The CIA Ran A Brothel And Nobody Went To Jail

They just moved the goalposts again. We’re staring down new Rumble creator program requirements like 75 unique chatters, 500 watch hours, and 20 shorts, and we get real about what that means for small shows trying to grow without turning into a content factory. We also ask for your help in a way that actually matters: show up live at least once, say something in chat, and prove that a community can beat suppression and silence.

From there, we dig into the bigger thread tying the whole morning together: who controls reality. We talk political tribes and the growing population of burned-out independents, then take a surprisingly useful detour through the flat Earth versus globe debate as a stand-in for how evidence, perception, and “expert authority” collide. When information stays gated, regular people can’t build on it, and that’s a power play whether we’re talking science, media, or institutions.

Money is the next pressure point. We break down Bitcoin price drops, why a Bitcoin standard changes your mindset, and why the real risk often isn’t volatility, it’s custody. We unpack rehypothecation, exchange trust, bank-run dynamics, and why “don’t trust, verify” leads back to self-custody. Then we pivot into election integrity concerns, birthright citizenship fights, Senate procedure, and the Save America Act, before closing with a hard look at the MKUltra hearing and what secrecy plus zero accountability does to a country over decades.

If you got something out of this, subscribe, share the episode, and leave a review. What’s one action you’ll take this month to be less dependent on broken systems?

Transcript

Welcome And Peasants Mindset

SPEAKER_21 0:06

And when they went to the green, the hello with Cup Jack had no red. Do you know what's he said?

SPEAKER_30 0:15

Let me take the bomb.

SPEAKER_13 0:20

We're getting screwed, ma'am. Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed. Well, the revolution's gonna be true. It's the little guys, the little guys that take the money of everything. It's gotta be peasants, ma'am. We're just peasants. Every one of us. You watch those old movies, you see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around. We're those people. We're those people. No, no, no, no, no, no. Buenos días, peasant! Buenos. Good morning, peasants. Welcome to another episode of The Peasants Perspective. So glad to have you with me today. For the very few, the dedicated who checked in on me yesterday as I was streaming in the afternoon doing watch parties and I had a bunch of MK Ultra videos lined up. So the funny thing about the MK Ultra videos. So we had to we had to clear out like three and a half hours of streaming yesterday to create the one, which may not have been worth it because I'm about to share with you in the audience our requirements this next month for the creator program in Rumble. Keep in mind, this is a new show. I mean, we've been around for five years. We had a little hiatus while I had to go to prison and we're back. We're we're over 350 episodes, 355 episodes in this year. This is not small. In the podcasting world, yeah, you've got guys out there with a thousand plus episodes. Those are the OGs. Okay. If we'd have continued on our pace, we'd had we'd be at 1,500 episodes or so.

SPEAKER_07 1:54

We do have thousands of hours of streaming.

SPEAKER_13 1:56

Thousands of hours of streaming, to very little avail, by the way. I think, I think if you went up to any podcaster, they're like, Well, what are the keys to success? They'd be like, You just gotta bang it out, man. You gotta put in the hours. Yeah, I'm gonna go.

SPEAKER_07 2:09

You need a 10,000 hours of streaming.

SPEAKER_13 2:11

Yeah, I've got 2,000 hours of streaming. Should that do it? Oh, yeah, you should have a big audience by then. What if it's not? It's like suppression. Suppression. John Attackis, good morning. Pray the Rosary Daily. Happy Wednesday. Just me underscore

Rumble Creator Program Requirements

SPEAKER_13 2:25

P. Happy July. That's one of our locals, Indianola. Yep. All right. So here's the new requirements for this next month.

SPEAKER_07 2:32

You ready for this? Yeah, I'm ready.

SPEAKER_13 2:34

So we have to stream 30 hours.

SPEAKER_07 2:36

Okay. We can do that.

SPEAKER_13 2:38

People say the show is great. It's as good as any show out there. Then I listen to it. I hear myself coughing, breathing, wheezing, snarling. All right. So we have to do 30 hours of streaming. Not a problem. We've been doing that for a while. Last month it was a little bit of a challenge because it took a couple days off. Okay. Total unique chatters. Now we had to pimp for chats. We ended up with 22 chats, which by the way. So this one, this one's a killer. This one might actually get us, Ron. 75 chatters. 75 chatters. So it is the first of the month. We've got eight people on Rumble. I need every one of you write and make a comment. Okay. And every day for the rest of the month. And tell your friends. Okay. Tell your friends. So I need you, the listeners, the dedicated few, those of you that listen after hours, one day this month, you need to arrive on the live. Okay. You need to arrive on the live. Let us know you're alive. Let us know you're there. Make a comment. And we got to get 75 of you. Now, if all the daily listeners comment, this isn't a problem. Over the course of the day, we get plenty of listens. It's a morning show, 6 30 a.m. Pacific time. I get it. It's kind of hard for my West Coast friends. But we definitely need you to make it alive to the live and make a comment. So we need you guys to say hello. Carlitz, good morning. Carlito and Tiffany, good morning, y'all. So 75 chatters this month. Rumble Premium Exclusive Hours we need to stream, five hours. That's been the standard. We usually make it. We can do it. We always make it because we're still on the program. Hours watch this month. Now, this traditionally has been 200 hours, which is fine. As long as we get our 30 hours of streaming and people watch, you know, enough people watch the whole show on Rumble, we hit it. We got to do 500 hours. Whoa. We've hit 500 hours on Rumble at our biggest show, but now we got to hit it. So I need everybody to watch the show to completion. Even if you got to put the phone in your closet and just leave it on play, do it. If you really love us, just as you go to bed at night, mute the phone, hit play, and let it play the day's episode all the way through as you're falling asleep. Just get it done. All right, raids. We got to do our five raids. Okay, we've done that. And now they added another another requirement that was voluntary. We have to do 20 shorts. Oh. Okay. So that is the hardest thing for us because it requires post-edit production, some clipping. That's like real work. No, I know. Not like streaming two hours a day isn't real work. But uh, we got to do shorts. So if anybody out there likes to make clips, please make some clips and send them to me. Otherwise, I have to do it. I don't know when I'm gonna do it. So this may be our last month in the creator program. I think the hardest thing to do is the 75 chatters. I mean, worst case scenario, I could just stay up all night one night and like do the 20 clips, but uh the hardest one's gonna be the chatters because I gotta get you, the listeners, to show up live. So please do. Tomaste. Yeah, please show up.

SPEAKER_07 5:40

Show up in the chats.

SPEAKER_13 5:42

Yeah, we got we got Tomaste. Switched over to Rumble to say hi. Oh, thank you. All right, we're at one, two, three, four, five. We're five, five rumble chats so far, Ron. We only have 70 more to go. Call your friends, wake them up, get them on the show. Let's do this. Let's get let's get our 75 before the 15th of the month. Otherwise, we're gonna be desperate. So I'm already pimping for chats. It's the first. This is gonna be this is gonna be a long month.

Simultaneous Sip And TDS Parody

SPEAKER_13 6:08

All right, guys. I know why you show up bright and early. You listened to me rant about to listen to me rant about the creator program. No, that's not why you're really here. You're here for the simultaneous sip. And all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice of stein, a canteen, jug, or flask, a vessel of any kind, and fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee, and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better, the simultaneous sip. And Ron, guess what? Dr. Trump has a cure for TDS. Oh right.

SPEAKER_17 6:36

Have you or someone you know been diagnosed with TDS? The symptoms can be relentless. Fortunately, I'm Dr. Trump and I have a treatment plan. Let's hear what some of my patients have to say.

SPEAKER_32 6:46

I have been suffering for over a decade, and after listening to Dr. Trump, I can see some results.

SPEAKER_19 6:56

Man, I've been suffering for years. I really didn't believe that was help out there. That was when I came across this video on TV.

SPEAKER_31 7:06

I really thought I was a lost cause. This was gonna affect me for the rest of my life. But after using the treatment plan, I can see a difference.

SPEAKER_17 7:17

I really wasn't sure I could help some of these people. They were so far gone, I wasn't really sure.

SPEAKER_19 7:26

I had no idea how much this was. I just needed help. I couldn't eat. I couldn't sleep. Constantly angry. I made everyone miserable around me.

SPEAKER_30 7:47

I feel like I've aged 20 years in the last two years.

SPEAKER_17 7:50

Thanks, A.

SPEAKER_30 7:52

I've been so concerned. I was really starting to worry about my future.

SPEAKER_17 7:57

The treatment is simple. Turn off. Fake news. Say your prayers, and if you ever feel anxious, just have a diet coke like me, and you're gonna see a remarkable difference in your life.

SPEAKER_07 8:06

Yes.

SPEAKER_13 8:09

That was pretty good. Just have a diet coke like me and it's possibly different. Love it. So that's kind of fun. There is a cure for TDS for all of our Democrat friends. You know, it's funny because the show doesn't feel anything to me or try to be like a uh Donald Trump sycophant show, you know, a bunch of bootleggers, although a random independent might believe

Political Tribes And Voter Fatigue

SPEAKER_13 8:30

that. But it's funny as I go out and meet with people and talk with people, there's people generally fall into kind of two camps. You kind of fall into the conservative and I wear the team colors camp. Like I'm Republican, I support Trump, I don't pay attention to him every day, but I just am down with everything he's doing. And then you've got the independent slash liberal camp. And I consider this people there, there's a there's a group of people that I think polling would call them independents. Okay. For the most part, they're libertarians, right? They're they're political agnostics, maybe even political atheists. They don't believe any political party is necessarily the solution, but they tend to lean policy-wise to the conservatives, right? Given given two choices, they're typically gonna go right. And I I've been running into a lot of these people lately. They're conservatives, you know, by the way they live their lives. Self-reliant. They voted for Trump and support his overall agenda, but they get really frustrated with the minutia of politics, how the sausage is made. They get tired of the mean tweets, they get tired of the war in Iran, they get tired of gas prices, they kind of just want all the solutions right now. And in I'm in that camp. Yeah, and that there's a there's a portion of them that believe that the free market is the solution. They might be right. Just like communism, we've never really tried a free market. You know what I mean? Who knows? Maybe it would work. But you know, you've got the free marketers, and then you just have the people that just are in the camp that no politician ever can do any good ever, right? And those are the black pillars. Like, I voted for Trump, but look at him, he's such a loser. He's a liar. It's like they're all liars, man. I mean, you know, I'm pretty adjacent that camp. Yeah, it's like it ain't no one ever gonna get it right. Uh, it's funny because in the Bitcoin community, they're they're wildly conservative, like you know, sound money and stuff like that. They're they're relatively socially liberal. Um, however, I will say this I've met and have been encountering more and more Bitcoiners who, through Bitcoin, have been converted to Christianity, which is really interesting. That's interesting. Yeah, it is really interesting. But a lot of them are political atheists, and they just believe that all the politicians, no matter what, are always gonna print money all the time. And they're probably right. Yeah.

