Be The Change

Coffee smells great. Bureaucracy, not so much. We open with a simple truth that carries the whole show: when institutions stall, people can still change a life. A young man about to age out of the system gets a real heavy bag instead of a toy and a spot in Driver’s Ed—two small, specific yeses that shift a future. That’s our north star: targeted help that turns “we can’t” into “you’re in.”

From there, we follow the money and the rules that shape everyday choices. We break down Virginia’s gun bill language that quietly boxes in lawful owners. We examine a “coming soon” daycare that soaked up funds for years without opening. We press on big banks that preach virtue while debanking entire industries. We ask why self-driving taxis rely on remote human guidance outside the United States, and what that means for safety, data, and jurisdiction. None of this is abstract—if a robotaxi hits your street, who’s responsible?

Elections sit at the hinge of legitimacy. Voter ID enjoys overwhelming support across parties and races, yet the loudest voices treat verification as taboo. We argue for standards you can see: clean voter rolls, photo ID with free access, paper trails, and transparent audits. Faith in outcomes should follow proof, not replace it. On immigration, we step past slogans to the math: add millions of people to a tight housing market and rents rise at the bottom first. Compassion needs capacity—secure borders, legal pathways tied to labor, and more homes so young adults can leave home without leaving hope.

Across the Atlantic, the Epstein files bump into UK politics, surveillance contracts, and due process. The names change; the pattern doesn’t. Power concentrates, narratives harden, and accountability slips—unless people demand receipts. That’s the throughline of our “peasant’s perspective”: set guardrails, publish the numbers, and keep tools serving citizens, not the other way around.

If this resonates, share the show with someone who wants solutions, not slogans. Subscribe, leave a review, and tell us the one change you’ll fund this month—big or small. Your yes might be the one that counts.

Chapters

• 0:00 Opening, Mission, Simultaneous Sip
• 5:10 Be The Change: Family, Prison, Charity
• 12:40 Breaking Cycles Of Incarceration
• 18:45 The 17-Year-Old, The Heavy Bag, Driver’s Ed
• 24:20 Why Small Donations Matter
• 28:30 Media Credibility And Washington Post Layoffs
• 34:20 Violence Narratives And Culture Wars
• 44:00 Second Amendment And Virginia Gun Bill
• 51:00 Self-Driving Cars And Outsourced Safety
• 58:20 Rumble Premium And Audience Notes
• 1:01:40 Washington State Income Tax Creep
• 1:09:30 “Coming Soon” Daycare And Public Funds
• 1:16:40 Banks, Debanking, And Power
• 1:23:20 Genomics, China, And Privacy
• 1:29:00 Election Integrity Flashpoints
• 1:38:30 Voter ID Support And Partisan Frames
• 1:46:40 Immigration, Language, And Housing Pressure
• 1:55:20 Moral Blackmail, Borders, And Power
• 2:02:30 Epstein Links And UK Political Crisis

Transcript

SPEAKER_20: 0:02

Those five times have all been like impactful hour long conversations.

SPEAKER_29: 0:06

Okay.

SPEAKER_20: 0:07

And I got her to do the equity class.

SPEAKER_02: 0:09

She kind of followed by the tree.

SPEAKER_20: 0:48

We're just peasants. Every one of us. You watch those old movies, you see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning, peasants. Welcome to another episode of The Peasants Perspective. So glad you guys joined us here today. It is one of my joys to come in here and essentially for free do this podcast. And I think Ron every day questions if it's worth waking up.

SPEAKER_26: 1:17

Yes. My wife is like, what the heck are you doing?

SPEAKER_20: 1:20

Yeah, what how long is this hobby gonna last? Like, oh no, we're going for a thousand episodes. Yes. Everything's monetized, it pays for itself. There's a there's a there's a focused influence, comfortable, yeah. Comfortable, we can remember everybody's name. Like, neither one of us would actually make a living, but this show would pay for itself. You know what I mean? Like that's that's the thing. It's not a huge audience, it's just enough. Maybe we could pay for the camera lights. Yeah, it's just enough for those 1775 coffee ads that you, the listeners, one out of a thousand of you might actually go get some coffee. Anyways, so please don't forget to share the show, spread it around. We love it. This is the peasants' perspective. This is the only show that I know that stays grounded on the ground. Literally. Like, how does the government interact with we the people, the peasants? I've been a septic designer, I've been in septic tanks. Your number two has been my number one for almost a decade till the government ripped me away from my family. Ron is a civil engineer. He battles every day with local jurisdictions, state, EPA, feds, all kinds of regulations. Why? Good times. So that the rainwater can flow away from your house during a storm. Simple stuff. Moddy Easel, it's a great damn boise. Good morning, son. Pony Boy, good morning. Shantini, good morning, and Carlitz, good morning to you all. Don't forget to share the show. And now, the part you've all come here for early, bright and early for the simultaneous slip. I know why you're here. You're here for the simultaneous sip. All you need is a cup, a mug, or a glass, a tankard, a chalice, or stein, a canteen, jugger flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the day, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better, the simultaneous sip. And it starts right now.

SPEAKER_37: 3:18

My head coffee smells good. And it's funny how coffee never tastes as good as it smells. As you grow older, you'll discover that life is very much like coffee.

SPEAKER_33: 3:26

The aroma is always better than the actuality.

SPEAKER_20: 3:31

Ron doesn't drink coffee, and every now and then he'll come in here and be like, it smells good. I'm like, it's not as good as you think. A little bit of sweet bitterness in the morning to get things started. I have had coffee before. Little sips, mostly in the candy form. We're not going to incriminate you, Ron. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay. That's this show is the peasant's perspective, right? We were born here. We didn't have a choice in the matter. Our feet were planted on this land. From dust we come to dust we go. No matter who's running the place, no matter what side of the road we drive on, we got to live here. Right? We got to live here and we got to figure out how to make it all work and how to get along. We have to lift each other up. We have to help each other out. Because at the end of the day, government is a fleeting thing. It is a construct of we the people, because again, we were here first and will be here last.

SPEAKER_27: 4:23

It's just and for the most part, I feel blessed in my life, but I'd like to keep it that way.

SPEAKER_20: 4:28

Yeah, I'd like to keep it that way. Exactly. Our forefathers built a pretty good society.

SPEAKER_27: 4:31

Yeah.

SPEAKER_20: 4:32

And one of the things, as peasants, is we have to recognize I am the solution. This is the Gandhi solution to all the problems we face. Be the change you want to see in the world. Gandhi didn't encourage the people who listen to him to pick up a gun and go cause revolution. No, he said, make better decisions with your eyes and your dollars. And I would advance that today to and your clicks, your eyes, your dollars, and your clicks, right? We as peasants control things when we recognize where our power lies. And one of those things is being the solution to the problems we see. Stop turning to third parties to fix problems that we ourselves can fix. When I went to prison, I had lived my life up until that point, doing everything I could to say yes to my children. This doesn't mean yes, you can sleep, stay up later. This doesn't mean yes, you can eat junk food. Oh no, no, no. My wife and I have been pretty good about drawing boundaries for our kids. But when it comes to things like I want to play sports, yes. I want to play guitar, yes. I want to get a horse, Dad, yes. Right? Anything I could possibly do to say yes for my kids, I've tried to do. I've always tried to encourage their outlets and things like that to expand who they are and their capacity, right? I always remember Jordan Peterson saying, Don't worry about it.

SPEAKER_27: 5:52

It also opens up the world of possibility. If you keep saying no to your kid, eventually they quit looking.

SPEAKER_20: 5:58

They quit asking, exactly. And I remember Jordan Peterson in his book, one of his books, he says, let the skateboarder skate, right? They're not that yeah, they fall, they hurt themselves. Let them, they're learning their abilities as a male. How much pain can I take? How high of a ball can I fall, right?

SPEAKER_27: 6:14

Where are the boundaries?

SPEAKER_20: 6:15

Skill sets, talents. I want to say yes and encourage my kids. When I became incarcerated, I couldn't say yes anymore. And what was even harder was my wife couldn't say yes. Right. So looking at our kids who are involved in sports and music, and it's like you're looking at the budget, and it's like, what do I cut? The income's gone. Do I cut the cell phones? Need those. Do I cut the rent? Kind of need that. Do I trim the food budget? On the margins. So what gets cut? Kids' sports, kids' extracurriculars, the guitar lessons, all that kind of stuff. We were fortunate because we had a family member that stepped up and said they would pay for those things. And that was where leftbehindandwithout.org was born. Was this idea of lifting each other's suffering? And as I went through the prison system and I talked to prisoner after prisoner, inmate after inmate. My dad was incarcerated. Now I'm incarcerated. My kids are incarcerated. It's like military service. It runs in families.

SPEAKER_27: 7:08

Well, you witnessed the generational incarceration.

SPEAKER_20: 7:11

I'll never forget standing in the hallway in Springfield, Missouri, during a blue light, a little lockdown, or standing in the hallway. There was about eight guys standing there, and I'm one of them. And I start talking about Left Behind and Without because I was encouraging anybody in there that had kids that needed programs, get a hold of this organization. They can help out. And all eight people standing there, I asked them, How many of you had parents that were incarcerated? Every single one of them raised their hands. Oh and then two of them that were older said, not only were their parents incarcerated, bless their souls, they've passed on, but they both had kids that were over 18 that are currently incarcerated as well. So two of those guys were on their trip three generations deep, and maybe even more if you went deeper. Right. This is an insidious problem. And what happens? Parents go to prison and kids get left getting told no. And eventually they'll say, I'll take. That's what happens. So last night, my wife had a phone call from a young uh mother, single mom, who in the she does every single person they help, she does a conference call with. She sees them sitting in their house, you know, that kind of thing. She said it was very obvious this person was in a trailer. And she was kind of emotional about the whole thing because it's not that she has a dad of her son that's incarcerated. Her son himself, as a teenager, has been in and out of juvenile detention. And a long time ago, Left Behind and Without extended their services to juveniles themselves that have been in and out, not just the children of them, right? So she first heard about the program when it was just for children of incarcerated, and she was heartbroken because she wouldn't be able to help out. And then somebody reached out to her and said, No, I think they'll help kids that are in the system too. So she got into the program the day before his birthday, and leftbehindwithout.org has a present program for Christmas and birthdays, right? Parents can go in and pick a present and you get, you know, a decent present, a nice present. And uh so she got her little application in for a present and she picked a punching bag for her 17-year-old. And my wife saw that he was 17 and saw the punching bag, and it was kind of like a cheap kitty one, like a blow-up one. And she's like, you know, I have an extra$50 in my little budget for gifts that expires this end of the month, you know. I I can get you a better punching bag. And so the mom said, Well, I've got we've got a garage that we can hang a punching bag, and that's what he really wants. So she ordered a full-on, you know, heavy bag from Amazon that had it delivered. It showed up on his birthday before he got on the bus. Wow. He was so excited getting on the bus, knowing that he had a punching bag waiting at home. And here's the kicker it was his only birthday present. Oh my god. It was the only thing he got. I almost couldn't hear my wife tell this storyline because I just thought that mother has had to tell her son no so many times, and she told my wife that. She said he doesn't even ask for things because he knows we can't afford them. So then she talked to him again and she's like, What does he want to do? She says, Well, he was interested in lacrosse, but couldn't play because there's equipment and I missed the opportunity. And she said, Well, what's he interested in now? She said, Honestly, he's 17 and he hasn't done driver's ed because we can't afford it. But he wants to drive desperately. And so my wife last night, as part of the program, enrolled him in driver's ed. So he's gonna find out today when he wakes up that last night he got enrolled in driver's ed. It's gonna be like Merry Christmas. Oh my goodness. Right. We can be the change we want to see in the world. This kid's obviously involved in the system. I have no idea why he's in and out of juvenile juvie, but I do know one thing. When it comes to juvenile offenders, we really want them to get set straight and have a second chance at 18. And doing things like helping a 17-year-old about to turn 18 get a driver's license. Right? Uh giving them a little bit of hope and an outlet for their aggression. And he's 17, a punching bag is probably a great thing.

SPEAKER_27: 11:14

It's a real good injection of hope right before you're gonna be an adult and you got to start adulting. Exactly.

SPEAKER_20: 11:21

So please consider if you can, if it's possible, remember that$50 difference was the difference between him getting a blow-up plastic cheap bag for 10-year-olds versus a real bag, right? Any donation matters, it makes a difference. Please consider going to leftbehindwithout.org and making a donation. Uh, make a regular donation. There are a handful of families that make, you know, a one or two hundred dollar donation every month, and it makes a huge difference. My the the program right now, I think, is serving, I think the last number I heard was like 135 children.

SPEAKER_22: 11:53

Wow.

SPEAKER_20: 11:53

Right. So be the change you want to see in the world. We can't always turn to the government to fix our problems. The government is never going to be at as adequately going to address the children of incarcerated parents or juveniles. Any program they do is designed to be for everybody. It's very not special and specific. We helped a specific kid get into driver's ed.

SPEAKER_27: 12:17

Well, that's what I just wanted to say was like, you know, 130 kids, you know, that doesn't sound like a big number, but this is a locally growing, you know, effort that is working. It and if we just sat around and waited for the government to come up with a program like this, it would just never happen.

