Iran Fallout And NATO Reality Check

The jokes land fast, but the story underneath is serious: when Iran “threatens” major US companies and the Strait of Hormuz becomes the world’s pressure point, who is supposed to carry the risk and who is just along for the ride?

We walk through Trump’s public posture on Iran, the push to end the operation on a clear timeline, and why oil prices and gas prices swing so hard on speculation. Then we hit the uncomfortable NATO question: if allied governments deny basing access and overflight when it matters, is it really an alliance or is it a one way security subscription the United States keeps renewing? The UK response, European energy dependence, and maritime security promises all get put under a bright light.

From there, the focus shifts home to election integrity and institutional trust. We break down the executive order aimed at voter roll accuracy and mail in ballot verification through USPS barcodes, react to Pelosi’s comments about “technology,” and connect it to broader fights over nationwide injunctions, public media funding for NPR and PBS, and the incentives that drive nonstop lawfare. We also dig into birthright citizenship and birth tourism, including China-linked concerns, and end with a practical warning about router malware that can turn your home network into a residential proxy for fraud.

If this kind of no-filter, systems-first analysis is useful, subscribe, share the show with a friend, and leave a review. What topic should we go deeper on next?

Transcript

SPEAKER_14 0:36

It's the little guys, the little guys every time it's the peasants.

SPEAKER_13 0:46

Peasants, man, we're just peasants. Every one of us you watch those old movies, you see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around. We're those people. We're those people.

SPEAKER_11 1:00

Good morning, peanuts. Welcome to another episode of the Peanuts Perspective. Brought to you by April Fool's Day.

SPEAKER_19 1:08

I don't know if you guys caught that, but yeah, the Peanuts Perspective. That almost sounds like the penis perspective.

SPEAKER_11 1:14

Oh, run. Okay, so I got that from uh one of our loyal listeners and one of the great people who wrote me while I was in prison. The uh uh yeah, Sarah Singh, she's on here. Yeah, Sir Sings. We she sent that to me yesterday. So for April Fool's Day. So good morning, peanuts. Welcome. Thank you. Kind of fun. Oh, I love I love fan art and things like that. One of our favorite pieces is is the uh where is it? One of our favorite pieces of art is totally missing right now. There it is. Yes, you have to put the camera on you. Yes, somebody took the time and burned that in. That was from that was from way back when. That was awesome. I love that, Taylor and Ron. Anyways, so fun, you guys. Fraser, good morning from Wet Boy C. Oh, good. Join in the fun. It's a little wet here today, too. Pony Boy, good morning for razor. Peanuts perspective. Yep, April Fools. Pony Boy, Sare Scenes, love it. Love you too. It was wonderful. Pony Boy, morning, peanuts. Y'all are nuts.

SPEAKER_18 2:14

That's right.

The Simultaneous Sip Ritual

Trump Mocks Iran Threats

SPEAKER_11 2:15

Chantiti, good morning. Carlitz, good morning. So glad you guys made us here. And yesterday we were so excited to just be back from Vegas. We totally forgot the simultaneous sip. Oh. Let's do that here this morning. I know why you're here. You're here for the simultaneous sip. And all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank, or a chalice, a stein, a canteen, jug, or flask, a vessel of any kind. And fill it with your favorite liquid. I like Diet Coke or Dr. Pepper this morning. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better, the simultaneous sip. Yes, so very good. Doug Wyatt, good morning, peasants. It's peanuts today, Doug. It's April Fool's Day. Carlito, good morning from Carlito and Tiffany. Good morning from YouTube. Glad you guys all made it. You know, they have scientifically proven if you get together and do something like the simultaneous sip, it just makes the day go better. Science. It's true, true, legitimate science. So yesterday, Donald Trump had a really great briefing in the White House, and we'll be talking about the executive order that he signed here in a minute. But first, we have to talk about Iran. Sounds like things are finishing up. Yeah. Good news, I guess. That'd be awesome. Warmongers that are like, no, no, no, no, no, no, war. Sounds like we're about over with. So Donald Trump was taking questions after he signed the executive order. And he was asked about Iran, because you know, they're big mad about what's happening over there, and they're threatening all of the American companies in the region. So Donald Trump gets asked about that.

SPEAKER_25 3:46

The Iranian government threatened a bunch of US companies today in the region, including Google, Apple.

SPEAKER_20 3:53

What? What are they threatening them with? PP guns? They don't have much left to threaten. My question for you is are you? I don't know. I mean, what are they? You may have said what are they threatened them with? I don't know. Tell me, how did they threaten them?

SPEAKER_21 4:08

Well, all I know is that they threatened them, sir. What does that mean?

SPEAKER_20 4:11

You said something missed.

SPEAKER_25 4:14

The government touch with these companies. Are you helping to backstop them?

SPEAKER_20 4:17

You don't even know what the threat was. What was the threat? I haven't heard it. What was the threat? Did they say they're gonna blow them up? They're gonna hit them. You know what they're not gonna do? They're not gonna hit them with a nuclear weapon. No.

SPEAKER_26 4:41

Nvidia, Apple Microsoft.

SPEAKER_20 4:43

Most of those people are dead already. What are they gonna threaten him with? What a BB gun?

SPEAKER_11 4:49

Are they gonna shoot a BB gun at him? What do they got left? Dude, one of the things I love about Donald Trump is he just puts their shame in their faces, right? Oh, Donald Trump, there's threats against American companies. Oh yeah? Okay. You know, they've been threatening us like death to America every day for 47 years. And but they had they were getting a nuclear weapon. So, oh, but they're big mad now. Oh, and and the reporter's like, fair enough. I don't know. I don't know what they're threatening with. Is it with their navy? Are they gonna use their navy? Are they gonna use their attack helicopters?

SPEAKER_19 5:18

People are dead.

NATO Bases And Alliance Leverage

SPEAKER_11 5:20

The people making their threats, they're dead. Love it. John Attackis, it's good morning coming from YouTube. Fun to have you. Okay, so the other thing that's coming out of this Iran conflict is our alliances. How strong are those alliances? Maybe they weren't so much alliances, but they were just a protectorate. You know what I'm saying? Because NATO and a bunch of the countries in NATO, it's one thing if you don't want to join us for an offensive action. I get it. NATO is a defensive setup, it's supposed to defend us against the big bad threat of Russian Orthodoxy or something like that. I don't know. At this point, who knows what NATO's purpose is? Which during this Iran conflict, guess who a lot of these NATO countries wouldn't even let us use their bases, which are our bases, that we have troops stationed at and equipment at. And then they wouldn't let us fly over their airspace or help in any way. So Secretary Rubio just laid it out.

SPEAKER_35 6:16

Look, what's the point of NATO? Then NATO is simply about us having troops in Europe to defend Europe. But when we need their help, not their help, we're not asking them to conduct airstrikes. When we need them to allow us to use their military bases, their answer is no. Then why are we in NATO? You have to ask that question. Why do we have billions and billions of dollars, hundreds of billions of dollars over the years, trillions of dollars, and all these American forces stationed in the region? If we can only use, we can, we went in our time of need, we're not going to be allowed to use those bases. So I think there's no doubt, unfortunately, after this conflict is is concluded, we are going to have to re-examine that relationship. Yeah.

SPEAKER_11 6:55

I mean, Donald Trump's been cutting funding to the UN because what's the point of you guys? And then NATO, it's like, what is the point of you guys? Why are we defending you if you won't even let us use a base that we paid for, bought, have troops stationed at, have equipment at? You won't let us use it because you're you're big mad about some activity getting going after the world's sponsor of terrorism? Like we just spent 20 years plus five years now fighting the worldwide war on terror that has been primarily financed through Iran, right? But it when you hear stuff like this, it makes you wonder you know, the allegations about like Obama funding ISIS and all that stuff, it starts making you go, you guys were never opposed to terror. You just wanted this gravy train to grow, right? There's no Russia, so let's create terrorism so we can justify these bases and having the United States there with their missiles to protect us, you know. What's the point of this? There has to be a utility. Hey, Iran's threatening you, and Trump's able to say with what a BB gun? Like that's the ridiculousness of this. Hey, uh, Spain's under attack. And and what that sounds like they should they should definitely defend themselves. You know what I mean? No, but but but but but they're part of NATO.

SPEAKER_19 8:15

They should at least think about it.

SPEAKER_11 8:16

I don't I don't know if they're really part of NATO. I mean, are we really gonna spend more money, blood, sweat, and treasure to defend Spain or to defend the UK or any of these nations? Pete Hexeth talked about it as well. As far as NATO is concerned, that's a decision that'll be left to the president.

SPEAKER_16 8:31

I'll say um a lot has been laid bare. A lot has been shown to the world about what our allies would be willing to do for the United States of America when we undertake an effort of this scope on behalf of the free world. These are missiles that don't even range the United States of America, they range allies and others and and yet when we ask for additional assistance or simple access pacing and overflight, we get questions or roadblocks or hesitations. And the president's pointing out we don't have much of an uh an alliance if you have countries that are not willing to stand with you when you need them, right? He's simply pointing that out, uh, and ultimately it'll be his decision of what that looks like after it is completed.

SPEAKER_11 9:12

Um I hope the decision is to pull out, but what I'm afraid of, right, the accusation with Trump is taco Trump, right? Uh Trump always chickens out is the acronym. And that's the thing here. It's super obvious we shouldn't be in NATO. We shouldn't be spending money on NATO. If you want an American base, it's an American base. Sign the landover. This goes back to the conversation about Greenland. Well, Greenland and Denmark, they're part of NATO, so you know, if you get attacked, you can definitely use Greenland. And Trump says it's better if we own it. And that's why. You know, it's really, yeah, we have a base on Diego Garcia, that island out in the middle of the Indian Ocean. Can't use it though, because it's a British territory. Uh okay, so maybe we should own it.

SPEAKER_19 9:53

Maybe it should be a U.S. territory.

UK Energy Panic And Hormuz

SPEAKER_11 9:55

Maybe it should be a US territory. Maybe Greenland should be a U.S. territory, right? Maybe Mexico should be a U.S. territory. Canada, let's just flip it to a state. What are we doing here? Alberta just got enough signatures. I know. I wonder if they use Dominion machines. I guess we'll find out. So Keir Starmer over in the United Kingdom, shout out to our UK fans, Jen and Chris. Love you guys. Uh, you have the biggest pillow biter I have ever seen for a prime minister. And you had a string of bad ones, okay? So this is Keir Starmer basically being like, hey, after Trump yesterday said, if you guys want the oil, go get it. But that's not our job. Like, we're not gonna sit there and protect your guys' oil flow. Like, you won't even let us use your base to keep us from getting them from getting a nuclear weapon, which by the way, you were in range of. So Keir Starmer, who's been really criticized by England about not having the military prepared, not helping out the United States, he's coming to the realization that the UK is going to have to go to Hormuz. If you want energy out of the Middle East, coming out of that strait, you're gonna have to go.

SPEAKER_10 11:03

The conflict in the Middle East has now entered a second mark. And while we're working at a de-escalation and peace, it is now clear that the impact of this war will affect the future of our country. So today I want to reassure the British leaders that no matter how fierce this is all, we are well placed weather, and that we have a long-term plan to emerge from a stronger, a more secure nation. First, and let me say once again, this is not our war.

SPEAKER_11 11:44

I gotta say, here, here's Carrie, Carrie, Starmer, it is your war. Okay, the the thing about Iran, and you can blame America for we've had a lot of problems, okay? But you know what we never were? Colonizers. And you know what we never did? We never did what you did in the Middle East by carving up the Ottoman Empire, a secure empire, and going after oil fields. You know, the whole issue with Iran is 100% caused by the United Kingdom. They're the ones that went over there, took the oil, did not pay fair wages to the Iranians, okay, which led to a nationalism movement where, hey, that is our oil coming out of our soil. Maybe we would want a little cut in, and then you're like, oh, oh, regime change, and we got the Shah. And then when the Shah was like, oh, hey, this is our oil, and you're still not fulfilling your end of the bargain. Oh, oh, we need Ayatollah. And what does Ayatollah do right out of the right out of the gate? He kidnaps the Marines, right, and starts a war with the United States, right? So I kind of look at it like, no, this is your war. And by the way, Lloyd's of London, and by the way, the UK banking system. How do you like that balance sheet kind of blown up right now, isn't it? Where do you think Iran got all that money? He got it from you guys and your stupid banking system, which is totally corrupt, non-transparent, right? So, no, this is your war. If you want the oil, go get it. We will not be drawn into the conflict. Oh, okay. That's see, that's what our presidents should have been saying, right? We're not going to be drawn into that contract conflict. We got Texas, we got Pennsylvania, we got the Anwar oil reserves, we got the Gulf of America, we got oil off the coast of California. We'll be fine. We'll be fine.

SPEAKER_19 13:35

You know, if we had said that, you know, somebody could make the argument that there'd be a big divot somewhere in Europe.

SPEAKER_10 13:42

Yeah, exactly. Not in our national interest. And the most effective way we can support the cost of living in Britain is to push for de-escalation in the Middle East and a reopening of the Strait of Hormuon, which is such a vital route for energy. To that end, we're exploring each and every diplomatic avenue that is available to us. The Foreign Secretary and the Chancellor of their counterparts in the G7.

SPEAKER_11 14:15

Are you talking about the foreign the guy that you had that was running around with Epstein? Are they are they going and cutting some?

SPEAKER_19 14:20

Which diplomatic solutions are you talking about?

SPEAKER_10 14:25

The Defense Secretary has been in the Middle East speaking to our part, and the UK has now brought together 35 nations around our statement of intent to push as one for maritime security across the Gulf. And today I can announce that later this week the Foreign Secretary will host a meeting that brings those nations together for the first time where we will assess all viable diplomatic and political measures that we can take to restore freedom of navigation, guarantee the safety of the fragments and seafarers, and resume the movement of vital. Following that meeting, we will also convene our military to look at how we can marshal abilities and make the street accessible and safe after the fighting has stopped. Because I do have to level with you. This will not be easy.

SPEAKER_11 15:37

This will not be easy. You're an island nation. Where was your navy? Where were your ships when the fighting broke out? Those were the ships that you needed. Lloyds, Lloyds of London, uh, who underwrites your policies? It should have been the Royal Navy. Where were they? Oh, Prince Andrew, you know he was in the Navy. How'd he do? What is it? He should be like at the front of this, right? Like some rear admiral right under the king, you know, directing the oh no, he got arrested for leaking state secrets to the Epstein crowd.

SPEAKER_19 16:07

Well, pretty embarrassing. You know, is who are the 35 countries? This man is a pillow biter. Yeah. Who are the 35 countries he's talking about that are coming together?

SPEAKER_11 16:16

Uh the other NATO countries. Oh, okay.

SPEAKER_19 16:18

I was like, as soon as he started talking about that, I was like, well, what are we doing? What's UN for?

SPEAKER_11 16:24

I mean, I mean we need a diplomatic solution. He had 47 years to find a diplomatic solution.

SPEAKER_19 16:30

Well, I love how on the heels of that is, and then he's like, and then as soon as we get done exploring all the diplomatic solutions, we gotta talk about the military option. And then after the fighting is over, and it's like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, what about diplomatic solutions? You're skipping right over those. Yeah, because there are none. Exactly.