Venezuela Earthquake And Hard Lessons

SPEAKER_13 10:47

All right, so there was this earthquake in Venezuela that happened a couple days ago. And we weren't we weren't streaming, so I didn't cover it live, but I did find this little video, and I'm gonna mute it because we don't need to hear the sound. But this is just the shaking in Venezuela, and look at these apartment buildings down here. Look at that. Oh my gosh, like immediately, just immediately down. Oh, jeez. I know, and these buildings too look like they're close to coming down as well. I'll tell you what, you know, anytime that you get upset about building codes, sometimes it takes a video like this to remind us why it is we do things the way we do them here in the United States. Okay, it looks like the death toll right now has climbed to 1,943. Oh, that is a lot of people, guys.

SPEAKER_07 11:32

That's way low. You think that's low? Yeah, the number's gonna be way higher. Uh, when it's all said and done. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah. It's gonna be tens of thousands.

SPEAKER_13 11:41

I had a family member, 200,000 people died. I'm like, I heard 197. But yeah, as they go through those buildings and pull all the rumble, they're gonna find out more and more people. This one right here, this video. Don't forget to comment, guys. We have enough people streaming. We could get like a third of the way there if everybody comments. So if you're listening to Rumble, make sure you make a comment. We got a pin for chats. 75 of you this month. It's more than we've ever had. Okay, so this one is for our good listener, loyal listener, Carlito.

Flat Earth Arguments And What Counts

SPEAKER_13 12:06

Carlitz. Okay, so Carlitz.

SPEAKER_07 12:08

Uh-oh.

SPEAKER_13 12:09

Carlitz is our flat earther. Okay, he's got his very good reasons to believe that. I I tend to think I might be a globetard. I think I might be a globetard.

SPEAKER_07 12:18

I'm definitely a globetard, and um, I don't I definitely don't understand flat earthers, but I definitely understand um, you know, space is a big place. They say, they say, I don't think you know I can see where people would say, well, where's the edge? But you know, for flat earth, I'm like, well, where's the bottom? Uh, you know.

SPEAKER_13 12:40

Yeah.

SPEAKER_07 12:41

So I don't know.

SPEAKER_13 12:43

Firmament. Onward, surrounded by the firmament. I don't know. I don't know the answer to any of it. I know that we cannot, I cannot prove the earth is round, but I also know you cannot prove the earth is flat. That is the beauty of just being a singular, you know, moral sentient being on this rock.

SPEAKER_07 12:59

I mean, me with the internet, I feel like I could prove somehow that the earth is round, but you're right. I mean, without like firsthand evidence, I really can't prove either one.

SPEAKER_13 13:09

Yeah. Now I've seen a couple conceptual models that explain why everything is flat to our observation, but why we're actually on a globe spinning through space or falling through space, depending on how you want to think about it, at an incredibly fast rate.

SPEAKER_07 13:23

So I, you know, everything from our perspective is a straight line, and therefore I've spent enough time on the ocean that I just have a hard time with that because I've just spent so much time crossing like the Gulf of Alaska.

SPEAKER_13 13:38

Yeah, yeah. The Bering Strait, the Bering Strait.

SPEAKER_07 13:42

Yeah, you know, and water, gravity is being held down, and you can only see so far because that arc. And if the Earth was flat, why would there be an arc on the water? I just don't know.

SPEAKER_13 13:53

That is a good question. Why can't you, with the right telescope, look to China look to Japan from the coast?

SPEAKER_07 13:59

Right. And then there are things like if uh have you ever heard of the Green Lantern? The comic book? No. Oh, no. This is an astral effect.

SPEAKER_13 14:12

No, no, no.

SPEAKER_07 14:13

This is an astral effect of the sun as it goes down and it goes through the light spectrum as it um is coming around the curvature of the earth. You have this effect called the green lantern. And it's when the green um um light rays light spectrum hits your eyes, it's like pew. It's a pretty cool effect if you can get the conditions just right. Huh. Interesting. But that can only happen because the light is bending. So that that the light is bending.

SPEAKER_13 14:43

So Carlitz says, I can prove the earth is flat on a simple Cessna ride. I know, that's I know. I'm it's always observably flat. So if it looks flat, fills and acts flat, and still then it must be a spinning ball. No, the earth is flat from our perspective, right? Like, like that's uh again, I'm a globetard. Okay, so I'm not I'm not making any like claim to some like physics PhD, be like, listen, man, you're too dumb to understand. I'm too dumb to understand, okay? I'm still trying to understand the blockchain ledger, let alone like the mysteries of space. But I got this little video here, it's just a cool little graphic description, and we touch on this stuff from time to time because of course, whether we like it or not, we're space race team player one, right? I'd rather space race than than war for Europe. So, but anyways, part of the whole part of the whole uh space bending time space continuum. This is some of the Einstein discoveries, is the sun is actually, you know, in an orbit around something itself, and it's dragging us through this gravity field here, anyways. But you know, when you hear people talk about bending space-time, this has to do with some of that. So we're always in a straight line. It's just the way we perceive it. Like we can model it on a 4D printer. And if you're doing transit, like you're trying to hit Mars at the right moment, boom. Oh, I was in the wrong spot. You gotta be in the right spot, but it always lines up on a straight line. And just like as it's rotating around here, we can never see the curve of these. We can see the outside curve, but it's always on a flat horizon. So, like, even if you take a hot air balloon all the way up as high as you possibly can, you can never actually see the curve of the earth. You can always just take a basketball, right? You can only see the the horizon, flat plane. You won't see the curve. Any curve that you do visually see is usually a play on light, right? But that play on light is being amplified, which is why everything is observably on plane, but everything's in motion together, flying through space.

SPEAKER_07 16:40

Yeah, I think that that green lantern example that I brought up is is is the is the point because it uses light to describe the shape that it's traveling, I guess.

SPEAKER_13 16:51

Traveling through, yeah. Now I'm a globetard, I can't explain it. I just saw the image and I thought, that's really cool. I'm gonna share that with the peasants. So, anyways, Carlitz, uh uh I I love the debate. Like, I love the flat Earth Globe Globetard debate. I think it's awesome. And uh, but at the same time, because we learn a lot, like you learn a lot about I'm not gonna call anybody retarded because I'm retarded. You know, it's funny because as I was doing kind of some of my deep dives on it, just every conspiracy ties into every other conspiracy, right? But as I would be, you know, the flat earth thing, what are they keeping from us? Like, what is it that they're preventing us from knowing as common knowledge because then we can't build on it. We're only as good as the information we have. So as soon as we have a scientific breakthrough and it becomes democratized, decentralized, and it gets into the minds of the masses, then the minds of the masses can do something with it. We can invent technologies, we can think it through. And so there definitely is an incentive to keep the mysteries of space from us and kind of push us back into the dark ages of just the earth is only what's observable. This allows the wizards and the magicians of the planet, aka your physicists and scientists, to do things that to us appear to be magic. And then we go, I believe in science. I believe in science, yeah, because it looks like magic. So, anyways, it is uh very interesting. So, as I would do my deep dives on this, that is one of the things that I kind of came to the conclusion is that space is a potential liberation vector for us. It's you know, and therefore they don't want you to be liberated, is has more to do with that. That's my opinion, but who freaking knows? So, as I was doing the deep dive, I'd randomly talk to different people who had real world experiences, people like Carlites, and I talked to a guy who was doing artillery in the military, and he said, you know, when you do artillery, you go to like MOS school and all this stuff, and they teach you based on physics because the legislature at some point gave money to the army to go figure out the curvature of the earth and how to shoot artillery 50 miles across the curving, spinning ball of the parabolas. Yes, so they created a calculation that every artillery person has to memorize, be able to do the math. And this includes things like the Corvallis effect, the curvature of the earth and spinning. So as the projectile is launched, it's compensating. And that's called SOP, standard operating procedure. That is the approved line, that is the science, that is the physicists, and all those people that put their pieces together. And then you have a paragraph that's SOP, and then in the instruction manual, you have a paragraph that's AOP, accepted operating procedure. Okay, so here's our standard operating procedure to pass the test. Here's what you're really gonna do when you fire a gun. Shoot in a straight line, adjust for wind and air temperature. It's like don't worry about the spinning ball. As you shoot the thing, everything's moving with it. You don't have to worry about the Corvallis effect. Anyways, I always thought that was kind of interesting. All right, back to something we understand more: the economy.

Bitcoin Bear Market And Sats Focus

SPEAKER_13 20:00

As if it's any less complicated. Port Angeles, Port and Hunter. I always assume that's Port Angeles. Good morning from Port is Port Angeles. Good morning from Port Angeles. The world is round, but the sun is gas, but can't prove either one. But I appreciate everyone's view. Yeah, I was up in Port Angeles this weekend. We had our family reunion up there. It was such a fun place. We did nothing but hike. It was like one hike after another, or I should say walk. We weren't really hiking, we had a bunch of kids with us. Okay, so one of the things Bitcoin's down. Have you noticed, Ron? Bitcoin's down, it's sitting down around 59,000, 60,000 is kind of holding that floor. Yep, we're definitely in a bear market. Uh, that doesn't mean things that are on the upside, though. It's interesting. I've you know, every day I pay attention to this. It's the new thing for me. Got orange fever. So I'm paying attention to it, and I'm listening to the different analysts and trying to figure out who's got a good track record, who doesn't, and stuff like that. And I am just absolutely convinced it doesn't really matter if you're on a Bitcoin standard what the price of Bitcoin is, because it's money in. You earn your money and you spend your money, but you put it into Bitcoin. And the objective at the end of every month is simply this have more satoshis at the end of the month than you started out with. That's it, right? And if you're earning money in the month and you're spending it in the month, you're probably gonna be fine on your cash flow. But at the end of the month, hopefully you have a couple extra sats, a couple extra digits, and that's that's the secret to a sound money standard. And other nation states around the world are getting in on the sound money standard. To count, right now, we have a minimum of 20 nations that are officially adding Bitcoin to their nation's balance, blockchain, and cryptocurrency to solve the problem of deepfakes uh via artificial intelligence.

