Lawyers Without Billboards

The Art of the Opening Statement | Lawyers Without Billboards S2-Ep21

Shewmaker & Lewis Season 2 Episode 21

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 39:10

What makes a great opening statement? Is it storytelling? Strategy? Psychology? Or knowing exactly when to bend the rules without breaking them?

In this episode of Lawyers Without Billboards, the team at Shewmaker & Lewis dives deep into one of the most important — and misunderstood — parts of any trial: the opening statement.

Steve, Patty, Jimmy, and Alexa break down:

  •  Why opening statements may matter more than closing arguments 
  •  How jurors and judges form impressions early 
  •  The importance of themes, roadmaps, and courtroom storytelling 
  •  Why lawyers should address bad facts head-on 
  •  The difference between arguing and “advocating” 
  •  How broken promises in opening statements can destroy credibility 
  •  Real courtroom war stories, including jury objections, snap decisions, and Steve’s unforgettable “first-person opening statement” technique 

Whether you're fascinated by courtroom strategy, jury psychology, or just love hearing experienced trial lawyers swap stories, this episode pulls back the curtain on how cases are framed before the first witness ever testifies.

🎙️ No gimmicks. No billboards. Just real lawyers talking about what really happens in court.

⏱️ Chapters

 00:00 – Welcome to Lawyers Without Billboards
 00:55 – What is the purpose of an opening statement?
 03:30 – Why themes matter in trial strategy
 05:20 – Opening statements vs. closing arguments
 07:30 – Why jurors make up their minds early
 11:05 – Can lawyers “open the door” in opening statements?
 12:20 – How to craft a compelling opening
 15:55 – How much argument is too much?
 16:50 – How long should an opening statement be?
 18:20 – Addressing bad facts before the other side does
 20:55 – Promises lawyers should never make
 22:20 – DUI example: facts vs. argument
 25:20 – Why lawyers take notes during openings
 26:20 – Turning an opening statement into evidence
 27:40 – Art vs. science in courtroom storytelling
 28:20 – Favorite courtroom opening statement stories
 31:15 – Steve’s unforgettable “first-person opening”
 36:20 – Final thoughts on courtroom advocacy 

🔔 Subscribe for candid conversations about family law, relationships, and the legal system - without the billboards.

🎙️ Hosts: Steve & Patty Shewmaker, Jimmy & Alexa Lewis
 🎧 Watch here: https://youtu.be/0h3fiWjIp0U or listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, and more.

📩 Contact: pshewmaker@shewmakerandlewis.com
| (770) 939-1939
🌐 Website: https://www.shewmakerandlewis.com

🎧 Podcast Library: https://shewmakerandlewis.com/lawyers-without-billboards

🎼 Music by Ben Hernandez – Dragonsong Productions
🎥 Produced by: Bleeding Edge, Inc.
🎬 Audio & Video Production: Rob Burgner
📍 Recorded at: Shewmaker & Lewis, Atlanta, GA

00:00:06 Narrator

Welcome to Lawyers Without Billboards, where we break down family law and other areas of the law.

00:00:12 Narrator

No gimmicks, no legal jargon, just real unfiltered talk from real lawyers.

00:00:17 Narrator

Join your hosts, Steve, Patty, Jimmy, and Alexa, partners at Shewmaker & Lewis, a law firm based in Atlanta, Georgia.

00:00:26 Narrator

Every episode, they tackle the legal questions that matter most.

00:00:29 Narrator

divorce, custody, child support, alimony, and everything in between.

00:00:35 Narrator

They’ll pull back the curtain to give you real insights on what happens inside the courtroom and beyond.

00:00:41 Patty Shewmaker

Reason 2, episode 20.

00:00:44 Patty Shewmaker

Welcome back to Lawyers Without Billboards.

00:00:46 Patty Shewmaker

We’re glad you’re here.

00:00:47 Patty Shewmaker

And this morning or this afternoon or whatever time of day it is.

00:00:52 Patty Shewmaker

What are we talking about today?

00:00:54 Steve Shewmaker

I think we’re going to lead off with opening statements and trials.

00:00:57 Patty Shewmaker

Well, that seems fitting to lead off with it.

00:00:59 Alexa Lewis

Sounds it sounds about right.

00:01:00 Patty Shewmaker

Yeah.

00:01:01 Patty Shewmaker

What’s your opening statement for this podcast?

00:01:03 Steve Shewmaker

I’m here.

00:01:04 Steve Shewmaker

I’m happy.

00:01:04 Alexa Lewis

I thought you just gave it.

00:01:05 Alexa Lewis

Didn’t you just give the opening statement?

00:01:08 Jimmy Lewis

Everything that guy said is ********.

00:01:10 Patty Shewmaker

That’s the most classic.

00:01:12 Patty Shewmaker

No, you’re right, you’re right.

00:01:14 Patty Shewmaker

That is the most classic.

00:01:16 Steve Shewmaker

LaGuardia Gambini’s opening statement.

00:01:19 Patty Shewmaker

The most classic opening statement in pop culture.

00:01:24 Patty Shewmaker

So what about opening statements?

00:01:26 Patty Shewmaker

It’s pretty easy to stand up.

00:01:29 Patty Shewmaker

And seems pretty easy.

00:01:31 Alexa Lewis

Introduce yourself, tell your story, sit down.

00:01:33 Steve Shewmaker

Let’s start out with a quiz.

00:01:36 Steve Shewmaker

What is the purpose?

00:01:38 Steve Shewmaker

And everybody’s going to have a chance to answer this.

00:01:39 Steve Shewmaker

What is the purpose of opening statements in trials, Jimmy?

00:01:43 Jimmy Lewis

It’s a preview of the evidence.

00:01:45 Steve Shewmaker

All right.

00:01:46 Steve Shewmaker

Is there anything, Alexa, you would add to that?

00:01:49 Alexa Lewis

I would say it’s to establish your theme of the case.

00:01:52 Steve Shewmaker

Okay, so Jimmy said preview of the evidence.

00:01:56 Steve Shewmaker

And you said theme.

00:01:58 Steve Shewmaker

What about you?

00:01:58 Patty Shewmaker

Is it my turn?

00:01:59 Steve Shewmaker

Yes, what about you, Patty?

00:02:00 Patty Shewmaker

It’s a roadmap.

00:02:02 Steve Shewmaker

A roadmap.

00:02:02 Patty Shewmaker

A roadmap.

00:02:04 Patty Shewmaker

And, you know, I think a roadmap is much more important when you have a jury, but I think it’s also helpful for a judge.

00:02:11 Patty Shewmaker

But it’s a roadmap of, okay, where are we going and how are we going to get there?

00:02:15 Steve Shewmaker

Okay.

00:02:18 Steve Shewmaker

It is certainly to inform the court or the jury about what’s about to happen.

00:02:23 Steve Shewmaker

When you think about it, judges will walk in and not know much about a case.

00:02:28 Steve Shewmaker

Maybe not much more than it’s a divorce or it’s a contract case, but they won’t know the nitty-gritty details.

00:02:34 Steve Shewmaker

I think one of you said something like the nature of the case.

00:02:36 Steve Shewmaker

You know, you said a roadmap I had written down in here.

00:02:40 Steve Shewmaker

It gives an outline of the evidence that will be presented.

00:02:43 Alexa Lewis

Yeah, it’s kind of what Jimmy said.

00:02:45 Steve Shewmaker

Yeah.

00:02:46 Steve Shewmaker

Do you make a first impression in an opening statement?

00:02:49 Patty Shewmaker

Absolutely.

00:02:50 Alexa Lewis

I think you make a first impression the second you walk in the door or the second the judge takes the bench.

00:02:55 Steve Shewmaker

I agree with you.

00:02:56 Steve Shewmaker

And if it’s just a judge, then you’re making, as most domestic matters are, if it’s just a judge, you’re making a first impression when the judge walks in and sees you.

00:03:08 Steve Shewmaker

You’re making a first impression months or years prior to that in other cases you’ve had.

