From Whole Milk To Whole Mess: Immigration, Fraud, And Power

A simple question about whole milk turns into a guided tour through immigration crackdowns, alleged fraud fronts, courtroom pivots, and the way trust fractures when institutions speak in slogans instead of facts. We kick off with a light touch—nutrition, nostalgia, and the “peasants” refrain—then follow the paper trail to Minnesota storefronts registered as transportation companies, where receipts seem to move people even when vans don’t. When a governor urges peaceful protest and documentation of ICE, the streets answer with confrontation, and Washington answers with talk of the Insurrection Act. That’s the whiplash moment: real communities trying to live normal lives while politics raises the temperature.

We pull at the threads that hold systems together: who audits what, what evidence courts share, and how a single word in a statute can turn a misdemeanor into a felony. The January 6 segment focuses on process more than personalities—intel that didn’t move, prosecutors who didn’t ask, undercover officers whose conduct could change the narrative in court. Tina Peters’ appeal becomes a case study in why jury instructions matter, and why due process is more than a box to check. Then the legal horizon shifts: a Supreme Court ruling affirms candidates’ standing to challenge election procedures, reopening doors that were slammed on “standing” and “laches” in 2020. Expect more scrutiny, more documents, and fewer easy talking points.

We round it out with the unglamorous failures that define daily life: a state auditor admitting years without child-level data while insisting there’s no fraud, and a Maryland letter clawing back $250 from someone who never applied for benefits—while hundreds of millions in overpayments go uncollected. Layer in negative net migration and a changing economic pitch, and you can feel the terrain moving underfoot. Through it all, we stay grounded: chaptered navigation, on-the-ground clips, and a push for clear rules, transparent audits, and evidence that sees daylight. If you’re tired of being told to “just trust the process,” this conversation offers something better: the specifics that make trust possible.

Enjoyed this one? Follow and subscribe, share it with a friend who loves receipts, and leave a quick review telling us which chapter hit hardest. Your feedback shapes the next deep dive.

Transcript

Whole Milk, Policy, And Childhood Nutrition

SPEAKER_36 0:27

We're getting screwed, man. Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed. Well, the revolution's gonna be true podcasting for sure. That's the only way we can. It's the little guys, the little guys that take the blood of everything. It's gotta stop. Peasants, man. We're just peasants. Every one of us. You watch those old movies, you see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning, peasants. Welcome to the best episode of The Peasants Perspective Ever. Yes. Yes. Absolutely. Okay, so we've got something really special for you guys this morning. We have a ex we have the funniest president ever, ever, ever, ever on the planet in the White House. Oh man, I just moved a tab. Dang it. That wasn't good. Okay. So this is Donald Trump yesterday. He's uh in the White House and he has a he has a he's got RFK in there. And they've just signed an executive order that basically undoes the ban on whole milk. I don't know if you know this, but you know, back when Barack Obama was in office, they banned whole milk, vitamin D milk, whole milk from public schools. Oh right. So they ended up all drinking skim milk and 1% and they couldn't get whole milk. So kids don't like white water, and so they end up drinking sugar drinks instead. So there's this whole thing where they're like kids stop drinking milk and they started drinking sugar drinks. Do your kids prefer vitamin D milk, whole milk? That's all we drink. That's why I was confused. I was like, what are you talking about? Bam, that's all we drink. Yeah, well, my parent, my parents fell victim to the food pyramid and all the stuff that they used to teach, you know, which we're gonna show a clip at the end of the show about asbestos floor tiles and how great they are, right? Anyways, so we always had like two percent, one percent, or my mom would buy vitamin D milk and she'd cut it.

unknown 2:27

Right.

SPEAKER_36 2:28

So as an adult, so ever since I had my own household, vitamin D milk only. Don't bring any of that one or two percent or skim into my house.

SPEAKER_33 2:36

So my in my household growing up, we actually grew um cows, right? My my family had cows and we had fresh milk all the time. And then we actually got goats and we had goat milk for a while. And well, whole milk is good for you.

SPEAKER_41 2:52

It's important what that brain is getting during the development. Is it getting soda or is it getting milk? So milk would help your cognitive ability. Absolutely. You can tell who's been taking cognitive test. Take it a lot of I've got I've aced every one of them because I drink milk.

SPEAKER_36 3:16

Because I drink milk. Look at his face. Look at his face right here. But keep in mind, this is the diet dope drinker. Cheers.

SPEAKER_33 3:27

He still looks like he's having a good time, man. Like he's like 10 years old.

Simultaneous Sip And Show Vibe

SPEAKER_36 3:30

He is absolutely iconic, man. He's just iconic. So, in honor, we have to do the simultaneous sip because I know why you're here. You're here for the simultaneous sip. All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a stein, a canteen, jug, or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like milk, like the president, and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better, the simultaneous sip happening right now. Mine was actually coffee, but diet coke. So fun, man. So, years and years ago in 2003, back when Stephen Miller was still a young student in school taking polypsy 122. This is his professor from Duke. And his professor from Duke said Stephen Miller was a good student, but he had a conversation with Stephen Miller one time in 2003 about what he wanted to do someday when he grew up. Stephen Miller.

SPEAKER_29 4:27

My former student. What's that? My former student. I'm sorry, say again. My former student. The Stephen Miller in the Trump administration? Did you want to say a little bit more about that before we listen to the clip?

SPEAKER_10 4:39

He said that I asked him in 2003 what he wanted to be when he grew up. And he said, I want to be number two in the White House. And I said, Oh, when do you want to achieve that? He says, In the next 15 years. I said, Wow. Okay, but who would be the president in 2003? And he said, Donald Trump, maybe? The guy is very smart. I didn't w where was this? And Duke is in Police I 122. You had him at Duke. Yeah. This is true story.

SPEAKER_29 5:09

I mean, I do a lot of homework here, Hein. You could have told me this before the program. There's no question he's a very smart guy. And he has a long-term vision. Was he a good student, by the way? He was very good. A very good student. Yeah. Yeah.

SPEAKER_36 5:21

He has a long-term vision. And that's what we've got going on right now in the United States. We have a clash over long-term visions and perspectives on what the United States is. This is coming from an Ohio City Councilman, and he's going on a little tirade about the Pledge of Allegiance.

SPEAKER_24 5:38

Someone who's an immigrant to this country and um re-got my citizenship about three, four years ago. I'm very proud to be an American citizen.

SPEAKER_36 5:47

Which I think is pretty incredible. You know, three years a citizen, all of a sudden serving as an elected official?

SPEAKER_24 5:51

That's pretty impressive. Um, but again, I was a longtime history teacher, and I can say the history of the Pledge of Allegiance is is a is a strange and varied one. It is not one the original version of the Pledge of Allegiance did not include any reference to religion in it. That came about in the 1950s, but it was okay.

SPEAKER_36 6:11

What happened in the 1950s? Um there was a huge immigration, like illegal immigration coming across the border, and Eisenhower started.

SPEAKER_33 6:20

So we needed to make sure that everybody understood what was going on.

SPEAKER_36 6:23

That was the last time we had a major deportation push when Eisenhower was like, You see what happened in Europe? That's called culture falling apart, right? And he was a huge part of the Marshall Plan and reconstruction.

SPEAKER_33 6:32

So we were in uh we were annealing culture. Huh? We were annealing culture into our country.

SPEAKER_36 6:39

Yeah, you know, we were being very accommodated.

SPEAKER_33 6:41

Yes.

SPEAKER_36 6:41

And it was like two things were going on. One, build the interstate system, and two, start deporting elements, and three, re-establish national pride, civic engagement, all that kind of stuff. So he's saying, well, they added for one nation under God in the 1950s. Yeah, because we had to solidify who we are as a people, right?

SPEAKER_24 6:56

It came out of an anti-immigrant sentiment. It was designed to ensure that the children of immigrants would see this country as you know, to indoctrinate in many ways. Why was that?

SPEAKER_36 7:11

Assimilation was that assimilation. Assimilation, but also why? What was why why were these immigrants like not religious? I mean, this is the 1950s. We don't look back in the 1950s and think, oh, hey, you know, the world was really anti-religious.

SPEAKER_33 7:24

I don't know.

SPEAKER_36 7:25

I mean, we had World War II. Because the Soviet Empire with Ace was atheistic. And so that's one of the big differentiations between the West and the Soviet Empire. Is the West claims a creator? Soviet Empire says the state. Right? So we wanted to make sure we incorporated that. That's that's the thing people don't recognize here. Is like this is you know antithesis to collectivism and the cold war and everything. And no way we hated immigrants, it's because we hated communists.

SPEAKER_24 7:53

I am against the idea of saying we are supportive of and um pride to be Americans and pride to be Athenians. I have no problem with that. But the Pledge of Allegiance, I'm not entirely sure, has a place here.

Stephen Miller Story And Long-Term Visions

SPEAKER_28 8:06

As far as the pledge, um very against it. Uh another council member for for three reasons. Um, one article of faith, I'm a Quaker, so I don't do that. Um, so I won't.

SPEAKER_36 8:18

That's actually the most legitimate reason that you'll ever hear. That's like a legitimate reason why you would be like, uh, you know, I I only swear allegiance to God. Okay, at least that. He's a Quaker. But you're a Quaker and you're in government.

unknown 8:31

Yeah.

SPEAKER_36 8:31

Back the train up.

SPEAKER_28 8:33

Two, uh it feels performative. And three, I'm uncomfortable with performing that in this current moment with this current administration. Oh. I think anything.

SPEAKER_36 8:44

So it really isn't about your faith, it's just really about the administration.

SPEAKER_28 8:50

I strongly dislike. And so I firmly am against that.

SPEAKER_36 8:56

Okay, so you've got Stephen Miller all the way back in 2003 that's like, yeah, I think I'm gonna cleanse America in not 15 years. He's got a long-term plan. And then you've got the other side where again, this is an ideological battle. This is the eternal struggle between individualism and collectivism, between believers and non-believers, right? It's it's just a constant thing. But right now, at this moment, sitting here in 2026, January of 2026, we are dealing with a lot of stuff in our nation. One of the big things is this deportation push, right? And cracking down on illegal immigration and all the fraud that comes along with it. And obviously, you've got two sides of the aisle here. And as for us as peasants who are just sitting on the ground, we have to live here. So it is true, some of these immigrants are our neighbors. There's a good chance you listening to me within, you know, a mile of where you live, there's probably a lot of illegal immigrants. If you could actually plot them all on a map, so they're surprising everywhere they're at. And so while there is some truth that America was built by immigrants, it's kind of a loose thing we say. Uh it's not that we're built by immigrants, it's that, well, we like this really broad interpretation of what an immigrant is. We like to call the people that came over on the Mayflower immigrants, right? Right. We like to call the pioneers immigrants, right? We kind of like overextend what it means to migrate or immigrate. And so that's where Kamala uh Pramala Jayapal, one of our great Washington state representatives, is saying here listen, America wasn't built by you, the Americans, it was built by everybody else that you the Americans brought here.

