iFraud Deep Dive

S2 E43 AmTrust vs Liakas - How PE Firms Profit From Fake Surgeries

iFraud Foundation Season 2 Episode 43

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 21:35

Send us Fan Mail

In this episode, we explore a sweeping federal lawsuit filed by AmTrust that alleges the existence of a sophisticated racketeering enterprise involving attorneys, medical providers, litigation funders, and professional recruiters. According to the complaint, individuals were allegedly recruited to participate in staged or exaggerated accidents before being funneled through a coordinated network of clinics and surgeons that generated extensive treatment plans and high-dollar medical bills.

The lawsuit claims that medically unnecessary procedures, inflated diagnoses, and strategically crafted medical documentation were used to increase the settlement value of personal injury claims. At the center of the allegations is the assertion that this was not a collection of isolated incidents, but rather a structured business model designed to exploit the civil litigation system and pressure insurers into costly settlements.

We'll break down the allegations, examine the legal strategy behind the RICO claims, discuss the role of litigation funding and medical referral networks, and explore what this case could mean for insurers, policymakers, and fraud investigators nationwide.

This is a story that goes beyond a single lawsuit. It raises fundamental questions about the intersection of medicine, litigation, and organized fraud—and whether the civil justice system itself is being weaponized for profit.

Let's dive in.

Support the show

SPEAKER_00

Imagine uh tripping over a cracked sidewalk. It's you know embarrassing. Maybe you walk away with a scraped knee or a bruised ego.

SPEAKER_01

Right, yeah. A completely normal accident.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. But now imagine that exact same trip, but instead of just walking away, you are immediately rushed into an irreversible spinal fusion surgery.

SPEAKER_01

Which sounds completely insane.

SPEAKER_00

It really does. And all because um a private equity firm in Bahrain needs to hit its quarterly profit targets. Welcome to today's deep dive.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, that premise it forces you to completely reevaluate what an accident actually is. I mean, you have to stop looking at a slip and fall as a clumsy, isolated incident. Right. And you have to start viewing it as the opening scene of this uh highly choreographed industrialized system.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell, which brings us directly to the massive document we're diving into today. We have a civil RSA co complaint. That's the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_01

A very serious piece of litigation. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_00

Oh, absolutely. And the plaintiffs bringing this suit are subsidiaries of Amtrust Financial. Specifically, we're looking at Wesco, Technology Insurance Company, and Associated Industries Insurance Company. Trevor Burrus, Right.

SPEAKER_01

Right. And those are the folks who insure the, you know, small and mid-sized businesses all around you the Delhi, the contractor. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. And the defendants on the other side of this are just this sprawling network of personal injury lawyers, medical clinics, surgeons, surgery centers, and um litigation funders. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_01

It's a huge cast of characters.

SPEAKER_00

It really is. And our mission today is to decode the architecture of this alleged, and we do have to emphasize, alleged association, in fact, enterprise. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_01

Right. These are allegations in a lawsuit.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell Yes. Very important to note. We're going to look at how the civil legal system and the healthcare system are purportedly being weaponized for pure profit.

SPEAKER_01

Okay, let's untack this because we aren't just talking about a few exaggerated injuries here.

SPEAKER_00

No, not at all.

SPEAKER_01

We're looking at the literal manufacturing of multi-million dollar lawsuits. Yeah. To understand the sheer scale of what Amtrust is alleging here, you really have to look at this enterprise as a perfectly integrated supply chain.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell A supply chain.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, exactly like a factory. Every single entity involved relies on the others to basically bypass standard fraud detection.

SPEAKER_00

Okay, I see.

SPEAKER_01

So the raw material entering the factory is a staged or manipulated accident, right? And the finished product rolling off the assembly line is this impenetrable, mathematically optimized insurance claim.

SPEAKER_00

Okay, let's walk through that assembly line then and meet the cast of characters starting right on the ground floor. Sure. At the very beginning, you have what the complaint calls runners. These are individuals whose entire job is to recruit vulnerable claimants.

SPEAKER_01

Right. And they specifically target non-English speaking immigrants, often promising them a you know a quick, easy payday.

SPEAKER_00

Wow. So they're going after people who might not fully understand the system.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. The runner coaches them on exactly how to stage the accident, where to say it hurts, and then they physically transport them to the next stop on the line, which is the law firm.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell And in the framework of this specific complaint, the central legal architects managing this whole flow are alleged to be Liacus Law, right? Specifically Dean and Nicholas Liacas.

SPEAKER_01

That's right. Once the claimant signs a retainer with the law firm, the firm basically takes over the logistics.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell They start managing the products.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah. They funnel the individual to a very specific network of what the complaint identifies as gatekeeper clinics.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Ross Powell Gatekeeper clinics.

