State Of The Union, Numbers Under Fire

One line in a packed chamber said the quiet part out loud: who are we here to serve? When a request to stand for American citizens split the room, it wasn’t just political theater—it was a live stress test of priorities, optics, and trust. We dig into why that moment hit so hard, how voter ID polls across every demographic, and where immigration policy collides with first principles and lived risk.

From there, we follow the money and the math. If government data can be revised, withheld, or walled off as “national security,” what does accountability look like? We unpack claims about jobs, inflation, and health care, then press the structural argument for reform. Tariffs get reframed as a historic way to lift the tax burden off workers, and health care subsidies get called out for hiding, not fixing, unaffordability. In a rare point of unity, the call to ban congressional insider trading breaks through—what does it say that self-policing earned quicker applause than a simple stand for citizens?

Credibility becomes the episode’s spine. We examine media-anointed “victims,” the Epstein file whiplash, and judges who cross lines that should stay bright. Titles don’t prove truth; receipts do. That lens carries into tech and power: AI’s capacity to index everything threatens to hollow out the Fourth Amendment by capability, not law. Guardrails matter, because once surveillance gets easy, restraint gets hard.

The border widens into a geopolitical cautionary tale. We outline how Mexico fits the classic definition of a failed state, why tariffs can work as leverage, and why some on the right float reviving letters of marque to target cartels without a conventional war. It’s provocative, but it forces the question: who restores order when the state loses its monopoly on force?

We close where consent begins: elections. Two paths emerge—incremental legal fixes like the SAVE Act, or a sharp reset to transparent, paper-based, machine-free voting that a third grader can audit. Whatever your lane, one standard should guide all sides: prove outcomes in ways ordinary citizens can verify. No mystique. No black boxes. Just receipts.

If this lens on power, policy, and proof resonates, follow the show, share this episode with a friend who cares about first principles, and leave a review telling us your top reform priority.

Transcript

Opening Banter & Simultaneous Sip

SPEAKER_17 0:03

Never quite center on me. It's a little guy. It's a little bit. Peasants, ma'am. We're just peasants. Every one of us. You watch those old movies, you see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning, peasants. Welcome to another episode of The Peasants Perspective. Oh my goodness, you guys are already here. John Attack is good morning. Shantin, good morning. Carlito, good morning from YouTube. And Rumble. Good morning, Carlites. Great State of the Union. Yes, absolutely. It was a good one. Wow.

SPEAKER_18 1:11

Everybody's lined up. Huh? Everybody's lined up like they're trying to get into Target.

SPEAKER_17 1:18

It's like it's like Black Monday or what is Black Friday. Gotta get into peasants. No, this is great. Uh we are two chatters short on Rumble for the month. We got a couple more days left. But if anybody's a regular listener that hasn't chatted this month, please chime in because two more of you, two more of you. So I'm pimping for chats right now. Okay, the next thing is the simultaneous sip, Ron. Back onto our routine. I know why you're here. You're here for the simultaneous sip. All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tankard, a chalice or stein, a canteen, jugger flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better, the simultaneous sip. Starting now.

SPEAKER_04 1:59

For you. Okay.

SPEAKER_22 2:01

The government is excellent and uses your tax dollars efficiently.

State Of The Union First Impressions

SPEAKER_17 2:09

They do not use your tax dollars efficiency. So, Ron, you got to watch the State of the Union last night. First impressions?

SPEAKER_18 2:15

I didn't watch the whole thing. Um, I only watched about 30 minutes. My first impression was, man, out of the gate. I was like, whoa. He's like, we're back, baby.

SPEAKER_17 2:27

I was like, whoa, America is back. The State of the Union is strong. Of course. Of course. I thought it was really good, actually. I'd be shocked if he ever gave a State of the Union that'd be like, oh, we're doing okay. Like we're kind of 50-50. We're kind of rebuilding a few things. No, he's pretty good at saying, we're the best. We're the best. So the one thing I wanted to kind of, as we get into the State of the Union, I want to play this. This is from Patrick Byrne. He's off in England right now. Or I guess he was in England and now he's back in DC. But he met with Tommy Robinson and he talked about what America's been going through as far as the four stages of a military psy-op. This is actually really good because we're kind of at the tail end of it. And we can get high enough above this thing and look back in time and we can look at exactly what Patrick Byrne's talking about here. How we basically had a color revolution or a military psyop campaign run against we the people.

Psy-Op Framework And 2020 Aftershocks

SPEAKER_22 3:19

The disorientation was BLM and anti- right here in DC. I happen to be walking by the FBI, which is supposed to be the greatest law enforcement agency in the world. And there were a group of people who took over the street in front of the FBI and shut down traffic, were doing wheelies and donuts and everything. They just shut it down and nobody did a thing. That whole somebody took over six city blocks in Seattle declared to the country. That was all just a disorient. And you know, because they have information dominance, they pound that into it was all a disorientation. The third stage was the fake election, which I think was the honest subject in itself. And then the fourth stage was cancel culture. That's the normalization. So to try to so these these to people understand military science. This this was this was carried out with a military position. These four weird things that happened that like have never happened in our history ever, and then suddenly all these weird things happen at once, a pandemic that changed all the rules. It may seem random. It may seem like a kaleidoscope, but it's not. It's it's four pieces to the puzzle. It was a very well-structured side.

SPEAKER_17 4:27

Yeah, it's easy to look back and see that. Like we started in 2020 and we were destabilized where we were like disoriented. What's going on? Riots, BLM, St. George Floyd, Chaws Chap, and then you have the election, right? Which is like the crisis, and then you have the normalization censoring anybody who spoke up against the election, anybody who spoke out in favor of January 6ers, anybody who spoke out in saying that COVID was a you know was a vi was was the problem. The vaccine was the virus. You know, anybody who spoke out, they got censored. They were trying to normalize things. So the reason I wanted to play that first and set the stage is, and but before I move on, I do have to do one thing. I have to say happy anniversary to my mom and dad. Happy anniversary. Just so I don't forget it. Gotta get it on the record. Thanks for reminding me this morning, mom. I'm bad with calendars. And at least how many years has it been? 43, I think, is what they said. Woo! And I am 42 and 90 minutes old. Don't do the math too hard. Don't do the math too hard. Okay, so this is Edward Dowd. Before we jump into the State of the Union, this is Ed Dowd. And Ron, you said Trump came out and he goes, the State of the Union is strong. I love Trump, obviously. Thank you for my freedom. I'm not here to bash Trump at all. He's been handed a bad set of keys, a bad deck of cards, right, in running this country right now. But Ed Dowd says something that to me makes a lot of sense. And this is why we can't quite make sense of the whiplash of numbers. Trump comes in and says everything's great. And we're like, well, last year everything was bad. Can it really turn around that fast? The answer's sort of, kind of, maybe not. Who knows? I remember Jordan Peterson one time, the economy is too big for any one person to wrap their head around. Right? The idea that you can kind of maintain what's going on out there in the broader economy is just impossible. So Ed Dowd is talking about all the numbers that the United States government has been pumping out.

SPEAKER_15 6:23

I can safely say it's the non-firm payroll loss garbage, just garbage.

SPEAKER_05 6:28

In relation to option three, how is it a national security issue?

Government Data, Revisions & Trust Erosion

SPEAKER_15 6:31

That's option four. Uh, you know, because uh, you know, with the with the with the COVID pandemic, the state of emergency was declared, and they felt like they could, you know, somewhere deep in the bottles of the uh deep state, they could uh make all sorts of uh statistics, national security issues, you know.

SPEAKER_17 6:50

So what he's saying there is a lot of statistics that we rely on, they've made national security issues. So even if they publish a number, they won't show their work. Or they just won't publish any numbers at all, and they'll say it's national security. They've just literally created this, you know, we can't tell you how many people are employed or unemployed or how to show our work because national security.

SPEAKER_18 7:12

So then they can just say it's a good thing, everything's good or everything's bad, but we can't show you any data.

SPEAKER_17 7:19

We saw this under Joe Biden. They told us on their little incremental release dates that there was a million jobs that had been created. And then systematically they would revise those estimates down, and we found out there wasn't a million jobs created, there was a million jobs lost. Oh, so it went the polar opposite of what they had told us. But every time they made a release, the markets would react. Markets don't react to the revision. But then when you add up the revisions, you're like, you guys just pulled a huge fraud on the entire market.

SPEAKER_18 7:50

Here's the other thing even if these numbers were accurate, it's often a disconnect from what people are feeling.

SPEAKER_16 7:57

Exactly, which is why the numbers are garbage. Currently, the CDC is not releasing cancer deaths since 2022. Wow.

SPEAKER_17 8:04

CDC's not releasing cancer deaths since 2022? Why would they do that? Why would they do that for the first time ever?

SPEAKER_15 8:11

So there's a lot, there's a lot of stuff going on in the government. And you know, I think this is beyond uh you know any any administration. There's there's bureaucratic. Obviously, with the upskeme files, we're finding out there's a shadow government going on. Who knows what's what the true agenda is, but the agenda seems to be government data is garbage at the moment.

SPEAKER_17 8:32

So, with that in mind, the state of the union is strong. Yes. Here is the best video I found of the whole night. The whole night. This right here describes the last 24 hours in a nutshell. Okay. This is it right here. This is Chris Murphy, former impeachment manager to the president of the United States Democrat, Democrat, giving one of these uh, you know, they decided not to go to the State of the Union, so they're doing counter-programming. Okay. So this right here is the best description of the State of the Union I have ever seen. This is the moment.

SPEAKER_09 9:11

This is the reason that she came here to the United States to speak truth to power, to explain the trials and tribulations that every immigrant and every refugee goes through to get here. And to press this country. Go Trump! Go Trump! Hey Murphy, thanks, man.

SPEAKER_17 9:34

Thanks, best video of the entire day yesterday. You have two worldviews. You have we need to let immigrants in and take care of them, and you have go Trump! You're a scumbag, Murphy! That right there encapsulates the state of the union. Okay, so now we're gonna go through some of these clips here. This is this is probably the most defining moment in the entire State of the Union yesterday. Now, when we play any video that has clapping, you guys, I don't even know if you can hear the clapping or not. We can't hear it. So I apologize. This is a State of the Union speech. There's a lot of clapping. So if the audience muddle muddled, I apologize.

SPEAKER_18 10:16

I might mute some of it.

Viral Clip: Split Worldviews On Immigration

SPEAKER_17 10:18

Maybe, yeah. So this right here was an iconic moment in history of State of the Unions. I am sure as time goes on, this will be one of those things that's like, hey, you want to read a zinger? Let's show you a couple things the president said in this speech yesterday. He put the entire Democrat Party on notice and he exposed them to the entire world. Watch this. He asked them to stand if they believe that the purpose of America is to serve her citizens and not illegal aliens.

SPEAKER_24 10:49

So tonight I'm inviting every legislature to join with my administration in reaffirming a fundamental principle. If you agree with this statement, then stand up and show your support. The first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens.

SPEAKER_19 11:12

The Republicans stand up and the Democrats stay seated.

SPEAKER_17 11:18

Unbelievable. Wow. So you can rhetoric and rhetoric all you want, and you can talk about how, you know, we've got to help help Abuela. But when it really boils down to it, if you can't even say you're here to serve the American citizens, look, he points out, and then look at this.

SPEAKER_19 11:53

And he just lets it sink in. He just lets it sink in. What an incredible moment.

SPEAKER_18 12:01

I mean, that's the best campaign ad ever.

Standing For Citizens: Defining SOTU Moment

SPEAKER_17 12:04

Yeah. And it's already coming out this morning. People in their primaries, right, are like zooming in on the person they were they're moving against. And they're like, stayed seating doesn't serve Americans. Yeah. They're just zooming in with a big yellow circle with an arrow, like, you know, the person I'm running against.

