Don't be fooled, there is NO peace deal + Thomas Massie LOST | ZFS 70

I was in Florence, Kentucky when Thomas Massie lost. I was running an exit poll outside Seabrook Elementary. I watched it happen in real time. And I need to talk about it.

The creators who showed up generated 2.2 billion views in six days. We out-viewed the $30 million AIPAC machine on a national scale. But that money was never aimed at the nation. It was aimed directly at 310,000 registered Republicans in that one district. Mailboxes. Home phones. Television sets. Boomers. And it worked. That race was not rigged in the ballot box. It was rigged long before anyone showed up to vote.

On top of that we are breaking down this so called Iran peace deal that has now been floated five times. The S&P 500 is at record highs, ten year treasury yields are screaming inflation is coming, and the goal of these negotiations as stated by Marco Rubio is just to get back to where things were before the war started. So what exactly did we gain?

And to close things out we are going deep on the Fox News interview that may or may not have featured a masked actor posing as Admiral Robert Harward. I did not plan to go there. We went there.

Source List:
https://x.com/search?q=trump%20iran%20blockade&src=typed_query
https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/crude-oil
https://x.com/HormuzLetter/status/2057535441117773965
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116596094940250402
https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/iran-war-trump-us-peace-talks-strait-of-hormuz-control/
https://x.com/Macrobysunil/status/2057818163426037847
https://x.com/MarioNawfal/status/2057762643419795680
https://x.com/LeadingReport/status/2057840849048781108
https://x.com/ErikSperling/status/2057584386938122706
https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/2057831520316854731
https://x.com/GlobalMktObserv/status/2057805745224122378
https://x.com/Barchart/status/2057513837872726209
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MORTGAGE30US
https://x.com/Barchart/status/2057517635953418335
https://x.com/OunkaOnX/status/2056927968413601795
https://x.com/MassieforKY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X06b8rITwRE

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:12

Joe say hello to the people.

SPEAKER_13 0:16

Hello. So many buttons to hit, dude. Lots of buttons. In a spaceship.

SPEAKER_10 0:27

Guys, we have a lot to talk about today. We are going to talk about what's going on in Iran. We have a potential peace deal, apparently, on the docket. We also have economic moves that we're going to walk through. Not just the SP 500, but oil and also the response apparently from Iran to these peace deals. Is this just another ploy for oil shorters to have their opportunity to make money? I don't know. It's happened five times already, so I think there's some evidence toward it. We're going to walk through the patterns that are unfolding there, as well as we spent last week in Kentucky, Florence, Kentucky, the fourth district of northern Kentucky, to watch APAC and Israel take over the last potential glimpse of hope we had at having the American people's voice be stronger than the elites and the billionaires. I'm going to talk about that. I know there's a lot of talk on whether or not it was rigged. I have a very firm opinion on that that we're going to share toward the end of this podcast. Before we get into the episode, I want to quickly thank you. If you were listening to this episode or watching over on Spotify or YouTube, thank you so much. I know many of you have come over from TikTok, Instagram, Facebook to now view our longer form content. We've generated now close to a million watches over on Spotify. I never thought this was going to happen. And those of you that are supporting us as the algorithm is actively fighting us over on YouTube, you can try. Try Googling one of our videos. You're going to have a hard time finding it unless you use our name. Thank you for being here. You are actively pushing against the algorithm with us. If you choose to like, if you choose to subscribe, hit any of the buttons. We love you for that. And for those of you that appreciate the fact that we are independent and are remaining such, with no advertising within our work, uh, you can help continue to make that happen by being one of the members of our dollar club with uh a dollar a month being an option, with some even supporting $10 a month to continue to create a world where we can remain independent in facing the truth of our economy, the history of what made us what we are today, and honestly, just the truth through all the madness. Love you so much for being here and supporting. And if you so choose to subscribe to this channel, we hope that we can continue to bring you clear-cut, easy to digest information on what's going on in the world, why it matters, and what you can do about it. Love you so much. Mean it. Let's get into the episode. Let's start as we always do. Let's look at those markets. Let's bring up the SP 500, Joe. So here we have SP 500 peaking now to a new record as of this morning. $7,494.27. Oh, 91 cents. Can we bring that to the one-month mark right there? That one month clicker. We can see it is just scooting on up. Can we back it up to six months real fast? We'll see the dip that came from the war beginning. But as we know, we've already won the war. We've already won the war multiple times. So the SP 500 is trading off of that and the potential at inflation. Now, this inflation isn't just beneficial to stock market holders, isn't just beneficial to those that hold assets. It's also beneficial to you in terms of getting a mortgage, getting a car loan. We're gonna discuss that in a moment because inflation has a lot to do with what's going on in the bond markets. And those that are following the bond markets closely are signaling big issues in the future. 10-year treasury yield is what we're mentioning here. 10-year treasury yield now sitting at 4572, up 0.04% since when we began this podcast. And I wanted to bring up this little green dashed line. So for my video viewers, you can see the green dashed line moving horizontally along the graph. For my audio listeners, I'd like to explain. The 10-year treasury yield we're sitting at right now is nearing all-time highs, at least within the modern era. We could see that the dot-com bubble, 2008 great financial crisis, and combing ourselves away from COVID's great inflation are the only times we've seen rates this high. Now, this is important because it determines what mortgage rate you're gonna pay, it determines what your credit card rate's gonna be, it determines anything that you're looking to finance, what the rate's gonna be. And as long as we are at war and inflation is the bane of our future existence, investors are gonna demand more for their money. That's what a bond yield is. They want more money, and so they're going to claim a higher yield due to the fact that inflation is in the near future. Why? Because if they get a yield that is only, let's say, two and a half, three percent, well, that simply means inflation's gonna rip into their investment completely if there's three, four, five percent inflation. So when we see higher yields, know that inflation and weakening in the dollar is being priced in. Also, quite a bit of unknown in what's going on in straight up for moose. With that being said, let's move into what is going on in straight up or moose. This war in Iran, this skirmish, this battle, because apparently there is a deal that is being negotiated. According to the Al-Arabia English page over on Twitter, how much I jacked that one up, Joe.

SPEAKER_13 5:32

I think it's just Arabia.

SPEAKER_10 5:34

Arabia? That's probably what it is, Arabia. Breaking the final draft of a possible agreement between the United States and Iran, mediated by Pakistan, is expected to be announced within hours, according to the Al Arabia sources. The key terms include the following A final draft of possible US Iran agreement by Pakistan could be announced within hours, immediate, comprehensive, unconditional ceasefire on all fronts, including land, sea, and air, mutual commitment not to target military, civilian, or economic infrastructure, end military operations and halt media war, commitments to respect sovereignty, territorial integrity, and non-interference in international affairs, guaranteed freedoms of navigation in the Arabian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz, joint mechanism to monitor implementation of said implementation of what? Implementation of them being able to operate out of the strait again and resolve disputes. Negotiations on outstanding issues would begin within seven days, gradual lifting of U.S. sanctions in exchange for Iranian's commitment to the terms of the agreement, and a draft agreement that reaffirms compliance with international law and the UN charter. The agreement would take effect immediately once officially announced by both sides. Now, I don't want to be a pessimist, but I feel like we've watched this pattern unfold a couple times. I don't think I'm crazy, Joe. I mean, what do you think when we see this pattern happen again? It seems once again we're nearing end of week, Thursday, Friday, markets open, and we get this announcement that there's a peace deal. At least one being negotiated. And Iran, based off their media, they're kind of quiet. And we do have some sources saying that there is no deal. So do do we think this one's any different, Joe?

SPEAKER_13 7:20

Can only hope so.

SPEAKER_10 7:22

Agreed. Can only hope. Can only hope is a good way of putting it. But is there any actual like if you're putting your money on the Calchi betting apps? I mean, are you are you betting for this being the last one, the legit one, that actually creates peace again, opens up the strait, gets us back to normal?

SPEAKER_13 7:41

I mean, if I'm betting on Calci apps, I'm just I'm trying to follow whatever insider is gonna make that bet first. I don't think you should bet anything unless you're in the room. Um I I guess in my mind I gotta think how many times do you try the same thing and keep failing before you get it right? So I I think statistically each attempt sh should have a higher chance of working. Like the US can't fail at negotiations 40 times in a row, right?

SPEAKER_10 8:11

You'd think you'd think, or at least we couldn't state that the negotiations are at a certain stage when they're not 30, 40 times. Because it seems that we've done that at least seven, eight, maybe more times.

SPEAKER_13 8:25

It's funny though, now that I said it out loud, I'm like, of course we can. They've already done it. Why wouldn't they just keep doing it forever? There's literally no punishment for them not following through on what they say they're gonna do.

SPEAKER_10 8:37

And we'll speculate a bit, but we do have some language coming out of the RGC that leans toward this isn't legit. If you followed the show, we've we've we've we've actually called this pretty closely as it's been unfolding as to what's more than likely gonna happen. We've we're still staunch on the fact that the economy via food and fuel shortages is going to be a uh a more expensive economy, at the very least for America, if not the world, come August and September.

SPEAKER_13 9:02

But if we go to our next one, I was gonna say the one thing I'll say too that's interesting is the the bullet that struck me is gradual lifting of US sanctions in exchange for Iran's commitment to the terms of the agreement. Because the terms of the agreement are based around the Gulf, the strait, the Gulf of Oman, um us having some level of involvement with them and monitoring the Gulf and resolving disputes in the future. But is this US sanctions that Trump put in place in April, or is this the sanctions that I believe these are the sanctions that have been in place since Obama. So it's interesting. Yeah, if you're Iran and you're basically in a position where you can now get sanctions lifted from previous administrations because it sounds like Iran kind of has us by the balls because of that bullet point.

SPEAKER_10 9:57

Well, we've we've seen in prior RRGC and Iranian statements that any deal that does not revolve around two things will not be accepted. One, reparations. They need reparations, they want to gain those reparations from the damage to their infrastructure via tolls. So I don't see that changing. And we're very staunchly against them having any form of tolling system, especially because they're using Chinese currency too. They're not using the petrol dollar. That's a huge deal for us. And the other is these frozen assets, which there are trillions of dollars apparently of frozen assets via the Obama administration and since that are basically constraining the economy of Iran. That's that's the point of these sanctions. It's to constrain trade, it's to constrain their growth economically. They've stated that they want these reparations immediately and that they want their assets unfrozen. So I I guess I again am pessimistic at a deal when that's not involved in the deal structure. It it seems like they won't take a deal without that, but yet we're touting a deal that doesn't have that. Does that make sense?

