So We’re Taking Greenland Now?

Start with a story and you can move a nation—pair it with money and timing, and you can redraw the map. We dig into how the new J6 website and sweeping pardons try to lock a narrative that facts alone never secured, then follow the consequences into immigration pipelines, sanctuary policies, and open-air drug zones that rearrange labor markets and public safety. The thread is leverage: who holds it, who loses it, and how it’s used to turn culture into policy.

From there, we wade into a hot-button idea: when institutions tip toward care-first decision-making, rule-based analysis gets sidelined. Whether you buy the gendered framing or not, the pattern shows up across newsrooms, law schools, and bureaucracies—where moral claims outrun trade-offs and compassion is easily weaponized. We connect those cultural shifts to demography and family structure, arguing that fertility gaps, migration surges, and atomized households shape political futures more than elections do.

Geopolitics puts the theory to work. Greenland isn’t a meme; it’s the Arctic keystone for radar arcs, missile paths, and resource access. We walk through why its location matters to NATO, why Denmark can’t defend it, and how U.S. acquisition—political or economic—would ripple through Europe. Then we break down Venezuela’s heavy crude play: blending with U.S. shale optimizes Gulf refineries, while routing proceeds through U.S.-controlled channels shifts loyalty without collapsing local administration. It’s regime change by checkbook rather than purges—a lesson learned from Iraq’s chaos.

Back home, HHS rewrites childcare funding rules: no more upfront payments, no billing absent attendance, no guaranteed seats without competition. That bureaucratic tweak has teeth, and the economic shock will be real where fraud propped up local cash flows. The larger takeaway is consistent across topics: facts rarely beat narrative head-on, but facts tied to institutional levers—money, legitimacy, logistics—can reset the board. If you care about borders, energy, demography, and the future of American leverage, this one pulls the threads together.

If this resonated, tap follow, share it with a friend, and leave a quick review telling us which segment challenged you most. Your take might shape the next show.

Chapters

• 0:00 Cold Open And Show Framing
• 1:46 J6 Website, Pardons, And Narrative
• 4:57 Exposure Arc: Russiagate To Accountability
• 5:20 Immigration, Parole, And Sanctuary States
• 8:02 Drugs, Labor Markets, And Urban Decay
• 9:20 Feminization Thesis And Wokeness
• 13:26 Institutions Tip Female And Policy Shifts
• 16:52 Care Ethics Weaponized And Identity
• 20:46 Postwar Masculinity Vacuum And Power
• 24:06 Feelings Versus Rules In Governance
• 28:28 Flags, Identity, And Cultural Change
• 31:02 Sexual Liberation And Civilizational Decline
• 35:40 Demography, Family Structure, And Destiny
• 38:20 Iceland, Consensus, And Speech Norms
• 40:24 Socialism Claims And Cuba Debate
• 44:40 Assimilation, American Culture, And Law
• 49:28 Mike Johnson, PACs, And HHS Money
• 53:42 Why Greenland Matters Strategically
• 58:06 NATO Pushback And U.S. Leverage
• 1:02:56 Venezuela Oil, Refining, And Leverage
• 1:08:32 Canada, Energy, And Economic Pressure
• 1:12:24 Strategy: Money Control Over Regime Change
• 1:16:08 HHS Rule Repeals And Fraud Crackdown
• 1:21:06 Enforcement, Capacity, And Political Costs
• 1:24:06 Media Framing And J6 Narratives
• 1:29:12 Mistaken Identity And Watchlisting

Transcript

SPEAKER_18: 0:55

The revolution's gonna be true podcasting for sure. It's the little team. It's the little gunnace. It's the little gunnice that takes the blood of everything. It's gummist. Peasants, man. We're just peasants. Every one of us. You watch those old movies, you see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning, peasants. Welcome to another episode of The Peasants Perspective. So glad to be with you, guys. This morning, it's going to be one of the best episodes ever. What? Yeah. Yeah, one of the best ever. I'm prepared. Yeah, it's going to be top 250 for sure. It's a Scott Adams thing. You're supposed to tell people it's going to be great. Sets the mindset. All right. So yesterday was January 6th. We didn't really do a whole bunch of January 6th stuff on January 6th. We just kind of briefly touched on it for a moment.

SPEAKER_22: 1:54

I mean, everything's kind of adjacent.

SPEAKER_18: 1:56

Yeah. You're talking with Taylor. I can tie everything back to January 6th. So yesterday, the White House put out this brand new website, whitehouse.gov forward slash J6 forward slash. So let's just scroll through this. So you've got Nancy Pelosi here, and you've got your cast of characters. President took decisive action to pardon January 6th defendants who were unfairly targeted, overcharged, and used as political examples. They were not protected by the leaders who failed them. They were punished over to cover incompetence. On his first day back in office, January 20th, President Trump pardoned all of us. Nancy Pelosi spent over three years and$20 million in taxpayer funds on our partisan committee. So, anyways, it goes in to basically, you know, vindicate us. Wow. Has a video of Nancy Pelosi saying, I take responsibility. I did it. We have responsibility, Carrie. We have responsibility. Posted a new timeline of events. Um pretty cool. And then one of the coolest things about it is this right here at the bottom. Uh, with this triumphant return to the White House prison, Trump wasted no time writing one of the darkest wrongs in America, modern American history. On inauguration day 2025, he issued sweeping pardons and commutations for the vast majority of January 6th defendants, patriotic citizens who had been viciously overcharged, denied due process, and held as political hostages by a vengeful regime. These Americans, many guilty of nothing more than peacefully protest protesting a disputed election, were finally freed from years of cruel imprisonment, restored to their families and exonerated. In one bold stroke, Trump ended the nightmare of weaponized justice and delivered long overdue vindication by those betrayed by the very leader sworn in. Unfortunately, these nine beautiful and courageous souls lost their lives, four on January 6th itself, and five by their own hand while enduring merciless persecution for the simple act of peacefully walking through the Capitol to protest a stolen election. So it's got Kevin Greesom, Matherin Pirna, Benjamin Phillips, Mark Angst, Ashley Babbitt, uh George Meacham, Roseanne Boylan, Christopher Stanton George, and David Hommel. All died as a result of January 6th, either day of or later. So that's pretty cool. That's pretty cool. Which is, am I not close enough here? You really got to get in there. I'm trying to swallow it. I'm trying to get it in there. So, anyways, that's pretty cool. It's nice to see the White House officially do that. Obviously, Trump's always been pretty nice to us, J6ers, but other people in his White House, namely Todd Blanch, apparently haven't been all that great. But uh, that's pretty big incentive. I've often stated to other J6ers, I'm like, you know, there's a there's an order to the revelation of things because remember, facts don't win, narratives do. We had all the facts in 2020. We didn't have the narrative. And so Trump has incrementally been releasing more and more information. And it's like, listen, it's gonna go Russia Gate, Spygate. Tulsi Gabbard came out and kind of dumped that on us. Then it's gonna go election. Trump's been working on that, then it's gonna go J6, then it's gonna be back to the beginning for accountability. It's gonna be exposure, exposure, exposure. Then you're gonna see someone in that Barack Obama orbit get indicted for Russia Gate, etc. And then you'll start to see indictments kind of sprawling out to all the scandals after that. That's my opinion. We'll see how it goes. Stephen Miller was on uh Fox News on Hannity, and he was talking about immigration. And did you know an interesting stat? Did you know that 80% of employees at dairy farms in Idaho are illegal immigrants? No.

SPEAKER_26: 5:34

Yeah, it's a little bit of a problem. Is it for your audience? Perfectly, Sean. This was not a loophole. The Biden administration, Secretary of Homeland Security, Alejandro Majorkez, devised a scheme to fly illegal aliens into the country and then to escort them en masse across the border by the millions and to give them something known as parole, which gives them a work permit, which gives them a social, which gives them a social security number, which gives them access to the voting booth. This was the plan all along to get them here illegally so they can get free government benefits, get hooked to welfare, and be able to participate in American elections. This was an attack on democracy by the Democrat Party. It's the same attack that we see, Sean, when you have California, a sanctuary state, that is refusing to turn over even illegal alien criminals and gang members to ICE. So these are illegal aliens in California who have been arrested by California police, by California law enforcement for serious crimes, for crimes against children, for felonies, for crimes that threaten public safety. And they are refusing to hand these criminal illegal aliens over to ICE. Instead, they're freeing them back into the cities to offend and offend again. By any definition, what California is doing is criminal. It is a violation of our laws.

SPEAKER_18: 6:58

It is one of the most heinous things that I have seen in my entire so California, Washington, Illinois, New York, these sanctuary states are obviously drawing a ton of attention because they're fighting ice from coming in there. States like Idaho, Utah, they're allowing ice to come into the jails and take out drunk drivers and kind of do their thing. But they're doing that in big part because they're protecting people that are still out in the fields. Right? Which I look at it this this is all one huge symptomatic problem. And if you can fix the illegal immigration problem, what's coming with the illegal immigrants, Ron? There's a couple things that come with them. Drugs, crime, crime, okay. What else comes with them? That disease for cattle, apparently. But one of the things that comes is drugs, right? So you've got the laborer that comes in, but he's humping on his back a bunch of drugs for the cartel, gives that to the cartel guy, and then heads over to Almond.

SPEAKER_22: 7:55

The cartels need mules, and these guys just happen to be going north.

SPEAKER_18: 7:58

They just happen to be walking, and you can carry an extra couple kilos on your back, right? So this is a picture of a shot of downtown Seattle. So Mayor Katie Wilson is back in office, and first thing she did was order the Seattle police to stop arresting open air drug use. So under the last mayor, he was like, Yeah, let's go ahead and arrest the open air drug users, right? You know, just to kind of clean up the streets. Well, Kate Katie Wilson, she doesn't want to do that. So this is immediately, this is right next to Lumen Field where the Seattle Seahawks play. Just right, you know, one week later, we already have this going on. This is what like walking down the halls of prison is like sometimes, like in the dorms. It's just open air drug drug use. So these people are using drugs that are brought by the immigrants and they're not at the jobs that are taken by the immigrants. Because all these people could be working somewhere, right? I mean, in theory, if you if you if you fill up all these, you know, basic labor jobs, then where do the teenagers live? They go to the check stands, and then that pushes the people, you know, it just starts to push people out of the market until pretty much someone is too old, no skills, no jobs. Anyways, so again, Katie Wilson has done that, and there's something that came up in my feed this week that I thought was really interesting, and it's this concept of feminization, right? So, one of the things that gets kind of bandied about by political pundits is this idea of feminizing politics or feminazis or first, second, third wave feminism. Now we're on to fourth wave feminism. Well, what does all of this mean? So, this little psych psychiatrist here, she breaks down exactly what she saw happening in 2020 and attributed attributes it to feminine energy, which then we're gonna look at that through the rest of today and we're gonna see a lot of openly declared feminine energy things happening at the root of a lot of our societal problems.

