
Speaker 13:Can you unpack something for me that you just said that I please on fascinating. You said that my father's Democrat party and your father ran for president as a Democrat. This is correct, and he led the state of New York as governor yes, three terms. He was a. You know he was Mr Democrat. Yes, right, and he was an iconic class for them. He was an iconic class for the Democrat Party. You can't go anywhere in New York without finding Cuomo on the name of a bridge or a road. Must be nice. And so you say that his party doesn't exist anymore, like a water poster.
Speaker 3:You know, what's funny is the bridges get named after him. But you know, developers do the same thing. They name streets after their kids and stuff like that. Only the developer knows. You know what I mean. Like Trump Tower, Trump Tower, yeah.
Speaker 12:At least he owned it, you know. But there's something completely different than being a politician and getting a bridge named after you, than being a developer and paying for it to be named after you. So my father's battle was against trickle down economics and Reagan republicanism. Ok, the Democratic Party that he fought for and the Republican Party that he fought against neither exists anymore. My father's party was take care of the little guy, take care of the little guy, take care of the little guy, take care of the little guy, by the way.
Speaker 3:Trickle down economics. The basic premise of that is let money flow where it needs to flow. So there's going to be accumulations of capital who people sell to people who sell the right widgets or people who have the right services. And then the idea is, as they get rich, they'll go out and buy second homes and vacation properties and yachts and boats or open new businesses. Or open new businesses and plow back the investment into their business and hire more employees. So the idea is let the market demand, you know supply and demand merit based economy dictate where capital flows. And then you can, you know, hit your wagon to someone's rising star. You want to go work for Trump because he's got stuff going on, lots of opportunity there. He's plowing back into his business, right? So that's trickle down economics. Yes, you're going to have some movers and shakers. You're going to have some market makers, some industry men, and they are going to look on paper like they're super rich. But what makes them rich is they're employing thousands of people, right, it's.
Speaker 3:What makes them rich is when they buy a yacht 700 people worked in a factory to make that yacht for a year. Right? That's the trickle-down idea. Is that, yes, a rich guy? His duty to society is to buy stuff right and keep spending the money. Keep the flow going, right? That's the whole idea. What the democrats proposed in the 80s was this bottom up, let's stimulate the body. Let's give them, the poor people, money to buy things, and then they'll go stimulate the body, let's give them, the poor people, money to buy things, and then they'll go to the grocery store and buy things and the money will work its way up. Ok, fair enough. It's kind of two sides of the same coin. If you give the bottom rung enough money, they'll naturally go out and place that money into the things that they want. And need.
Speaker 3:OK, same concept. That makes sense, except that de-incentivize work. So strike one. Okay. In the first model, top-down economics, if someone isn't working, someone's down on their luck. Bad news bears no skill sets, low IQ, et cetera right, they kind of get left behind. In this model, you give the low IQ people, but they go spend their money on video games, whereas in the other model, video games might not be the profitable industry. But in this one you're paying someone essentially to spend their money on video games because they don't have to work to see how that changes the market. And then, on top of that, once you're paying the bottom people because you own the money and you can dictate where that money goes. You can do things like oh, if you're getting food stamps, you have to buy these products, and that's how craft ends up benefiting specifically and only. But the organic food grower doesn't benefit because he's excluded from having his goods purchased by the bottom down economic model.
Speaker 3:Wow, that's tricky the incentives, or hey, we're going to give you money for housing for section 8, but you can only live in in specified low income projects that have paid huge application fees and have solar panels. You know what I mean. So there, you created a market for solar panels in order to get the gravy train of the free rent, but the solar panels have to be subsidized. Do you see how, all of a sudden, you create so many carrots and sticks and so many incentive points and so many moments of grift when you go bottom down?
Speaker 3:yeah, but when it's top down, you just let the market roll. Do people get left out?
Speaker 5:yeah, some people do and sometimes the money piles up in weird places, but you know yeah, whatever, yeah, whatever, okay, so let's keep listening out of our bedroom.
Speaker 12:Oh yeah, stay out of my heart, okay. Um, just do all the government we need, but, but only the government we need, and we're a secular society, don't put anything else on me. That's who they were. Republicans at that time were Teaching to the top for the top, about the top. Everybody should be the city world through the eyes of the top and everything else is great because the top has it great. That was the conflict. Now it's the left arguing for a cultural elite. This is how you will talk about people, benny. This is how you will raise your kids. This is what you will tell them is okay. This is what, uh, you know you will say and not say. And the Republicans are. This system sucks. All the little people are getting squashed. These elites are killing us Anti. Everything they flipped in terms of their operative animus and their constituencies out of convenience and time. So my father's party is no more.
Speaker 3:OK, so he goes on to describe. My father would have called up trump and said don't make fun of islam. My father would have called up trump and done all these different things right, defending the little guy. We don't just put big labels on big groups. We're from queens, we don't do that right, that kind of thing. But then at the end he gets to this.
Speaker 5:Let me get to this part here I don't really trust his analysis, by the way oh no, his analysis.
Speaker 3:I mean, there's a grain of truth in there.
Speaker 5:The country club republicans, they're a real thing he skirts around some truths, but with more lies.
Speaker 12:Yeah okay, so let's uh, germans, the trumps, you know, everybody had their little bucket for a while, until they assimilated. And today it's all provocative bullshit all the time. No responsibility, no accountability. You just move on to the next and it gets us views, it gets us clicks, but it's not getting us to a better place, and that's true.
Speaker 3:Well, he's going on to criticize Trump. I guess I kind of skipped over the whole part where Chris, my dad, would have called him up and said this and it's like yeah, ok, so you're not really on board with the agenda. You see that the Democrat Party has completely like lost its mojo, so to speak, but they're still so pervasive, right, and in my opinion, in the last six months, right Since I've been home and Trump has officially taken power and he's just taken a sledgehammer to the everything USAID Doge, you know, epa just goes on and on and on. He's just completely coming in and he's not afraid to take a scalpel or a sledgehammer, depending on what tool is needed, right. So it's just, it's not that it caught him off guard.
Speaker 3:I think they're stunned at his pace and his ability to multitask. On one day he's negotiating peace at the same time they're painting the border wall black, at the same time that he signs an executive order for mail-in ballots. And it's like, ah, norm, isom's got to be sitting back there, like I need more paralegals. You know what I mean. So this is patrick david bett, and he's on there talking about dems, are allergic to the golden age and just how they oppose everything what he's on with jesse waters.
Speaker 4:If we get this deal done with ukraine, what's going to happen to the democrat party?
Speaker 16:they'll one lose their minds. They will not celebrate. Although if you look at what's going on with polls CNN, harry Enten they can't help themselves. They have to give the polls of what their own people are saying on how this guy is winning. What happened with Russia? The way he got Putin to go to Russia. Then he's got EU, all the leaders from NATO, showing up with Zelensky to the White House. Now they're talking about the follow-up meeting that putin wants to have in uae or moscow. Trump wants to do it in in uh, alaska again as a follow-up. If they, if they get these things going and then besson on the other end is doing the tariffs behind closed doors and they're getting china to realize you can't go after taiwan. What else do you want to talk about? What else is going to be your argument? It's going to be a very painful 26 and a painful 28.
Speaker 4:What is Patrick Beck. David's philosophy on vacation. It's August, everyone's off. Dvd You're not off, you're never off. Do you ever take vacation?
Speaker 16:I just love the game. I literally love. If you love what you're doing, man, every day, it's a vacation to you. I knew you were going to answer it like that.
Speaker 3:All right, one man every day, it's a vacation to you. I knew you were going to answer it like that. All right, last night I was like I just was talking about 1776 live and uh, which we've got some amazing things going on over there. By the way, if you haven't been to one of our ignite presentations on thursday at 4 30 pm pacific so I believe that's 5, 6, 7, 30 PM Eastern Uh, we do the ignite presentation at four 30. You can go to 1776 liveus. Just go right there and you'll see a webinar registration register. Get the link and everything uh over there, right? We've built this incredible platform, teaches people incredible strategies on how to live in the private and stuff like that. And my wife and I were talking about it last night and I was like oh, I just recreated it, it was just a figment of my imagination, we just recreated it. And she's like and now it's a creation and I was like I know it's awesome and I've enjoyed every minute of it.
Speaker 3:It's been true recreation. Anyways, nietzsche says this. Right, this is. Nietzsche is one of my favorite philosophers. Everybody's got some favorites.
Speaker 3:I don't agree with every single thing he's ever written, clearly. I've got my own opinions, I have my own show, but he says this there's a point in history of society when it becomes so pathologically soft and tender that, among other things, it sides even with those who harm it Criminals and does this quite seriously and honestly. Punishing somehow seems unfair to it, and it is certain that imagining punishment and being supposed to punish hurts. It, arouses fear in it. Is it not enough to render him undangerous? Why still punish?
