Floor Time Or Fair Elections

What if the most valuable thing in the Senate isn’t the vote, but the minutes on the clock? We dig into the claim that “floor time” trumps the SAVE Act and ask a blunt question: should anything outrank securing the system that selects our leaders? From the politics of a talking filibuster to the math on voter ID polling across parties, we weigh what’s tactical noise and what’s foundational signal.

Our conversation moves from Senate strategy to courtroom skirmishes: the Jeff Clark disbarment fight, Georgia grand jury transcripts, and how inquiry itself became suspect during 2020’s aftermath. If legal institutions punish questions while new investigations revive probable cause, what does that do to public trust? We connect those dots to a simple proposal: national guardrails with local execution—paper ballots, in-precinct hand counts, tight absentee rules, swift transparency—standards designed to shrink the scale of possible fraud without permanently centralizing power.

We also confront the cultural layer that shapes what people accept as “truth.” Call it belief, call it narrative, call it identity—cults of all kinds bend perception. The way out isn’t another slogan; it’s a shared premise: rights predate the state, and elections must be simple, verifiable, and local enough for neighbors to trust their own eyes. Along the way, we touch Washington State’s income tax push and a Vegas biolab raid tied to dangerous pathogens—two reminders that governance without credibility breeds risk.

If you care about highways, housing, or farm bills, you should care about ballots first. Listen, challenge us, and decide where you stand on the trade between time and trust. If this resonates, follow, share with a friend who’s on the fence, and leave a rating so more people can find thoughtful conversation about how we fix what matters most.

Chapters

• 0:00 Cold Open, Tech Setup, Simultaneous Sip
• 3:00 Senate “Floor Time” Versus The SAVE Act
• 10:20 Filibuster Stakes And Election Security
• 17:45 Tuberville Claims And Voter ID Debate
• 24:30 Legal Fights: Jeff Clark, DC Bar, Georgia
• 33:10 Grand Jury Transcripts And Fulton County Questions
• 42:00 Costs, Consequences, And Voter Confidence
• 49:30 Remedies: National Rules Or Emergency Powers
• 58:40 Federalizing Elections And Federalism Tensions
• 1:06:20 Culture, Cults, And Political Narratives

Transcript

SPEAKER_16: 0:18

All right, all right, all right.

SPEAKER_14: 0:20

We'll let everybody get in here. We're having a party. A party. Oh man. What a what a great time to be alive. What an amazing time. All right, peasants perspective, we're back. That's you, Ron. That's not even special. Oh, we had we we had like 10 or 13 people that rolled in here in the first few minutes of the show. Why don't we say we have like an incredible opener when we're not ready or prepared? It just doesn't seem fair. No, it's the universe is not fair. We'll let people get on in here. Welcome, welcome. Sorry for the confusion this morning. We thought we'd be all cute and do something. Wow, man. We thought it was gonna be awesome. Ron, it actually isn't gonna be that hard to do that. That is how I want to do it, but we have to have our own cameras and our own audio. That way we control our own little deal. And then uh your ATEM, we can use that too because on your camera setup, when you're feeding we can have multiple cameras. So we're not as so it's like you know, the only camera I would control is my direct in front of me camera.

SPEAKER_15: 1:29

Right. We can have as many USB cameras as you want, and then just do a select few on the ATEM. Yep, exactly.

SPEAKER_14: 1:35

So, yes, pony boy, we're back. Glad you guys made it. We were rolling with a lot more than who's in here now, a couple just literally a minute ago.

SPEAKER_15: 1:43

Ah, well, we sifted out the chaff. We sifted out the chaff.

SPEAKER_14: 1:47

Who really wants a more channel? All right, well, we've gone long enough now. It is time for us to do the simultaneous sip. I know why you're all here. You're here for the simultaneous sip. All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tinker to chalice with stein, a canteen, jug, or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better, the simultaneous sip.

SPEAKER_19: 2:13

My coffee smells good. Kind of funny how coffee never tastes as good as it smells. As you grow older, you'll discover that life is very much like coffee.

SPEAKER_09: 2:21

The aroma is always better than the actuality. May that be your thought for the day.

SPEAKER_14: 2:27

Which is why this morning I'm chasing my coffee down with a Diet Coke chaser. Coffee gets a little cold, it's not nearly as good. All right, looks like we've got a couple more people who've climbed on in here. Shantini, good morning, Pony Boy, we're back. Douglas Wyatt, good morning, peasants. Ferazor, good morning, Marty Easel. Good morning, yes. Yeah, we thought we'd get a little cute there with our uh first broadcast, and ultimately it's best just to abandon it midstream. Literally, midstream, we had to abandon it. Okay, so yesterday a budget bill got passed through the House, made its way to the Senate, and they carved out of this budget bill the Save Act, which is supposed to provide us with, you know, ID and things like that for elections. They card they pulled it out under the promise that leader Thune, our fearless leader thune over in the Senate, would have a floor vote. And this would allow Republicans to force the Democrats to do a speaking filibuster, which means Mr. Smith goes to Washington style, they actually have to stand up and talk and filibuster. They can't just sit back and procedurally be like, well, we won't let it out of committee or allow plotcher. We would, we will, we will invoke filibuster. That's the whole thing right now. It's not that they use the filibuster, they threaten the filibuster. So the deal was is the Republicans were going to force the Democrats to actually use the filibuster. Now, the secret thing about the filibuster is guess what? All you got to do is wait them out. I mean, that really is the gist of it. The guy's gonna get out there and talk for 24, 40, 72 hours. Eventually, he's lone man standing, right? Now, you can coordinate with other party members and you can take shifts, and there've been some historical examples of this going on for a few days, right? But eventually the grandstanding happens, you've made a bunch of fundraisers for your next upcoming campaign because you're a tough guy. But eventually the will of the majority almost always prevails. Okay. So the idea that you're going to go to the filibusters kind of like sucks. It's just gonna suck up a bunch of floor time. However, there are certain bills that would seem to be a little more important than others. Would you not agree with that?

SPEAKER_15: 4:35

Yeah, yeah.

SPEAKER_14: 4:36

I would agree with it. So when we're talking about the elections themselves, right? Do we have free and fair elections or not? It's about as important as it gets. So our fearless leader, John Thune, he's decided to take a stand and he's telling you what the coin of the realm is. You and I thought it was money. You and I thought it was maybe our sacred vote. That's not the coin of the realm. Okay, let's listen here.

SPEAKER_05: 5:06

In fact, the previous majority has not been able to do that.

SPEAKER_06: 5:08

Right. Well, you know, I guess, and I I would just remind people that the coin of the realm in the Senate is floor time. There's a finite amount of it. And we have a lot of things we have to do.

SPEAKER_14: 5:18

Um, the coin of the realm in the Senate is floor time. Uh so we don't want to let something go to the floor that ultimately we would pass that they would filibuster because they would take up precious floor time, Ron. Heaven forbid we secure our elections because we needed to get to other senator priorities. Like, well, what are the other things that would be more important than the Save Act that could take up precious Senate floor time?

SPEAKER_06: 5:43

There's a housing bill that's awaiting action, uh, hopefully a market structure bill, possibly permitting reform, uh, farm bill, highway bill. Uh you can go right down the list.

SPEAKER_14: 5:53

Russia's elections? No, fuck you. We don't need elections. We need a highway bill. Excuse Dad, sorry for the F you. Seriously, think about this, right? Oh, the coin of the realm is uh Senate floor time. Then give all of the coins of the realm to secure our elections. Ah, huh?

SPEAKER_17: 6:11

Yeah.

SPEAKER_14: 6:12

You know what I mean? Like death blow to the Democrat, socialist, communist weirdos who are trying to destroy our country. I don't know, Thune. Seems like you could give a couple minutes of floor time to it.

SPEAKER_06: 6:23

Sanctions are a whole bunch of things that could be teed up for action on the floor of the Senate. And uh so you have to make some judgments, and the conference will have a conversation about that. I've committed to that, that we will talk about that idea um and uh and determine whether or not they're what the uh conference's views are about it and whether how they want to proceed. Uh as I said, we will vote on the SAVE Act, but um exercising or triggering a uh talking filibuster uh has ramifications implications that I think everybody needs to be aware of.

