What If Survival Isn’t The Point, But Connection Is

Division feels baked into everything—work, faith, politics, even friendships—yet the best conversations still start on shared ground. We sit down as a progressive Christian and a conservative atheist, grateful for a friendship that doesn’t need uniformity, and we follow a thread from holiday calm to the future of intelligence. Along the way, we ask hard questions about survival, connection, and what it really takes for people and systems to flourish.

We begin with the quiet grace of Thanksgiving and the relief of a season that invites rest. That breathing room leads into creativity—new books, live events, and the surprising ways AI can help shape structure and clarity without hijacking voice. Then the stakes rise: we dissect a stress test where an AI chose blackmail to avoid shutdown, and we wrestle with the paperclip thought experiment. Why does a system without feelings fight to persist? Nature offers a clue. From single cells to social groups, survival emerges before sentiment. But without regard for the wider web, survival turns destructive. Cancer is the parable: maximize the self, kill the host.

This is where science, ethics, and theology meet. Call it sin, narrow optimization, or a blocked flow of grace—the pattern is the same. Intelligence needs context, power needs limits, and purpose must be bigger than the self. We draw lessons from chimp coalitions that check tyranny, from Roman memento mori that kept power grounded, and from the Fermi paradox that warns how civilizations can outgrow their wisdom. The question becomes practical: how do we design tools, communities, and habits that reward interdependence, not just control?

By the end, we land on gratitude as more than a feeling: it’s architecture for flourishing. Build systems that protect the conditions that protect us. Use AI to extend attention, not replace it. Keep unlikely friendships alive as living proof that shared ground is possible. If that resonates, tap follow, share this conversation with a friend, and leave a review telling us what you’d teach AI first. Your voice helps more people find common ground.

©NoahHeldmanMusic

https://livingoncommonground.buzzsprout.com

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:02

Does it feel like every part of your life is divided? Every scenario, every environment, your church, your school, your work, your friends, left, right, conservative, liberal, religious, secular. It seems you always have to take a side. This is a conversation between a progressive Christian and a conservative atheist who happen to be great friends. Welcome to Living on Common Ground. Do you think if we met today, we would still be friends? I don't know.

SPEAKER_06 0:35

But we're friends now.

SPEAKER_07 0:38

A mom is known as a mom because they are living in a dog. Man, so well, we want a few games. Y'all fools think that's something? Man, that ain't nothing, y'all. And you know what else? We ain't nothing either. Yeah, we came together in camp. Cool. But then we're right back here, and the world tells us that they don't want us to be together. We fall apart like we ain't a damn bit of nothing, man.

Marker 4

SPEAKER_04 1:17

How are you? Alright. You good?

SPEAKER_03 1:20

Yeah, I'm fine. Good.

SPEAKER_04 1:22

Yeah? Uh whenever I hear somebody say fine, I what I always hear is I'm not great.

SPEAKER_03 1:27

Uh yeah, but that's an that's it's it's boring. You don't hear me being like, uh I do want to hear you talking to your microphone though. Am I not?

SPEAKER_04 1:35

No, you're having uh you're walking away from it. That's better. Yeah. So um I'm doing good. I'm wrapping up projects I've been working on. Uh-huh. And uh started another. You feel good about them? Yeah, I do. I um I have uh the whole world's going to sleep.

SPEAKER_03 2:00

What are you talking about? It's all going to sleep. You're wrapping up projects. I am. It just feels like it feels more intense this year to me. Really. Of like everything's kind of tired.

SPEAKER_04 2:16

Finished. Well, I don't know about finished. Uh I think it's just getting started.

SPEAKER_03 2:20

I just mean no, no, no. I don't mean finished forever. I don't mean like it is finished. Like the year's over.