SPEAKER_01

Right. These are physical therapy and rehab centers that they don't really operate to heal, they operate to generate templated, uniform medical records.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell Wait, I want to pause on the medical aspect for a second. Because the gatekeeper clinics bring in radiologists to write up these like terrifying XMI records.

SPEAKER_01

Oh absolutely. They sound catastrophic on paper.

SPEAKER_00

And that gets the claimant to the final and most lucrative stop, which is the surgeons. The complaint names practices like Gotham Neurosurgery with Dr. Andrews Cohen and uh McCulloch Orthopedic Surgical Services.

SPEAKER_01

Right. Operating out of places like Hudson Regional Hospital or the Empire State Ambulatory Surgical Center.

SPEAKER_00

But here's my question. If the goal is just to fake an injury and get an insurance payout, why go to the extreme of performing spinal fusions? I mean, why not just claim a broken arm or a torn rotator cuff?

SPEAKER_01

What's fascinating here is the deliberate choice of the spine. I mean, a broken arm is a terrible anchor for a fraudulent lawsuit.

SPEAKER_00

Because of the X-ray.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. An X-ray is binary. The bone is either fractured or it isn't. You can't really fake that.

SPEAKER_00

But that makes sense.

SPEAKER_01

A spinal fusion, on the other hand, relies heavily on subjective patient complaints of chronic pain, right? And soft tissue MRI readings that can be highly open to interpretation.

SPEAKER_00

Oh wow. So there's gray area they can exploit.

SPEAKER_01

Massive gray area. And more importantly, spinal surgeries trigger the absolute highest insurance billing codes in the entire medical system.

SPEAKER_00

So it's about maximizing the dollar amount.

SPEAKER_01

Always. By cutting into a perfectly healthy, or perhaps just mildly, naturally degenerating spine and fusing vertebrae together, the surgeons are creating a catastrophic injury out of thin air.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell That is just it's horrifying. They're essentially physically, permanently damaging these recruits just to inflate the spreadsheet value of the claim.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, it's really dark. There's even a detail in the complaint about a podiatrist, Dr. Siddhartha Sharma, who allegedly didn't even maintain standard ankle privileges in New York. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_00

Wait, a podiatrist?

SPEAKER_01

Yeah. But he was somehow seamlessly integrated into this highly complex surgical pipeline.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell The human toll of that is just staggering to think about. But um let's look at the financial engine keeping this whole factory running because you can't just convince someone to undergo a fake spinal fusion for free, right? You need capital. Enter the funders. These are litigation finance companies that step in to advance money to the claimants. Aaron Powell Right.

SPEAKER_01

And the complaint highlights one specifically called jumpstart funding LLC.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah. And the role of the litigation funder is critical for keeping the claimant trapped, isn't it?

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell It's the glue of the whole operation. When a vulnerable worker is recruited, they're often told they can't work while the lawsuit is pending, right? Just to make the injury look completely legitimate.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Ross Powell Right, because if you're paralyzed with back pain, you shouldn't be working construction.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. So suddenly they have no income. The funder swoops in and offers them a cash advance to pay rent or buy groceries.

SPEAKER_00

Oh, I see.

SPEAKER_01

But they do this at usurious, aggressively compounding interest rates.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell It kind of makes me think of a movie studio financing a blockbuster.

SPEAKER_01

Mm-hmm.

SPEAKER_00

The litigation funder is basically the executive producer here.

SPEAKER_01

That's a really good analogy, actually.

SPEAKER_00

Right. Like they're fronting the cash for the special effects, which in this case is the surgery and the claimant's living expenses, because they know it guarantees a massive box office payout when the settlement finally hits.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, and the numbers are specifically designed to just devour the claimant's share.

SPEAKER_00

How bad does it get?

SPEAKER_01

Well, say a worker takes a $10,000 advance at a 50% compounding interest rate. By the time the lawsuit settles three years later, they might owe $40,000 just on that initial advance.

SPEAKER_00

Oh my goodness. That's criminal.

SPEAKER_01

And then the lawyers take their 33% contingency fee. The surgeons take $150,000 for the operation. The claimant is left with virtually nothing.

SPEAKER_00

Nothing but a permanently fused spine.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. And to add another layer to your executive producer analogy, Amtrist alleges that jumpstart funding LLC is actually owned in part by the principals of the Lyakas firm itself.

SPEAKER_00

Wait, really? So the lawyers are securing the claimant, the doctors are inflating the medical damages, and the lawyer's own side hustle funding company is fronting the cash.