00:03:14 Steve Shewmaker

So that’s true.

00:03:15 Steve Shewmaker

But

00:03:17 Steve Shewmaker

You also have a chance to make a first impression in a voir dire, a jury selection, which doesn’t happen if it’s a judge alone.

00:03:22 Steve Shewmaker

So it may not be your first opportunity to present yourself to a jury, but it is certainly the first really good opportunity.

00:03:33 Steve Shewmaker

And Pat, which one of you said a theme?

00:03:35 Speaker 6

That was me.

00:03:35 Steve Shewmaker

Yeah, a theme is a very good point because, you know, if you have a theme and you can put it out there early and it catches people, you know, it’ll stay with them.

00:03:47 Patty Shewmaker

Can we touch on that for a second?

00:03:48 Steve Shewmaker

Sure.

00:03:50 Patty Shewmaker

And we’ve talked about themes a lot.

00:03:52 Patty Shewmaker

but sometimes I find I just don’t have a theme.

00:03:57 Steve Shewmaker

Then you need to try harder.

00:04:00 Steve Shewmaker

We should just sit.

00:04:01 Alexa Lewis

Down before you go to court from now on.

00:04:03 Alexa Lewis

We’re all just workshops and themes for you.

00:04:06 Steve Shewmaker

If you’re worth $500 an hour, you’ll come up with a theme in every case, you know.

00:04:09 Patty Shewmaker

But because sometimes it’s just, I mean, sometimes the theme is obvious, right?

00:04:14 Patty Shewmaker

Sometimes the theme is pretty easy to come up with, and it’s pretty apparent from when you’re just going through the case and representing the party.

00:04:21 Patty Shewmaker

But sometimes it’s just,

00:04:24 Patty Shewmaker

It’s just, I don’t know.

00:04:25 Patty Shewmaker

Do you guys have never had that happen where you just don’t have a theme?

00:04:27 Alexa Lewis

Well, yeah, certainly.

00:04:29 Alexa Lewis

I think, obviously, obviously, every single time you go to court, you’re not going to have a theme because you could be there on motions.

00:04:34 Alexa Lewis

Like, yeah, okay, you might give a brief opening statement on motions.

00:04:38 Alexa Lewis

It’s not really applicable for the most part if you have shorter hearing or it’s not a full-blown trial.

00:04:44 Alexa Lewis

But yeah, there’s definitely the case where it’s like,

00:04:47 Alexa Lewis

I mean, it’s just a divorce.

00:04:48 Alexa Lewis

Like, that’s what we’re here for.

00:04:50 Patty Shewmaker

And there’s nothing exciting.

00:04:51 Patty Shewmaker

There’s no really bad conduct.

00:04:53 Alexa Lewis

There’s no salacious catchphrase.

00:04:56 Steve Shewmaker

You are paid to come up with a theme.

00:04:58 Steve Shewmaker

You must come up with a theme.

00:05:00 Steve Shewmaker

But that could be a subject for a separate podcast.

00:05:02 Steve Shewmaker

How to come up with a theme?

00:05:03 Alexa Lewis

Oh, I thought you were going to say how Patty sucks.

00:05:06 Steve Shewmaker

No, but the theme is certainly, the theme is certainly something that you should introduce early and often, as early as the voir dire or the opening statement, which is what we’re talking about.

00:05:17 Steve Shewmaker

today.

00:05:19 Steve Shewmaker

So let me ask you something.

00:05:21 Steve Shewmaker

I’ll give this question to Patty.

00:05:23 Steve Shewmaker

I think it’s your turn.

00:05:24 Steve Shewmaker

What’s more important, opening statement or closing argument?

00:05:28 Patty Shewmaker

Opening.

00:05:29 Steve Shewmaker

Opening.

00:05:30 Patty Shewmaker

Yeah, opening.

00:05:31 Steve Shewmaker

Why’d you say that?

00:05:33 Patty Shewmaker

Opening, and that’s generally speaking, because there are some cases where closing becomes more important.

00:05:39 Patty Shewmaker

But opening is important because it’s really your opportunity to tell the judge,

00:05:46 Patty Shewmaker

This is what’s going on.

00:05:48 Patty Shewmaker

These are the issues.

00:05:49 Patty Shewmaker

This is what we want.

00:05:50 Patty Shewmaker

This is why we want.

00:05:53 Patty Shewmaker

And the judge is, especially judge, well, even jury.

00:05:56 Patty Shewmaker

I mean, they’re making a, they’re making up, a lot of times they’re making up their mind already in an opening statement.

00:06:03 Patty Shewmaker

Closing, you know, now you might say in follow up, okay, well, when is a closing more important?

00:06:08 Patty Shewmaker

Sometimes a closing is more important or important.

00:06:12 Patty Shewmaker

when we have complex issues and we kind of need to wrap them up and kind of summarize and be like, okay, judge, let me kind of put together everything that you’ve heard and explain it to you and package it for you so you understand, to make sure you understand.

00:06:26 Steve Shewmaker

Jimmy, do you think a closing argument is more important than an opening statement or vice versa?

00:06:32 Jimmy Lewis

No, I think opening is.

00:06:35 Jimmy Lewis

Considering the number of bench trials I’ve had where judges are like,

00:06:40 Jimmy Lewis

I don’t need to hear closing.

00:06:41 Jimmy Lewis

And then you get that one attorney who’s like, judge, I’d still like to do closing.

00:06:45 Jimmy Lewis

And you’re just like, read the room, man.

00:06:47 Jimmy Lewis

Yeah, the judge clearly has made-up their mind.

00:06:53 Jimmy Lewis

I do think that a lot of times with a jury, however, yeah, you,

00:06:58 Jimmy Lewis

I still think opening is more important.

00:07:00 Jimmy Lewis

I think closing is still very important, though, because you can kind of recap everything and really kind of show, here’s why that part was important.

00:07:08 Patty Shewmaker

Yeah, tie it up with a bow for them.

00:07:09 Jimmy Lewis

But also with the jury, I think it’s very important.

00:07:12 Jimmy Lewis

If you mention something in opening, you better be damn sure you hit that during your case, because they’re going to be like, you were promised this information and we didn’t get it.

00:07:22 Steve Shewmaker

I’m going to get to that as we go.

00:07:23 Alexa Lewis

Wait, aren’t you going to ask me?

00:07:26 Patty Shewmaker

No.

00:07:27 Alexa Lewis

Okay.

00:07:27 Steve Shewmaker

I was going to say that there have been articles written and psychological studies done that go back decades that indicate that most people, most jurors make up their mind fairly early.

00:07:41 Steve Shewmaker

It doesn’t mean you can’t change somebody’s first impression, but they tend to make up their mind early.

00:07:46 Steve Shewmaker

And the opening is much closer to early than the closing.

00:07:52 Steve Shewmaker

But the nature of things is that most people tend to make up their minds fairly early.

00:07:58 Steve Shewmaker

And the evolving nature of people these days, people are expecting fast, immediate results.

00:08:04 Steve Shewmaker

Okay.

00:08:05 Patty Shewmaker

And we’ve all been in front of the judge.

00:08:07 Patty Shewmaker

There’s always that one or two judges that you go in front of.

00:08:11 Patty Shewmaker

who make snap decisions?

00:08:13 Steve Shewmaker

Yes.

00:08:13 Patty Shewmaker

And that, I mean, then the opening statement becomes like, everything, the most important thing.

00:08:19 Steve Shewmaker

Well, that’s that is an interesting point because we know some of these judges here locally that we realize you got to get there first with the most.

00:08:27 Steve Shewmaker

Who was the Civil War General who said that?

00:08:30 Steve Shewmaker

Was it Ulysses Grant or somebody?

00:08:32 Patty Shewmaker

I don’t think it was Grant, but you would know.

00:08:34 Steve Shewmaker

I can’t remember.

00:08:35 Alexa Lewis

You’re the guy.

00:08:35 Patty Shewmaker

You’re the history bug.

00:08:36 Steve Shewmaker

I can’t remember.

