Adjuvants: Separating Fact from Fiction – What Works, What Doesn’t, and Why It Matters

In this episode of the Villa Botcast, we dive into Dr Brian de Villiers’ Adjuvant Tip for June 2025 and unpack the facts from the fiction surrounding spray adjuvants. From outrageous marketing claims to the real role adjuvants play in crop protection, we break down how these products work, what they can’t do, and why responsible use at registered rates is non-negotiable. Backed by science and explained by Villa's expert team, this episode helps growers and agronomists make smarter decisions in the field. 

At Villa, we know your time is valuable. That’s why we’ve introduced the Villa Botcast—a podcast voiced by AI so you can tune in anytime, anywhere. But make no mistake: every insight you hear is written by real, trusted professionals at Villa who understand the field.

Click here for everything you need in one place:
Visit our new website—now with faster, easier product search at your fingertips! Contact our trusted distributors, enter our first-ever photo competition (Villa Crop Capture Challenge), read the latest issue of our Insights newspaper, and follow us to stay up to date with practical tips, product guidance, and timely updates.

Click here to learn more about Class Act NG.

Transcript

Hi there and welcome to the Villa Botcast. You're on the go audio hub for smarter crop protection.

Quick heads up before we jump in. This episode is voiced by AI for speed and accessibility, but every insight you hear was crafted by real experts at Villa. That means you get reliable, expert backed information anytime, anywhere.

Okay, let's jump in. We're doing a bit of a deep dive today looking at, Doctor Brian de Villiers. Adjuvant tip for June 2025. That's right. And we're pulling from an interesting piece called Adjuvants: Separating Fact from Fiction. Our goal here really is to unpack the main message about adjuvants, to figure out what's real and what's, well, noise. Exactly. Cut through that noise and pinpoint the key takeaways, because, you know, the source itself hints there are some pretty and rages claims floating around about what these things can supposedly do. Okay. Outrageous claims. Yeah.

So let's start with the basics then. What's the fundamental point the material makes about adjuvants? Well, fundamentally adjuvants are used with crop protection products. Right. And the tech's always improving making them effective safe when used properly. Right. When used properly, that's the key bit. But they're often, really misunderstood. Profoundly misunderstood actually. And that misunderstanding probably fuels those claims. Doesn't it?

So what are they supposed to do? According to the source material, the proven stuff. Their main job, basically, is to help those people reach their full potential, optimize performance. So you could say, okay, and this is super important when conditions aren't ideal, maybe it's dry, maybe it's rainy. Whatever the environmental factor must be, the source really stresses this is backed up by a lot of statistical trials. Solid track record. They're helpers, not miracle cures. Got it? Helpers.

So let's tackle one of those claims. You mentioned the idea that an adjuvant can, like change the whole way. TCP works. When you're working with water sensitive herbicides, every detail counts. That's where Class Act NG comes in — a 4-in-1 adjuvant that gets the job done. It neutralizes salt. Antagonism with ammonium sulfate, enhances uptake with corn soap technology, spreads evenly and reduces foaming all in one. Pours more absorption, more impact. Class Act NGG — the smart choice for tough tank mixes.

A that's a big one, like making something that works on contacts suddenly move through the whole plant, becomes systemic or, making it work in minutes instead of days, right? The material says that's highly unlikely. Bordering on impossible, really. Adjuvants help the CPP do what it already does just, well, more effectively. They don't change its basic mode of action. Okay, so no rewriting the chemistry.

And what about the speed thing? Faster is better, isn't it? Well not always. The source points out that super fast control isn't necessarily the goal or even beneficial. Sometimes, you know, proper systemic movement takes time. Rushing it could even hurt the crop or lead to worse control. Long term. It's about better control within the product's designed limits. Enhancing not inventing. Got it.

Which I guess leads us to another claim the source highlights as even more worrying, yes, this is the really problematic one. The claim that using an adjuvant means you can drastically cut the rate of the CPP, use less product than the label says exactly, or even use rates that aren't registered at all for that situation. And Doctor de Villiers' tip calls this out directly. It's labeled as dangerous. Reckless. Wow. Strong words and for good reason. It just flies in the face of label recommendations. All the research and frankly, common sense. Adjuvants boost efficiency, sure, but not nearly enough to compensate for cutting the active ingredient below effective levels. So you risk the treatment just failing? Yeah. Or worse, you contribute to developing resistance in the pests or weeds. It creates more problems. The adjuvants role is to help the CPP work optimally at its registered rate. Full stop.

Okay, very clear now the source mentions Villa's perspective. Specifically. How do they fit into this? They seem to line up perfectly with what we've been discussing. Villa states quite clearly, according to the material, that their adjuvants help CPP reach more of their potential, more potential, not new potential precisely. Nothing more, nothing less. And they explicitly reject the idea of their products changing modes of action, or, crucially, justify using lower than label rates. So they definitely see the value in adjuvants with their products. But it's all about using them responsibly. Exactly that. Responsible use following the label, especially at the registered rates. Villa's position as presented here is that their adjuvants are purely there to help get effective control without causing other problems, and they wrap up with a pretty strong warning — don't buy into outrageous claims without solid proof. A documented track record and proper registrations. They even suggest talking directly to one of their agronomists for reliable info. Right? Go to the source — the science.

So boiling it down. The main takeaway from this deep dive seems to be: be really careful about exaggerated adjuvant claims. Yeah, their role is specific. They enhance, they don't transform and always, always use them with the registered rate of the CP, which really leaves us with a thought for you, the listener. Given how persuasive some of these unsupported claims can sound, how vital is it really to double check product information and stick religiously to those label recommendations and maybe think about, you know, what actually happens when we don't?

Thanks for listening to the Villa Botcast — powered by AI, driven by insight.