SPEAKER_18 12:19

If you're an American, you cannot vote for any of these people.

SPEAKER_17 12:23

Yep. And they know they're cooked. They know they're cooked. They know they just got schooled hard. All right, so we get through the clapping. A lot of clapping. This was a big deal. Okay, so this is one of the things that I had told to me twice last night was the put your shame in your face. That's a phrase I used to say way back in season one. We have to put their shame in their face. Okay. This is Donald Trump putting their shame in their face, pointing out the hypocrisy for everybody to see. It essentially short circuits the circular logic they're using that creates the hypocrisy. Right? So listen to this.

SPEAKER_24 13:05

Isn't that a shame? You should be ashamed of yourself not standing up. You should be ashamed of yourself. That is why I'm also asking you to end deadly sanctuary cities that protect the criminals and enact we're gonna come back to this.

SPEAKER_17 13:21

This is Ilon Omar screening her head up. Oh man, I really thought that was good. Now, you have to understand this is on a backdrop where the Democrats have lost their freaking mind. This is Congressman Steve Cohen, Democrat. Okay, listen to what he had to say. This is like a week or week ago, week or two ago. Okay. When Trump asked them to stand up and say that you represent American citizens, it's not just that these people have mixed constituencies or that these Democrats are trying to play some type of weird middle ground suburban mom angle. They have a genuine hatred for legacy Americans.

SPEAKER_13 14:14

We need people working in the front lines and local law enforcement to protect our citizens from the worst of the worst. The worst of the worst are not the immigrants. The worst of the worst records show are native-born Americans.

SPEAKER_17 14:26

We need it's a visceral hatred they have for native-born Americans. He's literally advocating for hiring illegal aliens and putting them on the police forces to protect apparently him and his ilk from the real threat, which is legacy-born American citizens.

SPEAKER_18 14:44

His neighbors.

SPEAKER_17 14:45

My neighbors. I need the import immigrants to protect me from the people who belong here.

SPEAKER_18 14:51

Oh, geez.

SPEAKER_17 14:52

Who can't leave here, who are tied to the land. That's what a peasant is. He's tied to the land, right? There's nowhere to run. I speak English. I'm born here. Everywhere else I would be a foreigner. This is where my creator dropped me. It's like I have a right, I have a necessity. That's not how he feels. You know, when I was in prison and all of the guards, 80% of them or more, were from Africa and were Muslim. He sure didn't feel like my constitutional rights were being protected. I'm not sure any of them had ever read the constitution. I'm not sure any of them ever had read the Bill of Rights. I remember asking one guard about the Fourth Amendment, something or another, and he goes, What are you talking about, the Bill of Rights? I don't owe you no money. When I said Bill of Rights, he literally interpreted it as Bill, as in he owed me money. And he was like, I don't owe you no money. It's like, we're not, we're not even talking past each other here. Here is Democrat rep Janelle Bynan being asked about, you know, Donald Trump putting everybody on the spot. And she does. She plays the middle ground. But you just heard Cohen talking. She's no different. She's just a little more politically savvy and doesn't say stupid things.

SPEAKER_07 15:56

What did you think about that moment when the president was asking Democrats to stand up for American citizens during that part of the speech when he was talking about immigration and immigration enforcement efforts?

SPEAKER_25 16:07

I think you can agree with the what, like standing up for American citizens, but I disagree with the how.

Sanctuary Cities, Shame, And Optics

SPEAKER_17 16:13

But he only wanted you to stand up for the what. You could have gotten a win. This would have been not a political, not have been a political disaster for you night less for you last night if you would have just stood up. You can go into committee meeting and vote against everything. Yeah, but you might have just lost the midterms. I mean, this is this that was as bad as Nancy Pelosi ripping up the speech. If you're at all moderate or middle ground, that was offensive for them not standing up. Okay. Like, well, we might want to protect the immigrants, but obviously job number one is the citizens. So it's not the what, it's the how.

SPEAKER_25 16:48

And so it's always about how do we bring our country together, but not stand on the backs of others. There's thinly veiled uh racist language, um, anti-immigrant language, and what he was asking, and and that was uh that was uncomfortable.

SPEAKER_17 17:04

Yes, thinly veiled racist language. I wouldn't say it was that thinly veiled. I kind of felt like he was pretty outright. Like when he said this, I I almost fell out of my chair laughing.

SPEAKER_24 17:16

The Somali pirates who ransacked Minnesota remind us that there are large parts of the world where bribery, corruption, and lawlessness are the norm, not the exception. Importing these cultures through unrestricted immigration and open borders brings those problems right here to the USA. And it is the American people who pay the price in higher medical bills, car insurance rates, rent, taxes, and perhaps most importantly, crime. We will take care of this problem. We're gonna take care of this problem. We are not playing games.

SPEAKER_17 17:52

So he comes right out and says it the Somali pirates prove to us that are there are places and cultures in the world that do bribery and corruption. And Ilan Omer is back there. She was losing her mind, man. She looked like a little petulant child yelling at Trump. In fact, here it is again.

SPEAKER_24 18:11

You should be ashamed of yourself not standing up. You should be ashamed of yourself. That is why I'm also asking you to end deadly sanctuary cities that protect the criminals and enact serious penalties for public.

SPEAKER_17 18:27

Look at how childish she looks doing. What does she keep yelling? Who blocked she's calling Trump a murderer and you know all this?

SPEAKER_24 18:33

The removal of criminal aliens, in many cases, drug lords, murderers all over our country. They're blocking the removal of these people out of our country, and you should be ashamed of you so you should be ashamed.

SPEAKER_19 18:51

You should be ashamed.

Voter ID Support vs Party Positions

SPEAKER_17 19:15

How popular is the Save America Act? So he just does a State of the Union. Obviously, the Republicans mostly are gonna want it, but the Democrats don't seem to want it. But it's pretty popular, right? Like the concept of citizens voting in American elections doesn't even seem that wild, right? Doesn't seem that way. CNN, in their polling, came up with these numbers. So the Democrats would not stand to support American citizens as the primary motive of American governance. They won't stand and will not pass the Save America Act, which ensures that only American citizens can vote. So you have to start asking yourself, who is the constituency of the Democrats?

SPEAKER_03 19:52

Take a look here. Favor photo ID to vote. 85% of white people favor it, 82% of Latino, 76% of black Americans favor it. So the bottom line is this voter ID is not controversial in this country. A photo ID to vote is not controversial in this country. It is not controversial by party, and it is not controversial by race. The vast majority of Americans agree with Nicki Minaj that, in fact, you should have a photo ID to be able to vote. So something we not take a look here.

SPEAKER_17 20:22

Major influencer, Nicki Minaj, weighs in on political voting topics. It's true, though. It's true. How can you vote against the Save America Act? Oh, you can't even. Oh, oh, I get it. It's because you actually don't like American citizens. I mean, this is the Cohen. It's like, oh, well, you just said it right there. The worst of the worst among us are the native-born Americans. Okay, yeah, but that's our problem. When you import someone, that's their problem dumped off on us. You see? I uh one of the things uh he talked a lot about Lake and Riley and passing the uh he called he called it passing the uh uh he he called for an act based on one of the angel, one of the kids that was killed by illegal immigrants. But anyways, uh which basically prevents sanctuary cities. But one of the things that I thought was interesting as I was thinking about it, it's like, okay, we only want to deport violent criminal illegals. And he uses these examples of people who were killed by people who were here illegally, and of course, it's easy to justify deporting that person. Really, they're gonna serve 20 years or longer in our prisons, and then we deport them, right? But that person should have never been here to commit the crime in the first place. So the Democrats to split the baby to try to split the issue are like, well, let's just take the criminals, the hardened criminals. Yeah, but every person who's here illegally is one drunk driving evening away from being the criminal that was here illegally that kills someone. You know what I mean? So every illegal is just a crime waiting to happen. They're an accident waiting to happen, they're a uh a fraud. Waiting to happen. And when it does happen, because inevitably some percentage of everybody gets into trouble, the easy thing to look at is go, well, they shouldn't have been here in the first place. And that's true. Even if your only crime is going to work really hard every day, working at your landscaping job, right, with the other pinches, and you go out to the bar in the evening after work and you drive home one time drunk and kill somebody, you're that murderer that we let through the border.

SPEAKER_21 22:27

Yeah.

Illegal Immigration Risk And Policy Logic

SPEAKER_17 22:28

So it doesn't matter. Like there, you could just run a red, red stop sign and kill somebody. It doesn't, it every illegal isn't supposed to be here. So any behavior or anything they do, they should have never been able to do. So it's one thing when someone's here working and they have a green card, they went through the process. We have accepted the risk. We looked at their background, we look at their out financial outlook, we looked at their ability to care for themselves, and we accepted the risk. Therefore, if a green card holder gets in a car accident, the gut response isn't you shouldn't be here. The gut response is that was tragic, just like if a citizen killed a citizen. But when you're here completely illegally, it's like there is a series of failures that allowed you to even be here.

SPEAKER_18 23:11

And it's an it's an indefensible policy that these Democrat, you know, leadership people seem to be glommed onto when you look at these numbers. The Democrat, you know, average citizen has has no desire or connection to No, they don't.

SPEAKER_17 23:29

It's the rich white liberals, it's the upper middle class white liberals that are in subdivisions and suburbs and high-rise apartments that are separated from me on a construction site, or you know what I'm saying, or you in a little small town community that's being, you know what I'm saying? Like there's a disconnect. They don't live in Springfield, Ohio, where you dump 20,000 Haitians on a town of 40,000. And then Governor DeWine goes, well, as far as you know, being a governor, it looks good because you know the GDP of Springfield's gone way up. Well, like we just What about my culture? What about my park? What about my pets?

SPEAKER_18 24:03

We just played the stats where 80% of all of America says we should have voter ID. But then when the president asked the Democrats to stand, they just sit there. And it's like, well, who are you representing? Because everybody wants it.

SPEAKER_17 24:16

Totally disconnected. Here Trump came out specifically against this. He puts their shame in their faces. He tells the Democrats, When I left, the border was closed. You opened it. You did this. You enabled this. You have the blood of these people who have been killed on you. For decades before I came along, we had the exact opposite.

SPEAKER_24 24:39

From trade to health care, from energy to immigration, everything was stolen and rigged in order to drain the wealth out of the productive, hardworking people who make our country great, who make our country run. Under Biden and his corrupt partners in Congress and beyond, it reached a breaking point with the Green News scam, open borders for everyone. They poured in by the millions and millions from prisons, from mental institutions. They were murderers, 11,888 murders. They came into our country. You allowed that to happen. And record-setting inflation that cost the typical family$34,000 in just a speck of time. Now the same people in this chamber who voted for those disasters suddenly used the word affordability, a word, they just used it in somebody, gave it to them, knowing full well that they caused and created the increased prices that all of our citizens had to endure. You caused that problem.

SPEAKER_19 25:46

You caused that problem. You caused that problem.

SPEAKER_24 26:09

Their policies created the high prices. Our policies are rapidly ending, and we are doing really well because prices are plummeting down. And even beef, which was very high, is starting to come down significantly. Just hold on a little while. We're getting it down. And soon you will see numbers that few people would think were possible to achieve just a short time ago. Nobody can believe when they see the kind of numbers, especially energy, when they see energy going down to numbers like that, they cannot believe it. It's like another big tax cut. I'm also confronting one of the biggest ripoffs of our times, the crushing costs of health care.