SPEAKER_35 16:52

So Rubio again, what's the point of this? And I've been a big supporter of NATO. And I've one of the reasons why I've been a supporter of NATO is because I believe that these basing rights give us leverage and give us uh flexibility and operational uh capability all over the world. But if NATO is just about us defending Europe if they're attacked, but them denying us basing rights when we need them, that's not a very good arrangement. That's a hard one to stay uh engaged in and say this is good for the United States. So all of them's gonna have to be re-examined. All of it's gonna have to be re-examined.

Ending The Iran Operation Timeline

SPEAKER_11 17:22

Oh, you think you think 2% of your GDP or 5% of your GDP was taxing until we completely pull out and we're like, see what your national defense costs you to your GDP? Because for us it's about 45%. But apparently we were king of the world, you know what I mean? Like, so good luck, Spain. Your GDP, 60, 70 percent to national defense. Because remember, they have a border with you know, with Africa, and they have a huge immigration problem coming straight into Spain. So good luck with that. Yeah, good luck. You think you think we're hardliners about our border? Wait until these guys wake up and smell the coffee and realize, oh, the United States won't be there for our next terror attack. I mean, I'm sure our hearts and prayers will go out to them, you know, for sure, for sure. So Donald Trump confirmed Epic Fury is fast approaching an end. The U.S. will be gone or done with the warranty. I think two or three weeks.

SPEAKER_20 18:16

There's no reason for us to do this. Look, problem with the state. A guy can take a mine, drop it in the water, and say, Oh, it's not safe. It's not like you're taking out an army or you're taking out a country, or you didn't he can drop it, or he can take a machine gun from the shore and shoot a little few bullets at a ship, or maybe an over-the-shoulder missile, small missiles. Uh that's not for us. That'll be for France. That'll be for whoever's using this trade. But I think when we leave, probably that's all cleared up today. I had tremendous numbers of ships were sailing through. Uh, we're negotiating with them right now. Uh, they've been again, we have had regime change. Now, regime change was not one of the things I had as a goal. I had one goal. They will have no nuclear weapons, and that goal has been attained. They will not have nuclear weapons, uh, but we're finishing the job, and I think within maybe two weeks, maybe a couple of longer to do the job. But we want to knock out every single thing they have. Now, it's possible that we'll make a deal before that, because we'll hit bridges and we get some, we'll hit some bridges, we've got a couple of nice bridges in line. Uh, but if they come to the table, that'll be good. But it doesn't matter whether they come or not. We've sent them back. It'll take 15 to 20 years for them to rebuild what we've done to them. They have no navy, they have no military, they have no air force, they have no telecommunications, they have no anti-aircraft systems, they have no leaders. You know, their leaders are all gone. That's why we have regime change. We have nice televisions. What are they gonna use?

SPEAKER_11 19:55

I think he's right there, right? America has no business dealing with machine gun outposts up in the mountains on the north of the Strait of Hormuz. We don't care about mines in the Strait of Hormuz. No nuclear weapons, get rid of the brutal regime as a byproduct of that, and that's it. Good luck, boys. Have fun. So the UAE is first in line here. They had announced yesterday that they're sending their military troops to go secure the Strait of Hormuz. They got something in the they got a dog in the fight.

SPEAKER_19 20:22

So they have an interest and they recognize it and they're doing something about it. Okay, good.

SPEAKER_11 20:26

And you know, these Muslim countries understand power and they understand that force is the only thing that speaks to another Muslim warlord. You know what I mean? So it makes sense to me. But Keir Starmer, Macron in France, these these guys, and many other nations. There's many other nations that have kind of done the whole, oh we can't do it. You couldn't do it. You had no military to project. You've totally relied on American farm boys from Iowa and Southerners from Mississippi and Louisiana to get deployed out there and defend you and do show of force. What is the point of any of this? We're entering a whole new world, right? All of a sudden, our hemisphere looking pretty good, looking right. Makes sense what we've got going on here. Just got to clean up Canada, fix that mess up there, got to deal with Mexico, Ecuador, a couple other countries, but for the most part, the Western hemisphere is kind of falling in line. Yeah, you guys have to do that. Yeah, you know, go deal with that. But you know what's not gonna be happening? Terror funding coming out of Iran with all that money, right? That's not gonna be happening. You know what else is gonna be happening? The constant threat of missiles and nuclear weapons in the future. That's not gonna be happening. I mean, they're gonna be focusing on rebuilding their economy, getting that bridge hap going again. Uh uh, they're done. Like I think with Trump's first response was threatened him with what? BB gun. Here's Trump continuing in this press conference.

SPEAKER_26 21:55

Does Iran have to make a deal for the US to end its offering on use token?

SPEAKER_20 22:02

Iran doesn't have to make a deal, no. Yeah, I've spoken to a lot of people. It's a it's a new regime. They are much more accessible. They are right. You know, they said, We have a president for you, Mr. President, out of respect. And they said, wait a minute. Do you want me to answer the question? You're a fresh person. You know? We had a lot of problems with you, haven't we?

SPEAKER_11 22:24

Uh you know, we've had a lot of problems with the Ayatollah, too. Figured that one out.

SPEAKER_20 22:28

Oh, they don't. You asked me a question. No, they don't have to make a deal with me. You know, when we feel that they are, for a long period of time, put into the stone ages and they won't be able to come up with a nuclear weapon, then we'll leave. Whether we have a deal or not, it's irrelevant. Now it's possible that we'll have a deal because they want to make a deal. They want to make a deal more than I want to make a deal. But in a fairly short period of time we'll be finished. They will not be able to do a nuclear weapon for years. And when they already, maybe in a long time from now, able to do a nuclear weapon, you'll have a president that will be like me and that he will go there and he'll knock the hell out of them again. Because they cannot have a nuclear weapon. They are very radicalized people, they're very sick leaderships. And I will say though that the leadership we're dealing with now, with the new regime, because we have a new regime, and the new regime is much better than the past. Yeah.

SPEAKER_11 23:30

Mm-hmm. And then that future president will be Baron Trump. All right. So pray the Rosary Daily. Happy Wednesday. Glad you made it. And Tiffany6967 as Teco Anime. I don't know anything about that.

SPEAKER_19 23:45

I think you got the wrong demographic.

Gas Prices And Market Reactions

SPEAKER_11 23:48

Typically avoid anime. Yeah, we're a conspiracy show here. All right. Donald J. Trump said this this morning. Iran's new regime, much regime president, much less radicalized and far more intelligent than his predecessors, just asked the United States of America for a ceasefire. We will consider when Strait of Hermoots is open, free, and clear. Until then, we are blasting Iran into oblivion, or as they say, back to the Stone Age. You know, I I I really do sit back and wonder what Iran, you know, not Iran, countries like China are thinking here. Like between Venezuela and Iran, the Chinese and Russian military equipment is totally useless. Totally useless. And they they're the ones, I China specifically, who relies on Iranian oil. It's like their primary supply of oil. So this was very disruptive for them. And they I'm actually surprised China hasn't come in and just sent, you know, they've got lots of navy. I'm surprised they haven't sent a fleet into the Gulf and said, Trump, we got it from here. We'll deal with the machine gunners and we'll deal with Edder. But you know, we would really like Crag Island. Like, go for it. I don't care. Why not? Then you can fight with Europe. You know what I mean? And by the way, Europe, good luck getting us to come to your aid on that one. So Trump again continues on here. Americans are feeling pricey. Okay, so Trump's being asked about oil prices. And they're also feeling a lot of people. What is the plan to bring it down? All I have to do is leave Iran. Okay, so she says, you know, Americans are facing the pressure at the pump. And what do you plan to do to bring down oil prices?

SPEAKER_20 25:35

And stock prices were up today almost to a record. Uh because they know two things. Number one, we have a safe country.

unknown 25:45

Yep.

SPEAKER_11 25:45

Number two, one, we have a safe country. And two, here we go, here's the finish of that. It's very necessary. Yep.

SPEAKER_26 25:52

A couple questions for you. First one affects Americans who own gas prices. Today they hit four dollars. Yeah.

SPEAKER_20 26:01

Yeah. And we have a country that's not going to be throwing a nuclear weapon at us in six months.

SPEAKER_26 26:05

But the Americans are feeling the effects in the interim. And they're also feeling a lot safer. What is the plan to bring them back down?

SPEAKER_20 26:12

Well, I have to do is leave Iran, and we'll be doing that very soon. And they'll become tumbling down. And stock prices were up today.

SPEAKER_11 26:20

That was a better clip, better audio. Okay. So let's not forget under Joe Biden, when when Donald Trump left office in 2021, January 20th, 2021, I took a picture at my local gas station. Gasoline was down at$1.87. Okay. In Washington State, we're the second highest gas price state. We were at$1.87. Biden came in and gasoline shot up almost instantaneously because the futures contracts all went up because the Keystone XL pipeline, which was scheduled to be finished soon, was canceled by the stroke of a pin by Joe Biden, laid off all the workers, and then the company behind it abandoned it completely and said, We will never come back. It took us a decade to get the price.

SPEAKER_19 27:04

Remember all the little stickers at the pump of Joe Biden saying, I did that.

SPEAKER_11 27:09

Yep. So Biden jumped gas prices up. Did CNN complain? No. Did Fox News run a bunch of pieces? No, because they were in on the steel. So you know, can't look too bad. Did anybody care? We did. I did, right? Because under Obama we had four dollar gas and then it went down to two dollar gas for Trump. And then under Biden, we went right back up to four dollars. These Democrats suck at this, right? Well, then Trump came into office, and what happened to the price of gas? It dropped immediately. 2025, we had cheap gas. It was floating 220, 230. I think the national average got down to under$2. Yay, when we go into Iran, and for the last month, we've watched gas prices skyrocket. Now, is it painful to drive by the gas station leaving my house with diesel at seven or uh$690 a gallon? Yeah, it's a little painful. Okay. Is it painful to see gasoline up? We I was just seeing$640 somewhere,$590 pretty regular. I see on the pumps. Yeah, it's pretty painful. But I also know, just like Trump says, as soon as we leave, guess what's gonna happen? Prices are gonna drop because the fundamentals are all in our favor. Everything that's happened here, happening here is worldwide speculation on how long this conflict's gonna go on. And of course, oil is a worldwide market, so the price goes up, is what it is. But guess what? Yesterday, on after this press conference, showing that hey, we're getting ready to leave, there's not a lot more targets to hit, we're not gonna stick around for the machine gunner. We just got the latest read on consumer competence.

SPEAKER_38 28:44

Lydia, the number, please.

SPEAKER_23 28:46

Stuart, we're coming in at 91.8. The expectation was 88. So this is an upbeat read higher than what we were expecting, and also higher than last month's read, which was 91.2. It seems that consumers are not as concerned about the economy as maybe what we were expecting 91.8 more upbeat than the expected 88.

SPEAKER_11 29:08

Because nobody is watching the news. They don't care. We get it. Listen, you've conditioned us to two decades of non-stop war. And I don't think the American population outside of the far left actually believes Trump's gonna go in and spend the next 20 years nation building in Iran. He's spoken against that so much, but he's been so consistent on Iran, being the great Satan, right? Flipping the tables on them, that he he he's gonna leave. And yeah, it's gonna be very difficult, as Keir Starber says. This is gonna be tough because we're not used to actually having to do our own dirty work these days. And again, prices came tumbling down. It's past the hour. So not only is consumer confidence up, which that's a big metric, 91%, 92% approval, like consumer confidence. Um MS Now and CNBC, all you doomsdayers, you're not breaking through. The American people are planning their futures, they're feeling good about the big, beautiful bill and the tax cuts and the drill baby drill and the Gulf of America. Have you heard what's going on down in Venezuela? Oh, they've been carving that up. We've got American oil companies all over there. Some oligarch got a gold mine. All that wealth's coming our direction. Now, we can deal with that when 20 years from now and we get the blowback from it, but still, right? The opportunity abounds.

SPEAKER_34 30:32

For now, and you're looking at the American stock market, is fair to say, surging. It's up 933 points right now. This says oil prices are dropping, uh, just down about 1% or$1. Let's bring in Wall Street Journal editor at large and Foxy contributor Jerry Baker. So there's Wall Street Journal reporting about President Trump wanting to stick to the timeline to end this war, even if it means not completely opening the Strait of Horde. It's past the hour now.

SPEAKER_11 30:57

So Wall Street Journal actually ran a really interesting piece on election integrity, which we're not gonna cover because it's be boring to us because you guys are like four years ahead of the curve on this. But they're finally acknowledging, yeah, there's some election problems we've got. But that's the thing. The reporting is Trump's leaving, he's signaling all the messages we're pulling out. He's telling other countries you're gonna have to go deal with it. And the American economy, the American stock market, it's that flight of capital. Where is it secure? America is the only place that's got stuff happening right now. You know, those really great markets in Singapore, everybody's all hopped up about. Yeah, they're they've got to deal with the Strait of Hormuz. You know, oh Hong Kong, which kind of is failing as a you know, economic capital because of the China takeover. Uh yeah, they're gonna have to go deal with the Strait of Hormuz. Oh, India. Oh, yeah. Oh no, India can't get the sanctioned oil anymore and resell it on the market like they were doing. So, you know, there's a lot of capital flying out of India coming here too. Whoa. Yeah, it's it's happening, man.

SPEAKER_35 31:55

President Trump always, always um would rather have negotiations than war. And he will always we gave him 60 days early last year. We gave him additional time to negotiate after Midnight Hammer again earlier this year. But each and every time those things have proved fruitless. But we're gonna keep trying. There are messages being exchanged, there are talks going on, there is the potential for direct meeting at some point. We're always going to be open for that. But we're not gonna be, we're not what what President Trump is not gonna allow is he's not gonna allow fake negotiations to be used as a delay tactic to buy more time, to buy themselves space. That's what he's not going to allow. You know, the Biden administration spent four years, four years trying to resurrect the Obama nuclear deal with Iran. They spent four years trying to talk to the Iranians, and they strung them along for four years. And I think they thought they could string this administration along for four years, but they're not going to string along President Trump. He's not going to fall for their games. He hasn't fallen for their games, so we'll always be prepared to talk. But we're not going to allow that or the failure of talks to impede our ability to defend this country and to protect this country from a real threat. It's a threat to the world. It's not just a threat to America. The difference is President Trump is the only leader in the world with both the capability and frankly the guts to do something about it. Now, the naysayers out there.

SPEAKER_11 33:12

Oh, by the way, did you hear about the cartoonist that was always critical of Donald Trump? Like he's made hundreds, thousands of cartoons, almost always depicting Trump as some sexual fiend or anything like this that got arrested for child pornography this last week.

SPEAKER_18 33:27

No.

SPEAKER_11 33:27

Oh yeah. It's like this is like the tenth journalist that's been super critical of Trump. There was a scene, uh, Jake Tapper's producer was arrested for uh soliciting sex from a minor. Anyways, a lot of these, a lot of these, you know, I don't know, what do you call them? Leftist pundits that are super critical of Trump, they turn out to be themselves the weirdos, the real creeps. Anyways, it's kind of one of those stories. But this is a little cartoon, another one of these AI creations of how how the taco crowd, the trout crowd that believes that Trump doesn't know what he's doing, this is what they think Trump is projecting. Okay. Let's make a deal.

SPEAKER_07 34:08

That's a good point. I'll take it. Best negotiation I had today.

unknown 34:16

Okay.

