Guilty Until Proven Innocent

If you’ve ever felt like headlines are just noise while power keeps consolidating, this conversation is our attempt to draw one straight line through the chaos. We start with a Supreme Court decision on race based redistricting and unpack why election law, map drawing, and media framing can reshape representation long before a single vote is cast. From there we get into the legitimacy spiral: why one side calls the Court “illegitimate,” why “pack the court” always reappears, and what that kind of institutional brinkmanship does to public trust.

Next we wrestle with accountability and selective enforcement, using the Comey controversy and broader “weaponization” claims as the lens. We talk about political rhetoric, what counts as a threat versus protected speech, and why people stop believing the justice system is neutral when consequences seem to depend on who you are. That thread continues into COVID policy and vaccine safety disputes, where the core issue isn’t just one study or one clip but the process: what regulators knew, when they knew it, how they communicated risk, and why mandates turned skepticism into lasting distrust.

We also zoom out to “accepted science” in everyday life, especially environmental rules and permitting that can quietly make housing more expensive and land harder to use. Then we land on what we call the way out: money. We argue that fiat incentives, opaque spending, and revolving door politics reward corruption, and we explore why Bitcoin, crypto custody, and a public ledger appeal to people who want verifiable transparency. We close with a quick detour into UFO declassification and what government disclosure could mean for public confidence.

Subscribe if you want more long form, no fluff breakdowns, share this with a friend who’s tired of narrative spin, and leave a review with the one topic you want us to dig into next.

Transcript

Cold Open And Morning Banter

SPEAKER_21 0:26

The revolution is gonna be for sure. It's the little guys, the little guys take the money every peasants, ma'am. We're just peasants. Every one of us. You watch those old movies, you see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning, peasants. Welcome to another episode of The Peasants Perspective. So glad to have you guys here today. Pray the Rosary Daily, you made it. It's Thursday. She's first. Pray the Rosary Daily. You're not usually the first one up. I like it. I like it. Bright and early. What were you saying, Ron?

SPEAKER_28 1:14

I gotta give her a special one here. Oh, a special, a special good morning. Takes me a while.

SPEAKER_21 1:18

It's like Ron's favorite thing. Typing in good morning to everybody who says, Good morning. You know, we would probably have like five times the show if we broadcasted later in the day, but then we couldn't be real people with real stuff to do. Oh man. Good morning. Carlito and Tiffany. Good morning, y'all. Carlitz, good morning, everyone. Glad you made it. Glad you made it. This is a good day. We're winning, Ron. We're winning. You know why we're winning? Yeah. We're winning. Rinning. I'm gonna need to do some diction this morning. We're winning because you guys joined us for the simultaneous sip, and we have a great president in the White House. Yeah. All you need for the simultaneous sip is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tacket, a chalice of stein, a canteen, jugger flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better, and it's the simultaneous sip. And it starts right now. Uh oh. There's always one, there's always one thing. Although we've been pretty good the last week or so. Okay, okay. Now we're back. We're back here. Let me get this reset. All right, simultaneous sip, and it starts right now.

SPEAKER_30 2:29

Like him or not, any fair-minded person would have to conclude that President Trump has oranges the size of beach balls. Um he he he uh he truly is tough as a pine nut. And what I've learned.

Rapid Fire News Wins

Supreme Court Ends Racial Gerrymanders

SPEAKER_21 2:53

Mr. Beach Balls, tough as a pine nut. Oh man, what a funny guy he is, Senator Kennedy. Let's see. Pony boy, good morning. Glad you made it. Pray the rosary daily. I feel like this time I like this time slot for your show. I know that's the feedback I get. The regular listeners just probably wouldn't make it at 3 p.m. or 7 p.m. or something like that. I actually really enjoy it. I I like getting in here, getting this show done. You know, every day when we turn the show off, it's like, hey, I accomplished something. That's right. And I didn't have to do push-ups. And I didn't have to do push-ups. Although sometimes I go to the gym beforehand. Although this week I haven't gone to the gym. I did sit, we have a home sauna, we have an infrared sauna, and uh we had it uh disassembled for a little bit, but it got reassembled. So this week I've been sitting in the home sauna in the morning. It's hard not to do. I have a home gym too, and I sit and stare at the thing and I'm like, I just work out here. I have to go to the gym. All right, so in the last 24 hours, some big things have happened. So this is actually yesterday, so at this point, we'd be like the last 36 hours. So the Supreme Court of the United States ended race-based gerrymandering. What? We'll talk about that. The Florida House passed new congressional districts, taking at least one seat away from the Democrats. Trump Fed chair Kevin Walsh was approved by the Senate Banking Committee and is headed to the Senate floor and will get approved. And he is pro-Bitcoin. In fact, he holds like a hundred million dollars in crypto assets and ownership. I think he has to divest himself from all this, but you know, ownership interest and a bunch of level one and level two uh layer transport things. So big time pro for Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. So that's pretty awesome. James Comey was indicted. That was exciting yesterday. A Fauci aide was indicted, a top aide, by the way. That's pretty big deal. I wonder if he'll flip. Fauci told me to do it. Indictments for a TPUSA assailant. Remember, there was an assault on some TP USA members, they were indicted federally. That's a big deal. Trust me, you don't want a federal indictment. They're no fun. So that was posted by Mark Meadows, and he basically he's saying, We're winning. Oh, that's good news. You know, sometimes it's hard to feel like you're winning, you know. Uh Senator Mike Lee said something. You know why Republicans tend to always coalesce and work with the Democrats more than the Democrats ever work with the Republicans? He said it was because of the White House press corps. He says, You got all these reporters who are all far lefties walking around in the halls of Congress catching the Republicans on gotcha questions. And he said, you know, what happens is all they hear all day long is why are you passing Inflation Reduction Act? Don't you want Americans to get some relief? You know, price of eggs are too high. Like every question they ask is premised around some left lefty talking point. And he says it gets in the Republicans' heads. He says, I can't prove it, but I I see it, you know, like the Republicans just they want to be liked. Everybody wants to be liked, you know. Not everybody's like Donald Trump with, you know, oranges the size of beach balls. So all right. So yesterday the Supreme Court released an opinion eliminating racial gerrymandering.

SPEAKER_31 6:06

Every week. Yes, there was a question before the court as to whether or not a state law in Louisiana uh intentionally created a second majority minority congressional district in violation of the 14th or 15th Amendment, specifically whether or not they created a district that would help African Americans in two separate parts of Louisiana. The justices have rendered the decision. Shannon Bream is now live, going through it, and she has the verdict. Shannon, good morning.

SPEAKER_11 6:39

Good morning. Okay, so this at first flush here is a win for the plaintiffs who were not black plaintiffs. They were non-minority voters who challenged this decision. These two uh districts that were minority majority, essentially, Louisiana had drawn up districts, and then they were told in a legal battle that they had not represented black and minority voters sufficiently. They went back and drew a second district. So they had two of these minority majority districts. Well, then non-black voters sued and said, this is now violating our rates, uh our rights on the basis of race. So it looks like this is a 6-3 decision. There is a one concurrence here, but it looks like the descent sticks together with justices uh Kagan, Sodomayer, and Jackson.

SPEAKER_21 7:20

Of course. Of course, the three super far lefties voted against it. Of course. Ron, do you want to come play with the lighting here? Oh, yeah. Now that now that the sun comes up earlier, I feel like I get flushed out earlier and earlier. All right, you guys will. Okay, so well, I need Ron over at the switchboard. So that's better. That feels better to me. All right, there we go. A little bit softer lighting. Okay, so Hakeem Jeffries. What did Ron DeSantis call him? Dollar store Obama, right? Or like I can't remember, it wasn't Tupac Shakur, but he had some. APAC. What was it? APAC. APAC Shakure, APAC Secure. So he had a press conference with all of his minority, majority voters here. This is like what? The Democrat Black Caucus back here? Doug Wyatt, good morning, glad you made it. Democrat Black Caucus back here. So he's big mad, Ron.

SPEAKER_16 8:10

I mean, we're gonna hear from him a couple times today. Today's decision by this illegitimate Supreme Court majority strikes a blow against the Voting Rights Act and is designed to undermine the ability of communities of color all across this country to elect their candidate of choice. But we're not here to step back, we're here to fight back. Now, when this decision came out earlier today, it's an unacceptable decision, but not an unexpected decision. Because this isn't even really the Roberts Court. It's the Trump court. And what we would expect from the Trump court is an effort to continue their scheme to suppress the vote and rig the midterm elections and beyond. Because these extremists have failed America in every possible way. They failed on the economy, they failed on health care, they're failing as it relates to this reckless and costly war of choice. The extremists have completely and totally failed America. So they've concluded, aided and abetted by the Trump court, that they have to cheat to win.

SPEAKER_21 9:29

You know, it's his cadence, right? Like the Obama cadence, but he's got that annoying kind of it feels so manufactured. This guy, so have you ever seen pictures of uh Hakeem Jeffries on the street?

SPEAKER_28 9:43

No, I try not to.

SPEAKER_21 9:45

So Hakeem Jeffries, let's see if I can get some funny pictures of him. So when you see pictures of him, like just let's see. So I saw, oh, here we go, here we go, here we go. Okay, so Google images, thank you very much. Okay, so this is Hakeem Jeffries. Oh right there. That's that's the man right there. This is this is Tupac cheap shakure or whatever you want to call him here. Oh my look at that! Isn't that hilarious? Thug life. Thug life. How about this one? This is his Instagram picture. This is what makes me laugh. So every time I see these now, I'm like, oh my goodness, that's the guy. He puts on a suit. He gets up there. These extremists, I can't even repeat it. I can't even like mimic it. Okay, so the Supreme Court overturned the Louisiana gerrymandered, creating a second minority district. And this actually has pretty significant impacts. Like, this could be like a 20-seat swing if every Republican state went and redistrict. Even Pennsylvania has two districts that were racially gerrymandered. Like it actually says that in the bill. They're created to basically give black voters a vote. So they have these weird districts that like tie in black neighborhoods.

SPEAKER_28 11:06

Minority majority.

SPEAKER_21 11:07

Yeah, minority majority. So here's here's Manu on CNN talking about this again. Major impacts.

SPEAKER_19 11:21

For sure, Manu, I think it certainly will. So the core bottom line holding of the Supreme Court today is that it is unconstitutional for states to draw congressional maps with the intent to create majority black or majority other racial minority districts. Now, there's a little bit of history that's relevant here to understand what happened. Louisiana has six congressional districts in the U.S. House. And after the 2020 election, Louisiana first drew a map that had one majority black district. By the way, the total population of Louisiana is about one-third black. Now, that was challenged and found to violate the Voting Rights Act because it did not adequately represent the black population of the state. Louisiana then went back to the drawing board. They came up with a new map that had two majority black districts. That was then challenged and went all the way out to the Supreme Court today. And the Supreme Court said that two district map is unconstitutional description. Look at those districts. They stretch all the way across the state.

SPEAKER_21 12:19

Oh, totally like based on like natural. Like someone up in Shreveport has a lot to vote with someone down in Bat Rue. Oh my gosh. Yes. Seriously, right? Boy, boy. They go there, they go project again. All of their social media posts about the ruling reflected 80-20 of Americans wanting to show their voting ID with comments reflecting. Exactly right. Yeah. So the crazy thing here is okay, well, they go, well, one third of the state is is black, so we need to have two of the six one-third districts black. Do they necessarily live in these districts? I mean, that you know, it's not like they're all concentrated there. I'm sure New Orleans or maybe Baton Rouge has more people. I don't know. I don't know. Again, it's all based on race. Like, listen, a black man can run in any district. Like, there are plenty of black representatives that represent majority white districts because they're good candidates. And there's plenty of whites that represent black districts because they're good candidates. Like it doesn't matter. Same thing with the Hispanics.

SPEAKER_19 13:16

It doesn't matter. Now, let me read you sort of the key holdings. Say this was a six to three opinion with the six conservatives striking down Louisiana's two district map and the three liberals dissenting. Now, the majority opinion was written by Justice Alito. Here's something that he wrote in the opinion. He wrote that section two of the Voting Rights Act was designed to enforce the Constitution, not collide with it. Unfortunately, the lower courts have sometimes applied this court's precedence in a way that forces states to engage in the very race-based discrimination that the Constitution forbids. Meaning, the Voting Rights Act, if it collides with the anti-discrimination provisions in the Constitution, the Constitution wins out. You cannot discriminate on the basis of race. In dissent, Justice Kagan wrote this. She wrote, I dissent then, from the latest chapter in the majority's now completed demolition of the Voting Rights Act. I dissent because the court's decision will set back the foundational right Congress granted of racial equality in electoral opportunity. So Justice Kagan and the dissenters are saying Congress passed the Voting Rights Act. That was intended to protect the rights and the voice of minority voters. And now we are disregarding that. With respect to other states, Mind you, we've already seen Florida and Mississippi take steps to try to redraw their maps to eliminate some of these majority black districts, which will almost certainly have the effect of swinging seats over from Democratic toward Republican leaning.