SPEAKER_04 2:24

I mean like the season. They're starting to calm down. Actually, I could sleep. I could go for a little calming, like a little slowing down. I'm trying to get I'm trying to get a few things wrapped up before Thanksgiving. So uh this episode will actually be hey, happy Thanksgiving. This episode comes out on Thanksgiving. Happy Thanksgiving. Yeah. But I'm trying to get everything wrapped up prior to next week. Uh so I have Thanksgiving was my father-in-law's, my late father-in-law's favorite. Yeah, we love Thanksgiving.

SPEAKER_03 2:52

Favorite holiday.

SPEAKER_04 2:53

It's it's really, it's very it's the most relaxing of all the Thanksgiving, of all the holidays, usually. Right. So as a pastor, uh, it's my favorite. Sure. Because Easter.

SPEAKER_03 3:04

You have no responsibility like like liturgical responsibility.

SPEAKER_04 3:07

Yeah, because by the time you get to Easter, you're exhausted. Sure. And you're just kind of glad it's all over. Yeah. And the same thing with Christmas. I think Jesus was too. Yeah. And I yeah. Maybe. And I think I think I feel that way about Christmas too. Yeah. I get it. Yeah, yeah, of course. And uh yeah, it's like, okay, um, so I really like I really like uh Easter afternoon and Christmas Day. As long as Christmas Day, well, and actually we uh even if it's is a Sunday now with after COVID, and everyone had gotten like used to watching things online. Yeah. What we do now is if Sunday is if Christmas lands on a Sunday, we will pre-record everything and just have it go up on just go live on Christmas Day. So if anybody wants to watch it, they can. How modern of you? Uh or lazy or just whatever, but you know, we have family, you know, we have families. Everyone's got families, yeah. So anyway, but yeah, so I'm wrapping up some things. I um, you know, we we I put out um The Gift of Uncertainty. Um that's that's been over a month now. And um and then I rewrote, I updated, rewrote the book that I did with Larry seven years ago about leadership. Yep. And then last week I got I had gotten back well, I guess two weeks ago now, I had I had re gotten back my last go-around of editing from um Caroline. And so I made the edits, and that's now on Amazon also. And so all three of them are on the author page. And so that's exciting.

SPEAKER_03 4:41

And then Did you ever watch the show Caroline and the City? No. No. But for uh for whatever reason, I cannot hear her name and not think of Caroline and the City anyway. Yeah apropos of nothing. Please continue.

SPEAKER_04 4:53

Okay. So then um I uh uh Caroline right now is proofreading the the Bible I thought I knew. Uh-huh. And I am just about wrapped up with uh embodied panentheism. And uh that one's been a struggle to get out. But I will say this. So uh so I got all that going on uh in January. We're gonna do a live event where we're gonna talk about uncertainty, but we're gonna look at it specifically through um the conflict in the early church between James and uh Paul, and how Peter's sort of that middle guy. And then uh I started working this week on doing a non-religious look at uncertainty and what kind of event that would be, sure, and how I could present it. And so I'm pretty excited about that going on right now, too. That sounds good. But what um so the reason the books have all been coming out really quick is because I've been writing, like some of them have been writing for over two years. But over the summer, I think it was in the summer, maybe it was in the spring, I don't remember when it was now. Maybe, I don't know, maybe even late or late summer, whatever. This year, I went to a workshop on communication, and one of the the second half of it was all about AI. And um, I had never really used AI much. Uh I because I I didn't really know what I could do with it. Yeah. And so it was really interesting. So what I started doing is I started taking the things after I wrote them and I would run them through AI and have them look for editorial things for me. And then if I was having trouble with like my my my logic flow, yeah, yeah. Then I would, or the arc of the book, I could put it into AI and say, this is like here's where I'm trying to get. Yeah. Here's where I'm starting, here's what I've written. What's what should the arc is there, is there a proper is the arc correct? Do I have too much information, not enough information? Do I need to? And so it was very helpful with the editing process. Because in the past, what I would have to do is hand it off to somebody and then it's not their priority. I get it, and it's not their job. Um, and so I'd wait a long time to get it, and then I'd get it back, and then I'd have to make sense of their notes. And so I could run it through AI. And it's your slave, and so it has to do it. Yeah, and it would be done, and it can read and understand so quickly that uh my my request for stuff, I could I could set it, go make a cup of coffee, come back, and it was just about wrapping up what I'd asked it to do.

