Viagra Stops Cancer While The News Burns

A Monday morning show shouldn’t feel like a stress test for reality, but that’s where we land fast: a viral health headline, then immediate reminders that real people are losing homes, safety, and trust. We start with Spokane’s devastating wildfire footage and the hard, practical questions it raises about evacuation scale, fire breaks, infrastructure, and why media exaggerations can distort what the public understands about risk and responsibility.

From there, we shift to a brutal story out of Twin Falls: an active shooter scene near an In-N-Out and a Tesla charging area that leaves families trapped at the worst possible moment. That “dystopian” feeling sets up our biggest media segment: RFK Jr’s clash with Dana Bash over vaccine safety talking points, autism research, and whether the job is to reduce “hesitancy” or tell the truth. We also dig into gain-of-function research, lab leak accountability, and why constitutional rights keep coming up whenever leaders claim emergency powers.

The back half connects bigger incentives: a prominent expert reversing toward “more likely a lab leak,” a depopulation proposal framed as sustainable development, and New York policies that require ID for subsidized groceries while resisting voter ID. We close with party fractures over democratic socialism, a Washington confirmation fight tied to “weaponization,” a disturbing funeral home scandal, and a look at yen swaps and bond-market pressure behind upbeat political messaging.

Subscribe for more, share this with a friend who’s tired of scripted narratives, and leave a review with the moment that made you stop and think hardest.

Transcript

Welcome, Audio Glitches, And Coffee Ritual

SPEAKER_12 0:37

Peasants, man. We're just peasants. Every one of us. You watch those old movies, you see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning, peasants. Welcome to another episode of The Peasants Perspective. My microphone does not sound right. Give me just a second here. There we go. How's that? That should make a difference. Maybe. Yep, that should make a difference. Oh, sorry, folks. Gotta make sure this works. Let me turn that up a little bit. Alright, well, gosh, that doesn't sound very good. Look at me. Always having sound problems, having some issue on my own. Alright, well, I'm here. Hopefully you guys can hear me okay. Sarah Singh says, good morning, Sarah Sings. I was just thinking about you the other day. Sarah Singh says, good morning, Thundering Oak. Good morning, Shantini, good morning, Carlito and Tiffany. Good morning, everyone. Got a case of the Mondays. Oh my goodness, me too. Um, Carlitz, good morning, Mariso, good morning from Meridian, Idaho. Marisol, you're back home. That's amazing. Sounds fine. Thundering Oak sounds good. Well, I'm glad I'm sound good because it just sounded a little bit funny to me. But I put these headphones on. I kind of wanted to. I I I overheard my wife listening to the podcast and I was like, ah, that sound. But you know, I'm the most critical person of my own sound of anybody there is. So no surprise there. Okay, so I don't really know where to fit in this study. So we'll we'll start on something after we do the simultaneous sip, which is what it is time for now is the simultaneous sip. And all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tankard, a chalice, a stein, a canteen, jug, or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unp of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better. But you gotta give me just a little more little second here. Still got some issues. Ah, I got issues. Hold on. Almost for time for the simultaneous sip. The simultaneous sip starts right now. I can't take anymore. I can't take anymore. That's being called the worst national anthem that's ever been re sung in a hundred two hundred and fifty years. And it was at the women's national baseball league, and uh they it was a women's baseball game. What's the what's the national anthem? Probably the worst anthem in 250 years. Oh, that's pretty good. Pony Boy says, good morning, Pony Boy, glad you made it. Okay, check this out, folks. This is just interesting. I don't really know what to think of it. So check this out. Polymarket reports, and then I double check this on Grok. Groundbreaking U.S. government study shows Viagra may be instrumental in stopping the spread of cancer. So it is a good time to get up and stop cancer. Somebody out there's laughing. I know somebody is out there is laughing. Okay. All

Spokane Wildfire Devastation And Hard Questions

SPEAKER_12 4:13

right. So we do have some really sad things happening, however. Sorry, I'm still laughing at my own joke. We do have some really sad things happening out in Spokane, Washington. We've had some absolutely devastating fires over the weekend, or I guess one specific fire over the weekend. So here's an image of this fire. This is, like I said, like uh really catastrophic. I've spent a little bit of time out in Spokane this last year. It is a fun, fun city. Look at this. Oh something's being weird here. Oh, it's playing picture in picture. All right, so I'm gonna turn the volume down because obviously you already heard a little bit of a treat there. So here is what's going on down in over in Spokane. For me, it's over in Spokane. But you've had basically a whole neighborhood that's just been devastated. And they've they have evacuated. Here's here's a daylight picture. Look at this. They have evacuated about 60,000 people out of Spokane, which is like, by the way, and I don't know if it's Spokane, Spokane Valley proper, but 60,000 people is like, you know, a fifth of the population of the area. It's it's if not more. That's a lot of people to evacuate for that area. Anyways, you see this, just look at that, just a whole neighborhoods. So this is not something, this is not something that's an impossibility out here in the West, but it is, you know, uncommon to lose whole neighborhoods. It's typically been a California problem. Hasn't usually been too much of a uh hasn't usually been too much of a um hasn't usually been too much of a you know Washington, Oregon problem per se. So our governor, Governor Ferguson, had a conversation with Donald Trump, and I'm presuming to ask for aid. Apparently I went really well. This is probably the first nice thing a governor Ferguson has ever said about Donald Trump coming out of his mouth here.

SPEAKER_13 6:08

I will just say I can I can't speak to the past. I wasn't governor then, uh, but what I can say is I deeply appreciate the president taking time. I think I requested a conversation. I'm losing track of the hours here today, but just a few hours ago. And I was on the phone with him literally a couple hours later. Um and I had the clear sense he understood what was going on. I had the clear sense he'd been briefed on what was going on. Um he was knowledgeable about the situation. Um and and I appreciated that.

SPEAKER_14 7:26

Uh nothing left but the skeletal outline. And this is a similar image that we're really seeing just around this roadway here. And if we even pan just a little bit more, uh, this is a cause for concern. We see that a gas line is still on, so hence that fire that you're seeing over there. Uh, we do have utility crews on site working to mend all of this at the current moment. But I think what's really interesting too, Charles, my photographer, if we could pan across the street and show the homes that are currently still standing, and I think it goes to show you the spotty nature of a fire that we're dealing with when it's so wind-driven like it was yesterday. John, you mentioned the 45 mile an hour wind gust. I mean, that is nearing the strength of hurricane force winds. And so that leads to the spotty nature because you have these embers that are being picked up.