SPEAKER_20: 12:32

Or, you know, they might give them a hundred million dollar grant and we'd still spend$10,000. Yes, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah. Again, every dollar matters. To my knowledge that I'm aware of, not one disbursement outside of Left Behind Without has gone to anything other than program. Right. There's there's a in there little bylaws, you know, there's compensation for officers if it the program gets big enough. But right now, it's really just about helping. Right. So please consider it. Um, and I the reason I said that is because again, it's part of the peasant's perspective. The things that happen in the government, the policies that take place, the illegal immigration that sucks up our housing, this affects us. When we pass laws and statutes that are ethereal and nebulous and selectively enforced, it creates these cycles of incarceration. It creates all these challenges. Only we, the people, can hold the government accountable. It is a mirror of us. It is through our consent that they operate. So that's why we do this show. That's why it's a passion project. It's the peasant's perspective. How many books or history books or narratives have you read that were written from the perspective of the peasant? Not many. Not many. Usually textbooks and history books are written by the winner, by the government. They're, you know, charged with telling a story that supports government authority, et cetera, et cetera. The books that are written by peasants look like, I don't know, 1984, Animal Farm, Soil Lake Green, Fahrenheit 451. You know, you can go on and on. We're living in that world right now. So as we go through the show today, right, pay attention to all of this stuff. We're being fed a load of bowl. We're being fed, you know, by a government that wants to control us. And while there are people in government that have good intentions, when you get into that machinery, unless enough people push for something and enough people provide support, the machine feeds itself and it will not feed you. Let's take a look at the peasants here. Uh Tip Time, good morning. Tip Time, amazing. Pray the Rosary. Good morning, Pony Boy. I don't donate to charity organizations because a lot of times the money doesn't make it to actual families. This is a charity I donate to. Thank you, Pony Boy. Stories like this make it real and touches you. Thank you, Pony Boy. Small donations are usually from the best places. You know, I I had early on in all of this, I remember I was still in prison. There was a family here in Kitset County that the father is in prison. The mother's out of the picture, so the grandmother is raising her grandkids.

SPEAKER_27: 15:00

Okay.

SPEAKER_20: 15:00

Not an uncommon situation.

SPEAKER_27: 15:02

No, it happens.

SPEAKER_20: 15:03

So she's got these four kids. I believe they're all girls. I don't know. But one of the girls is a younger girl, and she desperately wanted to join the dance team, right? Just take dance classes. It's that age, six, seven, eight years old. It's like you want to be a princess. Yeah. And um, so she got enrolled in dance, and the grandmother called my wife and was grateful that she got into dance. And then my grandmother, this is a story I heard over the prison phone. The grandmother got a little bit not choked up, but you know, hesitant in her next question because you don't want to hear the answer, but you kind of need to know because you got to prep yourself. She said, How long will this last? And my wife's response was as long as she wants to dance and we have funds to pay, we will pay. And that grandmother got emotional too, and then she started crying because again, nobody wants to say no. Right? We want to say yes, especially when it's good stuff. Again, left behind and without helps parents who have become accustomed to saying no, say yes, and hopefully it can make a difference.

SPEAKER_27: 16:07

Right. It's it's two presents in one.

SPEAKER_20: 16:09

Yep, it's two presents in one. Washington Post yesterday had a wipe out. Yeah. Washington Post, no more. They fired a third of their staff. Writers, editors, everything. What the heck happened? Now you might think, oh no, democracy will die in the darkness without the Washington Post. Yeah. Don't worry, folks. Remember, it was the Washington Post that brought a slop like this.

SPEAKER_16: 16:36

Russian President Vladimir Putin gave direct instructions to help elect Donald Trump president. According to a Washington Post in Archie, former President Obama received a secret CIA report in August. That report, quote, captured Putin's specific instructions on the operation's audacious objectives, defeat or at least damage the Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

SPEAKER_18: 16:57

This morning. Oh, that's one report. Here's another one. The Washington Post is reporting that U.S. intelligence agencies had sourcing deep inside the Russian. They didn't, by the way. Nobody inside the Kremlin government capturing Putin's direct instructions in the operation. Obama officially never happened. Almost started World War III. You expelled a bunch of diplomats over your own scheme and scandal. Incoming administration.

SPEAKER_20: 17:26

So the Washington Post, it's a decade late. But some of those writers got fired yet. Finally. Finally. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders are communist acolyte, you know, friends and comrades. They were like, Chip Bezos is too rich to fire people. He's worth like a jillion dollars and he has a yacht and he spent 55 million on his wedding. He could have kept those staff writers.

SPEAKER_26: 17:48

That's one of the posts. That's how I found out. That's I saw one of Elizabeth Warren posts. That's how I found out.

SPEAKER_20: 17:57

Who cares? They can learn to code. Oh, wait. You can learn to prompt. That's a good thing. You don't learn to code, you learn to prompt. I don't care that the Washington Post got fired. I hope some of their viewers come over here to the peasants and they can see firsthand the slot that their favorite paper fed us. All three of them that are left. I'm sure Richard Nixon is raw is just laughing right now in his grave. He's like, ha ha ha ha, I knew we'd get him. Richard Nixon had the big hooplaw with the Washington Post when they wanted to release that Vietnam report that showed that the government had been lying the entire time about Vietnam. Which, by the way, good on the Washington Post for doing that one. That was like 50 years ago. You've long since become slop. This is this is Nicole Wallace from MSNBC. And now she's not with Washington Post, but this is the ilk. This is what they think of you and me, Ron. A normal legacy American that has conservative beliefs.

SPEAKER_01: 18:55

Permission structure for violence. You've got polls about political violence. Democrats don't think it's a good idea. Only Republicans. I think upward of 50% say that if necessary, violence is okay. You've only got the conduct on one of the two sides.

SPEAKER_20: 19:12

Yeah, our perspective on violence is watering the tree of liberty. Okay. It's not going out and blocking ICE protesters, or even myself. I did not view my actions on January 6th as violent, although I admit and accept that they definitely don't touch a cop. Okay. For sure, don't touch a cop under any conditions. You can yell at them and you cannot touch them. Now, Nicole Wallace is saying only the conservatives have this penchant for violence. And uh JD Vance yesterday got on and said, be really wary of a political ideology and politicians who worship death, that everything is death. It results in death. We need to kill more people so that I can live, right? Not a good idea. This idea that death is the solution to inequality and all that kind of stuff. And the Bible says this too: beware of the death worshippers, these death cults, these abortionists, these people who want, you know, all the things that destroy civilization and culture. It's worshiping death. Here's someone who's probably not a Republican voter, by my guess. I don't know. You can judge based on her appearance and her language and actions here. But she's uh, you know, pretty stereotypical Seattle leftist, I would say. I see these face piercings all over the place. I just saw someone this morning. Just this morning when I went to the gas station to do a morning constitution on the way here. Okay, there was a transgender person in there with lit up like this. And I was like, ah, you know, they're everywhere. Here you go. This is the uh side of the aisle that doesn't think violence is a good option.

SPEAKER_23: 20:38

I really pray it doesn't get bad enough. But being a mom in America, I had to stop walking for this. I often think that if it gets to the point of knocking on doors, God, and like to even have these thoughts, it's like I'm literally separating from reality right now.

SPEAKER_20: 20:55

If it comes down to me taking out myself and my kids versus us being taken and harmed by now, I don't think she's an immigrant, I don't believe she's a non-legacy US citizen, etc. etc.

SPEAKER_23: 21:10

But she's so concerned. Ice, like God help me, I did not want to do it. This is not the life I wanted. But that is a very dark thought that I've had. Death would be a easier out than for my children to be taken and harmed by these pedophiles. What is she talking about?

SPEAKER_27: 21:29

In the hell is she talking about?

SPEAKER_20: 21:31

Ice, they might knock on her door and ask for her papers. I'd rather kill me and my family. Okay. All right. I mean, I feel like you're gonna be on some docuseries someday as we're like watching a documentary about how you did that, right? How you became so radicalized, you literally detached from reality. Dude. But don't worry, Nicole Wallace says it's only people on the right that have this pinch over violence. Although I haven't seen a lot of people on the right being like, there's too many immigrants in my neighborhood. Kids, everybody in the bathtub, face down. Okay, haven't seen it. Now, all this comes because this gentleman right here, of the same age group as the woman we just listened to. Okay. Now, women and men on a whole, on a bell curve, not individually, but generally, have a different way of thinking about things. A couple episodes, we paid the clip where the psychologist said that women and men, when they're put in a survey group and they're watching a game being played, that when someone cheats in the game, men and women both get upset at the cheater. Okay. But when the cheater gets punished, the men have pleasure centers light up in their brain. When they see justice, they see pleasure. When the when balance is restored, it's pleasurable to them. Men bring order out of chaos by implementing justice to the cheaters. Okay. Women, though they had a response to the cheater, a feeling of disgust. When the cheater got punished, women had the same reaction of disgust at them being punished. Women see the action, no matter what the reason, as bad. Cheating, punishment to them, they they emotionally, chemically feel it the same. Men don't. When we see a cheater getting punished, we're like, yeah. Oh! We love it.

SPEAKER_27: 23:26

Well, they are that's because life's not fair. But when you you see a little fairness, you're like, yay, fair.

SPEAKER_20: 23:32

So I'm gonna play this clip now. We just played a clip from a woman of this generation. And what this gentleman says is, and I include myself in this generation, we're the first generation that's a post-racist world. We were taught in school to love everybody. You know, Martin Luther King's I had a dream speech was memorized by everybody in the third rate class. Like, and we walked out into the world ready to mingle, right? Ready to go and be multicultural and metropolitan and all that stuff. And instead, we got a different reality. So women come out and they see this reality, and you can see how she adapted to fit into it self-hating, self-loathing, identifying with the others, the ones who really hate her, right? And all that kind of stuff, versus a man who came out and had a little bit different reaction. Dad, just so you know, there's gonna be a couple swear words. I know you listen every day. So I just want to let you know if you need to walk away, hit mute, or if you got kids in the car. I think there's two or three swear words. It's not bad. This isn't a tirade, but just FYI. It's a family show.

SPEAKER_09: 24:33

You want to know why I'm racist? My generation of white American men were told that the last 80 years were a problem. People who looked like us, that lived like us, they they were the problem. And that we all needed to get past racism together, and that if we could pull it off, if we could get past racism, if we could learn to live in a colorblind society, that things would be better for all of us. And so we were the first generation raised with a truly post-racial mindset. And as we started to reach adulthood, we walked down, put our put our hand forward to shake the hands of every other race, of every other group, of every other religion, and were immediately sucker punched by reality. Everybody else made it clear that no, they're not striving for a post-racial society. They want to fight over our corpse. They didn't want the quality, they wanted our stuff. Right now, to be a white man in America, you have to be out loud, expressly okay with the idea that in 50 years, your entire lineage, your entire bloodline, your entire cultural history won't exist anymore. I'm not gonna apologize for the achievements of my ancestors. I'm not gonna apologize because my people built a better world than yours. We took a land made of stick huts and bison chasers and turned it into the country that put a man on the fucking moon in less than 200 years. We made everything that these people are fleeing their homelands of thousands of years to come and deliver DoorDash to. Fuck you. Fuck everything that you say about us. Those are the two responses.

SPEAKER_27: 26:20

Okay. I mean, people, it is a sample size of two. Okay, yeah.

SPEAKER_20: 26:26

In a normal world, these two would be married. Like the right thing, except one of them went, and now this guy's living the bachelor life bitching online. He's married. We can't outrun indoctrination. That's the challenge we as peasants face more than almost anything else, right? Because we're gonna be here. The government will eat itself, it'll implode. It's you know, if you're in England right now, you're watching it implode right before your eyes over this Epstein stuff.

SPEAKER_27: 26:53

Yeah, the thing that I wonder is what are the third graders today memorizing?

SPEAKER_20: 26:57

Uh they're they're memp, you know how we were raised to be cultural and free, right? They're raised to be open sexual and no, you know what I mean? Everybody's can be anything they want. Like it's a it's bad. It's bad. Okay, and what's gonna happen is this generation's gonna come out in the real world, and you know, the vast majority of them are gonna want traditional lives and families. And guess what? That virtue they had, that idea that they would be tolerant and accepting is going to get weaponized against them. How dare you have a nuclear family? Well, you think you're better than us? Okay, right. So they've got their own challenges coming. And uh again, we got to set the table for them. Make your family strong now so they have a platform to stand on. That's one of the things that did not happen with this generation, is there weren't, as Mike Davis says, politic white male politicians in the South are so afraid of being called racist that there was no platform for us to stand on to just say, I mean, you can call it white culture, but I just like Americana. You know what I mean? They wouldn't make the transition. White culture became uh Americana became white culture, and therefore you couldn't talk about the glory of America. Like things, things, things that have been taken out.

SPEAKER_27: 28:08

It's it's it's it's akin to being a white supremacist.

SPEAKER_20: 28:11

Yeah, let's put it this way: uh a concept that when I was in school that I was taught about was manifest destiny, westward expansion. This continent belongs to us. Let's go take it.

SPEAKER_29: 28:21

Okay.

SPEAKER_20: 28:22

And it was sold to us as a pretty good thing. Like it's kind of what led to the settlement of the West. It's what created the uh we would have had a second civil war after the Civil War during Reconstruction if there wasn't a place for people to go to from the South to escape the United States' own military occupation, right? So the westward expansion and manifest destiny were critical to the development of our society. But you come to school now, and if they teach it at all, how do you think they spin Manifest Destiny? Here's a bunch of white racist men who colonialize the Indians, the bison chasers. Okay. Okay. Or we had a way of life that was superior, provided for more people to be lifted out of poverty, fed more people, provided more opportunity for pursuit of happiness, and on and on it goes. They never stage it in things like that. If you were a bison chaser, you were not an artist. Because why? Because you were busy chasing bison. But if you live in a Western society, there's farmers that produce more than they eat themselves. So you can trade your art to the farmer for food. It's a better world. Okay. What do we got going on in the chat?

SPEAKER_26: 29:29

I'm just chatting with Carlitz.

SPEAKER_20: 29:31

Carlitz, I agree with him, except we never met to the moon. It's not possible to land on plasma light. You're probably right, probably.

SPEAKER_27: 29:40

Yeah. Yeah, I said you couldn't see my eye roll. LOL.