Speaker 3:Punishing itself is terrible. With this question, herd morality, the morality of timidity, draws the ultimate consequence. That is what the Democrat party has become. When Rush Limbaugh used to talk about bleeding heart Liberals, soft heart liberals, this is exactly what he's talking about. You've gotten so hard Soft. You don't know how to punish a Criminal right. You fell on, victim to the con. You have Let your virtue your virtue of not wanting to judge, not wanting to do harm to others be weaponized against you, to where the, the criminal who struck you says strike not, otherwise you'll be an heir and you go. Uh okay, you know what I mean. Turn the other cheek. Let me hit you again. It's too much.
Speaker 3:There's a point in history of society when it becomes so pathologically soft and tender that, among other things, it sides even with those who harm it Criminals. It does this quite seriously and honestly. That's what the Democrat Party has become and that's why they cannot comprehend why people would support ICE and deportations. I don't. I don't like incarceration. I didn't particularly enjoy it. I don't know that. I would really want to be lifted off the street and you know taking thousands of miles back home where I was trying to get away from in the first place. You know what I mean.
Speaker 5:Yeah.
Speaker 3:But I cannot imagine a scenario or a world where I just moved to Brazil without asking, or just go to Canada and, just you know, start a business and decide to be a, a canadian royal mountie without having proper documentation. You know what I mean. It's not gonna happen. So yeah, you can pick your choices, but you don't get to pick your consequences over in the chat, carlis said, javier mele said it best fiera fuera out. I know portuguese, I don't know spanish. Sometimes I have to think about those words fora, it means out fuera.
Speaker 3:Okay, another thing that happened yesterday, pretty amazing tulsi gabbard went ahead and polled the security clearance of 37 intelligence officials. So this letter here says the us government security clearance system exists to protect classified national security information and to ensure that those entrusted with access to our nation's most sensitive information uphold the highest standards of integrity, objectivity and stewardship. So it goes on to say it is the determination of this office, the director of national intelligence, that certain individuals have engaged in some or all of the following conduct undermining those standards, to include politicization or weaponization of intelligence. To advance personal, partisan or non-objective agendas inconsistent with national security priorities. Failure to safeguard classified information in accordance with applicable laws, regulations and agency policies, failure to adhere to professional analytic tradecraft standards and other conduct detrimental to the trust and confidence required for continued access to national security information. It's kind of boilerplate, but it's also pretty damning. You guys were messing around and here's the list of people 37 people. I've never heard of a single one of them. Really Never heard of a single one of them.
Speaker 3:Andrew Seder, andrew P Miller, benjamin Cooper, beth Sainer, brett Holmgren, charles Kupchan, christopher Senter, kareem Gaff, diplet Sidhu, edward Gistaro, emily Holm, harry Hanna, heather Gutierrez, jamie Jowers, jeffrey Prescott, joel Meyer, joel Willett, john Ficken, meyer, joel Willett, john Ficken, julia Guranus, julia Santucci, lauren DeJong, shulman, lake Hartig, mayor Bittar, mark Feirstein, mary Beth Goodman, megan F Doherty, michael P Dempsey, perry J Blastein, richard H Leggett, samantha Vingrad, sarah Farnsworth, selby pearson, stephaniel sullivan, thomas west, zin nguyen, william tuttle and yale estonate and I hope I pronounced every one of your names wrong go ahead and complain, I'm weaponizing my funky jaw against you.
Speaker 3:Okay, it's taking a while to work out some of these weird vowel, and I wonder what the offices that these people held were.
Speaker 5:I don't know, but the fact that I've never heard of these people and I'm as deep as anybody in the news Hold on, though I think that this is by design, because I think that you run the first cattle through and you don't want to know who they are because it makes it easier. And you don't want to know who they are because it makes it easier. There's less friction If you have named people, like if Obama was on the list, oh brother, there would be a hail storm.
Speaker 3:They've already pulled, like John Brennan Clapper. They've already pulled the top people, the people we knew their names. They've already pulled their security clearance. That was like week one. So these people, they're still in the intelligence community. That was part of this. I don't think they were all previously fired. Maybe some of them were. I haven't seen any indications one way or the other.
Speaker 5:Well, we haven't seen their names before, but these are the people that did the work.
Speaker 3:Clapper just said do it. These people wrote it. They got down in the weeds with it. They looked at the doss dossier and said how can we convert this to something we can launder into the fbi or whatever other elements and parts they had to play with it. So tulsi gabbard got on to sean hannity last night to explain this, because apparently this sent some shock waves around dc. You know 37 people. Uh, these these people have kids on your kids' soccer team and, oh my gosh, they're getting come after. I thought they were the ones telling me all these years that, oh, they've seen. The goods Trump's a Russian asset or whatever it is. There's probably a buzz going around.
Speaker 3:You know these are the people that would go meet with. My imagination is these are also some of your intermediaries. Clappers like hey, I need something to be said on CNN, so go talk to your people. You know what I mean. These are the contact points, Yep. So Tulsi Gabbard explains herself.
Speaker 14:So thank you for having me on. It's great to see you. The intelligence community assessed in the months leading up to that November 2016 election that, yes, Russia was trying to interfere in our election by sowing discord and chaos, but stating over and over again that Russia did not appear to have any preference for one candidate over the other. They viewed both as equally bad for Russia's interest. The big shift that happened around what is now commonly known as Russiagate was after the election. In early December, President Obama called a meeting of his National Security Council leadership. From that meeting there was directive that was delivered from President Obama to then Obama's DNI, James Clapper, to then CIA Director, John Brennan, to come up with a new intelligence community assessment that contradicted the ones that had been produced previously by the intelligence community. This new one said that Russia Putin, did try to interfere in the election because he wanted Trump to win. They did this using shoddy intelligence little pieces of intelligence gathered from places that intelligence professionals refused to reference previously because they knew it was substandard and did not meet the quality and the credibility that is expected of them as intelligence professionals, and they used the Steele dossier, knowing John Brennan knew James Clapper, knew others within the intelligence community knew that the Steele dossier was a political manufactured document intended to be weaponized against then candidate Donald Trump. Well, Donald Trump won the election. The American people voted for Donald Trump in 2016. So these intelligence leaders and John Brennan and James Clapper and James Comey, then director of the FBI, then used this Steele dossier as a source for this.
Speaker 14:Obama directed new intelligence assessment, again stating and alleging that Putin, Russia tried to help Trump win the election, clearly showing a preference for Donald Trump.
Speaker 14:Now, if you go to ODNIgov, people who say, well, Tulsi, this is just your view or your interpretation no, it's all in hundreds of pages of documents that I've declassified and released that show, point by point, exactly what happened through this timeline that showed this very dangerous thing that occurred in the creation of Russiagate the creation of this manufactured intelligence assessment that essentially had the intent of undermining the voices and votes of the American people who elected Donald Trump.
Speaker 14:They were not happy with the outcome of that election, and so they created this politicized, weaponized piece of fake intelligence that, as you mentioned, then went on to serve as a foundation for everything that came after the multiple investigations, the years long Mueller investigation to congressional impeachments. This action singularly undermined the integrity of our Democratic Republic, what to speak of the fact that some of those folks, in those 37 individuals that we revoked, directed the revocation of security clearances from today by under the direction of President Trump. They aided and abetted in this action, this seditious conspiracy that undermined our democracy, undermined our republic and broke that sacred trust that every one of these professionals is supposed to have from the American people.
Speaker 4:We have deep state actors that are trying to influence our presidential elections. Is that what we're concluding here?
Speaker 14:yes, we have people within the intelligence community again when you look at. Oh, so it wasn't russia, it wasn't russia trying to influence the election.
Speaker 3:It was actual deep state intelligence actors yes and I just read poorly a name of 37 of them include in, in addition to the ones we see on tv all the time. I just put a poll in the rumble chat. Let's take a poll. Who thinks that shift will get prosecuted and who thinks that leticia j James will get prosecuted?
Speaker 14:while we finish listening to Tulsi Gabbard, careerists within the intelligence community, who did not object to their manipulation and manufacturing of intelligence and actually helped them get there, all moving towards their partisan interests, that they were not happy with the outcome this election and they were willing to do whatever it took in order to try to undermine President Trump's administration during his first term in office. These are bad actors that have to be rooted out. Our national security depends on it. The ability for the American people's trust to be earned back depends on exposing the bad actors and holding them accountable, and that's what President Trump is determined to do Exposing the bad actors and holding them accountable.
Speaker 3:And it's encouraging words Trump is determined to do, Exposing the bad actors and holding them accountable. And it's encouraging words I got to say. Now, sometimes you just got to take a seat. Sometimes you just got to take a seat and look at the world around you and just appreciate its beauty. But also just let things play out and relax a little bit. Ron, if you just need to take a seat for a minute because of all the exciting things in the news, who? Where would you get that seat?