Brennan Clip And No Kings Op

SPEAKER_11 34:17

So right there in the cartoon for the audio listeners, Trump's sitting at an empty table at the at the you know, at the beach here, and there's no one on the Iranian side negotiating. And then at the end, you've got the Iranian, you know, Moola sitting there with the gate down across the Strait of Hormuz. So that's that's the impression, that's the story, this simplistic criticism that everybody wants to levy at Trump. Now, we just listened to Trump talking, we listened to Marco Rubio, you listen to Pete Headseth, right? And the NATO fallout, that's really sad. Should have would have been nice if we could have used Diego Garcia, and it would have been nice if we could have done flyovers or from Spain or any of these other countries we had bases. But we didn't need them. We got floating bases, we're good, we'll make it work. In fact, we'll fly the bombers right out of St. Louis, Missouri if we need to, right? I mean, it's it's okay. We got a worldwide range because that's who we are. But you've got our former director of the CIA. This guy's under investigation, grand jury subpoenas, all that fun stuff. He's on MS now, still has a contract there. Still has a contract there. People still think this guy's like got some credibility, and he's part of that taco crowd, right? Trump doesn't know what he's doing, he's a liar. Let's listen to the other side. Because remember, we're conservatives, we're peasants. Well, actually, you know, it's not even that we're conservatives, we're just peasants, right? And we're concerned with truth a little bit. We kind of want to, but we gotta hear both sides so that we can hear it. So let's listen to uh Steve Bannon, or excuse me, not Steve Bannon, John Brennan.

SPEAKER_08 35:45

Um it's it's clear that there's this toxic mix of traits that Donald Trump has, which is he's a pathological liar, he is incompetent on so many fronts, and he's also deeply corrupt, which I think is now being manifest, manifesting itself in terms of the Gulf War. That's why you have these wholly incoherent, wholly inconsistent flailing about, because, first of all, again, there was no real rationale for this war. Secondly, he's trying to figure out what his next move is, and he doesn't understand exactly how he's gonna get himself out of this mess. And thirdly, the Iranians now seem to have a lot more influence and cards to play, especially in terms of the Strait of Homo's and allowing shipping to get out or not. And so therefore, I think Donald Trump is trying to present a false narrative to the American public by saying, yes, the Iranians now seem more reasonable, they're trying to negotiate. But, you know, he's protected himself for so many years in this cocoon of disinformation. But the reality now is just penetrating and and taking away that cocoon. And it's very clear in terms of how the the war is going, yes, we're decimating the Iranian military. But in terms of finding an off-ramp and getting out of it, as American consumers see their gas prices rise when they fill up their cars. So across the board, which is why, you know, talking about the No Kings rally, let's not let's pause there.

SPEAKER_11 37:01

Consumer confidence is at like an all-time high, it's like 92%. Okay. And yeah, gas prices are up, but they were up the entire Biden regime. And by the way, when you were the CIA director under Obama, also up.

SPEAKER_19 37:14

I I would say that this desk is a masterclass in gaslighting. I love how all the other people sitting at the table just sit there and stare at him like he's an oracle.

SPEAKER_11 37:25

Like, what the hell is going on? You know, there's been other instances where he says things like, you know, we're getting messages out of Iran that say that we're not negotiating. Have you ever considered the guys that you're getting those messages from are not at the negotiating table? You know what I mean? I'm I recall when Pete Heggseth goes, We know who's talking to who, we know who's doing you know what I mean? Like we know who's communicating with who and what's happening, and uh, we're taking notes.

SPEAKER_08 37:51

Forget Bruce Springsteen, a New Jersey guy, you know, in Minneapolis.

SPEAKER_05 37:55

Jersey corner. Jersey had hit with the chat.

SPEAKER_08 37:58

But intelligence analysts look for trends. And we see a trend here, and we also look for a trend of demonstrations of protests. What is fueling it? Is the fuel going away or is the fuel increasing? And both on domestic fronts and on the international front, there is more and more fuel that is feeding those fires of protests and demonstrations. And what are these protests looking toward? Looking toward the November elections. So again, I think the people who are organizing these rallies recognize that there is still several months before the November elections, and they want to make sure that that momentum is going to continue and that the people are going to feel as though that their voices are making a difference.

SPEAKER_11 38:33

Okay. So this is why you come to the peasants' perspective, or peanuts, excuse me. This is April Fools, it's peanuts. Notice how he says here, let's go back and listen to this. This is important. This is a CIA guy. Okay, this is this is a spook. This is a spy. He's a deeply corrupt, deeply evil man. This is assassination hit list kind of guy. Okay. Listen to how he says this. He's using the No Kings rallies. We just had eight million alleged people hit take to the streets this weekend. Oh, so upset. But he says something here. This is color revolution type stuff, right? Listen to this.

SPEAKER_08 39:06

November elections. So again, I think that both on domestic front and on the international front, there is more and more fuel that is feeding those fires of protests and demonstrations. What's the fuel?

SPEAKER_11 39:17

What's the fuel? Money. Money is the fuel. Okay. We know that this last weekend, five hundred million dollars was spent organizing this No Kinks protest. So where's the fuel coming from? This is this is not organic. This is not organic. And he says it, it's not organic when he says this. And what are these protests looking toward?

SPEAKER_08 39:38

Looking toward the November elections. So again, I think the people who are organizing these rallies recognize that the people who are organizing these rallies recognize there is still several months before the November elections, and they want to make sure that that momentum is going to continue and that the people are going to feel as though that their voices are making a difference.

Election Integrity Order And Mail Ballots

SPEAKER_11 39:57

It's an op. It's an op. The No Kings rally is an op. The fuel feeding this, keeping an eye on the midterms, where's the energy coming from? The fuel, the payments, the PSYOP, the Facebook ads, the promoted ads, all that stuff, and it's being organized. The organizers need to keep their eye on this. They've got time. This is a color revolution op right there. That's it. That's all you need to hear. Well, except for the nonsense before that, right? He's in a cocoon of disinformation. No, that's your gig, John Brennan. That's your gig. So this whole press conference that Trump had, or where he's answering questions from the uh from the media, came from this. This is he signed a very important executive order yesterday. So the Senate has been date been debating the Save America Act. They took off our vacation. Two-week vacation. We're out. Oh my gosh, it's 80% popular. Oh, heaven forbid we do the will of the people. Okay. So they bailed on that in a in a 3 a.m. amendment vote, clutcher, vocal vote, send it over to the House and let them get pissed off about it. So Trump kind of trumped them. He's using the power he has to force change.

SPEAKER_20 41:12

Stopping the massive cheating that's gone on. And so we're going to be signing an executive order. It's uh I believe it's foolproof. And uh maybe it'll be tested, maybe it won't. I think it's very obvious what's said. And I'll ask Will Scharf to serve off attorney, great talent, a brilliant young man. And if you could uh discuss it, and then I'm gonna ask Howard Luddick to say a few words, and then I'm gonna sign it. And we'll take a couple of questions. Okay, thank you.

SPEAKER_03 41:39

Mr. President, as you said, you have in front of you an executive order that deals with a number of issues relating to election integrity. As you've consistently identified, two of the biggest problems we have with election integrity in this country are one, inaccurate voter rolls that allow ineligible people to vote in various federal and state elections all over the country. And secondarily, you've consistently identified that vote by mail in this country has become right with fraud. People returning ballots who aren't eligible to return ballots, ballots being sent to people who aren't confirmed to be eligible voters. So what this executive order is going to do is one, we're going to take federal data, we're going to ensure that each state's election officials are provided with a comprehensive view of who the eligible voters in their jurisdiction actually are, allowing them to properly verify that everybody voting in their elections is legally able to vote. And then it orders the Postmaster General and the U.S. Postal Service to take bold new measures to verify uh that ballots both being set to people or being sent to people who are eligible to vote, and then that ballots being returned or being properly returned by eligible voters only. And we believe that combined the measures in this executive order will help secure elections in the future and ensure that the many abuses of our election system in the past aren't repeated in future elections.

SPEAKER_11 43:01

Okay, so we've talked about the voter registration problem. You've got this universe of ballots that get created based on these voter rolls. And we we have repeatedly covered about duplicate duplicate registrations, which create enough overage, which just happens to align almost perfectly with the margin of error for so many of these elected politicians, from governors to senators to house seats, where the margin of error is enough to swing their election in their favor, and their winning margin was almost precisely the duplicate voter number, right? Everything from our governor here, Bob Ferguson, to Melissa Slotkin up in Michigan. You can just go on and on and on. So the federal list has now been scrubbed, and then they're they're saying, okay, post office, if you're gonna use mail in ballots, they have to go out through the post office. These don't get FedExed. And so the post office is now required that every ballot they receive has to receive a special barcode. So Howard Lutnick, the Secretary of Of commerce is in charge of the United States Postal Service and the Post United States Post Office. Did you know they're two separate things? So the Constitution provides for a United States Post Office. But when the United States became a corporation, then they started what's called the United States Postal Service. So if you go to any post office, and and everybody do this, go to your local post office, you'll see two signs. You'll see one that says United States Post Office with a seal, and then you'll see the logo United States Postal Service, USPS. Yep. And then when you go in, you can do registered mail, which is through the United States Post Office, has a red tag label, or you can do certified mail, has a green tag label. They're completely different. One is a constitutional guarantee and the United States is the insurer. One is a private contract with a postal service that has a contract with the United States Post Office to basically do the work. But they're completely separate things. Most people don't know that. Yeah, we lost our post offices. Post offices are courts. Yeah, you could do a lot of legal stuff through the United States Postal Office. You can't do anything legal through the United States Postal Service. Anyways, kind of interesting thing there. Um, kind of one of those like when you see it, you're like, oh my gosh, I mean, the United States is a corporation. Okay, so this is Howard Lutnick, who is in charge of the United States Post Office and the United States Postal Service under the Commerce Department, talking about how this is going to work.

SPEAKER_22 45:28

The states, right, run these elections. They will, if they want to use the U.S. mail, the U.S. Postal Service, they're going to get a code, a barcode from the U.S. Postal Service, and they're going to put that on the envelope, and we will have one envelope per vote. None of this time where we have no idea, there's no observers to mail, there's no envelopes, there's no certainty. That's all gonna go away. And what the president is doing today is he's going to make sure that mail-in ballots are safe, secure, and accurate, and will have a clear distinction. If you voted by mail, you will have it on the envelope. Obviously, not on the ballot, but on the envelope. So we will know a million mail-in ballots. There'll be a million envelopes, and you'll be able to know exactly correctly that citizens voted.

SPEAKER_20 46:34

Very, very clearly. So I think this will uh help a lot with elections. We'd like to have voter ID, would like to have proof of citizenship, and that'll be another subject uh for another time. We're working on that. You would think it would be easy. It's a 98% issue for Republicans, it's 86%. Thing just came out a poll, and it's 86% with Republicans and Democrats, not leaders, because the leaders of the Democrats cheat. And the only people that don't want to do voter ID are people that cheat. There's no other reason for it. Uh proof of citizenship, they want to be able to cheat. There's no reason. They have all sorts of reasons, excuses, but it's all nonsense. They want to cheat. But the Democrats themselves are very high. It's a very positive, very, very good thing. The Democrat voters, the Democrat leaders, guys like Schumer, who are corrupt, uh, they want to use it for cheating because their policy is so bad. With think of their policy, open voters for everybody, where people pour into our gun fees all over the world. Think of that. Uh, you look at uh just take any issue, take anything. Everything they have is so crazy. But the fact that they don't want to sign voter ID is another issue, it's a big issue. The fact that they don't have proof of citizenship that they're so Trump, Trump, this man is a machine.

SPEAKER_11 47:54

Okay, day after day, he's just at these guys, at these guys, at these guys. Oh, yeah, we're fighting in Iran, and we're cleaning up elections, and I'm building a ballroom. We're gonna talk about that in a second. And I've got this thing going, and the borders closed, and we're still deporting. And could you imagine being on the opposition of him? How many, how many lawyers? I mean, the law fair is out of control, right? But at this point, the judges are stepping in on all these weak cases. This guy is a machine with this stuff. But what this does by putting that barcode on the ballot, I've I I personally would be opposed to identify in identifying marks on the ballot itself because we're supposed to have a blind ballot, right? But you can go into whatever database system and you can look up your voting history. And all it is is did you vote? Did you not vote? Right. Okay. So identifying the envelope is not the problem. We already track who's sending in or allegedly voting based on the polling and stuff like that. So the only allegation can that can be made against you is well, you voted, right? You can't really say who you voted for, um, especially the last couple cycles, because we have way more ballots than we have envelopes and people who actually voted. So I mean, we definitely can't who you vote for.

SPEAKER_19 49:04

We're gonna put in a barcode on the envelope and that's gonna solve everything. I was kind of thinking back, like, I think our envelopes already have barcodes on them. I don't know if this is gonna solve anything.

SPEAKER_11 49:14

No, because it is because the barcode is assigned from the voter rolls that the federal government assigns. Oh, so they're saying, hey, state of California, if you want to send out ballots, then yeah, print your ballot.

SPEAKER_19 49:26

So it'll be a federally controlled barcode, not a state controlled barcode.

SPEAKER_11 49:29

It's a federally controlled barcode. You're using the federal postal service. All right, the feds are gonna have a barcode they're gonna be able to put on that ballot that's gonna line up with that voter. So the post office is gonna know who they sent ballots to. So if you've got one house with a hundred ballots showing up, which has happened, there's gonna be a lot of barcodes. It's gonna be really easy to figure that out. You know what I mean? Yeah, which it was easy before, but nobody wanted to actually do the sort tables on the Excel sheet to see where the duplicates were until investigative journalists start poking around the list, right?

SPEAKER_19 50:03

Well, you wonder why they didn't want to do it.

SPEAKER_11 50:06

Yeah. Now, Nancy Pelosi, she is really screaming the alarm bells. She is warning the Democrats that the Republicans are going to cheat in this up and election, and we've got to do something about it.

SPEAKER_12 50:19

We always have concerns, but with with this um president and these Republicans who have no commitment to uh the the rule of law and and doing things the appropriate way, we're ready. We have three purposes now. One is to win the midterms, two is to make sure the elections are safe, and three to tell people what we will do when we win. And that is the that is the mission. The uh all there's so many things that you can do to protect the election. And they are being done, whether it's litigation or legislation or just mobilization, communication, all that. But in addition to that, we have to be on guard as to what they may try to do to the technology. They may try to creep into the technology and create a false count. How do you guard against that? That's that's a challenge. What? What?

SPEAKER_11 51:18

What? Let's go back. What are you talking about? Wait, wait, wait, hold on. Let's I want to hear that again. Is that even a possibility?

SPEAKER_12 51:27

But in addition to that, we have to be on guard as to what they may try to do to the technology.

SPEAKER_18 51:34

Huh.

SPEAKER_12 51:34

They may try to creep into the technology and create a false count.

SPEAKER_11 51:39

How do you guard against the fools be creeping? How would they- I thought the machines weren't connected to the internet. I mean, how would you creep into the machines?

SPEAKER_19 51:47

I have no idea.

