How Corruption And Psyops Bend Public Reality

Trust is getting crushed from every angle and pretending it isn’t happening feels like a luxury none of us can afford. We start with a viral-style undercover voting clip and the broader question it raises: are we living in a system where “plausible believability” matters more than transparent process, especially when polls, prediction markets, and media talking points all move in lockstep? 

Then we pivot into something unexpectedly hopeful: energy incentives. A painful hot tub power bill turns into a bigger idea about waste, efficiency, and design. We talk about a Bitcoin mining heated driveway snow melt system and why heat reuse can change the economics of Bitcoin mining, home heating, and even water preheating. If you care about Bitcoin, energy efficiency, and practical infrastructure, this section is for you. 

From there, we dig into privacy and power. We react to FinCEN and beneficial ownership disclosure changes, and the double standard we see when government pushes aggressive KYC rules on crypto while shell-company real estate pathways get quieter treatment. We also unpack claims about Polymarket, the DSA, and perception management, then move into a run of corruption stories: SPLC donor-laundering allegations, cookie stuffing affiliate fraud, H1B visa abuse claims, homelessness grant waste, and FBI “Round River” spreadsheets that label people as disinformation conduits. 

We close with the hardest part: what to do when institutions keep failing. We talk excess mortality claims and vaccine messaging conflicts, then land on a simple operating principle: verify, protect your family, and stay engaged without handing anyone your brain. Subscribe, share this with a friend who’s losing trust too, and leave a review with your take: what’s the first institution you stopped believing?

Transcript

Morning Banter And Simultaneous Sip

SPEAKER_03 0:07

And then they went to the green! The table! Do you know what's meant?

SPEAKER_10 0:16

Let me eat cake.

SPEAKER_04 0:21

We're getting screwed, ma'am. Every time we turn around, we're getting screwed. The revolution's gonna be true podcasting for sure. It's the little guys, the little guys that take the blood of everything. It's gonna be peasants, ma'am. We're just peasants. Every one of us. You watch those old movies, you see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around. We're those people. We're those people. Good morning, peasants. Welcome to another episode of The Peasants Perspective. I'm so glad you guys have made it here with us today. Pony Boy's in the house. He says, GM. I guess he's driving a General Motors vehicle. I listening. Ron, every time you jump in there, I'm like gonna go read your comment. Peasants Perspective says, Good morning, Pony Boy. And he says it again on YouTube. Arleats, good morning, everyone. Another hot one this morning. You know, I started watching that uh Yellowstone sequel, uh Dutton Ranch, I think it's called. Okay. Beth Dutton and whatever his name is. Really good show so far. I was on episode three last night. My walk, my wife walked in and said, it's three episodes. I haven't seen any boobs yet. I was like, I think it's pretty good. Good cinematography, good storytelling, no boobs. Let's watch it. So Fraser says, Happy Thursday, peasants. May you drink get you going this morning, your potatoes be loaded, and your ice cream be famous, but potato ice cream would be the grossest I ever I can think of. I always think of this old full house episode. You know, you had the Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen twins. And yeah, anyways, this she was this little you know girl was learning how to cook, make her food favorite food, and she's like, I love tuna fish and ice cream. What if we combine them? And Uncle Joey's like, some of our favorites are not meant to be combined. Potatoes and ice cream don't go together, bro. Unless you're just dipping uh I actually, you know, I gotta take that back. If you're dipping French fries in a mochi, you can kind of get there. You can get there. Fraser says the Idaho ice cream potato, because nothing says welcome to Idaho, like serving someone a potato that's actually ice cream.

unknown 2:35

Yeah.

SPEAKER_04 2:36

You know, when I was down in Brazil on my mission, I had we, you know, you don't have like at the time there was no like digital photography or anything, and actual photographs and little things. And I and I take a little, you know, uh in Brazil, it's very common to have these little like photo books. Sure, grandpa. You don't have to ever see them, anyways. So I got this little photo book with pictures of my family, so I could show people that I was meeting, you know, this is where I'm from, this is my house, this is my family. And of course, I had a postcard with an Idaho potato on the back of a and it was the whole potato. And the only thing, if anybody had ever heard of Idaho, the only thing they'd ever heard of was the potatoes. So when I'd show that postcard, these Brazilians, this is way before they have an email with a Photoshop. They're like, oh my gosh, that's a potato in Idaho! Yeah, absolutely. Oh, so fun. All right, it's time to get rolling with our simultaneous sip now. And all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice, a stein, a canteen, jug, or flask, a vessel of any kind, and fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better, a simultaneous sip. And it starts right now.

Undercover Voting Clip And Fraud Talk

SPEAKER_04 4:02

Well, maybe that's not the best clip to play, is my own role. All right, well, let me just tell you what that clip was showing up. So that was Cam Higbee and I thought it was death. It's Cam Higbee and James O'Keefe dressed up as adherents to the Islamic religion. The whole, you know, face covering anything. And he said this, he posted this. I went to Minnesota polls disguised as a Muslim woman. And you see this woman here with the green and bright yellow hair. Pole workers were going to let me vote in other people's names and then vouch for eight other unregistered voters. Watch this video. He's like, this was a uh Hamas fighter in Gaza. He'd like to vote. And they're like, Okay, okay, here's a ballot. I'm not kidding you. On video, here's a ballot. You can vouch for eight other people, and they were gonna let him vote in other people's name. He caught it on video. On video. Oh, Mike Lindell lost. Oh, he totally lost. Fair and square up in Minnesota, right? Fair and square. There's zero chance there was any voter fraud, even though they just caught them at the poll saying you can vouch for eight people. That's eight new ballots, one of them a Hamas Gaza fighter, and then allowing him to vote in the names that are not his own. Happening at the polls in paper. Now, as a Republican, we'd be like, Well, the day of vote is always breaking Republican. Listen, these Democrats are gonna get wise to it, and they're just gonna start sending the mass hordes to the polls so that you believe that the voting is accurate. Unbelievable. Thundering Oak says, Happy Thursday, folks. Welcome, welcome.

SPEAKER_17 5:39

So I did see one thing about this that I saw where Mike Lindell, you know, there was a story that he's refused to, you know, concede until all the votes were counted. And I thought, well, okay, yeah, okay, sure. That's makes sense to just, you know, from a from a perspective where we're at, yeah, let's do that. Yeah. Well, the the post was like, well, all the votes are counted. And I was like, hold on, time out. When was the last time we counted all the votes in the in like two minutes? What the heck is that?

SPEAKER_04 6:11

When you get your person in the lead, you go ahead and call it, Ron Method. Right. No, we're calling it. We're pulling the ripcord.

Hot Tub Bills And Energy Waste

SPEAKER_04 6:18

All right, let's change topics real quick, just because I want to show something that I think is really cool. So my we have a hot tub at home. I bought it years ago used, right? Bought a hot tub. I love it. We love having a hot tub. Kids play in it about twice a year. I get in it. It's amazing, okay? Anyways, but it runs constantly, heating, hot water that may or may not be used, right?

SPEAKER_17 6:39

Yeah, so and I know dads are aware of all that.

SPEAKER_04 6:42

Yeah, I'm I am, I have become my father. I walk around the house turning off lights. Nobody in here using these lights, right? It's like I I become that guy. I'm putting the permit.

SPEAKER_17 6:53

No electricity costs money.

SPEAKER_04 6:55

Yeah. Every time my wife comes in and asks about money, I look around, I'm like, well, the bathroom lights on. You're burning money up over there. So anyway, it's got this hot tub. So our electric bill's getting out of control because Washington State is retarded. Okay. There's just you know what I'm talking about. It's just like, what are we doing? So my wife calls because the electric bill is so extreme at this point. And she's like, listen, we've lived here for 15 years. Like, nothing's changed. Okay. And so she calls the electric company and she's like, What's the deal here? Oh, well, we have some rebates and we have some programs and I fill this out. We have low income. So they're like offering all these hiccups, get ups to get a hundred dollar rebate or this, whatever. And she's like, I don't care about paying the full price. She's like, I don't want your benefits, I just want everybody to pay the same. So it's it's another one of those methods that Washington State punishes people that are wealthy and rewards people that are not wealthy or lie about not being wealthy. Right. Anyways, so we decided to turn off the hot tub for a month. Okay. Let's see what the hot tub costs us. Okay. So our electric bill was give or take 600 bucks.

SPEAKER_17 7:59

Okay.

SPEAKER_04 7:59

We took off, turned off the hot tub, and our electric bill went down to 400 bucks. Oh, jeez. So one third of our electrical bill comes from a hot tub because we're heating water continuously for random moments of enjoyment. Wonderful. So the reason I wanted to tell that little story is not particularly because I'm, you know, wanting to tell you about how I can't afford my hot tub.

SPEAKER_17 8:24

I'm guessing it's not about the hot tub at all.

SPEAKER_04 8:26

Not at all. Not at all. But there are a lot of things in our homes and in our lives where we expend energy to heat something. Okay. Our houses, our hot water heaters, our hot tubs, and even our driveways. Oh. So this is really cool. How expensive would it be to do a heated concrete driveway? Like radiant floor heating. Well, how long is it? Let's say it's 300 feet.

SPEAKER_13 8:55

Okay.

SPEAKER_04 8:55

Expensive?

Bitcoin Mining Heat Reuse Breakthrough

SPEAKER_04 8:57

All right. Here's the video. Look at this. So these guys are doing a driveway in in the mountains of Idaho. Okay. Going up the hill. And they're putting down PEX pipe, right? Yeah. This is Bitcoin mining heating the water. Okay. So they're going to have free driveway heating. It's going to pay for itself and turn a profit for them to heat their driveway. And that's not a small project. This is a Bitcoin mining heated driveway snow melt system. So far, it's the biggest I'm aware of. It's 300 feet long and utilizes 12 S21 Pro machines in immersion fluid, which heat glycol through a set of braised plate heat exchangers. The three-quarter inch PEX is closely spaced and insulated so that it's it has maximum efficiency as a heat dump for mining ops when desired. It also allows the machines to run at their lowest practical temperature to meet the utilitarian purpose, snow melt, home heat, and water preheating. The mining system is the heat core with amazing secondary use.

SPEAKER_17 9:52

Wow.

SPEAKER_04 9:52

Yeah. This is somebody thinking. This is awesome. Remember, well, your uncle had a boiler system at his house. His whole hot water system and home heating system was running on a boiler. I see that regularly, especially when I get up into the mountains. They've got a boiler, right? Got lots of wood, but they're constantly chopping wood and feeding it because they don't want to spend the electricity to generate the heat, the heat that things are in there around their house. All of a sudden, Bitcoin mining is like you can heat it for free and actually make money. It's really incredible. So I just thought that was super cool.