Speaker 5:well, let me tell you look. Looking for a comfortable but unique option for your gaming setup, check out technosportusacom. With a wide range of ergonomic chairs and an array of colors that will definitely bring your setup to the next level. Always comfy, never boring. Technosport use code rumble for 10 off entire order.
Speaker 3:I know that when I'm thinking about people getting prosecuted if and when an indictment ever comes out I'm going to be looking for my technosport chair to sit down in absolutely all right.
Speaker 3:So so we're keep. We keep it coming in. We've got our answer to our question will leticia james get prosecuted? Will adam shift get prosecuted? John attackis says wish both, but expect neither for razor. Yeah, both should especially shift. Yeah, no kidding, you know, as I was doing a deep dive on shift one time I ran into this guy named john here to help he. His real name was jonathan mcgrievey. He ended up running for senate in baltimore and john here to help that rings a super bell twitter handle.
Speaker 5:Yeah, yeah, yeah I think we played a lot of him in our first yes, because he worked under the bush administration.
Speaker 3:He worked to infiltrate the muslim brotherhood and then when obama came around, he kind of got on the outs and then he started you know, it's kind of one of those things you know spies be spying and when he couldn't spy for the administration anymore, he basically started spying on the administration. But he was debt, he was tasked with he, he, he was employed, ish contracted through the department of Homeland security, if I'm not mistaken and he got paired up with a guy named Sean bridges who was a secret service cyber agent by Rod Rosenstein, who was the attorney in Baltimore. The DO in baltimore tasks them to go to cheryl atkins house to tap their internet. Okay, sean bridges got prosecuted for some type of fraud where he maintained like a 2400 million dollar bitcoin wallet wouldn't turn it over to the government, right, and he ended up spending time in prison for it but never turned over the bitcoin. So you know, profitable few years, okay, and then uh, but he did get indicted and prosecuted and put in prison for that.
Speaker 3:And Sean, uh, jonathan McGreevy is the one who told Cheryl Atkinson about the some of the planting and how the child pornography got on her husband's computer, cause he was the one tasked to go out and literally put the clamps and a new little router box on the outside of their house. They came in a van looking like they were the cable company, okay, and Atkinson's were like what's this extra thing over here? And he admitted all of it, court filings and everything. Anyways, the reason I was mentioning that was, I don't remember, oh, deep dives on Adam Schiff. So as I was kind of going through adam schiff, I ran into him, kind of heard his story. He does have some credibility, but some things are pretty out there as well. Um, but he was talking about how adam schiff was basically involved in a very untoward activity with a young minor in a hotel and anthony bourdain was there and saw it and anthony bourdain, you know, later was taken out in france and this whole like ugly connection okay.
Speaker 3:So ed martin writes a letter to add a letitia james lawyer. So apparently you know, letitia james's lawyer wrote a letter to pam bondy basically saying you need to drop any investigation into letitia James. You know this is silly. You know this mortgage fraud thing's not a big deal. Blah, blah, blah, blah blah. So Ed Martin, who is tasked with investigating Letitia James not the person, but the crimes she's committed allegedly says this Dear sir, this is written to Abe David Lowell Esquire, who is representing Letitia James. Does that name ring a bell? Oh man.
Speaker 3:No, abe Lowell was Hunter Biden's attorney no, and Abe Lowell is the attorney that loaned Hunter Biden $2 million to pay off his IRS debt to try to avoid IRS prosecution no, yes. To pay off his IRS debt to try to avoid IRS prosecution no, yes. I'm dead serious. Oh my God, I'm dead serious. So this Abe Lowell guy is kind of implicated in some stuff, okay, and here he is representing Letitia James, new York State's top prosecutor. She couldn't get Alan Dershowitz to defend her, you know what I mean.
Speaker 3:I imagine you were notified, mortified, to read online and publicly your recent letter to US Attorney General Pam Bondi. It got leaked. On page four you make admissions about your client Letitia James conduct that are stunning to me. I am special attorney investigating many matters, including the criminal referral to which you refer in the Bondi letter. I believe your admission regarding Letitia James' conduct indicates that she is serious about addressing the problems presented in the referral. After all, her approval of your letter includes admission, although she likely did not expect it to be published At this time.
Speaker 3:Letitia would be best to serve the quote good of the state and nation by resigning from office to address the issues in the referral. Her resignation from office would give the people of New York and America more peace than proceeding. I would take this as an act in good faith. Because of your reputation for using the media to argue your points, I prefer that we communicate by letter. I find leaks like your Bondi letter professionally unacceptable and personally insulting. To that end, I specifically ask that you redouble your efforts not to leak this confidential letter.
Speaker 3:I prefer not to have to move it forward to stop your client from leaking. Thank you for considering this and alerting your client to this matter. All the best, Edward R Martin Jr.
Speaker 5:And it got leaked, apparently because we're reading it.
Speaker 3:Yeah, martin jr, and it got leaked apparently because we're reading it, yeah, and I didn't go into look, but I did find that kind of fun. I guess the letter got leaked, definitely out of tish attorney's office. Okay, back to our poll. Anybody else pray? The rosary dealer says I hope both, I hope both. Okay, okay, we'll see, we'll see. So on that, there was another huge uh thing that happened.
Speaker 3:The usaa federal housing fhafa alleges a criminal alleges in a criminal referral to the department of justice that federal federal reserve governor, lisa d cook, committed mortgage fraud by designating out her out-of-state condo as her primary residence, just two weeks after taking a loan on her Michigan home where she declared it as her primary residence. When someone commits mortgage fraud, they undermine the faith and the integrity of our system. It does not matter who you are. No one is above the law. We have sent a criminal referral to the Department of Justice with regard to the allegations. Mrs Cook and doj should should follow the facts wherever they lead. So, basically, this woman right here sitting next to jerome powell too late pal committed mortgage fraud. Wow, ten days apart, she bought two houses and look at that matching signature primary residence, primary residence, criminal referral.
Speaker 3:Now, who is she? Lisa d cook is a member of the board of governors of the federal reserve system, appointed in may. Picture ever 23rd. Now she's a federal reserve, but that was the picture you got, buddy. Okay, she's a black lady to fill an unexpired term ending in 31 2024 and reappointed september 13th 2023, obviously by joe biden, for a term ending in january 31 2038. What you get? A 15-year appointment to the board of governors a 15-year appointment to the board of governors.
Speaker 3:Holy smokes. She is the first african-american woman and the first woman of color to serve on the board. Rut row, rut row. Seriously, like our first black president's, a treasonous traitor. And now the first black woman on the board of governors is a mortgage fraudster. Oh man, you guys are not doing very well at this. Oh for two. Oh for two. I listened. No, we're just fun in here yeah, no racism, no no racism we're just like don't care, sorry, but there's.
Speaker 3:There's a, there's an element of. Was this a dei hire? Now that we understand what that was all about can we never do that again. We never do that again yeah, and I'm not saying we're not hiring black people. I'm just saying let's not hire deis yeah, this is no bueno so she sat on the board, the board of governors, and apparently doesn't respect financial laws. It's pretty freaky. So pulte said this about it. And remember leticia james. Now her and adam schiff are all under the under the gun for mortgage.
Speaker 12:It doesn't matter whether you're a politician, it doesn't matter whether you're a lawyer. It doesn't matter whether you're a politician, it doesn't matter whether you're a lawyer, it doesn't matter whether you're somebody famous. If you commit mortgage fraud, we are going to go after you. It doesn't matter whether you're a politician.
Speaker 3:If you have a mortgage that you committed mortgage fraud, I highly recommend refinancing out of it right now.
Speaker 5:It might be too late. I mean, the record's already there, yeah.
Speaker 3:You know, here's the thing the United States government was weaponized against the people. Right, they absolutely would prosecute you for mortgage fraud, Ron.
Speaker 5:They wouldn't even hesitate one second If they got wind of it, they'd done, which makes it funny to me why these people all thought you know, hey, I got a great idea, we can all do this and save a few bucks.
Speaker 3:Silicon Bank when you know hey, I got a great idea, we can all do this and save a few bucks. Silicon bank, when they collapsed, had a bank ratio of 1 to 263. 1 to 10 is the limit. They should have shut down at 1 to 11. They got to 1 into 263. And then scott besant is like oh, and, by the way, the president of silicon bank also sat on the san francisco board of you know, uh, central bank board or whatever it is Fed Reserve Board and they're the regulators of the bank. So he was his own regulator. So they just think they're above it. I mean, if you're on the board of governors and you're making mortgages, you don't care, get whatever you want. Right, it doesn't even matter.