SPEAKER_11 51:48

Can't the machine can the machines do that? Can they manipulate votes? I don't think so. Yeah, I thought, wait, hold. This is Nancy Pelosi, right? This isn't crazy Donald Trump talking about it. She would know, but I don't know. There you have it, folks. That's the end of the story. Okay, the arc is now complete. The Republicans accused the Democrats of treating electronically. The Democrats said it's not possible. They gave us all the reasons why it's not possible. Trump swapped the vote, made it too big to rig, because who knows, man? It might be like 85% of America are MAGA at this point. And now she's going, hey, hey, do you understand what's possible here? We have an operation going on. We've got protests in the street. We've got communication. We've got lawfare. But you know what we really have to be careful for? The thing that we can't look, you know, if they creep into the technology, if they get into the machines.

SPEAKER_24 52:41

Technology.

SPEAKER_11 52:43

Oh my goodness. Uh pray the Rosary Daily. Evidently, Trump is at the Supreme Court this morning for the birthright censorship hearing. Yep, we're gonna talk about that in just two seconds. And uh Pony Boy said Jones, referring to Alex Jones, turned on him, Trump, saying he's lost his way. I don't see it. Yeah, listen, Alex Jones. I love him. Right? But yep, he's got his opinions, and I I don't know, man. Like for a long time, the criticism of Alex Jones was he never criticized Israel. Well then all of a sudden the narrative is Trump's being influenced by Israel, and now that he's pulling out, it's like I don't know, man. Like Alex Jones kind of became unsufferable for me about two weeks ago. So I'm gonna let him go through his manic episode and I'll be back at some point, I'm sure.

SPEAKER_19 53:30

Yeah, but we're gonna give Alex a few minutes.

Birthright Citizenship And Tourism Networks

SPEAKER_11 53:32

Yeah, I mean, but yes, this is next time he's turned on Trump, by the way. He he comes and goes, Hey, he's an independent spirit, maybe. I don't know. He'll be back. Yeah, he'll be back. And keep in mind Alex Jones is a save his bacon kind of guy, right? Oh, yeah. Uh everybody is at a certain point. Okay, so I am super curious to those of you in the chats that are listening live, what are you doing while we're talking? Are you sitting at home quietly watching this on the TV, like a news broadcast? Are you on your phone? Do you have it on audio and you're just you know on the go working? Are you a long haul trucker? Are you a long haul trucker? Yeah, what are you doing while you're listening to the peasants' perspective or it's paperful, sorry, peanuts perspective now? Um, so I'm curious. Put it in the chats, let us know what you're doing. I am I am super curious. You know, Shantini out there doing chores, milking cows, and you know, collecting eggs or whatever. Like, what's going on? All right, so let's talk about birthright citizenship. It has been presumptive that in the United States, if you're born on this soil, you have the right of citizenship. Typically, your parents, so just me, Pacific Northwest says sipping coffee and job hunting. Ooh, good luck with that. Um, so so birthright citizenship, there's just this presumption that if you're born on this soil, no matter who your parents are, you are the citizen. And that creates all kinds of challenges, creates the anchor baby problem where now the baby is the anchor, and now the family gets their legal status, and then once they get their legal status, the next thing you know, you're bringing over cousins, aunts, uncles, and everybody.

SPEAKER_18 54:58

Sure.

SPEAKER_11 54:58

That's a problem. You have birthright tourism, that's a problem. And I think that's the one that is kind of unknown to us. In fact, I had a really interesting experience, and I've shared this before, and I and I I hadn't really considered this possibility. When we had our youngest son or second to youngest son, I can't remember, but was born here in our local hospital, and he had long blonde hair, like two inch long blonde hair. And the nurses were just like, Oh my gosh, we haven't seen a baby with blonde hair like this. Usually it's peach fuzz, right? With blonde. We haven't seen a baby like this with long blonde hair forever. I was like, Well, do you do you get a lot of babies with long hair? Because my oldest daughter had long black hair. And they go, Yeah, we do, but usually they're you know not white, right? There's something else. And she's she told me that over 50% of the children that were born in our local hospital were born to essentially illegal aliens, non non-citizen. Over 50%? Over 50%.

SPEAKER_19 55:51

Wow.

SPEAKER_11 55:52

Yes. Now that caused me to sit back and go, where are these people living? Because I don't see this county doesn't have big areas of illegal immigrants. So they're either sprinkled in, you know, every other house or something. Like, where are they? Like, because we just you don't see that quite here yet. You know what I mean? And it made me think, I wonder if it's birthright tourism. Because when they said that, I thought, oh, it could be people flying in, staying here, nice quiet county outside of the radar. We don't have big ice outposts here, we don't have like border patrol patrolling the streets. It's just kind of could be somewhere else. So uh Schweitzer talked about this in Congress a couple, this is a couple months ago, talked about birthright tourism and how that's being manipulated. So it shows here Pony Boy is driving, but I will pull over to text going from wellhead to wellhead. Pony Boy is part of the great oil infrastructure of this country. He's the landman himself. John Attack is doing bank work and taxes. Wait, no, just listen. Great.

SPEAKER_07 56:55

All right, so let's hear about the problem with China subversion and birthright tourism. In China alone, we have identified more than 1,000 birth tourism companies that are almost exclusively focused on the United States. Our federal government does not track this information because there is no centralized collection of information on the nationality of parents who are giving birth. China, however, has done estimates themselves, uh, and the numbers are eye-popping. The Chinese government gave an estimate a few years ago. Their estimate was that on average, 50,000 Chinese citizens a year were giving birth in the United States or at U.S. territories like Saipan. There are others like Professor Salvatore Barbonus from Australia, who believes that number is higher. He's estimated 100,000. Uh, there was a research firm in China that estimated in 2018 alone 180,000 managed to give birth in the United States. No one knows what the actual number is, and that is the challenge that we face today. If you do the math, if you look at the ramping up of this activity over the last 13 years and you take the ballpark estimates, you are looking at roughly one million quote-unquote U.S. citizens who are being raised in the People's Republic of China today. If you look at the websites of these birth tourism companies, uh, they will tell you who is hiring them. Uh, these are not political dissidents, these are military officers, people from the Ministry of Propaganda, people that are high-ranking officials in the Chinese Communist Party. In other words, these are part of the CCP establishment.

SPEAKER_11 58:34

The CCP establishment has been taking advantage of this, and it's not the peasants over there doing this, the Lao Baijing, as they call them. This is military officials. This is their state government. These are communist party members that are having kids here specifically for the purpose to raise them in China as Chinese nationals and citizens and loyalists and communist party Kool-Aid drinkers, but then they get what? Ballots? They can immigrate here, they can come here and subvert our processes and things like that. That's what this issue has become. Do their ballots get barcodes? That's that will probably be the case, right? That will probably be the case. And that's the thing. When you live abroad, you get to pick. You get to pick what precinct you vote in. Did you know that? Yeah. So you got a million plus citizens over there. You can swing a lot of elections. Okay, so they covered this on Fox News, talking a little bit more in depth about this problem. Not just uh birth tourism, but also just the anchor babies in general.

SPEAKER_30 59:34

Let's start here with some examples of some of the types of individuals we could be talking about, like Juan Carlos Valencia Gonzalez. Now, Juan Carlos Valencia Gonzalez was born in Santa Ana, California in 1984. His parents were from Mexico. He happens to also be the stepson of El Mincho, the leader of the Jalisco New Generation cartel. And now he is reportedly leading that very same cartel. And here's the thing he is a United States citizen by birth. And it doesn't stop there. Reports of foreign wealth being used to manipulate the system. One Chinese billionaire reportedly has more than 100 US-born children through surrogacy. The idea build a future family and a business succession plan. Some clients, by the way, request up to 100 babies via multiple surrogacies. It can cost as much as$200,000. And why would they do that? Because babies born here are automatically U.S. citizens. Also, surrogacy is illegal in China. Nearly 41% of international surrogate parents in the United States are Chinese. So why is this such a debate? Look around the world. Much of Europe has restricted birthright citizenship. Asia basically ended it. The United States is still one of the few countries around the world that sits as an outlier.

SPEAKER_11 1:01:08

So 41% of surrogacy is going to Chinese billionaires and wealthy people and Chinese Communist Party members. 41%? Let's just round up to half. Wow. And then you throw in the other 25-30% that usually ends up being gay couples, and then you're left with a very small percentage of normal heterosexual couples that can't get pregnant that choose surrogacy rather than IVF, or you know, there's all kinds of reasons why you can't do characters.

SPEAKER_19 1:01:38

Well, they mentioned that a kid is worth about 200 grand. Do we have Chinese ladies that are just coming over here and getting pregnant for a profession?

SPEAKER_11 1:01:46

Uh well, you have women here who are professional surrogates that want to be able to do that. Yeah, I guess that's what I'm saying. Yeah. But but the thing is, is if you can get an a Chinese person over here, legally or illegally, and put them in the surrogacy program, you can run this program here. The objective is there is to get that birth certificate that that secures citizenship. Not only does that create a benefit possibility, and maybe the billionaires don't plan on their little kids using Medicare and welfare and whatever, but the bottom line is they get the vote, they get all that citizenship rights, they get the citizenship passport, and that that means something. That means something when you're trying to subvert the United States democracy, right? Yeah, that means you can't be spied on without a warrant. That means like it changes the game a lot. So big deal. Just like the uh the El Mencho uh successor down there. Yeah, he's a US citizen. So can we use FISA? You see what I'm saying? Like I mean, Obama wasn't opposed to droning U.S. citizens. I mean, maybe we just go there, but then all of a sudden I feel like I could get droned on any given Tuesday. So these are huge problems. That's why proper interpretation is hearing this case. Obviously, this isn't a result of legislation. This is a result of an executive order that immediately created a lawsuit, which has now finally made its way to the Supreme Court. So Donald Trump promised he was going to actually go, and he'd be the first president ever to go sit in the Supreme Court during oral arguments. Probably should have been there for tariffs. So, again, reporting on the legal matters at hand here. This is Shannon Breen.

SPEAKER_36 1:03:23

To get to the proper interpretation of what the founders meant with this, let me read you just a line from the Trump administration brief. It says the 14th Amendment citizenship clause was adopted to grant citizenship to freed slaves and their children. They point to that history and say, not to children of temporarily present aliens or illegal aliens. Shortly after the amendment's adoption, this court recognized that the amendment's quote, one pervading purpose was, quote, the freedom of the slave race. So they are saying this was clearly about those children making sure they would be provided for, have full citizenship, and not ever have that be in threat.

SPEAKER_24 1:03:58

And it's being abused, the president would argue, right now, uh, by people coming here, having kids, make them citizens, and then said for their parents they're here illegally. So the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, it kind of somewhat brings this into a close to modern era argument that some say it's like the Heller decision when it came to the Second Amendment, when people are arguing that that's not what the founding fathers meant about the Second Amendment. Does the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 play a role here? And if so, what role is that?

SPEAKER_36 1:04:29

So it's got very similar language to what you see in the 14th Amendment. So people will say, was it codifying what we now come to understand or what we have over time come to understand the application of those words subject to the jurisdiction thereof? Now, the people who are fighting against the president's executive order will say, this is what we've done for 150 years, and that was the intention. It could have made been made clearer by subsequent decisions, and yet they say what has happened with a course precedent. It's it's it's continued to march down this path and what Congress has done. There's been no one to quote disrupt the Apple cart, but maybe that's what the president's gonna do with this executive order.

SPEAKER_24 1:05:06

And it's just so uh funny, I I believe birthright citizenship should be overturned, take what it means. But the mu the Fox News pollsters don't agree with me. They asked, should children of legal immigrants get automatic citizenship? And 69% said yes. So I'm in the minority on a Fox News poll. Lastly, the president's remarks tonight with polling.

COVID Fraud Controls And Enforcement Gaps

SPEAKER_11 1:05:28

Who'd you poll? Did you poll legacy American citizens? Did you poll citizens of legal immigrants? Or did you go down to Epic City, Texas and poll the people down there? Oh, again, you know, they're using the polling to try to manipulate the court because the reality is any sane person would recognize if you're not subject to the jurisdiction thereof, just because you're here on a tourist visa, you know, visiting Disneyland and you suddenly go into labor, does not a citizen makey go home with your family? You know what I mean? Um I happened to have a child overseas in Puerto Rico. Didn't make it home. He passed away down there. It was very sad. It was many, many years ago. But that was a U.S. territory. But had I had the kid in the Bahamas, because we almost got off in Turks and Caicos, right? We were on a cruise. My wife went into early labor and we had to like delay it a day. It was crazy. But, anyways, we could have got off of the boat in Turks and Caicos and had the kid there. Does that make my kid a Turkish Caico? No. I would have brought the kid home with me. It would have been a U.S. citizen, right? I have siblings that were born abroad. My dad was stationed overseas in Japan. Do you think they gave my siblings Japanese citizenship? No, they did not. Okay. My parents were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. So when a child is born to American citizens that are vacationing overseas, or even if they're legally residents in the Netherlands, they do not get citizenship there. They are citizens of the whatever jurisdiction their parents were in, which would have been United States. That's how it should be. That's how most of the world operates. The United States only had the 14th Amendment because blacks were not considered citizens. So not only did you have to make them citizens, but you had to make their children citizens as well. There had to be like a clear distinction with that. The 14th Amendment addressed other issues as well, as far as equal protection under the law. The slaves are going to have the same rights as the white gentleman. Okay. The whole thing was set up that way. But what happened was the concept of birthright tourism wasn't there. It took a long time to cross the ocean. The Mojave Desert is big and vast, right? There wasn't a flood of illegals walking north from Mexico in 1892. And so it was like beyond their conception that somebody would tour down here to do that. So if you were here, it was presumed you passed the port, had legal status here, and were under the jurisdiction thereof. And the few that slipped through the crack, there was no policy to deal with it. And that stuck. Just because that's the way we've done it, does that mean it's the way it has to be? No. Of course not. Of course not. So the birthright citizenship case is being heard this morning. Trump will be there. It'll be really interesting to see how that goes. So here is Andrew Ferguson, and he's talking about one of the things that Trump did, or excuse me, Biden did uh when he came into power. One of the things he did with COVID was he got rid of all the fraud checks and balances. Everything that we would have used to find out if there was fraud in those COVID loans and things like that. He just did away with them.

SPEAKER_02 1:09:03

And so one of the first tasks that all of the agency members of the task force have been given by me is that they have to write a report that is going to explain what the advice administration did for four years to perpetuate fraud and what we've done immediately to turn all those systems back on. And that's one of the first things we're trying to get a handle on is how bad did it get? Why did it get that way? Who is responsible for that? And what have we done to at least turn those systems back on? But then there's a lot more to do. A lot of these agencies need to develop technological solutions to automate fraud preventions. With the right type of data, a lot of our fraud assessments can be made automatically. You don't necessarily need a human sort of checking every individual thing. You can create automated systems that can flag potential fraudulent payments. And that's the way you really stop the fraud. It's not just prosecutions, although those are incredibly important. There aren't enough prosecutors in America to recover all the fraudulently taken money. The way to really stop the fraud, the way to really protect the American taxpayer is to keep it in the agency, to prevent it from going out the door. And that's what we're going to help the agencies do is build up better systems, automatic systems to prevent fraud, to detect fraud, and to work with the Department of Justice to go after the people who do get the money through fraud.

SPEAKER_11 1:10:24

This seems so obvious, right? The best thing to do is just to make sure you don't give fraudulent loans.

SPEAKER_18 1:10:29

Yeah.

SPEAKER_11 1:10:30

That's simple. Like then you don't even have to prosecute criminals because they never became criminals in the first place. Seems logical. Last week JD Vance was talking, and this was over the weekend when I was gone, so didn't it wasn't big enough to make it into the show on Tuesday. But JD Vance said that the United States government did not even prosecute or investigate fraud unless it writ went to the threshold of$1.5 million.