SPEAKER_10 14:41

Yeah, and it can maybe help the Florida Republicans if those that effort is challenged in court, it seems. How do you see that playing out?

SPEAKER_19 15:00

Yeah, this one's moving quickly. The Virginia Supreme Court heard oral arguments just on Monday, just a couple days after the referendum passed. And this is the referendum that redrew Virginia's districts, congressional districts, to essentially have 10 of the 11 be democratic leaning, democratic favoring. If you look at the Supreme Court arguments in the Virginia Supreme Court Monday, it seems like the justices have a problem with the procedure behind this map. Basically, to make a long story short, Virginia was supposed to wait 90 days between passage of the law and beginning to vote on the referendum. They did not wait those 90 days. So the justices of the Virginia Supreme Court seem to voice real concern with the procedures behind this referendum. We should get a ruling fairly soon, but don't be surprised if the Virginia Supreme Court strikes down that 10 to 1 redistricted map and makes Virginia go back and do it again. Hot dog.

SPEAKER_21 15:57

We're winning, baby, right? I mean, Horkin Jeffries, he thinks that the Republicans are winning. Check this out again. Same same press conference. If you don't think that Donald Trump has, you know, oranges the size of beach balls, he's taking on all of the little centers of power that these guys have.

SPEAKER_16 16:18

And now we're at a point where affirmative action is gone, diversity is gone, equity gone, inclusion gone, racial tolerance gone, the Voting Rights Act largely gone. But guess what, extremists? We're still here, and we're not going anywhere.

SPEAKER_21 16:38

For at least one more election cycle. That doesn't sound like a party that's winning, if you know what I mean. It kind of makes you think maybe the media kind of pumps them up and makes them a little bigger than they are. But the reality is they had gerrymandered seats. Like they're not the majority. I say this all the time. Virginia abandoned the racial stuff, and they just went, listen, we want to restore fair elections. There's a lot of Democrats in the state, and we want to represent that. I mean, it's like at this point, you're gonna have minority majority party districts, is what you're gonna have.

SPEAKER_28 17:10

Exactly.

SPEAKER_21 17:11

Here's Hakeem Jeffries on with Jen Saki, one of the collaborators in the Russia Gate collusion and one of the enablers of Joe Biden. And again, big mad about all this.

SPEAKER_16 17:20

Because they are doing everything they can, it appears, to artificially give Donald Trump a Republican majority in the Congress and in the Senate. Which, of course, he's at risk of losing because his presidency has been a disaster, and the Republicans have been nothing but sycophants and rubber stamps for Donald Trump's extreme agenda. We're gonna make sure that there's a free and fair election in November. And this voting rights decision by the Supreme Court has come late enough in the process that I agree entirely with Mark Elias that at the end of the day, at best, it may give the Republicans an additional seat or two in advance of November of 2026, and then we got to battle it out in connection with 2028.

SPEAKER_21 18:06

Hmm. Very interesting. So it sounds like long-term between the correction of the census, between the redistricting that's gonna happen between now and 2028. We might rule for a thousand years, we might rule for a thousand years. We might have saved the republic. Yeah. Now, Hakeem Jeffries and the Democrats have long been planning this, but every time the Supreme Court comes out with a decision against the Democrats, it's like full-on nuclear warfare. I mean, these guys just want to blow up the court. It's ill, he called it illegitimate. Keep in mind, Donald Trump has honored it. Donald Trump doesn't exactly love the court, right? I mean, Donald Trump's super big mad about the tariff deal and stuff like that. So these guys can do nothing that satisfies either party. As it should be, as it should be, right? That's why they get lifetime tenure. They don't they can be immune from the politics of every single election cycle. Thank goodness. But if the Democrats get in power, they will do the exact same thing that FDR did. Pack the court. Now, FDR struck a deal with the chief justice in order to get all of the New Deal legislation through the Supreme Court by agreeing not to pack it. But there was a plan to pack the court. And if the Democrats take power again, they absolutely will pack the court by first getting rid of the filibuster and then ramming through their agenda.

SPEAKER_28 19:25

And so isn't the pack the court thing just like um a way to like leverage and make sure they get the position they want without necessarily actually packing the court?

SPEAKER_21 19:36

No, they'll well you mean as a negotiation tactic? Yeah. Okay, that's how FDR used it. Okay. But he would have packed the court had they not passed his agenda. Okay. There's nothing in the constitution that says you're going to have nine justices. In fact, for a good portion of our country, we had like seven. And so then we added a couple. So you could they want to add like two for every president, and then they'll do like a tenure form. Like they really want to change it to where that whatever the current party is in power, they can get a majority on the Supreme Court, which then would basically allow all their legislation to get through. Um, you know, there's not an unreasonable argument that nine justices really can't represent 350 Americans minus the 100 million illegal immigrants. You know, I mean, there there isn't, there isn't it makes sense. Like we had nine justices when there were 30 states, and now we have 50 states. Maybe we need more justices. I don't know. But the problem with this is anytime you tweak something like that, you change a generation of decisions because it will take, you know, 40, 50 years for there to be parody on the court again.

SPEAKER_28 20:38

Yeah, it changes the dynamic of the nation. Big time, right? Exactly.

SPEAKER_21 20:43

So, but Hakeem Jeffries, he's threatening it.

SPEAKER_16 20:45

I mean, they're gonna do it, and so the guy's falling apart, the MAGA majorities in Congress are falling apart, the Supreme Court is a disgrace, and Ben in the new Congress, we're gonna have to do something about this Supreme Court, and let me be very clear everything is on the table, everything to deal with this corrupt MAGA majority that is issuing political opinions that are designed to bolster the prospects of the Republican Party, and we will not allow them to succeed.

Court Legitimacy And Packing Threats

SPEAKER_21 21:18

I wonder if everything is on the table. You know what I mean? Well, he said all out warfare everywhere all the time. Yeah. As regards to dist redistricting, it's pretty pretty sketchy there. Pretty sketchy. So James called me yesterday, right? He was indicted, news media is like freaking out. Well, now we get a little bit more details because now that I think yesterday he stood before the judge, did his arraignment. I had like I had visions yesterday that they would wait the 72 hours, it would take him into the weekend, which then would put him into Monday because the weekends they just like pause the clock. Sure. I was like, how cool would that be if he sat in prison for for jail for like five days and all by himself? Oh, that would be oh.

SPEAKER_18 22:00

Oh, that would be so amazing.

SPEAKER_21 22:02

I don't think it happened. And I actually don't know the status. I don't know what his terms were. Maybe, maybe, maybe uh during the next video, I'll ask Rock so I can give this update. But Shipwrecking Crew off X, who is Shipley, he was a former prosecutor, retired, and then he kind of came out of retirement to help January Sixers. And he represented some 90 of them. And most of those cases he took pro bono. So this is someone who uh has quite a bit of bona fetis. He's an interesting guy. Lots of uh like Julie Kelly and him kind of get into it back and forth quite a bit on X from time to time. But he said this uh Jim Comey sent a text message to his book agent that reveals uh he says hypothetical here, that did not include uh and did and includes a portion that says words to the effect of quote, imagine if someone did make another attempt to assassinate him now, that picture would go viral and book sales could go through the roof. Oh my gosh. So what happened was James Comey wrote a fictional story about the FBI going after a popular radio show host who is inciting the right wing of the country, aka Alex Jones and aka James Comey. So it was a fictional story about James Comey getting Alex Jones, right? When you read the book, that's what it is. And apparently that did happen. There's little or no basis for believing there is there's more evidence that would provide substance to the indictment, would invite you to oh, that's that was his repos to this Andrew Steele guy. So that's seems to be what probably happened in the background. Alina Abba, remember her? She was Donald Trump's attorney in a couple of his trials. She was then appointed as the U.S. attorney in New Jersey, couldn't get confirmed, and then the judges threw her out, and it was like this whole debacle. Well, she was on with the view and being asked about this because they're like, isn't this free speech? And didn't James Comey says he doesn't know what 86 men means and stuff like that. She did a good job defending this. And it turns out after James Comey posted that 8647, somebody posted 86 Alina ABA and actually got arrested.

SPEAKER_04 24:08

Related to an Instagram post of seashells. Um, an Instagram post that he deleted the very next day and apologized for. Uh, do you think Comey's post uh rises to the level of a criminal threat against the life of the president and supports an indictment?

SPEAKER_13 24:24

I do. I'll explain why. Um, after Comey's post, and this is where I go back to Saturday's events, the responsibility of certain individuals like us, we all have a very big voice. He is a former FBI director. He knows what 86 47 meant. There's no question about it. He actually went on TV later.

SPEAKER_04 24:42

What do you think 86 means?

SPEAKER_13 24:44

Oh, shut up to kill the president. To get rid of the president. That's what it means. But wait, his words not mine. If you look at his late night show.

SPEAKER_04 24:50

But the diction the dictionary disagrees with you on that. Well, he's the FBI director. But use it in restaurants. Do they mean to kill?

SPEAKER_13 24:57

I mean, you can make it responsibility. A gentleman posted that about me. He posted on Twitter 86 HABA. And he was also charged. He was charged in Florida and he was held accountable because you cannot do it. Now, this is an FBI director. We have responsibilities. You guys have responsibilities not to call the president certain things or say things that could incite violence. I most certainly think after Saturday, I have a completely new perspective on how important our voices are and how we use them. Can I mention one thing that Matt Gates also used that 86 many times and nothing happened to him? Well, I think we look at everything. I'll be honest with you, absolutely everything is in context. I don't think anybody is immune to it. I don't think we should be sitting here and well, nobody has condemned Jimmy Kimmel for his comments.

SPEAKER_04 25:45

Those were despicable. Uh Joy pointed out earlier, and um the president uh also uh posted death to Democrats. Do you think the president should be held responsible for that?

SPEAKER_13 25:55

When you I I'll do respect if you haven't seen that post, I will tell you what I did. It does exist. Okay. What I can tell you is this. And what and who was the attorney general and the DOJ at that point? Probably Pam Bondy, no. Here's how I feel about this. Here's directly how I feel about this. Nobody should be inciting violence. Period.

SPEAKER_04 26:20

Including the president.

SPEAKER_13 26:21

But you have to remember something. The Department of Justice brings real cases. We are not Jack Smith, we are not Leticia James, we bring real cases amidst people.

SPEAKER_04 26:30

No, I know. I was I I actually had the pleasure of serving as a former federal prosecutor. Uh which is shocking. The Department of Justice. But let me ask you this. Um, I do believe that uh this is uh a vindictive prosecution against uh Comey directed by the president. Um and so far with with little pro success because he's done this many times. Um, as Trump's personal attorney, you actually were sanctioned nearly a million dollars for filing uh a frivolous civil lawsuit against Comey, against Hillary Clinton and others, that a federal judge called political grievances masquerading as legal claims. So why should anyone believe this pattern of targeting Trump's enemies is about justice and not revenge?

SPEAKER_13 27:16

If you think that the Russian collusion hoax, if you think that the things that we've now seen evidence of in this Department of Justice aren't real, I just tell you to sit tight because things are coming. Because what they did was weaponize. I don't want to hear about weaponization because the reason you all know who I am is because of weaponization. I sat through targeting people saying we're going to get Trump, and then a Hillary Clinton-appointed judge sanctioned me for suing Hillary Clinton. By the way, I'm proud of that. Well, I'm proud of what I did.

SPEAKER_21 27:47

Actually, he was appointed by Bill Clinton. Whatever, right? So the weaponization of government against Donald Trump and people in general, this is not a new thing, but it took on in a completely new flavor under Donald Trump. I mean, it was just an all-out campaign to get Trump at all costs. And it doesn't matter what they said, it couldn't be bad. If you were talking against the orange man with beach balls the size of oranges or oranges the size of beef balls, I always get stuff flipped around like that, right? It was it was justified. But if you spoke out against Biden, if you spoke out against the Democrats in any ways, it was amplified to the umpteenth degree.

SPEAKER_28 28:25

Yeah, you're just a racist.

SPEAKER_21 28:26

Yeah, you're just a racist, and there's really no accountability. I mean, here's a clip, a dual clip from Nancy Pelosi. Again, the hypocrisy abounds in politics. This is not a new thing, and it definitely can happen on both sides. Rhetoric is tricky, right? When are you just doing rhetoric and campaign speech? I remember reading about uh the campaign between Thomas Jefferson and John Adams. They ran for president after George Washington stepped down. Okay. And there's I can't remember which one it was. I can't remember if it was Jefferson or Adams that said it, but he said, if the other candidate wins, there'll be hermaphrodites running through the street and like assaulting people. It was like, what is this? So it was like a different word, and like we don't really use the word hermaphrodite. We say things like trans, you know what I mean? But I was like, wow, this is not like a new thing. You know, people will die if this other president is elected. You know what I mean? So it's not new. Rhetoric is rhetoric, political free speech is political speech. And I oppose the idea that every veiled threat, like I think it's okay that Hakeem Jeffries says it's total warfare everywhere all the time, with regards to redistricting. Okay, great. You know, I get the clarifier. You don't want to say total warfare all the time, everywhere. It can be taken out of context. Clarify your speech. But here's Nancy Pelosi again, total double standard, total double standard. When Trump says it, must be held accountable. When we say it, we can't be responsible for what people do.

