iFraud Deep Dive
Welcome to iFraud Deep Dive, an official podcast series of the iFraud Foundation — where we tackle the toughest issues facing the property and casualty industry in the fight against fraud.
Each episode features in-depth conversations breaking down complex issues into easily consumable information that we can all understand. We explore the fraud landscape, expose emerging threats, and highlight actionable solutions. From staged accidents and collusive networks to litigation abuse and regulatory gaps, we go beyond the headlines to bring you the insights that matter.
Whether you’re a carrier, broker, employer, attorney, or regulator, if you’re committed to protecting the integrity of our industry then this podcast is for you.
Subscribe now and join us in building a smarter, stronger, fraud-resilient future.
iFraud Deep Dive
S2 E2 Lawsuit Fraud Allegations Moreno vs Key Food
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
Today we look at the reply affirmation submitted by Daniel Johnston defendants’ counsel in the case of Moreno v. Key Food, seeking to dismiss the lawsuit or amend their legal response. The defendants allege that the plaintiff committed fraud upon the court by providing perjured testimony regarding his criminal history, employment record, and medical treatment. Supporting evidence includes surveillance footage suggesting the accident was staged and medical records that show unnecessary surgeries were recommended almost immediately. Counsel argues that the plaintiff failed to provide any sworn factual rebuttal or medical affidavits to dispute these serious allegations of dishonesty and litigation misconduct. Ultimately, the defense contends that the plaintiff’s actions undermine the integrity of the judicial process, justifying either a total dismissal or the inclusion of fraud-based counterclaims.
Let's Dive In!