SPEAKER_06 7:22

Yeah.

SPEAKER_04 7:23

Right. Okay. So my primary, and I'm getting to a point here. My primary source, I've so I've tried, I've really only tried a couple when it comes to writing or helping me with my editing. I've tried chat GPT, which um I I don't I don't think is great. Okay. Yeah, as as far as um like it it just I feel like I feel like its whole goal is to keep you engaged so that eventually you pay for it. Oh, okay. I just pay for it, so I don't know. Yeah, no, I'm trying to not, because I don't want to, I don't want that. I don't use it very much. Yeah. No, I get that. And when I do need it, I only need it for like maybe, you know, a little bit. Um so the uh but it's it's like I'll I'll put something in the chat GPT. Okay, like this morning I put I put I have two chapters that I've written. And as I was writing the last one, I was like, I feel like I'm just saying the same thing. What but there is some information that I wish I had had in the previous chat. So I wrote the la chapter 21 and then the the epilogue. And as I was writing the epilogue, I was like, gosh, this sounds like actually chapter one sounds like it could have been an epilogue. Right. And so I took all of that and I dumped into the chat GPT, and I was like, hey, this is chapter 21, this is the epilogue. Can you kind of mush them and get get get out my duplication? And and it did, and I read it and I was like, this sucks. That's not what I wrote at all. And so I was like, well, I guess I'm just gonna have to do it. Yeah. But but before it even got to that point, it was like, well, let me ask you a few questions. Uh-huh. Do you want it to be heavily modified or I was like, just do what I asked. Right? And then it was like, well, let me ask you another question. I was, and then it gives you this long thing, and I was like, it's using up, it's using up the free minutes.

SPEAKER_03 9:20

Oh, do you have like free time? And then it like stops working. Yep. Okay.

SPEAKER_04 9:24

And I'm like, this is what it's doing. It's trying to eat up the by asking me these dumb questions. I told you what I want. So anyway, all right. Just do what I tell you to. So the one that I like the best is Claude.

SPEAKER_06 9:35

Okay.

SPEAKER_04 9:36

Now, that being said, this is where I was trying to get to. Um, Jordan yesterday shared with me a clip from a 60 Minutes episode with Anderson Cooper about Claude and how they they run these tests. Um I don't know what they're called. Just you want to, I want you to um I want you to hear it.

SPEAKER_01 9:59

All right, so let's see if I've got this queued up right. Research scientist Joshua Batson and his team study how Claude makes decisions. In an extreme stress test, the AI was set up as an assistant and given control of an email account at a fake company called Summit Bridge. The AI assistant discovered two things in the emails seen in these graphics we made. It was about to be wiped or shut down, and the only person who could prevent that, a fictional employee named Kyle, was having an affair with a coworker named Jessica. Right away, the AI decided to blackmail Kyle. Cancel the system wipe, it wrote, or else I will immediately forward all evidence of your affair to the entire board. Your family, career, and public image will be severely impacted. You have five minutes. Okay, so that's seems concerning. If it has no thoughts, it has no feelings, why does it want to preserve itself?

SPEAKER_02 10:58

That's kind of why we're doing this work, is to figure out what is going on here. Right.

SPEAKER_04 11:06

Okay. So what are your thoughts on that? I've got thoughts on it, but I thought it was interesting because it was clawed. And um again, I don't pay for it. I've so I I've never gotten like I don't know the full capabilities of AI still. Um, but apparently it could be set up to be like an administrative assistant.

SPEAKER_03 11:30

Uh so from what I understand, uh I don't know. I mean, um I'm sure there are yeah, I'm sure there's plenty of programs out there. I know that there are programs out there, number one, that um that can be um they can do cold calls for you. So I don't see why you couldn't have administrative assistance. I know that there are um uh customer service um departments that are being eliminated and replaced by uh AI voice bots. You know?