SPEAKER_12 8:15

Right. No, not nearing the force of hurricane winds. In fact, that's worth a fact check. What are what are the wind speeds uh for hurricane winds? Okay. I have a feeling it's gonna be a lot more than 40 miles per hour. Let's see, the hurricane wind scale. So this is um, I may as well just share this with you guys since we're just having a casual morning here. Okay, so category one hurricane would be 74 to 95 miles per hour. Very dangerous, and winds will produce some damage. So 45 miles an hour. Sorry, not approaching hurricane winds. That's about half, half, half, half the speed of hurricanes. But nonetheless, we'll forgive the news reporter for sharing that. It is actually very tragic what's going on over there. Obviously, you know, Spokane, I mean, it's Washington State. This is like the hometown fire here, but it's uh very tragic. One of the things that Spencer Pratt put out this weekend, because obviously LA has had their own fires, and that's what was the impetus for him running for for mayor, but he put out that fires are weapons of mass destruction. And he's absolutely correct, right? If an arsonist lights on a fire and it causes untold amounts of damage, I mean, that's that's a weapon of mass destruction, and it's terrorism, frankly. And there's no allegation that I have seen at all that these fires in Spokane are set, you know, man-made or man-made fires. It's not an impossibility. If you know the area, it's dry as a tinderbox this time of year. But it's also very possible this was a thunderstorm or just, you know, semi-natural human causes, a cigarette butt out a window. I mean, I don't know, haven't heard anything. I'll let you guys know if I hear what was the cause of it. But the idea that fires can really cause some serious damage. And one of the other things is as a weapon of mass destruction, our leaders are responsible to put out these fires, right? Like having enough fire break, having enough uh engineering around your subdivisions so that wildfires can't come right up to them. Uh, that's probably something that, you know, I mean, if they're gonna do everything they do for zoning, you think that one would make sense. Um, obviously, water in California has been a big issue, making sure that the firemen have water available to them to fight fires. So all of those things kind of add up, right? Like you could think these fires can just break out at any time. You'd want to be, you know, pretty much prepared for them. And uh, you know, it is it's tricky. Now, the other thing, too, especially if coming from the West, the West is vast, right? So preparing for a fire, you can have be as prepared as you want to be prepared. And when you start talking about fires that come in and, you know, with thousand-acre fronts, it it almost doesn't matter how much prep you have. A county in a city the size of Spokane isn't gonna have enough firefighters for something like that. So the only way you can really prevent it is prepping the burn path to our cities. So I don't know. Uh Thundering Oak says, We have an at out in Spokane. Don't know how she's doing yet. Yeah, we have a community member out in Spokane as well. Sarah Sings, hope she says, I hope she's doing okay. Thundering Oak, thanks at Sarah Sings. I'm just reading back their conversation, you guys. Thundering Oak, I'm curious why the homes and cars are burnt, but the trees are not. I think it's just it's these aren't like okay, so I have been through a forest fire, and sometimes we see the most violent of images where you see a big front of fire. But really, a lot of these fires, forest fires do kind of pop up in these little patches. And so, you know, once the house starts burning, the house starts burning. The neighbors, you know, in the case like that, or across the street, if the neighbors are home, they're probably outside of their house with a hose spraying off their roof. Um, I think I don't think that's super uncommon to have kind of like spotty fires and stuff like that. The other thing, too, is fires will rush through the underbrush and leave the trees. So you will see, like in that case, we saw a picture of trees all around that are green. They're pine trees, they don't really burn like that, but everything below them is burnt. And that's actually how their pine cones open up and release the seeds, is fire. So they're like ready for the fires. That's why the trees aren't always burnt or just the canopies burnt and it'll grow back the next

Twin Falls Shooting And A Tesla Trap

SPEAKER_12 12:19

year. So, along with kind of the dystopian catastrophe happening over in Spokane, over in Idaho Falls, they had their own dystopian catastrophe as well. Now, Idaho Falls is a small town. Now that there's more information available up, it's about two hours east, hour and a half, two hours east of Boise. It's about three hours northwest of Salt Lake City. So it's it's part of the Snake River Valley, and it's uh it's a really interesting town. There's a huge Snake Ridge Gore gorge there. In fact, it's where Evil Knevel tried to jump the Snake River, was right there, right outside right outside of Twin Falls. So, anyways, Twin Falls had an active shooter situation at an in-and-out burger. So, in my circles, being from Idaho originally, uh, I've been hearing a lot about this. This was kind of one of those like not in my hometown kind of things. This is something that you constantly expect to hear from our major cities. We don't expect to hear about stuff like this coming out from little towns like Twin Falls. Twin Falls is considered a safe haven, you know, it's where people go to raise their kids quietly in a small, you know, southern Idaho towns. I I don't know what the current population of Twin Falls Inn is. I I I uh assisted in building the Mormon temple that's out there. So I spent some time there and I've passed through it a million times. And uh so I don't know what the population is, but when I was growing up, it was like 50 grand. Right now it might be like 100 grand or something like that. But they had a shooter out in Idaho Falls. It's just tragic. So this is of all the information, because it was really fragmented information coming in. This is the best compilation of what happened that I've seen. Again, we're starting to kind of live in a dystopian world, which is gonna matter here in a couple minutes.

SPEAKER_20 13:56

Now that there's more information available, I wanted to do it.

SPEAKER_10 14:51

And social media posts and social media users are speculating it's a guy by the name of Jordan Salinas. Now, that's not confirmed by any law enforcement or any official authorities yet. That's still kind of like just speculation. So take that with a grain of salt. But the dude did post the video on his YouTube channel that was him training at sundown doing desert drills with the suppressed FN57 USG, and it looked very similar to the way that he looked in the video that was recorded of him. Now, again, we don't know for sure that's the same guy, but a lot of people speculate it is. The Twin Falls chief of police came out during a press conference after the situation had been determined to be over, and he said that the gunman was deceased due to self-inflicted wounds after the attack. And officials stated that the threat to the community was over and that there was only one shooter outside of the bystander that was trying to engage that one shooter. A city spokesperson Josh Palmer ended up reporting that three people have been killed and that seven people were injured, some critically, and they were taken to St. Luke's Magic Valley Medical Center. In N Out Burger and the CEO of In N Out put out a statement on social media about this incident, and I wanted to read that to you guys because I thought that was pretty important. So they said, quote, to my dear In N Out family, customers, and friends and families to both. My heart is broken, my chest is heavy, my eyes burn from the tears I've shed. We lost one of our beautiful associates tonight. She was taking care of our most important asset, our customers. And her life was taken by a disgusting human who doesn't value the life of others or his own. He shot both on our property and off and ended his life shortly after he took the precious lives of our associate and customers, innocent people who never saw it coming. In and out will be mourning with the families and praying for them as they tread through a very painful season. I am no stranger to loss, but this is so incredibly tough. And my heart goes out to all the associates and the customers who are there during this traumatic event. I love you all, and I ask you to turn to God, not in anger, but seeking comfort and strength for those who are hurting. We will stand together and we will do everything we can to learn from this situation. Love and God bless you. Lindsay and family.