Speaker 3:It's actually stunning to me in a certain way that these people even have mortgages, to be completely honest with you. Yeah, but they understand that debtors win and savers lose, so maybe they're just leveraging out their wealth. That's fine, whatever, ok. So this is Ed Martin talking to Matt Gates and he's talking about kind of everything, right, he's the weaponization of government US attorney and he makes some really interesting admissions about January 6th and I want to talk about those. Are you confident with what you're able to get access to and assess that you're going to be able to very thoroughly make your prosecutorial judgments?
Speaker 19:Well, look, you know, I've been involved with our mutual friend, Tulsi Gabbard at DNI and she has gone, and I hope people have tracked what I call the birthday of the Russia hoax which was revealed by Tulsi. It actually was born on Friday, december 9th 2016. And it was. It was done by the Obama White House in a special meeting aided by the Washington Post. This is in the record. This is in indisputable. This is not like me and you debating and what we go forward from there and you say that was a Russia hoax. It was used to almost cripple the Trump administration by design. Then you go forward to 2020 and you say what happened on January 6th and afterwards and, to your point, matt, what they did with this.
Speaker 3:Ok, he's making the connection. The Russia hoax thing leads to January 6th. Duh, well, you and me, but for most americans these are separate issues. How, how are they separate? I don't even understand how they could be separate. They're separate issues. In the mind of them, this was trump and his gang. You know the democrats had nothing to do with january 6th. That's all republicans. And now right, listen to this elect committee was.
Speaker 19:They weaponized the power of congress. They were aided by the media and they were often aided by the article three courts and the prosecutors and they, they took the hoax and they pounded out a message and, frankly, they brainwashed 40 of the country, 50 of the country. There's still. People are still sick with it because they were lying. So what is our goal? One is to hold people that do things that are destructive and against the law accountable. I want to do that, we're going to do that, I promise you. But we're also trying to get to the truth, and so when you have a Tulsi Gabbard who can say here was some of the truth, I can tell you we've been going through the records, emails of this Department of Justice from the Biden era and we're seeing who was doing what.
Speaker 19:I'll give you a quick example they put everybody on January 6th that was arrested minus maybe 100, onto the terrorism watch list. And when you said, wait a second, you're on the terrorism watch list why You're supposed to be a terrorist or a member of a terrorist group or another criteria, the other criteria was we just wanted to put you on. And when you were pardoned by Donald Trump, the other criteria was we just wanted to put you on, and when you were pardoned by Donald Trump, all 1500 plus went off the terrorism watch list. Well, that just proves it wasn't a terrorism watch list. It's a list to punish you when you go to the airport, and that's what they did. We have a number, we have numbers that the IRS were auditing day six targets in a higher percentage than in, and then other groups. This is all the use of government against the people and and I'll just finish with this man, okay, I lived through that yeah, I was on that no-fly list.
Speaker 3:I was on that terrorism watch list I.
Speaker 5:I feel like we're still living through this to a certain extent. I hope it's over, right.
Speaker 3:I mean, yeah, me too I haven't been on a plane successfully without being on the watch list since, hoping to take my first trip sometime soon. But I was on that watch list. I was on the terrorism watch list. I had my bank account closed. I got the letter saying get your money out. You cannot bank here anymore. At wells fargo a bank I'd banked at since I was 14 I'd had an account there since I was 14 years old can't bank here anymore. I had all digital accounts sent me little letters saying can't, can't have an account, can't have an account, have an account. Lift on and on. Okay, and I got. I don't know if audit is the right word, but I got a proctal exam by the irs.
Speaker 3:It was not as soon as we shut this show down, I got into it with the irs. In fact, just so you understand what it meant to me, these are my dealings with the IRS. Okay, post-january 6th hundreds of communications with the IRS I had to deal with. I don't hardly ever talk about this. This year I was targeted.
Speaker 5:Absolutely. I was targeted. This was not an audit.
Speaker 3:I didn't just have to deal with a misdemeanor trespass, didn't just have to deal with a misdemeanor trespass charge. I had to deal with the irs. I had to deal with the department of homeland security and air marshals and tsa. I had to deal with banking officials and you were debanked. I was debanked, yeah okay, and guess what, there were lots of people that had sympathy, but I don't know that anyone, while we were going through it, really comprehended how much was going on.
Speaker 5:I didn't.
Speaker 3:And I'm right next to you. I kept my head down. I went to work every day. I limited my social media presence. I studied and did what I had to do to deal with my case directly, deal with the IRS directly, deal with all of that. And meanwhile I had close family members that are like did you get your vaccine?
Speaker 5:And meanwhile I had close family members that are like did you get your vaccine? And I'm like I'm sorry for laughing, taylor, but the same experience really. I mean I wasn't going through what you were going through specifically, but dude, the gaslighting and the brainwashed family members, it's a lot to go through, dude.
Speaker 3:And I'm sitting here going. I feel like the government's weaponized against me, I mean, and people are just like I mean, you know? I mean this is the United States of America, I'm sure it'll all work out, and it's like I don't think you guys know what time of day it is Like we're.
Speaker 5:The next step is up against the wall, sir time of day, it is like we're the next step is up against the wall, sir. Well, yeah, and then I would report to you some days. Like you know, I think I had a guy following me yesterday again and you'd be like, oh, come on, nobody's following you today. Nobody's following you, ron, and I'm like, bro, they, they were talking about details that nobody should know meanwhile, I'm just out there, I'm just like.
Speaker 3:Whatever last words I said to the fbi was I live my life in the light, right? There's nothing about my life that I'm not going to have to stand before my maker and answer for. So whatever you know, my mom always used to teach me happiness is a choice. But she also taught me very clearly you can you have the agency to make whatever choices you want, but you don't always get to choose your consequences. Right, I chose to support Donald Trump. I chose to go to January 6th. I chose to bring a bullhorn. I chose to do what I did. I got to suffer the consequences. The idea was to do it with dignity and integrity and not compromise who I am, not take a deal. You know what I mean. Not lie, not continue to double down on my own mistakes. You know what I mean.
Speaker 3:But Ed Martin is saying is saying looks, that list of misdemeanor trespass people and people who supported donald trump made its way to the irs and they started opening your files. It made it way to dhs and they put you on a terror watch list. Like these are not normal things. When I got debanked and I told the my defense attorney at the time he was like what I mean? I've defended major fraudsters. They don't even take away their bank account. They might freeze the funds, you know what I mean? They might monitor it, but they don't tell them to close it down. Right, that's unheard. He's like I have no rapists and murderers get bank accounts. Yeah, I mean, how do you think fundraising works when you don't have a bank to deposit things into?
Speaker 19:it just goes on and on you've've seen this, you know this, you've been aware of it, but we've never seen what happened in the Biden administration the use of government against the American people. We've never seen it in our history. And so am I confident we're going to get to the bottom of it? Yes, because I got to get up in the morning early and work hard all day. But it is a fight, and it is a fight because people have deleted, they disappeared, they moved on. They tried to say don't talk about it, get on with it.
Speaker 19:President Trump has said we're going to get to the bottom of it. I'm also involved in the 2020 election and the 2016 election. To get to the bottom of what happened, we're going to have grand juries, we're going to pull people in. And the one thing I'll say over and over again Matt, it won't surprise you it's the same people that were at the Russia hoax birthday party. It's the same people overlapping over and over again. And what Rudy Giuliani said once and he knows better than anybody in our American history when you put these people together and they're always working together that's called an enterprise, that's called a criminal enterprise, and you're in territory where everybody's held accountable for the whole of it, and that's what we're seeing.
Speaker 5:Yeah, some people might call them conspiring men.
Speaker 3:Gadianton robbers. Yeah, exactly, you know, I'm just continually stunned by it. I am, and I and I lived through it and sometimes I look back and I just think how did we make it? I mean, any an IRS audit can take people out right. Being on a on a no fly list, that can knock people out All these. It's funny. I had a J six, or call me up randomly out of the blue the other day. Have you been able to get a job? We don't talk that much.
Speaker 3:I was like I made my own I was like I, I know, I, I, I know how the job thing goes, like I'm not doing that and uh, he's like I cannot find a job. We've been out seven months, is that right? So february, march, april, may, june, j yeah, we've been out seven months. Seven months today.
Speaker 5:Wow.
Speaker 3:Today's my seven-month anniversary of freedom. Can you guys believe that? So we've been out seven months. He still can't find a job. You know, if you Google my name, don't recommend it. It's not good. If you're a family member of mine, don't Google your name.
Speaker 5:I'm going to come up Well, well, plus, every time you Google it, it gets tracked, gets trafficked.
Speaker 3:You don't want to be associated with a terrorist. You don't know when the list comes back. So one of the things I can't play this video because it's got the buffering wheel of death here. But Kristi Noem goes down to the border wall, does a little thing and she goes we're painting the border wall black. Make it even hotter in the summer so that it burns your hands when you try to climb it.