Inflation, Prices, And Policy Blame

SPEAKER_17 27:18

One of the things I said to my wife last night as we were listening to this, I was like, you know, Donald Trump makes it impossible to run as a traditional Democrat, a blue-collar union working Democrat. He just takes issue after issue from them, right? He's taking health care from them. He's taking union support and American jobs from them. He's take like he just goes into these areas that traditionally, when we did the Hegelian dialect, and you put anti-uh life, pro-war stance, but pro-life, pro anti-abortion stance, and we put pro anti-anti-life, pro-abortion stance, and pro-life anti-war stance is on the opposite side of the political spectrum. So either way, I have to choose to have one anti-life policy and one pro-life policy, no matter which party I look at. So you and I, Ron, as totally rational people with similar belief systems, could literally pick either or party and justify it based on our moral programming.

SPEAKER_21 28:14

Right.

SPEAKER_17 28:14

You know what I'm saying? Like either have to kill the baby in the womb or you kill Haji overseas. But either way, one party or the other wants to kill somebody. I know that sounds really crazy, but that is how this Hegelian dialectic split the parties. And it went, you can go down the row and you can see, well, I support this you, but not this issue. I support this issue, but not this issue. So then it just becomes a hierarchy of what of your top priority issues and stuff that you'll let go to the weightside.

SPEAKER_21 28:39

Right.

SPEAKER_17 28:40

You know what I mean? Like if anti-war is more important, then you let being pro-choice go to the wayside as far as abortion.

SPEAKER_18 28:46

Because but always in that list, somewhere in there, is death to murder.

SPEAKER_17 28:52

Yeah, always on both sides. Trump is the first president in the modern era to just come and go, no, I'm just gonna be pro-life top to bottom.

unknown 29:01

Right?

SPEAKER_17 29:01

I'm gonna be pro-life. I'm gonna be anti-war and I'm gonna be anti-death, but I'm also gonna be a realist and understand that you can have peace through strength.

SPEAKER_18 29:08

And then all the Christians in the entire country go, yeah.

SPEAKER_17 29:12

So there it does require people to kind of look in the mirror and assess their paradigms a little bit. Like you can be strong national defense, but did you are you really in support of 20-year endless wars in the Middle East that kill millions of living people, right? For essentially no reason. Justify Afghanistan.

SPEAKER_18 29:31

Well, we lost a lot of limbs.

SPEAKER_17 29:32

The only justification for Afghanistan is if you're in Afghanistan, he's saying we get a lot of free stuff at the end. You know, hey, if you if you spend 20 years fighting with Americans, at the end you'll have one of the most state-of-the-art militaries in the world. Well, for free.

SPEAKER_18 29:46

And they can ship a lot of cheap heroin everywhere.

SPEAKER_17 29:49

Think about how good of a deal it was for the Russians and the Chinese to arm the Afghanistans against the Americans. Because at the end of it, for are the cost of a couple AK-47s, they got Humvees, Blackhawks, night vision goggles, biometric identification for everybody in the country. Like they got it all for the investment of a few AK-47s. You know what I mean? Okay, so Donald Trump takes one other issue from the Democrats, health care. Oh. The crown jewel of this century for the Democrats has been Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act and what that has done to insurance. Donald Trump came right at these guys. The the shutdown last year was over Donald Trump not funding the uh what was it, the the additional money to cover the increasing premiums because Obamacare is broken.

SPEAKER_21 30:44

Right.

Health Care Costs And Obamacare Critique

SPEAKER_17 30:45

It's broken, right? It's too expensive. So their solution has been to be patching it. Just keep paying more, just keep paying more subsidies. That's the word. They were giving you subsidies. So if your insurance is$10,000 this year, they'll subsidize you$8,000. Well, that$8,000 is being robbed from our kids and from our future.

SPEAKER_18 31:02

Right. So rather than fix the problem, they part they're not going to be able to do that. That's the part that the average citizen doesn't see, and it's the part that makes it not affordable. You know, it is unaffordable, but people don't know it because it's it's paid for through these third party subsidies. And the problem is that they keep talking about it like it is affordable. It is not.

SPEAKER_17 31:24

No, it's not, which is why Donald Trump last night, continuing with what he was saying, came out hard on insurance cut.

SPEAKER_24 31:32

I'm also confronting one of the biggest ripoffs of our times, the crushing costs of health care caused by you since the passage of the Unaffordable Care Act, sometimes referred to as Obamacare, big insurance company that's gotten rich.

SPEAKER_17 31:49

It was tax cut. Big insurance companies got rich. And he really shames them for it, man. I loved it. Let's go to the chats here. Um, Pony Boy, happy anniversary to my mom, uh PB Brown, Utah Scouts, Kutin Tog. John Atis, thank you for the anniversary wish. Uh, let's see. Uh Berazer, happy anniversary to the parents of Taylor. Eva Razel, yes, happy anniversary, my parents also. Oh, that's fun. Uh Shantini, he was not happy. No, he wasn't. Pony Boy, if voter ID is unanimously approved by Americans on all sides. Why is it even a question? We know what the issue is, but it's so obvious. The issue is the lineup of people they have running for office on the Democrat Party. At the very end, when we get into private, we're going to show the CNN polling on the four frontrunners for the Democrat Party. And when you look at them, you're like, it's a clown car. In fact, Harry Anton uses the actual words. This is a clown show. They don't have a serious person. They have built their party around relying on fraud. They believe if they can get 25% of the people, who you can always get 25% of the people to believe in anything, or idiots. If you can get 25% of the people, you can backload with 25% more ballots. Some of the number discrepancies we have in registered voters to actual human beings is stunning. Like, you know, in Pennsylvania, having 99.7% of the adults uh registered, and it's like that's never happened. You know what I mean?

SPEAKER_18 33:09

Anywhere ever. Yeah.

SPEAKER_17 33:11

Anyone know why Justice uh Pony Boy Pinches, yeah, I wondered if you'd catch that. Anyone know why Justice Justice Thomas and Alito were not at the soto? They don't ever have all nine of them there. There's always three that stay out so that if they if State of the Union gets bombed tomorrow, the designated survivor, which is probably the housing and urban development director or whatever, and the three members of the Supreme Court, and you know, the one member of the house that still has a seat, they can like rebuild the government. So that's that's why they don't all show up at the same time. It's the same thing with the cabinet. They don't all show up at the same time. Somewhere in that chain of succession, those people are sitting in a bunker watching the State of the Union. Right. In fact, there's a really great TV series called Designated Survivor. That's about that, where they bomb the uh Capitol building during the State of the Union and the former housing director becomes president.

SPEAKER_18 34:01

Yeah, Kiefer Sutherland.

SPEAKER_17 34:03

Yeah.

SPEAKER_18 34:04

That's a good one.

SPEAKER_17 34:05

Yep. Okay, so Donald Trump also addressed the tariffs. This was really interesting because he did have the justices in the room, and we got the justices. Uh, I didn't we didn't have a Leto, right? We didn't have a Leto there, but we had Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts who voted against Trump's tariffs. He rallied against the tumor. And as time goes by, I believe the tariffs paid for. Oh, excuse me. He went, he he went on a little longer speech, and he really did kind of shame the justices in having voted against the bill. He goes, it was an unimaginable ruling, but that's okay. We have stronger tariffs and we're gonna do it. And it pans in on Justice Roberts' face, it's like you know, very stoic.

Tariffs As Tax Relief Strategy

SPEAKER_24 34:44

So he let's play this here. And as time goes by, I believe the tariffs paid for by foreign countries will, like in the past, substantially replace the modern day system of income tax, taking a great financial burden off the people that I love.

SPEAKER_17 35:03

I actually really love that. Taking a great financial burden off the people that I love. The whole speech, he's referring to the people, the American people. When he talks about health insurance, he's talking about the insurance companies got rich and we're gonna give the money to you, the people. So when he says taking a great financial burden off of people I love, he's talking about his doorman, his valet, his construction workers, his union workers. It's talking about us, right? It is a burden on us. It's a huge burden on us. It's not always a huge burden on someone who's wildly rich, right? What's the difference between$2 billion and$2 million?

SPEAKER_18 35:37

Isn't it refreshing to have a politician anywhere just recognize that it is a burden on the people?

Ban Congressional Insider Trading

SPEAKER_17 35:44

And not just recognize that it is a burden on the people to run to try to lower tax rates incrementally, but actually having a plan with tariffs and saying out loud this is designed to replace the entire taxation system where we tack, you know, tax people domestically. I had this vision yesterday. If you know, consider the United States government as a corporation. That corporation feeds off its own employees, unlike any other corporate structure out there, right? If I go get a job at Microsoft, I don't have to pay dues. Okay, I don't have to pay a membership to be there. I am the employee. The relationship we have with the government as a taxpayer is literally that of an employer. You are part of their corporate structure, you are a corporate access. United States Code Section 18 defines a citizen of the United States as a vessel of which the United States has complete and total dominion. When you volunteer to become a taxpayer, when you call yourself a citizen of the all-caps United States government, you are a piece of property to them. End of story. Say, you're you, it's there's no distinction here, right? Distinction is one thing, separation is another. You're the collateral. You are the collateral. You're the one who has to pay the national debt. Period. There's no call that Fort Knox is empty. When that gold gets gone, when people come calling notes due, guess what they're coming for? Your mortgages, your assets. You're the collateral when you're in that system. The idea that the employees of a system are the ones who pay themselves back and not the government itself. That's why Trump is treating the United States as a corporation and he's saying, listen, if you come here to shop, you gotta pay. That's the tariffs. It changes the it changes things dramatically. And in the United States' 250-year history, 175 years, that was the regime. And it led to the Gilded Age. So of course we want to return to it. I'm so glad that Trump is bringing that up. The other thing he did yesterday, and I was a little surprised by this, but I shouldn't have been. Uh, he really pushed for the passing of the bill that prevents insider trading. Now, when you talk about Congress, the whole thing has been Republicans are the money guys. They're the country club guys that got the backroom money deals. And then you've got the Democrats, right? And they're the communists. They're the ones that want to take the money from the guys in the back room at the country club and give it to the poor constituents and you know, spread the wealth. So there's always this kind of game that goes on. We want to save your taxes, we want to take your taxes. And that's the that's the the rouge. Behind the scenes, people on the left and right are insider trading. Okay, clearly. We see this, very obvious. Get your Pelosi tracker out, and it's across both parties, right? So the Democrats, more though, have run on that progressive like, we're against corporate America, we're pro-government, anti-America, we're pro-government to interfere in the businesses of America. Then you've got the Republicans that are pro-America for purposes of building the military, but they want hands off the corporations. So this is whatever. It's Hegelian dialect, it's the same dance, we're just going in a spiral. Well, Donald Trump kind of broke it yesterday because he said, hey, let's cancel insider trading, which normally is a Democrat talking point.

SPEAKER_24 38:58

As we ensure that all Americans can profit from a rising stock market, let's also ensure that members of Congress cannot corruptly profit from using insider information.

SPEAKER_17 39:13

So they stand up and chat, they stand up and clap you. Now, even Elizabeth Warren stood up and chatted. Look all the Democrats. Isn't that crazy? The Democrats can't stand up for American citizens, but they can stand up with getting rid of insider trading. To me, it feels a little bit of a ruse, but whatever. But again, if you're a normal American citizen, you're not sitting at home on your couch last night going, Donald Trump's an idiot. Our economy will fail if we don't allow people to inside trade. Nobody's making that argument. It doesn't benefit us at all if you have insider trading coming out of Congress. So even if you're absolutely hate Donald Trump and you're like a died-in-the-wool, true and true communist, your ideology doesn't allow for the people in charge to insider trade. This is the last scene in Animal Farm where the pigs and the farmers are sitting around the table and the animals cannot tell the difference between the two. I don't care if you're Elizabeth Warren and you want to get rid of quote unquote central banking, even though all of your policies enforce it, right? I don't care if you're the anti-banking gal. If you're insider trading, you're just a hypocrite. So they all stood up. They didn't stand up when we said, Do you represent American citizens? But when it came to getting rid of insider trading, they all stood up.