SPEAKER_20: 29:45

He's right on everything but the moon landing. You know what? Facts don't matter, narratives do. I remember I listened to one historian one time that was like, you know, why do you include the biblical story of Noah in all these histories? It's like, he's like, but you know, it could have been regional floods or this. He goes, it doesn't matter. It's in deep history, and every culture I write a history for has roots and principles that are rooted in that story. So whether it's real or not, the narrative is real. Exactly. This is again, facts don't win, narratives do. George Washington chopped down the cherry tree, whether he did or not, it's part of the story. Columbus might have been a criminal. He might have been extradited to face charges when he got home because he wasn't allowed to go, blah, blah, blah. Doesn't matter. Discovered America. But he didn't. He discovered the Bahamas. Shut up. Narratives matter. All right. So again, there is this idea from the peasant's perspective. We have a thing. So, for example, when it comes to the Second Amendment, the point of the Second Amendment is to not only defend myself against property invasion and things like that, but it's also ultimately to defend myself against the government. Right? Remember, Second Amendment was written just after a period of time where the government was quartering soldiers in houses, confiscating farmers' produce, you know, cutting off shipping, etc. All this kind of stuff. So the Second Amendment is there so that the government can have a healthy respect and fear for the people. And slowly but surely, over time, government and politicians have tried to take away our gun rights. This is a debate that happened yesterday in Virginia over a bill they have that's essentially outlawing all kinds of guns, right? They're they're going on a full-on gun grabber agenda here. Remember, the Spamberger lady, she's ex CIA, she's bad news bears. So this is this is the debate in Virginia yesterday over this Florida bill. And it's specifically asking about guns that are grandfathered in. Ron, if they pass some crazy gun legislation here in Washington state, the assumption is that it's not retroactive, that if I have a high capacity magazine, I can keep it.

SPEAKER_27: 31:50

If you've got it, you've got it.

SPEAKER_20: 31:51

If you've got it, you've got it, right? This is kind of the way it works. However, they can manipulate things in the bills that make it so where if you got it, you ain't ever getting rid of it. You know what I mean? Or there's only one way to get rid of it, surrender it to the government. So here's this debate. Look at how disingenuous these people that are sponsoring the bill and supporting the bill are about it, right? They don't want the American people or the people of Virginia to know what they're sneaking under their noses because this bill will turn what today are lawful gun owners will potentially turn them into criminals. Mr.

SPEAKER_07: 32:24

Speaker, I yield. The delegate will yield. Mr. Speaker, I would ask the delegate if a Virginian lawfully owns one of the grandfathered firearms that was grandfathered in before July 1 and wants to sell it, how would they go about doing that?

SPEAKER_40: 32:43

Delegate from Fairpatch, sell it.

SPEAKER_06: 32:44

Mr. Speaker, I think the bill speaks clearly on that matter. This is a bill about keeping our communities safe. And as I said, I hope that given Virginians' overwhelming support, we can move this forward in a bipartisan manner. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Mr. Speaker, follow-up. The delegate from Patrick, Delegate Woods.

SPEAKER_07: 32:59

I was wondering. Would the delegate yield? I'll yield for another question. I was wondering what exactly the law does say about when somebody can sell a grandfathered firearm.

SPEAKER_06: 33:10

Delegate from Patrick, Delegate Helm. Mr. Speaker, the bill is clear on sale, import, export of firearms, and all of it. And I do encourage the delegate to read the few full bill text. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

SPEAKER_07: 33:19

Mr. Speaker, speaking of the bill. Delegate has the floor. Mr. Speaker, I did read the bill. And we got a problem. Because, Mr. Speaker, even though the patron did not answer how you could actually sell or transfer one of these grandfathered weapons, the bill does say how you can do it. It says that you can sell it to a firearms dealer, or you can sell it to an out-of-state individual. Did you know that it is a federal felony for someone from the Commonwealth to sell a firearm to someone who doesn't live in the Commonwealth? Did you know that? Because then you'd be trafficking arms across sovereign state lines. Selling also that can bring up to five years in federal prison. So that's not a good idea. And then this bill right here, this actually makes it a state crime to sell a firearm to a firearm dealer. It says you cannot transfer it to any person. And there is no exception to allowing a dealer to purchase a firearm from you. The only exceptions that are in there is the dealer is able to sell to each other and to law enforcement. The government can keep their guns, but you can't. It allows a locality to run them, but it makes somebody who wants to participate commit a misdemeanor. So that doesn't make sense. Oh, okay, we can do give backs. We can do give backs. No, we can't do give backs because then the organization putting on the give back can't accept it because that's a misdemeanor. So what's left, Mr. Speaker? What is left? You can surrender it for nothing to the government, just like Australia, you can give it to a mini-family member, or you can die and your parents can inherit it. That's it. That's the only way you'll be able to transfer a grandfathered rifle here in the Commonwealth without becoming a criminal.

SPEAKER_20: 36:04

So, how do you tell that story from the perspective of the peasant here in 50 years?

SPEAKER_27: 36:10

Well, it was written down clearly.

SPEAKER_20: 36:12

Government stole your guns, is what it did. Why would they write the bill that way? It's about communicating our community safe. Nothing about that keeps it safer.

unknown: 36:21

Yeah.

SPEAKER_27: 36:21

Right? They both said the same thing. This is keep the Commonwealth citizens keeping us safe. Oh yeah.

SPEAKER_20: 36:27

It's about community safety. Here's another one. Okay. So now we've got this onslaught of self-driving vehicles. And if you go down to California, San Francisco, you can get an Awaymo, a Waymo self-driving car, with self-driving taxi. Pretty cool, right? Pretty cool. I mean, it's taking taxi jobs, but whatever. You know, cool. I like it. Seems like a good technology. All right, cool. Get shuttled around in a moving living room. It's awesome. However, again, right? Peasants' perspective, what is it costing me? I already mentioned one thing. It's costing drivers jobs. That's an Uber job. That's a taxi driver job that now doesn't exist. It's a peasant job. Right. So you'd think, okay, well, there's got to be some human support. Like so instead of being a taxi driver, you can become a programmer or you can become a maintenance something. Like there's some jobs, there's some retention. You fire 10 taxi drivers, but you keep one guy on to manage the fleet of 10, something, right? Presumably, those jobs would be here in the United States, right? Apparently not. Apparently not. Apparently, these this all this tech that they're doing the same thing that we've seen other big businesses do. They go for the lowest labor.

SPEAKER_35: 37:28

So no, does Waymo employ humans located remotely to help its vehicles navigate difficult driving scenarios?

SPEAKER_33: 37:37

Um they provide guidance, they do not remotely drive the vehicles. Um as you stated, okay.

SPEAKER_20: 37:47

So vehicles are self-driving. So they're not, you know, sitting in some room with a little, you know, virtual no, they're providing prompts like, oh yeah, that's a traffic cone, back up, get over. You know, it gives the prompt.

SPEAKER_27: 38:00

Okay. But not Mario Kart.

SPEAKER_20: 38:03

Somebody somewhere is accessing the data and cameras off these self-driving cars offer support when they get back into a corner or whatever the case is. Okay. So, I mean, presumably this would be someone local, right? That knows our local traffic laws, can read signs, kind of understands what's going on.

SPEAKER_33: 38:21

Ask for guidance in certain situations, and it's an input, but the Waymo B is always in charge of the dynamic driving task.

SPEAKER_20: 38:31

So that is just that's like saying the engine always drives the car. It's just a prompt. It's just a prompt, people. It's just an input. So is me turning the steering wheel, it's just an input. So is me stomping on the gas pedal. It's like, but he doesn't actually control it. Of course, the engine drives the car. Sure. You control it.

SPEAKER_33: 38:50

My additional inputs.

SPEAKER_35: 38:51

But but the human being, the human being helps the vehicle to navigate those difficult driving scenarios. Is that correct?

SPEAKER_33: 38:58

Yes.

unknown: 38:58

Okay.

SPEAKER_35: 38:59

So are all of these human operators located in the United States? Are they all here?

SPEAKER_33: 39:05

No, we have some in the US and some abroad.

SPEAKER_35: 39:08

So how does that break down?

SPEAKER_20: 39:09

What oh, so presumably they've got this program going on in London or something, right?

SPEAKER_35: 39:13

And maybe it's like a 50-50 split. Yeah, that would make sense. Or abroad.

SPEAKER_33: 39:17

Senator, I don't have that number for you.

SPEAKER_35: 39:19

I could get it back to you. Is it a majority or abroad?

SPEAKER_33: 39:23

I just don't have that number.

SPEAKER_35: 39:26

Very curious. Someone who's running the program has no idea how that workforce breaks down. Just seems kind of curious. Are some of these operators uh located outside the United States?

SPEAKER_33: 39:41

Some are located abroad.

SPEAKER_35: 39:42

And so to me, that's fairly shocking. Waymo has critical safety employees who may need to intervene in a split second if a Waymo encounters an unknown dangerous situation located uh located uh in the United States, but they are outside the United States. Um in what countries are these employees located?

SPEAKER_20: 40:05

Notice how he only gives one country the Philippines.

SPEAKER_35: 40:12

The Philippines, the Philippines, Mr. Payne, that is completely unacceptable. Having people overseas influencing American vehicles is a safety issue. Information, the opposite.

SPEAKER_20: 40:28

We don't even it's every hey, Filipino guy, for 45 bucks. Will you drive that Waymo with this person in it off the bridge? Sure. You know how long it's gonna take him to figure out I did that? There's an entire crime series called upload that starts out with this a guy in a self-driving car that the safety feature just gets turned off and boom he gets in a car accident.

SPEAKER_27: 40:52

Oh shoot.

SPEAKER_20: 40:53

This is scary stuff again. What's the peasant's perspective? I'm already hesitant with the self-driving car.

SPEAKER_27: 40:59

Well, the peasant's perspective is this is impacting me. Yeah, huh? It impacts me. That's the perspective.

SPEAKER_20: 41:05

Yeah, it impacts me. Literally, it could physically impact me. Like a Wiimo car could hit you. And the responsible party is in the Philippines in a different time zone. Work a night shift during my day shift.

SPEAKER_27: 41:18

You know what I mean? I wonder if they're watching it like a TV show eating chips.

SPEAKER_20: 41:22

Yeah. What's getting I always think this, and I've had my little car bit before, but it's like, I don't like the fact that our cars are loaded up with so technology, they're watching it.

SPEAKER_27: 41:31

Yeah.

SPEAKER_20: 41:31

You know, and I don't like it with our phone. I don't like it with anything. I mean, we're kind of stuck in this.

SPEAKER_27: 41:35

What am I doing? Well, I don't like it that they can track your mileage so they can be like, well, we're gonna start charging you per mile.

SPEAKER_20: 41:41

Why did the insurance rate go up this month? Well, you breaked a little hard.

SPEAKER_27: 41:45

Right. Okay. Or yeah, or if they're tracking your telemetry, so they're like, Well, you were speeding on July 3rd.

SPEAKER_20: 41:52

Yeah, heading towards a rally. We noticed you uh consistently go park around the Kitsap Republican Party building, so we've raised your rates and banking you. All right, Ron, do we got a rumble ad for us right now? Yes, we do. Great. You guys, being a rumble premium subscriber is very beneficial because you get to go onto the private side and listen to us talk to the unoffendables.

SPEAKER_27: 42:19

You've probably noticed Rumble is growing fast and it's not slowing down. They're building a real alternative to big tech that puts created first and it actually protects free speech. And now there's Rumble Premium, an easy way to upgrade your experience with premium. You get ad-free viewing across the platform, no pre-rolls, no interruptions, just content you came for. Plus, premium members unlock exclusive content like bonus videos, behind the scenes drops, and more from your favorite creators. Right now, Rumble is offering a ten dollar off on annual subscription. Just go to rumble.com slash premium and use the promo code studio at checkout. That's rumble.com slash premium. Promo code studio. No ads, more freedom and content you actually care about. That's the deal.

SPEAKER_20: 43:03

You know, one of the things I really love about our audience is I have a lot of interaction with many of you, right? You're either you're either over at 1776 live.us or somehow we have communication. And it happens more often than not. We'll get into some discussion, because of course people talk to me. It usually turns to politics or the happenings of the day. And uh they'll say something kind of about some obscure thing, like, oh, I listened to this committee hearing where a guy da-da-da-da. And they're you know, they'll rattle off some obscure fact, and it's like, yeah, I just covered that on my show, and then they'll be like, Oh, that's where I hurt. The reason sometimes we get out into the weeds with these weird things is it might be the only chance you get to hear it. And you know, having Waymo drivers in the Philippines, you go and get in a Waymo car, you're directly affected.

SPEAKER_27: 43:51

Yeah, you didn't hear about that on Fox News.

SPEAKER_20: 43:53

If you live in Virginia and you've got one of those bedazzled AR 15s, you know, you might be stuck with that thing for. While unable to sell it, transfer it, or do anything with it. And if you do, you might unwittingly be committing anything from a misdemeanor to a felony. You know, I mean it's pretty scary. And how how broadly do you think they're going to publish that stuff? Well, no, they're going to put a thousand people in jail before the rest of the world figures out don't sell your guns. Yeah. You know? Okay, so here is a committee meeting here at home, Washington State. This is you and me, Ron. And we've got this thing going on because they want to violate our state constitution and implement an income tax, but don't worry, it's only for the wealthy. So this is how the debate is going. In our state, everybody, the way they're doing it is everybody's going to file a tax return, and then you'll just apply an exemption up to a million.

SPEAKER_27: 44:44

So anybody from not Washington state, please comment in the chats on what you think about this.

SPEAKER_20: 44:50

If you have state taxes, please don't be the a-hole that's like, well, if I have to pay them, you do too. They have other taxes they're not getting rid of.

SPEAKER_27: 44:58

Dude, dude, dude, hold on, people. You know, people that have state taxes, please understand that Washington State is just raking us over the coals in every other way possible.