Speaker 3:She literally said that they're painting the wall black. Quote the black paint will get hot with the sun, which will burn people's hands if they try to climb it. Oh jeez, and next month they're going to electrify it.
Speaker 5:Don't wring your hands, so much don't wring your hands so much I gotta say.
Speaker 3:In 2016, when trump was going around doing rallies and you know, build the wall, build the wall. I said what an iconic thought. You know, through digital surveillance and just through tighter border policies, we are going to build a hypothetical wall. You know, we're really gonna enforce that border. Dude, he was serious, he built a wall I wonder how many. It's not a metaphorical thing. I always think of that asian comic when he's like he goes through and explains in detail and then he goes.
Speaker 3:But you don't have the vocabulary and don't read enough. So it comes out let's go, brandon. Yeah, I think there was a lot of people like me that were like let's build a wall. Was the let's go brandon? I'm trying to say this big thing.
Speaker 3:You know, border policies are really broken and when you let the illegal immigrants come in and build the wall we just don't rise and you get individuals who get stuck in a career path with a ceiling because you're constantly introducing low, cheap labor and some of them actually come with significant experience in other countries, which also means that they'll promote through the system faster and they compete with you. It also takes away entry-level jobs from you know other things, and then it creates an increasing level of crime because these people have already been introduced into the country and the first step into the country was a criminal act and so it's no big deal to shoplift or whatever, because they have a sense of entitlement and, at the end of the day, just build the wall brought to you by micro machines build the wall.
Speaker 3:He did it and now they're painting it black. I just dude. When I saw that I just had to chuckle. I wish you guys I could play the video. She's standing there. We're gonna paint the wall black because it'll burn your hands, suckers, okay. So julie kelly was on war room and she was talking about that. Yes, it does it. Oh, and I got to slow down it because I listened to everything at two times speed alvin and the chipmunks, yeah. So julie kelly was on war room talking about the grand juries and kind of all the different things that are happening, as well as andrew bailey coming over to the fbi. So she's another one of these people. She's well connected. I sat with her in the hallway of the DC courtroom. She sat in my courtroom for my sentencing and various parts of my trial. Really nice lady, very sympathetic. And you know it's funny inside of any organization there's always kind of infighting there's. You know, there's the Julie Kelly's a fed crowd and then there's Julie Kelly who's like ignore those guys, they're just spinning up narrative right.
Speaker 3:I don't, I don't really care. I'm, as you guys can tell, on this show. I just kind of take everybody at surface value. So I take her surface value, and here's what I do know about her she's connected, so dovetailing with that.
Speaker 20:Yes, it does appear, uh, that the doj and fbi ramping up their investigations. It appears that they are opening up grand jury proceedings hopefully not in washington for some of the perpetrators of the Russiagate hoax, and now we have the announcement that Andrew Bailey, the Missouri Attorney General, who has a long history background in state prosecutions, will be the co-deputy director, alongside Dan Bongino, of course, working for Kash Patel and AJ Pambandi, to start moving forward and advancing some of these cases.
Speaker 18:So you take this more as a sign of strength and perhaps more of a focus or orientation around prosecutions as opposed to chaos inside the FBI. That's obviously how the legacy media has tried to spin it. You think that this is actually potentially a good sign for real accountability in the form of, you know, working it through the courts, going after these people from a prosecutorial perspective.
Speaker 20:I absolutely do. And look, there is chaos within the FBI because you still have this systemically corrupt bureau under a systemically corrupt Department of Justice. The FBI is underneath the Department of Justice and they don't know who to trust. And they have found out the hard way and the good way by exposing a lot of the bad actors early on firing J6 prosecutors, firing prosecutors, investigators and agents who are involved playing the Mar-a-Lago raid and investigation. But they don't know who they can trust.
Speaker 20:And we just saw the firing of Brian Driscoll, who had been the acting deputy for a while, as they were awaiting confirmation and placement, of Dan Bongino and, of course, stephen Jensen, who also is the acting chief of the washington fbi field office, both of those gentlemen given their walking papers a week or so ago.
Speaker 20:So, in terms of leadership, natalie, cash and dan need to know who they can trust and they're not just going to pull some you, you know assistant chief, whatever the ASAC from random field office to work alongside of them, because the trust factor within the bureau is is nil. So I take this as a very positive sign politically motivated or politically natured investigations into Russiagate in January 6th and the Mar-a-Lago raid, adam Schiff, letitia James, et cetera, but also really fighting crime and reassigning, redirecting the resources and focus of the FBI to domestic law enforcement, to protecting the homeland, protecting cities, protecting the border, and so, yes, I definitely take this as a good sign, but I would not write off the chaos that is still going on, not necessarily the leadership level, but certainly the rank and file.
Speaker 3:So there's still chaos at the rank and file level.
Speaker 5:Does that mean there's still problem people?
Speaker 3:Probably you know there was a complete 180. You know, I mean, think about this January Sixers are domestic terrorists, january Sixers are heroes. I mean it's complete 180, right, total 180. When the FBI came to my house to return property, I wasn't there but my wife spoke with him for a short minute and the new FBI agent replacing the old FBI agent that was told to transfer because she was going to hit the fan. So you know, get out of town. So he transferred all the way across the country. Literally when, when, when, ed Martin was saying they've deleted things, they've told people to move on. That's exactly what they did. You know, separate the agent from his files. So you can come look at the files, but the agent can't be interviewed. Make it hard, make it difficult, that creates a slowdown. Clearly that FBI agent was involved in bad things and clearly they wanted to get him away from that office so it wouldn't be very convenient to dig into that.
Speaker 3:You know archive to dig into that. You know archive files. Oh, former employee, yeah, his stuff's in the archives, it's. You know, on the microfiche film. You know what I mean.
Speaker 3:But the new agent that was replacing was like well, your husband did try to overthrow the government. I'm a pardon man. Hello, your did try to overthrow the government, did I excuse me? You know what I mean. Like, uh, no, not what happened.
Speaker 3:So, yeah, there's chaos at the lower level because they probably look at trump as the usurper, because that's what they've been told by their employers, who allegedly have the cloak of authority. You know what I'm saying. Like it's a big problem. So, yeah, I can see why they'd bring in an outsider to come in and try to clean things up a little bit or be a partner, partner in justice. I hate to things up a little bit. Or be a partner, partner in justice. I hate to say partner in crime, but you know, a partner in justice on the thing. But wows us All. Right On the economic front.
Speaker 3:Peter Navarro, who is I don't know his official title now is whatever he's right in the White House dealing with economic policy. He is talking about how the United States is the product. Our market is the product that other countries are don't just want to sell to, but are totally dependent on selling to. And this is key as to why the tariffs have not caused price increases is because the countries and the exporters are eating up the costs, because that's how strategic and important our market is to them and and that's what's creating the leverage the foreigners the exporters who are heavily dependent on this market, and we see this clearly in the data.
Speaker 15:We saw it clearly from the first term. And think about it now. We've collected over $100 billion in tariffs already. We've had zero inflation from that and what happens is look, it's like if Germany or China or India is heavily, heavily dependent on the US market and tariffs go on. They've got a choice they either can't sell here if they raise prices or sell less, or they they got to eat it, and that's what they do the foreigners the exporters who have no one else to sell it to.
Speaker 3:You're a billion people in India. Who are you going to sell to mozambique? You know what I mean? They're totally addicted to foreign money and that's the source of capital and we have a prime position as the you know prime reserve currency and they want dollars. So they got to sell here. Okay, on to the chat to finish up our poll question uh, uh, pray. The rosary daily says, ironically, mortgage frauds in and of themselves are fraud, and I replied yes, in the way the system is, all loans are rooted in a fraudulent uh position because there's no gold or silver. You can go listen to that warner podcast with tucker carlson, where he talks specifically about this. Uh, cam razel on your question shift should be in jail. Leticia should be publicly shamed. She should be in jail too. They both use their political positions as blunt weapons. They should have a mom like me that is, that would take a stick and switch me each time I slow down to go and apologize that would teach them.
Speaker 3:Oh dude, I had so funny. I had a guard one time. Told me he goes the bop believes in capital punishment he should get the switch.
Speaker 5:I remember when I was, my dad's initials were not bop I got uh.
Speaker 3:I remember when I was a kid there was that uh person in singapore who's an american citizen that did graffiti on a car. Yeah, yeah, yeah. The guy got caved. He got caved yeah.
Speaker 5:I remember that.
Speaker 1:He got spanked.
Speaker 5:Well, it's a little harder than spanking. You know what I got to tell?
Speaker 3:you, I would have traded a thousand, not maybe not a thousand. I'd have traded a hundred lashings to not have to serve 14 months in prison.
Speaker 5:You could have caned me black, I would have been okay. Oh man, it would have been no joke. Though, don't, don't do the kids. Yeah, no joke okay, so I?
