Why Killing The Filibuster Might Be The Only Way To Pass Immigration, Election, And Welfare Reforms

What happens when the only way to fix broken systems is to break a few norms? We wade into the fight over the Senate filibuster and ask whether conservatives should narrow or nuke it to pass immigration, election, and welfare reforms while they still can. The stakes feel immediate: budgets dictate reality, and appropriations are where the rules of daily life are written.

From there we trace how incentives drive behavior, spotlighting alleged childcare and welfare fraud mechanics and how large-scale registration drives at churches and shelters complicate voter integrity without silencing legitimate voices. We then widen the lens to the border and fentanyl, arguing that accountability has to climb the ladder—from street-level actors to the politicians and bureaucrats who keep bad incentives alive. Along the way, we examine the rhetoric around law enforcement, the rise in threats, and why toning down labels matters when real people are in harm’s way.

We also dig into national security and technology: how hardware sourced through Chinese supply chains can embed risk into servers, drones, and everyday devices. On public health narratives, we revisit historical declines in measles mortality and the role sanitation played, calling for clearer attribution when institutions defend their reputations. We unpack a January 6 legal gambit—the “raindrop” theory—shifting focus from individual intent to government conduct and crowd dynamics.

Finally, we confront the political pitch that’s winning the middle: free buses, universal childcare, rent freezes. The message lands because costs are crushing families. We outline a competing path to tangible relief—secure borders, cleaner elections, and local experimentation—then close with a hard look at silver’s structural supply deficit, the gap between U.S. paper pricing and China’s physical market, and why industrial demand may keep prices elevated. Subscribe, share with a friend who follows policy and markets, and leave a review with the one reform you’d fast-track right now.

Transcript

Stream Glitches And Cold Open

SPEAKER_07 0:52

Can you guys hear us at all? Can anybody hear us? Are we even getting like back? How how is this happening here?

SPEAKER_08 1:02

Okay. I think we're back.

SPEAKER_07 1:06

Okay. Okay, so I can see me there. We're back. Pony Boy says we're

Nashville Blast And Election-Tech Suspicions

SPEAKER_07 1:10

back. Okay. It's Rand Paul had dirt back. Where were we? We got that censorship. Rand Paul, it was Kentucky, that Kentucky mafia. They're like, no. You guys remember the ATT data center on Christmas a couple years ago that got hit by what looks like none other than a missile in Nashville? Or I guess what's going on. Oh yeah. I do remember just happened to be a critical infrastructure hub for you know, it's like missiles going off. There's so many things with the election stuff that's hairy like that.

SPEAKER_08 1:40

Like just a random explosion on Christmas morning in one of the places that you would need to go look for the digital footprint of well the revelation that that that there was a was it are we talking about the same story where the 140,000 votes or whatever they needed they couldn't use because the the servers got nuked?

SPEAKER_07 2:00

No, that was uh that's a different story. This was this was it felt disconnected, but sleuths online were like, wait a minute, that was an ATT server room that is at the you know, like that server room technology-wise is at the center of where this foot this traffic was that we need to look at. And Michael Yell made statements about it. Anyways, it's not even Kentucky, it was Tennessee. But all right, so the thing that's keeping Republicans from passing things like voter registration, better tax, you know, even more better tax laws, uh fixing the immigration system so it's all not not all being held together by executive order, right? Is the filibuster. You just need to get rid of the filibuster. Now, conservatives obviously hesitant to ever

Case For Nuking The Filibuster

SPEAKER_07 2:40

change anything or do anything, you know, aggressive or progressive, they haven't wanted to do this. But Senator Mark Wayne Mullins, who originally was a no to eliminating the filibuster, is coming around on it.

SPEAKER_25 2:50

Gonna have to nuke the filibuster in the Senate. The argument being that if Democrats ever win back, they're gonna do it anyway. So um if Democrats win the House, they they end the Trump agenda, essentially, for the final two years of his presidency. So get everything you can done get done, if you're not worried about politics, in the next nine months, nuke the filibuster and act the agenda.

SPEAKER_22 3:12

Well, the president has said that. He's talking about all the time to nuke the filibuster. Problem is we're still playing politics. It's an argument to be made. I I I kind of leaned on the side of for a little bit of going, well, Will, should we really nuke the filibuster? Because once you do that, it is nuclear, it goes nuclear, it opens the door wide open. And I was like, why would we open the door wide open for the for the Democrats? But I was in a meeting with you know with leadership just recently, uh last week, and I brought this point up, guys. Does anybody in this room believe that the Democrats aren't going to nuke the filibuster? And if and if they do, what they're going to do is they're going to go after all the courts. They're going to try to pack in the courts, not with 13, not with 11, but now they're saying 23. And you're going, okay, if they if we know they're going to pack the court, if we know we think they're going to make Washington, D.C. a state, Puerto Rico a state, maybe Guam a state, and that why wouldn't we just go ahead and do it anyways? Because we're not interested in the politics of it. We're interested in the policy of it. Why wouldn't we install good policy? The argument was then, well, but they will undo everything we did. To which I said back to him is like, okay, how do we know they will undo everything we did? Because if it's sound policy and they do undo everything we did and it put us in havoc, then maybe it'll backfire on them. Because if we believe they're going to do it, then why don't we just go ahead and get it done and do what the presidents want us to do to put all this policy forward? And so there was a conversation that's taking place that's saying, well, maybe we don't do all the filibusters, but we just do it when it comes to appropriations. Well, that's where the policy is made to appropriations, anyways. I think that's a sound policy for us to have a serious conversation about because we only have three years here. And the president is laser focused on setting a foundation for the golden age to be rushing in and set it up for whoever the next vice or the next president's going to be. Is it going to be JD? Who's who knows? I'd say right now, JD's probably the front runner, but if you set the foundation, a solid foundation for somebody to build on, because you don't have to worry about a mid uh a re-election, which is the advantage that the president has, then let's go all in. And I'm in that favor where you're at right now is let's go all in. Let's get this thing done because we're not going to get immigration policy done um with bipartisan support. It's not going to happen because the Democrats are never going to give us a win on this. Um, you're not going, you we're not going to have good sound policy when it comes to reforming the Unaffordable Health Care Act uh with the with re with the Democrats. They're not they're not interested. I mean, we see what they've done. They they want to do a clean three-year extension on a failed policy that has a 90 90 percent um uh fraud rate on it. That's that's horrible. 10% is horrible. This is 90% fraud rate on it, and yet they want to do a three-year clean extension on on the premium tax. And so we know they're not interested in it, so we need to do it by ourselves. And so I my position on the filibuster has changed.

SPEAKER_07 6:01

When you look at that map of the United States, and you see that states with no voter ID are taking what what was the number? Well, I I closed it. It was eight times, eight times more in Medicaid welfare payments. Eight times, eight, eight times, right? This is a big, big multiplier,

Courts, Statehood, And One-Party Power

SPEAKER_07 6:21

all based on a correlation that there's no voter ID in those states, which means that they're a magnet for illegal immigrants that then can actually flip an election. And you've got the patronage system going on. Well, some of those states actually have Republicans that are in those districts and things like that. Makes you start to look at it and go, hmm, is there a possibility there's some Republicans that are in on this patronage system? Clearly there are, but why wouldn't they want to structurally fix this? Right. And like you said, if the Democrats come and vote it back, at least they're on the record for voting it back. And if they screw it up again, it's on them. The way it is right now, we all get the blame for this system because we're not changing it.

SPEAKER_09 7:00

Yeah.

SPEAKER_07 7:01

So Nick Shirley was on with the all-in podcast, and he's now taking his efforts from Minnesota, and he's heading to California.

SPEAKER_08 7:07

Hold on before we go on. Are there different kinds of uh filibusters?

SPEAKER_07 7:12

So there's a filibuster for different types of votes. So there's votes for nominees, there's votes for budget bills, there's votes for independent bills, there's votes for judges. So uh Chuck Schumer sound like he could get rid part of them. So Chuck Schumer got rid of the filibuster for confirming Supreme Court judges.

SPEAKER_08 7:31

Okay.

SPEAKER_07 7:32

Right? And so there's and so then Mitch McConnell, it was like, well, you guys screwed this up, and then Trump got three judges in.

SPEAKER_08 7:38

So maybe making the statement of that you're gonna get rid of the filibuster isn't really entirely accurate.

SPEAKER_07 7:43

You're just gonna get rid of the filibuster only exists as a creation of the Senate, right? They created it to slow the process down, basically, and give the minority essentially a veto vote. Because if somebody's willing to get up and talk long enough, it never gets out of the hearings. And that's where it happens, is in the hearing. And the filibuster doesn't actually happen. They don't go and talk the bill to death. They just go, we're gonna use the filibuster. And Mitch McConnell goes, dang it! Debate this bill, right? And so they don't even have to say they're gonna use the filibuster. The Democrats just the Republicans just assume they will. So the bill never gets to debate, it never gets out of the committee meeting, it rarely even gets to any discussion at all if the filibuster is rumored to be used. It's like, well, we're not gonna even waste our time if we can't pass it.

SPEAKER_08 8:31

Well, sometimes you just gotta put people on the record for the way they're starting to sound more and more like it's just a weapon against the people.