SPEAKER_14: 6:54

So the ramifications is that you would actually have to vote for the SAVE Act because no Republican could go back to their home district after you've watched Corey Booker get up there and Spartacus's way for the talking filibuster. Is that who's gonna do it? Second, third order consequences. I mean, we might not get to the highway bill. I mean, do you like the potholes on your street? Vote for more communists. We'll fill in the potholes.

SPEAKER_15: 7:21

We is Corey Booker the one that would get up?

SPEAKER_14: 7:24

Yeah, Cory Booker. Oh, there'd be all the Democrats. They'd get up and they'd be like, You're not letting illegals vote. My founding fathers never envisioned a country where not every single person would vote. You know what I mean? We have to correct for their sins of only letting white property owners vote for a hundred years. I don't know.

SPEAKER_06: 7:41

So let's go on here. So we uh we will have those uh discussions, but that's uh obviously ties the floor up for an indefinite amount of time uh with not only unlimited debate, but also unlimited amendments.

SPEAKER_14: 7:54

All right, rather we had the standard majority. Okay, so so basically he promised the House that they would do this Standing Save Act if they passed the budget bill. So the House bit off on it, and then Leader Thun comes around and he's like, Oh, hey, uh the time is precious, and we've got to fill in some potholes, and um, we've got a farm bill, you know, the soybean exports and uh uh elections. Oh yeah, well, I mean, I mean, we could probably give it 20 minutes. Tommy Tuberville gives it away.

SPEAKER_00: 8:25

And then, of course, President Trump wants same-day voting, uh, mail ballots, get rid of these voting machines. There's a half a dozen people, whether it's the House or Senate, Larry, that are up here as we speak, that did not get elected. It was all bogus because we've seen the evidence, and if we don't straighten that out, you're gonna see a lot more of it this fall. And it's just gonna get worse and worse with the American people saying, Listen, we got all y'all up there, and you don't do anything to straighten it out. We want closed borders and we want we want fair elections. Those two things they are demanding. And as Republicans, we had better to listen to them and do that, or we're gonna lose uh next fall.

SPEAKER_25: 9:00

A lot of states, you know, don't even have an ID picture. And by the way, uh I vote in the state of Connecticut. You don't need an ID, you don't need a picture. You could show them a credit card, Senator. Anybody can get a credit card, any kind of credit card. You could show them a debit card, and that's sufficient. Many states uh driver's licenses. Well, anybody can get a driver's license. Some states are allowing illegals to get driver's license uh for commercial purposes. So the SAVE Act would eliminate that stuff. It's very important, but you got to make the case. I don't hear that.

SPEAKER_14: 9:32

The big thing in here is Tommy Tooperville is telling, telling us there's a half dozen senators and representatives who are up here on Capitol Hill who did not win their seats.

SPEAKER_15: 9:42

And when he said that, Larry Kedlow, did you see his like non-plust response? Like, hmm. Okay. Says you.

SPEAKER_14: 9:51

A post-constitutional world? Interesting.

SPEAKER_15: 9:56

Like it was the first time he'd ever even thought of the idea. Like, huh.

SPEAKER_14: 10:01

Some of those guys aren't really elected? Yeah, that's what we're saying. Like, literally. They're freaking Cuban plants, man. I mean, holy cow.

SPEAKER_15: 10:08

I love Carlite's uh chat. Sometimes an FU is highly warranted. It's for real.

SPEAKER_14: 10:15

I can't I'm I'm shocked. I'm shocked at some of these senators. This is one of the most prestigious elite clubs on the planet. And I understand that a lot of these senators have stakeholders, big corporations. You know, if you're from Arkansas, you better have Walmart's endorsement.

SPEAKER_15: 10:35

I know, but it's it's funny how they carry water in weird buckets and then they take positions that they just like stand on these hills and they want to die on them, and you're just like, why?

SPEAKER_14: 10:45

Not one of those bills that he said has any long-term impact on a highway bill, there's always tomorrow for us.

SPEAKER_15: 10:54

And 10 years from now, there'll be another highway bill. They'll need it, you'll have to have another one.

SPEAKER_14: 10:58

You just did a highway bill under Joe Biden. Where's all that money? Right. Where's that? You haven't even spent all that money. Or you did and didn't do anything with it. Like the whole thing, we've got we've got five the coin of the realm is time on the Senate floor. You've had the least productive Senate in the history of the United States of America.

SPEAKER_18: 11:15

Right.

SPEAKER_14: 11:16

You've passed less bills that have gone to the president's desk in the last 12 months than ever before. And you have the trifecta. You have all the branches of government right now, John Thune.

SPEAKER_15: 11:25

Right. You've already squandered. Right. They've already squandered all the time we've given you.

SPEAKER_14: 11:32

Yeah. It makes you absolutely sick. It makes me sick because I'm sitting here going, and you want me to continue to prop this up?

SPEAKER_10: 11:42

Right.

SPEAKER_14: 11:42

There's there's Harry Enton yesterday, and we didn't, I didn't pull this clip, but even amongst the Democrats, voter ID has a 70 to 80 percent approval. Amongst Republicans, it's like put your 90 percent. This is not a controversial issue. You will not lose a single legitimate legal voter in America for voting for the Save Act. Not one. There's not one Democrat or Republican that is gonna turn around and go, my neighbors who came here from Guatemala can't vote, so I won't vote for you. It's not happening. It's not happening. Okay, so the fact that John Thune thinks he can get up there and rattle off a bunch of irrelevant bullsh and be like, that's more important than the save act, that tells you everything you need to know. And Tommy Tooperville says it out loud. They can't pass the save act because some of these guys are on the dime. Yeah, there's no doubt about it at this point. No doubt about it at this point. Let's see. Do we got an ad break yet? Ron?

SPEAKER_15: 12:43

I would love to. Let's see here. These things need to turn breakfast. Exactly.

SPEAKER_14: 12:52

They cue us up, they make it, they tease us, they're like, it's time, and then we get in there, and it's like exactly what happens. You guys must not like spend a lot of time on the internet. The cookies can't seem to figure out what you guys want. All right, while you're doing that, we're gonna listen to Harry McDonald McDugold, Dugald, who was Jeff, one of Jeff Clark's attorneys. That uh Jeff Clark was one of the attorneys that was advising Donald Trump. He spoke on January 6th. He's he's one that they came and you know, raided his house, took his cell phone, the FBI did. Then the the um DC Bar Association has since debarred him. They've taken his law license. Why? Because he was advising the president on the election, and so they debarred him. Well, now that there's a new motion because since the Fulton County raid, all of a sudden, the entire premise of what Jeff Clark was trying to say, which was there was enough probable cause to go to a judge and get a warrant. That was the whole premise of what he was trying to say, has now actually occurred in fact. And so now he's going back to the DC bar to be like, hey, turns out a judge agreed with me. Yeah. As in, I was giving good legal advice that proved sound and so he's looking to be reinstated. Oh, no, of course not. I mean, I mean, that's the corruption. I mean, we've got bottles to fill. We can't be worrying about 2020 election.

SPEAKER_21: 14:13

No further investigations of Fulton County, Georgia were warranted as an unequivocal matter in a way such that no rational lawyer could disagree by several DOJ colleagues in 2020 and early 2021, that period I was referencing. Apparently, says Jeff, the current DOJ and the magistrate judge who signed this warrant, Judge Salinas, again the Georgia judge, both disagree with that assertion. Can you just speak to you know what this means for people like Jeff Clark, who were politically prosecuted in Georgia?

SPEAKER_30: 14:48

Well, I view it as a vindication. I mean, Jeff's original recommendation uh for which he was criminally prosecuted in Georgia and for which the DC Bar seeks his disbarment was that additional investigations be undertaken. Uh, that was uh a prohibitive thought. Now the DOJ is actually carrying out an investigation of the very sort that he recommended. And we have just submitted to the DC Court of Appeals in Jeff's Bar case uh additional information citing the warrant, the issuance of the warrant, as uh vindication of his position. It is completely nuts that he would be disbarred for recommending confidentially and internally further investigations of the type that are now being carried out.

SPEAKER_21: 15:41

But it's the DC bar, Harry.

SPEAKER_14: 15:43

So I mean But it's the DC bar, so none of us are holding our breath.