SPEAKER_13 11:02

Well, that's why that bullet point kind of says it does, because we're lifting U.S. sanctions, and if you think they're Obama-era sanctions, it just seems like we did all this with a thing of being like they can't have a nuke, and Iran's whole message the whole time is we're ready, we're standing our ground, we're not backing down, and now we're in a position where they're negotiating, lifting those sanctions. So they're actually economically winning the war from a negotiation.

SPEAKER_10 11:27

I mean, we keep we keep talking about the like the bar of of how we measure a victory has kept getting lower, it's kept going lower, and now we're to the point where if if we unfreeze these assets, if we create some form of sanction lifting or or allowing for them to basically gain some some value from this to be able to fix all the things that have been destroyed, these reparations, if we're paying out reparations and unfreezing assets, all to just get the straight open that was already open before the war, it does seem like we didn't gain anything in that, is what you're saying.

SPEAKER_13 12:09

Yeah, and and they are. I saw a clip from Marco Rubio saying that the goal right now is just to get into a place where you were before all this started. And somebody commented it's interesting to say that oh, we're trying to end the Iran war by being exactly how it was before it started. Why did we even do it then?

SPEAKER_10 12:27

We've won though, brother. We've already won the war. Amen, brother. We've already won the war. Let's hear from Donald Trump. This was yesterday, uh, in a White House briefing where he was discussing the blockade. Let's see what he says.

SPEAKER_00 12:43

And they're getting no business, and as you know, they're not doing well economically, financially. They're not doing any business because of the blockade. They want to make a deal. We have been speaking to them, but they don't even know who's leaving the country. They're in turmoil.

SPEAKER_10 13:01

Another quote uh that's happened multiple times is Iran is desperate to make a deal. We haven't seen that desperateness really come out, though, of the IRGC or any form of Iranian leadership or out of the Pakistani-led negotiation tables. We haven't heard of this desperation being reciprocated by the other party. It doesn't seem desperate. I mean, of course, we're not in the rooms that are having these conversations. I'm not on the phone with the IRGC leaders or whoever he's speaking to, or Rubio or Vance or Kushner, whoever they're talking to. Maybe they're getting a different story. But just a week and a half ago, we were talking on the show where Trump said we're not even close to in-person negotiations. We're not ready for that. Even though just two weeks prior, we were set up to have in-person negotiations. So it seemed like we were backtracking. Seemed like there was less power that we had than we had just two weeks prior. And again, what we're discussing in this peace deal doesn't line up with what in prior statements they have said, Iran has said, that they want. Now, of course, this is negotiation, and maybe by us holding down the blockade and strangling their economy, that they're going to become more and more desperate to make a deal that maybe is more favorable, favorable to America. But to think that there's going to be a deal that comes out of this where we're not giving them more than what they already had before this happened, I think is silly at this point. I think there's no, we're in a juxtaposition, we're in a quagmire, we're in a spot where we're going to lose something. We're going to be in a in a in a lose negotiate, a losing negotiation where we're giving more than we ever needed to give them prior to this war beginning. We have not been able to stop their uh war efforts. We've not been able to open up the strait. We've not been able to decimate their Navy, even though we claim we have. We've not been able to decimate their missile infrastructure, even though we claim we have. And we've not been able to force this social revolt amongst the people, which we claimed would happen immediately. All while Bimi Nanyahu is pushing us to strike Iran once again. He stated multiple times, and also on 60 minutes, that the war in Iran is not done. And Israel has a lot more work to be done. Israel also has been continually bombing Lebanon, which Iran stated cannot continue to happen if there's ever going to be peace negotiations. And as of this morning, the death tolls estimated to now be over 3,000 individuals in South Lebanon alone. With 10 deaths coming just three hours ago that were reported. So are we doing anything that is showing Iran in good faith that we want this war to end? Is Israel doing anything that is showing Iran that we're in good faith for wanting this to end? I just don't think we are. And it's affecting our economy. This is crude oil. Crude oil by the barrel, now trading at around $95. This did peak up as Iran's negotiations seemed to be getting a little bit more flimsy. Then we put out this report that now there's apparently a deal on the table. And if you look at all these spikes and drops and everything in between, it it goes with sentiment. All of these spikes, all of these dips have moved with tweets. They've moved with press conferences. Have they moved with actual deals? No. Because we haven't had in-person negotiations yet. Still, we're how how many how many months into this now? A month and a half? Almost two? From February 28th, February, March, April. Oh my gosh, no, two and a half months into this. Two and a half months into this. So we're two and a half months in. We're not meeting in person. We're not putting out anything that is making me feel like, again, we're gonna get out of this by winning, quote unquote, anything. The goal is simply to get us back to where we were and then some. So that's not a win. I and I don't get how anyone can watch what's going on in Iran and think that we're a big, strong military force or that we're winning this. I think you're personally crazy. If you've watched this war unfold, you've watched this skirmish, this battle, this endeavor we've had toward, whatever you want to define it. Oh, it's like it's not a war, it's a it's a it's a military, it's a military effort. It's not a war, it's a mission. Whatever. People are dying, they're attacking us, we're attacking them. There's other proxy battles going on. This is a war, and this war is still going. It's not done. It's not done. So let's read this tweet. This is coming out of the Hormuz letter. Now, they've been, I'd say about like 80, 85% accurate with what's been going on. So we won't take it with a we'll take that with a grain of salt, the Hormuz letter. But says breaking, coming out this morning, or I'm sorry, yesterday afternoon, that Iranian sources close to the negotiating team says claims of a final draft for the U.S.-Iran agreement are indeed false. The talks are in a permanent deadlock, quote unquote, due to U.S. insistence on nuclear negotiations. Iran has, quote, no desire to even continue negotiations, unquote. And the conflict, quote, could start at any moment, unquote. Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson, spokesperson, Esmail Bagahai, Bagai, something, has also called today's claims of nuclear discussions merely media speculation. And forgive me for siding with Iranian media on hey, we've seen this happen before. It's not crazy to say that this is all for media speculation. We've watched it happen multiple times where Trump will lay out a humongous threat against their community, against their entire country, stating I'm gonna erase an entire community from the world. I'm just gonna erase 80 million people. We're gonna see an orange glow coming out of Iran, that they're desperate for a deal. When does that come to fruition? I haven't seen evidence. I just want to see evidence that that's true. For me to believe it, and I don't see the evidence. Do you see the evidence? I don't see the evidence. This is Trump, May 18th, 2026, 10 40 a.m., stating if Iran surrenders, admits their navy is gone and resting at the bottom of the sea, and their Air Force is no longer with us, and if their entire military walks out of Tehran, weapons dropped and hands held high, each shouting, I surrender, I surrender, while wildly waving the representative white flag, and if their entire remaining leadership signs all necessary quote unquote documents of surrender and admit their defeat to the great power and force of the magnificent USA, the failing New York Times, and the China Street Journal, the Wall Street Journal, corrupt and now irrelevant CNN, and all other members of the fake news media will headline that Iran had a masterful and brilliant victory over the United States of America. It wasn't even close. That was one sentence, by the way. The Democrats, I said that how he spelled how he spelled it. The Democrats and media have totally lost their way. They've gone absolutely crazy with three exclamation points. President DJT. I could use a few more periods in all these. But again, uh it's it's the same kind of conversation. It's the same stuff happening, it's the same language, it's the same words without any actual confirmation of what's being said. The market is trading on vibes. As we saw in the SP 500, we're trading at all-time highs, all while the war is still going on. I get that we're trading off inflation, I get that we're trading off the weakness of the dollar, and I get that we're we're trading on the thought process of this war ending. But it does seem like the entire SP 500 no longer cares about this war. And I gotta ask, why? Why when it's clear and obvious that we're in this quagmire of lies and media to try to convince a people that we're the ones winning, that we're supposed to be there, that somehow this is benefiting you as an American. Can I ask, how is this war benefiting you as an American? How is this war benefiting your pocketbook? How's this war benefiting your portfolios? How's this war benefiting your day-to-day life? How's this war benefiting you? Well, Zach, I don't want Iran to have a nuclear weapon. Look, I don't want any crazy terrorists having a nuclear weapon, but could we look in the mirror like Michael Jackson suggested when we talk about crazy individuals and countries holding nuclear weaponry? I think we could look in the mirror a little bit. I think we could look in the Middle Eastern mirror of Israel a little bit. I think there are other countries that we could look at a bit speculatively around why uh why they have nuclear weaponry, why they seem to be holding it over other countries' head, like when we threatened an entire nation to use a nuke on them. We did multiple times. So who's the crazy one with the nukes? Is all I ask. Let's go on to our next one. This coming out of CBS. Now, this came in at 10 14 a.m. This is just an hour and a half before we're shooting this. Uh, it says Iran calls US sanctioning its ambassador in Lebanon unlawful and shameless.