SPEAKER_19 40:30

And then, of course, Donald Trump was a little. They stood up to that, I can't believe it.

SPEAKER_24 40:39

As opposed to for the citizens. I can't believe it. Oh pass the Stop Insider Trading Act without delay.

SPEAKER_17 40:58

Okay, they all stood up. I expect that to be passed.

SPEAKER_18 41:01

There should be no opposition.

SPEAKER_17 41:02

There's gonna be some people that are pissed off because Trump just pissed in their Cheerios. I had a good deal with that water company going to smart meters, Mark Wayne Bowens, or I had a good deal with Lockheed. We were gonna get that new jet contract. I'm on the committee. There's gonna be some people that are pissed off. Now, this also changes the way lobbyists can interact because they can't go, hey, you know, do this and you know, invest in a little stock, and you know, that's where you get the return, right? We're all ready to go with a government contract. We're gonna buy our own stock back, which raises the prices, which is another problem, right? We give these companies money to make something, and they use that money not to make something, but to buy back their own stock to raise the stock prices.

SPEAKER_20 41:40

Yeah.

Party Pride Gap And Civic Trust

SPEAKER_17 41:41

And Trump put an end to it with an executive order, you know what I mean? So imagine, I mean, this these little things that Trump is doing and coming at, they're not little, they're huge. It's one thing to just blanket say, listen, you shouldn't insider trade, that's wrong. Let's just do it. It changes the entire lobbying landscape. It changes the rules of the game to such a degree that nobody wants to jump into it because where do where are our leverage points? Do you see what I'm saying? What's the perk that we can offer? Nancy Pelosi got asked about this after the State of the Union and total deer in the headlights, man.

SPEAKER_06 42:20

There was one moment, uh, Madam Speaker, where he called you out specifically uh around, of course, uh congressional stock trading. What do you say back to him?

SPEAKER_00 42:29

I say back to him, and that's what member said. Look at your own self. The inference he wants to draw is there was something wrong with that, which there wasn't. And if there was, people get prosecuted for. For a long time now, we've been trying to pass this law. It doesn't have now it has more support than it had before.

SPEAKER_06 42:51

And I I Elizabeth Warren stood up and applauded. Elizabeth Warren stood and applauded tonight when the president talked about it.

SPEAKER_00 42:58

Well that we all did. I did too. You said did Nancy stand up? Yeah, I did too. A lot of people stood up. A lot of Democrats stood up. I think that will pass depending on what the bill is. I mean, I I what we had, we thought we could husbands, husbands can trade pass. It was actually a tougher bill than Governor Spanberger had put for us. We thought it could pass, but it was clear that it wasn't going to make it to the House and the Senate. But any event, he gives his shout out. I don't pay any attention to him. What I'm concerned about is our democracy, which he is destroying. It's so good, man.

SPEAKER_18 43:40

I don't know. The president? I don't pay attention to him.

SPEAKER_17 43:43

I don't pay attention to him. But he is destroying democracy. Why? Well, he's not gonna let us insider trade anymore, or pay off the big insurance companies, or represent illegal aliens, or let Somali pirates into the country. Again, putting people's shame is in their faces. Hypocrisy. And I'm the first to raise my hand. We all do this. We're all rational in our own minds and we all have blind spots. Yep. I love it when people point out my blind spots because, in my opinion, based on my belief and some of Ayn Rand's theories, is there are no contradictions. If there are, check your premise.

SPEAKER_18 44:22

Well, and the Democrats always want to try to weaponize this against you.

Victims, Media Narratives & Epstein Files

SPEAKER_17 44:26

They want to weaponize contradiction. And if you're not solid on who I am and who you are and who we are, those contradictions don't get worked through. Well, they'll use terms like, well, have you checked your implicit bias? Exactly. Or there's they'll say, Well, you have white privilege, right? Or whatever. Well, this woman right here, I don't even know her name. It's totally irrelevant. I don't care. She's on BBC Radio, though, and she's apparently a Jewish woman. Look at this. Okay. We want to talk about putting your shame in your faces. These are the type of people that we're ideologically opposed to. And we have some of these same types of people on our side too. Okay. So this is the when your logic isn't right, when you have contradictions, we have to check the premise. This is the problem with Mike Huckabee and Ted Ted Cruz when they talk to Tucker Carlson. Tucker Carlson is not going to let some giant, some giant contradiction like we have a genetic right to this land, but we're not genetically connected to it stand. Does that make sense? Yeah. Like if your justification is God gave us this and we're genetically connected because of that, first of all, who's God that gave it? Okay. That's one question, but let's set that aside. Okay. But then it's also, well, if but if the justification is because you're genetically connected and you're not, okay. This is again blatant hypocrisy.

SPEAKER_10 45:42

Only two weeks ago, a week before I went away, I opened Twitter on my phone. What did I see? I saw Jewish privilege trending. Do you know how that feels? Do you know how frightening that is, how angering that is?

SPEAKER_17 45:56

So as a Jewish woman, it is terrifying, frightening, and intimidating to see Jewish power trending on Twitter.

SPEAKER_10 46:05

Interesting, because it's total white privilege on your part to use the word oppression in such a easy cavalier manner. You're playing to the gallery.

SPEAKER_17 46:17

So I'm sorry, I said a privilege. She said Jew privilege and then white privilege. Right? Pick one. You're either offended by it or you're not, right? But it's again, oh, well, you're using it for a so are you. You're using it to claim oppression. So are you. Okay. Donald Jake Tapper was uh talking to Sean Duffy, Secretary of Transportation, former Fox News host, and he's asking them about Donald Trump's performance because he called the Democrats crazy. Remember, he's like, these people are crazy, they don't support American citizens, they don't support good policy. And I think once or twice Donald Trump, you know, these people are crazy. So that was addressed by Sean Burr.

SPEAKER_31 47:02

These people are crazy. I'm telling you, they're crazy. I mean, but that's not something we ever heard from Obama or Biden from that stage.

SPEAKER_08 47:09

No, I mean that's we've never we've never had a a speaker rip up a speech either. But when you're saying issues like we're talking about trucking, um, we have, and this is it comes into my space, where you have states that are issuing driver's licenses to illegals, illegals who haven't been trained to drive a 80,000-pound truck on an American road. We have a little girl uh that has uh been had a life impacted for the rest of her life, and she's five years old, and it was illegal and illegal who hit her. I think the question becomes why doesn't every Democrat stand up and go, no, we want well-qualified drivers on American roads? That's not partisan. We don't want illegals who can't speak the language, contrary to American law for decades, to not be on American roads. I think those are easy issues, Jake. And I don't think we saw Democrats stand up and support them. Um, I mean, yeah, we get we got some applause for the U.S. Olympic hockey team, but that was probably one of the only bipartisan moments uh uh of the night, which I think is too bad. Again, if inflation's down, Democrats should applaud it. If uh real incomes are up, Democrats should applaud it. Unless you have the Edward Doubt opinion and all those numbers are made up, anyways. Um, those are good things that we should support as Americans. And just because Donald Trump's in office doesn't mean you have to sit on your hands. You should applaud that because that's good for America.

SPEAKER_17 48:22

It would make sense. That was one of the things they talked about yesterday was uh passing a bill that would prevent non-citizens from getting Class A CDL driver's license, which would prevent them from being in the 18 Wheelers. I think that's a good thing. I think that's a good thing. There was a poll put out by Gallup, and this is the graph for that poll. It says pride in being an American citizen by political party, 2001 to 2025. So it shows here in 2001, which by the way, I graduated in 2002. So when I left high school, there was a very marginal difference between Republicans and Democrats when it came to pride of being an American. But look at what happened here.

SPEAKER_18 49:01

And that's also 9-11.

SPEAKER_17 49:02

Yep, 9-11. So clearly, right, kind of tax up. Republicans are like 98% America.

SPEAKER_18 49:09

Well, that's all the you know, go get him, we'll never forget, guys. Yep, yep.

Judges, Ambassadors, And Institutional Rot

SPEAKER_17 49:13

And then the Democrats went to college. And by the time I graduated college, I was probably down here too. Indoctrinated. Yeah, so the Republicans have maintained a plus 80%, really like 85% to 95%. Right now it sits at 92%, pride in America. Whereas the Democrats are sitting right now at 36%. I find it interesting through the Trump era, they dropped, and then during the Biden era, they shot back up. I guess that open border was just so enticing for me. I'm just super excited about all the illegals coming in, but then immediately Trump gets re-elected and they're back down here. 36%. So when you are a quote unquote die-in-the-wool Democrat voter, you're 30, you don't like America. This is a problem for me. I have to live here. I want you to like the place you live enough to, you know, pick up the trash, do basic stuff, participate civically, scope speed limit, stop at the stop site, don't drive trunks. Right. All that stuff seems like a good idea. Yesterday I talked about John Solomon and how he's been talking about accountability's coming, accountability's coming. A couple, a couple months ago, he put this out. This was we heard what we heard yesterday, and then a couple months later, he put this out saying that Pam Bondy's behind the eight-ball, that the information that she is telling the public in Congress is brand spanking new. He's like, we reported on that six months ago. John Solomon, how do you think we feel about the stuff you report? Some of it we reported on five years ago.

SPEAKER_26 50:50

She did it. She put out this tweet, got a lot of traffic, great Fox News story. Uh oh my God, guess what I discovered? I discovered that Joe Biden gave up uh Donald Trump's phone and Mike Pence's phone to Jack Smith. That's great, madam attorney general, except that story came out in April. She wasn't even aware that that wasn't a new development, but an old development that had been discussed by Senators Grassley and Johnson for months. If you want to fix the pert walk problem, if you want to fix the um opportunity to bring accountability, Cash Patel has the evidence. The prosecutors, with the exception of Halligan, are lagging far behind the evidence. And that sand clock is ticking down not only on uh not only on statute of limitations, but on the time that occurs in between elections. 26 elections already underway. We're missing really valuable time to educate the public. The American people are missing valuable time. I don't think DOJ is getting there. When you see that there was a six-month delay in this document, when you see the Attorney General presenting something new that is old, uh, she's so far behind the facts. I'm really worried that Donald Trump doesn't have the team that can bring accountability to the Justice Department. That's just my reporting, and by the way, that's what many Justice Department and members of Congress have been saying to me privately over the last three weeks, four weeks.

SPEAKER_18 52:08

I have some same concerns.

SPEAKER_17 52:10

This is the shot to the heart. The reality that we might get four years down the road, and let's just pretend Trump doesn't go through a political impeachment. We might get four years down the road and it's just running out the clock. And even if we get a JD Vance, he does not have the will or the political capital to do what Donald Trump did last night at the State of the Union, let alone actually sign the executive orders and pass the laws. Right? If if Trump can get it done in his time period and then a JD Vance or a Marco Rubio takes over, they can keep it, but they're probably not gonna advance the football. Does that make sense?

SPEAKER_18 52:44

So this I hope they can do it.

SPEAKER_17 52:46

I hope so too. But this is one of those like, uh, what would happen if you fired Bondy? Well, now you got to go through a Senate confirmation. We can't even get them to vote on a bill that has 50 co-sponsors. It's a past. I mean, 50 co-sponsors, vote, let the Democrats talk themselves silly. JD Vance will show up and close it out. I don't like the way you talk.

SPEAKER_18 53:06

I don't like the way you're talking because it sounds like you're uh in like a fatalistic mood, like it's already lost.