SPEAKER_21: 15:50

As well as you make your case, even if it'll have an effect on the DC Bar. Well we will see. I'm very anxious to see how this proceeds. I hope the DOJ does handle this this well. Um, I'm not as complimentary as the DOJ a little bit later with some of what I'm covering in the show. But I would say in this in this moment, at least we have gotten uh retrieved this information. What do you think is the next shoe that should drop? What else? I I I have talked to several people in Georgia and they're like, look, it's not just Fulton County. The DOJ needs to go into other counties potentially as well. Do you believe that that should happen?

SPEAKER_30: 16:27

Uh there's certainly grounds for doing that in a number of other counties in Georgia. And getting back to the legal foundation, I want to briefly touch on this. The search warrant uh identifies uh a couple of federal statutes that are uh where they're seeking evidence of potential criminal violations of those statutes. Uh one is uh unlawful registrations, and the other is unlawful uh tabulations, uh tabulation of fraudulent ballots, and then uh fraudulent uh or failure to preserve election records. There's strong evidence for all of that. Now we haven't seen the affidavit and support of the search warrant, but from what I know, following this issue for the last five years, there's there's ample evidence to support uh probable cause for violations of those statutes. And as far as the director of national intelligence, Dulcie Gabbard, is concerned, uh election systems are critical infrastructure, so designated by the Obama administration, and it is absolutely within her jurisdiction to uh oversee or be aware made aware of criminal investigations into election and cybersecurity issues in the election. So it's absolutely within her jurisdiction, and there's nothing wrong with her being in Fulton County uh for the execution of that search warrant.

SPEAKER_21: 17:47

Uh I absolutely agree with you, and apparently so does an inspector general uh who So there were a bunch of whistleblowers that came out.

SPEAKER_14: 17:55

Tulsi Gabbard shows up at the ballots, and all of a sudden, people within the intelligence community start filing whistleblower complaints that Tulsi Gabbard's incompetent, doesn't know what she's doing. All of them got dismissed this week, quickly got dismissed. She knows what she's doing. So the big thing that he says in there is the DC bar, these crack attorneys, you know, these guys who spent years in law school and have decades of experience and can answer all of your questions, had a presumptive no-go zone when it came to questioning anything to do with the 2020 election.

SPEAKER_15: 18:26

Well, these two Emerald and this other guy, they were joking about it.

SPEAKER_14: 18:29

Yeah, it was a it was a it was it was a presumptive, can't ask questions. It's a no-go zone. We're not answering questions about that. You're answering questions about why you're looking into it. With with no consideration about what's going on on the other end, right? Which makes the entire DC bar who participated in this witch hunt and trial of Jeff Clark and the other people. There's many other people, including myself, who got sucked into this DC swamp. Every single person who touched this violated your civil rights, your civil rights. They defrauded you, an American voter. They especially defrauded me. They especially defrauded Jeff Clark directly, openly, brazenly. The kind of defrauding that if we lived in an earlier time, could only be shettled out back behind the bar. Right? There is no amount of Mia Koopas or Oopsies that corrects this. Because your entire premise, the entire foundation of how they've operated for the last four years was under a fiction, a faulty premise. An idea that don't ask questions. You want to know how bad this was. Jeff Perdue, who was a candidate for Senate, who lost in the Georgia runoff just after the 2020 election, he got called into a grand jury where Nathan Wade, Fannie Willis' boo, was uh doing the interview. His first ever felony charge, by the way. Okay, so he's in this grand jury. So let's look at some of this documentation from this grand jury. It's it's pretty interesting. This is the transcript that's now been made public. Oh, darn it. And it's got that whole deal where I'm gonna have to like figure out how to zoom this sucker in. How am I gonna do this?

unknown: 20:12

Okay.

SPEAKER_14: 20:13

So in this grand jury interview, you know what? I'm just gonna have to read it on my screen. There's no point in trying to zoom in on this for you guys. Okay, so in this grand jury interview, he says, All right, so here we're talking, we're here to talk about the Trump situation. Purdue gets pulled into the grand jury, and Nathan Wade is the prosecutor cross-examiner here. Okay. So qu uh, yes, sir, answer. Okay, I'm going to ask the relevant of questions uh question. Sure. We're talking about a lawsuit that you filed having to do with the alleged manipulation of the 2020 election. So this is Nathan Wade telling David Purdue, the candidate who filed a lawsuit for the election he was in, that then was told he had no standing, which has now been overturned by the Supreme Court because of course the candidate has standing in an election in which he participated. He's a candidate. Okay. So they're running off this. Well, uh, you you filed a lawsuit looking into it. That's why you're here, Nathan. So then he or that's why you're here, David. The uh, and then David Wade answers, yes, sir. Whoa, whoa, whoa, wait a minute. I'm sorry. This is this is a grand jury is looking into the 2020 election. So David Perdue doesn't know he's under investigation. He thinks he's there to provide information about what he observed that was wrong in the 2020 election. Look at the bait and switch these guys pulled. Right? And then he goes, uh, by Mr. Wade. Yes, sir. To clarify, this grand jury, special purpose grand jury, has been in panel to look at facts and circumstances related directly to or indirectly to possible attempts to manipulate the 2020 general election in Georgia. David Perdue answers Could I make a comment about that? Well, there, I'll call your attention to several questions. Who gave the directive? To shut down the state farm arena? Who directed people to allow ballots after 10:30 that that uh that night with no poll watches? Who directed these people to run those ballots more than once? I have so why has no investigation been made? Or my question it is, has anyone looked at sampling? Why isn't there a statistical sample of the Fulton County ballots to compare signatures against the registrant signatures to see if those are are right? Has anyone looked into the 1600 missing ballot bat uh batches or missing ballots just in 17,000 ballots there in Fulton County? These are the questions that I'm I would direct you to in terms of if if that is any of sort. So David Purdue is trying to ask questions about the election. So he goes on by Mr. Walton. Mr. Purdue, you mentioned earlier that you had some concerns about an allegation of a batch of 1,700 ballots that seemed to be missing. Can you can you tell the grand jury what that is? The Secretary of State's website in Fulton County says that these numbers are not precise. About 527,000 people voted. That's how many ballots are registered in the Secretary of State's website. But they say that only 510 or so thousand are in existence. So that's 17,000 is not that that has not been answered yet. As in, you have more ballots in your county than you had in the universe of available registered ballots of voters. So and when did you first hear about it? From a civilian in Middle Georgia named Joe Rossi. Okay, so he goes on to, anyways. So these guys they operated under the faulty premise of just don't look, don't examine, don't ask questions. And anybody who was asking questions got dragged into a grand jury, and then they use those questions in front of the grand jury to then tell the grand jury that the questioning was the crime. And look, they're right in front of you questioning the election. Do you understand the circular logic here with like four red herrings walk along the journey? You know what I mean? Like these people have done something that is so outrageous.

SPEAKER_15: 24:06

It's like an SNL skit.

SPEAKER_14: 24:08

It's like an SNL skit, except it has dire consequences.

SPEAKER_15: 24:11

And no punchline.

SPEAKER_14: 24:13

And even the American that pays no attention other than just gas prices, these things, these decisions cost you tens of thousands of dollars at the gas pump over the last four years and excess expenses. Just that alone. As a peasant, my job is to draw a line from the president's desk to your gas station, to your food dinner table. Right? Just that alone. Well, what does it have to do with me? There's a there's a reason. Right? I mean, let alone if your jobs have been threatened by illegal borders, blah, blah, blah. How do we fix this? Every day we come in here and we see news story after news story, more salacious than the last. And it's like, and what do you do about it?

SPEAKER_17: 24:53

Right.

SPEAKER_14: 24:54

Because Tommy Tilberville says it best. You got a half dozen senators and representatives here that shouldn't even be here. And by the way, for senators that are on a six-year cycle, all the senators that were elected in 2020 are up again here in 2026. So we're now at the point to where we've had a hundred percent turnover in the Senate, right? Which means you have a third of the Senate that can claim a seat prior to the known faulty 2020 election. Or less.

SPEAKER_17: 25:22

Yeah.

SPEAKER_14: 25:22

Or less.

SPEAKER_17: 25:23

Yes.

SPEAKER_14: 25:26

No wonder they don't want to vote on the Save Act.

SPEAKER_17: 25:28

Right.

