.png)
I Have Some Questions...
Most people know the headline of a leader’s story. Few know the path it took to get there. This podcast goes beyond titles, book launches and business wins, to explore the lived journey behind the thought leader.
Through deep, unhurried conversations, we uncover the moments that shaped them—the doubts, pivots, convictions, and quiet breakthroughs that built their body of work.
Each episode features authors, coaches, executives, and bold thinkers who have forged their own path. Instead of rehearsed talking points, they’re invited into a space where thoughtful questions unlock something more human. The result is a layered conversation that reveals not just what they preach, but how they became the kind of person who can teach it.
Because we believe the best stories aren’t always told—they’re revealed. And when brilliant people are given the right questions and the room to answer them fully, what emerges is insight you can feel, frameworks you can apply, and a deeper understanding of what it truly takes to lead, create, and contribute at a meaningful level.
I Have Some Questions...
183: "Kids Are Intuitively Hacking AI With Their Voice, Not Their Keyboard" ft. Justin Coats
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
Erik shares how he’s running a week-one “vibe coding” summer curriculum for his 10- and 7-year-old daughters using voice-first ChatGPT. He and Justin unpack what’s working, what friction to watch for, and how to think about learning, iteration, and human responsibility as AI becomes the new interface.
🧭 Conversation Highlights
- Erik’s kids start with voice prompts to generate images, then turn them into stories and comic panels. When they hit “out of ideas,” they switch to a question-driven loop.
- Justin connects voice interaction to a future where typing may matter less, especially compared to the speed and friction adults experience when typing vs speaking.
- Erik explains how he designed the curriculum to teach creativity in steps: character ideas, then world-building and story arcs, then tools like Scratch.
- They debate “creation” and responsibility: Erik pushes that he created the curriculum using a tool, while Justin emphasizes co-creation language and the need to define responsibility clearly.
💡 Key Takeaways
- Voice-first prompting reduced friction and boosted creative iteration for kids, without requiring typing skills as a constraint.
- A curriculum that gives kids a narrative “vehicle” (character, world, arc) is more effective than letting them only “play” with the tool.
- Guardrails matter: AI should support thinking, questions, and drafts, but kids still need to physically do the writing to keep the skill building.
- Ownership and responsibility should stay human-centered until AI can be held accountable for outcomes, not just outputs.
❓ Questions That Mattered
- What’s the right sequence for teaching kids creativity with AI tools so they don’t stall out at “what do I make?”
- How should adults think about the shift from typing to speaking as the primary interface with AI?
- Where do we draw the line between using AI as a thinking partner versus outsourcing the actual work (like story writing)?
- When AI helps generate curriculum or content, what does “created by” actually mean, and who is responsible for downstream impact?
🗣️ Notable Quotes
- “There’s no wrong answers, there’s no test. It’s just… I come up with an idea, I see it.”
- “If you create your digital baby, you didn’t do any of those things. It has to go do those things on its own.”
- “It really seems like creativity tends to be a function of speed.”
- “Until I can hold the AI responsible for something it created, I’m not confident I could use the language that it created something.”
🔗 Links & Resources