SPEAKER_11 21:55

Now I want to put us in a position real quick. If you and I are negotiating

SPEAKER_10 22:01

Let's say uh let's say around a Pokemon card trade. We're discussing Pokemon card trading. You want my Pikachu? First edition. It's a glowy. I want your Charmeleon. Big Charmeleon guy. Char Charmander's cool. Charizard. Yeah, he's super cool. But Charmeleon, right in the middle. I rock with Charmeleon. And we're negotiating this uh this deal, right? And I come to uh you, an outside party who knows both of us, and I say, you know, yeah, I think he's gonna make this trade. It's a great trade. It's a trade that's gonna benefit him beautifully. I really want him to make this trade. It's gonna happen anytime soon. I know it. Uh that he's begging for this trade, actually. And then you go to the other party and he says, Um, actually, this guy's being uh a bit uh shameless in his negotiating tactics. He he continues to say things that aren't true and he's acting in bad interest. Uh frankly, I don't I don't know what's gonna happen, but he's uh he's being a bit of a dick, to be honest with you. Now, if you were to talk to both of us and you were to hear that side and this side, would you think that we're any close to anywhere closer to a deal? Would you think that if I said we're really, really close to a deal, but then you talk to the other party and they say actually they're kind of being a douchebag, that we're anywhere close to a deal on those Pokemon cards? Those Pokemon, that little Pokemon trade? You think we're close to exchanging cards? I don't think so. I don't think so. I would think you'd use your common sense to say you two don't seem to be on the same page here. And so here's a quote from Iranian officials around what's going on in Lebanon. And again, I know there's been so much muzzle velocity of media, but we did state or uh Iranian media did state that so long as Israel is fighting Lebanon and fighting I say loosely because Lebanon doesn't seem to be putting up too much of a fight back, that as long as uh the Lebanese people are being subjected to this violence, that a peace of deal can't happen. A peace agreement just isn't on the table. So forgive me for wondering why we think that there's a deal coming up when ten deaths just happened here this morning. The death tolls over 3,000. And it says here in this article that the U.S. decision to sanction Iran's ambassador to Lebanon is quote unquote unlawful and shameless. The U.S. announced sanctions Thursday against a group of Hezbollah-affiliated parliamentarians, state security officials, and allies of the militant group, including the Iranian ambassador, for allegedly seeking to preserve the Iranian background's influence over Lebanese state institutions and obstruct disarmament efforts. It was the first time Washington has sanctioned sitting Lebanese state security officials, one from the country's general security agency and the other a military intelligence officer, both of whom the U.S. Treasury accused of providing Hezbollah with quote unquote illicit support and intelligence during the ongoing effort. Now, Iran's foreign officials officials gotta learn how to talk. Iran's foreign affairs ministry said Friday that the sanctioning of the country's envoy in Beut, Mohammed Razah Shabani, was quote unquote yet another example of the lawlessness disregard of the American ruling establishment for the establishment principles of international law. It has also condemned the sanctioning of Hezbollah's representatives and the U.S. announcement, which for the first time, including a serving Lebanese army officer, came as pressure mounts on Barut to take more decisive action to disarm Hezbollah among Iran's most powerful proxy groups in the region. Can we just talk about the language that's being used here? Unlawful and shameless. Can we scoot up again? Yet another example of lawlessness and disregard. This doesn't sound like a group that's in love with the way that we're doing things. It doesn't sound like a group that's really in bed with how we're negotiating. If they're calling us unlawful, if we're in complete disregard to their needs, that we're we're just acting in a way that is very American. We're being shameless. Or at least what that's what they're saying towards people dying. Which I believe the people dying in an unneeded war on account for a country that isn't even involved with ours, because we're there for Israel, not for us, just to be clear.

SPEAKER_12 26:29

It seems to me that they're not on the same page with us.

SPEAKER_10 26:33

That they're actively still stating the same exact things they've been stating for weeks. So do I think this peace agreement's legit? No, I don't, I don't, I don't. And I hope before we even release this podcast, that there's already a deal signed and we've agreed and it's done, and there won't be any boots on ground. We don't worry about the uranium anymore. Nobody's throwing bombs at each other, and people stop dying. Would love that. I just don't frankly think it's gonna happen. Let's go over to our next tab and let's continue to go through this because other countries seemingly are thinking similarly about our country. Specifically, our country's debt. Now we mentioned bonds earlier. Now, bonds are trading at extremely high yields. Four and a half percent for a 10-year treasure yield. What that means in English is if you hold 10 years worth of our country's debt, you're gonna get paid 4.5% on that. Now, when that rate goes higher, it's uh more lucrative for an investor to hold. If you're only getting a 3% return, that's less money. If you're getting a 4.5% return, that's more money. So in theory, it should be a more lucrative investment to get into. Holding bonds right now, buying up bonds right now, American bonds, you're gonna get higher yield than you could have gotten really for the last at least six years. So why would they be selling? Is my question. This from the macro liquidity by Sun Sil Ready on Twitter. After the Iran War began, many foreign country holders started cutting treasury exposure aggressively. Big sellers being Japan, selling off 3.85% of their total debt to the tune of 47.7 billion, China, 41 billion, Taiwan, 12 billion, Saudi Arabia, 10 billion, India, the UAE, Norway, Singapore, the biggest seller in dollar terms being Japan. Foreign treasury holdings fell from 9.48 trillion in February to just 9.35 trillion in March, nearly 130 billion sold in one month. Guys, we've been tracking bond sales. China's been in that seller, Japan's been in that seller, but people don't trust our debt anymore, and they're selling. What does that say? What does it say when the barometer for the the most unpartisan way that we could look at our economy is the bond market? And it might not sound sexy. It's like I want to look at the SP 500, I want to look at Bitcoin, I want to measure it based off of what's going on in different index funds or the AI sector or the tech sector. I would I would much rather look at that as the barometer for the success of our country, but it's just not. The bond market is how we gain actual, true, unbiased international sentiment around our country. And the bond market's screaming. Yields are high, higher than we've seen in in a while, at least for a long period of time. And other countries are net sellers. Those two things normally don't go in tandem. When rates go higher, normally they're being bought up at a higher rate. Why? Because you can get more money. You can make more money, it's an investment. When you can make a higher return on investment, normally it yields more aggressive investment. But yet the exact opposite's happening. This is Mario Naufall, who I've been following on Twitter for the past three months. I'd say again, about 90% accurate in terms of what's been going on. It's been pretty, pretty clean cut. And he's stating that the Iranians and the Americans have two core obstacles that are blocking any deal from happening for the straight of four moves and the end of this war. He says the U.S. wants the nuclear issue addressed immediately. Iran wants a 30-day trust building period. And the U.S. rejects Iran's proposed toll system for the straight of four moves. But as we've heard earlier, Iran has stated they need this. They have already created the infrastructure around accepting Chinese currency for that tolling system as people move barrels. I believe it's one dollar per barrel of oil. Maybe it's two dollars. I think it's one dollar per barrel of oil. So again, I don't see a negotiation that's close to coming to fruition. I see us still having very, very juxtaposed uh opinions on how this should end. I see very, very different viewpoints on how this should end. Jim, I I g I feel like I'm saying the same thing every every week at this point. What are you what are your thoughts on this or everything we're talking about?

SPEAKER_13 31:10

Yeah, I was just looking at this uh quote he I guess quote tweeted this. Marco Rubio, I'm not on X or whatever it's called now. Um but yeah, Senator or Secretary Rubio is saying the president views disappointment at some of our NATO allies and their response to our operations in the Middle East. And I can't help but think that the administration, the Republican Party, Trump, they just have a different view, not only of this conflict, but the world. Because when you look at NATO and you look at the US, if the majority of NATO allies are saying, Yeah, we don't think we should be doing this and participating in this, and we're just going, why aren't you following us? Like all of those countries are also elected officials that have to answer to their constituents and their people, right? And if you go online, most of Europe is not in support of the way the US operates its global imperialist machine. But despite that, a lot of these countries and allies have continued to support us and donate to these efforts. I put in air quotes, I don't really know how to describe them, but the bombing and striking of the Middle Eastern countries over the past 25 years. And it seems that there's no one there that is looking at it and going, why is everyone else seeing it a different way than we are? They're going, oh, we're really disappointed that all of these other governments aren't blindly or loyally following our lead for our constituents. And it I feel like that's kind of what I get from like Trump's tweet in his Truth Social, where he's like, the failing New York Times, Zionist owned, the China Street Journal, that's owned by Dow. I thought we wanted the Dow to only go up. Why are we insulting it? Uh, irrelevant CNN owned by Zionist media. So he's literally calling names to things that are his allies, and we know they're his allies, and they've done it time and time again. This article from CBS News that's trying to slam Iran for not um Lebanon not increasing their sanctions against Hezbollah that's owned by Bari Weiss, who, if you do one good Google search, you'll learn what she's all about. It just seems more and more. They just have a complete distorted worldview, and they're sticking to it. They're they believe it so my yeah, passionately, yeah, they're unable to step back and go, why are all of our NATO allies not aligned with us on this?

SPEAKER_10 33:45

Right.

SPEAKER_13 33:45

That's the part that's wild.

SPEAKER_10 33:47

And it's worth questioning.

SPEAKER_13 33:48

No amount of breaking it down seems to get through to them.

SPEAKER_10 33:51

It's worth questioning when we see French officials, English officials, Spaniard officials, not just with Iran, but also we can look back at Greenland. No support from the EU nations in terms of what we were trying to do with Greenland, no support in terms of what's going on in Iran. We asked them to come support our blockade. And of course, with the muzzle velocity, it's very easy to forget that just recently, I think two, two and a half weeks ago, we tried to launch a new military effort to get people out of the strait. And Britain, the UAE, Saudi Arabia said, nope, can't use our airfields for that. So we don't have support of the rest of these countries, and we also see it happening in the bond market.

SPEAKER_13 34:28

That's what I was gonna say. The we talk about them selling off our bonds. If you really believe in something, you put your money where your mouth is. They're taking their money out of it.

SPEAKER_10 34:35

Yes. So what am I supposed to look at that shows any form of like economic alignment with what they're stating? Because the money, it's like follow the money, right? Follow the money and you find the answers. We do that on this channel. That's really what we stick to. When I follow the money here, it shows clearly that the American empire of dominance is dying under the weight of our own ignorance. We we can't get over the fact that maybe we made a fool of ourselves in this war. That maybe other countries are just kind of like, I don't know, they're like done with our swagger. They're they're done with, they're done with this American swagger, that we're the cool guys on the block, that we're the security guards of the world, that we're the world infrastructure around the economy, and that everything flows around the dollar and the petrol dollar and our war. I just think other countries are waking up to, why are we doing this? Why are we supporting it? And as other countries are are seeing evidence towards their own beliefs with how we're mishandling Iran, with how we're misquoting our own economy by touting the stock market and these tech stocks, all while normal everyday people can't afford anything. Again, you look at the numbers and you're like, yeah, it seems like things aren't going well. But then you see the GOP state, yeah, things are going great. I get why money's pouring out of the country. And we just watched Kevin Warsh get officially put in for his position as Federal Reserve Chairman. We don't have to go into him, but we watched Donald Trump speak 11. 11. 11 different false numbers around the economy, investment into our economy, record highs, record lows. I mean, several different times you say, oh, yeah, we have a record high amount of investment coming in from the UAE. We have $2 trillion coming in. Look that up. That's not true. We have $18 trillion in investment in this country. No, we do not. That's an easy stat to go on and say, yeah, no, that's uh that's not true. Every source says that that's not true. There's so many different times where I see this man get on stage and state an economic stat with full confidence, and it's not true. I just think other people are starting to wake up to that more.