SPEAKER_14: 25:29

Even some of our Republicans might lose their seats. I would imagine there's a couple Republicans in Kentucky that are nervous about winning a free and fair and open election. Okay. I'm just saying. Patrick Byrne was asked about this. What do you do? What do you do if it's proven that the 2020 was election was fraudulent? And if 2020 was fraudulent, you can throw 2022, you can throw 2024, right? Even with Trump winning the election, it literally was a swamp of the vote.

SPEAKER_15: 25:59

Well, the thing for me is you can also throw in there 2016, 2014, 2012, 20, 2008, 2020.

SPEAKER_14: 26:07

It goes back to like 1968.

SPEAKER_15: 26:09

Yeah.

SPEAKER_14: 26:12

In Chicago, the mob taking the election for Kennedy. That's the craziest thing to me. We can now open a history book, right? With like no challenge to it. And I can show you in the history book, everyone agrees John F. Kennedy did not win the presidential election. Nixon did. The most popular president ever, up until Donald Trump. Okay. The guy the deep state could not abide. Richard Nixon. JFK stole that election from Nixon and then lost his head over it.

SPEAKER_15: 26:45

But all your random McNally books, they say something else.

SPEAKER_14: 26:49

The reality is that moment in time in America was another one of these moments like this. It was a populist uprising. JFK and Richard Nixon both represented a what's in it for me America, a anti-graft and corruption America. They both had that vision of Americana that was intoxicating to Americans. It's intoxicating to sit and listen to a Trump rally. The guy's hypnotic. You know, he he brings you back to this vision of we can do this, let's do it together, that kind of thing, right?

SPEAKER_15: 27:16

Well, yeah, it's like uh Mel Gibson shouting, Freedom! You know? Yes, exactly. People like that, it vibes with them.

SPEAKER_14: 27:25

I mean, how many people? I mean, don't don't take me wrong here, but how many women had a physiological reaction when Trump stood up and went, fight, fight, fight? You know what I mean? Like, even men were like, Yes, we'll take up the banner behind them. You are absolutely right. So, what happens now when we get definitive proof that the 2020 election was wrong?

SPEAKER_17: 27:48

Right.

SPEAKER_14: 27:48

Mel Kay and Patrick Byrne opine on this.

SPEAKER_29: 27:51

Now, let me ask you, this is the one question most people have. Let's say that they prove the 2020 election is stolen. What does that look like? And what is the mechanism to do anything about it? Well, the most what should happen?

SPEAKER_20: 28:05

Well, in the eyes of the gods, what should happen is everyone who was involved gets rounded up. However, let's not have a civil war. I've seen civil war. We don't want civil war. We don't want civil another way to do it is just have a national security declare, emergency declared, where you're saying we have now proven there's foreign access. So as they do, as as that happens, it justifies Trump doing something quite muscular. Like not just an executive order, but a national security emergency declaration. That language gives the president, if he can uh reasonably believes there was foreign involvement in something, he can declare it an emergency, blah, blah, blah. And SCOTIS is generally very uh they defer to the president anything to do with national security.

SPEAKER_29: 28:52

Now, the one good thing about this timing is that maybe it could come into play going into 2026, and we can actually get what you've been fighting for, which is paper ballots, same day voting, vote in person.

SPEAKER_20: 29:02

It's you know, people have to say it's not just about paper ballots, it's that the counting is done. Hand counting where the place where the place are where it's cast. We want hand counting in the place it's cast.

SPEAKER_14: 29:14

So even Patrick Byrne is implying there there isn't really a solution to flush these people out other than national emergency to fix the election. Do we have some Chicago steak that people need to be made aware of?

SPEAKER_15: 29:26

Yes, we do. Let's see if I can. Oh, yes. All right. Am I on screen? I don't know. Oh. All right. Let me tell you about my Valentine's Day sponsor. And honestly, this is one a no-brainer Chicago steak company code H-E-A-R-T 26. Look, you could fight for a reservation at some overpriced restaurant, sit there surrounded by strangers, rush through your meal, or you could just stay home, cook together, have a way better experience. These are USD State time steaks, hand selected, wet aged, up to 40 days. Restaurant quality delivered to your door. Here's the deal: it's the last rush-free Valentine's shipping. Order$199 or more, use code Heart26, and you'll get$145 in free gifts. That's two Maryland crab cakes, six Italian chocolate pastries, and free shipping. So you've got appetizer main course dessert done. Go to mychicagosteak.com slash heart26. Code Heart26. That's H-E-R-T 26. Link is in the description.

unknown: 30:33

Boom.

SPEAKER_14: 30:34

Okay. So thank you, Ron. All right, getting back to the chance. Uh Pony Boy says, I had a tinkle in my pants when he said fight, fight, fight. Ferraser, shocking news report on the Save Act. Another effort to undermine Americans' freedom to vote and make this unpopular policy off the land. Whose headline was that? That's like straight out of Mexico City, man. It's like not even, it's not even a thing. I don't know. Okay. I did uh as I went over here, I went ahead and clicked on the uh Chicago steaks. Sure enough, man. Claim your gift, put in the email address. It looks absolutely delicious. And uh I'll go ahead and let them leave some cookies on my computer. Oh my gosh, that looks so delicious. I don't know though. I guess it's too okay. Well, I'm not gonna criticize their pricing. Yeah, you better not. Go buy some Chicago steaks, folks. So point is we're Patrick Byrne and Melcare are having that discussion there. There's not a real great plan on what to do with people that are in office that shouldn't be there. I mean, you never know if these people know they're not supposed to be in office, if they're in on it, if they just won, you know, apparently my district's super progressive and wants communist policies.

SPEAKER_15: 31:49

Okay, sure.

SPEAKER_14: 31:52

I don't know. Who knows? So that's where I see the problem here. And you've got guys like John Thune looping it back to him. Coin of the realm is time on the Senate floor. I mean, we've got all these unelected guys that they've got their pet projects they need. There's nothing more important than the elections, obviously. So Donald Trump was asked about this yesterday, and he suggested something that I don't love, but I understand why they're talking about it. Federalizing and nationalizing the elections.

SPEAKER_19: 32:21

I want to see elections be honest. And if a state can't run an election, I think the people behind me should do something about it. Because you know, if you think about it, the state is an agent for the federal government in elections. I don't know why the federal government doesn't do them anyway. But when you see some of these states about how horribly they run their elections, what a disgrace it is. I think the federal government we'll see crooked elections, and we had plenty of them. And by the way, we had them last time, but go to 2020 and look at the facts that are coming out. Rigged crooked elections. If we have a uh areas, take a look at Detroit, take a look at Pennsylvania, take a look at Philadelphia, you go take a look at Atlanta, look at some of the places that trem horrible corruption on elections, and the federal government should not allow that. The federal government should get involved. Uh, these are agents of the federal government to count the votes. If they can't count the votes legally and honestly, then somebody else should take it.

SPEAKER_17: 33:20

But the constitution says that should be states that it's elections.

SPEAKER_14: 33:25

He lit Caitlin Collins up after that. I don't have the clip here, but he's like, I've been here for almost 10 years. I've never seen you smile. You're a horrible person. You're not smiling because you know you're not telling the truth.

unknown: 33:39

Okay, okay.