SPEAKER_38: 9:52

But I am saying that feminization has caused one specific particular problem, and that is wokeness. Like a lot of people, I was baffled by the woke phenomenon. Why did everyone seemingly go crazy all at once in the summer of 2020? It was inexplicable. It seemed to be mass hysteria, genuinely. And the more I thought about uh what caused it, um, which is a very important question because if we know what causes it, we know how to prevent it from happening in the future. Uh I read an article that someone else wrote that put forward a really simple, elegant thesis, which is that wokeness is simply feminine patterns of behavior applied to institutions where women had not been very well represented until recently. Um women tend to be more consensus for focused, consensus-oriented. Uh men, when they're approaching a moral question, will ask, what are the facts? What are the rules? Whereas women will say, What are the relationships at play here? How can we make everybody happy? How can we reach an outcome that will satisfy all the parties?

SPEAKER_18: 10:55

That is super critical. Men approach a moral problem and they go, What are the facts? What are the rules? Okay, women approach it and go, what are the emotions? What are the feelings? Who are the shareholders, the stakeholders in this situation? Whereas men just come in and that doesn't matter. What are the facts? What are the rules? We'll even arrest a president.

SPEAKER_22: 11:13

Yeah. Right? That's the camp I'm in.

SPEAKER_18: 11:15

Whereas she's looking at it going, well, we don't want to arrest the victims, and then you've got these people over here who have been harmed historically by societies.

SPEAKER_22: 11:22

Yeah, that's where the man has to step in and go, that's nonsense. Yep, he punched them, doesn't it? Facts are fact the color of his skin was. Yeah. Okay.

SPEAKER_38: 11:28

As opposed to the male perspective of how do we reach an outcome that is just and according to the rules. That sounded a lot like wokeness to me. And the um sort of piece that made it all click into place for me was the coincidence of timing. It is the case, just we can all agree as a matter of fact, that a lot of institutions that went woke or were affected by wokeness became demographically female in the last five years. Law schools in America turned majority female in 2016, and they've gotten a little bit more female every year since then. I think now it stands at 55-56%. The New York Times became majority female in its workforce in 2018, which is maybe why it was so susceptible to the fads of wokeness and the internal policing and the slack revolts that took place uh internally over there. Uh medical schools are now majority female. The white-collar workforce overall, employees in the United States with college degrees, a majority of them are women. Uh and managers, management positions uh in the US workforce, 46% female, so almost majority female. So the fact that all of these institutions tipped over to being majority female around the same time that wokeness emerged, seemed to me that couldn't possibly be a coincidence. And and one of the most consistent psychological differences between men and women is women have a strong uh impulse of caring, right? Which is exactly, I mean, I I'm not somebody who looks to evolutionary biology for the solutions to all human phenomena, but this particular one does seem glaringly Darwinian, right? That women see helpless things and they want to take care of them. That is definitely something that Darwin would find a pretty easy explanation for. But that's also something that wokeness can easily weaponize. It means that if you can frame your political issue as a way of caring for some helpless class, then you're golden, right?

SPEAKER_18: 13:28

You can't minorities are babies.

SPEAKER_38: 13:30

That's right.

SPEAKER_18: 13:30

And but that is Minorities are babies.

SPEAKER_38: 13:33

That is precisely what's going on at a deeper level.

SPEAKER_18: 13:36

And that's why Minorities are babies, and you turn them into your little baby project. Over in the chat, Shantini, good morning. John Attackis, good Wednesday morning, Pony Boy, good morning, Body Easel. Hello, son, hi mom. Freddy the Rosary Daily, good morning. Frazier, good morning, Radian Boise Carlitz, Grand Rising. Todd Blanche has to go as well. Yes, from all accounts, it does seem like Todd Blanche has got to go. Okay, so feminism, right? This feminine energy that seeps into everything. I heard Milo Yannopoulos one time talking about World War II and World or World War I and World War II. You know, these two huge, major world war conflicts that saw an unimaginable amount of blood out in the field, right? Just mechanized warfare, a scale that humanity had never seen before. And then we have the nuclear weapon. And all of a sudden, the world wakes up to a morning where we can destroy ourselves like that, right? And Milo Ianopoulos says there was a crisis of manhood. You had all these chauvinist men, and I use chauvinists just to be manly men, right? Who were leaders around the world. These are your kings, your presidents, your dictators, all these manly men. And they looked around the world and they realized that they had just about destroyed it. And that it caused a crisis of confidence, a crisis of what is morally right, what are the facts, what is the just and moral outcome, right? Once once you introduce the nuclear weapons, the machine guns, chemical warfare, all of a sudden, you know, just punching the bully in the face is no longer a possibility when he can turn around and mustard gas your city. Does that make sense? And so there was a crisis of leadership, a crisis of confidence amongst the males around the world that they had walked the world into a nuclear apocalypse morning, right? And so then that gave the ability for females to come in. It just created a power vacuum. Just nobody wanted to lead, right? Like every leader around the world's looking around like, uh well, they were all pumping the brakes. They were all pumping the brakes a little bit, exactly. Which is why after World War II, you do end up with Soviet Union continuing to do what it does, and you have the the Cold War, right? Because nobody wants to fire another shot. Because, you know, you might fire a quick rifle round, it might be followed up by an intercontinental ballistic missile. You know what I mean? Like it changed the dynamics. But with that also came the rise of femininity in politics. They'd been given the right to vote just a couple decades earlier, and now of a sudden they're getting hip to it, right? Then you get the fact that women during World War II, especially in the Western countries, went to work, right? This is Rosie Riveter. She all of a sudden they're at work, they're making a wage. This is the very beginning of the potential for a two-parenthouse, uh, two-income household, right? So all of that starts to just kind of tumble forward over the decades, to the point that as time goes on, you have leaders in our country. For example, for example, the elected mayor of Los Angeles, Kim Bass. She's sitting here talking about, again, feminine energy and protesting.

SPEAKER_15: 16:42

You know, you said, I'm quoting you here, you said what we are living through is one of the great civil rights and human rights struggles of our time. Right. What what can average people do to push back against this authoritarianism that we're seeing?

SPEAKER_34: 16:56

You know, I always look at history, and I think that this is a moral assault on our democracy.

SPEAKER_18: 17:03

And we notice how she uses those feminine words, a moral assault on our democracy. Okay, if it's a moral assault, what does a man think? What are the facts? Give me the information and what are the rules? But look at how she's gonna take it. She's gonna take it out of all the framework of what were the facts and what were the rules, and just go pure feelings here.

SPEAKER_34: 17:22

We need to look back at history when things like this have happened before the internment of the Japanese, the fugitive slave patrols, which is what this has felt like. And then looking back at the civil rights movement and having nonviolent direct action, civil disobedient protests, it is so extremely important that we protest.

SPEAKER_18: 17:41

You know, there's no question as to why it's just purely, oh, look, this is like the slave patrols. Well, what were the slave patrols? That was just cops doing their jobs, wasn't it? There was a law that said it was against the law to be a fugitive slave, right? So that was just cops doing their job. As soon as the law changed, what happened to the slave patrols?

SPEAKER_22: 18:03

Oh, they guess they were done.

SPEAKER_18: 18:04

They went away. And only the real hard hardcore guys in the South put on their hoods and kept doing them, right? But no, that's really the truth. A man would look at that and he'd go, Well, those slave patrols happened for a reason. You know, the internment of the Japanese happened for a reason. Rounding up illegal immigrants on our streets that have committed crimes is happening for a reason. But just because Kim Bass looks at it and goes, Oh, it just feels mean. Well, hold on. You know, we do family separation from parents every day when a drunk driver gets arrested or a criminal, like that's you know, what are the rules, the facts, and the rules, right? Lawbreaker, he gets separated from his family. Them is the rules. A woman doesn't look at it like that. Here's another one.

SPEAKER_22: 18:44

And make it a lot easier if they just stay out of the country.

SPEAKER_18: 18:47

Yeah, here's another example of a woman who's getting into independent media. This is Tim Waltz's daughter. Okay, so we're gonna play this clip here, and she's complaining about Nick Shirley because Nick Shirley has an ethical responsibility not to expose Somali fraud because people trust independent journalists more than mainstream media. You just can't go and do this to people and communities. Okay, so listen to this. All of that.

SPEAKER_35: 19:11

And that's you know, I said in a video this morning, like now I can kind of be let loose, and like I definitely want to have some of those conversations going forward. Yeah um, but I do like I definitely think people see somebody and they're like, oh, this person's, you know, I see myself in them, and so I'm gonna believe them. And that is what people definitely see in me. I think then that's like an ek ethical thing on his end. Like, you know, you can't just go and do the this to people.

SPEAKER_13: 19:37

I don't know. Yeah, but in communities. But I I watch it, I I haven't watched the whole video like you. I've watched a lot of clips on there because he's posted a lot of them. Um, but the the the style of it, I watch it, I'm like, oh no, like this is my style. It's what I do. Yeah, like here I am, like feeling like what I'm doing is a good thing, but then it can be used. Yeah. So so yeah, and there's no

SPEAKER_35: 20:00

Like checks and balances on you know content or not many and just social media in general.