00:08:37 Steve Shewmaker

The.

00:08:37 Patty Shewmaker

Firstest with the mostest.

00:08:38 Steve Shewmaker

Yeah, the firstest with the mostest.

00:08:39 Steve Shewmaker

But in any event, would you agree, Alexa, that most lawyers think that the closing is more important?

00:08:46 Alexa Lewis

Yes, most lawyers think that.

00:08:48 Steve Shewmaker

Why do you think that is?

00:08:50 Alexa Lewis

Probably because they get to.

00:08:52 Alexa Lewis

argue more because opening is just a preview.

00:08:55 Alexa Lewis

It’s really not argument.

00:08:56 Alexa Lewis

And they think that closing is going to be the most important because that’s where they’re going to get to shine.

00:09:01 Alexa Lewis

They’re going to get to argue their case and, you know, argue for justice or whatever it is that they’re there to do.

00:09:06 Steve Shewmaker

Yeah, and we’re going to get to some of the differences between presenting evidence and opening and arguing and closing.

00:09:13 Steve Shewmaker

But a lot of lawyers tend to think that the last word is more impactful and the person who gets the last word is going to be more impactful.

00:09:21 Steve Shewmaker

But

00:09:22 Steve Shewmaker

Judges, as well as jurors, are human, and humans evidently, according to this research, make up their minds earlier rather than later, right?

00:09:31 Steve Shewmaker

What are you smiling about?

00:09:33 Steve Shewmaker

What do I say?

00:09:34 Alexa Lewis

Nothing.

00:09:35 Alexa Lewis

I would say, though, that

00:09:37 Alexa Lewis

I’m going to give you the lawyer answer on whether or not opening and closing is more important.

00:09:40 Alexa Lewis

I think it depends because like Jimmy said, if the other side hasn’t proven their case or they promised you something in opening that you never got to see or they said certain evidence or testimony was going to be there and then it wasn’t, that’s when closing can be extremely impactful.

00:09:54 Alexa Lewis

And especially after a lengthy trial, because I know you guys have had trials that lasted, what, 11 days over the course of like months and you’re like, hey, let’s just recap.

00:10:04 Alexa Lewis

everything from a few months ago, just so I make sure you remember.

00:10:07 Patty Shewmaker

We almost needed to do an opening statement every day we showed up.

00:10:10 Steve Shewmaker

I agree with you.

00:10:11 Steve Shewmaker

I think there are times when a closing argument becomes more important.

00:10:16 Steve Shewmaker

And I think one of them would be the length of the trial, because if somebody presents something as a promise in an opening statement and it doesn’t deliver,

00:10:24 Steve Shewmaker

the jurors may very well be apt to forget that it was ever promised.

00:10:29 Alexa Lewis

Oh, it says if it was weeks before or something.

00:10:31 Steve Shewmaker

Right.

00:10:31 Steve Shewmaker

So if you have a case where your opponent makes promises in the opening statement that they don’t deliver upon, you may want to harp on that.

00:10:38 Steve Shewmaker

Yeah, keep good notes.

00:10:40 Steve Shewmaker

Oh, yeah, keep good notes.

00:10:42 Steve Shewmaker

Another one would be if there are highly arguable facts, facts that

00:10:48 Steve Shewmaker

could, the facts that are benign, but could be argued one way or the other, there’s a lot of them, you might have to try to explain how they all come together.

00:10:56 Steve Shewmaker

Sure.

00:10:57 Steve Shewmaker

Because I think we’ve had cases before where jurors came out and said, we just didn’t know what the importance of this piece of evidence was.

00:11:02 Steve Shewmaker

We just didn’t know.

00:11:05 Steve Shewmaker

So let me move on to the next question.

00:11:07 Steve Shewmaker

An opening statement.

00:11:08 Steve Shewmaker

Jimmy, is an opening statement evidence.

00:11:10 Jimmy Lewis

No.

00:11:11 Steve Shewmaker

Okay, it’s not evidence.

00:11:12 Steve Shewmaker

Does everybody agree with that?

00:11:13 Steve Shewmaker

Okay.

00:11:14 Steve Shewmaker

Then let me ask you a question.

00:11:16 Steve Shewmaker

You’re familiar with the legal concept of opening the door to something, right?

00:11:19 Steve Shewmaker

Like presenting an argument or a piece of evidence which allows the judge or the other side to explore that to the point that it might not be beneficial to you, but you open the door to it, right?

00:11:31 Steve Shewmaker

Can you open the door by something you say in an opening statement, Patty?

00:11:35 Patty Shewmaker

Yes.

00:11:35 Steve Shewmaker

You think so?

00:11:36 Patty Shewmaker

I do.

00:11:36 Steve Shewmaker

Case law actually in Georgia says different.

00:11:39 Steve Shewmaker

You cannot open the door in

00:11:42 Steve Shewmaker

opening statement, which sounds great.

00:11:44 Steve Shewmaker

I could just say any damn thing I want in an opening statement and I’m not opening the door.

00:11:47 Steve Shewmaker

And if someone tries to say I did, I can point to, there’s a case that I could pull that actually says that.

00:11:54 Steve Shewmaker

But I would still say don’t do that thing.

00:11:57 Alexa Lewis

Well, you’re also just inviting someone to try to figure out a way to get you to open the door during your direct or something.

00:12:04 Steve Shewmaker

Maybe, possibly.

00:12:06 Patty Shewmaker

Well, yeah, because I would be inclined to look at a party and say, well, your council said this in opening, you know, then, you know, do you agree or whatever.

00:12:17 Steve Shewmaker

Okay, so how do you make a good opening statement?

00:12:22 Steve Shewmaker

Anybody.

00:12:23 Alexa Lewis

I think you tell a good story.

00:12:25 Alexa Lewis

you take the facts that you have and the evidence that you plan to present and you turn it into something, like Patty said, a roadmap that makes chronological and or logical sense.

00:12:37 Alexa Lewis

Because you don’t want to be jumping around in your opening statement about things that happened three years ago, but things that happened yesterday to where everybody’s confused.

00:12:44 Alexa Lewis

I think you provide the court or the jury with a logical,

00:12:50 Alexa Lewis

may be chronological or reverse chronological, depending on your case, order that they can follow and understand, okay, these are the things I’m going to hear.

00:12:59 Alexa Lewis

These are the things they’re telling me that they’re going to present in as much of an entertaining way as you possibly can, which goes to your whole theme.

00:13:05 Steve Shewmaker

Okay.

00:13:06 Steve Shewmaker

So you need to work out your theme and your story.

00:13:08 Steve Shewmaker

You need to know your case well before you can write your opening, right.

00:13:11 Alexa Lewis

Sure, yeah.

00:13:11 Steve Shewmaker

Okay, so you got to talk to your client, look at the evidence, figure out what your client’s goals are, and how you’re going to get there, right?

00:13:18 Steve Shewmaker

Does that sound about right?

00:13:19 Alexa Lewis

Yeah, totally fair.

00:13:20 Steve Shewmaker

Okay.

00:13:20 Patty Shewmaker

And when I do an opening, or when I draft my opening, it really, first of all, there’s a difference between an opening to a judge and an opening to a jury.

00:13:29 Alexa Lewis

100%.

00:13:30 Steve Shewmaker

What’s the difference?

00:13:34 Jimmy Lewis

The number of people looking at you.

00:13:37 Patty Shewmaker

That is true.

00:13:38 Patty Shewmaker

He’s not wrong.

00:13:39 Patty Shewmaker

That is a truth fact.

00:13:41 Patty Shewmaker

Let me try this again.

00:13:44 Steve Shewmaker

What’s the difference, Patty?

00:13:46 Alexa Lewis

Go ahead, Jimmy, be quiet.

00:13:49 Patty Shewmaker

So a jury, I think you’re more going to tell the story, like Alexis talked about, and tell the story and set the stage.

00:14:01 Patty Shewmaker

For me, with the judge, it’s more like just the facts, where usually what I typically do with the judge is, okay, here’s the background.