SPEAKER_12 29:57

This is violence against women. He may not know that, but when he says things like, I want to protect women, whether they like it or not, that is violence against women. Would you want your son to say that to anyone? Would you want your daughter to be told that? Would you want your husband to say that to you, whether you like it or not? Violence against women. People don't have any intention of saying something that's going to lead to something dangerous. But we cannot take responsibility for the minds that are out there and how they hear it.

Comey Indictment And Political Rhetoric

SPEAKER_21 30:34

In the previous clip, I want to protect women whether they like it or not. Right? Protect women, whether they like it or not, whether they like it or not. Like I can't, I can't be responsible for how people interpret my words. Oh my goodness. So the other big thing yesterday was we had a top Fauci aide that was indicted as well. Oh. So here's here's the thing. When it comes to the COVID vaccine, up till now, there has just been no accountability. Yeah.

SPEAKER_28 31:04

I mean, we talk about attention now.

SPEAKER_21 31:05

Yeah, we talk about J6 and all these other things and no accountability, but there's been incremental moments of accountability. But when it comes to COVID, there's just been an omer tall and any talking about it. Republicans got behind it, Democrats got behind it big time. Donald Trump, you know, kind of got behind the vaccines. He took, he and his family took the vaccine, at least Ivanka did. And uh he took it. I mean, he took something. As far as we know. Yeah, exactly. Now, I have a lot of grace for Donald Trump in that in that. I think he was consistently being given bad advice. You know, you didn't have John Rich in the White House explaining COVID and the mark of the beast to him during his presidency. You had Anthony Fauci and all these allegedly credible people that were coming out of the medical industry that was just surrounded by sharks. Yeah, surrounded by sharks that up till then, these people at CDC, NIH, like, you know, you want to replace people. No, these people are untouchable, they're scientists. It's totally credible. Here's Ron Johnson in the Senate yesterday, and we're starting to get this stuff. Again, for some of us, this is like old news. For some of us, the moment they said, come get your shot, we're like, not doing it. Always a problem. Don't force me to do something, don't extort me. Like that alone was enough, right? Just the signal of it. But the science behind it took a long time for us to figure out. I don't know if there's snake venom in the shots. I mean, that was a thing going viral for a while. I have no idea. I'm not a scientist, right? I just knew that the coercion that they were doing was the problem. And even if the shot was perfect and caused no side effects, don't force me to do something.

SPEAKER_28 32:39

But hold on. We already knew that that couldn't be true because how good is the flu shot every year?

SPEAKER_21 32:46

Hence the reason you're forcing me to take something that up till now, everything you've ever forced people to take has been ineffective, or you're giving me syphilis. Like tusky, tusky-e experiment. Anyone, anyone? I remember when I was uh arraigned in Tacoma, when I was brought before the judge, it was during COVID, and uh when I was in there getting my mug shot and DNA swabbed and fingerprinted and all that stuff, one of the marshals who had brought me in was standing there, and you know, everybody had to wear a mask and the whole thing. And they go, Hey, are you getting the vaccine? Are you getting the shot? And this marshal goes, Oh, blank no. Because I was in the army during Desert Storm and I had anthrax side effects from the anthrax that you ain't never taken a blankety blank thing the government wants to force into my arm. Oh, blank no. And I'm sitting there just like, okay. You know what I mean? Like, can I go home now? Yeah, you and I probably agree on a lot of things, Mr. Marshall. I'm glad you brought me in. Can I go home? Yeah, can I go home now? So here's Ron Johnson exposing that the medical establishment knew that there were side effects. They knew it. They performed autopsies, they absolutely knew that the vaccine was very damaging to youth and children.

SPEAKER_27 34:04

Apparently, within FDA, you're reviewing, I think it was 96 autopsies of child death following the COVID mRNA injection. Uh, in that memo, Dr. Prasad writes, This is a profound revelation. For the first time, the U.S. FDA will acknowledge that COVID-19 vaccines killed American children. Healthy young children who face tremendously low risk of death were coerced at behest of the Biden administration via school and work mandates to receive a vaccine that could result in death. In many cases, such mandates were harmful. It's difficult, it is difficult to read cases where kids 7 to 16 may be dead as a result of COVID vaccines. Oh, it's just an acceptable cost. You know. Was it an acceptable cost?

SPEAKER_28 34:49

No.

SPEAKER_21 34:50

Now, if you look back at this time frame, here's Barack Obama and Anthony Fauci pushing the vaccine that they knew was going to cause death.

SPEAKER_14 35:00

Thanks to the work of the Biden administration, Dr. Fauci, we already have millions of kids around the country who have gotten vaccinated, which means that if you're still thinking about it, you know, get informed, talk to somebody you trust, your family doctor, your pediatrician, a school nurse, get more information about it. They'll tell you it's safe, it's effective. This is uh this vaccine is tailored for uh kids, and uh then come on down and find a spot to get vaccinated.

SPEAKER_21 35:34

In that memo, can you believe that? It's safe and effective, it's tailored for kids. I want to remind people there's never been a government in the history of the planet that is not killed, tortured, abused, and harmed its people. Never, including the United States of America, obviously. Okay, not all governments are inherently evil. Some are more bad than others, but the nature of government is power. And how do you maintain power? You take out opposition to power. This is it doesn't matter if it's the boardroom in a corporation, if it's gov the halls of government. Power is power and it seeks to protect itself and coalesce that power and concentrate that power. Period. So by nature, we as Americans have to learn from the spirit of 1776, right? Our founding fathers were brilliant and they were genius because they diffused the power. They made it very difficult for a king to arise, they made it very difficult for one man to wield power. And because of that, it allowed Americans to become complacent because you could have a tyrant get elected to Senate. You could have a tyrant be elected to the House. You even could get a tyrant on the Supreme Court. You could have a tyrant elected to president. But they didn't have the ability to make things happen without everyone else's signature on documents. And you know what I'm saying? They diffuse that power. But over time, what's happened is that power has concentrated. There have been moments like the Chevron Deference case. Defer everything to the executive agency, let them make the rules. Legislature just sets the direction. We want clean water, executive branch, go figure it out. We want people to be healthy, executive branch go figure it out. And how would the executive branch go figure out a mandate that says we want good health? They might say, well, let's kill all the unhealthy people. Okay. And there's very little accountability. And of course, everybody in the executive branch is accountable to the president.

SPEAKER_28 37:37

And it's effective.

SPEAKER_21 37:38

And it's effective. Yes. Safe and effective method to get rid of, you know, disease, kill the diseased people. So this is, we as peasants have to live with this reality. There's going to be someone in charge. There is a necessary need for government. It restrains our vices, it protects our private property. Ideally, it would protect our fundamental rights. Okay. So we have to be suspicious of government. We the people hold ourselves to the standard. You and I, Ron, you're innocent till proven guilty, right? We cast a cloak of charity on our neighbor. We treat them with kindness. Now, if they do something wrong and we can prove their guilt, then we have a cause of action. But when it comes to government, I need everybody to comprehend this. They are guilty till they prove themselves innocent.

SPEAKER_28 38:26

Yes.

SPEAKER_21 38:26

Everything the government is trying to do, you must assume has nefarious intention. Do not believe, just because your neighbor got elected, that somehow their benevolence is going to carry over to government. Once you get into government, there are stakeholders, there are machinations, there is money, there is blackmail. All those things become very, very prevalent. So when it comes to government and the people in government, they are guilty until they prove themselves innocent. We have to shift that burden. You have to think that way. Everything the government wants to do from a small county zoning regulation, you have to go, how does this hurt me? What are all the possibilities that this could hurt me? Because there could be a very squeaky minority that is trying to take your land or take your rights or take something from you.

SPEAKER_28 39:21

And the owners should be on the government entity to demonstrate how it's a benefit to you and all how all the negative impacts have been mitigated. And they should be doing that in and in a way that that makes sense if you were a four-year-old.

Fauci Aide Indicted And Vaccine Fallout

SPEAKER_21 39:35

Exactly. And don't just read the titles. The Patriot Act, this is going to protect patriots and allow us to come after you, right? Go read the bills. Actually, get, I mean, here we are having this huge discussion in Congress about FISA. And it's like, you know, we chapped, clapped, and cheered right after 9-11 when they passed the Patriot Act. How about the Obamacare Act, the Affordable Health Care Act, which has done nothing but cause health care to become unaffordable? Nancy Pelosi, well, we have to pass the bill to know what's in it. Of course. They are guilty until they prove themselves innocent. It's that is has to be the assumption. And here's Ron Johnson continuing in the Senate going over the actual list of known side effects that the FDA, CDC, NIH, they knew this. So while they were pushing vaccine mandates, while they were telling people they couldn't go back to work unless they got the vaccine, while they were sending uh removing members of the military, the uh uh warriors of conscience. And these are not potential side effects, these are known. These are known side effects, right? And we saw signals like with the VARES database where you report side effects, which we knew from previous reporting, only about 1% of side effects got reported. Most doctors don't even know to report. Okay. And so they saw the signals, and then they could see the actual data of what was happening in the list of side effects, and they still kept pushing the jab.

SPEAKER_27 41:13

Here's the sheet. These are the adverse events that they were showing a safety signal for using the new method, Bell's palsy, sinus rhythm, cardiac failure, chronic, acute left ventricular failure, adonal rhythm, which is severe arrhythmia generally occurred at the at the end of life, pulmonary infarction, cerebral artery occlusion, aortic stenosis, sudden cardiac death, hypertensive emergency, basal ganglia stroke. Now these aren't minor. Remember, we're always told these are you know uh adverse events are rare and minor. These are not minor adverse events, and this was these safety signals were showing and they were strong, but they were being hidden because FDA officials refused to acknowledge that the current system they were using was invalidated. And they had to look at the new system that unmasked these things. Our report goes on to detail how federal officials refused to acknowledge these res revelations or take action to warn the public. Instead, senior FDA officials repeatedly stopped to stop, repeatedly tried to stop Dr. Sharfman from continuing her work or commuting communicating her findings outside of FDA. In September 2021, Dr. Marks informed Dr. Patricia Savazzoni, the then director of CEDAR, that Dr. Scharfman, who was a Cedar employee, quote, has been asked to cease and desist conducting her data analysis. Dr. Marx complained that Dr. Sharpsman's work was had become, quote, a major distraction, that her efforts could create erroneous conflicts that feed to anti-vaccination rhetoric.

SPEAKER_21 43:05

Can you believe that?

SPEAKER_28 43:07

Of course we can. I can now.

SPEAKER_21 43:09

Of course we can. We live through it. This anti-vaccination rhetoric. Listen, I'm not anti-vax. I just want to know why people are dying. I want to know why kids are dropping dead on soccer fields. I want to know why Justin Bieber got Bell's posy a week after he got his COVID shot and had to cancel his tour.

SPEAKER_28 43:26

I'm getting to the point where I am anti-vax, and I want the government to do that thing where they demonstrate where it's all safe and effective for real.

SPEAKER_21 43:34

You know, it's interesting. Recently there was someone talking about the vaccine industry, and they're like, you know, the greatest example of vaccine success is the polio vaccine. You ever seen the chart of polio?

SPEAKER_28 43:43

Yeah, that's why I'm like, this is bullshit.

SPEAKER_21 43:46

Polio was entirely resolved. It had become a non factor.

SPEAKER_28 43:50

Right.

SPEAKER_21 43:50

It is a virus that pops up through the millennia, it does its thing through the population, people build up an immunity to it, and it goes to zero. It was At zero. And then the polio vaccine was released and got all the credit for your natural immunity. Oh, polio works. Let's do it.

SPEAKER_17 44:09

Right.

SPEAKER_21 44:09

The only vaccine that I've ever heard of that actually works is the smallpox vaccine because they literally took a smallpox pus tuwel off a cow, drained the pus, and put it in you, and your body fought it. Right. Right? It's the chickenpox idea. Someone in the neighborhood gets chickenpox. Let's have a slumber party with the kids. Let's get this over with.

SPEAKER_28 44:30

Well, that's why people were having COVID parties because they thought that we'll do the same thing.

SPEAKER_21 44:35

And it worked. Because your creator gave you an amazing immune system. I was in the septic industry for over a decade. Okay. I went, this is this is this is kind of a super immune. Huh? You're super immune. Super immune. Okay. Prison is like a petri dish of garbage. You have half the population in there is from third world countries, totally different disease sets, totally different natural immunity, and they bring all kinds of stuff. And then you're in this concentrated little area and you don't get exposure to the outside world. You don't get to eat dirt. You don't get exposed to stuff. And so viruses and sicknesses and conjunctivitis go through prisons and jails like nobody's business. And you're in closed-quarter cells. Well, they they try to keep it sterile. And so, you know, yeah, breeding sterile. Sterile is like, you know, I don't know about sterile. But point is, is in prison, everybody's sick all the time. Like it just we in in spiritual.

