We Are Living In A Fabricated Information World

If you’ve ever felt like reality gets rewritten in real time, this one is for you. We start with a ridiculous but relatable morning story about a “ghost phone,” too many alarms, and a hard fall that feels like a warning sign: the modern world runs on systems that don’t care if you’re ready, and the consequences land on regular people.

From there we go big: Chinese influence operations, the Eric Swalwell and Fang Fang saga, and why the most important part is not the tabloid angle. We talk about access, donor data, internships, and the way a single “muse” can lower guardrails while the real operation quietly moves forward. That leads into declassified-style reporting claims about election intelligence, agencies protecting their image, and the trust vacuum that forms when institutions “brief” people but don’t act.

Then we pull the thread through domestic politics and election integrity: DSA revolution rhetoric, why economic pressure makes extreme promises easier to sell, and practical election mechanics like Minnesota’s vouching system, voter roll cleanup, signature curing, deceased voters, and non-citizen registration claims. We also hit the bigger information battlefield, from bogus polling “experiments” to bot amplification and platform metric changes that can manufacture consensus.

Finally, we pivot into money and power: Bitcoin adoption signals from China, Harvard, and Citi, the inflation story versus real estate price cuts, and a local case study on whether government should own a commercial golf course. We close with a hard look at what happens when officials lean on law enforcement over political memes, and why the “peasant’s perspective” is really about defending sovereignty, transparency, and free speech.

Subscribe for more grounded breakdowns, share this with a friend who’s tired of spin, and leave a review with the single topic you want us to dig into next.

Transcript

Peasants Perspective Kickoff

SPEAKER_12 0:18

And then they went to the queen. It's hello. Do you know what she had?

SPEAKER_04 0:26

Let them eat cake.

SPEAKER_02 0:31

We're getting screwed, man. Every time we come around, we're getting screwed. Oh, the revolution's gonna be casting for sure. It's a little gunny. It's a little guy. We're just peasants. Every one of us. You watch those old movies, you see the peasants in the background with the kings and kings walking around, but we're those people. We're those people. Good morning, peasants. Welcome to another episode of The Peasants Perspective. So glad you guys made it. So we're

The Ghost Phone Faceplant Story

SPEAKER_02 1:14

on this morning. I got a weird deal. So I got my ghost phone, right? Okay. And it's Apple, and I couldn't transfer all my contacts.

SPEAKER_05 1:21

Okay.

SPEAKER_02 1:22

And so I have been dragging around my second on my iPhone for no other reason that every now and then I'll get a phone call or a text message from someone that I don't know their number. So I can look it up in my old phone. It's the only reason. Okay. And because of that, I have all my alarms set on the other phone. So I actually haven't set the alarms on my new phone until last night because I left my Apple phone in the in the Jeep. Okay. This is explaining a lot. There's a the top's off the Jeep right now. Okay. So the iPhone fell off onto the floorboard of the Jeep last night, and I didn't care because I don't use the phone except very rarely occasionally. It's like I keep thinking, I've probably got most of my contact at this point. I can leave the phone at home, right? So this morning, last night, I set my other alarm to figure out how to use this alarm on this new phone. It's you know, it's different. It's new. And uh so I get up and I and then as I'm up and I'm awake, I'm thinking, I bet you my cell phone is out in the Jeep going off. And it's, you know, it potentially could bug my neighbor or something. Yeah. So I'm like, okay, so I just run out, it's dark, right? Chinese proverb: man who wakes up before the sun cannot help his family but be healthy, healthy, wealthy, and wise, right? So we're up before the sun. So I walk out there, I hear my cell phone going off. Sure enough, yep, it's in the s in the Jeep. So I go out there, I grab it, and now you gotta understand my driveway is crushed granite, clean rock. So it's coarse and pokey. Okay. And then my kids on our little under our deck, they've got a spot where they can skateboard. It's exposed aggregate, scratchy. And they've got some pallets out that they've been skateboarding on and grinding and jumping up on, and they've got uh barbell plates laid out holding them down, which on top of exposed aggregate are quite slippy, slippery, would you not explain?

SPEAKER_05 3:12

So it's a minefield.

SPEAKER_02 3:13

So I grab my phone, it's dark, I'm wearing flip-flops, still in my PJs, my PJ shorts, okay? I'm I'm focused on my phone to turn off the really good image. And I get my foot caught in the pallet, I trip, I yard sell on the pallets, I step on a plate, it slips, I fall, I don't even, I have no idea the contortions my body made. But by the time I get back inside, I've got stubbed toes on both feet, skinned up on the top of one foot, skinned up on my knees, skinned up on my hands. I'm like, I'm feeling like an old man. Everything hurts right now, Ron. Everything hurts.

SPEAKER_05 3:57

So unfortunate.

SPEAKER_02 3:58

So I'm wide awake, did not need my coffee this morning. I'm like aching right now.

SPEAKER_05 4:04

All this this whole story to explain why we're sitting here and his alarm goes off, and then his alarm goes out, and his alarm goes off.

SPEAKER_02 4:11

He's got multiple alarms going. It's time to start, Ron. Carlitz, good morning, everyone. Carlito and Tiffany on YouTube. Good morning. Pray the Rosary Daily, good morning. Glad you made it for Razor. Good morning from Boise. Pony Boy, good morning. Everyone's checking in. I love it. John Attack is working from home today. Greetings, fellow Boise peasant. May your Wi-Fi be strong and your zoom camera mysteriously broken. I thought you worked at home every day. I didn't even know you'd left the house. Oh man, how fun is that? All right. Well, let me grab my uh make sure I got I gotta make the sound, make sure the sounds okay. We're gonna you know, don't want to make any mistakes for the 19th time. Time seven. All right, I know why you guys show up bright and early. You're here for the simultaneous sip. And all you need for that is a cup or a mugger, a glass, a tackard, a chalice of stein, a canteen, jug, or flask, or a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee, and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better, a simultaneous sip. Starts right now.

SPEAKER_07 5:14

It's a present.

SPEAKER_03 5:17

Quiet. You're very disrespectful in front of this young man. Don't you find her disrespectful? She understands. Quiet. Who are you with? Fake news. Fake news. You're a loud, you're a loud, boisterous person. You're fake news. Be quiet. Be quiet. Be quiet.

SPEAKER_02 5:39

You're a fake reporter and you report fake news. Go ahead. I hope they read that at his eulogy. This was our president. You're a fake reporter. You're fake news. Oh man. I don't know. I just think that guy's gotta be the funniest president we've ever had. He just goes and goes.

Swalwell And The Fang Fang Fallout

SPEAKER_02 5:58

All right, here's an update on an old story, if you want to call it old. And this is the Eric Swalwell case. You remember Eric Swalwell, right? What's the phrase that comes to mind when you think of Eric Swalwell? I always think Fang Fang.

SPEAKER_16 6:12

Bang, fang, bang, bang. Depends on the fang fang files. For years, Swalwell's been accused of sleeping with the enemy, Chinese spy. And he denied every ounce of it.

SPEAKER_14 6:24

Did you have any concerns about this person before you had what's known as a defensive briefing from the FBI to make you aware of this threat?

SPEAKER_13 6:33

No. Jim, I was shocked. That's when, you know, just over six years ago, I was told about this individual. And then I offered to help. The story says that, you know, there was no, there was never a suspicion of wrongdoing on my part.

SPEAKER_16 6:48

Now he's eating his words. New bombshell documents declassified by the White House show the FBI interviewed Swalell back in 2015. That was Obama's FBI. And he admitted to a physical relationship with the Fangster multiple times. They first met in the fall of 2012. He called her a striking individual. Went out for a drink a few weeks later, before things turned physical. He said it was just casual. They never formally dated, but Eric said Fang wanted to do more than just hang. He told the FBI about a time that they hooked up before he was elected to Congress. Swalwell said she showed up late at night. Fang Fang banged on his door. He let her in. She left a few hours later. He said he'd taken an ambient beforehand, so he couldn't remember much. Did he light any candles? No. Eric couldn't say. The spy's sex wasn't a secret. Swalwell's staff knew all about it. One aide told the FBI he heard Fang Fang would show up to Swalwell's door and make it clear she wasn't wearing any underwear. But it wasn't just sex. The FBI opened an investigation into possible illegal donations to his campaign. The name of the investigation? Freshman 15, looking into whether illegal campaign donations were being traded for internships and access to Swalwell. Fang Fang was in the country on a student visa. She couldn't legally donate to his campaign herself. So they investigated her for orchestrating a straw donor scheme. She was here on a student visa.

SPEAKER_02 8:29

A student visa. We have what half a million of these fang fang bang bangs running around potentially?

SPEAKER_16 8:35

And their financial analysis flagged four successful cash movements within a year. The FBI also intercepted intelligence that Fang Fang was offering favors for donations. Yeah. She reportedly guaranteed a private meeting with Swalwell for $5,000 and said she could land you an internship in his office for a steeper price. According to an FBI interview, he referred a student she called her sister. And that student was hired and worked on Swalwell's campaign for a year and a half, knocking on doors and researching people Swalwell was about to meet. She had access to every single donor record. Now in the document, Swallow says he had nothing to do with the hiring. All he did was forward Fang Fang's referrals. But the FBI always had its eye on the spy. A memo identified both of her parents as Chinese intelligence officers. And in the summer of 2013, an undercover officer tried to flip her, recruit her as a double agent. Fang Fang's official FBI nickname? Rusty Thumbs. She bragged that she used her sexuality to exploit politicians. She knew she was young and knew she was pretty and knew she could get away with it. But the FBI must have slipped up because Fang Fang smelled a rat and cut off all communication. She got spooked and fled to China, never came back. James Comey never pursued her. And the DOJ closed the investigation. Jack Smith decided not to prosecute her. And yeah, that's the same Jack Smith who tried to put Trump in prison.

SPEAKER_02 10:24

This story.

SPEAKER_05 10:38

Dude, I know. It's a shift. He is going it makes you wonder. He's not even the worst politician. Right. And and like if put all the sex aside, if even if that was none of that was true, everything else that was going on was like crazy.

SPEAKER_02 10:59

That's the thing. The sex just blinds you. Yeah. That's all it does. It's just the distraction. It's the it's the tool to get the foot in the door. It's the thing where all of a sudden all of your guardrails just drop. Hey, we know this. The Chinese are not just interested in infiltrating the government and politicians, business, tech, every sector of our economy. That's where a lot of these spies go. And of course, you know, when you're working at some industrial supply company, you're not thinking about espionage like that. I mean, everywhere. And the sex is just the muse. It could be anything. It could be money, it could be gifts, it could be vacations, access. I mean, we saw FBI agents who sat on stories in exchange for tickets to baseball games. Okay. Tickets to baseball games. But when you break down, just take away the muse, take away the thing, and it's like you let a foreign agent put interns in politicians' offices. You gave foreign agents access to donor lists. How do you how do you feel being a Democrat donor right now? Your stuff's exposed.

SPEAKER_05 12:13

The whole And I really like how that that one little part, Swabell was, he was very um honest about it. He's like, he's like, well, I didn't do anything except for my part where I forwarded the names. It's like that that's the whole thing, dumbass.