SPEAKER_08 10:24

The majority of Americans across the country, regardless of political party, know that immigrants from all over the world, Somalia, India, wherever they're from, Latin America, Africa, that immigrants have built because I know the interstate was primarily built by Indians from India.

SPEAKER_33 10:40

The Somalians, right?

SPEAKER_36 10:42

And I know the Empire State Building, when it was being taken to the skyline, was crawling with Somalis and riveting, right? Really, when she says immigrants, she's talking about Irish, right?

Pledge Of Allegiance, Assimilation, And Cold War Context

SPEAKER_33 10:53

Italians. Exactly. And then why does she list Somalians first? Uh, who knows?

SPEAKER_08 10:58

Who knows? I don't know. And make this country what it is today. Okay.

unknown 11:05

Okay.

SPEAKER_36 11:05

Hey, yeah, we're all in it together. It's a melting pot, and we absolutely want to encourage entrepreneurship. It's the American way. So if you're an immigrant and you want to come here and not be on the public charge, yes, start a business. I love my little Vietnamese restaurants and my, you know, tie and lons that I never go to. Highly suspicious of what's going on in the back room of those places because here Nick Shirley did another one of these videos yesterday. I watched all 54 minutes of it or whatever. If you thought the first video was good, this second video was something else. Oh no. Okay. So one of the things Scott Bessant has mentioned was they cut off money transfer places. He called them MBSs. Remember, there was a news clip where he was on with uh one of the Yehos on CNN, and he says, We've shut off some MBSs. And she goes, Mortgage back securities questioning. And he goes, No, money uh what was it? It was uh money wire services, or what was it, money, whatever it was. It was a money, it was a money wire service, okay? Okay, and uh so the these guys in this video, it's a long video, but he goes through and he explains how the transportation, the busing is what is actually tying all this together between the you know, autism, the Medicaid, the old care, the child care, all of that ties together. And the way the government does their audits is they're checking receipts. If you have someone go into adult care, if there's a receipt from for transport to go and come back, then you just assume it happened, right? Because all the paperwork's there. So the transportation hubs are the center of all this. So these guys went around to all these places that have these transportation hubs, and they're like, it's an apartment building. You're not even allowed to have a business here, and it has 60 vehicles in the fleet. Where are the vehicles? It's literally a vacant apartment. Like they just bought the building and it's just sitting there. Or in this case, right here on the screen, you'll see they're inside this shop. This is a transportation place, okay? They come in here and they're like, hey, we're looking for a taxi.

SPEAKER_33 12:58

Oh, I see it on the sign. It's the the express, the taw Tawakal. Tawakal Express.

SPEAKER_36 13:03

Yeah, this is money express. This is sending money.

SPEAKER_33 13:06

Oh, let's watch this.

SPEAKER_36 13:07

They go in here and they're just asking about transport. This little building's in like a little strip mall with like four buildings, four businesses in it. All of them have transportation centers. All of them point to the other guys and oh, go check there, go check there. So, like nobody's a transportation center, but everything's everything else. So take a listen, take a watch.

SPEAKER_22 13:25

Are you we're looking for the transportation company? Transportation? Looking for Safari transportation.

SPEAKER_36 13:33

There's no Safari transportation. No, but they're listed.

SPEAKER_22 13:37

Safari transportation. Safari transportation is 607 C or S. We're just looking for Safari Transportation. So, but this is registered for Safari Transportation 607.

SPEAKER_11 13:47

Okay, we don't know.

SPEAKER_22 13:47

We're asking where Safari Transport is.

SPEAKER_11 13:50

We don't know. Otherwise, it gets it. So the business is not here. Sorry, cut Omar.

SPEAKER_22 13:55

We don't know this. Do you see this? What is this? Money transferring.

SPEAKER_36 13:59

Ah, now in the video, they don't address money transferring at all. But Scott Besson has already told us that's how the money's making it over to Somalia, basically. And Al Al uh Shabaab or whatever his name is, the ISIS terror or the Al-Qaeda terrorist in Somalia. It's they also we also have found out that they've been taking money out of airports, like to the tune of five million dollars a week for going on 10 years now.

SPEAKER_33 14:21

In cash.

SPEAKER_36 14:22

In cash.

SPEAKER_33 14:22

Yeah.

SPEAKER_36 14:23

So here we are. There's supposed to be a transportation center. In the video, they explain how the transportation ties everything in together. And all through the video, a whole bunch of these transportation places they go have no cars, but they're actually a front for wire transfer.

SPEAKER_22 14:38

Okay, registered. This is fraud taking place. This is supposed to say this is for Safari Transportation. Who found out? Yeah, we did find out. This is fraud right here. Registered here. This is registered.

SPEAKER_38 14:50

Safari Transportation, State of Minnesota.

SPEAKER_19 14:52

Run it up.

SPEAKER_38 14:55

Well, but it's registered now. This is current just off the state of Minnesota website. This is from today. I just printed this off today. Go check it out. We're here. This is 607.

unknown 15:08

It's not Safari P.

SPEAKER_36 15:09

Okay, so it's a fraud. It's always deflection. In the video, some of these people begin to be absolutely ironic. I mean, we're talking screaming, threatening. They had bodyguards and stuff like that. It's just instantly, you're causing Islamophobia and all this stuff. It's like, listen, I don't care about your religion. It's a money transfer place. But it's registered on the state. So then they walk down the hole. No transportation company.

SPEAKER_22 15:32

And now we're going to 617, another transportation company. However, it is actually Cedar Riverside Liquor. Where is the transportation company? 617.

SPEAKER_38 15:43

617 transportation for the state of Minnesota is registered to 617 Cedar Avenue South.

SPEAKER_22 15:50

And it's uh the liquor store. David, they they aren't even trying to hide that. These are transportation companies. Where are the vans at? Should we ask? Let's go ask.

SPEAKER_38 16:05

Hey, we're looking for a green line transportation.

SPEAKER_22 16:10

Now we're in 617.

SPEAKER_36 16:12

So they just point them, oh no, that's you know, everybody. So they go on to show that everybody just covers for each other. Like, oh, you're connected to this guy. No, we're not. We are. It's just it was stunning. Donald Trump put put this out yesterday. He says, Does anybody believe that in Minneapolis these are the food stamp businesses? There's no food, there's no cleanliness, there's no service, there's no nothing except fraud. They get millions of dollars of taxpayer money and laugh at how stupid the Americans are, but not anymore. These people should be sent back to Somalia or any other country from where they came. California, Illinois, New York, and so many other places are equally as bad. It's all a giant Democrat scam with protection from the fake news media, but it will end as we make America great again. Okay. Sounds great. Now let's have a little comedy break here because, as always, this is not a conspiracy show, this is a news show. But anybody who has half a brain and knows anything about history should probably be a lot more sympathetic to the conspiracy theorists.

SPEAKER_35 17:10

I'll always defend a conspiracy theorist. Read a history book. How often does anybody know what's happening in history? We had a president in this country that couldn't walk. It's totally true. FDR. He was in a wheelchair because of polio. They didn't tell the American people, obviously, because they didn't want him to appear weak. Sure. But you don't think there were some uncles back in the town. Getting destroyed. Getting obliterated out there because they were convinced the president couldn't walk.

SPEAKER_26 17:40

Everybody around Thanksgiving table, like, tell us Uncle Johnny about your theory. He's like, the president can't walk. And they're like, really? Really? You're gonna die on this hill. He's like, he can't go up a hill.

SPEAKER_36 17:52

Where did I does anybody think this liquor store is a transportation company with 62 vehicles? Come on! The government would never do something like that. It's totally ridiculous. Now, yesterday I wanted to have a little comedy break. Kidnapping innocent people, while at the same time, we laugh about conspiracy theories. But oftentimes we are right. There is a lot of disinformation and misinformation out there. This is serious. If you live in Minnesota, if you live in the Minneapolis, St. Paul area, if you live around Portland, Seattle, you know, Chicago, this is deadly serious.

SPEAKER_33 18:30

Life might not be so fun right now.

Immigration Claims And “Built By Immigrants” Debate

SPEAKER_36 18:32

Life might not be so fun right now. Your community's in upheaval, things aren't normal. You want to fix things, but you don't want to disrupt things. I mean, this is a challenge. Okay. This is a real challenge. And not only that, but our entire government runs on this system of having citizen taxpayer slaves. You've got to pay taxes, and allegedly those taxes go to fix potholes and care, do child care. But when you find out that the potholes don't get fixed, the child care doesn't happen, and that we're bombing UMenis with American dollars and bombs. And then we turn around and we send money to Al-Qaeda, who is the people that we're bombing. This is a nightmare. Why are people paying taxes? Why are people doing anything? You've got the states going against the feds, cutting off a funding.

SPEAKER_33 19:12

This is an absolute and most good people are afraid to even do anything or speak up because they don't want to draw fire from all this.

SPEAKER_36 19:19

They want to draw fire. Exactly. Now, with all of this, though, we are living through history. This is a fourth turning. In 50 years from now, we're going to look back at this decade where Donald Trump was, you know, a political player.

SPEAKER_33 19:32

If the history books get written accurately, it's going to be an amazing point in time.

SPEAKER_36 19:36

It's going to be an amazing point in time, exactly. I mean, this is really monumental. And there are some big things we have to get through. And it's not all cupcakes and ding dongs. There's real power, right? A governor has real power. A mayor has real power. They can just say, Stop arresting criminals, cops, and all of a sudden your streets aren't safe. Like that. Right. So here's Governor Waltz. He gave a five and a half, almost six minutes. Speech yesterday. This is a governor of one of the several states. This is a governor of one of the several states who has decided not to run, whose state is being blown up with fraud. He was we barely didn't have him as a vice president. And he gave this speech last night.