SPEAKER_12 16:56

So what's particularly tragic about this is uh Mada Easel, you says it happened, it happened at a Tesla charging center, and it didn't actually happen at a Tesla charging center. This is the scene right here. I'll share this with you again. This is the scene right here where the young man is shooting into a Tesla. So this is, I believe the charging center is at the in and out, possibly, or right next to it. And there's actually a husband and wife. Uh, I believe they were up from Utah in that Tesla while it was charging, and they were unable to get away because the Tesla was charging, and they wouldn't get out of the Tesla to unplug it to drive away, and they ended up getting shot point blank through their Tesla. So very sad image there. Yeah, it's quite the dystopian, dystopian world.

RFK Jr Challenges Vaccine Talking Points

SPEAKER_12 17:45

Elon Musk posted this, and this is kind of where I wanted to go with this today. He says, You watch the Hunger Games and you sided with the resistance. You watch Star Wars and you sided with the resistance. You watched The Matrix and you sided with the resistance. You watched Divergent and sided with the resistance. You watched V4 Vendetta and sided with the resistance. When it's fiction, you understand. Yet you refuse to see it when it's the reality you're living in. Wild. So Elon Musk posted that. That's pretty good. That's pretty good, which kind of brings us to our next thing, right? Obviously, last week we had Anthony Fauci go to Congress and testify. And this weekend, on the weekend shows on State of the Union with Dana Bash, RFK Jr. came on. And this was 20 minutes of must-see cable news TV. It was absolutely amazing. Okay. And it's it's very uh, we're gonna watch a couple clips. We can't watch all of it, obviously. We're gonna watch a couple clips. We're gonna watch two longer clips, and there might be a little bit of overlap. I apologize if there is. It's just the nature of how these clips get cut. But this first clip is gonna go through, again, on my algorithm, all I saw yesterday evening was RFK. RFK was like one clip after another. In fact, there was like no other news other than these are these RFK clips, it seemed like. So there's lots of great clips. This first clip has most of the great clips that you see circulating are in this clip. So we'll we'll watch this and then we'll break it down. This dystopian universe, right? One of the things RFK is gonna tell Dana Bash here is you were part of the problem. And he's in in referencing CNN, but her specifically, too, right? You were part of the problem. You're you just repeat what you're told. He really goes after this mocking bird media concept that these guys were, you know, trust the Esperts and totally infatuated with that whole the whole thing, and they bear some blame for what happened during COVID. So this was a beautiful interview. And you have to remember something about Dana Bash. Her ex-husband, who she kept his last name, Bash, her ex-husband was one of the 51 or 53 signatories on the Hunter Biden's laptop is Russian Dentist Information Letter, right? He is a deep stater, and she was married to him up until after Trump, you know, allegedly lost the 2020 election. At some point they separated, but she kept his last name. So she is part of the deep state apparatus. Like 1000%. She's part of the that control structure that the media is. So let's listen to this exchange. It is wonderful.

SPEAKER_21 20:20

Did you say probing the link? I'm just quoting the Wall Street Journal. That they that the president wants you to go further to probe the link between autism and vaccines. He certainly does. Okay. Now have you talked to him about medical research that have studied this for 25 years and found no link between autism and vaccines? And and and just this is my question here, because I don't want to litigate that. My question is why not, because you are HHS secretary now, why not study what could cause autism, which scientists do believe starts with fetal brain development. Why not do some studies on that, whether there's an you're an environmental lawyer, whether there are environmental factors that go into contributing to a predisposed genetic situation?

SPEAKER_07 21:13

Well, let me say this first. We're doing all those things. And as one of the ways 70 studies out there.

SPEAKER_12 21:21

Okay, so she goes, uh why don't we study what could cause autism as opposed to what does cause autism? It's an interesting small little play on words there, and nobody would ever intentionally say that. If they do, they're the most nefarious people you can imagine. But unconsciously, when you say something like that, well, why don't you study what could cause it? Why don't we just study what causes it? Do you see the quick play there? Like, well, why don't we study the stuff that we know doesn't cause it, that could cause it? Like DNA. That's what she's implying there.

SPEAKER_07 21:56

We're doing all those things. And as one of the ways that we found Tylenol, there's seven. 23 studies out there and linked Tylenol explosure during later pregnancy and during the perinatal period to artist mindset. But um you are wrong when you say that this issue has been studied. It has been studied, and you're rolling your eyes to it, but I am because I I don't want I don't want to have you use our air to say this.

SPEAKER_21 22:23

There have been more than 40 studies involving 5.6 million people to conclude there is no link between vaccines and autism. This is the head of the Committee of Infectious Diseases for the American Academy of PC.

SPEAKER_07 22:36

And now let me tell you what the Institute of Medicine says, which is the National Academy of Sciences, which is the ultimate arbiter on vaccine safety, and which it does not have an interest in this debate. It says that none of the eight vaccines that are administered during the first six months of life have ever been studied for relationship to autism. It found two studies, one on the DTB vaccine that showed that it does cause autism, and one on the hepatitis B vaccine, that again suggests that it does cause autism. The Institute of Medicine dismissed those two studies because they were based on CDC's database. The studies that you're referring to are all from one vaccine, the MMR vaccine, or one ingredient primary.

SPEAKER_21 23:28

So you are using, you are actually looking at, you're starting new studies to try to link autism, but you're also telling me I'm trying to link autism to anything.

SPEAKER_07 23:36

I'm trying to find out why is autism calling.

SPEAKER_21 23:41

Are you also trying to find out how it interacts with people's DNA, what's predisposed to uh to to have an autistic child? Are you doing both?

SPEAKER_12 23:51

Okay. This is actually important to understand because this is going to come into more play here. Really important to understand. Once you see this, you can't really unsee it. In the Bible, there's a verse, I can't remember exactly where it's at, it's in the Old Testament. Beware of those who worship death, okay? Beware of those who worship death, beware of those who make death their muse, their idol. Okay. Even if it's just to avoid a death, anytime you glorify something and make it become start to respect it, to fear it, it becomes your idol. And so here she's she's saying, well, what if it's part of the DNA? This is one of the tropes about autism, is that somehow autism is genetic and that there's just environmental triggers, an allergy, uh, you know, some environmental presence in the in the uh in the womb, any number of things. But they want us to go down this genetic rabbit hole and go start checking DNA. First of all, it just creates a whole lot more testing. So there's one thing. There's a there's a whole industrial complex around testing and stuff like that. But more than anything, more than anything, by trying to say it's genetic, what they're going to do, and they're already doing this in countries like Canada, well, if you have any genetic predisposition to anything, which because autism is not genetic, and I think they've pretty conclusively shown that, because autism is not really genetic, and the the commonalities amongst everybody with autism genetically are tangential at best. You know, it's like partial, like, oh, 51% of people with autism have this gene combination. It's like whatever. Um, because of that, it's a dead end, and it will cause people to sterilize themselves because they're, oh, I have a genetic disposition to pass on, you know, the autism gene or whatever. It'll cause people to sterilize themselves. It'll cause a huge increase in abortion because they'll test babies in the fetus. So remember, most people that you meet with autism, you don't know they have autism or a mental problem until they start talking or, you know, doing something that's out of the ordinary. You'd never know that in the womb. And all of a sudden, genetic testing would lead to a whole probably rise in abortions amongst the upper middle class. You know, it could be really bad. Once you know that that's a motive, and I'll prove it to you here in a second, you'll see that over and over again, especially with vaccines. We actually know that genetics are not the cause of it. Mock my words, that'll be proven over time, and it's already proven, but the the powers that be don't want you to know that.