SPEAKER_07 8:38

The bureaucracy of democracy. Right. Africa needs a strong man. If the people are not moral and they're willing to steal from their government and steal from their neighbors, maybe they just need let's make sure the process is the punishment. At the end of this, the buses will be free, houses will be paid for. Okay. It's just a question of are we going to have any freedoms along with those free houses and free buses? So this is Nick Shirley taking his attention to California now. So the more we expose this stuff, the more the pressure is on the Senate and the House to actually structurally change things. Because one of the most frustrating things is even in the last couple weeks, they voted more money for these programs that we he just said there's 90% fraud in Obamacare. And I guess the Republicans are being pretty good about not extending it, right? Which is gonna cost the American people a lot because their premiums are going up and their copays are going up.

SPEAKER_08 9:25

Right. But what was the term that he used that they wanted to just like let the budget go through like clean? They don't want to, they didn't want to change it at all. They just wanted when when it goes through clean, that means they're not changing it. They're accepting.

Policy Wins Without Bipartisanship

SPEAKER_07 9:40

Any poison pills that are in there, they're there. Right. Because what Nick Shirley says he's heading out to California.

SPEAKER_08 9:45

Now I understand why he's going to California because they're big and they got a lot of people. I really wish he was coming to Washington.

SPEAKER_07 9:52

Every time someone says this fraud in Minnesota's the biggest ever and it's ever, ever, ever in the history of ever. I'm like, the history of ever that you've found. Minnesota dwarfs New York and California and Illinois, and Donald Trump said the same thing. Like, when you start looking at those states, it's gonna be worse. Right. Well, there's California.

SPEAKER_03 10:06

Like, hold my beer. Yeah. But in California, I mean the homelessness has just increased as they receive more money. And that's just one part of it. And like you talked about the light rail and everything like that. Uh the fraud is like crazy in California, and they have the highest taxes. Yeah, they want more.

SPEAKER_15 10:24

Yeah. Nick, has anybody approached you about this thing? I tweeted it about it. I had never heard about it, but these guys educated me on it called QITAN, which is this framework where you can actually sue on behalf of the state and on behalf of taxpayers. Has anybody approached you about thinking about using all of the information that you've garnered to try to launch some of these lawsuits or no?

SPEAKER_03 10:47

Yeah, I actually had somebody reach out to me the other day about it. So I'm gonna actually hop on a phone call with that guy.

SPEAKER_05 10:51

Yeah, also, as I understand it, some of these whistleblower laws reward the whistleblower with something like 20 to 30 percent of amounts that 50%.

SPEAKER_07 11:00

Just pause this real quick. Birkenbein, you need to hit live on your button to get out of the loop if you're looping. So it seems like everybody else is with us. Oh, look, my hair's a little off here.

SPEAKER_05 11:12

Gotta fix that. All right, back to this.

SPEAKER_15 11:14

In some cases, yeah.

SPEAKER_05 11:15

That are I don't know if it's like fines or it's amounts that are recaptured. Recaptured. But I don't know, Nick, you could become a billionaire here just with all the billions you've exposed. I know, right?

SPEAKER_14 11:25

I gotta I gotta sit down and figure it out. I know that's not why you're in it, but you'd be the most well-loved billionaire in America if you didn't. Absolutely. Well, the way to do it is, you know, since you're drafting off of these other news reports, is to set up your own tip line. So, Nick, what's your website? Or do you have a website where people can donate? And do you have a tip line? Because you wouldn't get the whistleblower awards for the stuff Fox9's been doing for a decade, but for the next one, you could. So, what is your website where people can donate, Nick?

SPEAKER_03 11:52

Yeah, everything's just on social media. So if they can message me on any platform, I should probably get a website going.

SPEAKER_14 11:59

Um Nick, what's your social media handle where people can DM you and donate?

SPEAKER_03 12:05

Yeah, it's just Nick Shirley. And if you go on X, I do have my tip section open. So if you would like to donate there, that gives them all the whether it be Venmo, Cash App, Crypto, you can all do it right there.

SPEAKER_14 12:16

So x.com slash Nick Shirley, you can go right there. Check them out.

SPEAKER_07 12:20

X uh uh Pam Bondi tweeted out uh something tagging Nick Shirley and put the wrong handle, put extra Y in there so he's got two Y's. Let's go to some random dude with like nine followers. It's getting like MAGA love and then he's getting Antifa hate, and he's like the attorney general just tweeted me out on a controversial tweet, and I got nothing to do with it. Uh Carleen says when Trump says that there's billions of dollars of fraud and we're going to get that money back, how do you think he will get it? The answer is he won't.

unknown 12:50

Okay.

SPEAKER_07 12:51

No, it's like every other major crime. I was in prison with a guy from Guyana or Ghana, because I think it was Ghana from Africa, but he's from Canada, lived in Canada, and he scammed people out of about $20 million in America. This is the guy that would call your grandma and get her to send over her retirement savings. So he had a $20 million restitution during the court. He got the he got the same exact sentence I did 87 months. $20 million that he scammed off of people. That's what they caught him scamming people. Okay. So he's got this big fat restitution.

Welfare Fraud Claims And Voter ID Maps

SPEAKER_07 13:20

Maybe $1,000 will get paid over his seven years because he won't even work in prison. He doesn't care. And as soon as he's done, he'll get deported. So there's no collection efforts once he gets deported to wherever. So that money never really gets recovered. It gets put on a list of we're going to recover it. Sometimes they get some funds back, but it's just like everything else. We will probably never see it. It'll just go back into the government coffers, right? Maybe pay down the national debt or get used for, I don't know, airstrikes in Iran. Which by the way, I haven't covered it, but in Iran, there's been uh like five or six consecutive days of pretty significant protesting in the streets. And there's two camps in these protests. There's the pro-We Want the King camp that are protesting on behalf of the of the uh Ayatollah. And then there's the anti-Ayatollah protesters. Trump put out a truth this morning and basically told Iran if you shoot the protesters, we're coming for you. So apparently we are the world's police, even policing riots in Iran. So don't love that. I'm sure he'll just strategically strike some, you know, important facilities they have. Iran, don't shoot your protesters. Same thing in Venezuela, too, please. All right, so Jim Waltz from the state of Washington, he is the GOP state chairman. So this guy right here should instill fear in all Democrats in the state of Washington because this is the man that holds the keys. If you want to run for governor, you got to come kiss this man's ring. Okay. If you want to run for Senate, you got to come kiss this man's ring in the Republican Party in the GOP. So this man right here, Jim Walsh, should absolutely strike fear in the heart of Democrats that this guy might run a campaign against you. So this is what we got to work with here in the state of Washington. All right. And I know we've got some local listeners. Yes, this is the guy that we're out there working for when we go to our local Kitsap meetings. This is the guy setting the tone.

SPEAKER_04 15:08

This money, this is significant money. Put it all together and it's getting into the billions. It's a lot of money that the state of Washington is paying childcare providers with not enough accountability for how that money is being spent, where it's being spent. And that's the empowering part of this controversy. Is I think there are private citizens who are seeing that they can do something. This must this is significant money.

SPEAKER_07 15:38

Significant money. I know that that strikes the heart of fear into all the Democrat legislators in Washington. Oh no, Jim Waltz is on the case. More fraud and wasted money in Washington State. Oh no, it'll be a campaign topic.

SPEAKER_08 15:53

I'm gonna move to Oregon.

SPEAKER_07 15:54

Oh my gosh. As you can see, I'm not really super high on the uh uh Washington State GOP because when I look at that, I just doesn't inspire me. Like, I don't feel like there's college kids that are like, yeah, I'll canvas my local apartment complex for Jim. You know, he's just so dynamic.

SPEAKER_08 16:11

To milk toast.

SPEAKER_07 16:12

Jim's great. Jim's great. Okay, no, we've got it all figured out here. So you move to Washington and you're a Somali, and this is this is how you get it done. So you are a Somali in Washington State, and you have four children. Ugh. Oh, we're just you have four children. Your Somali sister lives next to you with her four children. Okay. You tell Washington State you are an in-home child care provider. Your sister tells Washington

What The Filibuster Actually Is

SPEAKER_07 16:40

State she is also an in-home child care provider. Legit. Both you and your Somali sister now apply for a state paid child care because you are both working. Now you are ready for this. Got it? You're both child care providers. Really? Welcome to Washington State. You and your sister are approved for state child care. Awesome. Yep. You are qualifying job. Your qualifying job is being a child care provider to your sister's children. Your sister's qualifying job is being the daycare provider for your children.

SPEAKER_08 17:08

Okay.

SPEAKER_07 17:09

Washington State pays in-home chair care providers between $24 and $33 an hour per child. I'll show the math. Four times $4 times eight equals $768 per day. Now you work five days a week taking care of your sister's kids while she works taking care of your kids. That's $768 times five equals $3,840 per week. Hey, that's just about what I want to do. 4.2 times $3840 equals $16,128 per month to watch your sister's kids by the taxpayers of Washington State. And before you can scream you can't receive state paid child care because you would never be you were you would never be income, you are now a private business and you can deduct your home costs, food for children, your car payments, insurance, and more. And now you are suddenly still eligible for state-paid child care. That's $150,000. Welcome to Washington State, corruption at its finest. So not only do you get paid to watch your sister's kids, you get to deduct all of your personal expenses because you have an in-home business, which then drops your income level low enough to where Washington State will also pay you on top of subsidizing the child care provider, your sister, they'll pay you to pay her whatever copay she charges. Do you see how this is a patronage system? I got a sister. Yeah, I got a sister. Turns out all we had to do was watch each other's kids.