SPEAKER_25 20:26

They're pulling over people indiscriminately, including U.S. citizens, and demanding to see their papers. And at grocery stores, at bus stops, even at our schools. They're breaking windows, dragging pregnant women down the street, just plain grabbing Minnesotans and shoving them into unmarked vans, kidnapping innocent people with no warning and no due process. Let's be very, very clear. This long ago stopped being a matter of immigration enforcement. Instead, it's a campaign of organized brutality against the people of Minnesota by our own federal government. Last week, that campaign claimed the life of Renee Nicole Good. We've all watched the video. We've all seen what happened. And yet, instead of conducting an impartial investigation, so we can hold accountable to the officer responsible for Renee's death, the Trump administration is devoting the full power of the federal government to finding an excuse to attack the victim and her family. Just yesterday, six federal prosecutors, including the longtime career prosecutor leading the charge to investigate and eliminate fraud in our state's programs, quit their jobs rather than go along with this assault on the United States Constitution. But as bad as it's been, Donald Trump intends for it to get worse. This week he went online to promise that the day of retribution and reckoning is coming. That's a direct threat against the people of this state who dared to vote against him three times. And who continue to stand up for freedom with courage and empathy and profound grace. All across Minnesota, people are stepping up to help their neighbors who are being unjustly and unlawfully targeted.

SPEAKER_36 22:12

Okay, so he sets the predicate here. Government's attacking us, government's attacking us, disturbing our peace, blah blah blah blah. Now look at what he asks his constituents to do.

Minnesota Fraud Allegations And Wire Services

SPEAKER_25 22:25

And raising their voices in peaceful protest, even though doing so has made many of our fellow Minnesotans targets for violent retribution. Folks, I know it's scary, and I know it's absurd that we all have to be defending law and order, justice, and humanity by also caring for we have to defend law and order, justice, and humanity. But what about the fraud? Can we just agree to go after the fraud for our families and trying to do our jobs? So tonight let me say once again to Donald Trump and Christine Ohm end this occupation you've done enough. Let me say four critical things to the people of Minnesota. Four things I want you to hear as you watch the news and look out for your neighbors. First, Donald Trump, here we go. Four things. Donald Trump wants this chaos. He wants confusion. And yes, he wants more violence on our streets. We cannot give him what he wants. We can. We must protest loudly, urgently, but also peacefully. Indeed, as hard as we will fight in the courts and at the ballot box, we cannot and will not let violence prevail. If you're angry, I'm angry. Angry is not a strong enough word. But we must remain peaceful. Second, you are not powerless, you are not helpless, and you are certainly not alone. All across Minnesota, people are learning about opportunities, not just to resist, but to help people who are in danger. Thousands upon thousands of our fellow Minnesotans are going to be relying on mutual aid in the days and weeks to come, and they need our support. Days and weeks to come, mutual aid. Tonight I want to share another way you can help. Witness. Help us establish a record of exactly what's happening in our communities. You have an absolute right to peacefully film ice agents as they conduct these activities.

SPEAKER_36 24:19

Alright, go out and start obstructing law enforcement, folks. Go out and start getting in their faces.

SPEAKER_25 24:24

Go out uh hello. So carry your phone with you at all times. And if you see these ice agents in your neighborhood, take out that phone and hit record. Help us create a database of the atrocities against Minnesotans. Not just to establish a record for posterity, but to bank evidence for future prosecution. That's a threat.

SPEAKER_33 24:46

What's it called when you do stuff uh work on behalf of the state like this? Isn't that like the definition of fascism?

SPEAKER_25 24:55

Hello, people. Accountability is coming at the voting booth and in court. We will reclaim our communities from Donald Trump. We will re-establish a sense of safety for our neighbors, and we will bring an end to this moment of chaos, confusion, and trauma. We will find a way to move forward, and we'll do it together and we'll not be alone. Every day we are working with business leaders, faith leaders, legal experts, and elected officials from across this country. They've all seen what Donald Trump is trying to do to our state, and they know their states could be next. And that brings me to the fourth thing I want to say tonight, Minnesota. How incredibly proud I am of the way that you've risen to meet this unbearable moment. But I'm not at all surprised, because this is who we are. Minnesotans believe in the rule of law, and Minnesotans believe in the dignity of all people. We're a place where there's room for everybody, no matter who you are, or who you love, or where you came from. A place where we feed our kids, we take care of our neighbors, and we look out for those in the shadows of life. We're an island of decency in a country being He goes on to say some more platitudes.

SPEAKER_36 26:14

So after he gave this speech, this is how it turned out in Minnesota last night. This is a moment in history. This is a moment in time. It'll live for a long time.

SPEAKER_14 26:24

This was after he gave that speech. The law enforcement officer caught up to the subject on foot and attempted to apprehend him when the subject began to resist and violently assault the officer. While the subject and law enforcement were in a struggle on the ground, two subjects came out of a nearby apartment and also attacked the law enforcement officer with a snow shovel and broom handles. As the officer was being ambushed and attacked by the two individuals, the original subject got loose and began striking the officer with a shovel or broomstick, fearing for his life and safety as he was being ambushed by three individuals. The officer fired defensive shots to defend his life. The initial subject was hit in the leg. All three subjects ran back into the apartment and barricaded themselves inside. The attacked officer and subject are both in the hospital. Both attackers are in custody. This is another attack. Uh, this is this attack on another brave member of law enforcement took place while Minnesota's top leaders, Governor Walls and Mayor Fry are actively encouraging an organized resistance to ICE and federal law enforcement officers. Their hateful rhetoric and resistance against men and women who are simply trying to do their job must end. So a very lengthy statement there, Sean, but it sounds a whole lot more complicated than what we initially had. That this was one person involved with the shovel. It sounds like ICE was going after a Venezuelan illegal alien who had been caught and released at the border by the Biden administration in 2022. Uh, that person crashed a car, crashed into a parked car, got out and fled. Ice was chasing him down, and then while they were wrestling on the ground, two people came out of a nearby apartment and then started attacking the ICE officer with shovels.

SPEAKER_36 28:24

So sad. So that happened last night, and then of course it broke down even further. And this got some real chaz chop feel to it. So these guys cornered these ice agents, right? Because now the mob comes out and the crowd comes out middle of the night. These are those Minnesota nice neighbors, you know, these people that want to return to law and order. And they chased the ICE officers away from their vehicles. This vehicle right here is an ice vehicle that we're about to watch. And in the back of this vehicle is a gun safe that these guys pull out. Watch this. It gets worse. Watch. They actually hook it up to chains.

SPEAKER_05 29:09

Serious, serious cry.

Transportation Hubs, Fronts, And Field Visits

SPEAKER_36 29:10

This right here is a bounce car. But this is uh they hook chains up to it and drag it out of the back of this car.

SPEAKER_33 29:25

Do these people not understand that this is a serious crime? They try.

SPEAKER_36 29:28

I know in J6, if you touched a shield, picked up a baton that got dropped, they you got charged with a burglary.

SPEAKER_33 29:35

Right.

SPEAKER_36 29:36

Burglary of federal property.

SPEAKER_33 29:37

I'm sure that this is a felony burglary.

SPEAKER_36 29:39

Everything about this is a felony.

SPEAKER_33 29:41

Yeah.

SPEAKER_36 29:41

Okay. This is the this is what happened last night. So Waltz comes out, gives his speech, right? Right? Uh rah-rah, look, we've got to stop this.

SPEAKER_33 29:49

And no, this speech has very similar um feel and flavor to what they accused Donald Trump of doing on January 6th.

SPEAKER_36 29:59

Yes. Yes, which feels very scripted, and which we'll get to a little bit of that tomorrow because they had a first J6 committee yesterday. Yesterday. Before we move on any further, I want to get back to the chats. Moddy Easel, the bumpers crack me up. Yes, they do. Pony Boy, good morning. Shantini, good morning. Sunny cold today feels like one negative one today. Carlitz milk should put a mustache on Trump for their next ad. They should. You got Trump ads for milk, Trump's ad for McDonald's, Trump's ad for Trump ads for waste management. Uh Mattiel or uh Pony Boy, what? I'd love to see what the Somalians have done to their own house if they had helped us build America. Matter Easel, what an idiot, Shantini. That's awful. I know. So Donald Trump responded yesterday. He said, or really, it was actually this morning. If the corrupt politicians of Minnesota don't obey the law and stop the professional agitators and insurrectionists, there's that word. Yep. Very familiar with it, from attacking the Patriots of ICE who are only trying to do their job. I will institute the Insurrection Act. That's a gloves-off moment. Nobody can stop him once he declares the Insurrection Act. Supreme Court, there's no lawsuit, there's nothing, which many presidents have done before me and quickly put an end to the travesty that's taking place in the once great state. Thank you for your attention to this matter, DJT. How far can this go?

SPEAKER_33 31:14

Well, it seems like Donald Trump has given him a lot of room. So it's not like he's super authoritarian and we're souping in the net we're sending in the National Guard and we're going to tamp it down immediately. He's given these guys every opportunity to clean house themselves. Every opportunity.

SPEAKER_36 31:30

Every opportunity. How far will it go, though? It's one thing to just send in a bunch of Marines to, you know, secure the federal buildings in the area. It's a whole different thing to call the Insurrection Act and move in 10,000 troops. What about just completely taking over the state and arresting a lot of politicians? We're probably gonna have to wait until people die. There's no limit. Yeah. Okay. This is Tom Holman. All this agitation against ICE is paid.

SPEAKER_04 31:57

Oh, that's me. Sorry. I just left the meeting about 20 minutes ago here at the White House. I can say I can't say a lot, but let me say this. We are aware of this coordinated effort. We are aware that this is being financed. We are aware that there are actual groups well coordinated to attack the men and women rights and to try to prevent them from doing their jobs. Accountability is coming because we're working very closely with DLJ, the FBI, HSI. We're doing a deep dive into this. We'll follow the money. We'll follow these groups. We'll investigate these groups. Justice is coming to these people. We've heard that a lot.

SPEAKER_36 32:34

We've heard that for a year. 10 if you're a Qur. Stop what's coming. Yeah. Now, this is deep. What tools do you need to go in and correct the fraud? Well, I don't know. Maybe you would need some United States attorneys and an attorney's office that can prosecute the fraud that they find and can take care of the people who assault ICE and can do these different things. Well, remember we had that prosecutor that quit. Waltz criticized him, then he quit, then Waltz praised him. And then in the speech, he mentioned even the US attorney quit because of all this stuff, right? Well, Pam Bondi came on yesterday and she confirmed just that. In fact, it's even worse than what we suspected. I actually it's not as bad as we suspected, although maybe it is. I I had kind of thought that these guys might have been blackmailed or somebody got to them, made a threat, and they're like, we're out. Okay. Makes sense. Self-preservation. I understand the instinct. It was total, it actually is worse. I was thinking maybe it wasn't as worse. It is worse than that because the reason they quit was ideological.