SPEAKER_17 10:24

I wonder if that flex actually makes the mining profitable too. You know? What do you mean? Well, you're heating the water, but you're also maybe making the mining profitable because you actually have a use for the extra heat. So you know you can offset the cost by pretending that you're spending money on the heat for the driveway.

SPEAKER_04 10:44

That works, that analogy is perfect for your home furnace and your hot water heater or a hot tub. Okay. Already spending the money, anyways. If I if my hot tub could be heated by one of these closed systems from a Bitcoin miner, it wouldn't cost me $200. I would spend the $200, but I would make $240. Correct. Right. So the driveway is a luxury. Like you don't have to do that. Right. Mountains of Idaho, maybe you do. You know what I mean? Like, so it is very, very cool.

SPEAKER_17 11:11

Well, I mean, for places like Colorado where it's really cold, you know, Idaho where it's really cold, you're gonna offset the cost of snow shoveling.

SPEAKER_04 11:20

Snow shoveling, exactly. Exactly. It's pretty amazing. Uh Doug Wyatt says, Good morning, peasants. Welcome, welcome. Hey, we had the highest ever viewership when I got home last night. Yeah. Not last night, yesterday morning. So, you know, by the time we get done with the podcast, I head home and then I have to upload the audio and everything. Anyways, I looked, we had we had the highest number ever of people that had already watched the show by the time I got home last night. So thank you, everybody. I hit I said, please retweet, share the show, and you did, and do it again. Do it again. All right, another interesting thing at the towards the end of the show yesterday, I mentioned that the United States Treasury Department, FinCEN specifically, issued a final rule that that LLCs and trusts and businesses don't have to disclose beneficial ownership when they buy property. Okay. This is a pretty big deal. It's a major thing for privacy. But the reason that they started going down the road of forcing people to disclose the beneficiaries was anti-mon money laundering initiatives, right? They want to stop cartels from buying real estate through shell corporations. They want to stop foreign nationals, the whole thing. It makes perfect sense. Okay. It makes sense from their perspective. From our perspective, it's another one of those situations where a thousand safe gun owners get punished because one guy, you know, had a gun and shouldn't have. You know what I'm saying? It's one, it's another one of those situations. So they got rid of that requirement, and I applaud that.

KYC Rules And Real Estate Privacy

SPEAKER_04 12:48

But the interesting thing about this, and simply Bitcoin posted this. They said the government spent years telling everyone Bitcoin and crypto needed more KYC. KYC is know your client. This is what forces you to disclose, you know, who you are when you get these accounts. They need KYC to stop money laundering. Then it quietly killed the requirement for actual US shell companies to disclose who owns them and started deleting the ownership data it already had on file. Every Bitcoin transaction is etched in a public ledger forever. This is the opposite of that by design. They know exactly what they're doing. It's another one of those things where it's like, oh, you want to stop money laundering, yet you all we all know way more money gets laundered through real estate than Bitcoin, right? And not only that, you sucked up real estate. You've taken away an available property for someone who legitimately could own it, use it, and enjoy it, right? For criminal purposes. What's the worst thing that happens if you launder Bitcoin? You launder money. There's no stripping of ownership or anything from someone else, right? Anyways, I just found that as another one of those, like, yeah, that's it's it isn't this always the story, right? It's always the story. They accuse Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies of being these high crime activities. You know, 99.9% of all money laundered gets laundered through the traditional legacy financial system. You know, guess where all the drug sales and gun sales and human trafficking gets laundered through? Not Bitcoin, Chase Bank, HBSC, right? Remember when they paid billion-dollar fines for knowingly laundering drug cartel money, and James Comey settled that out for them. Real nice guy. You know, they can keep doing business, but slap on the rich, dude.

SPEAKER_02 14:36

Bad boys.

SPEAKER_04 14:37

Okay. We also played a clip yesterday where Jen Sauke was talking about how, you know, back in the day the Democrat Party used to select who our candidates were and stuff like that. But we don't have to do that anymore. Now the DSA is rising. Interesting thing about this is, you know, liars are just liars, right? I mean, and here's the thing nobody's perfect. We've all said a white lie or even big lies. I'm not making judgments, but there's stuff like this where it just makes you go, huh? You know, maybe we should just write you off. So a handful of years ago, Jen Saukee was bragging about how the Democrat Party was great because the people actually select their candidates until now when she's like, oh, by the way, yeah, we used to do that, but we don't now we don't. It's like, hold on.

SPEAKER_12 15:18

You, the people out there, get to choose. There is no, thank God, dark room in Washington where people sit around, they decide here's who the nominee is going to be. Typically, that's not how it happens. It's not how democracy works. And I think we both remember well when party leadership really selected the nominees. Now, you would never say it that way exactly, but they would now with capture free.

SPEAKER_04 15:41

But was somebody telling you to sh to tell people that, oh, you guys, of course you could, of course the Democrats picked Hillary Clinton, not Bernie Sanders, right? This is actually just symptomatic. Bernie Sanders has been leading that party for a long time. They stole the nomination from him essentially twice, right? And now it's like, well, now you've got a lot of Bernie Sanders, the squad and all their people. So it's just liars. You know, these these people, you can't really trust them to tell you what's going on.

Polymarket, DSA, And Psyop Theory

SPEAKER_04 16:08

Another thing that we can't really trust is polymarket. So Whitney Webb, a couple weeks ago, we paid the clip. Whitney Webb did a big deep dive on poly market. Polymarket started as a DARPA project. This is the United States defense, whatever, you know, it's their secret sci-up. This is where Facebook started, DARPA. This is where AI started, DARPA. This is what they they do a lot of seed capital. I actually worked for a program director at DARPA one time.

SPEAKER_17 16:32

I think this is where Windows 95 started.

SPEAKER_04 16:35

Yeah. And why did they call it Windows? Because we get to look right at you. All right. So Polymarket isn't real life. This is Frank Luntz posting that. And Polymarket had to delete this tree. Breaking DSA's Francisca Hong is near lock to win today's Wisconsin governor primary, despite no backing from Bernie or AOC. 96% chance. Now, what Whitney Webb exposes there is Poly Market is a government slap it was pulled out of DARPA and made private, but it was the intention of it at DARPA was to create these prediction markets where people could bet, but they could also weight the betting so that it would skew people's perspective. Humans are extremely impressionable. If you know Francisca Hong is a 96% lock and you want to vote for Crowley, you might be like, ah, she my vote gonna matter. She's gonna run away with it. I've been busy today. Yeah, right. It creates this apathy because it's like ah, it's we can't overcome the the distance. Right. 96%. Right. Okay, these are weighted. So they had to delete this. Anytime you hear someone saying polymarket odds or polling, the polling was also off 18, 20, 22. Anytime you hear that, you have to start asking yourself, am I being the victim of a psyop? Am I trying to are they trying to influence me? Obviously, I'm not sitting here saying the elections are clean, but it's an all-in effort. It's we have to get low turnout. If we have low turnout, we have more ballots we can manipulate. If we have more ballots, manipulate. If the if the and if the polling was one way, we can manipulate it the direction of the polling, and everyone will believe it. If we have to cheat for this wong lady 20%, people will believe it because the polling said she was up 20%. So, you know what I'm saying? Like it just is a big side. So Carl Higby over on Newsmax did a nice little bit on this. And I I really like his analysis. I've been listening to him for a long time. This is a this is a five-minute piece here. So we're gonna listen to all of it because he kind of lays out what looks to me like a large influence operation to try to create plausible believability around the Democrat Socialists of America candidates while at the same time merging the more legacy Democrats into one thing, but without offending the normie, middle ground, you know, moderate Democrats, while at the same time, there's an operation here trying to merge these two. This could be a really difficult puzzle. Yeah.

SPEAKER_09 19:05

What if all this was just a show? What if Hong and El Said in Michigan were all just the psyops to get the extreme socialist wing of the Democrat Party on board with the establishment of the Democrat Party? Spencer Pratt raised this question. He's been through this. He said they use fake polls, they use third world bots on their ex accounts, they cheat wherever they can to give false impressions of popularity, inevitability of the socialist virus, because the language of the communists is the lie. Now, I saw this and I was like, wow. Actually, he might be honest. Think about this. It's actually brilliant. It's not not Democrats who are doing this. The elected Democrats are all morons, but people who are behind the scenes are not stupid who get them elected. Elevate radical people that the extreme socialist wing of the Democrat Party gets behind. Pay for polls, because you know, Act Blue has been getting all that money from fixed-income old ladies who donate 80 times a day. Yeah, right. The men behind the curtains with the dark money, the same people who choose or chose Kamala, who pushed out Platner, and these pulled these levers behind the scenes, they pay for polls to give these socialists false hope, even pay for ads that they know do not poll well with the generic Democrat voter, but make the socialists happy. Stay with me here. Then the men behind the curtain actually send, spend a, I mean, a ton of money on the get out the vote efforts on election day and for mail and ballots in favor of the person they want, which is the more moderate appearing candidate who aren't actually moderate at all, like Virginia Governor Abigail Spamberger. So they have a better chance in the general election. Now, the result here is Democrats get their person that's they believe is more palatable. Socialists feel heard, those same behind-the-scenes players, then offer that extreme candidate like Hong will likely be, who lost a big payday at a donor company. I mean, she couldn't cut in the restaurant industry. Running for governor was her backup plan. So they're gonna have to get her a job at a pack or a company or whatever. And then in exchange for that, she'll tell her hardline socialist followers that hey, guys, we gave it our all, get behind this new guy or gal and unite the party, and pow, they have a united party for the general election. I mean, this was their plan in Michigan last week. I actually don't think that El Said was supposed to win. But when AOC and Bernie endorsed him, he did by accident. That that's why those two didn't endorse Hong, because they overplayed the PSYOP in Michigan, and now they have a radical Muslim socialist who trashes football in a state that, by the way, has the largest stadium in the world, or I think in the United States. I mean, these guys packed a parking in the Michigan University football season, the big house, hold us over like 110,000 people, and it's still overflowing every Saturday. Yeah, that guy's not gonna do well in Michigan. Hear me out.