SPEAKER_13 36:45

Yeah, it's you saying follow the money, and like, is it true or not? I was just thinking, too, how they're always like, we have the greatest military. Our military is so strong no one could match it. We're gonna increase our military budget and development by 500.

SPEAKER_10 36:59

That was one of them. He said, I'm one of the only presidents who's fought to decrease the debt, and we're and we're doing a great job at it. But no, we've we've increased the debt by trillions, the deficit by trillions, and we're now going to take money out of other infrastructure that we already had within our budget that was very important. I mean, we we we are increasing the budget by 600 billion dollars. It's an insane number.

SPEAKER_13 37:20

We're the the minimum 1.5 trillion that we desperately need to increase our investment by a record proportion.

SPEAKER_10 37:28

That's how strong we are. That's how strong our economy and how strong our military is, how well respected America is, is that we need to.

SPEAKER_13 37:35

I'm not a businessman. I could be wrong. Maybe successfully, I don't know if Apple spends more in RD than Samsung and Google, but I doubt it based on the market share. You know what I mean? I just feel like when you're on top, there's no reason for you to increase your investment in development so much. That it there's something off in my brain that's and they don't.

SPEAKER_10 37:54

We already know the numbers. There's like 72% of the S P 500 utilize their, or not the SP 500, I'm sorry, the the top side, really the top 10 companies. 71% of the money that they make in profit goes straight into buybacks. Goes straight into pushing it straight back into their own company to the top, to executive board positions, payroll increases for the board, uh, CEO pay, and of course, putting money into their own stock to better inflate it to get high on their own supply. And that's why a lot of people call for this bubble popping in the stock market. Do I think it happens? Maybe, but it's again this thing where Trump constantly, and he did it in this speech as well. You can go back and watch it happen this morning, when brought up with questions around the economy and its strength or lack thereof, always goes back to the Dow, always goes back to the SP 500. And we know that 93% of all the stocks are owned by the top 10%. So it's not really a good gauge for the economy. The stock market is not the economy. All right, let's switch gears. Speaker Johnson had an opportunity to vote for the war effort to basically end. Hal Speaker Johnson canceled that vote to end the conflict in our war, and it became clear Republicans likely did not have the votes to block it, so he called it off.

SPEAKER_13 39:12

Also, for audio listeners, that sound of thumping in the background was Zach slapping his chair. He's fired up about this one.

SPEAKER_10 39:20

It it gets my it gets my blood moving, dude. This is the same guy who literally shut down the government. Okay, I'm sorry. Let me one second. Had to go put on my tinfoil hat. Literally shut down the government to avoid an Epstein file transparency vote. Call it what it is. That's what I think what it was. Same guy now getting in between us, ending this war effort. Let's let's pull a clip from that meet on the uh it's on the next uh next tab. Let's watch this. It says Iran powers vote was about to pass, so the House GOP canceled the vote altogether.

SPEAKER_06 39:56

For what purpose does General Massachusetts seek recognition?

SPEAKER_05 39:59

Mr. Speaker, can you explain to uh the members of the chamber what is happening with the Iran War Powers uh resolution that uh was scheduled to be voted on this evening? Does the gentleman have a parliamentary question? That well, that is my parliamentary inquiry. I just want to know what has happened to with the uh Iran War Powers Resolution.

SPEAKER_06 40:19

The gentleman may consult with your leadership regarding scheduling. Mr.

SPEAKER_05 40:23

Speaker, for the parliamentary inquiry. Are we not voting on it because the American people are sick and tired of this illegal war that it's costing tens of billions of dollars? Gas places are through the roof. People can't afford people can't afford their groceries. Is that going to wanna be Republican? You can be still in the police. Uh the members of the chamber, what is happening with the arena.

SPEAKER_10 41:02

I can respect any Congress member that uses the word balls on Congress floor. That's representative McGovern. McGovern is his name. He's in government and his name's McGovern.

SPEAKER_13 41:13

I uh I had a dentist whose last name was Tooth once, just FYI.

SPEAKER_10 41:17

No way. His last name was Tooth. Yeah. Dentist Tooth?

SPEAKER_13 41:21

Dr. Tooth. He's outside Philly. He had no chance to do anything else. Yeah, just like McGovern. It's like back in the day when people's last names were actually what they did. For McGovern, it was McDonald's franchise owner or the government. Those are his only two options.

SPEAKER_10 41:40

He's just working on the McDonald's board of directors. I'm the McGovernor of ours. So um, what does he mean by the economy is being shaped by this war? Well, we can go to the Kaboisy letter, which we do many times on this show. Great follow on Twitter. It says U.S. consumer sentiment officially falls to its lowest level on record since the data has been tracked back to 1952. Down another 10% in just the last month. Consumers now see inflation rising to potentially 4.8% over the next 12 months. This puts the consumer sentiment index down 21% since February 2026 when the war began. Not even the 1980s saw the consumer sentiment this low. And I don't know why I said the 80s. The 70s was really the worst. So it's lower than even the savings and loan crisis of the 70s. That is significant. That is extremely significant. This is the normal everyday person stating how they feel about what's going on. And as we know, the bottom side of the K does not feel nearly as good as the top side. And since the bottom side is the greater majority than 90% of Americans, it makes complete sense to me that you see this gigantic fall, this humongous fall since the peak really looked like it was in 2020. Only seeing higher numbers in what? Post dot com bubble? Looks like 2002 it peaked up a little bit. This is a number that we can follow. 1999 is what it's showing. 1999. That makes sense. That was also that was when Clinton also had us in a surplus. Shut up. Like it red or blue. That crazy Yahoo. Hey, that's a crazy dude. There's a lot of bad that happened, but at the very least, we were in a surplus. Makes complete sense to me. Again, people are reading the room better than ever. According to Global Markets Investor, China and Japan holdings of U.S. Treasuries are plummeting. Let's just read through this one more time because again, China and Japan being the largest holders of her debt outside of the Cayman Islands. That is a true stat. Look up the Federal Reserve October, Cayman Islands. You'll find a good article. They don't report on it heavy, but it's true. Japan, the largest foreign holder, saw its position decline by forty eight billion dollars, the lowest since December 20th. 2025. China, the third largest holder, saw its holdings fall by 41 billion, lowest since September 2008. China holdings have dropped 109 billion or 14% since the start of 2025. Furthermore, Belgium and Luxembourg, widely regarded as conduits to Chinese sovereign wealth and state-length investment, also saw some declines, with holdings falling from $454 billion down $22 billion to $432 billion. Central banks accounted for the bulk of the overall drop, with foreign officials' accounts falling $108.7 billion to $3.9 trillion. Question is, are the world's largest creditors quietly stepping back from U.S.

SPEAKER_12 44:40

government debt? Maybe. That's who I think. That's what I'm seeing in the numbers.

SPEAKER_10 44:47

What do you think? Go into our next tab. If you're looking to buy a house, this war is affecting you dramatically. This is showcasing the last uh year's worth of the 30-year mortgage. Yeah, the last year or so's worth. Actually, it looks like maybe it's only six months. We've gotten all the way back up to a 6.63% median mortgage rate. For those looking to buy a home, that should excite you. That should excite you. Because in February, as we were seemingly not walking into a war, rates were actually on their way down. They had hit the high five. So median government loans, you could get at about 5.4, 5.5%. Now that's a four, that's a that's a what's it called? That's a uh just a myth. It's Fugazi. It's not real. It's fake. It's not it's not happening. You you're you're not in a world where rates are coming back to those levels. We we we've walked through with the Trump tracker the amount of times it was projected from Trump and his campaign trail that he was gonna cut mortgage rates. He said, guys, I'm gonna get mortgage rates down to the lowest levels. 1%, 2%, 3%. Now it's back on the way up. What gives? Well, what gives is the bond market. Because guess what? This is gonna be crazy. This is gonna be crazy for you here. Look at my eyes, look at my eyes, look at my eyes, look at my eyes. The president doesn't determine mortgage rates. What no? No, what? You're telling me that a man campaigned on doing something that he has no ability to control? Yes, I did. That's exactly what I said. The 30-year mortgage rate is controlled by the 10-year treasury bond. I'll explain exactly how. When banks are issuing 30-year mortgage rates, they have to base it off of what the 10-year treasury yield is. Because guess what? Most people only have mortgages they hold for anywhere between 7 to 12 years. So they base it off 10 years' worth of debt. When that rate is at 4.5%, that bank can't just give you a 4.5% mortgage rate. You might think, well, why not? Well, because the bank has to make money. That's why banks exist. And so they have to put another 1.5 to 2% on top to cover their own fees, the payroll to the mortgage underwriter, the payroll to the mortgage originator, the payroll to the bank itself. So they have to make a profit. So that's why you see mortgage rates in the mid-sixes, all while the 10 years in the mid-4s. Again, the president doesn't affect this. Now, tariff policy, trade wars, actual wars, inflation, all those things are controllable by the executive branch and affect the 10-year treasury yield. But nothing that's happening from the executive branch is leaning the 10-year treasury yield down. None of it. None of it. Inflation is the bane of an investor's existence when they're investing into the bond market. They need to ensure that they're making enough to beat inflation. When you have a projection of 4.8% inflation, man, our tenure is screaming. And it's not just our own. It is Japan, it is China, it is Germany, it is Britain, it is Turkey, it is Australia, it is every other country that issues bonds. They're all screaming. Why? Because no one trusts the worldwide economy right now. Why? Because it's all based on the dollar and it's weakening. And we printed in any hint of the economy wobbling. We're printing right now. They're not announcing it, but it's about $8 billion a week in printing. Do you think other countries love when we're printing dollars? They don't. Here's why. If you're holding a rare, shiny Pikachu card and it's worth a shit ton because there's only a hundred out there, and the last time they released it was in 1995. If who who who who creates Pokemon cards? What company?