SPEAKER_02 12:29

That that was the thing they were trying to get you to do. That was your goal. Forwarding the name, a congressman forward's name, hire this person. Yeah. You know, it's like Markin, happy Wednesday from the farm. Glad to have you. It just there's 500,000 of these foreign visa students in the United States. Do you know what you want to know my estimation of how many of them are here for non-nefarious purposes? Zero. Zero percent. Because it's the base programming. You can't get out of the country unless you've got a program. Yeah. Like that, that's what we know about how they ought to do this. That it's not like, hey, I'm from Shechuan and I just really want to improve my life and live the American dream. That's not what's happening here. You know, when you go to apply to get your visa to leave the country or whatever, they're like, oh, by the way, you're gonna go work at Apple, or you're gonna, you know, you're gonna do XYZ. It is just ridiculous. The other thing that's crazy about the story is the FBI basically sat on it, right? I mean, they briefed Congress, but they didn't do Jack. They briefed Nancy Pelosi, she didn't do Jack. Uh, I remember Kevin McCarthy came out and he screamed, X Wawell should not be on the intelligence committee. Didn't get removed. I mean, if I was a Republican on the intelligence community and I became aware of this, I wouldn't allow us to go into closed door session. I don't know, man. Like this whole thing, again, it just stinks to high heaven.

Declassified Election Intel And NSA Fear

SPEAKER_02 13:53

And it extends to every other branch of intelligence and government. Catherine Harridge posted a report this uh yesterday. Here's here's a picture of it here. Now I'm not gonna read it off the report, but you can see we're reading off of the declassified by the council of the president, uh, Warrington on 12 August 2026. So here's the highlights that she posts on her ex New Declassified Records alleged top officials, top official reluctant to share election intel. They feared deep state label. They feared that if they shared anything that was uh questionable about the election, they would get the deep state label, the White House Transparency uh from the White House Transparency Tax Course. March 2020, there's an email that alleges the director of National Security Agency, this NSA, opposed sharing election intelligence, including 2016 and 2020. So they had information with regards to our elections for both of those years, 2016 and 2020, and didn't want to share it. Timing could invite accusations of politiciz. Well, so would not sharing it. First Trump administration was suspicious of the intelligence community and aggressive in removing anyone who stands in their way. That was a quote. So they were afraid to share because they would get hauled out or not hauled out. I mean, okay. Acting ODNI Richard Grinnell has been tasked to clean house in the intelligence community, but apparently he didn't do a very good job at it. Releasing intelligence about the 2016 election in 2020 would lead to the NSA being, quote, accused of releasing it for political purposes. See, John Solomon's like, they didn't just put their thumb on the scale, they laid their whole body on the scale by not releasing all the stuff they knew that was going on and letting our country literally split down the middle. Right? We split down the middle over questions about our election. One side said, trust the authorities, they've always lied to us. And the other side said, Don't trust the authorities, they've always lied to us. The side that said, Trust the authorities because they lie to us, they're like, now Trump's in charge, so they won't lie to us. Deputy Director DDIR wanted to protect the NSA's reputation as neutral, credible while admitting that the CIA, FBI, and ODNI were perceived as hosting or being part of the quote deep state. The meeting ended with a suggestion that we all chew on it. And redacted said redacted would come back with options. Context, a credible whistleblower complaint was filed alleging the CIA, FBI, and other IC agencies suppressed intelligence about China's influence operations during the 2020 election targeting Trump and his campaign. The Feng Feng Bang Bang situation was a city councilman when it started out with Eric Swalwell. The Chinese are clearly attempting to infiltrate anywhere they possibly can. It's not even a political thing. It's not even a political thing. I'm sure they're doing it to the Republicans. I'm sure they're doing it to the Democrats. I'm sure they're doing it to the DSA and the libertarians and every group that comes near the throne of power is going to potentially be a target for a Chinese officer. Absolutely. And they've got the manpower to do it. China's goal was to impede President Trump's re-election cycle and denigrate him as a candidate. The DNI is working to declassify the records. Recently, declassified records show China obtained more than 200 million voter files during the 2020 election cycle. No evidence, votes changed. So this is the cop-out, right? We're waiting for the stamp of legacy media approval for this one.

SPEAKER_05 17:23

Yeah, this is the part that I hate the most. It's always, well, there's been no proof of, but it's like we haven't litigated anything.

SPEAKER_02 17:31

Yeah. But China could use data for identity theft, false voter registration, and coupled with other hacked data such as credit reporting for blackmail. No immediate response from the NSA or former intelligence official contacted, though uh though reported through the reported place of work, we'll update when she hears back. So that's Catherine Heridge's report. And this primarily comes from memos to me. So this is the uh the intelligence officer writing memos to himself. And there's a lot redacted there. I mean, key people, stuff like that, it's redacted. This Chinese infiltration is a huge problem. Okay. And the Chinese at their core, what is the CCP? Chinese Communist Party. Okay. They're the Chinese Communist Party. And unlike the Democrat Party, where you think they have democratic values, they don't. Like they're openly, unabashedly the Chinese model of authoritarianism. Okay. They are in complete control, total command economy, just control over everything. They have shared that ideology. It has made its way into the United States. It's been here for a long time. We've probably been fighting it for about 100 years domestically, but now it's getting to the tipping point. They've pulled the mask off, they're saying exactly who they really

DSA Revolution Talk And Constitution Hate

SPEAKER_02 18:44

are. This right here is the Democrat Socialists of America's steering committee. Okay. This is the steering committee. This is the committee that decides who's going to get money, who's going to get resources from the national DSA. And this is Cliff Connolly. Guys, these people have money, they have resources, and they have ambition. Careful.

SPEAKER_15 19:06

So the two things that we're famous for is our commitment to a program and our uh hatred of the United States Constitution. What the program does is it gives us a roadmap to revolution, and it gives us the obstacles that we finally will have to get over to have a revolution, which is the United States Constitution, the basis of the United States government. And what the minimum, maximum program specifically, what that format specifically gives us, is uh that roadmap. It gives us the minimum uh circumstances under which we would be able to take power and govern, and it gives us the maximum program, which is the goals that we're actually aiming for. It also uh clarifies democracy as both the end goal and as part of the process to get there ensures the internal party democracy that we want to see in DSA.

SPEAKER_02 20:02

So it it it really wraps up uh the internal party democracy that's called the Politburo, that's called the you know, the committees that the communists all set up. That's how they pretend like they're you know a democracy or doing that for the people because a lot of people are involved in writing these reports, but at the end of the day, it's whoever the charismatic leader is that's steering the whole thing. But these guys they hate the constitution, they want a revolution. This is the Democrat Party, just like MAGA is the Republican Party, DSA is the Republican Party. We're here, folks. We're at the threshold now. These guys have candidates spilled out everywhere. You don't think they might run a Republican just to see what happens? You know what I'm saying? Like if they're committed to destroy the Constitution, why wouldn't they?

SPEAKER_15 20:50

The revolutionary tradition of democracy that I think socialism and abolitionism in the United States have always been a part of, uh, and aims it, you know, at a future that we can live in as a as a human species, because I think absent a revolutionary uh democratic socialist republic in North America, we may not have a livable future.

SPEAKER_02 21:12

I don't think that guy could probably unclog a toilet. For real. I don't think he could probably unclog a toilet. Robin Delane, greetings from and happy day from Wisconsin. Glad you made it. So, how would you go about walking through our country? How would you go about they said the minimum plan is to take power and govern. The maximum plan is full-on revolution, abolishing the uh constitution and then just establishing democracy within the DSA, which is what basically you have in China.

SPEAKER_05 21:40

They don't get the vote. You want me to try and some somehow shill for this guy? No, I don't understand it at all.

SPEAKER_02 21:47

I don't understand. Yeah, we're like this is it's scary, but it's real. I don't think these are the majority, but in in light of our corrupt. Corrupted system. It's very easy to sell the talking points they have. It's very easy to sell, right? Stratification of wealth, uh, disparity in society, huge portions of the population are already on social services, aka they're receiving money from the government. They're dependents already. So why not a little bit more? Why not tax the rich a little bit more? And then I get a welfare raise, right? It's easy to sell this. When home prices are running away, when millennials can't afford to live anywhere and they're eternal renters, these are easy things to sell.

SPEAKER_05 22:33

I guess for me, I do get it when there is money involved. I get that. I get how people could be, you know, duped into it, or they just get, you know, wrestled into it, or they, you know, fall into it, or it's just bad, you know, bad luck. But I just don't get the DEI stuff, or that it's just like these thoughts and feelings that are driving them and stuff.

SPEAKER_02 22:56

You know, there was a clip I I for I decided not to play yesterday, but it because it was AI, but it was describing how there's a certain class of people that cannot make it in meritocracy. They're not taught to excel or compete or you know, find their little unique thing. And so they make their but every human is kind of pre-programmed to have a goal, right? To have something to seek for. And so what they do is instead of like achieving something in business or learning a skill set or anything like that, they go, Well, what I'm going to achieve is being a quote, good person. My goal is just to be a good person. Well, that's a movable, you can just sit there and be a good be a useless, nothing good person as as you're draining society. Right? That's not a good person by the American metric.

SPEAKER_05 23:46

I try to metric all that with value. Are you adding value or not? You know, if you're adding value, then you're worth it.

SPEAKER_02 23:54

Yeah, and their idea is I already am value because mama said she loved me. No. So that's like that's a guy. We want to live as a human species and just be good people. Oh, yeah, because humans, humans have proven they can be good people on their own. Wake up. Like these people don't have kids. And if they do, they're the crazy toddlers that you can't get control over because they either won't punish them or they're abusive. They go like either way on the pendulum, right? So, how would you take over our country? How is the DSA doing it? It's simple, guys. They're doing it the same way anybody takes power in this country through our elections. So we saw in

Minnesota Vouching And No-ID Voting

SPEAKER_02 24:30

Minnesota, what a crazy state. What a crazy state. I think the only reason Minnesota hasn't been way more in the news cycle the last 30 years, and it's all been California, California, California, is because it's cold. Nobody wants to go there nine months out of the year to do any kind of investigative journalism. We all forget about it. You know what I mean? It's just kind of like this thing up there, the great north. Well, apparently it's like extremely corrupt. I don't know if you've noticed or not, but they got some problems over there. So this is the this is the Minnesota Secretary of State. Now remember, Cam Higbee and James O'Keefe went into a polling center and exposed the vouching thing. And they're in cover-up mode right now. They're in cover-up mode. They don't want to admit what happened. They're trying to target for criminal investigation Cam Higbee and James O'Keefe for exposing this, right? And this is the Secretary of State lying to the people of Minnesota because what did they expose? You are the ID that you could vouch for somebody, and just your vouching is the ID. So he says, Yeah, we have a vouching system, but then he makes an abject lie. He says, After you're vouched for, we continue to force you to prove who you are. That is false. This is an election judge training video for Carver County, Minnesota, 2024. That's this last presidential election cycle. Okay, the Secretary of State just said that once someone's vouched for, you still have to prove who you are.