SPEAKER_27 21:45

Uh, we've seen over 40 countries uh commit to buying Bitcoin uh in some fashion for their national I said twenty, I meant forty forty countries balance sheets or other. So I'm seeing every day a deluge of new institutional investors that are interested in the asset class. So I Appreciate for folks who don't have that perspective. They're looking for some grand gesture or grand event. Um, but for those of us who have the luxury of being on the inside, uh all we're all we're seeing is steady growth, even if the headlines don't match that.

SPEAKER_13 22:14

So for people inside the industry, they're seeing the growth. And they're seeing the sheikh in Saudi Arabia and 40 different nation states are coming on chain, right? They're they're they're accumulating Bitcoin and other crypto assets at a very rapid pace. This to me, just like we were talking about flat earth and they try to keep you know the the liberty of space a secret from us so that we can't develop on it without their Gnostic wisdom that you get from your top secret clearances. It's the same thing with the money, guys. If you live in a nation state that's accumulating Bitcoin as part of its balance sheet, hello, signal through the noise. It doesn't matter what the value is compared to any specific currency right now, they're accumulating it as an asset. That means they recognize it as real. 40 nations, those are the ones that are openly doing it. How many are doing it privately, right? How many are doing it in the background because they don't want to devalue their currency and tip off their their people that the currency is on the fritz? Because otherwise, why would you need to buy more gold?

SPEAKER_07 23:15

All this buying that you're talking about, how come that's not driving the price up dramatically, like quickly?

SPEAKER_13 23:22

I think it's because so what really drives the price up is it's just volume trading, right? It's retail usage. Uh right. And so the retail usage is being suppressed right now. And a lot of the reason the retail usage is being suppressed is because a lot of the buying is happening through ETFs and through exchanges. Okay. And so those end up being people that are hodling, they're holding, or like if you're buying an ETF, you're not actually buying Bitcoin, you're buying shares in a company that owns the Bitcoin, and they're not spending the Bitcoin at the local coffee shop. And so it creates a scarcity. So this is this is what people who kind of look at this from a macro sense are seeing. They're saying, listen, what's happening right now is the ETFs, some of the exchanges, they call them treasury companies. Like you at your engineering firm could just open a river account and start saving your engineering profits in Bitcoin. That would make your engineering firm a Bitcoin treasury company. You're holding. Does that make sense? So there's a lot of treasury companies, companies that are designed to hold that are creating scarcity. And it just happens to be a bear market, so they're getting deep discounted prices. And of course, in a bear market, that's when retail adoption is at its lowest or retail use is at its lowest. And I understand this, right? Like we've got Tomaste that's talking about here. Tomaste says leverage holders are getting wiped out. That is true.

Exchange Risk And Self Custody

SPEAKER_13 24:40

Because you've had institutional money come into Bitcoin, you do have rehypothecation. If you buy Bitcoin on Coinbase, for example, you might not actually have bought Bitcoin. Right? Coinbase has, let's just use a round number, okay, a thousand Bitcoin. And if you buy Bitcoin on Coinbase, they might be selling 10,000 Bitcoin, knowing that when you go to actually take the Bitcoin off of Coinbase, they will have enough to send, right? But yet if you keep your Bitcoin in Coinbase, they are re hypothecating it. They are doing the exact same thing that banks do.

SPEAKER_07 25:12

Oh my gosh, really?

SPEAKER_13 25:14

Yes. And so jeez. So this is where things like the Clarity Act will help prevent some of that because how do you pay interest on Bitcoin? Through rehypothecation. This is how the banks pay interest. So when the banks are like, we don't want you to pay interest, I don't mind that because that deincentivizes re-hypothecation on the exchanges. Not all exchanges are the same. River does not rehypothecate. Every Bitcoin that their holders have, they prove that they have that exact same amount of Bitcoin, not less. Whereas Coinbase, if every single person who says, I have a Coinbase account and I have, you know, a Bitcoin saved in there, if they all raise their hands, there's 10,000 people on Coinbase who claim to own a Bitcoin, and then you know, Coinbase does an audit, they're like, We actually only have a thousand Bitcoin.

SPEAKER_07 26:02

Yeah. What happens if 2,000 people want to sell? Uh-oh.

SPEAKER_13 26:05

There could be a run on the exchange, just like there could be a run on the bank. It's no different. That is why a 1776 Live Tom, who's in the chats with us right now, is so uh adamant about getting your Bitcoin onto your private wallet, take it off the exchanges, then it can't be rehypothecated. A gold bar sitting in a bank vault on deposit, they will print 10 times the value of that gold bar and put that into circulation. That's what fractional reserve lending is, that's what rehypothecation is. They can do the same thing with Bitcoin, they can do the same thing. But when you put that Bitcoin in your closet or that gold bar in your closet, nobody can rehypothecate it, right? So that's so that is part of the reason. Is Bitcoin is being adopted, but not enough people are taking self-custody. A lot of people are leaving it on the exchanges. And it's my belief the reason they're doing that is they're viewing it as a tech asset, they're viewing it like it's a tech stock. So they're treating River or Coinbase just like you treat Merrill Lynch, right? They hold the stock, I just give them the money and they kind of do their thing and they look or kind of like a money market account or something. Kind of yeah, yeah. There's different ways to think about that. But 40 nation states are adopting this, right? And there's again, signal through noise. Do you want to hold the gold or do you want to hold the currency? I'll choose the gold because I know what they can do with the currencies. Uh Tomaste says the last bottom cycle, one of those rehypothecators, FTX blew up. Exactly right. Those of you that know the FTX scandal with Sam Binkman Fride, that's essentially what they were doing. They had so many Bitcoin on their balance sheet. They were taking people's money, giving them Bitcoin credits, and they didn't have enough Bitcoin to cover cover the uh the uh people moving.

SPEAKER_07 27:51

This is the kind of activity with money in general that I think is super unscrupulous. Is that the right word? Where you're like create these uh finance markets that are just leveraged beyond you know any sanity.

SPEAKER_13 28:10

When you think about Bitcoin and the crypto market, it's the wild west. Yeah. So you do have people who are doing things that we haven't seen bankers do without regulation in a century. Okay. They're doing things that cause a lot of risk for the people that are holding assets there. So how do you if the world is going to keep their Bitcoin on a public exchange, right? Then what do you need to create trust? Because right now there's not a lot of trust. We saw FTX blow up and the government was pretty behind. Like, oh yeah, we don't have to audit you because you're a crypto. You see what I'm saying? So it was it wasn't until the bank run actually happened. The way things work now is we know the bank runs happening before the bank runs happens, and you know, FDIC steps in, blah, blah, blah, blah. So regulation, right? How do you how do you put trust into a trustless marketplace? Regulate it, right? Put the force of law in there. So that's what the Clarity Act will bring. The Clarity Act will probably prevent a lot of pump and dump schemes that have happened in the crypto market. Bitcoin is a little bit different than that because you can take self-custody and you can participate in the Bitcoin network itself as a miner or a node operator. So it's a little different. In a Wild West, you can create your own trust. Don't trust other people, verify everything they do. The exchanges force you to trust. And in order to implement that trust and to have trust, then we want to have rule of law. We want to have some enforcement there to prevent people from breaking your trust. So that's kind of, you know, I just go back to the big picture. If you can figure out a way to get onto a Bitcoin standard, or you can at least tuck away savings that you don't intend to touch for a period of time, you kind of have to do one or the other. You either go on a Bitcoin standard completely. So the price fluctuation and volatility matters less, if not, if at all, or you need to just put savings into Bitcoin, right? And then just don't touch it for four or five years. Let it go through a four-year cycle, and you'll be much better off for it. Uh, Fidelity is rec, I think BlackRock, not Fidelity, all of them are doing some recommendation, but I think BlackRock, they just officially in their little prospectus things they give out to all their investment advisors, two percent. They think everybody should have two percent of their holdings in Bitcoin.

SPEAKER_07 30:24

I I think that is the funniest advice to ever to diversify with two percent Bitcoin.

SPEAKER_13 30:31

I think the I think the idea is it's it's you know I I understand it. BlackRock wants to make sure they have money to put into other stuff. Yeah, but there's really only two hot things right now. There's AI, which will probably destroy every worldwide currency, yes, and there's Bitcoin, which is gonna be the only thing that's gonna stand up to AI. So all right, that's very interesting stuff. I missed a comment from Ferrazier. Finally, good morning. I had a tr I had a trigger with Bitcoin, an auto purchase for me when it hit 59k and set another now. Yes, yes, deep, deep discounts. Okay, we have to have 75 chatters. We've got a bunch of people on Rumble right now. Please make sure you have an account. Make a comment. We got to get to 75 this month. I just saw a post from Tomaste. Oh, sorry. He says, uh he says, that's why you don't trust and instead verify by taking custody of your Bitcoin. Yes, absolutely.

Skid Row Footage And Petition Bribes

SPEAKER_13 31:26

Okay, on the election front, you remember down in California, James O'Keefe took a little adventure, took a little derivation down to Skid Row, and watched them literally handing over cash for signatures on ballots and registrations. Here's a clip that came out yesterday from James O'Keefe talking is showing some of the footage of this. I mean, we're talking blatant. They know what they're doing is a crime, and they're doing it anyways, sometimes with cops standing just up the street.

SPEAKER_10 32:07

Okay.

SPEAKER_04 32:19

In the wake of our bombshell reporting exposing mass election fraud in Los Angeles, utilizing the homeless population of Skid Row. Did you see James O'Keefe right there? Let me go back.

SPEAKER_13 32:28

This is James O'Keefe. He's got he's got some sweater. This this he's got like garbage in his hand, cigarette hanging out of his mouth, figureless gloves on one hand. Oh, he's totally fitting in there, isn't he?

SPEAKER_04 32:42

Fraud in Los Angeles, utilizing the homeless population of Skid Row.

SPEAKER_26 32:46

Yeah, because you have a register, I need to register you because I can get paid, too. Okay, I need to get paid.

SPEAKER_04 32:54

The Department of Justice put out indictments and promises that they intended to run a large-scale investigation and put a stop to the cash-for-ballot scheme once and for all.

SPEAKER_24 33:04

It appears to show Armstrong and others paying homeless people to register to vote and then signing various petitions.

SPEAKER_16 33:11

We're not putting up with it. We are going to aggressively prosecute election fraud. This is an ongoing active investigation. Ms. Brown is simply the first person that we are announcing charges for in this investigation. And uh, James O'Keefe is the source of that thing.