SPEAKER_08 18:39

Yeah.

SPEAKER_07 18:39

We'd have made way more money.

SPEAKER_08 18:41

We got to get into childcare. Way more money.

SPEAKER_07 18:44

Now you might be thinking, nah, nah, nah, nah. This can't be true. This can't be true. This isn't the American dream I grew up with. Well, I hate to tell you, it is. And you and many other legacy Americans are waking up having this thought here. You killed the sound. Give me the sound.

SPEAKER_21 19:05

I'm going to share a shocking truth with you. The government and foreign countries were stealing from you at a rate you can't even understand. While you struggled to not fall behind on your car payments, your house payments, your child support, while you struggled to maintain being able to pay for your children's extracurriculars. When you skipped family vacations the last four years. When you skipped Christmas. Every time you had to say no to your kids because you couldn't afford it. You had to say no to your wife because you couldn't replace it. You were saying no over and over and over again. At a level you can't even fathom. Cancelled your gym membership. Cancelled your Netflix account. Couldn't afford it. Cancelled your children's ballet lessons. Couldn't afford it. You put food back on the shelves at the grocery store because you couldn't afford to check out. You used your credit card to pay the water bill. You traded

Bureaucracy As A Weapon

SPEAKER_21 20:10

in your favorite car for some piece of shit that you could afford. Your seven-day vacation turned into a three-day weekend. You bought the three-bedroom, two-bath, because you couldn't get to the five-bedroom you needed. Just too much money. You had to pass on the neighborhood you and your wife dreamt of living in. You had to get rid of your livestock. Pets, dogs, cats, because you couldn't afford to feed them and maintain them. The word no can be very beneficial, but it can also be dangerous. No implies boundaries, which is totally fine. But when you start saying no to financial and or experiential items, the metaphysical effect it has on your life is massively detrimental. When you live on no, you'll create more no. Do you have the money? No. Wanna go do this? No. Dad, may I have this? No. Got us as a country and as a people so deep in the nose that you couldn't even say yes to God anymore. How many of you are conditioned to say no to things that you shouldn't actually be saying no to? No to opportunities. No to memories. There's nothing worse than saying no to a memory. You're saying no to creating a memory that's foundational, that's impactful. You'll block everything good that God has for you. The death of the American public created a society of no. They were stealing like you can't even believe. No progress, no fun, no family, no community, no barbecues, no nothing. God just knows. Yes to risk and yes to miracles. God loves yes. Time to say yes again.

SPEAKER_07 21:54

It's time to say yes again. I like that little that's uh dilly mean team. Gotta give him credit there.

California Fraud, Homelessness, And Taxes

SPEAKER_07 22:00

He does a good job with those. That's the thing. Us legacy Americans have said no. Why? Because I'm paying my taxes. We've said no, why? Because I can't afford the the house payment with the interest rates the way they're at. Why are the interest rates the way they're at? I don't know, because we're paying interest on a bunch of money that we gave to the Somali kids down the road that their dad drives a Tesla, their mom has a Buick or Lincoln Navigator, they've got the five-bedroom house that I wanted to get. I don't know where he's working. I don't know how a first-generation immigrant has a better job than someone with a college degree in some of these. Right? How does that work? I thought they were supposed to own the nail salons, but I don't see a nail salon. I see a child care sign in their window, but I don't see kids getting dropped off. Oh, her sister lives in the neighborhood. How interesting. Yesterday in our private chat, we talked about how 501c3s, which are charities, churches generally, own a lot of these LLCs that are childcare. Wouldn't it be interesting if we found out a bunch of mosques owned these childcare companies? And that's where the money is being funneled per tax-free, right? Because the LLC is a passer entity to the disregarded entity, the religious institution behind it. Wouldn't that be a huge scandal? Right. Now the challenge there is I don't want to tell the mosques they can't have LLCs and disregarded entities because I feel like we should be able to use churches to advance the kingdom of God and stuff like that. But if the loophole means you're getting a free house and I'm not getting a free house, well, at the end of the day, either we all go to a church that gives us a free house or the government's going to give us a free house. And by the way, free buses, right? Because we are approaching the point where the buses will be free. And this all ties together. All of the welfare fraud ties right together with um election fraud. They go hand in hand. You don't have the welfare fraud at the scale you have it unless you have election fraud. Citizens will be punished when they take advantage of the government. Immigrants will be disregarded.

SPEAKER_08 23:53

Well, the whole point of the fraud was to sway elections.

Qui Tam, Whistleblowers, And Funding Tips

SPEAKER_07 24:06

You've got p addresses where multiple people have registered the vote, more than your typical family size. So this got discovered.

SPEAKER_16 24:14

Why would a thousand people be registered to vote from one single location 201 Washington Street Southwest? And when you come here, you realize this is actually a church. What was happening when we were looking through the voter registration list from the previous election cycle is I noticed well over a thousand people registered from one single location. Come to find out it's a church. When we looked into it further, we realized what was actually happening here. It's actually a very well-organized plan by Democrat donors like George Soros. George Soros poured in millions into an organization here in Atlanta that did what? They went around this entire place and signed up all the homeless people. It's during the day right now, so you don't see all the homeless people, but usually this place is filled with homeless people. So an organization that supports Democrats received money from people like George Soros to go and register homeless people to be able to vote from one single place. And to make things even crazier, if we turn around, this place is directly across the Georgia Capitol. All it took for me is to find the voter list and to see why there are more than a thousand people able to register from one place to realize that something is wrong here. The building right next to 201 Washington Street is actually a Catholic church. Well, guess what? This place, 48 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive Southwest, has registered over 2,000 people to fro from one single location. And guess who it was? It was a progressive organization signing up homeless people that are literally right across the street. It's freezing here in Atlanta. It's actually 35 degrees at 1 p.m. But usually all of this area is filled up with the homeless people. And again, we're outside one of these mega churches that ended up registering more than a thousand people to vote from just one single place. Why would a thousand people be registered to vote from one?

SPEAKER_07 26:05

Register people to vote. I mean, it seems like a good idea until it gets taken advantage of. And what happens anytime something gets taken advantage of? If free to speech gets taken advantage of and I decide to be incendiary and I just violent in my rhetoric, then eventually someone's gonna tell me I can't say those things. And they're gonna have that opinion to the point where they'll take force to prevent me from saying it or stop me from saying it, right? Because the pendulum does swing. You might have the freedom to say what you want to say, but you don't necessarily have the freedom to choose your consequences, up to and including a punch in the mouth or jail time, right? Okay. But you have to enforce it. Okay. You have to enforce it. So the freedom of speech thing is tricky because on one hand, yeah, you can church, you can have freedom of speech, but do we allow a thousand people to register at one address? Like, is that just okay? And obviously, it's not just the Presbyterian Church and the Catholic Church. I'm pretty sure the mosques in America have figured this out. When you go through and map all this fraud, the Somali thing's gonna be really interesting because it's probably gonna be all on the surface, right? But you're gonna find a mosque that owns a bunch of childcare businesses and a bunch of healthcare businesses, and all the kids that go to the mosques, they're gonna be on the rolls of all these childcare places. All the kids are gonna be autistic, so they're gonna have autistic funding, right? And all these little businesses that are owned by

Restitution Reality And Geopolitics

SPEAKER_07 27:20

the in in the Catholic Church, you'd call them the deacons, right? Or in the Mormon church would be the elders and the priests, right? All the the the clergy that kind of are the lay ministry, you're gonna find out they they're all business owners, right? It's just like you're gonna see this. Is this what we want in America, or is this just gonna cause all kinds of problem? Because, like that uh Brendan Dilley video, we as legacy Americans have been saying no, thinking that we were sacrificing something for we the people. Turns out it's not we the people, it's you, the Somali, it's you the immigrant class, it's you the person who hopped the border to come pick our wall, uh our almonds in California, but turns out you're not picking almonds at all. You're sitting at home collecting a paycheck as long as you vote in November. They're looters, they're looters, exactly. So, where does this lead us? This is an attorney. His name is Andrew uh Bronca, and he's one of these, you know, does attorney work and does a lot of analysis online. And sometimes I like his takes, and uh, he's got a pretty strong take here.

SPEAKER_24 28:21

And here's the harsh, cold reality, folks. I touched at it at the beginning. But this is a time of choosing. There will not be a multicultural U.S. There will not be an America that would be recognizable to our founders that consist of traditional Americans, white first world, high IQ, high trust people, and millions of Indians, cultural Indians, whatever their technical citizenship, millions of cultural Somalians, whatever their technical citizenship, millions of Haitians or Venezuelans or uh Sudanese or any third world country. No such culture can exist. It's not possible. Multiculturalism cannot work and have a cohesive society. Each of those communities turns on the other because we live in a world of scarce resources, and there is no broader connectivity across in the context of Europe and America, and

State GOP, Childcare Money, And Accountability

SPEAKER_24 29:20

I'm afraid Europe's already lost, somebody is going to get ethnically cleansed. Someone has to leave. We can't all live together. There are irreconcilable differences. We have to have a cultural and, by extension, a racial divorce in America. The only question is who's going to be cleansed? Is it going to be white people eradicated from America? America's no longer a first world nation. We're degraded to third world status. That's one option. That's one path I can see happening. Or the only other alternative to that is this remigration, this cleansing of America of these third worlders. I know it's racist. I know. I don't care. Those are the only two possible outcomes. Somebody is getting ethnically cleansed. The only question is who?