Speaker 3:my answer to this poll question is I think schiff and leticia james will both go to jail. From what I've seen on the mortgage fraud thing, I think that that is like the easiest low hanging fruit Yep, easiest low hanging fruit. So other countries are totally dependent on us. For the bulk of their market share they depend on export exports. Their companies have become bigger than their capacity to sell just to the United States. I wonder a company like Apple, what is their United States market cap versus their foreign market cap.
Speaker 3:Can Apple survive without the rest of the world? Like apple? What is their united states market cap versus their foreign market cap? Can the can apple survive without the rest of the world?
Speaker 5:uh, so it used to be. The answer would be yes, I'm not sure anymore, but, um, to your point, there are a lot of companies that want to open up new markets like china, and you'll see um stories now and then for, for example, an actor who will do a bunch of stuff over in China to try to build his rep, or whatever. Well, you find out that they have a movie or something that they made in America and that they want to then market in a secondary market, what they call a secondary market market, what they call a secondary market, and that market is china, which ends up being a market that's bigger than america, and they end up make some of these actors make more money in secondary markets like china than they do in america. So, like, think of guys like john cena, and, and how come he can speak mandarin chinese? Yeah, why, why? Well, that's why he wants the yeah, so these markets are huge.
Speaker 3:And how come he can speak Mandarin Chinese? Yeah, why? Well, that's why he wants the market share.
Speaker 5:Yeah, so these markets are huge.
Speaker 3:He wants to be in China. What Arnold Schwarzenegger was to children of the 80s, he wants to be that to children in China.
Speaker 3:Yes, and he can make hundreds of millions of dollars in China, where inica, he made a, you know, let's say a hundred trump did sign an executive order saying films now have to be made here because he's like that's fine if you want to sell them there. But you got to have the jobs here because the trend was make the films overseas or up in british columbia, right, sell it overseas and make your primary market there, and the only thing that comes back home if any of the money repatriates, it just goes to a movie studio. That's basically just a handful of warehouses in Hollywood. Now you know very little is done in the U S in those films and I don't know. I mean it's a percentage game. I'm sure people in Hollywood that are in the business while I'm working today, yeah, but when you think of the whole universe of film production and how much of the percentage of that used to be based out of Hollywood versus now they're spread out to kingdom come, and it's not just onsite shooting, it's all of it is being done overseas.
Speaker 5:So when you talk about a company like Apple, there's a similar crossover, but it's different. So I don't know that Apple could exist with only a U? S market anymore, but in the foreign and secondary markets they also have to compete with a bunch of um counterfeited goods, yeah so. And it's harder to sell, you know um, a multi-thousand dollar iphone in china than it is anywhere else.
Speaker 3:Yeah so a set of callaway golf clubs. Right, yeah, exactly, okay. So scott beson also talks about how india, russia and china have created basically a uh oil racketeering scheme cartel something going on let's go back and look at the history.
Speaker 8:though becky and china importing it is suboptimal, but if you go back and look Pre-22, pre-invasion, 13% of China's oil was already coming from Russia. Now it's 16. So China has a diversified input of their oil. If you go back and look now, I believe India had less than 1% of their oil 1%, and now I believe it's up to 42. So India is just profiteering. They are just profiteering. They are reselling. They've made 16 billion in excess profits some of the richest families in India. So this is a completely different thing. Like this, this Indian what I would call the Indian arbitrage buying cheap Russian oil, reselling it as product, has just sprung up during the war, which is unacceptable.
Speaker 3:He just called India on the carpet and some rich Indian families. So India has a huge populist groundswell and they have an actual communist party, right, because a lot of times populism and communism look the same until they take power. So what?
Speaker 5:was he saying there?
Speaker 3:they're not allowed to buy oil on the market and resell basically russia's, like you know, not supposed to be selling oil pretty much to anybody, and china was buying 13. Now they're up to 16. But what's really been going on is india, since the war has started, has become the middleman because china's like, well, we don't want more tariffs, and russia's, like you know.
Speaker 3:So let's ship it down to india, which kind of has its own you know grace with the united states, because we're not an active enemy, we're kind of in there, I don't know the pseudo ally of some sort.
Speaker 3:Not quite sure exactly so they're funding the oil through india to avoid some caustic encourage instance yes, and probably more political than anything else okay and then, and then india is basically taking out this is our oil, and then they're selling it to china because they can sell to china. China and russia can't really sell to each other without us being like can't do that okay, so china is inserting themselves in this and that's being called out, which is pretty good. And, if you remember, trump called this out in a truth post a couple weeks ago, where he's like hey, india, more tariffs because you're doing this oil thing.
Speaker 5:Right. So they're not really buying legitimate oil, no, on an open market.
Speaker 3:No, they're totally. They're totally basically laundering the oil into the international market.
Speaker 5:They're kind of acting like a.
Speaker 3:Venezuela.
Speaker 5:Yeah, basically laundering the oil into the international got it.
Speaker 3:They're kind of acting like a president laser folks. Yeah, so here the other thing too that's that's happening, that's pretty significant is scott besant and trump are really aggressively trying to pay down the debt president trump and I are laser focused on paying down the debt.
Speaker 8:So I I've been saying that tariff revenue could be $300 billion this year. I'm going to have to revise that up substantially, so I think we're going to bring down the deficit to GDP. We'll start paying down debt and then, at a point that can be used as an offset to the American people.
Speaker 5:So please explain that a little bit, because I know this is going to be a super confusing thing for most people. So can we pay off the national debt? Is that a thing that you can do?
Speaker 3:okay. So the answer is yes, you can pay off the bonds, but you can't pay off the debt okay okay, okay, so you're making me more confusing.
Speaker 5:okay, I was. I was trying to simplify it so this is man 1776.
Speaker 3:We kind of laid this all out. It's 1776, live. We lay this all out. I feel like it's a little bit too much to go into because you kind of have to set the stage for this. But every ledger has a debit and a credit side yes, and you also have a public side and a private side yes. So it's almost like your ledger has four things going on. So the dollar bill itself is a debt note. It says Federal Reserve note on it. So it is a debt note. It is considered tender, which means it's a completed debt note. So when you exchange it, it's it's discharge cash cash cash cash, completed debt note. So when you exchange it, it's it's discharge cash cash cash is discharge.
Speaker 5:So that debt, the dollar bill, cannot be paid off, right? So that's an important point. So all of the cash that is in circulation cannot be paid off, cannot be paid off.
Speaker 3:And that number is somewhere north of $350 trillion. Okay, okay, it's not redeemable. There's no gold or silver attached to that. It's just literally the cumulative total of printed and digitized dollars in circulation. Yes, now everybody borrows that. That $350 trillion includes the money that was created when you got your mortgage. It includes the money that was created when you applied for a credit card. It includes the money that was created when you got an auto loan. All of that money makes it in the marketplace and there's 350 trillion dollars washing all over the world, flowing around as currency like the current of a river. It's floating around. Okay, that can't be paid off. When that goes away, we go back to barter.
Speaker 5:So what is scott besant talking about when he's talking about paying down debt?
Speaker 3:States, just like you with your mortgage. So now take that macro view and shrink it down to micro. The United States is your simple house, is a simple household. So, irregardless of the fact that money's not real, it's not based in real value, there's no gold or silver to redeem it for. Irregardless of that, you have a bond bond. You have a contract that requires an interest payment of these debt notes. So those bonds, our government is in hawk to the federal reserve who, by the way, created all of that 350 trillion dollars for 337 trillion dollars worth, at an interest rate of four to whatever percent. So your tax payment goes to pay the interest. We don't make enough money in revenue via taxes, fees, tariffs, et cetera, et cetera, to pay the credit card bill, to pay the bill due the bonds that are due. Okay, so what he's saying is through the tariff revenue, we can get our budget down to the point to where we're not in the red every year and every month For debt service, for debt service.
Speaker 3:Correct and then, once you do that, you can take the extra to start paying down the debt, which then lowers the amount of interest due, which then you can start paying down some principal. And there's that cycle. It's paying extra on the mortgage every month. You start to pay off that mortgage. Sooner those bonds sooner it doesn't pay off the overall debt. It pays off the United States government's debt it's like the operating capital it's the operating capital.
Speaker 3:And then at some point he says then that can be turned around and offset the american. What does he mean by offset? Offset your personal tax liability, your individual contribution to those bond payments? Because when that's what you're paying through your irs is the bond payments, but we can't pay off the debt. Because here's the thing, all that money is redeemable by us. So it's like oh, you've got. So basically you're going to make us work harder to pay ourselves off faster, when we could just write it off.