SPEAKER_19 1:10:56

Oh, jeez.

SPEAKER_11 1:10:58

Now I find that inconsistent. I was in prison with a guy that was serving a 16-month sentence for PPE loan fraud to the tune of$70,000.

SPEAKER_18 1:11:08

Okay.

SPEAKER_11 1:11:08

16 months for$70,000. That fraudster in Minnesota, they got sentenced two days ago for$1.9 million in fraud, one year. And then the next day, that same judge sentenced someone else with the same charges, similar fraud, six months.

SPEAKER_19 1:11:23

Hmm. Interesting.

SPEAKER_11 1:11:25

But 1.5 is the threshold. So which means if they go below that, they're targeting. Coincidentally, the guy that was in there for PPA loan fraud was a white guy. I don't know.

SPEAKER_19 1:11:33

Who knows? I wonder if you're Somali.

SPEAKER_11 1:11:36

Yeah, apparently, if you're Somali, they have thresholds somewhere around 400 million. I don't know. So I played a clip yesterday of Roger Stone, and Roger Stone's one of these characters that uh you have to kind of you have to kind of know who he is. So this is kind of along the lines of the Alex Jones problem. Okay. As peasants, we can accept everybody. We all have a crazy uncle that comes to I've been alleged to be that crazy uncle from time to time. So you have to, you know, we we have to make room in our heart for everybody, and we're all in a fight, and you know, we see through a glass darkly. There's a fog of war all the time to politics and stuff like that. Roger Stone is an old political operator. He has a huge tattoo of Richard Nixon on his back. He was one of Richard Nixon's biggest sycophants. Okay. And Richard Nixon was also one of the most popular presidents ever. And frankly, the deep state kind of ran him out of town. And his big thing in office was no graft, was parting words to his staff, I'm proud that our administration had no graft. We didn't have corruption, right? He was adamant about that. Which, again, projection. Why did they have to run him out of town? Because he was against greasing palms. And you know, and so, but Roger Stone is a throwback of that era. And he's been around forever, and he's been a close ally and confidant of Donald Trump all along. But Roger Stone, like so many of us, is really in it for himself. And I've always used, ever since January 6th, I've used J6 as a barometer, right? Your feelings on J6 and about Donald Trump on January 6th and about 2020 is a barometer. You can't be MAGA if you think 2020 was a legit election. Okay. Yeah. If you acquiesced, if you consented, the Ben Shapiro's, the Dan Bonginos, and on and on and on, the ones that couldn't see it in real time, that sat silent or, you know, just kind of moved on with life, they're not real MAGA. They're part of the coalition, right? They're part of the Republican coalition. You've got some rhinos in there, you've got some oil guys in there, you've got, you know, different people.

SPEAKER_19 1:13:44

They're part of the coalition, but they're not Yeah, and those same people, if they still can't see it, those people are CIA.

SPEAKER_11 1:13:53

Yeah. So this is Roger Stone right after 9-11. So when you hear Roger Stone talking about Trump, this is a fairweather friend. Okay. This is a fair weather friend. Listen to the way he talks about Donald Trump right after January 6th. He did not want this published. He didn't want this filmed. But this is the man behind Laura Loomer. This is the man behind so many of these alleged loyalists. Okay. He's right there in the mix of him.

SPEAKER_21 1:14:26

Let's be very clear. Let's be very clear. There is no man in cocksucker. It's one sentence. One sentence. So if you're intermediate and he says that, you punch him in the mouth as hard as you can to make your point. It's one sentence. We're not stupid. There is no paperwork, you cocksucker. He needs to be impeached. He needs to be denounced and impeached. Greatest single mistake in American history. Greatest single mistake. He's surrounded by morons and he surrounded himself by morons. A good long sentence in prison. He'll give him a chance to think about it. Wanna fight? Let's fight. Fuck you. Fuck you and your abortionist bitch daughter. Obviously, if you use any of that, I'll murder you.

Oprah Bribe Claim And Media Red Pill

SPEAKER_11 1:15:18

So that's Roger Stone behind the scenes, telling the documentarian, don't use this footage. He's calling for the impeachment of Donald Trump. He's telling someone to punch him in the mouth if he says anything. Right? He's talking about Ivanka Trump right there. That's Roger Stone. This is weeks after his sentence to prison had been commuted by the president. Is that someone who's very grateful for the gift of freedom that he was given? Because he did commit those crimes, by the way. I don't care what you say. I studied that case. With low lights. Amy Berman Jackson as his judge, right? He got a he got a he got a get out of jail free card, is what he got. And you know, all the crying, and my wife is old and I'm old. And yes, his house got raided. It was kind of stupid. Yeah, there was some lawfare and stuff like that. But listen, you did the thing, right? You did the thing. And that's how you repaid him. So this is the Alex Jones situation, too. Right? Some of these guys, Ron DeSantis, there's a whole bunch of these people. Cuidado, it's an old Portuguese word. Careful, right? Caution. Some of these guys here have don't have the bona fides you think they have. They're operators, they're self-interested, which is fine. Everybody's self-interested. But this is not calling for the president to spend a good long time in prison to think about things. Good thing Donald Trump didn't say that about you, Roger Stone. But I'm glad that you're on the media circuit now and you know you're in the ear of Laura Loomer and so many others. But that's just one of those things. And here's the other thing, too. How does this happen? Fetterman dropped a huge bomb this week. John Fetterman just exposed how Oprah Winfrey allegedly tried to buy his vote on the big, beautiful bill. She had her assistant approach me, he said, and offer me 20 million to vote against the bill, Fetterman told the Senate Oversight Committee. I told her that's not how the country works. He was a new senator. He immediately informed Democrat leadership. Their response, they swept it under the rug. I wonder how many other people she offered to pay that took the money.$20 million for a vote against the big, beautiful bill. A Democrat senator turning down$20 million from one of the most powerful liberals in America, and his own party buried it. Integrity over cash, rare sight in DC. That's interesting about John Fetterman. That's interesting about John Fetterman. But there's Oprah Winfrey. And remember, illegal campaign contributions to Kamala Harris, that whole setup. But then actually it wasn't illegal campaign contributions. Kamala Harris paid her like two million dollars to do that little sit-down, which was horrible. But that's Oprah Winfrey. That's Oprah Winfrey for you. Do you know who do you know who uh Chamath Pala Pipataya is?

SPEAKER_19 1:18:04

Yeah, right. I couldn't even guess the nationality. I have no idea.

SPEAKER_11 1:18:09

You'll recognize his face. He's all he's in the all-in podcast. Okay. Disclosure of this stuff to see the truth matters. Okay. True seekers care about truth. Peasants care about truth. Two plus two equals four. The sun rises in the east. You plant your crops in the spring, right? You have a duty to your voice.

SPEAKER_19 1:18:26

All the things I can confirm.

SPEAKER_11 1:18:27

Yeah, all the things you can confirm. Right. So truth does matter. And this guy's a billionaire, and he's been an ardent Democrat supporter, liberal, for many, many, many years. He was on the Katie Miller podcast, who is the wife of Stephen Miller, and she asked him, you know, you used to be a huge Democrat supporter. What changed?

SPEAKER_33 1:18:45

You went from being a large Democrat donor to now a very outspoken proponent on the other side of the aisle.

SPEAKER_18 1:18:53

Yeah.

SPEAKER_33 1:18:53

When you are so influential to other VCs and other people with high net worth here in California, and you really shaped their public opinion and public perception. How did you get there yourself? Was there a moment you woke up and you're like, okay, it's all different?

SPEAKER_31 1:19:10

There was. Um, this is not about politics for me. It's about the truth. Um, there was a moment where I was basically like everybody else and pretty brainwashed. My media diet was very much the same as everybody else's. Uh I read the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. I watched a little bit of CNN, a little bit of CNBC, a little bit of MSNBC, a little bit of CBS. Economist, every now and then, you encounter it on a plane, and you think you know what's going on. And I had a perception of Donald Trump initially from the moment he walked down the staircase in Trump Tower to announce. And then over the course of seven, six or seven years, I realized that some of those fundamental things that I was told about him were just totally false. And there was enough content online where I was almost afraid, but it started with Charlottesville. I was almost afraid to to look at it because I'm like, I think I was lied to. And then I saw it, I saw what he said, but then I saw the portrayal. I had originally believed that portrayal until I saw the truth, and then I just started to go down that rabbit hole. So for me, it was an evolution where I was like, I can't believe I'm being lied to by this group of people whose sole responsibility is to hold truth to power. The key word there is truth to power, not your perception or your desires. And I just think that that um that I mean red pilled me, I guess, in a way.

SPEAKER_18 1:20:46

Red pilled me.

SPEAKER_19 1:20:47

Yeah, so obviously I do know who that is. I just didn't know his name.

SPEAKER_11 1:20:50

I can't pronounce his name. I I used to pride myself on complicated names because you know, myself, weird last name. I thought, you know, I should do that. I don't know, man. At some point I just gave up. So that that's pretty interesting. When it comes to media bias, right? People have an uh an extreme trust in media. There's there's a certain presentation bias that something's professionally produced, it creates this credibility. So you're on a CNN set or an MSNBC set, and the camera angles and the cut to break and the scripting of it, it creates this huge amount of credibility. Now, Donald Trump has broken a lot of that credibility, right? Because they've lied blatantly to him, and people more and more turn to social media or independent journalism for their news and their information, which can put you in an echo chamber and in a bubble, right? You can end up in a bubble just watching Nick Shirley videos and think that that's the whole world, or you can end up in a bubble thinking, you know, the whole world's full of Antifa and they're just around the corner from you.

SPEAKER_19 1:21:51

Sure. And this is uh reinforcing something I've been talking about recently with some of my friends and family, and that is that we're gonna continue to be lied to as long as we allow ourselves to be lied to. And this guy just illustrated that perfectly is he was being lied to until he realized I'm being lied to, and then you know, and the rest of America just has to do this same exercise, they have to realize that they're being lied to.

SPEAKER_11 1:22:17

Yes, yes, you have to realize you're being lied to, but the machine is so good at lying, which is why it's important for people like us to have some credibility by getting nice cameras and some lights, and someone said, Your your podcast is so good. It's like, oh dude, if you saw how gonzo this was, I'm I'm sitting on a concrete floor right now, you guys. Ron built this shop. Okay, we're sitting in the corner of a space. But there is an element of, you know, we put this out there and it it lends some credibility, and that's what I want. I want to project that, and I want people to take a listen, and I don't want this to be graphically displeasing or anything like that. But at the same time, the content matters, right? We don't spend any time in the algorithm, we don't spend any time putting money and promoting the show, we don't spend any time. I don't care how many people like it, don't like it. I care about how many people view it because that's the real metric.

SPEAKER_19 1:23:11

We do a lot of we do a lot of time just trying to expose the cracks of truth or untruth.

SPEAKER_11 1:23:16

Yeah, but for the for the right person, this podcast resonates, right? Because you have to see with your own eyes and stay grounded on things. There is a path forward, there will be a tomorrow, right? Anyone who's lived through personal tragedy, I mentioned earlier, my son died. It felt like the world stopped. Yeah, I couldn't believe that you went to work that day, right? And we talk about 9-11, but for me, the world stopped. But you know what? Within a week, I was back at work, I was back into the routine, right? Time heals a lot of things. 9-11. Oh my gosh, they just hit the towers. I think the world's gonna change. Oh, I gotta clock in. I gotta hit the work. Why? The world's over. It's over. You know what I mean? Don't you know that we're at war in Iran now? The world's over. Gas price for$450. No, everything will resolve, right? That's that's the wisdom of age, is you go through some hard times and you're like, you know what's good? Get back on the horse, go back to work, get back on your routine. And as peasants, we have to live here. It doesn't matter who's in charge. There's always tomorrow. You have to plant your crops in the spring, you've got to harvest in the fall, right? There's some certain duties that we stay connected to that drive us from day to day. And so the news, they're they're they're there for the purpose of making money and influence. We're not here to make money, we're here for influence. Okay, but you you have to recognize that when these news outlets become corrupt and they're not privately funded, MS now has the right to say whatever they want to say. Okay, they can they they they pay for their airwaves, they got their their their cable news.

SPEAKER_19 1:24:49

Although we have played a couple of montages where all the people say the same thing as every other station.

Defunding NPR PBS And Judge Blocks

SPEAKER_11 1:24:55

Yeah, yeah, there's Mockingbird. I mean, who knows who they're getting their scripting from, but it's at its core, they're private businesses. Sure. When you have public funds going into a business that is slanderous towards the United States or just speaks pure untruths, like if the president of the United States gets up and says regarding the Charlottesville incident that there were fine people on both sides, but not the neo-Nazis, they should be condemned, and the white supremacists they should be condemned entirely. And then NPR or PBS gets on and says, Oh, Trump called the people at Charlotte, the Nazis, good people. Oh my gosh, they're fine people. The fine people hoax, the the the big one right at the beginning of Trump's first term. That set a lot of people off. Trump's a racist, and that's stuck. Trump's a Trump's a rapist, that's stuck, right? The stormy Daniels incident. But again, those are just lies. They're lies. But they're not some private corporation using their right to free speech. This is national public radio that gets public money. This is public broadcast service that gets public money, right? They're supposed to be like soft-spoken, quiet, and just down the line reporting the incidents of the day. They're not entertainment companies. They're not Fox News, whose corporate charter says entertainment. Okay. They're not there for that. They're supposed to be boring journalists. So they weren't. And they proved they weren't. And there were congressional hearings where they basically confirmed their bias. And so what happened? Congress cut their funding, and Donald Trump had an executive order as well that cut their funding. But yesterday, a judge in DC decided he can't cut their funding.

SPEAKER_37 1:26:37

Breaking moments ago, a federal judge blocking President Trump's order to cut funding for NPR and PBS. The Obama-appointed judge calling the move unlawful and unenforceable. The president has argued public broadcasters are biased and should not be receiving any taxpayer support.

SPEAKER_19 1:26:54

Breaking moments ago, a federal judge.

SPEAKER_11 1:26:59

Entertainment purposes. So there you go. Again, another one of these judges decides no, you can't defund them even though they're not news organizations. Oh, well, let's throw Fox News in the mix. Let's start giving them money or hey, peasants, peasants perspective, let's fill out an application. Let's see if we can get some of the government funds, right? If there, if you have no duty to at least speak truth to power, truth being the key word, right? And if you're going to be a part of media bias for the purpose of entertainment, because I understand entertainment bias, okay, playing to an audience. Fair enough. Don't like it. But even we play clips from MS now and stuff like that. Um, like the John Brennan clip, ridiculous. But this is one of those exceptions where it's like that's government money, right? My judge, Judge Lamberth, did the same thing with voice uh it's not called Voice of America. It's the one that Carrie Lake's in charge of that does foreign broadcasts, right? Foreign news. Could you imagine sitting out in a uh rural area of Poland and one of the radio stations you can get is one of these properties. America channels, you know, because we had radio stations all over the Eastern Bloc in order to try to break up the Soviet Union. And that radio station is saying that Donald Trump said that white supremacists and Nazis are fine people. Could you imagine that? Right? That's that's a government entity slandering its own government.