SPEAKER_04 33:27

We saw recently that the FBI was on the ground on Skid Row looking for more evidence of this election fraud scheme that we caught on camera back in February. Many claim that this election fraud was having an impact on the local Los Angeles election.

SPEAKER_22 33:40

Even LA residents questioning the sudden surge of mail-in ballots that has changed the leaderboard.

SPEAKER_04 33:46

So we visited Skid Row again, hoping to see the sidewalks clear of any election fraudsters. But to our surprise, we found the entire place had mostly returned to the same constant chaos, crackheads stumbling around, and the same election fraud schemes on almost every street corner. Some even featuring familiar faces.

SPEAKER_09 34:06

Oh, you're giving off phones? Yes.

SPEAKER_14 34:08

Oh man, have my ID This man behind me was actually caught bribing homeless to uh sign petitions, which is illegal. You're not even being a good investigative investigative.

SPEAKER_04 34:36

Our journalist sat with one of the homeless residents of Skid Row named Emily, and she quickly revealed that the petitioners are still active and pointed our journalists towards a couple of them.

SPEAKER_00 34:46

So if you walk from a corner this way, there's a lady right here at the red tent. Turn this street right here on this side of the street. And she saw a hot dog. And after hey, you got petition? Petition. Down there, there's a guy that stands by the bathroom dog. See the bathroom right there? Yeah, yeah, yeah. Don't ask loud, so no one else here. So I guess when people ask loud, that's when they tell them no, you know.

SPEAKER_04 35:09

We then headed to the bathroom that Emily mentioned, and almost immediately our undercover journalist was offered cash to sign a petition. With this gentleman offering them two dollars to sign as someone named Timothy Adams.

SPEAKER_11 35:26

Oh, they're doing uh things? Yeah. Um shit.

SPEAKER_04 35:44

Timothy Adams are here on the paying citizens to sign petitions is a violation of California Elections Code 18603, which states quote, every person who offers or gives money or other valuable consideration to another in exchange for his or her signature on a state, county, municipal, or district initiative, referendum, or recall petition is guilty of a misdemeanor.

SPEAKER_10 36:10

How much are you going to sign?

SPEAKER_04 36:15

The fraudster even expressed that he is well aware that what he is doing is against the law, because the fraudster even tells the journalists not to ask him about it when there are police nearby, echoing what the homeless woman, Emily, warned our journalist.

SPEAKER_00 36:28

Don't ask Lau, so no one else here. So I guess when people ask Loos, that's when they tell them no, you know.

SPEAKER_04 36:33

He even compares the election petition fraud to selling dope.

SPEAKER_10 36:36

Let's say you were the police.

SPEAKER_04 36:56

And upon reviewing some of our earlier footage from back in March, we were able to find petition fraudster Anthony Zack Spears, has been out of Skid Row buying petition signatures for months, maybe years. The journalist also interacted with workers from the NGOs operating in the area, and they all confirmed they have seen the fraudulent petitioners all over.

SPEAKER_09 37:15

I'm trying to help him. Do you know where the petitioner people? You know they give out cash, you know where they are.

SPEAKER_11 37:25

Oh, what are they doing? That's where they are.

SPEAKER_09 37:30

That's where they are right now. Oh, they have them up the kids somewhere. I don't know where. I've seen them around, but they should be around the people signing petitions to get cash. You know where they went. Yeah, I haven't seen it. Today, but they were but they've been around. I've seen them down here before, but I don't know where they at though. What corner they're in today, you don't know? No, because I did it before. You did it, right? You did it?

SPEAKER_16 38:01

Yeah, the petitions, I did that before.

SPEAKER_04 38:03

If you work for one of these NGOs operating on Skid Row and you notice any kind of financial malfeasance or any evidence of the NGO's involvement in this cash for ballot scheme, or if you yourself live in Los Angeles and want to visit Skid Row and record what's happening, please reach out to us. You can email us at tips at O'Keefe Media Group.com or call anybody that is down in LA, I highly recommend you do that.

SPEAKER_13 38:26

Wow. Wow. You see how many times it showed cash changing hands? Speaking of cash changing hands, Ron.

SPEAKER_07 38:36

Speaking of, yeah. So uh we hear a lot about crypto, but there's a part most people miss. Crypto was created so you could actually own and control your own money. After the 2008 financial crisis, Bitcoin was designed as an alternative to banks. So instead of whole bank holding your money, delaying transfers, or limiting access, you're in control. And if you've ever had to wait for a transfer to clear, you felt that problem. Now, fast forward to today. Everyone's heard of crypto, but getting started still feels complicated. That's why I use Rumble Wallet. It takes all that complexity and makes it simple. Choose what you want Bitcoin, dollar back security, stable coins, or even digital backed by real gold. No complicated setup. It connects you with Moonpay, so you can use your credit card, debit card, or bank and be up and running in minutes. Once you're set up, you can even support your favorite Rumble creators like me directly. So do it now. Scan the QR code and click the link in the description and download the Rumble wallet. From there, you can set up your wallet, tap buy, and you're in the game. In just a few minutes, you can go from hearing about crypto to actually owning some. Phew.

SPEAKER_13 39:40

Woohoo! Nice. Okay, you notice how they were changing money was changing hands. The NGOs who are quote unquote helping these people. Hey, I'm trying to help this guy get some cash. Where are the ballot people? We can get him some money. You got a lady selling hot dogs. If you sign the ballot,

Birthright Citizenship And Senate Tactics

SPEAKER_13 39:55

I'll give you the money that you can buy the hot dog with. Oh, that's a great way to get some free food. You think elections are secure? You think in California that they can't, they're doing that for years. Some of those guys have probably collected tens of thousands of signatures over a period of time. That's a job. Completely fraudulent people you're gonna sign for Timothy Adams. Who's Timothy Adams? See, this is where now you get you get this network effect where you've got all the different vectors of fraud. Let's say you let's say you had a foreign national that their parents came on a birthright tourism deal here. So they come here, they become a citizen, their children become a citizen, they go overseas, they never step foot in the United States again. But they have a ballot. Well, the NGOs will make sure that that ballot makes it to this ballot guy or that name, and he'll make sure somebody signs and they're going to clear the voter registration because there's a fake person that's not here in the US, but their ballot will get used.

SPEAKER_07 40:54

I think this is the most interesting part of the story. Not the cash, it's the sign with this name. And where did they get that name? Where did they get that name?

SPEAKER_13 41:03

Exactly. Where did they get that name? Or how about this? Motor voter, everybody who comes across the border and gets temporary status, asylum status, they also mysteriously get registered the vote because that's just the way the system works. You can't force them to prove they're citizens. So it's not a good thing.

SPEAKER_07 41:18

Motor voter.

SPEAKER_13 41:19

If they're getting any government benefits, we assume that they're voters because they're receiving the benefit, right? And so yes, their name gets on the registration polls. The registration gets passed on to these ballot harvesters, signatures get signed on initiatives and referendums and petitions. They get registered to vote, and inevitably they're going to vote. And that's probably where a lot of these ballots that show up after election day are coming from. It's the Skid Row list. And we saw that in the LA Merrill election, where Ramen got votes coming out of the Skid Row area late at a 30% plus margin over what she'd gotten leading up to the election. Yet what they said was even after the FBI descended on Skid Row, which we talked about a couple weeks ago, they're still up to the same old tricks. This is one of those things where it's like, how long do we have to wait for there to be real action here? Here, what if they said yesterday? The Supreme Court came out with that decision allowing the birthright citizenship, we'll call it a loophole to continue. Again, when we're talking about the elections, it's 15 plus things that they can cheat on. They can gerrymander, they can get dead voters, they can get voters who have moved but are still on the registration list, they can have multiple ballots printed out and they can harvest them. They can have machine fraud, they can have, you know, you go through all these different things. So the game is you want to fight this war on 15 fronts, right? If we can get rid of birthright citizenship, that gets rid of a chunk of voters that are not real participants in our civic society. If you can get rid of motor voter stuff, automatic registration, force people to prove that they're citizens when they register, that's one thing. If we can limit how ballots, if ballots are being mailed, that's one thing. If we can limit get control of the machines or eliminate them completely, that's one thing. A handful of these things are dispositive in certain districts. Fixing machines, you probably are going to fix Arizona. Fix the mail and balloting problem, you'll fix Washington and Oregon and California. Right? There's certain things where if you can fix one of the problems, you'll fix a state. Some things you need to fix multiple problems to fix the state because multiple states use multiple methods, like Arizona. You can in-person vote there or you can mail and vote. So you kind of need to deal with multiple things. But of course, the biggest chunk out of this would be to pass the Save America Act. So, in light of yesterday's birthright citizenship decision by SCOTIS, JD Vance went on Laura Ingram and he talked about what the plan is now. That more than ever, now that birthright citizenship has been affirmed by The Supreme Court. We need to get the Save America Act passed.

SPEAKER_27 44:03

Here, what is the administration prepared to do to protect the country and what can it do after this ruling?

SPEAKER_15 44:11

Well, one of the things we're going to have to do is just continue to enforce the border, Laura. This was a very disappointing ruling from the Supreme Court. Of course, we respect it, but we also think that it was a major, major mistake, as just as Alito and Thomas pointed out. It's just a preposterous ruling, and the absurdity of that outcome suggests why the Supreme Court should have gone the other way. Now, I know a lot of conservatives, Laura, certainly uh the people that I'm talking to, that you're talking to, are extremely disappointed in this. I do actually think there's a really big silver lining here. And that that's the simple fact that a lot of legal experts expected this case to go the wrong direction by seven to two or even eight to one. The fact that this case was a five to four decision effectively means that the the concept of birthright citizenship, which is an absurdity to the 14th Amendment, that concept is hanging by a thread. And so what I take from that is yes, we've got to fix the immigration system even more. We have to be even more aware of who's coming into our country to make sure that they're not benefiting from this atrocious Supreme Court ruling. But it also means that we have to keep fighting Laura because we actually have an opportunity to reverse this decision, just as we've reversed so many bad decisions throughout the generations.

SPEAKER_13 45:37

That is true. We do have a chance to reverse this. In fact, Alito and Thomas both alluded to this that the legislature does have an ability to fix this ruling. So let's listen to Shannon Bream's overview on Alito and then Clarence Thomas' dissenting opinions in this matter. Dr.