00:14:12 Patty Shewmaker

And the background is just enough background that the judge kind of, I was like, okay, I am oriented.

00:14:19 Patty Shewmaker

Okay, judge, and now here are the issues and go down, I go down by the issues and by the way, this is what my client wants.

00:14:25 Patty Shewmaker

And briefly, this is why my client wants what he or she wants.

00:14:29 Patty Shewmaker

And that’s really, that’s really where it’s coming in of this is what the evidence is going to show.

00:14:35 Patty Shewmaker

You know, but then even then,

00:14:40 Patty Shewmaker

depending on really kind of the posture of the case, my opening might be different.

00:14:46 Patty Shewmaker

Okay, and I’ll give you an example.

00:14:47 Patty Shewmaker

I had two, I had two hearing aids almost back-to-back, one on Thursday, and they were like sister companion cases.

00:14:57 Patty Shewmaker

The mom had a modification and the dad had a contempt.

00:15:03 Patty Shewmaker

but they all arose out of similar facts.

00:15:06 Patty Shewmaker

So we have this huge full-blown hearing on Thursday on mom’s modification, and then we come on Tuesday for dad’s contempt.

00:15:14 Patty Shewmaker

I don’t, same judge, I don’t need to do a whole full-blown opening again.

00:15:19 Alexa Lewis

They’d look at you like you were crazy if you did.

00:15:21 Patty Shewmaker

Yeah.

00:15:21 Patty Shewmaker

I mean, so it’s really kind of, you know, tailoring

00:15:26 Patty Shewmaker

the opening to kind of the posture of the case as well.

00:15:30 Alexa Lewis

I also agree with you on that, but I also think if you have a judge who heard the temporary and has heard motions and other things, when you get to the final, you don’t have to do the whole shebang you would have done if it was, the trial was the only thing the judge ever heard.

00:15:44 Patty Shewmaker

So sometimes you just have to be like, okay, all right, judge from last week’s episode.

00:15:49 Patty Shewmaker

Right, And just be like.

00:15:51 Alexa Lewis

As a continuation in this series.

00:15:53 Patty Shewmaker

Yeah.

00:15:53 Patty Shewmaker

All right, well.

00:15:55 Patty Shewmaker

And the judge hits skip recap.

00:15:57 Alexa Lewis

Yep.

00:15:58 Patty Shewmaker

On to the next episode.

00:15:59 Steve Shewmaker

Can you make argument in an opening statement?

00:16:05 Patty Shewmaker

Technically, we can.

00:16:07 Steve Shewmaker

Yeah, right, Should you argue an opening statement?

00:16:11 Jimmy Lewis

I’m probably going to.

00:16:12 Alexa Lewis

If you can get away with it a little bit, yeah.

00:16:14 Steve Shewmaker

How much should you argue an opening statement?

00:16:16 Alexa Lewis

Enough to not get an objection.

00:16:18 Steve Shewmaker

Do you agree with that, Jimmy?

00:16:20 Patty Shewmaker

Yes, you should set up your case.

00:16:21 Alexa Lewis

Yeah.

00:16:22 Steve Shewmaker

You should argue as much as you can.

00:16:24 Alexa Lewis

Absolutely.

00:16:25 Steve Shewmaker

Advocate.

00:16:26 Patty Shewmaker

We call it advocate.

00:16:26 Steve Shewmaker

Yes, there are the rules.

00:16:29 Steve Shewmaker

And then when you become experienced, you break the rules.

00:16:32 Steve Shewmaker

And when you become really experienced, you just disregard the rules completely.

00:16:36 Jimmy Lewis

And.

00:16:37 Alexa Lewis

I.   

00:16:37 Alexa Lewis

Just lay on the floor.

00:16:38 Jimmy Lewis

I also had an attorney one time object during my opening and the judge was like,

00:16:43 Jimmy Lewis

I don’t know why you’re objecting.

00:16:44 Jimmy Lewis

I know this isn’t evidence.

00:16:46 Jimmy Lewis

I know he’s just arguing his case to me.

00:16:48 Jimmy Lewis

So like noted, but Mr.

00:16:51 Jimmy Lewis

Lewis, go on.

00:16:51 Alexa Lewis

As you were.

00:16:52 Steve Shewmaker

Okay, how long should your opening statement be, Jimmy?

00:16:56 Jimmy Lewis

Depends on the case, but probably not more than a couple minutes.

00:16:59 Steve Shewmaker

A couple of minutes.

00:17:00 Steve Shewmaker

What’s a couple of minutes to you?

00:17:03 Steve Shewmaker

I don’t know what that means.

00:17:04 Steve Shewmaker

That’s too short.

00:17:05 Patty Shewmaker

That’s too short.

00:17:05 Alexa Lewis

I think it depends on the case, though.

00:17:07 Steve Shewmaker

Okay, I get it.

00:17:08 Steve Shewmaker

You can’t clean your throat into your hands.

00:17:09 Steve Shewmaker

Stop.

00:17:10 Steve Shewmaker

Let Jimmy answer the question.

00:17:12 Steve Shewmaker

Stop.

00:17:13 Steve Shewmaker

Jimmy.

00:17:13 Steve Shewmaker

Jimmy, how long is the opening standing?

00:17:15 Jimmy Lewis

I think it depends on the case because here, if you have a divorce that is, you’re dealing with custody and you have a guardian and you’ve had psyche vows,

00:17:24 Jimmy Lewis

and you’re dealing with alimony and you’re dealing with property division, and there’s a number of different boxes that you need to check.

00:17:31 Jimmy Lewis

Obviously, that’s going to be a longer opening statement, depending on what you’re really trying to push.

00:17:38 Jimmy Lewis

your narratives, your arguments, what you’re requesting.

00:17:41 Steve Shewmaker

I’m objecting non-responsive.

00:17:43 Steve Shewmaker

Alexa, how long should your opening statement be?

00:17:45 Alexa Lewis

I agree with Jimmy, though.

00:17:46 Alexa Lewis

It depends on the case.

00:17:47 Alexa Lewis

If it’s a contempt case with three issues or it’s a money contempt or something, 5 minutes max.

00:17:52 Steve Shewmaker

How long should your opening be?

00:17:54 Patty Shewmaker

As long as it needs to be.

00:17:56 Steve Shewmaker

Okay.

00:17:57 Jimmy Lewis

He would be a terrible judge.

00:17:58 Steve Shewmaker

I generally feel that regardless of the length and complexity of your case, it shouldn’t be more than about 20 minutes.

00:18:07 Alexa Lewis

Jesus, if you argue a contempt in like 20 minutes in your opening statement, it’s far too long.

00:18:13 Patty Shewmaker

No, he’s like everything.

00:18:14 Patty Shewmaker

That’s like the cap on everything.

00:18:16 Alexa Lewis

Oh, I agree with that.

00:18:17 Steve Shewmaker

Yeah, everything’s too long.

00:18:17 Steve Shewmaker

In other words, do not be up there too long.

00:18:20 Steve Shewmaker

Okay.

00:18:21 Steve Shewmaker

Now, should you only cover evidence that favors your client in open sale?

00:18:26 Alexa Lewis

No, never.

00:18:27 Steve Shewmaker

Okay, everybody agrees that.

00:18:28 Patty Shewmaker

Get out ahead of that.

00:18:29 Alexa Lewis

Yep.

00:18:29 Steve Shewmaker

Get out ahead of that.

00:18:30 Steve Shewmaker

So what are you talking about, Patty?

00:18:32 Patty Shewmaker

So if there is, if there’s evidence that’s negative to your client, you know it’s going to come out, you know it’s admissible, address it in opening.

00:18:41 Jimmy Lewis

Judge, we acknowledge hookers and cocaine.

00:18:44 Jimmy Lewis

He loves them.

00:18:45 Jimmy Lewis

We get it.

00:18:46 Jimmy Lewis

Who doesn’t?