SPEAKER_00 26:29

Ask them for their name and address. Do not ask a voter to look at the roster themselves to locate their name. Do not ask them to see an identification card. However, if a voter presents identification, thank the voter and inform them that an identification card is not required if they are registered. This announcement is not only for the voter in front of you, but for other voters in line who should not feel required to produce an identification card. In some circumstances, the identification card might be helpful, but make it clear that it is not required. The voter may say that they have a difficult name to spell and provide their identification to make the process easier to find their name. Or a voter might have problems speaking, and so the identification serves as their way of communicating their name and address. Once you know the name and address of the voter and you are using a paper roster, search and find the voter's name, check the page for any roster notations, hide challenges on other voter records from view. Have the voter confirm their name and address, point to the oath at the top of the roster page, and have them review the oath. Instruct the voter to sign their name on the line of the roster page to affirm the voter's oath. Give them a voter receipt and direct them to the ballot judge. Now, if an electronic roster is used, search and find the voter's name, ask the voter to confirm their name and address, and have the voter review the voter's oath. Instruct the voter to sign to affirm the voter's oath. As the judge, you will retain the signed voter signature certificate. Issue a ballot receipt to the voter, and direct the voter to the ballot judge. Please note that the signature may be electronic on the screen or on paper. So follow your local election official instructions. Sometimes it is difficult to find a voter's name.

SPEAKER_02 28:26

Check for spell. But don't ever ask him for an ID.

SPEAKER_07 28:30

Okay.

SPEAKER_02 28:30

And say it loud enough so people in line know they don't need to produce an ID. So the Secretary of State just totally lied. You don't have to do any additional verification. Once you vouch, it's vouched for. So I love this little meme here. I think it captures the spirit of the Democrats' plan here. Democrats, there's literally no voter fraud going on. How do you know if you don't check against a valid ID? Dead silence.

Curing Ballots And Broken Voter Rolls

SPEAKER_02 28:56

So yesterday I went down to Kitsap County to cure my ballot because my signature didn't match. Right. Now, we've got a whole bunch of stuff going on in our household. My wife was paimed inactive on the voter rolls. My daughter, who lives in Florida for a year plus, still getting ballots. So I took it all down there. Took it all down there, and I was like, I'm gonna go talk to the auditor. And I did. He was a great man. He answered all my questions. Uh, I even mentioned the Daryl Dog situation. He said, I can't have any, you know, shade, a cloud of anything, so that's why he's not working here. So we didn't get fired because of the sexual assault allegations. It was just the whole cloud of it. Makes sense. I was like, hey, I appreciate you saying that. He's like, I have to look voters like you in the eye. I can't have that. I was like, that's the best answer I've heard. Right. There you go. That's the best answer I've heard. But I brought this stuff in. Not once was I asked to identify myself. Now I identified myself, not with an ID, just by saying who I was. And obviously I had a ballot there and stuff like that. But so you are the ID. There was no effort to like identify myself.

SPEAKER_05 29:54

Okay. You're just famous enough, Taylor, they know who you are.

SPEAKER_02 29:58

Yeah. I recorded the entire interaction, it's just audio because it was just on my phone, you know, face up. But it was it was one of those deals where I was like, so we tracked down why my wife was made inactive. Somebody changed her address to Port Angeles. Oh. Doesn't make any sense to us. We've never lived in Port Angeles. There's never been a change of ID, but they're like, well, she was made inactive because she moved in 2024. I'm like, no, she didn't. That's just when I was in prison and could vote. And then I addressed the fact that as a convicted felon, I was still getting ballots at home. And they were like, uh uh, that's the Secretary of State at uh the state level. Oh, so I'm glad that you have confidence in the process, but there's kind of a broken part to it, right? Like, I'm still getting ballots. Well, I don't know. How do we how would we check for that? I'm like, oh, I don't know. Google search? Like, these are the easiest things to check. So then we started talking about other people. And he's like, Well, there's one person, prominent Republican in the area, whose mom was getting a ballot. In fact, the person might be listening to this right now. You were named by name by the auditor as an example of see, it's not our fault, it's his fault. He totally blamed you, by the way. Your initials are MC. And he said, Well, his mom moved and they didn't notify us, and then she died and they didn't run an obituary. I'm like, but there was a death certificate. Like, all of our welfare systems and everything are supposed to cross-reference that stuff. And what have we learned from Doge? Nobody's cross-referencing anything. Hey, my dad sent me some stuff from Chatty. In fact, maybe John Attackis, if you want to post it in the chat, you can talking about Idaho. Now, he really wants to believe the Idaho elections are good, right? But it was interesting. They do clean up their voter rolls. And is Idaho growing in population or shrinking in population, Ron? I'm pretty sure it's growing. Growing. But yet they removed a significant number of voters from the registration so that they had a less. Now, I understand removing some, adding some. There's a net growth in the state, right? So if you're removing and you have a deficit to the hundreds of thousands, where's your growth? And where'd these people go? And where did they come from to start with?

SPEAKER_05 32:04

Well, maybe they just had a lot of extra people on there. I mean, you know.

SPEAKER_02 32:09

Well, it's not summertime, so the migrants move, you know what I'm saying? Like they're down in somewhere else. So here's the thing: these uncured ballots and these ballots that get vouched for, they add up. They add up. So uh Scott Pressler broke this. He said, breaking one registered Minnesota voter can vouch for up to eight persons without an idea. ID. In St. Louis County, Duluth, Minnesota, 737 of the 13,375 voters that registered to vote on Election Day in 2024 were vouched for. That equals 5.5%. Whoa. 5.5% of the people in Minnesota who voted on Election Day in 2024 were vouched for. How many of those people were wearing a MAGA hat? The answer is zero. Zero people that had to be vouched for, had to be vouched for because they didn't have an ID or they couldn't identify themselves. Zero people that that would have been wearing a MAGA hat are on that list.

SPEAKER_05 33:09

That's why even if it was an even distribution, 5.5% is a lot. I mean, yep, yep, yep.

SPEAKER_02 33:18

Now in our county, it's about 1% of signature mismatch. I fell into that category. But you can suck 1% out of any election and just call it voter signature mismatch and put the burden on the voter to go cure their signature. Totally could do that.

SPEAKER_05 33:34

Well, I'm I mean that happened yesterday, right?

unknown 33:37

Yeah.

SPEAKER_02 33:37

And they were canvassing while I was curing my signature, which means they're gonna come up with a final, literally, while I was there, they were in a meeting doing the final canvas, and I'm like, I thought I had it till close of business today. So now you're gonna canvas, come with a final vote, then you're gonna have to take my thing over there, open my ballot because they said it wasn't opened, and do the whole thing over again. It's the little things, it's the little things, these anecdotal little things that add up. It's not one person being vouched for, it's not three people being vouched for, it's 5.5% of the day of voters. 5.5% is enough to sway most elections. Yeah.

unknown 34:15

Okay.

SPEAKER_02 34:16

That's a big deal. That is a big deal. This came straight from the clerk of county board, right? 5.5%. I don't think these people understand how big this is. Now, Department of Homeland Security, Pressler also posted this. There are more than 250,000 non-citizens registered to vote in just California, New Jersey, Nevada, and Pennsylvania. And so here's their list. And on this list, they include Idaho, 4,328 deceased voters are on their rolls, according to DHS. And remember, that's just their ability to check, right? That's that's somehow you had to be on DHS's whatever lists in order for them to scrub this. It's by no means a conclusive list, right? And then they had 49 non-citizens. You know what, Idaho, I'll give you that one. That's a that's a pretty small number compared to some of these other ones. But you know, you got Georgia with 42,000 deceased voters, Ohio, 59,000 non-citizens. Let's see, who takes the cake here? Texas. Uh, Texas has 111,000 deceased voters. That's the margin that will or won't decide if you get Ken Paxton or Talo Rico as your next senator. That's the margin right there. The dead folks, the dead folks could swing this election because they're on the voter rolls, they would get ballots unless they're scrubbed. Pretty amazing. Pretty amazing. The whole thing is a big facade. The communists, and we know this from it, it doesn't matter the authoritarian. It doesn't matter the authoritarian. You could go back to Lord Cornwell in England, you could go to Mussolini, you could go to Hitler, you can go to Stalin, you could go to the Imperial Japanese, you could go to Pol Pot. Any authoritarian dictator, what do they need to control? Information and perception. I mean, this is the opening chapter in 1984. He who controls history controls the present. Whoever controls the present controls the future. So you always want to spin and rewrite the past. John Attackis says, uh, like working in the sand, you are just looking at the backslide, removing the voters, not the forward movement. But uh well, okay, I don't know. Net totals. Okay, like net totals. Uh in Idaho, if you have died, moved or not voted in the last four years, they remove you from the voter rolls every six months. That's great. That's great. Some really should be asking why so many people have died in Idaho in the last couple of years to be having a net decrease in voter registration when your state is having a population boom. I'm just saying. Like some things just on their surface, yeah, the systems look right until you get beyond what your local county election clerk can control. That's what I discovered yesterday. Well, I don't have any control over felons on the voter rolls. Well, I don't have any control over scrubbing dead people. I don't have any control over XYZ. I kept asking them, do you scrub the list against Eric? Because that should take care of the situation with my daughter. Well, maybe the state she's in doesn't participate in Eric. I'm like, yeah, it's just it's just excuses. It's just excuses, right? If you wanted, I mean, with AI, you could literally say, look at the voter list and go, just go look at social media and see if these people are real. You know what I mean? Just go find some internet record of them somewhere in the last six months in this state. You know, find them on a flock camera. Like the amount of information you could get, and they have, is incredible, but they don't use it when it would serve us. They use it when it would hurt us. That's just almost every time. Like I completely support the concept of flock set, flock cameras, the concept of them to fight crime. But in reality, every power we give the government, they will use to the maximum extent possible. And now that the flock camera thing discussion's in vogue, Donald Trump says, by the way, he's going to review it and give an official opinion in the next few weeks. He's going to be way influenced by law enforcement, by the way. But now that the flock cameras are being exposed, we're seeing ring doorbell clip after ring doorbell clip of cops coming to people's home soliciting information based on their flock camera travel. You crossed a border. We see that you went to a dispensary and came across state lines. We see this, we see that. Some of it maybe produces results, but a lot of it is just straight up harassment.

SPEAKER_05 38:32

I've seen a bunch of them where the license plate reader just missed a letter, and so they're just harassing people.

SPEAKER_02 38:39

What's amazing to me, and this is what people are bringing up. Look, you can track someone down who crossed state, like there's a famous one, and I think it's I can't remember where Wisconsin. They went across into Illinois to a dispensary, came back. Anyways, it's like you can figure that out. You've got the time to watch that, but you can't find the half a million missing kids in this country. Right. I mean, it's really something else. Now, like I said, the whole thing's an illusion. Your voter rolls, voter integrity, right? Until you get to the bottom of it, it's an illusion. What do we know about public polling? Donald Trump's like, it's fake, right?

SPEAKER_05 39:14

Well, that's that's what I say too.

SPEAKER_02 39:17

You know, some of these places like Trafalgar and Gallup, they really want to not be fake. But when stuff like this happens, starts to make you wonder.

Polling Hoaxes Plus Bots And YouTube Views

SPEAKER_02 39:26

This is median strategies, okay? So this is wild. This is coming from Brett uh Loggiarto. He says this a polling firm came out of nowhere. So this is one of these new up-and-coming polling firms, and uh uh to show Francisca Hong, this is up in Wisconsin, with a 23-point lead over David Crowley in the Wisconsin prior primary, has shut down and said its whole operation was bogus. Median Strategies polling discontinued. Meeting Strategies has included its polling project, it uh has concluded its polling project and will not publish additional polls. All previous published polling releases have been withdrawn and should not be cited or treated as genuine polling data. Median Strategies was created as a short-term social experiment examining how purported polling information could enter and spread through the political information ecosystem without independent verification. Thank you for your understanding.