SPEAKER_18: 20:07

So so because he is just like us and he's just a dude going out and finding fraud, you can't just do that to those communities, man. Have you have you thought about their feelings? Well, a man would say, yeah, but the facts are they're committing fraud, right? So that's criminal behavior. And so what are the rules? Exposure and arrest. Okay, like this seems to follow a logical pattern here. But you've got women again, and I, you know, I love all of our women listeners. Most of you are women, right? And you understand this, but women come in and go, but the effect was you you marginalize these communities that are already marginalized, and that's my baby. Don't you know I take care of the minorities ideologically, like I take care of a baby? Don't make mama bear come out. That's what we're living through. Now, the other thing about this, too, is this extends again. This is Minnesota, right? The flag, the flag, you know, they changed their flag. So this is the guy who actually designed this new Minnesota Somali flag. Listen to him talk and tell me he's not feminine.

SPEAKER_09: 21:07

You know, like when the flag redesign kind of whole process was going about, and my flag was like chosen, there was a lot of even just controversy and apprehension from the more conservative sides just about the old flag being you know ushered out of being our flag. You know, a lot of it said this flag represents us, it's we love this flag. And you know, even despite its very colonialistic, very racist imagery and history, and even the historical context.

SPEAKER_18: 21:35

Because I know the Minnesota flag was just steeped in slavery, you know what I mean? Like, okay, a flag that's represented union miners and Northwoods loggers, right? All these years, and uh that's racist colonial slop.

SPEAKER_09: 21:50

Okay. A lot of people were still very upset at that being changed and removed. So I think, you know, just kind of starting from that point already, there was a lot of division almost between political lines about whether we change it or whether we keep the old flag, and then just kind of I think slowly morphed into um the whole Somali controversy of uh, you know, my perspective is they wanted to find a way to the far right specifically, like invalidate the progress, the progressive change of the flag.

SPEAKER_18: 22:22

Does that not sound gay? They have a gay flag. All right, in the tools. But Pony Boy says, funny how Waltz's daughter mentioned there should be checks and balances on social media, not the fraud, but the social media content creation. Exactly, exactly, because it's more concerned about feelings and stakeholders, shareholders in the issues than about the facts and what's right or wrong. What are the facts and what are the rules? Don't worry about the rules. What's important is that these Somalis are getting help. Okay. This has the ability to destroy entire countries and entire nations. So this is Seth Gruber, and uh he talks about Unwin's 1934 bombshell, sexual freedom equals empire killer. And he talks about how it's a combination of these things, right? When you get the feminism and then you combine that with a sexual liberation, it's like three generations, your civilization is done.

SPEAKER_21: 23:20

Eddie Unwin wrote a book in 1934 called Sex and Culture, where he examined 86 civilizations over 5,000 years. And shocker, he finds a 100% correlation between free the libido Woodstock's sexual insanity and the death of civilizations. And he says, once a civilization adopts total sexual freedom, that's actually the phrase he uses, you have three generations before your civilization is taken over by another society with greater social energy. Child sacrifice is always the foundation of a teenuring empire. Can't get the right to life right, you won't get any other rights right, right? And um, those who murder the unborn cannot be trusted to govern the born, and those who murder the unborn will one day murder you too, the longer that you tolerate the sacrament of Satan. I think it was 73. Three things happened in 1973. Obviously, Roe v. Wade, the Endangered Species Act that gives more legal protections to porpoises and sea turtles than human babies. Wow. And thirdly, the removing of obscenity laws by our Supreme Court allowing the widespread distribution of pornography. All that happens in 73. So if I'm doing my math right, 73 to 2003, 2003 to 2033. So we're approaching the third and final chapter.

SPEAKER_18: 24:27

We're approaching the third and final chapter. If you listen to Tim Poole, he says he's not worried about the liberals because the conservatives will win because they're having more babies than the problem is when you import quote-unquote liberals, aka Islamic Marxists or Mexican socialists who outpace even conservative Americans at having kids. See what I'm saying? Yeah. This democra demographics is destiny. So whether or not it's like a tsunami. Yeah. So whether or not you want to attribute sexual liberation to the direct downfall of society, what it does attribute to is a change in demo demographics and it changes the family dynamic, which changes fathers who are not the actual father of their children, right? Absentee fathers, that kind of thing, single mothers, it creates generational problems that destabilize society.

SPEAKER_22: 25:17

This is why a lot of people think Europe is lost. You know, they're just overrun.

SPEAKER_18: 25:22

Look at the difference between boomer liberals and boomer conservatives. And then their progeny, right? Liberals who live the American dream but had kids, but they were just loosey-goosey in their household. They're they're the ones that have 40-year-olds and 30-year-old kids that are not married. Okay. But then you go to the conservative families, and they're the ones that have little Zoomer Waffen kids that are 19 and 18 and are already married. You know what I mean? Trying to buy a house. Whereas the other ones are like, well, we'll just keep coming and living at home. You see what I'm saying? Demographically very different. And in the future, MAGA and the conservative side of things has a demographic future. The liberals don't necessarily. So, you know, our entire nation could be taken out, or we could just have kind of a new growth pattern. Does that make sense? Assuming we don't have the extra variable of Islamic overbreeders and Catholic South Americans that overbreed that vote left, right? I mean, let's just be frank about it. Now, Iceland has experienced this. This is some people being interviewed in Iceland talking about literally how in the last 10 years Iceland has completely changed as a country.

SPEAKER_06: 26:30

So Iceland is a country that has changed very rapidly in a very short period of time. So in a 10-year span, Iceland completely like took uh 180. It used to be a very local, comfy place, not many people, but now it's like very crowded, the whole infrastructure is falling down, and Iceland is essentially a dead island. There's no future, there is there's no church, no community. The whole fabric of Icelandic society has like been overturned by like leftist politics, if you want to go that route. So a lot of like promotion of homosexuality, a lot of like degeneracy. Uh we celebrate gay pride more than we celebrate our own Independence Day. So it's sort of like uh there's no hope in future for kids because Iceland is very like it goes to extremes. The government, so to speak, is very much has its fingers in your like kids and in your own personal opinions in a way that's kind of like a mommy for a drastic.

SPEAKER_36: 27:38

You cannot have uh wrong opinions of things, and you get what do women want?

SPEAKER_18: 27:42

They like agreement and consensus. Wasn't that one of the first things that she listed?

SPEAKER_36: 27:47

Publicly executed. You cannot go against anything except unless you're able to uh lose everything you have.

SPEAKER_18: 27:57

That sounds pretty feminine energy, right? Now, it gets even crazier. So here is a Washington state representative, Sean Scott, and he sat down with Brandy Cruz to have a little discussion, and she asked him a really great question about socialism, which is the political flavor of feminism, absolutely, right? It aligns perfectly with the nurturing needs, the try to take care of everybody's needs, according to according to your wants, according to your needs. I can't even remember the socialist creed, right? Because it makes no sense to me. But she asked him, is there a place where socialism has worked out?

SPEAKER_11: 28:34

I want you to give me one example of socialism, you think working well somewhere.

SPEAKER_19: 28:40

A good example of socialism working well somewhere. It's this is a really, really cool question. I think of uh Cuba in particular, uh very, very high literacy rate, number one. Number two, um, extremely strong commitment to public health. So that's one example that I can think of that would resonate with um pretty much anybody in our state who cares about education or healthcare. Would you disagree with that?

SPEAKER_11: 29:02

People flee on makeshift rafts and die in the ocean to flee Cuba for the United States.

SPEAKER_19: 29:09

Uh yeah, and I think that that is something that absolutely we have to be sensitive to. But you asked me about institutions that are working really, really well.

SPEAKER_11: 29:18

I asked you about places socialism is working, and you chose a country that people will risk their lives to flee from to this to this country. There's a reason for that, Sean.

SPEAKER_19: 29:27

There was a revolution in Cuba, that is correct.

SPEAKER_11: 29:29

They still do it to this day. They show up on the beaches of Miami because they would rather be here and would risk their lives in shark-infested rot water to flee the country that you just gave me an example of.

SPEAKER_19: 29:40

And if this if the the situation were reversed, um the injuries and the ailments that they sustain as a result of migrating to a place where they believe that they're going to be better off, I believe that they could be treated um in a much better way than American healthcare facilities are currently able to treat people. So that's one example that I can think of of uh socialism working very well in public health and in education.

SPEAKER_11: 30:02

All right.

SPEAKER_19: 30:03

Um that guy's insane.

SPEAKER_18: 30:08

Is there anywhere where socialism would work? Well, Cuba's healthcare system is pretty good. Everything else, people shark-infested waters, but if the migration pattern was reversed, Cuba could care for those immigrants better health-wise. It's what tell me that that's not feminine energy, right? Oh, and look at how the left does things. Men look at things as a whole. What are the facts? What is the what are the rules?

SPEAKER_22: 30:36

I forgot we were talking about feminine energy. I just thought it was the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

SPEAKER_18: 30:41

Hold on. Okay. What are the rules? What is just and right? And and men are gonna look at things and they're gonna see cost trade-offs, right? Like, yeah, free health care would be great, but if now I'm a slave to pay my taxes so that my unworking neighbor can have health care, that the the payoff's not there. The rules are being broken of society. Women look at it and they're just like, all caring, just throw money at it, just make the healthcare good. Yeah, but not at the cost of doesn't matter the cost. Do you see what I'm saying? It's just so so socialism works in Cuba, Ron. It works. And it's a great example because their healthcare is great. Is it? Right?

SPEAKER_22: 31:20

Like well, I mean, you should take the chance. I mean, because even if you get hurt on the way there, they got the best healthcare to patch you up.

SPEAKER_18: 31:28

Oh, yeah. That I mean, you should chance it. Now, even Donald Trump on his truth social feed posted this uh say it with me, liberal liberal women. Oh, great. Okay, now now no truths to show. It's uh saying well, Trump posted a video saying the same thing. Truth, what's going on? This this website.

SPEAKER_22: 31:52

The back, yeah.

SPEAKER_18: 31:54

Pow. Pow, it's not working. Who cares? Anyways, Trump posted a video on there. Harme Dylan was uh being asked about the American way, and she talks about how America has a certain personality, and when immigrants come here, they should assimilate to that. This is again Harme Dillon, who has a lot of masculine energy here.