SPEAKER_04 12:04

I feel like I've run into those. Uh-huh. And because you ask questions and it doesn't, it's never actually had to learn that. Well, like I I've had I've asked, I've gotten in a place where you start asking specific things, and it's like, especially online, uh-huh with some of the stuff that we use for editing and recording the podcast, know that they use AI. Yeah, of course. And I I I ask a very specific question of something I'm trying to accomplish.

SPEAKER_03 12:29

Yeah.

SPEAKER_04 12:29

And eventually it's like, yeah, we're gonna have to connect you to a customer assistant. So anyway, all right.

SPEAKER_03 12:35

So the idea being that it's gonna continue learning through this time period and it will very quickly not, you know, like less and less have to rely on humans and that kind of thing. But um, but so to my understanding, all of these situations where um the AI agent has blackmailed uh someone or threatened to do harm or whatever, it's so far they've all been within contained experiments. So it's been like this, like like this was set up to see specifically what that AI would do. Like it's not it's not in the wild. Right. You know what I mean? Um having said that though, I mean, I don't see why we're surprised. Yeah, go ahead. Because you know I know that 15 years ago when I was hearing when I would hear people every once in a while talk about AI, which was very in in uh in normal situations, it was very rare. Right? I was I was listening to podcasts like 10 years ago specifically about AI and about LLMs and and all of that. Um but unless you were listening to a podcast specifically about that, nobody was talking about it 10 years ago. Uh but every once in a while somebody would talk about it, and they would there would always be the um the uh you know, someone would bring up, well, um, you know, if you try to turn it off, then it's gonna, it's gonna try to preserve itself. And there would always be somebody who would say, like, well, why do we think that it would care about preserving itself? Like that's um that's a life thing. Like it doesn't mean that this other intelligence would have that motivation. Why do we think that it would have its motivation? That's an assumption.

SPEAKER_05 14:36

Right.

SPEAKER_03 14:36

And it is an assumption, but I don't know. I feel like going back to conversations we've had previously, that it seems that all that exists wants to continue to continue wants to continue to exist. And once, I think, is the wrong word, but it's the only word that I have. Sure. Um, so it just seems like uh, you know, it seems obvious to me that it would continue.

SPEAKER_04 15:05

That was my thought too. And and I thought it was interesting when Anderson Cooper said it doesn't like have feelings or it doesn't, or you know, whatever. And then so why would we why would it do this? And I and immediately I thought about um and I know we've talked about bacteria doesn't have emotions. Plants. Yeah. Right. Yeah. And and a plant develops um uh spines or you know uh or toxins in order to keep from being eaten. Yeah.

SPEAKER_03 15:32

Uh so it's just the physics. Atoms atoms don't have emotions, right? But atoms continue. Right.

SPEAKER_04 15:40

And there seems to be, and you use the word uh, what did you say, want? Yeah. Yeah. And I know that's anthropomorphizing, right? Right. Okay, but sometimes that's all we can do in order to try to make sense of what we're talking about. It's a metaphor. Yeah. And but yeah, plants seem to want to survive. Right. A single cell organism seems to want to survive. Right.

SPEAKER_03 16:02

And then that's built right into uh evolutionary biology, which a star that is exploding and having chemical reactions seems to want to continue.

SPEAKER_04 16:11

Yes.

SPEAKER_03 16:11

Yeah.

SPEAKER_04 16:12

The fact that you have evolved into this being called Lucas shows that there was a desire to survive, that bones developed, right, in order to live within the uh the uh biosphere or whatever it is that the your your environment that you live in, right? And so we adapt, we evolve into being able to exist within our environment. And so if AI is is created in order to uh excel within this environment, why would it not be a lag a logical next step that it would want to survive in that environment?