SPEAKER_05 45:54

Shannon, who's got more. Yet again, Shannon.

SPEAKER_23 45:59

All right, this comes from Justice Alito, who brought this up during the arguments. This is his separate dissent. He says the court's interpretation also has national security implications. Suppose that a person's only connection to this country is that he was born here to a mother who was present just long enough to give birth and then quickly return to her native country. Suppose that country is a strategic adversary or enemy of the United States. Suppose the child never visited the United States while growing up and was inculcated with hatred of this country. According to this court, now that person is a citizen of the United States. He can enter and leave the country as he pleases. He can travel the world on a United States passport. Even if he plots to harm this country, he cannot be deprived of his status as a citizen, at least under current precedent. He goes on to say that this uh this decision today also provides a powerful incentive to enter or remain in this country illegally. Uh, he goes on to say, in my judgment, the court has made a mistake that will seriously affect the country's future. So some very pointed dissents here uh from those who raised these very big concerns during the uh arguments. And uh they're real-world scenarios, which are not a fantasy. They're not a movie. I mean, these things that can actually happen now under this ruling that you have today from the It is not a fantasy.

SPEAKER_13 47:19

It could actually happen. So the numbers we have out of China, birth tourism, number as high as two million American citizens that were born in America that have never been raised in America, right? So they have passport, they have registered two million people. We're talking a population bigger than the size of the city of Seattle that is over there. Now, imagine we want to get into armed conflict and China just enlists 500,000 of these people and are like, you can't shoot your own citizens. It makes the law feckless. Now, for those of us normal people who are raised here, born here, grow up, right? We're like, just because you got a just because you got a piece of paper doesn't make you an American. Right? Like it wouldn't stop the the the normal peasants, but the law becomes feckless and it creates all kinds of concerns. What if you have a major terrorist, a major arms dealer, a major whatever that never steps foot in the United States but has American legal protections? You know, how do you get a warrant on someone that's hiding out in a state with no extradition that is up to no good? You know, it's like it becomes very, very complicated. You can't just declare an act of war on a citizen of the United States. You got to use legal process. You can't introduce Obama. It's a freaking mess. John Attackis says JD Vance is everywhere. You should ask him to come on Peasants Perspective because you have a mic and people are listening. That is what he's looking for. Yes, please. All of our listeners need to send JD Vance a message. Get a hold of his uh book, his uh show booker and see if we can get him on the show. Then I'm sure we get 75 chats. Yes. I'm sure I'm sure we get 75 chats. Speaking of, still need to pimp chats. Let your friends and family know about the show. Have a have a watch party, get everybody together bright and early in the morning, watch the show, everybody get their own Rumble account and log in and make a chat. I'm gonna have to do this for 30 days because we got 75 of you. We gotta get chatting. All right. This is Shannon Bream breaking down Justice Claris Thomas's 91-page dissent.

SPEAKER_05 49:15

Back to Shannon Bream for the view from Justice Thomas, who was a dissenter here. Shannon.

SPEAKER_23 49:22

Yeah, in his dissent, he gets to that point, Bill, that you're making there. The 14th Amendment was enacted in the wake of the Civil War, quote, with the one pervading purpose of securing equal citizenship for the freed slaves. He writes, it was enacted, as Justice Harlan wrote, to secure to a race recently emancipated the civil rights that other citizens enjoyed. So Thomas has always been about that was the purpose of the 14th Amendment. He goes on to say that the court, meaning the majority now, has repurposed the 14th Amendment to protect its own set of preferred rights that the Reconstruction Congress never contemplated, and that cannot find support in the text. Today, the court does so by recognizing a constitutional right to citizenship for the children of all foreign birth tourists and illegal aliens, uses very specific language there. Again, Justice Thomas adhering and agreeing with the government's argument, with which they made here very passionately, that the 14th Amendment was about protecting the children of freed slaves and not what we've come to understand it as. You see his language there. He mentions birth tourism. It came up in the arguments, and clearly that's a very big concern of the dissenters. We also have dissents by Justice Salito and others, so we'll read those as well.

SPEAKER_13 50:32

Yeah. And he had a big breakdown here. He put these points. 14th Amendment, 1868, one pervading purpose, securing equal citizenship for freed slaves after the Civil War. Reconstruction Congress intent, zero evidence the drafters contemplated children of foreign temporary visitors or illegal aliens. Subject to the jurisdiction clause, Thomas means full political allegiance, not mere physical presence on U.S. soil. The majority opinion, Thomas says it repurposed the amendment to protect preferred rights the drafters never contemplated. Thomas's direct quote, Those rights cannot find support in the text today. His warning on the ruling, I am not sure that today's opinion will stand the test of time. During Thomas's April 20, 2026 oral arguments, he probed whether immigration debates even existed when the 14th was written. His core distinction: freed slaves were entitled to citizenship because they were Americans with no other homeland. Children of foreign nationals are not in the same category. Robertson Barrett joined the liberal bloc in the 6-3 majority in Trump versus Barbara, and Gorsch joined Thomas in dissent. Alito filed a separate dissent. 91 pages. One purpose the 14th Amendment actually had per Thomas. Zero rights, the Reconstruction Congress contemplated for children of foreign nationals. 100% of Thomas's argument is grounded on the specific post-Civil War historical record, not modern policy preferences.

SPEAKER_07 51:49

Yeah, I think Thomas is right on this one.

SPEAKER_13 51:51

Yeah, I think so too. Now I grew up really believing in the promise of birthright citizenship, but that promise was sold to me in a uh in a manner that promise of birthright citizenship was sold to me by telling the story of a world where people had to get on boats and spend a month to cross an ocean and escape political and economic depravity and persecutions. And they would come here and they would assimilate fully and you could become American. Right. That was the promise. But I totally get in the arguments that they made, where it's like, well, now eight billion people are an eight-hour plane ride away from all the rights entitled to American citizens, which are premier in the world. Okay. Which is not meaning people need to escape something. When you were leaving England in 1870 to come to the United States, right, or 1792, down with a life decision. You weren't just gonna go check out Niagara Falls and whiz by the Grand Canyon on your way home, right?

SPEAKER_07 53:01

Snap some selfies.

SPEAKER_13 53:02

These were major decisions. It's like uh uh um uh what's his name? Lewis, uh CK Lewis, when he talks about you know pioneers coming across the plains, and he's like, What now takes you like four hours on an airplane ride used to take you 30 years, and it's like you know, you left Virginia with a wife and three kids, and by the time you get to California, you have a different wife because the one died along the way, and you have two new kids, and one of your kids grew up, got married, and another kid got scalped by Indians, and you know, you have a whole different, whole different family by the time you get to California, right? That the world is a big place, might be flat, might be round, don't know, but it takes a long time to walk across the American continent. And today, it just is not the same. If the founders were, you know, alive today, having the same debate, they would probably specifically exclude birth tourism and temporary visitors. Absolutely. But this this wasn't a thing. You didn't go from England to New York to see the sites, have a kid, get a citizenship card, and then go home. That wasn't even contemplated in the 18th year. So JD Vance is saying one of the problems with the Senate is they're holding on to this relic, right? They're holding on to old ways of doing things, and it's preventing them, the Senate, from addressing a new world, specifically the filibuster.

SPEAKER_15 54:23

Legislation is so important. The president has been laser focused on getting the Save America Act passed, and you're right, we actually have the majority of Senate Republicans who will support it. I actually don't think the problem that they have is with the Save America Act legislation itself. The problem that they have, with all due respect, is that they're worshiping dying institutional norms when the Democrats are in this is the dark side of conservatism.

SPEAKER_13 54:50

When you hear the word conservative, ask yourself, what are you conserving? Okay. So the idea is you're trying to hold on to a tradition, a custom, a law, a method, a function, something that has utility over time. You're trying to conserve norms, the way things are. Okay.

Uniparty Incentives And Tina Peters

SPEAKER_13 55:10

When things are working great, amazing. When things are broken, conservatives become the stick in the mud that doesn't ever want to get out of the mud. Okay. I like the mud. This is where I grew up. You know, everybody should live in the mud. And that's the problem with some of some of the older generations. Now, on one hand, we want to be conservative. We don't want to change too rapidly. That creates a lot of destabilization. But on the other hand, there are moments in history and moments in time where things do change rapidly. And for example, in this particular case, when we're talking birthright tourism, when we're talking Save America Act, you can see the system's broken. The problem isn't that they don't they want to fix the system. The Republican Marty knows they're stuck in the mud. The problem is they're committed to the thing that got them stuck in the mud in the first place. Does that make sense? We want to conserve this way of being. The filibuster. The filibuster. The filibuster, I think, is a powerful tool to prevent rapid change. But in a case like this, it's literally being used against the conservatives, knowing that if the Democrats ever get power again, they'll get rid of it and get their whole agenda in. So the conservatives are kind of shooting themselves in the foot here. So let's just let JD Vance continue.

SPEAKER_15 56:21

In fact, bragging that as soon as they get control, they're going to throw that stuff aside and make it so much harder for Republicans to even win elections. So what some of these Republicans are saying is they don't want to give up on the norm of the filibuster, this sacred Senate institutional norm that a few senators are obsessed with, including, of course, uh Mitch McConnell. The problem, Laura, is that Democrats themselves are saying the minute that they get power, the filibuster is going out the door. So unilaterally submitting and surrendering as Republicans when Democrats are openly bragging that they're going to get rid of the filibuster, it's just handing your enemy a weapon that they're going to use to strike you down. It's absurd. It doesn't make any sense. But that's why we frankly have to get better senators than there in the future.

SPEAKER_13 57:09

All that legislation is so important. What they should do is get rid of the filibuster, pass the Save America Act, pass every bill they want to pass, and then reinstitute it. That's what they should do. And then make sure that the Democrats never get a majority again. So how are they trying to manipulate this? We've got the birthright citizenship decision by the Supreme Court. It's very damaging. You've got no activity on the Save America Act. You've got an injunction on the United States Postal Service not delivering ballots to illegal people, right? That's being that there's an injunction on that. So how do you break this blockade? How do you break it? Lindell TV reporter, I can't remember her name, she's everywhere. She spoke with Tim Burkhart outside of the Capitol building and asked him, what's the plan? Apparently, Tim Burkhart has spoken to JD Vance and they're considering a nuclear option.

SPEAKER_28 57:58

Thank you so much. Just want to get your thoughts on uh JD Vance going in the Senate to preside over the Senate to actually implement the talking filibuster. Is this a viable path forward to get the Save America Act passed?