Speaker 3:Yeah you see what I'm saying. They're still keeping you in the slave model and, as trump says, is to too late. Powell, it's just a paper thing. It's just a thing. Okay, but they have to keep the illusion of it alive. It's just the way it is. I accept it on its face. It's just the way it is. It's a house of cards. Eventually, rome will fall and I plan to be on my farm, okay, so we are at the time where we probably need to be switching over to private. So we're going to do that, and I have so much stinking stuff left here. I do want to play one other thing before we go private, which we'll have to do here in a minute. This is Daniel Turner talking about a electric vehicle car company called the Rivian. You've probably seen these around, I know I see them all the time. Apparently, rivian had a little bit of a precarious business.
Speaker 21:I want to transition to this, because Rivian is saying it's facing a $100 million hole after Trump rolled back fuel economy standards. Rivian, I've driven one. It's a good product, but boy, financially they've got some real question marks.
Speaker 9:It's a fantastic car, it's really cool. I haven't driven one, I can't afford one. They're incredibly expensive, but God bless the people who can afford one. Right, but poor Rivian, their, their, their model was based on government mandates that were going to outlaw the combustion engine. Tax incentives that were, that were subsidizing your purchase of an electric vehicle. And then also these exuberance, these crazy standards coming out of the Biden EPA, of cafe standards, of tailpipe emission standards that were punishing their competition. So if your business model is based on the power of government coercion to get rid of your competition, then you don't really have a product right. What you have is force. And so no offense to Rivian. But now that you have to compete in the free world and the free market and you're not as profitable, that's not the fault of the Trump administration, it's the fault of a lousy business model that depended upon government to kick your enemies to the curb.
Speaker 7:Yeah, you built your business model on the sky high dreams of a bunch of liberal idiots.
Speaker 14:So they're eventually going to get voted out, so good luck, no bailout.
Speaker 3:Daniel turner, great to see you, no I like thank you this guy's a bunch of liberal idiots amen business model based on government mandates and force. Oh my, oh my, you know, cry me a river deeper. Yeah, for real. Okay, so last thing before we go. Well, let me just run through here and make sure it can be the last thing, yes, last thing before we go private. Uh, when we go private, we're gonna go deep. We're gonna go deep into some putin stuff.
Speaker 5:Hold on before we go private. Hold on, oh oh oh. Big moment, big moment, feeling it, there we go. All right, outdoor crew. If you're into fishing, camping or getting off the grid, meet your new best friend, the Hunter Orange 25-quart cooler from Caddysports. This isn't your average cooler, are you kidding me? None of these things are average. It's roto molded for max durability, bear proof and 20 lighter than other brands. It's so so it's easy to haul. Whether you're deep in the backcountry or just setting up at the dock. You'll get up to three days of ice retention. Wow, thanks to thick, high performance insulation. That means cold drinks, fresh food and fewer ice runs, whether you're chasing muttons offshore or posting up at a campsite. Best part, it's 40 to 50 percent cheaper than the big name coolers, but still built to perform season after season. And like all cat of sports name brand gear, it's proudly made in the USA. Use code rumble at checkout for 10% off your order today. That's cat of sportscom. Go grab the hunter orange 25 court cooler and keep your next adventure Ice cold.
Speaker 3:Now I got to say something. Ron and I got to know each other really well for the first time, like intimately on a, on a hike down the washington coast. We hiked from the top left corner, nia bay, all the way down to oil city. It was like 70 miles or so. 68 miles took us. Did we do it in seven days or nine days?
Speaker 5:I've done it twice uh, I think we did it in like five or six it was seven, seven maybe. Anyways, huge hike, tons of walking, holy cow, okay it was beautiful, though right along people that are like doing the math, like, oh, 70 miles in seven days, that's only 10 miles a day, dude, it's like one mile an hour you're up and down the the heads and then you've also got the sand, and the tide rules your hike.
Speaker 3:you know every. It's slow going rocks. It's slow going Beautiful. To my knowledge, it's the longest place where you can contiguously walk the shoreline.
Speaker 5:Yeah.
Speaker 3:Right. So it's national forest all the way down the coast, pretty much on the watch. So we we did that hike and it was required that we have bear cans for our food. Yep, and what we found out was it's really not bears, you're worried about, it's raccoons. That's why you have the bear cans. And not all bear cans, though they're bear proof, are not raccoon proof. So we need to ask these guys if their coolers are raccoon proof.
Speaker 3:That's the real test get around those little squiggly five digit hands with opposable thumbs. That's what you really want to know. It's one thing if you can avoid the blunt force of claws and teeth, it's the opposable, little wily raccoon hands that you've got to be really careful of. Okay, so Trump was on with. He did a phone interview with Fox in the morning and he was asked about what his real goal is in all of this. And this was kind of beautiful.
Speaker 6:I just want to end it. I and this was kind of beautiful I just want to end it. I want to end it. You know we're not losing American lives. We're not losing American soldiers. We're losing Russian and Ukrainian mostly soldiers, some people as missiles hit wrong spots or get lobbed into cities like Kiev and towns. But you know, if I can save 7,000 people a week from being killed, I think that's a pretty—. I want to try and get to heaven if possible. I'm hearing I'm not doing well, I am really at the bottom of the totem pole, but if I can get to heaven, this will be one of the reasons. Well, I think I saved a lot of lives with India, pakistan. They were going at it. The planes were being shot down. That was going to be maybe a nuclear war. If I let that go and I did that to trade I was just want to end it. I want to end it. You know we're not losing american lives we're not losing american soldiers I, so I've never heard that one before.
Speaker 3:I really hit the bottom of the totem pole, self-deprecating right, like the whole world's like horrible he's not with porn stars, blah, blah, blah.
Speaker 3:Sure I've just never heard that one I'm not doing so well in the heaven department, but I want, want to go to heaven, so I'm trying to save some lives. I actually really appreciate that. He just says it like that, like yeah, there is something greater than us and I'm looking to be to go to heaven, whatever that means. It means I got to do good. So he's out there doing good, you know, and sometimes want to be with the right vibration.
Speaker 5:You got to send out the right vibes.
Speaker 3:Sometimes doing good means chasing Adam Schiff with a sweat, with a switch. All right, guys, I think it's probably time to head over to private. So we will go over there, and those of you who stick around with us, we appreciate it. Thank you for joining the show today. You guys are always so amazing, and should we skip the outro? Thank you so much for hanging out on rumble chat. Yeah, we're just skip the outro. We'll go straight to private, all right. All right, guys. We'll talk to you guys again tomorrow and if you're in private, you'll get to hear the outro at the end of that.
Speaker 1:I know some of you love it?
Speaker 3:all right, are we private? Yes, okay, let's talk about the dirty truth of ukraine. This is so. This is general flynn talking about the centrality of Ukraine. This is pretty scary stuff here. So this is General Flynn talking about the centrality of Ukraine in worldwide horrible things.
Speaker 7:What we're seeing in Ukraine is we're seeing a country that is and everybody knows this. Now there's no more hiding this. So why is Ukraine so important? Well, it's a hub for human trafficking. It's a hub specifically for child trafficking. It's a hub for narcotics trafficking. It's a hub for human trafficking. It's a hub specifically for child trafficking. It's a hub for narcotics trafficking. It's a hub for weapons trafficking. We now know about our bio labs because Victoria Nuland said we had them there. I mean, we've always known that, but that's stated now publicly. And there's a lot of money just flowing into this country. And you say to yourself where is this money going? Is it money laundering? Is it money laundering?
Speaker 7:I mean money laundering, you name it. You know just this week and it may not have come up on your screen, but I know you pay attention a lot. I mean, there's a couple of people I think one of them is like somebody in the Ministry of Defense there, and it might be the Minister of Defense or maybe somebody in his orbit they're buying these now, these gigantic homes for, you know, millions and millions of dollars. And you say to yourself, how is this the case?
Speaker 3:how is that possible? Money laundering, war money trafficking, children specifically calls that out. It's the center of all the baddies. All the baddies hang out there. This is my contention from the beginning. Well, maybe Russia should take over all of Ukraine. You know what I mean. Put them in that totalitarian state. Let's see if we can clean it up. This was Putin. This was a little while ago. He was being interviewed and he was asking about the West and kind of our rot. Now, keep in mind, russia is a sovereign country. To my knowledge, russia I mean russia is the soviet era. They were kind of trying to expand the soviet curtain, blah, blah, blah blah. But for the most part the russians have never been colonists. The russians have always had more resources domestically than they could handle. They've had a hard time conquering their own peasants. You know what I mean. So they've never been like foreign explorers with colonies all over the planet. Not at all. So listen to the way he describes the west and the decadency, and even some of the words he uses to describe the elite leaders.
Speaker 11:But the gist of it is different. The gist of it is that the so-called golden billion for centuries, for 500 years, they have practically lived off of other peoples. They were ripping apart these poor peoples, poor nations of Africa. They exploited Latin America, they exploited the countries of Asia and, of course, no one forgets this.