SPEAKER_04 21:55

At least not with you know some extra ballots laying around.

unknown 21:59

He

SPEAKER_04 22:00

We just heard Jen Saki talk about well, they used to select leaders, but now they don't. So she was lying then and she's lying now, is what I'm telling you. They're still selecting the leaders. This to me makes perfect sense. They overplayed their hand in Michigan. They overplayed their hand. So they pulled back just a little bit in Wisconsin. And then you do, and we're going to cover this later, later, we do see a lot of problems in Wisconsin again with the election. It's a 2020 repeat, total 2020 repeat. So let's keep going here.

SPEAKER_09 22:27

Not far-fetched, considering the tactics Democrats have used in the past. Again, Al Said was a mistake, kind of like all the other times Democrats lost control of an operation. Fast and furious. When they lost track of guns, they were trafficking to the Mexican drug cartel to make the case that America had too many guns. Yeah, that got a U.S. border agent killed under Obama. They have used PSYOPs on the American people for decades. Remember when I told you about this being authorized under Obama to use PSYOPS just like this on the American people? You ever heard of the Smith Mund Act of 1948? This actually prohibited the U.S. government from disseminating government-funded propaganda or psychological operations materials on American citizens. Well, the Smith Mund Modernization Act of 2012, which was incorporated into the National Defense Authorization Act of 2013 signed by President then Barack Obama, changed that. Specifically, Section 1078. Got the receipts, folks. The primary goal was to remove limits to the United States government's ability to counter foreign propaganda. This basically showed the government the ability to influence U.S. public opinion. Hmm. Now the left-leaning Intel community would never get involved in an election wrongfully, right? Oh, except when they funneled the steel dossier to start the Russian collusion hoax, or when James Comey fraudulently and illegally interviewed Mike Flynn and tried to charge him with lying to the FBI, or when they raided Mar-a-Lago, or sending the number three DOJ guy all the way downstream to work in Alvin Bragg's office during the election to prosecute Trump, or coordinating with a Georgia prosecutor, Fannie Willis, to charge Trump with a state crime that he could not federally be pardoned for. No, no, no. They would never do anything like that. Never underestimate the tinkering, the party screaming democracy will do to circumvent democracy. But Trump should launch a full-scale investigation into this election. It's a win-win. Think about it. No Democrat should object to this. The socialists sure wouldn't. If it's found that nothing was wrong, then great.

SPEAKER_04 24:33

We restore faith in our electoral process. If you Oh, what a we're gonna come in and we're gonna investigate Wisconsin because we think Huang won. And the Democrats will be like, No, no, she didn't. The normies and the DNC would be like, Yeah, come investigate because we got robbed.

SPEAKER_09 24:49

Do find fraud, the socialists will then revolt and then tear the Democrat Party apart, likely start a third party, actually, which would guarantee Republican wins across the board for I don't know, a century, and will make it a pretty clear case for the Save America Act that you would probably get a couple more Democrats to get you across the 60 vote threshold in the Senate. Check me.

SPEAKER_17 25:13

That'd be interesting. You know, looking back in history books, I often wondered, you know, how come the parties changed? You know, every once in a while, you'd you know, you had the Whigs and then you had the whatever, and and then uh eventually we ended up with Republican and Democrat. But I was like, well, why did it change in those certain points in time? And now I'm like, well, this is one of those points in time. I guess you know, the Democrats are gonna go away and we're gonna end up with some other party, and then we'll have a new line in the history book.

SPEAKER_04 25:44

You know, it's interesting because Democrats are the party of Jefferson, right? I mean, they they go all the way back and they've kept the same name. Obviously, they've changed their tune a couple times. Uh the Republicans start with Lincoln, and before that was the Whigs. And it's you know, I should know this answer like again on. You'd think I would, considering what a US history kind of buff I am. But I'm pretty sure the difference between the Whigs and the Republicans was the Whigs were uh not sympathetic, but acquiesced to the concept of slavery. And so when slavery became unpopular, the Whigs kind of went away, right? I think I think policy-wise, there was a lot of similarity. It was very similar to rhinos who are collectivists today. And Republicans, you know, tradition what we consider MAGA Republicans that are not. There, it was, I think that was kind of the same thing. And it's the same thing over there. DSA Democrats, there's a micro split that's gonna cause one to kind of take the name over or not. Clearly, the Republican Party is MAGA, except for all the people that have been involved in politics for a couple decades, you know, become established.

SPLC CFO Indictment And Donor Laundering

SPEAKER_04 26:53

So this woman right here up on the screen, this is the chief financial officer for the Southern Poverty Law Firm. And uh she this is this is uh this is her uh talking about white supremacy.

SPEAKER_16 27:07

Their views I think white supremacy is you know one of the worst things mankind has come up with. Well, I can have a direct impact on these movements. And in just in the first year I was there, we did some very good work, myself and my colleagues exposing anti-immigrant networks in the United States, some of who some of which are still functioning today. Their views I think white supremacy is you know one of the worst things mankind has come up with. Well, I can have a direct impact on these movements. And in just in the first year I was there, we did some very good work, myself and my colleagues exposing anti-immigrant networks.

SPEAKER_04 27:43

Oh, that was a repeat in just 20 seconds. Okay, so that is the CFO of Southernly Poverty Law Firm who says white supremacy is one of the worst things ever. So that's a picture of her. This right here, you see this other picture? This is a woman who slept with white supremacists. So that's that's the that's the point of this one. Photo A, a woman who claimed white supremacists were one of the worst things of all time. Photo two, a woman that funded and had sex with white supremacists. The SPLC got a suit. Uh this woman, her name is uh Heidi Barrick Brich, got arrested yesterday and got indicted, in addition to the SPLC indictment. Now she is personally named.

SPEAKER_08 28:23

Organization was indicted earlier today. She turned herself into authorities in California. The SPLC is accused of funneling donor money to some of the groups it aimed to stop, like the Ku Klux Klan. Now, her name is Heidi Bearett. She was scheduled to be in court in California in the past hour, accused of helping funnel more than a million dollars in donor funds to a confidential informant to infiltrate a neo-Nazi organization. Authorities say she was in a romantic relationship with that source. DOJ indicted the SPLC earlier this year. We're told more charges are possible in this ongoing investigation. Right. We'll follow. Thanks. We both think.

SPEAKER_04 29:00

You know, they say opposites attract. That's true. That's true. It is true. You love the thing you hate, don't you? All right, unsealed indictment. This comes from Technofog. Unsealed indictment. The former SPLC CFO Heidi Barrett has she dated slash lived with a neo-Nazi and used donor funds laundered through a fake company to enrich them both. She created fake companies to launder donor money to hate groups. So here's the highlight here. The SPLC secretly paid F9, that's the informant, over $1.2 million in donors' money. Most of the money was funneled secretly through F9 through Tech Writers' bank account. Heidi Heidi Barrett oversaw payments of donors' money to the Fs, including F9. Barrick was also in a romantic relationship with F9. During this relationship, Barrett and F9 shared a house and two bank accounts. I usually don't like to share my money with white supremacists. I don't know. Between 2015 and 2021, approximately $140,000 in donors' money flowed from the SPLC operating account through the TechWriters account and ultimately deposited into the joint bank accounts held by F9 and Barrett. The amount is to a this amounted to approximately 66% of all the money ever deposited into their joint bank accounts. Barrett used donor money to pay the couple's personal living expenses. The objective of the conspiracy was to submit false statements to federally insured banks to ensure a bank action. The SPLC used the United States banking system to pay its Fs with donor money. It was the SPLC's intention to hide the fact that money being paid to the Fs was coming from the SPLC. Therefore, Heidi Barrett, employee one, and others knowingly signed bank documents containing false statements for the purpose of influencing banks to open and maintain accounts for fictitious entities. The fact down to the bottom, it was the objective of the conspiracy to conduct financial transactions knowingly designed to conceal the true nature, source ownership, and control of fraudulently obtained donors' money and the SBLC paid to the F's. She was living with a white supremacist, shared a bank account with him, laundered money back to herself and him, paying him additionally, by the way, 66% of all the money going into that bank account was totally fraudulently laundered into there. She's a complete and total hypocrite. Utter, total hypocrite. Now keep in mind, this is someone that the Democrats would haul into hearings to smear people like me, who are not white supremacists, but they would just paint the pictures of association everywhere they went.

SPEAKER_16 31:29

So I think that there's a big problem here in trying to figure out how many investigations go on of this, who is identifying extremists, how is this being reported. There is supposedly a report the Pentagon does every year internally on white supremacy in the military. Is that happening? What is it indicating? I'm just, it's very hard to answer your question because there's no transparency and no data.

SPEAKER_04 31:51

It's almost like they're trying to hide it. It's just a huge problem. You know, the dating pool's kind of small. It's hard to find a nice man that's not a white supremacist these days. That's what that's what she's thinking.

SPEAKER_17 32:03

Swipe right.

SPEAKER_04 32:03

Yeah, Ronald's says the Whigs were opposition to Jackson plus economic national development. Republicans, opposition to the expansion of slavery. Abraham Lincoln was originally a Whig before becoming one of the most prominent Republicans. But you trusted Chat GPT. Ask ChatPT about your son. Seriously, ask ChatPT about your son. Say, tell me everything you know about Taylor John Attackis on ChatGPT. And you know, those of you that are regular listeners or family that have known me for 42 years, just tell me if you trust ChatGPT. If it lies to you about the little things, why wouldn't it lie to you about the big things?

SPEAKER_02 32:38

Yeah.

SPEAKER_04 32:38

Uh the code there is opposition to Jackson plus economic national development. That's the code. They were acquiescing to the establishment of slavery. So I was accurate. That's that's the read between the lines there. Okay.

Culture War Comedy And Online Scams

SPEAKER_04 32:51

Now the WNBA is in a little bit of hot water. A little bit of hot water. We've got Royce White, old NBA player, and Innes Cantor, who have both declared their eligibility for the WNBA. And they're taking it pretty serious. Uh Royce White started doing his podcast with a wig talking about the oppression of black trans, sometimes trans women. Um, he's really getting into it. And he told my wife about oppress me, keep me down, the whole thing, right?

SPEAKER_17 33:17

I told my wife about Dennis and I showed her a picture of him and uh told him he was gonna register for the draft next year. And she's like, dude, he's like seven feet tall. I'm like, yeah.

SPEAKER_04 33:30

But you know what? There's a six foot eleven player in the WNBA. It won't matter. It won't matter. He got blocked by Sophie Cunningham. So this is like a big deal. So the the WNBA had to meet together to try to discuss this because these guys have declared their eligibility and have submitted all the appropriate documentation together.

SPEAKER_17 33:51

Yes, what are you gonna do?