SPEAKER_07 26:15

Yeah, but but Dana, you probably don't understand this because you're not a scientist, but genes are not. Well, you're not either genes don't cause epidemics. I understand genes epidemic. A gene provides an environmental.

SPEAKER_21 26:30

That's what I'm asking. Are you studying the environmental exposure?

SPEAKER_07 26:34

But your statement, you have been fooled. Your statement that this has been studied is not true. It's categorically, it is considered any of this stuff.

SPEAKER_21 26:45

It is considered who by every scientist who has studied this. That is not true.

SPEAKER_07 26:52

I can give you hundreds of scientists who have looked at this.

SPEAKER_21 26:55

So on the one hand, you are do you understand why people are getting the Academy of Sciences?

SPEAKER_07 27:00

What greater authority?

SPEAKER_21 27:01

Do you understand why people are not getting measles vaccines? Because they're hearing you say that it could cause subject.

SPEAKER_07 27:07

I'm not, it's very much related. Show me one of the studies that's been done on the first eight vaccines during the first six months of life. You will not find them. The National Academy of Sciences.

SPEAKER_21 27:19

So if that's the case, then why are you telling people to get the measles vaccine?

SPEAKER_07 27:22

Because that is one of the vaccines that has been studied.

SPEAKER_21 27:27

Okay.

SPEAKER_07 27:27

It's the only one that has been studied.

SPEAKER_21 27:30

Do you want people to get the MMR vaccine? Yeah, I said that already.

SPEAKER_07 27:35

Okay. So I know you're flustered now, and it is I I don't I'm not flustered at all.

SPEAKER_21 27:40

Because I am frustrated.

SPEAKER_07 27:42

And honestly.

SPEAKER_21 27:42

The reason I'm frustrated is because I you are the HHS, you are the HHS secretary, and you are talking about things that that that lead to vaccine hesitancy in this country. And and it is something that causes problems for people when there is not anything Let me ask you something.

SPEAKER_07 28:05

Do you see your job as ending vaccine hesitancy, or do you see your job as telling the truth?

SPEAKER_12 28:13

Uh do you see your job as ending vaccine hesitancy or telling the truth? What if, in some hypothetical situation, encouraging people to be so vaccine accepting and getting multiple boosters will not stop the spread of COVID, will actually increase the spread of COVID, will cause autoimmune deficiency problems amongst a huge portion of the population that gets the vaccine? What if we knew that giving chill little babies before the age of six months 40-something vaccines causes all kinds of environmental problems with their DNA and their development and things like that? What if? What if the truth would lead you to the conclusion that you're doing self-harm and institutional harm to our children and to people who get vaccines? What if that was the truth? Would vaccine hesitancy and removing that be the goal? Or would that be the objective? Right. So RFK makes an interesting point there. Is getting rid of vaccine hesitancy the goal?

SPEAKER_21 29:10

I see my job as telling the truth. And the truth is that there is study after study after study. It's one of the most studied things out there in science.

SPEAKER_07 29:20

You repeat it like a parrot. You're repeating it like a parrot. You don't want to be here and debate the story.

SPEAKER_21 29:29

So you I don't I'm not debating this view. Of course you won't. No, because I'm not sure what you're saying.

SPEAKER_07 29:38

That's what you do during COVID. Now we know that Anthony Fauci, who was the expert, was lying about everything, about mass, about social distancing, about natural immunity, about the transmission from the vaccine, about the source of COVID. He was lying, and you were punishing people for not trusting the experts. And now you're rolling out the experts again to talk about something that you have no personal knowledge of.

SPEAKER_21 30:05

Okay. Well, guess what? That is my job to talk to people. Your job is to talk to the American public. Yes, and my job is to get as much information as I can.

SPEAKER_07 30:15

And what we were doing a positive skepticism.

SPEAKER_21 30:19

What we were doing in COVID, and st and still, with regard to these vaccines, is getting the best information, the best science that we can.

SPEAKER_12 30:28

And they got the crappiest information and the crappiest science they can. He's so good at that. Uh Carlit says, Bobby for president. Yeah, he'll probably make another run at it. I wouldn't be surprised. Robin Delane says, Happy day. I'm back, bright-eyed and bushy tails. So glad to have you. So glad to have you. Okay.

Trust Collapse And Pandemic Power Debates

SPEAKER_12 30:46

So that was an excellent interview. We'll play another clip of that uh here in just a moment. And so Anna Kasparian over the weekend, we talked about this last week. This we saw this a little a little ahead of schedule. Okay. Obviously, any critique could go, the Democrat Party is fractured. But a couple of weeks ago, we're like, ah, they're talking. The noise is coming out, they're starting to say the things. This little internal strife between the Democrats and the DSA, the Democratic Socialist of America, the far left wing of the party, is starting to come out. Anna Kasparian on her show this weekend, The Young Turks, she made a huge admission. And this is not the first admission this week. And remember, last week we held Bill. So, in my opinion, these guys are kind of vying for that independent, middle-of-the-ground Democrat, reasonable Democrats. They don't want the far lefties. Although, in fairness, Anna Kasparian and the Young Turks have fostered the far left lefties. They've been there, you know, it kind of like what War Room is to the right wing now with Steve Bannon is what Young Turks has been to kind of the Bernie Sanders bros for many, many years. It's their rally point. It's the point where they go and they kind of get their, you know, their intellectual talking points from Sek Younger and Anna Kasparian. So Anna Kasparian this weekend, this is a big deal. There's a lot of quote-unquote Bernie bros who watch this show.

SPEAKER_19 32:06

The one thing that I think the conservative Americans were correct about, especially as it pertained to the pandemic, was questioning authority and questioning our institutions. Um, when the pandemic began, I had too much trust in our institutions. I have now switched over to having zero trust in our institutions. And when you have zero trust in our institutions, you're more likely to land at the accurate information.