SPEAKER_28 45:33

Well, that's what that was my point. The sterile environments become the breeding grounds for all the bad bugs.

SPEAKER_21 45:38

Yes. When I was in prison, we joked because the kennel cough, the spring filled kennel cough, would flow through the prison about every month. It was like there was a week where everybody and then it would go away. And then another week. Right. It was just like constant. I had I had cellmates that would get sick about every month and a half. I never got sick. Not one day. Not one time did I have to go on sick call. Not one time did I spend the day laying in bed. Not one time did I get the kennel cough. Totally above it all. That's from years of standing in septic tanks to this day. My just like two weeks ago, my family went through the whole virus cycle, and I'm like, totally fine, right? I guess maybe we need to like start passing out Taylor vaccines. Taylor vaccines. All you got to do is go to your septic tank, give a ladle, put it in your jambalaya, you'll be fine. Your body will figure out how to deal with every bacteria, every virus, everything.

SPEAKER_28 46:35

This is not medical advice.

Why Government Must Prove Innocence

SPEAKER_21 46:36

Not medical advice, although good practical advice, not medical practical advice. But seriously, right? Through years of being daily exposed to raw sewage, I and other people in that industry develop a pretty strong immune system. So highly recommend you let your kids eat dirt. Lee Zeldon was before the, I think he was before the Senate. And he's talking, he's talking about climate change and that entire agenda. But this entire theme of listen, you have to stop trusting these people that have agendas, people that make a profit off one crisis to another, government who coalesces power, rules, regulations from one crisis to another. You have to start asking how many of these crises are manufactured. So here's Lee Zeldon really ripping these guys apart. When predictions are made in the past. That was Taylor speed there.

SPEAKER_18 47:28

Slow it back down to normal human speed. When predictions are made in the past, uh, science uh will have a range of the pessimistic to the optimistic. And in order to justify, for example, the 2009 endangerment finding, they were adopting the most pessimistic views of the science. Now, when you get to 2026, great news, you're able to rely on present-day facts in 2026 rather than any bad assumptions from 2009. And just because you take exception when a member of Congress says in January of 2019 then 12 years the world's about to end, if we're sitting here today saying, well, gosh, it's only four years and nine months left. I don't think the world is about to end. They want to vilify you as if you're you're denying science. I mean, I just saw a clip yesterday where Al Gore was uh was talking about global freezing. I'm like, I I'm having trouble keeping up. I thought it was global warming and now it's global freezing. And I don't know what kind of a grift, I don't know what kind of money is is made. You want to talk about how making money off of a climate grift. Well, what won't get referenced by your colleagues on the opposite side of the aisle who bring up the greenhouse gas reduction fund is that the money was going to former Obama and Biden officials. Uh, the money was going to Democratic donors. Uh the the the conflicts of interests that we saw, the uh amount of self-dealing, the unqualified recipients. Uh Climate United Fund CEO was a special assistant in the off in the OMB during the Obama-Biden administration. They received$6.9 billion. Maybe you could go down a list with that, and today you could go through the coalition for Green Capital about a Biden Harris climate advisor serving on the board, joining the board in 23 while the organization was applying for GGRF. Uh power forward community CEO, CEO of Fannie Mae during the Obama-Biden administration. By the way, if we had 10 more minutes, I could just go through conflicts of interests. They're not offended by that. So we we just want to stick to the truth. We want to stick true to the science. And if you don't agree with them, you don't follow their logic, well, they'll want to vilify you. Um, but hey, as long as we stay true to these facts, it's good to get good to go. And I'm not gonna take morality lessons from people who join all you know all white country clubs.

SPEAKER_21 49:51

He's talking to Sheldon Whitehouse, who was like, You're denying climate. He's like, You're denying the racial diversity, Mr. Ron. You've run into this here locally in our in our county with the quote accepted science when it comes to wetlands and stuff like that. Talk about that for a second.

SPEAKER_28 50:07

How ridiculous it is. Well, I will talk about that for a second. Let's talk about science, period. So, science. Um switch the camera to you. Science really only works and it's a function of assumptions. You have to assume a bunch of things when you're in talking science, and some of those assumptions have to look, Taylor. Why do you make an assumption in science? In science, to fill in a gap. To fill in a gap and to cover a bunch of things that are variables that you don't know. There's a whole bunch of variables. What are those variables that you are assuming out of the science? They're biology. It's God. You're assuming God is out. You have to assume no God in order for science to work. And so science is a man-made creation that I believe is basically you know, this this world is Satan's domain. Science is Satan's domain for real. Yeah.

SPEAKER_21 51:12

Because it takes God out of the equation, and it and it it injects man's reason and logic, and we fail short.

SPEAKER_28 51:19

We we fail constantly.

SPEAKER_21 51:21

You look through history, and it's like, you know, for a long time they thought the earth was flat, and then science said it was round, and now we know it's Carlito. You're gonna jump in the chats there, just kidding. No, but seriously, you're absolutely right, right? They call it God of the Gaps, and then human fills it in. Rather than saying, hey, we don't know, we need to keep just looking, we need to keep discovering, we need to keep thinking about this, we fill in the gaps.

SPEAKER_28 51:43

And it has so think about the story of um the the priests that lit a fire to Ball, right? And they lit this, they lit this huge fire, and and how did they do it? We don't know, but probably had something science related because when the priests of God lit their fire without any science, the priests of Baal were like, we don't know how they did that.

SPEAKER_21 52:07

Yeah, we don't know how they did that exactly. Exactly. Uh uh Carlit says exactly, Ron, we are in Satan's little season. And Ruth Frederick said, Flat. So there you go. Okay, so I I remember, you know, in the septic industry, one of the things we want to do is protect groundwater. That's like another whole point of the septic industry. We don't just want to dump our sewage into your local stream that runs onto your neighbor's farm or whatever. Right. Give it enough time to filter before it gets back. Makes perfect sense. Makes perfect sense. But you'll have certain regulations that have direct impact on the buildability of your property. And I always think about this when it comes to wells and septic. Okay. Obviously, it makes sense. We don't want to put our septic system right next to a well head. Yeah. Not a complicated thing. So then how far should we put it away? Because you have these lots, they have boundaries that have been created on where you can have it. So your well has to be on your property, your septic has to be on your property. Makes sense. So how far away should we put the two? Well, as a conservative approach, they just decide it's got to be a hundred feet. Well, it's actually not a conservative approach. Oh, here's what they did: there was a big study in Pennsylvania where they did. They experimented with well heads and septic systems, and then they tested the water samples, they tested the well sleeving to see how much sewage was making it down, and they determined that under every condition, every condition, 20 feet was adequate.

SPEAKER_28 53:31

Okay.

SPEAKER_21 53:32

20 feet away from a well head, your septic system, there's enough dirt, there's enough distance and everything that well, the hundred feet would be conservative, then it'd just be overly conservative. It'd be five times what you needed. Here in Washington State, I sat with some of the guys that were on the committee that decided to make the current well standards. It's currently a hundred feet. And so they looked at that study, they had the information, and they go, Well, you know, what ifs? But listen, these guys did a pretty comprehensive study. 20 feet was more than adequate. They had positive results at five and 10 feet. Okay, but 20 feet was like, hey, there's no system, there's no sewage strength that at 20 feet, if the system's working, is going to be adequate. Well, well, if the system's working, all right, so let's double it. So they doubled it to 40 feet. And then they they broke and then they came back like eight months later. And then someone goes, Well, we need to double the amount. They doubled it to 80, as if they'd forgotten that they'd already doubled the amount. And then they said, okay, let's add a certain percentage, and they just rounded to 100 feet. So now you have to have a well a hundred feet away from your septic system. But here's the thing: once they put it 100 feet, that doesn't work for a lot of lots, right? You got a one-acre lot, you put the house in the middle, the well, like sometimes it just doesn't work. Oh, but that's okay. You can pay us money to get a waiver to go down to 75 feet because you're impacting the environment. Exactly. You can get down to 50 feet. You can get down to pretty much anything if you just pay them enough money, right? Now, what's the science? 20 feet. What's the restriction? 100. It those rules make some lots unbuildable, which decreases your private property values, things like that. That's the kind of nonsense. The accepted science. Accepted science is 100 feet. Why? Because a couple guys made some assumptions, forgot about the previous assumption, doubled it again, you know.

SPEAKER_28 55:15

And also, there's like a thousand of these rules, and every single one of them makes your cost house more, your house cost more. Significantly more. Every freaking one of them.

SPEAKER_21 55:24

So the association of realtors locally did a study in kit in our county, Kittsap County, what the cost of building was. And they figured one third of the cost of building was due to environmental regulations, building code regulations that are completely unnecessary. One third of the cost of housing.$600,000 house, you're paying$200,000 in completely nebulous, ineffective, extra costs for permitting, regulations, studies that tell you nothing.

SPEAKER_28 55:52

And most people that have probably gone through a permit process can understand what I'm going to say here. You're going to apply for what you want to do. You're going to go through a whole bunch of bulk rap and pay a bunch of money for people to go pick it apart and go, ah, you can't do that. You can't do that. Yeah, okay. Well, and then finally you get to build the thing, and in the end, you built the house you wanted at the beginning, but you paid all this money. You paid a whole bunch of extra money, and you spent like an extra eight months waiting, and then you had to eight months or longer.

SPEAKER_21 56:25

Yeah, yeah. Right now, in the federal government, there's Lee Zelden talking about that. Look, there's conflicts of interest, they're literally making money. The world's gonna get too hot. Pay Obama's advisors so they can make the world less hot. Okay, the world's getting colder. Okay, pay someone else's advisors so the world's getting colder. And then we find out about the kickbacks. Conflicts of interest almost always equal kickbacks. Here's a local Democratic uh um senator in the state of Iowa at a private fundraiser. Okay, private fundraiser, just like we showed Byron Donald's yesterday. Go buy shares in his company so you can have access to him so he can direct, you can be on you know, the people who direct the state. Here she is making an open admission that she doesn't even know who she is.

SPEAKER_07 57:09

In my life as a state legislator, there are times when I'm very clear that I'm doing the church thing, I'm the minister, and that's what I'm and there are times when I know I'm the senator and that's what I'm there for. There's a lot of times that get kind of mushy and kind of confusing, like today. I'm not really sure who I am right now. I'm kind of all things. Uh yeah, sometimes I can tell by the outfit I'm wearing or my name tag, but or who's paying me. But um but other times it's it's hard because all of these things they connect and they, you know, they get a little messy.

Regulation Science And Property Costs

SPEAKER_21 57:43

So sometimes I don't know who I am. Sometimes I'm the like the minister, sometimes I'm the senator, depends on my name tag, my outfit. I don't even know who I am sometimes, who's paying me? I wonder how much God pays her. Did you get that? Who's paying me? So, what if you have your senator name tag, but somebody's paying you and they want you to do something as a senator? Do you get it, you know? Right. This is why you must assume they're guilty. They must prove their innocence. Show me that you're working on our behalf. This is why our political remodel campaign, which we're gonna have a pretty significant kickoff this weekend with the take my cut my take back my county camp uh podcast. We're gonna do a whole separate series on that. This is why it's so important that we form a contract with our politicians. They need to define who they are. And when they're in that position of politician, there's only one person that matters, the constituent. The constituents that voted for you. We have to have a written contract. This is what you will do, this is what you won't do. Sign it. That way we can hold them accountable. Otherwise, they can be like, oh, I'm I'm representing you as a senator, it's retail politics, I'm kissing babies, shaking hands, but behind you, you've got some stakeholder that's paying you. And then when you go to vote, who do you work for in that moment? I don't have a problem with Byron Donald's having a private business. I don't have a problem with Byron Donald's having people buying stock in his private business. But if buying stock in his private business gives him access to his decision-making and deliberative process of being governor, which means that cuts my access out. That's pay to play. When she says, you know, who's paying me determines who I am at that moment, that's a problem. Because I don't think putting on your Senate name tag is enough to separate you from those interests that are buttering your bread. You must assume they're guilty. It's the same thing with the COVID. We find out Anthony Fauci's part of Moderna, right? We find out, we find out all these people that come out of big pharma and big medical, go into FDA, CDH, and then go right back in. Who do they actually work for? Hey man, you're the president of some big pharmaceutical company. We need you to take a sabbatical and head over to FDA and get some of the stuff that you started and are working on approved. And then when you're done with your term there, go ahead and come on back here and you'll get the payoff and the reward. You see what I'm saying? Absolute revolving door. Now, this Minnesota fraud, right? The daycares, the hospice cares, and all that kind of stuff. We know because we literally have a recording of Keith Ellison taking campaign contributions from some of these fraudsters. And it gets even worse than that. The fraudsters themselves knew they were committing fraud. Take a listen to this. This was yesterday in the House of Representatives, the Minnesota House of Representatives, reading disclosed messages between fraudsters when I was showing a text conversation between the owner of the center and a friend.

SPEAKER_29 1:00:45

A friend had asked the owner how much longer are you going to do the daycare scam? The owner replied, another year or two. I'm going to buy some nice homes in Nairobi. The owner was on public assistance at this time. They happened to be on vacation in Dubai when this text conversation took place.