SPEAKER_04 33:53

Right. Statement from the WNBA spokesperson. Today's meeting covered a wide range of topics, including ongoing discussions on transgender athletes and the continued hate and vitriol directed at players online. We will continue to engage all league stakeholders in the coming weeks and months. We'll approach these important conversations thoughtfully and in alignment with the values of the league. There is no immediate eligibility matters affecting the WNBA, strongly denounce bad faith efforts to use these topics to demean and or marginalize others. The pendulum swinging. The liberal women in America are going to start defending the victims of transgender women, which is normal women, because they've been defending the transgender women because people have been picking on them. And women like to sympathize with the victim, the perceived victim of the moment.

SPEAKER_17 34:39

So whoever's getting picked on.

SPEAKER_04 34:41

Whoever's getting picked on. So they're having a really hard time. You're picking on all women who support trans women by exposing their hypocrisy. This is a bad faith effort. No, you're the bad faith effort.

SPEAKER_02 34:52

Yeah.

SPEAKER_04 34:52

We're just exposing what you're doing. We're just following your process here. Declare yourself a woman, decide where you're at on the spectrum. Royce White has decided he's a sometimes black trans lesbian woman. Okay. Which basically means he can put on a wig and play basketball. Yeah. And they believe all women.

SPEAKER_17 35:13

Believe all women.

SPEAKER_04 35:14

They don't have any policy or any standards to stop this. So they're like, well, maybe they should adopt the international sports code where um uh uh a trans woman can't have gone through puberty as a male, or you know, they have to have the hormone. You're being ridiculous. You're being ridiculous. You're being totally ridiculous. So that's fun. WMBA in a little bit of hot water. And again, everything you see is kind of an illusion, right? Bill Gates' daughter is in a little bit of hot water, facing 20 years in prison. You heard me right. Bill Gates' daughter. Okay, so she started a business called foot uh she cut started a business. What's the business called here? It's called uh it's an online coupon business. Okay, it's an online coupon business. What's it what's it called?

SPEAKER_17 36:00

I have no idea. Uh I honestly didn't know he had a daughter. Okay, so it's an online coupon. How many kids does Bill Gates have? I didn't even know he had a daughter. Yeah, who cares? Yeah.

SPEAKER_04 36:13

Uh okay, so Bill Gates Neppo baby daughter Phoebe Gates, 23, has been accused of what's called cookie stuffing. This is an online thing. At her multi-billion dollar startup, FIA, an illicit practice that comes with a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison. Whoa, what is cookie stuffing? A digital personing assistant, a digital personal shopping assistant, co-founded by Gates, with fellow Stanford alum Sophie Kiani, reacted with shock in July following reports that it was dropping more web cookies than it should, taking undue credit for online retail partners. The company released a statement that it had only learned of the issue within the last 24 hours, promising to fix the glitch. Here's the problem with that. The spokesperson told the post any features causing misattribution misattributions were immediately removed over a month ago. So what would happen is you'd go online and you'd shop, you'd download this app. And when you made a purchase, it would drop a cookie on your computer in order to tell the person that you made the purchase from to prove that the purchase was because of them. It brought you there.

SPEAKER_17 37:14

So they get credit for the whatever, the funnel.

SPEAKER_04 37:17

And then it compounds, because as they shop in other places around the web, you can everything you buy gets attributed to them because you know they're on your computer, now they're in your algorithm and they're tracking it and steering you around. The problem is the way the law is written and the way it has to happen is in order to get those commissions, it has to be when someone buys something. What they were doing was they were putting the cookies on your browser the moment the pop-up came up. So whether you bought anything or not, they were reporting to these companies that they were earning commissions on other sales that you made. You went to eBay, bought something, they were tracking you, saying that's our sale. Or maybe not eBay, but you know, whatever online other vendors. So we are now continuing to connect users with items and other others offer thousands of brand partners, the spokesperson said, we will learn from this and we want to ensure that our users have the best possible thing. The problem is this when a when a shopper uses FIA selecting one of the coupon codes, the software drops a cookie, which tracks activity across the web to show the retailer that it helped drive the sale and earn itself a commission. The Microsoft Princess, whose data is worth 108.4 billion, according to Forbes, were aware of features that dropped cookies into the checkout process, even when customers did not use Fiat, according to people familiar with the matter and internal Slack messages. The illicit cooking stuffy traced back to December across uh back to at least December across sales as several major retailers, including Nike, Gap, Nordstrom, and seemingly made up the bulk of Fiat's revenue, according to the news outlet. After Fiat disabled the features in July, average revenue in the company plummeted from around 80,000 to between 10 and 28,000. Almost eight times their revenue was coming from fraud. Wow. Bill Gates' daughter. Bill Gates, she didn't even need to do this. Okay, she didn't even need to do this. In June, Cookie Stuffing accounted for about 51% of the merchy merch merchandise value that FIA claimed credit for selling the report said.

SPEAKER_17 39:08

Well, I maybe she's not really doing it for the money. She's doing it for some other reason.

SPEAKER_04 39:13

Well, at one point, who Gates, who insisted she wanted to succeed without her billionaire parents, saying she has such a desire to prove myself, grew concerned that FIA wasn't generating much commission from Etsy as she had expected. She messaged developers to make sure FIA was dropping cookies each time its browser extension popped up, even if the shopper didn't click the coupon, which would allow it to earn commission for the total gross merchandise. In a Slack channel on December 18th, she wrote, Worried this is an issue across the board. Can you confirm pop-up cookie drop is live on all sites with a coupon confirm? We are monetizing all on GMV. Okay, I think directed them for the couple of things.

SPEAKER_17 39:52

I think I get this now. I think I get it. So is this the case where she's not really doing this for the money? She's doing this for approval from dad. For approval from dad, and she's committing fraud.

SPEAKER_04 40:02

She's stealing from these major retailers. In a separate incident, Kiani suggested a feature would drop a cookie each time her user tried to close the pop-up window. A colleague told Keani that Google Chrome prohibits extensions from dropping affiliate cookies and dismiss events when a customer simply tries to close out a notification and Kiani can conceded. But she added, I guess we could say that the user is trying to open us and roll it back, even if they complain. So they're trying to pay back commissions and reverse, but it's too much. Straight to jail. I pushed a gate seven years. Straight to jail. You defrauded millions of dollars, overstated your revenue by 50% plus, straight to jail. Straight to jail. Straight to jail. Now it's not just there, it's everywhere else. There's a there's a sentence in uh Atlas Shrugged where Francisco Danconio, one of the one of the main characters, talks about when your economy, when you succeed by graft and pull more than by hard work, you know you're doomed. Okay. When you can manipulate applications, grant money, tax revenue, donor investment, commissions by dropping cookies and fraudulently doing that. What's the incentive to learn to weld? What's the incentive to learn to actually build something or invent something? Why would I put my energy into building the world when I can just take what other people will freely give via tax contributions and grant? You know what I mean? Why would I do it? So when your society, when you succeed in society by corruption and graft and pull, you know society's doomed. Well, what about labor? What about employment, right? We have a shortage of employment here in America. Why? Because we're told we're so entrepreneurial and industrious. We need to bring in foreign workers because there's not enough laborers. But yet we all know a bunch of people with college degrees that aren't even working in their field of study, right? So what what's going on here? Well, one of the things is illegal immigration. When we traditionally talk about illegal immigration, we are like, well, we need almond pickers and strawberry pickers, and you know, we don't want to do that work anymore. Fair enough. We don't want to move sprinkler pipe in the middle of uh hot Idaho summer, you know, bring in the bring in the migrants. I get it. I understand. I understand that. I understand that some of these jobs, there isn't a long line of applicants. I get it. But what about high-value jobs, tech jobs, stuff that require education, specialized jobs? You would think Americans would be able to prepare for that. Well, Trump's labor secretary

H1B Visa Fraud And Homelessness Waste

SPEAKER_04 42:34

started doing a little Nick Shirley himself and going to buildings that had large numbers of H1B visa applicants. Is that right?

SPEAKER_05 42:44

We are, Rob. Uh, thanks for having us. We are on the ground in Texas. Uh, we are in a building here with uh two stories, probably a couple of dozen offices, tech companies, and uh, we've been knocking on the doors. Just this building alone has over 500 approved H1B applications. And we're knocking on doors and we're not getting much answers. So it's very hard to believe uh that these visas that are supposed to be issued for unique uh uses uh by companies who need them to stay in business here in the United States of America, not only are they uh not even behind the door, but the uh doors are shut, the lights are off, and it doesn't seem like anybody's been here for a while.

SPEAKER_07 43:26

So what what's this seems like, you know, our companies just basically saying we can find smarter people in other parts of the world that are a lot cheaper than than Americans?

SPEAKER_05 43:39

Well, I think it's the cheaper part. I think you nailed it. Uh the fact is is that historically the sale here.

SPEAKER_04 43:47

This is this is he's saying the same argument I just said about well, what about the almond peckers? Is it just smarter people with cheaper labor? Well, that would be great. And it would be the the reason, and it would be logical from a business perspective. If he was in this building and it was bustling with a bunch of Indians doing tech work, but they're not there. So they're not even taking jobs. They're not doing jobs. That's what's being exposed here. It's not that they're taking a job that they're doing a job that an American could do, but for less. They're not doing a job at all.

SPEAKER_05 44:29

And obviously, under President Trump and Vice President Vance, and of course acting secretary Keith Sonderling, the Department of Labor is focused on protecting the American worker. And American jobs should go to American workers. And that's why when you have uh the fraud uh being uh perpetuated uh with H1B visas, there's a serious problem. It's a serious problem.

SPEAKER_07 44:50

I want to get your reaction to that. There's been a lot of criticisms that this administration is beginning to go softer on immigration than it was when we had Christy Noam running um DHT. And there's some truth to that.

SPEAKER_04 45:04

There's some truth to that. So the H1B visa fraud, it's just in your face. And I'm glad that they have gone to look. You know, glad Nick Shirley got the ball rolling on this because, you know, between Meme Oz and RFK and now this guy, they're just finding it everywhere. Minnesota, Texas, Maine, Washington, California, everywhere they look. Everywhere they look, they're seeing this. How about California and their homeless problem? Right? They get a lot of federal money, believe it or not. A lot of federal money to fight homelessness. They get what are called like block grants, right? They just give the government a bunch of money. Go, go fix homelessness, come up with your own programs. So California did. It came up with different programs. A bunch of NGOs stepped in. And Scott Turner, the HUD secretary, has taken a look at this and he's like, uh, we're spending a ton of money to stop homelessness. And you guys aren't accounting for it right. Here's another clip yesterday.