00:18:47 Steve Shewmaker

So it’s acceptable to say, to say, ladies and gentlemen, I expect in the course of this case, you will hear some things about my client

00:18:57 Steve Shewmaker

that will be presented by the other side that don’t necessarily portray my client in the best light.

00:19:02 Steve Shewmaker

We expect that you will hear this.

00:19:05 Steve Shewmaker

And we may even concede that some of these things are true, right?

00:19:09 Patty Shewmaker

Yeah, but this is, you know, but, you know, if there’s an explanation, but, you know, contrary to that, blah, blah, blah.

00:19:17 Steve Shewmaker

Yeah, you really ought to have the but.

00:19:19 Steve Shewmaker

The but is important because I think the but is the difference between malpractice and not.

00:19:23 Alexa Lewis

The but is also the reason you actually took it to trial because if it really was all that bad, you probably would say.

00:19:27 Steve Shewmaker

And my favorite, my favorite example of that ever, and maybe you guys have seen it, is that movie with Al Pacino, The Devil’s Advocate.

00:19:34 Steve Shewmaker

Remember that movie with Keanu Reeves?

00:19:36 Steve Shewmaker

And Keanu Reeves is representing

00:19:37 Steve Shewmaker

The guy played by, a guy used to play the actor in the series Coach.

00:19:43 Steve Shewmaker

What is his name?

00:19:44 Steve Shewmaker

I actually ran into him in the Dallas airport one time, but I can’t remember his name.

00:19:49 Steve Shewmaker

But Keanu Reeves is standing up there.

00:19:51 Steve Shewmaker

And his whole opening statement is, you’re going to hear some bad things about my client.

00:19:54 Steve Shewmaker

Like he was running around on his wife.

00:19:56 Steve Shewmaker

And we’re going to tell you, he’s done a lot of bad stuff too, include running around on his wife.

00:20:00 Steve Shewmaker

We don’t expect you to like him, but we want you to look at the evidence.

00:20:03 Steve Shewmaker

And then right after openings, they break and the guy wants to kick you on his ***.

00:20:06 Steve Shewmaker

And he’s like, look, if you’re out having sex with your girlfriend that night, you couldn’t be killed in your wife.

00:20:12 Alexa Lewis

Right.

00:20:13 Steve Shewmaker

So I’m conceding the bad stuff because it helps you.

00:20:16 Alexa Lewis

Yeah, it helps you.

00:20:17 Steve Shewmaker

The guy’s like, oh, and he’s like, yeah, you get it now, don’t you?

00:20:20 Steve Shewmaker

Which is a great example of what I’m talking about.

00:20:22 Alexa Lewis

Absolutely.

00:20:23 Steve Shewmaker

But yeah, you should concede bad stuff right away because you don’t want, I think one of the worst things you can do is just present all the good stuff about your client.

00:20:32 Steve Shewmaker

and not even pay any service to the bad stuff, and then it comes out from the other side.

00:20:36 Steve Shewmaker

I just think that makes you as the attorney look really, really shady.

00:20:39 Alexa Lewis

Well, and then you end up in closing with, and this is what they were trying to hide from you.

00:20:43 Alexa Lewis

This is what they didn’t want you to know, but we brought it to light today.

00:20:46 Steve Shewmaker

Right.

00:20:46 Steve Shewmaker

And that doesn’t, that doesn’t only go for bad facts, but it can be bad.

00:20:50 Speaker 6

Bad law.

00:20:51 Steve Shewmaker

No, bad law, weaknesses in your argument, things like that.

00:20:56 Steve Shewmaker

So, okay, do you make promises in your opening statement?

00:21:00 Alexa Lewis

I mean, you make statements of what you say you’re going to deliver.

00:21:03 Alexa Lewis

So yeah, you can interpret that as promises.

00:21:06 Steve Shewmaker

If you know you’re going to call a certain witness, say it.

00:21:09 Steve Shewmaker

Yeah.

00:21:09 Steve Shewmaker

If you know what that witness is going to say, then say it.

00:21:12 Alexa Lewis

Yeah.

00:21:13 Steve Shewmaker

But be careful what you promise because somebody may hold you to it, right?

00:21:17 Steve Shewmaker

Okay.

00:21:17 Jimmy Lewis

Yeah, like the bird lady from Home Alone 2 said, don’t make promises you can’t keep.

00:21:21 Alexa Lewis

There you go.

00:21:22 Steve Shewmaker

Okay.

00:21:22 Steve Shewmaker

Very relevant.

00:21:24 Jimmy Lewis

He doesn’t know what that means.

00:21:26 Alexa Lewis

He’s seen Home Alone 2.

00:21:27 Steve Shewmaker

I have seen Home Alone 2.

00:21:28 Steve Shewmaker

It’s not one of my favorites.

00:21:30 Alexa Lewis

Everyone remembers the first lady.

00:21:31 Patty Shewmaker

It was a very random reference.

00:21:34 Patty Shewmaker

So that’s why we’re like, okay.

00:21:36 Steve Shewmaker

But some attorneys may get confused and some clients may get confused.

00:21:40 Steve Shewmaker

You know, technically speaking, you’re supposed to say in the opening, well, I’m going to be back.

00:21:46 Steve Shewmaker

Let me stop myself.

00:21:48 Steve Shewmaker

Can you ask for things in the opening statement?

00:21:52 Patty Shewmaker

Yeah.

00:21:52 Patty Shewmaker

Yes.

00:21:53 Patty Shewmaker

I tell the judge, this is what we want.

00:21:55 Patty Shewmaker

These are the issues and this is what we want.

00:21:57 Patty Shewmaker

This is what we’re going to ask you to do, judge.

00:21:59 Alexa Lewis

And I also ask that they pay attention to certain facts or then that’s kind of a jury thing too, is that I ask that you pay attention when this person is talking or when this evidence comes in or whatever, because I expect it will show XYZ.

00:22:11 Steve Shewmaker

Yeah.

00:22:11 Steve Shewmaker

I like to say the same thing.

00:22:12 Steve Shewmaker

I said, pay particular attention when this witness testifies, because they’re going to tell you this thing, this thing, and this thing, which is important.

00:22:20 Steve Shewmaker

But a kind of a good example, as I was writing the outline for this podcast, I thought, what’s a good example of facts versus argument?

00:22:30 Steve Shewmaker

and one.

00:22:32 Jimmy Lewis

Let me back up to the asking thing.

00:22:35 Jimmy Lewis

So a lot of times with my openings, I’ll structure it as here’s this much kind of background information and here’s what we’re asking for and why.

00:22:44 Alexa Lewis

Can you structure your stories like that from now on?

00:22:48 Jimmy Lewis

Your commentary is not.

00:22:51 Alexa Lewis

I’m pretty sure the other two people at this table would appreciate if you would also structure your stories like that.

00:22:55 Steve Shewmaker

You know, an example I came up with is it was a DUI stop.

00:22:59 Steve Shewmaker

The facts that would come in, you know, would be, all right, you know, the government would say, you know, Jimmy was speeding.

00:23:06 Steve Shewmaker

He was stopped because he was speeding.

00:23:08 Steve Shewmaker

And he ran a red light, and he was weaving.

00:23:10 Steve Shewmaker

So he was speeding, he ran a red light, he was weaving.

00:23:13 Steve Shewmaker

When the officer walked up to Jimmy, Jimmy, the officer’s going to tell you that Jimmy smelled of beer.

00:23:20 Steve Shewmaker

The officer’s also going to tell you that when he tried to speak to Jimmy, Jimmy did speak to him and Jimmy’s speech was slurred.

00:23:26 Steve Shewmaker

We’re going to ask you to convict him of DUI.

00:23:29 Steve Shewmaker

Okay, so we’re telling you what the facts are.

00:23:31 Steve Shewmaker

We’re going to ask you to convict him.

00:23:34 Steve Shewmaker

Is any of that not permissible in an opening statement?

00:23:38 Speaker 6

It’s all fine.

00:23:39 Steve Shewmaker

Yeah, it’s all fine.

00:23:39 Steve Shewmaker

It’s all fine.