SPEAKER_06 58:08

Sure, it is. Um, it's just it's it's it's a scorched earth deal, though. I mean, it means that there's no turning back. I you know, it just it totally guts the thing. And um who are we gonna put in there behind him? That's always what you gotta worry about is who's gonna be the number two. Yeah, it's not gonna be somebody conservatives that votes like you or I would, I can guarantee you, because Senate will just have their feelings hurt, and that's the way they'll do.

SPEAKER_28 58:33

So, what's the alternative in your I don't know?

SPEAKER_06 58:35

I I but I I mean I'm all for it. I don't care. I'm all for it. I'm scorched earth kind of guy.

SPEAKER_28 58:40

I love it.

SPEAKER_06 58:40

As we say in East Tennessee, Scorched Earth, ERF.

SPEAKER_28 58:43

Okay, so can you talk to JD Vance then to get this done?

SPEAKER_06 58:47

Maybe I have.

SPEAKER_28 58:49

Oh, I love it. Okay, thank you, Carl.

SPEAKER_13 58:52

So JD Vance coming in and fulfilling his role as vice president, being president of the Senate, would allow him to call them into session and he could force the agenda onto the floor, force the filibuster to into a talking filibuster, and force the senators to talk until they drop and then pass the thing. But like he says, it's score church. Remember, this is politics. There's still people that need to be appointed or confirmed by the Senate that are appointees of Donald Trump. There's other bills that they need to get passed after the Save America Act. There's all this, remember, you've got a hundred senators, they all have egos of a president, but they all only have one one hundredth of the power of the president. You know what I mean? And so if you do that, you take the power from the Senate, you acknowledge that they're feckless, it's gonna make even senators that would otherwise be on board with Trump's agenda be like, well, now you've you've blocked me from naming the post office after me or whatever the case is, right? Like you've it's going to be a big deal. So it is a it is a crossing the Rubicon moment. To my knowledge, the vice president has not come in to run the Senate since like John Adams. You know, this isn't something that happens very often. But it would be wise if for them to do it. Because again, you got to save the nation. I'll never forget Donald Trump's tweet after he was elected. He goes, He who saves the saves the nation breaks no laws, right? If your objective as the president is to preserve the constitution, the function, the way of government, then get implementing things like only citizens can vote would be saving the constitution. Right? So how you do that in the end, it's just like Lincoln. He broke a lot of the Constitution to ultimately preserve the Constitution. Uh uh Governor DeSantis down in Florida had a little bit to say on this. He says, if we don't, this birthright citizen just proves that the way the federal government is operating is we the people don't run the place anymore.

SPEAKER_03 1:00:53

Uh, additionally, this legislation prohibits fleeting pre-planned adoption agreements and surrogacy contracts involving citizens or residents of foreign countries of concern. China ships people here for birth. They do certain it's really a seedy thing, and I'm glad that we were able to do that. I know we're hoping that the Supreme Court is going to interpret the 14th Amendment so that we can put a stop to some of the people that are coming here for a month having birth and then going back to China. That's part of an operation. Why would we let that happen and grant citizenship under those circumstances? Bill also creates enhanced criminal penalties for crimes committed to benefit foreign governments or foreign-owned terrorist organizations. As I mentioned, charitable organizations. It prohibits those organizations from accepting contribution or support from designated terrorist organizations.

SPEAKER_13 1:01:49

So, what they're saying is you have actual birthright citizenship firms who will facilitate mothers coming over to give birth to children here that are receiving donations from known terrorist organizations. Oh, jeez. This is an operation. So the executive order that Trump signed, eliminating birthright citizenship, that was challenged and made its way to the Supreme Court. So what Florida's doing is they're passing a series of laws that are going to try to cut birthright tourism in Florida down to nothing. And of course, they're going to be challenged. And hopefully, with that case, right, with the law, an act of legislature going to the Supreme Court, maybe we can come up with a different legal justification to eliminate birthright tourism, right? It's one thing when a parent comes here, and let's pretend they come here and they do get asylum. Okay. If they have a kid, their asylum, presumably, that's a lifelong status. Okay. Let's just presume. If their children come here, I can get on board. It's the hope and dream of America. Sure. Birthright tourism, that's an op. That's a military operation. You know what I'm saying? That is not going to fly. So hopefully that the Supreme Court can come up with a nuanced perspective there and eliminate birthright tourism, which is the real problem. Children of illegal immigrants, that's a huge problem, too. But the birthright tourism, that's a that's a military operation. That's just not dilution. Now, you would think that Republicans would just be like, man, we passed the Save America Act. 60, 70% of America is conservative. They're going to vote for the what are Republican candidates. We can rule forever. The problem is, I think the Republican Party is very split from their base, right? I think there's a lot of conservatives that vote for Republicans because who else would you vote for? We run into this here in Kitsap County all the time, right? Up in Maine, they're having a problem. They've got a really uh charismatic man, Plattner, running for Senate against Susan Collins, who's not a very good Republican. And he's been up in the polls. Why is that? Because a lot of Republicans are apathetic. A lot of Republicans don't take polls. They're not as excited. Trump's in power, blah, blah, blah. Democrats, they're up against the ropes. So they're fighting hard. So Plattner actually was leading in the polls until this weekend. There was a course change up in Maine.

SPEAKER_02 1:04:04

Fox survey out indicates the Senate race in Maine is shaping up to be a very close contest. Our new poll finds Republican incumbent Senator Susan Collins has a small three percentage point lead advantage over Democrat challenger Graham Plattner among Maine registered voters. But among voters who say they are extremely motivated to vote, Plattner leads by nine points.

SPEAKER_13 1:04:27

Fox survey out indicates the central registered voters, Collins has a lead, but for motivated voters, Plattner has a lead. So that makes his campaign look all energetic. Her campaign looks flat, but she has a chance to win. Unfortunately, she's not really the person we want to have winning in the first place. But you're stuck between you either vote for the real Nazi or you vote for the white lady who just votes for the liberals on all of our important issues. So it's a tough one up there. But that's part of the problem that the Republican establishment thinks they can pull out these little wins. And they can pull out these wins against these deep blue candidates in these purple states with rhino moderate Republicans who are committed to the Uniparty. Right. And why would they want to change that? I mean, do you think South Dakota really wants to send Toon, or is it North Dakota? I can't even remember. Or how about Tillis coming out of North Carolina? Do you think that the North Carolinians are like Tillis really represents us in the conservative? I don't think so. So they like it when it's like this. They like it because the left doesn't go all out against a Collins or a Tillis, right? Because they know push, come to shove, we can get you to do our bidding, the Uniparty bidding. Again, the Republicans and Democrats hate each other. And I really, and uh, Gary points this out all the time. There's no love lost between these people. I mean, you know, the Democrats and Republicans don't typically go golfing together. I'm sure there's a few who do, but most of them don't. But the the Uniparty is a deep state thing. It's the hey, you can vote for 90% conservative things because that doesn't matter to us, but pass FISA. But prevent the Clarity Act from passing. But you know, War Powers Act. Like it's these little things. Uh, don't change the elections. CIA likes to control those. You know what I mean? That's the Uniparty. Now, we did have a huge warrior in the election integrity movement that was released from prison. Tina Peters. She's out on uh parole right now. Her sentence was commuted, so I do believe she's still on parole, but she's out of prison. She made a visit to the White House. This is from a little while ago when Trump was talking about Tina Peters.

SPEAKER_18 1:06:31

Colorado, the poorly run state of Colorado, with a governor who's incompetent. And frankly, with a governor that won't allow our wonderful Tina to come out of a jail, a high-intensity jail. Because she caught people cheating on an election and they said she was cheating. She wasn't cheating. She went over, she looked at one of the election scams going on. And because she did that, they put her in jail for nine years. Governor of Colorado is a weak and pathetic man who was run by Trend de Aragua, the criminals from Venezuela, took over sections of Colorado, and he was afraid to do anything. But he puts Tina in jail for nine years because she caught people cheating. And when she walked over and got involved in it, they said she was cheating. She wasn't cheating. She caught people cheating on the election 2020. Along with a lot of other people that cheated on that election. You'll see that coming out more and more.

SPEAKER_13 1:07:35

That's the thing that hurts so much about the Tina Peters story, is she exposed their fraud, right? Now, I don't know. I haven't dug into her case in like every little gritty nuance. It's painful to do that because it reminds me so much of my case, right? But Tina Peters saw that they were about to do an update on the 2022 election machines. And so she went in and had the machines forensically copied so they knew what was on them. And after the update, she saw that they had changed everything from vote tallies to the the poll books.

SPEAKER_07 1:08:04

It was like just a different copy. These two copies don't match.

SPEAKER_13 1:08:09

So by bringing that to light, they found some tiki-tacky things. Oh, she did this, she did that. Some guy had access to the machines that didn't have the right badge, blah, blah, blah, blah. So these guys commit nation-ending fraud, cheating you out of your birthright to vote and run this place. We own this country, not the politicians. Okay. They cheated you out of that, but yet they came after her on tikky-tacky stuff, blew it up into the biggest scandal ever, wouldn't let her present her side of the evidence. Guys, what do we elect these people for? Then to, you know, I want Tina, I want them to commit crimes when they expose bigger crimes, right? Like, I don't care if a whistleblower leaks info if you're telling me that American citizens are being murdered, right? Like, okay, do it. You know, my my heart goes out to fathers who kill pedophiles that molested their kids. Feels justified to me. Someone's got to do it, right? It's kind of the same thing here. America does not like to be cheated. And the fact that Tina Peters exposed the cheating and she got punished for it, it just goes to show that the system is upside down. This birthright citizenship, as J.D. Fance continues with Laura Ingram, is the loophole. It's the loophole that is being exploited. They're driving a Mac truck through it to cheat us out of our birthright, to dilute our vote, and to ultimately control our nation.

SPEAKER_15 1:09:29

It's fundamentally a loophole that now exists in our immigration system that rewards illegal aliens just because they have a baby in the United States while they're in our country illegally. So I think that loophole is going to cause a lot of problems. There are a number of things that we're already looking at in the administration, Laura, to try to close down that loophole. But fundamentally, what we're talking about is fixing a problem the Supreme Court created. We also want to look over the long term at undoing that problem to begin with, because again, this was only a five to four decision, Laura. How many times did we hear people say that this was going to go eight to one against the administration? We made some very compelling arguments. We have the better of the case. We've just got to keep fighting at this. And this drives home, Laura, why the midterms are so important. Because it's the senators who ultimately vote on those Supreme Court justices. Imagine if one of the five justices who made a bad call today, if they left the Supreme Court, we want to make sure we get somebody good on there in the future.