SPEAKER_35 1:01:07

I mean, the audacity of all of this, Lisa, is just something something to behold. And yet, with all this evidence out there, it took this long to finally start taking people down.

SPEAKER_23 1:01:19

It did take this long. And thankful to the FBI and the DOJ for coming into Minnesota and finally starting to protect our taxpayer dollars.

SPEAKER_21 1:01:28

Ruth uh redfridge. So on was it Monday, the Learing Center got rated. They rated 20 different facilities, and then they raided some more people yesterday. So people have been putting cuffs this week. Yep. Right. And there were a couple that were prior to that, too, that were some egregious cases that apparently had been brewing since before Nick Shirley started doing his thing. So there's starting to be a little bit of accountability. But Ron, you we have to remember in all of this, this is we have to walk a really fine line because you know the Somalis built the economy of Minnesota.

SPEAKER_34 1:01:58

So Minnesotans, I mean not Minnesotans. Somalis brought more than just more than just built the economy. They didn't just build the economy, but we contribute to the soul of this great state. And I want to remind you that no human is illegal, Jeffrey. You are not illegal. Our neighbors are not illegal. And yeah, thank you.

SPEAKER_21 1:02:26

Listen, no human is illegal. On that we can agree, but you can do illegal things. Trust me, I know. I walked on the Capitol lawn. Okay. Trust me, I know you can be a legal human being in an illegal location. Okay. So tip uh uh JD Vance is in charge of the fraud task force. They also had a huge takedown in California this week. They arrested, I think, 20 individuals down there with hospice fraud. And according to Mement Oz and others, they're ramping this up. Like this is starting to be a huge focus this year, and they're gonna campaign on it. Republicans are gonna campaign on the anti-fraud, taking out the corruption stuff. Excellent. Love it. Prove to us that they're doing it wrong. Show us, show us the cuffs, right? Arrest these people. And here's JD Vance being asked about Tim Waltz and Keith Ellison because we have Keith Ellison on a mic taking a kickback, right? Arranging to make an investigation go away with a campaign contribution to follow. We we know that for a fact. There's almost zero chance, there's almost zero chance with these fraudsters openly talking about the daycare scam, that they weren't paying off these politicians. They genuinely believed the Somalis and the people who kind of were doing this mostly in Minnesota, that they built the economy. And you know what? It makes you actually wonder how much money was going into that local economy through these scams. Makes you really wonder what what economy does have Minnesota have without government scams?

SPEAKER_17 1:03:58

I don't know.

SPEAKER_21 1:03:59

It's kind of scary. It's hard to imagine the scale of this. I mean, you're talking like multiple Fortune 500 companies based in your city and that type of revenue coming into that town. Apparently, a lot of it was leaving the country, like houses in Nairobi, too, right? But how much of that money made its way back to politicians? How often did politicians write legislation and allow this stuff to happen? Because, like the state senator from Iowa going, who's paying me?

SPEAKER_28 1:04:26

Well, how often did they write legislation that opened the door for this stuff to happen?

SPEAKER_21 1:04:31

And will there be accountability? J.D. Vance confirms Waltz and Ellison are under federal investigation.

SPEAKER_05 1:04:38

Do you expect some type of accountability beyond political, some type of accountability for Attorney General Ellison or Governor Waltz?

SPEAKER_37 1:04:49

Well, we have to follow the law where it leads. And what we know is that there were multiple Minnesota authorities who were turning a blind eye to this fraud. Uh what we don't yet know is whether they knew it was going on as it was going on, but that's one of the things that we're looking at with these investigations. We're not gonna, you know, we're we're not gonna let anybody who committed a crime off the hook. And in fact, if you're a senior officer, if you're the attorney general or the governor or any other elected official, we're gonna look extra hard at what you knew and when you knew it and how connected your actions were to this fraud scheme. But it's part of the reason why we're serving these warrants, Will, is because of course, people don't come out and tell you, oh yeah, I knew that the quality learing center was committing fraud and people were getting rich off of it, and I did nothing. People don't say that. So we've got to do the investigatory work to understand what was known, when it was known, and by whom. That's a big part of the reason why the fraud investigation, these warrants that we saw being served all across this the city of Minneapolis, why that's such a big deal, is because we're finally starting to really get into the nitty gritty of what we knew, of what people were involved in this fraud scheme. But regardless of whether there was criminal Wrongdoing on behalf of the governor. Of course, like I said, Will, we're going to let the law make those determinations. We know that he turned a blind eye towards this. I mean, you have people, Will, who came into this country, many of them illegally, and six months later they're driving Mercedes, despite the fact that they don't have a job. That doesn't happen without some defrauding of the American taxpayer. The fact that they turned a blind eye towards it for so long is a scandal. We're also going to find out whether it was criminal.

SPEAKER_21 1:06:28

Yeah. So trending on X right now is crimes against humanity. And it's it's it's basically all about Anthony Fauci and this guy who was indicted. Wow. Very interesting. Crimes against humanity. Wow. Okay. So were they turning, were they just turning a blind eye? Is that criminal? I think so. Were they complicit in it and taking kickbacks? Is that criminal? I think so.

SPEAKER_17 1:06:52

Yeah.

SPEAKER_21 1:06:53

You know, the scale of this is hard for us to imagine, Ron. It's hard for us to imagine. Like the amount of money and the amount of criminal activity, the amount of cover-ups. Do you remember when Nick Shirley started doing his thing and then one of the leering centers, you know, one of these places, the guy gets up and goes, someone broke in last night and took all of our uh employee records and all of our payroll records and all of our uh Yeah.

SPEAKER_28 1:07:19

Remember the one that where they uh broke through the wall right into this saved all their stuff.

Pay To Play And Minnesota Fraud

SPEAKER_21 1:07:26

I imagine these guys had a head up. I imagine they've you know shredded and burned things, which then you know, watch for the charges of destroying evidence. The bank records, they don't they can't destroy those unless somebody at the bank is complicit. I saw I saw somebody post yesterday, the lawyers and accountants are as guilty as the fraudsters themselves. They know. There's just no way, there's no way that these guys were not in on it. Yeah, absolutely no way. So uh Scott Bessant was on uh Fox Business and he's talking about Jerome Powell. So Jerome Powell gave his last press conference yesterday. Interest rates are gonna stay high, didn't drop them. Okay, interest rates are gonna stay high. Again, there's an there's an argument for and against interest rates. If you're in Trump side of things, you want interest rates to go down to juice the economy. If you're on the good financial soundness, you should probably put interest rates at about 400% so we can suck up some of this inflation and this liquidity. Okay. So there's an argument both directions, but Jay Powell is doing something really interesting. He's not leaving. Usually, once you're the chairman, when you're done, you leave. He's gonna stay on the board of governors. So he's still gonna have a vote in things. And he cited the fact that because they're under investigation, he has to stay to resolve the investigation. AKA, what's happening here is somebody clearly is getting a kickback. Look at the way Tom Tillis from North Carolina just freaks out about all this stuff, right? I'm not appointing anybody unless the investigation's been dropped. Well, Judge Boseburg basically stopped the subpoenas, and and so the investigation was dropped. Tillis is now essentially allowing, acquiescing to Kevin Walsh being appointed, but Jerome Powell is gonna stick around.

SPEAKER_02 1:09:12

Secretary, um, we look forward to the Kevin Walsh era at the Fed. I know you've been a big supporter. Unfortunately, today, ungentlemanly, Jay Powell has decided to stay on as a governor. It's only the second time in 113 years. I don't know why. You know, let's just say why did he have to do it? Why not just leave it up to uh to Kevin Walsh for a new era?

SPEAKER_38 1:09:37

Uh well uh Larry, I I want to come back to the the warshed, but I I will say it it's highly unusual what chair former chair, soon to be former chair Powell, did. And Larry, to be clear, uh the last time that a fair Fed chair stayed on the board, it was at the request of the president. Yeah. And I I think one thing I can promise you is President Trump did not request for Jay Powell to stay. I think it's highly unusual for someone who says he's an institutionalist and cares about norms at the Fed. This is a a violation of all Federal Reserve norms. And I've got to tell you, also, Larry, I I think it is an insult to Kevin Walsh, Mickey Bowman, and Chris Waller to think that these other Republican nominees do not care about the institution of the Fed and that he alone can maintain the integrity of the Fed. We've had the worst inflation perhaps in our country's history, uh certainly in 47 or 50 years on under this chairman. And I think the good news is uh today Kevin Kevin Ward cleared committee. He's gonna be confirmed, he will be uh the new Fed chair on time uh May 15th, May 16th. And I think it's gonna be a new day at the Fed. And again, all President Trump wanted was accountability. We're gonna get an IG report on the building. That's that's all we ever asked for. And you know, I I think that we we will have a great monetary policy. I think we will have great management in terms of the regulatory and of the facilities.

SPEAKER_02 1:11:23

We'll leave it there. Thank you ever so much, Treasury Secretary's.

SPEAKER_21 1:11:26

So we're gonna get a new Fed chairman, but just like any organization, you got one boss, and then he steps aside to a less, you know, he's not the boss, but he moves to the board or whatever. Guess what? Everybody's still gonna treat him like the boss.

SPEAKER_28 1:11:42

What I wanted to say about this was, and I don't know anything about I haven't not been following this. I don't know who Wash or Warsh or whatever his name is. It doesn't matter. What is is important is that this guy is gonna stay on the board, like you said. And why is he doing that? And he's doing that because this is my feeling, this is speculation on my part. He's doing that because that he needs to maintain continuity of something that is off books and is not something that the the new board would be able to explain or figure out without him there, and he needs to be there in order to corral everybody, like, well, we did it like this because we needed to make it look like this. Yeah. So Tom Tillis. Regardless of all that, he should just step away and let the new people take over exactly because it should be able to stand on its own.

SPEAKER_21 1:12:33

Now on the board of governors, we have Lisa Cook, who has been fired by the president for mortgage fraud, right? But won't step down, won't leave. Because the Federal Reserve is a quasi-government agency, aka it's a private trust established on Jekyll Island in 1913.

SPEAKER_28 1:12:49

The more, the more these people that won't step down, the more this whole thing needs to be thrown out.

SPEAKER_21 1:12:54

Yeah, I know, right? Hey, we're gonna talk about Bitcoin at the end of the show because that's our out. Again, this is incredibly important. The significance of Warsh being appointed to the Federal Reserve is he's a pro-Bitcoiner, pro-cryptocurrency guy. Okay, personally has huge holdings there and is very affirmative for that. That's a big, big deal.

DC Jail Rights And FBI Warnings

SPEAKER_28 1:13:18

That is a big deal. Um, but Jerome Powell staying on is like cringy.

SPEAKER_21 1:13:24

Yeah. Now, something is happening with the Brian Cole Jr. case, the January 6th case. Yeah. So this happened with January 6ers. I experienced it myself. Did he did he get released? No. Okay. But what's going on is at that gulag in DC, they have a real problem with allowing inmates to have access to their attorneys. We know for a fact in the Proud Boys case that the privileged attorney client phone calls were being recorded and monitored by the prosecution. Absolute violation of your fundamental rights, violation of the bill of rights, violation of the law. Okay. They actually put things in there into motions. They bugged the attorney's laptops, right? This was a huge violation. And the judge just goes, meh.

SPEAKER_28 1:14:12

How come these guys never get charged with crimes for doing that? I just don't understand.

SPEAKER_21 1:14:17

There's a phrase I say, there are no laws that are only cops, right? Because apparently the law doesn't actually matter. There are no laws that are only cops. So his attorneys have filed a uh emergency motion to permit a contact legal visit. Of all the rights an accused person has, he has the right to represent it by counsel of the most uh far the most pervasive. Okay, accused person has the rights to be represented by counsel is by far the most pervasive for its effects, his ability to assert any other rights that he may have. Um so it goes through to describe how that's well established, you're supposed to have it, and it goes on to explain that uh counsel initially were forced to wait for nearly an hour for unknown reasons. I sat in a holding cell for six hours while my attorney and the probation officer were waiting on hold. And they were told repeatedly, because they'd call from, you know, they were on their conference call, they'd call from the cell phone to the jail. Hey, is Taylor gonna be brought in? Yeah, yeah, yeah. We're gonna go get him. I sat for six hours in a set in a cell with no access to phones or or even a clock to know how long I was in there. Okay. Sat, sat, sat, sat, and then the guy came and got me, goes, I'm taking you back to your to your block, to your cell. I'm like, but I had a I I had a call. Like you brought me from there for a call. You never came and got me for the call. Totally missed it. It's the one and only grievance I ever filed in prison. Is it your custom of this prison to prevent you know me from having my legal visits? And the answer is clearly yes. Same prison, same jail. I was there. Okay, they're doing this to Brian Cole right now. And so they they prevented him from having a visit. And what visits he's he's had, he's been Mr. Allen was forced to sit inside a lock cage, five-point restraints, and speak over a phone. This guy was free for five years. And now they're putting him in four points. This is this is we're talking like completely strapped down to a chair for his legal visits in a cage. Because he's that because he can build pipe bombs in prison.