SPEAKER_14: 33:42

One of the beauties of our system is the federalism, right? The fact that we push a lot of power and major decision making down to the most local level possible, which gives you a say. I can walk into my local school board, I can walk into my local town council, I can have a say in those meetings. It's a little bit harder for me to go to a committee meeting in the District of Columbia. You know what I mean? And so it's nice to have close to home. And when it comes to elections, you know, I'll be completely honest with you, I trust a coalition of my neighbors looking at the ballots and counting the ballots versus somebody who flew in from DC to look at and count the ballots. Yeah. Right. So I definitely think that elections should be local. It makes it harder to cheat. However, the Chinese, with endless amounts of people to sit and do whatever, have broken down our elections by the 3,000 counties and what's needed in each individual election, as and they put a full effort into it as if it was one single national elected election, right? They've they've the Chinese have been very patient and diligent in breaking down the steps to corrupt our elections nationally by doing it locally. So how do you react counteract that? Well, you're gonna have to come in with some national rules like hand count, no machines, right? The things that can kind of cut the cheat off at the head. There's always gonna be a cheat. There's always gonna be some official that walks in the back room with five extra ballots. It's the ability to cheat with hundreds of thousands of ballots that has to be nipped in the butt, right? I think what's setting up here is Donald Trump's gonna make what Patrick Byrne says a national emergency and basically take over the election infrastructure, and we'll see how 2026 looks. But you know, the Democrats, anything he does to nationalize, federalize, national emergency, the elections, they're gonna cry tyrant, foul, manipulating the elections. We can't win. It's rigged against us. And frankly, I don't even know. Dominion got bought out by Liberty Vote. Turns out it was bought out by a guy that used to share an office with Ed Martin, our eagle Ed Martin in the DOJ. So, who apparently used to be over elections in Missouri. So it's one of these, I remember what I say. Missouri is the conservative center of the universe when it comes to law, right? It was bought out by this Missouri guy. I don't know. Is this one giant cover-up, or are these guys, did they literally buy Dominion in order to neuter Dominion? I don't know. They're still using them. That's the crazy thing. They're still using these machines in all these special elections, which we happen to be over eight in. Over eight. We just had a sweeping victory for Donald Trump. Probably the largest margin of victory, especially if you take out the illegal ballots ever in the history of our country, right? Both popular vote and electoral college sweep. I mean, it honestly, when you look at it from a a uh political point of view and you take into account like faulty census and all that kind of stuff, Donald Trump's win in 2024 is more impressive than Reagan in 86 or is uh 84. It's more impressive, right? When you look at the map and how he did that, breaking through the blue wall, you know, it's impressive. So yeah, man, I know we harp on this day after day after day, but it's the only thing that matters. Every other discussion, no matter how important you think it is, Obamacare, no matter how important you think it is, is is literally the entire government talking about filling in a pothole when you've got a road barricade in front of you. Right, you know what I mean?

SPEAKER_15: 37:19

Like get rid of the barricade. I will say this. I never thought that federalizing our elections would be the answer. Did you ever think that that was the right answer?

SPEAKER_14: 37:28

Uh no.

SPEAKER_15: 37:30

No, no, of course not.

SPEAKER_14: 37:32

As somebody who prefers local power, yes, I never thought in a million years I would support some of the nonsense I've supported federally because apparently locally we're retarded.

SPEAKER_15: 37:46

Well, and also, if we did have national elections instituted, just imagine what the Democrat Party would do with that. Okay.

SPEAKER_14: 37:54

Exactly, Ron. Exactly. Right? Once you do it, it becomes precedent. Yeah. The only way you can pull this off is the Bukele model, where you have the quote, great exception. So you have to label it the exception. You have to label it the time we broke the constitution to restore it or something. You're going to have to craft that narrative. Again, facts don't matter here. I can I could come in and go, look, this senator has a stolen seat. This senator has a stolen seat. You could bring the hard drives right out of the election machines. You could walk into Mesa County, Colorado, and you could take everybody out of their elected positions, and you'd be completely justified in doing it from a legal and lawful perspective. But then you got to turn on the evening news. And you're going to have to deal with the evening news telling tens of thousands of people that you're a tyrant and a despot and that you're trying to take over their country, not restore it. And next thing you know, you've got a mob outside your door, a bunch of weirdos trying to both defund the police while weaponizing the police at the same time.

SPEAKER_15: 38:55

And it's really hard to get those torches unlit.

SPEAKER_14: 38:57

It's really hard to get the torches unlit. Exactly. You know, once the roof structure catches fire, you kind of just have a beacon and the moths come in. So, yes, that's the problem here, is all of this centers around narrative. Yeah, Donald Trump could send the marshals to go get Tina Peters out, but then he's the guy that sent the marshals to free a prisoner and couldn't follow the law, had to have an exception. But we're definitely getting to the point where, depending on how much we want to fix it, dramatic things are going to happen. Maybe they can pull it off with just a just a little bit of nationalizing the elections. Maybe just a little, right? Just one cycle. Just sort of spot nationalizing. Honestly, the best thing they could do is what the feds already did when the founding fathers wrote the constitution. Set the rules and then leave it to the states. No electronic machines, paper counting, local precinct, no mail-in voting, except for the following criteria for absentee, military service, nursing home, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, right? Affidavits from family that you can't get a ride to drop off your vote. Do the Wisconsin thing for absentee ballots before 2020.

SPEAKER_15: 40:02

Now, this is gonna be a whole nother mess, but let me let me just roll this out and see how you like this option. What if we um penalize states and not count them if they can't figure out how to get themselves in order? Well now it now now I already know that this is just another opportunity for everybody to go, oh well that state can't we can't count them.

SPEAKER_14: 40:26

Exactly. Then it becomes the Republicans can never get their act together. We have to throw out all the elections. New York and California decided the whole thing. Yeah, exactly. You know, what's good for the goose is good for the gander, the shoe has to fit on both feet. Uh going back here for Razor from CNN uh Monmouth poll, a majority of Democrats, 62%, they favor voter ID requirement, almost nine in ten independents, uh back voter ID. Yeah, it is a I mean the 30, what does that number end up being? The uh 28%, 38% of Democrats that don't support voter ID are not legal to vote in the first place. Nobody that is legal to vote and has an ID doesn't think thinks that that's too big of a barrier to vote. Right. Like it's in fact, you know, only the white liberal on a college campus thinks that blacks can't somehow figure out how to get ID cards. Right. You know what I mean? Like, this isn't 19, this isn't 1860 Jim Crow. You know what I mean? Like, or I don't even know. When was Jim Crow? Jim Crow came after the Civil War.

SPEAKER_15: 41:27

Well, I I went to pull some cash out of my bank account yesterday, and they're like, oh, you want to see a balance ID? Like, what? I just the balance?

SPEAKER_14: 41:35

What? Okay. Yeah, that's incredible. You know, when I go back in our recordings, one of the topics that we hit on a little bit was this idea of being in a cult and how being in a cult or in a high demand religion of any kind, it engages with call what's called the law of primacy. Whatever you're introduced to first kind of becomes your operating program. And it becomes very difficult to override that that operating.

SPEAKER_15: 42:00

That's how you develop your paradigm.

SPEAKER_14: 42:02

That's how you develop your paradigm. And so sometimes when people are raised in certain environments, even if they can consciously overcome certain biases, they'll they'll hold on to them, you know, in their subconscious and stuff like that. And I remember years ago, Laura Logan ran this interview thing where they had someone in the UN going in all these occult rituals that are apparently like running parallel with the UN. And one of the things that this person told Laura Logan is she goes, do not project your goodness onto them. Your values are not their values, right? They have a certain set of values, and these are as ingrained as those of you that are born again, for those of you that are, you know, carry any type of strong religious conviction. These are things that you have both emotionally felt and you have cognitive cognitively reasoned out. Okay. So that allows you to operate in in a place of faith, which the cynic would call a place of delusion, right? But but the faithful call it a place of faith, where your beliefs and your belief in the unseen directs the seen world and how you interpret it. Okay. The reason I say that is because one of the things that is a critic criticism of Jews, and again, I'm not criticizing Jews, but I'm gonna criticize Jews. Okay. And I and I have to hold the mirror up because you could say the same thing about Mormons, of which I claim to be Mormon, right? It's my ethnicity at this point. Um, you could say the same thing about certain Catholics who believe that their baptism or a baptism under the Nicene Creed is the only valid baptism that leads to salvation. Okay, and sometimes these beliefs lead to very difficult conversations.

SPEAKER_15: 43:43

Okay.

SPEAKER_14: 43:43

So, for example, talk to a Catholic who loses a child before they get baptized. Right. Right. Where is your child? Are they in heaven? Are they in purgatory? Is it straight past to hell? These are like challenging things because reality and your heart want. To believe one thing, but your religious faith and your traditions, which are set up for a certain utility, get the kids baptized, get them on the records, etc., etc. But the reason that you create the need to hurry up and get them baptized is if you don't get them baptized, they could die in original sin. Right. So when someone does occasionally die in original sin, what do we do about this?

SPEAKER_17: 44:22

Yeah.