SPEAKER_13 1:10:30

Yeah, that would be great because there might be a Florida case coming up that's going to address the birthright citizenship very soon. So that is the case. You got to address it big time.

Iran Detente And Oil Reality Check

SPEAKER_13 1:10:40

J.D. Vance was also on a podcast. He was on the Michael Nose should and he addressed the war in Iran and this memorandum of understanding that creates this ceasefire period. Now, this has been a good thing, right? What's happened? Oil prices have plummeted, stock markets rallying again, right? All the things are happening. Well, JD Vance, I don't know if he did this inadvertently or intentionally, or they're just committed to transparency. It's kind of like when um, it's kind of like when George Bush at that conference table is like, well, we're in Iraq for the oil. I was like, well, I thought it was yellow cake. I thought we were there for the right. No, we're there for the oil. So this is one of those ones where this ceasefire wasn't brought about because, again, do we have Iran up against the ropes? According to Trump, we do. Do we, you know, or are we up against the ropes? Well, this little clip from JD Vance might be telling you we were up against the ropes. When you listen to the guys who talk about money, the Bitcoiners, the sound money guys, the gold bucks, what they the way they present things is that our economy is on an inevitable crash course with reality, right? Stock market's gonna plummet. Oil prices have a huge play in thing, but they're completely controlled by navies and armies, and you know, most of the oil around the world is controlled by either large international corporations that are have roots in corruption, blah, blah, blah, blah. Standard oil. So when I heard this clip, I thought, you know, this is another one of those signals through the noise. We are on a precipice right now, absolutely on a precipice. And Donald Trump's method is we want to grow out of this. And how do you grow out of something? Well, part of it's going to involve printing money. And nothing says that to me more than this clip right here.

SPEAKER_15 1:12:17

So I think what the president has told us to do is use this MOU to sort of refill the world's oil economy, to refill some stocks, and then to see where the hand is.

SPEAKER_13 1:12:31

That's it. We weren't winning. We just needed to refill the oil. Our strategic reserve is at the lowest it's been ever. Ever. Okay. But the world's strategic reserves, Japan's others, the lowest they've ever been, ever. So let's open up the strait, let's get some oil boats going. We need this Iranian oil. Oh, and we're going to get some stocks up.

SPEAKER_07 1:12:56

Yeah, let's avoid world collapse and make some money.

SPEAKER_13 1:12:58

Let's make some money. Exactly. But we're there. No nukes. No nukes. Yeah. So why are we in Iran? Right. Now, I think we're in Iran. It's totally justifiable. I've made my opinions on that very clear. However, this is a tell. The economy is shaky. They had to stop fighting and essentially not win, come to a detente in order to juice the stock market and refill oil supplies for 48 days. And then what happens after that? We either get real peace or we're right back at it. Right? We're right back at it. So that's just another one of those things. Long-term guys, they're telling you like some of this stuff is pretty touch and go. Now, Robin Delane in the chat says, I'm here. Loving you guys from Wisconsin. I'm so glad you made it. Everybody, don't forget to chat. You've got to chat. You've got to come live and chat this month. Those of you that are listening after the show streamed live, make an appointment this month to come join us live, 6:30 a.m. Monday through Friday till about 8 a.m. Pacific Standard Time, of course, 9 30 Eastern time. Come join us and chatting live. We have to get 75 of you to chat with us this month. That's a huge jump for us.

SPEAKER_07 1:14:07

And we love cheese.

SPEAKER_13 1:14:09

If you want to support the show, that is how you can support us. Keep us in this little creators program at Rumble. So if you like what you hear and you want more of it, keep us incentivized. That $200 a month goes a long way. Just kidding. It barely covers the hosting. I don't even think it does actually. We stream so many hours, just the audio hosting alone is like $300.

MKUltra Hearing And Crimes Alleged

SPEAKER_13 1:14:29

All right. Yesterday there was a huge hearing on MK Ultra. To my knowledge, no Democrats attended this hearing. What does that tell you about the Democrats? I mean, a generation ago, we had there's a movie about Diane Feinstein's staffer. I can't remember his name now, but he just, it's called The Report with the crossed out. And it's about torture in Guantanamo Bay. And you would think that the Democrats would be all over human rights abuses, torture, stuff like that. But somehow in the last 20 years, the Republican Party went from the party that was covering up torture and using it as a campaign rally. Look at all these terrorists we're torturing and getting info from that we never got any good actionable info from. And they actually won an election. That's how Bush was re-elected in the movie. When the report gets released, they kind of do a little flipsy thing and they get on the news before the report's released about torture. And they're like, oh, and we've gotten so much great actionable intel. The war's going great because of our torture program. And Diane Feinstein in the movie goes, Well, the Bush has just won re-election because of that news article. We didn't get our report out in time to show that we were getting no actionable intel. So it's interesting to me that the Democrats didn't show up to this hearing. But let's listen to Anna Polina Luna's opening statement about the MK Ultra program. This is a program that every conspiracy theorist is familiar with. And every conspiracy theorist knows that the MK Ultra program, we have literally just touched the tip of the iceberg on this program. They destroyed a lot of the evidence when they got caught. They literally had a bonfire and destroyed tons of evidence. And a lot of the best things that we know about MKUltra, the depravity that was happening under the US government's uh assignment was happening, was because files, financial files that were supposed to have been destroyed were not destroyed. They had been misfiled, likely to make them hard to find. And so they didn't get destroyed when there was the purge. They came out years later and it showed who was paid and all the different programs that were paid, and you know, the torture programs and things like that. It was absolutely horrible. So let's listen to Anna Paulina Luna's opening statement on this.

SPEAKER_12 1:16:30

This hearing is about the crimes committed by the Central Intelligence Agency against the American citizens and the decades of secrecy used to conceal them. The American people deserve a complete and truthful record. The victims and their families deserve acknowledgement. And this Congress has a constitutional obligation to ensure that full declassification is not delayed any longer. Project MKUltra was not a policy failure or an overzealous program that got out of hand. It was a deliberate, systematic governmental operation that subjected American citizens, prisoners, hospital patients, veterans, ordinary people to LSD, electroshock, hypnosis, sensory deprivation, psychological torture without their knowledge or consent. This went on for 20 years on American soil, funded by American taxpayer dollars and authorized by the very top of U.S. intelligence apparatus. And this program, when it did end, the men who ran it did not cooperate with investigators. They did not come forward. They committed another crime. They destroyed evidence. The documents this task force has reviewed are unambiguous. In January 1973, the director of the CIA, Richard Helms, prepared to leave office. He personally ordered the destruction of MK Ultra records. The CIA official document in writing states: over my stated objectives, the MKUltra files were destroyed by the order of DCI Mr. Helms shortly before his departure from office. A separate internal account confirms that Helms telephoned Dr. Gottlieb directly and instructed him to destroy, quote, all files pertaining to drug research and associated activities. Gottlieb completed or compiled, compiled four people, spent an entire day tearing, burning down 152 files. Then Gottlieb had his personal papers destroyed by his secretary before he retired. The head of the CIA-owned records center protested the destruction in writing, but he was overruled. That is obstruction of justice. That is criminal destruction of federal records. And neither individuals were ever charged with a crime for it. Helms received a $2,000 fine for lying to Congress about an unrelated manner and collected his government pension until he died. Scottley retired in rural Virginia and wrote poetry. No one went to prison. No victim was ever formally compensated by the government for the harm that they caused. By 1975, the Church Committee and the Rockefeller Commission had already established through sworn testimony and the surviving 1963 Inspector General report that MKUltra existed and that the CIA had run a program of human experimentation on unwitting Americans. The scope and detail of what we know today is largely because of an accident. In 1977, an archivist diligently complying with a FOIA request discovered seven boxes of MKUltra financial records that had been misspiled and escaped the bonfire. Those seven boxes included the names of institutions, the name of subprojects, the researchers who particip who participated, the specific operation that the CIA had funded. And without them, the vast majority of MKUltra would only be a rumor, just as Helms and Gottlieb intended. Those seven boxes revealed that MKUltra comprised at least 149 subprojects, operated across more than 80 institutions, and involved 185 non-government researchers. They revealed that the CIA covertly contributed $375,000 to a hospital research wing, which was approved directly by DCI Alan Dolis, which Richard Helms um concurrence, so the agency could use unwitting patients as experimental subjects in what their own documents called a hospital safe house.

SPEAKER_13 1:20:11

So what they did, $375,000 back then was the equivalent to millions of dollars now. Sure. They went to a local hospital, like our local hospital here. They basically said, we're gonna send our people in there. We're gonna run experiments on the patients that you have that we choose, whatever experiments we want. And they created a hospital safe house. No one's gonna report it. These victims are gonna die of natural causes or whatever thing you've got going on there. And they went in and they abused normal American citizens who went to a hospital for medical help. Okay. Absolutely horrific.

SPEAKER_12 1:20:44

The CIO owns Inspector General said in 1963, his classify report concluded that the program had exceeded the agency's legal chapter, and covert testing on unwitting subjects placed the rights and interests of U.S. citizens in jeopardy. The program ran for a decade that we know of, and they ignore ignored their own watchdog. Let me be clear on what I believe that we are dealing with here. Administering drugs to people without their knowledge or consent, subjecting humans to psychological torture, and using prisoners and hospital patients as non-consenting research subjects. These are crimes against humanity. The Central Intelligence Agency committed them, and then the director of the CIA was ordered or was ordering the destruction of evidence.

SPEAKER_13 1:21:28

Let that sink in for a second. The CIA is a part of our government. The CIA is us. It is our country, and that is our government.

SPEAKER_07 1:21:41

I feel like I've been subjected to a campaign this whole time, my entire life.

