How to Amplify Your Art's Aura Online

In this episode, I explore the concept of artistic aura and what it means to preserve—and even amplify—it online. Drawing on Walter Benjamin's seminal essay, I examine whether digital reproduction truly diminishes an artwork's presence, and how artists can navigate the tension between visibility and authenticity in an age of constant sharing.

I also challenge the idea that the best content is effortless, arguing that thoughtful curation is often a deeper expression of artistic integrity than raw, unfiltered posting. Through examples from my own creative practice, I explore how content can either strengthen or weaken the connection between an artist and their work.

Finally, I discuss how to create an online presence that resonates with the spirit of your art, using intuition, alignment, and authenticity as guides. This can be strategic OR impulsive. Ultimately, the choice is yours. 

LINKS:

Creative Bewitchment Essays

Elisa's Artwork 

Elisa's Instagram

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:00

Welcome, strange one. I'm Elise Vita, and you're listening to Creative Bewitchment, essays crafted to stoke your inner magic and read aloud. As an artist, you have both extraordinary gifts and uncommon struggles. Join me as we journey through the realms of folklore, archetypes, astrology, and spell work, and learn to harness the power of your craft.

The Essay Begins

SPEAKER_00 0:30

How to Amplify Your Arts Aura Online. A couple of years ago, a trend made its way from TikTok into my zelennial platform of choice, YouTube. It was the concept of aura points, a way of characterizing someone's coolness or charisma. These points could be added or subtracted based on various factors, including everything from practicing Pilates to staying hydrated to using crest whitening strips. The quantitative nature of this trend misses the crux of aura altogether. A crux which, for artists, is particularly important. And that's that aura goes far deeper than any individual quantifier. While we can amplify it in certain contexts, it defies easy calculation or commercialization. In his 1936 essay, The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction, cultural critic Walter Benjamin defines an artwork's aura as its quote, presence in time and space, its unique existence at the place where it happens to be. For Benjamin, this unique existence is tied to handmade artwork's ritual function. Even contemporary, secular art can't help but fall within that historic tradition. Benjamin also argues that when artwork is mechanically reproduced, the original's aura withers. This poses a problem for modern creatives. In 2026, we're long past the age of mechanical reproduction. You don't need a dark room to replicate an artwork. You could snap a picture of your art with your phone and have it appear a thousand times over across different screens. While I don't entirely agree with Benjamin's premise that reproducing an artwork diminishes the original's aura, in the most extreme sense, I see a kernel of truth to it. It's why I, perhaps superstitiously, prefer to make limited, high-quality, and hand-signed prints rather than drop shipping them as many artists do. Fiscally, it's not the smartest decision. Spiritually, it's the only one for me. Physical reproductions aside, how do we balance the energetic principle Benjamin is describing with the fact that visibility is required for most art practices to be commercially viable? For most of us, the goal is to have the work appear on as many screens as possible. Ultimately, it comes down to how we choose to package the work digitally. We must toe the line of creating artful content while never treating the art like content itself.

The Lie of No Effort

SPEAKER_00 4:07

The lie of no effort. Even the Aura Point videos circulating in 2024 seemed to imply that in following their steps, you could become innately appealing. The irony being, of course, that there's nothing effortless about heeding instruction. It's conformity at worst, but at best, it's self-curation. For artists, curation isn't prescriptive. It's a form of meaning making. While making artwork might feel innate, curating a show is strategic. I leave out work that detracts from other pieces, and in doing so, greater aura shines through. To see how this principle applies to digital content, let's consider my essays. I view writing itself as one of my art forms, and recording it is content creation. In recording, I'm repackaging the writing to be consumed on other platforms. The least curated, most organic approach to narration would be to read the essays into my phone. You would hear what I sound like sending a voice memo to my friends, muffled consonants and humming heaters included. An effortless recording, however, is in doing the work I put into my art justice. The background noise breaks my cadence, and if my voice is muffled, the emotions behind it become harder to gauge. In this case, the edited, studio-produced version is a truer representation of the original text. It lets the spirit of my words shine through, preserving their aura, so to speak. If we want to amplify our art's aura online, rather than diminish it, we need to be strategic. The word aura itself comes from the Greek and Latin words for wind. Wind is sometimes subtle, but always active, exerting effort on the matter around it. It's why fall leaves are carried into the sky and landscapes transform over time. Making the most low effort content possible strikes me as passive and not sincere. There is enough stagnant energy in the world and online. Sometimes effort isn't antithetical to aura. Aura is born of it.

Creating Content for Auric Appeal

SPEAKER_00 7:28

Creating content for aura capil. I observe to extremes when it comes to artists' philosophies around posting online. There are those who insist art should speak entirely for itself, and to publicly associate yourself or your thoughts with the work cheapens it. Then, there are those who go so far as to turn their artwork into memes, juxtaposing quippy or relatable text over the images to make them as shareable as possible. Both extremes have merit. Walter Benjamin might roll in his grave over the memefication of art, but it's been 90 years since his seminal essay. You're not beholden to anyone else's theories, and I do believe there's an online approach for everyone, even for artists looking to preserve the aura of their originals. One approach would be to analyze your online presence with a psychic's eye, tailoring your content to resonate on the same energetic frequency as your actual art. What does this mean practically? Well, if someone makes paintings with tons of contemporary references or a playful spirit, then maybe a meme format works perfectly for them and their ethos. If someone like myself is intrigued by mystery, then maybe communicating in ways that are slightly more opaque is actually suitable, even if it means defying the best practices of marketing copy. Amplifying the aura of your art requires being rooted into the context of your work and in your creative intent. If you're deeply invested in your practice, you'll be able to feel when something isn't right with your content. This does, however, require sitting with yourself rather than sharing impulsively, unless, of course, being impulsive sits well in your physical body, as well as with your body of work. Personally, I often regret posting mindlessly. It doesn't give me enough time to ground before exposing myself or my work. When I wait before sharing, like a kestrel and hover before striking, I can feel if something is or isn't right, and be more likely to land on something that yields reward. When the content I've planned is unaligned, my throat tightens, and the skin on my hands contracts, as if my body's signaling a disconnect between what I'm about to communicate digitally and the actual art I've made. When something is aligned, I get a rising feeling in my chest and head, a warm current moving through me, carrying my artwork on its tide. I wonder what your own signs for alignment are.

Continuity, Confidence and Attuning to the Wind

SPEAKER_00 10:49

Continuity, confidence, and attuning to the wind. A repeated theme I noticed in those, admittedly silly AuraPoint videos circulating in twenty twenty four was that of competence. In ways both simple and misguided, digital creators were prescribing tactics to their audience to increase their competence and therefore aura. For artists, competence is found in authenticity. The irony of trying to quantify or hack something as ethereal as aura is that aura reveals itself most fully when we stop trying to force it. An effective digital presence isn't built through rigid strategy or algorithmic obedience. It's cultivated through continuity between what you make and how you share it. Every post can either fracture or fortify the continuity. In 2026, it's the desire to follow a formula rather than your intuition, not the digital reproduction of your work that will muffle your artistic voice. Instead, to amplify your arts aura, create a digital home it can guide others to. This could be a social media platform, a blog, or even a newsletter. The internet, for all its chaos, is also a carrier wind, scattering fragments of meaning farther than we can see. Our task as artists isn't to control the breeze, but to attune to it. When we act with integrity instead of urgency, the aura of our art moves naturally through the digital ether, finding the people ready to receive it and returning them to us. You've been listening to Creative Bewitchment. To view this episode in writing, or to browse my available artwork, head to elisavita.com. Until next time, Kindreds.