Trump Reaction And Conspiracy Humor Break

SPEAKER_00 33:28

What happened in Minnesota? We had six prosecutors who suddenly decided they didn't want to support the men and women in ICE. One of them was busy doing a photo shoot with the New York Times while ICE was out there risking their lives. So they came, they said, We want to resign, but we want to use our annual leave up until April, meaning they wanted the taxpayers to pay for them to go on vacation because they decided they didn't want to support law enforcement. So the breaking news tonight, I fired them all. They're fired from the office. And our U.S. attorney there, Rosen, he's great. He was just confirmed three months peanut in Minnesota.

SPEAKER_36 34:06

So they've got their U.S. attorney that's going to pick up the pace, I guess, and keep going. But a lot of it centered around they wanted to go after the wife of Renee Good or the partner or whoever it was. Now keep in mind, the surface level is you're going after a morning widow. The problem is these guys were part of an organized group. So this morning widow might also be a insurrectionist. And I have no sympathy for insurrectionists. Obviously, I'm joking. But you know, Minnesota is about to F around and find out. They're about to win the price is right.

SPEAKER_06 34:42

All right, kind sir. We have a treat for you. Johnny is going to tell us about it now. Johnny, what could this fine gentleman win?

SPEAKER_12 34:52

Bob, we've got the all-new JD Venus Pro 6,000 Hydro Water Cannon Liptard Blaster. Includes power steering, all-wheel disc brakes, bucket seats, pioneer AMF MMA track surround sound stereo, and 6,000 gallons per minute cannon with 360-degree swivel base for blasting the crap out of Womany Bastards with too much free time.

SPEAKER_36 35:15

All right, kind sir. We have they're about to they're about to get their prize. Now again, right, there's two sides to all of this. On one hand, we've got Shree Thindiar representative, who an immigrant who built this country, clearly, uh, has decided ice is done.

SPEAKER_19 35:34

And we must finally, we must, we must reform ICE. But it looks at this stage, folks, ice is beyond reform. ICE is totally out of control.

SPEAKER_36 35:49

And this week, there are 450,000 people or so that decided this man was their best representative. I just want to know how many patels voted for him. You know what I'm saying?

SPEAKER_19 36:00

I intend to introduce a bill to abolish ice. We need to make ice go away 2003. Before 2003, without ICE, various federal agencies were able to take care of business, and we can do this without ICE. But we do not need the murderers, we do not need this paramilitary organization, members on our street terrorizing. You better be careful. Don't worry, global warming will take care of all the ice.

SPEAKER_36 36:36

You're gonna get the JD Vance 9,000 water cannon if you're not careful. John Fetterman, I gotta I gotta eat some crow here. When John Fetterman ran against Mena Oz, Mena Oz was a horrible candidate. I was not excited for Memet Oz, but he was the Republican, he was endorsed by Trump. And when John Fetterman had a stroke and couldn't talk, Ron, couldn't make a sentence and had to use Google AI for his debate. Now, there were things that he said through Google AI and the whole speech.

SPEAKER_33 37:05

Well, it wasn't surprising to you, really. I mean, they just had elected Joe Biden.

SPEAKER_36 37:10

Maybe, maybe in my opinion, John Fetterman is the beneficiary of massive fraud, massive amounts of fraud. Okay. That's my opinion. Okay. However, they didn't know what they were buying because they had Google given answers that he clearly wouldn't have given. Do you think the Democrats would have, and I am, I'll die on this hill. Okay, 2020 election. Pennsylvania was stolen. I don't think there's anybody in Pennsylvania that can be like, I won my seat. Bolt, you're just kidding at the seat. Okay, so Fetterman's one of these people. They absolutely would have not done this for Fetterman if they would have known that a few years later this kind of stuff would be coming out of his mouth.

SPEAKER_30 37:50

And it was sky skyrocketing, you know, and it's like that's unsustainable. When you reach almost 300,000 people, that's unsustainable. And we need to, you know, as a Democrat, it shouldn't be unreasonable to want to secure our border and do it in that way. And now let's also let's also talk about ICE. Now, absolutely, again, what happened in Minneapolis was absolutely tragic. Uh, and then now if you think, now this is from the Washington Post, you know, this is the latest statistics. These are people that iCE now are at uh it's like now 67 percent have criminal charges, pending ones, or that that that so that's more than two-thirds you know the people now.

SPEAKER_36 38:35

Now there are some people one thing we're finding is the Democrats, not all of them can put together a full sentence from Cherie to Betterman that aren't involved in any kinds of illegal things, you know.

SPEAKER_30 38:45

But so me, I think two things can be true. You know, round up all the criminals, deport deport them, they shouldn't have ever been here. That was a Democrat.

SPEAKER_36 38:53

Round up on the corner criminals, deport them, they shouldn't have been here. That was a Democrat. Put quotes around that and put Democrat Senator 2026, okay?

SPEAKER_30 39:04

And they definitely have to go. And now I don't know, want to see more and more things happening in Minneapolis now, too. So two things must be true, and I strongly reject the extreme on either side, you know, about this now. So we must be true. And you know, I watched your earlier in your show. You just pointed out President Obama deported, you know, millions of people, and there wasn't having the same kind of outrage here, you know, here is from from Democrats border.

SPEAKER_36 39:35

It's so funny because listening to John Fetterman, he can't complete a full sentence, but he gets the ideas, and your brain ends up kind of finishing its whole thought process. So, overall, since Trump has been in office, we have had negative net migration, which is a really good thing. I mean, this is the first time in a century we've probably had negative net migration, but I don't know if it's enough.

SPEAKER_01 39:56

A new report revealing the US experienced negative net. Migration in 2025 with estimated net flows of negative two hundred and ninety-five thousand to negative ten thousand. So it's quite a bit. The report attributes the negative number mostly to the sharp decrease in migrants entering the U.S. So it says removals and voluntary departures have also played a role. Authors of the study predicted trend will continue this year, 2026.

SPEAKER_36 40:21

So I mean what so we could have as little as a ten thousand dollar negative net migration up to 200 and what almost 300,000 people, which is it's so funny. Like that's a big range.

SPEAKER_33 40:33

That's a big range, and I think that confuses a lot of people because of the negative um numbers, and that's really close to zero.

SPEAKER_36 40:40

Like it's just stayed the same.

SPEAKER_33 40:42

Yeah.

Governor’s Speech, Protests, And Filming ICE

SPEAKER_36 40:43

Yeah, which okay, whatever. Okay. You know, the Democrat Party wants to have their cake and eat it too, right? It's just pretty simple. They want to be free, but they won't want to do anything about it. Let's just open the borders, let everybody come in, we'll all get along, we'll hug each other. That's pretty much what you get. So for people like you and I, Ron, who are fathers and kind of understand a little bit how the world works, me, you know, been punched in the face a few times, been to prison, world's a rough place. So, you know, if you want to have freedom, you have to preserve it. You're gonna have to do something part about it. But the Democrat Party, if you look at what they do, it's kind of the do nothing but let us spend your money. Okay, so this is a pretty good breakdown of what the Democrats are.

SPEAKER_43 41:23

Who you want freedom with no responsibility. Son, there's only one person on earth who gets that, yeah. A baby. You're fighting for your your right to be a baby.

SPEAKER_36 41:40

You're fighting your right to be a baby. That's really what's going on here. So in Washington State, right? Coming bringing it back close to home. This is Michelle Esteban. And she spoke to uh Michelle Esteban's the reporter, she spoke to the Washington State Auditor Pat McCarthy about over oversight at DCYF. Now, DCYF is the Department of Children, Youth Families or something, Department of Children, Youth and Families or something like that. So these guys are the ones that who would be in charge of auditing the daycare centers and the autism schools and all that kind of stuff. So they sat down, because obviously, you know, we've got all this stuff coming out of Minnesota. There's been a lot of leads and things like that in Washington. And for the most part, Washington politicians just kind of want to run from this and pretend like it's not happening. So here's the woman who's in charge of spot checking the daycare. So this is the woman who's in charge of tracking all this stuff. So she sits down for this interview. I love getting into the weeds and getting out into the details on some of this stuff. And a good, a good interviewer through the Socratic method of just continuing to ask questions will often get people to say things twice, and then you find out the truth the second time. So listen to the lie, listen to the truth, and then listen to the cover-up for the lie that she just gave. This is someone who's running our state and spending our money and supposed to be holding accountable who spends our money.

SPEAKER_43 43:10

Uh, not only on a local level, but at a federal level as well. So do you get why people are saying, I want to hear from my state? And if you do, you know, why do you understand that or not?

SPEAKER_02 43:21

Well, I think I think what's good is it brings clarity. I'm glad that people are looking at uh how their agencies are functioning here in Washington State. And we pro we provide a plethora of information on our website. Every report that we do is on our website. You can go back and look at since the onset of DCYF, the Department of Children and Youth Families, you can see every report that we've done, and you can read through those reports, uh, and you can understand that they are audited, and we have expressed concerns uh over the past uh with some of the things that we've found that DCYF was not doing. And and but I uh there's some good news here, and I think it's important to know what that good news is. Here it is with the new administration, and I'm talking about the new secretary at uh DSHS, Tannison, uh, and the governor of the state of Washington and his efforts on accountability for his state agencies, we're seeing a change. And if we have not been able to get to the child level in DCYF for the last four years, but we did last year. We have right now that we've been able to get to that. And I credit the new leadership at DCYF. So there's a commitment.

SPEAKER_43 44:38

So just to be clear, what I'm hearing is we're not just looking at DCYF systemically, we're also looking at individual providers.

SPEAKER_02 44:46

We will look at individual providers.

SPEAKER_36 44:48

Oh remember what I said in the beginning about Minnesota? As long as all the paperwork matchups, as long as there's a transportation ticket from someone to somewhere and from somewhere back, and then there's billing, it's billing, billing, billing. So DCYF, just like whatever their system is, as long as everything's in line. Right.

SPEAKER_33 45:06

Paper trail's fine.

SPEAKER_36 45:06

The paper trail's fine, right? It doesn't matter if anybody actually went there. It doesn't even matter if these guys have a storefront where they can care for kids. It'll pass some quicker, right? As long as you've got all the paperwork right. So she just said, Hey, we've been auditing, and you know, we've got some concerns, but for the most part, it's been okay. And then she's like, but we haven't had enough good information. And we really haven't done anything. So you haven't looked at individual daycares, you've just looked at the big picture. Well, yeah.