SPEAKER_12 32:32

Yes. Yes. And that is why when I was coming out of college with a political science degree, arguably from one of the most conservative schools in the country, I was like, no trust in government. These people lie to you all the time. And that was 20 years ago. Okay. That was before we had a real live show of 20 years of all the nonsense stacked up on top of each other in ever increasingly compressed time frames. So, yes, distrust of government has long been a liberal, uh, uh a classical liberal perspective, right? I mean, this was the whole founding father's motive was don't trust the government, divide uh uh fracture the power so that no one man holds it. So, given all of that, it's kind of like a this is a good thing, right? This fracture in the part in the Democrat Party is a good thing because if they're divided, they won't win. And what you're gonna find is some Anakasparians, Bill Mars, as we get closer to the election, you're gonna see them really waffle on these DSA candidates who are the premier candidates for the Democrat Party. It's gonna be a huge, huge problem for them. So RFK continued talking in this interview with Dana Bash, and he starts getting asked asked about gain of function. Because remember, this is the big smoking gun. The United States was funding gain of function. Anthony Fauci knew about it. This was in violation of the law. Okay. So and it was it was the cover-up. Like if there was a thing that the United States and the media wanted to cover up more than anything else, let's pretend everything else happened completely like you would expect with a pandemic, and they tried to roll out lockdowns. You know, pretend this was Ebola. They kind of did their thing. They the the system couldn't tell the difference between a cold virus and Ebola, and it ran the Ebola game plan on us. But the reason that they had to do that, one of the reasons that they clearly had to do this, is because they had to cover up the gain of function connection. Gain of function is illegal. Gain of function is a crime against humanity, and they were doing it in contradiction to Barack Obama himself's executive order.

SPEAKER_07 34:45

And clearly, COVID-19 pandemic and many other global pandemics that we have have come from in-functional research. The RSA epidemic that we have, that is the biggest killer of kids in this country today, came from these kinds of experiments. The Lyme disease almost certainly came from this kind of research. So, um, and the scientists who you say are experts are making the argument that this is necessary for pandemic response, cannot point to one instance in history where research that came out of this kind of experimentation has actually provided us something beneficial.

SPEAKER_21 35:29

So, how do you prepare then? How do you prepare for the next pandemic? I mean, that's literally part of your job.

SPEAKER_12 35:35

Get some sunlight, some vitamin D, develop some good healthy eating habits, strengthen your immune system. That's how we prepare for the next pandemic, Dana.

SPEAKER_21 35:44

Up now, because experts think it's going to happen within the next 10 years again.

SPEAKER_07 35:48

Yeah, I mean, I think we did virtually everything wrong the last time. So, what about now? The principal thing that we need to do is we need to listen to what's happening to doctors on the ground. There are 15 million frontline physicians around the world. They're mainly now connected through the internet. We can tell on the front lines what's working and what's not. If we had listened to those doctors during the COVID pandemic, we would have saved potentially millions of lives. There were therapeutics out there that were working. There were doctors that were having no deaths from COVID and treating, in some cases, thousands of patients. And we weren't listening to them. Instead, we were doing the opposite. We were shutting them down. And then, Dana, the other thing that I would say is that we need to protect our constitutional rights. This is big. That is the primary obligation. What does that mean? Well, during COVID, we completely dismantled our constitutional rights. We began censoring people in violation of the government.

SPEAKER_21 36:49

Okay, but I'm you're at you're saying what not to do. I'm asking what to do. Um, but I but I want to talk about something to do.

SPEAKER_07 36:57

That is the number one priority. We protect the constitution.

SPEAKER_21 37:01

The constitution was Forgive me, but you're just you're talking about rights, and I'm asking about a potential public health crisis that is that is coming.

SPEAKER_12 37:10

But I do want to let's And a public health crisis does not trump my rights. That's the point. That's the point. Because Dana, you and your ilk and this leftist thinking believe that a public health crisis trumps my rights, that's where you're wrong. That's where you're wrong, right? If I'm a shop owner and I see a public health threat, I have the right to close my store. You should not have the right to tell me to close my store. That's the difference. Okay. If I'm a shopper, I have a right to shop or not shop. Okay. I have those rights. And in the case of confusion or public health problems or states of emergency, the default should be go back to where power is locally. It should go back to me, the individual, walking around with the power to make my own decisions. That's what we should preserve. That's what will get us through everything, not the opposite of, you know, well, it's a public health crisis, no individual rights, government gets to tell you everything.

SPEAKER_07 38:10

And one of the mistakes we made in the last time was suppressing those rights so people weren't being heard. Doctors who weren't saying you're doing it wrong were being marginalized and vilified.

SPEAKER_21 38:23

And because again, I really want to move on. But you were saying you were saying that because you were part of the problem. No, I wasn't part of the problem.

SPEAKER_07 38:32

There was absolute press malpractice. You weren't allowing your Mr. Secretary, your job is a fear of skepticism toward authority. And you weren't doing that.

SPEAKER_21 38:44

You mean this entity. No, okay. Are you gonna you want to sit here and attack me, or do you want to have conversations about it? I'm not attacking you, I'm asking questions about how to prevent the next transition.

SPEAKER_12 38:57

I'll tell you.

SPEAKER_21 38:58

These questions are so difficult.

SPEAKER_12 39:00

What a great interview. What a great interview that was. Uh, took myself off the stage. What a great interview that was. So, again, you know, fear and skepticism of the government should be your number one position. And they were funding gain of gain of research, which is the whole problem here. Okay. Now, after this interview, Dana Bash, same show, had on one of their scientists. These are one of the scientists that came on for years. He's a contributing author to CNN, Dr. Ash uh Ash Ashish Ja-S-H-I-S-H-J-H new word, J H A. I I used to pride myself on like, you know, saying last names correctly. I don't know. At some point, maybe it was when I was in prison, I just stopped caring completely about pronouncing people's names. I mean, when half the guys in there have a nickname like Snoddy, you know, it's like, I don't really care how to say his name, right? It's like Snotty. So, anyways, so this doctor that was one of the uh uh wet market theorists, natural origin theorists that kind of left the door open for uh the lab leak theory, he ended up going into the White House during our under RFK, right? Working over there, and he came back on CNN with some pretty in his, you know, I'd say in I would say for him, being that he was such a uh, you know, natural origin person. He was kind of one of the people that CNN would lean on that this was a pretty big uh reversal here.

SPEAKER_21 40:33

So you uh re-shared a tweet that said, among other things, the available evidence overwhelmingly uh does not show that it well, let me say it this way. You said that the available evidence points towards research-related incidents in Wuhan as the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic, and that we were funding research in an institution where we lacked full transparency into what research was being conducted. You agreed with that.

SPEAKER_22 41:07

I did. Um, this is gonna surprise some people. You know, when I went into the White House, my view was this was almost surely a natural outbreak, maybe a lab leak. Um, based on information I learned and based on information I've seen, I have come to the concluded it is more likely to have been a loud leak. Here's the bottom line no one in the United States knows for sure. The only people who know for sure are people uh officials in China, and we still need transparency and accountability on that. So that is my best assessment. I'm not suggesting I know for sure, but I'm saying my best assessment is that it probably was a lab leak.

SPEAKER_12 41:41

Which is the opposite of his assessment before, where it's probably not a lab leak.

unknown 41:46

Okay.

SPEAKER_12 41:47

Uh it's good. It's good when the news has to get the the information out there again, four years too late. And uh, you know, people people do not have a long memory. Like these same anchors. We play super clips every couple days, right? These same anchors were out there. You must be afraid, you must be, you know, you must get your vaccines, you've got to do all this. And again, what was the net result? Tons of suffering. There was no net benefit to the vaccines. None, none whatsoever. None, none, zero, zilch, nada. Okay.