SPEAKER_05 40:23

So do we get to know the results?

SPEAKER_02 40:26

Oh no, they had they had Wong 22 points ahead. They had that's what they did. And they did oh, they're the ones that went over and said Cynthia Raman was gonna lead in California. Guys a social experiment over our elections. It's the illusion, it's the illusion of super.

SPEAKER_05 40:48

It feels like that's what our whole lives are now, just one big experiment.

SPEAKER_02 40:53

It's the illusion of majority, right? Now, we've played clips on this show of bot farms getting taken down and stuff like that. Interesting, interesting thing. So USAID got shut down, and guess what's going on to internet viewership on things like YouTube? It's dramatically plummeted over the last year. Like pop cult pop music, like rap music, 70% loss and oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.

SPEAKER_05 41:15

Yeah, I know a lot of that stuff was propped up with USAID money.

SPEAKER_02 41:19

So yesterday, YouTube announced, because right now, to get a view on YouTube, someone has to watch for a period of time. Like there's a percentage of your video they have to watch to have it count as a view. Okay, and they do that to prevent the bots from overwhelming viewership. You can't just click and go, you gotta like watch enough to have your video count. They suspended that. Just an instantaneous click will now generate a view on YouTube, which will be very interesting to see if our YouTube viewership goes up because you know it floats around like 12. Hey, folks, start clicking. It floats around 12. Okay. YouTube, not the biggest home for us. But nonetheless, right now, every click is gonna generate a view. Why are they doing that? Because the internet was full of bots, because the internet was full of these shills that were paying for this stuff. Here's an example of that, right? You are endlessly and repeatedly being subject subject to an attempted psychological manipulation on social media. The sooner you realize you're on an information worthful battlefield, the better off you'll be. Be careful who you follow. So here is Sam Gali MD, Julia Strong, NJ overclocked, Tay Day, no steppy, basketball AF, Riley, MJ overclocked again over here, and Pinstriped Lagoon. Same same post. I just left the ER. We officially backed in, getting crushed by COVID. Delta variant is running rampant and much more transmissible than the virus. 99% of our ICU admits it did not receive a vaccine. Same cut and paste post. There's nine accounts. And I think overclocked is put in there twice. So there's eight accounts, just that one post alone. And of course, each one of those is gonna get their thousand, ten thousand view clicks, and views, and that's how this stuff spreads. It looks like, have you seen online? It's like every other post is people getting going to the emergency room and the ER is just overflowing. Meanwhile, you drive by your local emergency room and you're like, parking lot's empty. But where are the dead people? Uh you remember during COVID, people going to the the tents, you know, these tents set up outside of the hospitals, and they're like, What is this supposed to be like triage? It's just like ghost town, you know, tent tent things flapping in the wind. All a psyop from the polling data to the election results to the online chatter, it has all been manipulated.

SPEAKER_05 43:30

Yep.

SPEAKER_02 43:31

To the point to where that's why we have to have a peasant's perspective. How does this actually affect me? What is the end result of these policies, these things they're pushing? Does this take away my ability to be sovereign and or or does it take away my ability to be independent and sovereign, or does this lead me to dependency? Right? We have to start asking these fundamental principled questions because you can't believe your eyes. You know, if there's one thing that this show demonstrates day after day after day, it's that the government really can't. Be trusted. I'm not anti-government by any means, right? Like I'm not a true anarchist in the in any kind of sense. I do believe that human vice has to be restrained. I do believe I want a phone number to call if my house gets burgled or I get assaulted, right? I want those things. I want to have a social safety net for the orphans and the widows and the truly disenfranchised and the downtrodden. I want those things. But not at the cost of Somalis writing checks for $90,000 Porsches in Minnesota. I don't want that at the cost of electing DSA members to my local city council so that they can completely destroy my county and then eventually destroy my country because they hate the constitution and the division of power, because it prevents them from consolidating it. Right? We have to have that grounded perspective. What's happening on the surface? This is why, like in Idaho, and this is maybe I'm maybe I'm a little bit too hard, maybe I'm a little bit too stiff. But I don't see how on one hand, a governor or secretary of state or an attorney general can get up and give a speech and talk about the growth of Idaho, number one place to live, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. But yet you lose hundreds of thousands of people on your voter rolls. It just on its surface, it's like there's a lot of anecdotal things. And I'm sure every time someone comes up with a, hey, why do I have two ballots showing up at my house? Oh, this was a simple mistake. Do it at scale. Vouch for people up to 5.5% of the election, which basically means bring the buses in. You know what I mean? Like that's the problem. It's on its surface. If there's not something to prevent the fraud from happening, then you intended it to happen. And if you it's just that simple. You can't just say, well, we had good intentions when we set up the vouching system. Because what if somebody drove half an hour to a polling center with their wife and realized when they got there they forgot their wallet? Well, the wife can vouch for you. Makes perfect sense. Sitting in a committee meeting as a legislature. But you know what the criminal sees? Oh, that's how I can launder a ballot.

SPEAKER_05 46:08

Opportunity.

SPEAKER_02 46:08

That's how I can, that's how I can get the judge I want in. That's how I can get the city councilman in to approve my zoning thing. I just got to find some votes. Can I find eight people with IDs and have them bring eight people along? That's 64 votes. That might be enough to flip a school board seat. And it's not even that hard to do. If you don't stop it, then you're allowing it. And that's the challenge here. You've got, I think it was Wisconsin, eight million registered voters with only four million adults. And I could be off, but it was some massive disparity like that. Like it's beyond explanation. How about this? 100% voting out of hospice or uh out of nursing homes that specialize in Alzheimer treatment. Right. And you've got 100% voting, the families are irate. They're writing complaints to the state, totally ignored. Totally, these are people that have power of attorney. They can't manage their own affairs. Yet they're voting. Only in 2020, by the way. Okay. And the thing is, is the manipulation gets really in your face. Up in Alaska, we've got a huge problem going on, and Donald Trump has brought some attention to this. We have two Dan Sullivans running for office as Republicans.

SPEAKER_01 47:31

Challenging sitting Republican Senator Dan S. Sullivan. Dan J. Sullivan claims his campaign is for real, but he's being accused of running simply to confuse voters. President Trump writing, radical left Democrats have put up another man named Dan Sullivan, and they did this to take votes away from our great senator of the same name. Democrats are trying to trick Alaskans. Now, the Alaska Democratic Party and the Mary Patola campaign have denied any involvement in the alleged scheme. Dan Jay Sullivan says he's a pragmatic Republican and denies his campaign is a sham. The DOJ is reportedly investigating whether there's fraud or conspiracy involved. Now, in the same race on the Democratic side, former House Representative Mary Patola is now running for Senate, who's challenging sitting Republican senator.

SPEAKER_02 48:21

So the Republic, we have an incumbent, Dan Sullivan, and now we have a challenge to the incumbent named Dan Sullivan. Exact same name, exact same problem. How are you gonna know which one you're voting for on the ballot? I don't know. Truly, how are they gonna identify it? Like I don't know how they're gonna print it, but I could see this being a real problem. Which Dan am I voting for? Daniel or Dan? And which one was the incumbent good Republican? And which is the one that was campaigning in a hoodie?

SPEAKER_05 48:48

And and when all the grandmas come out saying, I thought I voted for the other guy, which guy are they even gonna be talking about?

SPEAKER_02 48:54

I voted for Dan Sullivan. 75% of the state's gonna vote for Dan Sullivan and the re and the Democrats are gonna win it because the tickets it's it's the most ridiculous thing, right? And you have to understand, again, everything's a psyop. We've seen it a million times, just an old montage, you know, covet era.

SPEAKER_17 49:14

We want to make sure that people can discern the truth from the misinformation, and we want to make sure that everyone understands it. No one's safe till everyone's safe.

SPEAKER_13 49:23

No one is safe, no one is safe until no one is safe, no one is safe until no one is safe, nobody is safe as a post-9-11 axiom.

SPEAKER_11 49:32

Safer but not yet safe.

SPEAKER_04 49:33

No one is safe, no one is safe, no one is safe, no one is safe from COVID 19 until everyone is safe. The whole world isn't safe, none of us are safe.

SPEAKER_11 49:40

No one is safe, nobody is safe, nobody is safe until we're all safe. Health experts have been saying nobody is safe.

SPEAKER_05 49:46

Nobody is safe until everybody is safe. Nobody is safe.

SPEAKER_11 49:49

Science is clear. None of us are safe. There is no safety. No one is safe. No one is safe until everyone is safe. No one's safe.

SPEAKER_04 49:56

Nobody is safe, nobody is safe. No one's safe. We'll never be safe until we're all safe. We are never gonna be safe. 99.5% of people are safe and will survive COVID-19.

SPEAKER_03 50:07

Uh, the only positive thing out of this is we should be able to manufacture a lot of vaccines, and nobody will be safe if not everybody is vaccinated. You don't have a choice. As long as not everybody is vaccinated, nobody will be safe. Normalcy only returns when we've largely vaccinated the entire global population.

SPEAKER_11 50:29

So get the fucking vaccinated. You need to get vaccinated. And if you don't, you are going to die. I know you're vaccinated. You're the smart ones, but you know there's people out there who aren't listening to God and what God wants. You know who they are.

SPEAKER_02 50:43

There's 10 more minutes of that. Oh my gosh.

SPEAKER_05 50:47

You're living in a fabricated world. Can anybody tell me that that is not a fear campaign? What the heck, man?

SPEAKER_02 50:55

No. And again, we have to come back to the peasant's perspective. Why are all these people saying the same thing, not producing any significant studies, science, facts, data? It's emotion, it's fear-driven, right? Capitalism is bad. Vote for us. Let's get rid of the constitution. It's holding you back. It's the constitution why you can't buy a house, young millennial. You know, it's not Somali corruption and an open southern border and any of these things, right? No, no, it's our economic system of lause far, lause faire capitalism.

SPEAKER_05 51:28

It's not the inflation from the money printers.

SPEAKER_02 51:30

Hey, you need the vaccine. No one's safe till everyone is. Apparently, apparently. Scott Adams said this the best. Now he got the vaccine. It might have been his undoing, fairness, right? Might have been his undoing. But he got the vaccine. And in retrospective, right, after he got COVID again and then had long COVID and probably got a cancer diagnosis that, you know, I'm sure in the back of his mind.

SPEAKER_05 51:55

Well, his whole experience is why, you know, we talk about him.

SPEAKER_02 52:01

But I remember, I remember exactly where I was working, operating my excavator. And he said on his show, he walked in California in his local neighborhood, he walked near some urgent Claire clinic, and they had one of these emergency tents set up with the vaccine. It was the first wave of vaccines, and you could just drive in and get your shot in a parking lot. And he broke down in tears. He broke down in tears because what an amazing thing we've done and what such advancements in science. And he was emotional about how as a country we've come together to beat this virus.

SPEAKER_05 52:35

And isn't America great? And this is such a great example.