00:23:40 Steve Shewmaker

Now, the counter

00:23:42 Steve Shewmaker

opening statement from the other side could be something like this.

00:23:48 Steve Shewmaker

The other side may say, okay, he, Jimmy, was at a party.

00:23:56 Steve Shewmaker

And you will hear that from other witnesses that Jimmy had not drunk any alcohol.

00:24:01 Steve Shewmaker

And you will hear that somebody spilled a beer on Jimmy, which is what led him to leave the party because he wanted to go home and change.

00:24:08 Steve Shewmaker

You will also hear that Jimmy had a babysitter who had to leave at a certain time, and Jimmy was rushing home to get there on time for that babysitter.

00:24:18 Steve Shewmaker

You will also see some evidence that Jimmy had dental surgery earlier that day, for which he could not drink alcohol that night, and it affected his ability to speak.

00:24:29 Steve Shewmaker

So these are the facts that we will present to you.

00:24:33 Steve Shewmaker

We will

00:24:34 Steve Shewmaker

we will ask you to look at these facts and conclude that Jimmy was not driving under the influence and acquit him.

00:24:40 Steve Shewmaker

Okay.

00:24:41 Steve Shewmaker

Now, would that all be proper in an opening statement?

00:24:44 Steve Shewmaker

That’s fine.

00:24:44 Steve Shewmaker

Okay.

00:24:45 Steve Shewmaker

Now, what if the defense said in an opening statement, you’re going to see some evidence that he had dental surgery and that could have caused his speech to be slurred.

00:24:57 Steve Shewmaker

And we’re going to ask you not to convict him because his speech was slurred because of the dental surgery.

00:25:03 Steve Shewmaker

Does that become more argumentative?

00:25:04 Alexa Lewis

That’s more argumentative.

00:25:05 Alexa Lewis

Yeah.

00:25:06 Steve Shewmaker

So the way you present these things can affect whether or not it’s argumentative or not.

00:25:10 Steve Shewmaker

But so I just kind of came up with that as an example.

00:25:13 Steve Shewmaker

Would you all agree with that?

00:25:14 Patty Shewmaker

Yeah, I think it’s a good example.

00:25:16 Patty Shewmaker

Well done.

00:25:16 Steve Shewmaker

All right.

00:25:17 Steve Shewmaker

Now, I think we touched on this earlier, but should you keep track of what the other side says in their opening statement?

00:25:23 Steve Shewmaker

Yes.

00:25:23 Steve Shewmaker

Can you just take notes?

00:25:24 Alexa Lewis

Yes.

00:25:25 Steve Shewmaker

Okay.

00:25:25 Steve Shewmaker

Why is that?

00:25:26 Alexa Lewis

So you can point back later at closing and say, this is what they told you and this is what they didn’t prove.

00:25:30 Steve Shewmaker

I agree with you, Alexa.

00:25:31 Steve Shewmaker

Is that the only reason?

00:25:32 Alexa Lewis

No.

00:25:33 Alexa Lewis

I think you want to pay attention to what the other side’s roadmap is as well, because you want to, it’s going to help you organize.

00:25:41 Alexa Lewis

how you’re dealing with their case, because you’re still responding to their case throughout the entirety of your case.

00:25:46 Alexa Lewis

You’re cross-examining their witnesses, things like that.

00:25:48 Alexa Lewis

They tell you what one of their witnesses is going to say.

00:25:51 Alexa Lewis

Great, I’m going to write that down because if number one, if their witness doesn’t say it, I’m going to argue about it later.

00:25:55 Alexa Lewis

Number 2, I’m going to figure out how I’m going to deal with what their witness is allegedly going to say.

00:26:00 Patty Shewmaker

Yeah, you might preempt it.

00:26:01 Patty Shewmaker

If they give you kind of a preview, you’d be like, oh, I need to address that with my client when he’s on the stand before they get to it.

00:26:08 Steve Shewmaker

Oh, yeah.

00:26:10 Steve Shewmaker

Occasionally is the time I hear something in an opening, I look at my client and I say, that was a surprise.

00:26:14 Steve Shewmaker

I didn’t know that was coming out.

00:26:16 Alexa Lewis

You didn’t tell me that.

00:26:18 Steve Shewmaker

Yeah, I know.

00:26:19 Steve Shewmaker

But anyway, let me ask you this.

00:26:20 Steve Shewmaker

Can you turn, is there any way you can turn what is said in opening into evidence?

00:26:28 Patty Shewmaker

Well, kind of like what I said, you know, your counsel said this.

00:26:31 Patty Shewmaker

Do you agree with what your counsel said?

00:26:33 Steve Shewmaker

That is precisely what I write.

00:26:35 Steve Shewmaker

The opening may not be evidence, but you can turn it into evidence.

00:26:38 Steve Shewmaker

How?

00:26:39 Steve Shewmaker

Your attorney said this in opening.

00:26:42 Steve Shewmaker

Would you agree with what your attorney said?

00:26:44 Steve Shewmaker

Most of the time, they’re going to go, yes, I agree.

00:26:46 Alexa Lewis

There is that one time when they say they don’t.

00:26:49 Steve Shewmaker

Well, that is, I don’t remember what time that was, do you?

00:26:51 Alexa Lewis

We’ll talk about it later.

00:26:52 Alexa Lewis

I do.

00:26:53 Steve Shewmaker

It’s not.

00:26:53 Alexa Lewis

It wasn’t us.

00:26:53 Alexa Lewis

It wasn’t us.

00:26:54 Steve Shewmaker

It wasn’t us.

00:26:55 Steve Shewmaker

And is it not permissible for the podcast?

00:26:57 Alexa Lewis

It was, no, we’ll talk about it later.

00:27:00 Steve Shewmaker

Okay.

00:27:00 Alexa Lewis

You’ll remember it, I promise.

00:27:02 Steve Shewmaker

Okay.

00:27:02 Steve Shewmaker

Well, you know, you can say, and there’s different ways to do it.

00:27:04 Steve Shewmaker

You can say to a witness on the stand whose words are evidence.

00:27:08 Steve Shewmaker

You could say things like,

00:27:09 Steve Shewmaker

your attorney said this in the opening.

00:27:11 Steve Shewmaker

Did your attorney get that right?

00:27:14 Steve Shewmaker

Was your attorney correct?

00:27:16 Steve Shewmaker

Well, what about this piece of evidence?

00:27:18 Steve Shewmaker

Wouldn’t that contradict what your attorney said?

00:27:20 Steve Shewmaker

So now what you’re doing is you’re turning those words into evidence.

00:27:24 Steve Shewmaker

And I love to do that because attorneys say it isn’t so.

00:27:28 Steve Shewmaker

It’s so.

00:27:29 Steve Shewmaker

Attorneys will shoot their mouths off in opening statements.

00:27:33 Steve Shewmaker

And they will say stuff that I’ll be sitting there going, wow, I can’t believe they said that.

00:27:37 Steve Shewmaker

And then I’ll go to them and say, you know, he said this.

00:27:40 Steve Shewmaker

Is that true?

00:27:42 Steve Shewmaker

So anyway.

00:27:42 Alexa Lewis

Really comes down to knowing your case.

00:27:44 Steve Shewmaker

Yeah.

00:27:44 Steve Shewmaker

Would you say opening statements more about art or science?

00:27:50 Patty Shewmaker

It’s a combination.

00:27:51 Alexa Lewis

Yeah, it’s a mix of both, for sure.

00:27:53 Steve Shewmaker

Over the years, has your experience changed the way you look at opening statements?

00:28:00 Patty Shewmaker

Yeah.

00:28:02 Steve Shewmaker

Tell me how?

00:28:02 Patty Shewmaker

Because when you’re a new attorney, you think the opening statements are boring and you went to the closing argument.

00:28:07 Patty Shewmaker

Yeah, it’s fun and it’s exciting.

00:28:09 Patty Shewmaker

And then as you get older, you start to care more about the opening statement and less about the closing.

00:28:15 Steve Shewmaker

I do agree with that.