Depopulation Push And Collectivist Incentives

SPEAKER_12 42:19

Daily Mail, the largest uh circulated publication in the world, posted a report from the Journal of Sustainable Development advocates and uh the Journal of Sustainable Development and Leading Report is reporting on this. And this is kind of the grok summary. Leading reports post, which says scientists say we need to have Earth's population to just 4 billion to save the planet, says Daily Mail. So let me pull this up here. Here we go. I got like 10 buttons I have to push. So scientists say we need to have the Earth's population to just 4 billion to save the planet per daily mail. At leading reports post on Daily Mail article covering a recent study proposing a gradual reduction of Earth's population from 8.3 to 4 billion by 2200 to ease strains on resources, biodiversity, and climate. The research in the journal Sustainable Development advocates voluntary declines via expanded education, reproductive healthcare, and women's empowerment rather than coercive policies, framing it as pro-homan path to sustainability. High engagement on that post with 3.6 million views and thousands of quote features, Thanos memes and replies highlighting polarized debates on overpopulation, risk versus economic and aging population concerns. Okay. What I said earlier was once you see it, you can't unsee it. This is one of those things. Over and over and over again, going back a long, many hundreds of years probably, again, beware of those who worship death. But going back 30 or 40 years, the climate alarmists and the depopulationists and the running out of oil, you know, and natural resources, folks, they have always advocated this population. Reduction for collectivists, for collectivists. This is the easiest thing to understand. Everybody has to work to eat. To each according to his needs, right? So you have to need it, aka need food to work. That's the point. If you're working, then you need it. If you don't work, then your means aren't very good and you don't need it. Every collectivist civilization, every collectivist society, one of the reasons that every single one of them soon get associated with things like child sacrifice is because their entire civilization revolves around reducing future populations, sacrificing your children, the future, for today's desires, hedonistic wants. That's what that is, right? We don't want to run out of resources. So we're going to sacrifice the future. We're going to throw our children into the volcano in order to prevent the volcano from exploding, in order to prevent the running out of resources, which, if you listen to Elon Musk, impossible. Okay. Or you listen to any other futurists, pretty much impossible. We're not even close to running out of resources. If you listen to these people, you will end up taking the six boosters. And you will encourage other people to take the six boosters. You will always be thinking any catastrophe is good because the human parasites will be removed. It is as tail as old as time. Collectivists always end up worshiping death, and their civilizations always get associated with the concept of child sacrifice, sacrificing your future for your present. That's what child sacrifice is, right? It's not always just throwing it on the altar of Moloch, it's entire ways in which our societies operate. Okay. And collectivists are the ultimate hypocrites. This is nothing new, right? If you're listening to this show, I I highly suspect I'm preaching to the choir. But here's Mandami in New York, and he's talking about free uh uh grocery stores in New York City. The interesting thing about this is in New York City, you do not have to be a citizen to vote. But in order to use these grocery stores, you're gonna have to present an ID card. Isn't that interesting? Collectivists want to control the population, they only want services to go to people that vote for them, people that are part of the system. This is the old Bernie Sanders things. Open borders is a co-creation. Yeah, it is. It's kind of a it's kind of a laissez-faire economic policy more than it is a socialist policy per se. But what the socialists are using mass immigration for is power. That's all. They're not using it because economically it makes sense for them. They're using it for power. And so when you hear see policies like this, where Mandami will adamantly fight against anybody having to present any cut form, semblance of ID to vote, oh, to come in the grocery stores, you'll need an ID card.

SPEAKER_08 46:56

How are you going to keep people from taking advantage of that uh, you know, that deal, basically? And is there gonna be a limit on the number of items that someone can take that are discounted at that level from that essential basket?

SPEAKER_11 47:08

So our RFP makes very clear that this is a program for New Yorkers to be able to put food on the table, not a program for people to be able to make a quick buck through reselling. I'm gonna pass it over to our EDC head GPAC to add some additional details.

SPEAKER_17 47:22

Yeah, so if you look in our RFP for the operator, um, we are looking to make sure that we target New Yorkers, whether it be at sort of a library card-esque thing, or and and also we manage who's buying and it's and that is focused on everyday New Yorkers. So we are mindful of that. Um, and so we're gonna make sure that we have all the place, all the things in place to make ensure that that does not happen.

SPEAKER_12 47:44

How are you gonna keep people from taking they're going to produce ID cards like some kind of a New York City library card or something like that? Guys, here's your sign. It's it's uh the umpteenth millionth example of you know, when the policy's against our power, we don't want it. When it's for our power, we want it. They don't really want to provide free groceries to people in New York, they want to provide an impetus for poor people in New York to vote. That's it. That's the whole reason they're doing that. Otherwise, they wouldn't care at all. There's no there's no empathy in their heart. They want to feed people, they want them to vote. And if that means feeding them a little bit, eh, print some money. And that's just what it is, right? Joe Manchin, who I have I don't have like an incredible amount of respect for Joe Manchin, but he was one of these blue dog Democrats out of West Virginia, right? And he was he was kind of the wild card Democrat, kind of did the Fetterman thing, except Fetterman's, you know, way more entertaining than Joe Manchin ever was. But, you know, he'd kind of vote across party lines, and he was kind of the guy there to make sure that we still had coal mining and fought against the environmentalists inside the Democrat Party. So he served a really good function as far as you know his service in the Senate. But again, you know, it's like why this guy remained a Democrat for so long is beyond me. But, you know, according to him, the Democrat Party has changed. Here's uh Joe Manchin on Face the Nation talking about how, you know, some of these ideas the socialists have, they sound good and he supports the idea. But when you really get down to it, especially the Democrat Socialists of America, their ideas are retarded because what do they lead to? Exactly what that science journal just released. We need half the population. If that's your working model that you're trying to reduce the population, half of your policies are going to be destructive.

SPEAKER_19 49:25

Heather, could you ever support a self-described socialist candidate? No.

SPEAKER_03 49:30

No way. My God, no. And even if they have some good ideas, I support the good ideas, but how could you support some of the crazy stuff they're for? Have you seen the platform? They're for just dismantling everything that we know. Whether it be the structure of government, Congress itself, or the Senate, they want to get rid of. And then they start talking about all the crazy things. No police, no this, no this, no that. Are you crazy? We want, we want uh a crime-free area. We have to have police for that. We want a strong defense, we want a strong border. But if Democrats can't say that, and they start lining up with the socialist demands about what you are to be a socialist, energy will be gone. There'll be no energy, okay? We have right now a tremendous amount of energy we're producing, and the world depends more on us than ever before.