SPEAKER_14: 44:22

Okay. I'm I'm pointing that out not because I want to make a critique of that doctrine. For all I know, those babies are floating downhill. I don't know. But when we're talking about, yeah, I have no idea. I don't know. Okay. I hate I hate being that guy, right? Because I have my set of beliefs, but I recognize that I can't really project them on the others. So sure in this world, I have to treat us all kind of the same, right? I have to start up just I have to take you at face value. But one of the things that it is acceptable for us to do as we understand this is when you learn about other faiths and their value systems, you do see it come out over and over and over again. So one of the things that comes out in any value system that allows you to abuse other people is there's typically an othering. You've you've drawn a circle around your tribe and you've said other tribes are inferior or somehow always inferior. You know, you can say all they're different, but the imposition is that they're inferior.

SPEAKER_15: 45:19

I hope I'm not stepping on what you're trying to say here, but I'm I was actually just thinking about this yesterday, where um I can't remember what I was watching, but they were talking about the goyim and how you know sometimes you can you can diss on the goim and you can spill on the goim and nobody cares about the goim because there are others, right?

SPEAKER_14: 45:36

That's the exact conversation we're having here.

SPEAKER_15: 45:39

Oh, okay. So the this is very interesting to me because if you have a people that can separate people out like that, and then I was thinking back to like the Ten Commandments and thou shalt not lie and stuff like that, but it's okay to lie to the Goyim. How is that how is that okay? You know, um, I'm just it's a very weird place to be.

SPEAKER_14: 46:01

There's a reason why Islam and Judaism are at each other's throats, they carry a lot of the same fundamental beliefs, okay? They don't want to admit that, okay, but they do carry like, yes, it's okay to lie to the infidelslash goyim. Right then.

SPEAKER_15: 46:16

Right there, right there. All you have to do is stop right there. You can lie to some people, but not others. Time out.

SPEAKER_14: 46:23

You know, no, you can't. I know, I know, I know. This this is the the reason I brought this up months ago now, right? Is talking about these cults, and cults are everything. You could be in a Republican cult, MAGA cult, Jewish cult, Mormon cult, cults, they capture their mind and they get you to live delusion.

SPEAKER_17: 46:42

Okay.

SPEAKER_14: 46:43

So in these Epstein files, over and over, we're talking thousands of references to the Going, the other, the non-Jews, right? That they stink, that they can be lied to, that they can be cheated, that they can do all these things, right? So this live streamer, and I can't remember his name, extremely popular, is getting way more views than we are doing his live streams. He had this big revelation the other day because when they were raiding the Fulton County ballots, he was like, if Donald Trump proves that 2020 election was stolen, and he stands up and he freaks out, he's like, everything I've said is a lie. My mom was right, my mom was worth the election was stolen. He's like, Oh my gosh, what a world! You know, he was freaking out. Well, now these these ballots come out, and again, this he is a lefty. And here's what he's seeing is the Democrats and the Epstein clan are freaking racist, they're Jewish supremacists, uh, and they're openly talking about the Goim. And even the people they're associating with, like Bill Gates, they're derogatory amongst each other, talking about, oh, he's Goim, so we're screwing them over. Okay, listen to this. No way, no way, no way, no fucking way. This is the way that this is the way the Jew make money. This is from Jeffrey Epstein to Roger Schenck that and made a fortune in the past year, selling short and shipping futures. Let the Goyim deal in the real world from shipping news and the most dramatic link from Jeffrey Epstein.

SPEAKER_11: 48:12

This is not me saying it, it's not Nick Fluentes saying it, it's not Sneeko, it's not Hassan, it's Jeffrey Epstein saying it. This is the way the Jew make money and made a fortune in the past 10 years, selling short the shipping futures. Let the goyam deal in the real world. Oh my fucking god.

SPEAKER_14: 48:29

As in, we get to deal with the fallout of a broken economy because they sold short the shipping industry. Yeah. They sold a let them deal with the fallout.

SPEAKER_15: 48:41

We'll make a fortune after we sell the entire economy short.

SPEAKER_11: 48:45

Yes. Just every bro, every stereotype confirmed overnight. Holy fuck. Play the music. Too much. I don't know if I'll be able to do that. Just keep that in mind. I just I can't break too many rules. Not all in one day. Let me go back and see if I can find some more of these, too. The F seen emails and goes nor numerous derogatory messages towards Goyam. Oh, here we go. Here's even more of it. Let's see it. This is the way they oh oh here we go. Goyam were only born were born to only serve us. He said in a 2010 sermon, without that, they have no place in the world. Only to serve the people of Israel. Guys, this is this is insane. Really? I really like. I mean, this this is this is like every every stereotype, every paranoia, every conspiracy theory, everything, just it it all aligns. And it seems like I I don't even know what to say. Wow. Conspiracy people always write. How is Nick gonna react? I can't wait to fire talking about Nick Fuentes. How's Nick gonna react?

SPEAKER_14: 49:46

He's gonna react with a big fat, I told you so, is what it's gonna be.

SPEAKER_15: 49:50

I was thinking of something to say that that was gonna be like, whoa, this might like set the internet on fire, but I was like, maybe those Germans had it right.

SPEAKER_14: 50:03

One of our listeners, one of our listeners in England, I mentioned something about running something by her husband, and she goes, Well, I don't know if I want to run by that that by him. He tends to think the Austrian artist has some good points. It's like 10. These are this is by the way, by the way, without exception, Ron. Without exception, every time we mention Israel or Netanyahu on this show, yeah, we get a we get a download in Israel on the audio, on the audio, every without exception. Yeah. Okay, so we definitely will have down. In fact, screenshot it tomorrow if you guys want to see it. We will always get that one download in Israel.

SPEAKER_15: 50:47

Every day we're looking to see if this will be the last episode. I'm trying to build our audience.

SPEAKER_14: 50:51

I'm not suicidal, folks. The reason I bring this up is understanding human nature. People become committed to their cult. Yeah, people become committed to it. And it and it spills out, right? The only purpose of the Goyim is to serve who? Us. How is that different than a southern Democrat plantation owner? How is that different than someone who justifies slavery because of a biblical view and the mark of Cain or something like that? How is it different? You know, the world's being run by an elite Jewish cabal of pedophiles with their goyem sycophants. Yeah, is basically what I read in the Epstein files. And, you know, you want to meet some of the Goyim that we should be kind of concerned about. Here's uh Phil Gates got uh asked a question about his association with Epstein.

SPEAKER_08: 51:41

I never went to the island, I never met any women, and so you know, the more that comes out, the more clear it'll be. Uh that although the time was a mistake, it had nothing to do with that kind of behavior.

SPEAKER_28: 51:54

So he never met any women. Why is he getting all these antibiotics for his wife then and delivered a good person?

SPEAKER_01: 52:00

Which he denies, by the way. He says that was an email that Jeffrey Epstein wrote and never sent. It was actually true that I was only at dinner.

SPEAKER_14: 52:12

So this is uh this is Bill Gates' wife, ex-wife, Melinda Gates, addressing.

SPEAKER_12: 52:17

I think that Bill Gates had additional affairs and that he tried to get medication to treat a sexually transmitted infection, and that he was gonna give you the medicine without you knowing. His representative has said all of this is false. It is not on you to have to respond to the details of that alleged behavior, but I I wonder what your dominant emotion is when you read these news articles with these details.

SPEAKER_22: 52:49

Sad. Just unbelievable sadness. Unbelievable sadness, right? Um again, I'm able to take my own sadness and look at those young girls and say, my god, how did they how did that happen to those girls, right? And so for me, it's just sadness, sadness for you know, I I've left, I had to, I left my marriage. I had to leave my marriage, I wanted to leave my marriage. I had to leave the I felt I needed to eventually leave the foundation, so it's just sad. That's the truth, right?

SPEAKER_14: 53:27

Yeah, it is sad. It's unfortunate, it's unfortunate because anybody who's studied Jeffrey and Melinda and their relationship could have seen this coming a mile away. Yeah, a mile away. You think this is the first time he's been in the news for his shenanigans? The amount of money, in fact, you know how they originated.

SPEAKER_15: 53:48

Yes, I do. She's the PR firm. Yes, right. Well, well, this is why, you know, when my wife was like, Oh, isn't it so sad? I was like, Yeah. She's the PR firm. I was like, bro, there's some crocodile tears.

