I Have Some Questions...
What if leadership wasn’t about having the answers—but about asking better questions?
On "I Have Some Questions…", Erik Berglund – a founder, coach, and Speechcraft evangelist – dives into the conversations that high performers aren’t having enough. This isn’t your typical leadership podcast. It’s a tactical deep-dive into the soft skills that actually drive results: the hard-to-nail moments of accountability, the awkward feedback loops, and the language that turns good leaders into great ones.
Each week, Erik explores a question that has shaped his own journey. Expect raw, unpolished curiosity. Expect conversations with bold thinkers, rising leaders, and practitioners who are tired of recycled advice and ready to talk about what really works. Expect episodes that get under the hood of how real change happens: through what we say, how we say it, and how often we practice it.
This show is for driven managers, emerging execs, and anyone who knows that real growth comes from curiosity rather than charisma.
Subscribe if you’re ready to stop winging it and start leading with intention.
I Have Some Questions...
072: "Must Capitalism Be Realigned Toward More Desired Outcomes?" (lessons from Dr. Helmut Love)
🧠Erik’s Take
In this solo reflection, Erik recaps and wrestles with the high-stakes conversation he had with Dr. Helmut Love — a guest who isn’t afraid to bring politically charged topics to the table. From socialism and wealth inequality to the role of capitalism in solving human problems, Erik walks through his own reactions, questions, and moments of discomfort.
This episode isn't about endorsing policies — it’s about staying in the room with hard ideas. Erik unpacks what it felt like to challenge a mayoral candidate on nuanced economic claims, the surprising clarity he found in Helmut’s thinking, and how we might actually do something better with the systems we have, if we had the courage to rethink how they work.
🎯 Top Insights from the Interview
- "Where socialism worked" isn’t about economic models — it’s about trust and proximity in small communities
- The wealth gap becomes a moral issue when its existence is paired with ineffective mechanisms for redistributing or repurposing wealth
- Capitalism can do better — but only if incentives are aligned toward the outcomes we actually want
- Nonprofits, while well-intentioned, often fail to solve problems at scale — and businesses might be better equipped to take on that challenge
- The private prison conversation reveals how easily good ideas can be corrupted by bad incentives — and why that's a design flaw, not a moral indictment
🧩 The Personal Layer
- Erik admits he rarely talks politics on the show — but he leaned in because the conversation demanded it.
- His willingness to stay curious even when he disagrees shows how hosts can challenge without condemning.
- The phrase “Why is the wealth gap bad?” wasn’t rhetorical — it was an invitation to dig beneath slogans and get to real meaning.
- This episode reflects Erik’s deeper coaching philosophy: that we grow by naming tensions, not avoiding them.
🧰 From Insight to Action
- Question your reactions. When you hear a charged word like “socialism,” pause and ask what the speaker actually means.
- Evaluate incentives. Whether it’s a prison, nonprofit, or business — follow the reward structure to understand the behavior.
- Use “why” as a tool, not a weapon. Asking “Why is the wealth gap bad?” opened up more truth than assuming everyone agrees.
- Talk across difference. Growth lives in respectful tension, especially in leadership conversations.
- Design for the outcome you want. Whether in systems or relationships, align structure with intention.
🗣️ Notable Quotes
“The closer we are to someone, the more socialistic we behave. That’s true in families. That’s true in tribes.”
“Why is the wealth gap bad? I wasn’t saying it’s not bad — I just wanted a real answer.”
“Wealth itself isn’t the problem. It’s the ineffectiveness of how we’re using it that breaks trust.”
“It’s easy to make a strawman out of capitalism. It’s harder to admit that we haven’t tried to do it well.”
“We don’t need to agree — we just need to stay in the conversation.”