SPEAKER_19 1:28:21

Yeah, I doubt they have a podcast over there that's helping people understand the truth, too. So those people probably all continue to believe that lie and other lies. We did get a uh download from the Russian Federation.

Ballroom Lawsuit And Judicial Overreach

SPEAKER_11 1:28:35

All right. Another thing happened yesterday, too, is Donald Trump had a judge say that he had to halt all work on the West Wing expansion, the ballroom, which we now find out is actually a military installation. It's gonna have a bunker underneath it, it's gonna be drone-proof and all these things. And the kicker, it's privately funded. And it's on the executive property. Well, there was something called the National Trust for Historic Preservation that is supposed to be in charge of preserving all of America's historical monuments and stuff like that.

SPEAKER_18 1:29:09

Sure.

SPEAKER_11 1:29:09

And they've been basically bankrupt for a long time. These guys were also in charge of the Kennedy Trump Center and let it fall into disrepair pretty bad, as well as all the the government, like what was it? The Rick Cornell said$21 million in lost money through the through the Kennedy Trump Center or something like that. So the National Trust for Historic Preservation sues me for a ballroom that is under budget, ahead of schedule, being built at no cost to the taxpayer, and will be the finest building of its kind anywhere in the world. I then get sued by them over the renovation of a dilapidated and structurally unsound former Kennedy Center, and now the Trump Kennedy Center, a show of bipartisan unity, Republican and Democrat president, where I am do where all I am doing is fixing, cleaning, running, and sprucing up a terribly maintained for years building that a but a building of potentially great importance. Yet the National Trust for Historic Preservation, a radical left group of lunatics whose funding was stopped by Congress in 2005, is not suing the Federal Reserve building, which, you know, Janine uh Pierot, attorney in DC, was trying to subpoena to find out about the money that's been overspent on that building, blocked by a judge, which has been decimated and destroyed inside and out by an incompetent, possibly corrupt Fed chairman. The once magnificent building is billions over budget, may never be completed, and may never open. All of the beautiful walls inside have been ripped down, never to be built again. But the National Trust for Historic Preservation never did anything about it. Or have they sued on Gavinor Newsom's Railroad to Nowhere in California that is billions over budget and probably will never open or be used? So the White House ballroom and the Trump Kennedy Center, which are under budget and ahead of schedule, will be among the most magnificent buildings of their kind anywhere in the world. Get sued by a group that was cut off by government years ago, but all of the many disasters in our country are left alone to die. Doesn't make much sense, does it? Donald J. Trump. When I read that, I was just like, these guys the conservatives try, they try to go to court, they try to file these you know frivolous lawsuits, they try to play the lawfare game, and they get blocked by the judges. Right? They get blocked by the judges. But this group that doesn't have funding, which basically means it's you know a board of trustees, has decided to sue Trump for these two buildings. Why? No reason, no good reason, none at all.

SPEAKER_19 1:31:37

I would say this is very similar to having your local H E HOA, you know, pull shenanigans.

SPEAKER_11 1:31:43

Yeah, it's like having your HOA pull shenanigans that hasn't been active for years. Right. Right. All of a sudden. All of a sudden it's like, I've made myself president, and you can't park your car in the driveway. So CNN had a panel discussion about this, and this is just kind of the disgusting nature at this point. It's it's just TDS constantly, nothing's right, nothing can be good, nothing is beneficial, right? But but everything that was ever done prior, I mean, these these these are people that will sit and praise Bush at this point, you know. Oh, Bush, he knew how to fight a war. You know what I mean? I mean, Bush, I mean, he knew how to occupy territory, you know. They've devolved into that.

SPEAKER_28 1:32:23

I mean, we're in the middle of a war, and I that that is such an important point. And the president is walking around with giant um renderings of a ballroom that no one has approved, that he just has come up with his out of his own mind. Um, just there is a tone-deafness here, and it's part and parcel, I mean, uh, with all the other things. His name is going on an airport in Florida. Okay, fine. Uh, he wants to put his name on the Kennedy Center, which is also gonna be challenged. He wants to put he put his name on the Institute of Peace. He's signing currency, which has never been done before from a sitting president. This is stuff that you see in uh non, let's let's put it this way, non-democratic nations, not things that you see in the United States of America.

SPEAKER_17 1:33:08

Are you guys really that mad about the ballroom? I mean, honestly, there's a giant hole in the ground now. What are we gonna do? Just leave it there? When you get the government involved in building stuff, ask the people in California what happens when the government gets involved in building stuff. You don't build anything, there's a big hole. I agree.

SPEAKER_28 1:33:23

This is like saying you could go, we burned down the house. So what are we gonna do? Yeah, I guess we have to rebuild it. I mean, you I mean, you I mean he poured down the ball.

SPEAKER_01 1:33:34

For Americans to be upset about about what he carried down the east wing. I think it's has has tremendous historical value that nobody even bothered to save uh anywhere. I am pissed at what he's done to Jackie Kennedy's garden. Is it my the thing I'm most pissed off about? No, I care a lot more about the people that have gotten killed in the streets of Minneapolis, but I think it's pretty outrageous that he is acting like a king. He's throwing his should we leave it? Well, maybe we should leave a hole in the ground. Maybe we should ask architects and a and a board of people that know this. Maybe he should go to Congress.

SPEAKER_17 1:34:09

If they want to, if they want to approve it, fine. It's being paid for by private donations. If Congress needs to put a single line in a bill that says, by all means, build a ballroom, fine with me. You could probably get the Republicans to do that. Why do you think the Trump president doesn't want it, by the way, a bigger thing?

SPEAKER_28 1:34:23

Well, why do you think Trump didn't bother? If he was gonna this is this if this was such an easy ask, you go to Congress, you ask them to just you know create but create a little line, they don't have to appropriate any money, no problem. Why didn't he just do that in the first place?

SPEAKER_17 1:34:36

Well, they have a different legal interpretation that they don't need it, A, B, and again, you get you get government involved in building stuff and things simply just don't. But they are the government, Scott.

SPEAKER_11 1:34:48

But they are the government. There was no need to go to the Congress to get approval for that because there was no appropriation. It's also not on federal property, it's on executive branch property, it's the White House separation of powers. They could be do anything they want there. Do you think anybody got upset when Jackie Kennedy replaced Eleanor Roosevelt's garden? Do you think anybody, you know what I mean? Like there's been expansions, there's been build-outs. Uh Franklin Roosevelt had a pool installed, no permits. Uh Barack Obama had a basketball put in, no permits, right? They had to take up space to do that. They had to destroy history to do that because every inch of that place is historical. You know what I mean? Listen, times have changed. You need a you need a better military skiff or whatever it is under that ballroom. That ballroom needs to be built. Apparently, when dignitaries come, they've had issues like they can't do anything in the winter because the White House lawn floods. Because you know, DC used to be a swamp, still is, just now it's a you know proverbial swamp, but it used to be a swamp. So they they, you know, there's been complaints about, you know, people come to these events with nice black tie and they walk away, they got wet socks. You know, hey, we're the richest nation in the world, most powerful military in the world. Here, we've got some lawn chairs set up and some grass under a tent. Let's have a ball. Oh, and by the way, how secure is that from things like drones or anything like that? So this is one of those deals where you just look at it, you're like, it's lawfare for lawfare's sake. Everything he does is gonna be challenged, and it puts it into the judiciary, which at some point, at some point, you're gonna have to defy a judicial order. And that that does become a breakdown of the constitution. And that's that's what we're up against at this point, right? They have forced this hand by creating stupid lawfare, Trump could say defy the congressional order or the the judicial order and just say, I'm gonna finish building. And then they'll say, Oh, you broke the constitution. He'll say, Oh, while I'm at it, while I'm at it, there's a couple other things I'd like to go back on. These tariffs, I'm not paying the money back. You see what I'm saying? Yeah. Oh, there's a couple other things I'd like to go back on.

SPEAKER_19 1:36:56

So you you put you put And now all of a sudden he's painted with the totalitarian Exactly.

SPEAKER_11 1:37:02

When the reality was when other presidents did things that were wildly unconstitutional, the court cases didn't even rise to be court cases because they would get dismissed. And then they we would just go along to get along. Acquiescence, acquiescence of the judicial branch. But right now, these judicial branch judges they won't acquiesce to anything. They're forcing funding for executive branch agencies that have been cut funding by Congress, right? They're forcing you to keep them open and keep the money flowing, they're forcing you to keep TSA shut down, they're forcing, forcing, forcing. And at a certain point, it's the nationwide injunction problem. We gotta stop it. The judges need to be held in contempt, not contempt, they need to be impeached, they need to be investigated, and they need to be removed. It's what Bukele says. You can't reform your country if you have a corrupt judiciary, they'll form a judicial cartel, and that is exactly what's happening. I watched my judge, Judge Lamberth, get in on that cartel, right? And he even wrote as much. This is my small part to stand against a corrupt power, whatever he wrote it. You wrote that in an opinion? You're biased. You're biased, and you're not a neutral arbiter, you don't do the law for the law's sake, you have an agenda. You're a team player. I hate team players at this point. I hate team players. I'd rather Alex Jones and his manic back and forth than I would a judge who's a team player consistently against the interests of the United States.

SPEAKER_19 1:38:31

You know, when I I wrote a letter of support for you and I got a response letter, which I really appreciated. I didn't expect that.

SPEAKER_11 1:38:37

By the way, by the way, that doesn't happen. That's that is not normal. I I want to I want to point this out. Well, this is why I wanted to bring it up because people wrote letters of support to the judge, which is normal. Judges do not respond to them, they do not mail things back that has never that was pointed out in a couple articles because the judge mentioned that. And a liberal reporter was like, uh, that's not the custom of the court.

SPEAKER_19 1:39:04

Right. And when what I wanted to add was is that the flavor of that response letter was just like what she just painted. It was like, what the heck?

SPEAKER_11 1:39:12

This letter is full of bias language, and falsities and inaccuracies about the facts of 2020 and January 6th.

SPEAKER_19 1:39:21

Yes, the bias drips off these people. Well, and I love how part of it was like, you must not know this Mr. John Attackis. Like, hmm. Like I do. Right.

SPEAKER_11 1:39:34

Like I got a I got a 15-year history with him. I actually do know him pretty well.

SPEAKER_19 1:39:39

Yeah, you know what I mean? Did you not just read this letter of support?

unknown 1:39:42

Yeah.

401k Expansion Into Crypto Assets

SPEAKER_11 1:39:43

Which you said, I'm hesitant to write the letter. Yeah. I had the letters read to me over the prison fonts, right? You said I'm hesitant to write this letter. Hell yeah. Because of free speech, and I feel like I could be attacked for free speech. And what did he do? He attacked you. Yeah. Your opinion. Yeah, exactly. You know when someone has lost the argument when they have to authoritatively stomp down. And that was what he did there. He was like, No, that my opinion is this, and you you don't clearly don't know him. He even said in there, he must have lied to you about what happened. I showed people videos. I never said I didn't push the gate. I said pushing a gate doesn't deserve 11 years in prison. I would have been better off opening a child care center in Minnesota. You know what I mean? And stealing a hundred million dollars. Had we known. Had we known, I would have gone about my criminal behavior completely differently. You know, I was a mortgage broker, I could have done mortgage fraud, and I left the industry because I don't believe you can be a mortgage broker without committing mortgage fraud. You just couldn't check those boxes. I just couldn't check the boxes. Yeah. Okay, so another big thing happened, and this goes along with our make crypto grade again team. So a new policy passed yesterday, and guess what? Your 401ks are now going to have the opportunity to invest in a lot of new assets.

SPEAKER_38 1:41:04

Oh BlackRock Global head of retirement solutions and head of life path, Nick Defusi joins me now. It looks to me, having a casual glance at this, that we're in for a vast expansion of the stuff that I can put in my 401k. Is that right? Yes, sir.

SPEAKER_25 1:41:20

Thank you for having me. Um so first of all, what the rule is trying to do, and this is a huge step forward for the 401k market, what the rule is trying to do is establish a process, not necessarily say which asset classes are good or bad, actually create a six-day process. And then what we want to be able to do is focus more on the rules and less on litigation risk. So you could invest in things, but you've got to follow this process. But it's not gonna happen for some time, or uh there's a 60-day window now where they're gonna spread to regular people, right? So think of regular people, uh about 25% of the population are in defined benefit plans, about 80% are in defined contribution plans. Right now, defined benefit plans currently have access to all of these assets. What we're trying to do is level the playing field, since so many Americans are relying on 401k plans. Those DB plans, teachers, firefighters, police officers, a lot of state workers have access to those defined benefit plans. Most of us in the private sector have defined contribution. And what the rulemaking is meant to do is to level the playing field and be able to offer these asset classes to both as long as you have a sound process.

SPEAKER_11 1:42:22

Okay, so a defined benefit plan like a pension or something like that could go and invest in real estate projects, could invest in Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies, et cetera, et cetera. But a 401k, like what the one that you control what you buy, you couldn't do that. So basically it became an insider deal. If you had a defined benefit plan, those guys could go guarantee the returns. But you, you've got to take the actually more risky investments, right? And suck up the stock market and be the little, you know, whipping boy of the stock stockbrokers. So this opens it up and allows you to now put for Bitcoin or private equity stake and real estate and things like that into your 401k. So that's actually a pretty big deal. So on Maria Bartolomo's show, they expanded on this.

SPEAKER_00 1:43:07

Well, it is a big announcement, and I think it is going to do exactly as you mentioned, possibly change the lives of up to 90 million Americans where they have the opportunity in their own investments to work with their uh fiduciaries, their investors to determine what they want. And I think that that's the um accessibility the president has directed um really through his labor department and his executive order. It's really going to allow Americans who didn't have the opportunity to invest in their retirements that was once reserved for really the ultra-wealthy. And now every hardworking American will have that opportunity as we know move into this rulemaking of this um expansion. Yeah.

Move To Private Stream Pitch

SPEAKER_11 1:43:47

Well, this is a really big deal. And the reason, one of the main reasons this is happening is tokenization is coming, right? So the stock market will be replaced by tokenization, which creates a lot more transparency and stuff like that. So you had to have a way for people with 401ks to go in and invest in this entirely new marketplace, which is the digital marketplace. So that's really good news. I think that's a good turn. It opens up a lot of investment opportunity. There's a lot of money in 401ks that is misinvested. You're leaving it in certain mutual funds or in certain stocks simply because you have nowhere else to put it, right? It's in my 401k. I have to be at the New York Stock Exchange. Man, I'm diversified. Yeah, diversified. Well, that's good news. Okay, guys, it is April 1st, which means we've turned over the new month, which means we've got to start doing some private streaming again. So we are gonna jump over to the private. Let me tell you what we're gonna cover over there. Because if you're not a member of Private, maybe this month is the month you do it. Make sure when you do become a subscriber to Rumble and get a paid account that you click through the link on our page so we get a little credit for it. And uh, I think it actually helps us in the algorithm because the more people like subscribe to Rumble Premium through us, the more they promote us in the algorithm because we're selling Rumble. So do it if you haven't already done it. We are a conspiracy show, so we are gonna be talking about the conspiracy we all knew, but now is official, Christy Gnome's husband living a double life as a cross-dresser. We're gonna be, I know Ron's like, are you kidding me? We're gonna be covering uh human alien hybrids. Okay, we're gonna be talking about that. We're gonna be talking about the Tyler Robinson situation with the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Okay. Apparently, the bullet don't match. Okay. Well, okay.