00:28:16 Alexa Lewis

Yeah.

00:28:17 Steve Shewmaker

Well, what are some of your best stories about opening statements that y’all can remember?

00:28:22 Steve Shewmaker

Anybody.

00:28:22 Alexa Lewis

So Haley and I’s jury trial, she was tasked with doing the opening statement.

00:28:28 Alexa Lewis

Opposing counsel got up.

00:28:29 Alexa Lewis

It was his case.

00:28:29 Alexa Lewis

He did his opening statement.

00:28:31 Alexa Lewis

And general rule, you don’t really want to object in somebody’s opening, but this was in front of a jury.

00:28:37 Alexa Lewis

And he started going into things that were completely irrelevant for purposes of the jury trial.

00:28:41 Alexa Lewis

It was a very narrow issue.

00:28:43 Alexa Lewis

So we object in the opening statement twice because he wouldn’t stop.

00:28:47 Alexa Lewis

So then Haley gets up to give our opening statement, which she’d now pared down from what she’d prepared because it was lengthy, but

00:28:56 Alexa Lewis

It didn’t need to be, first jury trial, want to be a little over-prepared.

00:29:00 Alexa Lewis

So she starts her opening statement, and in the middle of opening statement, opposing counsel sure as **** objects, for no apparent reason, except that she was explaining the law, which of course is perfectly permissible in an opening statement, what the law is.

00:29:15 Steve Shewmaker

If you did it correct.

00:29:16 Alexa Lewis

Correct, which she absolutely was.

00:29:18 Alexa Lewis

And then the judge had to instruct him basically to sit down and shut up.

00:29:23 Alexa Lewis

It was quite entertaining.

00:29:24 Patty Shewmaker

One of my favorite opening statement stories, and you talk about making that first impression, and yeah, opening statements aren’t evidence, but I mean, I think this is a temporary hearing.

00:29:34 Patty Shewmaker

And I’m going through, okay, this is the background, these are the issues, this is what the evidence is going to show, and judges, this is what we’re going to ask you to do.

00:29:43 Patty Shewmaker

And the judge just interjects and looks at the other side and says, why is what she’s saying, why is that not true?

00:29:52 Patty Shewmaker

Would you respond to that?

00:29:53 Patty Shewmaker

Why I had that?

00:29:54 Steve Shewmaker

Happened before, too, in front of a jury.

00:29:56 Patty Shewmaker

And you’re like, and you’re like, O.K., my work here is done.

00:30:00 Patty Shewmaker

I had that, and we just had only gotten through opening.

00:30:03 Steve Shewmaker

How about you, Jimmy?

00:30:04 Steve Shewmaker

Any great opening statement stories?

00:30:08 Patty Shewmaker

No.

00:30:09 Jimmy Lewis

Honestly, none right off the top of my head.

00:30:12 Jimmy Lewis

I mean, I can think of one.

00:30:14 Jimmy Lewis

It was last May in front of a judge who is senior status now that

00:30:22 Jimmy Lewis

case is still ongoing, so I’m not going to talk about anything really with it.

00:30:27 Jimmy Lewis

But I said like 2 words and he kind of did the same thing that you said.

00:30:32 Jimmy Lewis

And he just started basically parading the other side and was like, what?

00:30:40 Jimmy Lewis

wasn’t any of that brought up?

00:30:41 Alexa Lewis

But you know what that says to both of your credibility is that the words you are putting out there in front of these judges who know who you are and respect what you say,

00:30:50 Alexa Lewis

believe that what you’re telling them, you’re going to be able to prove.

00:30:54 Alexa Lewis

Like what you’re saying in your opening statement is likely what’s going to come out.

00:30:58 Alexa Lewis

So that means your reputation in front of those judges is very good.

00:31:03 Patty Shewmaker

Okay, we’ll take that.

00:31:05 Alexa Lewis

Well, it’s true.

00:31:05 Patty Shewmaker

I’ll.

00:31:06 Steve Shewmaker

Accept that.

00:31:07 Steve Shewmaker

Anybody got any other good first?

00:31:09 Patty Shewmaker

What’s your favorite opening statement today?

00:31:13 Steve Shewmaker

Okay, one of them was when I watched.

00:31:14 Steve Shewmaker

It was a case I had assisted in the preparation of, but I didn’t have a speaking role.

00:31:20 Steve Shewmaker

And it was at Fort Hood, Texas.

00:31:22 Steve Shewmaker

It was a military trial.

00:31:23 Steve Shewmaker

And a private defense attorney was defending a soldier, and the government was prosecuting him.

00:31:30 Steve Shewmaker

And I don’t even remember what he was being prosecuted for.

00:31:32 Steve Shewmaker

It doesn’t matter.

00:31:35 Steve Shewmaker

Prior to the opening statement, there was a heck of a lot of argument, because the defense attorney had decided

00:31:41 Steve Shewmaker

that she was going to present a PowerPoint presentation and opening, which is completely permissible.

00:31:46 Steve Shewmaker

It’s a vehicle you can use as long as you follow the rules we’ve talked about.

00:31:50 Steve Shewmaker

But she was going to play a clip of a movie and argue some bullet points about the similarity of this movie to this case.

00:31:58 Steve Shewmaker

And they argued back and forth about the permissibility of this particular tactic.

00:32:05 Steve Shewmaker

And the military judge finally raised his hand and said, wait a minute,

00:32:10 Steve Shewmaker

you have elected a bench trial, which is just me, no jury.

00:32:13 Steve Shewmaker

What is the name of this movie?

00:32:15 Steve Shewmaker

And the defense attorney said, you know, it’s such and such movie.

00:32:18 Steve Shewmaker

And he said, well, I’ve never seen this movie, so it will be lost on me, which I just chuckled and thought, you know, you need to know your audience.

00:32:29 Steve Shewmaker

And if you’re asking them to watch a movie or remember a movie they’ve never heard of, then you just wasted a whole bunch of time.

00:32:38 Steve Shewmaker

Yeah, that’s one story.

00:32:40 Steve Shewmaker

The other one actually did involve me.

00:32:43 Steve Shewmaker

There is a technique that I have not been to the Jerry Spence Litigation School.

00:32:49 Steve Shewmaker

Maybe one day I’ll find the time and the money to go.

00:32:52 Steve Shewmaker

But I am advised that one of the techniques they teach there is what’s called a first person opening.

00:32:57 Steve Shewmaker

Are any of you familiar with it?

00:32:59 Steve Shewmaker

No.

00:33:00 Steve Shewmaker

Jimmy, no.

00:33:01 Alexa Lewis

I can imagine what it is.

00:33:02 Steve Shewmaker

A first person opening is when you stand up and make an opening statement

00:33:06 Steve Shewmaker

as one of the parties.

00:33:08 Steve Shewmaker

And it is kind of argumentative in its nature.

00:33:11 Alexa Lewis

It feels weird.

00:33:12 Steve Shewmaker

But in this particular case, I was defending A Marine Corps colonel who had been accused of inappropriate touching and conduct with a…

00:33:21 Steve Shewmaker

And you did this?

00:33:22 Steve Shewmaker

Yes, with a female.

00:33:23 Steve Shewmaker

And this was at one of these joint civilian military assignments where you work around civilians.

00:33:32 Steve Shewmaker

So a bunch of them had gone out drinking the night before, and this girl had drunk too much too early on an empty stomach and evidently was embarrassing herself and throwing up and carrying on.

00:33:43 Steve Shewmaker

So this colonel, defying all common sense that I would have heard of, decided to take her home in a car by himself.

00:33:50 Steve Shewmaker

Now, to his credit, he did have another member of the party following them in a car, but he was alone in the car with this girl.

00:33:56 Steve Shewmaker

Well, this girl accused him of groping her and touching her and being inappropriate.

00:34:02 Steve Shewmaker

And when I spoke to him and looked at the evidence, I was like, okay, the motivation here is that she embarrassed herself and she needed to take the focus off of her.