Power Networks: Families, Agencies, Influence

SPEAKER_17 53:12

I'm not, but it's clear eyes, right? It's the it's like when you hear Donald Trump talking, State of the Union is strong, all your numbers are fake. We've got great employment, do we? My my point here is you're living we're living in this time where very little can be trusted. So we actually, the only way to do it is the AI style. We have to consume this information and filter it with our judgment. I have to be the judge of this stuff, right? Because I can't. This is one of the things I was saying last night in uh one of our meetings is there's no authority. There's no one that you can look at in this country right now and go, I can trust you because you're the sheriff. I can trust you because you're a judge. I can trust you because you're an elected official. I can trust you because you're an election committee person. I can trust you because you're a doctor. I can trust you because you're a CPA. You can't trust any titles. You can't trust anybody's, you know, claim to authority in a in at this per current state. Oh, hey, you've got a serious medical issue? Yeah, go to that doctor that told you that putting on a mask during COVID would save your life. Go to that doctor that told you that injecting mercury and aluminum and those turbo cancer stuff and didn't even open the insert for the vaccines to know that was in there. Go go ask that doctor about it. Do you trust them? Do you think they actually read the medical literature? Or did they just go to school long enough to get their degree and now you can pay them? Do you see what I'm saying? You can't trust a title. You can't trust somebody's degree. We are at a point where you can't even trust the name of something like victim. So Rokana yesterday tried to pull this fast one on Trump and try to bring a victim to the State of the Union. Remember when Donald Trump brought rape victims of Bill Clinton to the debate to be like, oh, you think I said something bad on a bus talking to another man, like locker room talk. There's four women that have credibly accused your husband of rape.

SPEAKER_18 55:16

I do remember that.

SPEAKER_17 55:18

Put their shame in their faces. So here is Scott Jennings talking about Rokana's guest. Rokana to me is proving to be a moron. He's proving to be someone that's got great talking points. He's probably wildly intelligent, but he's a fucking freaking moron because he doesn't know who he's working with. It's like over and over and over, Rokana's the one that's like, we got Trump now, and they're like, we've got Bill Clinton on a leash. He's like, oh, how did that happen? So he invites an Epstein victim to the State of the Union last night.

SPEAKER_04 55:48

And then there's the curious case of California Congressman Rokana. Well, he is bringing to the speech tonight someone connected to the Epstein file story. Let's hear from Rokana about that person in Cut 12.

SPEAKER_30 56:01

Hayley Robeson just wants justice. That's why I'm inviting her as my guest tomorrow at the State of the Union. She'll be speaking not just for herself, but for the thousands of survivors.

SPEAKER_04 56:12

You heard the name there, Haley Robson. Now, Rokana says she is speaking for the survivors, but is she? The files show something completely different. That Haley Robeson was, in fact, someone who worked with Jeffrey Epstein to recruit young women to the island, according to CNN's reporting, and I'm just going to read it to you. Quote: Robson told police she remembered bringing six girls to Epstein and told authorities she was like a Heidi Fleiss, the Hollywood madam who ran a high-class prostitution rink. Robeson provided police with the names of some of the girls she had brought to Epstein's house. She gave the officers the cell phone numbers for four of them and told police she wanted to assist the investigation in hopes of receiving lesser charges for herself. She cut a deal.

SPEAKER_17 57:00

She snitched to get a deal. Good thing she stayed out of prison, because when you a snitcher, it's not very good in prison. She trafficked women, there's more underage women and got away with it. She got away with it. And now she gets the category of the victim and got to go to the State of the Union with a sitting congressman.

AI Guardrails, Surveillance, And Military

SPEAKER_04 57:18

CBS News. Haley Robeson received$200 payments each time she escorted a new masseuse to Epstein's home, according to the police reports. Robeson targeted girls from the rural area outside Palm Beach, where she grew up, because Epstein believed they were less likely to complain to authorities. Here again, Robeson likened herself to the so-called Hollywood madam, Heidi Fleiss, in an interview with Palm Beach Police. And Epstein, she said, once admonished her for bringing a 23-year-old recruit to his home because she was told, the younger, the better. So of all the possible people that Congressman Rokana could bring to the speech tonight to highlight the Epstein issue, this is who he chooses. This latest Epstein fiasco with Rokana comes after he outed four innocent men on the House floor by name, whose names appeared in some files, but who had, it turns out, done nothing wrong. He claimed they were perpetrators, and in fact, they were just random people.

SPEAKER_17 58:19

They were in a police lineup. He doesn't sound very much. The four people that he named, they were four volunteers that went in a police lineup.

SPEAKER_18 58:30

Oh boy.

SPEAKER_17 58:30

That's the only reason their names are in the files. It was because in the lineup, and I don't know who else was in the lineup, like Schwexner or whoever, there's just, you know, four randoms. It'd be like jury duty.

SPEAKER_18 58:41

Right.

SPEAKER_17 58:41

We got four people in here that are tall white guys. Come stand in line and let the victim identify who, right? He exposed their names, called them perpetrators out of the Epstein files. Imagine these guys' phones blowing up. They didn't even know they were in the Epstein Files. They just did a police lineup 10 years ago. And all of a sudden they're like, oh, I guess it was a pretty serious lineup. Rokana, moron. Hey, I'm gonna bring a victim because she said it was really horrible what Epstein did to her. Yeah, you should ask the people she brought to Epstein about what he did to her. And by the way, she was an adult when she started working with Epstein.

SPEAKER_18 59:14

Well, either a moron or slash really unintelligent, or is he trying to do this because he has to for some part of the cover party?

SPEAKER_17 59:25

I think he's a moron. Okay. Personally, I think he's a moron. Because he he presents as a populist Democrat, and I think he is. I think he's actually someone that Republicans can work with to get a lot of like the meta like fixing Obamacare. And I think he you can work with him. But he's a moron. It's like you don't read the material, you just take the talking points and run with it. I I it's almost like he's running behind Massey's sales here.

SPEAKER_18 59:47

Massey's a little bit more of an operator in the I'm sorry, but we can't have Morons in our party.

SPEAKER_17 59:52

I agree. I agree. I agree. Here's another victim. Here's what I'll say. Up till now, all of the victims, with the exception of Virginia Goofy, who's rest in peace now pass all of the victims that you see publicly in the press conferences, they're not victims.

SPEAKER_29 1:00:11

They're like this woman right here. Because I also brought other girls. I brought my friends, you know, underage as well to him. So, you know, I just hold a lot of guilt and shame for doing those things. And I know how I felt the first time I ever went to his house and was actually abused by him. And, you know, it was one of the most devastating days of my life. And just to know that I had any influence on that happening to somebody else, just you know, it really is just devastating and breaks my heart. How many girls do you think you brought to Jeffrey Epstein? Um, I would say at the minimum minimum 50, but anywhere from 50 to 70 girls. I know that I can't remember the exact number now, but what were their ages? No. The same ages as me.

Mexico As Failed State And Tariff Leverage

SPEAKER_17 1:01:01

The madam who calls herself Heidi Fleiss, who was overage. She was eight, over 18. She was like 22 when she met Epstein and then went on to traffic underage kids. So at what point was she a victim? At least this girl was underage when she met Jeffrey Epstein, but she continued on to bring 50 to 70 girls. She can't even count. She doesn't even know how many victims she brought. The victims you see on social media and on TV are not victims. The reason they're out there is it's just like you have an attorney go talk to the media when you're in trouble to try to try your case in public opinion. These girls who are co-conspirators are trying to get victim status and they're pleading their case in the media. I was abused and that's why I did it.

SPEAKER_18 1:01:44

Well, that's why I said what I said about Ro Kana. You know, is he part of the cover-up?

SPEAKER_17 1:01:48

He's an idiot.

SPEAKER_18 1:01:49

Okay.

Privateers, Letters Of Marque, Cartel Fight

SPEAKER_17 1:01:50

He's an idiot. This is this is what I'm saying. Like, if you look at that, I can have sympathy. I'm sorry, Epstein hurt you. But when you go and continue and bring 50 or 70 girls, where are the 50 or 70 girls that didn't continue the trafficking? You're out here, me a coupa ink, right? Pleading your case in public opinion. You should have a life sentence in prison. I don't, what do you want me to say here? Oh, the the bad man made me do it. You know, there's a certain point in the Nuremberg trials when I was told to do it, it doesn't fly anymore. When I told the judge in my case, Judge, answers to my questions like you just have to, don't work for me anymore. If I've been abused and the solution is go abuse other people, that answer doesn't work for me anymore. You know what I mean? This guilt after the fact, here's what happened. These girls took the money. I understand they're 14, 15, 16. You took the money. You came back. If you hadn't taken the money, or even if you took the money and went and told your parents, that's what led to his downfall in the first place. You didn't tell anybody because you didn't think there was anything wrong with it until it's retrospective. You know what I mean? And then you're in trouble and you're sitting with a police officer listed as a co-conspirator, and you're like, how can I flip this to be a victim? I hate that. I hate the fact that the people we see are not the victims, at least not the full victims that we're led to believe. The other thing is all the people who've said the numbers are small, and I have even I've been unsure. I'm like, I don't know. Are we talking about five, 10, 15 girls? Or are we talking about hundreds of thousands? We're talking about probably thousands. And where are they? She brought 50 to 70 victims. And and here's the thing, too. Do you remember a guy named Judge Reinhardt? Yeah. Judge Reinhardt. So Judge Reinhardt's down in Florida, and he was one of the prosecutors working at the DOJ that was prosecuting Jeffrey Epstein during his first arrest. He quit the DOJ, went into private practice, and then was hired by Jeffrey Epstein. So he went from on the prosecution team to being a hired lawyer for Jeffrey Epstein. So here's a couple emails. Super weird. Okay, so this is Jeffrey Epstein to Bruce Reinhardt. I said Bob. Bruce Reinhart. Okay. At this point, he's a private attorney. There is a federal absconder, blank, YF release date, F514, 2008. How do I find her probation officer? So this is Jeffrey Epstein reaching out to Bruce Reinhardt, who was at the DOJ and is now in private practice to look up someone who's got an ankle monitor. So Bruce replies, you can call me, I'll have it by the end of the day. And then uh the response is questions. So then we go here and we go, my inside source. So this is Bruce Reinhardt, my inside source waiting to hear back from knowledgeable people. I will check again in the morning. Problem is that the conviction is out of New York, but we're trying to confirm where she was being supervised. I told them I thought it was out of Montana, but they might need to confirm. They're tracking down a victim. They're trying to find a victim that has run off from them. And he's using this judge, or excuse me, they're using this guy who eventually becomes the freaking judge. And also, he's part of the incorporation of the Florida Science Foundation, Inc., which includes Bruce Reinhardt, this attorney, who then goes on to become a judge. See electronic articles for incorporation, Bruce Reinhardt, and he's involved with this Florida Profit Corporation, okay, which gets wrapped up with Jeffrey Epstein. This is the judge.

SPEAKER_19 1:05:33

Reinhardt, make sure I get it. Bruce Reinhart, okay, so you can show the screen here. This is the judge.

SPEAKER_17 1:05:41

And look what he did. Bruce Reinhart, who approved the FBI search of Mar a Lago, was not appointed by Trump. So he went from prosecuting Jeffrey Epstein to working for Jeffrey Epstein, helping with the cover up and whatever that happened, and then he was rewarded with a judgeship. He had a Trump case, had to recuse himself. Because of all the negative things he said about Trump. But then he got another case, literally weeks later, dropped on his laugh, which was to approve the warrant for Mar-Lago, and he did. So this web of stuff is horrible. Here's another one. Okay, so you can't trust the judges. That's questionable. You know, a little background checking. What about an ambassador? What about an ambassador of the United States? Well, how about this one? Epstein files reveal that former U.S. ambassador to Mexico, there he is, beautiful man, impregnated an 11-year-old child. What?

unknown 1:06:34

Yep.