SPEAKER_13 45:54

A light, you know, on a corruption and a fraud, uh, that Lhasa, you know, using taxpayer money uh to what they were supposed to be doing is helping our homeless neighbors, our homeless men, women, and families. But yet instead there was corruption and fraud with the the former CEO of Lhasa. Uh they gave contracts to uh her husband's uh employer. Uh they couldn't account for 2300 uh spaces, housing spaces that they were supposed to be responsible for.

SPEAKER_04 46:20

They couldn't account, they didn't even know if they were 2,300 housing spaces they were being paid for that they couldn't account for. And the contract went to the husband of the council member.

SPEAKER_13 46:40

And so as we came to Ola said, you know what? Enough is enough. The status quo is not good enough. President Trump, uh, JD, uh Vice President Vance, our entire administration. You just saw the attorney general and others say, Man, enough is enough with the fraud and people using taxpayer dollars to do criminal activity in our country.

SPEAKER_04 46:59

So you made this announcement about enough is enough. How many billions and billions and billions of? I think Catherine Austin Fitz says there's 21 trillion missing from the budget. Oh boy. Right? This is so bad. It's everywhere. Uh, if you didn't file your taxes on April 15th, they're due on October 15th, by the way. So don't forget to help pay for all this. You're needed, Mr. Productive Peasant, Mr. Productive American, these H1B visa holders that aren't at work, and these homeless people that are not being assisted, and these hospice people that are not in hospice beds, and these children in learing centers, they need your money. So you ain't been doing it, pal. You got all that success, you white supremacists. Why do you think you are? You got that white privilege? You know what your white privilege is to pay for everyone else. I'm just kidding. Corruption touches all the races. All right.

Round River Spreadsheets And FBI Overreach

SPEAKER_04 48:00

Now, you'd think with all this fraud, our law enforcement agencies would just be going to town. And they they should have been doing this for a long time. But they haven't been. What have they been up to? Well, John Solomon released that report, and the FBI released the report on the Round River operation. We touched on this yesterday. So we got all this the spreadsheets and stuff like that. It's really interesting. There's a news reporter, Chanel Rion. Here she is, right here, for those of you that don't know who she is. Chanel Rion. She was listed on here as a conduit for Russia disinfo. She's totally a Russian agent, says Jeff Clark. So here we go through. They got this spreadsheet. So in the spreadsheet, ooh, we can barely see that. Uh, can I zoom? I don't know if I can zoom it. So in the spreadsheet here, it lists a whole bunch of people. So up at the top here, these are you know, Jim Jordan and a bunch of Republicans, and they're all listed as conduits for Russia disinformation. So what the FBI is doing is it's telling all of its partners anything these guys say, Russia disinfo. Okay. And then it goes over here and it lists a whole bunch of people and it calls them agents of Russia. This includes, I'm gonna have to here minimize the screen so I can pull it over here. This list includes people. So let me tell you what the FBI was considering conduits and agents. Oh man, this is okay. So we had okay, so we had conduits for Russia disinfo, Bill Barr, Mike Pompeo, uh Lindsey Graham, Ron Johnson, Chuck Rashley, Jim Jordan, Devin Nunes, Mick Mulvaney, all conduits, and there's a couple others. Uh targets of Russia disinformation. George Soros, uh, Joe Biden, John Kerry, Victoria Newland, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Michael Denton, advisor to Joe Biden. Uh, this is why what is the you know, I could I could actually read this yesterday. I can't read it today. Uh, you've got Chase Bank. Chase Bank was listed as a target of Russian disinfo. Why? Because Chase Bank was laundering money for Jeffrey Epstein. That's why. So if if you had any story that touched any of the people they listed, you were either the target of Russia disinfo, so the conspiracy against you is is you know not true. You were either, or if it was coming from you, you were a conduit like Chuck Grassley, right? Or you were an agent of Russia. And these are all notable names, right? And then it goes through and it puts people like Paul Pelosi and it describes Paul Pelosi, part of a George Soros conspiracy. I didn't even know that. Okay. What this what this is right here is this is like a roadmap to everything that's true. What is it that they couldn't let you know that was true? If it's not true, it's self-evidently not true. The internet will figure it out. But if it is true, then you gotta put the way you gotta put the the thumb on the scale, right? You've gotta tell chat GPT that that's a conspiracy theory and just ignore it. You've got to tell the SPLC, hey, this person's a problem. Why don't you go shack up with them? You know what I mean? Like it's uh it's insanity. The corruption is out of control. Uh here is Hans Manickee. He posted a little clip with General Flint, and this is his caption. This was what Russia Gate was about. RussiaGate, Round River, uh, what's the other one, Arctic Frost, uh um the Oxford, all of these were operations to just get Trump to stop the emerging America First movement, right? That that had it in its soul to want to fix the financial system, to want to fix the graft and corruption in all of our social benefit programs, that wants to stop, you know, foreign officials from influencing uh politicians and whatnot, go listen to Trump's 2016 speeches. That's what they wanted to oppose. And everybody that had a divested interest in the establishment wanted to get on board at that, with that. Because why? Because that's how they butter their bread, right? That's how they get rich, that's how they do it. So even General Flynn, who hired a very, very expensive law firm to help him in what was clearly an entrapment scheme, completely against the law. Everything about what they did to General Flynn is wrong. There's nothing that General Flynn did in this timeline of events that even rises to the level of suspicion. Okay, let alone probable cause or an actual crime. But yet they came after him, indicted him, and even his attorneys, who he was paying millions of dollars to, remember, at one point he took a plea deal. Well, of course you take a plea deal when they're acting like this.

SPEAKER_11 52:51

You know those those snakes that I had as lawyers who are come who come from a big law firm? They asked me one day, and my wife would would would confirm this. They asked me one day, if you had something on Trump, we could really use that. These bastards, right?

SPEAKER_04 53:06

And that's what they were after. That's what they that's the only thing they were ever after. They were never after General Flynn specifically. They were never after Taylor, specifically. They were 100% covering up everything they'd ever done. Carl Higby talked about that. I mean, fast and furious, Russia game, everything they'd ever done. Everything they'd ever done needed to be covered up. Their affiliation with FBLC and probably many other NGOs, Act Blue, you name it.

SPEAKER_17 53:35

Well, as time goes on, the things that they have to cover up keep growing, too.

SPEAKER_04 53:42

If the if the FBI or we discovered that the Trump family was doing some huge insider collusion, corruption, treason thing, it would just be all over. It would just be all hands on deck, get Trump, and it would be legitimate, right? But with the Biden family, it was the opposite. It was the total opposite. So in the classified documents that were just released, Hunter Biden and Devin Archer, who was Devin Archer, it was one of Hunter Biden's business partners who was indicted and I believe is currently sitting in jail. They were business partners. This is the Joe Biden. I don't know, Archer, Devin Archer, and then Trump posted a picture of them playing golf saying, look at this photograph. You know, if you remember this. Okay. AI defined. So they here, here in that list, it shows Hunter Biden. Okay, and it says FBI equities. And then it says Devin Archer, head at Rosemont, Seneca, Bohay, FBI equity. So what is an FBI equity? FBI equity is an agency's equities, are its interests, authorities, investigations, sources, methods, operational concerns, or information its own or information it owns or originated. So the FBI is saying it owns Hunter Biden and it owns Devin Archer, and they are an FBI equity.

SPEAKER_03 54:59

You can't hate these people enough.

SPEAKER_04 55:02

You can't hate these people enough. It's not just that they committed fraud here or there. It's not just that some random person getting some government program made a political donation. It's not just one scandal. I mean, we could live with maybe only fast and furious. I mean, what happened? More guns. I kind of want that. We could live with some of these things. But you put it all together, you pile it all together, and you realize it's always going one direction. It's always going one direction, one direction only. Democrats have become masters of weaponizing your virtue. And one of those virtues is trust. It's the honor system. That when I sign a document that says, if this is false, I'm committing perjury and that's a crime, I wouldn't sign that document if it's not true and accurate. Apparently, other people don't have that same feeling at scale. Okay. And it's across the board. There's not one element of anything going on in government. I beg you, send me a functioning program. Find one. There's not one thing. The IRS is doing the work of a mid-sized bank and they've got the budget of a nation state. Okay. Nothing is working. They didn't just tip the balance a little bit, they put their whole body weight on the scale.

SPEAKER_00 56:30

It's not putting a thumb on the scale of the 2020 election. It's putting an entire body on the scale of the election. It is unheard of to have a group of analysts go in and take active informant files without evaluating whether the evidence is true. That's a very important thing. One of the documents that we made public today on the White House website, and you go to whitehouse.gov, go to the election integrity tab, and you'll see it there under Round River, is a 2025 intelligence community review of this operation. In 25, the intelligence community looked back at this and said, we're very troubled by this. One of the things they were most troubled by was they were neutralizing and uh and denigrating long-term uh informants who were providing valuable information without even determining whether it what they were saying was true. They marked it Russian disinformation simply because it was about Joe Biden and hunter Biden, and they didn't put any thought into whether the evidence might actually be true.

SPEAKER_03 57:29

No thought.

SPEAKER_04 57:31

Because truth was not the objective power was. Truth was not the objective power was. I would argue to you that the FBI has never for one second of its existence been a net positive for the United States of America. I would make that argument. And I would make the argument that most of our 490 or so departments in government are no net benefit to the people of the United States. I would make that argument. Right. And I and I think you'd be hard pressed to say otherwise. Because though your intentions are good, your intentions also included the possibility of fraud. And the fraud is what we got. So clearly that is what you intended. The FBI was created to chase down bootleggers. And in order to chase down the bootleggers, they had to justify an operational budget. So the people who were behind the you know attempting to get the first charter for the FBI poisoned moonshine product in the Northeast, and approximately 10,000 Americans died. And then they went to Congress and they went to the government and they said, Hey, you need an investigative bureau that can cross jurisdictional lines and go after these bad guys. And that's where we got the FBI. And they've been denied a charter, a law enforcement charter. Did you know this? I've mentioned this before. So the marshals have a charter, your state troopers have a charter, your sheriff has a charter, the ATF has a charter, they all got charters. The IRS uses the ATF, by the way. The IRS doesn't have a law enforcement charter. They got to team up with the ATF. But the FBI, after this was discovered, there was a couple senators who were like, we're not giving you guys a law enforcement charter because of what you did up there. But we can't fully disclose that because that would really piss off the people. And we can see that, yeah, it would be nice to have somebody investigating kidnappings across jurisdictions and stuff. So it's not that the FBI was created by legislature, it was created by the Department of Justice, and it was never allowed to break off. So the FBI is inside the Department of Justice. So when the FBI shows up in your local county or your local city and they want to help with the local crime, a kidnapping, what they do is they do a joint task force. And the FBI shows up and they go, listen, we have all these awesome tools, but we're not allowed to use them. So, Mr. Sheriff, you can use them though. We can use them for you if you allow us. So, what we need you to do is we need you to sign this piece of paper, we need you to give us an office in your department, some somewhere that we can call, you know, yours, but we're using it. And you need to give us a computer. If you take those things out of your budget, now when we do the work, we're actually you. They borrow your local law enforcement agency's charter everywhere they go. They are a wild band of investigators with some of the most awesome investigatory tools on the planet. And they're not supposed to use them. Because in a secret safe somewhere, there's a document explaining to other senators and congressmen, should the FBI ever attempt to get a charter, to not give it to them. And they've tried two times to get a charter, and they've been turned down decades apart.