SPEAKER_28: 32:15

My opinion, as a woman who loves this country, the best country on earth, and I've traveled to dozens of countries around the world, and I'm an immigrant, is that you must subscribe to and share the fundamental American values that bind us all. And if you don't, uh, there are plenty of other countries. You can go live in Europe, you can go live under the thumb of the, you know, jack-booted police who arrest people for tweets, or you can live somewhere else where you think it's utopian, or New Zealand, which has got beautiful views and kind of crazy laws when it comes to some of these liberty issues. Um, so that's that's my view. To be an American truly, you must embrace all of our American laws and our values, our concept of Thanksgiving, our concept of shared um uh social principles of mutual respect and free speech and equal protection, and not judging people according to how they were born or what color they were born, but you know, what their what their potential is and their ability is. And I think that these are some of the things that I think are really critical. If we don't enforce those laws and those concepts socially and legally, we are doomed as a country.

SPEAKER_02: 33:24

Right. That's very well said, and uh there is an American culture. This is what's interesting is somehow we're viewed as this multicultural place with immigrants from everywhere. But the reality is there is a very distinct American culture, and in my view, that's why people want to come here. Uh and so to pretend like somehow uh you can you should be welcoming everybody, even if they despise the country or resent the country, it's just a huge misunderstanding of what it is to be an American.

SPEAKER_18: 33:55

The truth of the matter is, America is the one place on earth where the consensus is we can agree to disagree and we can walk our own ways. You stay on your side of the fence, I'll stay on my side of the fence. That is the American way at its core. It's don't tread on me. That is a very masculine thing. What are the rules? You can say whatever you want to say, and I can walk away.

SPEAKER_22: 34:17

Just leave me alone.

SPEAKER_18: 34:19

That is the American way. Now, can that be weaponized? Absolutely. You can weaponize it against us, right? And can people who should otherwise have different values get sucked in? I'll never forget uh Mick Ashley Babbitt's mother who met with Mike Johnson, and I said, Well, what's he like? And she goes, He's a little, you know, she pinched her cheeks. Like that. She's he's a little like a child. He's just a little, you know, like he's got little rosy cheeks, you know, he's just like a little kid. That's pretty interesting. Mike John um Mike Johnson has the speaker's gavel, and he could pass an incredible agenda and he could fix a ton of the fraud that we have systemically, right? Like make it very difficult to commit a lot of fraud. Uh, Mike Johnson could do a lot of things as Speaker of the House. Now he's got a small majority. I understand he's got to play politics a little bit, but there's some big questions that are like 80% issues. Like, you're not gonna survey Americans and be like, should we just give free money to Somali immigrants? The answer is gonna be no. You know, you're gonna they're gonna have to do something for it, right? So, why is it that our current legislature, which we have majorities as Republicans in the House and Senate, why can't we get anything done? Well, General Flynn did a little bit of digging on our Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson.

SPEAKER_10: 35:32

Just so people know, and I'm I'm very transparent about what I'm doing out there for the most part. I am uh in the in the process because I want Speaker Johnson to do more. And so we started looking at Speaker Johnson's packs and how many of his PACs turn money back around to daycare and health care clinics and such and that kind of stuff. It's incredible the amounts of money, and that's one person, but he happens to be the Speaker of the House. So this is not a this is not a partisan thing for me, just so people know, and I'm I'm very transparent about what I'm doing.

SPEAKER_18: 36:04

So Mike Johnson's in on this health and human services fraud, broadly, right?

SPEAKER_22: 36:09

Not shocking me.

SPEAKER_18: 36:10

Not shocking. I know, not shocking. Where are the 40,000 hours of J6 footage? Where are the the different legislation acts? Where's the single issue votes? None of it, none of it, right? But yet, there you go. Why are we not getting anything? Well, there you go. Is there a better person? I don't know. Marjorie Taylor Green's leaving, Matt Gates already got run out of the house. I don't know who to send in there, you know. So just rosy cheeked Mike Johnson, I guess. Okay, on to Greenland. Greenland, Greenland, Greenland. Look at this map. This is probably the best little map that explains why Greenland is so important to us. So here's Canada down here, United States over here, here's over here, here's Russia. Right? Isn't that amazing? Like to look at a map this way, look how Sweden is oriented. Like Sweden is north of Nova or North, like direct line from Nova Scotia. I always think of it being, you know, anyway.

SPEAKER_22: 37:07

Across the pole. It's across the pole from.

SPEAKER_18: 37:10

Yep. So sitting from Moscow here, in order for Moscow to hit us with pretty much any missiles, they gotta go over Greenland. Right, because of the so Greenland strategically the buffer. I pledge allegiance to the flag. Greenland is going to be a United States state. Almost no doubt about it here. Here is Stephen Miller talking with Jake Dauper about Greenland and being pressed because Donald Trump tweeted out this picture right here. The American flag. As soon as he got done with Venezuela in the press conference, and we're going to Greenland. We're taking Greenland.

SPEAKER_22: 37:45

We have to have it for national. You know those maps that we used to look at in social studies class that show how they're you know our territory expanded. It feels like we're gonna get another map.

SPEAKER_18: 37:55

It feels like we're on some like southern northern expansion route. There was a uh a speech that Putin gave where he was, you know, some pomp and circumstance thing he had going on over there in Russia, and he had a kid on the stage with him, and he asked the kid, where did where do Russia's borders end? And the kid goes, they they go all the way to Alaska, and then Putin whispers, but the mic can hear it. He goes, the Russian borders never end.

SPEAKER_17: 38:22

That was like that's pretty interesting.

SPEAKER_22: 38:25

Well, and also it's fitting that we have the Gulf of America, so it's all gonna work out really well.

SPEAKER_18: 38:30

All gonna work out really well. All right, here's Stephen Miller defending not only being in charge of Venezuela, but hey, we're taking Greenland too.

SPEAKER_27: 38:37

Important topic. Uh, the Premier of Greenland and the Premier of Denmark and other Danish officials are responding to a Twitter post from your wife, Katie Miller, herself a former Trump White House official, showing Greenland covered with an American flag, saying soon after that was posted, President Trump repeated the claim that the U.S. needs Greenland for national security reasons. The Danish Prime Minister um responded to this in an interview earlier today, as reported by Bloomberg, quote, I believe one should take the American president seriously when he says it wants Greenland, but I will also make it clear that if the U.S. chooses to attack another NATO country militarily, then everything stops, including NATO, and thus the security that has been established since the end of the Second World War. Can you rule out that the US is ever going to try to take Greenland by force? Well, let me let me go back a step.

SPEAKER_26: 39:27

The president has been clear for months now. I know you're treating this as breaking news.

SPEAKER_18: 39:31

The President has been clear for months now that the United States should be the nation that Birkenbein, the whispered comment from Putin was the Russian borders never end.

SPEAKER_27: 39:49

Right, but your wife posted that like hours after the Venezuela operation. That's that's why it's newly relevant.

SPEAKER_26: 39:55

No, I'm not and I'll I'll I'll talk with you about it for an hour. I think it's really important conversation. I just want to I just Wanted to reset Jake by making clear that it has been the formal position of the US government since the beginning of this administration, frankly, going back into the previous Trump administration, that Greenland should be part of the United States. The president has been very clear about that. That is the formal position of the U.S. government.

SPEAKER_27: 40:17

Right, but can you say that military action against Greenland is off the table?

SPEAKER_26: 40:21

It wouldn't be a military action against Greenland. The the Greenland has a population of 30,000 people, Jake. The real question is uh what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? What is the basis of their territorial claims? What is their basis of having Greenland as a colony of Denmark? The United States is the power of NATO. For the United States to secure the Arctic region to protect and defend NATO and NATO interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the United States. And so that's a conversation that we're gonna have as a country. That's a process we're gonna have as a new community of nations.

SPEAKER_27: 40:57

So you can't take it off the table that the U.S. would use military force to seize Greenland. You can't take it off the table.

SPEAKER_18: 41:03

I understand you're trying very hard to which which again is your job. You got a country with 20 million people in Latin America. You just blew in helicopters and took their president right out of his bed, and you're over here, but you won't use military for Greenland? We don't need to. We don't need to. Who's gonna stand up? If we just put out a memo saying we're coming to Greenland tomorrow, I promise you, whoever's in charge of Greenland will just bring out the key to the city. I'd like to stay living here and not go to prison. Thank you. Like, there's no military intervention.

SPEAKER_26: 41:32

I respect it. It's great to get exactly the headline, write that catchy headline that says Miller refuses to rule out the United States should have Greenland as part of the United States. There's no need to even think or talk about this in the context that you're asking of a military operation. Nobody's gonna fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland. One last question, Stephen.

SPEAKER_18: 41:59

I love I love the way they're framing it. But here's the thing serious people have are taking this framing seriously. So this is um uh this is committee chairman Salinger from NATO's from NATO. Okay, so he's from Austria, and he's very concerned about the United States taking Greenland. And here's what he says will happen if the United States goes forward with it.

SPEAKER_12: 42:24

If you take it, we take every single base of the Americans from Aviano to Rammstein, from Romania to all the other military bases, will be confiscated and you will lose it. And the whole position of American power since World War II if you take Greenland, you have to leave. It's very simple, Mrs. Miller. This is the leverage we have. You need these bases for global power protection, you won't have it. And we can defend ourselves very well, and we will do that without the US nuclear shield, without the US troops in Europe, without the American bases. We will simply run these bases ourselves, and we run your boys home into Chicago and Ohio. And goodbye. You go extreme, we go extreme. It's a issue.

SPEAKER_18: 43:10

Well, that doesn't scare us, okay? If you're saying, hey, we might have to pull out of Germany and Austria and Romania. Okay, that's great. You got a nuclear shield. Good luck over there. We're already strategically planning for you guys being a non-factor in 20 years. You know, I mean, it will be the Islamic Republic of France here, probably before the end of my life. Okay. If you take Greenland, we'll take all of the bases.

SPEAKER_22: 43:34

We're counting on you like we're counting on social security.