SPEAKER_02 52:38

And he was totally sincere about it. Now, correctly, later he went back and was like, uh, apparently they were lying to us. And and of for the decades he spent trying to get people to just see with clear eyes. I mean, he eliminated like corporate boardroom bull crap back in the days with the Dilbert, like TPS reports and stuff like that. Elon Musk says one of their mottos was don't show up in a Dilbert cartoon, right? Like don't do stupid office things. He destroyed the entire uh corporate consulting class because of his cartoon. But yet he couldn't apply those same skills to see that. To see that. And so in hindsight, he said this the people that avoided the vaccine, they they they got the right answer for the wrong reasons. Their default presumption was don't trust the government. And because of that being their default, the hesitancy to do anything the government says because of that, they got the right answer. Regardless of the fact that at the time there weren't studies supporting the anti-vaxxers, there wasn't a constant bell ringing on the media supporting them. They trusted their gut and they got the right answer. And that's what we as peasants have to do. You always have to ask yourself, okay, how does this affect my kitchen table? How does this affect me? How does this affect my ability to make choices in my life? Right. We have to internalize the declaration of independence, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. And anything that takes from that, we should have the highest sensitivities. The absolute highest sensitivities. Right. We have to really look at those things. So that's my that's my child. Listen, John Attaka says here, uh, let's see. If in Idaho, if you have died, moved or not voted in the last four years, they remove you from the rolls every six months. In 2023, 74k voters were moved for not voting in the last four years. Chatty said Idaho's four-year rule was changed recently, including what changed in the 2023 to 2025 from Chatty. The four-year renovating provision is decades old, but was being enforced well before recent debates about voter roll maintenance. Okay, well, I think Idaho should just give the feds their voter rolls and let them scrub it. It's like not that hard of a

Nancy Mace Optics And MAGA Coalition Cracks

SPEAKER_02 55:00

thing. All right, so let's talk about this Nancy Mace deal.

SPEAKER_07 55:04

Okay.

SPEAKER_02 55:05

I don't know why I find this just stunning, but she's now gone full podcast mode. She's in the twilight of her political career. She's got her new tattoos here, okay? And she's showing them off. So now, you know, this is her post. This is the land of the free, and you have the right to bear arms. Okay.

SPEAKER_07 55:22

Okay.

SPEAKER_02 55:23

So here's another one that she posted on her uh on her ex kit. This is this is the American. She wanted to be governor, folks. She wanted to be governor of North Carolina. Thoughts and prayers to all those affected by my sleeves. Make the mistake of opening my social media this afternoon. Some of y'all out of control. My biceps should not be a news story. We have more important things. Why are you thirst trapping here? Yeah. So Derek Guy, don't know who that is. He says this. He goes, I like tattoos and I think yours are well done. I'm curious what inspired you to get the opening line of Miss Dalloway tattooed on your arm. So she's got a little opening thought line there. Dalloway, as you know, is buying flowers for her dinner party, but it's at the dinner party where she wrestles with her homosexual memories of and desires for her friend Sally. Although you voted for gay marriage twice, you've made disparaging remarks about gay people. Would that book written by a bisexual feminist not be your moral values? Now, if you know anything about the Nancy Mace story, she does have a problem with swinging both ways. I don't know if it's a problem or not, but either way.

SPEAKER_05 56:23

I guess I don't know her.

SPEAKER_02 56:24

I don't know what. I'm probably gonna, every time Nancy Mace comes up, I'm probably gonna bring her up. I just think it's like the most it's she's one of those politicians that could have done so many great things. And maybe she did. Maybe part, maybe she's got some real wins in her legislative career. I know she's been a real fighter, but she's been one of those politicians that she takes the wrong position at just the right time. Right? Just the right time. Uh, one of them was the Epstein's releases, right? The Republicans that got behind releasing the Epstein stuff, Marjorie Taylor Green, Massey, um uh what's her name? Uh Boebert and uh MTG, Massey, Boebert, and Marjorie Marjorie Taylor Green, Lauren Boebert, Thomas Massey, Nancy Mace were the four primary Republicans, and Luna was like half in, half out on that one. She did vote for it, but that's because everybody voted for it. But she was like half in on half out on the disclosures. But they went against the president. Now, I'm not 100% positive. I think that the Epstein thing was just all political capital lost with nothing to gain. Like that's kind of where I think the Epstein stuff landed. Is there's not enough there there in what they have. Those files have been in the possession of the deep state for a long time. Obviously, everything they could do, they came out against Donald Trump. No mention of Clinton or Ahood Barak or any of the other people in there in the mainstream media, but they really shot themselves in the foot politically, and now they're all washed out. Except for Luna, she's still in. But everyone else got washed out. Really bad choice. But there were other things like that. Donald Trump once called Nancy Mace an evil woman. Very interesting. So, along with that, right, Nancy Mace represents a certain part of the Republican faction. She's got a lot of establishment in her, but she's also kind of on the edge of, you know, uh, on the edge of mainstream in the Republican Party. Same thing with Massey, MTG, these all these guys were. Rich Barris, who I've mentioned many times, I struggle with his opinions. And probably because we agree on more than we don't, so it bothers me when we don't agree, right? Or something like that. But he is a pollster. He's a people's pundit. And he was on with he was on with Frank, quite frankly, show. This is the show that I was on earlier this year, and I'm hoping to make it back there here soon. But he was on with quite frankly, and he was talking about how the MAGA party, right? The Republican Party has flushed out now some influential people that helped build a MAGA coalition. Tucker, Joe Kent, MTG, Massey, Alex Jones, they've all jumped off the MAGA bandwagon. And Rich Barris, I think, rightly points out this is a mistake for the Republican Party.

SPEAKER_18 59:07

Don't worry, Tucker, you can come back. Don't worry, Joe, you can come back. Don't worry, Marjorie, you can come back. Don't worry, Thomas, you can come back. Don't worry, Alex, you can come back. Don't worry, Marjorie, you can come back. What do all these people have in common? They're either OG MAGA or they represent what was truly new MAGA in 24, and they brought along the numbers that got us a winning coalition. You know, all of these other people out there, they dismiss these criticisms and these people fracturing off. You act like you had a 10-point popular vote win or something. You don't. And let me just give everybody a little bit of a stat and then I'll kick it back to you because this is real, and these people can destroy the Republican Party if they choose to do so. So instead of, you know, mocking them and making fun of them, you should be trying to figure out how to court them back because you chase them away for a tiny parasitic sliver of the coalition. Neocons are nothing. They are lit, they're literally dying right in front of our faces, people. Lindsey Graham just corked off out of nowhere. Mitch McConnell is still alive, but he's not. Okay. They're literally dying in front of our face, and you're sacrificing the future coalition, the future of America, the our future ability to win elections for these dinosaurs who are going extinct. And the truth is, the comet has been heading to Earth for years. They just never saw it coming because they're too stupid and too old to see it.

SPEAKER_02 1:00:29

So I think that's he's a good point. I remember Elon Musk once said Donald Trump is a product of his era. And I think that's one of the challenges Donald Trump has is although he's very in touch with things, he's not punk rock quite yet. You know, Lindsey Graham was his best bud. And that's a that's a problem. I think that everywhere we look, the Democrat Party is falling apart, the establishment Democrats are starting to wane and probably come over onto the moderate Republican side. DSA has clearly got a strong agenda. They're not wildly popular, but they can pick off enough people. They can definitely pick off enough people, especially when the contrast is the neocons. And that's the thing. I was an anti-war voter, I was an anti-neocon voter, so I voted for Barack Obama because he wasn't uh he wasn't John McCain. That's why. And then I voted for him again because he wasn't Mitt Romney. Not because I particularly loved Barack Obama, not because I totally believed in his message of hope and change. I was an entrepreneur, I was a business owner. Voting for him did not serve me very well. But I didn't want to vote for the neocons. And I think that Trump represented the non-neocon Republican option. How do you get a fiscal conservative? How do you get a social moderate in a package that's not pro-war? That was what Donald Trump represented. And unfortunately, because of this Iran situation, he's tarnishing that. And the only support he gets now is from the neocons. And in the process of doing that, he's tossed out anybody that's spoken against it. MGG, anybody who's, you know, hey, maybe Israel's a little too influential here, out on your butt. These were some of the most loyal people to Donald Trump and his overall agenda. I worry about that. I worry about that. You know, when I go to the Republican meeting and we have the guy stand up and berate Donald Trump and get ready for a socialist wave, it's like, even if it's just one in the room, right? It very much lets you know out there in the zeitgeist, there are people that are paying attention to the Nick Fuenteses, the Alex Joneses, the Masseys, you know, and as these and Megan Kelly, you can go on and on. And if these people don't warm back up to Trump on their own and Trump doesn't reach out to them, it's it could get ugly, right? Because they got people out to vote. You got to remember, these guys still have huge shows. And what's crazy is as USAID goes down, the Democrats are doing everything they can to put their own shows out there. I mean, heck, Gavin Newsome has his own podcast. We just watched Gavin Newsom and Gretchen Whitmer, two sitting governors sitting in a diner having a cheaty chat podcast, right? It's like, okay. Nancy Mace has started a podcast. MTG's got a show going on right now, right? But the the left is trying to spread out, but the USAID money's not there, right? So we'll see. But these Megan Kellars, Tucker Carlson, they carry their own. Alex Jones, although he did put out the bat signal yesterday because they got rid of more bots on X and changed the algorithm, and Alex Jones is like, my viewership just went down 50%. You know, Alex. You're actually the perfect vehicle for a psyop. Right. And I've wondered this, like as a show host myself, when we shut off the show, for the most part, I tune out. I don't read comments very often. It's not a lot, you know, but I'm not like socially engaging. And that's probably one of the reasons why the show grows slowly, but we want it to grow intentionally. It's because I'm not out there spamming, right? I'm not out there doing tons of clips and stuff like that. I'm not trying to go viral. I'm trying to produce real content here. What did you say, Ron, the other day? It's 6 30 a.m., time for the new feature film. Yeah.

SPEAKER_05 1:04:17

Two-hour podcast every day. Yeah, two-hour feature film every day.

SPEAKER_02 1:04:20

Two-hour feature film every day, right? So Alex Jones, all of a sudden, his numbers go down. I'm like, that could be the China block that wants you to be anti-Israel because it just causes division. That then you get feedback from your audience. You see that when you go hard against Trump, your views go up. Well, all of a sudden, when they suck out any of the falsities, your views go down. And now you're, you know what he did yesterday? He attacked Tim Pool. Did you hear about this?

SPEAKER_05 1:04:46

No.

SPEAKER_02 1:04:47

He attacked Tim Pool. Tim Pool, are you taking money from Israel? Blah, blah, blah. Tim Poole has taken the long road. He built his own platform, he built his own show, he does his own streaming. He's not sponsored by other than just local, you know, the sponsors that come to him directly. He doesn't do the platform thing, right? He doesn't have a benefactor particularly. But so Tim has a very consistent audience. If you listen to Tim, you're loyal to Tim. He did it with Blunt Force Trauma, right? He just kept producing quality content long, long enough that his audience doesn't rely on advertising. His audience doesn't rely on, you know, spamming and stuff like that. In fact, I don't even think he measures his metrics on the different platforms because he hosts his own. You can go subscribe on his website and watch the show directly on his website, and that's how he gears his show. Alex Jones lost that when he lost the InfoWars. And now he's working for someone else. He's a benefactor. So his ratings really matter. But he attacked Tim Poole. Like out of nowhere. Tim Pool's like, like literally, like a month ago. You were on my show. We were friends. What's happening here? And you're accusing me of being another Israeli shill because my views are up. You know, it's like crazy. Okay, shifting topics here.