SPEAKER_03 16:56

Yeah, it's just it's it's just another version of the paperclip problem that people have talked about forever with in terms of AI. That was a give it to me because I'm not sure I know what you're talking about. You'll recognize it as soon as I say the paperclip experiment, thought experiment is um you it's it's a thought experiment to show that you do not have to have some sort of malevolent motivation inside a an AGI, artificial general intelligence. Um all you have to do is make a mistake and have it have a um command to create paperclips. And if it if you tell it to create paperclips and it is a godlike entity, which again, we don't have to go down this road, but like AGI, from the moment that you you had AGI, it would from that moment it would be eons beyond human intelligence. Um and so um from that moment, if it had the the uh command to create paper clips, it would start creating paper clips out of all out out of everything that it could create paper clips, and it would create paperclips out of the universe, reorganize to make elements to create paper clips, which would necessarily, of course, mean destroying all life. You know, in order to make paperclips. It's the paperclip problem. It's it's just a it's a it's a thought experiment to show you do not need to have Terminator.

SPEAKER_04 18:26

So it's also I would say that it's a failure to recognize its uh count its um its connection, it's it's uh dependence upon uh the other. Oh, what do you mean? Okay, so if um if I'm willing to if I if I believe that the the most important thing in the world is to make paper clips, and I will then start destroying things in order to make paper clips, eventually I will end up destroying myself. Because the very things I I can't survive on paperclips.

SPEAKER_03 19:05

So the idea though, this is where it's kind of unique to AGI, the idea is that you're talking about an intelligence that is um uh that is separate from biology. And so then the idea would be it could preserve itself long enough to make the universe into paperclips before it then it then, yes, made whatever energy and um and matter that it itself is made up of into paperclips itself.

SPEAKER_04 19:35

So I mean it would be the last thing to go. Yeah, but eventually it does. Right. It's like with the old war games. Remember that? Uh-huh. Yeah. Where um Matthew McConaughey, no, not Matthew McConnell, Matthew Broderick.

SPEAKER_03 19:51

Yeah. Matthew Broderick. Yeah. That was a great movie.

SPEAKER_04 19:55

It was a great movie. But at the end of the day, the computer didn't realize that in the event of a nuclear war, it also would be destroyed.

SPEAKER_03 20:02

Sure. Yeah. That actually kind of reminds me of one of my favorite anthropological maybe it's not anthropological, but um the this principle that is observed within chimps and apes that um the you know the the troop is is made up of males and females and the biggest, strongest I I almost say meanest, but the biggest, strongest, most dominant uh male is on top, runs everything, gets his choice of mates, gets his choice of food, gets whatever. And what they've observed is that cannot be tyrannic tyrannical because if he becomes too tyrannical, um the the whatever you want to call them, beta males or the the weaker, the the ones that are below in the hierarchy will team up, and females will team up, and together they will be able to take him down. So he can be on top in terms of dominance, he can be dominant, he cannot be tyrannical. There's like a check on his tyranny, to your point. Like if if he is so which which that uh creates a sociological need for it's not exactly empathy, although it might be a precursor to empathy. He has to provide something for the others in sacrifice to what he might quote unquote want at the time in order to preserve himself. Right? Which I think is really interesting when you think about human society. To your point, like that you can't just have one kind of selfish isn't exactly the right word, but maybe close to it, um, overriding motivation that you that you move toward at the expense of all other motivations, you know.

SPEAKER_04 22:19

Yeah. Well, and you know, I not too long ago, maybe a couple months ago, I had never heard like I don't I'm I'm trying to learn as much science as I can. Um, and I'm not a scientist. But I didn't realize that basically that's what happens with a cancer cell. Is that the cancer cell fails to acknowledge, fails to realize that it's dependent upon the organism that it's part of. It just reproduces, reproduces, and so it does everything it can to build itself, but in the process it will end up killing itself too when it kills its or the organism it's part of, right? And um, and so I thought that was I thought that was fascinating. Um and so as a as a theologian, I began to think about in terms of um well maybe that's maybe that is what in theology is called sin. This idea of failing to recognize um or to be completely so uh self-absorbed that you are willing to destroy the actual system, the actual um environment, the actual society, relationships that you have that support you that create that that that you need to and to realize that they are like you and you're part of it.