SPEAKER_17 1:06:35

The president of Mexico is keenly aware of our case against Mancho and you other U.S. officials. The case have been um is likely, certainly convicted to years. We have the proof. Once we will help bring the whole new dynamic to what you anyways, ambassador to Mexico, 11-year-old, tied up in the Epstein scandal. These guys were horrible. And here's the thing: you want to know how deep it goes? Did you know? And this is again, just like John Solomon, this is old news today. Five years ago, in 2020 or 2021, whenever we covered this, we found this out when Jeffrey Epstein got arrested and Glenn and this whole like who they are kind of bubbled to the surface. Thank you, Q folks. One of the things we found out was Glenn Maxwell has some interesting siblings that are deeply embedded in the infrastructure of the United States. This is our hero, Alex Jones.

SPEAKER_14 1:07:22

Glenn Maxwell's sisters, London Telegraph. That's from five years ago. But now the documents come out that Christine Maxwell has run for a decade the DOJ's investigative data warehouse IDW system, including entire encryption key system and anti-terrorism data warehouse. Massad CIA M I6. And then what's the other sister do? She runs the WEFUN program. Can't make that overhead shot. I got all the documents right here. Now you're starting to figure out how this works. All because he was the head of the phonoma commission.

unknown 1:08:18

Yep.

Clown Car Polls And Ballots vs Voters

SPEAKER_14 1:08:18

He was the stand-in for standard for him. Polynomial for him, she runs her computers with a unit. Interpoly name. Now you start to get out of Cal eight to cabbage. I haven't even gotten all the worst stuff yet. By the way, I knew this and had forgotten it. So I've told Thomas Sisko, a great researcher, the other great researchers, just keep bringing me everything. A lot of times I've seen it, sometimes I haven't. He goes, Did you know that Island's Maxwell sister runs all the FBI computer systems and counterterrorism systems and the Epstein files? And I went, I did know she worked in cybersecurity for the federal government, but no, I didn't know that. It's all true. You know what the other sister does? Runs the World Economic Forum's security, computers, and technology via into the UN and NATO. Starting to get who Jeffrey Epstein is. Trilateral Commission stand in for David Rockefeller. I can't go. Go in my stead. You have my full authorization. To use the Tron analogy, you've got Dillinger's the human back uh, you know, in our dimension, and then you've got Tron referencing the main program. Nobody's gonna know what's the thing. He's got enforces everything, that's master control. And so Epstein's super gopher. I knew he was, as I explained, real spooks are not in any one agency, they're in everything. And then they they kind of are like a symphony conductor or an air traffic controller. I've been saying that for decades about how these guys operate now. It's all over the news because I mean I know what I'm talking about. But now it turns out that he was beyond that, he actually was David Rockefeller's body double, basically. So you can't make it up. You can understand.

SPEAKER_17 1:10:20

I'm supported by You can't make it up, man.

SPEAKER_14 1:10:23

We've got master control.

SPEAKER_17 1:10:26

So you've got Epstein involved with the Rockefellers and Epstein involved with the Rothschilds, both. Okay. There's a let me pull it up here. There's an image that I don't do a ton of these images anymore. Uh back in the first episodes, every episode we had like a special image that we would do. But I saw this and I thought, that's actually a pretty good drawing. Let me see if I can find it really quickly.

SPEAKER_18 1:10:50

Um The Rothschilds and the uh what's the other ones? Rockefellers. The Rockefellers. Those two family names seem to keep coming up. It's pretty odd.

SPEAKER_17 1:11:03

Well, here's why. So this is a look at so what this is is you've got ball, Satan, whatever you want to call it. You've got the royal family, and this is this is why this kind of I pulled the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers somehow have climbed the ladder to basically sit adjoining the royal family. Okay, and then you've got Freemasons and Zionists, the Vatican's tied into this, and then you've got our world leaders, actors, singers, sports stars, and then the public who watch the Tell I Vision.

SPEAKER_21 1:11:33

Okay.

SPEAKER_17 1:11:34

I just thought that was a good little thing. So when you hear about Epstein, right, being a stand-in for the Rockefellers and being the number one financial advisor to the Rothschilds and hanging out with Prince Andrew. Right. Do you see what I'm talking about here? He's their intermary with Ball. Yeah. Now, the interesting thing is they uh Jeffrey Epstein comes from the Zionist side of things.

SPEAKER_21 1:11:57

Right.

SPEAKER_17 1:11:57

I've never heard Jeffrey Epstein associated with Freemasons.

SPEAKER_21 1:12:00

No.

Election Integrity Paths: SAVE Act Or EO

SPEAKER_17 1:12:00

Freemasons tend to be more your Republicans. The Zionists tend to be more your Jewish Democrats. So interesting connection there, but he's sitting up here at this level. Allegedly. If there is such a thing. If there is such a thing. I have no idea. It's all allegedly. Yeah. Okay, it is time for us to jump over into private. We're going to be talking a little bit about AI. I did want to mention one thing before we get there. Michael Tracy, who in my opinion is kind of a deplorable person. Not in a good way. Okay, not in a MAGA way. He's kind of a deplorable person, but he does talk about uh a lot of the Epstein files allude to Donald Trump having committed horrible acts and stuff like that. And you've even had Ted Lew and others, we need redacted files. We have the redacted files. We know how this resolves. You guys are being weird about it, right? So he says this the accusations against Trump, and trust me, if he if he could criticize Trump, he would. The accusations against Trump that were supposedly covered up in the Epstein files related to a quote, Jane Doe accuser who claimed in 2019 to have been drugged and raped by Epstein in South Carolina in the 1980s when she was 13 years old. There's no evidence Epstein ever resided or vacationed in North South Carolina, nor that he ever piled, plied anyone with drugs. He was known to abstain entirely from drugs and alcohol and prohibited it in his presence. I don't know. More relevantly, the lawsuit brought by Lisa Bloom, who previously made fraudulent rape claims against Trump, namely the Katie Johnson lawsuit in 2016, which was publicly stunt, which was a publicity stunt cooked up by her former Jerry Springer show producer, alleging that Trump and Epstinately violently raped the 13-year-old girl in the 1990s. It was subsequently exposed as a total hoax. And it was all adjudicated and resolved. So when you hear people talking about Trump's in the Epstein files, it's centered around this particular case, which is a complete fabrication. Came around in 2019 making all these, you know, old, old claims that not only are wildly unverifiable, but in the case of it happening in South Carolina, there's no evidence Jeffrey Epstein ever even stepped foot in South Carolina. Okay, it is. Let's go ahead and jump over to private. We're going to be talking about what's going on in Mexico. It's a huge, huge deal down there. We'll see how things shape out this week. If the violence continues or it gets quelched, I mean, this could continue on and be like a long-standing thing, or it could resolve itself pretty quick. But we're going to talk about Mexico and the concept of being a failed state. And then we're also going to talk about election integrity. There was a huge election integrity symposium in DC yesterday. Trump didn't mention anything other than the Save America Act. A lot of people had ideas he was going to talk about aliens or he was going to talk about election fraud, and he did it. He just put the Democrats' shame in their face and moved on. But we're going to talk a little bit about the election integrity, and then I'm going to play the clip where uh Harry Inton says that the Democrats are a clown car. And then before we do that, we're going to hit this again. It's this idea that there's a destabilization. As someone who was accused of violence against a federal officer, assault on a federal officer, and I know how incidental my contact was, right? I got a seven-year sentence for what kind of amounts to incidental contact. It's the what could have happened that you get charged with, not what did happen. Okay. And it's not a it okay. So in New York, as cops are walking around, they're getting thrown snowballs at them. And there's videos of these cops getting snowballs thrown at them. Now, one of the things you'll see in these videos is like, you know, one of them runs up to the cop and slams a snowball on the back of his head. This isn't a 13-year-old doing that. This is an adult man as big as the officer himself, smacking him on the back of the head with a snowball and point blank and just going at it. So this is assault. If if I saw an officer and I picked up a snowball and threw it at him, that is assault. We're not teenagers just randomly engaging in snowball fights. Right? You have to all volunteer to do the snowball fight. Otherwise, somebody's committing an assault. Period. You know what I'm saying? Like, and and we can chalk it up to boys. No. No. I went to prison. I will never accept that answer again. I will never accept, oh, well, we just did a little bit of rioting again from a Democrat. It was pretty peaceful. I will never accept it again, right? From a Democrat. Republicans were not so full of hypocrisy on this one. So I'll never accept it from a Democrat. So when I heard Mondani say this, I thought, you're asking for some real problems. You're unleashing the public on the cops because you're going to protect the public.

Paper, Audits, And Machine-Free Voting

SPEAKER_05 1:16:44

From the videos that I've seen, it looks like a snowball fight. I think that there were two officers who were facing lacerations on their face. Snowball fight. Look, I I've I've seen the videos of this snowball fight. I think that it was a snowball fight.

SPEAKER_23 1:17:00

The NYPD says no arrests have been made, but the investigation remains ongoing.

SPEAKER_17 1:17:06

So for a snowball fight, did the cops throw any snowballs back? Were they like playing around? Were they having a fun time? Or was this a snowball attack? Mandami, it's that problem we have. People can't live honest to their true beliefs. You want to say one thing, do another. You want to criticize January 6th, but you'll let people on the street just lacerate the face of police officers. Oh, you don't like Jewish privilege, but you spout white privilege anytime it suits you. It's not consistent. It's not consistent. And for us peasants, we just need a little consistency. Right? We can't trust anybody. Oh, trust it. The judge said so. Yeah, till next week when he gets arrested for child porn. Or, you know, hey, that's a United States prosecutor. He has an ethical standard. Why'd he quit his job and go work for the pedophile he was prosecuting and help him look up victims that they're trying to hunt down? And then ends up being a judge and signs off on a warrant to search Donald Trump's house. And we know that warrant was faulty and illegally premised. And all where's the accountability? I can't trust my college professors. You know, I want to. All right, time to run over to private.

SPEAKER_21 1:18:24

Bye bye, everybody.

SPEAKER_17 1:18:26

See you tomorrow. Bye. Okay, so going on with that, one of the things to look at here is the onset of AI. So there's a dispute going on between the Pentagon and Anthropic. Anthropic, up until now, has been essentially the sole provider of AI services and stuff like that for the U.S. government. But Anthropic is a woke company, and that's a problem because they're trying to de-woke the military. The other thing, too, is Anthropic built its AI tools with certain safeguards, which probably aren't the worst thing. So let's take a look at that and listen to the some of the safeguards he built into AI.

Closing, Community Chat, And Sign-Off

SPEAKER_11 1:19:01

That's one reason why I'm, you know, I'm worried about the, you know, the the autonomous drone swarm, right? So, you know, the constitutional protections in our military structures depend on the idea that there are humans who would, we hope, disobey illegal orders. With fully autonomous weapons, we don't necessarily have those protections. But I I I actually think this whole idea of uh constitutional rights and liberty uh along many different dimensions, um, you know, can be undermined by AI if we don't update these these protections appropriately. So, you know, think about the Fourth Amendment. It is not illegal to, you know, uh put our cameras around everywhere in public space and you know record every conversation. It's a public space. You don't have a right to privacy in a public space. But but today the the government couldn't record that all and make sense of it. With AI, the ability to transcribe speech, to look through it, correlate it all, you could say, oh, there's this, you know, uh this person is a member of the opposition. This person is expressing this view and and make a map of all uh you know 100 million. And so are you going to make a mockery of the Fourth Amendment by by the technology finding kind of technical ways around it? And and and so, you know, again, if we if we have the time, and we should do this, we should try to do this even if we don't have the time. Is there some way of reconceptualizing constitutional rights and liberties in the age of AI? Like, you know, maybe we don't want to write a new constitutional, but you know, don't you have to do this, right? Do we expand the meaning of the Fourth Amendment? Do we expand the meaning of the First Amendment? Those are some good questions. Yeah.

