Coffee & Crime Stories
Coffee & Crime Stories
Grab your favorite mug and settle in for a conversation about the cases that captivate us all.
Welcome to Coffee & Crime Stories, where we break down true crime cases in the same way you'd discuss them with a friend over coffee. No dramatic music, no sensationalism – just clear, thoughtful conversations that help you understand what really happened.
Hosted by a practicing attorney, Coffee & Crime Stories offers a unique legal perspective on the cases that make headlines. Each episode, we dive deep into a different case, walking through the timeline, examining the evidence, and exploring the psychology behind the crime. With insights from the legal field, we'll help you understand not just what happened, but how the justice system responds to these crimes.
Whether it's a headline-grabbing murder, a puzzling disappearance, or a case that's been cold for decades, we'll help you make sense of the facts and understand how these crimes unfolded. Our legal background allows us to break down complex courtroom procedures, explain legal terminology, and provide context that you won't find in other true crime podcasts.
Perfect for your morning commute, lunch break, or whenever you need a true crime fix, Coffee & Crime Stories treats these real cases with the respect they deserve while satisfying your curiosity about the darker side of human nature.
So pour yourself a cup, get comfortable, and let's talk crime.
Coffee & Crime Stories
Laci Peterson murder case
The sources provide a comprehensive overview of the Laci Peterson murder case and the trial and appeals of her husband, Scott Peterson, focusing on the events surrounding her 2002 disappearance. They outline the prosecution’s circumstantial evidence, such as Peterson's affair, his suspicious behavior, and the timeline of events that led to his conviction for the murder of Laci and their unborn son, Conner. Multiple sources also detail the ongoing legal efforts by the Los Angeles Innocence Project (LAIP) to challenge the conviction by introducing purported new evidence and questioning the integrity of the original forensic science and police investigation. Furthermore, the texts explore the complex history of Peterson’s appeals and resentencing, highlighting the conflicting public and legal opinions regarding his guilt and the fairness of his trial proceedings.