Mark Carney's Biggest Challenge: Separatism in Alberta and Quebec - Episode #138!

Welcome to Tav's Headline News Reviews! 

oin the discussion as we explore the potential impact of Quebec and Alberta referendums on the Liberal government. With rising tensions and growing dissent, could these referendums be the catalyst for a major shift in Canadian politics? We'll delve into the key issues driving these referendums and examine the possible consequences for the Liberal government. From the economy to healthcare, we'll analyze the potential effects on Canada as a whole. 

Don't forget to like, subscribe, and share your thoughts in the comments!

My YOUTUBE CHANNEL LINK:
https://www.youtube.com/@TavsHeadlineNewsReviews

MY PODCAST LINK:
https://tavsheadlinenewsreviews.buzzsprout.com

My TWITTER/X LINK:
https://x.com/TavsNewsReviews

My FACEBOOK LINK:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=61576891084536

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:08

Thanks for watching Sunday, April the 19th, 2026. And all those other things. Two things that he's going to have to face are these two possible referendums and/or a separation from Canada initiatives that are going on both in Alberta and in Quebec. And they're real, they're strong, and they're definitely a threat. And that's something he's going to have to address and manage to the premiers of both provinces. And we're going to take a look at that a little bit closely and see what it's all about. And one thing I have noticed is the federal government isn't paying attention to it, and that may come back to bite them. As far as the two pushes for separation in our country, Alberta and Quebec, Alberta is the more threatening one. And the reason is right now there's a petition that's underway, a citizen-led petition, actively underway to trigger a vote on independence in Alberta. And the Premier has allowed is allowing it to go through. And if they reach the, I think it's the 170,000, 170, 180,000 signatures, I think it is, um, then that will force the premier to put it on a ballot and there will need to be a vote. And if that vote passes, then the premier is going to have to deal with it with her government. Legislative changes have been made to make it easier to trigger referendums in the province of Alberta. Alberta is already scheduled to hold a province-wide referendum on October 2026 this year. Why this matters is because this creates a real procedural pathway to separation for people if they get enough signatures, as long as it has, again, public support. Only about 29% of Albertans would vote to leave Canada today, as it's being reported. Roughly two-thirds, 65% would vote to stay. Many supporters view independence as a protest against the federal government and how Alberta has been treated in the past regarding energy and its ability to export its products outside the province and allowing its economy to grow. The movement is loud, it's organized, but it's not backed very strongly by other groups. That's that's the challenge. So one of the things regarding this separation movement in Alberta that shocked myself and many others in Canada is the group actually represented representatives of the separation group in Alberta actually went down to the states to meet with uh the Trump administration, some officials down in in the United States in the Trump administration, not anybody senior like the president or the Secretary of State, nothing like that. But they they went down there and meet a meetup, which which was surprising. And to tell you the truth, it's kind of threatening given that we're in a post-terror war with the United States. Some of the discussions that they had, apparently, that was reported was political support, uh, potential economic backing, and recognition if it actually happened. This this obviously when it happened when everybody found out about it, it triggered national anger. And there were some security concerns and political backlash when this when this happened, for sure. Um, and it also raised the pressure on the prime minister to and the liberal government to defend the sovereignty of Canada and project the national national unity on throughout the country, because this is something that sort of um is unheard of. Through all of the actions that Quebec have taken, they've never gone down to the United States, and nor at that time did they entertain them back in the 70s. They did talk to the French government, uh, but uh thing like this. This this was unheard of. Well, I grew up with Quebec uh threatening to separate from Canada. So this is nothing new. But the risk of a Quebec referendum is at the highest that it's ever been. That you uh witnessed in the video at the beginning of the episode. There's quite a big following. There always has been. Why does it make it different right now? Well, it's because there's political instability there. Uh, they just had the premier chain, there's a new premier there that last week was sworn in. There's instability politically, there's also instability in the leadership of the province, which all of that can reignite um the debate again regarding separation from Canada. Uh, but what are the differences between Alberta and Quebec as far as separation? With Alberta, it's more of a procedural situation where the the citizens have to vote and then there'll be a referendum on whether further procedures should take place within the province to separate. Uh so it's more of a procedural risk type scenario, if I will if I can call it that. With Quebec, it's totally different. It's historical, it's historically proven, and it's an extreme threat. It's something that's deep inside of and the the push for separation. There's more people in Quebec that have that in the van, the the willingness to separate, than in Alberta, and that is a huge threat to Canada. So I would say Quebec is the the is the biggest threat, especially now with the instability in political leadership. Alberta is is a threat, but will take there's a long process to get there. And whether there's the will to do that, that's that's the the question. So what's the impact on the government? And now that Prime Minister Kearney has secured a majority government till until 2029. For Prime Minister Carney, strong national leadership. He's very high on the polls. His image is is as as far as his political image is very, very high. It's the highest way ahead of Pierre Polyev. And of course, he's benefiting from the issue with the United States and that the the terrafore I've talked about this many times, and people see him as the best person to deal with the economic issues that we're experiencing right now. The situation with the United States, how that those negotiations with the free trade agreement will go, uh, and how he deals with the economy and how Canadians feel about the things that he will be doing to make their lives um less expensive and better. He's only been in office for a very short time and now he's got a majority. Uh the risks to all of this regarding separation, uh, it undermines uh Canadian unity, especially right now when we're fighting sort of a quote-unquote war with the United States, uh tariff war, having this kind of stuff going on right now. But it's not a good look. Uh it fuels populist opposition narratives to the government, the federal government. Well, it's gonna force a constitutional issue if it move continues to move forward, but then it's also could cause economic concessions by the federal government to quell the separation, whether it's Quebec or Alberta. It all at the end of the day, it all will boil down to the economy of both provinces. So, what's the bottom line and what's my takeaway on all of this? The short answer is yes, but uneven. Alberta, short-term political threat for Prime Minister Carney, more about pressure on Ottawa than immediate threat of separation. Uh it's gonna be uh sort of a irritant for the Prime Minister, especially if if the Premier of Alberta starts putting some pressure on the Prime Minister. As far as Quebec, it's a long-term term threat. It's always been there, it's never gone away. However, the momentum builds for separation, it could be very serious and create a lot of instability uh at the federal level. Because a lot of people that serve in the federal government are French Canadian. But overall, not an immediate collapse scenario. Uh, we're not gonna now have two processes just all of a sudden get up and leave, but a credible uh political threat definitely for the Prime Minister of Canada. So let me know your thoughts and comments on this issue. I'd like to hear what you have to say. Uh, thanks for watching. Be safe, and we'll see you on the next one.