SPEAKER_03 1:00:51

Interesting. Yeah. It's a tough place.

SPEAKER_04 1:00:58

This is still the best nation on earth. Believe it or not, it gets worse elsewhere to become the target. The problem with the United States is they have the ability to dragnet all of us. Right? They have the ability to dragnet all of us.

SPEAKER_17 1:01:11

And then lie to our faces about it. Huh? And then they lie to our faces.

SPEAKER_04 1:01:15

And then lie to your face about it. Exactly. And it again, it's the deck is stacked, right? That's something I realized when I was calling defense attorneys trying to find someone to help me out, and I was on my ninth person, and I was told I won't represent you because we disagree politically. I'm told that multiple times, right? And even my the one I did hire, he's a Bernie Sanders bro, but he's like, Oh, I set that aside for my because he was actually a really good man. But nonetheless, uh, the system,

Washington Income Tax And Recall Roadblocks

SPEAKER_04 1:01:48

right? So in Washington state, our legislature, even though a couple years ago they said no income tax, they just passed this millionaire income tax, right? So Brian Haywood had with uh let's go Washington started the initiative, put it all through there, and it went to court in Thurston County yesterday. The judge made a fool of himself, total political advocate. So here's what Brian Haywood says about this initiative. State Supreme Court blocked Let's Go Washington's referendum on the new income tax before voters even got a say. Let's go Washington qualified I-645, anyways. The AG's office then wrote a biased public investment impact disclosure, and an activist Thurston County judge denied LGW a hearing to even challenge it. An entire hearing went on without let's go Washington attorneys talking. And he made an order. This happened.

SPEAKER_03 1:02:34

This happened. Now, people come to me, they'll go, can't we just ignore it since the it wasn't fair at your peril?

SPEAKER_04 1:02:46

Now the Center Square exposes even more evidence of how the deck was stacked. SEIU 775 Treasurer Adam Glickman, first PI below, treasurer of the one one of the public unions benefiting from an unconstitutional income tax and bankrolling the no on 645 campaign, sent letters straight to the Attorney General Chief of Staff, David Postman, coaching the state on how to write a ballot title and summary to uh so repeal initiatives would fail. Postman isn't some unknown bureaucrat. He was Jay Inslee's chief of staff for five years, the architect of Inslee's political machine. Now he's running point at the attorney general's office, and the first call he takes on ballot language comes from a union writing the checks to kill I6 to 45. Postman forwarded Clickman's letter to the Solicitor General Noah Purcell. The same official help write the taxes legal defense and original bill. The Supremes blocked an up-or-down vote. An activist judge blocked the hearing. SEIU wrote the script. Former AG Bob McKenna even calls it obviously highly irregular. When a former Democrat attorney general calls the actions of the current Democrats obviously highly irregular, it's bad. That's the polite version. The taxes owned beneficiaries writing the rules for their own trial with an activist judiciary clearing the path. You need to vote like your state depends on it. Yes, on I-64 in the fall. They're not going to have really any other bites at this apple to overturn it. It's going to be maybe one shot and it's going to be a really bad language on the ballot. You're going to have to know exactly which box to check because you're not going to, you're not going to make the right decision if you read the text the way they've said it. Now, another thing happened at Washington State. Katie Wilson, recall efforts have been started on Katie Wilson. But just like repealing an unconstitutional on its face income tax is a challenge. Recalling a completely incompetent mayor is also a challenge. Recall charges have been filed against Seattle Socialist Mayor Katie Wilson. King County elections received the charges on August 11th. The charges accuse Wilson of failing to adequately address public safety concerns and criticize her handing of police leadership in the city surveillance camera system. The charges are now undergoing a review by King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office. If the filing meets requirements, prosecutors will prepare a ballot synopsis and submit the matter to King County Superior Court. A judge would then determine whether the charges meet the legal standard for misfeat, misfeasance, malfeasance, or a violation of the oath of office. Only if the charges clear those steps would proponents be allowed to start collecting signatures. She needs to be recalled. We'll see if the system even allows it. Right? Why? Why is it like this? Right? Our system devolved into a two-party system. And the idea is that as these two parties vie for power, they're a check-on balance on the other, right? The Republicans won't let the Democrats get away too much, and the Democrats won't let the Republicans get away too much. And anything they let each other get away with, they acquiesce to let the other do it eventually. Right. That's how it works. And so in my J6 experience, obviously you had all the election fraud, but one of the other things I was concerned about was there were so many issues on their face, and you had these Republicans that were just going along with it, like not even seeing the bigger picture. And it was so obvious. And it it just made it makes you wonder. And Mike Pence's One of these characters where it's like, remember when the Access Hollywood tapes came out? Um, Paul Ryan and Mike, Mike Pence was supposed to be the presidential candidate, and Paul Ryan was gonna push in at VP. They were emailing, they were trying to get Trump to drop off the ballot. He was behind that, he was a part of that. Okay. Obviously, they got elected. And during the four years, I was a fan of Pence. I was like, well, he's he literally they won't impeach Trump because they don't want Pence. I think I was wrong. I think I was wrong. And as we got closer to the 2020 election, I started to hear a lot of things about Mike Pence. I

Pence Allegations And J6 Disillusionment

SPEAKER_04 1:06:33

started to get these threats through you know my my conspiracy channels about Mike Pence being a uh predator and his wife being a predator. And there was a an investigator that had, you know, claimed to continuously be giving information to the Indiana State troopers, to the FBI, to the marshals, any agency he could deliver hard evidence of you know, very bad behavior by Mike Pence. And it just would go nowhere. And then this guy just showed up dead one day. Another Isaac Cappy kind of situation. Well, there was another whistleblower named Jonathan McGreavy. Jonathan McGreevy is the one who whistleblow to Cheryl Atkinson and said, Hey, I was a part of myself and Sean Bridges, Secret Service agent, put child pornography on your husband's computer. We did that. Okay, so that is what you know opened that door. And that happened. Like that's definitive proof now, validated even by a court. Couldn't be denied. They did that. So that same whistleblower who was doing a lot of dirty tricks for previous administrations was kind of on a meal coupa tour. And he went and, you know, met with he did an eight-hour deposition with Lynn Wood and he shared everything he knew and all that stuff. And Lynn Wood believed he was credible. Who's Lynn Wood? Lynn Wood was probably the America's number one defamation attorney. He represented Nicholas Sandman. He represented uh the Atlanta Olympic bomber. Um, what's his name? They made a movie about him. Uh Richard Jewell, is that right?

SPEAKER_17 1:07:57

Yes.

SPEAKER_04 1:07:58

Richard Jewell. Okay, so he's been around a while. He's been fighting the FBI and their slander. He's a defamation lawyer and their slander and defamation for decades. Well, this is right after the 2020 election. And one of the things Lynn Wood said, and this featured prominently in my trial because Lynn Wood for me was the nail on the coffin. It was an open question about Mike Pence. Mike Pence didn't certify the election, didn't send it back to the states, and Lynn Wood outed him as a predator. And that would just that would make perfect. Why would you do this? You could be the vice president, Mr. Pence. You're on the ballot. You can benefit from this, but instead, I followed the constitution. No, you didn't. No, you didn't. Okay. Why? So people blamed Lynn Wood for actions for people on January 6th. I do too. Not for Lynn Wood, I would have not gotten riled up. I 100% believe that, right? But I followed Lynn Wood very closely from the time I was arrested. Well, previous to that too, but from the time I was arrested till the day I went into prison, I would check in on what Lynn Wood said every single day. Not because I agreed with everything, because I wanted to know if he ever recanted his allegations. He didn't. So this is Lynn Wood right after J6. People are confronting him about the riot, kind of blaming it on him. And he turns it around.

SPEAKER_18 1:09:22

Yes, sir. You asked me the question. If I had said, I think I got evidence that Mike Pence was involved in uh the death of three children. Homicide. Get the electric chair back. Pence first. Do you understand what rhetorical and political and verbally is? Study the law and you'll know that is protected speech. I was making a point sort of unprotected, but what I'm saying is that you have, when you say things like this, you have people that take it seriously. Did you see the video where they let them in? They let them in. How is that the capitalist? You're blaming us. That was not so hard.

SPEAKER_02 1:10:02

No, I'm not blaming anybody. I'm just saying.

SPEAKER_18 1:10:11

I said that Michael Squatch. How were you talking about certification first? Oh now that's whistleblower. Michael Catherine Freezer in 2017. Now am I right? Does the whistleblower have credibility? Yes, he does. I'm not seeing credibility. What I'd ask is simply this. Get the whistleblower's accusations, investigate. Hold your power. You might find out something that's not going to do what you want to hear.

SPEAKER_04 1:10:50

You might find some out something you're not going to want to hear. He's never been sued. Well, he actually did get kind of bar challenges, but he's never been sued for defamation. He's never been arrested for anything. They just left him alone. Why? Because he has the truth and it becomes his defense. It literally becomes his shield. There's no other explanation for it.

SPEAKER_03 1:11:11

He would have been the easiest person to take out. Easiest person. But they didn't.

SPEAKER_02 1:11:19

Very curious.

SPEAKER_04 1:11:21

Why would Mike Pence certify a fraudulent election? Because there's a long string of cover-ups that goes back decades and decades. And Mike Pence is one of the characters, one of the hundreds of maybe thousands of characters in the story. And it's everything. 2020 was the pinnacle of everything. And we didn't know. Now, five years hindsight, we can see some of the damage. The stuff that the prophets were out there saying, those vaccines are going to cause cancer, those dah, dah, all that stuff, right? Now we're starting to see the results. Right now, now time is bringing the truth forward.