SPEAKER_01

That is the allegation, yes.

SPEAKER_00

They're quite literally loan sharking their own clients to guarantee they never back out of the scheme.

SPEAKER_01

It completely closes the economic loop. I mean, everyone is making money off the manufacture crisis, and everyone is validating everyone else's paperwork.

SPEAKER_00

Okay. But this brings up a huge question for me. If these clinics are churning out identical templated MRI reports and just scheduling unnecessary spinal fusions left to right, why doesn't Amtrust or Wesco just toss the claims in the trash?

SPEAKER_01

You'd think they would, right?

SPEAKER_00

Yeah. I mean it's it seems like an obvious fraud. Why don't they just point to the pattern and refuse to pay a dime?

SPEAKER_01

Because the enterprise is weaponizing a statutory trap built directly into New York law. It's called the duty to defend.

SPEAKER_00

The duty to defend. Okay, what does that mean exactly?

SPEAKER_01

So the moment a civil complaint is filed, even if it's entirely fabricated from whole cloth and just verified by Dean Liacus, the insurance company is legally obligated to incur immediate defense costs to protect their insured client.

SPEAKER_00

The moment it's filed.

SPEAKER_01

The very second. The meter starts running at like $500 an hour for defense attorneys the second that paperwork hits the docket.

SPEAKER_00

Wow. Okay, let's put the listener in the shoes of a small business owner to make this really concrete. Say you own a corner bodega. You have a general liability policy with Amtrest that covers up to $1 million.

SPEAKER_01

Okay. Classic setup.

SPEAKER_00

A runner stages a slip and fall on your sidewalk. The Lyakas firm files a lawsuit against your bodega for five million dollars, citing a life-altering spinal fusion. Even if you, the bodega owner, have security camera footage showing the guy basically laying down gently on the pavement.

SPEAKER_01

Which happens.

SPEAKER_00

Right. But Ampshers still have to defend you.

SPEAKER_01

They absolutely have to. And that leaves to the ultimate weapon in this whole scheme. It's the concept of extortion through fear of economic harm, as defined under the Hobbes Act.

SPEAKER_00

Extortion. So they're holding the insurer hostage.

SPEAKER_01

Basically, yeah. The insurance company knows the surgery was likely a sham, but they have to calculate the real-world risk of putting that case in front of a jury.

SPEAKER_00

Because juries are unpredictable.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. And jurors don't get to see the runner recruiting the claimant in a back alley. They are presented with the paper truth.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell The Paper Truth. You mean the stack of pristine medical records.

SPEAKER_01

Yes. A mountain of MRIs, physical therapy logs, and operative reports that are signed by state licensed doctors.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell So even if the medical records are entirely fabricated at their source, they look objectively real in a courtroom setting.

SPEAKER_01

Totally real. If Amtrust decides to fight your bodegas case at trial, they are really rolling the dice. If a sympathetic jury sees a plaintiff with a surgically altered spine, believes that paper truth, and hands down a $5 million catastrophic verdict.

SPEAKER_00

Wait, your Amtrust policy only covers the first one million?

SPEAKER_01

Exactly.

SPEAKER_00

Leaving me, the bodega owner, personally on the hook for the remaining four million dollars, I would lose my business. I would go completely bankrupt.

SPEAKER_01

And then you probably turn around and sue Amtrust for bad faith.

SPEAKER_00

Because they had the chance to settle the case within my policy limits and they chose to gamble with my livelihood instead.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell Which is exactly why the insurance company is essentially forced to settle. The scheme isn't about winning a fair intellectual debate at trial.

SPEAKER_00

No, it's about leverage.

SPEAKER_01

It's about artificially inflating the stakes so high that the cost of fighting becomes astronomically dangerous. The surgical escalation makes settling the only rational mathematical business decision for the insurer.

SPEAKER_00

That is wild. They're quite literally monetizing the risk parameters of the civil justice system.

SPEAKER_01

That's a great way to put it.

SPEAKER_00

But wait, if the legal trap requires absolute unshakable control over the medical paperwork to create that paper truth, they can't just rely on random doctors.

SPEAKER_01

No, they need a sure thing.

SPEAKER_00

Right, because a legitimate independent surgeon might look at the patient and say, Um, you don't need a fusion, just go home and rest. They would have to own the clinics outright to actually mandate the surgeries. But wait, in New York, corporations and private investors can't legally own medical practices, right?

SPEAKER_01

That's right. New York enforces the corporate practice of medicine doctrine very strictly. The law mandates that medical clinics must be owned and controlled by licensed medical professionals.

SPEAKER_00

Okay, to protect the patients.