SPEAKER_20: 45:06

I have a friend who has 162 acres in Wisconsin. She called me a week or two ago because she got a property tax bill. Should I pay this thing? Pay the tax bill, right? Yeah. It's$3,800. 162 acres, that's her annual tax bill. Okay. And I'm like, huh. I have one acre and I pay a thousand a month in property taxes.

SPEAKER_27: 45:26

Exactly.

SPEAKER_20: 45:27

We don't need an income tax.

SPEAKER_27: 45:28

No.

SPEAKER_20: 45:29

They got the money.

SPEAKER_27: 45:29

Okay.

SPEAKER_20: 45:30

So here is one of these obscure, not on mainstream TV. Como news isn't going to be playing this behind the scenes of what our Democrat politicians are saying about the taxes. They're laughing in our faces.

SPEAKER_01: 45:43

Comments from Rev Springer because he said don't trust Democrats that they won't this won't expand to everybody. He said it twice now on the record.

SPEAKER_21: 45:51

Um I'll just repeat what I said before. There's not support in the legislature for enacting an income tax on low-income people. There's not support in the public for that.

SPEAKER_20: 45:59

That's not necessarily low income. What about now? Look at his face. Okay. This is Representative Joe Fitzgibbon. Look at his face. Microexpressions matter.

SPEAKER_21: 46:08

Moderate income. Somebody makes 900,000. Um Rev Springer has, you know, made his see the little half smile from that.

SPEAKER_20: 46:15

Oh, what about 900,000?

SPEAKER_21: 46:18

I think what you're hearing from us is that we're not pursuing that. And we don't hear and we don't hear support for that from our constituents. And you won't in the future. We don't hear support for that in our colleagues or our constituents.

SPEAKER_20: 46:28

There's no support for the bill, period. She's asking, are you going to lower the threshold from a million down in the future? Are you going to lower it? Right. Can you say no?

SPEAKER_21: 46:39

We're not going to bind future legislatures, but that's not a proposal that we support.

SPEAKER_20: 46:44

Or states founders who turn this wasteland into a state, bound you, Representative Fitzgibbon, from ever implementing an income tax by putting it in the freaking constitution. Yeah. So please pass the favor on and bind future politicians from lowering the threshold for the income tax that you weren't supposed to implement in the first place.

SPEAKER_27: 47:12

Yeah, stop talking about the what the constituents want. The constituents already put it in the state constitution and support it overwhelmingly.

SPEAKER_43: 47:21

Overwhelmingly. I think Rev Springer speaks for Rep Springer. I mean, I think as as individuals, we're all, every one of us up here are elected from different districts, right? And so I think Rep Springer is a friend and a colleague. And I think that he stated his opinion, as you pointed out now, multiple times on the record. And I think that is absolutely his right to do. I think when I look at what my my constituents are asking me for and what the reality is on the ground, they're asking for us to actually look at millionaires. And I'm saying this in a singular sense because to Rep Fitzgiven's point, we're not going to bind future legislators, and I'm not going to bind um anyone to say this is what we will do next year. This is what you're bound already before we are doing this year, based on what constituents need, based on what we need in healthcare, education, housing, and public safety. And so when Rep Springer says what he thinks future legislators might do, I mean, you know, unless his you know middle name is Neo and he can go into the matrix and figure that out. I'm not quite sure that any of us know that's why we want you to bind them!

SPEAKER_20: 48:23

Because you can't guarantee that it's gonna go one way or the other. So please bind them. Like, and I'm not even conceiving the point that I want the income tax in the first place. But your whole premise is retarded.

SPEAKER_43: 48:34

Your whole premise is retarded. But um, but I again I respect him as a friend and colleague.

SPEAKER_21: 48:40

We're here talking about this proposal. This is what we think there's support for among us up here, among our colleagues in the legislature and in the public. And um, I don't see reason to think that that voters or legislators are going to support an income tax on low-income Washingtonians anytime soon.

SPEAKER_20: 48:58

Anytime soon. Defined soon. Next year, next year or two. Like, because you know, it's like you said this yesterday. My wife mentioned this. Well, what happens when inflation goes up? And now what today feels like a hundred grand is the million dollars. Right. You know, I have a Zimbabwe central bank note at home that's$50 million.

SPEAKER_27: 49:18

Right. And you can buy what, a pack of gum?

SPEAKER_20: 49:21

Yeah, it's worth$35. There you go. So this idea of like, you know, we have this moving value of what you can buy with your money. You know, for some of our audience members, you remember when you graduated high school, I know because you're old, right? And you were making three dollars an hour, and you were like, oh my goodness, and you know, you saved up your$3 an hour job over the course of the summer. You bought a car.

SPEAKER_28: 49:44

Yeah.

SPEAKER_20: 49:44

Guess what? You can have that$18 minimum wage job. You still ain't buying a freaking car at the end of the summer. This this idea, first of all, yes, your perceived income could go up to where all of a sudden you look like a rich person based on standards 10 or 15 years ago. Right. Right. So there's one way that it can nab you in the butt. The other way is they can just go, well, 900,000 is rich too, and 800,000 is rich too. And turns out quarter million dollars joint household income is pretty rich by taxing everybody in Seattle and Bellevue and Kirkland. And you know what I mean?

SPEAKER_27: 50:16

Who are these thousandaires that are getting off scot-free?

SPEAKER_20: 50:19

Yeah, now the reason that they've got to raise this revenue is because Washington has a problem with the budget. We have a shortfall year after year. We rely on the federal government to give loans and all that kind of stuff. And so, you know, we've got to raise revenue. We got to raise taxes. Heaven forbid we go look at places where we've been spending money. Let's just go right back and look at a daycare in Linwood, Washington.

SPEAKER_08: 50:40

So I have a toddler and we moved to Lakewood, Lakewood, Washington, three years ago, and I wanted to get my son in daycare. And this place keeps saying that it's opening soon. The address growing tots or something. Okay, it's been three years. Three years since they said they're gonna open, and we have a sign that says coming soon. Like this is such yeah. You can't tell me that there's not something corrupt about this. The sign says growing hotter, coming for me.

SPEAKER_27: 51:28

Looks like it's still coming soon.

SPEAKER_08: 51:31

Everything won't kid, obviously. I'm out of here. It's right next to my house. Lakewood, Washington. Do with it what you will, but I can't see her.

SPEAKER_20: 51:58

So three years, and the follow-up is they're funded. Oh what Washington State tax dollars to enter some federal block grant. But yet we got we gotta tax the rich, wrong, otherwise they're never gonna finish the Tots joy uncoming coming soon place.

SPEAKER_27: 52:14

I'm I'm gonna wreck your day today. What if we could get the funding that went to this place and redirect it to Left Behind and Without? That would be awesome.

SPEAKER_20: 52:25

All we'd have to do is the problem is I don't know if the staff at Left Behind and Without is willing to pay the politicians what it's gonna take to get the grants. Why wouldn't we be able to do that? I don't know. There's a lot of money going to that daycare.

SPEAKER_27: 52:43

There's no doing nothing.

SPEAKER_20: 52:45

There's probably kids on enrollment. It's getting money from the state.

SPEAKER_27: 52:49

There's no value because there's no one there. Yeah.

SPEAKER_20: 52:52

But some organization owns that property and is using that money to own the property, and that's an asset. No matter how you slice it, right? Even if you're super rich, again, if we start funneling money to buy real estate, but you're not having to spend your money. Imagine me, someone who understands business structure and entities and shell corporations, right? I mean the Hunter Biden brain in the well.

SPEAKER_27: 53:13

Imagine that I own that building. What would you talk to me about? What would you tell me?

SPEAKER_20: 53:17

Let me put it this way. Let's say I do make a lot of money somewhere. Okay. Okay. So now I got a lot of taxes. So what I do is I get you, Ron, to go open a daycare. Okay. And I get the government to fund the daycare. Okay. Right. Now I own part of the daycare. I've got some shares, some ownership interest. And so you get millions of dollars from the government. You purchase the building in the business name of which I'm a part owner.

SPEAKER_27: 53:37

This sounds like a good deal.

SPEAKER_20: 53:38

And now I just say, do whatever you need to do. I don't care if you put kids in there. I don't care what you do. What I want is the building depreciation. Oh. I didn't buy the building. The government did. But now I get to take depreciation off that building and apply it to my tax bill. Oh, that's good. Thereby forcing the taxpayers not only to fund the asset, but also to fund the tax break. Oh, okay. That's just a really simplistic way of looking at it. But if you're George Soros or Arabella Network or any of these things, and you start seeing all these NGOs and all these healthcare and childcare, and then they funnel to this another layer of NGOs, which funnels to a Bill and Hillary Clinton Foundation or a George Soros Foundation or a Bill Gates Foundation who are starting all these LLCs, seed funding them with a little bit of money, and then they use that money as leverage to go get these bigger.

SPEAKER_27: 54:26

Well, that building that we just looked at, how much do you think that thing's worth? A million bucks? Oh, way more than that. I know, but let's do it. Let's round it down. Let's round down to a million bucks just for easy math here. Okay. Let's say that there's 500 of these in each state, and there's 50 states. What's 500 times 50 times a million? And that's the asset class that we're talking about that just sitting on the ground doing jack shit. Yeah.

SPEAKER_20: 54:49

And yet we've got our politicians being like, well, our community doesn't have a uh a real desire for low-income people to be taxed. Okay. I don't think there's a desire for anybody to be taxed. You know, if anybody in that neighborhood in Lakewood drives by that building and knows what's actually going on, I'd be shocked if they voted for anybody who supported it. But yet they will. Why? Because facts don't matter, narratives do. Okay. It's coming soon, Ron. It's coming soon. Just be patient. Soon enough there will be kids filling that place up. You know, we'll be$10 million into subsidies before we get the first enrollment. Now you might think, ah, but Taylor, the banking system, they won't prevent that kind of stuff. The banks aren't going to let themselves be used for uber nefarious purpose. They wouldn't let, you know, George Soros or his ilk create these foundations and LLCs and funnel. No, they wouldn't do that. Listen, banks have done way more nefarious things. Here's Swiss Bank, right? One of the largest banks in the world, based out of Switzerland, and they do banking all over the place, and they have a whole bunch of affiliate banks. There's not a bad chance that your local bank is affiliated with this bank. Okay. So represent Senator Kennedy is grilling whoever their bank representative is about this bank's historical behavior, and not only historical behavior, but how the behavior has never really corrected. Even until today, they're debank people. Listen to this. There are very few institutions left that protect the peasant.

SPEAKER_11: 56:14

Can we agree that when the Nazis would conquer a country during World War II, that the Nazis would take the people's money?

SPEAKER_10: 56:23

Is that correct? I'm not sure what you mean by that, Senator. Sure you know what I mean. They took people's money, didn't they?

SPEAKER_22: 56:36

Yes, Senator.

SPEAKER_11: 56:38

And uh that includes the money of Jewish people, is that correct?

SPEAKER_22: 56:42

Yes, Senator.

SPEAKER_11: 56:43

And the Nazis not only took their money, um, they uh they took the hair from Jewish people in their teeth and sold them, didn't they?

SPEAKER_22: 56:50

Yes, Senator.

SPEAKER_11: 56:51

And they took the Jewish people's labor, didn't they? Yes, Senator. And ultimately the Nazis took the lives of many Jewish people, didn't they?

SPEAKER_22: 56:59

They did, Senator.

SPEAKER_11: 57:00

And the Nazis took all this money and put some of it in Credit Suisse bank, didn't they?

SPEAKER_22: 57:06

They did, Senator.

SPEAKER_10: 57:07

Why did Credit Suisse take this money?

SPEAKER_22: 57:11

Uh thank you for that question, Senator. UBS and Credit Suisse's conduct, uh behavior uh during World War II uh was terrible and shameful.

SPEAKER_20: 57:20

Why did Credit Suisse take it? So we stopped all that behavior, we decided never to do it again, we're never gonna do that, we're gonna follow all the rules above board this money.

SPEAKER_22: 57:33

Um profit from it at that time.

SPEAKER_11: 57:35

UBS got caught manipulating the live manipulating the live borrowing interest rate, didn't it? That's the London International Banking Overnight Rate. Manipulating the interest rate, isn't that correct?

SPEAKER_22: 57:45

Amongst other banks, yes.

SPEAKER_11: 57:47

Um UBS also got caught hiding the uh money of 52,000 Americans so they wouldn't have to pay taxes, isn't that correct?

SPEAKER_22: 57:55

That was settled in 2008.

SPEAKER_11: 57:57

Yeah, you paid 780 million dollars, didn't you? For doing that.

SPEAKER_10: 58:00

Isn't that correct?

SPEAKER_22: 58:02

I'm not sure of the exact numbers.

SPEAKER_10: 58:03

I I am.

SPEAKER_11: 58:04

U UBS also recent his history decided to de-bank people whose politics you didn't like, didn't you, didn't you? Uh no, Senator. UBS said we're uh we're not gonna do business with uh firearm-related companies or oil and gas companies and coal miners and crypto financing, didn't you?

SPEAKER_20: 58:23

You know, is crypto accepting all things we need to survive.

SPEAKER_11: 58:28

Uh we provide fair access uh for but you debanked these people, didn't you? Uh how noble of you.

SPEAKER_20: 58:36

How of you that when the Nazi so so now you've got banking, you've got all of our political class, you've got all none of these guys understand the peasants here. Like simple stuff. We're not asking a lot, you know, basic privacy rights. I don't know. One of the things that's important to me is to keep my medical data private. Like, you know, if there you want a way to ruin my life, get my genome and create one of those super viruses that targets me. Right now, that might seem dystopian, but Senator or uh Representative Burkhart says, you know that whole 23andMe thing?

SPEAKER_29: 59:09

Mm-hmm.

SPEAKER_20: 59:10

Guess what they're finding out in their intelligence briefings.