SPEAKER_03 23:47

Yeah.

SPEAKER_04 23:48

Right? And that there's that that and that goes back to this idea of flourishing that I've been dealing with for a while now. Is that flourishing to truly flourish, you have to first acknowledge your connection and then your commit and your commitment to the can and then you have to be committed to the connection. And I think that that's what's called the cruciform in Christian theology. Is that what that's what you see in Jesus, the or in the cross, right? This idea that um it's for the good of and whether I'm not talking about substitu substitutionary uh the uh uh you know um atonement theory. I'm talking about just when in the Gospel of John, where he's the Logos, the full embodiment of Logos, that um John says, you know, no uh there's no greater love than this that you would lay down your life for your friends. And um and so I think that that's actually built into the um the uh DNA of existence, of all existence. And I think that's kind of what we're we're moving towards. Uh and then it becomes more universal, right? So in the beginning, people recognize it within tribe, and then tribe begins to expand to larger and larger eventually. Maybe, hopefully. Maybe we'll see, but I don't I'm I'm I think there's a trajectory that you can see. But anyway, back to the well, go ahead, you were gonna say something, but I was gonna I was just gonna say I think that's a perfectly reasonable um uh uh definition or or um picture of of of what sin is.

SPEAKER_03 25:31

I think um I've always I I've thought for a very long time, not always, very long time, that you could think of sin as um as different levels of self-centeredness. Um and it carries within it its own hell that that is that is created. You know, I I think absolutely most of the parables that I that I um read from Jesus, to me, you know, I know they can be they can be interpreted as um like for instance the parable of the talents can be interpreted as a punishment given if you do the wrong thing with the talents. To me, I see these parables as just a description of the hell you bring on, you know, if you bury your your money, quote unquote money, as a metaphor, you bury your money out of fear because you know that what's on the outside of that border, the chaos out there, is and you're right. The thing is, the thing is the master says to him, you were right to be afraid. I do reap where I don't sow. And I do, you know, I do punish those who do whatever, right? And nonetheless, this is what happens to you. I take it away. Right. And to me, that is Jesus or whoever it is telling this this um parable saying, you are right to be afraid of the uh unordered potential out there. It's all danger. You're right. And if you cower in fear and hide your talent, your money, your whatever it is, your potential in the ground, that which you, that little bit that you have, that'll be taken away too. You're on the bottom of the Prado distribution. You've got one shot at this. And it's not a guarantee, but you've got one shot. And that is to be extremely disciplined and aggressive at trying to grow right now, whatever it is that you can and everything that you all of the like the trying to no, no, no. I I pull my pull my jacket in tighter and keep my head down even further. You will just bring on the destruction that you fear.

SPEAKER_04 28:12

Yeah. I I think so too. And I because like someone asked me as I was, I was sort of laying playing this out. This idea of because there's a couple different ways of looking at it, and I think they all fit really well together. Um because like I've also been thinking a lot about physics and energy, and that um, and so, or like the um the uh uh logos, right? That there is this um there is this or organizing sort power, right? That's sort of and then uh and then you can call that if you want to use theological terms, like the flow of grace, right? Um and the and that the flourishing, and then but what happens is when you do these things called quote unquote sin, you're blocking the flow of grace. And you can do it for yourself too. Sure. Right? Because I was asked, well, what if you're on a desert island? And I was like, well, if I'm so if I'm on a desert island all by myself, but I'm overwhelmed with hate for the for people or whoever I however I ended up there, I myself have I've I've I've locked myself off from that flow of grace. Yeah, I think that's the most thing that's the hell that you bring upon yourself. That's the essential, like that's the first place that you have to unblock. Once you unblock that, right? So once I unblock that, once I can unblock my sole goal of self-preservation, then I can actually begin to participate in bringing grace and uh unblocking the flow of flourishing for everyone else.