SPEAKER_18: 43:37

Yeah, we're yeah, exactly. Yeah, we're we're really holding our breath here. What makes no sense to me is these guys are like, what what Denmark's got Greenland as a colony. So it runs against their entire self-governance proposition. It runs against the fact that why do why would you not? I mean, I understand Greenland's protected, but as the Arctic becomes more and more of a busy place, why don't you want more expansion there? Why don't you want some defenses there? It makes you kind of go, do we have a Mike Johnson thing where these guys have stock in you know Moscow-based icebreaking companies? Or are they investing in, you know, Moscow long-range missiles? Like, what is going on? Are there childcare centers up in Greenland that are being paid for through Denmark? Like, what is the deal? Um, this is Trump's ambassador to Greenland was being asked about these same topics.

SPEAKER_33: 44:32

Yeah, it's it's amazing how fast events have developed since President Trump came into office less than a year ago from saying we need to own Greenland right out of the box to beginning to discuss it over and over. And then his actions in Venezuela, his warning to Iran, and then saying this, but especially his uh deep desire to make sure that the Western Hemisphere is secure, is a very exciting thing. It's exciting to watch because things happen when President Trump moves his team and intends to make changes. So when he says he wants to acquire Greenland, what's your understanding of that? Well, I'm not sure what he means by that. I saw the word buy, purchase. So I'm not sure what he means by that because a COFA uh free association with Greenland wouldn't cost the United States any money up front. I'm sure the Greenlanders would prefer to continue the kind of economic welfare that they receive from Denmark every year, which is around$600 million a year. But there are benefits to having that relationship. I'm sure Denmark benefits economically far more than$600 million a year with the resources that are pulled out of the water and the ground in Greenland. So there's a close relationship with Greenland and Denmark, but Denmark can't afford to develop Greenland and it also will never be able to defend it.

SPEAKER_18: 46:03

Yeah. Wouldn't it be interesting if we did have like 57, 58 states, Alberta, Greenland, throw Venezuela in there, let's throw Panama in for good measure. Heck, we'll throw Puerto Rico.

SPEAKER_22: 46:16

And like we have the Gulf of America, I was thinking maybe the Arctic could be the first, like it could be the first ocean that's named America.

SPEAKER_18: 46:25

The American Ocean? Yeah. Let's get right up on the shores. They'd be like, let's call it the Slav. They would want to call it the uh Anglo-Slav Ocean or Slav Anglophile. We'll have to think about it. Yeah, they might have a little something to say about that. Put your suggestions.

SPEAKER_22: 46:45

Wouldn't it be hilarious if Russia beat Trump to it? Go ahead and put your suggestions in the chat.

SPEAKER_18: 46:50

Wouldn't it be great if Trump beat him to it and did it, you know, the ocean of Russia or something like that, the Russian ocean? Oh my goodness. Well, India gets an ocean. Why can't we have one? Yeah, we have more boundary touching that ocean than any other. Yeah. Oh, that'd be hilarious. Now, Trump going down and taking the oil in Venezuela. So Trump put out a message yesterday that said that the new uh interim government in Venezuela, that's what he's calling them now, the interim government, has agreed to turn over$30 to$50 million of already sanctioned oil to the United States. So that's all that's just for the math that's$70 a barrel that ends up being like, or$60 a barrel ends up being like$547 million that Trump says he can then redirect down to Venezuela. Well, this is a huge move geopolitically. Big, big deal. Venezuela hasn't been putting a lot of oil out into the market, obviously, because they've been sanctioned everywhere. This is definitely going to dry up Iran, Cuba, and North Korea who buy dirty Russian or Venezuelan oil, heavy crude. But now that the United States is in the market and taking delivery, this affects the other major heavy crude producer in the world, which is guess who? Canada.

SPEAKER_01: 48:01

He was saying that America needed Greenland. Greenland rejected Trump's comments once again over the weekend. So where does it start? There are now global concerns about Trump's ambitions.

SPEAKER_03: 48:16

Look, Venezuela was the blueprint. The president actually went in, uh kidnapped a sovereign leader, and did it with very little outcry from the international community. We already know that the Pentagon has been drawing up plans for a military takeover of Greenland. The president, in addition, has said he would take Canada by economic force. Given the fact that he now has his hands on the largest oil reserves in the world, and we know that Canada refines oil very similar to uh Venezuela, I think that does now take a lot of leverage away from Canada, which means I think Donald Trump is his plan for economic takeover of Canada is coming into clear picture. As we look at Greenland, however, I think given what we saw play out in Venezuela, the precedent the president is now more in bold and not less to actually follow through with a military takeover because we haven't heard much from the international community, and I doubt even NATO allies would actually push back if in fact that's what the Trump administration decided to do.

SPEAKER_18: 49:24

Well, not that one Austrian. He'll take all your bases. He'll take all of your bases. Okay. You need to understand how important this is. Okay. Donald Trump has I don't want to use the word checkmate, but he's put him in check. I don't know if it's checkmate yet, but he's put him in check. Canada has become a beneficiary of the United States. South America, most of those countries have become a beneficiary. Somalia, beneficiary, all these African countries, beneficiaries, Somalian daycares, beneficiary. They have all become dependent on the mother's milk. Can't Justin Trudeau told Donald Trump that the United that Canada, to the tune of$200 billion a year, could not survive without American subsidies and trade imbalances, which is what prompted Trump to be like, then you should be a governor, then. You shouldn't be a president or a prime minister of a of a nation because you're not a nation. If you can't even self-sustain, you're just a little brother.

SPEAKER_22: 50:19

Right.

SPEAKER_18: 50:20

Right? So, but all of these, this is a lesson to people who get government benefit and welfare and government paychecks. When the government pays you, they own you. If the government pays Canada, they own Canada because by withholding those funds, what do they do? They can change the way Canada behaves because they're dependent on that money. Well, oil was the one piece of leverage they had left because Trump's energy dominance includes oil coming from Canada and the current amounts and probably more. And all of a sudden, you just opened up a whole new uh uh pipeline of oil coming from Venezuela.

SPEAKER_22: 50:57

Don't need them anymore.

SPEAKER_18: 50:58

We very well might see Canada become a couple states because they can't survive otherwise. How many other nations out there can't survive otherwise? We know NATO can't survive without the US. We know most of Europe can't survive. Britain just had a big thing because they're talking about deploying to Ukraine now, you know, to go defend Ukraine. All of Europe can muster together somewhere around 20,000 troops.

SPEAKER_22: 51:22

20,000?

SPEAKER_18: 51:23

Which is, by the way, about the population of our base in Germany. In fact, let's just look at that up. Jeez.

SPEAKER_17: 51:29

Oh my gosh. They are broken.

SPEAKER_18: 51:37

So I'm looking up what is the soldier population of the U.S. base in Germany? Uh the US military presence in Germany includes 35 35,000 soldiers and soldiers and civilians. So 35,000 people we have stationed in just Germany and their families, and all of Europe can come up with maybe 20,000 soldiers. And then it's oh, and that's based on the equipment. So they can only equip 20,000 soldiers. And then they went on to say that that equipment is too old.

SPEAKER_22: 52:03

Oh, jeez.

SPEAKER_18: 52:05

Procurement, Halliburton's gonna be running the presses. Okay. Senator uh Secretary Bergham talks about this oil now, now that we have the Venezuelan oil, how is this gonna play out for us?

SPEAKER_08: 52:15

Well, it at the top level, of course, uh, this is none of this is possible without the commander-in-chief, President Trump. Uh, strategically brilliant, and and then, of course, the breathtakingly excellent execution, uh, not only of something like when we were bombing Iran earlier and taking out their nuclear program, or here, you know, removing a head of a criminal organization, Maduro, uh, who also posing as a president, doing that with a flawless execution. All of that's only possible because President Trump had the foundation of having uh a policy of energy dominance and the fact that America can take these actions against countries that have these large reserves, and we see virtually no change at the price of the pump here in America, reflects the great strategy and the great execution uh of the American oil and gas industry, American energy industry, and President Trump. But in case of the synergy between Venezuela heavy crude, the refineries that we have on the South Coast and the Gulf of America, uh, which were built to handle that, and then you need to dilute that heavy crude uh with a lighter product. And of course, we have an excess of that lighter product here because the shale oils that come out of the shale revolution in America are perfect for blending uh to achieve this. So if you're in the refining sector, this is great news. Uh, it's great news for jobs, it's great news for gas prices going forward. Uh, it's great news for America, and it's great news for Venezuela because Venezuela has an opportunity now to actually have capital come in and rebuild their economy and take advantage of the fact that they've got a larger, they have larger oil reserves than Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia, one of the richest countries in the world, Venezuela, one of the poorest countries in the world. It doesn't have to be that way. With American technology, American partnership, uh, this Venezuela could be transformed, and that's that's that's a win for this hemisphere. It's a win for the people of Venezuela.

SPEAKER_22: 54:03

Yeah, it's awesome. Wow, look at that map. Do you see that? Look at the reserves in Venezuela. 303 billion.

SPEAKER_18: 54:11

It's right there, too. Just a hop, skip, and a jump to Florida.

SPEAKER_22: 54:14

It's got more than the Middle East. Wow. Yeah.

SPEAKER_18: 54:17

I'm thinking Alberta 51, Venezuela 52, Greenland, and Puerto Rico. They get island status and they get 53 collectively. I don't know how that'll work out, but it'll be like uh North Michigan, the North Peninsula of Michigan and Maine Peninsula, like two separate places. Okay, so let's move on now. Let's talk about Senator Mark Kelly, who has been in the hot seat. So Pete Heggseth got a put out a letter, put out a statement saying that Mark Kelly is going to be recalled to a review board of some sort and that they're going to take action, including reducing his rank. Okay, so it doesn't look like they're gonna fire him or call him to active duty and make him not be a senator.

SPEAKER_22: 54:58

So it's just gonna affect his retirement.

SPEAKER_18: 54:59

It's gonna affect his retirement, and it's it's a pretty big slap in the face for people.

SPEAKER_22: 55:03

Like this is a big deal.

SPEAKER_18: 55:04

You know, to get knocked down a rank, like it's a big deal. It would be easier for them just to ignore this, but it can't really be ignored. Well, Mark Kelly responded yesterday.

SPEAKER_25: 55:13

Let me make it perfectly clear this letter or anything that Pete Heggseth says or does, to me, is in no way gonna affect the way I do my job and represent my constituents in the United States Senate. Ain't happening. So, you know, his option, you know, right now is he can continue with this kind of bull or he can go take a hide. That's his option. And if I have an opportunity to, you know, tell him that tomorrow maybe I will.