SPEAKER_02 45:30

And we do those audits, but we have to get that information from the agency to be able to do that body of work, and we haven't been able to get that information for the last four years.

SPEAKER_36 45:40

So the correct answer to the first question should have just been, oh no, we're flying blind. I've just been cashing a paycheck for four years. We got no information. Like we have you know, we're just connecting a paper trail, but we don't know, we don't know what's going on. Individual daycares, what are those?

SPEAKER_33 45:54

We just hit the audit button on the computer and then it's done.

SPEAKER_36 45:57

Hey, I just says, Yeah, you're running smooth. Tim Waltz said so. Or Governor Ferguson said so. This woman's cashed a paycheck. This woman has put every audit they've had on the website that she just said was meaningless. What's the point of keeping the records if they're meaningless and not useful and detecting fraud or really knowing anything other than the facade that our government is functioning?

SPEAKER_02 46:22

This is a new day for DCYF. That's not to say that there may be issues in there in the final report, but we have not because you know, I mean, if you just don't have all the variables, you can't really add anything up.

SPEAKER_33 46:35

But this is a new day for our final report. We'll be garbage, but that's okay.

Street Clashes, ICE Confrontations, And Escalation

SPEAKER_02 46:39

Oh my goodness. Any evidence of fraud. Oh, yeah, let's go back. We gotta hear that in the final report, but we have not seen any evidence of any evidence of fraud. So they need to know that. So don't jump to that conclusion.

SPEAKER_36 46:56

So the house that's in the middle of a suburban neighborhood that's supposed to have 12 kids at it that doesn't have anybody there, no signage, and the person there doesn't even know they're running a daycare. No evidence of fraud.

SPEAKER_33 47:07

She just said there's nothing to see. Don't look.

SPEAKER_36 47:10

Don't look. We're gonna have a report, it might have problems, but it's a new day. We haven't had any information in the past, so everything we've ever said has been completely, you know, just pulling it out of our ass.

SPEAKER_02 47:19

Are there some internal controls that we're gonna talk about in our audit? Most likely. Um, that we need to have uh verification. Again, we our motto is trust but verify.

SPEAKER_36 47:32

Oh, trust but verify. Hey DHS, can we get some of that information so we can verify a thing or two? I mean, we trust you. I know we're good. Cut the checks.

SPEAKER_02 47:41

We need to do. We can't just assume something is the case. We have to do that.

SPEAKER_36 47:46

But you are assuming that there's no fraud because you've seen no evidence of it, because apparently you don't scroll Facebook. Okay.

SPEAKER_02 47:53

Heavy work, and we have a number of our auditors in there right now doing that work, and we're gonna come out with a report um in a couple months uh that we'll report on DCYF and this particular grant program.

SPEAKER_36 48:06

And how little fraud we found because we didn't look or have the information to find the fraud. What a mess. Now it's spreading, it's spreading. Here's Maryland. Haven't heard anything about Maryland. Well, this woman right here got a notice from the state that they'd overpaid her unemployment benefits, and they wanted her to send a little over a hundred dollars back to the state. This is what we call a legacy America. And this person, you know, when I, you know, you hear these black kids talking about, I want to have a t-shirt that looks like me. Well, this woman looks like us, Ron. She's a white lady, she's wearing a college sweatshirt. Cambridge, nonetheless, she's standing in front of a nice brick building. Hey, Ron, this could be you, I, our wives, right? This is pretty normal. One day you open up the mail and the state wants you to pay them back. There's some problems with that, though.

SPEAKER_18 48:49

Department of Labor has determined that you have received an overpayment of unemployment insurance benefits.

SPEAKER_15 48:54

The letter demanded Gina Cross return$250 to the state, alleging she'd received an overpayment and unemployment benefits. The problem is she's never applied nor ever received an ounce of unemployment benefits.

SPEAKER_36 49:08

Oh. Okay, so she's never applied for or received an ounce of unemployment benefit, but the state wants her to pay back an overpayment for$250.$250. They're gonna drag her life through a due process in order to adjudicate this.

SPEAKER_15 49:28

Cross believes she's been a victim of identity theft and fears the state has been shelling out unemployment benefits to a thief. In fact, according to a new state audit, in the past five years, the state has shelled out millions of dollars in overpayments to recipients who should never have received them. And according to the audit, the state did not timely pursue recovery of claimant overpayments, totaling eight hundred and seven point four million dollars, resulting in up to seven hundred and sixty point seven million that no longer can be collectible.

SPEAKER_36 49:59

Department of Labor has determined that you have received So she's got to pay back her$250 that she never ever got, but yet they can shell out$800 million, leaving six hundred seven hundred and sixty million on the table they can't recover. And it's just like, well, you know, we didn't have enough information, and there, you know, we don't have any evidence of fraud except for that white lady who got 250 bucks.

SPEAKER_33 50:21

Who we were really busy trying to harass.

SPEAKER_36 50:23

How good are these systems that they can detect a$250 overpayment to a non-person, but can't detect million-dollar overpayment to non-existent businesses?

SPEAKER_33 50:32

Ouch.

unknown 50:33

Ouch.

SPEAKER_36 50:34

Ouch. Ouch. You're trying to be a baby. So Josh Hawley, we mentioned the tweet the other day where Josh Hawley voted against the War Powers Act for Donald Trump or to rescind the War Powers Act. And Donald Trump listed a whole bunch of politicians, Markowski, Collins, right? And said, these guys are done. They should be primaried, never win an election again. Well, Josh Hawley was on the Will Cain show, and Josh Hawley, this is the second time Josh Hawley has voted against Trump, been called out, and he made nice. Josh Hawley made nice with Trump.

SPEAKER_42 51:03

I do want to ask you this, Senator. President Trump came after you hard the other day. Uh, this is just a few days ago. He posted on Truth Social. Uh he said the following, which we can put up on the screen. Republicans should be ashamed of the senators that just voted with Democrats and attempting to take away our powers to fight, defend the United States of America. He listed several senators, including you, Senator Josh Hawley. He said should never be elected again. You've changed your vote on the War Powers resolution now, um, not voting with those senators. Tell me why you voted the original way and why you changed.

Insurrection Act Talk And Federal Response

SPEAKER_05 51:35

Well, for me, this has always been about ground troops. Will ground troops into Venezuela, occupying Venezuela. Uh, that's not something that I think I would want to do. And listen, I talked to the president, I talked to the Secretary of State, I talked to the Department of Justice, I thank the administration for all of their outreach. And what the Secretary of State said to me very clearly is we're not doing that. We don't have ground troops in Venezuela. This is not another Iraq, we're not gonna occupy Venezuela, and you know what? That's good enough for me.

unknown 52:02

Okay.

SPEAKER_36 52:02

So apparently Josh Hawley's back in his good graces. So we can vote for Josh Hawley again. I have a feeling there's a trend here. Josh Hawley is gonna buck Donald Trump at some point, right? Because he's doing it and he comes back. You cannot win an election in Missouri without Donald Trump's endorsement at this point in the game. Okay. So uh that's I I I I kind of view that as Josh Hawley's just trying to keep his political career alive, but he's probably sincere. I mean, you know, if the objection is ground troops in Iraq, and that's the promise you got from Marco Rubio that we're not doing that, okay. I'll accept it on its face. But I do see a trend here.

SPEAKER_33 52:35

Yeah. Did you see who else was on that list? Who else was on there? Rand Paul.

SPEAKER_36 52:40

Oh, of course, I mean, of course not.

SPEAKER_33 52:41

Did you watch the uh Rand Paul on Rogan the other day? Yeah. Did you did you watch it? No, I didn't. Oh. Well, the one topic I watched it because I really wanted to hear what he was gonna say if Rogan asked him about Venezuelan's smartmatic. Never came up. Of course not. And I was like, well, that's a failed interview. Three hours worthless.

SPEAKER_36 53:04

Yep. Yep. Um not a big fan of Rand Paul. No, you know, as far as a political philosophy and as far as like talking points, he can come up with some good ones.

SPEAKER_33 53:14

Well, yeah, the other thing that I thought about the whole time that he was talking for three hours was was uh he's really good at narrating and telling a story and telling you uh informing us how things are happening and what's happening and everything that's going on and telling us how it's gonna go, and and that's when I was like having this like little bit of a epiphany of like, you know, when you have a politician that tells you a story like that, um, he's leading you down the primrose path. He's he's he's um narrating a story to lead us down this garden path as an American people. It's like why he's not a politician if you're doing that.

SPEAKER_36 54:01

You're an influencer.

SPEAKER_33 54:04

Yeah, yeah. He's a he's a really high-paid influencer.

SPEAKER_36 54:07

Yeah, it's funny, Alex Jones would go on these rants. I'm not an influencer, I'm a philosopher. He goes on, he's like, I don't want to be an influencer, the communists use influencers to change society for the worst. But yeah, that Rand Paul kind of fits that part. He's kind of an influencer. Um, you know, this isn't supposed to be a round about Rand Paul necessarily, because you know, we talk about him time to time, but yeah, that's that's interesting. All right, this is Jamie Raskin. We had our first official committee hearing for the J6 Select Committee, unlike the unselect committee. There's a couple players that are the same. Jamie Raskin is was on both committees, and Jamie Raskin kind of started it out like this yesterday.

SPEAKER_13 54:42

Nobody's laid a glove on a single sentence in the report of the January 6th Select Committee. Are you sure? Not one. And I defy anyone to challenge that statement. I would love to see someone show how anything we have found has been contradicted. I mean, we don't have all the information.

SPEAKER_36 55:02

Are you seeing the politician speak? It's the same as the other lady. Well, we don't nobody's laid a glove on it. They haven't disproved anything. Have you read any of the evidence that was released that disproved it? Well, of course not. Okay. So this is uh Barry Laudermer, he's the chairman of this committee, and he uh listen, let's make sure I get the right clip here. So he's uh he's asking a prosecutor. So this was a Department of Justice prosecutor that prosecuted friends of mine, right? This is one of the guys that put us in jail and prepared the cases and has all the ethical obligations. Provide exculpatory evidence, right? That's your uh Brady uh material, right? You gotta provide everything. Every single piece of information they have, they have to provide for you. Even stuff they're not gonna use in trial. They got to provide it for you. Could be exculpatory one way or another. It's up to you, the defendant, once provided that information, to craft your narrative or your story or your defense with that information, right? But you've got to provide it. Uh, it's a requirement by the Department of Justice. That's how you have law and order and a fair trial and all that kind of stuff. You have to have your chance.

SPEAKER_33 56:06

And if you don't provide it, you could end up with a situation where you get like a comey with the wrong date on a piece of paper.