Excess Mortality And Vaccine Messaging

SPEAKER_04 1:11:57

Ethical Skeptic, who's an account I've followed for a long time, and you should follow it. He was one of the early people. He does a lot of charts and graphs. He's a numbers guy. And he was one of the ones early on that was tracking COVID and case counts and all-cause mortality and all these kinds of things. And he says this everyone must remember that we are still experiencing excess non-COVID natural cause mortality of 2,700 deaths per week as of week 18 of 2026 and rising into the summer months. As the astute may notice, TES model, now six plus years out, are dead on accurate. The PFE is experiencing almost exactly as we predicted. Actuarial agencies rewrote their training based on TES's COVID analysis over the years. We are closing in on one million Americans killed by an unacknowledged factor. Something has been killing younger Americans to the excess for five years continuous now, since the MRA NRMA vaccine inflection date of week 14 in 2021. It's not COVID. So here's kind of your chart. It goes up and down. But starting right here, where the vaccine was introduced, it's trending up, up, up, up, up, up. And this adds to an excess of 20 almost 2,700 a week. Excess all-cause mortality. We have no idea why this extra million people have died. They're not COVID. They're not guys, it's vaccine side effects and vaccine-related injuries and cancer. Clearly. Clearly. Okay. So then he goes on to post this. A signal has manifested in the symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and lab findings. ICD 10 holds code R00. So these are insurance codes. A new record, excess mortality was set week 30 of 2026. 73.8% excess as compared to historical baseline. Two-thirds more people die every day than used to die every day. Excess all-cause mortality. This is the mortality bucket which holds deaths that are not easy to categorize. So just this category, these are the uncategorized, like we don't know why they died. This mortality bucket, which holds deaths that are not easy to categorize, typically younger, person, natural cause deaths needing additional scrutiny. It's not normal for a 23-year-old to die on a soccer field. There's something here. You can't just say routine heart attack, guy was 65. Yeah, he died of a heart attack, but we don't know what caused the heart attack. Was it plaque in the arteries? Was it red food died 47? Was it COVID? Was it myocarditis periocarditis? What was it that caused the heart attack at 23?

SPEAKER_17 1:14:47

They don't want to attribute it.

SPEAKER_04 1:14:48

Remember, we watched an NFL game where a player went like this. And then he got up and did heart health PSAs. Get your vaccine, folks. So here it is, right here. Look at this. This is unbelievable. Symptoms and signs of abnormal click and lab findings. So there Oh my gosh. It's huge. Right? It's huge. It's a huge deal here. This is just happening in the background. It's just happening in the background. It's happening in the background. It was a bioweapon, guys. Everything about it. COVID mortality is 94% below the level of two two years ago. Okay. 73% that of even one year ago. Access cancer mortality, however, is 41 times larger than all current COVID mortality. Virulent COVID ended, but cancer will not for a long time. We are now paying the price on the future remortgage in the name of vaccine science. The bill has come due. It is an expensive one, costing you the lives of your loved ones. 41 times. But yet you still have shills out there covering up for their malfeasance. So this is this is Bill Cassidy. Where's the post? Here it is. Okay, so this is Bill, Senator Bill Cassidy. And he's a doctor, right? So Trump put out, did the uh executive orders reducing the childhood vaccine schedule and stuff like that, which by the way isn't law. And by the way, the American Pediatric Association is still recommending all the vaccines, which is what doctors are going to follow because their insurance and their licensing all depends on. But the state isn't forcing it anymore. Now it's just private organizations forcing it.

SPEAKER_02 1:16:27

Okay.

SPEAKER_04 1:16:28

Okay. He says, I'm a doctor. This executive order is wrong. The president does not have the expertise to make those changes. Do you think the president's ex whatever? Vaccines are overwhelmingly safe. Vaccines are hard. Really? Vaccines do not cause autism. Really? Breaking up vaccines will mean children have to get more shots to get the same protection, not fewer shots. It will increase hesitancy and make children less safe. Parents should listen to their child's pediatrician about vaccines rather than listening to an inaccurate executive order. This is so wrong. So Cheryl Atkinson, who's one of the handful of reporters I have immense amounts of respect for, I've already met she's already been mentioned a couple times on the show. They put child pornography on her husband's computer. She got fired from CPS, C B C CBS. And she's been on the front line of a lot of these investigative things, including very much into the medical industry. So she posted this. You were taught in medical school by a system rife with conflicts of interests. The Merrick manual is literally written by Merrick. And as I documented in the Follow the Science, it contains false information on numerous fronts, including vaccine safety. You belong to medical associations that have become little more than fronts for the pharmaceutical industry, just like the SPLC was a front for white supremacy. You both your continuing medical education classes are largely sponsored and taught by professionals, being paid by the pharmaceutical companies. Their classes defended. They often contain incomplete, misleading, and false information. I loved it when I could take continuing education classes for Septic, and we would have the vendor of a proprietary product come in and teach the class. And at the end of the class, we're like, that's the best product on the planet. Oh, yeah. I'm going to use. Can I get some stickers? And it didn't cost WOSA anything for those educators. They just volunteered the day to come and do a continuing education class, which was basically an eight-hour sales pitch. Okay. You serve in a political body largely funded and ruled by conflicted vaccine industry donations, as both D and R members have stepped forward to admit, reported on full measure, your party leaders have been working for two decades to stop vaccine autism hearings and inquiries. You haven't even had one in Congress. You dismiss it, but you don't investigate it. You've surrendered your scientific curiosity to the public and public health responsibilities to a conflicted dogma pushed out by propagandists with financial interests. Vaccines are not a monolithic group that can be spoken of as safe and effective. It's as silly and unscientific as saying all medicine is safe and effective. There are different calculations for different vaccines and different people. There is no study that has ever proven, quote, vaccines do not cause autism. You're reciting false propaganda rather than medical science. Obviously, the vaccines have been pulled from the market after widespread use were not safe and effective after all. Many vaccines have been pulled from the market because they weren't safe and effective. But they told us they were when you took your first dose. There's literally hundreds of vaccines that they pulled from the market over. Because they didn't work. But they had total immunity for the people they injured. The government's chief praxine medical expert in court changed his mind and concluded vaccines can cause autism after all. But the government covered it up. The government has been paying vaccine autism injuries in vaccine court for decades while falsely telling the public the link is debugged. The problem is with that vaccine court, is every case is new. So if I go in and prove in a court of law, beyond a shadow of a doubt, and the decision is rendered in my favor and they cut me a jack, the next plaintiff who comes in with the same vaccine injury and the same vaccine has to start from scratch. New experts, new case. There can be no connection from case to case. That's unlike any other thing. If Walmart screws its customer over and one customer wins a lawsuit, and in the lawsuit it's discovered they screw everybody over, class action lawsuit, everybody's in on the decision. Bingo. Not vaccines, because the legislator carved out an exception for them to this. So every parent has to fight Goliath by themselves. Top CDC scientists recounted in detail multiple cover-ups at the agency regarding scientific studies linking vaccines to autism. They've actively covered it up. Is there any other agency that doesn't cover up their dog shit? Autism appeared as possible risk on a warning label for vaccine that was later pulled from the market. Thousands of scientific studies link vaccine to hundreds of disorders, including immune disorders such as diabetes and neurological disorders such as autism. The quote experts have been proven wrong on nearly every major public health controversy in recent years. I don't think the majority of people are buying what you're selling anymore. I sure hope not. I sure hope not. But every agency was corrupted by either money, self-interest, or ideology. We have to guard ourselves against this. And our current government, even though it's being led by Donald Trump, is still full of people who have been a part of the system. I'll refer you to the words of Jesus Christ in the New Testament when he tells the scribes, who are the bureaucrats and lawyers of the day, the priestly class, and he says to them, You hedge up the way to salvation. What does salvation mean? It literally means freedom. Salvation is the release from slavery. It's the release from bondage. It's the release from debt. It's the release from sin. That's what salvation is. And he's telling the scribes and the bureaucrats, you hedge up the way to salvation and you go yourselves not therein. Right? They're the Mr. Smiths in the movie The Matrix. Our new attorney general, although he seems to be a friend of Donald Trump, and he was his defense attorney, is a lifelong Democrat under Barack Obama, who prosecuted some crimes that we look back at and we go, you were covering up for the system. You were a hard-nosed state prosecutor who wrote false things in lots of indictments and lots of prosecutorial things over the years. And now he's running the DOJ.

Personal Exit Plan And Trust Rebuild

SPEAKER_04 1:22:28

Jeff Clark, vice president of the Oversight Committee project, who used to be in uh government, said just that.

SPEAKER_14 1:22:33

The FBI under Christopher Ray was completely corrupted. And there have to be consequences for that, Steve. Like I have called for radical accountability. And here we are, just a few months before the midterms. I know it takes time to get cases uh up and going, but you know, I would have expected things to really start like at about the six-month mark. Here we're well past uh a year, we're closing on two years, we don't have anything. There has to be a start for accountability. When I tweet about all these new revelations that John Solomon is helping spearhead, uh, I get a lot of encouragement. But I also get a lot of people who just they're turning off. They're saying, like, you know, tell me about more corruption. What's gonna happen about it, Jeff? What, you know, uh, why, why aren't you doing something about it? And I'm not inside the government anymore. I can't do anything except bring attention to it. Uh, but uh, Steve, we gotta keep, you know, banging the bully pulpits until we get action.

SPEAKER_04 1:23:26

The we can't stop talking until something's done. But it's really easy to want to stop talking. My ad my my advocacy is go to 1776live.us and figure out how you can remove yourself from this system. But you can work out your own salvation with fear and trembling, as Paul recommends, because they're never gonna give it to you. Okay, go work out your own personal salvation and shout from the rooftops so others will enter therein. That's all there is. You can only fix yourself. There is an there's very little chance that one man, Donald Trump, and even those who are loyal to him in his administration are gonna be able to fix this on their own. They need it's this isn't this is a whole country effort. Every sane, reasonable person needs to get off their butts and do something. I don't know what it is. Go feel inspired, don't do violence. It'll defeat the it'll defeat the mission, right? But you got to do something because everything these people touch turns to crap. Everything these people touch turns to crap. Despite their good intentions, path to hell is paved with those intentions. Last night in 1770, 1776, we read out of the dictionary the definition of the word intention. Anything that is contemplated as a potential result of any action, whether you want that result or not, if you endeavor upon that path and you get the result you didn't want, it can be said you intended it. Okay. If you create a system that fraud is possible, although your intentions are that everybody will be honorable and use the honor system, if you don't hedge up the way to the fraud and fraud happens, well then you intended it by design by not preventing it. Okay. Everything these people do, they pitch to you as a good intention, yet it's a path straight to hell. Patriot Act. Everything. The New Deal, everything.