SPEAKER_18: 55:46

Maybe, maybe you will. Except Pete Exeth has all the keys here. The the military doesn't have to play politics. Uh Jake Tapper asked him about this. Was uh invading Venezuela the unlawful order you were referring to?

SPEAKER_27: 56:01

We've heard Democrats say that the um operation in Venezuela was illegal. Do you think it was illegal? And if so, should the service members who were part of that have refused to obey those orders?

SPEAKER_25: 56:14

So, what we were talking about in the video is about a service member being given a specific order and having to make a decision about whether this is lawful or not. And this is like the reasonable person theory. What you're getting at is constitutional questions. Can a president uh try to do a law enforcement action on a head of state but use 150 airplanes and the full force of the US military to do that? So these are two different things. Now, Maduro is a bad guy, and it's good that he's gone. It seems like this president, because he had no plan beyond removing Maduro, has now installed Maduro's number two person in Delcy Rodriguez. You know, that what's that's what we call in the Navy fleeting up when the executive officer becomes the commanding officer. That's the situation we have in Venezuela right now. And it's because I I don't think they had a plan of what was gonna come next.

SPEAKER_18: 57:18

I don't think they had a plan. I think they have a plan. I think they're seems like they do. In fact, I think it's a very masculine plan. What are the facts? Right? What are the rules? Okay, so the rules are that when it comes to loyalty to your boss, there should be a chain of command that there's respect. Hence why we can't put the Nobel Prize winner and just plop around and be like, good luck, right?

SPEAKER_22: 57:39

Yeah, I was gonna ask you again about the money that Trump is uh well that the American people are getting from this oil sale or from the can you explain that again? There's some back oil that they're giving us.

SPEAKER_18: 57:53

So they've got these tankers that they've confiscated already, right? Right. And so there's a long drawn-out legal process to take that oil and put it to market and does it.

SPEAKER_22: 58:02

Oh, so there's bypassing that price.

SPEAKER_18: 58:04

Basically, by just signing it over, it's like, okay, go ahead and do the thing with the oil and then bring the money back.

SPEAKER_22: 58:09

Okay, so that money that comes back that's coming back to Venezuela? Yes. So okay, so that's what I wanted to know. So that bit of information is telling me that these people are brilliant. Yes. So before so you have this big infusion of cash back into the country to now prop up the government chains of command that you need to do. Yes. And it's the petrol dollars. So it's valuable.

SPEAKER_18: 58:36

Yes. And so what's what's happening here is they used to go offload it in Cuba or Iran, and then whatever portion of the proceeds would come back to the regime. Well, now Donald Trump's gonna hold the checkbook himself, and he's gonna go, okay, Miss Rodriguez, how much did you want for education? Right. Well, this is what these are the checks and balances to invest in the education.

SPEAKER_22: 58:56

This is instant loyalty.

SPEAKER_18: 58:58

Instant, because you're signing the paycheck.

SPEAKER_22: 59:00

Yes. So this is this sounds like there was a plan.

SPEAKER_18: 59:04

Now, this is different than what they did in Iraq. When they toppled Iraq, one of the first things they did is they put out the message all Bathists party members leave your jobs, right? So your local DMV guy who's a Bathist party member, just because, you know, before he was some other party member, it's like you just have to be a part of one of these political parties to have a government job, right? And all of a sudden he's fired. So this caused, this is what caused the power vacuum that led to the Iraqi Civil War, that led to the rise of ISIS, was literally who's the principal at your local school now? Because he just got summarily fired because he was a bath a Bathist party member. But he was a pretty good principal. The guy who was running the local town water system fired. So who's running the water system? Guy walked away with his keys because he was pissed. You see what I'm saying? And that's what caused a breakdown of all their social services. So, sure, we roll into Baghdad, take over the palace, and we've got the their parliament, and we've control the high level government, but High level don't do nothing. It's the low level guys that are actually your functionaries or your apparat checks that need to process your application for, like I said a million times, a driver's license or a building permit.

SPEAKER_22: 1:00:11

Right. The guys at the top are just admin.

SPEAKER_18: 1:00:13

Yeah, or all of a sudden the entire town gets got, you know, diarrhea. Why? Because they nobody's been putting filling the chlorine tablets in the water filter system. You know what I mean? So it does become a big deal. Donald Trump can control the redevelopment of Venezuela by controlling the money. It does seem like it's a different plan than we've seen since Korea. And it probably has a chance of surviving because it in the end, it's going to look like the Venezuelans fixed themselves. You know, they'll have some snap election and half of the people will get replaced, and half the people will get a vote of confidence. Like, yeah, that guy's a Maduro regime guy, but he never beat anybody, arrested anybody, snitched on anybody, and he runs that water system pretty good. Let's keep them there. Do you see what I'm saying? Give those guys a chance to change their loyalties because really their loyalty was just tied to a paycheck. So it'll be really interesting. Same thing's happening in Syria, right? Former Al-Qaeda member, former designated terrorist on all the sanctioned lists is now the president of Syria and is coming and visiting Trump in the White House. Why? Because he has the capacity to actually run that place. He has the respect of the other men that he needs to have the respect of. Why? Because they've probably seen him chop off a head or two. And it's just like Trump is earning the respect of leaders around the world by going in and arresting Nicholas Maduro and killing Solomony and doing what he says he will do. Right. Now, domestically, I know that a lot of governors who understand real politique, they understand where real power comes from. This is what gives governors like Polis in Colorado the ability to stand up to Trump or Waltz and his weak attempt to stand up to Trump or Gavin Newsom, who's constantly trying to stand up to Trump, right? It's like they have to play this balance. How much can I stand up and keep my political capital, if not gain political capital, without becoming so offensive that he comes in on with the hammer and actually does something to me? Because Trump has also checked in that he can't just go arrest the governor of Minnesota or governor of California unless they shoot someone in broad daylight, right? Because then it will look like he is just, you know, over-the-top authoritarian. Over-the-top authoritarian. So the way he's going about doing it is the same way with Venezuela. How do you control these people? You control the money because they've become dependent on the mother's milk. They become dependent on the money. The very thing that screwed them over or screwed us over is now going to screw them over because they cannot survive as states, or like we mentioned, other countries can't survive without the constant cash infusions. Well, HHS is starting to get to the bottom of all this domestic fraud, and they are cutting off funds everywhere.

SPEAKER_05: 1:02:48

Hello. I'm HHS Deputy Secretary Jim O'Neill.

SPEAKER_16: 1:02:51

I'm Alex Adams, HHS Assistant Secretary for the Administration for Children and Families.

SPEAKER_05: 1:02:56

For the past two weeks, everyone's been asking questions about the political patronage system in Minnesota. And competent state officials, through negligence or by design, for years have stood by as taxpayer money was diverted into the pockets of politically connected cronies.

SPEAKER_18: 1:03:11

By the way, this guy to me looks like an afference accountant assassin. Like, this is not the guy you want to have going over your business books and records. You know what I mean?

SPEAKER_24: 1:03:20

This guy just I was trying to figure out what to say about him.

SPEAKER_18: 1:03:24

This guy looks like an absolute accounting assassin.

SPEAKER_24: 1:03:27

Okay. That's a pretty good assessment.

SPEAKER_18: 1:03:29

Not someone you're going to send with an M16 to the front line, but definitely someone you're going to have rifling through the general's desk drawers. You know what I mean?

SPEAKER_05: 1:03:48

Raising a young family is a blessing, and it's okay to need help. Many families struggle to find affordable child care and rely upon state and federal assistance. Unfortunately, Governor Walls has allowed resources to be wasted on wide-scale fraud, diverting those resources away from the families who rely upon them to make ends meet.

SPEAKER_16: 1:04:09

Every dollar stolen is a dollar stolen from children and families who need those services the most. But fraud does not happen in a vacuum. The policies set in Washington influence how states administer these programs, and those policies can either prevent fraud or invite it.

SPEAKER_18: 1:04:25

So we should let Mike Johnson know.

SPEAKER_05: 1:04:29

Unfortunately, the Biden Harris administration adopted rules for the Child Care and Development Fund that created serious vulnerabilities. Those policies weakened accountability and made fraud easier, not harder. That's why today we released a proposed rule to repeal those Biden era mandates. The proposed rule does three important things.

SPEAKER_18: 1:04:48

So these proposed rules are not just for Minnesota now, they're nationwide. So pay attention to these. This could be, there are certain things when we look at the scale of this fraud, this could withhold potentially billions of dollars from going into circulation into the market. So this could have a real world street impact on the value of the dollar and the cost of goods. And you know, some of these communities here, like in in Little Somalia up in Minnesota, the density of these child care centers, or like in Boston, could this could be a significant percentage of their GDP.

SPEAKER_16: 1:05:24

Right? First, it ends the requirement that taxpayer dollars must pay for childcare before services are provided. States will no longer be forced to send payments to providers up front. Second, it ends the mandate for enrollment-based billing. Payments can once again be based on verified attendance, not just enrollment, so that providers can't bill for children who never show up. And third, it ends the mandate to prefund guaranteed seats at child care centers without competition. This restores parental choice and brings back market incentives that reward legitimate high-quality providers.

SPEAKER_05: 1:06:01

Taken together, these changes ensure that the payments reflect real services and real attendance, making it far harder for fraudulent or non-operational centers to game the system. Across welfare programs, Biden administration policies effectively backed up a Brinks truck and sent the security home. In childcare, that ends today.

SPEAKER_18: 1:06:23

Again, the ripple impact of this is ultimately long-term going to be excellent. Don't spend money on things that don't make you money. It's like, you know, business 101. Okay.

SPEAKER_22: 1:06:35

Yeah, I'm not against it.

SPEAKER_18: 1:06:36

Yeah, not against it. But we can't fool ourselves and think that this won't have an impact. I mean, this type of activity at the scale they're talking about could send California into a recession. It probably is going to send Minnesota into a recession, right? I mean, the the scale of this could be pretty freaking significant.

SPEAKER_12: 1:06:56

Wow.