SPEAKER_14: 54:01

Yeah, her whole job was to project normalcy for Bill Gates and to create the illusion of a family dynamic to protect the money pile, to protect the money pot. That she freaking owns a portion of. And it's only when she got implicated in the cover-up. It's one thing to be, you know, the wife that Bill Gates goes on a couple trips or whatever. It's another thing to be knowing about those trips with underage kids.

SPEAKER_15: 54:25

Right.

SPEAKER_14: 54:25

That's when she finally goes, as a PR person, I gotta get out.

SPEAKER_15: 54:29

And you can say, okay, yeah, the relationship crumbled. Yeah, that is sad, but dude, she knew what she was getting into.

SPEAKER_14: 54:38

I mean, if she didn't, ugh. It's funny because a year ago we could have done a Bill and Melinda expose on the foundation and how corrupt it is, and all of a sudden she's trying to put some distance. It's like, nah, honey, I don't know about that.

SPEAKER_15: 54:52

Exactly.

SPEAKER_14: 54:52

I mean, I'm not gonna, I'm not, I'm not holding anything over her head, but you were on the ride. Yeah. You were on the ride. So, Speaker Johnson, speaking of being in a cult, he gets asked about his cult belief system.

SPEAKER_27: 55:06

Publio has cited Matthew 25, 35 to critique Donald Trump's mass deportation agenda. How would you respond to Poblio in scripture?

SPEAKER_14: 55:15

Okay, so the Pope, the leader of the biggest cult, says that the borders and uh deportation are not biblical. So the biggest cult is now going after the little brother cult, the Protestant evangelicals.

SPEAKER_23: 55:27

So you want me to give you a theological uh dissertation? All right, I'll tell you what, I'll post it on my website later today, but let me give you a quick summary. Uh, borders and walls are biblical from the Old Testament.

SPEAKER_14: 55:37

But the Pope, who is the vicar of Christ, says they're not.

SPEAKER_23: 55:41

To the new. God has uh allowed us to um set up our civil societies and have separate nations. Immigration is not something that's frowned upon in scripture. In fact, it's it's welcome. We're gonna we're gonna welcome the sojourner and and uh love our neighbor as ourselves. But what's also important in the Bible is that assimilation is expected and anticipated and proper.

SPEAKER_14: 56:01

Unless you're Israelite, in which case you don't assimilate, they assimilate.

SPEAKER_23: 56:07

Right. When someone comes into your country, comes into your nation, they do not have the right to change its laws or to change a society. They're expected as written by the Israelite. Expected to assimilate. We haven't had a lot of that uh going on. When people cite um passages out of the Old Testament, they say, well, um, you're supposed to uh take care of the sojourner and the neighbor, treat them as yourself, uh welcome then in. Yes, but that is an admonition to individuals, not to the civil authorities. The civil authorities are given uh authority under scripture to maintain order. Uh, Romans 12, you want to do this? Roman Romans 13 says that um the the civil authorities are God's agents of wrath to bring punishment upon the wrongdoer. And it says if you do right, you have no fear of the civil authorities, but those civil authorities are necessary. It's a calling, it's a calling to maintain order in society, and we have not had that. When Biden and Harris opened the borders wide for four years, we had as many as 20 million illegals come across the country, and we all know many dangerous people, hardened criminals, child molesters, rapists, murderers, all the rest, terrorists who came into the country. We did not take care of our borders. Sovereign borders are biblical and good and right and they're just because it's not because we hate the people on the outside, it's because we love the people on the inside.

SPEAKER_14: 57:19

We now I mentioned him saying, you know, the big cult, Catholic Church. I don't believe cult the Catholic Church is a cult. I don't believe Mike Mike Johnson here is a part of some evangelical cult. I don't believe that at all. I have my own worldviews and stuff like that. But when we're reasoning with other people about our rights, our policies, and things like that, our founding fathers understood that you had to divide, you had to get past the dogma, you had to get past the doctrine of original sin and what are you going to do with kids when they're born in eight days. The civil authorities said we're having nothing to do with that discussion, right? Like we're not touching it. You can you can leave that for you. But in civil, your rights are fundamental. No matter how you slice it, and this is the thing that cuts through the cult mindset in politics. It's important. No matter how you slice it, my rights are fundamental. They originated with my existence, however I was created, and I certainly was, right? And therefore my rights are fundamental, and they existed before the existence of the state. It doesn't matter if you believe in Moses' uh declaration of who God is, I am that I am, or if you believe in the French philosopher, I think therefore I am. You come to the same conclusion. I am fundamentally in existence, and I have a right to self-preservation, I have a right to thought, speech, locomotion, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. And from there, derive all my rights out of necessity. And that's before the existence of the state, which is a voluntary association, which is imposed upon us by common consent.

SPEAKER_13: 59:03

Okay.

SPEAKER_14: 59:04

That's the fundamental point there. And it it cuts through because I can sit with an Islamist and I can discuss that. I can sit with an atheist, I can sit with any of the religions, cults, mindset, beliefs, non-belief systems, and we can simply have a reasonable discussion. Your rights are fundamental and are gifted to you by virtue of your existence. How you came to be and came into existence, that's between you and your brain. Right. But the reality is you're here, that's that. I wish that our politicians would spend more time talking about the undebatable. When we talk about our rights as fundamental, there's no debate that leads you anywhere other than I think therefore I am, and I am that I am, a rational, thinking, reasonable man. Right? That always ends there. If you can take the debate outside of all the little niche things and all the justifications for my rights come from God. Well, what if I disagree with your version of God?

SPEAKER_17: 1:00:03

Right.

SPEAKER_14: 1:00:04

Does that make sense? Cut through it all. There's only reality. You exist, your rights are fundamental. Change the way you talk about it, and you change the outcome of the debate. That's my perspective on that. Anyways, not that I don't support all these great cults. I'm I'm a cult member myself to one degree or another. It just is what it is. All right, guys, there's another big piece of news that's going on in Washington State. We are just about ready to overthrow our constitution for the umpteenth time and implement an income tax. It'll be a 9.9% tax appropriated uniformly on everybody, but then they're gonna give you a standard deduction up to a million dollars. So they are taxing you. Okay, they're just gonna give you an ex a deduction or a standard exemption for the first million. So, you know, most Washington State people won't pay an income tax yet until they progressively lower the deduction, until pretty soon they're like, there's no income tax in Washington State if you make under$2,000.

SPEAKER_15: 1:01:06

But if that's how the bill is structured, eventually or it's guaranteed. Oh, yeah, well, yeah, because all they gotta do is just change the number.

SPEAKER_14: 1:01:15

Yep. Oh, we know where to come up with a little bit of money. Oh, we're just gonna lower the exemption from a million to nine hundred and fifty thousand. Right. 800 to 600 to 200,000 buried filing jointly.

SPEAKER_15: 1:01:26

Well, and eventually, you know, cheeseburgers cost$500 and everybody's making a half million. So exactly. Yeah.

SPEAKER_14: 1:01:32

Everybody's so that's that's a lot of fun. That's something to really look forward to. Um, let's go ahead and let's look up here. Uh Ron, watch Europa one through eight. It'll give you the other side. The artist wasn't so bad after all. Uh pony boy, the Vatican should open the doors to the underground there there if there's no borders. Yeah, no kidding. They got like the strongest border on the planet. The Vatican is the original offshore bank. Yep.

SPEAKER_15: 1:01:59

That was me.

SPEAKER_14: 1:02:00

Or they're the original domestic bank, and we're all offshore, however, you want to think of that. Yep, lots of interesting stuff. Okay, let's go ahead and jump over into Hold on, man. Let's do it. Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.

SPEAKER_15: 1:02:12

Since the green light popped up. Still haven't tried 7075 coffee. Now's your shot. 70 and 75. Starter kit just dropped. Only a thousand units. You're getting the bold dark roast that hits hard. The smooth medium roast and the vitality mushroom coffee for clean energy and laser focus. No crash. I can hold it almost read this without even looking at it. All single origin small batch, toxin free and mold-free. Plus, you're also getting a gold spoon clip because freedom isn't scooped with plastic. A frother strong enough to stir up your coffee and your mother-in-law's opinions and a black 1775's tumbler.$170 worth of coffee and gear. Yours for$99. This is for the ones you've been watching 1775 blow up on Rumble, wondering if it's actually worth it. Spoiler, it is. Go to 1775coffee.com slash studio and grab your starter kit before they're gone. Bold beans, clean fuel in a morning routine that stands for something just like Rumble does. Yes.