Bitcoin Goes Mainstream With China And Citi

SPEAKER_02 1:06:03

Got some Bitcoin news. So yesterday in China, the Chinese public company Xibau Technology just announced that it bought 2,300 Bitcoin. The company said it will hold the Bitcoin as a Treasury Reserve asset on its balance sheet. The Chinese Chinese companies are now openly competing with America to accumulate more Bitcoin. Now, the significance of this was China was the first nation to ban Bitcoin like 12 times. And now they've capitulated. Now they're allowing their big companies to buy it and hold it as a reserve asset. Now China's long on gold. They've been hoarding gold for a long time. But the problem with gold is what? What do we know? It's hard to transact in. And the fiat system, great, accumulate as much as you want. But as soon as you need to buy oil with gold, now you need another another ship to haul it. And now you need a navy to get it across the Pacific or whatever it is. So gold is very limiting in our modern world. So the fact that they're allowing Bitcoin, that's a big deal, especially for a country that's banned it. Here's another one. Harvard yesterday announced that they bought a hundred million dollars worth of Bitcoin via the uh Bitcoin ETF. That basically means they paid back BlackRock to buy the Bitcoin for them. Harvard, $100 million. China and Harvard are now in on Bitcoin. You think you guys guys aren't smart? I'm just wondering, right?

SPEAKER_05 1:07:24

Do you think they're not smart? I think there are only two entities. There are how many more entities are going to be interested in owning some Bitcoin, I wonder.

SPEAKER_02 1:07:31

How about this one? This one came from Citibank. So this is their report on you know investment strategies. Infrastructure for diverse operating models, digital asset custody. Digital assets already operate on near-instant settlement 24-7. It bypasses the need to go have gold, you know, checked on and transported. It's instant settlement 24-7. City expects to go live with digital asset custody later this year, starting with the custody of one and one cryptocurrency only, Bitcoin. This is being built on City's common digital asset architecture, and we will offer one-stop custody experience. Clients will access traditional and crypto custody capabilities within the same framework for an integrated experience. So what this means is you have if you have a city account, you can now go into your city account and you can just buy Bitcoin in your bank account, tied to your bank account. So instead of having to go to River or whatever, you can do it through City. I don't recommend this. Okay, but they're doing it. White label platform capabilities, enabling clients to access cities leading infrastructure to deliver enhanced and competitive capabilities to their customers while simplifying operations. This includes transaction initiated and workflow management and reporting capabilities as well as mark information. So Bitcoin, uh cities on it. So in the last 24 hours, China, Harvard, and City have all made Bitcoin announcements. Are you too late for Bitcoin? Here's the question. So this is a chart. Bitcoin is still early. So this is adoption curve. And it says this Bitcoin is only 17 years old. Most foundational systems took 20 to 50 years to become an everyday infrastructure. Adoption always feels late in the moment until it becomes the invisible infrastructure. So this right here is kind of the curve, and it shows how Apple got adopted, how the internet got adopted, credit cards, and electricity, right? Because now these things are ubiquitous. 50% of the population or more has Apple products. Internet is almost universal, credit cards, almost universal. See you electricity, universal in what 99.999% in the United States at this point. I'm sure there's you know intentional off-grid stuff. So here's the curve, right? In the beginning, it's innovators. These are the tech enthusiasts and visionaries, the people who get right out in front of it. Remember the diners cards for credit cards? It was like one of the early credit cards. Do you have your diners card? Right? You've got your early adopters. These are forward-thinking and early believers. And this is where it shows Bitcoin's at, right here, 17 years old. The history books will say city adopted Bitcoin early. The history books will say, you know, all these countries jumped on early. Then you've got the early majority. These are the pragmatic majority seeking proof, right? We're not there yet. We're not there yet. Then you've got the late majority. They're skeptical and require social proof. Once most people are doing, it's like email. You know, you had people who had email in 95, 96. By 2002, you had the early majority. By 2012, it was the late majority. And by 2026, you don't have an email. I don't know anybody who doesn't have an email. In fact, it's so ubiquitous, we have tons of them, and we've stopped using them. Right? Because it's mainstream. Ubiquitous adoption and visible infrastructure. You don't make money anymore sending out spam emails. But there was a time where you could get a list of emails and you could make money just off clickbait ads going to people's inboxes. Now, people don't even open it because it's so mainstream. We see it coming a mile away. Oh, it's another email scam. You know what I mean? So we're early. We're early in this. And like we've talked about all the time, it's an asymmetrical bet. Now we do have some good news in the

Inflation Narrative And Real Estate Price Cuts

SPEAKER_02 1:11:07

market. We have inflation has been pretty well tamped down. This is on CNBC. They were kind of ragging on the DSA, the Elizabeth Warren's of the world that are gonna say the world is falling economically. I look at it like this: Trump is doing a lot to stem the bleeding, and he's changing us back to Hamiltonian economics. That's gonna, there's some serious things that have to happen for that to occur. We have to have lower interest rates, and we're gonna get them. It's called the debase debasement play. You gotta you gotta get those debts kind of down to a reasonable amount so Hamiltonian, so tariffs can cover it, right? So what are you gonna have to do? You're gonna have to devalue the dollar. It's like built into the cake. So, on one hand, we have kind of a short-term inflation drop, which I think is let's listen to the clip.

SPEAKER_10 1:11:52

The left and and people that don't like the president and and don't want things to work. And you know, like Senator Elizabeth Ward will come on and say, inflation's out of control and the economy is getting killed by by what's happening by these tariffs. This 3% with the market at new highs, and and really we haven't seen inflation uh you know go up back to three percent. Maybe it will this week, maybe we'll see it. But none of these things, none of these horrible things have happened, but they still talk like it's happening. It's amazing.

SPEAKER_19 1:12:22

Well, the important there's an important lesson there. Don't pick a congressman to be your money manager. That that's what I would say. But in the end, Congress has their own uh uh reasons to uh point out certain things, and the Democrats, of course, as you pointed out, really don't want to see the current administration have some success. But there's no doubt that this is some success. We're seeing more horsepower, we're seeing better equities, inflation, inflation really hasn't changed much in the last year or so.

SPEAKER_02 1:12:52

And that's great. Ron, how familiar are you with the story of Andrew Jackson going after the central banks? Because Donald Trump is very much repeating the same pattern.

SPEAKER_05 1:13:01

Uh, not a lot.

SPEAKER_02 1:13:03

Okay, so just in a nutshell, Andrew Jackson waged war against the central bank, right? Made it his life's work kind of in the end. And he succeeded. He killed the central bank in America in the eight in the 1840s, yeah, 1840s. And what that did was it led to four years of national depression. Four years of national depression before he killed the central bank. But what happened after that was the Gilded Age, where we went 50 years without a recession, just nonstop expansion. He killed the central bank, he gave the control of the issuance of credit back to the people, they invested in things that were good for them, and the economy exploded. And we had the Gilded Age, gave us everything we have today. During the Gilded Age, the computer was invented in the 1800s. Now, getting from one prototype to mass distribution took another 90 years, right? But we invented the first one during the Gilded Age. Everything we have today started with the Gilded Age, like almost all of our technology. But Andrew Jackson had to face down the central bank, he had to face down voters, and he had to put the country through four years of depression in order to wipe out all of the nonsense economics that were happening to get back to a sound system. Donald Trump is doing much the same. I think he's trying to avoid catastrophe because we have such a quick uh, like when you think about the 1800s, by the time you realized you were in a depression, the voting season had already passed. Now we could find out pretty instantly. Like, for example, what Donald Trump is doing, he's curbing inflation. But what happens when you curb inflation? Assets that only appreciate because of the inflation start to deflate. They look like they're deflating, right? So, real estate, this is the division between Wall Street and Main Street. Right now, we have a huge Wall Street boom. All the top numbers are looking good. The problem is, we the people, the peasants, there's a door open because there's something happening that affects more Americans than Wall Street. Real estate. Update As of this morning, 41% of all homes for sale in the United States are undergoing price cuts. There, this is telling us inflation is flat. That's what that's telling us. People aren't being able to count in that little bit of appreciation from year over year. They're dropping prices. There are many locations across the country this morning where over 50% of inventory is undertaking price cuts. These include, but are not limited to San Antonio, Austin, Dallas, Denver, and Tampa. On the opposite end of the spectrum, there are markets with less than 20% of inventory is undergoing price cuts. Rochester, New York, Atlantic City, New Jersey, and Hartford, Connecticut.

SPEAKER_05 1:15:46

Some of that Texas stuff could just be, you know, over pressure.

SPEAKER_02 1:15:50

You know, that's there are no easy solutions here. I've said this for months and months and months. If you're younger than 40, you want prices to come down. If you're over 40, you want prices to come up. When your net worth is tied to your house and you're a boomer or a Gen X and you finally got a house, right? You want the prices to rise. But if you're a millennial, you're like, dude, you know, unless you're going to give me free money, universal basic income, or free housing, you better get those prices to come down so that I can buy one with the wages that are offered in my community. Huge, huge disparity. You're not going to be able to keep both happy. Prices won't come down enough to make millennials happy. And if prices even flatten out, boomers are going to be upset. And depending on when they bought their house, they might be unable to afford it. So again, we have two currents happening here, which again, why we promote Bitcoin. It's the asymmetrical bet. There aren't a lot of good options for these people. We haven't talked a lot about the Japan yen swap. You know, Japan had to raise rates. So then Scott Bessant had to change the rules. Change the rules to be able to buy yen with euros. We didn't want to use the dollars for the transaction to prop the yen up, and they've already spent 70% of the liquidity they got them. What's the next play? We're going to give them Mexican pesos, right? We are we are very much rewriting our economic system and something's going to break. I think very much like Andrew Jackson, we could be looking at a couple years of hard times. And if things go right, I think the golden era is right here. Just like in Andrew Jackson's day. If they can trip out the British banking system, which is a lot of what Iran's been about, we could see some major changes. So we'll see. I got a local story for us.

Should Government Own A Golf Course

SPEAKER_02 1:17:40

I got a local story for us. This comes from KMJC. And this is actually an uh interesting story about a golf course. So here in Kittsap County, we have a public golf course called Rolling Hills golf course. It's over in East Bremerton. You know about this golf course? Did you know it was owned by the county? No. It's owned by the county. So let me let me read this here. I'll go ahead and just put it on the screen so we can all see it together. All right. Our story today is about Rolling Hills golf course in East Bremerton. And this, again, this happens in every county in America. If it's happening here, you almost certainly have a similar problem in one of your local counties. The county owns it. It's a golf course. A private company has been running it under a lease that extends next year. The course needs millions of dollars in upgrades, irrigation, greens, clubhouse, the works. The county is now deciding what comes next. Some people want the county to stay involved, maybe even take a more active role. Others say it's time for government to step aside and let private investors take full responsibility. We're looking at both sides, but I want to be clear about the bigger picture at stake. Government has no business owning and operating a commercial golf course. Would you agree with that?

SPEAKER_05 1:18:52

Yes.