SPEAKER_18: 1:06:57

You know, there's a lot of people that have had no problem buying new cars and gas and rent and blah blah. All of a sudden the money's gonna dry up. So you mean I only get paid for the two kids I have in my childcare instead of the 19 I have on the books? Well, you know, at$25 to$33 an hour, having your wage go from a couple hundred dollars an hour down to$60, which still sounds like a lot.

SPEAKER_22: 1:07:19

Well, yeah, and they had those lunch services or meal services that are preparing like well, well, preparing 90,000 meals a day or something.

SPEAKER_18: 1:07:28

4,000 meals a day. Right. You don't even have parking for them.

SPEAKER_22: 1:07:31

Right. McDonald's can't even do that.

SPEAKER_18: 1:07:34

The insanity of it. Now, Christy Gnome was on with Jesse Waters, and ISIS descended on Minneapolis. They are going door to door to these daycare centers. Okay. But they're also heading into California and other hot spots. And Christy Gnome basically put Gavin Newsom on notice. The governor of California says, bring it on.

SPEAKER_37: 1:07:57

Oh, we'll be there. We uh we are we think that this is just the tip of the iceberg. So Minnesota is unbelievable what we've seen, but it is leading us to networks all over the country and overseas, and we're gonna follow every single one of them. Homeland Security Investigations is an incredible team of individuals who go after human traffickers, sex traffickers, but the fraud that we have in our public programs that are tied to California, absolutely. We're gonna come to you, Governor Newsom, and we're going to arrest every single individual that has ties to this kind of ceiling of taxpayer dollars, and we will hold them accountable.

SPEAKER_18: 1:08:34

If you go after the use end users of the fraud, all the daycare center workers, we don't have enough prison space for them. We don't. Like, you don't have enough space. At the scale they're talking about, you don't have enough space. You do have enough space for all the politicians and bureaucrats who enabled it or grifted off of it. So if you're someone who's taking money from one of these fraud schemes, you're probably gonna get caught, right? You're gonna end up on a list at least because AI is gonna find you. It's just a matter of if they have the resources to prosecute.

SPEAKER_22: 1:09:08

Don't flee to Canada because that's just gonna be America in a few days.

SPEAKER_18: 1:09:11

Yeah, there's no running. Greenland, Canada, they're all coming in, man. I uh last night, just before scriptures and prayers, yeah, I saw something, you know, one of these Greenland clips I watched and I was kind of jacked for a minute. Right when Donald Trump got elected, and then immediately started talking about Greenland. My wife and I would talk over the prison phones about maybe we should move to Greenland, you know? And uh so last night I said, Kids, we're moving to Greenland. And my youngest son, who's seven, started crying. I don't want to move to Greenland. Thought dad was serious. I was like, we'll be okay. So Tim Waltz gets asked about um he gets asked about dropping out of the 2026 race, and he has a little bit of an interesting answer and he brings it back around to J6. Before we get there, Carlit says that Gnome looks like an actor. That's not her. It is her, stands all the colored makeup. Like I actually saw that too, and I had the double take. Is that Christy Gnome? And I went back and looked at it. It's definitely Christy Gnome. She said, you know, obviously some Botox and things like that, but it's just her without the colored, all the shadow makeup and stuff like that. No, that is her, Carlitz. Okay, this is it must have been like an ear, well, it was late night. It was like it's like an early morning interview. She hadn't she hadn't put her face on yet. Uh, the most hilarious thing with Christy Gnome is the South Park episode where they make fun of all of her makeup and her face like falling off. It's pretty cool.

SPEAKER_24: 1:10:33

I don't watch that.

SPEAKER_18: 1:10:34

Tim Waltz.

SPEAKER_30: 1:10:35

Uh decision to end your campaign by yourself, or did you receive uh pressure from inside now?

SPEAKER_04: 1:10:41

Uh this is a decision that I make and make with my family. Um, and certainly I think, as I said, it's the right decision. We uh I'll note, I think it's appropriate we're here today. Uh the war that's being waged against Minnesota, you're seeing it. We have a ridiculous surge of apparently 2,000 people not coordinating with us that are for a show of the cameras.

SPEAKER_18: 1:11:00

Um that's ICE and DHS, by the way, going door to door to these facilities. 2,000 people they sent.

SPEAKER_04: 1:11:07

I'm gonna note to all of you, today is January 6th. There's no debate what happened. The president of the United States led an insurrection against a fair election to try and overturn that and you know, report both sides of this. Well, he, you know, he said he really didn't, and courts convicted 400 of them and he pardoned them. No, he did that. He did that, and that's today. And it's clear that we also saw today he implemented five states are being punished with a freezing of federal funds illegally that were appropriated by Congress, our tax dollars.

SPEAKER_18: 1:11:38

But not for fraud. Now, he didn't have it. This press conference had nothing to do with January 6th. Okay, but because it was January 6th, he brought it up. But if you notice, if you don't think things are scripted sometimes, look at right here what C-SPAN is advertising. Live now, Dem's meeting on January 6th attack. And then Tim Waltz just brings it up kind of out of nowhere. Did the Democrats encourage you to retire? No, I made that decision on my own. But it's interesting you're asking this on this day, right? Right as the advertisement on C-SPAN is showing a January 6th promo. I don't know. It's pretty interesting. Scott Adams had this to say about January 6th. You remember the time when the Democrats uh got us all in on a huge hoax?

SPEAKER_00: 1:12:21

Well, let's start out by saying happy fake insurrection day, January 6. Do you remember when you thought it was ridiculous to imagine that Democrats would be playing uh complicated hoaxes on the public? It didn't seem like thinking that anything that could actually happen, right? And then you found out about the Russian collision hoax. Oops. It turns out they can run any major hoax against the country. Then you found out about the fine people hoax. And you said to yourself, how is it even possible that the mainstream media went along with that hoax? How is that even possible? And then again, you said to yourself, Wow, I didn't even think that could happen. What there's two examples where it happened. And then the the one that is the biggest F you in the world is that uh the January 6th insurrection hoax. Now, if you're new to this, and maybe the first time you've heard me talk about it, here's how you know that the January insurrection hoax was a hoax. Now what I'm talking about is the hoax that uh Trump knew that he lost the election and the people he s sent to the uh capital to protest also knew that the election was clean but they were trying to overthrow the country. Now, that entire hoax depended on nobody in the mainstream media nobody asking the asking the uh people who attended the uh the protest why they were there. And they would have found out that not a single person believed that it was a clean election and they were hoping to overthrow the government. It was the biggest assumption that drove the entire hoax, and not one not one legitimate legitimate, not one mainstream media ever took a protester in and said, Did you really believe that the election was clean? Because none of those existed. Every person who was there, Paul Betsha, plus Trump himself, Paul Betcher, believed that they were seeing an obviously rigged election and they wanted to slow things down until they could be sure it had not been rigged. Now that narrative got reversed by the hoaxers. The hoaxers knowing that this is actually good technique by the hoaxers. The hoaxers knew that if they could get there first with their narrative and say that no, he knew it was a good election. He was just trying to overthrow the country. If they could do that, and they could they could ram it down our throats every day, especially with the help of Hollywood uh theatrical people, and then they would put on this whole January 6th um publicized Hollywood produced thing so that every single day you would see their narrative and Trump was now out of office, so he couldn't really push his narrative as much as normally he could. So I called today happy fake insurrection hoax day, and uh I hope we never see anything like that again. But the the ability of the Democrats to to sustain a gigantic multi-year hoax with lots of moving parts, they can absolutely do that. We've seen it now multiple times.

SPEAKER_18: 1:16:19

It's that feminine energy, right? Where it's about feelings and emotions, it's not about facts. Because when facts get involved, it kind of breaks the narrative. This was the moment on MSNBC, October 2022, they did a live uh uh audience panel and they asked about J6. I remember when Scott Adams, I knew that as a country I would be okay, right? As a human being living in this country, like I wouldn't die being called a traitor. I probably will get called a traitor on my deathbed because you know, why wouldn't they call me that at this point? I literally get called a traitor almost every day online. Um, but I knew that as a country would be okay because Scott Adams said, Look, I'll just admit it, I don't want to live in a country where January 6th doesn't happen. And I was like, that's what most people feel like. Like something had to happen, I don't know what. You probably shouldn't have punched a cop, which I didn't, but you there needed to be the protest. This is what MSNBC found out when they did this panel, because while they might have had the narrative and they might have had the talking points, they didn't have the facts, and that was enough to keep their narrative from really sticking.

SPEAKER_29: 1:17:25

Doug Mastriano was at the insurrection and he was photographed breaching one of the restricted areas. Is that okay?

SPEAKER_20: 1:17:34

Which area? Because I saw video where capital officers were taking away barriers and unlocking doors. So that's I mean, I they opened the gates.

SPEAKER_29: 1:17:44

So it shouldn't be disqualifying for an elected official if they participated in January 6th.

SPEAKER_20: 1:17:50

He didn't strike anybody, he didn't hurt anybody.

SPEAKER_28: 1:17:52

The only one that died was a protester there, not a capital police.

SPEAKER_06: 1:17:56

An armed female veteran, which is the only one that died.

SPEAKER_24: 1:17:59

That's the only one who died.

SPEAKER_29: 1:18:00

The police officer did die. No, it was a strap.

SPEAKER_24: 1:18:04

That's not that's not on site.

SPEAKER_29: 1:18:09

So, what do you make though, overall of January 6th? I mean, it was watching that footage, it was pretty disturbing, and remember people throwing excrement at the walls, and it was our you know, it's the captain.

SPEAKER_28: 1:18:19

It looks a lot like Antiethes, actually.

SPEAKER_24: 1:18:21

It looks a lot of it, except on a much smaller scale, it looked the same as the Black Lives Matter riots. But I saw the similarities.

SPEAKER_29: 1:18:30

But so it's okay just because just because one side that you disagree with, even infiltrated good for one, it's good for the other.

SPEAKER_20: 1:18:38

Anybody who harmed anybody, anybody who caused property destruction, that needs to be dealt with. But if you're there making your voice heard at the people's house, no less, yeah, that's again, it's a fundamental constitutional right of an American citizen. And he's gay, by the way. Uh, because of it.