SPEAKER_19 1:45:29

I mean, it is April 1st, so let's hold on. Hold on.

SPEAKER_11 1:45:32

These are legit. This is no April 1st. April 1st was the beginning of the peanuts. This is we're back into the real world news now.

SPEAKER_19 1:45:38

Okay.

Kristi Noem Marriage Drama Breakdown

SPEAKER_11 1:45:39

And then uh we're gonna be talking about a couple other situations. We have a judge who held a hearing with a woman in delivery who was trying to fight a C-section, an emergency C-section. She was a she was an inmate, technically, and she was giving birth, and they actually held court with her on Zoom. So we're gonna be showing you guys we've lost the plot, America. We've lost the plot. Okay, and then we're gonna be talking about the routers and the routers that you need to get rid of because they are compromised. So let's jump on over to private and we'll talk to you guys there. The rest of you will see you tomorrow. Okay, so Christy No.

SPEAKER_18 1:46:19

Yeah.

SPEAKER_11 1:46:19

I like Christy No. I think she was, you know, the best DHS secretary we have ever had, which was a department created after 9-11. And I think she did a great job closing the border, getting the immigration crackdowns, lot of upstream swimming that she had to do. Okay, what did her in was that$220 million ad campaign that was kind of a glamour session for her. It was overspent. Okay, yeah, could have just done it with PSA public service announcements, but instead, you know, riding horses and the horse cost$200,000 to ship and do whatever because it was a prize horse and her makeup was fifteen thousand bucks, and it just looked bad. Senator Kennedy kind of blasted her, and that was it. That was kind of the it. It was it. Yep, you could Donald Trump, like Richard Nixon, wants no graft and corruption in his White House. It's full of it. There's lots of corruption going on.

SPEAKER_19 1:47:08

Sure. And this just kind of had a flavor of that. So it's like eh, the bad.

SPEAKER_11 1:47:12

Yeah, here we are talking about you know Somali fraudsters, and you had three advertising companies that are connected between you and Corey Lewandowski, your paramour, good doing it. It was a bad look.

SPEAKER_18 1:47:25

Yep.

SPEAKER_11 1:47:25

But simultaneously with that, you also heard in the congressional hearing when she was asked about her affair with Corey Lewandowski. Now, if you've listened to this show long enough, this is old, old news. The affair started back in 2020 when Corey Lewandowski was running around with Pam Bondy chasing down election fraud, and we found out that he had this relationship with Christy Null. Now, her husband is a dutiful Catholic and didn't want to divorce her, and they had whatever arrangement they had, and he was kind of an insurance agent, stay-at-home dad, whatever, whatever, whatever. Okay. And he just played the whole, you know, well, marriage is forever, and I'm Catholic. Okay, great, cool. Whatever. Now, affairs in DC are like raindrops. They're everywhere. Okay, so whatever. Again, whatever. But this story broke yesterday on um uh Daily Mail, and then New York Post carried an additional story on it. And we don't need to the salacious element of this is just kind of ridiculous. You can look at the screen right here. Secret double life of Christy Gnome's cross-dressing husband, Byron, put uh the pouting busty bimbo photo and trove of explicit messages. So there's a picture of her husband with fake boobs. So that's some pretty bad lighting, bro. Yeah. And they're the these pictures have all been kind of authenticated. There's a date and the meta locations, the the meta location. So this is legitimate, okay? Okay, but the thing here is it's like, oh my gosh, he's got this cross-dressing lifestyle. People have alleged that he's gay. I don't know necessarily, but either way, it's a bad look. Okay. So the thing about this, and the reason I'm covering it, is not so much for the salacious nature of it, because again, this was a known thing. Christy Nome put out a statement saying she's devastated by this news, her husband was living in double life. Maybe you didn't know about the stuffing the porch bra with balloons. You know, maybe you didn't know about that or the text message exchanges, but you definitely knew that your marriage was not a conventional marriage. Okay. So Laura Lilmer posted this, and I think this is actually the best context. This has been known by Trump World since the campaign. They knew about it. It's not a secret that Christy Gnome's husband is a gay man. That's why nobody reprimanded her for a very open and public affair with Corey Lewandowski, which is the kind of like so nobody cared? Because usually when it kind of bursts into public like that, there's more fallout. But it was an open secret. I talked about it. When she was confirmed, I was like, Well, but there is this one Lewandowski thing, you know. One pickup in the giddy up here. Um, they felt bad for her because her husband is gay, which is why he never divorced her for the affair. Because she was the beard. Okay. I'm shocked. It took this long for it to come out. It's been known for a long time. So I think this personally, I think I think that in response to the public, you know, public knowledge of her affair, he made some statements in those articles about his piety and Catholicism and kind of played off that whole, I'm just the dutiful husband doing my duty, you know, and I love my wife, but it is what it is. I don't know if he leaked the story, but he definitely commented on the story. It wouldn't surprise me one bit if Christy Gnome leaked this story on him, right? As a get back to him, and as now a justification for an actual divorce. Does that make sense? Yeah. Because now you can't play the pious husband and I'm the squ I'm the vicious wife. Now it's like, oh, that's gonna happen. This is the get out move. This is the get out move. Yep. That's my opinion on that. So this is a conspiracy show, so we'll see how it plays out. We will see how it plays out. Fraser says, I don't know about I didn't know, don't know about her baggage. The dog, and now her husband looks bad. What is the dog story? I saw that. Did she kill her dog or something? Yeah, why?

SPEAKER_19 1:51:24

Uh, it just needed to be put down. So it that's uh that's it. They just had a dog that needed to be put down, and she put it down, and everybody flipped out. Did she do it with a gun? Is that why? I think so. And she just talked about it in her book, and that was it.

SPEAKER_11 1:51:37

I shot a mule with a gun once.

SPEAKER_19 1:51:39

I I shot I put I put down in my one of my old dogs with a gun, too. You know, it's it's what you do.

SPEAKER_11 1:51:44

It's probably the most humane way to do it.

SPEAKER_19 1:51:46

What are you gonna do? It is, it's the most humane thing you can do. Yeah, well, I mean, whatever.

Gaetz Talks Alien Hybrid Programs

SPEAKER_11 1:51:52

So there's that. So that's sort of so she's you know, defense shield of the Americas or whatever, and kind of a soft landing for her. And again, this was known. Anyone who didn't know it, it's because you don't pay attention and listen to the peasants podcast. You know, if you listen to us, you would have known. Um, anyways, so we'll see. I didn't know about her baggage. All right, so Matt Gates was on with Benny Johnson, who's Matt Gates, former congressman from Florida, now a host on the OAN show. And he's similar to uh he's a firebrand.

SPEAKER_19 1:52:26

He's like the male version of Christy Gnome.

SPEAKER_11 1:52:29

No, not quite.

SPEAKER_19 1:52:31

Not quite.

SPEAKER_11 1:52:31

So Matt Gates has got a couple funny things too. So Matt Gates, single man, and one day in a congressional hearing, someone criticizes him for being racist. He's like, How dare you call me racist? I have a Cuban son.

unknown 1:52:44

What?

SPEAKER_11 1:52:45

You have a son? So he adopted a Cuban boy. Okay, and at the time he said that his son was like 18 or 19. And there's no allegations of like weirdness here, but it is kind of weird, right? A single guy adopted a kid. Yeah, I I don't I don't know any of the factory there, but okay.

SPEAKER_19 1:53:04

That's different. I don't I don't know any single guys. Well, I take that back that have adopted children.

SPEAKER_11 1:53:10

Yeah, I don't I don't know. I maybe, maybe they're they're likely, and I'm casting a cloak of charity here. This is one of those situations where you know, this kid's in the family circles and homeless, and who's you know what I mean? And okay, I'll adopt you, and you have to get guardianship so you can enroll them in school. And so maybe there's that that that's kind of the way it was presented. Was it was just like, yeah, you know, like I adopted a kid in need, you know, that kind of thing. And the kid has spoken and has never said anything bad about his dad, loves his loves his dad, and cool, all that kind of stuff. But it did come out in a really weird, like, how dare you call me racist? I have a Cuban son.

unknown 1:53:49

What?

SPEAKER_11 1:53:50

Okay. So, anyways, he was on the Benny Johnson show and he reveals something that conspiracy theorists have been hypothesizing about since the 50s or 60s. Human hybrid breeding programs.

SPEAKER_09 1:54:04

I think the most important information will be the biologics that are not human that have been discovered. And like even some of the briefings that aren't classified just need just need to be out in the public. I mean, I had someone come and brief me who was in a military uniform, worked for the United States Army that was briefing me on the locations of hybrid breeding programs where captured aliens were breeding with humans to create some hybrid race that could engage in intergalactic communication. An actual uniform member of the United States Army briefed me on that.

SPEAKER_15 1:54:39

Non-human biologics, interracial alien mating? What the F is going on? Look, wait a second, you had whistleblowers tell you this kind of thing? Can you please unpack it?

SPEAKER_09 1:54:50

Yeah, I had a I had a guy who was uh who was uniform, he was uh a senior enlisted uh with the United States Army, came into my office at Cresh in Crestview, Florida, uh, in a non-classified setting. I had members of my staff there, and uh what they explained is that the military ran a very secret program where uh uh aliens that were living were enforced breeding programs with uh humans that had been abducted from war zones and from even uh the caravans of uh of migrants. Now, again, I I didn't verify this, but what the whistleblower was telling me is that there were like between six and twelve locations around the country where this happened, and what he wanted was uh uh a group members of Congress to all show up at the same time at all these different locations so that uh any of those activities could could not be moved. And of course, it's a physical impossibility to get members of Congress to simultaneously show up at like eight locations at one time, and so that never occurred.

SPEAKER_15 1:55:59

What do you mean non-human biologics?

SPEAKER_09 1:56:01

Like this was the testimony of of David Rush uh before the uh the House Oversight Committee, which which I joined, and uh the uh the testimony was that in crashes of craft that had been recovered by the CIA and through a a special program that the CIA had for crash recovery, um, that it wasn't just you know the the hard materials, it was also biologics, but that they couldn't identify a human source of those biologics.

SPEAKER_11 1:56:31

So we've got aliens that have been captured alive that are in forced breeding programs with kidnapped people from war zones and the migrant caravans. Huh? Wow. I mean, this actually ties into the Epstein files a little bit with some of the stuff he was dabbling in, but wow, wow.

SPEAKER_19 1:56:51

This like uh touches the fringes of some conspiracies out there that maybe we'll talk about some other day.

SPEAKER_11 1:56:58

Carlitz says, dude, that hybrid breeding program stuff is crazy. I know, I know it's crazy because to talk about it, you have to acknowledge aliens and believe, right? And now you talk if you go down the rabbit hole.

SPEAKER_19 1:57:11

Well, and also the other half of that. I mean the other half. I mean, who's breeding?

SPEAKER_11 1:57:18

Yeah, who's breeding? Now, if you go down the rabbit hole of the alien stuff and you talk start to you know hearing from the abductee victims, the aliens are interested in crossbred hybrid breeding too. This is the Alexander Hitchen theory of where we even came from, the Anunnaki with genetic, uh genetic manipulation, and DNA evidence has shown that we have a splice in our DNA, which can only that we can do now in CRISPR, but there's a fuse in our DNA that separates us from the monkeys. Oh, right. So there's there's a lot of like stuff coming out that kind of verifies that this is probably happening. Like there's enough science and undisputed evidence that these victims and these people that have escaped these programs. This is like the MK Ultra Plus crowd, have talked about this. These are breeding programs with alien hybrids, and the attention is intergalactic communication or telepathic or whatever the case is, or I don't know. It's pretty interesting. Pretty interesting, which brings the question do you think there's a base on the backside of the moon? Because I think it's getting more and more likely every day at this point.

SPEAKER_19 1:58:20

Well, I think there's a base somewhere. I'm not sure about the moon.

SPEAKER_11 1:58:24

It's definitely on the backside of the moon. The Nazis got there first, and that's probably what the story is. Okay, Iron Sky. Go watch the movie Iron Sky one and two. You got to get the full flavor.

SPEAKER_19 1:58:34

You have to believe that we got to the moon first. So yeah.

Charlie Kirk Ballistics Weirdness

SPEAKER_11 1:58:37

Well, you know, we might have got there and didn't like what we found. Carlitz is like, there is no moon. It's geez, it's seven miles away. Okay, so moving on to Charlie Kirk. So Charlie Kirk, obviously, the story is that Tyler Robinson, a lone gunman, who is upset at Charlie Kirk's anti-trans, you know, language, climbed up onto a roof with a 30-6 that was disassembled, assembled it, took a sniper shot, then jumped off the roof with the gun in the box and a towel, hit it in some bushes, took off, went back home, turned himself in, the whole thing, right? Right. Immediately people start suspecting foreign involvement. This was actually something that Joe Kent said that they were blocked from by Cash Patel from inspecting anything or investigating anything because it's Cash Patel's pet issue. And of course, you know, we caught the shooter and so many hours and the whole thing. So Margie Taylor Green posted this because there was an ATF report that came out yesterday, part of the uh investigation into the ballistics, and what they determined was they could not link the bullet fragments to the shell casing. So the shit the bullet was a yeah, Jupiter Ascending is a good one, too. That's probably revelation right there. Uh Carlitz commented on that. Okay, so the bullet shell casing came from the 306, and there was the inscriptions on it, you know, that kind of stuff. But the bullet, when it hit Charlie Kirk, fragmented, and so now with the fragments, they cannot positively identify it as a 30-0-6 bullet, which then leaves open the possibility that it wasn't a 30-06, it could have been something else, a different round from a different location, something like that. So this the uh the headlines are kind of making it sound like bullet doesn't match. It's not that the bullet doesn't match, it's that that you can't confirm that the bullet matches.

SPEAKER_19 2:00:27

Yeah, so this kind of thing always comes up, and I don't even like talking about these details when you get into these stories. It's more important to just know that there's weirdness surrounding it. But do do we bother talking about the details? I mean, what kind of and like asking questions like what was the bullet made out of? Was it jacketed? Was it just a lead slug? Was it a frangible, you know, all those kind of things? Yeah, you start going, well, what could it be? Right.

SPEAKER_11 2:00:55

So I don't know. But the point is, is you can't definitively say that he was shot with a 30-06. You can say that Tyler Robinson had a 30-06 and they found shell casings, and you can say he was shot, but you can't say that there weren't other shooters now. There opens the possibility, which has always been the conspiracy claim. There's other weirdness around this because you've got lone gunman Tyler Robinson, but you had a man in the crowd who said, I did it, I shot him, I whatever.

SPEAKER_19 2:01:21

He was yelling, shoot me, shoot me, I did it.

SPEAKER_11 2:01:25

I did it, I shot him, and then they arrested him, looked at his phone and found child pornography. So now he's got a child pornography charge. But it's like, what was that? Did you just find an opportunity and wanted to commit suicide by cop? Did you want to get arrested? Did you want, or was this an organized effort and you're one of the patsies to cover for the whole thing? And now you're pinched, you're in prison, child pornography. No newscasters are calling him saying, So what was that all about? Does someone put you up to it? Because why would you? It's behind bars. You see what I'm saying? So it creates a lot of weirdness.

SPEAKER_19 2:01:56

But it sure seemed like it was uh intentional and designed to you know move attention.