SPEAKER_02 1:18:52

All right. First, the scale of golf in Kitzep County, because the numbers matter. According to a detailed 2024 study, the National Golf Foundation preferred prepared for the county. There are roughly 26,000 golfers living in Kitzep County. I don't even think I'm on that list. These those resident golfers have the potential to generate more than 400,000 rounds of golf a year. Looking at actual play at the major public courses, Gold Mountain alone, the city's two 18-hole tracks hosted nearly 92,000 rounds in 2023. McCormick Woods did about 37 rounds. Whitehorse, here locally, or I guess local for me, 42,000. Trophy Lake around 36,000. Those adds add those up in your past 230,000 rounds at just the bigger public facilities before counting private clubs or smaller courses. Countrywide activity is clearly in the hundreds of thousands and rounds annual countywide. Now looking at Rolling Hills, in 2023 it hosted 25,000 rounds. That's the highest total it's had in more than a decade, but it's still well below the 30,000 to 40,000 rounds that are typical that are typical for a solid 18-hole public course. It's far below the 35,000 to 40,000 rounds. The course itself used to generate in the 1990s and early 2000s. In other words, Rolling Hills is a meaningful but underperforming piece of a much larger local golf market. One course doing 25,000 rounds does not define its golf in Kitsap County. What with that context? Supporters of continued county ownership make a few solid points. First, Rolling Hills is a community amenity. It's one of the more affordable places to play in Kitsap County. Seniors, juniors, military members, and working people use it. If a pure private investor takes over, the fee, the fear is that fees will rise and those discounts will shrink. So we let those guys play on the taxpayer dive?

SPEAKER_05 1:20:49

I guess so.

SPEAKER_02 1:20:50

Public ownership. The argument goes is the as the argument goes, is the only way to guarantee the course stays accessible to ordinary residents. So public ownership is the way that people think that that's the only way you can have low-income golf.

SPEAKER_06 1:21:04

Okay.

SPEAKER_02 1:21:04

Second, land is finite. Once you sell a public asset, it's gone. If golf economics change, a private owner might eventually want to develop the property. Counter county ownership keeps the decision in public hands. What if they want to turn it into a subdivision later? Right? Public can't control that. Third, the current arrangement already brings the county a steady check every year. Some people argue that can't the county can't improve the deal, demand capital investment from the operator while still collecting rent, and keep the best of both worlds. What happened? I don't know. That was weird.

SPEAKER_07 1:21:35

I don't like it when it does that. I don't know. It split my screen. On page two. There you go.

SPEAKER_02 1:21:45

All right. There are legitimate concerns. Affordability matters. Losing a public recreational asset permanently is a real risk. And the county has every right to protect the public's interest in property it already owns. Now the other side, and this is where there's a stronger argument lies. The fundamental problem is not the lease terms or the capital needs. The fundamental problem is that government agency is in the business. The problem is that the government agency is in the business at golf at all. Golf is a private commercial activity. People pay to play, private companies build courses, maintain them, market them, and either make money or close them. That is how markets work. When a government owns the land and the buildings, it creates a set of distortions that private operators never face. First, capital. The six to eight million dollars in needed upgrades is not a small number. Under private ownership, investors put their own money at risk. They decide whether the return justifies the investment. Under public ownership, the pressure is always there to use taxpayer funds, issue bonds, or accept lower returns because it's a quote, community benefit. That is how deferred maintenance happens in the first place. The current operator paid the county rent, but the property still deteriorated. Why? Because the incentive structure was wrong. Money that should have gone into the course went into the county instead. And the county had no strong incentive to re force reinvestment. Additionally, these upgrades will raise the price at Rolling Hills. The price advantage of Rolling Hills is not significantly lower than private courses. If you add the upgrades and required maintenance and not offset these costs with county funds, then the pricing would be about equal to private courses. Second, efficiency and scale. Private operators live or die by performance. They cut waste, innovate, and respond to customers because they have to have to. Look again at the numbers. The broader Kitsap market supports hundreds of thousands of rounds and tens of thousands of golfers. Golfers. Gold Mountain does near uh does nearly four times the volume of Rolling Hills on its own two courses. Other private and public operators are successfully attracting play at higher volumes. One underperforming 25,000 round course does not require permanent government ownership to keep golf alive in this county. It seems obvious, right? Why would the county be involved in golf? And if you go across the country and you look at different counties, there's it's not just golf, it's a ton of other things. I mean, Mundami's now go in this direction with grocery stores, right? This is a huge problem for us. Why is the government involved in these things? The idea is they get $100,000 a year by owning this big chunk of land. That's great. But what are you missing out on tax revenue? Because clearly, you know, there's no tax revenue here. You're getting a lease payment. But what are you also getting? You're competing with the private businesses. The private, there's 25,000 rounds that could go to the other golf courses if you just close the doors right now. What about expansion? At some point, the clubhouse is going to get really dilapidated, and then you're going to do what? Run a bond to raise debt to fix it? Get private investors come in and what negotiate a lower lease amount? Like there's no real good options keeping it in public ownership, which begs the question why was it in public ownership in the first place?

SPEAKER_05 1:24:55

Yeah, I have that question for starters, but also if the lease for the what is the issue here? Is the are the leasees complaining about or the lease is up next year.

SPEAKER_02 1:25:06

So do they renew the lease? And the people who run the lease are like, well, we need money to fix the golf course. So if you want us to renew the niece, throw us since you own it and we're just operating it, fix the facility.

SPEAKER_05 1:25:18

Just cancel the lease. That's what I say.

SPEAKER_02 1:25:21

And sell the property to a parking lot.

SPEAKER_05 1:25:22

Turn it into a park. If it's publicly owned, it should be a park for everybody. It should be free for everybody, not just old guys that want to kick a stick around. Exactly.

SPEAKER_02 1:25:30

They have to pay to be there. So it's publicly owned, but you have to pay to be there. Yeah, no.

SPEAKER_05 1:25:36

Just make it a park.

SPEAKER_02 1:25:37

Make it a park. If you want to keep it, make it a park.

SPEAKER_05 1:25:40

Yeah. And if the current leasee wants to up his lease, he should be footing the bill for all the upgrades. I mean, he's using the place. Exactly. Or just sell it to him. Yeah.

SPEAKER_02 1:25:49

So this is something that, again, in every county you have to grapple with this. Is it worth maintaining this public facility to have a 10% discount on golf rounds or you know, name the activity? Or should we just turn it over to private investors and let them upgrade the facility and make it nice? Weighing in the balance, right? So KMGC, we want to see both sides. Obviously, I have a biased view because I'm a capitalist. And I don't think they should be in on that. Here's another breakdown of this for anybody who wants to like quickly screenshot this. Right. So these are the different arguments. So you're gonna see that, but it's showing you all the numbers. So this is pretty well researched. And thank you, Gary, for that story. There's another local story that's going on.

Meme Policing And A COVID Official’s Power

SPEAKER_02 1:26:32

So up in Port Angeles, Clawham County area, just up the corner from us, and in Jefferson County, there is one individual during COVID that found herself, found herself able to work in two different counties with uh her job. And I actually know this person personally. Uh her name is I say I know her personally, Dr. Allison Barry. So Dr. Allison Barry was married to one of my competitors, and this became a big problem because my competitor was very bitter about my competition. And so he, I believe, I believe there was some, you know, husband-wife-y things. And I kind of got on the wrong side of this particular lady. She worked in the health department. Well, she ended up during COVID era being the health czar or COVID officer for Clawland County and Jefferson County at the same time.

SPEAKER_06 1:27:22

Okay.

SPEAKER_02 1:27:22

Kind of a big deal here. Okay. Kind of a big deal. So here's what happened. There's a gentleman out in Port, uh, Port Angeles. His name is Jesse Farmer. And Jess Farmer doesn't much like this lady. So he's been posting memes online. Okay. Posting memes online. These are just memes. And when you go look at the memes, and I should have pulled some up just so I could show you guys, they're not violent or threatening. They're just pointing out that this woman got super on board with COVID. Okay. So everything that like was happening, six foot distancing, masking, enforcement, she was behind just pushing, pushing, pushing, pushing vaccine mandates, campaigns. Right. This woman, in my opinion, has some blood on her hands. Whether it's just policy, whether it's shutting down businesses, or physically creating an environment where people felt so compelled to get the vaccine they did and then had adverse events up to and including death. Right. Every public health officer in the country has to look in the mirror and ask themselves, did you help or hurt? In hindsight, were you on the right side of this or the wrong side of this? I don't believe she has done that because she has been extremely sensitive to any criticism of her. And I know this for a fact because I have sat in appeals hearings with her sitting on my left-hand side, right? Just absolutely not even knowing what's going on, but having an absolute agenda that she wants to push. Okay. I've seen it in person. So this is a report from Port Angeles, Jess Farmer for a meme, he posted online. It makes her mad. This is from Port Townsend News. As it clearly shows just how much power the police have. And they know how to do this stuff. Yet folks like me who expose government corruption, they allow thousands of online posts, memes, stickers, death threats, false police reports, and do nothing. If you're active online and making political stances, yeah, I've got stuff in my inbox that's pretty nasty. Okay. So the threats get made against you for making satire sat satirical memes. Nobody wants to do anything about it. To track down an IP address, okay, no, do nothing. To track down an IP address, a home address, they don't even try to talk to the people or shut it down. Yet a meme against the health director. And they pull out the tools they have to harass citizens for something he has a legal right to do. Don't ever think the pol uh think the police, such as Jefferson County Sheriff Office in Washington, work for the people who pay them. They work for the radical left, period. Our lives have no value to them. They're willing to violate our rights and their oath of office to appease any radical left demon who asked them. Oh, and the city of Port Angeles did not redact Jesse's driver's license. I did. They clearly came out for him. So they requested because what happened was Jesse got a visit from the police. And it came from this health officer. 9 21 41 a.m. New call created. Type threats location. Gave his address. Performed by mobile unit C119. Agency context, police call type, threat status, right? They got a threat call. Incident created. They created the report. There's the there's the number. Unit location, right? Send them out. Unit status, right? Unit arrives. Call marked ready for dispatch. Attempting to page the following pagers, they sent more people. Attempting to page the following more people. Eventually, here's Jesse Farmer. Okay. So they showed up at his house, they harassed him, and they've done this multiple times at her behest. Finally, this is the narrative added to the report. And just look at this. Again, we talk about weaponization. We talk about a political officer using law enforcement to go intimidate a local citizen for posting satirical memes. Don't forget, they put um Doug Mackey in prison for memes about Democrats voting on Wednesday in 2016. No harm, no foul. Nobody voted on Wednesday by text message, by the way, but yet they put him in federal prison for this. This is that same behavior that Hillary Clinton exposed. A local health officer in Clawham and Jefferson County is exposing that same behavior against one of our citizens locally. This is not a national issue. This is a power problem. This is a problem with power. Okay. So the officer says, I spoke with Jesse on the phone, reference an online post he made about Allison Barry and said, quote, these people are still in your community. It's time to get rid of them. Allison has in like vote them out. Allison believed it could be a threat. I spoke with Jesse over the phone. In summary, he said it's a political post, and he was referencing to getting Barry replaced. Jesse advised it was purely political, and he felt harassed because Allison was using the law enforcement to call him about this. He said he will continue to make political posts. Jesse is practicing his First Amendment rights. Quote, there is no crime. But they continue to harass him over this stuff. Right. We have to be careful who we give power. Any power you give to the government, they will abuse to the maximum extent possible. Whether it's raising debt to pay for a public park, to keep a small constituency of, you know, transient military people getting a $5 discount on golf, or whether it's a health officer enforcing nonsensical COVID regulations to your detriment and then calling law enforcement when you point it out and want to follow the process of replacing them politically. Right? We have to guard against this. It's just one of those lines in the sand. As peasants, we have to have the right to speak up. We have to speak up. We have to make it so overwhelming that to these people it becomes noise. Obviously, they're not getting criticized enough if they're that sensitive. That's the way I look at that. Not there's just way too sensitive. Here's a little bit um about here. Both counties pay her separately, with Clawham County as a primary employer in Jefferson County under a separate contract for health officer services. Dr. Allison Berry, also known as Allison Berry Unthank, has served Kollum County's health officer since 2018. She is listed in such as in Klollum County's official directory of appointed officials. And public salary data shows her receiving substantial compensation from Column County, around $162,000 a year. In a recent year, earlier figures under her prior name were lower. She works under the Column County Health Department, Health and Human Services. In mid-2021, the Jefferson County Board of Health appointed her as its health officer as well, succeeding Dr. Tom Locke, who became deputy. Jefferson County negotiated and approved a secret agreement for health officer services documented at $63,291 a year. So she's raking in $230,000 a year between the two counties per year. Agreement dated September 2020. News reports at the time noted ongoing salary discussions for Jefferson role, and that she declined to discuss her call and pay due to potential adjustments from the dual appointment. She continues in both roles as confirmed in recent bios and reports in 2025 to 2026 and does part-time clinical work at Jamestown Healing Clinic. The dual arrangement is common for smaller county sharing and health officer. Each county compensates for services provided. Exact figures can change with contracts, colas, or workload. I don't know of any health officers that work in two counties. Do you know anybody who works in two counties? I don't know who works in two counties. So, anyways, I know this woman personally. And uh in Portuguese, we say cuidado. Careful. You know, on its surface, it just doesn't look right. And when you see how she actually operates, you're like, Yeah, not my cup of tea. So I don't care now. I don't compete with her husband. I'm not even in that business anymore. I used to I used to bite my tongue because I was like, couldn't criticize him or her. Another interesting thing yesterday.