SPEAKER_13 1:21:47

They committed crimes against humanity and then covered it up. What is the punishment for that? How is it that it even still exists as an agency? The minimum they should have done was rename it. Right? This is the kind of stuff where you have to sit back and you go, the government is guilty till they prove themselves innocent. Every depraved thing that Nero did is being done today. Every depraved thing that Nero, who lives in history infamously for his depravity, everything he did is being done today with the sanction of our government. There was a little interaction here where this MK Ultra program overlapped with a sex training program. We were creating sex slaves, okay? And they we don't know, we know a lot about it from third-party sources and even some of the victims, like Catherine O'Brien, who came forward. And this problem is insidious. Some of the famous people that we look up to, Ronald Reagan, was were involved in this kind of stuff. The Iran Contra scandal overlapped with MKUltra a lot. Where did Epstein come from? He came from the Iran Contra scandal. That was where he first started working with the government. Where does Soros come from? He comes from the Iran Contra stuff. All these guys come out of the same time frame where MK Ultra has now reached its zenith to reach its pinnacle of understanding on how to break the human mind, create, you know, dual personalities, embed information into mine, you know, replace allegiances that you've had your whole life with a new allegiance, essentially how to industrialize Stockholm syndrome, right? All of this stuff were the were the net educational results of MKUltra. And then they start to put it into practice. Well, one of the things that they did was they ran a brothel in San Francisco.

SPEAKER_29 1:23:39

The remarkable aspect of Operation Midnight Climax was that there wasn't even the pretense of scientific experimentation. The person watching behind the one-way mirror was a grossly overweight drug officer sitting on a portable toilet and drinking cocktails out of a pitcher. There was nobody there that was a scientist or somebody who understood sexual behavior or human psychology. So there was no science involved in it at all. That was my next question.

SPEAKER_17 1:24:08

Do you think that the agents were involved in the sexual encounters?

SPEAKER_29 1:24:12

And could that have actually been the reason why the bordello was opened? There was no prospect of any serious scientific result out of that project, given the personnel who were overseeing it. So the IA officers, particularly got involved in overseeing Operation Midnight Climax, certainly were able to take advantage of what it offered.

SPEAKER_13 1:24:35

What they were doing was they opened a brothel, they would drug people, and then they would watch them and participate. And it gets worse. That's just the public brothel. Okay. No scientific reason. When we went and looked at the uh rendition, the terrorism, the the torture that was happening in Guantanamo Bay, there was the guys that were running that program were just sadists. Like they didn't, they didn't have any background that would show that they had the ability to get information through torture. It was two mad psychologists who just thought if we keep people up forever, they'll start telling the truth. If we waterboard people, they'll start telling the truth. If we do all these horrible things to people, they'll start tearing the truth. And it was literally just how far can we push the human psyche? And that's what was going on there. They've never got any actionable intelligence, not one name in all the torture we did. Like we literally realized torture didn't work after the Inquisition, right? But we don't learn from history because we never read deeply. We never understand this stuff and we just repeat it over and over again.

SPEAKER_07 1:25:37

You know, we talk about this like it's crazy and it is, but um, you know, what's the purpose of the torture? It's to stress people out to get them to talk, right? Yes. It's uh, you know, and so the stress is the tool. Well, the American people have been getting stressed out constantly by our government. You know, we're stressed about finances, we're stressed about uh go ahead.

SPEAKER_13 1:26:04

In the hearing, they named that I think Lee Harvey Oswald, the Manson killers were all MK Ultra subs. Oh yes. And that's confirmed. I mean, they confirmed it in the hearing. Like they assassinated a president with one of these people that was involved in this program early on. They assassinated the Mansons went in and assassinated that. I can't remember the family now, but they talked about it in the hearing, just killed them all, right? Just totally MK Ultra. And we just know that that the one of the most famous serial killing cults in America, the Mansons, were a product of the CIA. And the drug experimentation, all that stuff. Now, here's the thing Tim Burkhart in this hearing asked the expert witness if this program isn't still active and if it couldn't be used on a more sophisticated level to generate assassins in our modern day, aka the Charlie Kirk assassin.

SPEAKER_06 1:26:53

What are the possibilities that that what we've learned in MKUltra now that it is advanced so much to algorithms and and the computer and getting to loners that some of these loners could through this just mass propagation of whatever you're doing uh could cause someone to maybe take a shot at a president.

SPEAKER_01 1:27:25

I know there's a lot of speculation out there about the uh Butler shooting and I guess even the Charlie Kirk shooting. I just hate to speculate um because I don't know. I have no firsthand knowledge whether those guys are programmed through radio waves or through their computer activity. So I would never hazard a guess except to say what I've already said that they developed means that we've never been told about many, many years ago, and I imagine they've evolved to be much more effective now.

SPEAKER_06 1:28:00

One more time and I apologize again. But don't you think that they can cast this broad net through these algorithms and other things, and maybe they don't know the exact person it's gonna affect, but they know what type of person it's gonna affect, and they know it's gonna happen, and that way they can they can't predict when it's gonna happen, but they think it will happen, and then that way they can sort of wash their hands of this whole thing and say we didn't have anything to do with it, but in effect they really did because they uh they put this out there and they continue to put it out there to whatever method you're talking about. Go ahead, guys. I'm sorry. Ma'am, if you want to jump in. Doctor, go ahead.

SPEAKER_29 1:28:41

It sounds to me like you're describing something like the Martin Luther King assassination. The FBI didn't carry it out, but it created such a climate just denouncing King as the most dangerous man in America and putting out all this material about how he was helping communists, they must have thought it's gonna filter down. Somebody will take action, and then we can say we didn't have anything to do with it.

SPEAKER_06 1:29:03

And James Earl Ray was a third-rate thief. He made an incredible shot, one foot on a commode, one foot in a in a bathtub, uh leaning out of a window, basically. And um the next day, the um or that afternoon, all the shrubbery was cut in front of the flop house he was staying in. There's a lot on that one that will never be discussed. I have some friends that were there, so I guess I could I'm on pretty close to first hand knowledge. But um, yeah. I'm sorry. I'm probably gonna get audited when I walk out of the room.

SPEAKER_13 1:29:35

I just so basically, you know, what's the possibility that they took what they learned through MK Ultra and that they're applying it to the mask? And the answer to that is yes. Yes. Listen, the blue light flicker on your devices, your cell phones, the the addiction, all of this information and how we go about hypnotizing the transing of America, trans, putting us in the street.

SPEAKER_07 1:30:00

Yeah, why would you throw away such a useful tool?

SPEAKER_13 1:30:03

Why would you throw away such a useful tool? Exactly. And we know they've used it. We know that a lot of this stuff made its way into our technology. And he's right. Now they might not know who's gonna take the shot, but they know if he just pumped this out with this type of propaganda, we can get you to do whatever. But they also might know who's gonna take the shot. They also know who's gonna take the shot. Yeah, exactly. But this this hearing was phenomenal, and I recommend you go listen to my private stream yesterday where I watched a bunch of these clips. The stream got cut off because my chrome died and I fell asleep. I literally fell asleep on camera watching one of the longer players. I was it was late at night. I was trying to get the 30 hours, anyways. But there's some really good clips up there, guys. It all comes down to this.

You Are The Solution And Take Action

SPEAKER_13 1:30:46

There are lots of problems out there, but there's only one solution. You are the solution. No one else is going to save you. Only you can save you. That's why we talk about Bitcoin. Get off the dollar, then inflation doesn't matter. You can secure your own financial future, right? We talk about not being dependent on other people. As peasants, listen, you got to have a job, you depend on an employer, but you do everything you can to be self-reliant, to hedge up for a future day, to save for a rainy day, as they say, right? And getting involved politically. Our politicians will continue to treat you like chopped liver until you stand up to them. How do you stand up to them? Go to the political meetings, whether it's Democrat or Republican, go to your council meetings, your city council meetings, your school board meetings, write letters to your senator and your congressmen, call them on or on the regular, make your voice heard, get get uh active in civics and politics and things like that, because this country does still belong to us. Who else would it belong to? Take your place. This is what Clarence Thomas said in April.

SPEAKER_25 1:31:54

I think if we don't stand up and take ownership of our country and take responsible for it, we are slowly letting others control how we think and what we think. And the I think the beauty of going to school uh is that you learn how to think for yourself. You develop the discipline to think things through. Uh, you if you think it's losing confidence, then you get up and you participate. You don't sit on the sideline. You think that the kind the sit that the the state is being run and inconsistent with how you feel, then you get up and you participate. You prepare yourself if you think that the medical profession is not right, then you become a doctor or be a medical uh uh person and you deal with that. Uh, I think we need to take ownership of our country, it's our country.

SPEAKER_13 1:32:46

And that's it. We have to take ownership. It's our country. You don't like MK Ultra, then get involved in politics, man, because that was politics untethered. That was Americans just fat and happy, right? Living on post Bretton Woods and living on the new dollar standard or whatever. Fat and happy, and we weren't watching, we weren't paying attention. We have to see the signal through the noise. We have to take care of ourselves. As peasants, we have to live here. There's nowhere for us to run. So get involved, take your country back. Otherwise, they're gonna MK Ultra you, your kids, and every grandkid you've ever had into putting pictures of whoever the current president is in the house, where you might have, you know, Mary or Jesus in your home. You're gonna it's gonna be like North Korea here pretty soon. Really take your country back, take your county back. Go to politicalremodel.com, take back my county.com, and get involved.

Outro Clip And Final Sign Off

SPEAKER_13 1:33:44

All right, guys, that's it for the show today. We will talk to you tomorrow and we'll send you on a raid while we're watching the outro.

SPEAKER_20 1:34:19

I'm thirty seven. I'm plenty seven, I'm not old. Well, I can't just call you man, you could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. Well you didn't bother to find out, did you? I did say something about the old woman, but from behind you looking if you automatically treat me like an inferior. Well, I am king. Oh king inferior. How'd you get that, eh? By exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. If there's ever going to be any progress. How'd you do? How do you do, good lady? I'm Arthur, King of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of Britons. The Britons. Who are the Britons? We all are. We are all Britons. And I am your king.

SPEAKER_21 1:35:09

No, we had a king. I thought we're an autonomous collective.

SPEAKER_20 1:35:12

You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship. A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes are. There you go. That's what it's all about. Only people will these good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives there. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What? I told you. We're in a narco-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week.

SPEAKER_05 1:35:39

Yes.

SPEAKER_20 1:35:39

But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see. By a civil majority in the case of purely internal affairs. Be quacked. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of meeting. I order you to be quacked. I'm your king. You don't vote for king. The lady of the lake. Her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur from the bottom of the water. Signifying by divine providence that I aren't was to carry Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds, distributive thoughts is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony. But you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some water returns for a sort of. I mean, if I went round saying I was an emperor, just because some moistened bitch had loved a scimitar at me, they put me away. Shut up, we shut up. Now we see the parcel in the system. I've been repressed. Oh, what a giveaway. You hear that, you hear that. I'm on about. Do you see repressing me? You saw it in the