00:34:14 Steve Shewmaker

She needed to put the focus on anybody but her so that she could basically be able to walk into work the next week and stay safe and hold her head up high.

00:34:24 Steve Shewmaker

So I did an opening statement where I came in very emotionally.

00:34:28 Steve Shewmaker

I did it all on my feet and I just said, oh, I’m Ms.

00:34:32 Steve Shewmaker

So-and-so.

00:34:33 Steve Shewmaker

I’ve, oh my God, I can’t believe what I just did.

00:34:35 Steve Shewmaker

I just threw up at this party and I don’t remember what I did.

00:34:38 Steve Shewmaker

And I inappropriately touched a man, another person was there.

00:34:41 Steve Shewmaker

I can’t believe I did that.

00:34:43 Steve Shewmaker

And then I was in the car and I can’t remember everything clearly, but he was driving me home.

00:34:47 Steve Shewmaker

He was taking care of me.

00:34:49 Steve Shewmaker

And then the next thing I know, I wake up at home and the sun’s on my face and I feel bad and I’m just sitting here thinking about what I did the night before.

00:34:57 Steve Shewmaker

How can I ever go to work?

00:35:00 Steve Shewmaker

It wasn’t my fault.

00:35:01 Steve Shewmaker

I have to blame somebody else.

00:35:03 Steve Shewmaker

I have to do this.

00:35:04 Steve Shewmaker

And that was the opening statement.

00:35:05 Steve Shewmaker

It’s called the first person opening.

00:35:08 Steve Shewmaker

I have yet to do that in a domestic case, but I’ve been tempted to a few times and I think I’m going to.

00:35:15 Alexa Lewis

I like the 2026 goal.

00:35:19 Steve Shewmaker

Maybe.

00:35:19 Steve Shewmaker

2026, maybe 2027.

00:35:22 Steve Shewmaker

you can’t force these things.

00:35:24 Steve Shewmaker

You have to find the right case.

00:35:26 Steve Shewmaker

If you, I mean, this is a really cutting edge, aggressive technique.

00:35:32 Steve Shewmaker

I mean, it’ll, you know, judges will say, I want, I don’t want to turn away opening statements.

00:35:37 Steve Shewmaker

Because in divorce cases, you tend to be like, judge,

00:35:39 Steve Shewmaker

The parties have been married this long.

00:35:41 Steve Shewmaker

They have this many kids.

00:35:42 Steve Shewmaker

These are the incomes you’re going to hear about.

00:35:44 Steve Shewmaker

The issues in this case are A, B&C.

00:35:46 Steve Shewmaker

We’re going to ask you to do this, and this.

00:35:48 Steve Shewmaker

There may be some evidence of bad conduct or salacious activity.

00:35:52 Steve Shewmaker

We’ll tell you what that evidence is.

00:35:53 Steve Shewmaker

And at the end, we’re going to ask you to do this.

00:35:55 Steve Shewmaker

It’s really rather bland.

00:35:57 Steve Shewmaker

It is.

00:35:57 Steve Shewmaker

But judges expect that, and they need that roadmap.

00:36:01 Steve Shewmaker

So every once in a while, the judge would say, you know what?

00:36:04 Steve Shewmaker

I could use some dish.

00:36:05 Steve Shewmaker

I could use something that that mixes it up.

00:36:09 Steve Shewmaker

If you want to mix it up that way, that’s great.

00:36:11 Steve Shewmaker

As long as you have the right case.

00:36:13 Steve Shewmaker

If you have a run-of-the-mill case, there’s no reason to go over the top.

00:36:17 Steve Shewmaker

It requires the right case.

00:36:19 Steve Shewmaker

So I’ll challenge the three of you to think about that.

00:36:22 Steve Shewmaker

First person opening is a real thing.

00:36:24 Alexa Lewis

Interesting.

00:36:24 Patty Shewmaker

I don’t know if I can pull it off.

00:36:26 Patty Shewmaker

Sometimes that’s personality.

00:36:27 Steve Shewmaker

Maybe so.

00:36:29 Patty Shewmaker

Interesting.

00:36:30 Patty Shewmaker

Well, I like it.

00:36:31 Steve Shewmaker

Anyway, opening statements are extraordinarily important.

00:36:34 Steve Shewmaker

You need to really put your heart into it and use your judgment properly.

00:36:39 Steve Shewmaker

Do you think that at this firm we do that?

00:36:42 Alexa Lewis

I think so.

00:36:42 Alexa Lewis

I’d like to think so, yeah.

00:36:44 Steve Shewmaker

Have you ever run your opening statement by somebody else in the firm?

00:36:48 Steve Shewmaker

Who?

00:36:49 Alexa Lewis

Probably all three of you over the course of the last almost 13 years.

00:36:53 Steve Shewmaker

Yeah, how about you, Jimmy?

00:36:55 Jimmy Lewis

No.

00:36:57 Steve Shewmaker

Jimmy’s just out there flapping doing his thing.

00:37:00 Jimmy Lewis

I’d drive her crazy at home.

00:37:03 Jimmy Lewis

It’ll be.

00:37:03 Alexa Lewis

I’m a member of this firm, am I not?

00:37:05 Jimmy Lewis

Well, yes, but it’ll be.

00:37:08 Jimmy Lewis

And I’m like, hey, what do you think about this?

00:37:10 Jimmy Lewis

And she just, yes on this, yes on this, no on that.

00:37:18 Steve Shewmaker

And I woke Patty up one time at like 3:00 in the morning to get her to read a paragraph of my first year law school brief that I had to write.

00:37:27 Steve Shewmaker

And she’s so frustrated and she looked at it and she goes, it’s fine.

00:37:30 Steve Shewmaker

I was like, and then I yell at her, you didn’t even read it.

00:37:33 Steve Shewmaker

She’s like, it’s 230 in the morning.

00:37:36 Speaker 6

You didn’t even read it.

00:37:37 Steve Shewmaker

I was like, don’t you don’t you care about me?

00:37:39 Steve Shewmaker

She’s like, no, I don’t.

00:37:40 Steve Shewmaker

Don’t you care about your future?

00:37:41 Steve Shewmaker

Not right now.

00:37:42 Alexa Lewis

Not right now at 2:00 in the morning.

00:37:43 Alexa Lewis

She’s.

00:37:43 Steve Shewmaker

Laughing, but she remembers this.

00:37:45 Patty Shewmaker

I do remember this.

00:37:45 Alexa Lewis

Of course she remembers it.

00:37:47 Alexa Lewis

was 2:00 in the morning.

00:37:47 Alexa Lewis

She was like, what the hell are you waking me up for?

00:37:49 Alexa Lewis

And I’m like, I’m like, you’re like, you’re like, turn the light on, dude.

00:37:53 Alexa Lewis

No, he did.

00:37:53 Alexa Lewis

That’s the problem.

00:37:54 Patty Shewmaker

You can’t even see.

00:37:57 Steve Shewmaker

That’s how intimidated I was by Wendy Hensel, my first-year writing professor, who later became the Dean of Georgia State Law School, Dean of Georgia State, and is now the Dean of the University of Hawaii.

00:38:07 Steve Shewmaker

In fact, I’m going to make sure she hears this podcast.

00:38:09 Alexa Lewis

Yeah, I adore her.

00:38:10 Steve Shewmaker

Hi, Wendy.

00:38:12 Steve Shewmaker

All right, anything else about opening statements before we adjourn?

00:38:14 Alexa Lewis

Before we close, let’s just close it out.

00:38:16 Steve Shewmaker

Closing it out.

00:38:17 Steve Shewmaker

Go ahead and close it out, Patty.

00:38:18 Patty Shewmaker

All right, thanks for joining us.

00:38:32 Narrator

That’s it for this episode of Lawyers Without Billboards.

00:38:36 Narrator

If you found this episode helpful, make sure to follow and subscribe on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

00:38:46 Narrator

For more resources or to get in touch with us, visit Shewmakerandlewis.com.

00:38:51 Narrator

Thanks for listening and we’ll see you next time.