SPEAKER_28 1:16:24

Right, because he's like a Hannibal Lecter. Come on.

SPEAKER_21 1:16:28

Council were forced to sit in an open lobby area with the jail staff and other attorneys standing nearby who could overhear the entirety of counsel's side of the conversation. When the council asked for an explanation, Captain Haney, I know Captain Haney, I know who that is. I have met him. Okay.

SPEAKER_28 1:16:45

Is he a good dude or a bad dude?

SPEAKER_21 1:16:47

He's a he's a employee? He's an employee. He's a bad dude because he does the bidding of the prison. Captain Haney advised that it was administrative at the direction of the warden. That's who Captain Haney is.

SPEAKER_28 1:17:02

Okay.

SPEAKER_21 1:17:02

Captain Haney will do whatever the warden says. He's cool with the inmates. He's the one who told me, hey, your books aren't coming. Have your people, they're white, call the jail. And if there's anything that makes the jail jump, it's when white people call in. Okay. He's also the one who said he was grateful that we were even in there because they cleaned up the jail to a huge degree because of all of our complaints. He says, This prison's had black people for 30 years, ain't a damn thing been done. You guys show up and in one year we're like mopping the floors. It's all raw sewage in the floors, right? Oh my gosh. So Captain Haney, not a bad human, but he's an employee. Absolutely. All right. Right? Council's inability to have privilege and confidential conversation with Mr. Allen is an obvious and grave violation of his rights under the Sixth Amendment. The absurdity of an initial attorney-client meeting in front of a correctional staff and unrelated attorneys had no stated purpose and was characterized merely as administrative. As the court is aware, the DC jail has housed many high-profile defendants, but none to counsel's knowledge have been denied this essential right in the manor counsel experience. None? None? You should go look at the other January 6th cases. So they're asking for the permission to have an attorney client visit in private. Makes perfect sense to me. Speaking of employees, Dan Bongino was on the Sean Hannity show and he explained this when it comes to Russia Gate, right? There are employees that know what they're doing is wrong, but they do it anyways.

SPEAKER_32 1:18:25

This thing was bullshit from the story. I know we that's not the that's not the story. You knew Russia hoax was bullshit. Everybody knew it was bullshit. The PP table that's that's not the point. The point is they knew it was bullshit. There is no way they thought this was real.

SPEAKER_21 1:18:42

This thing was bullshit. There was no way they thought it was real. Uh I'm doing this for an administrative reason. Captain Haney, you took an oath too. You took an oath too. You could tell the warden might cost you your job, but at least you could die with some integrity. Right? So here's Dan Bongino, same podcast, talking about how he fears for his safety if power ever shifts back to the Democrats. Oh. You hear what Hakeem Jeffrey says? If I was a Supreme Court justice, I'd fear too. If I was any Republican, this MAGA extremist, I'd fear too. We know what they did before. Well, he did say everything is on the table. Everything is on the table, including re-education camps, concentration camps, oh boy, arresting the masses, going after Catholic nuns. Talk about that in a second.

SPEAKER_32 1:19:33

But listen, what I I will never be the same, and I'm being as serious as a stroke right now. I'm really I'm scared, man. Like I know I know what I did, and I'm proud of my work, and I'm proud of what me and Cash accomplished in the past year, beyond proud. Um I know what we did, I know what's coming, I know what I started, and some of it's I know what I laid out, and I know it's all you saw a lot of these cases coming out over the past few days, even. But don't think for a second that I don't think every day, and this is what's really sad, and this is why I know, and I never thought this after reading them on Friday night, that they're gonna come for me. And uh listen, man, I'm not it's not a sob story, I knew what I was getting into. But it happened to the president, and he went through just the worst the just destruction of his civil liberties, civil liberties I've ever seen. But I say to my wife all the time, I know Sean, I can look you in the face as a friend, tell you and your millions of viewers and listeners, I promise you everything I did, I did with a dotted eye and a cross T. I brought in my own attorney from the outside, a person I trusted, a wonderful, wonderful person. I said, No, everything is gonna be by the book. Everything. I'm confident in that. And you know what? It don't matter. They'll rewrite the book, just like they did for President Trump. And I said to my wife, I said, you know, I got a 14-year-old. The presidency could change. I hope it doesn't in in a little over two years. You don't think on election night, if we lose, like it's not going through my head like they're gonna send some thugs to my house. I was never the same after that because after reading what I read about how many people did this to President Trump, this Russia hoax collusion, crossfire hurricane bullshit, and not a single person stopped them. I'm terrified that they're just not gonna do the right thing when they're in charge.

SPEAKER_21 1:21:37

But listen, there are no laws, there are only cops. You have to assume the government is guilty before you can assume that they're good. It's that simple. It's like an easy mantra. Guilty, the government is guilty till they prove themselves innocent. It's a conservative approach. Yeah. So here's a picture that Eagle Eye Ed Martin, right, weaponization attorney, pardon attorney, posted. And in this picture, you've got in the highlighted circles, these are oath keepers. Okay, these are these are people affiliated with oath keepers. And standing here, what do you see here in black and white? Look like some nuns. They're nuns wearing a little Trump scarf. Where is this? This is at the Capitol on January 6th.

SPEAKER_28 1:22:17

Oh, okay.

SPEAKER_21 1:22:18

I didn't know there were nuns there. Oh yeah. Oh yeah, dude, there's so much yes. Everybody was there. This was a slice of America. I mean, there was blacks, whites, Mexicans. I'm sure there were some illegal immigrants in the crowd. You had nuns, you had Baptists, you had everything there. You know, you had everybody there. Huge crowd. When we when we first got back from January 6th, I showed you some of the footage that I took, which is on my laptop that has been blown up, right? But that got blown up by the TSA, by the way, on my way home from prison. I don't know if TSA blew it up or if after we were pardoned, some something on my computer associated with my discovery, you know, fried my computer. But it literally like it worked. We got on a flight, we were on the no-fly list, had to do that whole thing, super duper screening, separated from our stuff, get home, laptop won't even turn on, like completely dead. So this picture here was taken by agents at the FBI. And this is a text message exchange between Molly Gaston, Joseph Cooney. I just noticed for the first time the nuns near the Oath Keepers in one of the New York Times photographs. I know, says Joseph. Molly Gaston says, I would like to take a special assignment of finding and prosecuting them. What? I'm with you, says Joseph. Although I'd like to prosecute any nun who still still wears a head habit.

SPEAKER_28 1:23:39

Ha ha ha ha. What? For what? Prosecute him for what? For being there.

SPEAKER_21 1:23:45

And apparently for wearing a head habit. Okay. And apparently for being a head habit. Here's an exchange. This is from a little while ago. This was a podcast that John Kiriaku and uh I can't remember this other guy, is the podcast host. These are both former CIA agents.

SPEAKER_17 1:24:04

Okay.

SPEAKER_21 1:24:04

Now Kiriaku went to prison because he exposed that the CIA was torturing people. He went to prison for exposing that the CIA was torturing people. This other CIA agent didn't go to prison. Okay. He stayed out of prison and he has this podcast that's pretty large, a little bit bigger than ours, I would say. And they had an interesting exchange here. And this person uh might it's I can't remember, but he does breakdowns of body language and debates and stuff like that. He breaks this down. You need to understand that when people go into government, whether or not they're your neighbors or you think you trust them, you have to recognize that when they cross that threshold, there's other things that are happening behind the scenes that you don't know about. There's other agendas. As Catherine Austin Fitz says, they answer to a higher power, not God, a different morality. Okay. This is exposed here, and he breaks it down really well.

SPEAKER_26 1:25:04

Former CIA agents who are now YouTubers get into a heated debate mid-podcast. And this one gets very interesting.

SPEAKER_25 1:25:11

And why are you working with Russian state media?

SPEAKER_24 1:25:16

Oh, because I've got five kids and nobody's beaten a path to my door to give me work.

SPEAKER_26 1:25:21

We've seen many people in this position being accused of this very thing. He does something unusual and just owns it. Claims, look, I have kids to feed. The government threw me in prison for exposing the waterboarding program under Obama.

SPEAKER_25 1:25:34

That is exactly the foundation for how Russian covert influence operations happen. Aw, poor CIA.

SPEAKER_24 1:25:42

Andrew is kind of taken aback by this. Fuck the American government. What have they done for me? What have they done for my children? Do you really violate my rights? Do you really not know the answer to that?

SPEAKER_26 1:25:54

Come on, man. He doesn't land a single blow in this entire interaction. This is a really interesting game being played here. I would be interested to know how people feel about this. I don't know what the right answer is. It was the CIA that put me in prison.

SPEAKER_24 1:26:08

What in the world do I owe CIA? It was your decisions that put you in prison.

SPEAKER_25 1:26:12

It was the CIA's law breaking that put me in prison. It was your choice to highlight the CIA's law breaking to media that put you in prison. There we go.

SPEAKER_26 1:26:21

And there it is. That is the moment that Andrew lost this thing. It was your decision to highlight the CIA's lawbreaking. When is it okay for a whistleblower to blow the whistle?

SPEAKER_24 1:26:33

Government, I think, uh or the agency maybe would have been perfectly happy if I starved to death from lack of work or ended up at McDonald's. And uh and I worked hard to rebuild my life. Uh, the only people who offered me a job were the Russians.

SPEAKER_26 1:26:53

That seems to be John Kiriaku's message. More information is good. I'm going to use the platform that's available to me. It's up to the people listening to think for themselves.

SPEAKER_25 1:27:02

Your children's, they live every day under the protection of the United States. They have all the benefits of American citizens. They, you're, you get to enjoy. You're here on an American podcast, you flew on an American airline, you're staying in an American protected. What do you think my children's memories are? Police officers driving around the streets right now? All of these people are contributing to the freedoms that you have.

SPEAKER_24 1:27:21

Oh, wow.

SPEAKER_25 1:27:22

All of them. Wow.

SPEAKER_24 1:27:24

And you're sitting here saying you're a true believer.

SPEAKER_25 1:27:26

I'm a true believer in the fact that we we have to serve the American dream. We have to serve the American purpose. That's what we're doing. And that's exactly what I'm doing by opposing the American government.

SPEAKER_26 1:27:39

These two guys couldn't be more different in their perspective on this topic, which is what makes this interaction so interesting.

SPEAKER_25 1:27:45

You don't oppose the American government by making yourself a voice for Russian state media. Why not? Because you're not talking out about the American government, first of all. What you're talking out about is Putin's invasion of Ukraine. No, I talk about the American government every single day. So whatever Whoever you're you're speaking to, you are if you are giving Okay.

SPEAKER_28 1:28:06

My take. So the difference between these two is Kiriaku is being honest. That's it.

SPEAKER_21 1:28:15

That's it. You went to prison because you exposed the CIA's law breaking. Why didn't the CIA people who were lawbreaking go to prison? He went to prison for speaking the truth.

SPEAKER_28 1:28:27

And then totally vindicated. Bustamante's responses was you live under the protection of you know the CIA, blah, blah, blah in America. And I was thinking, you know, you can make that same argument for every illegal alien here.

SPEAKER_21 1:28:44

That is revelatory. You got one guy who's drinking. We have to serve the American dream no matter who we waterboard, no matter who we kill, no matter who we put in prison.

SPEAKER_28 1:28:54

No matter how many illegal actions we take.

SPEAKER_21 1:28:57

All these cops driving around, they're helping you. Dan Bongino, who just left the FBI, who just left the FBI in that same podcast with Sean Hannity, confirms you should never talk to them. As American citizens, here's the FBI. They're supposed to protect you. Don't talk to them. Don't talk to them. All those cops that are driving around, let them go do their thing. Don't talk to them. Don't provide them with information. Don't help them. It's hard, it's hard, it's a hard pill to swallow. But you never know when you think they're coming for truth, and they're not.

SPEAKER_01 1:29:32

They're coming for you. I had two sons that worked for the FBI. They were deity in my family. You know, I had a lot of family that like you, NYPD, my parents were in law enforcement in different ways. They were deity. They made it to that was the top of the top. And one just recently passed away, and he was so disgusted with the FBI. So I had a friend, high ranking, FBI. I'll give you no more details than that. Not the highest ranking, but high where he was. Yeah, yeah. And I never thought anyone would ever say something like this to me. He goes, Sean, if the FBI ever, ever comes to your house for any reason, do not talk to them.

unknown 1:30:15

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01 1:30:16

I wasn't raised. My my natural gut instinct would be, how can I help you? What do you need? He said, They come after you, odds are they're not going to be people that like you. Number one. Number two, you you it's an immediate perjury trap. I'm like, well, I don't lie. I mean, it doesn't matter if you don't lie. You can just say something. It turns out not exactly 100% what you how you remembered it. And if they want to get you, they can get you. And that goes against every fiber of my being. Was that good advice? Unfortunately, yeah.