SPEAKER_11 2:02:04

Yes. So here's where the story gets even more weird. So Congressman former Congresswoman Marjorie Trader Green says the ATF could not match the bullet to Tyler Robinson's gun. And when the news breaks, guess what happened? The sheriff resigns. And Mel says from uh Village Crazy Lady, and OFC, the sheriff who arranged for Tyler to turn himself in, Nate Brooksby, resigned today. Total coincidence, I'm sure. So this is kind of one of those weird things. Kind of one of those weird things.

SPEAKER_19 2:02:37

Maybe he just got something else going on in his life.

Police Authority Abuse In Deposition

SPEAKER_11 2:02:39

Yeah, maybe he's just got something else going on in his life. Now, I'm gonna play this clip here because we do talk about police corruption and abuse of authority. We support the police, okay? We support individual police officers and their mission to keep the peace, officers of the peace. Okay. However, just like anything, we've learned from sad experience, the moment someone gets a small bit of authority, they often abuse that authority. So here is a police officer going through a deposition. And I believe what happened here is he's one of those officers that went up on someone that was doing a public audit, filming in public, and uh abused his authority just a little bit.

SPEAKER_27 2:03:13

Then you said you're going to jail for failure to identify. Um what ordinance or state uh code section is the crime of failure to identify? There is a law. Why would you say that you're going to jail for failure to identify? And then Mr. Grey says, Can I just leave? You said if you wish to do so, but I need to identify you first. Do you agree with me at that point, Mr. Gray was not free to leave? He was detained because he was there. So he was not free to leave, he was being detained. And if he had attempted to leave, what would have happened? Mr. Gray said that he would like to stay there. Do you remember saying that you're not going to stay here? Period. And why was Mr. Gray not permitted to stay here? Was Mr. Gray on a public property? Is City Hall a public property? Why was he not free to stay there and continue what he was doing? And and now you don't know why he said he asked why he had to leave, and you said, Because I'm instructing you. I'm giving you a lawful order to leave. You remember saying that? What was your authority for a quote lawful order that he must leave the public sidewalk on the public city hall? Then you told him that if he didn't leave, he was going to jail again. Do you remember saying that?

SPEAKER_11 2:04:58

It's one of those deals where the authority, I'm giving you a lawful order based in what? And when it all shakes down and here's the officer sitting in the deposition, there is no law, there is no rule, there is no statute, there is nothing that would prevent a person standing on a public sidewalk, having their cell phone out and filming.

unknown 2:05:18

Right.

Inmate Labor And Forced C Section

SPEAKER_11 2:05:18

Well, he's investigated for a crime and he failed to identify himself. And there is that a crime? What invest crime were you investigating? I was just, I was fishing. It was a fishing expedition. So at 1776 Live.us, we focus a lot on interactions with police officers and how to deal with that. Because these guys have guns. They have they have uh they have handcuffs. And if they take you to jail, now you've got to deal with the team players, the judges, the prosecutors that are all team players. Do you see what I'm saying here? But what law are they enforcing? They're not, they're just enforcing their authority sometimes. So you have to learn how to navigate that. If you want to learn how to navigate that, go to 1776live.us and get in one of the classes because we do talk about that. Because you can't fight with these people, but you have to stand on your rights so that you can get to a deposition or something like that if things were to escalate. But you've got to know what your rights are, and you can't be belligerent, you can't argue. Does that make sense? But you can absolutely inquire what law, what lawful command, and that kind of stuff. And then that this is where your remedy is, is there. But you but you don't want to get in those positions in the first place because then you got to deal with the team players. This is this is a really interesting case, and there's two clips that go with this, and I'm just gonna play one. And I don't remember if this is the first clip or the second clip, but what happened here is this woman is incarcerated and she's pregnant, so she has to have the baby. And this is one of the worst scenarios that we come up with in our system. I have a personal friend who was arrested many, many, many, many years ago. She was pregnant, she had a five-year sentence. She was drove a getaway car when her friend was shoplifting. Oh boy. So she got five years. Still 1.9 million, you get six months. Drive a getaway car for someone who stole$85 of makeup, you get five years. So figure. But in this, she had a baby while incarcerated. She had to be handcuffed to the to the bed the whole time. And then when she got to hold the baby, she had 48 hours to the minute with the baby, and then took the baby and away they went. So it was it was it. It's one of the probably the hardest things she ever went through. So this is Judge Michael Khalil, and he's having a hearing because the BOP, the Bureau of Prisons, wants to force an emergency C section so they can just kind of move this along and get it over with. Okay. Now, this woman did eventually have an emergency C section because that happens, right? At a certain point, yeah, you might need to have one. But at this point, she's up, she's talking, she's in labor, Ron. She's in labor. Okay. Now, there's one thing that they don't take away from you when you go to prison. You do have a right to your medical decisions. Okay, they they have to provide life-saving care, but you can deny shots, vaccines, etc., etc. Now, obviously, COVID infringed on that because they restrict so many of your liberties if you refuse to take their care or whatever. But this is one of those situations where we as Americans just have to sit back and be like, what are we doing? So in the first clip, let me see if uh it's attached here. It's not. Um, in the first clip, she in the first clip, they have the hearing and they've got all these people on. And she literally has to have a nurse hold an iPad so she can appear in court while she's uh in labor. Okay. And I think I think this is the second hearing.

SPEAKER_06 2:08:38

I'm a circuit court judge here in Jacksonville, Florida. The state of Florida has filed a petition for declaratory judgment, and they're asking for an emergency c-section to be granted by the court.

SPEAKER_29 2:08:48

I have not had a chance to be able to consult with my own legal representation, and I'm trying to understand how you are taking my rights away as a patient to be able to decide my own care to give me an emergency C-section against my will.

SPEAKER_06 2:09:06

Well, let me ask you about that. What about the risk to the child?

SPEAKER_29 2:09:08

Anytime you go into childbirth, whether you do a vaginal or a c-section, there is inherent risk to the mother and the baby. I have other children out here in the world that need me. If I die from a C-section, nobody on this call is gonna take care of my children.

SPEAKER_06 2:09:24

Well, you have a new doctor coming on. I don't know.

SPEAKER_29 2:09:26

So they don't have nobody asking Americans that they can give me.

SPEAKER_06 2:09:30

Let me ask you. I don't know that then I don't find that race really has has uh much to do with this, ma'am.

SPEAKER_29 2:09:39

It does have much to do with it because historically, black people do better when they have healthcare body.

SPEAKER_11 2:09:46

Okay, so this race thing. Some for some people this might rub you wrong. Ah, it doesn't matter. Stop. This is a court of law, it nothing in here matters. But over and over and over again, with with malpractice lawsuits and different litigation where there's uh an error, okay, that has been statistically proven and it has been presented in court and confirmed many times that there is some correlation between quality of care and less malpractice incidences. Quality care and outcomes. Quality care and outcomes when the race of the patient and the doctor are the same. I'm not posting any fingers, but it's a high correlation between white doctors and black patients with bad outcomes, and conversely, black doctors and white patients with bad outcomes.

SPEAKER_19 2:10:42

It's not a racist thing, but it does have a tinge of biasedness to it. But you know, it's it's just the way it is.

SPEAKER_11 2:10:53

It's just the way it is. So in a litigation, you can say, hey, look, this is a fact. Now let's dig into deeper and why, and you find latent racism and bias and prejudice or misunderstanding of whatever. Right. Okay.

SPEAKER_19 2:11:04

So and cultural stuff.

SPEAKER_11 2:11:06

So the thing that you find in court systems is they'll use anything they want when it's convenient. Right. So when this woman brings it up and she articulates it well, okay, they're like, uh, well, that's probably not a big issue. Well, if I do have an out bad outcome and I go to sue, I'll bring that up because it's been brought up 10 billion times before. You see what I'm saying? And it's been confirmed by the courts that that is a factor in all of this.

SPEAKER_29 2:11:33

It's nobody black in here. I'm so tired of this. I'm I'm over this whole situation. Like y'all are gonna make me have have level three traits in how bad y'all stressing me out.

unknown 2:11:44

Ms.

SPEAKER_06 2:11:45

Doyle, that's what's going to be entered. I'm gonna circulate this order, this proposed order to the other attorneys enter this in today, not requiring anything except for in an emergency basis.

SPEAKER_29 2:11:56

Thank you so much, Your Honor. I appreciate you spending two hours. On a Sunday going through my medical history and fighting for my vagina and my baby.

SPEAKER_11 2:12:13

Dulley had three prior C-sections, including one that resulted in hemorrhage. After three hours of testimony, all white Doyley lay in her hospital bed. The judge ruled that she could keep trying for vaginal birth unless there was an emergency.

SPEAKER_19 2:12:24

Oh, jeez.

SPEAKER_11 2:12:28

Overnight doctors said the baby's heart rate dropped for seven minutes. Doyle woke to her hospital bed being wheeled into surgery. Baby was delivered by C-section. The next day at 8 a.m., nurses again put Doyley in front of a tablet for the final hearing.

SPEAKER_29 2:12:44

Tell them I don't want to be on the case.

SPEAKER_11 2:13:04

At the hearing, Dr. Aaron Burnett said Doily likely couldn't safely deliver vaginally warning of risks of uterine rupture. Dr. John Davis added that the hospital avoids unnecessary C-section, but the Doily's condition required intervention. Hospital staff noted the concern for the baby's welfare. Doctors at the hospital declined further comment, citing privacy, even though Doily had signed a waiver allowing the hospital to discuss the case with Pearl Publica. The hospital did not address her claim that race played a role in her care. Judge Michael Khalil also declined to comment citing judicial ethics and the need to preserve neutrality and fairness.

SPEAKER_19 2:13:35

So hmm. You know, it's interesting. You know, she had talked about having prior uh kids. I thought that those would have been vaginal births. Now that I know that they were C-section births, uh, C-section makes way more sense because once you got one, it's kind of it's really hard to do a vaginal birth after words.

SPEAKER_11 2:13:54

Yes, I I get it. My you know, this was the situation we have with people that know. Yeah, but it it is one of those deals where it's like, you know, why the emergency C-section was always going to be an option for sure. Oh does it make sense? But the trauma of having to have hearing after hearing while while she's in labor, who's to say the stress of those hearings is not what caused her to not be able to deliver. Sure.

SPEAKER_19 2:14:18

Do you see what I'm saying? It could it was it could have been deemed unnecessary and impactful.

SPEAKER_11 2:14:24

Yes, exactly. That's the point there is the system becomes this machine, and you have to have a hearing, you have to do that. And thank goodness, you know, the baby survived and the mom survived, and it all worked out.

SPEAKER_19 2:14:35

Sure. Even when you have a judge there that is talking very calmly, and he's a very nice guy, but he says things like, Well, I'm gonna put that in there, it's gonna be the order, and there's nothing you can do about it.

SPEAKER_11 2:14:47

And meanwhile, the the the zoom call hangs up and she's like push, and she's whatever she's action, and now she can't push. You know what I'm saying? Like it is it complicates things big time. It's just another one of those deals where it's like, you know, the system is supposed to work, but that's one of those instances where you're like, Can't you just let her have the baby and make this decision with her doctor? Yeah, you know what I mean? Because ultimately they made the decision, but it's like let her have this moment.

SPEAKER_19 2:15:14

Right. You don't need to have a dozen white guys on a zoom call gang up on you like trying to pop a baby out. Exactly.

Router Malware Warning And Proxies

SPEAKER_11 2:15:22

Yes. Okay, the FBI issued a flash notice identifying 18 popular router models targeted in a large malware operation. Affected models include routers from D-Link, Netgear, TP Link, and Zyxel. Attackers exploited known vulnerabilities to install malware called Avricon, turning compromised devices into residential proxies. Essentially renting out access to your home framework network to criminals who use it to hide their identity online. The FBI estimates access to around 369,000 devices has been sold since 2020 across more than 120 countries. The detail worth understanding here is that what a residential proxy actually means for the people whose routers were compromised. Criminals pay for access to those devices specifically because traffic routed through a home router looks like a regular person browsing the internet rather than a server in a data center. Your router becomes cover for someone else's fraud, cyber attacks or worse, and you have no idea what's happening because your internet still works fine. The FBI noted patches were already available for some of the vulnerabilities that were exploited. If your router is on the list, check the manufacturer's site for a firmware update. If it's old enough to no longer receive security patches, it's worth replacing regardless of whether it appears here specifically. So you have models.

SPEAKER_19 2:16:33

The tech on this, I'm wondering.

SPEAKER_11 2:16:36

What? You got one of those?

SPEAKER_19 2:16:38

I think so. What I'm wondering is do these devices, if other people are connecting to your network or using your network somehow, do those devices show up? Do you know that there are devices connecting or are they passing through undetected?

SPEAKER_11 2:16:53

I think they're passing through undetected. Bummer. So this is where people that are dealing dabbling in child pornography can make it look like it's coming from your server. Which, you know, maybe the FBI gets hip to that, they show up, there's nothing on your devices, no browser history, but you had to go through the the you know investigation. Right. But it also makes it harder for them to track the actual criminals, uh, right, to actually get to them because it's being redirected through the home routers. This is also how you can have bot farms that are in Nigeria, but they look like they're coming from the 50 states. And look at this organic groundwell of support for this No Kings rally. See what I'm saying?

SPEAKER_19 2:17:30

It it can be because they all have residential IPs across America.

Sign Off And Final Thoughts

SPEAKER_11 2:17:34

It can be fraud. It can there's so many ways that this could be used. So many ways this could be used. So it's a big heads up, you know. Just like our election technology and Nancy Pelosi's concerned, you know, the Republicans could get in there and manipulate, right? It could be coming through your home router. All right, guys, that's it for us today. Thanks for sticking around to the very end. We love you guys so much, and we will talk to you again tomorrow. Bye.

SPEAKER_04 2:18:25

What the make lives in that castle over there? I'm 37. What? I'm 37. I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you ma'am. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well, you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say sorry about the old woman, but from behind, you're not subject to is you automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king. Oh, king, eh? Very nice. And how'd you get that, eh? By exploiting the workers. By hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society.

SPEAKER_32 2:18:58

If there's ever going to be any progress, lovely fill fair here.

SPEAKER_04 2:19:04

How'd you do? How do you do, good lady? I'm Arthur, King of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the who? The Britons. Who are the Britons? But we all are. We are all Britons. And I am your king. No we have a king. I thought we were an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship. A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working class is. How dare you go? Bringing class into it again. That's what it's all about. If only people will. These good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What? I told you. We're in anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week.

SPEAKER_19 2:19:47

Yes.

SPEAKER_04 2:19:48

But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting by a civil majority in the case of purely internal affairs. Be quacked. Or by a two-thirds majority in the case of the quat. I order you to be quacked. All right, do you think he is? I'm your king. I didn't vote for you. You don't vote for kings? Why do you become king then? The lady of the lake. Her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite held aloft Excalibur from the bosom of the water, signifying by divine providence that I, Arthur, was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. Be quiet! Oh but you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery tart threw a sword at you. Shut up! I mean, if I went round saying I was an emperor, just because some Moisson beat had lobbed a scimitar at me, they put me away! Shut up, will you? Shut up! Now we see the violence inherent in the system! Shut up! Now we see the violence inherent in the system! Help, help! I'm being repressed, bloody peasant! Oh, what a giveaway! Did you hear that? Did you hear that, eh? That's what I'm on about. Do you see it repressing me? You saw it, didn't you?