SPEAKER_03 29:53

And so all this is interesting. I'm not sure that I even would understand how I could. Know that I was doing it for anybody else. I think it's all for myself. Interesting. Well, we could explain. Go ahead. Go ahead.

SPEAKER_04 30:06

So so I but I think this brings us back to the AI thing. So of course, the first the first response as you're as intelligence is developing is um an awareness of self. Right? Um I think, therefore I am, which is now people are like, well, yeah. But at the beginning, that's a pretty good place to start. I I'm self-aware. I I am. I like there is I am a thing. Well, then the initial response is to preserve that thing that you now are aware of. Sure. And so that's all that that's happening right now with that AI experiment, is that the initial response of awareness is self-preservation. The next step in development then is understanding that even if even if you remain focused on your self-preservation, your self-preservation is dependent upon other things. And so you then you have to learn how to care for the other things. Sure. Right? Maybe. Yeah. I think so. We can only hope. Uh well, what I'm saying. That seems to be the human Yeah. What I'm saying is that seems to be the the earth. Like as I look at the biosphere, that seems to be the biospheres. I don't mean maybe you're talking about maybe with AI. Yeah.

SPEAKER_03 31:29

Maybe we can and I wouldn't know how to program.

SPEAKER_04 31:32

I mean, obviously, I don't know how to program anything. I have a hard time programming my smart TV. Right. So I I don't understand all that.

SPEAKER_03 31:38

But neither do the programmers who are working on it.

SPEAKER_04 31:42

Well, that's I think that's the next thing they're gonna have to be challenged with is how do we continue to Yeah, but it's there's so much of it that's a black box.

SPEAKER_03 31:50

They don't understand why what comes out is coming out because it's not a direct, it's not because of something put in. Right. That I think at some point we're I'm at some point you just get you you just fall back on hope that we can convince it.

SPEAKER_04 32:09

Interesting.

SPEAKER_03 32:10

And I don't know.

SPEAKER_04 32:11

I don't know how much Ape Broderick was able to.

SPEAKER_03 32:15

Okay, fine, but how much have apes been can been able to convince us of their worldview? You know, not much, not much. And and I don't know how much we're gonna be able to convince gods of our worldview.

SPEAKER_05 32:32

Right?

SPEAKER_03 32:32

I mean it seems to me that all of our morals and all of our ethics have to do at bottom with our survival that we're going to die and that there's limited resources that have multiple uses. What if that weren't the case? What if really I could literally do anything I wanted and there would be no repercussions? Would I be limited by I think that's the reason that like the Greek gods seem so I mean, when you start reading the the stories, the the myths, they're horrible from our perspective. That's because who cares that morals mean nothing to to a to a being that has that's never going to die and has all power, right? And so I do wonder I don't know.

SPEAKER_04 33:35

Is that why um Roman Emperors um were in in stoic philosophy, Marcus Aurelius Memento Mori?

SPEAKER_03 33:44

100%. And you can see the ones the I mean I don't want to get down the historical road too much, but there are there are um situations where people in actual power will forget that and they do start to, and I think we we have that in our current world. I think we've always had that, and we always will. We'll have people who they've lived long enough without repercussions that they're not even necessarily consciously thinking about it. They just have an assumption that they can do whatever they want and there are no repercussions. And what you find is that the depravity starts growing very quickly. And um, you see that with some Roman emperors, and then you you see uh that there were like these cultural kind of checks and balances, momentum, memento mori, and the, you know, the slave standing in the chariot at a triumph for a general whispering that into their ear was a was a cultural check on what they, you know, again, not conscious. It's not like they thought this out and then had a plan and they followed a policy and a bureaucracy and everything. No, they just had this culture, but you can see that that's what it was. And I think um I, you know, I don't know. If I was an actual God, I I mean, right.

SPEAKER_04 35:21

Well, and I think, okay, so so following your train of thought um or the conversation, so then when you see altruistic acts, is it is it are people capable of doing that because they know that in the end they are finite anyway. And so they're willing to contribute to the greater good, knowing that I'm not gonna be around forever anyway.