SPEAKER_32 1:30:59

Shit. I I'll tell you. What does that say? I'm there, I don't know, four or five months or so. And someone, someone we know in the space, or you at least know of, I don't know about how, but you know, called about a very serious, it was like a swatting doxing case. It involved some interstate travel. So it definitely had an FBI nexus. And it was in she she didn't know this at the time, but and I I I didn't tell her, but was involved in a bigger case I couldn't disclose. It turned into an even bigger case later and even involved me. Um, and some doxing done on me. I didn't know that at the time. I call up, I send two guys out there right away. I call up, uh, I forget where it was, it doesn't matter. Talk school or something. It wasn't, but whatever. I say get two guys out there right away. This person calls and doesn't want to talk to them. And I'm like, these are our you asked for help. These are our guys. I had a Sean, I couldn't believe it. I was on the phone like 20 minutes. Like these are our guys. These are our guys, like these are good guys. I would not send two Tam sandwiches over to your house. These are good guys. You I can't help you if you don't want to tell us the details. Getting back to what you were saying, like isn't that sad? Like, I grew up the same way.

SPEAKER_21 1:32:12

Like you had two sons that work for the FBI, but they're guilty till proven innocent.

SPEAKER_28 1:32:17

Yep.

SPEAKER_21 1:32:18

It's it's that simple.

SPEAKER_28 1:32:19

There's not that many FBI agents out there, and if they're talking to you, there's probably a reason. So probably don't talk.

Bitcoin As The Way Out

SPEAKER_21 1:32:26

Yeah. Hey, we're coming because we're investigating something about somebody else. Give us everything you know. And like you said, it could just be a perjury trap. If what you say doesn't help them in their investigation, they'll just turn on you. If you know you know what I'm saying? Like you never know. You never know. You have to be very careful of the employees. As Dan Bongino said, they all knew it was wrong. The whole Russiagate investigation, they knew that all this stuff is wrong, but they'll still do it. Why? Because embedded in there are people who want to prosecute nuns just because they still wear a habit or just because they're standing next to the oath keepers. I mean, this happened, right? Fundamentalist Catholics, homeschool parents, abortion protesters, absolute total targeting. Total targeting. Okay, let's shift gears here. Let's talk about the way out. There's a there's a there's a saying it amongst Bitcoiners, fix the money, fix the world. Much of our problems center around the stakeholders who have money who can pay the politician to represent them exclusively against the constituents for any reason, personal reasons, profit reasons, doesn't matter. Right. And so when you fix the money, one of the great things about Bitcoin is it's a public ledger. If the government pays somebody or spends money and they're using Bitcoin, you're gonna know where that money goes. This is what we have going on at the Federal Reserve right now. Billions of dollars for a remodel that should cost a few million. Where's the money going? Don't know. Don't know, don't care, can't tell you. So fix the money, fix the world. This is Eric Trump talking about how we are on the verge of something huge here, right? If the internet, if Bitcoin was the internet, we're at about 1996 adoption rate, right? I was talking to my mother-in-law yesterday.

SPEAKER_28 1:34:16

This is back when Katie Kirk was talking about what the Google is and the emails.

SPEAKER_21 1:34:22

Google wasn't even around, I think, in 95, right? 96, 97, 96, 97. And so I was talking to her yesterday because she, you know, she was around from black and white TVs till now. And I was like, you know, back in the early 90s, when people started talking about the internet, what did you think about it? I didn't think anything of it. Like it was, what's the big deal? It's not a big deal, right? I'm like, now you can't even go an hour without interacting with the internet. Everything you watch, your cell phone. I mean, the internet is just deeply involved in every aspect of human life right now. So when people are like, Well, what if the internet goes down? Bitcoin's the last thing you have to worry about. You know, how much cash do you have? Oh, that cash is worthless. You know what I mean? Like, you got big problems. Medical industry, everything breaks down. So here's Eric Trump talking about how we're on the verge of something huge.

SPEAKER_22 1:35:11

You know, you literally had Jamie Diamond two years ago that was laughing at Bitcoin, not not, you know, believing in the asset. Now all of a sudden using JP Mortgage Hace. You can go out, you can you know borrow against your Bitcoin holdings to get home mortgages. You have Charles Schwab that's about to, you know, you've seen all the announcements that they've made, but they're about to custody Bitcoin for the first time. This is the low-cost provider of all wealth management in the country with 30 million bank accounts, and they're going all in. You see what they've done at BlackRock, you see what they're doing with all the ETFs that you just mentioned, the most successful ETFs in history. In history, every single one of them that launches has become an incredible success. Now all of a sudden they're adding on top of that, they're adding yield strategies on top of that. Then you look at what Michael Saylor's doing, and he's doing he's a dear friend and doing a phenomenal job. You look at what Simon and MetaPlanet's doing, doing a phenomenal job. You look at what 21 Capital is doing. Guys, they are buying and they are not selling.

SPEAKER_21 1:36:10

You know, you literally had Yeah, there's a huge wave of of money coming into Bitcoin. Now, up until now, institutions that are bankers and things like that have opposed Bitcoin. Do you know why they've opposed Bitcoin? Do you think it's because it's a bad technology? Do you think it's because there's not it's not internet gold and no value? Why is it that they were opposing Bitcoin? You have to understand the fundamentals. Why would they oppose Bitcoin? Because they couldn't make money on it. They were bingo. They couldn't make money on it.

SPEAKER_20 1:36:41

You know, I I think you know, everybody here is is you know interacting with Bitcoin in some way. Everybody here is you know came to a Bitcoin conference, and so you know, when George says, well, it's early, maybe you're like, well, you know, it doesn't feel early. I've known about Bitcoin for five years. Um, but I think the reality is, and this is something that I didn't fully appreciate until kind of sitting on on this side as you know, as an operating company, talking to you know various classes of institutional investors, you know, like 99% of the capital in the world can't buy Bitcoin. They can't even buy Bitcoin ETFs. And George, I think we spoke on this uh on a panel you know two days ago or yesterday. Like these these big pools of capital, trillions and trillions of dollars, have mandates and they can't buy Bitcoin, they can't buy commodities, they can't buy funds or ETFs. They can only do one thing. Some of them are fixed income, some of them are equity investors, some of them are you know long short or convertible arbitrage. And so, you know, a lot of Bitcoiners, including myself, have had this you know, vision or has this thesis that Bitcoin wins and it, you know, hyper Bitcoinization is this event, and you know, at some point Bitcoin's worth a million or five or ten million dollars equivalent at some point in time. But what that actually looks like, right, if you're a Bitcoin maximalist in that fashion, it doesn't happen without all of this happening, right? It doesn't happen without you know big bad BlackRock and the and Wall Street coming in and institutionalizing the asset. Like, what do you think Bitcoin winning looks like? It looks like$200 trillion flooding into the market in in some way or some form. And right, so that's you know, there's private credit, there's there's equity investment, preferred investment, senior debt, right? All of this stuff, these are pools of capital that are latent, that are ready to be tapped into. And right, so the genius of of you know Michael Saylor and strategy from 2020 onwards was realizing that and then creating an instrument for each of those pools, right? And so, you know, stretch is a big, big TAM, right? Everybody wants no volatility and high yield, right? So I think that's the that's the golden goose. But I think you know, a lot of idealist Bitcoiners who think Bitcoin is gonna go to$10 million simultaneously dislike Wall Street or dislike the treasury companies, and that's in my opinion, that's very paradoxical, right? This is this is what Bitcoin winning looks like.

SPEAKER_21 1:39:01

Yeah, and Bitcoin's winning because now they're getting on board. A couple years ago, they poo-pooed it because they couldn't buy it. They couldn't buy it, it competed with their investment products. But now that the market has opened up to them, one after another, you get banks, hedge fund managers, Morgan Stanley, Charles Schwab. They're all like, yep, yep, all of our clients need to hold it because it offsets their losses. And they they figured out how to collateralize it. They figured out how to collateralize it because it's real. Does that make sense? Yeah, so is it too late to get into Bitcoin? No, no, we are at bargain basement values right now. Bargain basement. You know, people who are like, oh, I missed the boat when Bitcoin was a hundred bucks or a thousand dollars. It's like, you didn't miss the boat.

SPEAKER_28 1:39:49

You didn't miss the boat. What I'll say is you will never miss the boat. You just will miss some of the upswing potential.

SPEAKER_21 1:39:55

Potential, but 10x, you buy right now and it goes to where they're projecting it's gonna go. Not me, not some dedicated Bitcoiner that's been in it for 10 years, the maximalists, as they call them. This is what the banks are predicting. They're like, we're buying it because we're attracted to up and right on the financial chart. Okay, because all that liquidity, all that fiat, you know, it's so interesting. Our money is fiat. And this is like, you know, we just talk about the fiat dollar, the fiat economic system. You know what the word fiat is. Like it has one single translation fake. Fiat means fake. It's a nice, proper, nice way to say fake.

SPEAKER_28 1:40:38

The if you ask the uh institutionalists, they will say that it means new, but it's not that's not true.

SPEAKER_21 1:40:45

It's new because we printed it. It's new because money was always real until we created fiat. So it's a new fake money. It's fake money. Fiat means fake. It's a canard, a parse, right? This is hilarious to me. I'm like, oh, you want to go get some of those fake dollars? No, they're real dollars. Yeah, they're real fake dollars. It's like it's fiat. Now, it's not just our financial institutions getting involved, even a country like China, totally authoritarian communism, right? They have banned Bitcoin like 30 times. You can't stop it. And guess what? We just found out this week.

SPEAKER_15 1:41:21

China is believed to be stockpiling substantial holdings as part of a strategic reserve. Just last week, Indo ACOM commander Admiral Paparo stated that Bitcoin has direct implications for power projection.

SPEAKER_21 1:41:32

China is believed to So China's stockpiling it, which is why Donald Trump is adamant that we have to make America the Bitcoin capital of the world because once you understand Bitcoin, it's inevitable. It's a stone rolling, like you just cannot stop this thing. And that's it's it's that simple. Like it's it's very difficult to describe the glaring, the evident when everybody's decided not to see it because you live in a world of fake, right? We spend our whole life chasing around fake dollars, we call them fake dollars, fiat dollars, but yet you can't get it. And as institutions, they've gotten it for a long time, which is why they've poo-pooed it. But now that they can buy it, it's it's gonna go to the moon. China's stockpiling it, which is why Trump is adamant.

SPEAKER_03 1:42:16

I became a fan of crypto, and to me, it's an industry. I view it as an industry, and I'm president. And if we didn't have it, China would, or somebody else would, but most likely China, China would love to. And we've dominated that industry. It's a big industry, by the way. In fact, when the stock market went down recently, crypto and Bitcoin and all of that went down much less than anybody else as a group. Uh, and we've created a very powerful industry, and that's much more important than anything that we invest in. We we invest in it, but really that was an industry that wasn't doing particularly well. I got involved with it a couple of years ago and uh before this whole, before the second term. I got involved before I uh decided to run. I only decided to run because I saw what was happening, and Biden was incompetent, and the administration was crooked and incompetent. And I was in Bitcoin then, not knowing if I was gonna do it a third time. So uh it's become amazing. I mean, it's the jobs that it produces, and I notice more and more you pay in Bitcoin. I mean, people are saying it takes a lot of uh pressure off the dollar, and it's a great thing.

SPEAKER_28 1:43:22

When was that a lot of huh? When was this video from?

SPEAKER_21 1:43:25

Oh, I just deleted it. I could have looked it up. It was from uh about seven months ago. Did you have it sped up? I don't think so. Man, he sounded good. It's Ron, he's got early onset dementia, if you ask some of the Democrat senators for a hockey or a two or uh AirPak APAC Shakur. Okay, so as you can see, nations are getting involved, the big banks are getting involved. Why? Because it's real, it's real, it's the it's a scarce asset, it's a true store of value. It was it was less of an invention and more of a discovery. Even the world's fourth largest economy was on TV yesterday. This is their finance prime minister or whatever he is talking about Bitcoin as well.

SPEAKER_00 1:44:10

Well, I think as far as the crypto is concerned, uh you may know that at this moment I mean the uh um uh the Japanese FSA uh had a special committee to discuss about the crypto uh currencies. And I think there the new uh revision of the law is at the diet. I think you know we will start forming some sort of a product uh about the of the cryptocurrency next year, maybe. So we will do it. And uh other than that, I think you know um prediction market. I think it's that's a bit difficult for us to um adopt in Japan because uh you know, because uh Kleinaro kind of things, you know.

SPEAKER_21 1:44:49

So they're they're poo-pooing poly market gambling, and they're changing the law to allow Bitcoin. Talk about big money coming in, right? Uh you heard Eric Trump saying just a couple years ago that it all the big banks were poo-pooing it. Bitcoin is a true store of wealth. All signs point to this is awesome. For us peasants, if you view it as a tech stock day-to-day, right?

SPEAKER_28 1:45:17

For us peasants, we're we think short term because we've been trained to think short term, because the dollar is more valuable today than it's a million dollars, and I I have but well, we've never been able to save money to long enough to make it mean anything, so we've never really been a saving nation.

SPEAKER_21 1:45:33

And we've convinced ourselves that, and listen, I'm a real estate junkie, right? We've convinced ourselves that real estate's the only real way for us to build wealth.