SPEAKER_17 1:20:47

And unfortunately, Pete Hexeth gave Anthropic a ultimatum. Take off the guardrails, which prevent us from violating everybody's privacy and from sending autonomous storm swarms with orders to kill. Take off the guardrails, or we're come bringing someone else in. And guess what Anthropic said? We can't take off the guardrails. So guess who showed up yesterday? Grok! So now Grok has a contract with the government to go do this stuff. That's the threat of AI, right? Oh, I don't need privacy, I don't have anything to hide, except you don't know what you're hiding from. I'm in a world where it's stunning to me, you know, when I hear Tucker Carlson, oh, there's no faith in government. I'm running, I'm running under his air cover right now, right? Because obviously we don't have any faith in government. But the fact that you're saying it, what's the logical next step? Watering the tree of liberty? That that is gonna send every judge chills down his back because guess what? Judges are susceptible to the peasants with picked forks. You know what I mean? So it's like uh if you guys don't trust our authority and start questioning our authority and we go down this road, eventually we end up in a failed state. What does a failed state look like? I don't know. Mexico, Venezuela, a bunch of other countries. Chanel Riyon talks about Mexico and the state that it's in and how it is essentially a failed state. Listen to this. Think about where we are as a country and the things we highlight on the show. And if things don't change, you know, and everything, all changes have to be kind of incremental, but if things don't change, you can see the road we're going. If our politicians are bought off, how long till they're overtly bought off? If our if our politicians are part of some cabal, how long until the cabal is openly running? You know what I mean? This is Mexico.

SPEAKER_01 1:22:34

We are on a collision course with Mexico. It's a failed state. A failed state is widely defined, but at its essence, Max Faber defines a failed state as one that has lost its monopoly on the legitimate use of physical force within its territory. This is the most accepted definition of a failed state. And in a world where violent cartels run roughshod over the entire Mexican government, Mexico is a failed state. So when Trump and his team said earlier that we would enforce a 25% tariff on Mexico because of the government's intolerable alliance with the cartels, all of Mexico's governors backed their president Scheinbaum in a joint statement, indignant that Trump would say such a thing. Quote, we energetically condemn the accusations that suggest there is a link between our government and narco-trafficking cartels. Well, the word alliance is Trump being diplomatic. But despite the protests from the Mexican government, they knew they had no leg to stand on. So, first order of business today, Scheinbaum called Trump begging Trump was gracious. After a friendly conversation, Scheinbaum agreed to supply 10,000 Mexican soldiers to the United States southern border in exchange for Trump causing the 25% tariff deal. This is the art of the deal. You only get here, though, if you have the right information. And Trump had it. Trump's information, he knew the extent of cartel influence in Mexican politics. And he knows that even though Scheinbaum has made promises here that are going in the right direction, Mexico is not known to be an honest broker. It's a century-long open secret. Mexican cartels have infiltrated the Mexican government and run it from the inside. After decades of strategy and bribery, the cartels don't control the government. They are the government. And boy, did they. When Vincente Fox tried to shake things up back in 2020, he failed miserably. He centralized the police force, hoping that would help, but that actually made it easier for drug lords to buy off top police officials. At one point, over 400 officials were indicted on corruption charges. It was worse at the local level. By 2016, only 1% of all crime in Mexico were punished. And the government was completely unable to defend against cartels. Of the few times an honest official tried to stand up to the cartels, they were taught their lessons. In Juarez, along our southern border, a place with a murder rate five times higher than Sudan, cartels were murdering one police officer every 48 hours until the police chief stepped down. And he did. That's just one of dozens of examples. In 2021, there was some improvement. Instead of 99% of all crimes in Mexico going completely unpunished, the number improved. The number in 2021 is an improved 95% of crimes in Mexico go unpunished. Don't sleep easy. Those are just the crimes that are reported.

SPEAKER_17 1:26:25

Think about that person. What fraction are we dealing with? 2% of crimes get solved or 1%? I mean, it's it's up being a very small, small number.

SPEAKER_18 1:26:43

Yeah, it's point something.

SPEAKER_17 1:26:44

Lawless state. Lawless state. People have to take the law into their own hands. I was explained very clearly why gangs exist. When police do not protect the citizens, gangs will arise to protect their abuela and their grandmas and their little brothers and sisters. That's what they do. Young men want to protect something. And if the state isn't doing it and they can go off and create a family or something, they'll protect what they know, their family, and they create gangs. And then once you create a gang and you have to pay for the gang, you get involved in drugs, blah, blah, blah. And it goes on and up the ladder until you have a cartel. It starts simple. If you can't protect the people, somebody will. That's the natural hierarchy. You've got to protect yourself. If you can't protect yourself, you've got to enlist others to do it for you. And that's why they cover a territory and they protect that territory. It seems counterintuitive because what do the gangs do? They feed off the people they're protecting through extortion and asking them to pay for their services that they may or may not need. Sounds a lot like taxes. Sounds a lot like taxes.

SPEAKER_01 1:27:48

But you get the picture. If the definition of a failed state is a government that has lost its monopoly over physical force against criminal cartels, Mexico is a failed state. And if their cartels start shooting our deportation planes out of the sky, killing our border officials, and authorizing weaponized drones to start murdering ICE agents, we have more grounds to invade Mexico than we ever did to invade Iraq or Afghanistan. But who wants war? Not America first. How do we get around this? Blackwater founder, Eric Prince, a likely future candidate for president, and one of the most successful private defense contractors in US history.

SPEAKER_17 1:28:32

This part is kind of freaky. This is the direction that a lot of conservatives on our side of the aisle are saying is the solution to the problem. This is, again, kind of scary.

SPEAKER_01 1:28:45

Bring back letters of mark from privateers. Private citizens authorized by Congress to attack the enemy. As Prince puts it, giving a private organization a hunting license to slay cartels. Privateers, of course, would have to post bonds to ensure they operated within certain rules. It takes care of the root cause of Mexico's failed statehood without going to war. Private citizens with licenses to kill cartels would, as Prince puts it, fill a dead space. Bureaucracies can't. Utah Senator Mike Lee, a constitution-loving lawyer by trade, expounded, reminding the naysayers that the Constitution explicitly grants Congress the right to issue letters of mark. And that is a very good alternative to war. The Mexican government has been teetering on collapse for decades. The peso's in the toilet. And when called to step up and be a responsible nation-state, my prediction, the Mexican federal government will collapse within days. And President Trump should let it.

SPEAKER_18 1:30:09

Should we get into the mercenary business? Yeah. So the whole time I was thinking about what if you had like a young dog the bounty hunter twitch streaming with a case while like full on killing the cartel members.

SPEAKER_17 1:30:24

How do you know that was a cartel member? I don't wow. Like Rambo. But don't worry, they'll be bonded. Yeah.

SPEAKER_18 1:30:39

Oh man. It'll be the most watched show ever.

SPEAKER_17 1:30:43

The thing about letters of mark is the last time they were used, there was no live streaming. There were no pictures from the front. It was, hey, we've got pirates on the path. Let's pay a couple guys to go out and kind of, you know, let's pay a couple pirates on our side to go pirate the pirates.

SPEAKER_18 1:30:57

Right. And you never really know what happened except for the problem went away.

SPEAKER_17 1:31:01

The problem went away. Somebody came home. Okay. Yazas. I know, I know people who would join those mercenary groups with letters of mark to go and, you know, just to relive the glory days of Afghanistan. You know what I mean? Oh, this is Harry Anton talking about the clown car of the Democrat Party.

SPEAKER_03 1:31:23

They're all running, and this is just a downright clown car at this point on the Democratic side. I mean, just take a look here. Top choices for the 2028 Demprez nominee. You have a leader, but it's not really a clear leader. It's within the margin where you have Newsom at 19%. Then you have former vice president Kamala Harris at 18%. Quite a weak number for her, given that, of course, she was the nominee last time around. Pete Budajet, who, of course, has run before 13%. Alexandria Casio-Cortez at 12%. This is just a total clown car. It is a total mess. There is no clear frontrunner at this particular point on the Democratic side. Who the heck knows who the nominee is going to be in three, two years, three years?

SPEAKER_02 1:32:02

It's been a long time since we've had a Democratic race like this.

SPEAKER_03 1:32:05

Yeah, it has been a long time. This is very unusual for the Democratic side to not have a clear front runner at this point. National early poll leader at at least 25%. Look at this. This year, we get the giant question mark. No one, no one, no one, no one. In 2020, when there was no incumbent, it was Joe Biden who was there, Hillary Clinton in both 08 and 16, and Al Gore in both 2000 and 2004 at this point were at least at 25% of the early posts. You have to go all the way back, all the way back from when I wasn't even in elementary school yet, not even in a pre-K yet, to 1992. That was the last cycle in which there was no clear front runner at this point.

SPEAKER_02 1:32:45

Very unusual. Just to be clear, this isn't predictive because she didn't win in this primary and he didn't run. But this gives you a sense of eager. So what about you, sir? What are the prediction markets saying his dogs are? Yeah, okay.

SPEAKER_18 1:32:56

So it seems to me that the clown car keeps getting better the more they describe it. And you know, they didn't even mention Ilhan Obar.

SPEAKER_17 1:33:05

Yeah. Well, she is not American-born. That's an odd. She can't run.

SPEAKER_18 1:33:10

I'm sorry. Otherwise, she'd be the front runner.

SPEAKER_17 1:33:12

Elon Musk would already be our president if it comes in. Here's the thing: the Democrat Party does not rely on voters to win election. They rely on ballots. Oh. Which is why you can have a 20, 25% candidate that can suddenly pull 51% of the votes. Because remember, that polling was amongst Democrats. Okay. So when they're split four ways to nowhere, there's no front runner. And all those people you look at, they're not serious people. They're not serious people. Gavin, I mean, even Kamala Harris and Gavin Newsom, who've held you know executive office, they're not serious people. Clearly. So what does that party think? Do they really think that America is simply going to vote against Trump no matter who we put in? Because remember, this party, just this last election cycle, removed their elected nominated candidate who went through the entire primary season, won primaries, had voters vote for him to be their candidate. They just swapped him out for Kamala Harris. So that party does not rely on voters to win. They rely on ballots to win, which is why they had the election integrity symposium in D.C. yesterday. So let's listen to Kara Casanova interview one of our heroes, one of my heroes, Patrick Byrne, about election integrity.

SPEAKER_12 1:34:34

Ready, Kara Castanova with Lindell TV here with Patrick Byrne in Washington, D.C. at the election integrity summit. Patrick, obviously, an expert on elections and integrity and uh elections that were stolen. Can we talk about what went on today and what are the ideas that you guys are floating around to protect elections?

SPEAKER_22 1:34:52

Absolutely, Kara. Great to be on with you. It was a really information-packed day, a lot, five different speakers and study sessions on uh best practices. Saw some fantastic uh new innovation from this Eli system or LE system, the the alternative to Eric, where artificial intelligence is being used to clean up voter rolls, and it's available for uh uh activists within their own states, and your own states can be using great system they put together. ELLY should look into that. Also, great information. I mean, basically, there's two camps, those who are thinking this can be done through the SAVE Act and those kinds of incremental legal gains, and others who think look, there's such overwhelming evidence. The president just has to bite the bullet and declare a national emergency. We know foreign powers are involved in our elections. We can prove foreign components. Our equipment is riddled with stuff that comes out of the Beijing. We can prove all this. There's no way to fix it before the election. He's just got to declare a national emergency and do it, really simplify the election and do it like it's a third world country and get these things done. If he can get some of it done through the Save Act, that'd be great. And then the rest of it he does by executive order. But anyway, there's two camps here: those who want to sort of that incremental legal, and those who are saying it's time.