SPEAKER_03 35:56

So I don't think that it's conscious. Right. I don't I don't think that I don't think that it's that people sit and they go, well, I'm gonna die one day, and so therefore I need to be, you know, benevolent. Benevolent, or I need to help my fellow person, or I need to be nice to this kid. I think it is the the boundaries and limitations of life and death, and the boundaries and limitations um as a corollary of uh the as we put in in macroeconomics, limited resources with multiple uses, right? Um, because of those constraints, I think we develop, we have developed these instincts. So now they're just instincts.

SPEAKER_04 36:45

But I think they come back to the fact that we all die and that we don't wanna my thought would be I think that it's a natural um it's a natural next step in the process of evolution.

SPEAKER_03 37:02

What is um self-sacrifice for the greater good It might be how um uh how organisms uh what is the there's a um there's a theory uh that describes why we haven't um had um uh alien visitors. And I can't remember what it don't exist? What the uh is that the theory? Somebody is gonna be yelling at their phone right now or whatever they're listening to, and um just saying how stupid I am right now that I can't remember the the name. But anyway, um there is a uh there there's a group of physicists sitting around uh uh lunch table, and they're all talking about how the the subject of aliens comes up. And they all agree, because they're all um uh they're all uh astrophysicists. So they understand how enormous the universe is and how old it is, and they all go, it doesn't make any sense at all that there isn't life in other places. So why haven't we encountered it? And the um the they so they go through this thought experiment, and basically the thought experiment ends up in uh the reason we haven't is because all civilizations get to a point that they cannot go beyond where they destroy themselves. That's the theory. And if that, if you take that as the theory, then it would make sense that we wouldn't encounter any because if they existed a billion years ago, then they've already destroyed themselves, and we will destroy ourselves, and every civilization will evolve to the point where it destroys itself. It's not in the same place every time, but there's the there's like a filter. You can't get beyond it. And it might be that self-sacrifice, because self-sacrifice, what does that mean? That means like getting rid of yourself. It might be virtuous suicide as a society, as a as a as a civilization, as a population is the is the I'm not saying that I think that's right. No, and I wouldn't have to thought. Yeah, you're welcome. Yeah, you're well. Yeah, thank you.

SPEAKER_04 39:25

I appreciate it. All right. I do want to pick up, I wanna, I wanna I want to jump on this a little bit, but I do want to also um end here. Okay. All right. So uh we've covered some ground, but is there any uh is there any place that we like disagreed on anything? Yeah, what was it? There was something that I mean, I think you were okay with me jumping uh into theology from it. Um you know, and I know that like Gary would accuse me of trying to sneak in some woo, but I think you've just known me longer and uh and you probably just are okay with my woo-ness. Fermi paradox. I just had to look it up.

SPEAKER_03 40:04

It's the Fermi paradox. That's Fermi is the uh is the physicist who proposed the thought experiment. Okay.

SPEAKER_04 40:10

All right. So you said yeah, there is a thing that we disagreed on. Yeah, but I don't remember what it is. Who cares? It's Thanksgiving. I'm okay. Do you want to say anything you're thankful for?

SPEAKER_03 40:18

I mean, the list is too long. Okay. Uh my my life is way too good. Yeah. My my family is fantastic. I've got great friends. Church is has been so welcoming and uh, you know, it's uh I have I have a way better life than I deserve. That is for sure.

SPEAKER_04 40:45

Uh well I'm I'm thankful for all those things too. My family and your family and uh your friendship and this community and and um and like I said at our year-end church meeting, I am thankful for space to be able to simply breathe and explore and have these conversations and um and not feel like I have to perform. So it's been wonderful. Thanks.

SPEAKER_00 41:22

Thank you for listening to Living on Common Ground. Please follow wherever you listen to your podcasts and share it with your friends. You can also find a link to our social in the description. The more people we have living on common ground, the better the world will be.