SPEAKER_01

Right. The policy goal is straightforward. Patient care must be prioritized over corporate profit. You cannot have businessmen dictating medical protocols just to hit financial targets.

SPEAKER_00

But the complaint alleges they found a massive loophole to get around this. They detail a corporate entity called Health Plus Management, or HPM, operating under the umbrella musculoskeletal resources.

SPEAKER_01

And in 2019, HPM was actually acquired by InvestCorp, which is a foreign private equity firm based in Bahrain.

SPEAKER_00

Wow. And the the allegation is that HPM represents this institutional grade violation of the corporate practice of medicine. It's what people call a dock-in-a-box scheme.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, the classic dock in a box. The doctor's name is painted on the front door, right? It looks legitimate. But HPM, the private equity-backed management company, secretly controls the marketing, the hiring, the human resources, and the internal referral networks.

SPEAKER_00

And the complaint offers some incredibly dense financial documentation to prove this. It's kind of hard to read through.

SPEAKER_01

It's very dense, yeah.

SPEAKER_00

They mentioned that over just a few days in the fall of 2019, HPM perfected security interests in the entire accounts receivable of multiple clinics, specifically DHD, NJS, PMR, and SMSR. But hold on. Perfected security interests. What does that actually look like in practice? Does that mean the private equity firm effectively holds a mortgage on every dollar the clinic hasn't even made yet?

SPEAKER_01

That is a perfect way to translate it, honestly. By perfecting a security interest in the accounts receivable, the private equity firm takes absolute legal ownership of the clinic's future cash flow.

SPEAKER_00

Oh wow. So the doctor is totally trapped.

SPEAKER_01

Completely. If the on-paper physician tries to step out of line or, you know, refuse a referral or prioritize genuine patient care over the surgical quota, HPM can financially asphyxiate them instantly.

SPEAKER_00

So it legally turns the physician owner into a highly paid subordinate employee of a non-physician profit-driven entity.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly.

SPEAKER_00

And the micromanagement is blatantly documented in the complaint. The text includes phone call logs for a Dr. Ashley Simla, who supposedly became the new independent owner of the DHD clinic.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, these logs are revealing.

SPEAKER_00

If you're a doctor taking over a medical practice, your first calls are going to be to medical suppliers, hospital administrators, maybe former colleagues to build out your staff, right?

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, you would be setting up the infrastructure for actual patient care.

SPEAKER_00

According to the subpoenaed logs, Dr. Simala's very first phone call as a clinic owner was to a physical therapy facility connected to a guy named Fabio Aguar.

SPEAKER_01

And Aguilar is a known runner who explicitly marketed himself to non-English speaking construction workers.

SPEAKER_00

Then Dr. Simala's second call was to Paul Alapis, the director of business development at Hudson Regional Hospital, which is exactly where the enterprise funnels all the surgeries. And his third call was straight to Nicholas Liacas, the personal injury lawyer.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell If we connect this to the bigger picture, you really see the true danger of the dock in a box model. When you introduce private equity from Bahrain and completely remove physician autonomy, the ultimate goal of a healthcare facility fundamentally shifts.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Ross Powell It stops being about healthcare.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. It goes from patient healing to profit maximization via rote protocol schemes.

SPEAKER_00

Here's where it gets really interesting, though. The corporate audacity doesn't even try to hide itself. The complaint points out that HPM maintains a separate concierge website specifically to market these medical clinics directly to personal injury attorneys.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, it's pretty brazen. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_00

They have completely abandoned any pretense of traditional patient care. They're essentially advertising themselves as a one-stop shop for manufacturing medical damages.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell And the machine is fully built at this point, right?

unknown

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01

The lawyers are ready to trap the insurers, the private equity firm controls medical narrative, and the funders are providing the cash flow. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_00

It's all set up.

SPEAKER_01

The only thing the assembly line needs now is bodies to put through the gears.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell And the data analyst at Amtrust found a geographical pattern regarding those bodies that is just mind-blowing. They call it the Jirabacoa anomaly.

SPEAKER_01

The Jarubacoa anomaly.

SPEAKER_00

Yes.

SPEAKER_01

According to the data in the complaint, a statistically impossible number of claimants represented by the Liacas firm all hail from the exact same small town in the Dominican Republic, Jirabacoa, which only has a population of about 70,000.

SPEAKER_00

These individuals immigrate to the U.S. and all magically move to the same specific suburb in Long Island. Freeport.