SPEAKER_45: 59:13

Hey everybody, Tim Burchett. Going to uh conference meeting this morning. Um I've been working on a piece of legislation dealing with the Chinese who are purchasing our genetic material from a lot of these ancestry groups, so we get your history checked on, see where you're from. Everybody's always related to the King of England.

SPEAKER_20: 59:35

Nobody's a nobody's a horse thief, it seems, but everybody's related to the King of England when someone's in a horse thief. Well, first of all, the King of England probably propagated a little faster the better, you know. But I think that's always funny because there's a lot of whore thieves out there.

SPEAKER_45: 59:50

Anyway, uh the um that information called it they create what's called a genome, and it's and the Chinese are actually buying it up. We've been told that some of our intelligence if they're developing a genome, develop um diseases that would affect childbearing American women, childbearing age. So I've been working on this for over a year. It's like getting a glacier moved. The big boys are making money off of it, obviously.

SPEAKER_20: 1:00:21

The intelligence community is telling them that the Chinese government is buying publicly available genome information and they're creating a virus that will target childbearing aged American women, Caucasian women. And he can't get legislation to move because the big boys are making money off it. Who's the big boys? I don't know. The banks who took Nazi wealth and debanked things like coal mining and gun sales and oil and gas. Those guys. The biomedical industry, which we don't even have to go into there. I mean, those guys have been chasing you down with a needle for a long time. Nothing that we have institution-wise is really there to serve we the peasants. They serve their own interests. And while we might get a Burkhard or one of these people that go in there and try to make a huge difference, unless we speak up and unless we do something, this is gonna be they're going to feast on our corpse.

SPEAKER_28: 1:01:21

Yeah.

SPEAKER_20: 1:01:22

Uh you don't know how else to say it. So all of this leads me to this election issue. Uh I think we can flush a lot of this out if we can just have confidence in our elections and real results. It's not just confidence. I don't want a narrative. American elections are secure. We pick your winner, right? Everybody believe it. I don't want that. Want verifiable factual results. I want to see that, right?

SPEAKER_27: 1:01:45

Observable.

SPEAKER_20: 1:01:46

So when certain people who I've watched for a decade fight against everything that I consider fair and honest about elections, start freaking out at what Donald Trump and his administration are doing with election security and going after ballots in Fulton County, I get a little giddy. This is Mark Elias, the guy who paid Fusion GPS for the steel dossier that created the entire Russia Gate narrative. This is the attorney that paid for it. He knew the Russia Gate thing was fake. He paid Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS. But this guy, along with the Washington Post and Nicole Wallace here, whose husband was one of the signers on the letter saying the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation and it wasn't. Her husband signed on that. So here we have two Russia colluders, people who have tried to tell we, the American people, professional liars that Putin's involved in all this stuff. So when Mark Elias gets on TV and says this is the most dire warning I've ever had, I get a little giddy.

SPEAKER_05: 1:02:45

Yeah, look, I've been sounding the alarm about the risks of Donald Trump faced to democracy uh since I was the general counsel to Hillary Clinton's campaign.

SPEAKER_20: 1:02:53

You and I you know, back when I uh paid for the guys to drum up Russia, think Trump's a threat to democracy, not Putin. That's why we framed him.

SPEAKER_05: 1:03:04

Television sounding the alarm before the 2020 election and what we saw afterwards. And I am here to sound a larger and louder alarm today than I ever have before. I mean, the fact is that Donald Trump has proven himself desperate. As you point out, the redistricting has not worked out the way he wished. I'm proud that my law firm represented the Democratic Party in defeating the Republican effort uh that just uh we just won in the Supreme Court. But the fact is that when that didn't work out, he then went to plan B. And plan B is what uh we are seeing it is political prosecutions, it is the threats of more political prosecutions, it is the dry running of how one seizes ballots. Yes, he's interested in 2020, but he's really interested in setting up the mechanism to be able to seize ballots in 2026.

SPEAKER_20: 1:03:50

Why? Does he want to count them?

SPEAKER_05: 1:03:54

He has found a prosecutor in Missouri, in Georgia, in Missouri, seizing ballots in Georgia. That prosecutor in Missouri apparently has nationwide jurisdiction, so he has found a willing prosecutor to to to do these things. Meanwhile, you have Steve Bannon on TV, who, as you know, is uh you know never too many degrees away from Donald Trump's psych psyche uh this morning saying that uh that ice should uh should be around uh uh polling locations.

SPEAKER_20: 1:04:22

And I mean, why would it matter? I mean, the legals aren't allowed to vote, right?

SPEAKER_05: 1:04:26

I mean, I mean like I'm not afraid to walk. Can't they be anywhere in America? What we have seen ICE do is is uh tragic towards U.S. citizens, including killing uh U.S. citizens. So, so you know, like this is all lining up. But but Nicole, if I can just add one final thing.

SPEAKER_20: 1:04:41

He's narrative building right now. It's narrative building.

SPEAKER_05: 1:04:44

The biggest lie that Donald Trump is telling right now that we really can't let go slide, and that we cannot let normalize is this idea that states operate as his agents. The Constitution does not allow this the president to have any role in federal elections. I just want a case in DC district court in which the judge rejected the executive order that Donald Trump issued, saying that the president has no role in elections, but yet he is trying to turn the constitution on its head. States run elections, period. They don't act as the agent of the federal government, they don't act as the agent of the president, the president has no role, and we cannot allow him to sort of slide this by people as if somehow the states are doing his bidding, and therefore if they don't do the job he likes, he can he can go in. He can't.

SPEAKER_20: 1:05:31

The president is different than any other elected official out there because he takes an oath to preserve the constitution. So if you think that to preserve the constitution, the union of the several states, then you might have to nationalize or standardize some things when you've got illegals voting, you have fraud in all its different variations and forms. And the reality is the American people are almost entirely behind the concept of voter ID. American citizens should vote.

SPEAKER_40: 1:06:02

Take a look here. Favor photo ID to vote. 85% of white people favor it. 82% of Latino. 76% of black Americans favor it. So the bottom line is this voter ID is not controversial in this country. The photo ID to vote is not controversial in this country. It is not controversial by party, and it is not controversial by race. The vast majority of Americans agree with Nicki Minaj that, in fact, you should have a photo ID to be able to vote.

SPEAKER_20: 1:06:29

Yes, Nicki Minaj is single-handedly saving the country. It's why are Democrat politicians even pretending like this is a problem? It should be super obvious. You're not, you're not, you're not using illegals to win your election, Bernie Sanders, are you? Elizabeth Walker.

SPEAKER_27: 1:06:48

Yeah, after he was shouting out those percentages, I was like, who's left?

SPEAKER_20: 1:06:51

Yeah, are you relying on Guatemalans to secure your seat? Like, I understand that you want to defend Ilan Omar and there's that special Somali situation in that one district in Minnesota. You know, I get that. But why the broad opposition to this? Donald Trump was asked this question. Will you trust the results of the midterms if Republicans lose control of Congress?

SPEAKER_37: 1:07:09

I will, but if the elections are honest. Look. Ah, seems reasonable. I want the last one that wants to complain. I just want I just had a great election. They say one of the greatest elections you will agree ever. Won all seven swing states, won 84% of the counties in America. That's why the map is all red. We just had a great election. Uh I believe there was cheating. I think I think it was cheating. Well, speaking of county, what are you doing in Fulton County? Speaking of counties, what is happening in the country? Will you try to do that? So we'll get back to the Fulton County issue here in a minute.

SPEAKER_20: 1:07:43

Right, because we all know that they raided the Fulton County warehouse and got the ballots. So Senator Dick Blumenthal, or as he's often called, Dunang Dick, the man who lied, bold face lied about his service in Vietnam. I was deployed, I shot guns, I did all this stuff. And then we find out he never went. He never went. I mean, this is as outrageous as me going around and telling stories about my time in Afghanistan, looking for Osama bin Laden in the caves. And then you find out I was never there. That's this senator. Okay. So this senator, a man who has no problem, bold faced lying, and apparently gets re-elected cycle after cycle, believes that Donald Trump trying to do anything about the elections is totalitarian.

SPEAKER_39: 1:08:33

It's simply a step toward totalitarian and authoritarian effort to suppress the vote. And it goes along with his season.

SPEAKER_20: 1:08:45

I'm starting to wonder that the Democrats can only win elections if they can get that extra 20 million, you know, massive turnout, like the Joe Biden turnout, 81 million votes. Like I'm starting to wonder if that might be the only way they think they can win.

SPEAKER_39: 1:08:58

Election machines and voting rolls, imposing citizenship tests, a series of actions that are designed to suppress and maybe stop the vote.

SPEAKER_20: 1:09:08

Oh, like like who? Like Zelensky? Could he stop the vote like Zelensky did, your hero? Donald Trump replies, right? Like, uh, why is this such a big deal? Like, what's wrong with counting the ballots? Doesn't everybody want these things to be free and fair? What is it looking about?

SPEAKER_37: 1:09:25

I'm not doing anything, but the FBI went in because it's been under under uh, I guess, review for years, the cheating that took place in Fulham County. And in that particular thing. Well, you're gonna find out. Look, why would anybody be upset that they went in and they went, they got the ballots, I guess, right? Again, they did this. That's been under review and under investigation for four years. And now they got a court order. You know, they got a court order signed by nobody knows what a respected but liberal judge signed a court order, allowing them to go and pick them up. Well, you're gonna know what the ballot's safe because they're right now inspecting the ballot. I'm not involved in it, but they are inspecting and checking.

SPEAKER_20: 1:10:10

Now, that seems reasonable to me, right? There's been all this dispute about the ballots, and Fulton County says they counted them four times. So I'm totally confident the FBI is gonna get the exact same results Fulton County got, right? Right, right, guys? Right?

SPEAKER_27: 1:10:22

Well, yeah, if you count them four times, what what's the matter with the count number fifth?

SPEAKER_20: 1:10:25

Now, you know, the allegation from the left is well, they're gonna count them and come up with a different result because they're the cheaters. Okay, well, you could have counted them on camera at some point or done anything to allow normal people to verify, but instead it was a whole lot of trust me. So here's Stacy Abrams, who, by the way, never conceded her governorship loss to Brian Kemp. Right. So this is a woman who has told us over and over and over again that the elections are not secure and they're not fair unless she wins. But now, that's a different story. Quietly in Georgia, right? This genuine fear, right? I look into these people's eyes on these little clips like this, I see the micro expressions, and I I have tells too. I mean, we all do, but that's the point. As human beings, we're the best lie detectors when we look at this stuff. Look at her eyes, look at how she's talking about this.

SPEAKER_04: 1:11:16

Okay, this is serious concern. Georgia, my home state, the FBI conducted a search of a Fulton County Election Center. This is something we should care about because if America has a faith, it is the faith of democracy. If we have a collective practice, it is at the altar of the notion that Americans come together and that we are allowed to choose our leaders and set our course.

SPEAKER_20: 1:11:41

It's faith and belief. She doesn't talk about it as a reality or a fact. As long as you believe the elections, as long as you have faith in the elections, not talking about reality and fact.

SPEAKER_04: 1:11:52

And that we have the right to be heard. We are watching now as this nation under a Republican authoritarian regime strips us of our faith.

SPEAKER_20: 1:12:03

If you believed me, you would already think the elections were rigged. But the left has to believe that they're fair because otherwise you would have to embrace the fact otherwise they are rigged. Yeah. And you'd have to embrace the fact that these freaking people putting these policies in place isn't because they're fighting Republicans, it's their policies.

SPEAKER_04: 1:12:26

It defies our tradition. Tells us that the belief in democracy is no longer sufficient to protect us.

SPEAKER_20: 1:12:35

The belief isn't enough.

SPEAKER_04: 1:12:40

These ice raids are one version of it. But the raid on an election center should also send chills down our spine, especially if they are followed by arrest of election workers who simply did their job. They did what they were told to do. It's also one of the most diverse. And with the seizure of those election records, they also got a list of voters. Are you kidding me?

SPEAKER_20: 1:13:10

We're gonna kick out Geraldo and Pablo and Rodriguez and Emanuel and Mohammed, they all voted.

SPEAKER_04: 1:13:21

A list that they've been asking for, state after state after state. In fact, in Minneapolis, Pim Bondi said to Tim Walls by letter, if you will give us your list, we might stop killing you.

SPEAKER_26: 1:13:33

Oh my gosh. What?

SPEAKER_20: 1:13:35

Altar of democracy. Listen, lefties, you're you're gonna cash some checks at some point, right? I just heard on the radio today, on the way in here, someone saying, Looks, if they're gonna accuse Trump of being a totalitarian dictator, lean into it and do it. Because no matter what you do, they're going to accuse you of it at this point. Doesn't matter what you do, you're a racist. I can marry a black woman.

SPEAKER_19: 1:13:56

You're still racist. What are you calling? What are you colonizing a black woman?

SPEAKER_27: 1:14:00

Yeah, that's that's what happened to like Dave Chappelle. Yeah, it's like it's like I married an Asian woman. Hello? Hello?

SPEAKER_20: 1:14:07

Yeah. So anyway, the whole thing is as nine. I remember when Rashida Taleb called Mark Meadows racist in on an open floor debate, and Mark Meadows lost his mind. And this is back when uh the Baltimore, what was his name? The black guy with the shaved head. It wasn't Lewis, it was the other Cummings, Elijah Cummings was chairman of that committee. And Rashida Talib calls uh uh Mark Meadows racist. And Mark Meadows gets pissed. And he, I demand speaking time, so he gets on these. I am not a racist. I have an interracial grandkids. My kids have intermarried. Like you calling me a racist, you're telling my grandkids that Pappy don't love them, right? And they force Rashida to leave to retract it from the record. They'll call you a racist no matter what you do. They're gonna call Trump a totalitarian no matter what he does.

SPEAKER_26: 1:14:57

Right.

SPEAKER_20: 1:14:58

Guys, don't say things like they'll just kill you. Don't cash those checks.

SPEAKER_27: 1:15:04

Right.