Prosecutors Quit, Ideology, And Enforcement Tools

SPEAKER_36 56:12

Yeah. So you would think that these prosecutors would kind of had have had everything they needed to know, right? They would have been able to put together the full picture to prosecute these cases and tie it all together and all that kind of stuff. And you you know, the American people just assumed that they had that. And maybe they did, maybe they didn't. But this particular prosecutor was unaware of some pretty critical things like, you know, undercover informants in the crowd.

SPEAKER_27 56:33

But it's beyond beyond question that the FBI through these reports knew that there was going to be violence at the Capitol. However, we have been unable to find any evidence that that information was transferred from the FBI uh uh formally to any anyone else, including the U.S. Capitol Police and the U.S. Capitol Police Intelligence Division. We're still looking at that.

SPEAKER_36 56:56

So pay attention to what he's saying. The FBI knew there was going to be violence at the Capitol, but the information never made it to uh the Capitol building, uh the police officers and the people that would prepare a response to it.

SPEAKER_27 57:07

Is that normal operating procedures? I mean, is this turf battle so tight within the FBI that they would take they would not report actionable intelligence that they're very very likely is going to be violence at the Capitol?

SPEAKER_03 57:20

I think what you found here was a communication failure. They downplayed the information.

SPEAKER_36 57:25

This isn't one of the prosecutors. We'll play that clip next.

SPEAKER_03 57:27

They probably saw that it wasn't uh actionable or it came from sources of questionable reliability. So they downgraded the veracity of the information, chose not to disseminate some of it to the partners, and let them make their own decisions. In my opinion, it was a bad judgment call inside the Bureau not to have that pre-event call, share that information with them, let the partners make their own decisions and combine it with information that they may have developed separately. So I would say it was an intelligence shortfall.

SPEAKER_36 57:58

There's two major events in my life that we got the same answer, and it changed my life forever after that. The first one was 9-11, where they said, Well, yeah, the intelligence agencies had all this information, but they didn't data share. And so what did that do? Created the Department of National Intelligence, tied all the intelligence agencies together. So now they all talk, but it's all foreign intelligence, right? To prevent terrorism. Well, now you've got domestic terrorism, January 6th, an attack on the Capitol. And what happened again? Well, we had the evidence that was going to happen, but we didn't talk to each other, so nobody could make an assessment. So guess what the solution is going to be coming out of this committee? I promise you they're going to talk about this. Better communication between domestic law enforcement. Just like we did better communication for international intelligence, you're going to have the same thing going on domestically now. It's just the answer. Okay. So then he this is where he has the prosecutor up and he asks an additional question. So you've got all this intelligence. The FBI knew there was going to be violence, didn't pass the information on. I'd like to propose a second consideration. There could be a chance that the FBI might have been planning to instigate the violence, which is why they didn't pass it on.

SPEAKER_27 59:05

But it's beyond beyond question that the FBI through these reports knew that there was going to be violence at the Capitol. However, we have been unable to find any evidence that maybe I just played the same clip.

SPEAKER_36 59:19

All right, I did. I played the same clip. So let me bring this other clip over. Okay, so this is the prosecutor. And he's being taught uh asked by uh Mr. Griffith.

SPEAKER_32 59:28

Were you ever advised as you were doing your investigations of any FBI agents uh on January 6, 2021, being inside the Capitol and observing the January 6th rioters?

SPEAKER_31 59:40

Um I I'm not sure what you mean. There I wasn't aware of, nor did I see any evidence of FBI agents uh within the crowd or planted there, if that's what you're getting. Oh okay. So this is the prosecutor. I'll put people in jail. My friends.

SPEAKER_36 59:53

My friends. Okay.

SPEAKER_31 59:54

All right. How about FBI paid informants? I understand there were people who had been signed up. As uh informants by the FBI went there, not at the direction of their FBI handlers, but individually. There were a small handful of such indictments. And did you interview those individuals? No. And did your off did anybody in your office interview those individuals? They may have. I'm I'm not certain as I said. I'm not certain. And so and you didn't call any of those individuals as witnesses in any of the cases? I did not. I again couldn't say that it didn't happen in any case, but I did not.

SPEAKER_36 1:00:23

So basically, those witnesses who could have been provocateurs or anything could have potentially provided exculpatory information. Do you think they cared about that?

SPEAKER_33 1:00:32

No.

SPEAKER_36 1:00:33

Nope. So what were they doing? Oh I don't know. Well, here's Barry Lauderck sitting down with Laura Logan, giving it away.

SPEAKER_07 1:00:40

Congressman Barry Loudermilk from Georgia's 11th Congressional District has been on the hill for almost a decade. He's the chair of the House Administration Subcommittee investigating the investigators, trying to get to the bottom of the security failures around January 6th.

SPEAKER_27 1:00:57

When there was one video clip that had made it out in public that some people had claimed this was definitely a police officer. We verified that to be true.

SPEAKER_07 1:01:08

This is the clip recorded on the body cam of the undercover officer in question. I've never seen anything like this. He can be heard chanting.

SPEAKER_06 1:01:18

USA!

SPEAKER_37 1:01:20

USA and at times urging the crowd to advance.

SPEAKER_07 1:01:33

It's tear gas. It's tear gas. The committee has not made his name public yet, but he was identified to defense attorneys as Officer Nicholas Tomasulla.

SPEAKER_27 1:01:43

We've already been able to say confirm, yes.

Abolish ICE Push Versus Crackdown Politics

SPEAKER_36 1:01:45

So we know Capitol Hill Police was undercover, encouraging people to go, go, go, which might seem like a small thing to you sitting at home. But I sat in a trial where every word I said, chanting was used as supporting the crowd, adding to the rage, inducing more violence by chanting USA by saying 1776, by saying whose house, our house. These were used against me. You participated in a riot. You lent your voice to it.

SPEAKER_33 1:02:12

Well, they called you a leader of the mob because you were saying words.

SPEAKER_36 1:02:15

As I was saying words. So this is not insignificant in legal proceedings.

SPEAKER_27 1:02:22

This was a Metropolitan Police Officer.

SPEAKER_07 1:02:25

Undercover.

SPEAKER_27 1:02:26

Undercover.

SPEAKER_07 1:02:27

Who was doing what?

SPEAKER_27 1:02:28

He was at one point, he was helping people climb up the scaffolding. Because remember, out on the West Terrace, the scaffolding was being built for the inauguration. Scaffolding and telling them go, go, go, keep going, keep going.

SPEAKER_07 1:02:43

The New York Times and other reporters, right after January 6th, people used that scaffolding to get to the upper West Terrace. And they defined that as a critical access point that day. So if you have an undercover police officer assisting people in climbing up there, that doesn't sound insignificant.

SPEAKER_27 1:03:02

No, it isn't. Now, the next question is what was he doing? Right? Why was he telling those people to go?

SPEAKER_36 1:03:09

And why was he who gave him the assignment to be there undercover at all? Exactly. Prosecutors like, I don't know about this. I, you know, what are you talking about? Now, we know about some other people. For example, there's the famous name Ray Epps. Even though we're going to discuss a little bit about Ray Eps, because again, we're talking about an operation here, right?

SPEAKER_20 1:03:28

So take a look at this. I know it's been a long time, but remember Ray Epps. Let me introduce you again to Ray Epps. Play the video.

SPEAKER_06 1:03:47

He's got the bar.

SPEAKER_11 1:03:49

All right. No, Dave, but one more thing. Yeah, sir. Can we go out there? No. When we go in. Are we gonna get arrested? You don't need to get shot.

SPEAKER_36 1:03:59

So let's go right here. This man right here's name is James Grant. This man right here is Ryan Sandlin. I was in prison with James Grant and Ryan Sandlin. Ryan Sandlin was in the hole the whole time because he's a bully. He's like a professional criminal. I don't mean to be mean about that or anything.

SPEAKER_33 1:04:13

Just an accurate description.

SPEAKER_36 1:04:15

He's just, you know, he, I don't know, his family's like Italian or something, and he's just got kind of a thuggy attitude.

SPEAKER_33 1:04:20

So he's full of piss and vinegar.

Net Migration Turns Negative And Policy Stakes

SPEAKER_36 1:04:21

He's just full of piss and vinegar. He'll beat you up in two seconds, by the way. This is this guy is a you know, fist first, talk second kind of guy. In fact, he got in a road rage incident on the way to January 6th. So I don't know him. I've never talked to him. If everything I'm saying is inaccurate, I apologize up front. But a lot of people spread a lot of shit about you in prison, okay? So they didn't want you in the pod. So that's Ryan Sandler. By all accounts, a completely innocent person. And this is James Grant next to him. I spent my entire time in DC with James Grant. And James Grant actually beat a bunch of his charges. Like on his indictment of 14 charges, like seven of them, he was acquitted on a bench trial. Um and so, anyways, but he was right here at this breach. And these guys are innocent, they're just there. And who's the guy in between them? Ramps! Ah, see the whisper in the ear? I whispered in the ear of the guy next to me. Oh my gosh! It's what, three minutes after the pipe?

SPEAKER_20 1:05:27

The night of January 5th, he is filmed yelling at the crowd that they are going to go into the Capitol, and again on the day in question, he has filmed at the front of the crowd at the barricades just before the initial breach. He whispers something into the ear of the guy next to him, and that guy initiates the breach. Then later at 2 43 p.m., a red flare goes up, 2.45 p.m., red smoke pops, and at 2.46, Ray Epps is in video being extracted from the crowd of eight men, uh eight-man team, even though he was allegedly alone that day. Play that clip.

SPEAKER_34 1:06:02

Every three-letter guy I know that was at January 6th, we all saw the same things happening. We all knew that this was an operation.

SPEAKER_16 1:06:16

Watch the footage on top of the Capitol, and if you fast forward it and watch it, you really do see movement of individuals. You just see them moving through the crowd. The red smoke pops, and when Epp starts to leave, he's got four people in front of him and four people behind him, and they literally get him the hell out of there. They go behind the media and then just disappear. They said he was there by himself or with his nephew, also. They got separated. You know, if he was there by himself, then why aren't four guys leading him out and four guys following? It's plain to see, it's obvious. It's obvious.