SPEAKER_07 30:19

The trick when we talk race and ethnicity is it's a false conversation. There is no differentiation of race. Okay, yeah, genetic differences, blue eyes, brown eyes, whatever.

SPEAKER_09 30:29

Right?

SPEAKER_07 30:29

But for the most part, you know, we're humans, we can we can get along. It's culture, it's culture that matters. I've I've said this on the podcast five years ago. I've said it to my kids, I've given this example a million times. If you come walking up my driveway and you're a white guy with baggy pants, tattoos on your face, right? A hoodie pulled up, drug paraphernalia in your hand, we have a cultural problem. Your culture does not mix with my Christian household, right? Your culture invites bad spirits into my household. Your culture invites bad influences into my household that that deprive us as of from that moral compass that we need, right? I reject that culture. If you come knock on my door, I'm gonna be highly suspicious. You're not gonna be invited in for a glass of water really quick. I'm gonna have to vet you, figure out what you're there for, send you on your way. Does that make sense? If you walk up my driveway and you're a black man and you're wearing, you know, dress pants and a polo shirt, and you have a briefcase in your hand, or a you know what I'm saying, and and you're clean cut and you walk up, come in, have a glass of water.

SPEAKER_08 31:32

I'll give you a minute.

SPEAKER_07 31:33

Clearly, you're part of my culture. You're an entrepreneur, a worker, a salesman, but you're out here doing something. You're approaching me peacefully, dressed appropriately. I don't have any drug paraphernalia following you. Even if it's for a hustle, even if it's for a hustle, you're working, right? My dad was a quarter door world book salesman. You know, yeah, game game is.

SPEAKER_08 31:51

You should at least give him a minute.

SPEAKER_07 31:52

Yes. We have the same culture. This other person, I the symbols that you come to me with, if you come to me wearing a burqa or a hijab, I gotta check on things. You know what I'm saying? Yeah, and this is really scary. I remember uh Christmas of 2020, after Trump lost the election at my Christmas when I went home for uh Christmas in Boise, I read an article to my family about balkanization in the United States and how people are gonna start siloing because cultures can't coexist, it doesn't happen. You know, one individual can drop into a community and whatever, maintain their little household culture. But when you have entire Somali cultures, some of those people that talk in on those microphones that say they've been here for like they were born in America, and I'm like, I can't hear that you were born in America. It sounds like you were born in Somalia. Uh yeah. But if you're maintaining accents in America, your culture's too thick.

SPEAKER_09 32:46

Does that make sense? For real.

SPEAKER_07 32:48

You can't get rid of the accent. So this right here is a meme that was posted by Mark Mitchell, the Rasmussen Reports polster. And uh, I've been really watching this Fallout uh Fallout series on

The Childcare Swap Scheme Explained

SPEAKER_07 33:00

on uh on Amazon. It's really good. It's really good. So this is one of the scenes from there. This is one of the guys that's uh let's just put it this way. I posted if you know He's a funny actor. Yeah. Now this probably It's important you say yes. Okay. So the meme that got posted here, we're talking about an ethnic cleansing. That's basically what was going on in this scene. This guy asks some other people, are you American? And they're like, We're American. He goes, What kind of American? And the one's like, I'm from Kansas, the other one's I'm from Miss Missouri. And the other one's I'm from Florida. He's like, Florida, like barely America. And then the other guy's like, I'm from America too. He's like, I detected accent. He's like, Columbia, because that's South America. Anyways, ethnic cleansing is coming. The buses will be free, no matter what you think about it. It's we're we're on that path. Here is uh Ben Burkwam talking about uh Donald Trump and how he put how he classified fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction. Part of this ethnic cleansing, like what the gentleman mentioned, we don't want to ethnically cleanse no death, no violence, but the re-migration, right? People need to go back home to where they came from. And part of doing that is cutting off the money supply that pushes people into this country. That money supply, a big chunk of it, comes from fentanyl and the drug cartels. We've covered this kind of ad nauseum. But Ben makes some really good points here. He says if there isn't massive amounts of action, right, we're in some serious trouble. It can't just be the little one of the things you realize with the Somali thing, if you were to go after every single person, like you know, the mom that has the home daycare center that's clearly making a hundred grand, in my opinion, from fraudulent means, there's more people on those services that deserve jail time based on the amount of money they've stolen than we have beds in prison. Right. We don't have the capacity, which means most of your daycare providers that are doing this aren't gonna be arrested. And then it starts to go up. And once you go up the bureaucratic level, hands get cleaner and cleaner. All I all I processed was an application. Right. You know what I mean? So, how do you actually stop this? You're gonna have to go after the politicians that enabled it, you're gonna have to go after the judges, you're gonna have to go after these people that ran these wholesale programs. Like there needs to be department heads of the Department of Health and Human and Child Services in the state of Minnesota needs to go to jail as a proxy for all the people that we can't put in jail on their behalf.

SPEAKER_23 35:37

It's pretty clear the cartels run places in Mexico and Venezuela. Claudia Scheinbaum said we're not allowing any American intervention into Mexico. Look, the president designated eight different cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, two in Venezuela, six in Mexico. I can guarantee you in 2026, the relentless pursuit of drug traffickers is not going to slow down, not one bit. It's going to continue. We're going to continue to blow narco boats out of the water. We're going to blockade ships coming in and out of Venezuela with illegal illicit oil. And we're going to something's going to happen in Mexico because they are the biggest offender. I don't see how you go anywhere but straight after the cartels. As Joe Biden said in 1999, hit them where they live, right?

SPEAKER_06 36:21

Yeah. And now, you know, designating fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction, uh, that's just a huge released more of the options that President Trump has to not just attack these guys, these terrorists, but also prosecute. And I want to make a point.

SPEAKER_07 36:36

And so there's there's everything that's not as a weapon of mass destruction. We just showed those two churches, a Catholic church and a Presbyterian church, that have weaponized homelessness to increase voter rolls. Which once you create that voter registration, uh who knows if a ballot gets cast. Good chance they do coming out of those churches, right? Because the politicians, all they got to do is walk across the street and be like, I need a thousand votes. How would you like a grant for whatever? You know what I'm saying? And so knowing that, that homeless population, when I go see the homeless population, I don't see, you know what I don't see? Somalis. I don't see immigrants. Our homeless population is made up of what? Our brothers and sisters. It's the legacy Americans that get screwed by the fentanyl and then get put into these systems where they're just another vote to be bought by a corrupt politician playing the patronage system with whatever church that they're hanging out at the soup kitchen for or whatever homeless shelter. Does that make sense? Homeless shelter is registering people to vote.

SPEAKER_08 37:35

They become a commodity.

SPEAKER_07 37:36

They become a commodity. So the fentanyl is what destroys our outlook on life to become the commodity. Meanwhile, whatever opportunities that you had, that bright-eyed American kid, they bring in an immigrant and they give put them right

“Say Yes Again” Monologue And Middle-Class Squeeze

SPEAKER_07 37:50

on that career path. Meanwhile, our our uh homeless population is primarily legacy Americans and veterans.

SPEAKER_06 37:57

Trump is doing right now is an assault against the enemies of this nation. But think about this, consider this, and it's the same thing that I was told when I was down in Mexico. Uh I I asked, is anything going to change now that we've cut the heads off the snakes of these cartels? And and the reporter down there, Aaron Ibarra, told me, not until you start arresting the politicians. And you look at America and it's the exact same thing. The same politicians that are aiding and abetting illegals in their own community, whether that's in Minneapolis, Minnesota, or Chicago, Illinois, or Portland, Oregon, or Salem, Oregon, or uh, or Los Angeles, these politicians that are aiding and abetting the cartels, you can guarantee there's money coming from the cartels, either directly or indirectly to them until they are prosecuted. Uh we're going to continue. We're in a in the midst of a civil war in this nation, depending, which will determine the direction that this country goes. Either we'll be a nation of laws, the rule of law, we'll have secure borders, or if the left wins, we'll be a communist nation where the cartels, the jihadists, and and and the communists run this nation. And that's my fear. That's what we're up against. That's why this year is so critical.

SPEAKER_07 39:01

Despite what we think about it, despite what we believe, there's more than enough money in the tax system for us to have anything and everything we want for free.

SPEAKER_09 39:09

Yeah.

SPEAKER_07 39:10

Okay. Or at least at a significantly reduced cost. Here you and I can argue about the legitimacy of if government should be paying for those things.

SPEAKER_09 39:19

Right.

SPEAKER_07 39:19

Right. But Mandami, he's under no impression. He just won an election in New York, biggest, most important city in America, financial center of the world, probably more billionaires per capita there than anywhere else. Maybe not, I don't know, per capita, right? Maybe Aspen, Colorado's got more per capita, but they all have offices in New York. Okay. And Mundami gets it. Mundami understands what's going on here. Well, he thinks he has a mandate there. He thinks he has a mandate. And what's the mandate? The mandate is this Republicans, listen up. The buses will be free. That's the mandate. How you get there is up to you. You want to use robotics and AI and universal basic income. If you want to do wealth redistribution, if you want to what what whatever happens, there's Certain things at this point in our country, the pendulum is too many people have Section 8 housing to just take it away. Right? Too many people have welfare benefits to just take it away. These are generational problems, and unfortunately, boomers have had it a little too good on that individual ruggedism rugged ruggedism, whatever it was. Okay. And now Mandami is coming into power, and there's going to be way more like him because the message, the winning message, is the same across the board. It's just a matter of how we get there. Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders would get on stage and bullet point by bullet point, they would talk to their audience about the same problems. Same problems. Affordability. Bernie Sanders used to talk about immigration. Same problems. Their solutions were different. But the problems were the same. Now we're getting to the point where the problems, because they have gone unaddressed for 15, 20 years now, the solutions are becoming self-evident.