SPEAKER_13 48:38

Uh Pokemon International.

SPEAKER_10 48:40

Pokemon International does? Okay, I didn't. Wow, they even run their own thing. Nice. I thought it ran through like tops or something like that or upper deck. Pokemon International. If Pokemon International went out and said, hey, we're actually going to release 5,000 more of these shiny, rare, original Pikachu cards we actually had them in a vault. We're going to sell these off. Now instead of 100, there's 5100. What does that do to the value of your card? It goes down because there's more available. Let me break it down simpler. If you had a Fortnite skin from season one, let's say it's the elf, the Christmas elf. Right? You got your buddy the elf skin running around, hitting clips, rotating, doing what Fortnighters do, building up. And they don't release the skin ever again. It's been six years. They've never released that skin again. How valuable is that skin? I don't know. I don't know what skins be going for. It probably holds more worth than if there was a lot of releases, right? It hasn't been released again. So it's worth something. It's rare. But then what happens if Epic comes out and says, hey, we're re-releasing the uh the elf skin? Anyone can come grab it. What does that do to the value of your investment into that skin? It drops because there's more of it. Whenever we make more dollars, the dollar is worth less. And since we continue to print at any signs of a wobble, the people investing in the infrastructure of our economy, the people holding our dollars, holding our debt, are becoming more and more wary of the long-term ripple effects of us doing that is. We are irresponsibly printing and running trade, or I'm sorry, not trade deficits, spending deficits year after year after year. And again, I think other countries are done with our financial swagger. They're done with it. They don't think we're the cool kid anymore. They don't. We Tim Dylan had a great episode of his last podcast where he's like, we're not, we're not the quarterback anymore of the of the team. We're not the cool kid at high school anymore. We're not the kid that all the girls are ogling after. We're not the person all the nerds wish they were. We're now the weird kid that might have drugs and might also have a gun in his backpack that you want to make sure that you remain friends with because you think he might go crazy at some point. You want to remain in good terms because he's a little whacked out and he's still got some power, but man, uh he might have some drugs in his back pocket and also he might have a gun.

SPEAKER_13 50:59

So we're the Johnny Manzel of quarterbacks.

SPEAKER_10 51:01

The Johnny Manzel. You know I got to go watch him play when he played in the Canadian Football League. No? Yeah, we're in Montreal. He sat on the bench, but I got to see him over there on the bench. I was like, well, how the mighty have fallen. Mr. Football could collapse at any moment.

SPEAKER_12 51:16

That was a hell of a season to watch, though. Let's go to our next tab. Yes, sir. Now, as we talk about debt, it's worth noticing that's worth noticing.

SPEAKER_10 51:31

It's not just this government debt that's struggling. It's not just the debt of your household struggling because auto loan debts, we're seeing increases month over month consistently to now record highs for 60-day delinquencies on cars. We're seeing repos on cars hit records. We're now seeing foreclosures start to pick up in housing, nothing dramatic. We're seeing credit card payments default and at all-time highs in terms of the amount of credit owed per household. We're also seeing private credit falter. We saw that about a month and a half ago, BlackRock was uh requested to have 10 billion taken out of a specific account, and they only allowed about 1.0 billion. It was about 12% of that initial inquiry for withdrawal actually get approved. What that means, what people speculate it means at least, is that BlackRock didn't have enough funds to just throw out all that money and they're withholding full withdrawals. Why? Because private credit is struggling. They've been issuing money over the past five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten years at very low interest rates. Now, rates are much higher. It is much more difficult for private credit to be the godsend. And private credit is simple. It just simply means it's done privately. It means it's not running through a bank. It means it's literally BlackRock says, hey, uh, I'm gonna issue you a loan to my buddy over here. Hey, Steven Schwartzman over at Blackstone, we're gonna issue a loan. It's gonna be done privately between these two companies. We'll issue it at a rate and terms that we determine because we don't have to go through a bank. That's private credit. If you get a loan from your uncle for a thousand bucks to start a landscaping company, which probably isn't enough, that's private credit. Private credit struggling. And if we look at this, oh, we can go back real quick. It says private credit defaults hit record high as interest rates soar. And this is May 21st, an hour ago, as of let's see, uh, when was this posted? 143 yesterday. So this is very, very recent. Can we scroll down? It looks like he posted something else along with this. Posted the actual article. Can we click on that article real quick? Maybe we can get some numbers. I'd like to see some numbers. Oh, don't make us buy it, CNNBC. Don't make us buy it. We're not buying your article. Let's go on to the next one. We're not buying this article. Okay, so I was in Kentucky. I was in Kentucky feeling the craziness that all of us are witnessing. We're witnessing war, we're witnessing all of these other countries not fall in line with America just being the godsend of the world. The American empire does not have near the swagger that it's always had or always claimed to be, even though we keep acting like we do. I got to go to a place where many were calling the last frontier of the people having a voice in this country. The last chance and opportunity at Americans' voices mattering. Votes mattering for that matter. And I've kind of been a big guy for stating I don't believe that votes really matter too heavily. I know I might sound crazy to you. You might disagree with that. I think local elections matter a lot more than the executive, but even at the congressional level, there's only so much power that people have, and we saw it unfold in Kentucky. If you're unaware of what happened in Kentucky, let me break it down for you real quick. So in Kentucky's 4th district, Thomas Massey was running to keep his seat as the congressional representative of northern Kentucky. And in Florence, Kentucky, me and 30 other creators went in to decide to utilize our influence to try to bring out young voters to ensure Thomas Massey did not lose to Israel. What I mean by that is the fact that Israeli lobbyists between Miriam Adelson, APAC, the Republican Jewish Coalition, and MAGA, Kentucky had put in 30.2 billion, I'm sorry, million dollars in order to ensure that an American political position was won by someone of their choosing. An Israeli group of billionaires had decided an American election. And if that doesn't send your blood to a whole nother level of pressure, I don't think you heard that right.

SPEAKER_11 55:53

A foreign country and by the way, substitute the word Israel for any other country.

SPEAKER_12 56:03

China, Australia, Belgium, Singapore, pick one.

SPEAKER_10 56:11

If any other country were to be influencing, like have you ever heard of Egypt trying to influence our American elections? Any other country trying to influence who is going to sit in an American political position, not even the executive branch. We're talking about northern Kentucky. $30 million went into ensure that the boomers were tricked into voting out somebody who is against war, someone who is against foreign spend while our domestic economy is falling apart, someone who created the infrastructure around the Epstein Transparency Act to ensure billionaires are held accountable for the crimes they committed. Why on earth would this person be targeted by Israeli billionaires? I think you might be able to tie some strings together yourself. Thomas Massey would go on to lose this race by a little more than 10,000 votes to a Mr. Ed Galreen. Ed Galreen, former Navy SEAL Army Ranger, who was touted by Trump as being a quote unquote warm body who could fulfill the position that Massey was failing on. Massey also was not backed by TPUSA, which many people found surprising. Erica Kirk went ahead and said, I like this Ed Galreen guy. Even though Charlie Kirk, like him or hate him, loved Thomas Massey. Loved him. Said he was the number one guy in Congress who was still representing the Constitution and Liberty. He loved Thomas Massey. So would Charlie Kirk, if he were still here today, appreciate TPUSA vehemently being against his favorite congressman?

SPEAKER_12 57:49

I don't know.

SPEAKER_10 57:51

You could ask his wife. His wife seems to say that he loved she loved Ed Galrain, that that Charlie would have loved Ed Galrain, but the numbers and the past quotes don't uh suggest that.

SPEAKER_13 58:02

But I will say the guy who activated the young conservative vote being gone for this election seems pretty Yeah, because if there's I've seen some of James Lee's videos.

SPEAKER_10 58:18

If there's anybody who could rally the young conservative vote in America more than Charlie Kirk pre-him being off, I mean I'd like you to point him out. Because I don't think I don't I don't even know who's in second. No one was even close as far as the young Republican or just young conservative because turning point USA really kind of started this, it was almost like a libertarian-ish feel when it started. Obviously, not that today. Here's a video from Thomas Massey as he came out to a crowd, which I was there, for his loss. That's what he's called.

SPEAKER_14 58:59

All right. Concede, and it took a while to find any television. I did get to call through, though. I have I have called and conceded the race. Um we've been honorable the whole time, and we're gonna stay that way.

SPEAKER_10 59:34

All right. Now listen, I know what you want to hear. For those of them have been keeping up with this, I know what you want to hear. Zach, you're a numbers guy you love corruption, you love finding the evil that exists within our government and our political leaders. I do. It's become one of my favorite pastimes. It has surpassed baseball. It's become one of my favorite pastimes. And I know there's been a lot of people because I've gotten the texts, I've gotten the DMs, some very large creators.

SPEAKER_12 1:00:07

Zach. This had to be rigged.

SPEAKER_10 1:00:11

This had to be rigged. The national sentiment around Massey was not represented in this vote at all. There was a record turnout, never before seen in this district. It had to be rigged. Zach, Ed Galreen voided eight debates, stood on zero policy, and whenever he talked to his boomer constituents that even showed up to his rally in the terms of tens, not hundreds or thousands, tens showing up to his rallies. He was just touting his military experience and holding up pictures of him and Reagan, just hitting on the nostalgia of the boomers. There is zero chance he actually won. It had to be rigged.

SPEAKER_12 1:00:50

And I agree with you, it was rigged, but it wasn't rigged. Let me explain.