SPEAKER_36 1:06:51

All of this was withheld. All of this was withheld within our with our tribes. So you can look at any individual and you go, well, he punched a cop or he took a baton or he did this. Yeah, but we didn't have a fair shot. I mean, like from the most basis, all the barking that the Democrats do about due process, we were denied that. We were denied basic things like exculpatory evidence. You know, my friend James Grant and right and my non-friend Ryan Sandlin. When I got to so James Grant had been in prison the whole time. So when I got to DC and I found out who he was, I was like, oh my gosh, you know Ray Epps. You know what he said to me? These guys have been in prison for four years. Now keep in mind, you're completely limited to what media you get. It's all just what's on public. Right. He's close to the city. Did you ever talk about Ray Epps on public TV? No. And we didn't even have Fox News in there, okay? We had a local Fox channel, so we didn't even get to see the Tucker Carlson episode on Ray Epps. So Ray, so James Grant, who's standing next to Ray Epps, in theory, you'd think he'd be a co-defendant, but nope. Everyone else is a co-defendant but Ray Epps. Okay, the guy who instigated it. So I go, James, tell me about Ray Epps. What did he say? What what how did that go? He goes, Who's Ray Epps? What? This is a real conversation I had with him. And I was like, um the guy in the red hat that you know got you guys to push the gate. He's like, oh yeah, we're trying to subpoena that guy. Trying to trying to get get him, like, you know, but they we they were denied by the court to bring him in. And then it wasn't but three, four weeks later that uh, because Tucker Carlson did his big expose where he got fired while my trial was going on. Okay, so that's why Ray Epps was such, you know, Tucker Carlson just told us who Ray Epps is finally. And we we already knew, but Tucker Carlson featured it. I brought it up in my trial. Judge was like, damn, I'm don't care, there's nothing exculpatory. You're guilty, right? So he didn't know who Ray Epps was. They never got to subpoena him, and it was a couple weeks later he got charged with a single misdemeanor, quickly took a plea deal, got sentenced by Judge Bosberg, familiar name, to one year unsupervised probation, which is basically just go home.

SPEAKER_33 1:08:49

And then didn't he just retire?

SPEAKER_36 1:08:51

Bosberg?

SPEAKER_33 1:08:52

No. Epps.

SPEAKER_36 1:08:54

He's in hiding now.

SPEAKER_33 1:08:55

Yeah, I think he just retired immediately.

SPEAKER_36 1:08:58

Big payoff. Now, all of this, the entire January 6th event centers around the 2020 election. And it centers around the fact that the courts would not hear the cases. They dismissed the vast majority of the cases on standing or latches. A, you don't have standing to challenge the election, or B, it's too late to challenge the election. It's already decided.

SPEAKER_31 1:09:23

Sorry, but okay.

Washington State Oversight Gaps At DCYF

SPEAKER_36 1:09:24

So those were the two reasons why all 63 cases were dismissed. One of those cases out of Illinois just kept appealing and appealing and appealing. And he made it all the way to the Supreme Court yesterday. Everything that happened in J6 was set up because judges would not hear the cases and the evidence. So slowly, as those cases went through appeals, we've gotten little trickles of information, little video clips of testimony, depositions, and it's painted a pretty complete picture. So the Supreme Court he heard one case yesterday, which was the uh the William Trevor vs Montana case. So William Trevor was a um was running for election in Montana, and he had this case go to the Supreme Court. And what this case says is it says this. I'm not gonna read the whole thing. The Supreme Court just ruled nine, oh wrong case. Well, I'll just mention this. The Supreme Court just ruled a nine-zero that a warrantless welfare check, aka if somebody calls in a bomb threat at your house or says, you know, some red flag flag thing, or you know, docs, what do they call it? Um swatting, where police shot Trevor Case in his own home was justified. Apparently, police do not need probable cause to break into gun owners' homes without warrants and shoot them. He was killed in his house thinking he was defending his house from robbers because they'd broken into his house and killed him. And apparently they can do that. So don't shoot cops in your house. Okay, so now the actual case I was talking about first. Okay, well, the case apparently I thought that was the case. But they decided 7-2 yesterday that politicians, if you ran in an election, you have default standing to challenge that election, the rules, ballots that are brought in afterwards. So they basically said all those judges who dismiss those cases, they have standing, which by the way opens up those cases to be reheard and have the evidence actually brought forward. So, like in Arizona where you've got 20,000 affidavits of people swearing under penalty of perjury that they witnessed crimes in the election process, all of a sudden now we can dig into those. So this sent the Hill, you know, you had a lot of things going on yesterday. This sent the Hill kind of in a panic. This is Hakeem Jeffries responding to the court's decision. Tell me if this doesn't make you feel a little happy.

SPEAKER_33 1:11:45

Why would they be worried about this?

SPEAKER_36 1:11:47

Why would they be worried about the remote?

SPEAKER_44 1:12:17

Because Republicans know that if a free and fair election takes place, they're losing. In fact, Republicans are going to get routed all across the country, as we've repeatedly seen, including most recently, in the off-year election in November, and in the mayoral election in Miami, where a Democrat was elected in early December, for the first time in almost thirty years. The whole reason why Republicans launched this failed gerrymandering scheme is because they know what we know. The American people are rejecting their extremism and embracing the democratic vision for making life more affordable for everyday Americans. And so it's clear to me that though their gerrymandering scheme is crashing and burning, despite all the skeptics out there who thought that Democrats in the House were cooked somehow. As if we were gonna step back. No, we didn't step back, we fought back. And they started this gerrymandering war, we're gonna end it. And we're not going to allow Republicans to artificially maintain their majority in the House of Representatives. We're gonna show up and stand up and speak up continuously for free and fair elections, and that's what the American people are gonna get on November 3rd, 2026.

SPEAKER_33 1:13:51

Is this projection working?

SPEAKER_36 1:13:53

Yeah, no kidding, right? Oh man. Again. So this is this is uh this is Hermie Gilling explaining that decision. That was their I should have played this video first. That was their reaction to the decision.

SPEAKER_09 1:14:05

Today there was a major victory at the United States Supreme Court in a case involving a Illinois congressman who wanted to challenge Illinois' practices of allowing mail-in ballots to be countered for two weeks after election day. And the lower courts had said that he didn't have standing to challenge that. Imagine that a candidate for federal office doesn't have standing to challenge a federal election. And today the Supreme Court ruled that yes, he did. I was proud to be a co-author of the United States Amicus Brief in that case. This is very important. It's really going to open up a lot of opportunities because in the 2020 election, which a lot of people are still concerned about, court after court said that these candidates couldn't challenge the elections. And I think you were left with some lefty advocates and Mark Elias's of the world were allowed to, but candidates weren't. So that's insane.

SPEAKER_36 1:14:56

Yeah. If you have if you're not party to the election, you can challenge it. But if you're party to the election, sit down and shut up and take your back. Now, this has drastic effects. So Tina Peters out in Colorado, she had her case here heard by an appeals court yesterday, right? So this was it your position. I I gotta play this to you. Uh uh I listened to this clip 10 times yesterday. If you're involved with us at 1776live.us at all, there are so many vocabulary words that are in this clip. Okay, it's a lot of vocabulary words. So for those of you that are in the chats that are part of that, you're gonna you're gonna hear a lot of words. And this is a very big robot.

SPEAKER_33 1:15:40

Should we ask people in the chat to post words that they don't understand and want additional help?

SPEAKER_36 1:15:45

Post words you either don't understand or I don't know, post all the vocab words, those of you that are listening that know what I'm talking about.

SPEAKER_33 1:15:50

Like bingo.

SPEAKER_36 1:15:51

Okay, yeah. So this clip here is the all the male voices for the audio listeners, all the male voices are the panel of judges.

SPEAKER_37 1:15:58

Okay.

SPEAKER_36 1:15:58

The female voice is the uh state's representative.

SPEAKER_37 1:16:01

Okay.

Maryland Overpayments And Systemic Waste

SPEAKER_36 1:16:02

And what they're looking at here is they're this is appeals court. So not only the assumption in an appeals court is the trial court has done its thing. So the evidence has been presented. So they're not examining evidence, they're not doing what a jury does. They're looking at the technicalities. Did the technical due process happen? Did all the I's get dotted, T's get crossed? And if there was anything that wasn't sufficient, did it prejudice Tina Peters' rights? Did it keep her from mounting a certain defense? Did it, you know, prejudic make the jury misunderstand instructions? And there's a main discussion here that has to do with the jury instructions. And there's two things that went on. One, she was charged a felony charge, but the words of the charge were the misdemeanor statute. So then when the jury got instructions, they don't get read the charge, they get read the statute, and she was found guilty by a jury of a misdemeanor charge, not of the felony charge. But the state of Colorado's opinion is they're aware of the error. Rather than do anything about it, they just go, We'll just we'll just enter a guilty plea because we think the jury would have committed it on the we'll apply it the way we think it should have been applied. For that same statute, to flip it from misdemeanor to law to felony has to do with um one particular word, which is might versus will. Okay, you might benefit from what she did versus you will benefit. So the anyways, the the word play becomes important because it's the difference between a misdemeanor and a felony. This all goes back to that 2020 election. That's what this case is about. 2020 election, hearing the evidence.

SPEAKER_39 1:17:43

Is it your position that a person can still be convicted of a crime with which they were never charged and with which the jury was never instructed as long as the evidence is sufficient?

SPEAKER_36 1:17:54

This is a judge asking a appeals prosecutor or you know, the state can you put someone in prison without ever convicting them? That's where we're at.

SPEAKER_45 1:18:09

That's where we're at. I'm yes, I think that that is what the case law indicates. That if the it's just in the in in this case, I'll just point out too that you know, I don't have the language of the hypothet, you know, the the statutes that you're citing your hypothetical, but it it's it was one word, might.

SPEAKER_21 1:18:26

And it was already Yeah, but but that one word distinguishes it from a felony to a misdemeanor.

SPEAKER_39 1:18:31

And they made an extra sentence, 15 more months in the in the Department of Corrections that couldn't have been given had it been a misdemeanor conviction. It clearly affects a substantial right.

SPEAKER_21 1:18:45

And I I'll just say I'm confused as to why the people are continuing to maintain that the proper remedy on this isn't to enter the conviction for the misdemeanor, because the indictment used the word might, and the jury was instructed on that, so that's what the verdict is. It I I am I am baffled at as to the position that's being taken that we can somehow overlook that and still enter the felony because the evidence that was presented at trial would have supported the felony.

SPEAKER_36 1:19:12

Are you in the prosecution's opinion? The prosecution's opinion supported a felony, so straight to jail. What do I say? There are no laws, there are only cops, there's only power, there's only force. Tina Peters was going to jail because the governor wants to put her in jail because he wants to cover up a stolen election.

SPEAKER_33 1:19:26

Period.

SPEAKER_36 1:19:28

Everything else is just performative.