Speaker 3:Okay, so he's talking about these european leaders, these elites, and he kind of loops the america into this. They grew fat and rich exploiting other countries. They didn't grow wealthy because they created great widgets and sold them to their own people. They went to other countries and took their resources and brought them home. Does that make sense? Yeah and they exploited those other countries. And he's like nobody forgets this, like it wasn't that long ago.
Speaker 11:It's still going on and I have a feeling that it's not even about the leaders of this country. So, even though it is a very important thing, but the common people of these countries, in their heart, they can feel what's happening. They can see our struggle for our independence, for our true sovereignty, and they see this connection with their aspirations to be truly independent, which is exacerbated by the fact that in the Western elites there is a strong desire to freeze the current unfair state of things in international affairs. In international affairs, for centuries they've been stuffing their stomachs with human flesh and they've been stuffing their pockets with money. But they must realize that this ball of vampires is about to end.
Speaker 3:He says this ball of vampires is about to. Endal of vampires is about to end. For centuries, western elites grew accustomed to filling their stomachs with human flesh. They've been stuffing their pockets with money, but they must realize the cabal of vampires is about to end. In Atlas shrug, it talks about the second handers, the looters. Right that? They're literally cannibals. They eat, they eat ourselves from within. They create nothing new, they just consume. They accumulate the create money and create value as a foreign concept to them. They steal value, they steal money. They view the earth as a pie that can only be cut up. It cannot be expanded. Right, and he says this cabal, they consume human flesh. They take your life resources, they take your entire essence and they employ it in their purposes. They come down to the Congo and they get the natives to harvest rubber, something that's essentially useless for them. Right, they're spending all their time harvesting rubber to sell back to europe, to make tires and all these kind of things, and we're like, oh, how great is this? You know, we got rubber tires for our cars on the backs of human flesh. You know, you've, they're vampires.
Speaker 3:That system is coming to an end Again. Top down economics. Going back to the beginning with Chris Cuomo. If you let natural market forces happen, then people have a place in the labor. They have a place to barter their what they want. If you do bottom and you have to incentivize spending, that's where you end up incentivizing one thing or another and you create these disparities, you create these slave systems where we go to overseas for cheap labor that is exploited. Oh, it's cheaper. Yeah Well, you're directing it, you're not letting it just happen.
Speaker 5:Yeah, but we could all drive Rivians.
Speaker 3:Sure, we can. All right, guys, I've got one last video and this is the left. Actually, I have two last videos and this is the left's, or actually have two last videos.
Speaker 17:This is the left's response to Trump and his negotiation with Putin, and they're just flabbergasted that Trump would owe Putin a phone call the fact that he feels he's got to check in with Putin right away and that just as this meeting is taking place, we get news that Putin is saying by the way, no NATO troops on the ground in Ukraine. That is unacceptable. Still feels like Trump needs Putin's approval in a way. That's got to be very disturbing to Zelensky sitting there, but of course, zelensky was a good actor. He's playing it cool. He's not biting on any of the questions he got. Not biting on any of the questions he got and hopefully what's going to happen is they're going to go into this meeting with European officials and the Europeans are saying we need to put these troops on the ground inside Ukraine and it's not Vladimir Putin's business.
Speaker 5:The fact is this woman.
Speaker 3:I don't know who she is. I'm surprised you didn't say, because clearly Trump's a Russian asset Again, crazy. But Carolyn Leavitt makes it very clear the United States position in all of this and this is what we're going to end the show with today. We are done with.
Speaker 22:We'll take your questions today here in our new media seat. Today we have Jack Posobiec, who joined us in Anchorage, alaska, last week. Jack, thanks for being here. Why don't you kick us off?
Speaker 23:Caroline. Thanks so much. So a couple of questions regarding the status of these peace talks. Obviously, we saw the president and President Putin there in Anchorage. We saw the world leaders here yesterday with this summit. We've heard phrases like coalition of the willing. We've also heard Article 5-like guarantees. When it comes to the security guarantees, what is the current status of that? I know the president earlier today mentioned boots on the ground would be UK, france, germany possibly, but unequivocally said no US troops on the ground, but US coordination. Can you elaborate on that and what would the red lines?
Speaker 22:be Sure. Well, you got to the heart of what I was going to say to all of you today on security guarantees, which is the president has definitively stated US boots will not be on the ground in Ukraine, but we can certainly help in the coordination and perhaps provide other means of security guarantees to our European allies. The president understands security guarantees are crucially important to ensure a lasting peace and he has directed his national security team to coordinate with our friends in Europe and also to continue to cooperate and discuss these matters with Ukraine and Russia as well.
Speaker 23:Now? Have the Russians responded at all? I know he spoke with President Putin last night. What has been their response? Because we've heard some reports from the Kremlin and others saying they're unequivocally against NATO troops on the ground.
Speaker 22:Well, look, the president continues to have these conversations with both leaders. Those conversations took place in Anchorage, alaska, again yesterday with the Europeans and President Zelensky, and he has directed his team to come up with a framework for these security guarantees that can be acceptable to help ensure a lasting peace and end this war.
Speaker 23:And then just last question, real quick on this, Regarding some of the funding. We're hearing questions about another round of weapon sales, possibly a round of US purchases of Ukrainian drones. Will that money be funded by the US taxpayers? Are we finally going to see an end to the US taxpayer-funded seemingly endless mandate for these foreign wars?
Speaker 22:Well, the president is very sensitive to the needs of the American taxpayer and immediately upon entering office back in January, he made it very clear that we're not going to continue writing blank checks to fund a war very far away, which is why he came up with a very creative solution to have NATO purchase American weaponry, because it is the best in the world, and then to backfill the needs of the ukrainian army and the ukrainian people and their military. So that's the solution the president has came up with. We'll continue to see that forward. As for any additional sales, I'll have to defer you to the department of defense so this is great news.
Speaker 5:It's great news. You know. This is actually addressing the one thing that I was really scared about. Um, I think we mentioned yesterday. I mentioned that, uh man, my camera angle is really off but, uh, there you go, watch it fall off again.
Speaker 5:Um, so yesterday, when we were talking about this, I was like you know, this is a really slippery slope where, if you could get boots on the ground and then all of a sudden, american lives are in danger. And then. So this is addressing that specifically and I'm glad to hear that we're not going to have boots on the ground yeah, yeah, there was another video I wanted to play today.
Speaker 3:Democrat, dear lawfare democrats, lawyer up, justice is coming. Nobody's above the law. It's a five minute minute video on MSNBC Morning Joe where they're just lamenting all the lawfare Democrats and how tough it's going to be and how government's now being weaponized against them. Oh, boo hoo, we won't watch it today. I'll try to play it tomorrow. But yeah, no, I think that you know we're pulling back. This morning on the radio it was like Trump's putting out messages, basically like this is the last conflict to resolve around the world. This is the last hot work. Can you imagine there might be a moment. Can you imagine nation states are in open conflict with each other? There might be, a moment.
Speaker 3:I know you talk about world peace. I mean, he was the Miss Universe pageant owner for a while, and how many of those girls got up there? My goal is world peace. He's making it happen for all those young ladies. He's going to secure his place in heaven. World peace by making the pageant queen's wish come true. World peace, it's delivered. We're on the precipice. It's pretty incredible. Don't forget to visit leftbehindandwithoutorg. They are running low on funds and they've got kids that are constantly wanting things to do.
Speaker 1:So please take a look at that. And, of course, don't forget to visit peasants perspectivecom and we'll talk to you again tomorrow. Bye guys, old woman, man, man, sorry, what knight lives in that castle over there? I'm 37. What, I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, I can't just call you man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind you looked.
Speaker 1:What I object to is that you automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king, oh king. Eh, very nice. And how do you get that? Eh, by exploiting the workers. By exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. If there's ever going to be any progress there is. There's some lovely filth down here. Oh, how do you do? How do you do? Good, lady, I am Arthur, king of the Britons.
Speaker 1:Whose castle is that King of the who, the Britons? Who are the Britons? Well, we all are. We are all Britons, and I am your king. I didn't know we had a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working class is oh, there you go, bringing class into the gang. That's what it's all about. If only people would realize. Please, please, good people, I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What I told you we're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes, but all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see, by a simple majority in the case of purely internal affairs Be quiet but by a two-thirds majority in the case of more major.
Speaker 1:Be quiet. I order you to be quiet. Order. Who does he think he is? I'm your king. Well, I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings? Well, I can become king. Then.
Speaker 1:The Lady of the lake, her arm clad in the purest, shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up. If I went round saying I was an emperor just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they'd put me away. Shut up, will you Shut up? Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up, come and see the violence inherent in the system. Help, help. I'm being repressed, bloody peasant. Oh, what a giveaway. Did you hear that? Did you hear that? Eh, that's what I'm on about. Did you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?