SPEAKER_28: 1:19:00

For misdemeanors. That's East Germany. That's East Germany.

SPEAKER_31: 1:19:03

Yeah, that's what's scary. It was an actual sorry but mostly peaceful protest.

SPEAKER_20: 1:19:10

And the other ones that were the Was the protest legitimate in your eyes, administration, I feel like, is using it as their Reichstag fire. That's exactly what they're using in that.

SPEAKER_29: 1:19:24

So he do you think that President Trump could have quailed the violence that day?

SPEAKER_31: 1:19:30

Not him personally. I don't think so. No, it started while he was still speaking. I was actually there. I I I was there to to see what I thought was going to be the last time I ever saw Trump in the line. So did he tell everybody to go and and start writing? No. I didn't think so. No, and and actually, um, I I I I stayed for the whole speech, like a ton of people did. And then we all headed to the Capitol because he said, let's go to the Capitol and and peacefully, let's see how voices be heard. And we get to the Capitol, we're like, what the hell's going on? Because it already happened.

SPEAKER_22: 1:20:04

I'm pretty sure I saw Democratic operatives instigating people to carry.

SPEAKER_18: 1:20:09

This was the moment that their narrative kind of fell apart. They thought they were rock solid until that panel, and they're oh my gosh. You know, I mean, there's a lot of indecisiveness about January 6th. All right, it's time for us to jump over to private, and we are going to be diving into one specific case uh that Rand Paul released yesterday. This is um her last Christine Crowder. So she was wrongfully accused of being at the Capitol on J6, got ultimately charged, and she didn't go in the Capitol at all. And all the pictures they had were not her. They put her on the no fly list, kind of screwed her life up. Wasn't even her. So we're gonna hear a little bit about those East Germany tactics here in the private side. And um and yeah, and then we're gonna hear the the basically the last words of Ashley Babbitt. In fact, maybe we'll uh head out with the last words of Ashley Babbitt, and then right after this, Ron, we'll go ahead and jump over into private. So this is Ashley Babbitt, just like me that day walking to the Capitol. I shot a video very similar to this. I've since the day I found out about Ashley Babbitt, I've many, many times thought it could have been me.

SPEAKER_39: 1:21:19

So despite what the media tells you, it's on ground definitely say something different. There is a seat of nothing but red, white, and liberal patrons in Trump. And it was amazing we could see the president talk. We are now walking down the inaugural path to the capital of three million plus people. God bless America patriots.

SPEAKER_18: 1:21:48

All right, guys, we're gonna jump over to private and look at this timeline for uh Christine Crowder and hear from her. So we'll talk to you guys tomorrow. Bye. All right, those of you sticking around. So Julie Kelly posted this. This was posted by Rand Paul. So this is the FBI investigation into Christine Crowder, detailing a 23-month investigation based on an an based on an anonymous tip about an air marshal's wife being accused of being at the U.S. Capitol on January 6th, which ended in a case of mistaken identity. So January 2021, February 11th, the FBI received a tip. Then they sent out an order for a full investigation. Then they verified known as suspected terrorists. So they decided whoever that was in their pictures at the Capitol was one of these suspected terrorists. FBI approved the paperwork to add Crowder to the terrorist screening data set, labeling her as a domestic terrorist. Watch listing travel notification. October 2nd, the FBI assigned to the Crowder case, filed a July 15th, 2021 notification from the terrorist screening observation unit of planned travel by Crowder. The document states that she was watchlisted by the FBI and would receive expanded selective status by TSA, aka the watch list. Future search warrants conducted physical surveillance of Crowder's home for the purpose of photographing, photographing the property for future search warrants. FBI receives video from an anonymous tipster of the individual they believe Crowder exiting the Capitol. Third time to attempt to identify Crowder. The FBI tried to identify her. They couldn't do it. One and a half years later, an anonymous tipster was interviewed. The anonymous tipster who reported Crowder is interviewed by the FBI in the interview of the tipster and their spouse tell the FBI they saw videos Crowder posted to Facebook from inside the Capitol. Prosecution without identification. The U.S. Attorney's Office tells the FBI Crowder's case will be accepted for prosecution despite the FBI being unable to positively identify her through physical surveillance. The FBI conducted more physical surveillance of her FBI Facebook search warrant. FBI finally, uh Crowder finally identified and interviewed. Crowder was interviewed by the FBI agent. She showed the agents the outfit she wore that day and the ride share receipt showing the ride occurring at the same time. She was accused of being in the U.S. Capitol. A confidential human source provided the FBI with a photo showing Crowder's attire on January 6th. In light of new evidence, June 6, 2023, the FBI closes the investigation of Crowder into the memo. The FBI states the reasons for closing the investigation as negative results of a geofence query and facial recognition Crowder's rideshare receipt and the photograph of her wearing clothes that were not consistent with the original tip. So this is at least the third person I know that had their lives turned over by the FBI that did not go in the Capitol. She was on with Barina Morello, Christine Um forget her name again. Crowder. This is what she had to say.

SPEAKER_32: 1:24:40

When I was going through your your documents, there's the image of the woman that they're accusing you of being, and she's lifting up her left hand, right, her arm completely, and she's waving to someone. You, accord I spoke with you yesterday about this, haven't been able to do that for 26 after an injury.

SPEAKER_23: 1:24:56

I had a stroke at 26 years old, and I never regained the use of my left arm. So my friend knew that because she's been on vacation with me. We were close for a long time. So why they would think someone all they had to do was look at me or look re research something about me and find out that I was disabled. So there was obviously no way I was climbing the capital steps, number one, or number two, I could use my left arm. And they also left out that my husband was, you know, an air marginal himself. Yeah, I'm sure that was just a coincidence, though. Right, yeah, right. Just yeah, weird coincidence that they forgot that.

SPEAKER_32: 1:25:28

Well, I mean, as we as we go through all of this, we look through all the information. I'm glad you have this now. I'm glad you've been able to obtain all this information. This is really important for you to have. And I do hope that you guys are able to get counsel here because what they did to you is unacceptable and there needs to be accountability. The people who are part of all of this, they also need to be arrested. Right. Oh, I don't think they're gonna be arrested.

SPEAKER_23: 1:25:48

They were just following orders. Yeah, it's the people at the top. Yeah, those that those are the people at the top who allowed this and told my husband, you know, walk away. Yeah.

SPEAKER_32: 1:25:56

Well, Christine, Christine, we're very we're very honored to have you on the show today. And thank you for sharing your sort with the American people. I know everyone was so upset about this terror wash list that so many Americans landed on. So thank you. She told her husband to walk away from her.

SPEAKER_18: 1:26:09

She's toxic. Should walk away from her. Unbelievable. The uh when I think about the whole J6 debacle and I think about like this woman's life. Yesterday I was on with Larry Brock, Lieutenant Colonel Larry Brock down in Texas. I was on his spaces at noon. I posted it on my timeline if you want to go watch it. And uh he's running for office down there, and he was in prison with me in Missouri. And um he actually called the uh Capitol Hill police officer that testified in his trial against him and wanted to talk to him just man to man. And the officer was very receptive and but couldn't say too much or anything on the record because he's got to go talk to his press office and get approval and stuff like that. But he basically said, and I'm paraphrasing, but basically, I had to say what they told me to say. The FBI tried to destroy my life for a number of years. So I'm not willing to take any risks or talk to you or do anything, you know, on the record because the FBI tried to destroy my life just to get me to testify against you. And that was one of the things he brought up. He's like, Do you remember me trying to calm people down? He goes, Yes, I remember you very well. But the FBI wouldn't let him say that in his in his uh testimony. Anyways, I I think that you're gonna find that all over the place. You're gonna find cops that were pressured, you're gonna find prosecutors that were pressured, you're gonna find a lot of people that felt like they were pressured. Now, some of them might have done it totally willingly, and this is where it gets really tricky. They can go to Bon Gino and Cash Patel be like, I was forced to do it, I didn't want to do it. Okay, you were just doing your job good enough. Well, do you know if they were forced to do it or did they do it with a smile?

SPEAKER_17: 1:27:49

Right?

SPEAKER_18: 1:27:49

There's kind of a difference. So I guess, I guess just like we have to take over Venezuela and work with who's there, it's no different than our own government, is it? You kind of stuck working with who's there. Steve Bannon said this about January 6th, as we'll know it, Patriots Day, probably going to go down in history as one of the handful of most important days in our country.

SPEAKER_14: 1:28:09

Five years on. Outrageous. Twenty-two years in a federal medium security prison. Are you kidding me? That's a death sentence. And they knew it was a death sentence. Every one of them ought to be peel hawk. The most corrupt, disgusting, revolting people in that Justice Department, in that FBI, and in that federal court. Five years on. Outrageous.

SPEAKER_18: 1:28:41

Five years on. So they came after us, and like that one person on the panel said, they tried to use it as a rice tag event, and it didn't go over very well. Cause we're here. Yay! All right, guys, that's it for us today. We will talk to you guys again tomorrow.

SPEAKER_07: 1:29:22

What night lived in that castle over there? I'm 37. What? I'm 37, I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you ma'am. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind, you look what Jesus automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king. Old kingdom. How do you get that, eh? By exploiting the workers or adding on to outdated imperialist dogma, which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. There's never going to be any problem. How do you do? How do you do, good ladies? I'm Arthur, King of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the British. The Britons. Who are the Britons? We all are. We are all Britons. And I am your king. You're doing yourself. Why are you living in a dictatorship? A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working class is. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your Lord? We don't have any Lord. What? I told you. We're in a narco-synglist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-wiki meeting. Yes, I think by a civil majority, in the case of purely internal affairs, be quiet or by a two-thirds majority in the case of being quiet. I order you to be quiet. Are you king? The lady of the lake. Signifying by divine providence that I asked was to carry excalibus. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in pollen, distributed swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some classical aquatic ceremony. You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some water is passed through a sword. I mean it's all the way around saying I was an emperor. Just because some poisoned beast had loved a symmetry of me, they put me away. Shut up! We shut up! Now we see the violence inherited in the system! Shut up! Now we see the violence inheriting the system! I'm being repressed! Oh what a giveaway! I'm on about. Do you see it repressing me? You saw it, did you?