SPEAKER_20: 1:15:04

Don't put that out there. Don't make it acceptable and expect it. Come on.

SPEAKER_27: 1:15:08

Well, I did I did want to mention that because it seemed like the gentleman that you played earlier, the the guy and the chick that were both anti. The guy's argument was all about oh sh the guy's argument was all about my brain just went freaking blank. I'm sorry.

SPEAKER_20: 1:15:27

Alright, it'll come back. It happens. We're we're an hour into this thing.

SPEAKER_27: 1:15:32

By the way, we got a lot. Oh, oh, now I remember what I was gonna say. He was injecting words like kill into his dialogue, and it was like, why is he injecting words like that? Yeah, and it it is to normalize those words in the dialogue. It's like all of a sudden, you know, after you say kill five or six times, you know, maybe it becomes more normal.

SPEAKER_20: 1:15:57

And you have to think the most nefarious way possible. Yeah. I was in prison, okay. I've seen nefarious criminal intended mindset thinking. Machiavelli, crisis solution, problem crisis solution, right? Hegelian dialectic. This all plays into this. These people are students of that. Okay, they don't they don't make you read Machiavelli in high school. Right.

SPEAKER_27: 1:16:19

And when they say words like that and just drip them in over time.

SPEAKER_20: 1:16:22

So what happens is they're going to kill us, they're going to do something, they're going to do whatever. And the other side's like, we're not going to do that. We don't have any attention to that. They're going to kill us. Who are we going to kill? Kevin. Punch a cop and get shot. Right. Oh, look, they killed us. They killed Kevin. Yeah, but he came and punched a cop. Right. Yeah, but we said you were going to kill us. Right. Oh, is there any boundary to when we can or can't defend ourselves?

SPEAKER_27: 1:16:43

Right, exactly. This is how it works.

SPEAKER_20: 1:16:45

Yes. It's like they're going to kill us. Who? The people we send to go get killed. There's problems all around. Obviously, we've got a couple of rays of hope as far as ballots getting raided in Georgia. It's like, a breath, maybe we might get through this. You know, Senator Thune isn't going to be worried about pothole legislation and whatever legislation because elections are the issue. This Fulton County administrator, I can't remember his name, it's irrelevant. He'll be in prison soon, I'm sure. Gave this speech where he says, hey, this raid that happened on the ballots, these guys had a heads up, which by the way was a leak out of Geo Day. They got sent a letter saying we're going to come collect these things if you don't provide them via subpoena. So they had a heads up. And they were also told that along with the raid, there would be arrests.

SPEAKER_00: 1:17:30

Well, I'm told that. I mean, I've gotten up. I received a call on Monday before last Wednesday before the raid that there were going to be arrests in Georgia. Secretary of State, uh, his deputy, uh, Sterling, I believe his name is, me, and two or three others. Uh that did not happen on Monday. Didn't happen on Tuesday. But lo and behold, on Wednesday, the FBI shows up. And in addition to the FBI showing up, when uh Tulsi Gabbard showed up and we'd heard a rumor that she may be coming, I couldn't believe it. But I didn't meet her, didn't talk to her, but she was in fact uh there. So that leads me to believe, and any rational thinking person, that there's something sinister going on here. There's something bigger than just the FBI.

SPEAKER_20: 1:18:18

I agree. There's nothing since when the director of national intelligence shows up to look at ballots, and we've had 10 years of allegations of everybody from Russia, by the way, your side of the aisle saying Russia was mad, right? Everybody from Russia to Serbia to Venezuela to China to satellites in Italy, of course the national director of intelligence would show up.

SPEAKER_19: 1:18:40

Something smells dying heaven, right? Of course they would, buddy. I was like, bro, do you not these guys?

SPEAKER_20: 1:18:50

We started the show out with Washington Post saying that Russia manipulated our elections. Okay, so even Democrats should agree somebody should look into this.

SPEAKER_26: 1:19:04

Something's going on. I can't believe it. I can't believe it.

SPEAKER_00: 1:19:08

Uh confiscating the records, records that they took. So that's why I say that. But nothing happened. Now, after the uh F FBI raid on Wednesday, on Friday, I received another call. Actually, it was Monday. That's Monday. Same source saying that uh you guys can't relax. Even though the FBI has been there and they've confiscated uh the 700 boxes. Arrests are coming. So we'll have to wait and see.

SPEAKER_20: 1:19:41

Well, uh the source that cannot be named because it's a leaker. You're gonna arrest are coming. I can't stop it. He's talking about an inside man. Now the letter that they got, I looked at it, it wasn't dated. There's no date on the letter. That's right. But they got a heads up and he got a phone call. Uh, I know, I mean, I guess I I called the FBI. You know, they didn't call me.

unknown: 1:20:06

Okay.

SPEAKER_20: 1:20:06

Oh, by the way, uh, we're just poking around. Uh nope, that's not how it works. No, someone inside that DOJ is leaking to these guys, giving them a heads up. Now I wonder if the ballots they took are even the ballots that have been in storage for four years. They had a week to do something. I mean, I guess I hope it was in that courthouse warehouse, and these election officials didn't have direct access. But it's interesting because the moment the FBI showed up, these election officials walked in there like they knew where they were going and what they were doing. So Christina Bob, who is one of Donald Trump's attorneys through this whole saga here, she talks about exactly kind of what was going on with these Dominion machines, Brian Kemp, because he was the Secretary of State that signed a contract for these Dominion machines. And then Brian Kemp promoted a bunch of these people that, these judges that turned down these cases in Georgia. He's given them promotions to hire judgeships. And of course, Rathensburger moved up in the whole, like there's a cabal in Georgia of people that were involved in engaging in this Dominion contract. It's all coming out now.

SPEAKER_36: 1:21:05

What do you think? Everything that's unfolding here. Let's take Fulton County, Georgia first and the Purdue testimony that the Georgia Bureau of Investigations had evidence, and Kemp said, don't investigate.

SPEAKER_12: 1:21:19

Yeah, I believe it. I mean, you have to remember that Brian Kemp was the Secretary of State in Georgia in 2018. It was under Brian, Secretary of State Brian Kemp, that the Dominion Machines were brought in. It was under Secretary of State Brian Kemp that the voting facilities were changed to those big voting centers rather than counting at the precinct. Brian Kemp changed all of that. It was Brian Kemp who uh contracted with Dominion for the machines. And then his election in 2018 was a historic victory. You know, the most voter turnout in a midterm election in Georgia, where he won with like 50.8% of the vote against Stacey Abrams. It was very small margin. She challenged that election.

SPEAKER_20: 1:22:00

Stacey Abrams wouldn't concede the election because she said it was rigged. Now I'm sitting here looking at this and I'm going, damn, it might have been. How about you join the election integrity team? Right? But she's banking her hopes on what? She got a two million dollar donate, or it's literally a donation, a grant from the Biden administration one day after incorporating. She got paid off. So now she's like, oh yeah, of course, leave Brian Kemp in charge because he won't investigate me. Why wouldn't that be the case? Steal your election, pay off your opponents, so some chaos, act like it's no big deal.

SPEAKER_12: 1:22:50

That election where um it prompted the uh questions into the voting machines, and Amy Clobuchar and Elizabeth Warren senators saying, Oh, the machines are rigged, they're hackable, all of that stuff. It was Democrats that actually raised that issue in Georgia with Brian Kemp's election. Then Kemp is in office, shuts down the investigation into 2020, works with Brad Raffinsburger, who originally said that Donald Trump won the state of Georgia, there was not enough margin for it uh to switch to Joe Biden. And then of course he recanted that. So there's a lot of weirdness going on with Brian Kemp, Brad Rapinsburg, and I'll throw Chris Carr in there, the attorney general, because when you have an attorney general who's allowing a lot of this to go on and they know they're not going to be held accountable, these broke Republicans, it's all Republican activity, these broke Republicans are getting away with it.

unknown: 1:23:39

Huh. Huh.

SPEAKER_20: 1:23:40

So you mean the Democrats aren't our enemy, the Republicans are too? Huh. I wonder what the peasants' perspective is. Yeah, it's one big party and you ain't in it. And apparently, Klobuchar and Warren weren't in the club either when they were bitching and complaining. That's what's crazy about this. Yeah. 80% plus of Americans support voter ID. Obviously, we do believe that our elections are supposed to mean something. And we bite the bullet. We vote for people that lose all the time and we suck it up and we pay the taxes and we drive the speed limits they wrote, you know, all the laws they go on, and we're like, oh, be more engaged next time.

SPEAKER_27: 1:24:19

Yeah.

SPEAKER_20: 1:24:19

Well, if I'm a totalitarian and authoritarian and I want to take over a country without firing a shot, because you know, I'm only 30 people, this is how you do it. You'd get Brian Raffensburger and Brian Kemp to get a contract for machines that can flip boats, right? You you you then protect those boats and protect everything so nobody can ever look at it. And you have all the control governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, election officials, arrests are coming. Arrests are coming. What they did is of national security concern. Right now, Democrats are still on this bend because they're trying to figure out a way to sell to the American people that immigrants should receive full citizenship rights, full protection under the Constitution, and be allowed to have a say in how we govern ourselves. So here's Representative Kane, who again we came a hair away from having as a vice president. This was Hillary Clinton's running mate, and he was also, if you'll remember, he's also the one that said our rights don't come from God, they come from government. And he said, People who believe their rights come from God are like Iranians. Okay, right. So he's over here being like, Why do we call illegals or aliens?

SPEAKER_34: 1:25:27

Why do we call immigrants illegal? There's only one kind of person that we demonize with the label illegal, and I'm tired of it. In being here for 13 years, I've just heard too few words on this floor that talk about the contributions that immigrants have made to this country during our entire history. Immigration is the transfusion into the bloodstream of the American economy and the American politic that keeps our nation young. The American politic? Are there challenges? Yes. Do we need order? Of course we do. Should we reform? Yes. But it should be within the overall framework of immigrants are not a problem. Our immigrant communities are part of what makes our nation great and successful. And I'm tired after more than 13 years of hearing immigrants just dragged down, called illegals. Why don't we call people convicted of fraud illegals? Why don't we call people convicted of sexual harassment illegals? There's only one kind of person that some label an illegal in the United States, and that's if they have violated the laws to enter the country.

SPEAKER_20: 1:26:39

What about Yeah, because your very presence is illegal.

SPEAKER_34: 1:26:43

It's ongoing.

SPEAKER_20: 1:26:44

We call fraudsters fraudster, we call pedophiles pedophiles, we call murderers, murderers, and rapists rapers, and we call a person, a vessel, standing in front of me that has no legal right to be here illegal.

SPEAKER_27: 1:26:57

Right.

SPEAKER_20: 1:26:57

Your existence in this spot is illegal.

SPEAKER_27: 1:27:02

Well, and the other thing is it's like criminals, once they're in the system, they're you know, they're being addressed. If you're an illegal and you're here, your crime has not been addressed. It's just ongoing.

SPEAKER_20: 1:27:14

Yeah, you go from being an illegal to being an illegal criminal, an illegal fraudster, an illegal whatever. Okay. Now, you gotta understand the Democrat Party has really never changed. Okay. This idea that the party switched on segregation and racism and blah, blah, it's not the case. Okay. When Democrats promote illegal immigration, it has nothing to do with anything other than selfish interest. Here's an example of your run-of-the-mill liberal upper middle class woman who decided it might be a good idea to sponsor someone into the country. In particular, as we think about the impact of housing, wrong clip. We'll come back to that one. This is uh, like I just said, typical woman who thought, eh, I'll sponsor someone.

SPEAKER_42: 1:27:56

And it's really fun having them. What I realized is there's so much. Prejudice against refugees mostly because people don't know them.

SPEAKER_07: 1:28:03

Lisa says she feels like she has her own personal chef as well.

SPEAKER_19: 1:28:10

She is a slave. I love these refugees. They do my cooking, my laundry, my landscaping. You have a house slave. You're not paying her a living wage. You're not allowing for you.

SPEAKER_20: 1:28:37

Oh my gosh. Of course, this random segment of people that can afford to bring someone over here. They're undercutting my mother-in-law clean houses for decades. You're undercutting her high side hustle. Yeah. You've imported an aboela. This is unbelievable. Immigrants, when they come into our country, they put pressure on everything. Everything. Right? Scott Bessant just testified they put pressure on housing prices.

SPEAKER_24: 1:29:07

Oh, yeah. In particular, as we think about the impact of housing, his was Biden's open border policies directly related to some of the inflation that we've seen in housing. That's where you're previously cut off.

SPEAKER_03: 1:29:18

Yes. So to come back to that, uh, I would point to a study from uh the Wharton School that said that supply and demand worked, especially in low-end housing, that letting in 10, 20, we don't know how many illegal aliens that flooded into the housing market, they all need someplace to live. So what we have seen is that the Wharton study says that for every 1% increase due to the illegal immigration, rents went up 1%. So if you got a 20% increase in population, then rents went up 20% and economics 101 in particular as we think about the impact of housing, is but they cook my food.

SPEAKER_20: 1:30:00

Yeah, but they prevent your own kids from renting, from getting a house, right? Right? Which is why Eric Snake, guys, this is the greatest show. Okay, the way we go through this narrative and the way I show this to you, I I personally feel like it is of value, right? If people listen to this show long enough, you start to see through these eyes, how does this affect me? Right? How does this matter to me?

SPEAKER_27: 1:30:22

Let me tell you, let me let me tell you a story because I never get to tell stories. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Um, I my old boss told me a story once that was great. It illustrates this great. So he's sitting around the table um at dinner time with his daughters and a future uh son-in-law, and he's talking to one of the other parents, and he says, Hey, do you want your kids to move out when they grow up? Oh, yeah. Well, that's why we need to build more housing. Because if you don't build more houses, there's nowhere for new people to move into new houses. So okay. Well, of course, people die, and then peace, you know, houses become available. And so, you know, there is a homeostasis point that is a sweet spot where there's enough housing for everybody. Well, that's great.