SPEAKER_26 41:02

Here, where the language of the New Deal was born, we will return the vast resources of this city to the workers who call it home. Not only will we make it possible for everyone.

SPEAKER_07 41:16

Sounds a lot like the forgotten man and woman, right? The deplorables. This is your country. Sounds a lot the same. This is good. This is coming from the communist. Don't you agree, Ron though, with what he's saying? New Yorker to afford a life they love once again. How is it possible for a native New Yorker not to be able to afford to live in New York? They can't. Right? They can't. They get stuck on the the Section 8 HUD housing projects. And the only people that move to New York are people coming from the Midwest that make a name for themselves and strike it rich and can afford that Manhattan penthouse.

SPEAKER_26 41:51

We will overcome the isolation that too many feel and connect the people of this city to one another. The cost of childcare will no longer discourage young adults from starting a family.

SPEAKER_07 42:05

You can't live in New York unless you have two incomes. And you can't have two incomes if someone's got to be home watching the kid. So easy solution.

SPEAKER_26 42:14

Because we will deliver universal child care for the many by taxing the wealthiest few. Those in rent-stabilized homes will no longer dread the latest rent hike, because we will freeze the rent. Getting on a bus without worrying about a fare hike or whether you'll be able to get to your destination

Voter Registration At Churches And Homeless Shelters

SPEAKER_26 42:40

on time will no longer be deemed a small miracle because we will make those buses fast and free. These policies are not simply about the costs we make free, but the lives we fill with freedom. For too long in our city, freedom has belonged only to those who can afford to buy it. Our city hall will change that.

SPEAKER_07 43:06

He did not get elected in New York because he was talking to homeless people. He did not get elected in New York because he was talking to people that are at the bottom of the rung. He got elected in New York because he spoke to the middle class. All those things about free this, free that. You need to recognize who it's going to be free for. It's going to be free for people in your income bracket. Why? Because you're the one that's actually getting screwed. Donald Trump knew that. That's why he spoke to the middle class as the deplorable, the forgotten man, because it sure doesn't feel like you're middle class. It feels like you're bottom class. Right. And that's the problem there. And the socialist Mondami has figured it out. He's not talking to the homeless people. He's not talking to the rich people. He's talking to the same voter block that has won every election since the dawn of time, the American middle class. And he's providing them with solutions. Okay. Because unfortunately, even for the middle class family, they do have to take into account the cost of bus fare and the cost of child care, because they can't live in that three-bed, two-bath, which they already settled for instead of the five-bed, because they have to have two incomes so they can live close to mom and dad because property values have gone up. So the only way you can live close to mom and dad is two incomes to live in this expensive area. And every listener to the show knows you live in one of these areas. Right? Unless you're living in like rural Missouri, you're pretty much living in one of these areas where your kids can't afford to actually work and live near you unless they double up incomes. And so then that creates a child care problem. Well, if boomer grandparents don't want to help watch the grandkids, do you see what I'm saying? Someone's going to have to watch these kids if everybody's got to go to work. Of course the state's going to step in. Someone's got to get you to work if you can't afford to buy a car. So we got to provide buses. Right? This system's the collectivist system has been proven time and time again to fail, but oh, it's enticing. Oh, it's enticing to just let the other rich people pay for my tab. Because I can drive around and see there are other rich people. The reality, though, is when you go walk a mile in those people's shoes, that person you think is rich has no time. He's strung out. You know what I mean? That person that you think is doing really well, he's really not. He's maxed out on credit cards, trying to get that student loan bailout to work out for him. You know what I'm saying? The buses are gonna be free. The problems have been the same for too many election cycles. And now it's who's going to give me a solution to my problem the fastest. And the younger generation have some urgent problems. Housing, cost of food, repayment of education, if it was even worth it, right? These all have to be considered. The solution to all of it from the conservative side to regain the America we want, there's one path that I see, right? And it's there's a couple steps to it. One, re-immigration. People need to leave the country that shouldn't be here, come off of the social safety, uh, social safety net. That money needs to be put back into the system and ideally just pay down the national debt, whatever.

SPEAKER_08 46:08

Kind of like a debt snowball.

SPEAKER_07 46:10

But if those people aren't here, they can't collect the benefits, right? The next thing is fix the election apparatus and the election system so that we can have fair elections. At that point, I believe that we're going to flush out a lot of bad policy makers, and we're going to get the feudal system. Yes, you're going to have bad policy. Mondami clearly won New York, right? And it's going to fail, but they won't do the same thing in LA. That's the beauty of the feudal system. We can try different experiments.

SPEAKER_08 46:36

But at least if you get those two things done, then you'll at least have ground to stand on and to and to fight for the stuff that you want policy-wise. Exactly.

SPEAKER_07 46:46

Tom Holman was on the Charlie Kirk show, the guys that keep running the Charlie Kirk show after Charlie's gone. And he's talking again about this idea like there will be an ethnic cleansing in America. You've got blue state governors that are doing everything in their power to stop the deportations. Why would that be? Oh, it ranges everywhere from votes to patronage to corruption to, you know, uh ideology of self-hate. Like all of these are factors as to why these blue states don't want to work with Tom Holman and the Border Patrol to deport people. But Tom Holman is like, hey, this has

Culture Clash, Multiculturalism, And Cohesion

SPEAKER_07 47:20

got to stop. You guys have elevated the rhetoric, which the American people are now turning on their own police force, the government who's trying to help them. All right. You guys are running on the problems. We're trying to fix the problems, and you're trying to make it worse. And Tom Holman is giving a warning to the blue state governors. It's time to back down. It's time for you guys to step aside and let this happen.

SPEAKER_27 47:39

But I hope there's more we can do legally to get these guys to stop impeding the good work that you guys are doing. Because it's so important. A lot of these mayors need to go see jail cells, as far as I'm concerned.

SPEAKER_12 47:49

Well.

SPEAKER_27 47:51

And governors.

SPEAKER_12 47:55

I know things you don't. Wait. I can just say, look. Wait. Wait and see.

SPEAKER_27 48:08

By the way, this is why the midterms are so important, right? Because getting these Republicans to do anything next year ahead of these midterms, they're going to be total cowards. They don't want to rock the boat. Little do they know that would actually galvanize support and more people would show up for them. Um, but if if we have a good outcome in these midterms, and even if we don't, frankly, because we still have the federal branch, but it like there is going to uh I I believe that you guys are gonna be even more emboldened. There's gonna be even more uh runway for you guys to do some some really important things.

SPEAKER_01 48:38

Let me end let me I think we're done. Let me end with this. I want to say the same thing I said last week when I was down in the same dignity at a press conference. I'm I'm I'm asking every mayor or governor, you can not like us. You can, you know, you know, protest us, you can impede us, you can call us all the names you want. I'm asking them to stop the hateful rhetoric. Yes, because I said back in March if the hateful rhetoric doesn't die down, there's gonna be bloodshed. And there has been. People have died. And as I said uh last week, I have throughout my long career, I've buried more patrol agents, I've buried ICE agents. And the worst part of my job is handing a folded flag to a child or a spouse. I don't want to bury anybody else. So please stop the haporhetic because ICE uh uh threats of assault are up like eighteen hundred eighty eight no, excuse me, eight thousand percent. Actual assault are up like twelve hundred percent. So I'm I'm begging you. No more bloodshed. And you know, every night I go to bed, I pray for the men and women, Ice and Boric job. I also pray for the people we're looking for. I don't want anybody to die. So for God's sakes, stop the hypo rhetoric just like us all you want. But stop calling these people Nazis and racist and Gestapo, because you got nuts out there that feel bullying to take action. Again, argue with us all you want. Come to the table and talk to me. Sanctuary cities, I don't want to work with sanctuary cities. I want them to work with us on and concentrate on public safety, but stop the hateful rhetoric. I'm telling you, the bloodshed isn't over. So, you know, God bless the men and women vice, God bless the men and women Borb show, God best President Trump, and God bless the greatest nation on earth.

SPEAKER_07 50:25

Okay, so you heard it from his own mouth. We are heading into a situation where there will be bloodshed. And you know, we can hope for the best that he's just referring to small, you know, one-off shootouts or whatever. But the reality is uh Border Patrol and ICE, this first year that Trump's been around, it's what we had, right? So whatever Biden had for four years, they've let atrophy, and I know they weren't super gloves off. Trump took the gloves off, and we've just had that group of people doing incredible work, really, for what they've had. But this entire year they've been hiring, they've been training. And when Tom Holman says, listen, back off, I believe it's because there's going to be a surge. How do I know there's going to be a surge? Because they're telling us, and these new Border Patrol agents are not like the last Border Patrol.

SPEAKER_13 51:13

We're granted rare access inside the U.S. Border Patrol Academy. We're under President Donald Trump. The curriculum has changed.