Trump On South Korea Drills And Kim Jong Un

SPEAKER_02 1:34:55

So the United States, and this is, I think this is one of those fair criticisms on both sides. You can criticize Trump for doing this, but you also have to look back and go, oh, you know, other actors have a hand at this. So this post, the Donald Truth that uh Donald Trump posted yesterday is about South Korea. Based on my and North Korea, based on my good relationship with Kim Jong-un of North Korea, I am not happy with the fact that the United States has long ago agreed to participate in joint military exercises with South Korea. These exercises are not only costly with much of these costs paid for by the United States of America as usual, but send a signal that is totally inappropriate and hostile to a country that as long as Donald J. Trump has been president, has been unthreatening and respectful North Korea. Therefore, and based on the fact that it is too late to cancel, I've instructed Secretary of War Pete Hexeth to substantially reduce the joint military exercises while somewhat unrelated. Question mark. I recently asked President of South Korea if they would like to join us in the denuclearization of the Islamic Republic of Iran. They said no thanks. Thank you for your attention to this matter, President Donald J. Trump. They said no, thanks. I love it. You know, Donald Trump has really been like, what good is an ally if they're not an ally? Exactly. You know, if you're gonna be a protectorate, well, then we'll go deal with Kim Jong-un directly. We're gonna stop sending troops over there and spending all this money propping you guys up. South Korea, LG, Samsung, Kia, you'll do fine. Hyundai, you'll do fine. You don't need us there, right? So Donald Trump was asked yesterday in a very flippant manner, why hasn't Kim Jong-un responded to you and your request to meet?

SPEAKER_13 1:36:33

Yeah, Kim Jong un responded to your request.

SPEAKER_03 1:36:39

Um, just so you have to say what's South Korea. South Korea has been protected by us for many, many years.

SPEAKER_02 1:36:54

He goes on to basically say what we already know. So Kim Jong-un and Donald Trump might have another meeting. I think that's great news.

RFK Jr Lyme Disease Push And Trust Problems

SPEAKER_02 1:37:01

Another thing that happened yesterday, and again, you know, to me, this is kind of like a half measure. But for anybody who knows anything about Lyme disease, it was created in a lab, Port Dietrich, right? They released them. In fact, we could play a clip where there's a one of these, you know, gain of function scientists like, we could put the lone star tick or the lone star tick, which gives you the you can't eat meat. Do you know about this? Get bit by a tick and all of a sudden you're allergic to red meat. So it's a big deal, right? People who get bit by this, like, you ain't ever having a steak again. So there's a there's a scientist that's like, we could do that, and uh then everybody would be vegetarian and we would stop global warming because of the cow farts. He literally said that, like, made the whole connection. Well, they did it, right? Lyme disease. Uh, there's another disease that came out of Fort Dietrich called the Alpha Gow syndrome, the Lone Star tick disease. These are all lab creations put on ticks. Bill Gates has funded. In fact, he just released a bunch of ticks. Like the fact they're still doing this is just mind-boggling. But nonetheless, because the government was behind it, the government has refused to sponsor or prop up any studies on how to treat or cure Lyme disease. We don't want to know how many people are affected by this, right? That's just the reality. So, what's happened is people with Lyme disease, they languish for years trying to figure out what's ailing them before they finally get appropriate treatment. Well, RFK, and again, one of these half measures has decided, along with Dennis Quaid, that they're going to uh change the way diagnostics and treatment is for this so people can get help. That is a really good thing. But it goes, it to me, it doesn't go far enough. I wish they would just admit they did this. I wish they would admit that this is our creation. I hate the fact that it's here's a problem. Oh, here's our solution. Everybody who's got to get treatment for Lyme disease, they should be free. Why? Fort Dietrich's insurance policy should pay for it. Or the government or something, you know what I'm saying? Like they did it. I think every COVID loan, every SBA loan for COVID should be forgiven. Every single one of them. I don't care the dollar with the national debt. I don't care. It was a false premise. Should have people should have just been able to keep their restaurants open. They shouldn't have needed these interest-bearing loans to cover the gap over a virus that Anthony Fauci paid for and funded and covered up, right? So here is the here is the Mia Koopa without the Coupa.

SPEAKER_09 1:39:32

Hi, I'm Robert F. Kennedy Jr., your HHS secretary. I'm joined today by my good friend, actor and patient advocate Dennis Quaid. They were announcing bold new actions by the Trump administration to improve care, accelerate research, and speed innovation for Americans living with Lyme disease, with alpha cal syndrome, and other tit-borne diseases. Too many Americans spend months or even years searching for answers. Too many are misdiagnosed, and too many go and treated. We're changing that.

SPEAKER_14 1:40:05

Nearly half a million Americans are diagnosed and treated for Lyme disease annually.

SPEAKER_02 1:40:10

Half a million Americans. Half a million Americans. I know I know at least two people I know that absolutely had Lyme disease. Like they knew it. It was diagnosed and they were getting treatment. Absolutely all came from Fort Dietrich. Half a million per year get diagnosed with it. This is an astronomical problem.

SPEAKER_14 1:40:32

Every one of those numbers is a person, a family, and a community looking for answers. I know how devastating that search can be. My good friend, the late Chris Christoverson, spent years living with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. But Alzheimer's wasn't the problem. He actually had Lyme disease. And when doctors finally diagnosed him correctly in 2016 and started the right treatment, his symptoms did improve. His story isn't unique, and that's exactly why these new actions matter.

SPEAKER_09 1:41:05

That's why HHS is investing millions in innovation to develop AI-powered tools that improve patient care, enable earlier diagnoses, and accelerate research to help eradicate Lyme disease and other tick-corn illnesses. And we're already delivering results. Over the past two years, HHS has worked with the Lymex community to help bring two improved FDA-cleared Lyme diagnostics to market, giving clinicians better tools and helping more patients get an accurate diagnosis sooner.

SPEAKER_14 1:41:43

That's you out there to help move the science forward. If you've had Lyme disease and recovered, or if you were diagnosed with Lyme disease but still suffer lingering symptoms, please share your experience through Cure ID. That's the free FDA and NIH app and websites that collects real-world treatment information. And every story shared gives researchers more data, strengthens future clinical trials, helps eliminate misdiagnosis, and improves care for the next patient.

SPEAKER_09 1:42:14

And if you don't yet have a trusted Lyme clinician, we've made that easier too. Visit HHS.gov slash Lime and use the Lyme Clinician Locator to find experienced providers near you using your zip code.

SPEAKER_14 1:42:30

Together we can advance science, improve care, to give more patients the answers they deserve.

SPEAKER_09 1:42:37

We want to get back to a country where families can enjoy the outdoors again, where kids can spend their summers exploring the woods, camping, fishing, hiking, and playing outside. And parents don't have to wonder whether a single tech life could change their child's life forever. That's how we make America healthy again. Thank you very much. Thank you.

SPEAKER_02 1:42:59

It bothers me to my core that you have these industries that create these massive problems, and then these industries get the profit from the solution. I despise the fact that we have outrageous levels of cancer in this country. And for years we've been putting red food dye 47 and blah, you know, all kinds of chemicals in our food, glycophate. And then it's like, oh, but we can profit off cancer. It absolutely makes me ill that we would do Lyme disease research. We would put it in ticks. We would literally fly helicopters over Maine to deposit them. And then we're like, oh, half a million people a year. Yeah, we're gonna throw some more money at it. And now you've got treatment. I hate the fact that we had an upside-down food pyramid, and as 50% of the country is obese, now we have GLP1 drugs. Right? Rather than just, you know, why don't we do what Italy does with their food? We can all have pasta and be skinny.

SPEAKER_05 1:43:58

Doesn't it make you wonder about the intention of it all?

SPEAKER_02 1:44:02

It does. It does. It does.

Peasant’s Perspective Rules And Closing

SPEAKER_02 1:44:06

All right, guys. That's it for the show today. I appreciate it for you guys sticking around. Interesting stuff happening out in the world. Remember, we have to have that peasant's perspective. See things just on their surface, right? A lot of times are, you know, there's not evidence for things, but some stuff is just listen, your default position should be when it comes to the government, they're guilty until they prove themselves innocent. Absolutely. Every time, man. All right. We'll talk to you guys tomorrow. Bye.

Monty Python Bonus Clip On “Government”

SPEAKER_12 1:45:04

Well, I can't just call him man. You could say Dennis. I didn't know you were called Dennis. I did say something about the old woman, but from behind you, they automatically treat me like an imperialist. Well, I'm kidding. How'd you get that, eh? Looking at workers. Hanging on to our dated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. Is there ever going to be any progress? How do you do, good lady? Um king of the Britons. Whose castle is that? The Britons. We all are we are all Britons. And I am your king. No, we're the king. You're fooling yourself. We're living in a dictatorship. Stop perpetuating autocracy in which the working class is. That's what it's all about. These good people. I am in haste. Who lives in that castle? Who lives in that case? Then who is your lord? We don't have a lord. What? I told you. We're in a narco-syndicalist commune. We take it in turn to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. Yes. But all the decisions of that officer have to be ratified at a special bi-weekly meeting. By a simple majority in the case of Pure Internal. But by a two-thirds majority in the case of the case. Or the you should be quacked. The lady of the lake. Um clad in the purest shimmering samite. Held a loft excaliber from the bottom of the water. Signifying big problems. That is why I'm talking. Listen, strange women lying in pounds. Distributive thoughts is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some plastical aquatic ceremony. Big you can't expect to wheel supreme executive power just because some watery powerful authority. Just because some moist and bit love the symmetry, we think of it. Do you see what's in me? You saw it in