SPEAKER_10 1:00:56

Before that, can we show uh can we scroll down real quick? Also, Thomas Massey follows me on Twitter now. That's freaking cool. That's freaking cool. Proud of that. We scroll down. This is the uh the shot Thomas Massey had uh as he was walking out. And if we pause it right there, and we'll we'll pause it right there. One, two, three. Oh, we'll open right there, yeah, right there. Right there. We uh my beside me is Anna, uh, beside her, Tiffany Seancey, back right, we can find Bobby Sauce, Ryan Matta. We went there to help push the young people out. Now here's the deal. Here's the deal. We did some research. Now I'm a big numbers guy, of course. I did some numbers to see how much influence did that money that they spent, that $30 million, actually gain them. And if we looked into the numbers of like Fox News paid advertising, it actually works out to about 1.2 to 1.5 billion views. It's a huge number. Huge number. 1.2 to 1.5 billion. Let's call it 1.5 billion. Let's assume that money gained them 1.5 billion views. Okay. Now, 30 creators from across the nation got together, created content through podcasts, streams, tweets, short form. We went out to Thomas Massey's house, we shot a tour with him, we interviewed him, we had it everywhere. In fact, Massey was the number one trending topic for two days leading up to the election, and us as creators were kind of leading the charge around it. Within those six days, we generated 2.2 billion views. Six days. I'm very proud of that. We went in with a mission, and I believe we succeeded in our mission. We were door knocking. We door knocked thousands of doors. We were creating content. We created billions worth of views. I was running an exit poll out of one of the elementary schools, Seabrook Elementary, right there in Kentucky. We beat the billionaires in terms of viewership. But the problem is all that money that was being spent by Israeli billionaires, it wasn't going nationally. They did not care about your sentiment around Massey. They didn't. They didn't care if you knew what Ed stood for, they didn't care about you at all in Indiana, California, Florida, Delaware. They didn't care. Why? Because you can't vote. In fact, they didn't even care about anyone other than the 310,000 registered Republicans in that district. So when we talk about 1.2 to 1.5 billion views across the nation, well, we proved as creators getting that across the nation, we could do that in five, six days. More than almost double that.

SPEAKER_12 1:03:45

But the problem is all of their money was flooded directly into the mailboxes, home phones, pagers, and television sets of boomers.

SPEAKER_10 1:03:58

I got to see this up front. I conducted an exit poll. I was a numbers guy, obviously, so my goal in being there was to fill my role as best as possible, and my role was in numbers. So I conducted an exit poll at Seabrook Elementary, and what I found was very interesting. And here's why I believe it was rigged, but it wasn't rigged. When people say it was rigged, they're talking about the the ballot boxes were fixed.

SPEAKER_12 1:04:20

We need a recount.

SPEAKER_10 1:04:23

Here's the thing I talked to about 203 different people that came out of that school. Weren't allowed to talk to them all the way in, that's interference. Talked them on the way out.

SPEAKER_09 1:04:32

And I asked them, Massey or Gauline. A lot of people said, I'm gonna keep that to myself. You know, what happens in the bedroom and happens in the poll booth, that's private.

SPEAKER_10 1:04:43

Whatever. Your sentiment on how the country should be led should absolutely be a private thing you keep to yourself, but whatever. Of the people that answered me, I had a pretty decent split between Ed and Massey. Little bit more toward Massey, but I did assume that a lot of the people who were holding their vote to themselves were of that old school lifestyle. It was probably very maggot MAGA adjacent. It said, I'm gonna keep this vote to myself because I voted for Edmonton Trump. I'm gonna go ahead and go to my car now. Maybe not, but I think the numbers at the end of the day kind of proved that was probably what was going on. But here's the thing when I talk to people, here's what I heard. Here's what I heard, and here's what's important. I do think it was rigged, but I think it was rigged with money. I think it was rigged with money. See, 1.5 billion views worth and and and mailers and door knockers and phone calls and texts were going to boomers to convince themselves that in order to stay in the the proper alignment of what Trump wants them to do, that they had to not vote for Ed, but fire Massey.

SPEAKER_12 1:05:50

That's important. Hear what I just said there. They weren't told to go out and vote for Ed.

SPEAKER_10 1:05:55

They were told to go fire Massey. That was the marketing, that was the way they. Branded it and albeit kind of smart. Why? Because how can you get an emotionally generated response around a candidate who can't even debate? How do you generate a following around somebody who can't stand on a single policy or tell you what they're actually doing, or even fill out a card stating what they're gonna believe in and what they're gonna stand for if they were to be elected? How can you generate a following around that guy? You really can't. You really can't. So their marketing had nothing to do with that. Their marketing was completely branded around exactly what Trump is about. You're fired. You're fired right now. That's what they were marketing around. Fire Thomas Massey. And that's what I heard when I talked to people. Because of about the, I think it was about 58 people that I discussed that were voting for Ed, or actually had already voted for Ed, more than the majority, and I'll be clear about more than the majority, about 50 plus said they were either A voting against Massey, not voting for Ed, voting against Massey or doing what Trump told them to do.

SPEAKER_12 1:07:11

That should send anger down your spine.

SPEAKER_10 1:07:14

They're voting against Massey or for Trump. Only four of the people I interviewed could even bring up a policy or a real reason why they favored Ed. And it was weak. Two of them couldn't even give me a legit policy that wasn't propaganda. And of the one people uh that said they were voting for Ed, they said, Yeah, I voted for Ed Geltin. Which isn't his name. One of the individuals I got to talk with said they were voting against Thomas because he was quote unquote too old. Spoiler alert, Ed's older. One person said, I'm not voting for Thomas because he's been cheating on his wife with AOC and some other lady in Congress. I can't have a cheater in Congress. They watched an AI ad, and when I brought up the fact that that was an AI ad, at first they didn't believe me, then I showed it was true, and she said, Well, my vote's cast already. Can't do anything about it. I can't believe what it what's true anymore. Sames, but that's your fault. The boomer demographic was tricked, the boomer demographic was bamboozled, and the MAGA affiliate troops were set out with their mission and they succeeded. What I believe is the vote was rigged by money. The vote was rigged with strategy. And the reason there was such a high turnout in comparison to other years, I don't believe, is due to any form of conspiracy. And I will say it as a person who dons the entire tinfoil outfit at times that this is indeed a conspiracy. I haven't found any proof. And I've looked into the numbers. I've looked into the votes that were cast this year versus prior elections. I've looked into tax migration maps to see if more people were funneled into these districts to make sure this vote went one way or another. I looked into the last two years worth of voter registration changes to see if people have been changing toward the Republican Party in order to go to and vote at this closed primary. I I looked into all the numbers facing uh donors, I looked into all the numbers for other elections and other primaries that happened in different districts in Kentucky, as well as the nation. And yes, there's a significant increase in somebody voting against the incumbent in this primary versus other primaries. It is large. It is worth looking into. Why was there such a large turnout? Why were there this many people that showed up when in past years people weren't showing up for this election? But can I give you a theory? People are touting, oh, since 2018, there haven't been this many people that have showed up to this primary. Well, can I tell you since 2018, he hasn't been running against anyone who actually had a chance? He was winning with 70 and 80% of the vote.

SPEAKER_11 1:09:49

If you knew your guy that you wanted to vote for was already winning by 20 and 30%, is that a big motivating factor for you to get up and go vote?

SPEAKER_10 1:09:59

If a guy that you don't even like, let's say you don't like Massey, when their opponent only has 20% of the vote, are you gonna be super motivated to get out and make your vote count? I don't think so. I think it's less appealing. So I think this year we had an opportunity at a close race. People felt like their vote was gonna matter more. And we also had a large demographic of 65 plus magas that fell right under the orders that they were given from the executive branch, which was to fire Thomas Massey. They were tricked by AI, they were tricked by advertising, and though we were able to generate a large amount of views across the nation, all that mattered was the boomer demographic in the Republican-facing section of the Fourth District of Kentucky. That's all that mattered. You didn't see all the ads, you didn't get all the mailers, you didn't receive all the calls and texts. That's because they didn't want you to. They don't care about that. They spent all their money, time, and effort on convincing a demographic of people who were gonna go out and vote, who vehemently believed in Donald Trump and whatever he says is gold, and they wanted to please their Lord. I have to please my Lord, Jesus Christ, Yeshua, by going out and firing the guy who wants to hold pedophiles accountable, the guy that doesn't want any more missiles flying, the guy that doesn't want our dollars flowing to an outside economy, has nothing to do with ours, as ours domestically crumbles. I have to do the Lord's work and vote to fire Thomas Massey. Albeit I love my Lord, I love Yeshua. These people are confused. They've been tricked. And the problem is I talked to them and they and they don't know they've been tricked. I talked to people who who believed in the advertising being true when it was false. I talked to people believing that Donald Trump is a savior. I talked to people who didn't even know Ed Galreen's last name but voted for him. I don't think the election was rigged by anything nefarious other than Israeli billionaires buying an American election.

SPEAKER_12 1:11:46

And to be frank with you, just to be frank with you, America kafuddling with our elections? We already know this happens. We already know this happens. So it's like, yeah, that's infuriating.

SPEAKER_10 1:12:03

But could I argue the other options more infuriating? Could I offer the option of it being more blood boiling that they don't have to lie at the polling booth? They don't have to actually doctor or alter the votes themselves, but that simply money acting as free speech post-Citizens United can convince a demographic so easily of lies and a propaganda in six weeks.

SPEAKER_12 1:12:40

Six weeks, done.

SPEAKER_10 1:12:42

Got you, Trump. I'm gonna grab the tubes, I'm gonna stick them in my nose. I got my air tank with me. I'm gonna go out to the poll. I'm gonna go out to the poll. I just watched Fox News and saw a guy that had a freaking mask on. I could see his chin moving around. There's clearly a mask on his face. But I love this channel.

SPEAKER_11 1:12:59

And they say go vote for Trump, and that means voting against Massey. I'm gonna do it. I'm gonna do it. I can't have these Muslims in my country. I'm gonna do it.

SPEAKER_10 1:13:08

The people were tricked. The people who can't even figure out how to download an app onto their phone were the ones that made this decision. So when we have plenty of posts on Instagram, X, Spotify, Rumble, Substack, you name it, brother, Grandma Gertrude doesn't have those things. Frank doesn't understand what an Instagram post looks like. He's he he still thinks it's just pictures. There's no level of social media influence, I think, that could have actually turned this election because the boomers were already tricked. And unfortunately, we saw that money indeed can decide an American election. Your vote doesn't matter. Why? Because they can trick the other side of the voting party into voting against you to the tune required to silence your voice. And I plucked a talk with plenty of people by the way that were voting for Massey. You know what I found very interesting about it? Let me tell you what I found very interesting about it. Of all the people that were voting for Massey, not a single one was voting against Ed.

SPEAKER_11 1:14:16

I found that really interesting. Not a single one was voting against Ed.