SPEAKER_12 1:36:16

I'm like pushing Patrick, but continue on because this is fascinating.

SPEAKER_22 1:36:20

Yeah, that it's that it's really time for a national emergency declaration. We know the components are are Chinese, and we know they we have all kinds of proof now that the that there's overseas meddling in our elections, and so he really has to act in a very muscular fashion, I think.

SPEAKER_12 1:36:38

What country do you honestly think is the most guilty for meddling with U.S. elections? Top three.

SPEAKER_22 1:36:43

Well, I think of it this way: the front line of what we're facing is a duo of Cuba-Venezuela. This has been a 25-year project. Cuba, Fidel Castro, and Hugo Chavez started this, and they've reached the fruition 25 years later. But that's like a joint venture. It's a joint venture of Venezuela and Cuba. There are some minor shareholders in a joint venture, and they are Russia, China, and Iran.

SPEAKER_12 1:37:09

And uh, would the Democrat Party possibly be one of those entities that steal elections and rhinos, maybe even that are compliant?

SPEAKER_22 1:37:15

Yeah, they're they're the dividends they're receiving the dividends. They're the people receiving the dividends. The Democrats and Republicans do not think this is a left-right issue. It's an us, them. There are our elites who are overthrowing our republic using this garbage election technology, and it is them against us, and there are plenty of Republicans, Rhino Republicans in it, along with 90% of the Democrats.

SPEAKER_12 1:37:40

Is there any way we could get Elon Musk in on this? Because he has so many unlimited funds to maybe because this all of like you mentioned AI earlier, AI could clean up voter rolls, but AI could also rake voter rolls. Like the right technology could really screw America, for lack of a better way to put it. Only Elon Musk or a tech genius like him would be able to actually, I think, go in and figure out what's wrong. What do you think?

SPEAKER_22 1:38:03

I don't think it's a tech problem. I think the problem is to get the tech out. The tech doesn't add anything, the tech just makes it more complicated and easier to hack. The solution is to drag the technology behind the barn and shoot it in the head. We should be getting as much of the tech. So we do hear these different alter ideas about more tech here, more tech there. I think the main event is we should be dragging the technology out and doing things like, you know, we Tim Meisberger was here from the State Department. He's run 55 elections overseas. He knows how. He's gone into a place like Burma where nobody trusts each other and held a clean election where afterwards everyone has to agree, okay, that was clean. He's done it 55 times. We and it it isn't a matter of throwing more electr more technology on top. In fact, we as Americans are probably too dependent. Oh, let's add more technology, we'll fix the it's the opposite. The technology is creating all these seams and ways they can cheat. We need to, I think, strip the tech.

SPEAKER_17 1:39:04

That's been my opinion. The election should be completely auditable by a third grader.

SPEAKER_18 1:39:08

Yes.

SPEAKER_17 1:39:08

Right? There shouldn't have to be any code. I don't have to have a degree or training. I should be able to, I should be able to add one to a whole number. That should be your qualifications for being able to completely audit an election.

SPEAKER_18 1:39:19

That is my thing the whole time. Yep.

SPEAKER_12 1:39:22

If you can name the top five counties in America that are the most corrupt, which ones would you say? Or states.

SPEAKER_22 1:39:28

Oh well, Arizona is a cartel property at this point. Georgia, I mean, the jokes write themselves. You following what's being revealed in Georgia? It's so it's absurd. Uh Pennsylvania. I mean, it's the it's the swing states. They picked, it's not a coincidence. They picked the swing states to get all this junk technology in.

SPEAKER_12 1:39:51

What do you think will come out of that FBI search in Georgia?

SPEAKER_22 1:39:54

I know what they're gonna find. I know what they're gonna find. I was there on I was there on January 1st, 2021. I know what they're gonna find.

SPEAKER_12 1:40:03

Could you give us a hint? Is it gonna put anyone in jail?

SPEAKER_22 1:40:06

Well, all the ballots were allegedly printed in one print shop, but we obtained some of the blank ballots from different stacks and took them to an FBI, retired FBI forensics guy.

SPEAKER_12 1:40:17

He said they were printed the Hey everybody, Kara Castanova with Lindell TV here with Patrick Byrne in Washington, D.C. at the election intemporary summer. And uh elections that were Patrick Stolen. One of the most we talk about what's going on today. What are the ideas that you guys are floating around to pretend anybody? I have never seen.

SPEAKER_18 1:40:40

So do you have I can't do anything but mute it.

SPEAKER_22 1:40:44

Okay, hit play now. Uh new innovations in this Eli system, the LE system, the alternative to Eric or artificial intelligence is being used to clean. I don't know.

SPEAKER_17 1:41:02

I don't know where it's coming from.

SPEAKER_19 1:41:05

Is it stopped? I muted it. That was weird.

SPEAKER_22 1:41:12

Should we look into that? Also, great inform. I mean, basically, there's two camps, those who were thinking this could be done through the Save Act and those kinds of impacts and took them to an FBI retired FBI forensics guy. He said they were printed, the ballots were printed in different shops, meaning at least at least some of them were fake.

SPEAKER_12 1:41:32

Last question, Patrick. So, one of the most taboo subjects of all time in my lifetime was election integrity. Anybody I have never seen anything like it. And January 6th was an extension of that because it was a bunch of people that were there because they believed the election was stolen, which leads me to believe that there was something. I mean, it's common street sense. When you're forbidden from talking about a specific subject, you know that something is up with that. Uh, it's been so censored. Can we just talk about why anybody that speaks out against the election's lives have been completely destroyed and what that means?

SPEAKER_22 1:42:02

That is so odd. I've I've heard what you said. I never internalized it. I guess I was so out there to begin with. No one will explain to me, to the extent I've even heard this, no one will explain to me why it's such a taboo subject. No one, nobody on the other side will explain why it's so taboo to question elections and to dig into them. That kind of suspicious to me, as Shakespeare said, methinks the lady does protest too much. You know, the more they're protesting, the more you want to. I've run all kinds of internal corporate investigations. Of course, it's the people who are protesting and fighting the transparency are the first people you need to look at.

SPEAKER_12 1:42:43

It seems like a lot of the people that were fighting and saying these things, it now turns out they possibly are right. Uh, and we'll find out more with this FBI investigation. I guess time only tells. A lot of these things will only come out, uh, hopefully in our lifetime, but they will eventually come out. The truth does always come out. What are your thoughts on that? Does the truth always come out?

SPEAKER_22 1:43:00

The truth, the truth, I think the truth has come out. It's just been a lot of it has been effectively covered up, but it's now reached the point if Trump does his job, it is not something that they can keep inside. Trump does his job. He's got to be more muscular, in my view. He's played nice, he's worried, just like he was on the night of December 18. But at some point he's got to do something, the muscular thing. That's what we're talking about. What would you say? Top thing. Declare a national emergency based on the Department of War has already said we cannot have Chinese components in our infrastructure, just like they just did with Microsoft and took all those things away. We now know, no question, there are Beijing components in our election machine that they've hidden the supply chain. Based on that alone, you should say all these machines are off the table. And as by national emergency.

SPEAKER_12 1:43:54

That would be great. Uh, we if he does it, it's because he does watch Lindell TV. So maybe he would take your advice. Thank you so much, Patrick. Thank you, Kara. Great to be on. Me too.

SPEAKER_17 1:44:02

That's a great interview.

SPEAKER_21 1:44:04

Yeah.

SPEAKER_17 1:44:04

It really lays out the election integrity and kind of what's what's at risk and what has to be done. And I agree with him. I just think no machines.

SPEAKER_18 1:44:11

Yeah, what do you think the possibility is that we could have a totally um computer free uh election? Nationwide.

SPEAKER_17 1:44:20

It's a signature. He either signs it or he doesn't.

SPEAKER_18 1:44:24

Okay.

SPEAKER_17 1:44:24

Because they're not going to elect, I mean, you're not going to get the legislature at this stage to ban machines. Do you remember voting previously? Executive powers.

SPEAKER_18 1:44:32

Do you remember voting pre uh machines? No. I do. It was great. It was so hard. All you had to do was go down to the fire station and you signed a little piece of paper, went to the booth, punched the card, and then you went and gave it back and put it in the thing and you got your sticker. And it was it was so hard. Oh man, I almost couldn't do it. I I don't know why people think this is so hard. It's not. It was the easiest thing ever.

unknown 1:45:00

Yep.

SPEAKER_17 1:45:01

Alright, guys, that's it for us today. Thank you so much for sticking around to the end. We will talk to you again tomorrow, but we do have a raid on the way out, so don't log out yet. All right. Put it in, Ron. Put in the raid. I think this is our last raid for the month. Confirm. It's so exciting when it happens. All right. Go to the raid. Check it out. I want to go. Mission sequence. As a computer surprising, I like having the computers count, but in Idaho, they keep the paper ballots for recounter. Yeah, but nobody ever gets to recount it for Azure. That's the problem. There are no ballots that can be recount. See Georgia, see Arizona, see Pennsylvania. There's a disconnect between the ballots, the signature verification, and the pull tapes.

SPEAKER_18 1:45:48

Right. And then they don't bounce. The audits are just as corrupt as the original. The vote.

SPEAKER_17 1:45:55

Yeah, there's no there's no checker balance when you have a machine involved. All the mail-in voting, all the balloting is to backload whatever they did on the machines. And then they will not let you look at it. That's that's the kicker. So saying, well, we keep a copy of the ballots in case we have to have the recount, but you've prevented recounting at all. And the same people who counted it the first time count it the second time. So the incentive is for them to cover up.

SPEAKER_18 1:46:20

And then the madness is when Duros goes, well, that's never been adjudicated.

SPEAKER_17 1:46:24

The cyber, the Cyber Ninja Symposium in in Arizona revealed so much about the ballots, the counting, and everything, they just couldn't take the step to say overturn the election like it was too late. So they just kind of put out their report. But if you are under any guise that you can audit trail this or you can nope, nope, nope, nope. The whole idea of the blind Australian ballot is the ballot is disconnected from the person. So you can see that I voted, but you cannot see who I voted for. So if you're dealing with a universe of ballots, not voters, and they're mailing them in, and then I never get to check the ballots because I disconnect it from the signature envelope. So as long as I'm within the universe of registered voters, you can do anything you want with those ballots. And sure, you know, when people are like, well, we did a spot audit. We walked over to that pile of ballots and we pulled, yeah, that pile of ballots is the one that came in sequential order from the people that came in the door. But the ones that came mailed in, those never get spot audited. Guaranteed. Anyways, ranting. All right, guys, we'll talk to you again tomorrow. Bye.

SPEAKER_28 1:47:55

What night lifted that car to over there? I'm 37. What? I'm 37, I'm not old. But I can't just call you ma'am. You could say dentist. I didn't know you were called Dennis. You're supposed to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind, you don't have dangerous the automatic treatment experience. But I have all these experiences. How did you get that? Is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet. Oh, but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up! Oh but if I went round saying I was an emperor, just because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me, they put me away. Shut up, will you? Shut up! Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system. Shut up! Come and see the violence inherent in the system! Help, help! I'm being repressed! Bloody peasant! Oh, what a giveaway! Do you hear that? Jew that, eh? That's what I'm on about. Do you see him repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?