SPEAKER_20: 1:31:09

Assuming everybody only has two kids.

SPEAKER_27: 1:31:11

Correct. So that you can stabilize this if everybody has two kids. Yeah, the growth rate is a stable growth rate. But then if you throw in 20 million immigrants, they gotta live somewhere. So they are absorbing that housing and the rents are going up because there's no additional spaces to rent. You figure with it. And I don't know why that that simple concept is so hard for some people to understand. I don't understand why you can't understand that.

SPEAKER_20: 1:31:41

It's interesting because in high school and these different places, there is almost no, in my opinion, from what I've seen, almost no emphasis on real-world application. Yeah, yes, economics 101, basic supply and demand. Nothing escapes these market forces. They don't even learn about uh compound interest. No, the most powerful force on earth. Okay, yeah, they don't learn about any of that because schools are meant to indoctrinate you, they're meant to train you to be good employees, taxpayers, citizens if you want to be altruistic. Or but we're not the the government doesn't want you to be entrepreneuristic. We've got immigrants for that, we've got H1B visas for that.

SPEAKER_27: 1:32:19

Well, and if they just want you to be fodder, then they don't really have to educate you.

SPEAKER_20: 1:32:24

No, and this is why Eric Smith, senator from Missouri, and other Republicans, not enough of them, but some of them are putting their foot down. Enough of this nonsense.

SPEAKER_44: 1:32:35

So you know what? Spare me. To the media, the pundits and the talking heads, to the protesters on the streets and their political friends here in the halls of power. We know who you are. We know what you care about. It's not humanity or empathy or compassion, it is raw power. And we know what you do with that power. And we've seen what you do with that power. The empty chair at the Riley family dinner table is the cost of what we paid for your power. And it's our patriotic duty to ensure you never get close to power again. Let me say this also to my friends and colleagues in my party. Don't give these people an inch. Don't fall for their moral blackmail. Don't let them negotiate or squirm their way into killing the president's mass deportation agenda. The American people support it. Don't let them talk you into believing that this is about justice. That's not what they care about. You know what I care about? I care about Americans. I care about the people who are risking their lives in the freezing cold to enforce our laws rather than the ones who are hellbent on breaking it. I care about the people who are trying to get these kinds of monsters who rape and murder our daughters out of our country, rather than the ones who want to put their bodies on the line to keep them here.

SPEAKER_20: 1:34:15

That is the truth. We're done. We know who you are. Your virtue blackmail in and Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged, she calls it white blackmail. Weaponize your virtue against you. One of the big revelations we've had with this series of Epstein dumps, which I really wish we could be done talking about Epstein, right? One of the weird revelations with this Epstein dump is it turns out the world is is actually being run by a cabal of pedophiles. Actually, now this was years and years ago, before we ever started broadcasting, there was what was called the Pizzagate conspiracy. And it was the idea that there was this pizza shop in Washington, DC, called, I think it's Alfonso Pizza or something like that, that all the famous politicians and pundits would go to regularly. And this Alfonso guy was a creep. I mean, total creep. All kinds of pedophilic imagery and symbolism in his pizza shop and on his Instagram and pictures with kids and just gross. But he had connections to every major politician. He had people like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama being like best pizza shop in town. He's like wildly connected. And then all of a sudden we found out that there was this pizza gate conspiracy from the WikiLeaks data where we found out Barack Obama was ordering$65,000 of hot dogs and pizza, which is pet pedo talk for young boys and girls, into the White House. There's an email from Hillary Clinton telling Barack Obama, listen, it was going to be business as usual, but I think having these parties in the White House is inappropriate. We should use our predetermined destinations where they're safer. This is all in the WikiLeaks files. It's all there. All there. There was a local news reporter who ran a story about Pizzagate. This was his last report. He was fired, came back for a short moment, and then was fired again.

SPEAKER_25: 1:35:58

Expired after airing this segment exposing Pizzagate.

SPEAKER_31: 1:36:02

To be clear, not one single email in the Podesta emails discusses child sex trafficking or pedophilia.

SPEAKER_25: 1:36:09

Well, they do if you use the if you understand their vocabulary, it does. Let them cook, I get that.

SPEAKER_20: 1:36:16

Yeah. Pizza, hot dogs, you know, map. They have all these code words that they use universally. This is not just the elites, this is even your local corner pedo, right, in your neighborhood. They use these terms and symbols regularly to what does let them cook mean? Let them cook is let the eating begin. When you've got pizza in front of you, let's eat it. Let's cook, right? Spirit cooking, a Marina Brahmanovich, this whole thing.

SPEAKER_31: 1:36:42

That is a fact. But there are dozens of what seem to be strangely worded emails dealing with pizza and handkerchiefs. Self-described online investigators say that those words in the emails about pizza and the talk of handkerchiefs is code language used by pedophiles. Well, if you check out the YouTube videos by these bands, Heavy Breathing has songs that do joke about pedophilia. I didn't know this part.

SPEAKER_25: 1:37:07

He went to jail for 15 months for being a serial child molester. I John Podesta.

SPEAKER_20: 1:37:14

Or was it Tony Podesta? Okay. This is one of the top bundlers for the Democrat Party, and he was the his brother was the head of the Democrat National Convention. Tony Podesta and John Podesta.

SPEAKER_25: 1:37:26

I feel like you should be in jail for longer than that. The segment effectively ended on the station in early 2017. Swan aired a controversial reality check episode January 2017 that discussed Pizzagate conspiracy theory. This led to his suspension, and he was required to take down his associated truth and media website and social media accounts as a condition of the reinstatement. Although he returned to on-air duties briefly, the Pizzagate focused segment is widely regarded as his last official reality check, aired on mainstream television, and he was fired a year after that. No shot! He did another one. This is literally the same guy 10 years later. He released this, I guess, yesterday. We know he's using it because we use it.

SPEAKER_30: 1:38:17

Yeah, 10 years ago, I was called a dangerous conspiracy theorist and a madman proclaiming that pedophiles and possibly even pedophile elites.

SPEAKER_25: 1:38:26

Can you imagine? Like, bro, can you imagine being this fucking vindicated?

SPEAKER_19: 1:38:32

Yeah, I can! I totally can! Yes! I totally get it! I totally get it! To all my haters, I hate you. You were wrong!

SPEAKER_25: 1:38:43

Ten years later, holy shit! So fucking based. Oh my god. That's why mainstream media died after COVID. Like it the mainstream media credibility after COVID went into the shit or see the unspoken rule was simple.

SPEAKER_30: 1:38:59

Some questions are not allowed. Not because they're wrong. Oh no. But because they lead to the truth. That's right. The truth. At least in the form of a cabal of elites and powerful people who delight in the physical and sexual abuse of children. Is real. Remember how we started. Epstein is a Pizzagate. The other reality, it's time to accept Pizzagate is much more and much bigger than just Jeffrey Epstein.

SPEAKER_20: 1:39:34

And the connections, the guy who went into Alphonse's pizza with a gun to go find their whatever thing, went in there, kicked in the door, shot one single bullet that hit their server, rendering it uninspectable. And then he went to jail, got and he was sentenced by Katanji Brown Jackson, new Supreme Court justice. And then when he got out, he was promptly murdered. Patsy. Patsy. You got one thing to shoot that computer. And you'll get off on your drug charges or whatever else we got you. I've seen it. Why? Because I've talked in people in prison who'd made deals like that. Take this charge, ignore that charge, work with us here, give us what we need there. Absolutely. Now, the fallout of this, because now all the WikiLeaks stuff, oh, there's some smoke over here. Then we continues on, and now we get the Epstein dumps, and we're like, oh, it's a raging tire fire. It's not a little smoke, it's a raging tire fire. England is on the verge of collapse as far as their government is concerned. Okay. This is coming out of the House of Commons. This was when the last set of Epstein documents got released. We're gonna listen to this. This is Keir Starmer, their prime minister, basically saying nothing to see here with regards to Mandelson, Peter Mandelson, who was the uh ambassador to the United States. Now, this guy, Petey, as Epstein called him, was the deputy prime minister for a while during the banking crisis, and Epstein was emailing him from prison. Oh, jeez. And they openly talked amongst each other, Epstein and Glain and others. We got Petey in. He's essentially the Prime Minister, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. He set policy and he did a bunch of stuff. One of the things this Mandelson guy did was he was introduced to Palantir by who? Epstein and his friends.

SPEAKER_41: 1:41:27

Does the prime minister have full confidence in Peter Mandelson?

SPEAKER_17: 1:41:32

Mr. Speaker, let me start by saying the victims of Epstein are the forefront of our minds. He was a despicable criminal who committed the most heinous crimes and destroyed the lives of so many women and girls. The ambassador has repeatedly expressed his deep regret for his association with him. He's right to do so. I have confidence in him, and he's playing an important role in the UK-US relationship.

SPEAKER_41: 1:41:57

This is interesting, Mr. Speaker. He says the ambassador has expressed full regret, but the victims of the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein have called for Lord Mandelson to be sacked. And just so the House is aware, in 2019, Jeffrey Epstein was convicted of child prostitution and sex trafficking that took place between 2002 and 2005. That is the precise period which Lord Mandelson called Geoffrey Epstein his best pal. Absolutely. Was the Prime Minister aware of this intimate relationship when he appointed Lord Mandelson to be our ambassador in Washington?

SPEAKER_17: 1:42:27

And Mr. Speaker, as she and the House would expect, full due process was followed during this appointment.

SPEAKER_20: 1:42:33

As it is with full due process. Keir Starmer with all the resources available through the Five Eyes Intelligence Network. The idea that I'm confident that he's good. We did full due process. It's all good. I'm questioning the due process. I'm wondering who's looking into these.

SPEAKER_41: 1:43:00

Mr. Speaker, I asked the Prime Minister if he knew. The fact that he didn't answer indicates that he probably did know. I wasn't asking a question about process, I was asking a question about his judgment. The Daily Telegraph reports today that while Lord Mandelson was business secretary, he brokered a deal with Geoffrey Epstein while he was business secretary, and that this occurred after Epstein had been convicted of child sex offences. Given this new information, does the Prime Minister really think it is tenable for our ambassador to remain in post?

SPEAKER_17: 1:43:29

Mr. Speaker, the relationship between the US and the UK is one of our foremost relationships. And I have confidence in the ambassador in the role that he is doing.

SPEAKER_41: 1:43:37

Mr. Speaker, I think it is embarrassing that the Prime Minister is still saying that he has confidence in a man who was brokering deals with convicted child sex offenders while sitting in government. That is a disgrace. This government has repeatedly, repeatedly refused to declare Lord Mandelson's full interests. And as part of the appointment, there will have been extensive government vetting, including details and timings of Peter Mandelson's dealings with Jeffrey Epstein. So will the Prime Minister publish all these documents, including those about his interests?

SPEAKER_17: 1:44:04

Well, um, Mr. Speaker, as I say, full due process was gone through in relation to proportion, as would be expected. As for the publication of documents, as she well knows, that's subject to a procedure which includes an independent element. It's subject to the usual procedure. But can we be able to do that?

SPEAKER_41: 1:44:19

An independent element. Keep that phrase, an independent element. The ambassador should be in the White House talking about how we respond to an incursion into NATO airspace. Instead, he is giving interviews about himself to the sun. This is a man who already had to be removed from cabinet twice. And now we learn that he was brokering billion-pound deals with Jeffrey Epstein while business secretary. I didn't get a proper answer. He's talking about process. This is not about process, this is about judgment. Just last week I told him that he should sack his deputy prime minister. They all cheered and congratulated themselves. She was gone two days later. His face two is broken, and he's got a totally new front bench. So I will ask him again: will he make sure that these documents are published? And will he actually instruct Peter Mandelson to publish all his correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein?

SPEAKER_17: 1:45:02

Well, since the ambassador's been in the White House discussing NATO V news, as we all are, with a number of international calls this morning, uh and on Ukraine as well as the attack in Doha uh yesterday. Mr. Speaker.

SPEAKER_20: 1:45:13

Oh man, the Epstein stuff that goes into Ukraine is dirty, dirty, dirty. They were planning in their emails about trafficking kids once chaos in Ukraine broke out. All right, we got some steak that you guys.

SPEAKER_27: 1:45:25

I love me some steak, don't you?

SPEAKER_20: 1:45:27

Oh, when I see the pictures from this website, it makes my mouth water.

SPEAKER_27: 1:45:32

Just don't go to the website or you will buy. And now I'm gonna tell you to go to the website. All right, let me tell you about my Valentine's Day sponsor, and honestly, this one's a no-brainer. Chicago Steak Company, code H-E-A-R-T26. Look, you can fight for a reservation at some overpriced restaurant, sit there surrounded by strangers, rush through the meal, or you could just stay home, cook together, have a great, a way better experience. These are USDA Prime Steaks, hand selected, wet aged, up to 40 days, restaurant quality delivered to your door. Here's the deal: it's last week for free Valentine's shipping. Order$199 or more, use code HERT26, and you'll get$145 in free gifts. That's two Maryland crab cakes, six Italian chocolate pastries, and free shipping. So you've got an appetizer, main course, and dessert done.

unknown: 1:46:24

Woo!

SPEAKER_27: 1:46:25

Go to mychicagosteak.com slash heart26. Code Heart26. That's H-E-A-R-T 26. Link is in the description.

SPEAKER_20: 1:46:37

Boom. Yes. And don't forget to get in on that. It's you know shipping for Valentine's Day.

SPEAKER_40: 1:46:42

Yep.