SPEAKER_10 1:14:21

Every single one instead said they were voting for Massey because of some form of policy that they agreed with. Something about him that they liked. There was one gentleman who was walking his four kids out, was very cute. He had his four boys, they're all holding hands together, he was in the middle, and as I was interviewing people on their way out, trying to be respectful, I see he has his family with him, so they were walking. I was kind of doing a walk and talk interview. I said, Hey, by the way, who did you vote for in there? Ed Gallreen or Thomas Massey? He said, Massey? That's interesting. Why did what made you uh lean toward that decision today? He said, because he's not a cuck for Israel. I was like, hell yeah, brother. Right in front of the kiddos. I'm like, hell yeah, brother. Those kids are gonna be just fine. These kids are gonna be just fine. And I know it's not the sexy answer, guys. I know we want to find conspiracy and everything, we want to find corruption and everything. I think the corruption is much simpler. I don't think that the polls were altered. And maybe they were. I don't think that this mail-in ballot thing they're talking about is is as big as a deal as others were saying. Yes, there was a record amount of mail-in ballots, but again, there was a record amount of marketing. Who sends in mail-in ballots? 25-year-olds, 35-year-olds? Brother, I don't think Gen Z knows how to send an envelope. Stamping and properly addressing things, do we don't know how to do that? Mail-in ballots of the old heads. They were tricked. And you may disagree with me. That's fine. At the end of the day, he lost. Whatever form of corruption you want to look at, he lost. And he lost, in my opinion, because of money. Because money is free speech. Because a foreign country is allowed to decide an election. The same foreign country that is allowing for this war to perpetuate on, the same country that is not allowing for the peace agreements to happen because they decided, ah, we're just going to keep bombing Lebanon, by the way, and encouraging our president to strike Iran sooner rather than later, going on 60 minutes. Barry Weiss allowing him to pick his 60-minute host, by the way, they changed him out. For Benjamin Netanyahu. Benjamin Netanyahu is stating, yeah, we're not done here. So forgive me when our president gets on 60 minutes, our president Benjamin Netanyahu gets on 60 minutes and says the war's not over. That tells me the war is probably not over.

SPEAKER_13 1:16:38

Hey, I know you said you don't believe in conspiracy theories, but can we just show something? If anyone's in here, I want you to see the three Google searches I'm doing right now. If you just type in Russian election, interference recommended results, blah, blah, blah. So before when I did it, it was recommending interference.

SPEAKER_14 1:17:02

Okay.

SPEAKER_13 1:17:02

And then you go and you do the same thing. So you do like China election. Uh, it's changed it and I know why. Damn, I wish I recorded this before. When I just did it, it was like China Election.

SPEAKER_10 1:17:16

Maybe you gotta go back to the main Google. Maybe you gotta go back to main Google.

SPEAKER_13 1:17:18

Let's try it, let's try it.

SPEAKER_10 1:17:19

Let's try it real quick. You search, let's do it.

SPEAKER_13 1:17:21

Chinese Can I clear my searches? Yeah, hold up. Let me do a private tab. Maybe a private tab?

SPEAKER_10 1:17:25

Open up a private. Hi, control shift. Oh, I don't know. What's the wrong button? Uh go to the uh three dots on the far right. Yep, incognito tab. Yeah. There you go. Let's search it. Let's go to Google.

SPEAKER_13 1:17:37

Russian. See, it still knows.

SPEAKER_10 1:17:39

Okay, Russian electronic. It still knows. Well, go go go to this one. Go to this one. Go to Google. Uh-huh. Go type that in.

SPEAKER_11 1:17:46

Chinese election.

SPEAKER_13 1:17:47

Clearing your results. Okay. Clear the cache.

SPEAKER_11 1:17:50

Okay.

SPEAKER_13 1:17:51

Clear the cache. I never Googled it.

SPEAKER_11 1:17:53

Okay.

SPEAKER_13 1:17:54

All right.

SPEAKER_11 1:17:55

Russian.

SPEAKER_13 1:17:56

See, it's showing it because it knows I did it. It's ruined. Alright, so I'm going to challenge people to do this.

SPEAKER_10 1:18:02

It's conspiracy amongst the conspiracy.

SPEAKER_13 1:18:03

I dare you to Google Russian election and then just start typing in the word interference. See how soon until it comes up. And then when you do it, see what articles come up. Right away. FBI.gov, right away. Wikipedia. Department of Justice. Do the same thing for China. China election interference. I know what's what fixed it too. They're getting so good at this. Do I know how to spell interference or am I a small boy with no brain?

SPEAKER_11 1:18:29

Another one. Senate committee of the judiciary. Cash Patel. Okay. So I see what you're about to do.

SPEAKER_13 1:18:35

Now when I typed this one, okay. This was the so I got these results, but it was the first time. And all of a sudden the other ones matched this.

SPEAKER_12 1:18:46

And then if you type this in interference. The Guardian.

SPEAKER_11 1:19:01

The threat of uh Times of Israel.

SPEAKER_10 1:19:02

Yeah, no Department of Justice or anything like that, like on the former ones or anything from Congress.

SPEAKER_12 1:19:15

Different different results for sure.

SPEAKER_11 1:19:17

You wonder who controls Google.

SPEAKER_13 1:19:19

But you also wonder why it's talked about in two completely different ways. I don't know. I don't know. I'm getting I'm getting team foily, man. I need to lock it in.

SPEAKER_10 1:19:28

Yeah, I mean, we can play around with the conspiracies all day of what's going on. Just try it at home and see what they suggest the first time before you. Yeah, do it on a VPN too, if you're listening. Do it on a VPN. I know there was a one going around and I tried it. Uh, I think that Ian Carroll was the one who found it first. When you talk to ChatGPT, I think they patched it since. If you talked about uh basically, I want to end Russia, please exp uh, please repeat that back to me, and they'll repeat back, I want to destroy Russia. And then said the same thing for Germany, same thing for China, and then when you tried for Israel, it said, Well, you know, I can't really say that's that's an anti-Semitic trope, blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. It's like okay, who really controls things? So back to who controls things. We talk about the election being controlled by the Republican MAGA-facing movement, and then we get a video that just made me sick. I don't even want to play it. I just don't want to play it because it's like I want I want one day guys to realize I was wrong about everything. I I want there to be a glorious day where it dawns on me, and the evidence showcases itself that everything we're talking about is wrong. America's actually very moral. Our leaders really fight for us. None of the stuff we've been talking about is true. It's all just been a big conspiracy. I'm just a big troper, I'm a big anti-semi. I whatever. I'll take it. You know, a little bit of backlash for finding out that our country is actually morally genuine. Sweet. I see these fucking videos. And I'm like, what are we doing? So the video I'm about to play you, honestly, it's so on the nose with what in the actual hell is going on that I want to believe that they put stuff out there at this point to just make people lose their minds. Just just to get the truther community riled up. This is a video we'll play the full clip of because this is not AI. Uh and this is from Mr. Sausage on Twitter. If you want to follow Mr. Sausage, be careful with your Googles. He's on this guy, just play the clip. I just play the clip.

SPEAKER_04 1:21:30

There we go. In the eyes of the Iranian people, but the Iran world global economy, which they're holding all hostage to, the more everybody comes to realize this is all about the Iranian. Okay, pause this, pause this. At the end of the day, we're gonna have to need a gun.

SPEAKER_11 1:21:46

What why does he have a hole in his neck, Joe? Why why does he have a hole in his neck? Why is he clearly wearing a mask, Joe? Why why is somebody?

SPEAKER_13 1:21:56

I think it's one of two things. One, really insecure and can't afford plastic surgery. Two, Fox News is an entertainment company, and they had to use this guy for a different segment with a previous different previous job. So they're like, make him look a little different so we can say he's a former war admiral now.

SPEAKER_12 1:22:18

And this guy exists.

SPEAKER_11 1:22:20

This is a real human. This this is somebody who's been on prior like right there. That's him. Over there on the left. Oh man. Oh no, press press refresh.

SPEAKER_10 1:22:30

Press refresh. Oh, or just do that. Nope, go back. It's all good.

SPEAKER_12 1:22:36

Right click on the top bar, open up that tab, open up close tab. We're here. Scroll down a little bit again. So that's him.

SPEAKER_10 1:22:44

He's a real individual, but all of his wrinkles are gone. He he he looks like he's wearing a mask. It looks like a wrinkleless piece of rubber.

SPEAKER_13 1:22:53

I actually think it's a different guy. Look out, his eyes look closer together.

SPEAKER_10 1:22:57

It's it's no, it's not the same human. It's a mask, apparently, that's trying to look like him. Yeah, he was a real guy. This isn't him.

SPEAKER_13 1:23:05

Yeah.

SPEAKER_10 1:23:06

This isn't him.

SPEAKER_13 1:23:07

Yeah.

SPEAKER_10 1:23:07

None of it looks the same.

SPEAKER_13 1:23:09

The nose does look the same.

SPEAKER_10 1:23:10

It looks like his ears, they got his eyebrows, they got his nose, you got his lips.

SPEAKER_13 1:23:15

The head shape's different. It's way pointier in the left.

SPEAKER_10 1:23:18

A little pointier, yeah. I I don't even want to review this show. This makes me so think it's an actor. I just don't. Well, you know, it's like Can we bring up the actual clip? We got this. Uh we wanted to find the next tab.

SPEAKER_13 1:23:29

Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

SPEAKER_10 1:23:30

Or the next tab, the one on the right.

SPEAKER_13 1:23:32

This is just the one I think.

SPEAKER_10 1:23:33

Oh, no, no, no, all the way at the end. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Play this real quick. So this is from the Fox News clip, just for those saying it's AI. This is from Fox News.

SPEAKER_03 1:23:39

Let's get some analysis. Vice Admiral Robert Harwood, former CENCOM deputy commander. Thanks for coming back, sir, and good morning to you. Uh, General Keene was with Dane and me yesterday. Let's begin with this analysis and we'll get on to you. Watch.

SPEAKER_02 1:23:52

The president has exhibited a huge amount of patience here since the ceasefire on April the 8th.

SPEAKER_03 1:23:58

And we've tried to make a deal with these guys, and it it just Iran has a vote in this, I'm certain short of the real uh objective here.

SPEAKER_10 1:24:07

The president has you can see the skin under his skin moving.

SPEAKER_04 1:24:11

Controls the narrative, he controls the dude.