SPEAKER_06 51:25

This is the fastest I've ever seen government move.

SPEAKER_13 51:28

One of the biggest changes, a new pursuit policy. Our last pursuit policy. We would let them go. So they knew that the Border Patrol would not pursue them. Execute. That's no longer the case.

SPEAKER_09 51:44

Yeah. Oh yeah.

SPEAKER_11 51:52

The new implementation is the MRDS, which is a miniature red dot site. Is it a game changer, though, for you? 100%. Really? Yes.

SPEAKER_13 52:02

Many of the changes paid for, they say, by President Trump's big beautiful bill, which also allocates funding for 3,000 new Border Patrol agents, on top of the more than 19,000 already on the job. And that's going to be a record high. That will be a record high.

SPEAKER_07 52:38

That's pretty good. But new Border Patrol, not the same as the old. So Sanctuary mayors, shut your faces. These guys are coming with red dot lasers and high-speed pursuits. So, you know, if you fight back, there will be fighting back. We are in serious, serious times. Jesse Kelly, who's Megan Kelly's brother, a lot of people don't know that, found that out while I was in prison. Uh Jesse Kelly knows Dan Bongino pretty well, right? I mean, they were kind of associates in the podcast space.

Fentanyl, Cartels, And Policy Enforcement

SPEAKER_07 53:10

And uh I think they became personal friends the way he talks about them. But he said this. He said Dan Bon Gino is one of us, right? When he's going to the FBI, he's got a list of things he wants to do, all the stuff he wants to do. And Jesse Kelly, when Bongino left his podcast and went into government, he said this. He said that if Bon Gino leaves within a year, it's all over. It can't be saved.

SPEAKER_18 53:31

Oh, geez. Dan is one of us. Look, he's he's richer and more famous, but he's one of us, okay? If Dan leaves, that will tell me everything I need to know. That will tell me everything I need to know. And that's honestly, it's the day I dread, it's the day I worry about. There, I just told you. If I I wake up, what's that, Chris? Am I hearing he's going to? No, no. I've not oh let me be clear. Let me let me clarify. I've never heard a word about Dan leaving. He's never said anything to me privately about it either. I've never even heard a rumor about it. I've never heard a word about it. That this is something I came up with in my own mind. But I wake up every day and I look at my phone for maybe a text message or maybe just a headline. Dan Bongino stepping down. If Dan Bongino steps down, especially if it's over the next year, it can't be saved. He doesn't believe he can save it. He's not gonna sit there and do nothing. If he throws his hands up and says, screw it, I'm done. That'll tell you it can't be fixed.

SPEAKER_07 54:42

So serious topics today.

SPEAKER_18 54:44

I'm not willing to give up that are easy.

SPEAKER_07 54:47

You know, hope is the only thing you have.

SPEAKER_08 54:49

Yep.

SPEAKER_07 54:50

But serious topics today. You have serious people talking about eliminating free speech to say free speech. Okay. All right. You've got serious people that are explaining how deep this fraud goes. We know it's connected to elections, which means we can't self-correct this with the way systems are. Embrace the warm blanket of communism, comrade. Exactly. We absolutely know that the American zeitgeist understands more and more the buses will be free. It's just a matter of who's paying for them and how. More and more we're understanding that. More and more serious people who have never let a racist thing come out of their mouth are saying things like there has to be an ethnic cleansing, right? Recognizing, look, we're done. We're Somali, I don't care if you're Somalian. I care if you have a Somalian culture, right? At this point, I'm gonna start calling white people Guatemalan. What do you mean? Are you acting Guatemalan? Right? Because now we're just calling out cultures, right? But there will be a cultural cleansing in America. That we know it's just a question of who's here at the end. Okay. All of these things are gonna happen. You've got Tom Holman saying, please stop the rhetoric. There will be bloodshed. Why? Because right now the guys that are MAGA conservative are in power and they're gonna take out the immigrants, and they're not gonna be deterred in doing it. They're training with guns. Okay. They're so serious about this, they moved 87,000 IRS agents over to ICE and Border Patrol. Which, by the way, when they're done with the remigration, they'll go back over to the IRS. Just get ready for it, folks. All right. It's time for us to jump over into the private chat. We are gonna cover quite a few topics there. We're gonna be talking a little bit about vaccines and the history of vaccines and just basically how we've been lied to the whole time. We're gonna talk a little bit about January 6th. One of uh a fellow J6er Will Pope is still fighting his case in court, and he uh put an interesting motion to compel the raindrop theory discovery. We'll be talking about that. And then we will also be hearing again from Andrew founder Palmer Lucky. Um, he's gonna be talking about Chinese hardware and how it spies on us, and it's in everything. We're gonna be talking about Lily Phillips, who just got baptized. If you don't know who she is, good. And then uh we're gonna be talking a little bit about silver. So we got quite the private show. We hope you guys are with us on Rumble Premium. That's how you're able to listen to us on private. And thank you so much for joining us today. Had a great audience. Sorry I missed a lot of the chats. Um sorry I missed a lot of the chats there, but yeah, we had the reboot thing. Anyways, thank you guys so much for joining us, and we'll talk to you again tomorrow. Don't forget to go listen to yesterday's shows. We actually had two: the interview with Doug, and then we did a normal, normal news show. So we'll talk to you guys on the private side. Okay, here we are.

SPEAKER_09 57:33

All right.

SPEAKER_07 57:34

Okay, so one of the things with vaccines, and I learned this years ago because my wife has been vaccine hesitant for

Middle Class Promises: Free Buses And Childcare

SPEAKER_07 57:40

decades, like all of my kids' lives for the most part. And with the exception of my oldest two, she did delayed vaccine schedules. And then with the youngest two, I believe she's avoided vaccines completely. Okay. She's always done this in consultation with pediatricians and stuff like that. So we're kind of old school looking at this and seeing the problems with it. We've had friends who've, you know, we have a dear friend that was in our church with us whose kid was completely vibrant, normal, went and got the MMR vaccine and just instantly went autistic, like nonverbal, like like you will never convince those parents that it wasn't the shot. It was completely normal one day, goes to bed that night, doesn't say, doesn't talk anymore. Just just instantly. So obviously the adverse side effects have been one thing, but then there's also been the question on if vaccines actually even do anything in the first place, ever, ever, ever historically.

SPEAKER_28 58:31

Public health authorities should take credit for the decline in measles' deaths in America. They should. But they should take credit in the following way. Between the year 1900, this is all on the CDC website, what I'm about to tell you, and the year 1960, 61, 62, the years before the first measles vaccine in America, 1963, the mortality rate for measles declined by over 98%. Yes, by over 98%. That is you can just go pull up the mortality data on the CDC website. This is uncontroversial. It's just data, what I just said. Some people get emotional about it, but it's just data, what I just said. Why would they get emotional? Well, for the reasons we just discussed. Um that decline had nothing to do with vaccines. You know how I know? There was no measles vaccine. That's how I know. What what what caused that decline? I I I think that in part it's the public health uh um uh uh health authorities should take a lot of credit for that. Nutrition sensation, better sanitation, clean water, getting sewage, running out of the streets, right? All of these things. Um, initiatives to make sure that there's a natural light. Like remember all the tenement buildings, yes, um, um, all these initiatives, even basic things like quarantine. Oh, if you're sick, not that not the kind of forced kind of stay-at-home stuff that we're talking about, just if you're sick, hey, maybe you should stay at home in bed, kind of stuff. Um, and so So that declined 98% over 98%. You know how many people died in the few years, on average, a year before there was the first measle vaccine in 1963, when pox of this country were still like the developed world? Around 400 Americans a year died. That's one in 500,000 Americans died of measles in the years before they were vaccinated. Every death is a tragedy. And measles can still kill people just like any virus can in parts of the world that are really underdeveloped. Any virus can kill children, adults. And there were still pockets of America in the early 60s that were like that. But that declining rate of mortality, it was a trajectory that was ongoing even when the measles vaccine was introduced in 63. So those 400 deaths which have now gone down, how much of that is attributable to measles vaccine? How much of it is to the continued efforts of public health agencies? Right? We we that could be debated forever. We don't need to. But the important point is this long way to answer your question is this. When you listen to public health authorities today, they will say to you, measles is what caused the decline. Measles vaccine is what caused the decline in mortality. They never talk about those other things that they did.

unknown 1:01:12

Yeah.

SPEAKER_07 1:01:14

I being in the septic industry, one of the things we used to say is the plumber has saved more lives than every doctor combined. Right? Truly. Sanitation, things like that. And these stats that he shows there with measles, measles was like almost eradicated before we had a vaccine introduced. Polio was the same way. You go look at the chart, we get the polio vaccine after polio is a non-issue. There's a lot of things like that that would things are non-issues. And now we have vaccine schedules for kids for things that were never an issue in the first place, like infants with STDs. Right? It wasn't really a huge concern for us. They weren't going to the orgy parties quite yet. So that's really interesting. I wanted to include that because we haven't touched a lot on the COVID stuff and the vaccines, but our government has kind of been killing us.

SPEAKER_08 1:02:06

Well, we didn't want to just throw another label on our backs, uh, you know, some kind of unvaxxed people.