SPEAKER_12 50:16

It doesn't so the world depends on us for energy, and you don't want to, you know, decrease the uh uh ability to output energy, but the socialist policies are nonsense, right? They are going to lead to all the problems of shortages, mismanagement of resources. There's nothing that these guys are ever going to produce that's worthwhile. And that's the thing. It's just the nature of collectivism. And I'm so glad that Donald Trump has mentioned that this has been a thousand-year fight. It is the tale as old as time, the fight between the individual and the collective. It's the tale as old as time. And the United States Constitution and the Declaration of Independence set forward the um set forward the cause of of individuals thousands of years. But there are old forces that want to drag down the individual and collect people for power, whether it's collect people as a voter base in the modern sense, or the ancient base, collect people as a slave labor base, it's the same thing, right? It's the same thing. When you're a voter base, but part of being a voter includes paying taxes, you're just the debt monkey. That's all you are. Any reasonable perfe person can see this. And even a Democrat who's been a business owner, or like I said, the blue dog Democrats, they get it. Given the Democrats' overwhelming amount of confidence going into the midterms and their, you know, ability to peacock and make themselves seem like they got something real going on. They're way behind on money, they're way behind on, you know, polling where they should be in other years where they've taken the midterms. But nonetheless, it's a midterm year and they're just expected to win. Well, with the little fracture inside the Democrat Party, guys, I think there's hope. We've played a couple clips from James Carville. He was on Fox News this time, basically saying the same thing. The Democrat Party's crazy, especially when you start looking at the far left side. He mentions Hassan Hassine Piker. He's one of the rabid anti-Semites that's one of the main commentator pundits for the far left.

SPEAKER_14 52:18

So, where should Democrats draw the line on this stuff?

SPEAKER_02 52:21

Whatever Scott Galloway says, I'll believe it. I think that's he's one of the smartest, most cogent, uh brilliant analyst there there is. And I'm not sure what to understand what McDonald's doing, but to talk about the larger Democratic Party post-the-election in Michigan going forth. I am not going to be in the same party with Hassan Pike. I can tell you that right now. If he becomes a force in a Democratic Party, I'm out of here. I have no intention of ever being in the same political party with that guy. Now, I think that a majority, overwhelming majority of Democrats agree with me. But this idea that we're going to seize the means of production and this don't just go look at the DSA platform. You don't have to look any further than that. And, you know, Jaggy, it may be that the two-party system is just going to be under tremendous stress here in the coming months. I mean, you you see it in with Tucker and Martin Taylor Green and on the Republican side. You see it going on right now. And I can't sit here and tell you for certain the audience is going to turn out. But the one thing I can tell you for certain, Hasan Python and James Carl are not going to be in the same political party. One of us is going to lead. It might even be me.

SPEAKER_05 53:32

You're going to have to leave it there, James.

SPEAKER_12 53:33

How crazy would it be if James Carville left the Democrat Party? He takes some people with him, you know. That that between the two of them, talking about the Democrat Socialists of America being crazy, they are the flagship of the Republican Party. They they are like he does, he did have made a fair analysis, you know, the Margie Taylor Green and the Tucker Carlson's the Republican Party and the fracture there. Isn't it nice that our fracture happened like four months ago and now we've kind of recovered and it's old news, and now it's like, oh, look at the Democrats, they're fracturing. He who fractures last loses. Okay. That's probably the best way to look at this. But he's that's really interesting. You know, I might leave the party. Wow, that could be that could be powerful. But again, the mainstream Democrats, the ones that are left, they don't support the DSA platform. You're hearing it in their own words over and over and over again. Kevin Hassent, who is the secretary of let's see, is he the secretary of labor? Oh, he's the NEC director. So the NEC director, Kevin Hassent, was on CNBC. And again, as far as how our country's doing in our economics, we're doing pretty well. And he talks about what would happen if the Democrats took over. How would that change um change how Donald Trump has kind of arranged the trade deals and the different policies?

SPEAKER_18 54:49

If the socialists have their way, then the prices won't matter at all because the stores will be empty. That's what happens when you have socialism. And Joe, you'll remember when I was CEA chair before, uh, we put out a chapter in the Economic Report of the President, warning about socialism coming. And I wrote a book called The Drift, Stopping America's Slide to Socialism, because we could see it coming in the first term. And when we did that, when we put out the chapter, the Democrats went nuts and said we were the most partisan White House ever. Well, now they kind of wish they went back and read that chapter because this is what's happening to their party.

SPEAKER_12 55:22

Yeah. He went nuts. That's pretty good. Pretty good. Kevin Hassan, I like him. He just seems like a really quiet, kind of steady hand at the till, so to speak. So back to back to Joe Manchin, finishing off his little interview on Face the Nation. He gets asked about Bernie Sanders. So this is where Bernie Sanders has always been a socialist, right? Like he's always been a socialist. And he's run as an independent, then he'll run as a Democrat, run as an independent. But Joe Manchin says in this interview, he says Bernie Sanders used the Democrat name to run, right? To get that 50% liberal voters and then his 10% wacky voters up there in in uh New Hampshire, wherever he's from. So uh so Bernie Sanders has has really tainted the Democrat name with socialism. In 2016, he was by far the most popular Democrat, right? By far. Probably should have won the primary over Hillary Clinton. Everybody knows and understands that the their the DNC primary was rigged for Hillary Clinton. So Joe Manchin makes the point that Bernie Sanders is not a Democrat.

SPEAKER_03 56:23

Pete against him.

SPEAKER_12 56:24

You know who says it's a rigged system? Bernie Sanders. He's an independent.

SPEAKER_03 56:28

Bernie. Bernie's a socialist now. And I respect Bernie. I respect where he's coming from. Bernie's always been who he is, but he's had to use the Democratic Party to get on the ticket.

SPEAKER_12 56:37

Yes.

SPEAKER_03 56:37

He took that, he took that path.

SPEAKER_12 56:40

Yeah. He had to use the Democratic Party to get on the ticket. And now all the other DSA people are doing the same. And it's making these guys nervous. It's making the old school Democrats nervous because they know that socialism, when properly explained, is completely not popular. All right. So

Iran Update And Weaponization Fund Fight

SPEAKER_12 56:55

we headed into the weekend last weekend. Not really certain where we were at with Iran. And over the weekend, there was another ceasefire called or a stop in uh a stop in the fighting, I guess, or whatever the case is. So that's really good news. The other thing that happened this weekend is Tom Tillis and John Cornyn both said they were going to block Todd Blanche's confirmation, which was supposed to be this week. And mostly this was over the weaponization of government fund. Todd Blanche has said it's over, they're not going to be paying anybody. And then uh, but then they didn't like put it in writing quite the way they wanted. So over the weekend, uh, Todd Blanch did write a attorney general's memorandum and an order saying that there's no weaponization fund. It's dead, done, over, never gonna do it. So that's pretty interesting. So Donald Trump, yeah, so it's presumed. I think as I went to bed last night, it was presumed that Todd Blanch would get confirmed this week because of that. But Trump had a little bit of fun with this. He kind of played with it and he was like, hey, you know, if if they don't appoint him, I'll, I'll, uh, I'll do the weaponization fund and I'll spearhead and make sure it goes through.