SPEAKER_33 1:19:30

And he just admitted that she wasn't really tried properly.

SPEAKER_36 1:19:33

Hey, hey, we audit all these daycare centers, but we don't have any information to audit them.

SPEAKER_33 1:19:37

Yeah.

SPEAKER_36 1:19:38

Oh, we try all the cases, we just don't try them with information that's relevant. You know, straight to jail.

SPEAKER_21 1:19:43

Are are are you still maintaining that position in front of us here today?

SPEAKER_45 1:19:47

Yes, that is our that is our position. I'm sorry.

SPEAKER_21 1:19:52

What what case law supports that argument?

SPEAKER_45 1:19:53

Um I've cited it in my brief.

Hawley, War Powers, And Trump Alignment

SPEAKER_21 1:19:54

I don't have it uh right in front of me, but it's it's usually it's the omitted, it's the omitted elements. uh case law, right? But that's just where the the element the element was omitted and the uh but the element that was omitted wasn't in dispute here the jury was affirmatively misinstructed it was instructed on the misdemeanor and it found her guilty of that misdemeanor beyond a reasonable doubt this isn't the omission of an element this is a misinstructed jury how how can we correct that right by saying no we'll just assume that that that because she could have also been convicted of the felony we enter that even though we don't have a jury verdict that is uh that that's uh I understand it's a difficult position for the people to be in um but not a position you have to take but I and there it I do uh it's not a position you have to take you're making an affirmative choice Governor Polis and your entire apparatus you're making a choice you don't have to take this position you can't even support it I do believe that the omitted element language applies because it to me I understand you know I can hear from the way you're you're talking about it that that seem it seems more egregious to to to add this extra word than it is to omit an element but to me omitting an element is a pretty big deal and the fact that that can be except in those cases at least the person was originally charged with the elemental language here never on the table.

SPEAKER_45 1:21:28

That is true but if I can just add and again I I it seems that I will not be able to convince you but I just want to touch an argument out there which is that there was no there wasn't a confusion from the parties about what they were talking about because they the correct statutory citation that so they were on notice of that of the statutory citation the language was incorrect but the statutory citation was correct.

SPEAKER_39 1:21:52

Couldn't that also mean that the prosecution was on notice that they'd only charged since the language was correct they'd only charged that language and not I mean both of them were on notice of something wrong.

SPEAKER_45 1:22:02

Oh yes I guess what I'm saying Your Honor is just that there wasn't a notice problem because there was the statutory citation and the parties treated it as though I think it it was an oversight.

SPEAKER_36 1:22:15

I think everybody believed that if they had charged and used the language for the that's what the record bears out in my estimation yeah that's the Tina Peter case charge her with a felony put her in jail or charge her with a misdemeanor put her in jail for a felony okay uh straight to jail straight to jail now things are changing right that was a court hearing a case the evidence is being opened the Supreme Court just said hey politicians have standings when they just lose their elections if they've got cause to break right so that changes things. So 2026 is going to look different I think there's going to be some cases reopened for 2020 right so they can go look at the fraud might be latches as far as remedy but it's not latcheus as far as no fraud fraud statutes are seven years so we're still within the seven year statute of limitations. So this leads Steve Bannon to feel pretty good about our odds in November.

SPEAKER_17 1:23:09

Uh the Trump plan is working. This is why they're getting crazier and crazier why am I enthusiastic about the midterm elections and everybody else is kind of doom and gloom is that um number one we are going to have a a re energizing on the on the um redistrictings in Florida. I think Florida's gonna give us another three seats I think there's a couple others out there we can pick up and I see that there's a um a um policy set that could play very well for us particularly the fact that the left is getting crazier and crazier now that they can't point to affordability they can't point to anything on the economy because remember I told people don't don't fall into the affordability trap President Trump says it's a made up term but don't fall into the affordability trap. Clearly inflation's an issue but that issue is brought on by Biden President Trump stopping the rate of growth getting inflation under control. But it's it's gonna be gr economic growth it's gonna be jobs it's gonna be wages and you've got a plan to deal with that.

SPEAKER_36 1:24:11

And you can start to see the green sprouts of that right now and as the Democrats lose that as a as a talking point right as a political talking point they're gonna get crazier and crazier you see what is in Minnesota they're defending the stealing of your money and that's where they're gonna be so 2026 we've got economic improvement so your normies moderate just go along to get along I watch Monday night football people they're gonna have wage wage raises they're gonna see their prices stay flat so that they can afford more things that's good. You're gonna see accountability right you're probably gonna see some arrests the grand conspiracy case will probably this spring sometime start seeing indictments and things like that. Who knows what it'll go but action's action right and then on top of that you've got the actual systemic changing of the election apparatus. Hopefully we can get rid of the machines get rid of mail-in ballots but at least we've got court observers we've got courts now directed to take these cases uh you've they did a lot between 2020 and 2024 to change some of the local state laws you know to fix things up except for Michigan it got worse. So we got to hold our heads high.

SPEAKER_33 1:25:17

I kind of wonder if we should go back to trying to do something like they do in India where you dip your finger in ink after you vote.

SPEAKER_36 1:25:23

Yeah they did that in Afghanistan too. As uh Patrick Burns says the State Department's really good at running elections in other countries. Okay. So we're gonna leave with this we're not gonna do any private chat today just because we've already kind of reached the time we want to reach but just and also those of you that only listen to the public side you haven't heard the outro in a while you've got to hear some outro so you guys are really going to want that.

J6 Committees, Intel Failures, And Informants

SPEAKER_33 1:25:45

Should we do an ad read before we go well let's see if there's anything we can read we got everybody here today why can't we we can do controllers coffee rumble premium rumble wallet let's let's try to add that rumble wallet that looks all right let's do it pow pow pow powder life water hydration models okay they can cancel your accounts freeze your cards decide you're not allowed what you're allowed to buy say or support big banks and financial institutions have total control and they use it that's why financial independence matters more now than ever introducing rumble wallet a non-custodial wallet built for real freedom with rumble wallet you control your money not a bank not a government not a tech company buy digital assets like tether tethergold and bitcoin in one place no permission no middlemen no cancel button and when you want to support the creators you actually believe in you can use the Rumble Wallet app to directly tip content creators like us fast and without interference this isn't a credit line you can shut off it's your wallet permanently yours to protect your future yours to protect your family when the system fails when institutions turn on their own people financial sovereignty is the difference between security and vulnerability rumble wallet isn't about politics it's about freedom ownership and protecting what's yours so tech control today downrun rumble wallet now and step away from big banks for good true ownership true protection true financial freedom woohoo rumble's doing everything yeah Bon Gino's coming back to Rumble so who knows maybe you know the audience will like he tupple which by the way we have quite a few listeners that listen on the other platforms a couple on well at this moment there's only one on YouTube Facebook we got actually quite a few on X.

SPEAKER_36 1:27:36

I'd like to invite all of you that are listening on platforms that are not Rumble to please come over and join us on Rumble especially if you're a regular listener. We love the chats over in Rumble that's where the community's at that's where we're trying to build and that's where we get the most credit for you watching. So if you do enjoy the show every morning I see plenty of you guys on X, please consider coming over and joining us on Rumble. Okay I'm gonna play one little funny video. Now just as this is just a little ad from you know way back when so let's listen to it and then we'll laugh about it. Tell a little story.

SPEAKER_23 1:28:08

Smart woman she's putting a new floor down by herself wise woman she's using Kentile vinyl as best as tile easiest flooring to install easiest flooring to care for save everywhere with Kentile vinyl as best as tile I just thought that was so funny.

SPEAKER_36 1:28:24

The first house I ever demolished had asbestos four tiles looked exactly like that. Let me tell you Taylor I ripped out tiles just like that from my house four years ago it was I'd probably cut off years of my life so much asbestos I remember you know we bought this machine that's supposed to like dig them up dude those things are glued on there you got like 60 years of an easy yeah I I had a machine too it did not work the scrapers did not work I ended up having to use a uh heat gun you know what's funny about it asbestos was a luxury product. Yeah right so if you had a nice house you put asbestos in oh yeah so it's always funny because you think like the dumps and the dives are gonna have it nope it won't remember when that came out it was high tech it was high tech high tech high tech to destroy your lives anyways I just think that is freaking hilarious. Uh I I had a lot of show left but this show just took some time today there was a clip I was gonna play from Bob Ferguson Washington state governor talking about how the CDC, NIH, they've and FDA have been firing people going anti-science. So but that's okay because Bob Ferguson is going to hire all those defunct people and he's gonna bring it to Washington. This is actually a big deal. This would cause me to leave Washington. They'll chase you around over here and stab you in the arm with a needle and ask questions after the fact. And Bob Ferguson is setting up that medical tyranny in Washington state. They've already put into legislation all the rules they need at the state to be able to chase you around and stab you with a needle. And now Bob Ferguson is like oh yeah by the way we're getting all those tyrants that are being thrown out of CDC and we're bringing them here. So that's a lot of fun.

SPEAKER_33 1:29:58

Well he's also got the health departments all right you know that's what I'm saying.

SPEAKER_36 1:30:03

Oh yeah. And then there was another thing at a city council in Olympia yesterday they proposed adding protections. They want to make sure that we have equal protection for diverse family structures. Guess what they're talking about we just brought this up yesterday. Polyamory now in in Olympia polyamorous couples have full protection you're a family doesn't matter if you got nine people in your polycule it's one family you know that was one thing that Tim Waltz promoted he said no matter how you love and I was like what are you talking about?

SPEAKER_33 1:30:33

You should feel you should love everybody. Everybody should love everyone you're not talking about love.

SPEAKER_36 1:30:38

We lost the gay love argument so now we're on to the big love argument.

SPEAKER_40 1:30:42

I just love everybody so I think that's free I don't know I find it kind of funny yeah uh okay guys that's it for today we will talk to you again tomorrow man sorry what night lived in that cast over there I'm 37 what I'm 37 I'm not old well I can't just call you ma'am you could say Dennis I didn't know you were called Dennis did you I did say sorry about the old woman but from behind you look what you automatically treatment but I have key old keys how do you get that inferior talking about this in our society when I don't think you're the guy the lady of the lady tell the lost escalabus on the bottom of the water signified by divine prominence that I are what to carry escalables. That is why I'm talking listened women importance distributed sword is no basis for a system of government supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses not from some classical like a wedding ceremony you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some water is cast for a sword is all way around saying I was an emperor just because some poison beast has not a similar mate shut up now we see the violence in the system shut up in the system help help us be a repressed do you see a repression? You saw it did you