SPEAKER_07 1:02:14

We don't care about labels at this point. Not really. Okay, so Will Pope, uh, fellow J6er, he filed an interesting uh motion here. So one of the things that I remember one time I was talking to my defense attorney, and I was kind of laying out all these extraneous things about J6, the crowd control, the pipe bomb. It was just kind of rolling out. And he kind of stopped me after my rant, and this was early on in my representation with him. And he goes, you know, if you're trying to make an entrapment defense, he says, I could peruse the annals of case law and find very few successful entrapment defenses. And he's right. Even when you're openly entrapped, getting that into court and proving entrapment is like very difficult because the bar you have to overcome is that, well, you still did a crime. You still intended to do a crime. Right. So unfortunately, our federal agency, specifically the FBI, is more concerned about crimes you could commit than crimes you do commit. Right. Which is why so often you see them being like, we found a terrorist in a chat room who said something incendiary. We pulled him off and private chatted with him for a while. We offered him materials to

A Conservative Path: Remigration And Elections

SPEAKER_07 1:03:20

make a bomb, a book on how to make the bomb. We gave him a prepaid visa card to make the to get the materials to make the bomb. And then as soon as he ran the credit card, we went and arrested him.

SPEAKER_08 1:03:30

That's our that was uh the good work from our pre-crime division.

SPEAKER_07 1:03:33

Yeah. Our makeup crime division. Literally, we're making crime where there was none.

SPEAKER_08 1:03:37

I was thinking about minority report. Yeah.

SPEAKER_07 1:03:39

So, anyways, it's very difficult to do an entrapment by a stoppel defense. Well, there was another theory that the prosecution put out there, which is the raindrop theory. And I was a victim of this. You know, in my trial, they said I led the mob. In my trial, they implied that if I hadn't gone there, the mob might not have ever gone haywire and activity. You know, they they made a big deal about that. How I was a leader. And if I wasn't there, you know, mob violence would have been reduced. I don't know about that, but okay. Okay, and they call that the raindrop theory that an individual actor in a crowd can cause the butterfly effect, right? They can you can be the drop that overfills the bucket. So he says in ECF, which is electronic filing number 147 at 12, I notified the court of my intent to counter the government's raindrop prosecution theory with a raindrop defense theory that shows how the government conclud contributed to flooding the field. I explained that on ECF number 225 at 7, pointing out the current FBI agents cheered as people went up the steps, entered the government's alleged restricted area, and took photos on the Capitol. In this motion, I will continue to expand on this defense, laying out the broader raindrop theory that the government created that the government creating the conditions for the field flooding was an act of inducement. And there was a heavy presence of undercovers in the crowd contributing to the flood. This is not an entrapment by a stoppel defense, which requires evidence of both inducement and lack of predisposition. Instead, raindrop theory is entrapment by outrageous government conduct defense. Since the magnitude of the government's actions on and before January 6th were so outrageous and shocking, they can't constitute an induced entrapment of all who were at the Capitol, regardless of predisposition. We now have a growing body of evidence, including a testimony of former Capitol Police Chief Stephen Sound, to show this was the case. In the pages ahead, I outline the possible probable cause that justifies the court compelling additional raindrop theory discovery. Really good motion there. So super glad he's doing that. You know, when we talk about the Fed direction and entrapment, it's not necessarily individual entrapment. It's just what he's describing. There's no fencing, there's no security guards, there's not appropriate signage. They didn't use the sound system, they didn't use the least restrictive means. They started firing pepper spray into the crowd. On and on and on it goes. I like that theory. The raindrop, the raindrop inducement theory. It's a good one. That's pretty interesting. Now, here's the Andrel founder. I promised we'd talk about this. And the risk of Chinese hardware. This is another one of those things that we have to be constantly vigilant of and aware of. As we're advancing technologically, it is critically important that we build our components in the United States or in an area where we have absolute certainty that what you're buying is what you're getting. Because China, who's basically leading the world in manufacturing, especially of electronics, is putting stuff in everything.

SPEAKER_05 1:06:35

So what could happen if we got the Chinese devices components inside here?

SPEAKER_17 1:06:39

The risks apply to everything that's made with Chinese components. So computers, servers, phones, and also drones. You might remember the supermicro incident, where in the United States certain server farms had Chinese components that looked like tiny little power filtration capacitors. But in reality, they were actually copying and sniffing and stealing information, very sensitive information for the computer. With the supermicro incident, it was smaller than a grain of rice. And so, for example, you can imagine if you had a flight controller here, maybe it could have a component inside in China. And it might not be everyone. Maybe you inspect a hundred of them, but then only one out of a thousand has this particular, you know, tracking chip in it. It might be listening, it

ICE, Rhetoric, And Warnings Of Violence

SPEAKER_17 1:07:20

might be tracking its location, it might be gathering data silently to wait to transmit at the last second, it might be broadcasting its location. There's a lot of things you can do when you control the hardware. It's really almost impossible to overstate how concerning that would be. How many computers exist in the Japanese government, in critical utilities and infrastructures and military? Millions, at least. So then the question becomes: how many of them are compromised by Chinese intelligence operations placing listening devices or false components in them? Some people would say zero, and I think they're crazy. I actually have personal experience with China placing listening devices into sample products that I would receive from Chinese factories. My previous company, Oculus VR. My first company was a virtual reality company. I started when I was 19 years old. And there were multiple times we discovered actual wiretap electronics in product samples that were given to us. They would listen to us and transmit the voice samples over a cellular radio. If I experience them trying to steal our technology and our decisions, even as a small company, surely they're targeting every government, every military, every company. And for that reason, I think it's critical that countries for their critical technologies, whether it's computers, phones, or drones that are used by the government, they really need to make sure that they are not built in China with Chinese components.

SPEAKER_07 1:08:40

This has been a huge concern, not just with electronics, but all manufacturing in general. When I was in jail waiting for sentencing, I was in the DC dungeon down below the courthouse. They put me in a holding cell in there with this black gentleman. And he's in he's an older guy, he's in his late 60s, and he was very decrepit. He had a cane, he was very ill. Well, he was in there for like solicitation of a minor or something like that. So he was pleading guilty. He got sentenced to 10 years. But uh the guy had worked for the State Department. So he worked in one of the big warehouses in the DC area. There was a State Department warehouse, and I was like, So what'd you do? He said, Well, I did logistics and delivery. And it was pretty simple. He just ran a warehouse. But what it was was say you have an embassy over in Turkey and you need a new desk. Well, you can't just go out and buy a new desk in Turkey. You can't just go online and order one because as soon as they see it's going to the State Department, right? The embassy, they're going to put a bug in it. And it's, you know, with technology, these bugs are like ingrained in the wood and wirelessly transmitting. These like so you can't source materials for sensitive places, even things like desks and coffee tables and you know, fake, fake plants that go in waiting rooms and stuff like that. All of that has to be sourced domestically through trusted products and services. And so that's what that warehouse was. It has desks and chairs and you know, all the standardized things that need to get shipped out regularly to different military and state department facilities around the country. So it's not just a concern for electronics, it's been everything. So, but electronics, there's a bottleneck, right? If we need a desk, I can ask an Amish farmer to build one. I can get a lot of craftsmen to build a desk. Right. There's probably a lot of factories that will less specialization. Yes. But when you're talking electronics, there might be one factory on the planet that can make the circuit board. Especially when you're talking about the highest tech. Yeah, and they just happen to consistently put listening devices in. Because sometimes they get used in university labs. You know, that TV monitor that you're getting for the university lab is actually spying on you the whole time.

unknown 1:10:40

Okay.

SPEAKER_07 1:10:41

I walk around my house, and anytime I walk in and there's music playing, I walk straight over to the Alexa and I unplug it. All right. So I just want to put that out there because the threats are huge. Our national security should be focused on stuff like that, right? Okay, so this is Lily Phillips. Now, I hope that none of our listeners know who she is. I'm embarrassed that I know who she is, but something has changed in the culture of America. And I would pin this on Kim Kardashian. Some might say Pamela Anderson, but I think she was a little too X-rated for her day, right? But Kim Kardashian made the sex tape cool, right? She had her whole entrance into the scene and as being anybody that anybody knew was her sex tape with Ray J. You don't know what I'm talking about. No. Good for you. But you know who Kim Kardashian is, right? Barely. Okay, so she started out with a sex tape. I did not know. Her and a rapper.

SPEAKER_08 1:11:34

I had no idea how she got famous. That's how she got famous. Okay.

SPEAKER_07 1:11:38

And then that spun that sex tape spun off into the reality TV show, and now she's a billionaire, and her sister's a billionaire. Their whole family basically came off of this sex tape.

SPEAKER_08 1:11:48

Okay. That was all mysterious to me. I had no idea.

SPEAKER_07 1:11:51

No idea where she came from. No. Okay, so that's where she came from. Okay. Okay. So she kind of broke this mold that you could be a sex goddess while at the same time have some kind of legitimate career. And there have been countless women who have tried to go on the same path, including some of our politicians. Right? You go back and look at their back history and you're like, that's inter that's an interesting career path. Took a left turn into public activism. Okay. But it's all about influence. This this is an important point to understand. The modern narratives are driven by influencers. It used to be your nightly newsmen, your Tim Brokows, but now news is decentralized and people get their information from wherever they get their media. ESPN and Disney figured this out. That's why you have ESBN anchors talking about sports that will make comments about Donald Trump, right? Because you're going

Private Show Tease And Tech Surveillance

SPEAKER_07 1:12:40

to get your information wherever you get the information. Lily Phillips is a super famous independent porn star, right? She's got a huge OnlyFans following. Literally millions of people, unfortunately, follow her. Okay. I don't know who she is either. She's recently gotten in some trouble because she's traveled overseas to Thailand and she's done some nefarious adult acts in Thailand where it's against the law to film those types of things and stuff like that. So she's faced, I think she was facing like 15 years in prison in Thailand. I don't know even where that's at. Again, I don't follow her that closely.