SPEAKER_28 1:45:40

That's because real estate keeps up with inflation, maybe that's the only thing that holds value, so you're gonna put money into assets like real estate because it holds the value, exactly.

SPEAKER_21 1:45:51

So Eric Trump here is talking about his confidence in Bitcoin. Keep in mind his dad is the president. Okay.

SPEAKER_22 1:45:58

So a long time ago I said that Bitcoin was gonna hit a million dollars, and I I have absolute conviction in my mind that Bitcoin is going to hit a million dollars. I don't know if it's 2030, I don't know if it's 2031, but I absolutely believe it gets there. I believe we're in the infancy. I think our best days are ahead of us, guys. The compression is happening, it's happening right now in ways that so many people can't even comprehend. And I've never been more bullish on this asset class in my life.

SPEAKER_21 1:46:22

Never been more bullish on that asset class. If you're attracted to up and right, Bitcoin's where it's at. If you need fixed income, you're older and you don't want to wait out the volatility till 2030. Go do go do Michael Saylor's ETF, paying 11%. Fixed rate, capital, tax-free. Wow. Right. And in I listened to his whole speech yesterday. It was fascinating. He was talking about he revived an old credit instrument that kind of went away when the railroads all got built, but it's how the railroads were built. Totally legal, a credit instrument. But when we went to a fake currency, you didn't have equity investment at by the people at large. And he's reintroduced that, and which is why it's totally legal. It's just kind of been uh a non-factor because we had fake money. Now that we have real money to invest in, real capital, you're able, he's able to do unbelievable things. Literally, the way the world, the West was settled, the railroad, is the way it was done, and that's what they're doing with Bitcoin, which just goes to show this is going to be the way the new golden age is created. Bitcoin and AI kind of go hand in hand. AI is like the discovery of oil, and Bitcoin is like the railroad to get the oil to where it needs to go. Does that make sense? It it is going to, it is going to uh all the ills that AI will create for us. If we live in a fake money world, it'll be impossible. It'll be impossible to get ahead. We will live in a world of universal basic income to try to just keep you going because you won't be able to have jobs, you won't be able to be productive. But Bitcoin changes that. It recenters AI a little bit to where AI gets directed at creating true value instead of just at duplicating garbage.

SPEAKER_28 1:48:02

And that that um that that condition that you just described where we all have universal basic income, don't get fooled if they start talking about universal high income.

SPEAKER_21 1:48:14

That's Elon's thing. Yeah. It's it's the same thing. Exactly. High, if everybody's on universal income, you're all poor. There's those who have and those who have not. It's that simple. Katie Miller, our local Seattle communist, was asked about this new tax law that we've passed in Washington state, right? The millionaire tax, they say. But what they're doing is they're forcing all of us to file. In Washington State, we have no state income tax. You don't have to file. But now they're gonna re force everyone to file to apply the exemption. And of course, this is creating kind of a flight out of the state of Washington by super high income earners. Well, she was asked about this, and you she had a pretty sad response.

SPEAKER_36 1:48:51

I think the claims that millionaires are gonna leave our state are like super overblown. And if you know the ones that leave, like bye.

SPEAKER_17 1:48:58

Um so my guy.

SPEAKER_21 1:49:04

One of the things you have to recognize is they want you poor. People on that side of the aisle, the Democrats, the Republic, the uh crappy Republicans, the communists, they want the population dependent on them. They want you to believe, like the CIA agent, well, your kids benefit from the system, all the cops and everything. They want you to feel like you need them. They want you to feel like you need them. So if the people who don't need them, the wealthy people who can pay for their own services, who aren't on social services and things like that, if they leave, so be it. One less vote to fight for. Because it's easy to get the votes when all you campaign on is I'll do this, I'll pay for this, I'll do that. It's hard to campaign on fiscal responsibility.

SPEAKER_28 1:49:46

Yeah, when you're all poor and the party is promising you, you know, trinkets and baubles, yeah, you have to vote for them. Exactly.

UFO Disclosures And Nonhuman Claims

SPEAKER_21 1:49:53

So, yeah, no, we want them to leave. We want the flight of capital out of the state so that we have the dependents left. That that you guys, that is what they do. That's what they've always done. Go look at the Soviet Union. They persecuted the kulags. Who were the Kulaks? It was the upper middle class. It was your local grocery store owner. It was your local refactory owner. It was your local, you know, service provider, the people that could make it on their own, that didn't need the state, that provided value to their community members. Total persecution sent them straight to the gulag so that they could take over their stores and make the people who used to buy from them buy from the state. So yeah, no, we'd love to get you out. Yeah, we'd love for Microsoft to leave because then everybody can work for the parks department. That's exactly what they're intended to do. The other thing, too, is the US military has announced that they're about to release all the declassified alien UFO information. Donald Trump commented on this.

SPEAKER_11 1:50:53

Do you have an update on UFO files and what might be what we're going to be thinking about?

SPEAKER_03 1:50:57

Well, I think we're going to be releasing as much as we can in the near future for some reason. And I guess it's just a reason in the minds of people for a long time. And uh anything having to do with UFO or related material that we're going to be releasing a lot of things from. I think someone's going to be very interesting to people. I've interviewed people my first term primarily, but I interviewed some pilots. Very solid people. And they said they saw things that you wouldn't believe. So you're going to be reading about it. Based on things you wouldn't believe.

SPEAKER_21 1:51:48

Turns out she's become quite the quite the proponent of freedom. Like she's she's one of the top congressmen right now in office. She's one of my favorites. Yeah. She was she was talking on the Pod Force One podcast about some of the things that she's seen in Skiffs. So we're going to end the show on this. You ready to have your mind blown? If it wasn't already blown. Okay.

SPEAKER_33 1:52:08

I've seen evidence in a skiff that leads me to believe there are things we cannot explain, and I have observed things that are of non-human origin and creation. That's my opinion. Um again, but there has been a declassification order from the president, and you will see as soon as that stuff comes up.

SPEAKER_06 1:52:26

You know, if you had to just make uh a decision now about whether there really were, I guess, aliens moving among us with their strange machines that have all sorts of powers. Do you think that's plausible?

SPEAKER_33 1:52:42

I don't call them aliens, and I don't know what these things are that they're using, right? Um, but I think that there's stuff that we have witnessed as members of Congress um been briefed on that we cannot explain. And I will leave it at that because that's going to be coming out soon. And I think that the American people will have many of their questions answered.

SPEAKER_06 1:53:00

So you've seen in a skiff evidence.

SPEAKER_33 1:53:02

Uh I can't tell you, I can't tell you what I've seen in a skip because I'll get in trouble for that. Right. But when it's declassified, well, I have to be careful about how I answer it. But when it's declassified, I will um I will have a press conference and I'll show you exactly what we saw.

SPEAKER_21 1:53:16

So JD Vance and others have said they're not aliens, they're demons and angels. And I kind of look at that as like, uh-huh. Like you're trying to you're trying to hold on to a perspective that you know what I'm saying? Like it might be true, it might be the case. Be cautious for those who take those kind of information to corral you. Yeah. So you need to go to church, pay your tithes, and pay because look, now we have aliens and demons. We've always had aliens and demons. Okay. And it very well may be. I don't know. But again, just be cautious of anybody who uses this like climate change or anything else to coalesce, to coalesce us. Uh Pony Boy asks, I'm interested in using Bitcoin instead of a 401k, not fully, but a good portion. What do you think of that? Is that possible? Oh, yes, I absolutely think that's possible. And I think a 401k is the biggest scam in the world. We used to have pensions, right? You work for a company for 30 years and they were obligated to continue paying you in retirement. Well, pensions broke the corporation. So in 1983, they created the IRAs and the 401ks. So now you're responsible for your retirement. Okay. The problem is that whole system is based on fiat. It's all fake. You're, you know, as they print more money, then the market goes up, is and and you can see that there's not real value there.

SPEAKER_28 1:54:37

As the value of your position goes up, the value of the dollar goes down just enough to keep you right where you were.

SPEAKER_21 1:54:43

Yeah, you actually sent me a video this morning, and I'm gonna I'm gonna pull it up because it just turned out to be relevant, pony boy. So this this was a video that uh that uh Ron sent me this morning in those early hours of the morning. Uh and uh this is I can't, what is his name? Ian uh Ian Carroll. He's talking about uh equities and the how the way the banks are positioned. Again, all the more reason why banks are getting into Bitcoin, you should too.

SPEAKER_05 1:55:10

This is released by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City right here. This scratch here behind my head is showing banks' unrealized gains and losses over time going back to 2002. This is the great financial crisis right here. Oof looks bad. But wait a minute. What the fuck is that over there? If you see a circle right here, it annotates that this graph is showing data where they've marked their securities at fair value. That means that the banks that own these assets have had to decide what the assets are worth if they were to sell them. That leaves an awful lot of Google room for them to say that their assets are worth more than they're actually worth, especially if all the banks had to sell all of those assets into the market at loss, all those asset prices would drop off a fucking cliff. So just know that this fucking hole that they're digging over there is a self-reported number. And here's the uh kicker. They found that at third quarter end, 722 banks reported unrealized loss exceeding 50% of their capital. And 31 of those banks report negative tangible equity levels, meaning they are underwater. They're not telling us which banks. They've known this since February, and they've been coming out saying the economy is strong. They even pointed out Silicon Valley Bank in this exact report as their poster child for an unstable situation back in February. Probably would have been good to know that a little earlier, huh? Some of the things they say in these reports are just amazing. Right here. Banks face difficulty in liquidating securities without realizing losses. No shit. That's the definition of a loss. Is when your securities are under this much fucking water and you try to sell them, you're gonna lose money. The bank crisis is just getting warmed up. We haven't even begun to drop off the cliff yet. Uh if your assets are not in credit, crypto, hard assets, diversified in ways that you feel comfortable with, you should probably start doing your research and learning about money right now.

Bitcoin Class Plug And Closing

SPEAKER_28 1:57:36

Or like right now, like yesterday. No, he says, or like three years ago.

SPEAKER_21 1:57:42

Or like three years ago. So the the interesting thing about that, we put the river link in the chat. And for those of you that listen after the fact on audio or on uh video, you can go into the show description and there's a link to River. River is an exchange where you can open an account, it takes five minutes. You can do it from your cell phone.

SPEAKER_28 1:57:57

It's just kind of like opening a bank account. Easier. It's very, very easy.

SPEAKER_21 1:58:02

Easy. Okay, open the account and then you can buy Bitcoin and hold it there. I would encourage you to go to 1776live.us. We're offering a Bitcoin class that is going to explain how to get it into private custody. It is technical, right? You have to have some technical skills. It's not something that's intuitive. There's no hotline you can call, right? You've got to learn how to manage this yourself. So we're we're there to help educate people on how to do this. Because, as peasants, if you're investing in a 401k, that's what you're investing, investing in. You're the one holding all those negative assets that they can't liquidate. And when they do want to liquidate their holdings, guess who they're selling it to? The stockbrokers that are pitching it to you. Uh okay.

SPEAKER_28 1:58:41

At a loss.

SPEAKER_21 1:58:42

At a loss. And you're gonna sit there and pay them market rate, their determined market rate, knowing that those assets are losers. They offloaded corporations' liabilities through pensions to you through the 401k, and they sell you their losses. Okay. When it comes to the stock market, you buy low, sell high. Well, what happens when high is inflated and everybody figures it out and starts selling, right? This is the problem. This is where Bitcoin becomes a true store of value. It's the best hedge against inflation that exists. Better than gold, better than silver, and uh it's going up and you know, up and to the right, as they say on the charts. So I would I mean, uh, you know, far be it for me to be a financial advisor, but when you learn about money fiat money is a Ponzi scheme. It's it's like what that one guy says. People understand Bitcoin, they don't want 1% of their wealth in it, they want 100%. It is the only hedge against that nonsense. You might think a stock is a great deal, or your stockbroker said it's great. Look, Jim Kramer said this is a buying opportunity. No, it's backed by fiat, it's backed by fiat, it's fake. Okay, guys, thank you so much for the show today. I appreciate it. We will see you again tomorrow. Bye.

SPEAKER_09 2:00:23

I'm thirty seven. I'm twenty seven. Well, I can't just call him man, you could say daddy. I did say something about the old woman. But from behind you automatically treat me like an empiricity. Did you get that? Hanging on to a stated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. How do you do, good lady? Um castle is that the Britons. We all are we are all Britons. I am your king. Stop perpetuating autocracy in which the working class is. That's what it's all about. These good people. I am in hate. Who lives in that castle? Who lives in that cast? Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What? I told you. We're in a narcose syndicus commune. We take it in turn to act as a sort of executive officer for the week.

SPEAKER_32 2:01:43

Yes.

SPEAKER_09 2:01:43

But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. I order you to be quiet. I'm your king. The lady of the lake. Signified by define common. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women, not an important distributive source. There's no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the message, not from some flashical aquatic speech. You can't expect to world supreme executive power. Just because some more retards or emperor. Just because some motion beats the symmetry.