The SPAC Podcast: Special Purpose Acquisition Company

Why Public Conglomerates Are Outperforming Private Equity

• Joshua Wilson

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 1:24

In this clip, Roland Austrup discusses research from an upcoming white paper comparing modern public operating conglomerates to private equity performance. Companies like Danaher, Constellation Software, Brookfield, Roper, and Berkshire Hathaway have demonstrated that public markets can deliver strong long-term returns while maintaining operational flexibility.

Roland explains why some companies may actually face more constraints under private ownership than in public markets, where capital access and broader investor participation can create stronger alignment and long-term growth opportunities.



Disclaimer: Michael J. Blankenship is a licensed attorney and partner at Winston & Strawn LLP. Joshua Wilson is a licensed Florida real estate broker and holds FINRA Series 79 and Series 63 licensure. The content of this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be considered legal, financial, or compliance advice. All views and opinions expressed by the hosts and guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect the policies or positions of any regulatory agency, law firm, organization, or employer. Listeners should consult their own legal counsel, compliance teams, or financial advisors to ensure adherence to applicable regulations, including SEC, FINRA, and other industry-specific requirements. This podcast does not constitute a solicitation or recommendation for any financial products or services. Let's 

Connect on LinkedIn: 

https://www.linkedin.com/in/mikeblankenship/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/joshuabrucewilson/ 

To Contact Us, Please Visit:

https://www.TheSPACPodcast.com/contact/

Roland Austrup: I've got a white paper that I'm working on which compares, private equity to public markets. So I'm not gonna go into great detail on it, but I'll characterize the main themes that we're seeing there right now.

We did a study of, what I would call modern operating conglomerates because a venture isn't operating conglomerate, but what we do under the hood is different than what Danaher Constellation or Brookfield or Roper or Berkshire do. But you can classify a number of companies as modern, operating conglomerates and what we've noticed or public conglomerates, what we've noticed is that the performance of those companies actually outperforms private equity indices. So the thesis that, one of the thesis of our, the paper writing is that there, there's, and this is not to take anything away from private equity or venture, but.

A lot of companies decided not to go public because they didn't really want to have the cost of being a public company or the regulatory burden of being a public company. They thought they'd have more freedom by being funded privately. I would argue that's not the case. If you have if you're not democratized with public market investors, you have very few people that can control you and if you don't perform.

They have certainly more controls on your business than, a broader a public market investor base would have. So I think a lot of the, a lot of operating companies are realizing that. They have more handcuffs being private than if they're public.