SPEAKER_09 1:13:17

Okay.

SPEAKER_07 1:13:17

But she is an influential person. Okay. And that's why I'm pointing this out. This is scary. I became aware of her when I was in prison and I was watching a Fox News episode where she had just completed some challenge for her OnlyFans page where she had sex with a thousand men in 24 hours. Oh my gosh. Yeah. And she was the reason Fox News was playing it because in the recap, she was crying and she was like, I went numb and I disattached, and she was crying. And they're like, Well, maybe she'll turn her life around. Well, she didn't turn her life around. She beat it later with 1,113 men in 12 hours. Right. So this is not someone that you want to know who she is. But something interesting did happen yesterday.

SPEAKER_09 1:14:02

Everything that I've done. Praise the Lord.

SPEAKER_07 1:14:14

So that whatever podcast oftentimes we'll have these young adult independent stars, and some of them will come on and be like, I'm a reformed virgin. What's that mean? Well, I got re-baptized. But uh, I think that's good. It's been one day. She's been one day since she's been baptized. So we'll see if she's fully reformed. There have been some notable people who have left that industry and left that life, okay, gone on to do productive things elsewhere. I hope that she leaves that life and does something productive. All right. I hope. Go your way, said no more. But as far as the zeitgeist is concerned, the only reason I played this is this is a hopeful thing. Despite my judgments, despite my thought of, yeah, we'll see all this lasts, this is a hopeful thing. There are millions of kids out there that watch her that are going to see this and they're going to make incremental changes.

SPEAKER_08 1:15:12

Or they might least just question things.

SPEAKER_07 1:15:14

That baptism symbolizes acknowledging what she has been was somehow wrong. Right? It acknowledges that. And that that's the one thing that you can go, okay, this is a step, but acknowledgement is the first step. Because prior to now, she's been totally unremorseful about it. Right. And that right there, we'll see. Hopefully it's not a big ruse, but it could be pretty significant. Um there are other people that had very significant, I mean, lives that I can't even imagine that have gone on to do other good things as a good example, right? Milo Ionopoulos comes to mind. Gay man, right? But now it's like his whole work is to kind of reform the thinking around acceptance of homosexuality. It's very interesting to watch his trajectory. It'll be interesting to watch Lily there. So uh I will not be following it closely, but that came up on breaking news, 9-11 news was like this is newsworthy, right? So I wanted to include it. There's a change happening. JD Vance is a convert to Catholicism. There's quite a few people that have lived lives that were essentially atheistic or secular that have turned to religion. And I think a lot of that is realizing there are no secular answers to the problems that our world has. The secular answers are going to be

Vaccines, Sanitation, And Public Health Narratives

SPEAKER_07 1:16:30

the African answer. We need warlords, we need dictators, military dictators. But if we have a moral society that has a compass, it doesn't always matter if what you do is right or wrong. It very much matters what you believe is right or wrong. Because it's upon that ideal that we can build. So I welcome Lily Phillips into the Christian household. And I hope that she understands that now the compass points one direction. So even when we are misguided and we're off path, we know where the compass is. We know where true north is. All right, let's talk about silver here. And my whole point in talking about silver and playing this clip is I really want Ron to invest in silver before it gets too late.

SPEAKER_00 1:17:15

Lost a bunch of money, been there, done that, but don't have the t-shirt. So I do have big recollections of that, okay? Was there and did it. The thing is, this time it is totally different. Okay. We are in a structural supply-demand deficit. The population of the world has went has gone from 3 billion or whatever it is, people up to 11 billion people. They've suppressed the price of silver for the last 50 plus years. The thing is, this supply-demand deficit when it does hit a wall is not going away. It is not it will be with us for 5, 10, 15 years. Like if a hundred thousand million dollars million ounce deficit. Think about it. The average silver miner, Phil Baker, the CEO of Hecomining, says about three to five million ounces. You know, and a big one would be ten. So if you had 20 small mines, where's where's the silver going to come from to fill the supply-demand deficit? It isn't there. It isn't in the pipeline, it hasn't been the silver that needs to fill this deficit has yet to be discovered. Okay. I'm a 77 years old and I will not live to see the silver market back in the supply-demand balance, okay, unless there's some sort of you know uh restrictions put on its on its use. So when silver goes up this time, to whatever three-digit number is gonna be. Keith New Meyer has been predicting three-digit silver, he's been right. Let's say it ends up at 500, which is not unreasonable, okay? $500 for an ounce of silver. It's gonna go up there and it's gonna stay there. It's the new price. You know, I have a fair amount of physical silver stashed away in the evolve, and I can guarantee you I'm gonna be selling an ounce of it. Okay, it is pure unadulterated wealth. Silver is money, gold is money, and I'll be passing it down to my to my daughter, and um I'll sell my shares. There's where I'm gonna do, I'm gonna wait until this thing really soars, and then I'm gonna take the money off the table, and uh by selling my shares, but my physical, I won't sell it out.

SPEAKER_02 1:19:20

Very interesting perspective. Now, I want to go back to China for a moment because there's been a massive spread between the Western and Chinese silver markets, which recently hit as high as an $11 spread. Why is the Chinese market pricing silver so much higher? And does that price represent a more accurate picture of the silver price in your view?

SPEAKER_00 1:19:40

Well, it's just uh supply and demand. I mean, they don't have a paper market in China, it's all physical. Uh the drain out of the Shic uh Shanghai Futures Exchange and Shanghai Gold Exchange uh is just absolutely enormous. There was one point three million taken out of the Shanghai Futures Exchange today. And there was another million yesterday. So what they're doing is they're trading physical silver and it's you know they just can't refine it from good delivery form into uh retail form fast enough. And so therefore the demand is there, so the price goes up. It's as simple as that. There's more demand than there is supply. You know, and and the other thing that's happened and uh it was in my column this morning is that the uh the difference between the US silver price and the the uh Chinese silver price is 13.8 per 13 percent over 13 percent yesterday was it's been going up steadily the last four days in a row. And it's only a matter of time before uh you know the US the paper price catches up. But when you've got these short sellers of last resort, uh not-for-profit sellers, the big eight shorts, whatever you want to call these uh commercial traders out there, the banks and investment houses that are desperately trying to keep the price down, as long as they're in charge, okay? And they're losing control. It's obvious. I mean just take a look at the chart. These are desperate, these are desperate times for them. But as long as they're called controlling the paper price, uh we're not gonna know what the true price of silver is. And uh that's through all of recorded history up until now, we have never known what that is. But I guarantee you, before this is all over, we're gonna find out.

SPEAKER_07 1:21:18

Yeah. Raw silver. Silver, silver, silver, man. It is a good commodity, and it's going in everything. And it is the fastest conductor of electricity, which is why these data centers aren't using gold or fiber optic or copper. They're upgrading to silver. So it's like it's it's literally

J6 “Raindrop” Defense And Government Conduct

SPEAKER_07 1:21:40

like a totally robotics AI world. Silver, silver, silver, silver, silver, silver, silver, silver, silver, silver, silver, silver. I've been watching the price just uh skyrocket. So this morning, I think we were at 72 or 74. 72.53 this morning. And I think it did like 80 earlier last week. But the big tell is the agent markets are like $10 more than here. Part of that is because they're all physical delivery and there's still a paper market here. So that's pretty interesting. All right, guys, that's it for today. Thank you so much. Especially if you stuck around to the very bitter end. We'll talk to you again on Monday. Bye.

SPEAKER_19 1:22:48

Old woman! Man, ma'am, sorry. What knight lives in that castle over there? I'm 37. What? I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you ma'am. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind, you're not what I object to is you automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king. Oh, king, eh? Very nice. And how do you get that, eh? By exploiting the workers. By hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. Is there ever going to be any progress? How do you do, good lady? I'm Arthur, King of the Britons. Whose castle is that? The Britons. We all are. We are all Britons. And I am your king.

SPEAKER_20 1:23:45

I thought we're an autonomous collective.

SPEAKER_19 1:23:47

You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship. A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working class is a king. That's what it's all about. Only people are pleased, good people. I am in hate. Who lives in that cast? Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What? I told you. We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turn to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. If they take it by a civil majority in the case of your internal affairs to be quiet or by a two-thirds majority, in the case of being quiet. I order you to be quiet. I'm your king. The lady of the lake, armed clad in the purest shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bottom of the water. Signifying by divine providence that I asked was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds, distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be equat! But you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up! I mean, if I went round saying I was an emperor, just because some moistened bitch had lobbed a scimitar at me, they put me away! Shut up, will you? Shut up! Now we see the violence inheriting the system! Shut up! Now we see the violence inheriting the system! Help, help! I'm being repressed! Bloody peasant! Oh, what a giveaway! Do you hear that? Do you hear that, eh? That's what I'm on about. Do you see him repressing me?

SPEAKER_10 1:25:36

You saw it in you!