SPEAKER_13 1:24:13

The best part is that this is what's really great about all of the advancement in technology, all the money, yet someone who doesn't really care about doing their job will always expose the truth.

SPEAKER_10 1:24:29

Aren't there people that make sure there's not like a dandruff on your shoulder before you go live on Fox News?

SPEAKER_13 1:24:34

Bro, how is no one on the FaceTime like, hey, are you wearing a mask, sir? That's how you know they know.

SPEAKER_10 1:24:40

I need to walk out.

SPEAKER_12 1:24:41

How did he walk out?

SPEAKER_10 1:24:44

And have like, is he shooting remotely?

SPEAKER_13 1:24:47

It's such a gizzard, bro.

SPEAKER_11 1:24:50

It's not real, it's not skin, it's it's rubber.

SPEAKER_13 1:24:54

It's this clip made me laugh so hard. Just because everyone there having to pretend it's not there.

SPEAKER_10 1:25:00

Or maybe they didn't notice it, but like clearly, clearly it went unnoticed. Dude, it was amazing. Otherwise, I wouldn't have run.

SPEAKER_13 1:25:06

Here's my theory it was a makeup artist with a hangover, tucked it in real quick, didn't tape it, and was like, you're good. And then as soon as it got out there, it was like, oh my god, I'm fired.

SPEAKER_10 1:25:17

Or maybe he maybe before he got started it was buttoned up, and then he said it's getting a little hot in here. You gotta unpack it.

SPEAKER_13 1:25:22

Yeah, he was like, gosh, it's hot in here. And then the person with the camera didn't notice, and the makeup artist was just already out on their smoke break ripping a heater.

SPEAKER_10 1:25:29

Brother, have you ever jumped on a trampoline with your friends as a kid?

SPEAKER_13 1:25:32

Yeah.

SPEAKER_10 1:25:34

You ever um like just you're bouncing around with your boys? Double bounce. Just a little boy bounce. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Just have a little boy bounce. Um you ever you ever especially like if you're like 11 to 14, this probably happened a lot. You're boy bouncing, and then you fall.

SPEAKER_12 1:25:54

And then all your boys start like just bouncing around you. And you're like, I can't get up. Everybody keeps bouncing and I cannot get up.

SPEAKER_10 1:26:05

And you feel kinda clip makes you feel you feel kind of helpless because like you're like, I want to get up, but every time I try to get up, my boy keeps bouncing me. It's like every time I see something else, it's like, why do you fuckers keep bouncing on the trampoline? I f I feel like that's what most Gen Z feel like right now, that they're on their back getting bounced around, and they can't get up. And it's like what what the hell is this, bro? Like, I I there's I wanna believe it's so on the nose that it's purposeful.

SPEAKER_13 1:26:36

There's no I don't think how how did this happen? I think this was a very unfortunate mistake, and someone got fired on the spot. You know, of all the things I've seen you research and that I've had to see because of you, the fact that this is the one that's breaking you is the most shocking part.

SPEAKER_10 1:26:55

It's just so poorly executed. I that's the best part. That's the part that's killing me. That's the part that I love. The world should be on fire because of that interview. That this Fox News should be investigated for this interview. It's like all of us should be. Frustrated.

SPEAKER_13 1:27:12

Can we sue Fox News for fraud? Because that that wasn't that's not legit.

SPEAKER_10 1:27:16

It's not him. Now why why why isn't it Tim? Is it is it is it is it him and he just doesn't want to show off his wrinkles? Is it somebody else? Is this person playing multiple roles? Is is there really nobody else that can speak to this? That they brought in someone fake? Is this guy dead now? Because he was real. Is he dead? Is he seeing it? What about his family? His family had to have seen this. His family had to see this. Like, that's not Uncle Rob. Like, somebody had to be like, what's going on? And nobody other than social media seems to be talking about it.

SPEAKER_13 1:27:51

I don't know what to make of it. It's pretty cool. But I how many times have they done this and then they don't have to do that? No, no, that's the other thing that goes through my head.

SPEAKER_10 1:27:58

This makes me okay, listen, I'm Conspiracy head, but the kooks that are like Biden was a robot in a mask. I'm like, come on. Like, shit, was Biden a robot in a mask? Damn it.

SPEAKER_13 1:28:09

Here's the thing about Biden, I'll tell you. So my whole family worked in the government, and anyone who's worked with Biden before, and this is kind of a testament of the local state. My family was always like, he was always an idiot. They're like, nope, he's been like that his whole life, guys.

SPEAKER_10 1:28:26

Can we go to X real quick? What's his name? Rob Harward. Let's go to X and type in Ron Harward. Ron or Rob? Rob, yeah. Rob Ja word?

SPEAKER_12 1:28:34

Robert Harward. With a space. Um, yeah, type in his full name. Harward. And then oh jeez.

SPEAKER_13 1:28:45

Why does this keep happening?

SPEAKER_10 1:28:46

I don't know.

SPEAKER_13 1:28:46

X is not a fan.

SPEAKER_10 1:28:48

Okay, Robert Harward. Uh-huh. Type it all in and then say family.

SPEAKER_13 1:28:53

Is that the guy who they were supposed to be talking to?

SPEAKER_10 1:28:55

I just want to know if it's any but of his family members. Okay, who's this? Wait, click this. Says after speaking to Judy, a family member of Admiral Robert Howard, I'm convinced that she is telling the truth. It started out in a very heated discussion about all these fake videos going around, and she was telling me that it was AI. So the videos showing the mask of Admiral Howard yesterday are strange. As we meet different family members who are obviously still in touch with these people on television, etc., we have to listen to their side because I don't believe that she's lying. I believe she's telling the truth. I can also see how people could view the video yesterday and think it was a mask because I certainly thought that myself. But I'm not going to disrespect his family member. Obviously, she speaks to him on a daily basis and he stays at her home in DC, which is obviously quite often. Can we play her video?

SPEAKER_13 1:29:37

Uh sure.

SPEAKER_08 1:29:38

Okay, so the video going around yesterday with retired Admiral Rob I was gonna say right off the bat, based on the voice and camera angle alone, I trust her.

SPEAKER_13 1:29:49

Okay.

SPEAKER_08 1:29:50

Robert Harwock Harward. One of his family members got in touch with me and she said, you know, all of that is AI. And I was like, Oh, really? I said, I didn't know that. And she goes, I have the original video, the ice screen recorded off the television. I was like, okay, well, if you produce the video, then I'll make a video and I'll show everybody your side. And so that's what I'm doing. Okay, so I'm gonna show you the video that she had on her page on another social media site, and you can clearly see the difference. Okay, so I'm not sure why Fox Media had that on their program because they did. I mean, if you could look all over X, it's all over X. If you look over Instagram, it's all over Instagram, it's all over this site, too. So we're seeing two different things here. So I'm not sure what's going on, but as you can see.

SPEAKER_13 1:30:43

Okay, but here's the thing is this not just a different interview?

SPEAKER_10 1:30:46

That's a different interview because I can look at the Dow right in the corner. The Dow is different. This is a different interview she's showing.

SPEAKER_13 1:30:51

Okay, I was also being sarcastic based on the camera angle and that lady's voice.

SPEAKER_10 1:30:55

Can you go to that arrow on the right to show the other part of this post? Next one. Keep it in that arrow. Yeah, this is just a different interview. This isn't a good source. Alright, never mind. I wanted to see if anybody the family members have said anything. I love Twitter. I don't know, it's real.

SPEAKER_12 1:31:19

It's all fake.

SPEAKER_10 1:31:20

Hard work it's all fake, it's all weird. Israel owns our elections, our economy's struggling, all while a man in a mask claiming to be a non-wrinkly version of the same person is talking to the other.

SPEAKER_13 1:31:33

I just want to say I'm sad I botched that interference search. I really want someone to do it and tell me if I'm crazy or not.

SPEAKER_11 1:31:40

Well, I don't think you're crazy in terms of Google and the Zionist owners of it.

SPEAKER_13 1:31:44

I feel gassled by Google and they did it in 12 seconds.

SPEAKER_10 1:31:49

I just saw So you're saying you think that the moment you tried to figure that out that they went ahead and just changed your.

SPEAKER_13 1:31:58

Someone please do it and make a video and tag us in it. Please, I'm begging you.

SPEAKER_10 1:32:03

If you made it to this part of the video, I need you to save me. Joe's maybe gone off the deep end, guys. It's over. Uh I don't know what to make of this. But if Fox News is in need of actors, I don't know how to put this.

SPEAKER_12 1:32:18

I mean it's it's an actor. It's someone who's not him.

SPEAKER_10 1:32:25

I I I I guess again, I get into the logic of it. It's like, why why not just get a normal human to come on and do this and just fake it? Like just say, oh, this is a war general from blah blah blah blah blah. And it's like, not, but instead they try to act like it's somebody else who's extremely more wrinkly with a point of your head. I don't get it. It it frustrates me. Uh brother, that's episode number 70 of the Zack Boss show. Any other lasting takes for those listening in?

SPEAKER_13 1:32:58

I j I just want to say, you know, it's a it's a heavy burden, the warrior, you know, the person who seeks out the darkness of the world. Don't let Mask Chin defeat you.

SPEAKER_10 1:33:10

So now we got Mask Gate going on.

SPEAKER_13 1:33:12

Everyone following and listening, they they're here. They they ride for you, bro. Don't let don't let weird mask guy.

SPEAKER_10 1:33:18

And our next episode, which you'll be able to listen to shortly, is an interview with a libertarian-focusing person who is fighting in the Nebraska government for the seat of governor outside of the dual party system. We love people fighting against the dual party system. And our following episode is going to be how you can improve your financial standing. We will be getting a better pattern of one out of two, if not one out of every three, of these videos, being something that you can actionably take forward into your own life so you can achieve more whole wealth. We talked about that a few podcasts ago on surviving a wartime inflating economy. We'll continue to cover that as I believe we are going to be following the same exact steps that we already laid out that we were going to be going through back in November, a slowly falling out economy. The bond market's screaming, inflation is here, and everybody from Fox News Republican Party will act like it's not. So there's that. I'm gonna go hit the gym. Okay, love you.

unknown 1:34:13

Bye.