SPEAKER_01

And this is where the data just becomes completely absurd. These residents of Freeport, Long Island magically suffer severe, catastrophic trip and fall accidents on sidewalks and entirely different boroughs, the Bronx, Brooklyn, and Queens. All of them. Yeah. The pattern was so egregious that New York Governor Kathy Hoshel actually cited this specific geographic anomaly in a 2026 address about combating insurance fraud.

SPEAKER_00

I look at it as a bizarre Bermuda triangle of tripping. I mean, I want you to imagine the sheer statistical impossibility of hundreds of people from your exact foreign hometown moving to your exact American suburb, and then all of you individually commuting to random disparate parts of the city just to trip over specific cracks in the pavement.

SPEAKER_01

It's unbelievable.

SPEAKER_00

And then defying all odds, you all end up with the same lawyer, you go to the same private equity-owned clinic, and you all receive the exact same spinal fusion surgery.

SPEAKER_01

The odds are astronomical. And the final piece of the puzzle here is the timeline of these lawsuits, which completely exposes the artificial nature of the whole enterprise.

SPEAKER_00

How so?

SPEAKER_01

Well, in New York, the statute of limitations for filing a personal injury lawsuit is three years.

SPEAKER_00

Meaning you have three years from the exact date you fall on the sidewalk to officially file the paperwork in court.

SPEAKER_01

Right. Now, the complaint outlines that the Liacus firm's case filings skyrocketed and peaked in 2022, but then they plummeted sharply in 2023 and 2024.

SPEAKER_00

Why the sudden drop?

SPEAKER_01

Because the massive batch of staged accidents occurred during the height of the scheme in 2020. The firm simply sat on the claims to build up the medical paperwork, you know, letting the interest compound.

SPEAKER_00

Well, wow.

SPEAKER_01

And then they dumped them all onto the court docket right before the three-year ticking clock expired.

SPEAKER_00

So the sudden drop-off in lawsuits aligns perfectly with the moment the statute of limitations passed for that initial 2020 cohort of staged accidents.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. It is purely a numbers game. They are processing cohorts of humans like batches of inventory.

SPEAKER_00

That is so bleak.

SPEAKER_01

It is. This raises an important question, though, and it's the anchor we really cannot lose sight of amid all this talk of private equity loopholes and statutes of limitations. Right. We're analyzing corporate structures, billing codes, and data anomalies. But actual human beings, often vulnerable non-English speaking immigrants, who were promised an easy solution to their financial struggles, they were subjected to irreversible, highly invasive spinal surgeries.

SPEAKER_00

Their bodies were permanently altered.

SPEAKER_01

Yes, permanently altered, just to pad an investment portfolio and a law firm's bottom line.

SPEAKER_00

So what does this all mean for you? You might be listening to this thinking, well, I've never faked a slip and fall, I don't own a clinic, and I'm not an Amtrust insurance executive, so this is just a wild true crime story that doesn't affect my life.

SPEAKER_01

Right. It feels distant.

SPEAKER_00

But you are absolutely paying for this assembly line. Fraud-driven claim inflation completely distorts the medical system. It clogs up the civil courts, so legitimate grievances, people who actually suffered real injuries through no fault of their own, they cannot get a hearing.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly.

SPEAKER_00

And most directly, it increases insurance premiums for every single small business out there. Yeah. The deli on your corner, your local contractor, your favorite neighborhood restaurant. Yep. When insurers bleed millions of dollars to extortionate schemes, those costs don't just vanish. They're passed on to the business owners, who then pass them on to you every time you buy a sandwich or hire a plumber.

SPEAKER_01

It acts as a massive, invisible tax on the entire local economy. And I will leave you with a final, somewhat provocative thought to mull over.

SPEAKER_00

Okay, let's hear it.

SPEAKER_01

If litigation funding, aggressive legal tactics, and private equity loopholes can already turn the human body and the civil justice system into a highly predictable, risk-free financial asset class, um, what happens in the next five years?

SPEAKER_00

Oh man. With technology accelerating.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. What happens when these networks start using artificial intelligence to optimize their accident staging locations based on algorithmic blind spots in municipal camera networks?

SPEAKER_00

That's terrifying.

SPEAKER_01

Or what happens when they use AI to automatically generate perfect, statistically unassailable, templated medical records at a scale that human auditors can't even process?

SPEAKER_00

They wouldn't even need the gatekeeper clinics to do the paperwork.

SPEAKER_01

Right. Will technology finally give regulators and insurance companies the tools to catch the fraudsters? Or will it just make the dock in a box scheme truly terrifyingly invisible?

SPEAKER_00

It makes you wonder. The next time you're walking down the street and see someone trip on a crack in the sidewalk, are you watching a genuine, clumsy accident? Or are you just a background extra standing on the set of someone else's multi million dollar corporate production?