SPEAKER_06 1:25:30

An ideology, the left is taking him to court. Every beautiful thing he wants to build, they want to block. Every mile of border he wants to secure, they want to stop. Every legal alien he wants to deport, they want to keep here. Every transgender inmate that he wants to be housed in their biologically correct prison, they're suing to keep men housed with women. Every school district where he's trying to stop racial discrimination, transgender ideology, the sexual abuse of our children, they're there defending the abusers. They're there defending what's putrid and hateful on race discrimination, battling with every single university to say just because you're a young white man in this country doesn't mean that you're not allowed to get the same treatment when you're applying for college. They're the ones that are in court every day fighting to say, no, that kind of discrimination is good. That's the kind of discrimination we want. Ripping apart the fabric of society by race, by ethnicity at the seams. That's their ideology. I'm sorry for this monologue, but it's got to be said, Will. It's never stopped and it's never gonna stop. It can only be defeated when millions of upstanding citizens say, we're not gonna let them take our country away. That's what Trump and MAGA and America First is all about and will always be about.

SPEAKER_01 1:26:46

And that reveals that it's not just something that can be laughed off as an indulgence of the past, it actually hasn't ended.

SPEAKER_04 1:26:53

Ideology, right, right. Every single thing they intended it. They intended the fraud, they intended the corruption, they intended the open border, they intended the covering up and protection of corrupt politicians and business people around the world, they intended the insider trading, they intended it. How do we know? Because they designed a system that allowed it, and then they defend it. That's how we know, and they'll defend it every way they can. Let's rewind to 2020. Let's go into Michigan or Wisconsin, 2020. There's no evidence though. Then why did people get fired? Why in Indiana did people go to jail over putting Barack Obama on the ballot? But yet we just move on. Story in the past. Guys, the cover up has been happening since 1770. Okay. Since the ink was dry on the Constitution, there's been an effort to get rid of it. And we're getting to the crescendo here. So this then shows cameras coming into the into the ballot counting room where this employee goes to the little machine and does all the tabulation stuff by herself. Okay. Now they filmed it. That's not how the law reads. She's supposed to have like someone looking over her shoulder.

SPEAKER_15 1:28:18

Official report is saying.

SPEAKER_03 1:28:21

Okay, so they show it. So intense.

SPEAKER_04 1:28:28

Middle of the night, by the way. This was like, you know, two in the morning, 2 30 in the morning when this was going on.

SPEAKER_15 1:28:33

Here's what the official report is saying. She printed 64,000 ballots in the back conference room of City Hall.

SPEAKER_17 1:28:45

64,000.

SPEAKER_03 1:28:47

Printed.

SPEAKER_04 1:28:50

Caught. Caught. It's a four-year-old story. No evidence. Wisconsin.

SPEAKER_15 1:28:57

Wisconsin. This is Wisconsin. For the November 3rd, 2020 election. She had city employees and others at the CTCL fill out uh ballots on the fourth, sixth, and other floors of City Hall. Then kicked out observers around 10 to 10:30 p.m. on November 3rd. Then brought in large amounts of ballots at 1.15 a.m. on November 4th. All illegal, unconstitutional. Number one way, however, the liberals stole the presidential election in 2024. Now listen to this. We have a documente email from one of her coworkers by the name of Ryan Chu. He wrote on November 4th at 4.07 a.m. Damn Claire, you have a flair for drama delivering just the margin needed at 3 a.m. I bet you had those votes counted at midnight and just wanted to keep the world waiting. Now remember, up in Wisconsin, all of a sudden, in the middle of the night, Joe Biden came out ahead like a fireworker. Just shot up.

SPEAKER_03 1:30:15

And all of a sudden, he's declared the winner. Now, this woman has been fired.

SPEAKER_15 1:30:24

Obviously, this needs to be reported uh in greater detail, but this could be how Biden had more ballots than Donald Trump. Not more votes, but more ballots. 64,000 extra ballots.

SPEAKER_04 1:30:42

There's one party that knows that you need ballots to win election. There's another party that believes you need voters. One of them has a lot of voters, and the other one has a lot more ballots. It's especially easy to win elections when you can print 60,000 plus ballots in the back room of City Hall. This almost brings me to tears. How do you fix all we've only touched on a couple things today? Uh how do you fix this if you can't flush it out at the election? As it says on here, this person who's congratulating her for stealing the election is email signature. Government employee. Excuse me, is an email signature. A Republican if you can keep it. Winners always believe they won fairly. The aim of the election official is that the losers recognize they lost fairly. Plausible believability. The polymarket odds, the polling. Look how pop look at look at all these people were paying to stand on the corner and hold no king signs. Plausible believability.

SPEAKER_17 1:31:42

Yeah, I love listening to Harry Iton and his analysis on polls, but I mostly don't believe any poll I've ever heard anymore.

SPEAKER_04 1:31:50

Shouldn't. I don't believe any medical advice. I don't believe any nutritional advice. I don't believe any any anything. You can't. My default position is the government is guilty until they prove themselves innocent. Now you, Ron, you're innocent until you're proof. Thank you. But the government, guys. She got fired. She printed ballots. They know the rooms she did it in. They have the proof. But yet you still have people out there saying it's a whisper campaign that your vote doesn't count. Oh, it counts alongside all the fake ballots.

SPEAKER_17 1:32:27

But we st we still have media that will say bold facedly to the American public every night at 6 6 p.m. There is no evidence.

SPEAKER_04 1:32:40

Every time. So we have to live here. We're peasants. This show doesn't have a huge audience. Nope. But to the extent that I can, I try to just share what's out there. We're only as good as the information we have. I can't warranty or guarantee that every clip I play or thing that's said or thing is true or objectively true. But you know what? When the narrative is all going one direction and it's straight to through the gates of hell, anybody who says don't go that way is probably more correct. And that's the thing. Nobody can specialize in every aspect of this. But over and over again, the people who do, the IRS whistleblowers, the FBI whistleblowers, the you know, internal this the labor investigator general, Nick Shirley, all everybody. There's no aspect of this that is above suspicion. There is no good intention that we shouldn't question. There's nothing that we should trust. We should verify everything, as Tomaste just said there, right? It's a good way to live. Uh it's not the way I prefer. The way I prefer is the honor system that everybody just does the right thing because it's the right thing. But in the absence of that, I've got to make sure my oxygen mask is on. I've got to make sure I'm taken care of. I have to get off the sinking ship. Okay. It doesn't mean that you can't help. It doesn't mean you can't speak up. It doesn't mean you shouldn't vote. It doesn't mean you shouldn't participate. It means you should more. But don't hang your success on that because it is a sinking ship. And in some regards, perhaps all we can hope for is to just tread water till we get to shore. Right? But the boat's going down one way or the other. Every empire fails. Go read the book of Ecclesiastes. It'll ground you. This is all vanity. What is real? What is real is you and I, what is real is our families, what is real is the meals we share, what is real is the free trade of ideas in a free marketplace. Everything after that is a construct. Everything was built and could be rebuilt if we have to. I don't want to burn the system down. That would be stupid. You have no idea, the people that the government does lock away. It's a needed function. Governments are born of our vices, which are part of our inherent characteristics as humans, the seven deadly sins. Right. We need to deal with that. And every society has created some way to deal with it. However, when the government starts to put its hand on things like free markets, when the government starts to put its hand on things like what we give value to to store our energy, aka gold and silver, and take our uh gold and silver and return us fake paper, right? When those things are going on, the government has hugely overstepped its bounce. Hugely overstepped its bounce. And when you see resistance to fixing the systems, like checks and balances on the honor system, you see that resistance, you know that though they sold it to us with good intentions, uh, the bad was always considered a possibility, and people ran to take advantage of it. And the scale of trillions.

SPEAKER_17 1:36:00

And there's likely grift included in that all that all of it. Yeah.

SPEAKER_04 1:36:04

All of it. Right? So I get feedback often from the show from one of the everyday listeners who says, you know, your show makes you want to rip your hair out.

SPEAKER_02 1:36:12

I get it.

SPEAKER_04 1:36:12

I get it.

SPEAKER_02 1:36:13

Yeah.

SPEAKER_04 1:36:13

I get it. But when you accept it as is, you can realize that you're not that. And you can start to live accordingly. You don't have to go with the flow of the river when it's falling over a waterfall. You can get off the floaty. Get to dry land. All right, guys. That's it today. We will talk to you again tomorrow.

Monty Python Outro

SPEAKER_10 1:37:08

I'm flipping seven. I'm flipping seven. Well, I can't just call him man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know he was called Dennis. I did say something about the old woman, but from behind, you're not. Well, I am king. I'm king. How'd you get that, eh? By exploiting the workers, by hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. If there's ever going to be any progress, lovely full family. How do you do? How do you do, good lady? I'm Arthur, King of the Britons. Whose castle is that? King of the Britons. Who are the Britons? We all are. We are all Britons. And I am your king. No we have a king. I thought we're an autonomous collective. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship. A self-perpetuating autocracy in which the working classes. There you go, but you're classes with the gate. That's what it's all about. Only people would these good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? No one lives in that castle. Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What? I told you. We're in a narco-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week.

SPEAKER_05 1:38:28

Yes.

SPEAKER_10 1:38:28

But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. Yes, I see. By a civil majority in the case of purely internal affairs. Be quacked. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of quack. I order you to be quacked. I'm your king. Don't vote for king. The lady of the lake. Her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite, held a loft Excalibur from the bosom of the water. Signifying by divine providence. I offer was to call the Excalibur. That is why I'm your king. Listen, strange women lying in ponds, distributed thoughts is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some philosophical aquatic ceremony. Big you can't expect to wield supreme executive power just because some watery talk for a thought of insight. I mean, if I went around saying I was an emperor, just because some moistened bitch had loved the cemetery at me, they put me away. Shut up, shut up. Now we see the function in the system. Help, help! I've been repressed! Oh, what a giveaway! You hear that, you hear that?

SPEAKER_03 1:39:47

I'm on about. You see repressing me? You saw it in you.