SPEAKER_14: 1:03:05

Okay, so let's um let's go ahead and jump over into private now. It is which today we didn't stream onto YouTube or anywhere else fun. So we you know, if you guys were all premium subscribers, you could just come right on in with us into private. Okay, so earlier I mentioned that uh in the hospice program that California has a hundred percent survival rate.

SPEAKER_02: 1:03:29

This is Men and Oz talking about that, and they're also stealing their ID, and you're stealing their ability to go to take Medicare benefits because when you go to hospice, you actually give up your insurance to go into a program designed for your last few months of life. Yet, Rob, many of the people in these hospice centers, they have 100% survival rates. Like no one dies. They're not dying, they're fakely put on these lists. And so we need to take this stuff seriously. I'm gonna ask one big question to the audience. Are you ready? Why would anyone let this happen? I'm hoping you're all wondering that. I wondered that.

SPEAKER_26: 1:04:01

Well, here's the that's the the the scale of this indicates that just nobody, nobody cares.

SPEAKER_14: 1:04:07

Uh yeah, the scale of this indicates that nobody cares. Right? Just pay, just pay. The money is no accountability for the money. Donald Trump's had a huge disagreement with the president of Colombia, but apparently it's resolved itself and they're on the same page. So, Pony Boy, if you're still listening, this is for you. This is in Spanish. But the president of Colombia, and this is a quick clip, he's had a conversation with Donald Trump, and he said, Hey, the the real front line for drugs, it's not in Colombia, it's in Miami and Dubai. The front line of drug trafficking is no imagination.

SPEAKER_10: 1:04:46

The front line of drug trafficking lives in Dubai, in Madrid, in Miami. I pass their names to President Trump.

SPEAKER_09: 1:04:57

Their ties beyond themselves. They are the bosses of the bosses.

SPEAKER_14: 1:05:05

Their capital is outside of Colombia.

SPEAKER_10: 1:05:18

That is why. Okay, then it repeated.

SPEAKER_14: 1:05:24

So Colombia, who Trump is, you know, they're making they're making coke. That sweet white snow, right? He's been coming after him. Well, now, after this Maduro capture, this Colombian president is singing a different tune. Instead of working against Trump on behalf of the capos of the capos, the real bosses, which is what he's implying, he seems to have turned and helped Trump and said, Those are the guys, those are the real bosses. You want to do another Maduro thing, take them out. They're in Miami, Madrid, Dubai. They're the ones that are running this, they're the ones that. They're forcing, allegedly, me to do what I'm doing in my country and look turn a blind eye, et cetera, et cetera. I don't believe the Colombian president is a good guy by any means.

SPEAKER_15: 1:06:10

No, but I think he is telling the truth.

SPEAKER_14: 1:06:12

Never underestimate the power of self-preservation. Yeah. Right? The only time self-preservation doesn't seem to work is when you have that occult mindset and you're like willing to be the suicide bomber so that you can go with your virgins in heaven or whatever you believe is going to happen. Right. That's about the only thing that overrides self-preservation. So that's kind of what I see there is uh he's doing the self-preservation thing. In a scary bit of news, there was another one of these biolabs that was discovered in Vegas. So a couple years ago, you remember the biolab that was discovered in California being run by the Chinese? Do you remember this at all?

SPEAKER_15: 1:06:46

Oh, jeez.

SPEAKER_14: 1:06:46

Oh my goodness. Yeah, there was a biolab discovered in like LA that had like all the viruses. I mean, we're talking like smallpox, tuberculosis, Ebola, everything. They found another one of these biolabs in Vegas. And apparently the owner of this biolab is connected to the other biolab, and he's been in jail, but the biolab was still running.

SPEAKER_24: 1:07:09

Now under investigation, a federal investigation, agents seizing vials of unknown liquids and probing a potential link to a Chinese national accused of running a similar lab in California that held deadly pathogens. Our senior national correspondent William Lajaness is reporting live on this out of Los Angeles for us. Hello, William.

SPEAKER_04: 1:07:29

Sandra, two amazing things about this story. One, the man who owns that Vegas lab, he's a Chinese scientist linked to the CCP, is and has been in jail the last three years. Secondly, the lab is not an FDA licensed facility, but it's in a house in Vegas, raided Saturday morning by the FBI, SWAT pulling out boxes of what police believe are hazardous biological agents and pathogens, normally found in a secure university or industrial lab with airlocks designed to prevent an outbreak.

SPEAKER_07: 1:08:01

Almost immediately, investigators observed multiple refrigerators, a freezer, and other laboratory type equipment, along with numerous bottles and jugs containing unknown liquid substances.

SPEAKER_04: 1:08:15

So the Vegas lab, according to police, belongs to 62-year-old Jew by Jew, a scientific Chinese national, and a fugitive. Well. Okay. Also goes by the alias David He. He was arrested in 2023 for manufacturing unlocked. Hold on! I can't remember this.

SPEAKER_13: 1:08:41

Oh deeper! Oh Jewish keeper like David He David, David He, Jew by Jew.

SPEAKER_15: 1:08:49

I think he is just his pronoun.

SPEAKER_04: 1:08:51

David He's medical devices and lying about unapproved HIV and pregnancy test kits that he was selling.

SPEAKER_14: 1:08:59

He also operated I hope you didn't take one of those pregnancy test kits. I thought it was negative. I don't know why I'm getting oh I says I don't have AIDS spreading around.

SPEAKER_04: 1:09:09

Oh my goodness. And CDC tests did show the vials contained HI, COVID, hepatitis, herpes, and malaria. Police arrested Jew, and he's been in jail ever since. Congressional investigators linked the lab to the Chinese Communist Party, a tie that also suggests the same people are behind the Vegas lab.

SPEAKER_07: 1:09:44

What do we think these people were doing with those uh substances in the house? And I'll tell you the the the truth is we don't know yet.

SPEAKER_14: 1:09:54

Oh, it was just personal research. I know, I know, you know, I keep my vials of HIV in the fridge just for all about personal use. Yes, personal use, maybe just a little hepatitis for me and my homies. Oh my goodness. That that the obtuseness. Clearly, it was to kill Americans. I mean, there's no you know what I mean? Like, what else are you gonna do with it? You weren't advancing like front-level science here, you know. It's like guys in jail, lab still operating. Oh my goodness. All right, guys, that's it for today. Just some craziness. I'm afraid of something like that popping up in my neighborhood. Yeah. You know, one of the more terrifying things you can do is go and follow all the Kitzap County like police pages and stuff like that.

SPEAKER_15: 1:10:36

Attempted murder up in Hansville, pirates, like you find out who all your neighbors are.

SPEAKER_14: 1:10:41

Yeah, it's terrifying. Terrifying. All right, guys, that's it for today. We'll talk to you again tomorrow. Bye-bye.

SPEAKER_03: 1:11:14

What night lived in that castle over there? I'm 37. What? I'm 37, I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man, you could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you did both of find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind, you're not what I object to is you automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king. Oh king. How'd you get that, eh? By exploiting the workers, or hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. If there's ever going to be any progress, how do you do, good lady? I'm Arthur, King of the Britons. Whose castle is that? The Britons. We all are. We are all Britons. And I am your king. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship. A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working class is opening classes. That's what it's all about. These good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? Then who is your lord? We don't have it, what? I told you. We're in a narco-syndicalist commune. We take it in turn to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special byweek committee. If I think by a civil majority in the case of your internal affairs, be quiet or by a two-thirds majority in the case of being quiet. I order you to be quiet. I'm your king. The lady of the lake, the armed clad in the purest shimmering samite, held a lost excaliber from the bottom of the water. Signifying by divine providence that I asked was to carry excaliber. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds, distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derived from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. But you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart through a sword is cut out! I mean, if I went round saying I was an emperor, just because some moistened bitch had locked a scimitar at me, they put me away! Shut up! Will you shut up? Now we see the violence inherited in the system! Shut up! Now we see the violence inherited in the system! Help, help! I'm being repressed! Oh, what a giveaway! You hear that? Did you hear that, eh? I'm on about. Do you see it repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?