SPEAKER_20: 1:46:42

Okay, so let's continue on here. This is world shattering stuff here. England's not a small player on the world stuff. They might be considering themselves a middle power, but like our little brother at this point, right? Or our old uncle, I guess you could think of it like that. All right. So this Mandelson scandal has more tentacles because A, we can look at Mandelson and I I don't know. I I didn't read any particular email where Mandelson and Epstein are talking about pizza and hot dogs and stuff like that. Although there is a lot of shady stuff. But more than anything, it's the business relationships that Epstein is curating and getting Mandelson to get involved with. Right. That the talking it all. Yeah. And while Mandelson was in serious positions in the English government, he was taking these meetings. And he won't I gotta have to refresh this. And there's some real concern about who some of those meetings were with.

SPEAKER_13: 1:47:37

And this, as I say, is relevant now. On the 27th of February, 2025, the Prime Minister, whilst in Washington, visited the American data and AI company Palantir at its headquarters. The meeting did not appear in the Prime Minister's register of visits. It only came to light later. Now, Palantir, we should remember or remind ourselves, was a client of Global Council, the company in which Peter Mandelson had a commanding share. Later that year, Palantir received from this government a£240 million deal. British companies couldn't company. That deal was granted by direct award. Given the allegations now coming to light about Mandelson's contact conduct, can the minister assure the House that the Cabinet Secretary will review the circumstances around the award of that contract and assure himself that there are no other such contracts, no other undisclosed meetings, that the government is going to go through all of the communications that Mandelson sent out whilst he was ambassador, messages we must assume, some of which were sent to old business contacts, potential few business contacts, and so on. In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister knew that Peter Mandelson had maintained an unhealthy relationship with a man who was a convicted paedophile, and he appointed him to the role of ambassador anyway. Everybody in this house should be shocked by it. It must be concluded that had the Prime Minister been pressed on that point at the time, the appointment would not have been made. But the Prime Minister knew, his aides knew, and the appointment was made anyway. What else did he know? Only after this humble address, only if the government treats with it in good faith, will we know that? I very much hope that it is not the case that we find that there are gaps in our security and vetting process. If there are, the government will be able to fix them. But I think it's also likely that we'll see that there were reports that consistently raised concerns that were swept away. And it will then be the duty of the government to disclose who swept them away and why.

SPEAKER_20: 1:49:38

Ultimate responsibility. And why? Because this massive contract to palantir to surveil the English people was granted through these nefarious connections. Epstein, Peter Thiel, Mandelson, and a contract was granted. You don't think Starmer or other people in his cabinet, the people he's accusing of pushing that, those warnings. Things aside might not be getting paid. And what's the overriding thing here? It's what Eric Schmidt said. This is about power. And how does power express itself in the 21st century? Surveillance and control. Something like we need to surveil people to prevent the future pandemic. And who would do that? Oh, I don't know. Our friends over at Palantir. Well, how would I get a hold of them? Well, call your buddy Epstein and get a connection. Here's Bill Gates talking about the net result of what they, this elite cabal, Bill Pill Gates, is clearly tied in with Epstein. We're trying to accomplish by turning all these foreign leaders onto Palantir.

SPEAKER_38: 1:50:38

What then is the next step to preventing something like that from happening again? Is it as simple as people spending more money, or is there some other focus that has to be the focus of the world?

SPEAKER_14: 1:50:50

Well, you have to do constant surveillance, including things like sewage surveillance or taking people who have respiratory infection and making sure you know what it is. And so if if something new appears, even in Africa, you can contain it before it gets all over the entire globe. And so we understand far better how to do diagnosis, we know what to look for. Um, the world hasn't come together yet to create that surveillance system. Uh when it does break out, we need to come up with drugs and vaccines very quickly. We have some great technology for that. Uh so that could have been worse. That is, the death rate from that pandemic, you know, was about 1% higher in the elderly. Oh, we have to stop people from dying by killing them. You know, the next pandemic that comes home.

SPEAKER_20: 1:51:47

The list goes on and on. This is about money.

SPEAKER_27: 1:51:50

It's a good thing that some scary bug hasn't come and got us already.

SPEAKER_20: 1:51:54

I know. This is about money, and this is about power. Tear Starm was supposed to represent to the British people change. Look.

SPEAKER_15: 1:52:04

This was our manifesto. Right? One man, one word, change. That's what we promised. That was that was the whole of what we as the Labour Party promised this country. Change. This looks more like the same. Yeah, it looks more like the same. It's more pizza gate.

SPEAKER_20: 1:52:27

Pizzagate at the highest levels. Here's another Mike Graham show, and we're gonna let him play. I'm gonna turn up the speed just a little bit, although the English do typically talk a little faster. Um well, I might have to hit play here before I can. Is it the so we're gonna listen to him because he's explaining it to us in as clear terms as you get? This is the end of the British government. Keir Starmer's cabinet, it's over. Oh, it's just a matter of time, right? Now, in England, they can have snap elections. I mean, they can they can stand up a new government pretty quickly, but now it's about controlling the demolition of this one. And remember, the the rejection is the contracts, it's the deep embedded associations with Jeffrey Epstein and his ilk, right? So is the other party innocent of this? In America, Democrats say elections are stolen, and then Republicans say elections are stolen, and then they accuse each other of stealing elections, and we, the people are supposed to go, well, my party says they're not fair, or now they're fair.

SPEAKER_19: 1:53:29

Yeah.

SPEAKER_20: 1:53:31

So will England be able to prop up a different government? Haven't they already tried to do this?

SPEAKER_32: 1:53:36

Starmer doesn't want is a debate about Peter Mandelson and about what he knew and when he knew it. Because the trouble for Starmer um is that on Monday he launched a full cabinet investigation into what the real relationship was between Jeffrey Epstein and Peter Mandelson. But of course, he shouldn't have had to launch a full cabinet investigation because there was already a cabinet investigation that had taken place some weeks earlier when Gordon Brown, the former prime minister, had asked the cabinet exactly what uh Peter Mandelson had done when he was business secretary back in two.

SPEAKER_20: 1:54:10

Because they're not concerned about the pedophilia.

SPEAKER_32: 1:54:17

Uh when he was effectively Deputy Prime Minister of this country, when Gordon Brown was Prime Minister. Gordon Brown had asked exactly what evidence they held inside of number ten about what Mandelson had been doing, what secrets he'd been revealing, who he'd been conversing with, who he'd been sending emails to. And do you know what the cabinet said? They said they couldn't find anything. They said they didn't know anything. They said there wasn't anything. And of course it now turns out that there was plenty. Dan Hodges today in the Daily Mail points out that when this sort of scandal first came to fruition properly, it was just before uh uh the state visit to the UK by President Donald Trump. As he says, um it involved the US ambassador to Washington while the US President was visiting the UK. But did neither Keir Starmer nor anyone else think to ask the Americans what else have you got on this? It's a good question. He says it's simply beggars belief. Starmer is a former director of public prosecutions, he's meant to be a top lawyer, isn't he? So he's meant to be a bit curious about this stuff. Uh what's more, in that position he had a major role liaison directly with the US intelligence services in the fight against terror. Dan Hodges continues. Yet we are meant to believe his lack of curiosity meant that he didn't even bother asking what information the Americans held about his most senior diplomat befriending a notorious paedophile and placing himself directly at the heart of what many now suspect was a Russian honey trap operation. So we've got the Russians involved, we've got the CIA probably involved, the NSA, MI6, MI5, Downing Street, the police, you know, everyone's involved, but nobody's asking a question about Peter Manson what he's doing. There are only three credible answers, according to Dan Rodgers. One, Starmer did ask, and the US authorities fobbed him off or lied to him, which would represent another damning blow to his international credibility. Two, he didn't bother to ask, in which case he's simply not fit to hold Prime Ministerial Office, which I think is more likely. Or he did ask, he learned the truth, but again, he then decided to hide that truth from the Parliament and its people. Whatever you may think about Keir Starmer, and I know what most of you think, you agree with me that he is a complete waste of space and a dud. He's finished. He's toast I predicted it uh almost eighteen months ago. I said he wouldn't last the pace. I said he would never get all the way to 2029 for another election. I said there might not even be uh uh uh anybody getting to 2029 for an election. This is a crisis of mammoth proportions, ladies and gentlemen. Have no fear. This is not messing around. This could not only take down the government, it could take down the whole uh parliamentary system in this country. Because if it turns out that all of this was covered up, if it turns out that lots of people knew and they didn't say anything, they're all out of a job. The whole civil service will be held to account. The whole of this government will be out of a job. Maybe then we can start rebuilding this country into what it really should be a place to be proud of, a place to enjoy living in, and a place for us to enjoy our own country. That's what we need. And we need it now.

SPEAKER_20: 1:57:36

You know, the whole point of English the English governmental system is you've got this parliamentary system that allows people to run their day-to-day, but the king or queen of England is the mother-father figure. And they're supposed, just like our president is supposed to preserve the constitution, the king of England is supposed to preserve England.

SPEAKER_15: 1:57:55

Okay.

SPEAKER_20: 1:57:55

So presumably, in a crisis like this, this is where the king can come in and exercise those monarchical powers. Prince Andrew was just hauled off to an undisclosed location. He's been kicked out of the royal family. He touched the royal family, too. Oh, dang it. Where are the English gonna turn? I don't know. We have a problem. We have a crisis, a crisis of leadership, a crisis of government. Who can we turn to that can provide some order out of chaos? Muhammad's got a good idea here. He's got this thing called Sharia law. They'll bring some justice, they'll roll some heads, they'll definitely bring order. Do you see what just happened there? England is on the verge of actual collapse. May not happen. Because we go to the brink all the time and pull ourselves back when we look over the cliff. But that's happening. And it's not just England, it's other countries too. This is another clip. Again, this English thing is like magnifying glass on how these Epstein connections, it's way more than just associating with a pedophile.

SPEAKER_27: 1:58:57

Well, and and and because we're American, we maybe didn't understand his English, because when he says have no fear, it it sounds like he's just saying something, you know, kind of conversationally. But what he's saying is, we are past the point of fear.

SPEAKER_20: 1:59:12

Yeah. Like the worst things you can do to us are all teed up in the hopper. Yes. Because everything we're seeing from this guy, you'll torture my kids.

SPEAKER_27: 1:59:21

Yeah.

SPEAKER_20: 1:59:21

You know, when you read about Jeffrey Epson talking about the Goeim, I'm Goyim.

unknown: 1:59:25

Yeah.

SPEAKER_20: 1:59:26

That means I'm on the dinner table, especially if you go down the spirit cooking road. Okay. So this was yesterday in England. Okay. Watch Keir Starmer when he's pressured by the same MP to do an investigation and not your cabinet, an independent one outside of your cabinet. Watch Keir Starmer lose it. Now we talk about micro-expressions, these politicians who are essentially actors. They're good at holding their cards. Watch this.

SPEAKER_41: 1:59:59

If that was really the case, then he wouldn't mind if the ISC had a look. And let's be clear. He says the cabinet secretary makes it non-political, but that doesn't make it independent. What we want is an independent look. The ISC is independent. The cabinet secretary works for him. We know that there will be a cover-up. Do you see that?

SPEAKER_20: 2:00:20

Mm-hmm. This is called someone realizing it's all over. Watch him.

SPEAKER_41: 2:00:25

We know that there will be a cover-up because this impli this dependent the cabinet secretary works for him. We know that there will be a cover-up because this impli this implicates the Prime Minister and his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, a protege of Peter Mandelson. The Prime Minister chose to inject Mandelson's poison into the heart of his government. If that was really the case, then he We want an independent look, one that you don't control.

SPEAKER_29: 2:00:56

Oh man.

SPEAKER_20: 2:00:57

Because we're getting an independent look right now on these Epstein files that have been released, and it's damning. The protege of Mandelson is Keir Starmer's chief of staff. This would be like Donald Trump having Goebbels as his deputy chief of staff. I mean, Stephen Miller.

SPEAKER_29: 2:01:15

That's funny.

SPEAKER_20: 2:01:16

It's a joke, right? But guys, this is big stuff. When we tell the story of America, we have to tell it from the peasant's perspective. Government is always against us. Even when it's trying to do what we've implemented to do, it becomes an entity. It becomes a self-sustaining thing. It wants control, it wants power. The political parties exist for no other purpose than to acquire power. Political party does not exist to give you a lower tax rate. They'll tax you if it means they have power. Period. Right? So this is huge. Is there going to be accountability? I don't know. I sure hope so. Sounds like there's probably some arrests coming in Georgia. Sounds like the English government's about to fall apart. We'll see if they can clean house and get rid of all the toxins that have been associated with Epstein, because it's not just the pedophilia. If you're involved with that, death penalty, boom, said it, done. Okay, that's like a no-brainer. Just end you right now. But when you're maybe not involved in the pedophilia end of it, but you're involved in the connections, the business, the payoffs, the bribes, the crypto industry, the transferring of money, the arms.

SPEAKER_27: 2:02:22

You still need a timeout.

SPEAKER_20: 2:02:25

You need a timeout, maybe 20 to 20 to life. There you go. 20 to life. All right, guys, we're gonna wrap the show up today. We're not even gonna go into private because we went way along today, but it was a good show. I hope you guys enjoyed it. Please don't forget to share it, comment, like, all that fun stuff. We will talk to you again tomorrow.

SPEAKER_02: 2:03:18

I didn't say you were called Dennis. I did say something about the picture with the automatic treatment. Well, I think how'd you get that? Why do you workers? There's never going to be any problem. How do you do? How do you do good ladies? I'm asking the king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? The Britons. We all are all Britons. And I am your king. You're doing yourself. We are living in a dictatorship, a self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working class is. That's what it's all about. Please, please, good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives in that. Then who is your Lord? We don't have a Lord. What? I told you. We're in a narco-syndicist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the wheel. But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-week image. I order you to be quiet. I'm your king. The lady of the lake. Signified by divine providence that I asked was to carry excalibus. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women, not an important distributive thought is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some classical aquatic ceremony. You can't expect to worry about supreme executive power just because some water is tart for a sword. Just because some poison picked up the semiconductor.