SPEAKER_04 58:01

We have a man named Don Blanch. He's outstanding in every way. Most of you know who he is. You're not gonna find a better person. And everybody, and it's because I backed Warner's opponent, and his opponent won in a landslide. This is that's the only reason it's happening. But I will say there are a lot of people that like uh people were hurt so badly. Uh 22 suicides, and they were destroyed, their families were destroyed. There's never been an attack on any group of people in this country, in my opinion. Maybe one. There's one group that was attacked violently and basically. Like these people were attacked. And this would be a reimbursement for the payment they sell. A lot of people like it. Uh, if they don't if they don't approve Todd, I put it back on the table. A lot of people like it.

SPEAKER_12 58:52

Now, I gotta tell you, being that I might be subject to that weaponization fund, you know, group of people that they've targeted like nobody else ever. Hello, I did it. Do we side with the resistance folks? Okay. Uh he'll put it back on the table. I don't really like feeling like a bargaining chip, you know, personally. I'm kind of I'm kind of done being the bargaining chip, the non-volunteering bargaining chip all the time. I don't know. I don't really love that. But it'll be back on the table if they don't approve him. And it sounds like they're going to. It sounds like he, you know, check the boxes on the paperwork to say there's no more weaponization fun. Oh well, I guess it is what it is.

Houston Funeral Home Scandal Turns Horrific

SPEAKER_12 59:28

Very interesting story coming out of Texas. Carlitz, I hope you're ready for this. Down in Houston, you got a problem. You had an unlicensed funeral director that is involved in a forgery case. This is a two news report out of Houston. This is really good. A transgender man was running a funeral home, and somebody passed away of natural causes, and the family, who was mostly out of town, hired this funeral home to take care of his funeral, and they turned over some legal paperwork, which apparently gave this funeral director some form of a power of attorney. And then the story just gets weirder from there.

SPEAKER_16 1:00:08

That's how unique Green stormed out of the courtroom Friday morning. I don't have nothing to say, but asked how Green made an $800,000 bond earlier this week. Green didn't have many answers. But what about those forged documents prosecutors say got filed to steal the estate of Lawrence Gammon? Did your mother forge them? Did your mom forge them? No answers there either. When Houston police raided Green's funeral home in the third ward, investigators allegedly found a Home Depot bucket full of organs. And what about those? They were for you to eat for lunch. Green is now free from jail on five.

SPEAKER_01 1:00:47

What happened?

SPEAKER_16 1:01:00

A man who passed away last summer, which included his holiday seconds and retirement.

SPEAKER_01 1:01:11

Everything's being really slow here. I'm having some kind of play again.

SPEAKER_16 1:01:26

Retirement accounts. Green is also accused of forging paperwork to the state funeral commission for funeral director and embalming licenses.

SPEAKER_00 1:01:36

She has always claimed her innocence that she's not guilty, and that's an explanation for all this evidence against her.

SPEAKER_16 1:01:45

So for now, Green is out of jail on bond and ordered not to engage directly or indirectly in planning any end-of-life services in Harris County. That includes not accepting any money for those services or holding.

SPEAKER_12 1:02:02

Alright. Apparently. Apparently, my internet I can't tell if it's my internet that's choppy. It probably is my internet. It's not very good here. I don't know what's going on. Not a hundred percent sure why I'm so choppy. But I don't know if you guys were able to hear that story very well. Interesting story. Funeral director falsified everything. Ah, darn it. Why did I just do that? You funeral director falsified everything. It's pretty crazy. Okay, and I just did a wonderful thing. I just totally closed out my last couple uh slides, and I am left with one. So we'll just jump to the end here. The other two slides were just kind of informational things, but I can't quite get this thing. Okay.

Yen Swap Bailouts And Market Reality Check

SPEAKER_12 1:02:54

All right. I'm having broadcast issues here. I'm having all kinds of uh having all kinds of broadcast issues here. Let's see if it remedies itself pretty quickly.

SPEAKER_01 1:03:03

I didn't make for me, I made for the Okay, let's see if I can.

SPEAKER_12 1:03:11

Okay, so this is President Trump on Air Force One. All right, this will be this is gonna be our last clip. So this is President Trump on Air Force One. Interesting things are happening in the big macroeconomic picture, right? There's a lot of stuff going on with the different bond markets. Some of this stuff is hard to follow, and I I do feel commonly, because I do see the headlines, you know, you'll have like bond market crashes or buyouts, and there's always these uh, you know, people that are like, that's it, it's crashing. It's like, oh, these guys are good at kicking the can down the road. The the bond market or the yen uh the uh the the yen swap carry trade, as they call it, essentially a lot of people, a lot of big international companies or even governments will go borrow yen, then they buy dollars, and there's there's a there's an exchange differential there, and there's an arbitrage. And it basically the yen is kind of like the original source of credit, which then creates other credit instruments and other fiat currencies around the world. So it's just another one of those nonsense ledger entries that creates money. Okay. Well, the Japanese market has been having real catastrophic issues, like end of the financial system type ups and downs and their bond rate, and you know, they've reached the too much debt kind of problem. So the United States, similar to what it did to Argentina, I think it was earlier in this year, they did a currency swap. So basically, we took some of their yen off their books, not buying it, swapping it to give them dollars, which allows them to then pay their bonds, which will prop them up a little longer, kick the can down the road, and then we do some swap back and we make money. So when we did it with Argentina, we made money. So Donald Trump's on Air Force One being asked about why are you propping up the yen? Again, for the doomers out there, that was like the beginning of the end. And now it's propped up. So we've just kicked the can down the road. So here's Trump talking about that as well as some other things. Uh financial benefit.

SPEAKER_04 1:05:02

Financial benefit. And we also, it's also good for the world economy. But we we make like uh when we did with Argentina, I got criticized. We made $25 million on that deal. Uh, Venezuela, we make hundreds of millions of dollars. I make good deals. Intel. I made $75 billion for the country. I didn't make for me, I made for the country. Intel. I backed Intel. It's the hottest stock right now on the New York stock, we're on the very stock exchanges. So we made about $75 to $80 billion. Japan wanted to, it was really uh more than anything else, it was a signal of friendship. Because the yen is weakened, and the dollar is doing great. The fact is, our country is doing great. Everybody wants help from our country.

SPEAKER_12 1:05:55

Sometimes I wonder if he's more of a cheerleader. We're doing great. Yeah, you're the tallest midget in the room, bro. Like everybody's short. Uh the the the fact that he says, you know, it's just a sign of friendship. It was a bailout. We bailed out the nation of Japan, just like we bailed out Argentina. Now, can we make a monetary profit? Sure. Yeah, absolutely you can. The problem is where'd that money come from? It's not gold or silver, it's not increased productivity. It's um, it's a swap, it's um, it's a money game, right? And uh it props up the system quite a bit more. It's another one of these, like, uh, we should all be paying very close attention to this. All right, you guys, thank you so much for joining me today on a bright and early Monday morning.